To the Editor:
More than 1 in 4 individuals in the United States have now experienced a COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) infection. Symptomatic reinfection despite positive serology has been documented,1 , 2 but little is known about the impact of reinfection on subsequent natural immunity. In a study conducted prior to the omicron variant’s prevalence, vaccination added no additional protection to natural immunity in the first year; however, booster impact was not ascertained.3 In a cohort of health care professionals (HCPs), vaccination in previously infected individuals was associated with lower risk of reinfection over time.4 Some have argued that HCPs with prior infection should be exempt from vaccine mandates indefinitely.5
We identified 11 HCPs with a distinct third infection (Table ). Cases were captured via a robust program to identify and evaluate infected HCPs as previously described.6 All HCPs were employed by a large health care institution with sites in 4 states employing over 73,000 HCPs. The study was deemed exempt by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board (20-003887). Infections were classified as a repeat infection if occurring more than 90 days after a prior infection or if new COVID-19 symptoms began after complete resolution of prior symptoms. The 2 individuals reinfected within 90 days reported new anosmia. The median age was 27 years (range, 22 to 56 years), and 10 of the 11 HCPs were female. Of the first infections, 90.9% (10 of 11) occurred before the emergence of variants; 63.6% of second infections (7 of 11) occurred during delta variant predominance, and 90.9% of third infections (10 of 11) occurred during omicron prevalence. Vaccination status at the time of the 33 infections was unvaccinated in 20 (60.6%), booster overdue in 8 (24.2%), up to date in 4 (12.1%), or partially vaccinated in 1 (3.0%). Among the 11 HCPs, first, second, and third infections were asymptomatic in 2 (18.2%), 4 (36.4%), and 5 (45.4%), respectively. One second infection required hospitalization; no HCPs endorsed immunosuppression. The mean time to second infection was 314 days (95% CI, 238 to 390 days), while the mean interval between the second and third infection was 110 days (95% CI, 81 to 183 days) (P=.008 for difference in means).
Table 1.
Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 Reinfectionsa
| Age/sex, state | Infection dates,b test method, locally predominant variant,c vaccination status,d symptom status, other test reasone | Days between 1st and 2nd infection | Days between 2nd and 3rd infection | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26/F, Florida | 3/26/2020 | 8/2/2021 | 1/21/2022 | 494 | 172 |
| PCR | PCR | PCR | |||
| NA | ≥85% Delta | ≥85% Omicron | |||
| Unvaccinated | Unvaccinated | Unvaccinated | |||
| Symptomatic | Symptomatic | Asymptomatic | |||
| Occupational exposure | Household exposure | Surveillance | |||
| 23/F, Wisconsin | 9/7/2020 | 12/19/2021 | 1/29/2022 | 468 | 41 |
| PCR | PCR | PCR | |||
| NA | Mixed delta and omicron | ≥85% Omicron | |||
| Unvaccinated | Booster overdue | Booster Overdue | |||
| Symptomatic | Symptomatic | Symptomatic | |||
| Community exposure | |||||
| 32/F, Wisconsin | 10/19/2020 | 10/16/2021 | 1/24/2022 | 362 | 100 |
| PCR | PCR | Antigen (Flowflex) | |||
| NA | ≥85% Delta | ≥85% Omicron | |||
| Unvaccinated | Booster overdue | Booster overdue | |||
| Symptomatic | Symptomatic | Symptomatic | |||
| Household exposure | Household exposure | Community exposure | |||
| 25/F, Minnesota | 10/25/2020 | 9/24/2021 | 1/19/2022 | 334 | 117 |
| PCR | PCR | PCR | |||
| NA | ≥85% Delta | ≥85% Omicron | |||
| Unvaccinated | Unvaccinated | Unvaccinated | |||
| Symptomatic | Asymptomatic | Asymptomatic | |||
| Community exposure | Surveillance | ||||
| 32/F, Minnesota | 11/5/2020 | 10/4/2021 | 1/3/2022 | 333 | 91 |
| PCR | PCR | PCR | |||
| NA | ≥85% Delta | Mixed delta/omicron | |||
| Unvaccinated | Booster overdue | Booster overdue | |||
| Symptomatic | Asymptomatic | Symptomatic | |||
| Household exposure | |||||
| 43/M, Minnesota | 11/5/2020 | 6/30/2021 | 1/25/2022 | 237 | 209 |
| PCR | PCR | PCR | |||
| NA | ≥85% Alpha | ≥85% Omicron | |||
| Unvaccinated | Partially vaccinated | Booster overdue | |||
| Symptomatic | Symptomatic | Asymptomatic | |||
| 27/F, Minnesota | 11/7/2020 | 10/21/2021 | 1/22/22 | 348 | 93 |
| PCR | Antigen (On/Go) | PCR | |||
| NA | ≥85% Delta | ≥85% Omicron | |||
| Unvaccinated | Unvaccinated | Unvaccinated | |||
| Symptomatic | Symptomatic | Asymptomatic | |||
| Household exposure | Surveillance | ||||
| 25/F, Wisconsin | 11/28/2020 | 8/9/2021 | 1/16/2022 | 254 | 160 |
| PCR | PCR | PCR | |||
| NA | ≥85% Delta | ≥85% Omicron | |||
| Unvaccinated | Booster overdue | Up to date | |||
| Symptomatic | Symptomatic | Symptomatic | |||
| Posttravel | Household exposure | ||||
| 46/F, Minnesota | 12/17/2020 | 4/5/2021 | 1/22/2022 | 109 | 292 |
| PCR | PCR | PCR | |||
| NA | ≥85% Alpha | ≥85% Omicron | |||
| Unvaccinated | Up to date | Up to date | |||
| Symptomatic | Asymptomatic | Symptomatic | |||
| Pretravel | |||||
| 56/F, Minnesota | 1/30/2021 | 12/23/2021 | 1/22/2022 | 327 | 30 |
| PCR | PCR | PCR | |||
| NA | Mixed delta and omicron | ≥85% Omicron | |||
| Unvaccinated | Unvaccinated | Unvaccinated | |||
| Asymptomatic | Asymptomatic | Symptomatic | |||
| Surveillance | Surveillance | ||||
| 22/F, Minnesota | 3/2/2021 | 9/7/2021 | 1/27/2022 | 189 | 142 |
| PCR | PCR | PCR | |||
| ≥85% Alpha | ≥85% Delta | ≥85% Omicron | |||
| Unvaccinated | Unvaccinated | Up to date | |||
| Asymptomatic | Symptomatic | Asymptomatic | |||
| Surveillance | Surveillance | ||||
F, female; M, male; mRNA, messenger RNA; NA, not applicable; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.
Infection date is date of symptom onset or date of positive test result if asymptomatic.
Predominant circulating strain at the time of the infection in the individual’s state per nextstrain.org. If a single variant accounted for ≥85% of sequenced infections, that variant is listed alone. If no variant accounted for 85% of infections, all circulating strains identified at that time in that state are listed.
Vaccination status is “unvaccinated” when no doses have been received, “partially vaccinated” when one dose of mRNA vaccine has been received or a primary vaccination series was completed in the prior 14 days, “up to date” when a booster dose has been received or is not yet due (primary vaccination with mRNA vaccine was completed within the prior 5 months or Janssen vaccine within the prior 2 months), and “booster overdue” when primary vaccination with mRNA vaccine was completed more than 5 months earlier or Janssen vaccine more than 2 months earlier.
Postexposure tests were performed within 14 days of prolonged close contact with a communicable source without recommended personal protective equipment. Surveillance testing programs were in place starting September 2, 2020, for workers in long-term care facilities and January 17, 2022, for unvaccinated staff.
This case series is subject to limitations. Following current public health guidance, postinfection testing to document polymerase chain reaction clearance was not routinely performed. However, persistence of polymerase chain reaction positivity longer than 90 days in immunocompetent individuals is unusual. Second, most third infections occurred during the omicron surge, and other variants may not display the same immune evasion to natural immunity. Third, the number of infections is too small to draw conclusions about the protective effect of prior infection or vaccination. Finally, samples were not available for genetic sequencing to confirm the variant(s) causing infection.
This case series provides new evidence of the potential for multiple reinfections in immunocompetent individuals. We noted a shorter interval between the second and third infections compared with the interval between the first and second infections, recognizing that almost all third infections occurred while the omicron variant was the predominant circulating strain. Omicron is known to partially evade vaccine-mediated and natural immunity.7 Although infection and vaccination appear to impart short-term protection of a similar magnitude,8 vaccination may still boost immunity or provide protection against new variants in individuals with one or more natural infections.
Acknowledgments
Author contributions: Dr Swift—conceptualization, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing/original draft, visualization, and supervision; Dr Hainy—investigation, data curation, and writing/reviewing and editing; Dr Sampathkumar—validation, writing/reviewing and editing; Dr Breeher—conceptualization, validation, and writing/reviewing and editing.
Footnotes
Potential Competing Interests: Dr Swift reports support from Pfizer Inc via Duke University for the HERO Together COVID-19 vaccine adverse event registry. The other authors report no competing interests.
References
- 1.Gargouri S., Souissi A., Abid N., et al. Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 symptomatic reinfection in four healthcare professionals from the same hospital despite the presence of antibodies. Int J Infect Dis. 2022;117:146–154. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zhang J., Ding N., Ren L., et al. COVID-19 reinfection in the presence of neutralizing antibodies. Natl Sci Rev. 2021;8(4) doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwab006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.León T.M., Dorabawila V., Nelson L., et al. COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations by COVID-19 vaccination status and previous COVID-19 diagnosis—California and New York, May-November 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71(4):125–131. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7104e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Shrestha N.K., Burke P.C., Nowacki A.S., Terpeluk P., Gordon S.M. Necessity of COVID-19 vaccination in persons who have already had COVID-19. [published online ahead of print January 13, 2022]. Clin Infect Dis. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 5.McGonagle D.G. Health-care workers recovered from natural SARS-CoV-2 infection should be exempt from mandatory vaccination edicts. Lancet Rheumatol. 2022;4(3) doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(22)00038-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Breeher L., Boon A., Hainy C., Murad M.H., Wittich C., Swift M. A framework for sustainable contact tracing and exposure investigation for large health systems. Mayo Clin Proc. 2020;95(7):1432–1444. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Altarawneh HN, Chemaitelly H, Hasan MR, et al. Protection against the omicron variant from previous SARS-CoV-2 infection [published online ahead of print February 9, 2022]. N Engl J Med. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2200133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 8.Kojima N., Shrestha N.K., Klausner J.D. A systematic review of the protective effect of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection on repeat infection. Eval Health Prof. 2021;44(4):327–332. doi: 10.1177/01632787211047932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
