Skip to main content
Clinical Liver Disease logoLink to Clinical Liver Disease
. 2022 Mar 10;19(2):78–81. doi: 10.1002/cld.1206

Drug‐Induced Liver Injury: A Mexican View

Raúl Contreras Omaña 1,, Rosalba Moreno Alcántar 2, Eira Cerda Reyes 3
PMCID: PMC8912224  PMID: 35308476

Short abstract

Content available: Author Audio Recording


Abbreviations

ALF

acute liver failure

ALT

alanine aminotransferase

CTLA‐4

cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4

DILI

drug‐induced liver injury

HILI

herbal‐induced liver injury

LA

Latin America

PD‐1

programmed cell death receptor 1

PDL‐1

programmed cell death receptor ligand 1

TNF

tumor necrosis factor

ULN

upper limit of normal

Listen to an audio presentation of this article.

Drug‐induced liver injury (DILI) and herbal‐induced liver injury (HILI) are being increasingly recognized throughout the world as important causes of liver damage. The unpredictability of these diseases, together with their low prevalence, underreporting of cases, and the difficulty to establish a precise prognosis, makes DILI and HILI priority topics for Mexican and Latin American (LA) hepatologists.

Main Causes of DILI and HILI

An increase in the global consumption of herbal‐derived supplements (HDS), and with it HDS‐induced DILI, has been observed. 1 In LA, there is a large market for herbal and HDS because these products are more accessible 2 ; most cases are not evaluated at medical appointments and perhaps are mild cases, with just a small percentage being severe cases.

A network established between hepatologists from various LA countries (Latin American DILI Network) described 311 cases of DILI, with 37 of them caused by HDS (10%). Most HILI cases are not reported. 3 , 4

The causative agents for DILI in children and in adults vary. Drugs that act on the central nervous system (anticonvulsants) and antimicrobials (minocycline) are the more common causes of DILI in children. Infants are more susceptible to liver injury caused by valproate and are at increased risk for Reye syndrome caused by aspirin. Although propylthiouracil may cause DILI in all age groups, children are more susceptible to severe and fatal hepatotoxicity. 6 , 7 With increasing age, there is a greater risk for liver injury caused by isoniazid, amoxicillin clavulanate, and nitrofurantoin. 8 , 9

There is no evidence to suggest that women are at higher risk for all‐cause DILI, but they seem to be at higher risk for liver injury caused by certain medications, such as minocycline, methyldopa, diclofenac, nitrofurantoin, and nevirapine. 10 DILI is a rare cause of acute liver injury in pregnant women because the use of prescription medications is uncommon. There is no evidence that pregnancy increases the susceptibility to DILI. Common causes of DILI in pregnant women are antihypertensive agents, such as methyldopa and hydralazine, and antimicrobials, including antiretroviral agents. 11

The use of illicit drugs should also be noted because agents such as methylenedioxymethamphetamine have been linked to liver injury and, in some cases, acute liver failure (ALF). 12 Antibiotics and antiepileptics are the most commonly reported drugs, accounting for 60% of DILIs. 13 Tables 1 and 2 list the main agents associated with DILI and HILI.

TABLE 1.

Most Common DILI Agents

Acetaminophen (common drug to cause intrinsic DILI)
Antibiotics
Amoxicillin/clavulanate
Isoniazid
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole
Cephalosporins
Fluoroquinolones
Macrolides
Nitrofurantoin
Erythromycin
Tetracyclines
Minocycline
Antituberculosis agents: isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide
Antiepileptics
Phenytoin
Carbamazepine
Lamotrigine
Valproate
Analgesics
Nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory agents
Diclofenac
Immune modulators
Interferon‐beta
Interferon‐alpha
Anti‐TNF agents
Azathioprine
Immune‐checkpoint inhibitors
Ipilimumab (CTLA‐4 inhibitor)
Nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and cemiplimab (PD‐1 inhibitors)
Atezolizumab, avelumab, and durvalumab (PDL‐1 inhibitors)
Cardiovascular drugs
Amiodarone (oral)
Angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors
α‐Methyldopa
Beta‐blockers
Calcium channel blockers
Hydralazine
Hypolipidemics
Fibrates
Niacin
Statins
Miscellaneous
Methotrexate (oral)
Allopurinol
Androgen‐containing steroids
Sulfasalazine

Adapted from Sherlock’s Diseases of the Liver and Biliary System. 25 Copyright 2018, Wiley Blackwell; and American Journal of Gastroenterology. 5 Copyright 2021, American College of Gastroenterology.

TABLE 2.

Most Common Herbal and Dietary Supplements in LatinDILI Registry

Anabolic steroids
Herbalife products
Garcinia cambogia
Lipodex
Centella asiatica
Camellia sinensis
Echinacea
Monascus purpureus
Hydroxycut
Ginkgo biloba
Peumus boldus
Chaparral

Adapted from Clinical Liver Disease. 3 Copyright 2020, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Diagnosis and Prognosis of DILI

DILI has a wide range of clinical presentations, from asymptomatic patients with just low‐grade biochemical alterations to ALF or persistent chronic inflammation. Symptomatic cases show nausea, vomiting, anorexia, upper right quadrant pain on the abdomen, skin rash, pruritus, icterus, ascites, and encephalopathy. 14

Being an exclusion diagnosis, several tests must be realized to discard other causes of liver injury. A complete medical history should be obtained; a compatible temporal association with the suspected drug can be helpful, and patients should always be asked about the consumption of herbal remedies or products. Severe DILI diagnosis is frequently clinical in a patient with ALF who requires hospitalization.

The diagnostic approach of DILI depends on the biochemical pattern shown at the moment of presentation. r value is defined as the patient’s alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/upper limit of normal (ULN) divided by serum alkaline phosphatase/ULN. An r value >5 suggests hepatocellular injury, while <2 is associated with cholestatic damage, and values between 2 and 5 suggest a mixed damage pattern. 15

Differential diagnoses include acute viral hepatitis, autoimmune hepatitis, liver ischemia, Budd‐Chiari syndrome, acute biliary obstruction, and Wilson’s disease. Mixed and cholestatic cases of DILI have a small but well‐documented risk for chronicity. 15 , 16 Causality has been traditionally established by using scores such as Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method, Maria and Victorino System Clinical Diagnostic Scale, and Drug‐Induced Liver Injury Network expert opinion. 17 , 18 Case reports can be helpful in diagnosing atypical or uncommon cases. 19 , 20

Prognosis is generally determined by the pattern of liver injury, age, comorbidities, Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease score > 19, and Hy’s law (bilirubin levels > 2.5 mg/dL and ALT or aspartate aminotransferase >3 times greater than UNL), which has a good prediction capability for ALF and mortality within 26 weeks. 21

A Mexican View

In the last 30 years, HILI has slowly reached an important place as a cause of liver damage in Mexico. In the late 1990s, a study reported that 75% of Mexican medical practitioners had recommended herbal medicines to their patients, and that almost 90% of adults used them regularly as self‐prescription. 22 There are regions of Mexico with high reported use of herbal remedies, such as Oaxaca, Veracruz, Nuevo León, Yucatán, Chiapas, and Hidalgo, which are areas with a large proportion of indigenous inhabitants. The common belief that herbal medicines are harmless and the underregulation of their marketing make them easily accessible. Components of herbs, their side effects, the chemical products used on the crops, the environment, and the clinical host‐related risk factors are the most important determinants of herbal‐related liver damage. 23 A study conducted by Higuera de la Tijera et al. 24 showed that, in Mexico, liver damage caused by herbology products raises the risk for ALF and death (odds ratio, 8.7 and 35, respectively) compared with cases of DILI related to other drugs. In Mexico, many medications are available “over the counter,” and prescription expeditions are less regulated in comparison with other countries, such as the United States. Besides, herbal supplements are commonly used by the Mexican population, not regulated whatsoever, easily available, and cheap, and our people see these products as “harmless.”

As for DILI, Mexican studies reporting true prevalence are scarce, and most of them are in the form of unpublished abstracts or case reports. A first attempt to create a national register of DILI and HILI cases (Hepa‐tox) was proposed in 2018, but the project did not grow as expected. The Mexican Association of Hepatology is working on the launch of a new platform for a national DILI/HILI register, expected to be open in the months to come. We expect to use a Web‐based system, like Google Forms, to achieve a simultaneous register across the country and to capture useful statistical data prospectively.

Key Points

  • There is a great necessity to create a Mexican DILI/HILI database.

  • Herbal supplements and remedies, by not being regulated, are a common cause of liver damage in Mexico.

  • There is a need for stricter regulation on prescription expenditure among Mexican pharmacies.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Kullak‐Ublick GA, Andrade RJ, Merz M, et al. Drug‐induced liver injury: recent advances in diagnosis and risk assessment. Gut 2017;66:1154‐1164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Andrade RJ, Medina‐Caliz I, Gonzalez‐Jimenez A, et al. Hepatic damage by natural remedies. Semin Liver Dis 2018;38:21‐40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Nunnes V, Méndez‐Sánchez N. Impact of herbal and dietary supplements causing drug‐induced liver injury in Latin America. Clin Liver Dis 2020;16:83‐86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Hillman L, Gottfried M, Whitsett M, et al. Clinical features and outcomes of complementary and alternative medicine induced acute liver failure and injury. Am J Gastroenterol 2016;111: 958‐965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Chalasani NP, Maddur H, Russo MW, et al. ACG Clinical Guideline: diagnosis and management of idiosyncratic drug‐induced liver injury. Am J Gastroenterol 2021;116:878‐898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Rivkees SA. 63 years and 715 days to the “boxed warning”: unmasking of the propylthiouracil problem. Int J Pediatr Endocrinol 2010;2010:658267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Koch L. Therapy: propylthiouracil use associated with severe hepatotoxicity in children. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2010;6:416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Lucena MI, Sanabria J, García‐Cortes M, et al. Drug‐induced liver injury in older people. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;5:862‐874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Chalasani N, Björnsson E. Risk factors for idiosyncratic drug‐induced liver injury. Gastroenterology 2010;138:2246‐2259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Andrade RJ, Chalasani N, Björnsson ES, et al. Drug‐induced liver injury. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2019;5:58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Lao TT. Drug‐induced liver injury in pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2020;68:32‐43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Cajanding RJM. MDMA‐associated liver toxicity: pathophysiology, management, and current state of knowledge. AACN Adv Crit Care 2019;30:232‐248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Bonkovsky HLJD, Russo MW, Shedlofsky SI. Drug‐induced liver injury. In: Boyer TD, Manns MP, Sanyal AJ, eds. Zakim & Boyer’s Hepatology. 6th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2011:417‐461. [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Senior JR. Monitoring for hepatotoxicity: what is the predictive value of liver “function” tests? Clin Pharmacol Ther 2009;85:331‐334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Benichou C. Criteria of drug‐induced liver injury. Report of an international consensus meeting. J Hepatol 1990;11:272‐276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Bjornsson E, Olsson R. Outcome and prognostic markers in sever drug‐induced liver disease. Hepatology 2005;42:481‐489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Maria VA, Victorino RM. Development and validation of a clinical scale for the diagnosis of drug‐induced hepatitis. Hepatology 1997;26:664‐669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Rockey DC, Seeff LB, Rochon J, et al. Causality assessment in drug‐induced liver injury using a structured expert opinion process: comparison to the Roussel‐Uclaf causality assessment method. Hepatology 2010;51:2117‐2126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Chalasani N, Fontana RJ, Bonkovsky HL, et al. Drug induced liver injury network (DILIN). Causes, clinical features, and outcomes from a prospective study of drug‐induced liver injury in the United States. Gastroenterology 2008;135:1924‐1934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Fontana RJ, Seef LB, Andrade RJ, et al. Standardization of nomenclature and causality in drug‐induced liver injury: summary of a clinical research workshop. Hepatology 2010;52:730‐742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Ghabril M, Gu J, Yoder L, et al. Development and validation of a model consisting of comorbidity burden to calculate risk of death within 6 months for patients with suspected drug‐induced liver injury. Gastroenterology 2019;157:1245‐1252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Taddei Bringas GA, Santillana Macedo MA, Romero Cancio JA, et al. Aceptación y uso de la herbolaria en medicina familiar (acceptance and use of herbs in family medicine). Salud Pública De México 1999;41:216‐220. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Valdivia‐Correa B, Gómez Gutiérrez C, Uribe M, et al. Herbal medicine in mexico: a cause of hepatotoxicity. A critical review. Int J Mol Sci 2016;17:235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Higuera de la Tijera F, Velarde Ruiz Velasco JA, Córdoba Reyes M, et al. Identificación de factores de riesgo que impactan en el Desarrollo de insuficiencia hepatica aguda y mortalidad en pacientes con daño idiosincrático por fármacos o herbolaria. Rev Gastroenterol Mex 2018;83(suppl 2):86‐87. [Google Scholar]
  • 25. DiPaola FW, Fontana RJ. Drug‐induced liver injury. In: Dooley JS, Lok AS, García‐Tsao G, Pinzani M, eds. Sherlock’s Diseases of the Liver and Biliary System. 13th ed. London: Wiley Blackwell; 2018:468‐487. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Liver Disease are provided here courtesy of American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases

RESOURCES