Abstract
The effects of betaine supplementation on growth performance, blood components, nutrient digestibility, excreta noxious gas emission, and meat quality of broiler chickens were examined using different dietary crude protein (CP) and methionine (Met) levels. A total of 768 Ross 308 broiler chickens were allotted to four treatments, with 12 replications of each treatment conducted over 6 wk. Treatments were factorially designed, with 2 levels of CP [Starter: CP 21% (low Met) and 23% (high Met); Finisher: CP 18% (low Met) and 20% (high Met)] and 2 levels of betaine supplementation (0 and 0.12%). Body weight gain and feed conversion improved significantly as dietary levels of protein increased (P < 0.05), but the results for betaine supplementation differed. The concentrations of serum total protein, albumin, and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) were elevated by either the supplementary betaine or the CP (P < 0.05). In addition, serum albumin concentration significantly increased in groups fed low CP amounts and betaine 0.12% compared with groups fed low CP only (P < 0.05). Total tract digestibility of nitrogen in broilers fed high CP amounts or 0.12% betaine, was observed to be greater than that in groups fed low CP amounts or no betaine treatment (P < 0.05). Supplemental betaine affected excreta ammonia gas emission, and hydrogen sulfide concentrations decreased significantly in low CP-fed groups (P < 0.05). Breast meat quality and relative organ weights were not influenced by CP levels or dietary betaine supplementation. These results suggest that betaine does not increase productivity, but may affect serum total protein, albumin, GPx, excreta ammonia emission, and nitrogen digestibility in broiler chickens. In addition, betaine supplementation is more effective in increasing serum albumin concentration when it was added in low CP (low Met) diets.
key words: antioxidant enzyme, excreta ammonia gas, productivity, trimethylglycine
INTRODUCTION
Betaine (N, N, N-trimethylglycine) is a non-toxic amino acid derivative that is present in relatively large amounts in many foods, including sugar beets, wheat, spinach, and aquatic invertebrates. However, it is not present in significant quantities in most feed ingredients (Fernández et al., 2000). In the body, betaine is generated in the liver and kidney from choline, through the sequential action of choline oxidase and betaine-aldehyde dehydrogenase (Dilger et al., 2007). It serves as a methyl donor in the conversion of homocysteine to methionine, catalyzed by the betaine-homocysteine methyltransferase enzyme (Ueland et al., 2005). Due to its ability to donate a methyl group, betaine can be used to spare methionine and improve intestinal function against osmotic stress, which occurs during diarrhea or coccidiosis in animals (Saunderson and MacKinlay, 1990; Amerah and Ravindran, 2015).
Many studies have shown responses to betaine supplementation in the diets of chickens. The positive effects of betaine on methionine sparing in chicks have been previously indicated (Kidd et al., 1997; Simon, 1999; Mahmoudi et al., 2018). In contrast, Esteve-Garcia and Mack (2000) used a wheat-soybean meal-based diet, supplemented with choline to provide an adequate supply of methyl groups, and found relatively small and non-significant responses to betaine supplementation. However, the effects of methionine were significant in improving body weight gain (BWG) and feed conversion ratio (FCR), and in increasing the breast yield of broiler chicks. Schutte et al. (1997) and Kermanshahi (2001) also observed that there was no evidence of betaine sparing DL-methionine as an essential amino acid supplement in broiler diets. Although betaine has been thought to function as osmolyte, play a role in fat distribution, and act as a methyl donor, the effects of betaine in the donation of methyl groups has long been controversial.
Methionine is the first limiting amino acid in corn-soybean diets for broiler chickens. Dietary methionine treatment significantly affects the growth performance, serum protein metabolism, meat quality, and oxidative status of muscle in broiler chickens and pigs (Tian et al., 2016; Wen et al., 2017). In addition, Ratriyanto et al., (2017) demonstrated that the changes in bird productivity and nutrient digestibility depend on the amount of dietary crude protein (CP). In a review, Eklund et al. (2005) reported that the methionine sparing effect of betaine could enhance the efficient use of dietary protein. We speculated that betaine supplementation to low protein and low methionine diets may improve the efficiency of protein utilization and enhance the performance of broiler chickens, thereby reducing nitrogen excretion to the environment as well as providing the opportunity to formulate low cost ration compared with high protein diets with high methionine levels. Therefore, the objectives of this study were i) to evaluate whether betaine supplementation to low or high protein diets improve the production performance, blood components, nutrient digestibility, excreta noxious gas emission, and meat quality of broiler chickens ii) to see if there is interaction between dietary levels of CP and betaine.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The research was carried out as per guidelines of the Animal Care and Use Committee of Dankook University, Republic of Korea.
Animals and Experimental Design
A total of 768, Ross 308 (male, 1-day-old) broiler chickens, weighing between 40 and 42 g, were selected for 6 wk of feeding trials. The broilers were sorted into 1 of 4 dietary treatments. Each treatment involved 12 replications and 16 broilers were used per replication. There were 2 phases of differing CP levels—the starter (1 to 21 d) and finisher periods (22 to 42 d). Treatments were arranged in a 2 × 2 factorial, with 2 dietary CP levels [high CP or low CP (high CP − 2% less)], and 2 levels of betaine [betafin® (CTC BIO Inc. Seoul, Korea), natural betaine anhydrous 96%] supplementation (0 or 0.12%). The diets (in mash form) were formulated according to recommendations from the Nutrient Requirements of Poultry (NRC, 1994), based on corn-soybean diets containing CP 23% (21%) and methionine 0.5% (0.45%) for 1 to 21 d, and CP 20% (18%) and methionine 0.38% (0.34%) for 22 to 42 d (Table 1).
Table 1.
Starter1 |
Finisher |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Ingredient, % | Low CP | High CP | Low CP | High CP |
Corn (7.9%) | 59.83 | 55.84 | 65.66 | 61.59 |
Soybean meal (45%) | 19.69 | 20.50 | 17.51 | 18.67 |
Corn gluten meal (61%) | 11.69 | 14.83 | 7.27 | 10.45 |
Wheat bran | 2.00 | 2.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 |
Soybean oil | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 |
Tricalcium phosphate | 1.83 | 1.81 | 1.31 | 1.29 |
Limestone | 0.93 | 0.94 | 1.12 | 1.13 |
Salt | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.41 | 0.41 |
DL-Methionine (99%) | 0.10 | 0.19 | 0.06 | 0.09 |
L-Lysine (99%) | 0.27 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.19 |
Vitamin premix2 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 |
Mineral premix3 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 |
Nutrient composition | ||||
ME, kcal/kg | 3200 | 3200 | 3200 | 3200 |
CP, % | 21.00 | 23.00 | 18.00 | 20.00 |
Ether Extract, % | 5.62 | 5.61 | 5.68 | 5.67 |
Crude Fibre, % | 2.64 | 2.67 | 2.67 | 2.70 |
Ash, % | 5.48 | 5.59 | 4.96 | 5.06 |
Ca, % | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.90 |
Available P, % | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.35 | 0.35 |
Sodium, % | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.18 |
Lysine,% | 1.10 | 1.10 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Methionine, % | 0.45 | 0.50 | 0.34 | 0.38 |
Cysteine, % | 0.37 | 0.41 | 0.33 | 0.36 |
Threonine, % | 0.75 | 0.82 | 0.66 | 0.72 |
Tryptophan, % | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.20 | 0.22 |
Glycine, % | 0.78 | 0.84 | 0.71 | 0.76 |
Serine, % | 1.03 | 1.13 | 0.90 | 1.01 |
Choline, mg/kg | 997 | 1007 | 981 | 992 |
Folacin, mg/kg | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 0.56 |
Total sulfur amino acid, % | 0.82 | 0.91 | 0.67 | 0.74 |
Digestible lysine, % | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.84 | 0.84 |
Digestible methionine, % | 0.42 | 0.47 | 0.31 | 0.35 |
Digestible cysteine, % | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.23 | 0.26 |
Digestible threonine, % | 0.63 | 0.70 | 0.54 | 0.60 |
Digestible tryptophan, % | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.14 | 0.15 |
Digestible glycine, % | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.53 | 0.57 |
Digestible serine, % | 0.95 | 1.05 | 0.80 | 0.90 |
Digestible sulfur amino acid, % | 0.67 | 0.75 | 0.54 | 0.61 |
Stater diets provided during d 1 to 21; finisher diet provided during d 22 to 42.
Provided per kg of complete diet: 15,000 IU of vitamin A, 3,750 IU of vitamin D3, 37.5 mg of vitamin E, 2.55 mg of vitamin K3, 3 mg of thiamin, 7.5 mg of riboflavin, 4.5 mg of vitamin B6, 24 ug of vitamin B12, 51 mg of niacin, 1.5 mg of folic acid, 0.2 mg of biotin and 13.5 mg of Ca-Pantothenate.
Provided per kg of complete diet: 37.5 mg Zn (as ZnSO4); 37.5 mg Mn (as MnO2); 37.5 mg Fe (as FeSO4·7H2 O); 3.75 mg Cu (as CuSO4·5H2 O); 0.83 mg I (as KI); and 0.23 mg Se (as Na2 SeO3·5H2 O).
Experimental Management
Broilers were housed in a temperature-controlled room with 3 floors of stainless steel battery cages (64 × 124 × 40 cm), allowing free access to feed and water during the experiment. Consistent light was provided for 22 h, and temperature and humidity were adjusted according to the Ross 308 manual management guide.
Growth Performance
Body weight of broilers was measured on days 1, 21, and 42 of the experimentation period. After measuring the remaining feed on days 21 and 42, BWG, feed intake (FI), and FCR were calculated. Dead birds were recorded to determine the mortality (%) during the experiment.
Blood Profiles
Serum samples were collected from broiler chickens in each group at the end of the experiment, for analyses. Total serum protein, albumin, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine and uric acid concentrations were determined by standard laboratory methods, using an automatic analyzer (ADVIA, Bayer, Tokyo, Japan). The activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) in the serum, were measured using a commercial kit from Enzo Life Sciences Company (Ann Arbor, MI, USA) as per instructions from the manufacturer.
Apparent Total Tract Digestibility
To determine the nutrient digestibility, 0.2% chromium oxide (Cr2 O3), as an indigestible marker, was added to the diets, 5 d prior to the collection period. Clean stainless steel collection trays were placed under each cage, and excreta (feces and urine) from the broilers was collected twice daily, in the last 3 d of the experimental period. After drying at 60°C for 72 h, it was pulverized and passed through a 1-mm screen; apparent total tract retention of dry matter, nitrogen, and energy were analyzed (AOAC, 2000).
Excreta Noxious Gas Emission
Excreta (feces and urine) samples were collected using stainless steel collection trays from each replication in the last 3 d of the experiment, for analyses of ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, total mercaptan and acetic acid. The samples were stored in 2.6-L sealed plastic containers for 5 d, at room temperature (25°C). Following the fermentation period, a Gastec (model GV-100) gas sampling pump was used to detect gas (Gastec Corp., Tokyo, Japan). For these measurements, the adhesive plaster of each container was punctured, and 100 ml of air was sampled at approximately 5 cm above the feces.
Breast Meat Quality
At the end of the experimentation period, 12 broilers were randomly selected from each treatment, individually weighed, and slaughtered by cervical dislocation. The pH of collected breast muscle samples was measured using a pH meter (Istek 77P, Seoul, Korea). Meat color values were measured using a Minolta colorimeter (CR-300, Tokyo, Japan). Meat samples were measured at three different locations across the breast and expressed as L* (lightness), a* (redness), and b* (yellowness) values. The pH value of raw breast meat was measured using a digital pH meter (NWKbinar pH, K-21, Landberg, Germany) after blending 10 g of finely homogenized samples with 90 ml of double-distilled water. The water holding capacity (WHC) was determined using a method by Kim et al. (2009). Ten grams of breast meat samples was ground using a grinder (PA-82, Mainca, Barcelona, Spain) equipped with 3-mm plate, and heated to 70°C in a water bath for 30 min. The samples were then cooled with ice and centrifuged at 4°C at 1,000 × g for 10 min. The WHC was calculated as the ratio (%) of liquid weight after centrifugation, to that of the original liquid. For cooking loss estimation, raw meat samples (3 × 5 × 8 cm) were placed in plastic bags, after being weighed, and were cooked in a water bath at 80°C for 1 h. The samples were then cooled to 4°C for 2 h and weighed again. Cooking losses were calculated based on the differences in weight between the raw and cooked samples. Drip loss (%) was determined by weight loss. Samples were removed from broiler breast meat, weighed, and suspended in a zipper bag for 7 d, at 4°C. The initial and final weight (at 1, 3, 5, and 7 d) of each sample was used to calculate drip loss.
Relative Organ Weight
Following blood collection, the same broilers were weighed individually and killed by cervical dislocation. The liver, spleen, bursa of Fabricius, breast meat, abdominal fat, and gizzard were removed weighed. Organs, breast muscle and abdominal fat were expressed as a percentage of live body weight.
Statistical Analysis
The cage was used as the experimental unit for performance. Individual birds were used as experimental units for digestibility, blood profile, excreta noxious gas, and meat quality measurements. To investigate the effects of different dietary CP levels and betaine, data were analyzed in a 2 × 2 factorial design. Two-way ANOVA (using SAS software) was used analyze the interactions between the 2 factors. When interactions (P < 0.05) existed between the dietary CP levels and betaine, multiple comparisons were conducted by the Tukey's method to compare significant differences between treatments, using a significance level ofP < 0.05.
RESULTS
Growth Performance
Broiler chickens fed a 0.12% betaine supplemented diet during the periods of 1 to 21 d, 22 to 42 d, and 1 to 42 d showed no significant differences in BWG, FI, and FCR. During the period of 22 to 42 d and 1 to 42 d BWG and FCR improved under high CP treatments compared with low CP treatments (P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in mortality during the experiment. There was no significant interactive effect of betaine supplementation and dietary CP on performance of broilers in the entire experiment period (Table 2).
Table 2.
Low CP |
High CP |
CP |
Bet |
P-value |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Items | Bet 0 | Bet 0.12% | Bet 0 | Bet 0.12% | SEM2 | Low | High | 0% | 0.12% | CP | Bet | CP × Bet |
1–21 d | ||||||||||||
BWG3, g | 682 | 680 | 695 | 704 | 9.25 | 681 | 688 | 689 | 692 | 0.2059 | 0.2059 | 0.1960 |
FI4, g | 1098 | 1093 | 1101 | 1102 | 8.42 | 1096 | 1097 | 1100 | 1098 | 0.2342 | 0.3533 | 0.7899 |
FCR5 | 1.61 | 1.61 | 1.58 | 1.57 | 0.02 | 1.61 | 1.60 | 1.60 | 1.59 | 0.5268 | 0.4411 | 0.1055 |
22–42 d | ||||||||||||
BWG, g | 1913 | 1941 | 2203 | 2109 | 18.15 | 1927 | 2156 | 2058 | 2025 | 0.0187 | 0.7128 | 0.2666 |
FI, g | 3789 | 3851 | 3849 | 3726 | 16.75 | 3820 | 3788 | 3869 | 3789 | 0.4096 | 0.4875 | 0.6261 |
FCR | 1.98 | 1.98 | 1.75 | 1.77 | 0.02 | 1.98 | 1.76 | 1.88 | 1.87 | 0.0048 | 0.3753 | 0.5353 |
1–42 d | ||||||||||||
BWG, g | 2595 | 2621 | 2898 | 2813 | 20.48 | 2608 | 2856 | 2747 | 2717 | 0.0062 | 0.8540 | 0.1094 |
FI, g | 4887 | 4944 | 4950 | 4828 | 21.76 | 4916 | 4889 | 4919 | 4886 | 0.3126 | 0.4080 | 0.8011 |
FCR | 1.88 | 1.89 | 1.71 | 1.72 | 0.02 | 1.89 | 1.71 | 1.79 | 1.80 | 0.0002 | 0.1583 | 0.1539 |
Mortality, % | 6.3 | 6.8 | 7.4 | 6.7 | 1.26 | 6.6 | 7.1 | 6.9 | 6.8 | 0.4595 | 0.7725 | 0.6258 |
Low crude protein (CP) diet, 21 and 18% CP, 0.45 and 0.34% methionine for starter and finisher periods; high CP diet, 23 and 20% CP, 0.50 and 0.38% methionine.
Standard error of means.
Body weight gain.
Feed intake.
Feed conversion ratio.
Blood Profiles
There were no significant differences in creatinine, uric acid, and GPx concentrations in broiler chickens fed different levels of CP or betaine in their diets. The BUN concentration tended to increase in broiler chickens fed a diet containing 0.12% betaine (P = 0.0889). Broiler chickens in the high CP groups showed higher total serum protein concentrations than the low CP groups (P < 0.05). Total protein, albumin, and GPx concentrations were elevated in broiler chickens fed a diet containing 0.12% betaine compared with those fed no betaine diet (P < 0.05). There was a significant interaction between CP levels and betaine supplementation for albumin concentrations (P < 0.05). Broiler chickens fed a low CP containing 0.12% betaine, showed increased serum albumin concentration compared with birds fed low CP diet alone (Table 3).
Table 3.
Low CP |
High CP |
CP |
Bet |
P-value |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Items | Bet 0 | Bet 0.12% | Bet 0 | Bet 0.12% | SEM2 | Low | High | 0% | 0.12% | CP | Bet | CP × Bet |
Total protein, g/dL | 3.0 | 3.1 | 3.4 | 3.7 | 0.1 | 3.1 | 3.6 | 3.2 | 3.4 | <.0001 | 0.0050 | 0.1163 |
Albumin, g/dL | 1.2b | 1.4a | 1.4a | 1.4a | 0.1 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 0.1159 | 0.0126 | 0.0408 |
BUN3, mg/dL | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0.2 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 1.0000 | 0.0889 | 0.2515 |
Creatinine, mg/dL | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.01 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.6158 | 0.4526 | 0.6158 |
Uric acid, mg/dL | 2.9 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.4 | 0.3 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 0.4920 | 0.5699 | 0.9046 |
SOD4,U/mg protein | 171.7 | 178.1 | 171.2 | 183.3 | 2.0 | 174.9 | 177.3 | 171.5 | 180.7 | 0.9343 | 0.4011 | 0.8690 |
GPx5,U/mg protein | 199.4 | 211.5 | 200.8 | 219.7 | 2.5 | 205.5 | 210.3 | 200.1 | 215.6 | 0.4265 | 0.0364 | 0.8167 |
Low crude protein (CP) diet, 21 and 18% CP, 0.45 and 0.34% methionine for starter and finisher periods; high CP diet, 23 and 20% CP, 0.50 and 0.38% methionine.
Standard error of means.
Blood urea nitrogen.
Superoxide dismutase.
Glutathione peroxidase.
Total Tract Nutrient Digestibility
As shown in Table 4, nitrogen digestibility in broiler chickens fed high CP diets was greater than in those fed low CP treatments (P < 0.05). Moreover, betaine supplementation increased nitrogen digestibility (P < 0.05), and tended to increased dry matter (P = 0.1020) and energy digestibility (P = 0.0598). However, betaine and 2 CP levels did not have any significant effects on the digestibility of dry matter and energy of broilers. There was no significant interactive effect of betaine supplementation and dietary CP on nitrogen digestibility.
Table 4.
Low CP |
High CP |
CP |
Bet |
P-value |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Items, % | Bet 0 | Bet 0.12% | Bet 0 | Bet 0.12% | SEM2 | Low | High | 0% | 0.12% | CP | Bet | CP × Bet |
Dry matter | 72.08 | 72.75 | 72.64 | 73.53 | 0.46 | 72.42 | 73.09 | 72.36 | 73.14 | 0.1542 | 0.1020 | 0.8091 |
Nitrogen | 66.34 | 67.31 | 67.22 | 68.11 | 0.34 | 66.83 | 67.67 | 66.78 | 67.71 | 0.0179 | 0.0097 | 0.9104 |
Energy | 69.13 | 71.95 | 69.83 | 71.94 | 0.49 | 70.56 | 70.89 | 69.48 | 71.95 | 0.1964 | 0.0598 | 0.7573 |
Low crude protein (CP) diet, 21 and 18% CP, 0.45 and 0.34% methionine for starter and finisher periods; high CP diet, 23 and 20% CP, 0.50 and 0.38% methionine.
Standard error of means.
Excreta Noxious Gas Emission
Ammonia gas emission in broiler chickens fed betaine was lower than in those fed no betaine treatments (P < 0.05). The decreased hydrogen sulfide emission in low CP treatments was comparable with that in high CP treatments (P < 0.05). However, changes in betaine and CP levels did not have any significant effects on the emission of total mercaptan or acetic acid. There was no significant interactive effect of betaine supplementation and dietary CP on excreta noxious gas emission (Table 5).
Table 5.
Low CP |
High CP |
CP |
Bet |
P-value |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Items, ppm | Bet 0 | Bet 0.12% | Bet 0 | Bet 0.12% | SEM2 | Low | High | 0% | 0.12% | CP | Bet | CP × Bet |
Ammonia | 31.4 | 30.4 | 31.7 | 31.0 | 0.3 | 30.9 | 31.4 | 31.6 | 30.7 | 0.2155 | 0.0225 | 0.6441 |
Hydrogen sulfide | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 0.0371 | 0.8562 | 0.6233 |
Mercaptan | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.0000 | 0.9217 | 0.1746 |
Acetic acid | 26.1 | 25.1 | 26.0 | 25.8 | 1.2 | 25.6 | 25.9 | 26.1 | 25.5 | 0.8218 | 0.5919 | 0.7487 |
Low crude protein (CP) diet, 21 and 18% CP, 0.45 and 0.34% methionine for starter and finisher periods; high CP diet, 23 and 20% CP, 0.50 and 0.38% methionine.
Standard error of means.
Meat Quality and Organ Weights
Dietary betaine supplementation and different CP levels did not have any significant effects on pH, meat color, WHC, cooking loss, or drip loss in broiler chickens. There was no significant effect of betaine supplementation and dietary CP on the relative organ weights of broiler chickens. There was no significant interactive effect of betaine supplementation and dietary CP on meat quality and organ weights (Table 6).
Table 6.
Low CP |
High CP |
CP |
Bet |
P-value |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Items | Bet 0 | Bet 0.12% | Bet 0 | Bet 0.12% | SEM2 | Low | High | 0% | 0.12% | CP | Bet | CP × Bet |
pH value | 5.33 | 5.37 | 5.33 | 5.36 | 0.05 | 5.35 | 5.35 | 5.33 | 5.37 | 0.9842 | 0.4899 | 0.9684 |
Breast muscle color | ||||||||||||
Lightness (L*) | 54.76 | 54.28 | 55.14 | 54.41 | 0.53 | 54.52 | 54.78 | 54.95 | 54.35 | 0.6569 | 0.3048 | 0.8311 |
Redness (a*) | 10.38 | 10.39 | 10.24 | 10.33 | 0.19 | 10.39 | 10.29 | 10.31 | 10.36 | 0.6307 | 0.7967 | 0.8496 |
Yellowness (b*) | 8.45 | 8.59 | 8.55 | 8.37 | 0.19 | 8.52 | 8.46 | 8.50 | 8.48 | 0.7605 | 0.9163 | 0.4128 |
WHC3, % | 55.36 | 55.13 | 56.61 | 55.48 | 1.48 | 55.25 | 56.05 | 55.99 | 55.31 | 0.8425 | 0.4405 | 0.5320 |
Cooking loss, % | 18.43 | 18.45 | 18.45 | 18.46 | 0.55 | 18.44 | 18.46 | 18.44 | 18.46 | 0.9795 | 0.9738 | 0.9993 |
Drip loss, % | ||||||||||||
d 1 | 4.14 | 3.91 | 3.97 | 3.85 | 0.19 | 4.03 | 3.91 | 4.06 | 3.88 | 0.5631 | 0.3892 | 0.7923 |
d 3 | 8.87 | 8.77 | 8.85 | 8.73 | 0.17 | 8.82 | 8.79 | 8.86 | 8.75 | 0.8597 | 0.4868 | 0.9564 |
d 5 | 11.43 | 11.41 | 11.41 | 11.32 | 0.15 | 11.42 | 11.37 | 11.42 | 11.37 | 0.7314 | 0.7455 | 0.8416 |
d 7 | 14.07 | 14.00 | 13.93 | 13.56 | 0.17 | 14.04 | 13.75 | 14.00 | 13.78 | 0.0817 | 0.1744 | 0.3650 |
Relative organ weight4, % | ||||||||||||
Breast muscle | 18.13 | 17.69 | 18.23 | 18.96 | 0.66 | 17.91 | 18.60 | 18.18 | 18.33 | 0.2857 | 0.8192 | 0.3652 |
Liver | 2.87 | 2.87 | 2.90 | 2.93 | 0.07 | 2.87 | 2.92 | 2.89 | 2.90 | 0.5547 | 0.8128 | 0.7925 |
Bursa of Fabricius | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.17 | 0.16 | 0.01 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.8859 | 0.7379 | 0.2364 |
Abdominal fat | 1.48 | 1.50 | 1.52 | 1.53 | 0.11 | 1.49 | 1.53 | 1.50 | 1.52 | 0.7266 | 0.8808 | 0.9964 |
Spleen | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.5833 | 0.9374 | 0.8138 |
Gizzard | 1.08 | 1.12 | 1.13 | 1.17 | 0.05 | 1.10 | 1.15 | 1.11 | 1.15 | 0.2193 | 0.3637 | 1.0000 |
Low crude protein (CP) diet, 21 and 18% CP, 0.45 and 0.34% methionine for starter and finisher periods; high CP diet, 23 and 20% CP, 0.50 and 0.38% methionine.
Standard error of means.
Water holding capacity.
Based on live body weight (average 2604, 2625, 2890, and 2810 g) per each treatment.
DISCUSSION
The present study aimed to determine the effects of dietary protein levels and betaine supplementation, and their relationships with growth performance, blood profiles, nutrient digestibility, noxious excreta gas emission, and meat quality of broiler chickens.
The application of betaine in poultry nutrition has been known to influence productivity. Addition of betaine in feed, has been the subject of studies on improvement of BWG and FCR (Virtanen and Rosi, 1995; Hassan et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2018). During periods of osmotic disturbance caused by heat stress in broiler chickens, betaine is involved in the protection and development of the morphological characteristics of the intestinal epithelia, resulting in improved growth and feed efficiency (Hamidi et al., 2010; Sakomura et al., 2013). However, other studies have revealed minimal or no effect of betaine supplementation on production performance in terms of BWG, feed efficiency, or egg production during growth in broilers or laying hens (Saunderson and Mckinlay, 1990; Harms and Russell, 2002; Park and Ryu, 2011). Through its methyl donating property, betaine may have spared the dietary methionine, which could be available for other vital functions like protein synthesis and immune modulation, resulting in increased growth performance in broiler chickens. However, as methionine was low in the diet in the present study, there was no indication that the addition of betaine had the potential to spare methionine. The results of the present study were consistent with those of previous studies by Saunderson and Mckinlay (1990) and Park and Ryu (2011), who also showed that dietary replacement of methionine with betaine did not improve productivity in broilers and laying hens. This finding suggests that betaine has no direct effect on the improvement of productivity performance in growing broiler chickens, in comparison with 2 levels of CP levels and methionine.
Total serum protein represents the sum of albumin and globulins, the measurements of which indicate the total amount of protein in blood. There is scientific evidence to confirm that some plasma constituents can be used as indicators of health and functional effectiveness of some organs and immune efficiency of animals. For instance, total protein is positively related to synthesis of tissue for the growth of pigs and broiler chicks (Kapelanski et al., 2004; Piotrowska et al., 2011; Law et al., 2017). Therefore, total protein can reflect protein synthesis and nutritional status. It can also reflect dehydration, kidney disease, liver disease, and many other conditions. If total protein is abnormal, further tests must be performed to identify which protein fraction is abnormal, so that a specific diagnosis can be made. The mean values obtained in the present study are within the range cited by Harr (2002) that is 2.5 to 4.5 g/dl. In addition, BUN is the product of protein metabolism of poultry, which can be affected by dietary protein intake and protein catabolic rate. Reduced concentrations of serum BUN were confirmed in broilers fed low-protein diets (Yang et al. 2009). In the present study, total serum protein, albumin, BUN (P = 0.0889) concentrations were greater in broilers fed high levels of CP and 0.12% betaine diets, than in broilers fed low levels of CP and no betaine diets. In addition, increase in serum albumin was observed to be more effective by the supplementation of 0.12% betaine in low CP diets. This could indicate that protein status was improved in broilers fed betaine-supplemented diet. The increase in serum total protein, albumin, and BUN due to 0.12% betaine supplementation could be associated with its characteristic as a methyl group donor, which is fairly consistent in protein metabolism. Improvements in total protein, albumin, and BUN due to betaine supplementation, could be evidence of the role of methyl donor groups in protein metabolism, although there were no methyl donor effects on overall growth performance.
The antioxidant mechanism of betaine remains unclear. A previous study speculated that the antioxidant properties of betaine were related to higher free radical scavenging abilities (Alirezaei et al., 2012). However, there are currently insufficient data to support this notion in poultry. There are several antioxidant defence mechanisms to preserve the integrity of biological membranes from detrimental oxidative stress caused by free radicals and reactive oxygen species. Among them, enzymes such as SOD and GPx, are first line defense antioxidants (Ray and Husain, 2002). Alirezaei et al. (2012) reported that betaine enhanced SOD and GPx activities in the muscle of broiler chickens, experiencing methionine deficiency induced oxidative stress. The antioxidant activity of betaine may also be due to its ability to block the induction of mitochondrial lipid peroxidation (Ganesan et al., 2007). Erman et al. (2004) demonstrated that betaine exerted cellular and subcellular membrane stabilization in the liver by restoring both non-enzymatic and enzymatic antioxidants. It has been shown that betaine is involved in the synthesis of methionine, which serves as a major supplier of cellular cysteine, via trans-sulfuration pathways, for the synthesis of reduced glutathione, that protects the cell from reactive metabolites and reactive oxygen species (Craig, 2004). An increase in the GPx enzyme was observed in betaine treatments in the present study. Therefore, betaine has antioxidant properties, which could protect cells and organ systems against oxidative damage in broiler chickens.
In this study, broilers fed diets containing betaine reveled higher levels of nitrogen, dry matter (P = 0.1020), and energy (P = 0.0598) digestibility as compared with broilers that were fed a no betaine diet. This result confirms previous observations that betaine improves total tract digestibility of CP, amino acids, and dry matter (Remus et al., 1995; Augustine and Danforth, 1999; Eklund et al., 2006; El-Husseiny et al., 2007; Mosenthin et al., 2007) in pigs and poultry. Therefore, in this study, improvement in energy digestibility may be attributed to increased organic matter digestibility. Kettunen et al. (2001) identified that betaine decreased the ratio of villus height/ crypt depth both in healthy and coccidian challenged broilers, which may partially explain the increased digestibility of nutrients when supplemented with betaine. The osmotic properties of betaine also support intestinal cell growth and survival, and enhance cell activity, thereby potentially influencing nutrient digestibility (Ratriyanto et al., 2009). The present study indicates that betaine decreases excreta ammonia gas emission in broilers. We found no studies regarding the influence of betaine on excreta gas emission in broilers. However, excreta gas emissions correlated with nutrient digestibility. Considering that betaine improves nitrogen digestibility, as shown in the present study, theoretically, the reduction in ammonia emission levels should be easily understood. Therefore, we expect that supplemental betaine can decrease odors in broiler housing due to reduced excreta ammonia gas emission in growing broilers.
Betaine has been reported to affect some carcass characteristics and meat qualities. It has been shown that betaine accumulates in the muscles of pigs (Matthews et al., 2001), thus possibly affecting meat quality. Alterations in the water-retention capacity of the muscle tissue following dietary betaine supplementation may increase total body weight and carcass weight (Esteve-Garcia and Mack, 2000). Some studies suggest a close relationship between the pH of meat and supplemental dietary betaine. The initial pH of the meat was increased in pigs, in association with a decreased drip loss of the meat, when the diet was supplemented with betaine (Matthews et al., 2001). In contrast, other authors have reported that betaine supplementation was less effective in improving carcass characteristics of broiler chickens and pigs (Waldroup and Fritts, 2005; Fernandez-Figares et al., 2008). The results of the present study confirmed that dietary betaine has no effect on the meat quality of broiler chickens. Therefore, further study is needed to determine the effects of betaine on meat quality in broiler chickens, as there is a lack of such information.
In conclusion, the results of this study indicate little or no positive benefits, in terms of productivity and meat quality, from the supplementation of betaine to the different CP diets of broiler chickens. However, betaine supplementation, regardless of dietary CP levels, increased serum protein, albumin, and GPx concentrations, and nitrogen digestibility, whereas excreta ammonia gas emission decreased. In addition, increase in serum albumin was observed to be more effective by the supplementation of 0.12% betaine in low CP diets. Betaine supplementation seems to be related to the efficient use of protein for the methionine sparing effect, but it did not lead to improvement in the broiler performance.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The present research was conducted by the research fund of Dankook University in 2019.
REFERENCES
- Alirezaei M., Gheisari H.R., Ranjbar V.R., Hajibemani A. Betaine: a promising antioxidant agent for enhancement of broiler meat quality. Br. Poult. Sci. 2012;53:699–707. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2012.728283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Amerah A.M., Ravindran V. Effect of coccidia challenge and natural betaine supplementation on performance, nutrient utilization, and intestinal lesion scores of broiler chickens fed suboptimal level of dietary methionine. Poult. Sci. 2015;94:673–680. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- AOAC . 17th edn. Association of Analytical Chemists; Arlington, VA., USA: 2000. Official methods of analysis. [Google Scholar]
- Augustine P.C., Danforth H.D. Influence of betaine and salinomycin on intestinal absorption of methionine and glucose and on the ultrastructure of intestinal cells and parasite developmental stages in chicks infected with Eimeria acervulina. Avian Dis. 1999;43:89–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen R., Zhuang S., Chen Y.P., Cheng Y.F., Wen C., Zhou Y.M. Betaine improves the growth performance and muscle growth of partridge shank broiler chickens via altering myogenic gene expression and insulin-like growth factor-1 signaling pathway. Poult. Sci. 2018;97:4297–4305. doi: 10.3382/ps/pey303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Craig S. Betaine in human nutrition. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004;80:539–549. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/80.3.539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dilger R.N., Garrow T.A., Baker D.H. Betaine can partially spare choline in chicks but only when added to diets containing a minimal level of choline. J. Nutr. 2007;137:2224–2228. doi: 10.1093/jn/137.10.2224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eklund M., Bauer E., Wamatu J., Mosenthin R. Potential nutritional and physiological functions of betaine in livestock. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2005;18:31–48. doi: 10.1079/NRR200493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eklund M., Mosenthin R., Tafaj M., Wamatu J. Effects of betaine and condensed molasses solubles on nitrogen balance and nutrient digestibility in piglets fed diets deficient in methionine and low in compatible osmolytes. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2006;60:289–300. doi: 10.1080/17450390600785525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- El-Husseiny O.M., Abo-El-Ella M.A., Abd-Elsamee M.O., Ab-Elfattah M.M. Response of broiler chick performance to dietary betaine and folic acid at different methionine levels. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2007;6:515–523. [Google Scholar]
- Erman F., Balkan J., Cevikbas U., Kocak-Toker N., Uysal M. Betaine or taurine administration prevents fibrosis and lipid peroxidation induced by rat liver by ethanol plus carbon tetrachloride intoxication. Amino Acids. 2004;27:199–205. doi: 10.1007/s00726-004-0105-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Esteve-Garcia E., Mack S. The effect of DL-methionine and betaine on growth performance and carcass characteristics in broilers. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2000;87:85–93. [Google Scholar]
- Fernandez C., Lopez-Saez A., Gallego L., De La Fuente J.M. Effect of source of betaine on growth performance and carcass traits in lambs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2000;86:71–82. [Google Scholar]
- Fernandez-Figares I., Conde-Aguilera J.A., Nieto R., Lachica M., Aguilera J.F. Synergistic effects of betaine and conjugated linoleic acid on growth and carcass composition of growing Iberian pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2008;86:102–111. doi: 10.2527/jas.2006-0230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ganesan B., Rajesh R., Anandan R., Dhandepani N. Biochemical studies on the protective effects of betaine on mitochrondrial function in experimentally induced myocardial infection in rats. J. Health Sci. 2007;53:671–681. [Google Scholar]
- Hamidi H., Jahanian R., Pourreza J. Effect of dietary betaine on performance, immunocompetence and gut contents osmolarity of broilers challenged with a mixed coccidial infection. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2010;5:193–201. [Google Scholar]
- Harms R.H., Russell G.B. Betaine does not improve performance of laying hens when the diet contains adequate choline. Poult. Sci. 2002;81:99–101. doi: 10.1093/ps/81.1.99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harr K.E. Clinical chemistry of companion avian species: a review. Vet. Clin. Pathol. 2002;31:140–151. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-165x.2002.tb00295.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hassan R., Attia Y., El-Ganzory E. Growth, carcass quality and serum constituents of slow growing chicks as affected by betaine addition to diets containing 1. Different levels of choline. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2005;4:840–850. [Google Scholar]
- Kapelański W., Grajewska S., Bocian M., Dybala J., Jankowiak H., Wiśniewska J. Changes in blood biochemical indicators during fattening of the high-lean pigs. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep. 2004;22:443–449. [Google Scholar]
- Kermanshahi H. Betaine replacement for DL-methionine in the performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chicks. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2001;3:273–279. [Google Scholar]
- Kettunen H., Tiihonen K., Peuranen S., Saarinen M.T., Remus J.C. Dietary betaine accumulates in the liver and intestinal tissue and stabilizes the intestinal epithelial structure in healthy and coccidia-infected broiler chicks. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 2001;130:759–769. doi: 10.1016/s1095-6433(01)00410-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kidd M.T., Ferket P.R., Garlich J.D. Nutritional and osmoregulatory functions of betaine. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 1997;53:125–139. [Google Scholar]
- Kim Y.K., Jin S.K., Yang H.S. Effect of dietary garlic bulb and husk on the physicochemical properties of chicken meat. Poult. Sci. 2009;88:398–405. doi: 10.3382/ps.2008-00179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Law F.L., Zulkifli I., Soleimani A.F., Liang J.B., Awad E.A. The effects of low-protein diets and protease supplementation on broiler chickens in a hot and humid tropical environment. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2017;31:1291–1300. doi: 10.5713/ajas.17.0581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mahmoudi M., Azarfar A., Khosravinia H. Partial replacement of dietary methionine with betaine and choline in heat-stressed broiler chickens. J. Poult. Sci. 2018;55:28–37. doi: 10.2141/jpsa.0170087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matthews J.O., Southern L.L., Higbie A.D., Persica M.A., Bidner T.D. Effects of betaine on growth, carcass characteristics, pork quality, and plasma metabolites of finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2001;79:722–728. doi: 10.2527/2001.793722x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mosenthin R., Eklund M., Ratriyanto A. In: Manipulating Pig Production XI. Paterson J.E., Barker J.A., editors. Scott Print; Perth, Western Australia: 2007. Effects of betaine on ileal and faecal digestibilities and intestinal microbial fermentation of crude fibre in piglets; p. 187. [Google Scholar]
- NRC . 9th ed. National Academy Press; Washington, DC, USA: 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. [Google Scholar]
- Park J.H., Ryu K.S. Relation between dietary protein levels and betaine supplementation in laying hens. J. Poult. Sci. 2011;48:217–222. [Google Scholar]
- Piotrowska A., Burlikowska K., Szymeczko R. Changes in blood chemistry in broiler chickens during the fattening period. Folia Biol. (Kraków). 2011;59:183–187. doi: 10.3409/fb59_3-4.183-187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ratriyanto A., Indreswari R., Nuhriawangsa A.M.P. Effects of dietary protein level and betaine supplementation on nutrient digestibility and performance of Japanese quails. Br. Poult. Sci. 2017;19:445–454. [Google Scholar]
- Ray G., Husain S.A. Oxidants, antioxidants and carcinogenesis. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2002;40:1213–1232. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ratriyanto A, Mosenthin R, Bauer E, Eklund M. Metabolic, osmoregulatory and nutritional functions of betaine in monogastric animals. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2009;22:1461–1476. [Google Scholar]
- Remus J., Virtanen E., Rosi L., McNaughton J. Proceedings of the 10th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition. World's Poultry Science Association; Antalya. Turkey: 1995. Effect of betaine on nutrient utilization of 21-day-old broilers during coccidiosis; pp. 371–372. [Google Scholar]
- Sakomura N.K., Barbosa N.A.A., Longo F.A., Da Silva E.P., Bonato M.A., Fernandes J.B.K. Effect of dietary betaine supplementation on the performance, carcass yield, and intestinal morphometrics of broilers submitted to heat stress. Braz. J. Poult. Sci. 2013;15:105–112. [Google Scholar]
- Saunderson C.L., Mackinlay J. Changes in body weight, composition and hepatic enzyme activities in response to dietary methionine, betaine and choline levels in growing chicks. Br. J. Nutr. 1990;63:339–349. doi: 10.1079/bjn19900120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schutte J.B., De Jong J., Smink W., Pack M. Replacement value of betaine for DL-methionine in male broiler chicks. Poult. Sci. 1997;76:321–325. doi: 10.1093/ps/76.2.321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simon J. Choline, betaine and methionine interactions in chickens, pigs and fish (including crustaceans) Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 1999;55:353–374. [Google Scholar]
- Tian Q.Y., Zeng Z.K., Zhang Y.X., Long S.F., Piao X.S. Effect of L- or DL-methionine supplementation on nitrogen retention, serum amino acid concentrations and blood metabolites profile in starter pigs. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2016;29:689–694. doi: 10.5713/ajas.15.0730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ueland P.M., Holm P.I., Hustad S. Betaine: a key modulator of one-carbon metabolism and homocysteine status. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2005;43:1069–1075. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2005.187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Virtanen E., Rosi L. Proceedings of the Australian Poultry Science Symposium. University of Sydney; Sydney, NSW, Australia: 1995. Effects of betaine on methionine requirement of broilers under various environmental conditions; pp. 88–92. [Google Scholar]
- Yang Y.X., Guo J., Yoon S.Y., Jin Z., Choi J.Y., Piao X.S., Kim B.W., Ohh S.J., Wang M.H., Chae B.J. Early energy and protein reduction: Effects on growth, blood profiles and expression of genes related to protein and fat metabolism in broilers. Br. Poult. Sci. 2009;50:218–227. doi: 10.1080/00071660902736706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Waldroup P.W., Fritts C.A. Evaluation of separate and combined effects of choline and betaine in diets for male broilers. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2005;4:442–448. [Google Scholar]
- Wen C., Jiang X.Y., Ding L.R., Wang T., Zhou Y.M. Effects of dietary methionine on growth performance, meat quality and oxidative status of breast muscle in fast- and slow-growing broilers. Poult. Sci. 2017;96:1707–1714. doi: 10.3382/ps/pew432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]