Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2022 Mar 10;17(3):e0265221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265221

Identification of the shared gene signatures and pathways between sarcopenia and type 2 diabetes mellitus

Shiyuan Huang 1, Chunhua Xiang 1, Yi Song 1,*
Editor: Kanhaiya Singh2
PMCID: PMC8912249  PMID: 35271662

Abstract

Background

Sarcopenia is characterized by the age-associated loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength that develops progressively and plays an important role in the disability of the elderly. It has received growing attention over the last decade and has been implicated as both a cause and consequence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The existence of T2DM could increase the risk of developing sarcopenia through multiple mechanisms including advanced glycation end-product accumulation. Meanwhile, sarcopenia would alter glucose disposal and may contribute to the development and progression of T2DM due to reduced muscle mass.

Methods

We implemented transcriptomic analysis of skeletal muscle biopsy specimens in sarcopenia patients and proliferating myoblasts or differentiated myotubes from individuals with T2DM. Related microarray data were selected from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) to screen the genes, which were differentially expressed for sarcopenia and T2DM. Multiple combinatorial statistical methods and bioinformatics tools were used to analyze the common DEGs. Meanwhile, functional enrichment analysis was also carried out. Furthermore, we constructed the protein-protein interaction (PPI), as well as transcription factor (TF)-gene interactions network and TF-miRNA coregulatory network. Finally, based on the common DEGs, drug compounds were speculated using the Drug Signatures database (DSigDB).

Results

A total of 1765 and 2155 DEGs of sarcopenia and T2DM were screened, respectively. 15 common genes (LXN, CIB2, PEA15, KANK2, FGD1, NMRK1, PLCB1, SEMA4G, ADARB1, UPF3A, CSTB, COL3A1, CD99, ETV3, FJX1) correlated with sarcopenia and T2DM simultaneously were then identified, and 3 genes (UPF3A, CSTB and PEA15) of them were regarded as hub genes. Functional enrichment analysis revealed several shared pathways between two diseases. In addition, according to the TF-gene interactions network and TF-miRNA coregulatory network, part of TF and miRNA may be identified as key regulator in sarcopenia and T2DM at the same time (e.g., CREM and miR-155). Notably, drug compounds for T2DM and sarcopenia were also suggested, such as coenzyme Q10.

Conclusion

This study revealed that sarcopenia and T2DM may share similar pathogenesis and provided new biological targets and ideas for early diagnosis and effective treatment of sarcopenia and T2DM.

Introduction

Primarily aging-associated skeletal muscle changes are muscle atrophy, usually accompanied by sarcopenia. Sarcopenia is characterized by the age-related progressive loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength which results in muscle weakness, restricted mobility, and increased susceptibility to injury [1]. It is estimated that about 50 million people suffering from sarcopenia in the world at present, and the number is expected to reach 500 million by the year 2050. Data show that one-third of people aged 65 and above had sarcopenia (the incidence rate was 14% to 33%), and the prevalence rate of the elderly aged 80 years and above was as high as 50%-60% [2]. The concept of ‘Sarcopenia’ was first defined as the age-related loss of muscle mass by Rosenberg in 1997 [3]. Later, organizations, such as the International Working Group on Sarcopenia (IWGS) and the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP), expanded the definition of sarcopenia with muscle function, including muscle strength and physical performance [4,5]. However, it is hard to reach an agreement on the definition of sarcopenia, since the experts in these organizations propose different thresholds and diagnostic tests for the evaluation of muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical performance. Several reasons that contribute to sarcopenia include increased inflammation [6], excessive oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction [7], reduced muscle capillarization [8], and changes in dietary intake of protein [9].

T2DM, a common metabolic disease, is usually accompanied by insulin resistance, activated inflammation, advanced glycation end-product (AGE) accumulation and increased oxidative stress. These mechanisms would result in activated inflammation, mitochondrial and vascular dysfunction, and impairments in protein metabolism, which cause a problem to muscle health, e.g., muscle mass, muscle strength, muscle quality, and muscle function [10]. Specifically, the anabolic action of insulin in skeletal muscle may be progressively lost in T2DM due to the impaired insulin sensitivity. Additionally, the impaired insulin action may induce increased protein degradation and decreased protein synthesis, which leads to reduction in muscle mass and strength [10]. Moreover, the results from the hind limb muscles of diabetic mice revealed that the decline in muscle mass, muscle endurance and regenerative capacity were related to AGEs accumulation [11]. Thus, the risk of sarcopenia is increased in T2DM patients [10,12]. On the other hand, skeletal muscle is essential for glucose clearance and is in charge of over 80% of glucose uptake from postprandial glucose load, and consequently, it has been proved that sarcopenia would alter glucose disposal by lowering muscle mass and also increase localized inflammation, which may contribute to the development and progression of T2DM [13].

Since various bidirectional associations between sarcopenia and T2DM exist, and the fact that one condition can increase the possibility of developing the other [12], our study is aiming to find biological pathways and the relationship between sarcopenia and T2DM and provide a new idea for the diagnosis and treatment of sarcopenia. Firstly, two datasets, GSE1428 [14] and GSE166467 [15], were selected for finding DEGs for regulating skeletal muscle in sarcopenia and T2DM, respectively. Then, common DEGs were found out, and with these common DEGs, further pathway enrichment analysis was performed to investigate the biological processes of genome-based expression. The network of protein-protein interactions (PPIs) was built from these common DEGs to select the hub genes. Then, transcription factors and miRNA were also traced based on the common DEGs in the PPIs network. Finally, potential drugs were suggested via the DSigDB database. The sequential workflow of our research was presented in Fig 1.

Fig 1. Workflow of the whole study.

Fig 1

DEGs, differentially expressed genes; GO, Gene Ontology; PPI, protein-protein interaction; TF, transcription factor.

Material and methods

Data collection

GSE1428 and GSE166467 datasets were assembled from the GEO database [16]. GPL96 (Affymetrix Human Genome U133A Array) platform was applied to GSE1428 dataset microarray analysis [14] and the GPL10558 (Illumina HumanHT-12 V4.0 expression bead chip) platform was used for GSE166467 [15]. GSE1428 dataset, which illustrates skeletal muscle sarcopenia in transcriptional responses, was contributed by Giresi et al. GSE166467 for T2DM was presented by Ling et al. The skeletal muscle sarcopenia dataset (GSE1428) provided microarray data from vastus lateralis muscle biopsies of young and old people. The T2DM dataset (GSE166467) contained data from both proliferating myoblasts and differentiated myotubes from individuals with T2DM and controls. In addition, before the DEGs analysis, the RMA algorithm was used to normalize the datasets from raw data if necessary.

Identification of common DEGs between sarcopenia and T2DM

We achieved the identification of DEGs for the GSE1428 and GSE166467 datasets using GEOquery [17] and limma [18] packages in R. P-value<0.05 was considered as cutoff criteria to determine significant DEGs. Besides, common DEGs were also acquired and displayed in venn diagram with R software.

Enrichment analysis of gene ontology and pathways

Gene set enrichment analysis is a comprehensive resource for collected gene sets that accumulate biological pathways for biological discoveries [19]. Gene ontology is a kind of functional enrichment clustered into three subsections of biological process, molecular function and cellular component [20]. In addition, four major databases, including KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes), WikiPathways [21], Reactome [22] and BioCarta, were used to specify the shared pathways between sarcopenia and T2DM. GO terms and enriched signaling pathways were completed through the Enrichr web server (https://amp.pharm.mssm.edu/Enrichr/) for shared DEGs. The top 10 listed pathways with the smallest P-value are exhibited.

PPI network construction

Finding the functions of protein is the primary step in systems biology and drug discovery [23]. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) and the obtained network are crucial in the field of biological processes at many levels of cellular structure and function, including basic metabolism and cell differentiation [24,25]. Similar DEGs in sarcopenia and T2DM were identified through the NetworkAnalyst platform (https://www.networkanalyst.ca/) and organized into a visual PPIs network [26]. Then, the PPIs network was further visualized and integrated with the Cytoscape platform (https://cytoscape.org/) to analyze the protein interactions and genetic interactions [27].

Establishment of the topological algorithm and identification of hub nodes

In this work, the highly interconnected hub nodes [28] were determined by cytoHubba, a plugin of Cytoscape software. Nodes in the network could be ranked by 11 topological algorithms with cytoHubba (https://apps.cytoscape.org/apps/cytohubba) [29]. The prominent modules are located at the position in the PPI network where the interconnect density of the hub nodes is highest.

Recognition of related transcription factors and miRNAs

TFs and miRNAs constitute two major regulation modes of gene expression, including transcription and post transcription. To choose the TFs and miRNAs, a co-regulatory network has been visualized by the NetworkAnalyst platform, which has been widely used as a bioinformatics tool [30,31].

Evaluation of candidate drugs

Drug compounds recognition is the vital module of this study. According to the common DEGs for sarcopenia and T2DM which are determined in the PPIs network, drug molecules could be predicted based on the DSigDB database [32]. In this work, the access of the DSigDB database was obtained on the Enrichr platform (https://maayanlab.cloud/Enrichr/), which is widely used to represent multiple visualization details on gathered functions for the genes [33].

Results

Identification of DEGs and shared genes between sarcopenia and diabetes

GSE1428 dataset was normalized by the RMA algorithm (S1 Fig) before DEGs were explored for sarcopenia. A total of 1765 DEGs were obtained with 1055 upregulated and 710 downregulated genes, which satisfied the screening criteria. For T2DM, the mRNA expression level in either proliferating myoblasts or differentiated myotubes from GSE166467 with T2DM (n = 13) versus controls (n = 13) was compared. Collected 147 genes for interaction genes of sarcopenia versus proliferating myoblasts and 54 genes for interaction genes of sarcopenia versus differentiated myotubes were compared using R, followed by identification of 15 common DEGs (LXN, CIB2, PEA15, KANK2, FGD1, NMRK1, PLCB1, SEMA4G, ADARB1, UPF3A, CSTB, COL3A1, CD99, ETV3 and FJX1) (S1 Table). Venn diagram displayed the overlap of DEGs from sarcopenia, differentiated myotubes and proliferating myoblasts (Fig 2A). The heat map for the shared common genes showed paralleled transcriptional signature among most of these genes according to the log fold change (Fig 2B).

Fig 2. Identification of shared DEGs between sarcopenia and diabetes.

Fig 2

(A) Overlap of DEGs represented through a Venn diagram. 15 genes were found common from 147 genes for interaction genes of sarcopenia versus proliferating myoblasts and 54 genes for interaction genes of sarcopenia versus differentiated myotubes. (B) Heat map for the shared DEGs of sarcopenia and T2DM according to the log-fold change.

Functional enrichment analysis

The analysis of gene functional enrichment was carried out on the Enrichr platform. The ongoing study analyzed GO terms and enriched pathways for 15 common DEGs (LXN, CIB2, PEA15, KANK2, FGD1, NMRK1, PLCB1, SEMA4G, ADARB1, UPF3A, CSTB, COL3A1, CD99, ETV3, FJX1). The data justified that the common DEGs are mostly enhanced in the regulation of G1/S transition of mitotic cell cycle and Rho protein signal transduction for the biological process subsection. In the molecular function group, the common DEGs are mainly enriched in endopeptidase inhibitor activity and protease binding factors. Cellular component study exhibited that common DEGs located significantly in the nucleolus. Analysis result from KEGG, WikiPathway, Reactome and BioCarta pathway was also obtained. The information attained showed the AGE-RAGE signaling pathway in T2DM complications significantly (P<0.01) assembled in the KEGG pathway database. Functional analysis results of GO (Fig 3A) and pathway (Fig 3B) were displayed according to -log10(P value) (detailed in S2S6 Tables).

Fig 3. Functional enrichment analysis of common genes.

Fig 3

(A) Enriched GO terms. (B) Pathway analysis through databases of KEGG, WikiPathway, Reactome and BioCarta. The results were displayed according to -log10(P value).

PPI network to identify hub genes

The InnateDB database on NetworkAnalyst was employed to construct PPI network of the common DEGs, which was then imported into Cytoscape software for visualization and optimization. The PPIs network contained 126 nodes and 127 edges (Fig 4), and it was constructed for hub gene identification and drug molecules detection for sarcopenia and diabetes in the following steps.

Fig 4. PPI network for common DEGs shared by two diseases.

Fig 4

Nodes in purple color indicated common DEGs.

Identification of hub genes

Hub genes were screened regarding their degree value from the PPI network in cytohubba, which was a plugin of Cytoscape software. The top three identified hub genes are UPF3A, CSTB and PEA15, which were all affiliated to common genes of sarcopenia and proliferating myoblasts of T2DM. The network consisted of 72 nodes and 73 edges. Interactions between interrelated proteins (Fig 5) and the topological analysis result were presented (S7 Table).

Fig 5. Identification of hub genes from PPI network.

Fig 5

TF-gene interaction network

TF-gene interaction network was generated using the NetworkAnalyst web tool. For the 15 common DEGs (LXN, CIB2, PEA15, KANK2, FGD1, NMRK1, PLCB1, SEMA4G, ADARB1, UPF3A, CSTB, COL3A1, CD99, ETV3, FJX1), the TF-genes were identified (Fig 6). The network contained 161 nodes and 230 edges. CSTB, SEMA4G and ADARB1 were regulated by 62, 38 and 31 TF-genes, respectively.

Fig 6. TF-gene interaction network based on common DEGs.

Fig 6

Nodes in green color indicated common DEGs, and nodes in yellow color indicated TF genes.

TF-miRNA coregulatory network

The main TF-miRNA coregulatory network based on the 15 common DEGs was produced via NetworkAnalyst. The network created comprised 289 nodes and 409 edges including 15 common DEGs (S2 Fig). Details were displayed in S8 Table. This interaction can be used to analyze the regulation factor for sarcopenia combined with T2DM. Moreover, the subnetwork, which specifically include only hub genes (UPF3A, CSTB and PEA15) and their associated miRNA and TF (Fig 7), was extracted from the main TF-miRNA coregulatory network.

Fig 7. TF-miRNA coregulatory network including hub genes.

Fig 7

The nodes with yellow diamonds are hub genes, red round nodes represent miRNA and green round nodes indicate TF.

Identification of candidate drugs

Drug molecules were detected for 15 common DEGs from the DSigDB database on Enrichr platform. Results from the candidate drugs were generated, and these drugs represented possible common drugs for sarcopenia and diabetes. The analysis depicted that Coenzyme Q10 CTD 00001167 and dihydroergocristine HL60 UP were the two drug molecules with the highest combined score (Table 1).

Table 1. Suggested top drug compounds for sarcopenia.

Term P-value Adjusted P-value Combined Score Genes
Coenzyme Q10 CTD 00001167 0.008965 0.141336 611.4626003 ETV3
dihydroergocristine HL60 UP 0.001684 0.085573 244.4667349 LXN; PLCB1
(-)-isoprenaline HL60 UP 3.11E-04 0.031049 223.3772771 LXN; ADARB1; PLCB1
Prestwick-983 HL60 UP 3.48E-04 0.031049 211.9492283 LXN; ADARB1; PLCB1
colforsin MCF7 DOWN 0.022273 0.199012 186.9959577 KANK2
etacrynic acid HL60 UP 0.023741 0.205246 171.9789874 LXN
2,2’,5,5’-TETRACHLOROBIPHENYL CTD 00000481 0.027403 0.21128 142.3784815 PLCB1
OZONE CTD 00006460 0.028134 0.21128 137.5099228 COL3A1
TERT-BUTYL HYDROPEROXIDE CTD 00007349 2.39E-05 0.006409 130.1775809 KANK2;COL3A1; NMRK1;
UPF3A; ETV3; FJX1; CD99
spironolactone CTD 00006774 0.029594 0.21128 128.5967412 COL3A1

Discussion

Sarcopenia-related muscle dysfunction has a great impact on the life quality of elderly people. Changes in skeletal muscle development, homeostasis and metabolism during aging are reflected in gene expression regulation [34]. Sarcopenia has been discovered as a new diabetes complication among the elderly population, which makes it a major public health event [10]. The study was implemented to analyze microarray data of sarcopenia and T2DM. 15 common DEGs were identified (including LXN, CIB2, PEA15, KANK2, FGD1, NMRK1, PLCB1, SEMA4G, ADARB1, UPF3A, CSTB, COL3A1, CD99, ETV3 and FJX1) to establish PPI network, as well as TF-gene interactions network and TF-miRNA coregulatory network. In addition, predicted drug compounds of sarcopenia and T2DM were suggested.

Identified 15 common DEGs were selected for exploring GO terms. GO terms were selected according to the P-values. For biological process, regulation of G1/S transition of the mitotic cell cycle, regulation of Rho protein signal transduction, regulation of vitamin D receptor signaling pathway were among the top GO term. Evidence revealed that the G1-to-S-phase transition is critical for cell proliferation [35]. Rho is also called Rho GTPases, which plays an important role in the regulation of cytoskeletal recombination and takes part in many physiological activities including cell migration, adhesion, cytokinesis, proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis [36]. Vitamin D receptor (VDR), which might be expressed in muscle fibers through vitamin D signaling, acts a crucial role in regulating myoblast proliferation, differentiation and moderate sarcopenia [37,38]. GO terms in terms of molecular function endopeptidase inhibitor activity, protease binding and double-stranded RNA adenosine deaminase activity were considered to be at the top of the list. Top GO terms based on the cellular component were nucleolus, nuclear lumen, collagen-containing extracellular matrix.

The determination of the KEGG pathway was acquired from the 15 common DEGs to find similar pathways for both sarcopenia and T2DM. Top 10 KEGG pathways included AGE-RAGE signaling pathway in diabetic complications, Amoebiasis, Platelet activation, Relaxin signaling pathway, Diabetic cardiomyopathy, Nicotinate and nicotinamide metabolism, African trypanosomiasis, Carbohydrate digestion and absorption, Endocrine and other factor-regulated calcium reabsorption, Long-term depression. The AGE-RAGE axis enhances the generation of ROS and a good deal of cytokines and chemokines, which lead to local tissue insulin resistance [39]. Therefore, this signaling pathway acts a crucial role in the pathogenesis of diabetic complications [40]. AGE, known as an aging product, also leads to sarcopenia through increasing reactive oxygen species generation [39]. At the same time, data from WikiPathways showed that the most interacted gene pathways were Cell-type Dependent Selectivity of CCK2R Signaling WP3679, GPR40 Pathway WP3958 and Tryptophan catabolism leading to NAD+ production WP4210. Results from the Reactome pathway produced Fatty Acids bound to GPR40 (FFAR1) regulate insulin secretion Homo sapiens R-HAS-434316 and Free fatty acids regulate insulin secretion Homo sapiens R-HAS-400451. BioCarta database hinted that these common genes were enriched in Phospholipase C Signaling Pathway Homo sapiens h plcPathway.

PPI network analysis was the vital section, which helped us detect potential hub genes involved in the shared mechanisms of sarcopenia and T2DM. Analysis for PPI also came into being for 15 common DEGs and results revealed that owing to possessing a high interaction rate and high degree value, UPF3A, CSTB and PEA15 genes were selected as hub genes, respectively. PEA15 encodes a death effector domain-containing protein, which acts as a negative regulator for apoptosis. This encoded protein may contribute to insulin resistance in glucose uptake, since it is an endogenous substrate for protein kinase C and overexpressed in T2DM [41].

TFs are proteins that control the transcription of DNA into RNA by attaching to a particular DNA sequence, hence it is essential for regulatory biomolecules [42]. Furthermore, miRNAs participate in the regulation of protein expression mainly through binding to target sites on an mRNA transcript and inhibiting its translation [43]. TF-genes and miRNAs play key roles in the ratio of transcription and RNA silencing on the post-transcription, respectively. Thus, they are significant regulatory biomolecules and even potential biological markers [44]. TF-gene interaction network was acquired from the common DEGs. According to the network, CSTB has a high interaction rate with other TF-genes, displaying a degree value of 62 in the network. Among the regulators, CREM had significant interaction with degree value of 4. Mechanistically, oxidative stress activation in T2DM enhanced CREM expression [45]. In experimental mouse models, CREM expression was associated with preventing inflammation and myofibrillar protein degradation that affect sarcopenia [46]. Besides, TF-miRNA coregulatory network analysis indicated relationships among the common DEGs, TFs and miRNAs through visualized TF-miRNA coregulatory network. As a result, 206 miRNAs and 68 TF-genes were revealed in this study. Among the most interacted TFs, EGR1 has a high degree value of 4. The expression of EGR1 is rapidly changed by mechanical stimulation. The induction of Sirt1 by EGR1 is necessary for moving away from the superfluous reactive oxygen species, which is produced by the mechanical stimulus. This activation is lost in aged animals due to the loss of EGR1. Therefore, the decreased expression of EGR1 in the elderly may contribute to reduced muscle function in sarcopenia [47]. The change of miRNA expression in T2DM patients has been established by many researchers, and their results revealed that miR-155 is crucial for insulin sensitivity regulation of liver, adipose tissue, and skeletal muscle. Moreover, a series of clinical researches have also found low miR-155 levels in the serum of patients with T2DM, which may lead to insulin resistance [48]. Meanwhile, increasing evidence has revealed that miRNAs are differentially expressed in sarcopenia of the elderly, plasma miR-155 level in the sarcopenia group was significantly reduced compared to the non-sarcopenia group [49].

Based on the DSigDB database, drug compounds were put forward. Among all the predicted drugs, our study highlighted the top 10 significant drugs. Coenzyme Q10 CTD 00001167, dihydroergocristine HL60 UP, (-)-isoprenaline HL60 UP, Prestwick-983 HL60 UP, colforsin MCF7 DOWN, etacrynic acid HL60 UP, 2,2’,5,5’-TETRACHLOROBIPHENYL CTD 00000481, OZONE CTD 00006460, TERT-BUTYL HYDROPEROXIDE CTD 00007349 and spironolactone CTD 00006774 were the peak drug candidates for sarcopenia and T2DM. A series of studies have shown that coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) could prevent oxidative damage, optimize mitochondrial functionality and anti-inflammatory effect [50]. These mechanisms are related to the physiology and biochemistry of aging muscle and also the potential function in preventing sarcopenia [51]. The previous study has proven that combining CoQ10 with metformin can improve glycemic control by reducing oxidative stress and improving the mitochondria morphology [52]. Furthermore, it was found in the mouse skeletal muscle transplants that isoprenaline increased the volume of regenerated muscle due to the hypertrophic effect [53]. Insulin-stimulated glucose transport activity in rat adipocytes was inhibited by isoprenaline [54]. Therefore, isoproterenol may alleviate sarcopenia by improving muscle metabolism and muscle function.

The current study used a lot of bioinformatics methodologies with GSE1428, which compared biopsy samples of skeletal muscle between the elderly and young people, and GSE166467 which indicated mRNA expression in either proliferating myoblasts or differentiated myotubes from individuals with T2DM. We have implemented DEGs analysis between two databases and tried to find the mechanisms by which two diseases interact. Indeed, different reasons (e.g., impaired insulin sensitivity, AGEs, subclinical inflammation and mitochondrial dysfunction) may be related to this association. Therefore, this work is expected to provide guidance for healthcare professionals to diagnose sarcopenia at an early stage for elderly patients with T2DM. Furthermore, the drug targets are suggested through the identification of hub genes. For example, CoQ10 has been shown to be effective in the animal models of both T2DM and sarcopenia treatment [50,51]. Biguanides, a first-line hypoglycemic agent, may protect the development of sarcopenia, which is revealed by observational cross-sectional research [55]. It is expected that more mature T2DM treatment may inspire the treatment of sarcopenia and these drugs should be considered for further verification by clinical trials. In the future, it is hoped that specific drugs will be developed to treat sarcopenia in addition to protein supplementation and exercise.

Conclusion

This is the first study to explore the relationship between sarcopenia and T2DM using transcriptome analysis. We have recognized the common genes between sarcopenia and T2DM to explore the association of these two diseases. Analysis revealed that sarcopenia and T2DM have similar pathogenesis including increased inflammation, excessive oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction. Moreover, the existence of one disease may increase the risk of developing the other. Besides, some drug targets, which are identified based on the hub genes, are logically selected since they are probably candidate for drugs that already sanctioned. In conclusion, our research provides new biological targets and ideas for early diagnosis and effective treatment of sarcopenia combined with T2DM.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Normalization of the GSE1428 microarray data.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. The main TF-miRNA coregulatory network.

The nodes with yellow diamonds are common DEGs, red round nodes represent miRNA and green round nodes indicate TF.

(TIF)

S1 Table. Differentially expressed genes.

(XLSX)

S2 Table. GO annotation analysis details.

(XLSX)

S3 Table. KEGG enrichment analysis details.

(XLSX)

S4 Table. WikiPathway enrichment analysis details.

(XLSX)

S5 Table. Reactome enrichment analysis details.

(XLSX)

S6 Table. BioCarta enrichment analysis details.

(XLSX)

S7 Table. Topological results for top three hub genes.

(XLSX)

S8 Table. Details of the main TF-miRNA coregulatory network.

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We thank all GEO data builders and data contributors, as well as the team that built the Enrichr online analysis page.

Data Availability

Data are available from the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (accession numbers GSE1428 and GSE166467).

Funding Statement

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81901429). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Shou J, Chen PJ, Xiao WH. Mechanism of increased risk of insulin resistance in aging skeletal muscle. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2020;12:14. doi: 10.1186/s13098-020-0523-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chen LK, Liu LK, Woo J, Assantachai P, Auyeung TW, Bahyah KS, et al. Sarcopenia in Asia: consensus report of the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15(2):95–101. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.11.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rosenberg IH. Sarcopenia: origins and clinical relevance. Clin Geriatr Med. 2011;27(3):337–339. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2011.03.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, Landi F, et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: Report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing. 2010;39(4):412–423. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afq034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fielding RA, Vellas B, Evans WJ, Bhasin S, Morley JE, Newman AB, et al. Sarcopenia: an undiagnosed condition in older adults. Current consensus definition: prevalence, etiology, and consequences. International working group on sarcopenia. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2011;12(4):249–256. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2011.01.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mankhong S, Kim S, Moon S, Kwak HB, Park DH, Kang JH. Experimental Models of Sarcopenia: Bridging Molecular Mechanism and Therapeutic Strategy. Cells. 2020;9(6):1385. doi: 10.3390/cells9061385 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Waltz TB, Fivenson EM, Morevati M, Li C, Becker KG, Bohr VA, et al. Sarcopenia, Aging and Prospective Interventional Strategies. Curr Med Chem. 2018;25(40):5588–5596. doi: 10.2174/0929867324666170801095850 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Prior SJ, Ryan AS, Blumenthal JB, Watson JM, Katzel LI, Goldberg AP. Sarcopenia Is Associated With Lower Skeletal Muscle Capillarization and Exercise Capacity in Older Adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2016;71(8):1096–1101. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glw017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Makanae Y, Fujita S. Role of Exercise and Nutrition in the Prevention of Sarcopenia. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 2015;61 Suppl:S125–S127. doi: 10.3177/jnsv.61.S125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Izzo A, Massimino E, Riccardi G, Della Pepa G. A Narrative Review on Sarcopenia in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Prevalence and Associated Factors. Nutrients. 2021;13(1):183. doi: 10.3390/nu13010183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mori H, Kuroda A, Ishizu M, Ohishi M, Takashi Y, Otsuka Y, et al. Association of accumulated advanced glycation end-products with a high prevalence of sarcopenia and dynapenia in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Investig. 2019;10(5):1332–1340. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mesinovic J, Zengin A, De Courten B, Ebeling PR, Scott D. Sarcopenia and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a bidirectional relationship. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2019;12:1057–1072. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S186600 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.DeFronzo RA, Tripathy D. Skeletal muscle insulin resistance is the primary defect in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009. Nov;32 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S157–S163. doi: 10.2337/dc09-S302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Giresi PG, Stevenson EJ, Theilhaber J, Koncarevic A, Parkington J, Fielding RA, et al. Identification of a molecular signature of sarcopenia. Physiol Genomics. 2005;21(2):253–263. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00249.2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Davegårdh C, Säll J, Benrick A, Broholm C, Volkov P, Perfilyev A, et al. VPS39-deficiency observed in type 2 diabetes impairs muscle stem cell differentiation via altered autophagy and epigenetics. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):2431. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22068-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Clough E, Barrett T. The Gene Expression Omnibus Database. Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1418:93–110. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3578-9_5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Davis S, Meltzer PS. GEOquery: a bridge between the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and BioConductor. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(14):1846–1847. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wettenhall JM, Smyth GK. limmaGUI: a graphical user interface for linear modeling of microarray data. Bioinformatics. 2004;20(18):3705–3706. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth449 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kuleshov MV, Jones MR, Rouillard AD, Fernandez NF, Duan Q, Wang Z, et al. Enrichr: a comprehensive gene set enrichment analysis web server 2016 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(W1):W90–W97. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw377 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Doms A, Schroeder M. GoPubMed: exploring PubMed with the Gene Ontology. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33(Web Server issue):W783–W786. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki470 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Slenter DN, Kutmon M, Hanspers K, Riutta A, Windsor J, Nunes N, et al. WikiPathways: a multifaceted pathway database bridging metabolomics to other omics research. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(D1):D661–D667. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fabregat A, Jupe S, Matthews L, Sidiropoulos K, Gillespie M, Garapati P, et al. The Reactome Pathway Knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018. Jan 4;46(D1):D649–D655. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sikić M, Tomić S, Vlahovicek K. Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites in sequences and 3D structures by random forests. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009;5(1):e1000278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000278 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pagel P, Kovac S, Oesterheld M, Brauner B, Dunger-Kaltenbach I, Frishman G, et al. The MIPS mammalian protein-protein interaction database. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(6):832–834. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chowdhury UN, Ahmad S, Islam MB, Alyami SA, Quinn JMW, Eapen V, et al. System biology and bioinformatics pipeline to identify comorbidities risk association: Neurodegenerative disorder case study. PLoS One. 2021;16(5):e0250660. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250660 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Xia J, Gill EE, Hancock RE. NetworkAnalyst for statistical, visual and network-based meta-analysis of gene expression data. Nat Protoc. 2015;10(6):823–844. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2015.052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003;13(11):2498–2504. doi: 10.1101/gr.1239303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hsing M, Byler KG, Cherkasov A. The use of Gene Ontology terms for predicting highly-connected ’hub’ nodes in protein-protein interaction networks. BMC Syst Biol. 2008;2:80. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-2-80 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chin CH, Chen SH, Wu HH, Ho CW, Ko MT, Lin CY. cytoHubba: identifying hub objects and sub-networks from complex interactome. BMC Syst Biol. 2014;8 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S11. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-8-S4-S11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhou G, Soufan O, Ewald J, Hancock REW, Basu N, Xia J. NetworkAnalyst 3.0: a visual analytics platform for comprehensive gene expression profiling and meta-analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(W1):W234–W241. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Al-Mustanjid M, Mahmud SMH, Royel MRI, Rahman MH, Islam T, Rahman MR, et al. Detection of molecular signatures and pathways shared in inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancer: A bioinformatics and systems biology approach. Genomics. 2020;112(5):3416–3426. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2020.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yoo M, Shin J, Kim J, Ryall KA, Lee K, Lee S, et al. DSigDB: drug signatures database for gene set analysis. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(18):3069–3071. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chen EY, Tan CM, Kou Y, Duan Q, Wang Z, Meirelles GV, et al. Enrichr: interactive and collaborative HTML5 gene list enrichment analysis tool. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:128. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-128 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Fochi S, Giuriato G, De Simone T, Gomez-Lira M, Tamburin S, Del Piccolo L, et al. Regulation of microRNAs in Satellite Cell Renewal, Muscle Function, Sarcopenia and the Role of Exercise. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(18):6732. doi: 10.3390/ijms21186732 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bertoli C, Skotheim JM, de Bruin RA. Control of cell cycle transcription during G1 and S phases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013;14(8):518–528. doi: 10.1038/nrm3629 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Narumiya S. The small GTPase Rho: cellular functions and signal transduction. J Biochem. 1996;120(2):215–228. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a021401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wagatsuma A, Sakuma K. Vitamin D signaling in myogenesis: potential for treatment of sarcopenia. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:121254. doi: 10.1155/2014/121254 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Abiri B, Vafa M. Vitamin D and Muscle Sarcopenia in Aging. Methods Mol Biol. 2020;2138:29–47. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0471-7_2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Dozio E, Vettoretti S, Lungarella G, Messa P, Corsi Romanelli MM. Sarcopenia in Chronic Kidney Disease: Focus on Advanced Glycation End Products as Mediators and Markers of Oxidative Stress. Biomedicines. 2021;9(4):405. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9040405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Litwinoff E, Hurtado Del Pozo C, Ramasamy R, Schmidt AM. Emerging Targets for Therapeutic Development in Diabetes and Its Complications: The RAGE Signaling Pathway. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015;98(2):135–144. doi: 10.1002/cpt.148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Baig MH, Kausar MA, Husain FM, Shakil S, Ahmad I, Yadav BS, et al. Interfering PLD1-PED/PEA15 interaction using self-inhibitory peptides: An in silico study to discover novel therapeutic candidates against type 2 diabetes. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2019;26(1):160–164. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.08.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Caramori G, Casolari P, Adcock I. Role of transcription factors in the pathogenesis of asthma and COPD. Cell Commun Adhes. 2013;20(1–2):21–40. doi: 10.3109/15419061.2013.775257 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sethupathy P, Corda B, Hatzigeorgiou AG. TarBase: A comprehensive database of experimentally supported animal microRNA targets. RNA. 2006;12(2):192–197. doi: 10.1261/rna.2239606 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zhang HM, Kuang S, Xiong X, Gao T, Liu C, Guo AY. Transcription factor and microRNA co-regulatory loops: important regulatory motifs in biological processes and diseases. Brief Bioinform. 2015;16(1):45–58. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbt085 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bitar MS, Al-Mulla F. Upregulation of CREM/ICER suppresses wound endothelial CRE-HIF-1α-VEGF-dependent signaling and impairs angiogenesis in type 2 diabetes. Dis Model Mech. 2015;8(1):65–80. doi: 10.1242/dmm.017145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Rodrigues ACZ, Wang ZM, Messi ML, Bonilla HJ, Liu L, Freeman WM, et al. Heart and neural crest derivative 2-induced preservation of sympathetic neurons attenuates sarcopenia with aging. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2021;12(1):91–108. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12644 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Pardo PS, Boriek AM. The physiological roles of Sirt1 in skeletal muscle. Aging (Albany NY). 2011;3(4):430–437. doi: 10.18632/aging.100312 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Jankauskas SS, Gambardella J, Sardu C, Lombardi A, Santulli G. Functional Role of miR-155 in the Pathogenesis of Diabetes Mellitus and Its Complications. Noncoding RNA. 2021;7(3):39. doi: 10.3390/ncrna7030039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.He N, Zhang YL, Zhang Y, Feng B, Zheng Z, Wang D, et al. Circulating MicroRNAs in Plasma Decrease in Response to Sarcopenia in the Elderly. Front Genet. 2020;11:167. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Pastor-Maldonado CJ, Suárez-Rivero JM, Povea-Cabello S, Álvarez-Córdoba M, Villalón-García I, Munuera-Cabeza M, et al. Coenzyme Q10: Novel Formulations and Medical Trends. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(22):8432. doi: 10.3390/ijms21228432 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Barcelos IP, Haas RH. CoQ10 and Aging. Biology (Basel). 2019;8(2):28. doi: 10.3390/biology8020028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sun IO, Jin L, Jin J, Lim SW, Chung BH, Yang CW. The effects of addition of coenzyme Q10 to metformin on sirolimus-induced diabetes mellitus. Korean J Intern Med. 2019;34(2):365–374. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2017.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Roberts P, McGeachie JK. Long-term isoprenaline administration and its effect on the revascularisation and regeneration of skeletal muscle transplants in mice. J Anat. 1996;188(Pt 3)(Pt 3):705–712. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Vannucci SJ, Nishimura H, Satoh S, Cushman SW, Holman GD, Simpson IA. Cell surface accessibility of GLUT4 glucose transporters in insulin-stimulated rat adipose cells. Modulation by isoprenaline and adenosine. Biochem J. 1992;288(Pt 1)(Pt 1):325–330. doi: 10.1042/bj2880325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Cetrone M, Mele A, Tricarico D. Effects of the antidiabetic drugs on the age-related atrophy and sarcopenia associated with diabetes type II. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2014;10(4):231–237. doi: 10.2174/1573399810666140918121022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Kanhaiya Singh

17 Jan 2022

PONE-D-21-34818Identification of the shared gene signatures and pathways between sarcopenia and type 2 diabetes mellitusPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Song,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Mar 03 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Kanhaiya Singh, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

 “The National Natural Science Foundation of China (81901429).“

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed.

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

3. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

4. We note that Figure 1 in your submission contain copyrighted images. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

a. You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of  Figure 1 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license.

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

b. If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

5. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

Although the Reviewers have found this study interesting, they have recommended some modifications.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: While going through the manuscript. I found it very impressive. But it has some lacking which need to be addressed.

First, the name of those miRNA which are regulating the selected hub genes are missing, network is so condensed that it is very difficult to figure out the name of those regulatory miRNA. It would be better if name of miRNA regulating these hub genes will be incorporated in result as well as discussion part.

Second, It would be much better if a subnetwork will be extracted from the main network of TF-miRNA-mRNA which specifically include only hub genes and its associated miRNA and TF. That would increase the clarity of network due to reduced nodes number and also will be more informative. Main network can be considered as supplementary data.

Third, Why the author has decided to go with only one dataset in each case?

Reviewer #2: In this manuscript the authors are looking into sarcopenia and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) at the transcriptomic level. They have compared DEGs between the two conditions and identified common pathways. It has also been indicated that one condition can increase the risk of developing the other condition. The authors have also identified drugs that can be used as a potential treatment for both sarcopenia and T2DM.

Overall, the findings of this manuscript are well-supported by the data and the methods used are appropriate. The manuscript is also well-drafted. There are a few points to consider that I have outlined below:

1. Some terms and concepts have been explained in the materials and methods section. It will be better if they are explained either in the introduction or the results section.

2. Lines 139, ‘and its inhibiting translation’, please rephrase. It is confusing.

3. Line 153 should be ‘were obtained’.

4. Line 218, Table 1, please use borders for all the cells. The information currently looks haphazard.

5. Line 332, it is confusing. Please rephrase or clarify.

6. Line 354, should be ‘Acknowledgements’.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2022 Mar 10;17(3):e0265221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265221.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


7 Feb 2022

Editor

Comment: Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming.

Respond: Corrections have been made.

Comment: Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: “The National Natural Science Foundation of China (81901429).” Please state what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.” If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Respond: Corrections have been made in the cover letter.

Comment: In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

Respond: Corrections have been made in the cover letter.

Comment: We note that Figure 1 in your submission contain copyrighted images.

Respond: We have already changed Figure 1 to avoid the problem.

Comment: Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript.

Respond: Thanks, we have double checked the reference list. Reference [30] and [31] has been placed after original reference [43] in revised manuscript.

Reviewer 1

Comment: First, the name of those miRNA which are regulating the selected hub genes are missing, network is so condensed that it is very difficult to figure out the name of those regulatory miRNA. It would be better if name of miRNA regulating these hub genes will be incorporated in result as well as discussion part.

Second, It would be much better if a subnetwork will be extracted from the main network of TF-miRNA-mRNA which specifically include only hub genes and its associated miRNA and TF. That would increase the clarity of network due to reduced nodes number and also will be more informative. Main network can be considered as supplementary data.

Respond: The number of miRNA which regulated the selected hub genes was large, so we have displayed them in S10 table. Since the network of main TF-miRNA coregulatory network is so condensed, we have exhibited it as S9 Fig and extracted a subnetwork involving only hub genes and its associated miRNA and TF as Fig 7.

Comment: Third, Why the author has decided to go with only one dataset in each case?

Respond: Of course, combining information from multiple existing studies can increase the reliability and generalizability of results. However, concerns also exist at the same time. Heterogeneities caused by demographic, clinical and technical variables often exist across studies from different platform. Failure to consider these variables in the statistical models and meta-analysis can result in reduced statistical power or false positives. In this study, we chose only GSE1428 for sarcopenia and GSE166467 for T2DM to get preliminary result. We should also notice the shortcoming of the study. Firstly, analytical methods may limit the predictive capability of the result and new proof from future studies may renew current results. Secondly, our analyses are based on public datasets, and further researches about the detailed molecular mechanism are necessary.

doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050184

doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1265

Reviewer 2

Comment: Some terms and concepts have been explained in the materials and methods section. It will be better if they are explained either in the introduction or the results section.

Respond: Corrections have been made. TFs and miRNA are explained in the discussion part in revised manuscript.

Comment: Lines 139, ‘and its inhibiting translation’, please rephrase. It is confusing.

Respond: Corrections have been made.

Comment: Line 153 should be ‘were obtained’.

Respond: Corrections have been made.

Comment: Line 218, Table 1, please use borders for all the cells. The information currently looks haphazard.

Respond: Corrections have been made.

Comment: Line 332, it is confusing. Please rephrase or clarify.

Respond: Corrections have been made in revised manuscript.

Comment: Line 354, should be ‘Acknowledgements’.

Respond: In standard American English, “acknowledgments” is spelled without the additional “e.” In British English, and most places outside of North America, “acknowledgements” is spelled with the extra “e.” After we searched some papers published on PLOS ONE recently, we found that ‘Acknowledgments’ without “e” was mainly used.

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263301

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263344

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263307

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Kanhaiya Singh

28 Feb 2022

Identification of the shared gene signatures and pathways between sarcopenia and type 2 diabetes mellitus

PONE-D-21-34818R1

Dear Dr. Song,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Kanhaiya Singh, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Manuscript has been revised well and all the points have been addressed wisely. The manuscript can be considered for the publication

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Kanhaiya Singh

2 Mar 2022

PONE-D-21-34818R1

Identification of the shared gene signatures and pathways between sarcopenia and type 2 diabetes mellitus

Dear Dr. Song:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Kanhaiya Singh

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Normalization of the GSE1428 microarray data.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. The main TF-miRNA coregulatory network.

    The nodes with yellow diamonds are common DEGs, red round nodes represent miRNA and green round nodes indicate TF.

    (TIF)

    S1 Table. Differentially expressed genes.

    (XLSX)

    S2 Table. GO annotation analysis details.

    (XLSX)

    S3 Table. KEGG enrichment analysis details.

    (XLSX)

    S4 Table. WikiPathway enrichment analysis details.

    (XLSX)

    S5 Table. Reactome enrichment analysis details.

    (XLSX)

    S6 Table. BioCarta enrichment analysis details.

    (XLSX)

    S7 Table. Topological results for top three hub genes.

    (XLSX)

    S8 Table. Details of the main TF-miRNA coregulatory network.

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    Data are available from the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (accession numbers GSE1428 and GSE166467).


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES