Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Heliyon logoLink to Heliyon
. 2022 Mar 4;8(3):e09060. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09060

Status of disease prevalence, drugs and antibiotics usage in pond-based aquaculture at Narsingdi district, Bangladesh: A major public health concern and strategic appraisal for mitigation

Md Abu Kawsar a,∗, Md Tariqul Alam a, Debasish Pandit b, Md Moshiur Rahman c, Mamun Mia d, Anuradha Talukdar d, Tofael Ahmed Sumon c
PMCID: PMC8913307  PMID: 35284681

Abstract

This research aimed to investigate the present status of disease prevalence and usage of aqua drugs for various aquaculture operations in the Narsingdi region of Bangladesh. Data were collected through the market survey, preset questionnaire interview, personal contact, and participatory rural appraisal tools. Amongst the respondents, the maximum percentages were found practicing mixed cultures of carp, tilapia, and pangas. The respondents suggested that epizootic ulcerative syndrome, saprolegniasis, streptococcosis, tail and fin rot and bacillary necrosis are common fish diseases in the area. About 140 drugs of different companies used in aquaculture for different purposes such as disease treatment, growth enhancement, water quality improvement, toxic gas removal, improvement of feed conversion ratio. Zeolite, rotenone, disinfectant, oxygen precursors, ammonia reducers, and probiotics were applied for pond preparation, water, and soil quality maintenance, while 30 different antibiotics were used for the purpose of treatment. Among the available antibiotics, oxytetracycline, ciprofloxacin, enrofloxacin, erythromycin, sulphadiazine, and trimethoprim were found extensively used by the fish farmers. Four enzymes and eighteen growth promoters were identified as being utilized to enhance digestion and boost up the production. This study elicited various issues connected with application and administration of such aqua chemicals, including farmers’ ignorance about their usage, proper doses, application methods, withdrawal period, and the human health concerns associated with their irresponsible use. However, the consequences of these chemical products to the environment, animal health, and human health required further study for the betterment of mankind.

Keywords: Antibiotics, Antimicrobial resistance, Fish health management, Probiotics

Highlights

  • •

    EUS, saprolegniasis, streptococcosis are the most prevalent disease in Narsingdi district.

  • •

    Around 140 aqua drugs and chemicals are currently in use for treatment of those diseases.

  • •

    About 40 different antibiotics are found in use by the farm managers.

  • •

    A proper education of using drugs and chemicals is recommended for the farmers.

Antibiotics; Antimicrobial resistance; Fish health management; Probiotics.

1. Introduction

Aquaculture already accounts for 62.5% of the world's fish production for human consumption (FAO, 2018). Bangladesh is now one of the world's major aquaculture producers, with an annual production of 2.58 million metric tons in 2019-20, and standing as the fifth leading inland aquaculture producer globally (DoF, 2020). This sector (both culture and capture fishery) of Bangladesh produces 4.5 million metric tons of fish, contributing 3.52 % and 26.37% of the national and agricultural GDP (Gross Domestic Product), respectively. More than 12 % of people of Bangladesh are involved in fisheries and aquaculture activities on a full- and part-time basis for their subsistence (DoF, 2019). Bangladesh's aquaculture sector is expanding since the state's inland output is only marginally lower than China's. Indeed, the industry serves as a second source of export revenue for the government (Shamsuzzaman et al., 2017, 2020). The Aquaculture industry has expanded, varied, increased, and mechanically commendable in Bangladesh over the last decades. Chemicals are, in fact, the critical components of thriving farming and have been utilized in numerous structures over centuries (Faruk et al., 2008). Aqua drugs are crucial for aquatic animal health management, pond installation, water and soil quality management, feed formulation, enrichment of natural production, reproductive manipulation, live fish transportation, growth stimulation, processing, and end-product value addition (Subasinghe et al., 1996; GESAMP, 1997).

Apart from the massive use of antibiotics, aquaculture uses a variety of medicines to keep fish healthy and produce more. Potassium permanganate, sodium chloride, malachite green, formalin, glutaraldehyde, methylene blue, and hydrogen peroxide are the most frequently utilized compounds (Plumb, 1992; Sumon et al., 2020). Sodium chloride is a traditional remedy especially for treating fungal and parasitic infections in fish (Phillips, 1996). Formalin is a versatile chemical that is used to treat fungal infections as well as flush fish and fish eggs in hatcheries. Potassium permanganate (KMnO4) is the powerful oxidizer that's been certified for use in ponds for external bacterial and protozoan infestations on skin, gills, and fins (Floyd, 1993; Plumb, 1992). Antibiotics were used in aquaculture for more than 50 years to treat bacterial infections in fish (Shamsuzzaman and Biswas, 2012). Recent research has shown that antibiotic use in aquaculture and the aquatic ecosystem has been linked to the development of antimicrobial resistance (Rahman et al., 2009). Pesticides like organophosphates, rotenone, and saponin are also employed to treat disease in aquaculture. Trichlorfon, melalhion, and diptarex are the most often used organophosphates in finfish aquaculture to prevent ectoparasitic crustacean infestation. Organophosphates' substantial neurotoxicity can have substantial negative impacts on the health safety of fish farm laborers (Alderman et al., 1994).

In Bangladesh, farmed aquatic animals were found to be infected with a variety of diseases (Karim and Stellwagen, 1998; Faruk et al., 2004; BFRI, 1999). Due to a lack of vaccination and good health management practices, disease problems in Bangladesh's aquaculture business remain unresolved. Experts advised that the fish vaccinations for disease resistance prevent death and economic loss (Assefa and Abunna, 2018), but in this region, this vaccination initiative needs a massive process, infrastructure, funding, and timeline (Asif et al., 2021). To combat fish diseases, farmers apply a variety of chemicals and medicines. Regrettably, monitoring drugs and antibiotics used in the country's aquaculture industry has received only a little attention, resulting in the aquaculture sector suffering. Farmers have been urged by chemists and representatives from various pharmaceutical companies to use their medicines on this occasion. However, the majority of the farmers indiscriminately apply such chemicals without understanding their requirements, efficacies, and method of administration and considering this issue; the current study was carried out to assess the status of disease prevalence and to identify the different types of chemicals and antibiotics used in the health management of fish and their purposes, dosages with potential concerns.

2. Materials and methods

The survey was undertaken randomly in 3 hatcheries, 7 nurseries, 90 grow-out farms, 20 medicine outlets, and 10 aquaculture specialists from various fish feed and pharmaceutical industries from January to December 2020 in the Narsingdi district of Bangladesh (Figure 1). The study area was selected because the Narsingdi district is well-known for its semi-intensive commercial fish farming, and no study on this issue has been conducted in this area. Properly structured questionnaires were designed and pre-tested by several farmers in the surrounding areas before collecting the primary data. The questionnaire focused mainly on the status of fish farming systems, diseases prevalence, affected species and therapeutants they used. Fish diseases were identified based on physical appearance and farmer's observation about infected fish. Through photographs of clinical signs, the interviewer helped them in identifying the diseases. During pre-testing, all essential information regarding the objective's completion was given much thought. Primary data were collected by a survey of farmer households in selected sites after the final questionnaire was improved, using participatory rural appraisal techniques like direct farmer interviews, personal contact, focus group discussions, and crosschecks. Several focus group discussions were held in 6 Upazilas (sub-districts) within the Narsingdi region, with each group having 15 and 25 members. The district fisheries office, upazila fisheries office, private aquaculture professionals, and medicine shops owner provided valuable secondary data as well as the available previous literatures were reviewed extensivelywhich includes online scientific articles, government surveys, books, international studies, and media reports on aqua drugs and antibiotics used in land-based aquaculture.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Map showing study areas in Narsingdi district. A total of 6 upazilas i.e., Belabo, Monohardi, Narsingdi South, Palash, Raipur and Shibpur were investigated.

The study subsequently compiled, accumulated, and analyzed all the data in MS Excel version 2010 and represented in tabular and descriptive statistical techniques.

2.1. Ethical statement

All procedures performed in studies involving animals (fish) were in accordance with the ethical standards of the “Sylhet Agricultural University Ethical Committee”. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

3. Results

3.1. Health management tools and culture strategies

The studied farms in this experiment are assigned into six categories. Such as, polyculture of carp, tilapia and pangas, polyculture of tilapia and pangas, polyculture of koi and shingi, mono culture of shingi, koi and all others were categorized as others (Figure 2). In carps, monosex tilapia, and pangas polyculture, the maximum percentages were found at Belabo (∼70%), Shibpur (∼60%) and Narsingdi (∼60%). The significant number of Vietnamese koi monoculture was recorded in Palash, Monohardi, and Raipura with a percentage of about 50, 45 and 35 respectively. Stocking density and culture duration were found varied with culture strategies. Almost all culture system had a duration of 3–6 months and used commercially manufactured feed. It was found that the stocking density of carp, tilapia and pangas were 60,540 fry/ha, monoculture of koi were 748803 fry/ha, monoculture of shingi with 741315 fry/ha, mixed culture of koi and shingi with 864867 fry/ha, and mixed culture of tilapia and pangas had 56834 fry/ha.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Categories of fish cultured in the study area.

3.2. Major aqua drugs used in pond preparation

For pond preparation and improvement of the water quality of culture ponds, a variety of conventional and emerging chemical compounds are available on the market. For pond preparation, chemicals like zeolite, lime, biofertilizer and rotenone were applied by the farmers. Table 1 provides a list of the dose suggested by manufacturer and supplier information, of these compounds, along with their active ingredients. Lime and zeolite were found to be the most extensively (51% farmers) (Figure 3) used chemicals. The second highest use of chemicals covered by the application of lime only by 31% of the farmers.

Table 1.

Chemicals used for pond preparation and water quality management.

Trade name Active ingredients Therapeutic class Dose (Kg/hectare) Source
Zeofresh SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3, CaO, MgO, Na2O, K2O, TiO2, Zeolite 59 Square Pharmaceuticals Ltd (Limited).
ACME's zeolite SiO2, A12O3, Fe2O3, CaO, MgO, Na2O Zeolite 62 The ACME Laboratories Ltd.
Zeopel SiO2-72%, A12O3-12%, Fe2O3-1.9%, CaO-3.7%, MgO-1.2%, K2O-3.8%,Na2O-0.65%, MnO-0.08%, P2O3-0.03%, Cr2O3-0.03% Zeolite 59 SK + F Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Zeolite SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3, CaO, MgO, Na2O Zeolite 62 National Agricare Imp. Exp. Ltd.
Zeo-Ren SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3, CaO, MgO, Na2O, K2O, P, Mn Zeolite 62 Renata Ltd.
Zeo prime SiO2-66%, A12O3-20%, Fe2O3-3%, CaO-6%, MgO-3%, K2O-3%,Na2O-4%, MnO-0.05%, P2O3-0.16% Zeolite 59 SK + F Bangladesh Ltd.
JV zeolite SiO2, A12O3, Fe2O3, CaO, MgO, Na2O, K2O and Mn Zeolite 54 Eon Animal Health Ltd.
Zeolite gold SiO3, MgO, CaO2 etc. Zeolite 62 Fishtech BD Ltd.
Geotox SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3, CaO, MgO, Na2O Zeolite 62 Novartis Animal Health
Mega zeo plus SiO2, A12O3, Fe2O3, CaO, MgO, Na2O, K2O and Mn Zeolite 49 ACI Animal Health Ltd.
Lime CaO, Ca(OH)2 247 Chemical Seller
Aqua lime CaCO3, Ca(OH)2 247 ACI Animal Health
Matrix SiO2, A12O3, Fe2O3, CaO, MgO, Na2O Sodium alumino silicate 25 Eon Animal Health Ltd.
Aqua pure SiO2 - 60–65%, Al2O3- 18–22%, CaO- 15–18%, MgO- 2–5%, Fe2O3- 2–3%, Na2O-1-2% Sodium alumino silicate 25 Square Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Hunter Degueline, tephrosin and toxicarol as rotenoids Rotenon 15 Eon Animal Health Products Ltd.
Aquagreen-G Sea weed extract, enzyme precursors and micronutrients Biofertilizer 12 Square Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Robot SiO2 - 45–60%, Al2O3- 20–25%, CaO- 15–20%, MgO- 2–5%, Fe2O3- 2–5%, Na2O-1-2% Zeolite 25 Catapol Bioscience Ltd.
Matrix super Probiotics, Yucca and Zeolite Zeolite 25 Fish World
Open in a new tab

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Drugs and chemicals used (%) for pond preparation.

3.3. Chemicals used as disinfectants

In surveyed area, land-based aquaculture operations reported to experience extensive use of disinfectants. According to the company's information leaflet, Timsen, Aquakleen, Sansure, Pathonil, and many other drugs are effective in both preventing and destroying bacterial and fungal diseases, as well as destroying pathogens. Salt, and commercial disinfectant specially BKC (Benzal Konium Chloride) were found to be the most widely used (41%) disinfectant (Figure 4) to treat bacterial and fungal infections. The disinfectants indicated in Table 2 were found in the market. Moreover, some other disinfectants were found in use but with only a small percentage, such as, commercial disinfectant (28%), salt (12%) and potassium permanganate (10%) etc.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Disinfectants used in the study areas.

Table 2.

Chemicals used as disinfectant.

Trade name Active ingredients Dose Usages (According to supplier) Source
Timsen n-Alkyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride 40%, stabilized urea 60% 0.6 ​kg (kg)/hectare Preventing agent against viral, bacterial, fungal and parasitic pathogen. Eon Animal Health Ltd
Aquakleen tetradecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide: 6.6 g, BKC-83 ​g, amino nitrogen-10000ppm 2.47L L/hectare Square Pharmaceuticals Ltd
Virex Potassium peroxymono sulphate 50% 1.49L/hectare ACI Animal Health
Sansure BKC-80% 0.74L/hectare Opsonin Pharma Ltd
Pathonil Alkyl dimethylbenzyl ammonium chloride 80%, BKC 80% 1.49L/hectare ACI Animal Health
Polgard plus 3-Methyl and 4-Methyl two chain brominated compound 1.23L/hectare Fish tech (BD) Ltd.
Micronil Benzalkonium Chloride 80% 1.48 L/ha Eskayef pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Povidon aqua Povidon-Iodine USP 2.47L/hectare Eskayef pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Povicef Povidon-Iodine 10% 2.47L/hectare Opsonin pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Bactrisol-Gold Alkyl benzul dimethylbenzyl ammonium chloride 80%, BKC 80% 0.74L/hectare First Agro International
Unidine Alkyl phenoxy polyglycol ether iodine complex 0.88L/hectare ACI Animal Health
Potash KMnO4 2–20 kg/ha Chemical seller
Salt NaCl 62–247 kg/hectare Chemical seller
Bleaching powder Chlorine 2.47–24.71 kg/ha Chemical Seller
Pathoside plus Alkyl benzyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride 80%, Carrier 20% 0.74L/hectare Fish World
Germidin plus Iodine 20% with activants 250–500 ml/acre KRF Agro Care
Farmsafe Dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride 5%, Yucca extract-q.s, ethanol-q.s, 0.61–1.23L/hectare Catapol Bioscience Ltd.
GPC 8 Glutaraldehyde patent formula 0.74L/hectare Reneta Ltd.
Aqua cleaner plus Kostikthyosulphate, Secondary alken sulphonet, sodium salt, UTDA, Methlium 2.47L/hectare Fish World
Microbite Alkyl benzyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride 80%, BKC 80% 0.74L/hectare Nutrihealth LTD
Aquaxide plus Alkyl benzyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride 330 ​g, Glutaraldehyde 300 ​g, water q.s.p. 1litre 0.74L/hectare Advanced Agrotech Ltd.
Virokill aqua Alkyl benzyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride 80%, water q.s.p....1Litre 0.74L/hectare Advanced Agrotech Ltd.
Eco safe Alkyl benzyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride 80%, Excipient q.s.p. 500ml 1.48L/hectare Nutri Forte Ltd.
Open in a new tab

3.4. Chemical used for oxygen supply

The study found several products with identical active ingredients but under different namesin the study area for enhancing oxygen levels in the aquaculture pond. Oxidizing agents, sodium carbonates, and hydrogen peroxide are the main bioactive constituents of those chemicals (Table 3). In the study area, farmers used 12 different oxygen enhancers such as Oxy-Ren (24%), Oxy more (18%), Oxy pond (16%), Oxy gold (16%) and many other brands in their ponds (Figure 5).

Table 3.

Chemical used for oxygen supply.

Trade name Active ingredients Dose Source
Oxymax Sodium carbonate, H2O2 1.23–2.47 ​kg/hectare Eon animal health products Ltd.
Oxy more Sodium carbonate per-oxyhydrate 1.23–2.47 ​kg/hectare SK + F Bangladesh Ltd.
Oxy gold Sodium percarbonate 1.23–2.47 ​kg/hectare Fishtech Ltd.
Oxy-A Sodium percarbonate 1.23–2.47 ​kg/hectare The Acme Laboratories Ltd.
Best oxygen Sodium percarbonate 0.61-1.23/hectare Univet ltd.
Oxylife Sodium percarbonate 1.23–2.47 ​kg/hectare Square pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Bio ox Sodium carbonate,H2O2 1.23–2.47 ​kg/hectare ACI animal health
ACI-OX Sodium carbonate,H2O2 1.23–2.47 ​kg/hectare ACI animal health
Oxy flow Sodium carbonate,H2O2 1.23–2.47 ​kg/hectare Elanco Ltd.
Oxy-Ren Sodium carbonate 1.23–2.47 ​kg/hectare Renata Ltd.
Oxypond Sodium percarbonate 1.23–2.47 kg/hectare Fish world
Oxypol Sodium percarbonate 1.23–4.94 kg/hectare Catapol Bioscience Ltd.
Open in a new tab

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Oxygen enhancers used in the study areas.

3.5. Antibiotics for disease treatment

There were 30 antibiotics found in the study area with various trade names and utilized by fish farmers during the current investigation (Table 4). The active components of these antibiotics are mostly oxytetracycline, chlortetracycline, sulphadiazine trimethoprim, amoxicillin, and sulphamethoxazole. Oxytetracycline (26%), Erythromycin (19%), and Sulphadyazine (17%) were found to be the most commonly used antibiotics, followed by Ciprofloxacin (14%), Enrofloxacin (9%), Chlortetracycline (6%), Amoxicillin (5%), and some other antibiotics with a lower frequency of use (Figure 6). Most farmers are found ignorant about the mode of action of a particular chemical in the current investigation. As a result, while treating a disease, they first test one chemical, and if it doesn't work, they try another. They calculate the dosages of a given chemical based on their own experiences, the instructions on the packet, if any, and the advice of chemical vendors.

Table 4.

Antibiotics used for disease treatment.

Trade name Active ingredients Dose Source
Otetra-vet 20% Oxytetracycline 5 gm/kg feed Square pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Biomycin Oxytetracycline 5 gm/kg feed Biopharma Ltd
Aquamycine Oxytetracycline 5 gm/Kg feed ACI Animal Health Ltd.
Renamycin Oxytetracycline 5 gm/kg feed Renata Ltd.
Oxy-D Vet Oxytetracycline 20% doxycycline 10% 5-10 gm/kg feed Eon Animal Health Ltd.
EST-Vet Erythromycin thiocyanate, Sulphadyazine, trimethoprim 3-5 gm/kg feed Eon Animal Health Ltd.
Cotrim-vet Sulphamethoxazole, trimethoprim 5 gm/kg feed Square pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Sulprim-vet Sulphadyazine, trimethoprim 3–5 ml/kg feed Square pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Renatrim Sulphadyazine, trimethoprim 3–5 ml/kg feed Renata Ltd
AT-vet Sulphadyazine, trimethoprim 3–5 ml/kg feed ACME Laboratories Ltd
Erisen-vet Erythromycin, sulphadyazine, Trimethoprim 5 gm/kg feed Square pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Micronid Erythromycin, sulphadyazine, trimethoprim 5 gm/kg feed Renata Ltd.
Ciprocin-Vet Ciprofloxacin 5 ml/kg feed Square Pharmaceuticals Ltd
Turbonid Erythromycin, sulphadyazine, trimethoprim 5 gm/kg feed Eskayef pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Renaquine Flumequine 20% 3–5 ml/kg feed Renata Ltd
Levomax Levofloxacin 10% 5 ml/kg feed Eskayef pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Maxtor Chlortetracycline 45% 5 gm/kg feed Eskayef pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Eska'CTC Chlortetracycline 20% 5 gm/kg feed Eskayef pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Enroflox DS Enrofloxacin BP 20% 3–5 ml/kg feed Eskayef pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Augment vet Amoxicillin trihydrate BP& clavulanate BP 5 gm/kg feed Eskayef pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Ciproflox Ciprofloxacin 10% 5 ml/kg feed Eskayef Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Bactitap Oxytetracycline hydrochloride 5 gm/kg feed ACI Animal Health Ltd.
Eryvet Erythromycin thiocyanate, Sulphadyazine, trimethoprim 5 gm/kg feed ACI Animal Health
FRA C12 l- Monolaurin & essential oil 5 ml/kg feed ACI Animal Health
Ciprovet Ciprofloxacin 10% 5 ml/kg feed Eon animal health Product Ltd.
Eon CTC Chlortetracycline 20% 5 gm/kg feed Eon animal health Product Ltd.
CF-vet-20 Ciprofloxacin 5 gm/kg feed Prapti Animal Health
Novoflor Florfenicol 1–2 ml/kg feed Eskayef Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Cidaflox Ciprofloxacin 5 ml/kg feed Opsonin pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Flumequine Flumequine BP 20% 5 ml/kg feed Eon animal health Product Ltd.
Open in a new tab

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Antibiotics used in the study area.

3.6. Chemicals used as growth promoters

A variety of chemicals were found available in the market used in aquaculture as growth promoters and production boosters. Most of the growth promoters found in the market contain vitamins, minerals, amino acids, fatty acids, antioxidants, and prebiotics. Similarly, some others were found using for enhancing growth, spawning performance, disease resistance, and bio-availability of the feed supplements (Table 5). Current research revealed that 18 growth promoters were available in the study area. Such as, Megavit Aqua (17%), Spa (15%), Charger Gel and Nutrigel (13%) were the most common brands of growth promoters used by the farmers (Figure 7).

Table 5.

List of chemicals used as growth promoter.

Trade name Active ingredients Dose Source
Megavit Aqua Vitamin, mineral and amino acid supplement 1 gm/kg feed Elanco Ltd.
Charger Gel 1-3 D-Glucan, Polysaccharides, Btain, Beta Glucan 6-8 gm/Kg feed Fishtech (BD) Ltd.
Aqua bind Essential amino acid, omega-3 & omega-6 fatty acid 5-15 gm/kg feed Square Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Vitamix F aqua Vitamin, mineral and amino acid 2.5 kg/ton feed ACME laboratories Ltd.
Acimix super-fish Vitamin mineral, antioxidant 1 kg/ton feed ACI Animal Health
Spa Protein, Cholesterol carotenoid, Vit-D, Ca 10-15 gm/kg feed Eon Animal Health
Nutrimax Vitamin, mineral 1 gm/kg feed SK + F Bangladesh Ltd
Square Aquamix Vitamins, minerals, and amino acids, prebiotics, yeast, and antioxidant 1 gm/kg feed Square Pharmaceuticals Ltd
Eon Fish Grower Vitamin and mineral premix 1.5–3 gm/kg feed Eon Animal Health Ltd.
Aqua boost Organic acid and ß-glucan 500 gm/MT feed Elanco Ltd.
Protifish 18 essential amino acid and minerals 1–5 ml/kg feed Eskayef pharmaceuticals Ltd
Nutrigel Feed binder with vitamin, mineral & probiotic 5–10 ml/kg feed Eskayef pharmaceuticals Ltd
Realbind Binder with all essential qualities 10 ml/kg feed Reneta Ltd.
Growth gel Protein, omega-3 & omega-6 fatty acid, cholesterol, Calcium, Vitamin D3, Carotenoid. 10–15 ml/kg feed ACI Animal Health
Amino plus Amino acid, Multivitamins, DCP, probiotics, Trace minerals 3-5 gm/kg feed Fish World
Vita power Amino acid and Multivitamin 5 ml/kg feed Fishtech (BD) Ltd.
Eskalina Organic spirulina 100% 1-10 gm/kg feed Eskayef pharmaceuticals Ltd
Rapid grow Multivitamins 3-5 gm/kg feed Fishtech (BD) Ltd.
Open in a new tab

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Growth promoters used in the study area.

3.7. Probiotics used in aquaculture

The current study showed that 42% of fish farmers applied 11 different brands of probiotics, such as Pond care (27%), Aqua Star Pond (19%), Profs (17%), and Safegut (14%) and many others (Figure 8) to control disease-causing bacteria, adsorb toxic gases, improve water and soil quality parameters, and promote the proliferation of beneficial microbes. According to respective probiotics companies, they include a variety of beneficial bacteria at different concentrations, such as Bacillus sp., Rhodococcus sp., Rodobacter sp., Streptococcus faecalis, and many others (Table 6).

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

Probiotics used in the study area.

Table 6.

Probiotics used for fish health management.

Trade name Active ingredients Dose Source
Profs Bacillus sp. and Padiococcus sp. 0.37–0.52 ​kg/hectare Eon Animal Health Ltd.
Bio plus Bacillus sp. and Rhodopseudomonas sp. 3.70–4.94 L/ha ACI Animal Health
Aqua star pond Bacillus sp., Pediococcus sp., Enterococcus sp., Paracoccus sp. and organic career 0.5–1 kg/ha Renata Ltd.
Pond care Bacillus sp., Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus oryzae 0.12 ​kg/hectare SK + F Bangladesh Ltd.
Biomax power Bacillus subtilis
and eight other beneficial bacteria		 7.41–9.88 kg/ha Square Pharmaceuticals Ltd
Protox aqua Rhodopseudomonas sp. 4.94–7.41 L/ha Square Pharmaceuticals Ltd
Safegut Lactic acid bacillus, Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus licheniformes, Aspergillus oryzae, Aspergillus niger, Saccharomyces boulardii, vitamin, and enzyme 3 gm/kg feed Eskayef pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Aqua photo Rhodopseudomonas sp., Bacillus subtilis 4.94–7.41 L/ha ACI Animal Health
Aquazyme Saccharomyces sp., Bacillus sp., Sodium sulphate, Polyvynail alcohol, starch, hydred, selenium, magnesium, and silicate. 0.5–1 gm/kg feed Eon Animal Health Ltd.
GPA Multi species probiotics 0.5–1 gm/kg feed Opsonin pharmaceuticals Ltd.
IKI-IKI Bacillus sp. and Padiococcus sp. 0.37 kg/ha Opsonin pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Open in a new tab

3.8. Chemicals used for obnoxious gas removal

A variety of toxic gas elimination agents are used by the farmers in their culture ponds. In this study 42% of the farmers used Yucca plant extract to remove toxic gas, 33% used a combination of Yucca and Bacillus sp., 21% just Bacillus sp., and 4% used other chemicals (Figure 9). About sixteen toxic gas removers with various trade names were identified (Table 7).

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Open in a new tab

Gas reducers used in the study area.

Table 7.

Chemicals used for toxic gas removal.

Trade name Active ingredients Dose Source
Bio-Aqua-50 Yucca plant extract, saponin components glyco components 0.44–0.51L/hectare Eon animal health
Gasonex plus Na-lorile ether sulphate 0.49–0.98 kg/ha Fish tech. (BD) Ltd.
Aqua Magic Azotabactor chorococcum, Bacillus subtillis, Candida utilis 0.98 kg/ha Fish tech (BD)Ltd.
Gastrap Lactic acid Bacillus, Bacillus subtillis and Enzymes 0.49 kg/ha Square pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Ammonil Yucca plant extract, Bacillus subtillis, Candida utilis 0.24–0.49 kg/ha Elanco Ltd.
Pondkleen Extract of Yucca schidigera 0.74L/hectare ACI Animal Health
Ukasol aqua Yucca schidigera 0.74L/hectare Eskayef pharmaceuticals Ltd
Gasonil Bacillus subtillis, Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus polymyxa, Bacillus coagulans, Yucca 30% 0.37–0.74 kg/ha Eskayef pharmaceuticals Ltd
Biopond SiO2-38_45%, A12O3-33-36%, Fe2O3-1-2%, MgO-0.5%, TiO2-1-2%, FeSO4, MnSO4, Cao, V2O3, CaSO4 and Bacillus subtillis, Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus polymyxa, Bacillus megaterium 2.47–4.94 kg/ha Eskayef pharmaceuticals Ltd
Aqua4 Zeolite, probiotics, enzyme & yucca 7.41–9.88 kg/ha Eskayef pharmaceuticals Ltd
Ammo Check Extract of Yucca schidigera 0.74–0.98 L/ha Navana Phamaceuticals Ltd.
Bio-Aqua plus Extract of Yucca schidigera plant and probiotics 0.49 L/ha Fish World
First Yucca Gold Extract of Yucca schidigera 0.74L/hectare First Agro International
Gaskit-L Yucca schidigera plant extract, enzyme, Bacillus subtillis 0.74L/hectare CATAPOL bioscience Ltd.
Gaskit-X Yucca and others 0.74L/hectare CATAPOL bioscience Ltd.
Yuka Extract of Yucca schidigera 0.74L/hectare Opsonin pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Bioaqua Extract of Yucca schidigera 0.74L/hectare Nutrihealth LTD
Open in a new tab

3.9. The enzymes used in aquaculture

Farmers in the study area applied four types of enzymes (Table 8) viz. Biozyme (34%), Acmezyme (27%), Polzyme (23%) and Finzyme (16%) (Figure 10) to boost up the endogenous enzyme activity, dry matter and energy digestibility, growth, survival, intestinal health, and to improve feed conversion ratio.

Table 8.

Enzymes used in aquaculture.

Trade name Active ingredients Dose Source
Biozyme Amylase, β-glucanase, lipase, protease, and hemicellulase 0.5gm/kg feed Fishtech (BD) Limited.
Acmezyme Cellulase, zylanase, protease, amylase, phytase, pectinase, hemicellulase, and lypase, 1-3 gm/kg feed ACME Laboratories Ltd.
Polzyme Protease, cellulase xylanase, lipase, and amylase 1–3 ml/kg feed Square Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Finzyme Cellulase, zylanase, protease, amylase, phytase, pectinase, b-glucanase, and lypase 1-5 gm/kg feed Eskayef Pharmaceuticals Ltd
Open in a new tab

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Open in a new tab

Enzymes used in the study area.

3.10. Antiparasitic agents used in aquaculture

The farmers applied eight brands of antiparasitic agents such as Verkil vet, Acimec1% solution, Delitrix etc. in their pond to kill various types of harmful external parasites in the research area (Table 9). The primary active ingredients of the available antiparasitics are ivermectin, deltamethrin, cypermethrin, and trichlorfon which are used by 47%, 37%, 7%, and 6% farmers, respectively (Figure 11).

Table 9.

Antiparasitics used in aquaculture.

Trade name Active ingredients Dose(L/Meter/hectare) Source
Verkil vet Ivermectin 1% 0.82 Eskayef Phamaceuticals Ltd.
Acimec1% solution Ivermectin 1% 2.46 ACI Animal health
Delitrix Deltramethrin 2.8% 0.41-0.82 Fishtech (BD) Ltd.
Paratrix Deltramethrin 1.75% 0.41-0.82 Advanced Agrotech Bangladeah
Argulex Trichlorfon 40% 6.56-8.2 Eon Aquaculture Ltd.
Sumithion Cypermethrin 4.1–5.74 Sumito Chemical Company Ltd.
First killer Deltramethrin 2.8% 0.82 First Agro International
Parasite plus Deltramethrin 2.5% 0.41 Fish World
Open in a new tab

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Open in a new tab

Antiparasitics used in the study area.

3.11. Common diseases reported

The current investigation identified major clinical signs in diseased fish were red spots and lesions on the body, pop-eyes, abdominal distension, ulcers on the tail, fin, and lower abdominal side. Pop-eyes, reddish ulcers, cotton like fungal growth and abdomen distension were found commonly in Carp, Tilapia, Pangas, koi and shingi. In the study area, the most prevalent diseases were epizootic ulcerative syndrome (90%), saprolegniasis (90%), streptococcosis (80%), fin and tail rot (70%), and bacillary necrosis (60%) with some other diseases being observed with lower incidence (Table 10).

Table 10.

Prevalence of disease and antimicrobial used in the study area.

Disease Respondent n = 100 Infected species Therapeutants they used
Streptococcosis 80% Tilapia Erythromycin with commercial disinfectant
Bacillary Necrosis of Pangasius (BNP) 60% Catfish Sulphadyazine and trimethoprim with disinfectant
Abdominal dropsy 50% Tilapia and catfish Oxytetracycline with enzyme
Fin and Tail Rot 70% Tilapia, Carp and catfish Ciprofloxacin with disinfectant
Epizootic Ulcerative Syndrome (EUS) 90% Carp, tilapia, koi and catfish Oxytetracycline or amoxicillin with disinfectant
Saprolegniasis 90% Koi Amoxicillin with disinfectant
White Spot disease (ICH) 40% Catfish Oxytetracycline or ciprofloxacin or enrofloxacin
Lernaeasis 20% Carp Ivermectin or deltamethrin with oxytetracycline
Argulosis 30% Carp Trichlorfon or Ivermectin with oxytetracycline
Open in a new tab

4. Discussion

Aquaculture is becoming more commercialized and intensive day by day in Bangladesh (Shamsuzzaman et al., 2017). Various kinds of drugs are becoming an essential element of effective aquaculture production. The goal of this study was to learn more about the current scenario of culture compositions, disease prevalence, application of aqua drugs, and their effects on fish health and the environment. There are six types of cultured farms that were investigated in this experiment. The experimental area had the highest percentages of mixed culture of carp, monosex tilapia, and pangas. Some previous research also revealed similar culture compositions in the different areas of Bangladesh (Kawsar et al., 2019; Rahman et al., 2017).

Current investigation showed that farmers applied the nine distinct commercial aqua drugs for various aquaculture operations, especially in health management of fishes. Besides, in pond preparation, disinfecting the culture environment, stimulating growth, and enhancing immunity number of drugs and chemicals were found in use. The primary sources of these chemicals are local animal feed and veterinary medicines stores, which is in the perimeter of the farmers and very easy to purchase. This study identified zeolite and lime as the most used chemical for pond water quality maintenance. In addition lime and zeolites are reportedly a most used chemicals in the area which is consistent to this survey (Chowdhury et al., 2012; Faruk et al., 2008; Kawsar et al., 2019; Shamsuzzaman et al., 2012).

One of the major limitations emerged in aquaculture intensification nowadays is fish diseases, which become a significant constraint in effective and sustainable aquaculture business profitability, in consequences. EUS, fin and tail rot, dropsy, bacillary necrosis, white spot, saprolegniasis, lernaeasis, and argulosis were the most common diseases and symptoms (Table 10) reported by farmers in this study. Several authors have also documented comparable circumstances in Bangladeshi aquaculture industry (Faruk et al., 2004; Amin, 2000; Mazid, 2001). According to the supplier's information, disinfectants and antibiotics were used by farmers to maintain their ponds free of pathogens and to cure several infectious diseases such as Epizootic Ulcerative Syndrome (EUS), Red spot disease, streptococcosis, ichthyophthiriasis, etc. In some cases, the farmer got about 95% recoveries from the disease condition within a short period (Rahman et al., 2017). In the current investigation, 23 disinfectant brands and 30 antibiotic brands with various trade names were found on the market. Similarly, Shamsuzzaman and Biswas (2012) identified 12 disinfectant brands and 14 antibiotic brands on the southwest coast of Bangladesh. The most often used disinfectants in the study area were commercial disinfectant such as BKC and salt potassium permanganate and bleaching powder. Rahman et al. (2017) stated that 22%, Kawsar et al. (2019) claimed that 40% of farmers of the study area used potassium permanganate and 38% were used commercial disinfectant. Antibiotics were found to be administered indiscriminately in the current investigation, although the specific causes of the disease were unknown. Some farmers did not use the prescribed treatment doses. A total of 15 antibiotics were identified and farmers were reported with irresponsible and frequent use of such drugs without approval and without knowing their effects on fish health (Faruk et al., 2021). Several issues regarding improper use of aquatic medications, such as lack of information about chemical use, sufficient dosage, form of application, and indiscriminate use of antibiotics have been reported by Hasan et al. (2020).

Several aqua drugs have been found to be used as oxygen precursors, ammonia reducers, growth promoters, antiparasitics, enzymes, and probiotics to aid digestion and keep the aquatic environment healthy. Antibiotics with six categories of other compounds, including nutritional supplements, disinfectants, saline, ammonia removal, probiotics, and pesticides, were administered by the fish farmers of Mymensingh (Faruk et al., 2021). Previously several authors found very similar outcomes in their research on aqua medicines in Bangladesh (Kawsar et al., 2019; Rahman et., al., 2017; Shamsuzzaman and Biswas, 2012; Chowdhury et al., 2012; Rahman et al., 2015).

4.1. Antibiotic exposure pathway in aquaculture

In aquaculture, as in other animal production sectors, similar strategies (e.g., vaccination and use of antibiotics) are used to control infectious diseases. Antimicrobial use in aquaculture differs from cattle farming due to the greater diversity of species, farming practices, and different application methods. The application of antimicrobial in aquaculture ponds has a consequence in the formation of drug-resistant bacteria repositories in aquatic species and even in the ecosystem (Schmidt et al., 2000; Akinbowale et al., 2006; Hamom et al., 2020). Antimicrobials, in whatever form these are applied in food production, these will have significant complications on human health, surrounding environment, and aquatic ecosystems (Rasul and Majumdar, 2017; Brunton et al., 2019). According to the pathways analysis (Figure 12), the two most prevalent techniques of administering antimicrobial drugs in aquaculture species are medicated feed and applying antibiotics directly to the water (immersion therapy), both of which require flock treatment of the animals (Heuer et al., 2009). Antibiotics are most often administered to aquatic animals by combining them with specially formulated feed. However, antibiotics are not efficiently metabolized by fish and are mostly execrated in the environment via faces. Seventy-five percent of antibiotics supplied to fish are estimated to be released into the aquatic environment (Burridge et al., 2010). These practices can lead to excessive usage of antimicrobials and strong selective pressure in the aquatic animals and the exposed surroundings. According to the findings of some previous studies, effluent from antibiotic-treated cattle farms (fecal waste) may end up in aquaculture ponds since cow dung is a popular source of raw ingredients in land-based aquaculture (Jha et al., 2004), potentially introducing antibiotics into the aquaculture setting (Sobur et al., 2019; Kabir et al., 2018).

Figure 12.

Figure 12

Open in a new tab

The possible exposure pathway of antibiotics through a hypothetically illustrated aquaculture setup. Different sources like raw materials of the feed, some intentional approaches of the farmers, and various waste disposals input the antibiotics into the setup, which afterward affect the local environment and public health through contaminated water sources and sediments, including consumption and handling of the aquaculture end products and in consequences, antimicrobial resistance becomes developed into different ecological compartments (Santos and Ramos, 2018; Ngogang et al., 2021; Ullah et al., 2020; Thai et al., 2018; Han et al., 2017; Chowdhury et al., 2015; Pruden et al., 2013).

Another source of antibiotics in fish farms in the study area is the dumping of poultry litter and other slaughterhouse wastes in the pond ecosystem to increase primary production. Resulting antibiotics may gain access to the pond environment, and there has recently been an increase in the incidence of food-borne illnesses caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria (Teuber, 1999). The use of poultry litter as an aquaculture supplement may transmit certain food-borne or zoonotic bacteria and multidrug-resistant bacteria to the aquaculture setup and consequently to the consumer (Aly et al., 2009).

4.2. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in aquaculture

We found a total of 30 brands of antibiotics were reported from the study area. A total of 58 antibiotics have been recorded from various parts of Bangladesh previously (Asif et al., 2021). Lulijwa et al. (2020) studied antibiotic usage in key aquaculture-producing countries, including Bangladesh, and found that 19 antibiotics are used in Bangladeshi aquaculture. This study showed that antibiotics were applied indiscreetly by fish farmers without identifying the exact causes of fish diseases. Rahman et al. (2017) described similar findings. Antibiotics used inappropriately or irrationally can lead to the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria (Inglis V. 2000). The longer an antibiotic is exposed to the environment, the higher the chance of resistance developing, and administering these medications into aquatic environments allows them to survive for lengthy periods. Antibiotic residues have severe public health consequences (Table 11), including antibacterial drug resistance, hypersensitivity reactions, mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, bone marrow suppression, teratogenicity, and disruption of normal gut flora (Schar et al., 2020; Okocha et al., 2018; Miranda et al., 2018).

Table 11.

The literature revealed the potential health effects of active drug residues.

Active substance Purpose of use Impact on human health Literature cited
Antimicrobial agents To control infectious disease Increase the number of infections, frequency of treatment failures, and infection severity. Increased risks of AMR genes. Kruse and Sorum, 1994; Heuer et al. (2009); Okocha et al. (2018); Tomova et al. (2015)
Disinfectants Routine sanitation and biosecurity Cancer and reproductive/developmental effects. Irritation in case of skin and eye contact. Tsitsifli and Kanakoudis (2018), Watterson et al. (2012)
Pesticides Elimination of undesired species, renovation and/or complete harvesting Refractory hypotension, congestive heart failure, brain cancer, prostate cancer, pulmonary dysfunction and electrocardiographic abnormalities Gurjar et al.,2011; Lee et al. (2011); Andersen et al. (2012)
Vitamin premix Used as feed supplement Literature is not available
Oxygen precursors Provide ample oxygen during oxygen deficit Literature is not available
Open in a new tab

4.3. Options for risk management

The most efficient way to manage and control the emergence and expansion of antimicrobial resistance is to minimize the demand for antibacterial treatment (Moges et al., 2014). A federal administrative framework is necessary for antibacterial agent licensing, approval, monitoring, and regulation in all countries where antimicrobial agents are applied in aquatic biota. Production planning should include stocking strategies and management measures to prevent the invasion of germs and the spread of infectious diseases. As Bangladesh is a leading aquaculture producer, the government should place a high priority on the control and monitoring of aquaculture drugs and chemicals at the field level. When it comes to the usage of aqua drugs and antibiotics, there are a few guidelines to follow, including (i) constantly endeavor to enhance the pond ecosystem, (ii) aqua drugs and antibiotics should only be used when it is essential, (iii) use antimicrobials only for bacterial infection, (iv) use an antimicrobial to which the pathogens are susceptible, (v) arrange training on Good Aquaculture Practices (GAP) for farmers, (vi) Aqua chemicals should be handled with caution since they can be harmful to public health, (vii) use appropriate dose, (viii) Minimum use of chemical is the best alternative to reduce adverse effect.

5. Conclusion

Considering the tremendous expansion and significance of the aquaculture sector in several areas of Bangladesh, the study sought to ascertain the current state of aquaculture inputs like chemicals and antimicrobial substance use in aquatic animal care and identified several challenges when it comes to using chemicals, including a lack of understanding of the compounds, their unregulated uses, and application methods. Significant measures are required to combat the establishment and spread of indiscriminate chemical usage and antimicrobial resistance in aquaculture. The efficacy of various aqua products in field trials and fish disease diagnosis based on signs, symptoms, and eye assessment may be considered a significant research gap in this study. However, to reduce the detrimental effects of drugs used in aquafarming, government policymakers, fisheries experts, researchers, farmers, entrepreneurs, the pharmaceutical industry, and scientists should collaborate to address the challenges.

Declarations

Author contribution statement

Md. Abu Kawsar: Conceived and designed the experiments; Performed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data; Wrote the paper.

Md. Tariqul Alam, Debasish Pandit, Md. Moshiur Rahman & Anuradha Talukdar: Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data.

Mamun Mia: Performed the experiments.

Tofael Ahmed Sumon: Analyzed and interpreted the data; Wrote the paper.

Funding statement

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Data availability statement

Data included in article/supplementary material/referenced in article.

Declaration of interests statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

No additional information is available for this paper.

Acknowledgements

The authors express their gratitude to the people who are actively participating in this survey research. The authors also express their gratitude to the journal's editor and anonymous reviewers for their insightful remarks and ideas.

References

  1. Akinbowale O.L., Peng H., Barton M.D. Antimicrobial resistance in bacteria isolated from aquaculture sources in Australia. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2006;100(5):1103–1113. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02812.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Al Asif A., Hossain A., Hamli H., Islam S., Kabir S.L. Research trends of aqua medicines, drugs and chemicals (AMDC) in Bangladesh: the last decade's (2011-2020) story to tell. Asian J. Med. Biol. Res. 2021;7(2):90–106. [Google Scholar]
  3. Alderman D.J., Rosenthal H., Smith P., Stewart J., Weston D.D. Chemicals used in mariculture. ICES Coop. Res. Rep. 1994;202 [Google Scholar]
  4. Aly S.M., Atti N.M.A., Mohamed M.F. 6th Int. Sci. Conf., MANSOURA. 2009. Effect of pond supplemented with chicken manure on bacterial build up and its antimicrobial resistance, besides the quality and shelf-life of cultured nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) [Google Scholar]
  5. Amin M.N. Vol. 28. Rural Development Academy; Bogra, Bangladesh: 2000. (Impact of Fish Diseases on Fish Culture in Northern Region of Bangladesh). [Google Scholar]
  6. Andersen H.R., Wohlfahrt-Veje C., Dalgård C., Christiansen L., Main K.M., Nellemann C., Grandjean P. Paraoxonase 1 polymorphism and prenatal pesticide exposure associated with adverse cardiovascular risk profiles at school age. PLoS One. 2012;7(5) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Assefa A., Abunna F. Maintenance of fish health in aquaculture: review of epidemiological approaches for prevention and control of infectious disease of fish. Vet. Med. Int. 2018;2018 doi: 10.1155/2018/5432497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. BFRI . Bangladesh Fisheries Research Institute; 1999. Fish Diseases: Prevention and Control; p. 7. Circular leaflet no 6. 2ndedition. [Google Scholar]
  9. Brunton L.A., Desbois A.P., Garza M., Wieland B., Mohan C.V., Häsler B., Guitian J. Identifying hotspots for antibiotic resistance emergence and selection, and elucidating pathways to human exposure: application of a systems-thinking approach to aquaculture systems. Sci. Total Environ. 2019;687:1344–1356. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Burridge L., Weis J.S., Cabello F., Pizarro J., Bostick K. Chemical use in salmon aquaculture: a review of current practices and possible environmental effects. Aquaculture. 2010;306(1-4):7–23. [Google Scholar]
  11. Chowdhury A.A., Uddin M.S., Vaumik S., Al Asif A. Aqua drugs and chemicals used in aquaculture of Zakigonj upazilla, Sylhet. Asian J. Med. Biol. Res. 2015;1(2):336–349. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chowdhury A.J., Saha D., Hossain M.B., Shamsuddin M., Minar M.H. Chemicals used in freshwater aquaculture with special emphasis to fish health management of Noakhali, Bangladesh. Afr. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2012;4(4):110–114. [Google Scholar]
  13. DoF Yearbook of fisheries statistics of Bangladesh, 2018-19. Fish. Res. Surv. Syst. (FRSS) 2019;36:135p. Department of Fisheries, Bangladesh: Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  14. DoF Yearbook of fisheries statistics of Bangladesh, 2019-20. Fish. Res. Surv. Syst. (FRSS) 2020;37:141p. Department of Fisheries. Bangladesh: Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  15. FAO . Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; Rome: 2018. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2018 - Meeting the Sustainable Development Goals. [Google Scholar]
  16. Faruk M.A.R., Alam M.J., Sarker M.M.R., Kabir M.B. Status of fish disease and health management practices in rural freshwater aquaculture of Bangladesh. Pakistan J. Biol. Sci. 2004;7(12):2092–2098. [Google Scholar]
  17. Faruk M.A.R., Ali M.M., Patwary Z.P. Evaluation of the status of use of chemicals and antibiotics in freshwater aquaculture activities with special emphasis to fish health management. J. Bangladesh Agric. Univ. 2008;6(2):381–390. [Google Scholar]
  18. Faruk M.A.R., Shorna H.K., Anka I.Z. Use and impact of veterinary drugs, antimicrobials, and supplements in fish health management. J. Adv. Veter. Anim. Res. 2021;8(1):36. doi: 10.5455/javar.2021.h482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Floyd R.F. Pergamon Press; 1993. The Veterinary Approach to Game Fish; pp. 395–408. [Google Scholar]
  20. GESAMP (Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection) Towards safe and effective use of chemicals in coastal aquaculture. Rep. Stud. (IMO/FARMACOAO/UNESCO/IOC/WMO/WHO/IAEA/UN/UNEP) 1997;65:40. [Google Scholar]
  21. Gurjar M., Baronia A.K., Azim A., Sharma K. Managing aluminum phosphide poisonings. J. Emergencies Trauma Shock. 2011;4(3):378. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.83868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hamom A., Alam M.M., Iqbal M.M., Khalil S.M.I., Parven M., Sumon T.A., Mamun M.A.A. Identification of pathogenic bacteria from diseased nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus with their sensitivity to antibiotics. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2020;9(3):1716–1738. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hasan J., Rahman M.H., Ullah M.R., Mredul M.M.H. Availability of aqua drugs and their uses in semi intensive culture farms at Patuakhali district in Bangladesh. Arch. Agricult. Environ. Sci. 2020;5(3):368–376. [Google Scholar]
  24. Han Y., Wang J., Zhao Z., Chen J., Lu H., Liu G. Fishmeal application induces antibiotic resistance gene propagation in mariculture sediment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017;51(18):10850–10860. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b02875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Heuer O.E., Kruse H., Grave K., Collignon P., Karunasagar I., Angulo F.J. Human health consequences of use of antimicrobial agents in aquaculture. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2009;49(8):1248–1253. doi: 10.1086/605667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Inglis V. Use of Chemicals in Aquaculture in Asia: Proceedings of the Meeting on the Use of Chemicals in Aquaculture in Asia 20-22 May 1996, Tigbauan, Iloilo, Philippines. Aquaculture Department, Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center; 2000. Antibacterial chemotherapy in aquaculture: review of practice, associated risks and need for action; pp. 7–22. [Google Scholar]
  27. Jha P., Sarkar K., Barat S. Effect of different application rates of cowdung and poultry excreta on water quality and growth of ornamental carp, Cyprinus carpio vr. koi, in concrete tanks. Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2004;4(1):17–22. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kabir S.L., Lubna M.M., Islam M., Haque A.Z., Neogi S.B., Yamasaki S. Isolation, molecular identification and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Campylobacter species of dairy origin: first report from Bangladesh. Vet. Sci. Dev. 2018;8(1) [Google Scholar]
  29. Karim M., Stellwagen J. Department of Fisheries, Ministry of Fisheries & Livestock; Bangladesh: 1998. Final Report on Fourth Fisheries Projects: Shrimp Aquaculture (Preparatory Phase for National Development Program) [Google Scholar]
  30. Kawsar M.A., Alam M.T., Ahamed S., Mou M.H. Aqua drugs and antibiotics used in freshwater aquaculture of North Chittagong, Bangladesh. Int. J. Fisher. Aquat. Stud. 2019;7(1):28–34. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kruse H., Sørum H. Transfer of multiple drug resistance plasmids between bacteria of diverse origins in natural microenvironments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1994;60(11):4015–4021. doi: 10.1128/aem.60.11.4015-4021.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lee S.J., Mehler L., Beckman J., Diebolt-Brown B., Prado J., Lackovic M., et al. Acute pesticide illnesses associated with off-target pesticide drift from agricultural applications: 11 States, 1998–2006. Environ. Health Perspect. 2011;119(8):1162–1169. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1002843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lulijwa R., Rupia E.J., Alfaro A.C. Antibiotic use in aquaculture, policies and regulation, health and environmental risks: a review of the top 15 major producers. Rev. Aquacult. 2020;12(2):640–663. [Google Scholar]
  34. Mazid M.A. Bangladesh Fisheries Research Institute; Mymensingh: 2001. Fish Disease and Prevention; p. 36. [Google Scholar]
  35. Miranda C.D., Godoy F.A., Lee M.R. Current status of the use of antibiotics and the antimicrobial resistance in the Chilean salmon farms. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:1284. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Moges F., Endris M., Belyhun Y., Worku W. Isolation and characterization of multiple drug resistance bacterial pathogens from waste water in hospital and non-hospital environments, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Res. Notes. 2014;7(1):1–6. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ngogang M.P., Ernest T., Kariuki J., Mouliom Mouiche M.M., Ngogang J., Wade A., van der Sande M.A.B. Microbial contamination of chicken litter manure and antimicrobial resistance threat in an urban area setting in Cameroon. Antibiotics. 2021;10(1):20. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10010020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Okocha R.C., Olatoye I.O., Adedeji O.B. Food safety impacts of antimicrobial use and their residues in aquaculture. Publ. Health Rev. 2018;39(1):1–22. doi: 10.1186/s40985-018-0099-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Phillips M. In: Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center. Arthur J.R., Lavilla-Pitogo C.R., Subasinghe R.P., editors. Aquaculture Department Tigbauan; Iloilo, Phillipines: 1996. The use of chemicals in carp and shrimp aquaculture in Bangladesh, Cambodia, Lao PDR, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Viet Nam. In:Use of Chemicals in Aquaculture in Asia; pp. 75–84. [Google Scholar]
  40. Plumb J.A. In: Disease in Asian Aquaculture. Shariff I.M., Subasinghe R.P., Arthur J.R., editors. Fish health Section of the Asian Fisheries Society; Manila, Philippines: 1992. Disease control in aquaculture; pp. 3–17. [Google Scholar]
  41. Pruden A., Larsson D.J., Amézquita A., Collignon P., Brandt K.K., Graham D.W., Zhu Y.G. Management options for reducing the release of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes to the environment. Environ. Health Perspect. 2013;121(8):878–885. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1206446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Rahman M.M., Alam M.M.M., Khalil S.M.I., Bari S.M., Rashid M.M. Status of chemicals and aqua drugs used in freshwater aquaculture in north-eastern Bangladesh. J. Sylhet. Agric. Univ. 2015;2(2):243–252. [Google Scholar]
  43. Rahman M.Z., Khatun A., Kholil M.I., Hossain M.M. Aqua drugs and chemicals used in fish farms of Comilla regions. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 2017;5(6):2462–2473. [Google Scholar]
  44. Rahman M., Huys G., Kühn I., Rahman M., Möllby R. Prevalence and transmission of antimicrobial resistance among Aeromonas populations from a duckweed aquaculture based hospital sewage water recycling system in Bangladesh. Antonie Leeuwenhoek. 2009;96(3):313–321. doi: 10.1007/s10482-009-9348-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Rasul M.G., Majumdar B.C. Abuse of antibiotics in aquaculture and it’s effects on human, aquatic animal and environment. Saudi J. Life Sci. 2017;2(3):81–88. [Google Scholar]
  46. Santos L., Ramos F. Antimicrobial resistance in aquaculture: current knowledge and alternatives to tackle the problem. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2018;52(2):135–143. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Schar D., Klein E.Y., Laxminarayan R., Gilbert M., Van Boeckel T.P. Global trends in antimicrobial use in aquaculture. Sci. Rep. 2020;10(1):1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78849-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Schmidt A.S., Bruun M.S., Dalsgaard I., Pedersen K., Larsen J.L. Occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in fish-pathogenic and environmental bacteria associated with four Danish rainbow trout farms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000;66(11):4908–4915. doi: 10.1128/aem.66.11.4908-4915.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Shamsuzzaman M.M., Biswas T.K. Aqua chemicals in shrimp farm: a study from south-west coast of Bangladesh. Egypt. J. Aquat. Res. 2012;38(4):275–285. [Google Scholar]
  50. Shamsuzzaman M.M., Islam M.M., Tania N.J., Al-Mamun M.A., Barman P.P., Xu X. Fisheries resources of Bangladesh: present status and future direction. Aquacul. Fisher. 2017;2(4):145–156. [Google Scholar]
  51. Shamsuzzaman M.M., Mozumder M.M.H., Mitu S.J., Ahamad A.F., Bhyuian M.S. The economic contribution of fish and fish trade in Bangladesh. Aquacul. Fisher. 2020;5(4):174–181. [Google Scholar]
  52. Sobur M.A., Sabuj A.A.M., Sarker R., Rahman A.T., Kabir S.L., Rahman M.T. Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. associated with dairy cattle and farm environment having public health significance. Vet. World. 2019;12(7):984. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2019.984-993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Subasinghe R.P., Barg U., Tacon A. In: Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center. Arthur J.R., Lavilla-Pitogo C.R., Subasinghe R.P., editors. Aquaculture Department Tigbauan; Iloilo, Philippines: 1996. Chemicals in asian aquaculture: need, usage, issues and challenges. In: use of chemicals in aquaculture in asia; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  54. Sumon T.A., Hussain M.A., Mita F.A., Bir J., Khalil S.M.I. Status of formalin in commercially important fishes from the northeastern region of Bangladesh. Bangladesh J. Fisher. 2020;32(1):23–28. [Google Scholar]
  55. Teuber M. Spread of antibiotic resistance with food-borne pathogens. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. CMLS. 1999;56(9):755–763. doi: 10.1007/s000180050022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Thai P.K., Binh V.N., Nhung P.H., Nhan P.T., Hieu N.Q., Dang N.T., et al. Occurrence of antibiotic residues and antibiotic-resistant bacteria in effluents of pharmaceutical manufacturers and other sources around Hanoi, Vietnam. Sci. Total Environ. 2018;645:393–400. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Tomova A., Ivanova L., Buschmann A.H., Rioseco M.L., Kalsi R.K., Godfrey H.P., Cabello F.C. Antimicrobial resistance genes in marine bacteria and human uropathogenic E scherichia coli from a region of intensive aquaculture. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2015;7(5):803–809. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Tsitsifli S., Kanakoudis V. vol. 2. 2018. Disinfection impacts to drinking water safety—a review; p. 603. (Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Proceedings). No. 11. [Google Scholar]
  59. Ullah M.A., Naeem M.A., Hossain A., Al-Asif A., Hasan M.R. Categorization and distribution of aqua-chemicals used in coastal farming of south-eastern part of Bangladesh. J. Aquac. Res. Develop. 2020;11(11) [Google Scholar]
  60. Watterson A., Little D., Young J.A., Murray F., Boyd K.A., Azim E. Scoping a public health impact assessment of aquaculture with particular reference to Tilapia in the UK. Int. Schol. Res. Not. 2012;2012 [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data included in article/supplementary material/referenced in article.

Articles from Heliyon are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES