Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2022 Mar 10;12:3892. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07717-z

Droplet nuclei caustic formations in exhaled vortex rings

Andreas Papoutsakis 1,, Ionut Danaila 2, Francky Luddens 2, Manolis Gavaises 1
PMCID: PMC8913841  PMID: 35273246

Abstract

Vortex ring (VR) structures occur in light or hoarse cough configurations. These instances consist of short impulses of exhaled air resulting to a self-contained structure that can travel large distances. The present study is the first implementation of the second order Fully Lagrangian Approach (FLA) for three-dimensional realistic flow-fields obtained by means of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) and provides a method to calculate the occurrence and the intensity of caustic formations. The carrier phase flow field is resolved by means of second order accurate Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS) based on a Finite Difference approach for the momentum equations, while a spectral approach is followed for the Poisson equation using Fast Fourier Transform (FFT). The effect of the undulations of the carrier phase velocity due to large scale vortical structures and turbulence is investigated. The evaluation of the higher order derivatives needed by the second order FLA is achieved by pre-fabricated least squares second order interpolations in three dimensions. This method allows for the simulation of the clustering of droplets and droplet nuclei exhaled in ambient air in conditions akin to light cough. Given the ambiguous conditions of vortex-ring formation during cough instances, three different exhale (injection) parameters n are assumed, i.e. under-developed (n=2), ideal (n=3.7) and over-developed (n=6) vortex rings. The formation of clusters results in the spatial variance of the airborne viral load. This un-mixing of exhumed aerosols is related to the formation of localised high viral load distributions that can be linked to super-spreading events.

Subject terms: Biomedical engineering, Physics, Fluid dynamics

Introduction

Respiratory infections can be transmitted through droplets (>5μm) and droplet nuclei (<5μm)13. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) report2 COVID-19 in particular, is primarily transmitted through droplets and contact46. The airborne route is a potentially important transmission pathway for viral infection in indoor environments since contact transmission can be limited by fast inactivation of the virus on hands. Furthermore, contact transmission often incorporates an initial airborne path where large inocula droplets deposit on surfaces through sneezing7. The interaction of the carrier phase flow field with the exhaled droplets dictates the intensity of the viral load and the infection distance. Recent research810 has shown that Vortex Rings (VRs) can be produced in coughs and can enhance the transport of fine cough droplets. Vortex ring structures occur in light or hoarse cough configurations8. These instances consist of short impulses of exhaled air result to a self-contained structure (i.e., vortex ring) that can travel large distances. Increased concentrations of airborne viral loads have been related to super-spreading events11, and have been attributed to individual behaviour of coughing and sneezing12 and also to specific activities13.

Turbulence increases the mixing of droplets and droplet nuclei14 and the settling velocity15,16. As the droplet size and Stokes number increase, the particle trajectory memory becomes pronounced; thus, un-mixing17,18 and Random Uncorrelated Motion (RUM)19 are observed. Un-mixing results in the segregation of droplets by a preferential concentration, clustering mechanism20.

Clustering is exhibited as the formation of narrow local droplet accumulation regions in the zones of low vorticity and high strain rate21 and have been associated with zero-acceleration points22. For high Stokes number regimes, inertia droplets sample the carrier phase velocity field as a white noise23, forming clusters due to a multiplicative amplification mechanism2325. This multiplicative process of amplification and dilatation was identified19 as the deformation of the Lagrangian volume of the dispersed phase26 transported along a particle trajectory. The Lagrangian volume may vanish, giving rise to instantaneous singularities in the particle concentration field identified as caustics or caustic formations. In addition to mixing and un-mixing (clustering), RUM was identified as a third type of characteristic response of the dispersed phase in turbulent flows, applicable to all Stokes numbers19. The occurrence of RUM was linked with the occurrence of singularities due to trajectory intersections related to the trajectory history. Particle motion, as the overlapping of a mesoscopic smoothly varying component and RUM, was identified in2729. RUM results in a multi–valued velocity field of the dispersed phase due to the folding of the dispersed continuum, playing a significant role in collision processes.

The intensity of caustics is important to a great variety of environmental, biological, engineering and cosmological3034 flows (e.g., environmental pollution35, the impact of radioactive particles36 and the potency of spray delivered medication37 are dependent on the formation of such accumulation regions38), and has become the focus of experimental39 and theoretical work40. The Fully Lagrangian Approach (FLA or Osiptsov method)41, treats the particulate phase as a pressureless continuum40, by introducing the Jacobian matrix determinant |J| (i.e., ρ0=|J|ρ)42. Thus, continuous fields for the particle number density and the particle velocity can be defined on the Lagrangian dispersed continuum. Due to the absence of pressure, the continuum can intersect itself creating overlapping folds. Particle collisions may occur among particles that are attached to overlapping folds43, thus a low particle loading constrain needs to be incorporated in order to support the pressureless continuum assumption. The use of the FLA in turbulent flows19,44 resulted in the identification of the concentration distribution and the identification of the mechanisms involved in the segregation process18,19. A turbulent diffusion model was introduced for the first order FLA, implemented for numerical experiments in homogeneous isotropic turbulence and assessed in comparison with DNS simulations using a standard Lagrangian approach for the dispersed phases45. In the same paper it was also reported that the singularities of the point-wise number density inferred from the standard FLA pollutes spatially averaged results. A second order closure for the spatially filtered number density was then presented, in which the FLA number density was interpreted alongside with the spatial structure of the dispersed continuum, and was connected to a length scale40.

The introduction of the FLA into the study of turbulent flows44 resulted in the identification and analysis of spatial structures of the dispersed phase distribution using the moments of concentration. FLA analysis concluded that particle concentration in the long term follows a log normal law19. This is consistent with an alternative analysis using Voronoï tessellation46. Also, FLA studies on DNS of homogeneous and isotropic turbulence led to identification of the mechanisms involved in the segregation process18,19. Using the FLA in turbulent flows also enabled the quantification of the singularities related to trajectory intersections and the establishment of a relation between the frequency of their occurrence and the Stokes number.

In this paper we present the first implementation of the second order Fully Lagrangian Approach (FLA2) for three-dimensional realistic flow-fields obtained by means of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). We provide a method to calculate the occurrence and the intensity of caustic formations. This is achieved by calculating a principal direction of the caustic front based on the tensor of the Hessian of the deformed continuum. The structure of the paper is as follows. The range of the conditions and the configuration of the cases studied are presented in the “Results” section. In the same section the FLA and the FLA2 results are presented and discussed. Specifically, the solution of the number density for the exhaled Lagrangian clouds is presented for low Reynolds axisymmetric and also high-Reynolds fully turbulent configurations, for three distinct exhale parameters. In the “Methods” section the implementation of the FLA2 for CFD configurations is presented and the results are further discussed in the “Discussion and conclusions” section. The DNS methodology and the implementation of the second order FLA for three-dimensional turbulent flow fields is presented in the “Supplementary Material”.

Results

In order to investigate the occurrence of caustics of droplet nuclei in coughs due to large scale vortical structures and due to turbulence we performed a series of DNS of cough configurations. The scope of this analysis is the calculation of the droplet distribution, the investigation of the occurrence of caustics and finally the calculation of the intensity of the droplet nuclei clustering. The exhaled droplet nuclei distribution is modelled by representative droplet clouds, integrated in time using a standard Lagrangian approach based on the fully resolved carrier phase flow field. The number density of the droplet nuclei for each cloud is calculated using the Fully Lagrangian Approach26,47 Although the standard FLA identifies the occurrence of caustics, the second order FLA is used to calculate the intensity of the caustics by providing a measure of the number density filtered at a given length-scale Rε as n^dRε. The numerical implementation of the method is described in detail in the “Supplementary Material” of this paper.

Cases setup

Given the ambiguous conditions of the human coughs as described in literature8,10,48,49 we focus in simulations to carrier flows represented by vortex rings with Reynolds and Stokes numbers related to human cough conditions. Vortex rings are produced by the sudden injection of exhaled air in a surrounding flow that is initially at rest. Theoretical description of vortex rings50 generally assumes that the flow injection producing vortex rings is generated by a piston-cylinder mechanism. Using this equivalence, we consider injection pulses with a finite duration T and average injection speed U0, issuing from an orifice of diameter D. The exhale (or injection) parameter is then n=TU0/D, corresponding to the piston stroke ratio in a piston-cylinder mechanism. Long duration of exhumation impulses, as the ones observed in a typical cough, result to large injection parameters (n>40), which lead to the formation of jets. The exhale parameter n is related to the temporal injection profile U(t) (or injection program) and the average injection velocity U0 as:

n=1Dt=0t=T+τU(t)dt=U0TD,withU(t)U0=3tτ2-2tτ3,t<τ1,τ<t<T3T-tτ2-2T-tτ3,T<t<T+τ0,T+τ<t. 1

Injection velocity program (1) has a trapezoidal shape, with acceleration and deceleration ramps of duration τ. We set in all simulations τ=0.1T.

A coarse estimate for the exhale parameter n of a cough can be derived from the volume V of the air exhaled. Following the classical slug-flow approximation, we assume that V=(πD2/4)TU0 and obtain n=4V/πD3. The typical exhaled volume from a cough has been calculated in the range of 0.25–3 l9,51. Thus, the exhale parameter for coughs at this exhaled volume range spans from n=40–477, assuming a mouth opening of D=2 cm. For such high exhale/injection parameters, the injected flow consists of a leading vortex ring followed by a trailing jet. It was observed52 that the vortex ring carries only a fraction of the circulation produced by the injection process, the rest being injected in the trailing jet. The critical time at which the vortex generator produces the amount of circulation engulfed by the vortex ring was called formation time and the corresponding injection parameter (or stroke ratio) formation number F. The value of F depends on different injection parameters and ranges from 1 to 8. For laminar injections, with trapezoidal injection profiles, as in the present study, it was experimentally found52 that F3.6–4.5. This means that for our injection program (1), if n<4 the full injected slug will be absorbed by the vortex ring, while for n>4 the vortex ring will be followed by a visible trailing jet. Higher is n, longer is the trailing jet. Given the evidence of vortex rings in intermittent coughs810, we focus in the narrow region of exhalation regimes characterised by low injection/exhale parameters n. This choice is also supported by the observation that the entrainment of the surrounding air in the flow is mostly due to the high circulation of the vortex ring, which is thus expected to mainly contribute to the long-distance propagation of particles. We consider, however, three different injection/exhale parameters n: two values, n=2 and n=3.7, lower or equal to the formation number F, corresponding to vortex rings without trailing jets, and the value n=6 for a vortex ring with a substantial trailing jet (see Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Non-dimensional vorticity magnitude |Ω| iso-surfaces, normalised with U02/L for the test cases C3DN2 at t=4×103 s (top) C3DN4 t=8×103 s (middle) and C3DN6 (bottom) at time t=12×103 s equal to twice the injection period T for each one of the cases simulated.

The nominal exhale velocities range between U0=1 m/s to U0=10 m/s which include experimentally measured coughs8,53 and breathing scenarios3. The value of the injection Reynolds number Re=U0D/ν was reported3,51 to range between Re=1000 and Re=16,000. A synopsis of the aerodynamic conditions of coughs as presented in the literature is shown in Table 1. A typical value51 of the orifice diameter is 2 cm, while a reasonable choice of the air kinematic viscosity is ν=15.6×10-6m2/s. In our simulations we selected two representative set of cases characterised by a low Reynolds number Re=1000 (axisymmetric laminar simulations) and a high Reynolds number set of cases with Re=10,000 (three dimensional simulations).

Table 1.

Flow conditions for cough in literature.

Author u (m/s) D (cm) V (l) Droplet nuclei d (μm)
Verma et al.10 2–6 >0.5 5–10
Bourouiba et al.51 2 0.25–1.6 10
Tang et al.53 2–25 2 1–3
Liu et al.9 20 2.26 1 5–100

For the droplet size distribution used in our simulations we used eight bins of representative particles with diameters from 0.5 to 100μm in agreement to droplet nuclei sizes reported in literature3,49,51. The laminar axisymmetric simulations Re=1000 correspond to U01m/s and a characteristic time of the flow t0=D/U020×10-3 s, the fully turbulent three-dimensional simulations Re=10,000 to U010 m/s and t02×10-3 s. For the three-dimensional turbulent simulations the sinusoidal fluctuations described in the “Supplementary Material” were superimposed on the inlet velocity program in 1, assuming kT=0.1 and εT=1. The details of the transitional and fully turbulent simulations are presented in Table 2.

Table 2.

Cases simulated.

Name Domain Size nθ×nr×nz T (ms) n Re
C2DN2 2D×4D 1×512×4096 4 2 1000
C2DN4 2D×8D 1×512×4096 8 3.7 1000
C2DN6 2D×12D 1×512×4096 12 6 1000
C3DN2 1.5D×3D 513×256×512 4 2 10,000
C3DN4 1.5D×6D 513×256×1024 8 3.7 10,000
C3DN6 1.5D×9D 513×256×1536 12 6 10,000

Cases, C2DN2, C2DN4 and C2DN6 (See Table 2) consist of axisymmetric simulations of exhaled vortex rings that account for the resolution of long injection times and longer transport distances. Each one of these cases corresponds to different exhale parameters resulting to different ratios of droplet nuclei encapsulated within the vortex rings in relation to the particles left behind in the trailing jet. Cases C3DN2, C3DN4 and C3DN6 are three dimensional turbulent simulations of exhaled VRs. The domain length spans for twice the final distance covered by the VR (3D, 6D and 9D) and incorporates non-reflective outlet boundary conditions54, thus ensuring a minimal influence to the flow structures. In the radial direction the total domain radius corresponds to a confinement coefficient of 3 which has limited effect on the formation and the circulation of the VR54. Grid size resolves the finest turbulent scales (Δx=0.0039D2η=Re-3/4D), where η is the Kolmogorov length scale. The low-Reynolds number simulations of vortex rings (Re = 1000) have been carried out by means fully resolved 2d-axisymmetric simulations54,55. Although coherent vortical structures emerge they do not cascade to fine three-dimensional turbulent fluctuations. The high Reynolds cases56 (Re = 10000) result in turbulent vortex rings integrated by means of Direct Numerical Simulations45,57. The cases simulated are of increasing computational cost due to the larger computational domain and long simulation time required when the exhale parameter n increases.

The exhaled droplet and droplet nuclei relaxation time τ0 is defined as:

τ0=ρdd218μair, 2

where ρd is the droplet density, μair the carrier phase dynamic viscosity and d the droplet size. Droplet sizes simulated in our study are provided49 in Table 3. The Stokes number of the particles St=τ0U/D, is:

St=ρd18ρairDd2Re, 3

where Dd=d/D is the non-dimensional droplet diameter. Droplet clustering occurs for local Stokes numbers greater than unity St>1. Based on the macroscopic timescale t0=D/U0 a critical diameter δ0 is defined as:

δ02=18ρairρdRe-1. 4

Table 3.

Droplet sizes and Stokes numbers used in the simulations.

Bin 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 δ
d (μm) 0.5 1 2 5 10 20 50 100
St (Re = 103) 2.89e-05 1.16e-04 4.62e-04 2.89e-03 1.16e-02 4.62e-02 0.289 1.16 δ0=93.0μm
Stt (Re = 103) 9.13e-04 3.65e-03 1.46e-02 9.13e-02 0.37 1.46 9.13 36.5 δτ=16.5μm
St (Re = 104) 2.89e-04 1.16e-03 4.62e-03 2.89e-02 0.116 0.462 2.89 11.6 δ0=29.4μm
Stt (Re = 104) 2.89e-02 0.116 0.462 2.89 11.6 46.2 289.0 1155.0 δτ=2.94μm

The Stokes number is then presented as St=(Dd/δ0)2. For turbulent flows, the time scale is D/URe-1/2 and the Stokes number is defined as Stt=τ0U0/(DRe-1/2) resulting in a critical diameter dt defined as:

δt2=18ρairρdRe-3/2. 5

Droplets with diameter d>δ are expected to exhibit trajectory crossing39. In our simulations we assume a range of droplet nuclei dimensions from 0.5 up to 100μm. Critical droplet diameters δ0 and δt for the macroscopic and the turbulent time scales are shown in last column of Table 3. In the same table we present the droplet nuclei characteristics for eight distinct representative sets of parcels (bins) issued during the cough simulation. As it can be inferred from Table 3, the selected diameters for the representative droplet nuclei parcels result in a wide range of Stokes numbers from nearly non-inertia droplets (i.e., St<10-3) to droplets well within the ballistic regime (i.e., St>10)58. The particulate Reynolds number Red=U0d/ν can be expressed as a function of the macroscopic Reynolds number as Red=Re×d/L, for the regimes simulated (Re = 1000–10,000 and d=0.5100μm it spans from as low as 0.025–50. Although FLA can be applied for non-Stokesian drag law expressions45, the specific computational setups for both droplets and droplet nuclei are within the applicability regime of the Stokes law, which is used in this study.

Every s=10 computational timesteps, N droplet clouds for each size bin are injected at random positions on the orifice cross-section. The number N of injected clouds per s timesteps is:

N=(cAursΔt)/nc, 6

where c is the number density of the exhumed plume, A=πD2/4 is the orifice cross-sectional area, and nc is the number of droplets represented by each cloud which is constant. The particulate velocity is considered equal to the inlet velocity of the carrier phase, and the initial conditions for the Jacobian and Hessian entries are defined as dictated by the FLA (see “Supplementary Material”). Although the number density distribution of droplets and droplet nuclei is well documented in literature49,51 in the order of 1–10×106/m3, in our analysis we focus in the relative compression of the dispersed phase.

Droplet nuclei distribution

Iso-surface of vorticity for the three-dimensional cases C3DN2, C3DN4 and C3DN6 are shown in the Fig. 1 at times 2T after the end of the injection. For the cases with n<=3.7 the flow field vorticity has been almost completely absorbed by the VR. The corresponding distributions of droplets with d=2μm at the same instances are shown in Fig. 2. As it can be inferred form Fig. 2 the vortex rings with n=2 and n=3.7 present a thin trail of droplets along the trail of the vortex rings. The colour of the scatter points corresponds to the number density inferred from the FLA. For n=6 the trailing droplet nuclei are significant and lag the evolution of the VR. This results to the dilation of the trailing droplets as they lag behind, as it can be inferred from the low number densities shown in blue. For all three cases high number densities occur at the re-circulation regions and at the front of the vortex ring.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

FLA number density for d=2.0μm droplet nuclei, for the test cases C3DN2 at t=4×103 s (top) C3DN4 t=8×103 s (middle) and C3DN6 (bottom) at time t=12×103 s equal to twice the injection period T for each one of the cases simulated.

In Figs. 3 and 4 we present the FLA results for the number density and the FLA2 result for various filtering widths Rε; for droplets with diameters 2μm and 5μm, respectively. The filtering widths correspond to different orders of magnitude from Rε=10-4D to Rε=10-2D which correspond to filter sizes from 2μm to 0.2 mm. It can be observed that qualitatively, the solution converges to the FLA solution as Rε tends to zero. For the larger filtering lengths the areas in the vicinity of caustic regions are affected, resulting in variations between FLA and FLA2 inside larger areas as the filtering width increases.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Number density for d=2.0μm droplet nuclei. Case C2DN2. T=4 ms (a) FLA (b) FLA2 Rε=0.01 (c) FLA2 Rε=0.001 (d) FLA2 Rε=0.0001.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Number density for d=5.0μm droplet nuclei. Case C2DN2. T=4 ms (a) FLA (b) FLA2 Rε=0.01 (c) FLA2 Rε=0.001 (d) FLA2 Rε=0.0001.

Caustics occurrence

Due to their pressureless nature45 dispersed flows can compress to the point that particulate trajectories cross and the dispersed continua overlap. Fully Lagrangian approaches infer the particulate density by the deformation of the continuum from its initial distribution. It is expected that the transformation from the Eulerian to the Lagrangian coordinate will present a point-wise singularity at the loci of the intersections or folds. The Jacobian, being zero, cannot serve as a measure of the compression. A single surface on the Eulerian space with zero Jacobian does not not necessarily mean that particle with a finite initial separation have collapsed to a single point furnishing infinite number density. In such instances the curvature of the dispersed continuum dictates the separation between neighbouring particles. The second order FLA assumes a finite filtering length scale Rε on which the dispersed continuum is reconstructed40. This approach provides a number density on the caustic, i.e. the intensity of the caustic at a given length scale. The quantitative comparison of the FLA2 results with the point-wise number density provided by FLA is shown in Figs. 5, 6 and 7 for the three-dimensional DNS simulations and in Fig. 8 for the case C2DN6 at times t=2T. In the same figures we present the Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) of the scatter. As the Jacobian magnitude for a cloud crosses zero resulting in singular number density values, the numerically calculated nd overshoots to spurious values. For these cases FLA2 provides finite number densities that are volume averaged at an Eulerian length scale Rε. These number densities correspond to the intensity of the caustic formations. As seen from Figs. 5, 6 and 7 although the 1/J axis provides unbounded values, the n^dRε axis is bounded. Numerically, this singularity is expressed by very large spurious values whose magnitude is related to the temporal resolution of the initial value problem solver. In the Figs. 5, 6 and 7 the 1/J axis is cropped to a maximum value of 104. As the filtering length-scale increases the limiting intensity of the caustics decreases too, as the number density is averaged on a bigger volume. The droplet nuclei with low inertia Stt<1.0 (see Table 3) show number densities below 10nd0 and no caustic formations are observed since the volume filtered number density n^d does not deviate from the point-wise number density nd=1/J (see Figs. 5, 6 and 7a–c). This behaviour presents a global character for all exhale parameters simulated, as shown in all three Figs. 5, 6 and 7. For the droplets above the critical diameter 2.94μm the turbulent Stokes number Stt becomes larger than unity (see Table 3) and this arises as a significant deviation of the FLA2 filtered number density from the FLA result (see Figs. 5, 6 and 7d–h). The same behaviour is observed in the droplet nuclei conveyed by the laminar flow field in the low-Re case C2N2 shown in Fig. 8. For the laminar flow field case, the limiting values for the number densities appear in the Fig. 8f–h which correspond to droplets with diameter larger than the critical diameter shown in Table 3.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Scatter plot of the filtered FLA2 number density versus 1/J. Colours correspond to the filtering length. Dashed iso-lines correspond to the kernel density estimation at levels 10% 50% and 90%. Case C3DN2. T=4 ms.(ah) Dd=0.5100μm. (dh) are presented in logarithmic scale.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Scatter plot of the filtered FLA2 number density versus 1/J. Colours correspond to the filtering length. Dashed iso-lines correspond to the kernel density estimation at levels 10% 50% and 90%. Case C3DN4. T=8 ms. (ah) Dd=0.5100μm. (dh) are presented in logarithmic scale.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Scatter plot of the filtered FLA2 number density versus 1/J. Colours correspond to the filtering length. Dashed iso-lines correspond to the kernel density estimation at levels 10% 50% and 90%. Case C3DN6. T=8 ms. (ah) Dd=0.5100μm. (dh) are presented in logarithmic scale.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Scatter plot of the filtered FLA2 number density versus 1/J. Colours correspond to the filtering length. Dashed iso-lines correspond to the kernel density estimation at levels 10% 50% and 90%. Case C2DN6. T=12 ms. (ah) Dd=0.5100μm. (dh) are presented in logarithmic scale.

Caustics intensity

From Figs. 5f, 6 and 7f it can be observed that at a length scale Rε=10-5 a maximum limit for the number density appears at 20nd0, at a larger length scale (Rε=0.0001) this limit reduces to 10nd0 and for Rε=0.001, number densities higher than 3nd0 are filtered out. For Rε=0.01 we obtain the highest limiting value of nd0. This limiting value at different length scales describes the intensity of the caustics and provides a direct measure of the compression of the dispersed phase due to the large vortical structures of the flow. It also accounts for the effect of the turbulent scales on the compression and dilation of droplet nuclei. The VR seems to convey the droplet nuclei at large distances, retaining the high initial number density of the exhaled plume nd0 at large distances from the orifice. This is surprising since nd0 would have been expected to reduce due to the expansion of the cough jet.

Higher Stokes number nuclei present a ballistic behaviour58, which is characterised by high inertia particles moving on almost undisturbed trajectories. When crossing, these trajectories provide genuine Morse points with low J and low H. Thus, both the FLA2 and the standard FLA converge to very high number densities as shown in Figs. 5h, 6h and 7h where the scatter points and the 90% KDE probability cluster along the 1/J line.

In Fig. 8a–h we present the filtered number density scatter plot against the point-wise number density for the two dimensional simulations for n=6 exhale parameter (i.e., case C2DN6 in Table 2). As shown in Table 3, the critical droplet nuclei diameter for the formation of caustics is 16.5μm, which is in agreement with the appearance of a limiting maximum value for the filtered number densities shown in the Fig. 8f–h. For laminar cases, the predicted loading for the caustics approaches n^d=100 for the smallest length scale shown (i.e. Rε=0.00001). As expected, the point-wise number density result (x-axis) is polluted by singularities resulting to spurious point-wise number densities with nd>104. The observed even higher intensity of the caustics for the laminar case can be attributed to the lack of small scale fluctuations that are expected to smooth the caustic fronts and damp their intensity.

Discussion and conclusions

In this work we investigated the compression and dilation of droplet nuclei in vortex ring structures occurring in human cough configurations. These instances consist of short impulses of exhaled air and are characterised by finite exhale or injection parameters n dictated by the cough exhaled volume and the orifice diameter n4V/(πD3).

The resulting self-contained structure, can travel large distances. Numerical simulations for turbulent and laminar configurations have been carried out. The carrier phase flow field is resolved by means of second order accurate Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS) based on finite difference approach for the momentum equations and a spectral approach for the Poisson equation using FFT.

To obtain such predictions we developed a second order Fully Lagrangian Approach for Eulerian configurations in the Computational Fluid Dynamics framework. The evaluation of high order derivatives needed by the second order FLA is achieved by pre-fabricated least squares second order interpolations in three dimensions. The primary direction of the caustics was calculated by means of Singular Value Decomposition.

The effect of undulations of the carrier phase velocity due to large scale vortical and small scale turbulent structures on the concentration of exhaled nuclei and the corresponding viral load was investigated.

It was observed that the coherent vortical structure of the vortex ring as well as the turbulent fluctuations of the flow field, induce significant caustic formations in agreement to the droplet nuclei Stokes number based on the smallest time scales of the flow. Furthermore, the intensity of the caustics was observed reaching up to 20 times the initial concentration for the turbulent cases and 100 times the initial number density for the laminar configurations. This occurs at significant length scales ranging from 40 to 400μm, highlighting the smoothing effect of turbulent fluctuations to the intensity of the caustic fronts.

Eulerian CFD simulations59 and Eulerian/Lagrangian approaches3,9 for coughing/breathing configurations in a variety of setups suggest the reduction of the number density of the exhaled droplet clouds. In our work we observed instances of significant localised caustic formations39 that result in high number densities sustaining or exceeding the initial number density of the droplet nuclei clouds when exhaled.

Eulerian approaches24,60 can describe large-scale structures and integral parameters of dispersed flows when uniqueness of all parameters of the particulate continuum is assumed. Classes of two-particle models that allow for singularities in the phase space and intersecting trajectories25,6166 have been widely applied67,68. Eulerian models for the particulate continuum inferred either from the kinetic equations for particles or from the equations for the probability density functions (PDF) of particles are also applicable for the modelling of inertia droplets29,69. Eulerian approaches, however, are bounded by the grid resolution. Dispersed phase presents fine length scales that are not correlated to the carrier phase length scales. Caustics for example occur on very thin surfaces even in fully resolved laminar flows. Standard Eulerian-Lagrangian approaches38,70, on the other hand, demand a prohibitive number of representative particles71,72. The Osiptsov method26, can successfully identify caustics73 by a small number of representative clouds. The standard FLA, however, cannot provide a prediction of the number density on the caustics. Also, the spurious values in the vicinity of the caustic singularity pollute statistical analyses44. For this the second order FLA was used in this work, to evaluate the intensity of droplet nuclei caustics.

The following observations conclude our findings.

  1. The exhale parameter n was not observed to affect the concentrations of the droplet nuclei by no other means than resulting in plumes with pronounced trailing jet.

  2. The trailing jet of the vortex ring conveys droplet nuclei resulting in the reduction of their number density.

  3. The methodology identifies the theoretical limit (St > 1) for the formation of caustics for both laminar and turbulent simulations.

  4. Both turbulent fluctuations and macroscopic VR vortical structures generate high number densities sustaining or exceeding the initial number density of the droplet nuclei clouds when exhaled.

  5. Increased intensity of the caustic fronts conveyed by the large coherent vortical structures of laminar VRs was observed when compared with turbulent VRs.

Methods

The carrier phase flow field is resolved by means of second order accurate Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS). Droplet clouds are injected with the carrier phase velocity and the Jacobian and Hessian matrices are initialised according to the initial conditions of the initial value problem of the method40 described in the “Supplementary Material”. Droplet clouds are distributed uniformly along the radial and the azimuthal directions of the orifice. The instantaneous dispersed phase droplet number flow rate is integrated in time. The closest integer number of droplets is then emitted, while they are subtracted from the total influx integral.

The droplets are decomposed following the domain decomposition of the carrier phase computational domain. When crossing domains, the droplet clouds are deleted from the current partition and re-injected into the new partition. In order to avoid the re-allocation of memory addresses and retain the computational efficiency of memory arrays, erased particles are flagged as empty objects which are re-used by newly injected droplet clouds.

Supplementary Information

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge financial support from the City, University of London. Additional funding has been received by the UK’s Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) through Grant P/K020846/1.

Author contributions

A.P. and M.G. initiated the project. A.P. developed the model analyzed the data and performed the simulations and wrote the manuscript. F.L., I.D. and A.P. developed the parallel carrier phase solver. All authors contributed in writing and reviewing the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-022-07717-z.

References

  • 1.Graham, F. Daily briefing: WHO describes coronavirus as a pandemic to spur countries to action. In Nature. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. 10.1038/d41586-020-00732-y (2020). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 2.Aylward B, Liang W. Report of the WHO-China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) WHO-China Jt. Mission Coronavirus Dis. 2020;2019(2019):16–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Li H, Leong F, Xu G. Airborne dispersion of droplets during coughing: A physical model of viral transmission. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:4617. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84245-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Liu Y, et al. Aerodynamic characteristics and RNA concentration of SARS-CoV-2 aerosol in Wuhan Hospitals during COVID-19 outbreak. bioRxiv. 2020;86:2020.03.08.982637. doi: 10.1101/2020.03.08.982637. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chan JFW, et al. A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: A study of a family cluster. Lancet. 2020;395:514–523. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30154-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cowling BJ, et al. Aerosol transmission is an important mode of influenza A virus spread. Nat. Commun. 2013 doi: 10.1038/ncomms2922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Weber T, Stilianakis N. Inactivation of influenza A viruses in the environment and modes of transmission: A critical review. J. Infect. 2008;57:361–373. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2008.08.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Prasanna Simha P, Mohan Rao PS. Universal trends in human cough airflows at large distances. Phys. Fluids. 2020 doi: 10.1063/5.0021666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Liu K, Allahyari M, Salinas J. Peering inside a cough or sneeze to explain enhanced airborne transmission under dry weather. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:9826. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89078-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Verma S, Dhanak M, Frankenfield J. Visualizing droplet dispersal for face shields and masks with exhalation valves. Phys. Fluids. 2020;32:91701. doi: 10.1063/5.0022968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lewis D. Superspreading drives the COVID pandemic—and could help to tame it. Nat. News Feature. 2021;590:544–546. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-00460-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Edwards DA, et al. Exhaled aerosol increases with COVID-19 infection, age, and obesity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2021 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2021830118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cyranoski D. How to stop restaurants from driving COVID infections. Nature 2021. 2020;587:7834. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-03140-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fung J, Hunt J, Perkins R. Diffusivities and velocity spectra of small inertial particles in turbulent-like flows. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2003;459:445–493. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2002.1023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wang L, Maxey M. Settling velocity and concentration distribution of heavy particles in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 1993;256:27–68. doi: 10.1017/S0022112093002708. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Maxey MR. The gravitational settling of aerosol particles in homogeneous turbulence and random flow fields. J. Fluid Mech. 1987;174:441–465. doi: 10.1017/S0022112087000193. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fessler JR, Kulick JD, Eaton JK. Preferential concentration of heavy particles in a turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids. 1994;6:3742–3749. doi: 10.1063/1.868445. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Reeks M. Transport, mixing and agglomeration of particles in turbulent flows. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2011;530:012003. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/530/1/012003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Meneguz E, Reeks M. Statistical properties of particle segregation in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 2011;686:338–351. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2011.333. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gustavsson K, Meneguz E, Reeks M, Mehlig B. Inertial-particle dynamics in turbulent flows: Caustics, concentration fluctuations and random uncorrelated motion. N. J. Phys. 2012;14:115017. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/14/11/115017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Squires K, Eaton J. Preferential concentration of particles by turbulence. Phys. Fluids A. 1991;3:1169–1178. doi: 10.1063/1.858045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chen L, Goto S, Vassilicos J. Turbulent clustering of stagnation points and inertial particles. J. Fluid Mech. 2006;553:143–154. doi: 10.1017/S0022112006009177. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gustavsson K, Mehlig B. Ergodic and non-ergodic clustering of inertial particles. EPL Europhys. Lett. 2011;96:60012. doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/96/60012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wilkinson M, Mehlig B, Bezugly V. Caustic activation of rain showers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006;97:048501. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.048501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gustavsson K, Mehlig B. Distribution of relative velocities in turbulent aerosols. Phys. Rev. E. 2011;84:045304. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.84.045304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Osiptsov A. Investigation of regions of unbounded growth of the particle concentration in disperse flows. Fluid Dyn. 1984;19:378–385. doi: 10.1007/BF01093900. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fevrier P, Simonin O, Squires K. Partitioning of particle velocities in gas solid turbulent flows into a continuous field and a spatially uncorrelated random distribution; theoretical formalism and numerical study. J. Fluid Mech. 2005;533:1–46. doi: 10.1017/S0022112005004088. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Masi E, Simonin O, Bédat B. The mesoscopic Eulerian approach for evaporating droplets interacting with turbulent flows. Flow Turbulence Combust. 2011;86:563–583. doi: 10.1007/s10494-010-9313-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zaichik LI, Simonin O. Connection between two statistical approaches for modelling of particle velocity and concentrations distributions in turbulenct flow: The mesoscopic eulerian formalism and the two-point probability density function method. Phys. Fluids. 2006;18:5107. doi: 10.1063/1.2187548. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tomita K, Den M. Gauge-invariant perturbations in anisotropic homogeneous cosmological models. Phys. Rev. D. 1986;34:3570–3583. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.34.3570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Vogel S. Life in Moving Fluids: The Physical Biology of Flow. Princeton University Press; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Serrano XM, et al. Long distance dispersal and vertical gene flow in the Caribbean brooding coral Porites astreoides. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:21619. doi: 10.1038/srep21619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lebreton L, et al. Evidence that the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is rapidly accumulating plastic. Sci. Rep. 2018 doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22939-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Knight G. Plastic Pollution (Heinemann Library. Ill; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bell ML, Dominici F, Ebisu K, Zeger SL, Samet JM. Spatial and temporal variation in PM2.5 chemical composition in the United States for health effects studies. Environ. Health Perspect. 2007;115:989–995. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Thomas AJ, Martin JM. First assessment of chernobyl radioactive plume over Paris. Nature. 1986;321:817–819. doi: 10.1038/321817b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Rygg A, Hindle M, Longest W. Linking suspension nasal spray drug deposition patterns to pharmacokinetic profiles: A proof-of-concept study using computational fluid dynamics. J. Pharm. Sci. 2016;105:1995–2004. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2016.03.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sazhin S. Droplets and Sprays. Springer; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Samant O, Alageshan J, Sharma SEA. Dynamic mode decomposition of inertial particle caustics in Taylor-Green flow. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:10456. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89953-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Papoutsakis A, Gavaises M. A model for the investigation of the second-order structure of caustic formations in dispersed flows. J. Fluid Mech. 2020;892:A4. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2020.176. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Osiptsov AN. Investigation of regions of unbounded growth of the particle concentration in disperse flows. Fluid Dyn. 1984;19:378–385. doi: 10.1007/BF01093900. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Healy DP, Young JB. Full Lagrangian methods for calculating particle concentration fields in dilute gas-particle flows. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2005;461:2197–2225. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ravichandran S, Govindarajan R. Caustics and clustering in the vicinity of a vortex. Phys. Fluids. 2015 doi: 10.1063/1.4916583. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Picciotto M, Marchioli C, Reeks M, Soldati A. Statistics of velocity and preferential accumulation of micro-particles in boundary layer turbulence. Nuclear Eng. Design. 2005;235:1239–1249. doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2005.01.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Papoutsakis A, et al. Modelling of the evolution of a droplet cloud in a turbulent flow. Int. J. Multiph. Flow. 2018;104:233–257. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2018.02.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Monchaux R, Bourgoin M, Cartellier A. Analyzing preferential concentration and clustering of inertial particles in turbulence. Int. J. Multiphase Flow. 2012;40:1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2011.12.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Osiptsov A. Lagrangian modelling of dust admixture in gas flows. Astrophys. Space Sci. 2000;274:377–386. doi: 10.1023/A:1026557603451. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Zayas G, et al. Cough aerosol in healthy participants: Fundamental knowledge to optimize droplet-spread infectious respiratory disease management. BMC Pulmonary Med. 2012;12:11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-12-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Duguid JP. The size and the duration of air-carriage of respiratory droplets and droplet-nuclei. J. Hygiene. 1946;44:471–479. doi: 10.1017/S0022172400019288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Danaila I, Kaplanski F, Sazhin SS. Vortex Ring Models. Mathematical Engineering. Springer International Publishing; 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bourouiba L, Dehandschoewercker E, Bush JWM. Violent expiatory events: On coughing and sneezing. J. Fluid Mech. 2014;745:537–563. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2014.88. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Gharib M, Rambod E, Shariff K. A universal time scale for vortex ring formation. J. Fluid Mech. 1998;360:121–140. doi: 10.1017/S0022112097008410. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Tang JW, Liebner TJ, Craven BA, Settles GS. A schlieren optical study of the human cough with and without wearing masks for aerosol infection control. J. R. Soc. Interface. 2009;6:S727. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2009.0295.focus. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Danaila I, Kaplanski F, Sazhin S. Modelling of confined vortex rings. J. Fluid Mech. 2015;774:267–297. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2015.261. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Danaila I, Luddens F, Kaplanski F, Papoutsakis A, Sazhin SS. Formation number of confined vortex rings. Phys. Rev. Fluids. 2018;3:094701. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevFluids.3.094701. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ungate, C. D., Harleman, D. R. F. & Jirka, G. H. Stability and mixing of submerged turbulent jets at low Reynolds numbers. Energy Laboratory Report No. MIT-EL 75-014. (1975).
  • 57.Papoutsakis, A. Assessment of LES sub-grid models for turbulent reactive flows. Ph.D. thesis, University of London, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine (2008).
  • 58.Xia H, Nicolas F, Punzmann H, Shats M. Lagrangian scale of particle dispersion in turbulence. Nat. Commun. 2013;4:1–8. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Khosronejad A, et al. Fluid dynamics simulations show that facial masks can suppress the spread of COVID-19 in indoor environments. ArXiv. 2020 doi: 10.1063/5.0035414. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Falkovich G, Fouxon A, Stepanov M. Acceleration of rain initiation by cloud turbulence. Nature. 2002;419:151–154. doi: 10.1038/nature00983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Zaichik L, Alipchenkov V. Refinement of the probability density function model for preferential concentration of aerosol particles in isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids. 2007;19:113308. doi: 10.1063/1.2813044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Alipchenkov V, Zaichik L. Subgrid continuum modeling of particle motion in a turbulent flow. Fluid Dyn. 2008;43:731–744. doi: 10.1134/S0015462808050074. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Zaichik L, Alipchenkov V, Sinaiskii E. Particles in Turbulent Flows. Wiley VCH; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Zaichik L, Alipchenkov V. Statistical models for predicting pair dispersion and particle clustering in isotropic turbulence and their applications. N. J. Phys. 2009;11:103018. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/11/10/103018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Chun J, Koch D, Rani S, Ahluwalia A, Collins L. Clustering of aerosol particles in isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 2005;536:219–251. doi: 10.1017/S0022112005004568. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Pan L, Padoan P. Relative velocity of inertial particles in turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech. 2010;661:73–107. doi: 10.1017/S0022112010002855. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Bragg, A. & Collins, L. New insights from comparing statistical theories for inertial particles in turbulence: I. Spatial distribution of particles. N. J. Phys. 16, 115017 (2014).
  • 68.Bragg, A. & Collins, L. New insights from comparing statistical theories for inertial particles in turbulence: II. Relative velocities. N. J. Phys. 16, 055014 (2014).
  • 69.Shrimpton J, Haeri S, Scott S. Statistical Treatment of Turbulent Polydisperse Particle Systems: A Non-Sectional PDF Approach. Springer; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Crowe C, Sharma M, Stock D. The particle-source-in cell (psi-cell) model for gas-droplet flows. J. Fluids Eng. 1977;99:325–332. doi: 10.1115/1.3448756. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Sazhina E, Sazhin S, Heikal M, Babushok V, Johns R. A detailed modelling of the spray ignition process in diesel engines. Combust. Sci. Technol. 2000;160:317–344. doi: 10.1080/00102200008935806. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Healy D, Young J. Full Lagrangian methods for calculating particle concentration fields in dilute gas-particle flows. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2005;461:2197–2225. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Gustavsson K, Mehlig B. Statistical models for spatial patterns of heavy particles in turbulence. Adv. Phys. 2016;65:1–57. doi: 10.1080/00018732.2016.1164490. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES