Abstract
This study aims to investigate the wound-healing effectiveness of the phenolic compound, naringin, both in vitro and in vivo. Male mice were shaved on their dorsal skin under isoflurane, a biopsy punch was made in four symmetrical circular resection windows (6 mm) to induce a wound. These excision wounds were used to study the topical effects of naringin in terms of various biochemical, molecular, and histological parameters. We observed a significant recovery in the wound area. Increased levels of MMP-2, 9, 14, TIMP-2, VEGF-A, and VEGF-R1 were induced by naringin in the HaCaT cells. The time course experiments further revealed that levels of VEGF-A and B increased within 36 h; whereas levels of VEGF-C decreased. In line with this, VEGF-R3 levels, but not VEGF-R1 and 2 levels, increased soon after stimulation; although the increase subsided after 36 h. Additionally, naringin cream upregulated wound healing in vitro. The blockage of VEGF by Bevacizumab abolished the function of naringin cream on cell migration. Histological alterations in the wounded skin were restored by naringin cream, which accelerated wound healing via upregulated expression of growth factors (VEGF-A, B, and C and VEGF-R3), and thus increased MMP-2, 9, 14 expressions.
Keywords: naringin, wound healing, MMPs, VEGFs, VEGFRs
1. Introduction
The healing of a skin wound presents a complex process involving a cascade of cellular functions. Immediately after an injury, multiple biological functions are activated and respond in a synchronized manner. The wound repair process commonly leads to the substitution of the superficial epidermis, mucosa, or fetal skin, and skin repair displays an unspecific form of healing, wherein the wound is healed by a non-functional mass of fibrotic tissue known as scar tissue [1,2,3,4]. In fact, approximately 400 million people suffer from acute wounds annually, including traumatic wounds, burns, and surgical wounds [5]. Wounds can take longer to heal in patients with diabetes, resulting in increased risks of infection and of developing dangerous symptoms [6,7,8]. In addition, chronic wounds fail to heal by not following a predictable or expected healing pathway. The care of chronic wounds has thus evolved into its own specialty, with physicians often using a variety of therapies, including engineered skin, growth factors, pressure wound therapy (NPWT), and negative extracellular matrices (ECMs) [9].
Diminished production of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and decreased angiogenesis are thought to contribute to impaired tissue repair in diabetic patients [9,10]. Therefore, the potential use of therapeutic angiogenesis to improve wound healing has attracted great interest. Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) are considered powerful therapeutic tools for proangiogenic and pro-lymphangiogenic therapy for the treatment of several diseases [11]. The VEGF family of growth factors currently contains five other known members, including Placenta Growth Factor (PLGF), VEGFA, VEGFB, VEGFC, and VEGFD, which are key regulators of physiological and pathological vasculogenesis, angiogenesis, lymphangiogenesis, and vascular permeability [12,13,14,15]. These functional effects are controlled via the class III subfamily of tyrosine kinase receptors VEGFR1 (Flt-1), VEGFR2 (KDR/Flk-1), and VEGFR3 (Flt-4). Of these, VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 play major roles in angiogenesis, whereas VEGFR3 is primarily involved in lymph-angiogenesis [16]. Recent studies have reported that overexpression of VEGF-C via an adenoviral vector could improve the healing of full-thickness punch biopsy wounds in genetically diabetic (db/db) mice [17]. Indeed, when the function of endogenous VEGF-C/VEGF-D is blocked with a specific inhibitor, wound closure is delayed even further [17]. Phenolic compounds, including naringin, are characterized by suppressive effects on reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and pro-inflammatory cytokines’ production [18,19,20,21,22,23]. Naringin is an active flavanone glycoside extracted from tomatoes, grapefruits, and related citrus fruits, which has been reported to exert protective effects against atherosclerosis development, with hepato-protective [24], cardio-protective [25], reno-protective [26], and neuro-protective effects [27]. Further investigations are necessary to validate the effectiveness of naringin in wound healing and inflammation. Thus, the present study aims to investigate the therapeutic value of naringin as a potential candidate to activate the VEGF pathway, thereby contributing to wound healing.
2. Results
2.1. Naringin Cream Improves Wound Healing in a Mouse Model
To investigate the effects of naringin cream on wound healing in vivo, we applied the naringin cream topically to full-thickness excisional wounds. Two different naringin doses were used (2.5 and 5 mg/wound). As shown in Figure 1, naringin treatment consistently accelerated wound closure, particularly at day 5, as compared with the control group. The naringin cream formulation also exhibited good homogeneity and extrudability. Our data suggest that naringin cream plays a positive role in the healing process of acute wound injuries.
2.2. Naringin Cream Treatment In Vivo
In Figure 2A, histological examination demonstrated that all groups treated with naringin showed significant closure as compared to the control and Gentermay treated wounds. The IHC results showed that on day 7, when wound healing was almost complete after naringin treatment, both the proteins of Ki67 and proliferating cell nuclear antigens (PCNA) had decreased expressions. The vessel number and CD31 level showed that the 5 mg naringin treatment group had the highest vessel numbers of the three treatment groups (Figure 2B). These results suggest that the enhanced wound healing provided by naringin cream treatment may be achieved via stimulating regeneration, including blood vessels. The expressions of VEGFA, VEGFB, and VEGFC were all increased in the skin wound tissues (Supplementary Figure S1).
2.3. Upregulated Expressions of VEGFs and VEGFRs via Naringin Cream Treatment
To further assess the relevance of the results related to improve wound healing, we examined the levels of MMPs and the VEGF axis. HaCaT keratinocytes were used in the study, representing an in vitro model of proliferating and migrating keratinocytes. After exposure to the indicated dose of naringin, protein levels of MMP 2, 9 and 14, and VEGFA were increased; however, TIMP-2 and VEGF-R1 were only increased in response to 10 μM of naringin (Figure 3A,B). The level of TIMP-1 remained unchanged upon naringin treatment. Expressions of VEGFA and VEGFB were increased in a time-dependent manner at 36 h, but subsequently decreased at 48 h. In contrast, production of VEGFC increased soon after stimulation but subsided after 24 h, while VEGFD remained unchanged in response to naringin (Figure 4). As VEGF family production rates changed profoundly and dynamically, the levels of their receptor VEGFR3 also changed substantially.
2.4. Naringin Activates HaCaT Keratinocytes Migration
Aside from providing physical protection, wound dressings must interact with the wound and improve the healing process. To evaluate the effects of naringin on wound closure, human keratinocyte HaCaT cells were used. A cell proliferation assay (CCK-8) demonstrated that naringin did not affect HaCaT cell proliferation with 24 h treatment (Supplementary Figure S2). As shown in Figure 5, the in vitro scratch-wound healing assay and migration assay showed that naringin significantly enhanced migration and the narrowing of the scratch area by 24 h. Considering the function of naringin on VEGFs, the anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab (Avastin) was used to block the effect of naringin on VEGFs. After exposure to bevacizumab, the increased wound-healing and migration effects were lost. These results indicate that VEGFs play a critical role in the migration of upregulated keratinocytes induced by naringin.
3. Discussion
The acute skin wound-healing process may be summarized into four overlapping phases: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and tissue remodeling [28]. In most mammals, the natural wound healing process, including scar formation and tissue fibrosis, is a highly evolved tissue-scale attempt to restore the critical barrier functions necessary for survival. There are several types of wounds, depending on a variety of factors including the source of the wound and any underlying issues that may lead to it. Abrasions, lacerations, punctures, burns, and avulsions are common types of skin injury. While multiple factors may impair wound healing, the factors influencing repair can generally be categorized into local and systemic factors [29]. Local factors are those which directly influence the characteristics of the wound itself, including oxygenation, infection, and venous sufficiency; while systemic factors involve the overall health or disease state of the individual which may impair the healing process [30]. Age and gender, sex hormones, nutrition, stress, ischemia, diabetes, keloids, fibrosis, jaundice, uremia, obesity, immunocompromised conditions (cancer, radiation therapy, AIDS), and other issues could be systemic factors [31,32]. In recent years, a growing body of research has been directed at understanding the critical factors influencing poor wound healing. Further clarification of the influences exerted on the repair process by these factors may contribute to the development of therapeutics to resolve impaired wounds. We evaluated the effects of naringin on different factors which affect cutaneous wound healing and the potential cellular and molecular mechanisms involved.
Naringin, a flavanone glycoside containing the flavanone naringenin and the disaccharide neohesperidose, has been one of the main active components in many Chinese herbal medicines for hundreds of years. It has been experimentally revealed to possess several biological properties such as anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anticancer activities. As shown in a recent study, naringin promotes osteoporotic fracture healing through increasing the VEGF level by interacting with its receptor VEGFR-2 [33]. The present study demonstrates the in vivo and in vitro effects of naringin, highlighting the potential pharmacological value of its activities. A previous study reported that naringin exerts a significant effect on bone repair, where naringin may mimic estrogen and suppress osteoclastogenesis by modulating OPG and RANKL expressions leading to increased bone mineral density (BMD) and bone strength, as well as inhibition of urinary calcium excretion [34,35]. To investigate potential effects beyond its positive functions on bone formation, we utilized PEO and naringin to formulate a naringin cream, thereby discovering that naringin cream could be greatly beneficial to wound healing. During treatment with the naringin cream, the regenerative response was coupled with efficient wound closure, consistent with the dynamic activation of the VEGFs’ pathway. In terms of VEGF-A and B production, we noted a clear increase in the initial 36 h, followed by a decline until 48 h; while VEGF-C increased only to 12 h. VEGF-D was not affected by naringin treatment. Of note, VEGFR3 expression was increased, but not that of VEGFR1 and 2, indicating that naringin treatment predominantly induces expression of VEGFA, B, C, and VEGFR3. During wound regeneration, the tissues display alternations in the expressions of MMPs and TIMPs, and both overproduction of MMPs or underproduction of its specific inhibitor TIMP-2 may result in matrix degradation and regeneration. Concurrently increased expressions of MMP-2 and MMP-9 were found within 12 h, after which point, they decreased. Meanwhile, the decrease of TIMP-2, as an MMP-2 and MMP-9 inhibitor, suggests the existence of a complex mutual interaction [36]. To explore the precise expression balance between MMPs and TIMPs, and thereby further clarify their roles in ECM regeneration during wound healing, we observed that TIMP-2 was decreased after naringin treatment at 12 h, and upregulated after 36 h. The blockage of VEGF-mediated MMP activation by bevacizumab abolished or perturbed the function of naringin in the wound healing assay and migration in vitro. These findings suggest that activation of the VEGF signaling pathway and relatively higher expressions of MMP-2 and 9 may contribute to the function of naringin serving as a prognostic initiator in wound healing. Additionally, we found that the wound contraction was almost completed in the 5 mg naringin-treated group at day 7. Thus, we choose day 7 to sacrifice the mice for obtaining wound tissue. At day 7, the wound healing process in the naringin-treated group was in the remodeling phase, we hypothesized that in this moment the cells had passed from an uncommitted proliferation toward a specialized cell fate. For that reason, we found higher CD31 but not PCNA and Ki67.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Animals and Cell Culture
Male C57BL/6 mice (20–25 g) were provided by the National Laboratory Animal Center (NLAC), NARLabs, Taiwan. The mice were housed under a 12 h day/night cycle with water and commercial pellet food ad libitum. Five mice were involved in each group including control (cream only), 2.5 mg naringin, 5 mg naringin and Gentermay with three independent experiments. All experiments were completed under the approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at China Medical University (Taichung, Taiwan) (2019-188-1). Human keratinocyte cell line, HaCaT cells, were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and antibiotics at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator.
4.2. Preparation of Naringin Ointment
Naringin was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co (St. Louis, MO, USA). The naringin (5/2.5 mg) ointment was composed of 70% of PEG400 (SCRC, Shanghai, China) and 30% of PEG4000 (SCRC, Shanghai, China). The naringin, PEG400 and PEG4000 ingredients were mixed and stirred until well-distributed at 80 °C, and then stirred into a semi-solid state at room temperature. Gentermay, a product that contains gentamicin in a cream base, served as the positive control. Gentermay was used at 5 mg/wound. The cream was applied to the wounds once per day.
4.3. In Vivo Wound Model
The mice were shaved on their dorsal skin under anesthesia with 2% isoflurane carried in oxygen, and then a biopsy punch made four symmetrical circular resection windows (6 mm) to induce a wound. At days 1, 3, 5 and 7 past wounding, the wound regeneration was recorded by macroscopic images. At the end point of the experiment, the animals from each group were sacrificed with an overdose of isoflurane. For the histopathological analysis, the skin tissue was fixed in 4% formaldehyde solution in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) on ice for 10 min, dehydrated, and embedded in paraffin. The tissue paraffin was cut into 5 μm sections. Fixed sections were then stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE). The sections were analyzed using an optical microscope (Nikon 80, Tokyo, Japan). Immunohistochemical analyses were performed using anti-PCNA (13110, Cell Signaling), Ki67 (ab16667, abcam) and CD31 (ab28364, abcam). The sections were incubated overnight with Abs at concentrations of 0.5–5 μg/mL at 4 °C. After incubation with peroxidase-conjugated secondary Abs, the chromogen diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride was added. The sections were imaged with a transmission microscope (Karl Zeiss Axio Observer Z1) at 200× magnification.
4.4. Histopathological Evaluation
Once the mice were sacrificed, the dorsal skins were fixed with 3.7% neutral buffered formalin at room temperature for 24 h. Seven-micrometer serial sections were clipped and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE), and examined for naringin ointment-induced histopathological changes that were scored as the area of wound and mouse skin epidermis. Skin thickness was measured using the Image J software (version 1.46; Madison, WI, USA, National Institutes of Health).
4.5. Western Blot
The HaCat cells cultured with or without naringin were harvested and total cell protein was extracted using whole cell lysis buffer. The protein concentrations were determined by the Bradford method (Bio-Rad, CA, USA). Samples with an equal amount of protein were subjected to 8–15% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) membrane. The membrane was incubated at room temperature in blocking solution (5% nonfat milk) for 1 h followed by incubation for 2 h in blocking solution containing an appropriate dilution of anti-MMP2 (ab86607, abcam), MMP-9 (ab76003, abcam), MMP-14 (ab51074, abcam), TIMP-1 (MAB3300, millipore), TIMP-2 (ab180630, abcam), VEGF-A (ab46154, abcam), VEGF-B(ab185696, abcam), VEGF-C (ab191274, abcam), VEGF-D (ab155288, abcam), VEGF-R1(ab32152, abcam), VEGF-R2 (9698, cell Signaling), VEGF-R3 (2485, cell Signaling), and β actin (E-AB-20058, Elabscience). After washing, blots were then probed with appropriate secondary horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) and detected by an ECL detection system (Millipore). β-actin served as internal control.
4.6. Wound Healing Assay
In vitro migration was analyzed using Ibidi μ-Dish 35 mm (cat. No. 81176, Ibidi). HaCaT cells (70 μL; concentration: 5 × 105 cells/mL) were added to a Culture-Insert well and cultured for 16 h and 24 h. The proliferation of cells was inhibited by treating with a proliferation inhibitor (actinomycin C). After removal of the Culture-Insert, cells were cultured for 16 and 24 h. The migration distance of cells was recorded and measured using Image J software.
4.7. Migration Assay
Cells were plated onto the Transwell® Boyden chamber with or without naringin treatment on the upper chamber for migration assay. The chambers were incubated for 24 h with complete medium added in the lower chamber. Non-moved cells were removed by cotton swabs and the chambers were stained with crystal violet. Photomicrographs of three random regions were captured from duplicated assay chambers. The numbers of cells were counted and normalized to the untreated control.
4.8. Statistical Analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism statistical software (version 6, GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Results were represented as means ± standard deviation (SD). One-way ANOVA was carried out when multiple comparisons were evaluated. Values were considered to be significant at p < 0.05. All experiments were repeated independently at least three times.
5. Conclusions
The current study demonstrates the effectiveness of naringin to accelerate and thus enhance the wound-healing process via several mechanisms. The in vivo wound-healing model revealed higher levels of CD31 detected in the mice used in this study. Interestingly, levels of PCNA and Ki67 in the naringin cream treated group were decreased compared to the control group. We hypothesize that this could be due to the times at which the analyses were performed after the puncture event. After seven days, regeneration was nearly complete, thus the cell proliferation markers PCNA and Ki67 were decreased in accordance with the wound size. However, CD31 is active in the later stages of the wound-healing process in order to rebuild the blood vessels, which could explain why we identified the dose-dependent increased level of CD31 via naringin. The exact mechanisms behind our observed improvement in wound healing by naringin treatment based on in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo models could partially be explained by its combined ability to enhance cell migration, activate the VEGFs pathways, and upregulate the downstream effectors MMP-2 and 9 (Figure 6). We herein propose a possible association between VEGFs and the cell-modulatory properties of naringin, although additional studies are required to further elucidate the molecular mechanisms under different conditions, such as a burn or diabetes model.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank James Waddell for the critical reading and revision of our manuscript.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded online, Figure S1: IHC evaluation of VEGFA, B and C. Wound sections were evaluated on day 7 by staining with anti VEGFA, B and C antibodies. Scale bar = 40 μm. The expressions of VEGFA, VEGFB and VEGFC were all increased in the skin wound tissues; Figure S2. A cell proliferation assay (CCK 8) demonstrated that naringin didn’t affect HaCaT cell proliferation with 24 h treatment.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, S.-T.H.; data curation, J.-H.Y., W.-T.C., C.-J.C.; formal analysis, J.-H.Y., W.-T.C.; funding acquisition, S.-T.H.; investigation, J.-H.Y., W.-T.C., C.-J.C.; methodology, J.-H.Y., W.-T.C.; project administration, J.-H.Y., W.-T.C., C.-J.C., H.-L.Y., S.-T.H.; software, W.-T.C., C.-J.C.; supervision, H.-L.Y., S.-T.H.; validation, H.-L.Y., S.-T.H.; writing—original draft, J.-H.Y.; writing—review and editing, S.-T.H. All of the authors approved the final manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported and funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan (MOST 110-2320-B-039-40-) China Medical University Hospital (DMR-110-189, DMR-111-005, DMR-111-013, DMR-111-016, and DMR-HHC-109-3), and An-Nan Hospital, China Medical University (ANHRF-110-25).
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Eming S.A., Krieg T., Davidson J.M. Inflammation in wound repair: Molecular and cellular mechanisms. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2007;127:514–525. doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5700701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Worley C.A. The wound healing process: Part III—The finale. Dermatol. Nurs. 2004;16:274–295. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Worley C.A. The wound healing process symphony: Part II. Dermatol. Nurs. 2004;16:179–180. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Worley C.A. The wound healing process symphony: Part I. Dermatol. Nurs. 2004;16:67–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sen C.K. Human Wounds and Its Burden: An Updated Compendium of Estimates. Adv. Wound Care. 2019;8:39–48. doi: 10.1089/wound.2019.0946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Frykberg R.G., Banks J. Challenges in the Treatment of Chronic Wounds. Adv. Wound Care. 2015;4:560–582. doi: 10.1089/wound.2015.0635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ramanujam C.L., Han D., Fowler S., Kilpadi K., Zgonis T. Impact of diabetes and comorbidities on split-thickness skin grafts for foot wounds. J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 2013;103:223–232. doi: 10.7547/1030223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Usui M.L., Mansbridge J.N., Carter W.G., Fujita M., Olerud J.E. Keratinocyte migration, proliferation, and differentiation in chronic ulcers from patients with diabetes and normal wounds. J. Histochem. Cytochem. Off. J. Histochem. Soc. 2008;56:687–696. doi: 10.1369/jhc.2008.951194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kumar M., Dhatwalia S.K., Dhawan D.K. Role of angiogenic factors of herbal origin in regulation of molecular pathways that control tumor angiogenesis. Tumour Biol. J. Int. Soc. Oncodev. Biol. Med. 2016;37:14341–14354. doi: 10.1007/s13277-016-5330-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Maeshima Y., Makino H. The role of pro-angiogenic factors and angiogenesis inhibitors in diabetic nephropathy. Nihon Rinsho Jpn. J. Clin. Med. 2010;68((Suppl. S9)):396–400. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Brown L.F., Yeo K.T., Berse B., Yeo T.K., Senger D.R., Dvorak H.F., van de Water L. Expression of vascular permeability factor (vascular endothelial growth factor) by epidermal keratinocytes during wound healing. J. Exp. Med. 1992;176:1375–1379. doi: 10.1084/jem.176.5.1375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Karkkainen M.J., Haiko P., Sainio K., Partanen J., Taipale J., Petrova T.V., Jeltsch M., Jackson D.G., Talikka M., Rauvala H., et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor C is required for sprouting of the first lymphatic vessels from embryonic veins. Nat. Immunol. 2004;5:74–80. doi: 10.1038/ni1013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Makinen T., Jussila L., Veikkola T., Karpanen T., Kettunen M.I., Pulkkanen K.J., Kauppinen R., Jackson D.G., Kubo H., Nishikawa S., et al. Inhibition of lymphangiogenesis with resulting lymphedema in transgenic mice expressing soluble VEGF receptor-3. Nat. Med. 2001;7:199–205. doi: 10.1038/84651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Partanen T.A., Arola J., Saaristo A., Jussila L., Ora A., Miettinen M., Stacker S.A., Achen M.G., Alitalo K. VEGF-C and VEGF-D expression in neuroendocrine cells and their receptor, VEGFR-3, in fenestrated blood vessels in human tissues. FASEB J. Off. Publ. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 2000;14:2087–2096. doi: 10.1096/fj.99-1049com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Skobe M., Hamberg L.M., Hawighorst T., Schirner M., Wolf G.L., Alitalo K., Detmar M. Concurrent induction of lymphangiogenesis, angiogenesis, and macrophage recruitment by vascular endothelial growth factor-C in melanoma. Am. J. Pathol. 2001;159:893–903. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)61765-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Shibuya M. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) and Its Receptor (VEGFR) Signaling in Angiogenesis: A Crucial Target for Anti- and Pro-Angiogenic Therapies. Genes Cancer. 2011;2:1097–1105. doi: 10.1177/1947601911423031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Saaristo A., Tammela T., Farkkila A., Karkkainen M., Suominen E., Yla-Herttuala S., Alitalo K. Vascular endothelial growth factor-C accelerates diabetic wound healing. Am. J. Pathol. 2006;169:1080–1087. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2006.051251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Akintunde J.K., Akintola T.E., Aliu F.H., Fajoye M.O., Adimchi S.O. Naringin regulates erectile dysfunction by abolition of apoptosis and inflammation through NOS/cGMP/PKG signalling pathway on exposure to Bisphenol-A in hypertensive rat model. Reprod. Toxicol. 2020;95:123–136. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2020.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Elsawy H., Algefare A.I., Alfwuaires M., Khalil M., Elmenshawy O.M., Sedky A., Abdel-Moneim A.M. Naringin alleviates methotrexate-induced liver injury in male albino rats and enhances its antitumor efficacy in HepG2 cells. Biosci. Rep. 2020;40:BSR20193686. doi: 10.1042/BSR20193686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhou J., Xia L., Zhang Y. Naringin inhibits thyroid cancer cell proliferation and induces cell apoptosis through repressing PI3K/AKT pathway. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2019;215:152707. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2019.152707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bai J., Li S., Wu G., Ma L., Li C., Liu H., Zhang P. Naringin inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced activation of microglia cells. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2019;65:38–42. doi: 10.14715/cmb/2019.65.5.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nan L.P., Wang F., Ran D., Zhou S.F., Liu Y., Zhang Z., Huang Z.N., Wang Z.Y., Wang J.C., Feng X.M., et al. Naringin alleviates H2O2-induced apoptosis via the PI3K/Akt pathway in rat nucleus pulposus-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Connect. Tissue Res. 2020;61:554–567. doi: 10.1080/03008207.2019.1631299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Li Z., Gao M., Yang B., Zhang H., Wang K., Liu Z., Xiao X., Yang M. Naringin attenuates MLC phosphorylation and NF-kappaB activation to protect sepsis-induced intestinal injury via RhoA/ROCK pathway. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018;103:50–58. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.03.163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lv Z., Wu W., Ge S., Jia R., Lin T., Yuan Y., Kuang H., Yang B., Wu L., Wei J., et al. Naringin protects against perfluorooctane sulfonate-induced liver injury by modulating NRF2 and NF-kappaB in mice. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2018;65:140–147. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2018.09.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Heidary Moghaddam R., Samimi Z., Moradi S.Z., Little P.J., Xu S., Farzaei M.H. Naringenin and naringin in cardiovascular disease prevention: A preclinical review. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2020;887:173535. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Amini N., Sarkaki A., Dianat M., Mard S.A., Ahangarpour A., Badavi M. The renoprotective effects of naringin and trimetazidine on renal ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats through inhibition of apoptosis and downregulation of micoRNA-10a. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019;112:108568. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.01.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gopinath K., Prakash D., Sudhandiran G. Neuroprotective effect of naringin, a dietary flavonoid against 3-nitropropionic acid-induced neuronal apoptosis. Neurochem. Int. 2011;59:1066–1073. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2011.08.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wallace H.A., Basehore B.M., Zito P.M. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island, FL, USA: 2021. Wound Healing Phases. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wernick B., Nahirniak P., Stawicki S.P. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island, FL, USA: 2021. Impaired Wound Healing. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Roine E., Bjork I.T., Oyen O. Targeting risk factors for impaired wound healing and wound complications after kidney transplantation. Transplant. Proc. 2010;42:2542–2546. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.05.162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Menke N.B., Ward K.R., Witten T.M., Bonchev D.G., Diegelmann R.F. Impaired wound healing. Clin. Dermatol. 2007;25:19–25. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2006.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Knight R.J., Villa M., Laskey R., Benavides C., Schoenberg L., Welsh M., Kerman R.H., Podder H., Van Buren C.T., Katz S.M., et al. Risk factors for impaired wound healing in sirolimus-treated renal transplant recipients. Clin. Transplant. 2007;21:460–465. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2007.00668.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Song N., Zhao Z., Ma X., Sun X., Ma J., Li F., Sun L., Lv J. Naringin promotes fracture healing through stimulation of angiogenesis by regulating the VEGF/VEGFR-2 signaling pathway in osteoporotic rats. Chem.-Biol. Interact. 2017;261:11–17. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2016.10.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zhang P., Dai K.R., Yan S.G., Yan W.Q., Zhang C., Chen D.Q., Xu B., Xu Z.W. Effects of naringin on the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of human bone mesenchymal stem cell. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2009;607:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.01.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wu G.J., Chen K.Y., Yang J.D., Liu S.H., Chen R.M. Naringin Improves Osteoblast Mineralization and Bone Healing and Strength through Regulating Estrogen Receptor Alpha-Dependent Alkaline Phosphatase Gene Expression. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021;69:13020–13033. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c04353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Arpino V., Brock M., Gill S.E. The role of TIMPs in regulation of extracellular matrix proteolysis. Matrix Biol. J. Int. Soc. Matrix Biol. 2015;44–46:247–254. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2015.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.