Abstract
Doses of 10 to 100 mg of the azole antifungal agent SCH 56592/kg of body weight/day were studied in immunocompetent mice as therapy for systemic infection by Fusarium solani. Treatment was begun 1 h after intravenous infection and continued daily for 4 or 13 doses. Prolongation of survival and organ clearance were dependent on both the dose and the duration of SCH 56592 therapy, with the best results seen at 50 and 100 mg/kg/day. The results at the highest doses of SCH 56592 used (50 or 100 mg/kg/day) were comparable to those obtained with amphotericin B at 1 mg/kg/day. SCH 56592 has potential for therapy of systemic infections caused by F. solani.
Fusarium species, traditionally considered plant pathogens, are now known to produce life-threatening infections in patients with compromised immune responses (13, 24). Of the various species of Fusarium, the major species isolated from humans has been Fusarium solani, followed by F. oxysporum and F. moniliforme (3–5, 8, 10, 14, 18, 20, 22). In all, as many as 15 different Fusarium species have been reported as causing infections in humans and animals (8).
Although the status of the host and the degree of tissue invasion remain the most important factors in predicting the outcome of Fusarium infections, the availability of effective antifungal agents is desirable (1). Unfortunately, the in vitro activity of the available agents is not very good. Polyenes such as amphotericin B and natamycin have in vitro activity, but their use is limited by toxicity (1, 17, 19, 21). Flucytosine and the currently available azoles (fluconazole and itraconazole) have no meaningful activity in vitro, and resistance is practically universal (17, 19, 21), although the combination therapy of flucytosine and ketoconazole has been reported to have activity against extensive subcutaneous hyphomycosis caused by F. solani (4). SCH 56592 is a novel triazole antifungal with in vitro and in vivo activity against a variety of fungi, including Candida spp., Cryptococcus neoformans, Coccidioides immitis, Aspergillus fumigatus, and many other opportunistic yeasts and molds (9, 11, 15, 16, 23). In this work we have studied the activity of SCH 56592 in the treatment of disseminated fusarial infection in nonneutropenic mice.
(This work was presented in part at the 98th General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology, 1998 [10a].)
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Organism.
A single isolate of F. solani (FS 1184; Fusarium Research Center Culture Collection, Pennsylvania State University) was used for all experiments. This organism was isolated from the blood of a cancer patient with invasive fusariosis. Stock lyophilized vials from the fungal strain were obtained from the Fusarium Research Center and kept at 4°C until use (7). For both susceptibility testing and animal studies, FS 1184 was grown in Fusarium culture medium (1 liter of 5% glucose in water, 1 liter of sterile saline solution [0.85% NaCl], 2 g of potassium chloride [KCl], and 2 ml of Tween 80 [polyoxyethylene-20-sorbitan monooleate]) for 72 h. The conidia were then harvested and prepared as described by Anaissie et al. (2).
Susceptibility testing.
By using an adaptation of the microdilution variant of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards procedure M27-A (12), FS 1184 was tested two different times against SCH 56592, fluconazole, itraconazole, and amphotericin B. Fluconazole was dissolved in water, and itraconazole, SCH 56592, and amphotericin B were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide, according to the M27-A protocol. The conidial inoculum was adjusted to 80 to 82% of transmittance at 530 nm, by following the methodology of Espinel-Ingroff et al. (6), to produce a stock inoculum of 0.5 × 106 to 3.0 × 106 CFU/ml. The MIC for the azoles was defined as the concentration of the well which visually showed growth that was less than 20% of growth in the control well after 48 h of incubation. The MIC for amphotericin B was defined as the lowest concentration at which no growth was visible.
Animal model.
Four- to six-week-old healthy male CF1 mice with a mean weight of 24 g (Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc., Indianapolis, Ind.) were used. No immunosuppressant agents were used. The inoculum for infection was prepared by adjusting the organism to a transmittance at 530 nm of 10%, which produced 1 × 107 to 3 × 107 CFU/ml, and was quantitated by plating onto Sabouraud dextrose agar. Infection was established by injecting 0.2 ml of the adjusted inoculum via the tail vein. After infection, mice were observed twice daily, and animals exhibiting profound inanition or an inability to reach food and water were sacrificed. SCH 56592 was prepared for administration by heating 4 g of methylcellulose (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) at 80°C for 90 min in 1 liter of distilled water. After approximately 45 min, 5.6 ml of Tween 80 (Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, N.J.) and 9 g of NaCl (EM Industries, Gibbstown, N.J.) were added. This solution was autoclaved. SCH 56592 was added after cooling, and the mixture was stored at 4°C until use. For amphotericin B, a vial containing 50 mg of amphotericin B USP (Pharma-Tek, Huntington, N.Y.) for injection was reconstituted per the manufacturer’s instructions. SCH 56592 was given orally by gavage once daily in a final volume of 0.1 ml at daily doses of 10, 25, 50, or 100 mg/kg of body weight. Amphotericin B was administered intraperitoneally once daily at a final dose of 1 mg/kg in a final volume of 0.1 ml. Treatment with both drugs was begun 1 h after intravenous infection and continued daily for a total of 4 or 13 doses. Groups of 16 to 20 animals each were treated with either amphotericin B, SCH 56592, or methylcellulose diluent or were left untreated. On days 5 and 14 (24 h after the last dose of drug), five mice from each group were sacrificed for determination of the numbers of CFU of F. solani per gram in the liver and kidney. This determination was made by removing and weighing the organs, homogenizing the organs in 10 ml of sterile saline with a Stomacher 80 (A. J. Seward, UAC House, London, England), and plating appropriate dilutions on Sabouraud dextrose agar. The plates were incubated at 35°C for 48 h, and the number of colonies was then counted. All surviving animals were sacrificed at 21 days after infection. All animal care procedures were supervised and approved by the University of Texas—Houston Animal Welfare Committee.
Statistical methods.
Survival times were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared by the log rank test. Organ clearance results were subjected to analysis of variance. Calculations were performed by using SPSS for Windows, version 7.5.1 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, Ill.).
RESULTS
In vitro susceptibility testing results.
The MIC of fluconazole and itraconazole against FS 1184 was >64 μg/ml, that of amphotericin B was 1.0 μg/ml, and that of SCH 56592 was 4.0 μg/ml. These results suggested that FS 1184 was resistant to fluconazole and itraconazole but potentially susceptible to amphotericin B and SCH 56592.
In vivo study. (i) Survival and mortality.
The effects of treatment on the survival of mice infected with FS 1184 are shown in Table 1. In all, three different experiments, using various combinations of doses and treatment durations, were performed. Mice treated with the methylcellulose diluent had the same duration of survival (6.2 to 8.4 days) as untreated mice (5.9 to 9.5 days). A significant and dose-dependent effect of therapy on prolongation of survival was apparent for SCH 56592. The most consistently increased survival results were obtained with SCH 56592 at 50 mg/kg/day, suggesting that the peak of the dose-response curve had been attained. The etiology of the slight decrease in survival noted when 4 daily doses of SCH 56592 were given at 100 mg/kg/day is not clear, and this effect was not observed when 13 doses were given. The results of treatment with SCH 56592 at 25, 50, and 100 mg/kg/day were not statistically different from those produced with amphotericin B at 1 mg/kg/day.
TABLE 1.
Effects of treatment on survival
Treatment
|
Expt 1
|
Expt 2
|
Expt 3
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Drug, daily dose (mg/kg) | Total no. of dosesa | Survivalb | Pc | Survival | P | Survival | P |
Control (no treatment) | 5.9 ± 0.8 | 9.5 ± 0.7 | 8.8 ± 0.6 | ||||
Methylcellulose diluent | 4 | 6.2 ± 0.7 | 0.896 | 8.4 ± 0.7 | 0.232 | ||
13 | 9.1 ± 0.6 | 0.629 | 7.9 ± 0.8 | 0.624 | |||
SCH 56592 | |||||||
10 | 4 | 7.1 ± 1.3 | 0.309 | 11.6 ± 0.5 | 0.057 | ||
13 | 12.5 ± 1.8 | <0.014 | |||||
25 | 13 | 14.3 ± 1.6 | 0.002 | ||||
50 | 4 | 11.8 ± 0.9 | 0.0001 | 14.6 ± 1.0 | 0.0005 | ||
13 | 14.7 ± 1.0 | 0.0002 | 18.7 ± 1.2 | <0.0001 | |||
100 | 4 | 9.4 ± 0.9 | 0.008 | 10.7 ± 1.3 | 0.143 | ||
13 | 14.9 ± 1.3 | 0.0009 | |||||
Amphotericin B, 1 | 4 | 13.5 ± 1.0 | 0.0025 | ||||
13 | 16 ± 1.4 | 0.0005 |
At one dose per day.
Kaplan-Meier estimate of mean survival in days ± standard error (SE).
For comparison with the control group by the log rank test. Not all conditions were tested in all experiments. Experiments 1 and 2 used 16 animals in each study group; experiment 3 used 20 animals in each study group.
(ii) Response to therapy.
Data on the reduction in the numbers of CFU per gram of kidney and liver are shown in Tables 2 and 3, respectively. Reduction in the numbers of CFU per gram was a function of the dose and duration of therapy in both the kidney and the liver, with maximal reductions produced after 13 daily doses of therapy with SCH 56592 at 50 to 100 mg/kg. In the liver in particular, this duration of therapy resulted in complete clearance of the infecting organism. The organ clearance results after four doses of therapy with SCH 56592 were similar to the clearance seen with four doses of amphotericin B.
TABLE 2.
Effects of treatment on colony counts in the kidney
Treatment
|
Expt 1
|
Expt 2
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Drug, daily dose (mg/kg) | Total no. of dosesa | 103 CFU/g ± SEb | Pc | 103 CFU/g ± SE | P |
Control (no treatment) | 4 | 27.3 ± 5.0 | 21.6 ± 2.7 | ||
Methylcellulose diluent | 4 | 23.0 ± 3.2 | 0.25 | 19.3 ± 2.5 | 0.28 |
SCH 56592 | |||||
10 | 4 | 13.8 ± 0.8 | 0.015 | 22.3 ± 3.3 | 0.44 |
50 | 4 | 9.7 ± 1.1 | 0.005 | 18.0 ± 3.8 | 0.23 |
13 | 4.9 ± 1.3 | <0.001 | |||
100 | 4 | 5.8 ± 1.0 | 0.001 | 13.1 ± 0.9 | 0.009 |
13 | 5.9 ± 1.7 | <0.001 | |||
Amphotericin B, 1 | 4 | 8.2 ± 4.4 | 0.014 | 13.1 ± 1.5 | 0.013 |
At one dose per day. Animals were sacrificed 24 h after the last dose of drug.
n = 5 for all groups.
To aid in the interpretation of the results, the P value of the t test comparing the CFU per gram for each treatment group (4 and 13 doses) with the CFU per gram for the untreated animals in each experiment is shown. By analysis of variance, the numbers of CFU per gram were significantly different among groups in both experiments (P < 0.001). Day 14 organ burden data are not available for the untreated animals because essentially all such animals died prior to 14 days.
TABLE 3.
Effects of treatment on colony counts in the liver
Treatment
|
Expt 1
|
Expt 2
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Drug, daily dose (mg/kg) | Total no. of dosesa | 103 CFU/g ± SEb | Pc | 103 CFU/g ± SE | P |
Control (no treatment) | 4 | 108 ± 20.7 | 78.5 ± 13.6 | ||
Methylcellulose diluent | 4 | 93.3 ± 10.0 | 0.27 | 64.8 ± 8.2 | 0.207 |
SCH 56592 | |||||
10 | 4 | 42.3 ± 3.4 | 0.007 | 45.3 ± 2.3 | 0.021 |
50 | 4 | 23.0 ± 3.6 | 0.002 | 29.0 ± 3.3 | 0.004 |
13 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | <0.001 | |||
100 | 4 | 16.7 ± 3.2 | 0.001 | 23.2 ± 1.8 | 0.002 |
13 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | <0.001 | |||
Amphotericin B, 1 | 4 | 19.5 ± 5.1 | 0.007 | 32.9 ± 3.8 | 0.006 |
At one dose per day. Animals were sacrificed 24 h after the last dose of drug.
n = 5 for all groups.
To aid in the interpretation of the results, the P value of the t test comparing the CFU per gram for each treatment group (4 and 13 doses) with the CFU per gram for the untreated animals in each experiment is shown. By analysis of variance, the numbers of CFU per gram were significantly different among groups in both experiments (P < 0.001). Day 14 organ burden data are not available for the untreated animals because essentially all such animals died prior to 14 days.
DISCUSSION
SCH 56592 has previously been shown to have excellent activity both in vitro (9, 16, 23) and in vivo (11, 15, 23) against a variety of fungi, including Candida spp., Blatomyces dermatitidis, C. immitis, and Aspergillus spp. In this study, we have shown that SCH 56592 is also active both in vitro and in vivo against F. solani in an immunocompetent mouse model of systemic fusariosis.
The effect of SCH 56592 in vivo was dependent on both the dose and the duration of therapy. Optimal effects were produced when 13 doses were given at 50 to 100 mg/kg/day. This dose optimum is similar to, but slightly higher than, the optimum dose in other studies with this compound. Oakley et al. (15) demonstrated that SCH 56592 at 25 mg/kg/day was better than itraconazole or amphotericin B in a neutropenic murine model of aspergillosis. Lutz et al. (11) found that doses of 10 and 25 mg/kg/day cured mice infected with C. immitis. Finally, Sugar and Liu (23) have shown that 25 mg/kg/day sterilized the lungs of mice infected with B. dermatitidis. Although a slight diminution in survival was noted when four daily doses of SCH 56592 were given at 100 mg/kg/day, this effect was not observed when therapy was given for a longer period. Thus, the higher doses of SCH 56592 required for treatment of this difficult infection appeared well tolerated.
Of interest, SCH 56592 appeared to completely clear the infection in the liver. The liver appears to be preferentially targeted by the fungus in this model (the numbers of CFU per gram of tissue in the livers of untreated animals are three- to fourfold higher than those in the kidneys), thus making this effect even more apparent. The relatively less effective clearance of the renal infection may be a function of the pharmacokinetics of SCH 56592, as effective concentrations of SCH 56592 in the liver are two- to fourfold higher than those in the kidney (20a).
In conclusion, we found that SCH 56592 increased survival and reduced organ burdens in immunocompetent mice infected with F. solani. Prolongation of survival and organ clearance were dependent on both the dose and the duration of SCH 56592 therapy. Similar results were obtained with amphotericin B. SCH 56592 has potential for therapy of systemic infections in humans caused by F. solani.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported in part by a grant to M. Lozano-Chiu from the Dirección General de Investigación Cientifica y Enseñanza Superior of Spain.
REFERENCES
- 1.Anaissie E, Kantarjian H, Ro J, Hopfer R, Rolston K, Fainstein V, Bodey G. The emerging role of Fusarium infections in patients with cancer. Medicine (Baltimore) 1988;67:77–83. doi: 10.1097/00005792-198803000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Anaissie E J, Hachem R, Legrand C, Legenne P, Nelson P, Bodey G P. Lack of activity of amphotericin B in systemic murine fusarial infection. J Infect Dis. 1992;165:1155–1157. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Anaissie E J, Rinaldi M G. Fusarium and the immunocompromised host: liaisons dangeureuses. N Y State J Med. 1990;90:586–587. . (Comment.) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Attapattu M C, Anandakrishnan C. Extensive subcutaneous hyphomycosis caused by Fusarium oxysporum. J Med Vet Mycol. 1986;24:105–111. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Collins M S, Rinaldi M G. Cutaneous infection in man caused by Fusarium moniliforme. Sabouraudia. 1977;12:151–160. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Espinel-Ingroff A, Dawson K, Pfaller M, Anaissie E, Breslin B, Dixon D, Fothergill A, Paetznick V, Peter J, Rinaldi M, Walsh T. Comparative and collaborative evaluation of standardization of antifungal susceptibility testing for filamentous fungi. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:314–319. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.2.314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fisher N L, Burgess L W, Tourssoun T A, Nelson P E. Carnation leaves as substrate and for preserving cultures of Fusarium species. Phytopathology. 1982;72:151–153. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Guarro J, Gene J. Opportunistic fusarial infections in humans. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995;14:741–754. doi: 10.1007/BF01690988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Law D, Moore C B, Denning D W. Activity of SCH 56592 compared with those of fluconazole and intraconazole against Candida spp. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:2310–2311. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.10.2310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lozano M, Ribera J M, Puig J, Rives A, Sierra J, Grañena R, Rozman C. Bronconeumonia por Fusarium solani en un paciente afectado de leucemia aguda mieloblastica. Enferm Infecc Microbol Clin. 1990;8:78–79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10a.Lozano-Chiu M, Arikan S, Paetznick V, Anaissle E J, Loebenberg D, Rex J H. Abstracts of the 98th General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology. Washington, D.C: American Society for Microbiology; 1998. Successful treatment of murine fusariosis with Schering (SCH) 56592, abstr. F-101; p. 270. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lutz J E, Clemons K V, Aristizabal B H, Stevens D A. Activity of the triazole SCH 56592 against disseminated murine coccidioidomycosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:1558–1561. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.7.1558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. Approved standard M27-A. Wayne, Pa: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nelson P E, Dignani M C, Anaissie E J. Taxonomy, biology, and clinical aspects of Fusarium species. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1994;7:479–504. doi: 10.1128/cmr.7.4.479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Neumeister B, Bartmann P, Gaedicke G, Marre R. A fatal infection due to Fusarium oxysporum in a child with Wilms’s tumour. Case report and review of the literature. Mycoses. 1992;35:115–119. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.1992.tb00831.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Oakley K L, Morrisey G, Denning D W. Efficacy of SCH 56592 in a temporarily neutropenic murine model of invasive aspergillosis with an itraconazole-susceptible and an itraconazole-resistant isolate of Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:1504–1507. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.7.1504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pfaller M A, Messer S, Jones R N. Activity of a new triazole, Sch 56592, compared with those of four antifungal agents tested against clinical isolates of Candida spp. and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:233–235. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.2.233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pujol I, Guarro J, Gene J, Sala J. In vitro antifungal susceptibility of clinical and environmental Fusarium spp. strains. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997;39:163–167. doi: 10.1093/jac/39.2.163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rabodonirina M, Piens M A, Monier M F, Gueho E, Fiere D, Mojon M. Fusarium infections in immunocompromised patients: case reports and literature review. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994;13:152–161. doi: 10.1007/BF01982190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Reuben A, Anaissie E, Nelson P E, Hashem R, Legrand C, Ho D H, Bodey G P. Antifungal susceptibility of 44 clinical isolates of Fusarium species determined by using a broth microdilution method. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989;33:1647–1649. doi: 10.1128/aac.33.9.1647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sanche S E, Sutton D A, Magnon K, Cox P, Revankar S, Rinaldi M G. Abstracts of the 98th General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology. Washington, D.C: American Society for Microbiology; 1998. Psuedoepidemic of Fusarium oxysporum from bronchoscopy specimens, abstr. F-102; p. 270. [Google Scholar]
- 20a.Schering Plough Research Institute. Data on file.
- 21.Sekhon A S, Padhye A A, Garg A K, Ahmad H, Moledina N. In vitro sensitivity of medically significant Fusarium species to various antimycotics. Chemotherapy. 1994;40:239–244. doi: 10.1159/000239199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Srdic N, Radulovic S, Nonkovic Z, Velimirovic S, Cvetkovic L, Viro I. Two cases of exogenous endophthalmitis due to Fusarium moniliforme and Pseudomonas species as associated aetiological agents. Mycoses. 1993;36:441–444. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sugar A M, Liu X-P. In vitro and in vivo activities of SCH 56592 against Blastomyces dermatitidis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:1314–1316. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.5.1314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Vartivarian S E, Anaissie E J, Bodey G P. Emerging fungal pathogens in immunocompromised patients: classification, diagnosis, and management. Clin Infect Dis. 1993;17:S487–S491. doi: 10.1093/clinids/17.supplement_2.s487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]