Abstract
Copper-based materials can reliably convert carbon dioxide into multi-carbon products but they suffer from poor activity and product selectivity. The atomic structure-activity relationship of electrocatalysts for the selectivity is controversial due to the lacking of systemic multiple dimensions for operando condition study. Herein, we synthesized high-performance CO2RR catalyst comprising of CuO clusters supported on N-doped carbon nanosheets, which exhibited high C2+ products Faradaic efficiency of 73% including decent ethanol selectivity of 51% with a partial current density of 14.4 mA/cm−2 at −1.1 V vs. RHE. We evidenced catalyst restructuring and tracked the variation of the active states under reaction conditions, presenting the atomic structure-activity relationship of this catalyst. Operando XAS, XANES simulations and Quasi-in-situ XPS analyses identified a reversible potential-dependent transformation from dispersed CuO clusters to Cu2-CuN3 clusters which are the optimal sites. This cluster can’t exist without the applied potential. The N-doping dispersed the reduced Cun clusters uniformly and maintained excellent stability and high activity with adjusting the charge distribution between the Cu atoms and N-doped carbon interface. By combining Operando FTIR and DFT calculations, it was recognized that the Cu2-CuN3 clusters displayed charge-asymmetric sites which were intensified by CH3* adsorbing, beneficial to the formation of the high-efficiency asymmetric ethanol.
Subject terms: Electrocatalysis, Energy
Copper-based materials can convert carbon dioxide into multi-carbon products but suffer from poor activity and selectivity. Here, the authors report CuO clusters supported on nitrogen-doped carbon nanosheets for the reduction CO2-to-ethanol, and investigate the change in the catalytic sites while in operation.
Introduction
Electrochemical conversion of carbon dioxide into value-added products using sustainable energies is environmentally friendly and economical approach1. As well known, C2+ hydrocarbons or oxygenated compounds such as ethanol (C2H5OH), ethylene (C2H4) and n-propanol (n-C3H7OH) with remarkable energy densities have more value for solving the energy crisis2. However, complex product selectivity limits the development and application of carbon dioxide reduction. The origin of this selectivity toward C2+ hydrocarbons has been a prominent topic of study recently and has been intensely debated3–6. Copper-based materials are absolutely effective and promising catalysts for the reduction of carbon dioxide to multi-carbon products3. Previous works indicated that both the catalysts and substrates could affect the local structure and the electronic state of active sites, and then modify the reaction pathway and catalytic mechanism4,5. Many strategies have been developed to modify or optimize the copper-based catalysts for improving the multi-carbon products selectivity, such as adjusting the surface morphology4,5,7–13, doping metals or non-metals14–18, building nanostructures19–21, or designing single active sites22–25.
Despite tremendous effort has been paid, further advances are still needed to understand the structure-activity relationship (SAR) and efficient conversion CO2 to multi-carbon products especially for high economy asymmetric C2+ products (e.g., ethanol). Therefore, the design of catalysts that selectively produce ethanol via electrochemical CO2RR were supposed to focus on minimizing three competing reaction pathways which reduced the faradaic efficiency (FE) of asymmetric ethanol by consuming electrons and protons, the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), C1 product formation (e.g., CH4, HCOOH) and other symmetrical C2 product formation (e.g., ethylene). However, little is known about the structure-activity relationship, extraordinarily to explain the catalyst structure changes with the product changes under different potential. Hence, it is urgent to build the structure-activity relationship between atomic structure and products for designing electrocatalysts.
Here we synthesized CuO clusters supported on nitrogen-doped carbon nanosheets (Cu/N0.14C) as dispersed electrocatalysts, achieving high-performances CO2 reduction that are superior to CuOx catalysts in terms of stability, activity and selectivity. The prepared Cu/N0.14C catalyst with appropriate nitrogen content displayed high C2+ products Faradaic efficiency of 73% which includes ethanol FE of 51% at the potential of −1.1 V vs. RHE with a current density of −14.4 mA/cm−2 in 0.1 M KHCO3 electrolyte. Moreover, it exhibited superb long-term CO2 electroreduction durability over 10 h. The well-defined self-reconstruction for the active sites of Cu/N0.14C also facilitate the in-depth mechanistic understandings from complementary Operando Spectroscopy (XAS, XPS and FTIR), XANES simulations and theoretical calculations to present the atomic structure-activity relationship between the ethanol selectivity and in situ dynamic structure (local structure, electronic structure and the adsorbed intermediates), that would benefit the recognition for the CO2RR process.
Results and discussion
Structure characterization of the Cu/NxC
In a typical procedure, copper phthalocyanine and dicyandiamide were continuously mixed in ethanol and dried. Subsequently, the dried mixture was pyrolyzed at different temperatures for a series of Cu/NxC samples with different nitrogen content (x = 0.14, 0.11, 0.02, 0, x is mass contents ratio of nitrogen to carbon). The linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curves demonstrated that the activity of Cu/N0.14C was better than other contrast samples with maximum current density. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) revealed that Cu/NxC displayed a nano flake structure without obvious large-scale particles on the surface (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1). The nanosheet structure was further confirmed by atomic force microscopy (AFM), and the corresponding height profiles of the scans showed a thickness of about 0.6 nm (Supplementary Fig. 2). The N species in the samples could prevent Cu atoms from aggregating excessively and ensured the atomic dispersion of Cu species. As we found in Supplementary Fig. 3, Cu nanoparticles (about 2–3 nano) were observed in the sample Cu/C (without N). High angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM), which can be clearly observed in the atomic phase, revealed that the copper atoms of Cu/N0.14C agglomerate into clusters without an obvious lattice (Fig. 1b). Elemental mapping by Energy Dispersive Spectrometer (EDS) (Fig. 1c) demonstrates that nitrogen is uniformly dispersed within the carbon matrix. X-ray diffraction (XRD) revealed only a broad peak from the (002) of the Cu/N0.14C and N0.14C (Fig. 1d), however the Cu/C showed totally different peaks which could belong to a pure metallic copper (PDF#04-0836). The electron diffraction pattern of Cu/N0.14C revealed it was amorphous material in Supplementary Fig. 4. To further study the electronic structure of the catalysis, Cu K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and soft-X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) were carried out as shown in Fig. 1e–g and i and Supplementary Fig. 5. The Cu 2p3/2 XPS fitting curves revealed that Cu was mainly +1 and +2 valence in Cu/N0.14C26,27. The Cu L3M45M45 Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) showed no distinct peak around 918.5 eV which indicated that no Cu0 existed on the surface. The N K-edge presented four obvious resonances (Fig. 1i) assigned peak A1, A2, and A3 to pyridine-like, cyanide-like, and graphite-like N, respectively, whereas A4 at ∼407 eV is attributed to the transition from N 1s core states to N−C σ* bonds28. Obviously, peak A3 of Cu/N0.14C shifts negative energy which indicated the charge transfer had occurred compared with that of N0.14C while other peaks keep the same position, indicating graphite-N formed a chemical bond with Cu sites29. The C K-edge XAS spectra in Supplementary Fig. 5 showed no difference between Cu/N0.14C and N0.14C, excluding formation of the Cu−C bond. Thus, we could conclude that Cu sites only bond to graphite-like N, in Cu/N0.14C.
X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) measurements were employed to further investigate the electronic structure and geometric structure of the Cu/N0.14C. Fig. 1e showed the Cu K-edge XANES spectra of the Cu/N0.14C together with the references of CuO, Cu2O and Cu foil. The absorption edge of the Cu/N0.14C was between the Cu2O and CuO, indicating that the oxidation state of the copper species is in the intermediate valence state between +1 and +2. The feature of XANES at 8986 eV and 8997 eV for Cu/N0.14C resembled the mixture dominated by CuO with a little contribution by Cu+ or Cu0 complex. The Fourier-transformed (FT) k3-weighted EXAFS oscillation in Fig. 1f also showed the disappearance of the feature for Cu–Cu in R space in Cu/N0.14C with simultaneous appearance of the peak at 1.5 Å for Cu−O/N. The fitting result displayed that the Cu−O/N bond length is 1.93 Å with the coordination number (CN) 3.4, (Supplementary Figs. 6, 7 and Table 1) indicating that Cu ions in the as-synthesized catalysts were predominately in the form of CuO clusters coordinated with four oxygen atoms. Notably, the coordination number of Cu−O/N is lower than that of the CuO (CN = 4) with a litter shorter bond length (1.93 Å) (the bond length in CuO is 1.95 Å) suggesting that Cu species with a definite Cu–O/N coordination-unsaturated structure (CN < 4, bond length <1.95 Å) existed. Note that TEM and EDX results showed CuO clusters were uniformly dispersed and anchored on the N-doped carbon nanosheets support. To further explore the N-doped that influenced CO2RR activity, XANES and FT-EXAFS of Cu/C without the N-doping was plot in Supplementary Fig. 8. The XANES of the Cu/C indicated that the Cu ions were reduced to metallic Cu. The FT-EXAFS data also showed the peak for Cu–Cu in R space with the weak peak at 1.5 Å for Cu–O revealing that the copper in Cu/C agglomerated into larger metallic particles with a copper oxides surface in the air (more detail in Supplementary Figs. 9, 10 and Table 2). Our study indicated that N-doped promotes the dispersion of CuO clusters in the as-synthesized catalysts and played the critical role in improving FE for direct CO2-to-ethanol electrochemical conversion. These results agreed well with XRD and HAADF–STEM results. The structure of the Cu/N0.14C is further discussed by operando XAS.
Electrochemical characterization
The electrochemical CO2RR activity of Cu/NxC catalysts were evaluated in CO2-saturated 0.1 M KHCO3 solution. Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curves (Fig. 2a) demonstrated that the activity of Cu/N0.14C was better than other contrast samples with lowest onset potential and maximum current density. This suggested that the increase in nitrogen content is helpful but limited to improve the activity. Versus Cu/N0.14C catalysts, the NC catalyst has little activity. Fig. 2b showed the product selectivity of CO2RR of Cu/N0.14C catalyst. The main products formed at low potential were CO and H2. At −0.7 V (versus the reversible hydrogen electrode, RHE), hydrocarbons such as ethylene (C2H4) and methane (CH4) started to form, and the selectivity of CO and H2 decreased. The product of ethanol (C2H5OH) was first detected at −0.8 V vs. RHE. Subsequently, the faradaic efficiency (FE) of C2+ products continuously increased in the range −0.8 V to −1.1 V. At −1.1 V, the maximum FE of ethanol is 51% with a current density of −14.4 mA/cm−2 and the total C2+ products FE is up to 73%. We also gave the each product partial current density of Cu/N0.14C catalyst in Fig. 2c. The LSV curves of Cu/N0.14C in N2 afignd CO2 were measured, respectively, in Fig. 2d. In CO2-saturated 0.1 M KHCO3 solution, the Cu/N0.14C displayed high activity. Fig. 2e showed that H2, C1 and C2+ products distributions of five catalysts. Cu/NxC catalysts truly boosted the product selectivity of CO2RR. We further evaluated the stability of Cu/N0.14C for CO2RR by a long-term experiment of 10 h. Both the partial current density and FE of C2+ products lightly decreased (Fig. 2f), that demonstrated good stability. There were no structural changes of Cu/N0.14C after long-term CO2RR electrolysis, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 11.
Operando XAS, SR-FTIR Spectroscopy and Quasi-in-situ XPS-AES results
Studying the atomic structure-activity relationship of CO2RR catalyst under operando conditions is crucial to reveal the intrinsic reactive mechanism. In order to identify the realistic catalytic centers of Cu/N0.14C, operando XAS study were employed to directly monitor its catalytic behavior. We first collected ex-situ XAS data of the fully activated Cu/N0.14C. When Cu/N0.14C was soaked into the KHCO3 solution at open circuit (OC), no obvious structural change was observed from the XANES in Supplementary Fig. 12. Operando XAS spectra recorded approximately every 10 min. There were drastic changes taking place in the sample at the very beginning when the potential was altered. Every spectrum was measured twice after the potential was kept constant for 30 min. XANES and derivative of XANES spectra under the altered potential were plotted in Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 13. The oxidation state of Cu was estimated by comparing the energy position of the absorption edge. It could be clearly seen that XANES dramatically changed with the decreased applied potential indicating that this was a potential-dependent process. The gradual shift of the absorption edge to low energy side revealed a fall of the Cu valence state. An obvious critical potential at −0.8 V vs. RHE could be identified. The valence state of copper remained between +1.0 and +2.0 above this potential. Notably, there was a crude transfer to +1.0 at this critical potential. Below −0.8 V vs. RHE, Cu ions gradually get more deoxidized. Especially, the position of absorption edge was in the middle of Cu foil and Cu2O when the potential was below −1.1 V, illustrating that the copper ions were nearly in averaged valence state of about +0.5. The changes of the atomic local structure around copper ions during CO2RR were captured by FT-EXAFS, as shown in Fig. 3b. Wavelet transforms for the k3-weighted Cu K-edge EXAFS signals at OC, −1.1 and −1.4 V vs. RHE were plot in Fig. 3c. Under open-circuit condition, FT-EXAFS data showed only one peak located at ~1.5 Å which is the typical scattering feature of Cu–N/O coordination. The FT EXAFS fitting results in Supplementary Figs. 5, 6 and Table 1 showed that CN of O/N atoms to Cu atoms was about 3.4 with an average bond length of 1.93 Å, without the Cu–Cu bond contribution. The Cu–O/N bond intensity slight decreased at −0.6 V vs. RHE. No C2+ products are formed at this stage in Fig. 2c. Once applying the potential of −0.8 V vs. RHE, the intensity of the scattering peak extremely descended with an additional peak at ~2.4 Å. This is a typical scattering feature of the Cu–Cu bond. The conversion of CO2-to-ethanol reaction occurred concurrently. The intensity of Cu–O/N scattering peak further descended with the increasing of the Cu–Cu bond as the potential decreased. Moreover, the Cu–O/N peak intensity stabilized and the Cu–Cu bond slowly increased with the potential further decreasing to −1.1 V vs. RHE. The FT EXAFS fitting results (Fig. 3d, Supplementary Figs. 5, 6 and Table 1) indicated that the coordination number of the first Cu–O/N shell gradually decreased from 3.4 to 2.0 along with decreasing potential from OC to −1.4 V vs. RHE. In addition, the average Cu–O/N bond length slightly decreased. The coordination number of the Cu–Cu bond increased to 2.7 with a bond length of 2.53 Å, slightly shorter than that in Cu foil. The FT-EXAFS analyses are in agreement with the XANES data. Note that at −1.1 V vs. RHE with the maximum FE of ethanol, the metallic Cu–Cu coordination number was 2.0 and the CN of the Cu–O/N dropped down to 2.3 concurrently.
The transformation from CuOx to Cu0 studied by operando XAS during electrochemical CO2RR have been widely reported30–32. However, Cu–Cu coordination number, extracted from EXAFS data fitting was usually larger than 8 with the disappearance of Cu–O bond, indicating that Cu nanoparticles formed with average sizes more than 1nm33. In this work, operando XANES spectra revealed that Cu/N0.14C would not transfer to Cu0 totally and FT-EXAFS spectra showed Cu–N/O bond becoming steady with CN of 2.0. The stability of Cu–N coordination has been proved during electrochemical CO2RR34. These results suggested CuO clusters have almost reduced, leaving only Cu–N bond of the CuNx. XAFS is the technique measuring average values over all Cu species. Therefore, the fitting coordination number of Cu–N (CN = 2.0 at −1.4 V vs. RHE) was lower than the coordination number of the true active sites since a large part of Cu atoms bond to another Cu atoms (Cu–Cu CN > 2). On the other hand, considering that a definite Cu–N coordination-unsaturated structure (CN < 4) existed in Cu/N0.14C, we suggested that Cu–N CN of the remaining CuNx is 3, x = 3. Moreover, EXAFS fitting results also indicated the Cu coordination shell switched from Cu–O to Cu–Cu with an unusual low coordination number of 2.0 at −1.1 V vs. RHE, with the maximum FE of ethanol. There are two possible structures of the in situ generated Cu species of Cu/N0.14C, according with the Cu–Cu CN of 2.0. One is that the formation of ultrasmall Cu moiety, Cun, where n = 335, while the other one is a mixture of CuN3 sites and Cu metal particles.
We further integrated two evidence to prove the formation of the Cu3 moiety rather than metal particles. Firstly, we found that the potential-dependent transformation was reversible and in situ generated Cu species were highly unstable and could be easily oxidized in the absence of the applied potential. As shown in Fig. 3e and Supplementary Fig. 14, an operando XAS was performed on this sample after the applied potential was switched off and other conditions remained unchanged. It could be obviously seen that Cu–O/N bond increased, with Cu–Cu bond disappeared concurrently, indicating that the coordination environment reversed from Cu–Cu shell to Cu–O/N shell. Notably, the Cu–O/N bond was still lower than that of the initial fully activated sample. At last, the KHCO3 solution was poured out and the catalyst was in air atmosphere, and ex-situ XAS was performed on this sample. Its spectral shape was identical to that of the initial fully activated sample, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 15, suggesting the Cu species remained to be oxidized and dispersed in the air. This result agreed well with HAADF–STEM results after CO2RR electrolysis in Supplementary Fig. 11. The conversion process of the Cu/N0.14C catalyst was shown in Fig. 3f. On the other hand, we preformed operando XAS on the Cu/C in Supplementary Fig. 16. The XANES and FT-EXAFS of Cu/C were mostly unchanged, verifying the Cu metal particles were very stable and could not be easily oxidized. Therefore, we could rule out the existence of Cu metal particles possibility.
Secondly, we carried out Quasi-in situ x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) analysis to prove the valence of Cu species of Cu/N0.14C remain at +1 without Cu0 under the altered potential. The Quasi-in situ XPS and AES results were shown in Fig. 4a, b. The Cu/N0.14C showed two peaks at 934.6 eV and 932.2 eV, which corresponded to Cu2+ and Cu+/Cu[0 26,27. The peak at 934.6 eV disappeared at the −1.1 V vs. RHE, which indicated the Cu2+ was reduced during the CO2RR process. The peaks around 932 eV still remained. To verify the valence of the Cu, AES was employed to distinguish Cu+/Cu0 species. The peaks around 916.5 eV showed a little shift indicating that the sample would retain the valence at +1 during the CO2RR process36,37. The XPS detected the valence state information with depth sensitivity of 1–10 nm38. Therefore, there are no Cu metal particles existing under the electrochemical conditions. Notably, the Cu AES shifted to the higher kinetic energy with the potential reduced, indicating fewer electrons on average Cu were transferred to the nitrogen-doped carbon support of the −1.2 V vs. RHE. The catalysis electron configuration would obviously affect the adsorption of the non-polar molecule, which played an important role during the reduction process39,40. Probably, the ethanol productivity declined at −1.2 V vs. RHE, because the larger cluster could lead to the Cu0 electron configuration increasing32,41. Interestingly, the Quasi-in situ XPS of the Cu/C showed different changes during the CO2RR process, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 17. The binding energy of the Cu 2p3/2 peak for the pristine Cu/C was at 932.9 eV and the kinetic energy L3M45M45 peaks located at 916.4 eV correspond to the Cu+ species37,42, which may be due to the surface oxidation during exposing to air. The XPS altered completely after CO2RR process at −1.1 V vs. RHE. The binding energy of Cu 2p3/2 peak located at 932.7 eV and the kinetic energy L3M45M45 peak located at 918.5 eV corresponding to Cu0 36,43, indicating that catalysts would not be oxidized in the transfer process. Therefore, the Cu/C without N-doping had a Cu0 electron configuration with high H2 productivity and less multi-carbon productivity. These data agreed well with the XAFS results, identifying a strong relationship between the structure of the catalysis and selectivity of multi-carbon products formation.
Hence, we can consequently conclude that the Cu–Cu bond of the operando spectroscopy was from in-situ generated ultrasmall Cu moieties, Cun, under the electrochemical conditions, where n = 3 at −1.1 V vs. RHE. Three Cu atoms chemically bonded to each other with the Cu–Cu coordination number of 2 and one Cu atom bonded to three graphite-like N, forming the Cu2–CuN3 moiety, as shown in Fig. 3f. Such Cu3 moieties which are similar to copper clusters44 have geometric shapes of equilateral triangles, and anchored on the N-doped carbon nanosheets support. The Cu–N bonds play an important role to disperse and anchored the Cu3 moiety uniformly. Moreover, the coordination number of Cu–Cu increased to 2.6 with the potential decreased to −1.2 V vs. RHE, suggesting the Cu4 appeared with tetrahedron configuration of the Cu3-CuN3 moiety and the ethanol productivity declined accordingly. Notably, the in-situ generated Cun–CuN3 cluster can’t exist without the applied potential. Furthermore, one CH3* was adsorbed to one Cu atom according to operando FTIRS results in the next discussion. Therefore, there are the other two oxygen atoms which were adsorbed to another Cu atom, because of the average Cu–N/O coordination number ~2. The cluster was shown in Supplementary Fig. 18. The theoretical XANES spectrum was also calculated to confirm that it was the active site based on convolution results for every considered model around each Cu atom. It could be found that the simulated result for this model could reproduce the main features of the experimental XANES at −1.1 V vs. RHE well in Fig. 4c. Two oxygen atoms may be from the adsorbed groups, such as OH*, OCHO*(or CO2), as shown in Supplementary Fig. 19a, c. The experimental spectra were both properly reproduced in Supplementary Fig. 19b, d. The simulated spectra were similar to the spectrum that was calculated without the adsorbed groups. A slight change in the structure of the 2nd shell does not significantly affect the simulated XAFS spectrum, especially for the H atom. On the other hand, the XANES spectra of the references with different local structures were used to compare with XANES of the Cu/N0.14C at −1.1 V vs. RHE and rule out Cu–N2 site, Cu–N3 site with trigonal planar geometry, Cu–N4 sites (including tetrahedral geometry, square planar geometry and Cu–N3 with CH3*) and different sizes Cu nanoparticles as shown in Supplementary Figs. 20–23. We also tried linear combination fitting (LCF) of XANES of Cu NPs with different sizes and various Cu–N4 sites, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 24. We could not obtain a fitting spectrum which was matched with operando XANES at −1.1 V vs. RHE. The main features of LCF result were notable different from that of operando XANES. Therefore, the possibility of combining for Cu NPs with different sizes and various Cu–N4 sites could be excluded.
In order to verify that Cu2–CuN3 clusters in-situ generated are truly metastable catalyst and the potential-dependent reversibility was real chemical reaction, the freeze-quench approach was used to freeze the redox state and local structure of the catalyst and measured XAFS data at liquid helium temperatures (18 K), as shown in Supplementary Fig. 25a. The X-ray edge energy as well as the spectral shape of the freeze-quench and operando spectra do not differ significantly in Supplementary Fig. 25b–d. This comparison verified that the freeze-quench and operando method access the same electrochemical state of the Cu/N0.14C (same oxidation state and local structure). The spectra which were measured for three times could be perfectly overlapped in Supplementary Fig. 25e–g. These results indicated that Cu2–CuN3 clusters oxidized without the applied potential was the chemical reaction and Cu2–CuN3 clusters in-situ generated material were truly metastable catalysts.
Overall, Operando XAS study revealed that a transformation from Cu/N0.14C to unique ultrasmall Cun moiety and presented the structure-activity relationships of this catalyst, indicating the in-situ generated Cu2–CuN3 cluster is the optimal site for CO2 reduction to ethanol.
To further reveal the key adsorbed intermediates in the catalytic reaction, we carried out Synchrotron radiation operando Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (SR-FTIRS). No obvious absorption band was observed on scanning the applied potential ranging from −0.1 V to −0.7 V vs. RHE (Fig. 4d). Interestingly, distinct vibration features were observed at 1450 cm−1 when applied potentials were lower than −0.7 V vs. RHE, which could be assigned to the antisymmetric methyl groups vibration of CH3* 45,46, an important intermediate for C2 formation rates. Furthermore, when the applied potential was below −1.1 V vs. RHE, two new bands at ~ 1780 cm−1 and 1920 cm−1 could be ascribed to the surface-bound C=O species12,47 and electrogenerated CO bound to copper surface12,48 suggesting H* radicals were consumed by other products at −1.2 V vs. RHE, which was consistent with the electrochemical results (Fig. 2c). The FE of the ethanol reached a high point at −1.1 V vs. RHE and then decreased obviously at lower potential to accompany the hydrogen rate increased. The FE of ethanol reversed at −1.2 V vs. RHE may be due to the Cu cluster enlarging that lead to the competing reaction of HER and CO2RR hydrogenation to CH4 enhancing, which blocked the CO2 to ethanol41,49. These FTIRS analysis showed uniformity with operando XAS and XPS results. On the other hand, the infrared bands for CH3* over the Cu/C catalyst were not observed even after applying potential at −1.2 V vs. RHE in Supplementary Fig. 26. The intensities were much lower than those over the Cu/N0.14C. These results were consistent with the low C2+ formation rates of the Cu/C catalyst, further confirming the unique structure of Cu/N0.14C under the electrochemical condition. Therefore, FTIR results provided experimental evidence for the conversion of CO2-to-ethanol reaction mechanism and demonstrated that CH3* was the major intermediates covered the catalysis. To further investigate the property of the adsorption species, the isotope labelling operando FTIR was measured under the reaction condition, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 27. With H2O replaced by D2O in the electrolyte, the peak shifted to 1190 cm−1 obviously indicating that it could be assigned to the vibration of hydrogen group (CD3*). This result was consistent with previous speculate. Therefore, the FTIR results suggested that the adsorption of CO2 was the rate-determining step after CH3* formed. It may be highly affected by mass transfer process. The results are consistent with previous reports whereby the selectivity of C2+ products formation increased with the density of CO250,51.
Density functional theory calculations
Theoretical investigations were conducted based on DFT calculations to further understand the reaction mechanism of the Cu2–CuN3 cluster with CH3* adsorbed. A supported Cu2–CuN3 cluster model with a Cu bonding with three N atoms on N-doped carbon nanosheets was proposed to be the structure of active sites with an applied potential of −1.1 V vs. RHE in Supplementary Fig. 28a. For comparison, we built a model of Cu3–CuN3 cluster in Supplementary Fig. 28b that represent for the growth of Cu clusters and may be the active site for the more negative applied potential. The calculated average partial charge of three copper atoms in the Cu2-CuN3 cluster was +0.20 e− because of the charge transfer between the cluster and N-doped carbon nanosheets. The charge exchange primarily occurred with the Cu atom bonding with N atoms. The other two Cu atoms changed slightly before the reaction occurred, which profited from the absorption of C atoms. This was similar to the Cu3–CuN3 cluster. The difference was that the average partial charge was +0.15 e−. Interestingly, the charge distribution between Cu atoms was charge-asymmetry as shown in Fig. 4e f. The major charge transfer occurred at Cu–N3 site. The N-doping played an important role to adjust the electron transfer and further charge distribution between the Cu atoms and N-doped carbon interface.
Theoretical investigations were conducted based on DFT calculations to further understand the reaction mechanism of the Cu–N3 with triangle pyramid geometry, Cu–CuN3, Cu2–CuN3, and Cu3–CuN3 in Supplementary Fig. 20c, f, g, h. The supported CuN3, Cu–CuN3, Cu2–CuN3 and Cu3–CuN3 models with a Cu bonding with three N atoms on N-doped carbon nanosheets which were proposed to be the structure of active sites with the applied potential and represents the growth of Cu clusters that may be the active site for the formation of ethanol according the results of operando XAS analysis. The reaction pathway of CO2RR to CH3CH2OH for the Cu2–CuN3 cluster was investigated combined by the computational hydrogen electrode approach as shown in Fig. 5a, b, Supplementary Fig. 28, and Supplementary Data 1–1352. The *OCHO mechanism was preferred for our catalysts than the *CO mechanisms, due to the production of CO was suppressed along with the formation of ethanol at the potentials below −0.8 V as shown in Fig. 2b. CO2 molecules interact with two exposed Cu atoms, respectively, forming coadsorbed (*OCHO + *OCHO) (State 3). One adsorbed *OCHO was firstly reduced to form *CH3 + *OCHO (State 9), and then the other *OCHO was reduced to construct *CH3 + *OCH2 (State 12), that went through the C–C bond formation to CH3CH2OH. Similar reaction processes based on *OCHO mechanism were considered for Cu3–CuN3, as well as CuN3 and Cu–CuN3 which contained only one active Cu site, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 29. The calculated overpotential (−0.501 V) for Cu2–CuN3 cluster was much lower than that of CuN3 (−1.685 V), Cu–CuN3 (−1.368 V) and Cu3–CuN3 (−0.699 V), implied that the Cu2–CuN3 observed by operando XAS is the real active site for reduction of CO2 to ethanol, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 30. Furthermore, there were relatively high energy barriers for State 8 → 9 (−0.501 eV) and State 11 → 12 (−0.467 eV) in the reaction process of Cu2–CuN3, both of which containing –CH3 and easy to be detected in accordance with our FTIR results.
The hydrogen evolution reaction is a competing reaction with CO2RR53,54. Therefore, the competing relationship between CO2RR and HER should be considered. The adsorption energy was calculated to further investigate the difference between Cu2–CuN3 and Cu3–CuN3. The adsorption energy of H* showed that the Cu3–CuN3 model (−0.36 eV) had a much lower energy than the Cu2–CuN3 model (+0.15 eV). The CO2 adsorption energy for Cu2–CuN3 and Cu3–CuN3 has been calculated and the result shown that the adsorption energy of CO2 for Cu2–CuN3 and Cu3–CuN3 are +0.24 eV and +0.18 eV, respectively, implying the adsorption capacities for Cu2–CuN3 and Cu3–CuN3 are close. However, the corresponding adsorption energy is +0.15 eV (Cu2–CuN3) and −0.36 eV (Cu3–CuN3), respectively, indicating the adsorption capacities of H for Cu3–CuN3 are much stronger than that for Cu2–CuN3. These results shown the adsorption processes of both CO2 and H at the Cu2–CuN3 are non-spontaneous processes. On the contrary, for Cu3–CuN3, the adsorption of the H is spontaneous process, while the adsorption of CO2 is still non-spontaneous process, illustrating the H adsorption is advantage state for the competing reaction. Therefore, the larger amounts of H were adsorbed on the Cu3–CuN3 sites, which preempted the adsorption sites of CO2 and reduced the amount of ethanol produced. It corresponded with the competing reaction of H2 and CH4 increasing when the potential decreased.
CH3* was the key intermediate for C2+ formation rates and it occurred when the potential decreased to −0.6 V vs. RHE. This result suggested the rate-determining steps (RDS) altered when the potential at decreased to −1.2 V vs. RHE, combining the FTIR results in Fig. 4d. To further analysis why RDS changed during the reaction, the different charge density for Cu2-CuN3 (with/without CH3*) and Cu3-CuN3 (with/without CH3*) was calculated as showing in the Fig. 4e, f and Supplementary Fig. 31. The charge density differential diagram indicated the nonbonding Cu atoms in the Cu2–CuN3–CH3 got 0.15 e− and the charge accumulation occurred. These results showed that charge-asymmetry effected intensified by CH3* adsorption. Due to the charge accumulation, a polarization electrical field was presented that could modulate the CO2 reduction reaction and reduce the thermodynamic energy barrier for the reaction55. The electron-rich Cu atoms enhanced the boundary oxygen sites of the adsorbed CO2, which protected the oxygen end from being protonated and occupied the valence electron of carbon to avoid the C=C double bond formation56.
Conclusions
In summary, we systematically investigated a catalyst in which CuO clusters are supported on nitrogen-doped carbon nanosheets (Cu/N0.14C) for efficient CO2 electroreduction. The catalysts delivered high C2+ products FE (~73%), which included an ethanol FE of 51% at the potential of −1.1 V vs. RHE and the current density of −14.4 mA/cm−2 in 0.1 M KHCO3 electrolyte. Operando XAS and XPS results revealed a potential-dependent structure transformation from CuO cluster to Cun–CuN3 moiety, which is a reversible process. Once Cu2–CuN3 clusters have been formed at −1.1 V, CO2 conversion to ethanol occurs with the maximum FE, indicating the Cu2-CuN3 cluster is the optimal site. The N-doping played an important role to disperse the reduced Cun cluster uniformly and adjust charge distribution between metal atoms and substrate. Operando FTIR and theoretic calculations results demonstrated that CH3* was the major intermediates and Cu2–CuN3 clusters were charge-asymmetric sites that are intensified by CH3* adsorbing. The charge-asymmetric sites are responsible for the outstanding asymmetry ethanol formation. Overall, our findings suggest a strategy engineering the pre-catalysts to modulate the electron transfer and in-situ generate ultrasmall metal clusters anchored on the substrate as high dispersion asymmetric sites, which is the key factor to facilitate the formation of asymmetric products. It would extend to the single-atomic site, oxide composite structure, and metal-support effect. These catalysts have great potential to exhibit novel catalytic properties such as more efficient catalytic performance and higher selectivity compared to the single atom catalysts and oxide catalysts.
Methods
Preparation of Cu/NxC and the comparison samples
Typically, 100 mg copper phthalocyanine and 1.0 g dicyandiamide were continuously mixed in ethanol and entirely dried. Subsequently, the dried mixture was pyrolyzed for 2 h in the N2 atmosphere at different temperature to obtain a series of Cu/NxC samples with different nitrogen content (x = 0.14, 0.11, 0.02, corresponding pyrolysis temperature at 800 °C, 900 °C, 1000 °C, respectively. x is mass content ratio of nitrogen to carbon). Collect obtained black powder after pyrolysis and directly used for further characterizations and catalytic performance test. Cu/C was prepared with copper chloride and trimesic acid. The pyrolysis temperature was 800 °C and other synthesis conditions were the same as above.
Characterization
TEM images were carried out by the JEOL JEM-2100F microscope (200 kV). AFM was obtained on SPM-960 AFM. Typically, small amount of sample was ultrasonically dispersed in the aqueous solution. For AFM measurement, 10 μL of the completely dispersed solution was carefully dropped on a flat mica sheet, and then placed it in a fume hood to air dry. For TEM, 10 μL of the dispersed solution prepared above was dropped on a copper mesh with carbon support film. EDS elemental mapping and HAADF-STEM were characterized by a JEOL ARM-200 microscope (200 kV) with a probe spherical aberration corrector. X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) spectra were observed by RigakuTTR-III XRD of Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å). XPS spectra were acquired on a PerkinElmer Physics PHI 5300 spectrometer57.
Electrochemical measurements
Electrochemical measurements were accomplished in a gas-tight H-type cell at CHI 760E electrochemical workstation (Shanghai Chenhua, China). For preparation of the working electrode, 2 mg of the catalyst was dissolved in 500 μl solution (including 10 μl Nafion solution (5 wt %) and deionized water/ethanol (volume ratio, 1:4)) to form a well-dispersed catalyst ink. Furthermore, we dropped 10ul ink on the glassy carbon electrode. The catalyst loading is about 0.2 mg/cm2. The Ag/AgCl electrode and platinum plate were employed as the reference electrode and counter, respectively. The cathodic chamber and anodic chamber were separated by Nafion 117 membrane. All the potential was reported versus RHE. The conversion between different electrode potentials used the following formula: ERHE = EAg/AgCl + 0.197 V + 0.0591 × pH. LSV (the scan rate of 10 mV·s−1) and CV experiments (50 mV·s−1) were implemented to test the catalytic performance in CO2-saturated 0.1 M KHCO3 electrolyte, respectively57. Comparison of CO2RR activities for the other catalysts were shown in Supplementary Table 3.
Operando XAFS Measurements
The computer-controlled electrochemical analyzer was used to conduct electrochemical measurements. The catalyst modified carbon paper, Pt plate and Ag/AgCl (KCl-saturated) electrode were employed as the working electrode, counter electrode and reference electrode, respectively. The plexiglass electrochemical cell which had the flat wall with a circular hole of 15 mm diameter. was applied for operando XAFS measurements. Cu/NxC catalyst coated carbon paper contacted with the copper slip and the catalyst layer faced inward. Afterwards we poured KHCO3 solution into the cell which was connected to the electrochemical station with the copper tape. The organic glass upper cover of the cell with the Ag/AgCl reference electrode was used to fix the distance between reference electrode and working electrode from start to finish57. Operando XAFS data were measured with fluorescence mode using the Ar-filled Lytle detector.
Operando SR-FTIR Measurements
Operando SR-FTIR measurements were conducted at the infrared spectroscopy and microspectroscopy station (BL01B) of National Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory (NSRL) 58. The CHI 660E electrochemical workstation (Shanghai Chenhua, China) was used to apply voltage to a self-made infrared reflection cell. The infrared spectrums were collected using Bruker Vertex 70 V/s FTIR spectrometer with nitrogen cooled mercury cadmium telluride detector, and the synchrotron radiation infrared beam was focused on the reflection cell using Bruker Hyperion 3000 microscope equipped with a ×15 objective. In the measurements, the gap between the working electrode and the ZnSe window was carefully maintained on the order of microns to prevent excessive water absorption. All spectrums were collected using single-potential alteration FTIR spectroscopy and were acquired by averaging 128 times scan with a 4 cm–1 resolution, and the background spectrums was conducted under open-circuit voltage, the voltage ranges for conducting measurements were 0 V to –1.2 V with an interval of 0.1 V.
Quasi-in situ XPS and AES
Quasi-in situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy was conducted of catalysts drop-casted on carbon paper as same as mentioned in Electrodes section. Before test the electrolytes should be CO2-saturated to remove the dissolved oxygen in the solution. Samples were conditioned at different potential for 30 min as one conditioning step. After that the samples was moved to the XPS vacuum chamber without extra exposed to the air. That would avoid the air to influence the catalysts to keep the authentic state under the CO2RR process. XPS (ESCALAB 250X) was measured at Analytical Instrumentation Center, Shanghai Tech University. It was used to characterize the chemical bonding character of the obtained catalysts using a monochromatic of 1486.6 eV (Al Kα source). All XPS spectra were corrected by C 1s peak with the binding energy at 284.6 eV. All of the reagents were used without further purification.
Freeze-quench XAS
The Cu/N0.14C was electrodeposited on a carbon paper electrode, which was an integral part of the XAS sample holder. The Cu/N0.14C was equilibrated potentiostatically for 20 min at −1.1 V vs. RHE. The Cu/N0.14C electrode was rapidly frozen by immersion in liquid nitrogen. The chemical reaction is extremely slow at low temperature environment and the chemical state of the catalyst was well preserved for XAFS data collection periods. X-ray absorption spectra at the Cu K-edge were collected at beamline BL14W1 of the SSRF using a Lytle detector with the Ni filter. The measurements were performed at 18 K using a cryostat (ARS). The excitation energies (scan range 8779–9779 eV) were selected by a Si (111) double-crystal monochromator.
Computational methods
DFT calculations were performed within the frame of plane-wave-based density functional theory (DFT) by VASP package. The generalized gradient approximation (GGA) in the Perdew−Burke−Ernzerhof (PBE) formalism was adopted to treat the electron exchange and correlation energy. The cut-off energy was set to be 500 eV. For structural optimization, 3 × 3 × 2 k-points meshes with a the original Monkhorst-Pack scheme was used and the convergence of energy and force were 10−6 eV and 0.01 eV Å−1, respectively. 6 × 6 × 4 k-points meshes were used for static calculations. A 20 Å vacuum layer in the z-axis direction was added to avoid the interfere of the layer image coupling caused by the periodic boundary conditions59. For more details, please see Supplementary Figs. 20, 28, 29, 31 and Supplementary Data file 1–13.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by the Photon Science Center for Carbon Neutrality, National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11975301, 21801015, and 2210020315), Beijing Institute of Technology Research Fund Program for Young Scholars (3090012221909), Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2020286), Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility Operation Research Project, Maintenance and reconstruction project for large scientific equipment of Chinese Academy of Sciences and National Major Scientific Research Instrument Development Project (41827802), Users with Excellence program of Hefei Science Center of CAS(2020HSC-UE003) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (WK2310000099). The authors thank the BL02B and 03U in the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF), BL01B in the National Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory (NSRL) for help with characterizations. The authors thank Experimental Center of Advanced Materials (ECAM) of School of Materials Science & Engineering, Beijing institute of Technology for help with characterizations. We are grateful to Chuangwei Liu and Jige Chen for valuable discussions, support, and cooperation of DFT calculations. We thank Yang Liu, Guoqiang Chen and Li Ma for helpful discussions on this work. The authors thank Big Data Science Center of Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility. This work was also supported by Experimental Supporting System at Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility. The authors also thank Analytical Instrumentation Center (#SPST-AIC10112914) (SPST, ShanghaiTech University), the Electron Microscopy Center and the HPC Platform of ShanghaiTech University and Beijing Zhongkebaice Technology Service Co., Ltd.
Source data
Author contributions
Y.W., D.W., and W.C. conceived the project and designed the experiments. Y.W. and X.S. performed the operando XAS experiments, EXAFS data analysis and XANES simulations. X.S., H.L., and Z.Q. performed the operando SR-FTIR experiments and data analysis. Z.P. and F.Y. designed Quasi-in situ XPS and AES experiments. X.S., X.N., and Z.P. performed the Quasi-in situ XPS and AES experiments and data analysis. Z.J. and W.C. conducted material synthesis. Z.J., D.Z., H.S., and W.C. performed structural characterization. J.Z. carried out DFT calculations. Y.W., X.S. W.C., and Z.J. wrote the manuscript. X.S. and Y.W. provided interpretation of mechanism. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Data availability
The data supporting the findings of this work are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files. The DFT data for cluster and reaction pathway as cif files are provided as a Supplementary Data file 1–13. All the data reported in this work are available from the authors on reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Xiaozhi Su, Zhuoli Jiang, Jing Zhou.
Contributor Information
Wenxing Chen, Email: wxchen@bit.edu.cn.
Yu Wang, Email: wangyu@sinap.ac.cn.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-022-29035-8.
References
- 1.Zhang W, et al. Progress and perspective of electrocatalytic CO2 reduction for renewable carbonaceous fuels and chemicals. Adv. Sci. 2018;5:1700275. doi: 10.1002/advs.201700275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zheng Y, et al. Understanding the roadmap for electrochemical reduction of CO2 to multi-carbon oxygenates and hydrocarbons on copper-based catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019;141:7646–7659. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b02124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Popovic S, et al. Stability and degradation mechanisms of copper-based catalysts for electrochemical CO2 reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020;59:14736–14746. doi: 10.1002/anie.202000617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yang KD, et al. Morphology-directed selective production of ethylene or ethane from CO2 on a Cu mesopore electrode. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017;56:796–800. doi: 10.1002/anie.201610432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kim D, Kley CS, Li Y, Yang P. Copper nanoparticle ensembles for selective electroreduction of CO2 to C2-C3 products. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:10560–10565. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1711493114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chatterjee T, Boutin E, Robert M. Manifesto for the routine use of NMR for the liquid product analysis of aqueous CO2 reduction: from comprehensive chemical shift data to formaldehyde quantification in water. Dalton T. 2020;49:4257–4265. doi: 10.1039/c9dt04749b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Resasco J, et al. Promoter effects of alkali metal cations on the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:11277–11287. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b06765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Schouten KJ, Qin Z, Perez Gallent E, Koper MT. Two pathways for the formation of ethylene in CO reduction on single-crystal copper electrodes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:9864–9867. doi: 10.1021/ja302668n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jiang K, et al. Effects of surface roughness on the electrochemical reduction of CO2 over Cu. ACS Energy Lett. 2020;5:1206–1214. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ebaid M, et al. Production of C2/C3 oxygenates from planar copper nitride-derived mesoporous copper via electrochemical reduction of CO2. Chem. Mater. 2020;32:3304–3311. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang Y, et al. Catalyst synthesis under CO2 electroreduction favours faceting and promotes renewable fuels electrosynthesis. Nat. Catal. 2019;3:98–106. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ma W, et al. Electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 to ethylene and ethanol through hydrogen-assisted C–C coupling over fluorine-modified copper. Nat. Catal. 2020;3:478–487. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cai Z, et al. Selectivity regulation of CO2 electroreduction through contact interface engineering on superwetting Cu nanoarray electrodes. Nano Res. 2018;12:345–349. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Li H, et al. Changing the product selectivity for electrocatalysis of CO2 reduction reaction on plated Cu electrodes. ChemCatChem. 2019;11:6139–6146. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ma S, et al. Electroreduction of carbon dioxide to hydrocarbons using bimetallic Cu–Pd catalysts with different mixing Patterns. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016;139:47–50. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b10740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nitopi S, et al. Progress and perspectives of electrochemical CO2 reduction on copper in aqueous electrolyte. Chem. Rev. 2019;119:7610–7672. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhou Y, et al. Dopant-induced electron localization drives CO2 reduction to C2 hydrocarbons. Nat. Chem. 2018;10:974–980. doi: 10.1038/s41557-018-0092-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Liang ZQ, et al. Copper-on-nitride enhances the stable electrosynthesis of multi-carbon products from CO2. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:3828. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06311-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wang Y, et al. Reticular chemistry in electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction. Sci. China Mater. 2020;63:1113–1141. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Reller, C. et al. Selective electroreduction of CO2 toward ethylene on nano dendritic copper catalysts at high current density. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1602114 (2017).
- 21.Tan D, et al. Multi-shelled CuO microboxes for carbon dioxide reduction to ethylene. Nano Res. 2020;13:768–774. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Karapinar D, et al. Electroreduction of CO2 on single-site copper-nitrogen-doped carbon material: selective formation of ethanol and reversible restructuration of the metal sites. Angew. Chem. Inter. Ed. 2019;58:15098–15103. doi: 10.1002/anie.201907994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Guan A, et al. Boosting CO2 electroreduction to CH4 via tuning neighboring single-copper sites. ACS Energy Lett. 2020;5:1044–1053. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhao K, et al. Selective electroreduction of CO2 to acetone by single copper atoms anchored on N-doped porous carbon. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:2455. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16381-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Song Y, et al. High-selectivity electrochemical conversion of CO2 to ethanol using a copper nanoparticle/N-doped graphene electrode. ChemistrySelect. 2016;1:6055–6061. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ghodselahi T, Vesaghi MA, Shafiekhani A, Baghizadeh A, Lameii M. XPS study of the Cu@Cu2O core-shell nanoparticles. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2008;255:2730–2734. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Espino´s JP, Morales J, Barranco A, Caballero A, Holgado JP, Gonza´lez-Elipe AR. Interface effects for Cu, CuO, and Cu2O deposited on SiO2 and ZrO2. XPS determination of the valence state of copper in Cu/SiO2 and Cu/ZrO2 catalysts. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2002;106:6921–6929. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wang X, et al. Theoretical characterization of X-ray absorption, emission, and photoelectron spectra of nitrogen doped along graphene edges. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2013;117:579–589. doi: 10.1021/jp307405r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Li X, et al. Exclusive Ni-N4 sites realize near-unity CO selectivity for electrochemical CO2 reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:14889–14892. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b09074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Eilert A, Roberts FS, Friebel D, Nilsson A. Formation of copper catalysts for CO2 reduction with high ethylene/methane product ratio investigated with in situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016;7:1466–1470. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mistry H, et al. Highly selective plasma-activated copper catalysts for carbon dioxide reduction to ethylene. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:12123. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jung H, et al. Electrochemical fragmentation of Cu2O nanoparticles enhancing selective C-C coupling from CO2 reduction reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019;141:4624–4633. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b11237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Moller T, et al. Electrocatalytic CO2 reduction on CuOx nanocubes tracking the evolution of chemical state, geometric structure, and catalytic selectivity using operando spectroscopy. Angew. Chem. Inter. Ed. 2020;59:17974–17983. doi: 10.1002/anie.202007136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wang, X., Yang, D., Zuo, S., Yang, H. & Zhou, Y. Freestanding millimeter-scale porphyrin-based monoatomic layers with 0.28 nm thickness for CO2 electrocatalysis. Angew. Chem. Inter. Ed.59, 18954–18959 (2020).. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 35.Matos J, et al. In situ coarsening study of inverse micelle-prepared Pt nanoparticles supported on gamma-Al2O3: pretreatment and environmental effects. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012;14:11457–11467. doi: 10.1039/c2cp41339f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Seah MP, Smith GC, Anthony MT. AES—energy calibration of electron spectrometers. I—an absolute,traceable energy calibration and the provision of atomic reference line energies. Surf. Inter. Analy. 1990;15:293–308. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Deroubaix G, Marcus P. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis of copper and zinc oxides and sulphides. Surf. Inter. Anal. 1992;18:39–46. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hofmann S. Practical surface analysis: state of the art and recent developments in AES, XPS, ISS and SIMS. Surf. Inter. Analy. 1986;9:3–20. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Xue ZH, et al. Tuning the adsorption energy of methanol molecules along Ni-N-doped carbon phase boundaries by the Mott-Schottky effect for gas-phase methanol dehydrogenation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018;57:2697–2701. doi: 10.1002/anie.201713429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sun Z, et al. Simultaneously realizing rapid electron transfer and mass transport in jellyfish‐like Mott–Schottky nanoreactors for oxygen reduction reaction. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020;30:1910482. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Cheng T, Xiao H, Goddard WA., 3rd Full atomistic reaction mechanism with kinetics for CO reduction on Cu(100) from ab initio molecular dynamics free-energy calculations at 298 K. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:1795–1800. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1612106114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Thuler MR, Benbow RL, Hurych Z. Resonant photo- and Auger emission at the3pthreshold of Cu, Cu2O, and CuO. Phys. Rev. B. 1982;26:669–677. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Cai J, et al. An APXPS endstation for gas–solid and liquid–solid interface studies at SSRF. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 2019;30:81. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sculfort S, et al. Two-dimensional triangular and square heterometallic clusters: influence of the closed-shell d10 electronic configuration. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009;48:9663–9667. doi: 10.1002/anie.200903895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kruppe CM, Krooswyk JD, Trenary M. Selective hydrogenation of acetylene to ethylene in the presence of a carbonaceous surface layer on a Pd/Cu(111) single-atom alloy. ACS Catal. 2017;7:8042–8049. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Li S-H, Yang Z-X, Chen S-W, Lee S-H, Lin J-L. Comparison of the chemistry of ClCH2CH(CH3)OH and ClCH2CH2CH2OH on Cu(100) and O/Cu(100) J. Phys. Chem. C. 2016;120:9826–9835. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wuttig A, et al. Tracking a common surface-bound intermediate during CO2-to-fuels catalysis. ACS Cent. Sci. 2016;2:522–528. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.6b00155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Gunathunge CM, Ovalle VJ, Li Y, Janik MJ, Waegele MM. Existence of an electrochemically Inert CO population on Cu electrodes in alkaline pH. ACS Catal. 2018;8:7507–7516. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Schouten KJP, Pérez Gallent E, Koper MTM. The influence of pH on the reduction of CO and CO2 to hydrocarbons on copper electrodes. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2014;716:53–57. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Gao D, Arán-Ais RM, Jeon HS, Roldan Cuenya B. Rational catalyst and electrolyte design for CO2 electroreduction towards multicarbon products. Nat. Catal. 2019;2:198–210. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Fan L, Xia C, Zhu P, Lu Y, Wang H. Electrochemical CO2 reduction to high-concentration pure formic acid solutions in an all-solid-state reactor. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:3633. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17403-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Xu H, et al. Highly selective electrocatalytic CO2 reduction to ethanol by metallic clusters dynamically formed from atomically dispersed copper. Nat. Energy. 2020;5:623–632. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Yoo JS, Christensen R, Vegge T, Norskov JK, Studt F. Theoretical insight into the trends that guide the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to formic acid. ChemSusChem. 2016;9:358–363. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201501197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Liu C, et al. Single-boron catalysts for nitrogen reduction reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019;141:2884–2888. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b13165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Liu M, et al. Enhanced electrocatalytic CO2 reduction via field-induced reagent concentration. Nature. 2016;537:382–386. doi: 10.1038/nature19060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Lin SC, et al. Operando time-resolved X-ray absorption spectroscopy reveals the chemical nature enabling highly selective CO2 reduction. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:3525. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17231-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Jiang ZL, et al. Discovery of main group single Sb-N4 active sites for CO2 electroreduction to formate with high efficiency. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020;13:2856–2863. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Chen C, et al. Coupling N2 and CO2 in H2O to synthesize urea under ambient conditions. Nat. Chem. 2020;12:717–724. doi: 10.1038/s41557-020-0481-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Su XZ, et al. Operando spectroscopic identification of active sites in NiFe Prussian Blue analogues as electrocatalysts: activation of oxygen atoms for oxygen evolution reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;140:11286–11292. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b05294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data supporting the findings of this work are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files. The DFT data for cluster and reaction pathway as cif files are provided as a Supplementary Data file 1–13. All the data reported in this work are available from the authors on reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.