Abstract
Immune checkpoint molecules are promising anticancer targets, among which therapeutic antibodies targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway have been widely applied to cancer treatment in clinical practice and have great potential. However, this treatment is greatly limited by its low response rates in certain cancers, lack of known biomarkers, immune-related toxicity, innate and acquired drug resistance, etc. Overcoming these limitations would significantly expand the anticancer applications of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade and improve the response rate and survival time of cancer patients. In the present review, we first illustrate the biological mechanisms of the PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoints and their role in the healthy immune system as well as in the tumor microenvironment (TME). The PD-1/PD-L1 pathway inhibits the anticancer effect of T cells in the TME, which in turn regulates the expression levels of PD-1 and PD-L1 through multiple mechanisms. Several strategies have been proposed to solve the limitations of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment, including combination therapy with other standard treatments, such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, anti-angiogenic therapy, other immunotherapies and even diet control. Downregulation of PD-L1 expression in the TME via pharmacological or gene regulation methods improves the efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment. Surprisingly, recent preclinical studies have shown that upregulation of PD-L1 in the TME also improves the response and efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade. Immunotherapy is a promising anticancer strategy that provides novel insight into clinical applications. This review aims to guide the development of more effective and less toxic anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapies.
Keywords: Immunotherapy, PD-1/PD-L1, Combination therapy, PD-L1 regulation
Introduction
Immunotherapy, a promising anticancer strategy that improves the specificity and strength of the immune response to cancer, has been widely studied in recent years. Brakes on the immune system protect healthy tissues and organs from attack by the immune system; this brake system is hijacked by cancer cells to escape from the immune system or even turn against it [1]. The programmed cell death 1 receptor (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway and the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) pathway constitute the well-known brake system of the immune system. Targeting these two pathways has been shown to be a successful anticancer strategy [2]. Antibodies against the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway have been extensively applied to cases of melanoma, lung cancer, lymphoma, liver cancer, colorectal cancer, urothelial cancer, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, cervical cancer, kidney cancer, stomach cancer and breast cancer [3]. This monotherapy or combination therapy (as adjuvants or neo-adjuvants) produces a remarkable clinical response. A small number of cancer patients subsequently experience long-term remission. Nevertheless, the PD-1/PD-L1 blockade, similar to other anticancer treatments, is also limited by a low response rate in certain cancers, lack of known biomarkers, immune-related toxicity and innate and acquired drug resistance. To date, the clinical response to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade is barely 40% [4]. Thus, identifying optimal biomarkers for screening cancer patients who are responsive to immune checkpoint blockades (ICBs) and accurately monitoring its therapeutic efficacy is of great clinical importance [5]. In addition, it is important to precisely distinguish cancer cells from normal cells in ICBs, thus preventing severe adverse events such as discontinued treatment, dose reduction or even death due to immune-related toxicity [6]. Similar to other anticancer treatments, some patients may not be sensitive to ICB or develop drug resistance after a period of medication. Elucidating the potential mechanisms of low responses and drug resistance to ICB will enhance their clinical benefits [7] and is key to improving the efficacy of immunotherapy [8].
In the present review, we first illustrate the biological mechanisms of PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoints and their role in both the normal immune system and TME, aiming to enhance current understanding of the immune checkpoint molecules PD-1/PD-L1. Combination therapy with other standard treatments, such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, anti-angiogenic therapy, other immunotherapies and even diet control, is expected to address the limitations of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. Either upregulation or downregulation of PD-L1 expression in the TME improves the therapeutic efficacy of ICBs; a combination therapy of either with immunotherapy may represent a novel anticancer treatment and combinatorial drug design. This review summarizes the latest developments, prospects and challenges of the combination therapy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade and PD-L1 regulation, aiming to provide novel ideas for developing more effective and less toxic anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy.
Immune checkpoints in cancer therapy
The immune system in carcinogenesis
Advanced cancer has mainly been treated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy in recent decades. However, these treatments are unable to distinguish normal cells from cancer cells, leading to damage of normal cells, severe adverse events and even discontinuation of treatment. The normally functioning immune system is capable of accurately recognizing and eliminating cancer cells due to significant differences between normal cells and cancer cells, thus achieving precision killing. The interaction between cancer cells and the immune system used to be considered the main determinant factor for carcinogenesis [9].
However, recent evidence has shown that most new tumors formed in the esophagus would naturally be eliminated due to the weaker viabilities of these newly formed tumors that of adjacent mutant epithelial cells, rather than differences in survival due to the involvement of the immune system [10]. Mutations are the potential origin of cancers. It was recently found that carcinogenicity is mediated by oncogenes (e.g., BRAFV600E), lineage-specific transcription factors (e.g., SOX10) and chromatin factors for regulating development (e.g., ATAD2) [11].
A recent study analyzed the relationship between immune response and tumor development [12], finding that chronic inflammatory cells secrete IL-6 and that transient inflammation leads to persistent reprogramming of epithelial cells leading to subsequent tumorigenesis, thus underscoring the role of the immune system in promoting tumorigenesis. Established anti-tumor immune responses suppress tumor development, but tumor cell clones that escape immune surveillance eventually develop into clinically visible tumors.
Cancer immunotherapy eliminates cancer cells by stimulating and enhancing immune function or regulating the immune state based on immune surveillance and immune editing. Of all immune cells, T cells are the most powerful tool for directly killing cancer cells and are characterized by high specificity, strong memory and high adaptability [13]. The cancer-immunity cycle, in which cancer cells release specific antigens and the immune system is activated to kill them, is a cyclical process involving 7 steps: (1) Antigens are expressed and released by cancer cells; (2) cancer antigen processing and presentation; (3) T cell initiation and activation; (4) T cell migration to cancer lesions; (5) T cell penetration to cancer lesions; (6) recognition of cancer cells by T cells; and (7) elimination of cancer cells by T cells [14]. Multiple factors in this cancer-immunity cycle are potential therapeutic targets for immunotherapies. Cancer cells have been reported to express high levels of immunosuppressive signal proteins, which contribute to avoid the attack of immune cells in the TME.
The basic biology of immune checkpoints
T cells are the most important part of the immune system, and their function is strictly and precisely regulated by the immune system, as multiple receptor molecules on the cell membrane transduce activating or inhibitory signals. Once T cells are activated by antigen stimulation, the immune system also initiates negative feedback to avoid continuous overactivation of T cells that causes excessive damage to the body. Inhibitory receptor molecules, known as checkpoint molecules, expressed on the surface of T cells are responsible for the negative feedback of the immune system, inhibiting the elimination of target cells by T cells by binding corresponding ligand molecules on the target cell surface. Checkpoint molecules are well studied in translational research in immunotherapies [15].
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have recently been highlighted for their functions in blocking the effect of inhibitory immune molecules on T cells and thus reducing immune tolerance to cancers; these ICIs have been widely analyzed by biopharmaceutical companies. Many immune checkpoints have been identified, including CTLA-4 and PD-1; while both have been thoroughly investigated, PD-1 has been of particular interest and has been widely applied in clinical practice.
The PD-1/PD-L1 pathway in cancer immunotherapy
PD-1/PD-L1 structure
PD-1 is a cell surface receptor that was initially found to be preferentially expressed in apoptotic cells [16]. Later, PD-1 was identified as the key immune checkpoint for regulating T and B cell response thresholds to antigens. As a key checkpoint for T cells, PD-1 exerts a central role in regulating their cellular functions. The interaction between PD-L1 and PD-1 inhibits T cell function by inducing T cell exhaustion to promote immune evasion [17]. Therefore, abnormally upregulated PD-L1 levels in cancer cells and some immune cells results in immune escape. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies have become a hot topic in cancer immunotherapy.
PD-1, also known as CD279, is a type I transmembrane protein encoded by the PDCD1 gene of the CD28 immunoglobulin superfamily. It was first discovered and reported by Ishida et al. in 1992 [15, 16]. PD-1 is mainly expressed in activated CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, natural killer T cells, B cells, macrophages, dendritic cells (DCs) and monocytes; its expression is induced by the T or B cell receptor pathway and enhanced by the stimulation of tumor necrosis factor [18]. However, naive T and B cells barely express PD-1 [19–21]. PD-1 is comprised of 288 amino acids, including a single Ig variable-type (IgV) extracellular domain, a transmembrane domain and a cytoplasmic domain [22–24]. Its extracellular domain is similar to that of other members of the CD28 superfamily, containing an Ig variable-type domain that is important in ligand binding. N-terminal and C-terminal tyrosine residues in the cytoplasmic domain are involved in the formation of immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motifs (ITIMs) and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based switch motifs (ITSMs), respectively [16, 24–26]; the latter is the main signal transduction domain of PD-1 and is closely related to the response activity of effector T cells.
The biological functions of PD-1 rely on two ligands: PD-L1 (also known as B7-H1 or CD274) and PD-L2 (also known as B7-H2 or CD273). The former was initially discovered by Dong et al. in 1999 [27], and the latter was discovered by Tseng et al. [28]. PD-L1 is widely expressed in T cells, B cells, DCs, cancer cells, macrophages and others and is further upregulated by activated proinflammatory cytokines [29]. It is mainly responsible for the immune escape of cancers.
The role of PD-1/PD-L1 in the immune system and in cancers
Under normal circumstances, the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway negatively regulates the immune system. ITSMs are a vital site for the biological functions of PD-1, which is phosphorylated by binding to PD-L1 and further induces immune inhibition by activating a series of intracellular pathways [3]. Notably, the specific mechanisms by which PD-1 exerts its immunosuppressive effects differs between T and B lymphocytes [30].
Two signal pathways are involved in the immune response induced by T cells following pathogen invasion: the binding of major histocompatibility complexes (MHCs) on the antigen presenting cell (APC) surface to T cell receptors (TCRs) and the binding of APC-expressed immunostimulatory ligands to TCRs. As a result, activating or inhibitory signals are transduced to T cells and further regulate immune responses, such as T cell activation and exhaustion. PD-1/PD-L1 pathway can inhibit TCR-mediated T cell activation. In T cells, the engagement of PD-1 ligands and PD-1 results in the recruitment of SHP-1/2 (Src homology 2-containing tyrosine phosphatase 1/2) to the C-terminal of the ITSM. SHP-2 then dephosphorylates TCR-associated CD-3ζ and ZAP70, resulting in the inhibition of downstream signaling [31]. Specifically, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway is suppressed, and the expression of the cell survival gene Bcl-XL is reduced [32]. In addition, PD-1 inhibits TCR-induced activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway by activating PTEN [33]. Moreover, by inhibiting the activation of the RAS-MEK-ERK pathway, PD-1 suppresses the proliferation of T cells [34]. PD-1 has been reported to inhibit the activation of PKCδ, thereby decreasing the level of cytokine secreted by T cells, such as IFN-γ and IL-2 [35]. Furthermore, PD-1 signaling regulates T cell metabolism by suppressing glycolysis and promoting lipolysis and fatty acid oxidation [36].
PD-1/PD-L1 interaction also inhibits the activation of B cells. When PD-L1 binds to PD-1, two tyrosines on its ITSM bind to the B cell receptor (BCR) and are phosphorylated, which recruits SHP-2 to the C-terminus of PD-1; SHP-2 is then phosphorylated. Subsequently, phosphorylated SHP-2 dephosphorylates the BCR, thus leading to acute Ca2+ disorder and long-term growth arrest. Therefore, PD-1 can impair the immune response of B cells to antigens [35].
The brake system of PD-1/PD-L1 was gradually developed during the course of evolution. In this brake system, negative feedback terminates the killing effect of the immune system in a timely manner and thus protects against excessive damage to normal tissues. Generally, the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway prevents the overstimulation of T cells and maintains immune tolerance to self-antigens, thereby reducing damage to surrounding tissues and preventing autoimmune diseases from developing [37, 38].
Cunningly, cancer cells escape the killing effect induced by T cells by utilizing this brake system. Overexpression of PD-L1 induces the development of an immunosuppressive TME in multiple cancers [39–41], including non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [42, 43], melanoma [44], renal cell carcinoma (RCC) [45], prostate cancer [46], breast cancer [47] and glioma [48].
Cancer cells highly express PD-L1 on the cell membrane. The binding of PD-L1 to PD-1 in T cells produces negative signals, inducing T cell apoptosis and reducing immunocompetence, which thus helps cancer cells escape immune surveillance and killing. In addition, the activation of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway negatively affects the differentiation of effector T cells (Teff) and memory T cells (Tm) and upregulates the differentiation of regulatory T cells (Treg) and exhausted T cells (Tex), thereby significantly inhibiting the immune effect of T cells [49]. The binding of PD-L1 to PD-1 also inhibits the proliferation of tumor-specific T cells and induces apoptosis by triggering the release of cytokines and cytotoxins [50]. Cancer cells are also able to transport PD-L1 (carried in exosomes) to remote regions via the circulatory system. Therefore, they can remotely inhibit T cell activity before reaching metastatic lesions [51–53].
Blocking the binding of PD-L1 to PD-1 blocks this negative feedback and restores the function of T cells as well as their ability to kill cancer cells. Therefore, ICIs (PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors) exert their anticancer effect via the immune system of the host, which is quite different from conventional cancer therapies. To date, the extraordinary efficacy of ICIs has been validated in multiple types of solid tumor cancers and hematological malignancies, with a sustained response and long-term survival benefits [54–58]. The inhibitory effect of PD-1/PD-L1 pathway on T cells is shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
PD-1/PD-L1 interaction mediated T cell inhibition. Factors that regulate PD-L1 expression mainly includes (1) genomic aberrations, (2) microRNA-based control, (3) oncogenic transcription factors and pathways and (4) posttranslational regulation and transport. The RAS/MEK/ERK, PI3K/Akt/mTOR, JAK/STATs signaling and TLRs/IKKs pathways are the main pathways regulating PD-L1 expression. IRF1, STATs, MYC, NF-κB, c-Jun and HIF1α/2α are the main downstream transcription factors. Posttranslational modifications of PD-L1 include phosphorylation, ubiquitination, glycosylation and palmitoylation. Induction of PD-L1 by cytokines, such as IFN-γ, is considered a secondary mechanism. Activation of PD-1/PD-L1 signaling leads to the recruitment of the phosphatase SHP-2 to the C-terminal of the ITSM, which downregulates the RAS-MEK-ERK and PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathways and attenuates LCK-induced phosphorylation of ZAP70. In addition, SHP-2 induces the expression of BATF, which inhibits the expression of some effector genes. In general, activation of PD-1/PD-L1 signaling leads to the inhibition of T cell proliferation and activation. Activation of PD-1/PD-L1 can be blocked by anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. In addition, APCs uptake tumor antigens and regulate T cell responses through the interaction between major MHC and TCRs. APCs (dendritic cells) regulate T cell activity through modulating the interaction between PD-L1/PD-L2 and PD-1 and the interaction between B7 and CD28. CTLA-4 is a negative regulator of costimulation that is activated in the recognition of specific tumor antigens presented by APCs
The regulation of PD-1/PD-L1 in the TME
The TME is mainly composed of tumor-associated stromal cells, extracellular matrix (ECM) [59], nonmalignant cells surrounding malignant lesions and complex signaling networks for maintaining the internal interactions of the TME [60]. TMEs not only promote the growth of cancer cells but also trigger invasion and metastasis [61]. In addition, exosomes carrying noncoding RNAs are vital components of the TME and provide favorable conditions for the growth and migration of cancer cells [62].
The ECM is comprised of the basement membranes and interstitial matrix [63], an important barrier for metastasis. Various substances can be found in the ECM, including a large number of growth factors, cytokines and metalloproteinases secreted by cancer cells and other cells in the TME, as well as acidic substances produced by cancer metabolism. These acidic substances in turn maintain the weakly acidic TME, induce epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and promote the formation of a hypoxic microenvironment.
Regulatory effects of the TME on PD-1
The influence of PD-1 on immune suppression is very complicated. Previous studies have shown that PD-L1 expressed in cancer cells induces immune suppression through the apoptosis of activated T cells and the production of IL-10 by stimulated T cells [27]. Furthermore, persistent activation of PD-1 decreases glucose metabolism in T cells and induces T cell incompetence and exhaustion [64–66]. In a chronic lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) infection mouse model, persistent antigen exposure exhausted T cells and completely or partially eliminated effector T cell function, which was reversed by the application of an anti-PD-L1 antibody [67]. In addition to inducing cell differentiation into Tregs, PD-1 also regulates their development and cellular functions [68].
When stimulated by inflammatory factors, DCs upregulate PD-1 and thus significantly inhibit the antibacterial ability of the innate immune system [69]. PD-L1 on the surface of macrophages regulates T cell migration, leading to the active immune expulsion of T cells from the TME [70]. In addition to regulating immune tolerance, PD-L1 expressed in cancer cells quickly establishes a molecular barrier to fight against the killing effect of immune effector cells [71]. By regulating the mTOR pathway, PD-1 expressed in melanoma cells promotes malignant growth [72].
As an immunosuppressive molecule, PD-1 inhibits the activation of T cells and induces their apoptosis. PD-1 is expressed at low levels in naive T lymphocytes and can be immediately activated by TCRs. Transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) is highly important in the process of PD-1 activation by TCRs [73]. It induces abundant expression of PD-1 on the immune cell membrane following antigen stimulation, which may be attributed to a self-protection mechanism that prevents the overactivation of immune cells.
Other factors in the TME can also regulate the expression level of PD-1. IL-7, IL-15 and IL-21 can induce the activation of PD-1 in peripheral T lymphocytes [74]. Although upregulated PD-1 does not affect the expansion and survival of T cells, it inhibits the secretion of cytokines [75]. IL-12 and IL-6 induce PD-1 during the activation of TCRs by altering the chromatin structure of the PD-1 gene and activating the STAT3/STAT4 pathway, in which the proximal cis-acting elements in the promoter region of PD-1 and the transcription factors FOXO1 and NF-κB are needed [76]. Moreover, the inflammatory factors TNF-α and IL-6 regulate the growth inhibition of T cells in osteoarthritis by blocking the interaction between PD-1 and PD-L1 via induction of the secretion of soluble PD-1 [77]. In macrophages, interferon-α (IFN-α) regulates the expression of PD-1 by activating the JAK/STAT pathway. The interferon-sensitive responsive element (ISRE) in the promoter region of PD-1 enhances PD-1 transcription by forming the p48/STAT1/STAT2 complex with the JAK/STAT pathway [78]. Additionally, IFN-α has been reported to synergistically regulate the expression of PD-1 with TCRs, producing a strong inhibitory feedback signal targeting the T cell-induced immune response [79].
Regulatory effects of the TME on PD-L1
PD-L1 causes T cell exhaustion and immune tolerance, which is the main factor for the immune escape of cancer cells [80, 81]. In addition to expression on the cell surface of T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, DCs and macrophages, PD-L1 is also highly expressed on the surface of cancer cells. A variety of cytokines and exosomes in the TME inhibit the activation of cytotoxic lymphocytes (CTLs) by inducing the expression of PD-L1 and activating the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway, which eventually promote immune escape. The main regulatory factors for PD-L1 are reviewed below.
Interferon-γ
Interferon is a biologically active glycoprotein secreted following viral infections; it has antiviral, antibacterial, antitumor and immunomodulatory functions [82]. Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) is a type II IFN that is mainly secreted by CD8+ T lymphocytes, NK cells and macrophages. IFN-γ can promote cancer growth and resist immune surveillance in certain circumstances [83]. An increasing number of studies have validated the induction of cancer progression by IFN-γ through activation of PD-L1 and immune escape from the attack of certain subtypes of T cells [35, 84]. IFN-γ induces the expression of PD-L1 through multiple pathways, and analyzing these pathways facilitates the development of novel cancer therapies with fewer adverse events.
Tumor necrosis factor-α
As an inflammatory cytokine, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) activates inflammatory cells, kills pathogens, stimulates tissue repair and induces angiogenesis and connective tissue formation. However, it facilitates the immune escape of tumor cells by upregulating expression of PD-L1 [85]. TNF-α is mainly produced by activated macrophages, T cells and NK cells, which bind to specific homotrimeric receptors on the cell membrane. By activating the NF-κB and ERK1/2 pathways, TNF-α upregulates PD-L1 expression at both the mRNA and protein levels [85]. In addition, it stimulates cell growth, differentiation and apoptosis by inducing an inflammatory response through the activation of caspase, JNK and NF-κB. TNF-α also regulates the expression of PD-L1 by targeting miRNA-155 [86].
Interleukins
Interleukins (ILs) are a type of cytokine that are important in the maturation, activation, proliferation and immune regulation of immune cells and participate in multiple physiological and pathological processes. The proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IL-17 regulate the expression of PD-L1 in the TME. Epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) regulates the expression of PD-L1 as well as cell proliferation through the IL-6/JAK/STAT3 pathway [35, 73, 76–80, 82–85, 87]. In addition, overexpression of PD-L1 and knockdown of NKG2D enhance NSCLC patient tolerance of radiotherapy through the IL-6/MEK/ERK pathway [88]. During carcinogenesis, IL-6 interacts with proteins involved in the formation of proliferative matrix and drives myeloid suppressor cells, thereby suppressing the immune system. Therefore, inhibiting the IL-6 pathway in the TME can enhance the cytotoxic response and sensitivity of cancer cells to NK cells by downregulating PD-L1 expression [89, 90].
Epithelial growth factor
Epithelial growth factor (EGF) is a small-molecule active peptide widely distributed in the human body. EGF contributes to cell growth by binding to corresponding receptors and activating the EGFR pathway. The EGFR pathway is well known for its regulation of cancer cell migration and proliferation. Moreover, EGFR mutations that trigger malignant proliferation and metastasis without the need to bind to EGF have been detected in many types of cancer cells. The EGFR pathway has also been reported to be involved in immune escape. EGF upregulates PD-L1 expression in lung cancer, breast cancer, head and neck cancer, esophageal cancer and salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma. MYC, an important transcription factor in cancers, is also involved in the regulation of PD-L1 by EGFR. In the EGFR-derived PD-L1 pathway, knockdown of MYC significantly downregulates PD-L1 expression [91–93]. MYC upregulates PD-L1 expression in T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) cells by directly binding to the promoter region of PD-L1, suggesting that the EGFR pathway is able to upregulate PD-L1 by upregulating MYC and promoting nuclear translocation [94]. EGF not only induces the transcription of PD-L1 but also influences its protein stability and biological function. Additionally, the RAS-EGFR pathway is a classic oncogenic intracellular pathway that promotes tumor immunoreactivity by regulating the mRNA stability of PD-L1 [95]. A previous study reported that K-RAS mutations in EGFR-driven lung cancer were associated with the expression of PD-L1 [96, 97].
Exosomes
Exosomes are extracellular vesicles (40–150 nm in diameter) released by almost all types of cells. They serve to transduce intracellular information to other cells and thus change their activity [98, 99]. Functionally, exosomes can regulate the growth, migration and angiogenesis of cancer cells [62, 100]. Cancer-derived exosomes can promote macrophage polarization into M2 macrophages and the expression of PD-L1 in these macrophages by upregulating phosphorylated STAT3 and further enhancing the immunosuppressive effect [101]. Consistent with these findings, cancer-derived exosomes containing PD-L1 have been found to have a strong immunosuppressive effect [51]. Cancer-derived exosomes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia induced an immunosuppressive response in monocytes. Monocyte activation is mainly induced by noncoding microRNAs contained in exosomes which activate the TLR7 pathway in monocytes, promoting monocyte-induced secretion of cytokines and eventually inducing the expression of PD-L1 [102]. At present, research on exosomes is in its infancy, and we believe that the novel regulatory effects of exosomes on PD-L1 will be elucidated in the future.
The PD-L2 pathway in cancer immunotherapy
Molecular structure and distribution of PD-L2
PD-L2, also known as B7-DC, CD273 or PDCD1LG2, is the second most important ligand for binding to PD-1after PD-L1 [103]. PD-L2 protein is a type I transmembrane protein encoded by the PDCD1LG2 gene, consisting of 270 amino acid residues and located on chromosome 9 with PD-L1 [104]. The extracellular domain of PD-L2 consists of a membrane-distal immunoglobulin variable region and a membrane-proximal immunoglobulin constant region [22]. Several studies have shown that the affinity of the PD-L2/PD-1 interaction is 3–4 times higher than that of the PD-L1/PD-1 interaction. This difference in affinity is attributed to the presence of a tryptophan residue unique to PD-L2 that binds to a binding site on the surface of PD-1 [105]. PD-L2 is expressed primarily by dendritic cells, macrophages and cancer cells and downregulates the effector functions of T cells through the PD-1/PD-L2 axis in the TME [106]. PD-L2 is expressed on activated CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cell subsets, which can bind to PD-1 on T cells and inhibit T cell activation and proliferation [107].
PD-1/PD-L2 axis–mediated immune escape in cancer
The PD-1/PD-L2 pathway plays a major and complex role in the development and progression of cancer. The regulatory role of PD-L2 on T cells in the TME has been controversial. Some studies have shown that PD-L2 suppresses immune function by binding to PD-1 co-inhibitory receptors [103, 108]. However, other studies have shown that PD-L2 is a positive co-stimulatory molecule that stimulates T cell proliferation and cytokine production, exerting its functions through receptors other than PD-1 [28, 109]. In human T cells, PD-L2 acts only as a negative regulator of T cell activity, inhibiting T cell proliferation by interacting with PD-1, reducing cytokine production and leading to cell-cycle arrest [103, 107, 110]. Cancer cells frequently achieve immune escape through the PD-1/PD-L2 pathway mediated by potent inhibitory signals, thereby hindering the proliferation and function of effector T cells and forming an immune escape microenvironment that suppresses anti-tumor immunity [29, 111–113]. Tumors can induce immune escape via various mechanisms, thereby evading cytotoxicity from the immune system, and eventually progress and metastasize to other parts of the body [112, 113]. During tumorigenesis, the PD-1/PD-L2 signaling pathway can cause the exhaustion of T cell function and promote immune escape. The inhibitory effect of PD-L2 on T cell function involves the regulation of the PI3K/AKT and MEK/ERK pathways [110, 114]. T cell activity is regulated not only by receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) but also by non-RTKs. Studies on SHP-1 and SHP-2 have shown that they regulate T cell activity [115, 116]. PD-L2 inhibits the PI3K/AKT and MAPK pathways while also increasing the phosphatase activity of SHP-2 [110]. PD-1/PD-L2-induced SHP-2 activation is involved in the early signaling pathways required for negative regulation of T cell function, such as cytokine production, and cell adhesion [110]. Concomitant with T cell receptor (TCR) or B-cell receptor (BCR) cross-linking, PD-1 binds to PD-L2 and induces inhibitory signals by recruiting phosphatases (e.g., SHP-2) to the ITSM in the cytoplasmic tail of PD-1, resulting in the dephosphorylation of effector molecules involved in downstream TCR or BCR signaling[117].
Advances in PD-1/PD-L1 blockade-based combination treatment for cancer
As an adjuvant therapy, immunotherapy has become the next focus of competition in the clinical development of anticancer drugs. Immunotherapy has exhibited positive results both as adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy in the clinical treatment of cancer. Since this review focuses on PD-1/PD-L1 blockade, immunotherapy and ICB mentioned later refer to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade, and ICI refers to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor.
Although great progress has been made in immunotherapy of cancer, they face challenges in cancer therapy mainly due to their low response rate. Atezolizumab is a human-derived anti-PD-L1 inhibitor approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2016 for the treatment of urothelial cancer. The clinical trial IMVigor 210 reported that the target response rate in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer expressing moderate to high levels of PD-L1 was only 27%. The PD-L1 inhibitor does not exhibit its predicted effects in up to 73% of patients with high levels of PD-L1, probably due to innate resistance [118, 119]. Unfortunately, this low level of therapeutic efficacy may reduce even further in patients responsive to ICB after a long-term treatment, a phenomenon known as acquired resistance. Most melanoma patients with a good response to ICB have been reported to only experience limited or transient benefits of ICB treatment [4, 9]. Although clinical evidence has supported the role of immune surveillance in controlling the recurrence and progression of some common types of cancers, such as prostate cancer, ovarian cancer, breast cancer and colorectal cancer with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) [13, 120], most patients have difficulty benefiting from ICB [9, 121–123]. To date, the molecular mechanisms underlying acquired resistance remain unclear, which significantly hinders the sustainability of ICB treatments. Hodgkin's lymphoma and melanoma have the best response to ICB, while head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and gastrointestinal cancers do not show high response rates. The response rate of NSCLC is medium, but the resistance rate remains high. In general, the following five mechanisms are thought to explain acquired resistance to ICB. First, tumor antigen presentation may be damaged due to the downregulation of MHC class I molecules or deficiency in antigen presentation induction; as a result, TCRs would be unable to recognize tumor antigens, and ICB would become invalid. Second, IFN-γ sensitivity may be lost. IFN-γ activates the JAK-STAT pathway, which upregulates MHC class I molecules and enhances anticancer immunity. However, inactivating mutations of JAK1 and JAK2 occur during ICI treatment, which would eliminate the sensitivity of cancer cells to IFN-γ. Third, neoantigens may be eliminated. Selective pressure in the TME during anti-PD-1 treatment may clear the neoantigen without the production of neoantigen-specific T cells, and therefore, immune escape could develop. Fourth, cancer-induced immune inhibition could occur. Stabilized β-catenin induced by WNT and the loss or mutation of PTEN facilitates the production of inhibitory cytokines, which would further prevent the infiltration of CD8+ T cells and inhibit their functions. Fifth, positive expression of other ICIs may occur. Several other immune checkpoints are produced during a single ICI treatment, thus resulting in acquired drug resistance [124–127].
Most conventional anticancer therapies also lead to drug resistance; however, combination with ICB may produce a satisfactory outcome by overcoming drug resistance. Combination therapy aiming to enhance anticancer efficacy is of major interest. ICB can be combined with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery, targeted therapy and antiangiogenic therapy. Combination therapy with ICB not only enhances the capacity of antigen presentation and rescues exhausted effector T cells but also activates the immune system by releasing cancer antigens and stimulating them to kill cancer cells, which may yield enhanced anticancer efficacy [128]. In addition, changes in killing factors and immune factors that attack tumor cells potentially influence immunotherapy efficacy.
Nevertheless, combination therapy is significantly restricted by the occurrence of severe adverse events (AEs). A recent systematic review and meta-analysis reported that the incidence of treatment-related AEs in combination therapy with chemotherapy and anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 antibodies was up to 97.7%, which is the highest of all types of combination therapies for cancers [129]. This meta-analysis included 36 clinical trials with 43 regimens. Among them, the incidence of all-grade treatment-related AEs was 97.7%, and the most common AEs were anemia (45.4%) and hair loss (45.1%). The incidence of grade 3 and above AEs was 68.3%, and the most common AEs were neutropenia (19.6%) and anemia (11.4%) [129].
It also analyzed combination therapy with immunotherapy and targeted therapy in 45 clinical trials with 47 regimens. The incidence of all-grade treatment-related AEs was 94.5%, and the most common AEs were fatigue (34.3%) and diarrhea (31.7%). The incidence of grade 3 and above AEs was 68.3%, and the most common AEs were hypertension (9.3%) and hyponatremia (3.6%) [129].
Additionally, combination therapy with different immunotherapies was analyzed, including 54 clinical trials with 57 regimens. The incidence of all-grade treatment-related AEs was 86.8%, and the most common AEs were fatigue (26.4%) and diarrhea (21.1%). The incidence of grade 3 and above AEs was 35.9%, and the most common AEs were lipase increase (7.2%) and colitis (3.6%) [129].
Moreover, the meta-analysis analyzed combination therapy with immunotherapy and radiotherapy in 7 clinical trials with 7 regimens. The incidence of all-grade treatment-related AEs was 89.4%, and the most common AEs were dysphagia (30.3%) and nausea (24.9%). The incidence of grade 3 and above AEs was 12.4%, and the most common AEs were lymphocytopenia (10.3%) and dysphagia (8.8%) [129].
It is urgent to develop more reasonable combination therapies with fewer AEs and higher survival benefits. In the following section, we mainly summarize combination therapy with ICIs and others in NSCLC patients. ICB has achieved unprecedented efficacy in the treatment of NSCLC patients. However, only a small number of NSCLC patients have exhibited high response to ICB [121].
Some of these therapies are displayed visually in Fig. 2. PD-1 inhibitors nivolumab (Opdivo), pembrolizumab (Keytruda), cemiplimab (Libtayo) and PD-L1 inhibitors atezolizumab (Tecentriq), avelumab (Bavencio) and durvalumab (Imfinzi) are the PD-(L)1 inhibitors already approved. Numerous clinical trials have been designed to study the efficacy or safety of these approved PD-(L)1 inhibitors in combination with other approved standard treatment regimens. Key information on those clinical trials that have been completed is summarized in Table 1. As can be seen from the table, among those completed clinical trials, more than half of the combination regimens were based on the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab and nivolumab. The number of combination regimens of the two anti-PD-L1 antibodies atezolizumab and durvalumab also exceeded 30. There are few strategies regarding the combination therapy of cemiplimab and avelumab. From the combination regimen of nivolumab, it can be seen that nivolumab combined with CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab with/without other treatment strategies has the largest number. Regarding the combination regimen of pembrolizumab, it can be seen that the number of regimens with combined targeted therapy (including anti-angiogenic therapy) is the largest. The number of regimens combined with chemotherapy was the second largest. Because these combination regimens are based on approved treatments, many of them are already approved for cancer treatment.
Fig. 2.
Combination strategies to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. A Combination therapy with PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockers. The activation of PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 can be blocked by anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 antibodies, respectively. The combined application of PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors produces synergistic effects. B Combination therapy with chemotherapy. Chemotherapy is able to induce ICD, promote the release of tumor antigens and DAMPs, activate DCs, induce local production of CXCL10, recruit T cells to the tumor bed and enhance the differentiation of antitumor-specific CTLs. Chemotherapy can also reduce the number of immunosuppressive cells, such as MDSCs and Tregs. However, systemic chemotherapy shows undifferentiated toxicity to tumor cells and the anticancer immune system, while local chemotherapy enhances immunotherapy by remodeling the TME and attracting activated immune cells to the tumor region. C Combination therapy with radiotherapy. Radiotherapy markedly upregulates the cell adhesion factors ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 on the surface of cancer cells. One of the mechanisms by which radiotherapy may enhance immunotherapy is through activation of certain types of club cells which release proteins that are beneficial to immunotherapy. D Combination therapy with an AMPK activator. Reduced PD-L1 levels in the presence of AMPK activation could enhance the efficacy of combining ICB with an AMPK activator. E Combination therapy with STING agonists. The cGAS-STING pathway is essential for linking the innate immunity and adaptive immunity against cancers. Cancer cells can escape immune surveillance by inactivating the cGAS-STING pathway. Therefore, ICB can be combined with STING agonists to boost the efficacy of immunotherapy. F “Cold” tumors lack activated tumor-specific T cells, which may contribute to primary resistance to ICBs. Effective combination therapy can turn these tumors into hot tumors that are sensitive to ICBs
Table 1.
Completed clinical trials of approved PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in combination with other approved treatment strategy
| Target | Checkpoint inhibitors | Combined intervention | Combined category | Conditions | Phase | Trial number |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PD-1 | Nivolumab | Tivozanib | Anti-angiogenesis therapy | RCC | Phase 1, 2 | NCT03136627 |
| Cabozantinib | Anti-angiogenesis therapy | Breast cancer | Phase 2 | NCT03316586 | ||
| Bevacizumab | Anti-angiogenesis therapy | Hepatocellular carcinoma | Phase 2 | NCT04393220 | ||
| Carotuximab | Anti-angiogenesis therapy | NSCLC | Phase 1 | NCT03181308 | ||
| Pomalidomide | Anti-angiogenesis therapy | Nervous system lymphoma | Phase 1 | NCT03798314 | ||
| Ramucirumab | Anti-angiogenesis therapy | Gastric cancer; GEJ Cancer | Phase 1, 2 | NCT02999295 | ||
| Pazopanib + sunitinib + ipilimumab | Anti-angiogenesis therapy + targeted therapy (multiple kinases) + CTLA-4 antibody | RCC | Phase 1 | NCT01472081/CheckMate 016 | ||
| Pemetrexed + paclitaxel + veliparib + carboplatin | Chemotherapy | NSCLC | Phase 1 | NCT02944396 | ||
| Bendamustine hydrochloride | Chemotherapy | Hodgkin's lymphoma | Phase 1, 2 | NCT03343652 | ||
| Idarubicin + cytarabine + solu-medrol + dexamethasone | Chemotherapy | AML | Phase 1, 2 | NCT02464657 | ||
| Carboplatin + pemetrexed + ipilimumab | Chemotherapy + CTLA-4 antibody | NSCLC | Phase 2 | NCT03256136 | ||
| TG4010 + chemotherapy | Chemotherapy + Other treatment | NSCLC | Phase 2 | NCT03353675 | ||
| Cyclophosphamide + fludarabine + TIL infusion + interleukin-2 + ipilimumab | Chemotherapy + other treatment + CTLA-4 antibody | Ovarian Cancer | Phase 1, 2 | NCT03287674 | ||
| PD-1 | Nivolumab | Ipilimumab | CTLA-4 antibody | Melanoma | Phase 1 | NCT01621490 |
| Ipilimumab | CTLA-4 antibody | Melanoma | Phase 3 | NCT02599402 | ||
| Ipilimumab | CTLA-4 antibody | Melanoma | Phase 2 | NCT02320058 | ||
| Ipilimumab | CTLA-4 antibody | ED-SCLC | Phase 3 | NCT02538666 | ||
| Ipilimumab | CTLA-4 antibody | Melanoma | Phase 3 | NCT02714218 | ||
| Ipilimumab | CTLA-4 antibody | Melanoma | Phase 3 | NCT03068455 | ||
| Ipilimumab | CTLA-4 antibody | Urothelial carcinoma | Phase 1 | NCT03387761 | ||
| Ipilimumab | CTLA-4 antibody | RCC | Phase 2 | NCT03029780 | ||
| Ipilimumab | CTLA-4 antibody | MPM | Phase 2 | NCT02716272 | ||
| Ipilimumab | CTLA-4 antibody | Melanoma | n.a | NCT03438279 | ||
| Ipilimumab | CTLA-4 antibody | Melanoma | Phase 1, 2 | NCT02941744 | ||
| Ipilimumab | CTLA-4 antibody | Melanoma | Phase 2 | NCT02731729 | ||
| Ipilimumab | CTLA-4 antibody | Malignant pleural mesothelioma | Phase 2 | NCT03048474 | ||
| Ipilimumab | CTLA-4 antibody | Melanoma | Phase 2 | NCT01783938/CheckMate 064 | ||
| Ipilimumab | CTLA-4 antibody | Cancer | NCT03165409 | |||
| Ipilimumab + SBRT | CTLA-4 antibody + radiotherapy | RCC; kidney cancer | Phase 2 | NCT03065179 | ||
| Ipilimumab + radiotherapy | CTLA-4 antibody + radiotherapy | Melanoma | Phase 1 | NCT02659540 | ||
| Ipilimumab + surgery | CTLA-4 antibody + surgery | Head and neck carcinoma | Phase 1, 2 | NCT03003637 | ||
| Ipilimumab + enzalutamide | CTLA-4 antibody + targeted therapy (AR) | Prostate cancer | Phase 2 | NCT02601014 | ||
| Interferon γ | Other treatment | Solid tumor | Phase 1 | NCT02614456 | ||
| Interleukin-2 | Other treatment | RCC | Phase 1, 2 | NCT02989714 | ||
| PD-1 | Nivolumab | Tumor biopsy specimens + blood samples | Other treatment | Melanoma | n.a | NCT03348891 |
| JS001 + pembrolizumab | PD-1 antibody | Carcinoma; hepatocellular | Phase 2 | NCT03939975 | ||
| BDCA-1 + myDC + avelumab + ipilimumab | PD-L1 antibodies + CTLA-4 antibody + Other treatment | Solid tumor | Phase 1 | NCT03707808 | ||
| Mogamulizumab | Targeted therapy (CCR4) | Solid tumor | Phase 1 | NCT02476123 | ||
| Mogamulizumab | Targeted therapy (CCR4) | Solid tumor | Phase 1, 2 | NCT02705105 | ||
| Mogamulizumab | Targeted therapy (CCR4) | Solid cancer | Phase 1 | NCT02946671 | ||
| Brentuximab vedotin | Targeted therapy (CD30) | Hodgkin lymphoma | Phase 1, 2 | NCT02572167 | ||
| Brentuximab vedotin | Targeted therapy (CD30) | Hodgkin lymphoma | Phase 3 | NCT03138499 | ||
| Daratumumab | Targeted therapy (CD38) | NSCLC;TNBC | Phase 1, 2 | NCT03098550 | ||
| X4P-001 | Targeted therapy (CXCR4) | RCC | Phase 1, 2 | NCT02923531 | ||
| Cetuximab + cisplatin + radiotherapy | Targeted therapy (EGFR) + chemotherapy + radiotherapy | Squamous cell head and neck cancer | Phase 3 | NCT03349710 | ||
| Entinostat | Targeted therapy (HDAC) | Cholangiocarcinoma; pancreatic adenocarcinoma | Phase 2 | NCT03250273 | ||
| Vopratelimab + ipilimumab + pembrolizumab | Targeted therapy (ICOS) + CTLA-4 antibody + PD-1 antibody | Solid tumor | Phase 1, 2 | NCT02904226 | ||
| Binimetinib + ipilimumab | Targeted therapy (MEK1/2) + CTLA-4 antibody | Colorectal cancer | Phase 2 | NCT03271047 | ||
| Regorafenib | Targeted therapy (multiple kinases) | Solid tumor | Phase 1, 2 | NCT03406871 | ||
| PD-1 | Nivolumab | Dasatinib | Targeted therapy (multiple kinases) | Myeloid leukemia | Phase 1 | NCT02011945 |
| BBI503 + doxorubicin + pembrolizumab + paclitaxel + sunitinib | Targeted therapy (multiple kinases) + Chemotherapy | Cancer | Phase 1 | NCT02483247 | ||
| Omaveloxolone capsules + ipilimumab | Targeted therapy (NF-κB) + CTLA-4 antibody | Melanoma | Phase 1, 2 | NCT02259231 | ||
| INCAGN01949 + ipilimumab | Targeted therapy (OX40) + CTLA-4 antibody | Malignancy | Phase 1, 2 | NCT03241173 | ||
| Elotuzumab + pomalidomide + dexamethasone | Targeted therapy (SLAMF7) | Myeloma | Phase 2 | NCT02612779 | ||
| BBI608 + ipilimumab + pembrolizumab | Targeted therapy (STAT3) + CTLA-4 antibody + PD-1 antibody | Cancer | Phase 1 | NCT02467361 | ||
| DV281 + breath actuated nebulizer | Targeted therapy (TLR) + other treatment | NSCLC | Phase 1 | NCT03326752 | ||
| DS-8273a | Targeted therapy (TRAIL-R2) | Melanoma | Phase 1 | NCT02983006 | ||
| Pembrolizumab | Bevacizumab | Anti-angiogenesis therapy | RCC | Phase 1, 2 | NCT02348008 | |
| Anlotinib | Anti-angiogenesis therapy | NSCLC | Phase 1, 2 | NCT04670107 | ||
| Pazopanib | Anti-angiogenesis therapy | RCC | Phase 1 | NCT02014636/KEYNOTE-018 | ||
| Lenalidomide | Anti-angiogenesis therapy | Blood Cancer | Phase 1 | NCT01953692/KEYNOTE-013 | ||
| Bevacizumab | Anti-angiogenesis therapy | GBM | Phase 2 | NCT02337491 | ||
| Bevacizumab + cyclophosphamide | Anti-angiogenesis therapy + chemotherapy | Ovarian cancer; fallopian tube cancer; peritoneal cancer | Phase 2 | NCT02853318 | ||
| Doxorubicin | Chemotherapy | Endometrial cancer | Phase 2 | NCT03276013 | ||
| mFOLFOX6 | Chemotherapy | Colorectal cancer | Phase 2 | NCT02375672 | ||
| PD-1 | Pembrolizumab | Nab-paclitaxel | Chemotherapy | NSCLC | Phase 1, 2 | NCT02733250 |
| Azacitidine | Chemotherapy | Colorectal cancer | Phase 2 | NCT02260440 | ||
| Nab-paclitaxel + epirubicin + cyclophosphamide | Chemotherapy | TNBC | Phase 2 | NCT03289819 | ||
| Nab-paclitaxel + doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide + carboplatin + paclitaxel | Chemotherapy | TNBC | Phase 1 | NCT02622074/KEYNOTE-173 | ||
| Oxaliplatin + capecitabine | Chemotherapy | BTC | Phase 2 | NCT03111732 | ||
| Docetaxel | Chemotherapy | NSCLC | Phase 2 | NCT02574598 | ||
| Pemetrexed + carboplatin + cisplatin | Chemotherapy | NSCLC | Phase 2 | NCT03664024/KEYNOTE-782 | ||
| Carboplatin + cisplatin + etoposide | Chemotherapy | SCLC | Phase 3 | NCT03066778 | ||
| Decitabine | Chemotherapy | Myeloid leukemia | Phase 1, 2 | NCT02996474 | ||
| Cisplatin + 5-FU + capecitabine | Chemotherapy | Gastric cancer; gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma | Phase 2 | NCT02335411/KEYNOTE-059 | ||
| Chemotherapy | Chemotherapy | Gastric cancer | Phase 2 | NCT02918162 | ||
| Doxorubicin hydrochloride | Chemotherapy | Sarcoma | Phase 1, 2 | NCT02888665 | ||
| Carboplatin | Chemotherapy | Ovarian cancer; fallopian tube cancer; peritoneal cancer | Phase 1, 2 | NCT03029598 | ||
| Cyclophosphamide | Chemotherapy | MBC | Phase 2 | NCT03139851 | ||
| PD-1 | Pembrolizumab | Paclitaxel + carboplatin + bevacizumab + pemetrexed + ipilimumab + erlotinib + gefitinib | Chemotherapy + anti-angiogenesis therapy + CTLA-4 antibody + targeted therapy (EGFR) | NSCLC | Phase 1, 2 | NCT02039674/KEYNOTE-021 |
| Cisplatin + pemetrexed + carboplatin + paclitaxel + nab-paclitaxel + ipilimumab + etoposide + pegfilgrastim | Chemotherapy + CTLA-4 antibody + other treatment | NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 1 | NCT01840579 | ||
| Niraparib + dostarlimab | Chemotherapy + PD-1 antibody | NSCLC | Phase 2 | NCT03308942 | ||
| Cyclophosphamide + doxorubicin hydrochloride + prednisone + rituximab + vincristine sulfate | Chemotherapy + Targeted therapy (CD20) | Lymphoma | Phase 1 | NCT02541565 | ||
| PegIFN-2b + ipilimumab | CTLA4 antibody + other treatment | RCC; Melanoma | Phase 1, 2 | NCT02089685/KEYNOTE-29 | ||
| Talimogene laherparepvec | Oncolytic virus therapy | Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck | Phase 1 | NCT02626000/KEYNOTE-137 | ||
| alfa-2b (HDI) | Other treatment | Melanoma | Phase 1 | NCT02339324 | ||
| Pegzilarginase | Other treatment | SCLC | Phase 1, 2 | NCT03371979 | ||
| PegIFN-2b | Other treatment | Melanoma | Phase 1 | NCT02112032 | ||
| Sintilimab | PD-1 antibody | NSCLC | n.a | NCT05059951 | ||
| SABR | Radiotherapy | Breast cancer | Phase 1 | NCT02303366 | ||
| Radiation therapy | Radiotherapy | Malignancy | Phase 1 | NCT02987166 | ||
| Radiation therapy | Radiotherapy | RCC | Phase 2 | NCT02599779 | ||
| SBRT | Radiotherapy | Urothelial cancer | Phase 1 | NCT02826564 | ||
| PD-1 | Pembrolizumab | Intensity modulated radiation therapy | Radiotherapy | Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck | Phase 2 | NCT03057613 |
| SABR | Radiotherapy | RCC | Phase 1, 2 | NCT02855203 | ||
| Radiotherapy | Radiotherapy | Cancer | Phase 1 | NCT02303990 | ||
| Hypofractionated stereotactic irradiation (HFSRT) + bevacizumab | Radiotherapy + anti-angiogenesis therapy | Glioma | Phase 1 | NCT02313272 | ||
| Radiation therapy + cisplatin | Radiotherapy + chemotherapy | Squamous cell carcinoma | Phase 1, 2 | NCT02759575 | ||
| Docetaxel + doxorubicin hydrochloride + intensity-modulated radiation therapy + therapeutic conventional surgery | Radiotherapy + chemotherapy + surgery | Thyroid cancer | Phase 2 | NCT03211117 | ||
| Brachytherapy | Radiotherapy + other treatment | Esophageal cancer | Phase 1 | NCT02642809 | ||
| Radiation + Vitamin D + aspirin + lansoprazole + cyclophosphamide + curcumin | Radiotherapy + other treatment + chemotherapy + targeted therapy (p300/CREB) | Cervical cancer; uterine cancer | Phase 2 | NCT03192059 | ||
| Radiotherapy + rituximab + autologous dendritic cells + GM-CSF | Radiotherapy + targeted therapy (CD20) + other treatment | Follicular lymphoma | Phase 2 | NCT02677155 | ||
| SBRT + trametinib | Radiotherapy + targeted therapy(MEK1/2) | Pancreatic cancer | Phase 2 | NCT02704156 | ||
| Dabrafenib + trametinib | Targeted therapy (BRAF) + targeted therapy (MEK) | Melanoma | Phase 1, 2 | NCT02130466/KEYNOTE-022 | ||
| PD-1 | Pembrolizumab | Acalabrutinib | Targeted therapy (BTK) | Ovarian cancer | Phase 2 | NCT02537444/KEYNOTE191 |
| Acalabrutinib | Targeted therapy (BTK) | Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma | Phase 2 | NCT02454179 | ||
| Acalabrutinib | Targeted therapy (BTK) | NSCLC | Phase 2 | NCT02448303 | ||
| Maraviroc | Targeted therapy (CCR5) | Colorectal cancer | Phase 1 | NCT03274804 | ||
| Abemaciclib + gemcitabine + ramucirumab + samotolisib | Targeted therapy (CDK) + chemotherapy + anti-angiogenesis therapy + targeted therapy (PI3K) | NSCLC | Phase 1 | NCT02079636 | ||
| Necitumumab | Targeted therapy (EGFR) | NSCLC | Phase 1 | NCT02451930 | ||
| Afatinib | Targeted therapy (EGFR) | Squamous cell carcinoma of the lung | Phase 2 | NCT03157089 | ||
| PEGPH20 | Targeted therapy (HA) | Solid tumor | Phase 1 | NCT02563548 | ||
| Entinostat | Targeted therapy (HDAC) | Solid tumor | Phase 1 | NCT02909452 | ||
| Vismodegib | Targeted therapy (hedgehog) | Basal cell skin cancer | Phase 1, 2 | NCT02690948 | ||
| Margetuximab | Targeted therapy (HER2) | Gastric cancer; gastroesophageal junction cancer | Phase 1, 2 | NCT02689284 | ||
| Eribulin mesylate | Targeted therapy (microtubule) | TNBC | Phase 1, 2 | NCT02513472 | ||
| Eribulin | Targeted therapy (microtubule) | HR + /HER2- MBC | Phase 2 | NCT03222856 | ||
| Anlotinib | Targeted therapy (multiple kinases) | Ovarian cancer | n.a | NCT05188781 | ||
| Axitinib | Targeted therapy (multiple kinases) | RCC | Phase 1 | NCT02133742 | ||
| Lenvatinib | Targeted therapy (multiple kinases) | Gastric cancer | Phase 2 | NCT03609359 | ||
| Lenvatinib | Targeted therapy (multiple kinases) | Solid tumor | Phase 1 | NCT03006887 | ||
| PD-1 | Pembrolizumab | Saroglitazar | Targeted therapy (multiple kinases) | Biliary cancer | Phase 2 | NCT02703714 |
| Niraparib | Targeted therapy (PARP) | TNBC; ovarian cancer | Phase 1, 2 | NCT02657889 | ||
| Ibrutinib | Targeted therapy (brutons tyrosine kinase) | Non-Hodgkin lymphoma | Phase 1 | NCT02950220 | ||
| Ibrutinib + everolimus + docetaxel + paclitaxel + cetuximab | Targeted therapy (brutons tyrosine kinase) + targeted therapy (mTOR) + targeted therapy (EGFR) + chemotherapy | Gastric adenocarcinoma; genitourinary adenocarcinoma | Phase 1, 2 | NCT02599324 | ||
| Afatinib dimaleate | Targeted therapy (EGFR) | NSCLC | Phase 1 | NCT02364609 | ||
| Platinum + afatinib | Targeted therapy (EGFR) + chemotherapy | Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung | NCT04552535 | |||
| Pemigatinib + gemcitabine + cisplatin + docetaxel + trastuzumab | Targeted therapy (FGFR) + targeted therapy (HER2) + chemotherapy | Malignancies | Phase 1, 2 | NCT02393248 | ||
| ImmunoPulse IL-12 | Targeted therapy (IL-12) | Melanoma | Phase 2 | NCT02493361 | ||
| Encorafenib + binimetinib | Targeted therapy (RAF) + targeted therapy (MEK1/2) | Melanoma | Phase 1, 2 | NCT02902042 | ||
| IMP321 (eftilagimod alpha) | Targeted therapy (soluble LAG-3 protein) | Melanoma | Phase 1 | NCT02676869 | ||
| Lenalidomide + dexamethasone | Targeted therapy (TNF-α) | Myeloma | Phase 2 | NCT02880228 | ||
| Paricalcitol | Targeted therapy (vitamin D receptor) | Pancreatic cancer | Phase 2 | NCT03331562 | ||
| Cemiplimab | Ipilimumab | CTLA-4 antibody | Lung cancer | Phase 2 | NCT03430063 | |
| Ipilimumab + chemotherapy | CTLA-4 antibody + chemotherapy | Lung cancer | Phase 3 | NCT03515629 | ||
| PD-1 | Cemiplimab | Hypofractionated radiotherapy + cyclophosphamide + docetaxel + carboplatin + GM-CSF + paclitaxel + pemetrexed | Radiotherapy + chemotherapy | Malignancy | Phase 1 | NCT02383212 |
| Isatuximab | Targeted therapy (CD38) | Malignancy | Phase 1, 2 | NCT03367819 | ||
| PD-L1 | Atezolizumab | Anlotinib | Anti-angiogenesis therapy | NSCLC | Phase 1, 2 | NCT04670107 |
| Bevacizumab + carboplatin + paclitaxel | Anti-angiogenesis therapy + chemotherapy | NSCLC | Phase 3 | NCT02366143 | ||
| Bevacizumab + gemcitabine + leucovorin + Nab-paclitaxe + oxaliplatin + capecitabine + cisplatin | Anti-angiogenesis therapy + chemotherapy | Solid tumor | Phase 1 | NCT02715531 | ||
| Bevacizumab + interferon alfa-2b + PEG-interferon alfa-2a + ipilimumab + obinutuzumab | Anti-angiogenesis therapy + CTLA-4 antibody + targeted therapy (CD20) + other treatment | Solid tumor | Phase 1 | NCT02174172 | ||
| Bevacizumab + cobimetinib | Anti-angiogenesis therapy + targeted therapy (MEK1) | Gastrointestinal tumor | Phase 1 | NCT02876224 | ||
| Bevacizumab + sunitinib | Anti-angiogenesis therapy + targeted therapy (RTK) | RCC | Phase 2 | NCT01984242 | ||
| Bevacizumab + sunitinib | Anti-angiogenesis therapy + targeted therapy (RTK) | RCC | Phase 3 | NCT02420821 | ||
| PD-L1 | Atezolizumab | 5-FU + bevacizumab + carboplatin + leucovorin + nab-paclitaxel + oxaliplatin + paclitaxel + pemetrexed | Chemotherapy + anti-angiogenesis therapy | Solid tumor | Phase 1 | NCT01633970 |
| Azacitidine | Chemotherapy | Myelodysplastic syndromes | Phase 1 | NCT02508870 | ||
| Nab-Paclitaxel | Chemotherapy | TNBC | Phase 3 | NCT02425891/IMpassion130 | ||
| Carboplatin + pemetrexed | Chemotherapy | NSCLC | Phase 3 | NCT02367781 | ||
| Carboplatin + nab-paclitaxel + paclitaxel | Chemotherapy | NSCLC | Phase 3 | NCT02367794/IMpower131 | ||
| Carboplatin + cyclophosphamide | Chemotherapy | Breast cancer; cervix cancer; ovarian cancer; endometrial cancer | Phase 1 | NCT02914470 | ||
| Carboplatin + paclitaxel + bevacizumab | Chemotherapy + anti-angiogenesis therapy | Ovarian cancer | Phase 1, 2 | NCT03394885 | ||
| Bendamustine + cyclophosphamide + doxorubicin + obinutuzumab + prednisone + vincristine + rituximab | Chemotherapy + targeted therapy (CD20) | DLBCL | Phase 1, 2 | NCT02596971 | ||
| Carboplatin + docetaxel + pertuzumab + trastuzumab + trastuzumab emtansine + doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide | Chemotherapy + targeted therapy (HER2) | TNBC | Phase 1 | NCT02605915 | ||
| PD-L1 | Atezolizumab | Talimogene laherparepvec | Oncolytic virus therapy | TNBC; colorectal cancer | Phase 1 | NCT03256344 |
| Radium-223 dichloride | Radiotherapy | CRPC | Phase 1 | NCT02814669 | ||
| HFRT | Radiotherapy | NSCLC | Early Phase 1 | NCT02463994 | ||
| Ciforadenant | Targeted therapy (adenosine A2A receptor) | Cancer | Phase 1 | NCT02655822 | ||
| Alectinib | Targeted therapy (ALK) | NSCLC | Phase 1 | NCT02013219 | ||
| Obinutuzumab + polatuzumab vedotin + rituximab | Targeted therapy (CD20) + targeted therapy (CD79b) | Lymphoma | Phase 1, 2 | NCT02729896 | ||
| Daratumumab | Targeted therapy (CD38) | NSCLC | Phase 1, 2 | NCT03023423 | ||
| Daratumumab + lenalidomide + pomalidomide + dexamethasone | Targeted therapy (CD38) + targeted therapy (TNF-α) | Myeloma | Phase 1 | NCT02431208 | ||
| Gilteritinib | Targeted therapy (FLT3/AXL) | AML | Phase 1, 2 | NCT03730012 | ||
| Trastuzumab emtansine | Targeted therapy (HER2) | MBC | Phase 2 | NCT02924883 | ||
| Cobimetinib | Targeted therapy (MEK1) | Solid Tumor | Phase 1 | NCT01988896 | ||
| Cobimetinib + Paclitaxel + nab-paclitaxel | Targeted therapy (MEK1) + chemotherapy | TNBC | Phase 2 | NCT02322814 | ||
| Cobimetinib + regorafenib | Targeted therapy (MEK1) + targeted therapy (multiple kinases) | Colorectal Cancer | Phase 3 | NCT02788279 | ||
| Cobimetinib + venetoclax | Targeted therapy (MEK1) + targeted therapy (Bcl-2) | Myeloma | Phase 1, 2 | NCT03312530 | ||
| PD-L1 | Atezolizumab | Cobimetinib + vemurafenib | Targeted therapy (MEK1) + targeted therapy (BRAF) | Melanoma | Phase 1 | NCT01656642 |
| Rucaparib | Targeted therapy (PARP) | Gynecologic cancer; TNBC | Phase 1 | NCT03101280 | ||
| Lenalidomide + obinutuzumab | Targeted therapy (TNF-α) + targeted therapy (CD20) | Follicular lymphoma | Phase 1, 2 | NCT02631577 | ||
| Durvalumab | Bevacizumab | Anti-angiogenesis therapy | HER-2 negative breast cancer | Early Phase 1 | NCT02802098 | |
| Paclitaxel | Chemotherapy | TNBC | Phase 1, 2 | NCT02628132 | ||
| Azacitidine | Chemotherapy | Solid tumor | Phase 2 | NCT02811497 | ||
| Nab-paclitaxel + epirubicin + cyclophosphamide | Chemotherapy | TNBC | Phase 2 | NCT02685059 | ||
| Tremelimumab | CTLA-4 antibody | Head and Neck cancer | Phase 3 | NCT02369874 | ||
| Tremelimumab | CTLA-4 antibody | Solid tumor | Phase 1 | NCT02261220 | ||
| Tremelimumab | CTLA-4 antibody | HER2 negative breast cancer | Phase 2 | NCT02536794 | ||
| Tremelimumab | CTLA-4 antibody | Breast cancer; ovarian cancer; colorectal cancer; cervical cancer; RCC | Phase 1 | NCT01975831 | ||
| Tremelimumab | CTLA-4 antibody | Pancreatic ductal carcinoma | Phase 2 | NCT02558894 | ||
| Tremelimumab | CTLA-4 antibody | NSCLC | Phase 1 | NCT02000947 | ||
| Tremelimumab | CTLA-4 antibody | Head and neck cancer | Phase 1 | NCT02262741 | ||
| PD-L1 | Durvalumab | Tremelimumab | CTLA-4 antibody | Bladder cancer | Phase 2 | NCT03430895 |
| Tremelimumab | CTLA-4 antibody | Malignancy | Phase 1 | NCT02978482 | ||
| Tremelimumab | CTLA-4 antibody | Gastric cancer; gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma | Phase 1, 2 | NCT02340975 | ||
| Tremelimumab | CTLA-4 antibody | Colorectal cancer | Phase 2 | NCT03007407 | ||
| Tremelimumab | CTLA-4 antibody | Solid malignancy | Phase 1 | NCT02141347 | ||
| Tremelimumab | CTLA-4 antibody | Prostate cancer | Phase 2 | NCT03204812 | ||
| Tremelimumab + paclitaxel + carboplatin + etoposide + gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel + 5FU + leucovorin + gemcitabine + cisplatin | CTLA-4 antibody + chemotherapy | Solid tumor | Phase 1 | NCT02658214 | ||
| Tremelimumab + SBRT | CTLA-4 antibody + radiotherapy | Pancreatic cancer | Phase 1, 2 | NCT02311361 | ||
| Mogamulizumab + tremelimumab | CTLA-4 antibody + targeted therapy (CCR4) | Solid tumor | Phase 1 | NCT02301130 | ||
| Tremelimumab + cetuximab + 5FU | CTLA-4 antibody + targeted therapy (EGFR) + chemotherapy | Head and Neck cancer | Phase 3 | NCT02551159 | ||
| Tremelimumab + AZD9150 | CTLA-4 antibody + targeted therapy (STAT3) | DLBCL | Phase 1 | NCT02549651 | ||
| HFRT + SBRT + tremelimumab | Radiotherapy + CTLA-4 antibody | SCLC | Phase 2 | NCT02701400 | ||
| PD-L1 | Durvalumab | Brain radiotherapy + stereotactic radiosurgery + tremelimumab + HER2 directed therapy | Radiotherapy + CTLA-4 antibody + other treatment | Breast cancer | n.a | NCT02563925 |
| Ablation + radiotherapy + tremelimumab | Surgery + radiotherapy + CTLA-4 antibody | Colorectal cancer | Phase 2 | NCT03122509 | ||
| Ensartinib | Targeted therapy (ALK) | NSCLC | Phase 1, 2 | NCT02898116 | ||
| Dabrafenib + trametinib | Targeted therapy (BRAF) + targeted therapy (MEK1/2) | Melanoma | Phase 1 | NCT02027961 | ||
| Ibrutinib | Targeted therapy (brutons tyrosine kinase) | Solid tumor | Phase 1, 2 | NCT02403271 | ||
| Ibrutinib | Targeted therapy (brutons tyrosine kinase) | DLBCL; follicular lymphoma | Phase 1, 2 | NCT02401048 | ||
| Daratumumab | Targeted therapy (CD38) | Myeloma | Phase 2 | NCT03000452 | ||
| Pexidartinib | Targeted therapy (CSF1R) | Pancreatic cancer; colorectal cancer | Phase 1 | NCT02777710 | ||
| AZD5069 + nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine | Targeted therapy (CXCR2) + chemotherapy | Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma | Phase 1, 2 | NCT02583477 | ||
| Gefitinib | Targeted therapy (EGFR) | NSCLC | Phase 1 | NCT02088112 | ||
| Selumetinib + tremelimumab | Targeted therapy (MEK) + CTLA-4 antibody | Solid tumor | Phase 1 | NCT02586987 | ||
| Eribulin | Targeted therapy (microtubule) | Breast cancer; ovarian cancer | Phase 1 | NCT03430518 | ||
| Olaparib | Targeted therapy (PARP) | Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck | Phase 2 | NCT02882308 | ||
| PD-L1 | Durvalumab | Olaparib | Targeted therapy (PARP) | Bladder cancer | Phase 2 | NCT03534492 |
| Olaparib + bevacizumab | Targeted therapy (PARP) + anti-angiogenesis therapy | Solid tumor | Phase 1, 2 | NCT02734004 | ||
| Avelumab | Axitinib | Anti-angiogenesis therapy | GBM | Phase 2 | NCT03291314 | |
| Axitinib | Anti-angiogenesis therapy | RCC | Phase 1 | NCT02493751 | ||
| Axitinib | Anti-angiogenesis therapy | HCC | Phase 1 | NCT03289533 | ||
| Talazoparib + chemotherapy | Chemotherapy + targeted therapy (PARP) | Ovarian cancer | Phase 3 | NCT03642132 | ||
| HFRT | Radiotherapy | GMB | Phase 2 | NCT02968940 | ||
| SAR | Radiotherapy | NSCLC | Early Phase 1 | NCT03158883 | ||
| Cisplatin + 5-FU + mitomycin + radiation therapy | Radiotherapy + chemotherapy | Bladder cancer | Phase 2 | NCT03617913 | ||
| Radiotherapy + cetuximab | Radiotherapy + chemotherapy + targeted therapy (EGFR) | Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck | Phase 1 | NCT02938273 | ||
| Magrolimab | Targeted therapy (CD47) | Ovarian cancer | Phase 1 | NCT03558139 | ||
| Cetuximab + gemcitabine + cisplatin + carboplatin | Targeted therapy (EGFR) + chemotherapy | NSCLC | Phase 2 | NCT03717155 |
n.a. not applicable, SABR stereotactic ablative body radiosurgery, HFSRT hypofractionated stereotactic irradiation, SAR stereotactic ablative radiotherapy, RCC renal cell carcinoma, NSCLC non-small-cell lung cancer, TNBC triple-negative breast cancer, SCLC small-cell lung cancer, ED-SCLC extensive-stage disease small-cell lung cancer, MPM malignant pleural mesothelioma, AML acute myeloid leukemia, MBC metastatic breast cancer, BTC biliary tract carcinoma, GBM glioblastoma multiforme, CRPC castrate-resistant prostate cancer, DLBCL diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, GEJ Adenocarcinoma gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, HCC hepatocellular carcinoma
In addition to the above combination experiments, there are a large number of clinical trials studying the efficacy and side effects of approved/investigational PD-(L)1 inhibitors in combination with other cancer treatment regimens. Key information on representative ongoing clinical trials of such combination therapy is shown in Table 2. As can be seen from the table, most of the combination strategies are PD-1/PD-L1 blockade combined with chemotherapy, targeted therapy, radiotherapy and other immune checkpoint inhibitors. Chemotherapy, targeted therapy and radiotherapy are classic strategies for cancer treatment, and most approved cancer treatment strategies belong to them. Therefore, combination regimen containing these treatment strategies is likely to show numerous breakthroughs. PD-1/PD-L1 blockade has also been combined with many biotherapy regimens, such as cell therapy and vaccine. In addition, PD-1/PD-L1 blockade has also been combined with many novel cancer treatment options, such as electric field therapy, which has shown excellent efficacy in the treatment of glioma. More than half of the combination regimens belong to dual combination therapy, such as PD-1/PD-L1 blockade combined with chemotherapy. We can also see clinical trials with triple combination therapy. The results of these clinical trials will bring valuable data to improve the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade.
Table 2.
Representative ongoing clinical trials for PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in combination with other cancer treatment regimens
| Interventions | Target | Conditions | Phase | Development status | Trial number |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. PD-1/PD-L1 blockade + Other type of immune checkpoint inhibitors | |||||
| Approved immune-checkpoint inhibitors therapies | PD-1 + PD-L1 + CTLA-4 | Melanoma; NSCLC | Phase 4 | Recruiting | NCT03673332 |
| Nivolumab + ipilimumab | PD-1 + CTLA-4 | NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT03823625, NCT03285321, NCT03333616 |
| Nivolumab + ipilimumab | PD-1 + CTLA-4 | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Active, not recruiting | NCT03001882, NCT03091491, NCT03262779 |
| Nivolumab + ipilimumab | PD-1 + CTLA-4 | NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 2 | Enrolling by invitation | NCT03083691 |
| Nivolumab + ipilimumab | PD-1 + CTLA-4 | NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 3 | Active, not recruiting | NCT02538666 |
| Nivolumab + ipilimumab | PD-1 + CTLA-4 | NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 4 | Active, not recruiting | NCT02869789 |
| Pembrolizumab + ipilimumab | PD-1 + CTLA-4 | NSCLC | Phase 3 | Active, not recruiting | NCT03302234 |
| Nivolumab + relatlimab | PD-1 + LAG-3 | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT04205552, NCT04623775 |
| BI 754091 + BI 754111 | PD-1 + LAG-3 | NSCLC | Phase 1 | Active, not recruiting | NCT03156114 |
| XmAb®23104 + ipilimumab | PD-1/ICOS + CTLA-4 | Melanoma; NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 1 | Recruiting | NCT03752398 |
| Nivolumab + ipilimumab or chemotherapy | PD-1 + CTLA-4/chemotherapy | NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT03158129 |
| Nivolumab + ipilimumab or nivolumab + platinum-doublet chemotherapy | PD-1 + CTLA-4 / PD-1 + chemotherapy | NSCLC | Phase 3 | Recruiting | NCT02477826 |
| Durvalumab + tremelimumab + chemotherapy | PD-L1 + CTLA-4 + chemotherapy | NSCLC | Phase 3 | Recruiting | NCT03164616 |
| 2. PD-1/PD-L1 blockade + Chemotherapy | |||||
| Nivolumab + decitabine + tetrahydrouridine | PD-1 + chemotherapy | NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 2 | Active, not recruiting | NCT02664181 |
| Nivolumab + gemcitabine | PD-1 + chemotherapy | NSCLC | Phase 4 | Not yet recruiting | NCT04331626 |
| Nivolumab + docetaxel | PD-1 + chemotherapy | NSCLC | Phase 3 | Recruiting | NCT03906071 |
| Nivolumab/pembrolizumab + chemotherapy | PD-1 + chemotherapy | SCLC | Not Applicable | Not yet recruiting | NCT04306042 |
| Nivolumab + carboplatin + paclitaxel | PD-1 + chemotherapy | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT02259621 |
| Nivolumab + platinum-based chemotherapy | PD-1 + chemotherapy | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT03823625 |
| Nivolumab + paclitaxel + carboplatin AUC5 | PD-1 + chemotherapy | NSCLC | Phase 1 | Recruiting | NCT04699721 |
| Nivolumab + carboplatin + nab-paclitaxel | PD-1 + chemotherapy | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT04015778 |
| Nivolumab + temozolomide | PD-1 + chemotherapy | SCLC | Phase 2 | Active, not recruiting | NCT03728361 |
| Nivolumab + decitabine + tetrahydrouridine | PD-1 + chemotherapy | NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 2 | Active, not recruiting | NCT02664181 |
| Nivolumab + irinotecan | PD-1 + chemotherapy | SCLC | Phase 1 | Recruiting | NCT04173325 |
| Nivolumab + carboplatin + cisplatin + etoposide | PD-1 + chemotherapy | SCLC | Phase 2 | Active, not recruiting | NCT03382561 |
| Toripalimab + platinum-based chemotherapy | PD-1 + chemotherapy | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT05055583 |
| Opdivo/Keytruda + tirapazamine | PD-1 + chemotherapy | NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT03259867 |
| Camrelizumab + nab-paclitaxel | PD-1 + chemotherapy | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT04167774 |
| PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy | PD-1 + chemotherapy | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT04941417 |
| Pembrolizumab + pemetrexed + gemcitabine + cisplatin + carboplatin | PD-1 + chemotherapy | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT04586465 |
| Pembrolizumab + tirapazamine | PD-1 + chemotherapy | NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT04701476 |
| Atezolizumab + gemcitabine | PD-L1 + chemotherapy | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT04480372 |
| Nivolumab + relatlimab + carboplatin + cisplatin + paclitaxel + nab-paclitaxel + pemetrexed | PD-1 + LAG-3 + chemotherapy | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT04623775 |
| Nivolumab + BMS-986012 + carboplatin + etoposide | PD-1 + fucosyl-GM1 + chemotherapy | SCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT04702880 |
| Nivolumab + ipilimumab + platinum-doublet chemotherapy | PD-1 + CTLA-4 + chemotherapy | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Active, not recruiting | NCT02659059 |
| Nivolumab + ipilimumab + oxaliplatin | PD-1 + CTLA-4 + chemotherapy | NSCLC | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT04043195 |
| Nivolumab + ipilimumab + paclitaxel | PD-1 + CTLA-4 + chemotherapy | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Active, not recruiting | NCT03573947 |
| Nivolumab + ipilimumab + guadecitabine | PD-1 + CTLA-4 + chemotherapy | Melanoma; NSCLC | Phase 2 | Not yet recruiting | NCT04250246 |
| Nivolumab + ipilimumab + platinum-based chemotherapy | PD-1 + CTLA-4 + chemotherapy | SCLC | Phase 2 | Active, not recruiting | NCT03670056 |
| Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibody + Chemotherapy + bronchoscopy-assisted interventional therapy | PD-1/PD-L1 + chemotherapy + interventional therapy | NSCLC | Phase 2, Phase 3 | Not yet recruiting | NCT04702009 |
| Immune checkpoint inhibitor + chemotherapy | PD-1/PD-L1/CTLA-4 + chemotherapy | NSCLC | Not applicable | Recruiting | NCT04807114 |
| Durvalumab + bevacizumab + pemetrexed + cisplatin/carboplatin + SBRT | PD-L1 + EGFR + chemotherapy + SBRT | NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 2 | Not yet recruiting | NCT04517526 |
| Camrelizumab + apatinib + albumin paclitacxel | PD-1 + VEGF + chemotherapy | NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 2 | Not yet recruiting | NCT04459078 |
| Nivolumab + ipilimumab/nivolumab + chemotherapy | PD-1 + CTLA-4 / PD-1 + chemotherapy | NSCLC | Phase 3 | Active, not recruiting | NCT02998528 |
| Pembrolizumab + carboplatin-paclitaxel/nab-paclitaxel | PD-1 + chemotherapy | NSCLC | Phase 3 | Active, not recruiting | NCT02775435 |
| Atezolizumab + chemotherapy | PD-L1 + chemotherapy | NSCLC | Phase 3 | Active, not recruiting | NCT02486718 |
| Pembrolizumab + chemotherapy + radiotherapy | PD-1 + chemotherapy + radiotherapy | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Active, not recruiting | NCT03631784 |
| Atezolizumab + carboplatin/cisplatin + pemetrexed | PD-L1 + chemotherapy | NSCLC | Phase 3 | Active, not recruiting | NCT02657434 |
| 3. PD-1/PD-L1 blockade + Radiotherapy | |||||
| Nivolumab/pembrolizumab + radiotherapy | PD-1 + radiotherapy | Melanoma | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT04017897 |
| Sintilimab + radiotherapy | PD-1 + radiotherapy | NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT04513301 |
| Nivolumab + radiosurgery | PD-1 + radiosurgery | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Active, not recruiting | NCT02978404 |
| Nivolumab + intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) | PD-1 + IMRT | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT04577638 |
| Nivolumab + SBRT | PD-1 + SBRT | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT04271384 |
| Nivolumab + ipilimumab + radiation therapy | PD-1 + CTLA-4 + radiotherapy | NSCLC | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT03168464, NCT04013542, NCT02696993 |
| Nivolumab + ipilimumab + thoracic radiation therapy(TRT) | PD-1 + CTLA-4 + TRT | SCLC | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Active, not recruiting | NCT03043599 |
| Nivolumab + BMS-986218 + SBRT | PD-1 + CTLA-4 + SBRT | NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT04785287 |
| Nivolumab + ipilimumab + SBRT | PD-1 + CTLA-4 + SBRT | SCLC | Phase 1 | Recruiting | NCT03223155 |
| Durvalumab + radiotherapy | PD-L1 + radiotherapy | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT04062708 |
| Durvalumab + tremelimumab + radiation therapy | PD-L1 + CTLA-4 + radiotherapy | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Active, not recruiting | NCT02888743 |
| Atezolizumab + SBRT | PD-L1 + SBRT | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT02992912 |
| Nivolumab/pembrolizumab/atezolizumab + stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) | PD-1/PD-L1 + SBRT | Melanoma; NSCLC | Phase 2 | Active, not recruiting | NCT03511391 |
| Immunotherapeutic agent + radiation | PD-1/PD-L1/CTLA-4 + radiotherapy | NSCLC | Not applicable | Active, not recruiting | NCT03035890 |
| Immunotherapy + radiation | PD-1/PD-L1/CTLA-4 + radiotherapy | NSCLC; SCLC | Not applicable | Recruiting | NCT03705806 |
| Nivolumab, pembrolizumab, ipilimumab or atezolizumab + SBRT | PD-1/PD-L1/CTLA-4 + SBRT | Melanoma; NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT03693014 |
| Durvalumab + bevacizumab + pemetrexed + cisplatin/carboplatin + SBRT | PD-L1 + EGFR + Chemotherapy + SBRT | NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 2 | Not yet recruiting | NCT04517526 |
| 4. PD-1/PD-L1 blockade + targeted therapy | |||||
| Spartalizumab + PBF-509 | PD-1 + AR | NSCLC | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Active, not recruiting | NCT02403193 |
| Pembrolizumab + INCB001158 | PD-1 + Arg | NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Active, not recruiting | NCT02903914 |
| PD-1 inhibitor + metformin | PD-1 + AMPK | SCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT03994744 |
| Nivolumab + metformin hydrochloride | PD-1 + AMPK | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Active, not recruiting | NCT03048500 |
| Nivolumab + ceritinib | PD-1 + ALK | NSCLC | Phase 1 | Active, not recruiting | NCT02393625 |
| PD-1 inhibitor + CAB-AXL-ADC | PD-1 + AXL | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT04681131 |
| PD-1 inhibitor + CAB-AXL-ADC | PD-1 + AXL | Melanoma; NSCLC | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT03425279 |
| Nivolumab + BMS-986340 | PD-1 + CCR8 | NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT04895709 |
| Spartalizumab + NIR178 | PD-1 + CD73 | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT03207867 |
| Nivolumab + pembrolizumab + OR2805 | PD-1 + CD163 | Melanoma; NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT05094804 |
| Nivolumab + cabiralizumab + APX005M | PD-1 + CSF1R + CD40 | Melanoma; NSCLC | Phase 1 | Recruiting | NCT03502330 |
| Nivolumab + nimotuzumab | PD-1 + EGFR | NSCLC | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT02947386 |
| Nivolumab + nintedanib | PD-1 + EGFR | NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT04046614 |
| Nivolumab + BT5528 | PD-1 + EphA2 | NSCLC | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT04180371 |
| Sintilimab + pemigatinib | PD-1 + FGFR | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Not yet recruiting | NCT05004974 |
| Nivolumab + BMS-986012 + carboplatin + etoposide | PD-1 + fucosyl-GM1 + chemotherapy | SCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT04702880 |
| Nivolumab + BMS-986012 | PD-1 + fucosyl-GM1 | SCLC | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Active, not recruiting | NCT02247349 |
| Nivolumab + plinabulin | PD-1 + GEF-H1 | NSCLC | Phase 1 | Recruiting | NCT02812667 |
| Nivolumab + ACY-241 | PD-1 + HDAC6 | NSCLC | Phase 1 | Active, not recruiting | NCT02635061 |
| Nivolumab + HBI-8000 | PD-1 + HDAC | Melanoma; NSCLC | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Active, not recruiting | NCT02718066 |
| PDR001 + DKY709 | PD-1 + helios (IKZF2) | Melanoma; NSCLC | Phase 1 | Recruiting | NCT03891953 |
| Nivolumab + Ipilimumab + BMS-986205 | PD-1 + IDO1 | Melanoma; NSCLC | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Active, not recruiting | NCT02658890 |
| Nivolumab + LT-803 | PD-1 + IL-15 | NSCLC | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Active, not recruiting | NCT02523469 |
| Spartalizumab + JDQ443 + TNO155 | PD-1 + KRAS G12C + SHP2 | NSCLC | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT04699188 |
| Spartalizumab + capmatinib | PD-1 + MET | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Active, not recruiting | NCT04323436 |
| Nivolumab + glesatinib + sitravatinib + mocetinostat | PD-1 + MET/SMO + RTK + HDAC (Class I/IV) | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Active, not recruiting | NCT02954991 |
| Nivolumab + rucaparib | PD-1 + PARP | SCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT03958045 |
| Nivolumab + copanlisib | PD-1 + PI3K | NSCLC | Phase 1 | Active, not recruiting | NCT03735628 |
| Nivolumab + eganelisib | PD-1 + PI3K-γ | Melanoma; NSCLC | Phase 1 | Active, not recruiting | NCT02637531 |
| Nivolumab + TPST-1120 | PD-1 + PPARa | NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 1 | Recruiting | NCT03829436 |
| Nivolumab + COM701 | PD-1 + PVRIG | NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 1 | Recruiting | NCT03667716 |
| Nivolumab + denosumab | PD-1 + RANKL | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT03669523 |
| PD-1 inhibitor + CAB-ROR2-ADC | PD-1 + ROR2 | Melanoma; NSCLC | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT03504488 |
| Nivolumab + sitravatinib | PD-1 + RTKs | NSCLC | Phase 3 | Recruiting | NCT03906071 |
| Spartalizumab + TNO155 + ribociclib | PD-1 + SHP2 + CDK4/6 | NSCLC | Phase 1 | Recruiting | NCT04000529 |
| PD-1 inhibitor + JAB-3068 | PD-1 + SHP2 | NSCLC | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT04721223 |
| Camrelizumab + famitinib | PD-1 + TKI | NSCLC | Phase 3 | Recruiting | NCT05106335 |
| Immune checkpoint inhibitor + anti-angiogenesis agents | PD-1 + VEGF | NSCLC | Not applicable | Recruiting | NCT04137588 |
| Ezabenlimab + BI 836880 | PD-1 + VEGF/Ang2 | NSCLC | Phase 1 | Recruiting | NCT03468426 |
| Camrelizumab + apatinib + albumin paclitacxel | PD-1 + VEGF + chemotherapy | NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 2 | Not yet recruiting | NCT04459078 |
| Tislelizumab + anlotinib + irinotecan | PD-1 + VEGFR | SCLC | Not applicable | NCT05027100 | |
| PD-1 inhibitor + anlotinib | PD-1 + VEGFR | NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT04790409 |
| Nivolumab + anlotinib | PD-1 + VEGFR | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Not yet recruiting | NCT04211896 |
| Nivolumab + ramucirumab | PD-1 + VEGFR2 | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT03527108 |
| Nivolumab + anlotinib | PD-1 + VEGFR2 | NSCLC | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT04507906 |
| Nivolumab + AL3818 | PD-1 + VEGFR2 | NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT04165330 |
| Nivolumab + X-82 | PD-1 + VEGFR/PDGFR | NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT03583086 |
| Nivolumab + ipilimumab + nintedanib | PD-1 + CTLA-4 + EGFR | NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Active, not recruiting | NCT03377023 |
| Nivolumab + ipilimumab + plinabulin | PD-1 + CTLA-4 + GEF-H1 | NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT03575793 |
| Nivolumab + ipilimumab + NKTR-214 | PD-1 + CTLA-4 + IL-2 | Melanoma; NSCLC | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Active, not recruiting | NCT02983045 |
| Nivolumab + ipilimumab + Tocilizumab | PD-1 + CTLA-4 + IL-6 | NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT04940299 |
| Nivolumab + ipilimumab + denosumab | PD-1 + CTLA-4 + RANKL | Melanoma | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT03161756 |
| Nivolumab + ipilimumab + BMS-986207 | PD-1 + CTLA-4 + TIGIT | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Not yet recruiting | NCT05005273 |
| Nivolumab + ipilimumab + certolizumab/infliximab | PD-1 + CTLA-4 + TNF-a | Melanoma | Not applicable | Active, not recruiting | NCT03293784 |
| Pembrolizumab + GEN1046 | PD-1 + PD-L1 + 4-1BB | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT05117242 |
| Durvalumab/avelumab/atezolizumab/nivolumab/pembrolizumab + N-803 + PD-L1 t-haNK | PD-1/PD-L1 + IL-15 + cell therapy | Melanoma; NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 2 | Active, not recruiting | NCT03228667 |
| ICB + MDNA11 | PD-1/PD-L1/CTLA-4 + IL-2 | Melanoma; NSCLC | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT05086692 |
| Durvalumab + oleclumab/ceralasertib | PD-L1 + CD73/ATR | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT03833440 |
| Durvalumab + bevacizumab + pemetrexed + cisplatin/carboplatin + SBRT | PD-L1 + EGFR + chemotherapy + SBRT | NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 2 | Not yet recruiting | NCT04517526 |
| Atezolizumab + tocilizumab | PD-L1 + IL-6R | NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Not yet recruiting | NCT04691817 |
| Atezolizumab + cabozantinib | PD-L1 + TKI | NSCLC | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT03170960 |
| Atezolizumab + ramucirumab | PD-L1 + VEGFR-2 | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Active, not recruiting | NCT03689855 |
| Durvalumab-platinum–etoposide + anlotinib | PD-L1 + VEGF | SCLC | Phase 2 | Not yet recruiting | NCT04660097 |
| Ipilimumab + osimertinib | CTLA-4 + EGFR | NSCLC | Phase 1 | Recruiting | NCT04141644 |
| 5. PD-1/PD-L1 blockade + cell therapy | |||||
| Nivolumab + pembrolizumab + atezolizumab + FT500 | PD-1 + PD-L1 + NK cell cancer immunotherapy | Melanoma; SCLC | Phase 1 | Recruiting | NCT03841110 |
| Sintilimab + CIK cell + pemetrexed + albumin paclitaxel + carboplatin | PD-1 + CIK cell therapy + chemotherapy | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Not yet recruiting | NCT04836728 |
| Nivolumab + MILs™—NSCLC + Tadalafil | PD-1 + cell therapy + PDE-5 | NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 2 | Active, not recruiting | NCT04069936 |
| Nivolumab, ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, lifileucel, LN-145, LN-145-S1 | PD-1 + CTLA-4 + TIL cell therapy | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT03645928 |
| Atezolizumab + cyclophosphamide + fludarabine + MAGE-A1-specific T cell receptor-transduced autologous T cells | PD-L1 + cell therapy + Chemotherapy | NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT04639245 |
| Nivolumab + IRX 2 | PD-1 + cell therapy | Melanoma; NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 1 | Active, not recruiting | NCT03758781 |
| 6. PD-1/PD-L1 blockade + vaccine | |||||
| ICB + ChAdOx1-MAGEA3-NYESO/MVA-MAGEA3 + chemotherapy | PD-1/PD-L1/CTLA-4 + vaccine + chemotherapy | NSCLC | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT04908111 |
| Nivolumab + ipilimumab + dendritic cell-based p53 Vaccine | PD-1 + CTLA-4 + vaccine | NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 2 | Active, not recruiting | NCT03406715 |
| Nivolumab + UCPVax | PD-1 + vaccine | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT04263051 |
| Nivolumab + pembrolizumab + pemetrexed + viagenpumatucel-L | PD-1 + DHFR + vaccine | NSCLC | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Active, not recruiting | NCT02439450 |
| Nivolumab + TG4010 + chemotherapy | PD-1 + vaccine + chemotherapy | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Active, not recruiting | NCT03353675 |
| Nivolumab + ipilimumab + GRT-C901/GRT-R902 | PD-1 + CTLA-4 + vaccine | NSCLC | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Active, not recruiting | NCT03639714 |
| Nivolumab + ipilimumab + GRT-C903/GRT-R904 | PD-1 + CTLA-4 + vaccine | NSCLC | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT03953235 |
| Nivolumab + pembrolizumab + recombinant human EGF-rP64K/montanide ISA 51 vaccine | PD-1 + vaccine | NSCLC | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Active, not recruiting | NCT02955290 |
| Nivolumab + ipilimumab + UV1 vaccine + leukine | PD-1 + CTLA-4 + vaccine | NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT04300244 |
| Nivolumab + pembrolizumab + GEN-009 adjuvanted vaccine | PD-1 + vaccine | NSCLC | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Active, not recruiting | NCT03633110 |
| 7. PD-1/PD-L1 blockade + Other treatment regimens | |||||
| ICI + fecal microbial transplantation (FMT) | PD-1/PD-L1/CTLA-4 + FMT | Melanoma; NSCLC | Phase 2 | Not yet recruiting | NCT04951583 |
| Nivolumab + FMT by capsules | PD-1 + FMT | Melanoma; NSCLC | Phase 1, Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT04521075 |
| Opdivo + Yervoy + Novocure Optune | PD-1 + CTLA-4 + electric field therapy | Melanoma | Phase 1 | Not yet recruiting | NCT05004025 |
| Camrelizumab + microwave ablation (MWA) | PD-1 + MWA | NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT05053802 |
| Pembrolizumab + laser interstitial thermotherapy (LITT) | PD-1 + LITT | Melanoma; NSCLC; SCLC | Phase 1 | Recruiting | NCT04187872 |
| Pembrolizumab + Radium-223 dichloride (Xofigo, BAY 88–8223) | PD-1 + radiotherapeutic drug | NSCLC | Phase 1 | Active, not recruiting | NCT03996473 |
| ICB + CAN-2409 + valacyclovir | PD-1/PD-L1/CTLA-4 + gene therapy | NSCLC | Phase 2 | Recruiting | NCT04495153 |
| ICB + Different sleep conditions | ICB + sleep disturbances | NSCLC; SCLC | Not Applicable | Recruiting | NCT04070651 |
| Exercise intervention + standard oncological treatments | ICB + chemotherapy + exercise intervention | NSCLC; SCLC | Not Applicable | Recruiting | NCT04263467 |
Phase 4: Only after the drug is approved can it enter the phase 4 of the trial. At this stage, new uses or new populations of drugs, long-term effects and subjects' responses to different doses can be further studied
NSCLC non-small-cell lung cancer, SCLC small-cell lung cancer, PD-1 programmed cell death-1, PD-L1 PD-1 ligand, CTLA-4 cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4, LAG-3 lymphocyte-activation gene 3, ICOS inducible co-stimulator, EGFR epidermal growth factor receptor, VEGF vascular endothelial growth factor, VEGFR vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, IMRT intensity modulated radiotherapy, SBRT stereotactic body radiation therapy, TRT thoracic radiation therapy, AR adenosine receptor, Arg arginase, AMPK adenosine 5'-monophosphate-activated protein kinase, ALK anaplastic lymphoma kinase, ATR ATR serine/threonine kinase, AXL AXL receptor tyrosine kinase, CCR8 CC chemokine receptor 8, CD73 ecto-5'-nucleotidase, CSF1R colony stimulating factor 1 receptor, EphA2 ephrin A receptor 2, FGFR fibroblast growth factor receptor, GEF-H1 guanine nucleotide exchange factor H1, HDAC histone deacetylase, Helios IKAROS-family genes, IDO1 indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1, IL-2 interleukin-2, IL-6 interleukin-6, IL-6R interleukin-6 receptor, IL-15 interleukin-15, KRAS KRAS proto-oncogene, SHP2 Src homology 2 domain tyrosine phosphatases, MET MET proto-oncogene, RTKs AXL, MER, VEGFR2, PDGFR, KIT, RET, MET, DDR2, TRKA, PARP poly ADP ribose polymerase, PI3K phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, PPARa peroxisome proliferator activated receptor a, PVRIG CD112 receptor, RANKL receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand, ROR2 recombinant receptor tyrosine kinase like orphan receptor 2, CDK4/6 cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6, TKI tyrosine kinase inhibitor, PDGFR platelet-derived growth factor receptor, TIGIT T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains, TNF-a tumor necrosis factor-a, CIK cytokine-induced killer, TIL tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, DHFR dihydrofolate reductase, FMT fecal microbial transplantation, MWA microwave ablation, LITT laser interstitial thermotherapy
Combination therapy with PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockers
Upregulation of other immune checkpoints is a potential cause of resistance to PD-1 inhibitors. Therefore, combination therapy with other ICIs can be a crucial strategy, including the combination of PD-1 inhibitors and CTLA-4 inhibitors, which is commonly used in clinical applications.
The combination of the anti-PD-1 antibody nivolumab and the anti-CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab was used for the first time in humans in December 2009 and targeted two unrelated pathways [130]. CTLA-4 produces a strong inhibitory signal to terminate the proliferation and activation of T cells, which can be blocked by CTLA-4 inhibitors, thus restoring the activation of T cells. Therefore, CTLA-4 mainly acts on interactive signal transmission between lymphocytes. PD-1 blocks the activation of the immune response [131]. Flow cytometry also indicated that CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibitors target proteins in different pathways [132]. Additionally, a preclinical study demonstrated the synergistic effect of nivolumab and ipilimumab in a mouse cancer model [133].
Combination therapy was initially designed for populations that do not express PD-L1. The clinical trial CheckMate 227 (NCT02477826) reported that the efficacy of first-line combination therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab was superior to that of platinum-doublet chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients with a high tumor mutation burden (TMB ≥ 10 mut/Mb); combination therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab significantly enhanced the overall response rate (ORR, 45.3% vs. 26.9%) and median progression-free survival (mPFS, 7.2 months vs. 5.5 months) [134]. The results of the CheckMate-227 trial on advanced NSCLC immunotherapy showed that treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab for 4 years provided robust and long-term OS benefits for patients with advanced NSCLC compared to that for chemotherapy regardless of PD-L1 expression or histological type. However, the incidence of immune-related AEs (irAEs) is significantly higher in combination therapy than in monotherapy and requires further analyzed [135].
The NEOSTAR phase II randomized clinical trial (NCT03158129) found that the combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab resulted in a higher pCR rate (38% vs. 10%), less viable tumor (median 9% vs. 50%), and greater frequencies of effector, tissue-resident memory and effector memory T cells compared to nivolumab alone [136].
In the CheckMate 9LA trial, nivolumab + ipilimumab + two cycles of chemotherapy exhibited durable survival benefit compared with chemotherapy alone in advanced NSCLC patients with or without brain metastases [137]. The POSEIDON trial reported for the first time that first-line durvalumab + tremelimumab + chemotherapy for metastatic NSCLC patients achieved both the PFS and OS endpoints, with an mPFS of 6.2 months and an mOS of 14 months, compared with 4.8 months and 11.7 months for chemotherapy alone [138].
Combination therapy with PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockers also showed benefit in other cancer types. In the CheckMate 648 trial, first-line use of nivolumab combined with ipilimumab in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma showed an OS benefit over chemotherapy alone. In patients with tumor cell PD-L1 expression of 1% or higher, the OS of nivolumab combined with ipilimumab was significantly longer than that of chemotherapy, with mPFS of 13.7 months and 9.1 months, respectively. Overall survival was also significantly longer with nivolumab plus ipilimumab than with chemotherapy in the overall population [139].The data from CheckMate 204 showed that combination nivolumab plus ipilimumab was efficacious in patients with asymptomatic melanoma brain metastases (MBM). The 36-month intracranial PFS was 54 1%, and OS was 71 9%, supporting first-line use of nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Some patients with symptomatic disease also achieve a long-term response with the combination [140]. Dual PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade by balstilimab and zalifrelimab combination showed promising and durable clinical activity in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic cervical cancer who relapsed after platinum-based therapy. Compared with the ORR of 4% to 14% for current second-line therapy, the combination therapy achieved an ORR of 25.6%, and the effect was durable, which is very promising. ORR was higher in PD-L1-positive patients and squamous cell carcinoma patients, reaching 32.8% and 32.6%, respectively [141]. Other important clinical trials that assessed the efficacy of dual PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade include NEOSTAR in NSCLC, CheckMate-214 in renal cell carcinoma, Checkmate-142 in colorectal cancer, CheckMate 067 in Melanoma, CheckMate 040 in hepatocellular carcinoma, CheckMate 743 in malignant pleural mesothelioma and CheckMate 648 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Combination therapy with chemotherapy
Chemotherapy was previously thought to directly or indirectly damage CTLs to inhibit the immune system. Recent studies have shown that chemotherapy not only directly kills cancer cells but also positively regulates the immune system to change the local tumor immune microenvironment. For example, chemotherapy induces immunogenic cell death (ICD) [142], promotes the release of tumor antigens and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and activates DCs to increase cross-presentation of antigens. In addition, chemotherapy can also induce local production of CXCL10, recruit T cells to the tumor bed [134] and enhance the differentiation of antitumor-specific CTLs [143]. Chemotherapy can also reduce the number of immunosuppressive cells, such as myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) [144] and Tregs [145]. In addition to prolonging the efficacy of immunotherapy, tumor shrinkage due to chemotherapy also reduces the risk of drug-resistant clones.
In the past decade, different types of chemotherapeutic drugs have demonstrated the ability to regulate multiple anticancer immune pathways [146]. Given the wide application of chemotherapy in regulating the cancer immune response, combination therapy with ICIs and chemotherapeutic drugs remarkably improves clinical outcomes by enhancing the activity of CTLs. Systemic chemotherapy (SC) has been reported to have a negative immune effect, but local chemotherapy (LC) enhances the immune response. Combination therapy with LC and anti-PD-1 antibodies significantly promoted the immune response and survival rate of glioblastoma. The proliferation of antigen-specific effector T cell clones increases with the upregulated infiltration of cancer-associated DCs in LC-treated mice. In contrast, SC leads to systemic and intratumoral lymphatic exhaustion and reduced immune memory in long-term survivors [147].
Combination therapy with ICB and chemotherapy has been highlighted in the medical field and extensively evaluated in clinical trials, especially for treating advanced NSCLC. To date, combination therapy with ICB and standardized chemotherapy has achieved promising efficacy in NSCLC (KEYNOTE-189, IMpower130), small-cell lung cancer (SCLC, KEYNOTE-407, IMpower133) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC, KEYNOTE-355, IMpassion130).
The advantages of combination therapy with ICIs and chemotherapy have been confirmed [130]. In the clinical trial KEYNOTE-021, the efficacy of combination therapy with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy was much higher than that of chemotherapy alone (55% vs. 29%), and it decreased the risk of disease progression by 47% [148].
Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignancy in females, and TNBC is the subtype with the highest recurrence and mortality rates. Hormone therapy and targeted therapy are ineffective for treating TNBC; it is mainly treated with conventional chemotherapy, but the efficacy is not ideal. Despite great advances in immunotherapy, its application to treatment of TNBC is a huge challenge. The combination of nab-paclitaxel and atezolizumab can effectively prolong PFS in patients with metastatic TNBC. However, the combination of paclitaxel and atezolizumab did not meet the primary endpoint of the clinical trial [149, 150]. This shows that the combination of different chemotherapy drugs with ICB may induce different therapeutic effects in the same type of tumor. A systematic analysis of the TME before and after chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy in TNBC patients would help to clarify the therapeutic mechanism and improve its efficacy. Paclitaxel-based chemotherapy may weaken the core anticancer immune cells. However, the activities of those cells can be significantly enhanced by ICIs, suggesting that combination therapy with paclitaxel and atezolizumab influences the efficacy of anti-PD-L1 antibodies in TNBC patients [151]. The dosage form of chemotherapeutic drugs may also influence the efficacy of combination therapy. Paclitaxel nanomicelles can stimulate the antigen presentation of DCs and activate anticancer immunity. Combination therapy with low-dose paclitaxel nanomicelles and anti-PD-1 antibodies enhanced therapeutic efficacy by inducing CD8+ T cell-dependent anticancer immunity [152].
The combination of immunotherapy with chemotherapy also showed potential advantages in clinical trials compared to immunotherapy alone.
The CheckMate-816 phase III clinical trial showed that nivolumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy can markedly improve event-free survival in patients with resectable NSCLC, meeting its primary endpoint. Nivolumab plus chemotherapy exhibited a statistically significant clinical improvement in event-free survival compared to that of neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone.
In the KEYNOTE-407 (NCT02775435) randomized trial, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy substantially improved OS and PFS in NSCLC patients compared to that of placebo plus chemotherapy [153].
Among the clinical trials on perioperative immunotherapies for NSCLC patients, IMpower010 is the first phase 3 clinical trial demonstrating that immunotherapy can considerably improve DFS in patients with early stage resectable NSCLC compared with best supportive care after adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. Based on this clinical trial, atezolizumab has been approved by the FDA as an adjuvant therapy for stage II-IIIA NSCLC patients whose tumors expressed PD-L1 ≥ 1% after surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy [154].
The NADIM trial showed that combination of neoadjuvant nivolumab with platinum-based chemotherapy is feasible in patients with resectable stage IIIA NSCLC. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy has the potential to change some stage III NSCLC to curable disease [155].
Immunotherapy plus chemotherapy has demonstrated good therapeutic efficacy in unresectable locally advanced NSCLC. Five-year follow-up data from the PACIFIC study showed that the combination of durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy significantly improved OS and PFS in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC. The KEYNOTE-799 trial showed that the combination of pembrolizumab plus chemoradiotherapy has promising anti-tumor activity in patients with unresectable, locally advanced, stage III NSCLC [156]. The results of the GEMSTONE-301 trial showed that consolidation therapy with sugemalimab has superior efficacy and acceptable side effects in patients with stage III NSCLC after concurrent or sequential chemoradiotherapy.
The results of the KEYNOTE-811 trial showed that the addition of anti-PD-1 antibodies to the conventional treatment regimen (trastuzumab plus chemotherapy) for HER2-positive gastrointestinal malignancies improved therapeutic efficacy with a longer duration of survival [157]. In addition, the adverse effects of this new treatment regimen (anti-PD-1 antibody + trastuzumab + chemotherapy) are also completely manageable. Based on these data, this new treatment regimen has been approved by the FDA as a first-line intervention for the treatment of HER2-positive gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas (GEACs).
However, due to the high heterogeneity of the TME, the overall efficacy of immunotherapy on tumors remains low, and the combination of immunotherapy and other therapies does not produce synergistic effects in all patients. A retrospective analysis of three cohorts of patients with advanced GEAC found that in patients with low PD-L1 expression in the tumor, compared with chemotherapy alone, the combination of chemotherapy and PD-L1 inhibitor had no significant effect on OS and PFS [158].The results of the GEMSTONE-302 trial on sugemalimab in the treatment of stage IV NSCLC showed that sugemalimab plus chemotherapy provided significant and clinically meaningful PFS improvement in different subtypes of metastatic NSCLC regardless of PD-L1 expression, with a 52% reduction in the risk of disease progression and death [159]. Additionally, the combination therapy showed some benefit to OS, with a 2-year survival rate of 47.1%.
The CHOICE-01 trial showed that the combination of toripalimab with first-line standard chemotherapy resulted in longer PFS, higher objective response rate (ORR) and longer duration of relief in patients with advanced NSCLC with manageable side effects [160]. In the IMpower132 trial, the addition of atezolizumab to the combination of pemetrexed + platinum complexes showed improved PFS in patients with stage IV nonsquamous NSCLC [161].
Combination therapy with radiotherapy
Radiotherapy is a local treatment that directly kills cancer cells with radiation. In addition, it triggers an antitumor immune response by releasing tumor-associated antigens, inducing type I interferons (IFNs) and changing the immunosuppressive TME. Immunotherapy aims to kill cancer cells and lesions by utilizing the immune system. Notably, the immunogenicity induced by radiotherapy in the body can stimulate the release of cellular contents, thus producing in situ vaccines, which is conducive to the anticancer effect. As a novel therapeutic strategy, combination treatment with radiotherapy and immunotherapy has achieved good clinical outcomes. To date, more than 100 clinical trials have been conducted to analyze the efficacy of combination treatment with radiotherapy (radioconjugates) and immunotherapy.
It has been reported that radiotherapy markedly upregulates the cell adhesion factors ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 on the surface of cancer cells. Combination treatment with radiotherapy and anti-PD-1 antibodies activates tumor-specific T cells in the TME [162]. In addition, combination treatment with radiotherapy and anti-PD-L1 antibodies increases the infiltration of CD8+ T cells and reduces the accumulation of MDSCs and regulatory T cells, thereby improving anti-tumor immunity [163]. Preclinical studies have shown that the addition of immunotherapy can achieve higher local control rates at the same radiation dose [164]. A recent preclinical study demonstrated that radiotherapy facilitates immunotherapy in NSCLC by activating certain types of club cells. These cells subsequently release proteins that alleviate the inflammatory response and enhance the antitumor immune response by effectively inhibiting MDSCs, thereby significantly enhances the therapeutic efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors [165]. The authors compared the efficacy of hypofractionated radiotherapy (different hypofractionated doses of radiotherapy) + PD-1 inhibitor and PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy in mouse NSCLC models and found that the tumor-free survival rate of mice in the combination group was 4 times that of the monotherapy group (40% vs. 10%). In addition, the secreted protein CC10 is thought to be a biomarker for the efficacy of combination treatment with radiotherapy and immunotherapy. Interestingly, the gene Scgb1a1, which encodes CC10, is a biomarker for radiotherapy-activated club cells.
Local radiotherapy (RT) induces an antitumor immune response partially by activation of immune evasion and tissue remodeling processes, e.g., via upregulation of PD-L1 and TGF-β expression. A combination treatment with Bintrafusp alfa (BA) and RT (BART) enhanced tumor infiltrating white blood cells, reprogramed the TME and reduced radiotherapy-induced fibrosis, leading to reconstitution of immune TME and spontaneous lung metastasis regression. Combination treatment with BART may further support clinical transformation by eradicating cancer lesions while preserving normal tissues [166].
Clear clinical evidence indicated that colon cancer patients with mismatch repair defects (MMRd) or those with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) respond well to immunotherapy, but the vast majority of microsatellite-stable (MSS) patients do not benefit from immunotherapy [167]. PDAC is one of the cancers most resistant to immunotherapy. So far, immunotherapy alone has been proved to be ineffective for the treatment of PDAC patients, so it is necessary to carry out combination therapy based on the mechanism of intrinsic resistance to immunotherapy [168]. A phase II trial study found that radiation therapy enhances the response to immunotherapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab in patients with MSS CRC and PDAC [169].
Recent studies have suggested that combination treatment with radiotherapy and anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 antibodies has better therapeutic efficacy compared with that of anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 antibodies monotherapy. Conventional fractionated radiotherapy, hypofractionated radiotherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) have been applied in combination with radiotherapy and immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients, with radiotherapy administered prior to immunotherapy. The PEMBRO-RT clinical trial was the first to explore the efficacy of pembrolizumab as a maintenance therapy following SBRT in advanced lung cancer patients, which double that of the placebo group (41% vs. 19%) with an acceptable tolerance [170]. A phase I clinical trial recruited patients with advanced solid tumors that had progressed after standard therapy and were given nivolumab + urelumab or nivolumab + cabiralizumab concurrently with and after SBRT. The results showed that 2 patients achieved complete response (5%), 7 patients exhibited partial response (17%), 12 patients showed stable disease (29%), 20 patients had disease progression (49%), mPFS and mOS were 3.0 months and 17.0 months, respectively. Patients with elevated serum IL8 prior to SBRT did not respond to treatment. These data demonstrate that SBRT in combination with nivolumab + urelumab or nivolumab + cabiralizumab is feasible in advanced solid tumors with modest antitumor activity and acceptable toxicity [171].
It remains unclear what is the optimal time for combination treatment with ICIs and radiotherapy to maximize the efficacy and minimizing the AEs in different types of cancers, which merits further investigation.
Combination therapy with surgery
Under normal circumstances, tissue damage caused by surgery can trigger an inflammatory response and the transformation to a Th2 immune response, involving enhanced activity of Tregs and expansion of MDSCs. Surgical stress results in dysfunction of NK and T cells. Therefore, the perioperative period is critical to enhance immunity and reduce cancer recurrence. Neoadjuvant therapy can preoperatively shrink cancer lesions, reduce surgical difficulty and resect micrometastases to decrease the risk of recurrence. This therapy may even be beneficial for patients who are unable to be surgically treated. A phase II clinical trial, CheckMate-159 (NCT02259621), showed the safety of preoperative neoadjuvant immunotherapy with nivolumab in NSCLC patients; this treatment was associated with fewer AEs, did not delay surgical treatment and caused a major pathological response in 45% of excised tumors. Intraoperative pathology also confirmed the massive infiltration of T cells and macrophages in cancer sections, suggesting that preoperative ICIs can enhance the antitumor immune response [172]. The clinical trial NADIM (NCT03081689) on stage IIIa lung cancer patients showed that after preoperative neoadjuvant treatment with nivolumab + carboplatin + paclitaxel, the main pathological response (MPR), pathological complete remission (pCR) and partial remission (PR) in imaging examinations achieved 85.36%, 71.4% and 72%, respectively [173].
Taken together, these results indicate that neoadjuvant therapy with ICIs achieves extraordinary outcomes, although its efficacy needs to be validated in multicenter large-scale clinical trials. In addition, imaging-based response was significantly later than pathological response, which is a huge obstacle for the conventional preoperative imaging. At present, multiple clinical trials on neoadjuvant immunotherapies for NSCLC are ongoing, including NCT02938624, NCT03217071, NCT02818920 and NCT02259621, which are expected to provide more data.
Combination therapy with targeted drugs
Combination therapy with EGFR-TKI
EGFR mutations are the most common malignant drivers of lung cancer. NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations express PD-L1 at varying levels, and as a result, the therapeutic efficacy of combination treatment with EGFR inhibitors and ICIs remains controversial [174, 175]. EGFR mutations activate transcription factors such as STAT3, STAT1 and NF-κB, which further translocate into cell nuclei to induce PD-L1 expression. In addition to EGFR, PD-L1 can also be influenced by TP53, KRAS, STK11 and other genes. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) enhance immune presentation by upregulating MHC class I and II molecules [176]. TKIs can enhance CTL-mediated anticancer activity, inhibit apoptosis of T cells and stimulate the production of IFN-γ [177]. Moreover, TKIs reduce the infiltration of Tregs in the TME by accelerating Foxp3 degradation [178]. Due to the immunomodulatory effects of TKIs, combination treatment with TKIs and immunotherapy is considered a promising strategy, although current findings are ambiguous.
However, several clinical trials have suggested that neither ICI monotherapy nor combination treatment with TKIs and ICIs is recommended for lung cancer driven by gene mutations due to the low efficacy, high incidence of AEs and rapid progression of diseases. The efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors in advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR/ALK mutations is generally lower than 5%, while that of targeted therapy is up to 70% [174]. A retrospective study in Japan involving more than 20,000 advanced lung cancer patients with EGFR mutations found that the overall incidence of interstitial pneumonia or immune pneumonia was 4.8%: 4.6% in targeted monotherapy, 6.4% in ICI monotherapy and 25.7% in combination treatment with ICIs and TKIs [179]. A number of clinical trials on TKIs were discontinued due to poor efficacy and severe AEs. A recent clinical trial analyzed immunotherapy efficacy and genetic data in 155 cancer patients. Of these patients, 2 lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR mutations developed drug resistance after chemotherapy and EGFR-TKI medication, and they further suffered rapid progression after switching to the PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab, with significant enlargement of cancer lesions by 53.6% and 125%, respectively [85]. Representative clinical trials using PD-(L)1 inhibitor in EGFR-mutant NSCLC include KEYNOTE-010 and CheckMate 012 for PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy, and NCT02088112, TATTON, NCT01998126 for combination treatment with PD-(L)1 inhibitor and TKIs.
EGFR T790M mutation-negative and KRAS/TP53 comutation NSCLC patients were responsive to combination treatment with targeted therapy and ICIs, which may be attributed to the higher incidence of coexisting high expression levels of PD-L1 (≥ 10%), high percentage of CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) (20% vs. 4%) and lower frequency of FOXP3+ TILs in EGFR T790M mutation-negative NSCLC patients compared to those in EGFR T790M mutation-positive patients [180]. The relatively high TMB in NSCLC patients with KRAS mutations may be a potential explanation of their good response to ICIs, while that in patients carrying other key driver gene mutations (e.g., EGFR, ALK, ROS1) was relatively low [181].
Thus, targeted therapy is still preferred for EGFR-mutant lung cancer patients. The efficacy and safety of combination treatment with ICIs and TKIs in lung cancer patients carrying driver gene mutations remain uncertain and should be further analyzed to identify specific populations that may benefit from it.
Combination therapy with agonists of the STING pathway
MYC binds to the DNMT1 promoter and activates its transcription, thereby inhibiting the cGAS-STING pathway through epigenetic regulation [182]. The cGAS-STING pathway is vital in linking innate immunity and adaptive immunity against cancers [183]. Cancer cells can escape immune surveillance by inhibiting the cGAS-STING pathway [182]. The cytosolic DNA-sensing cGAS-STING pathway has therefore been widely analyzed in immune activation [184, 185].
The surface expression of PD-L1 can be upregulated by targeting the DNA damage response (DDR) protein poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) and checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1) [186]. PARP is a DNA repair enzyme, and its inhibitors (PARPis) significantly upregulate PD-L1 [187], which activates the STING/TBK1/IRF3 pathway, upregulates chemokines such as CXCL10 and CCL5 [94] and induces the activation of CTLs [188]. DDR protein inhibitors also upregulate chemokines such as CXCL10 and CCL5 by activating the STING/TBK1/IRF3 pathway, thereby inducing the activation of CTLs [188].
By promoting the accumulation of cytosolic DNA fragments, PARPis induce antitumor immunity independent of BRCAness by activating the DNA-sensing cGAS-STING pathway and stimulating the production of type I interferons. ICB further enhances the regulatory effects of PARPis [189]. Therefore, PARPis are promising immunomodulators for ICB in cancer treatment.
Remarkable results have been achieved in the maintenance treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer and breast cancer with PARPis combined with ICIs [190–192]. At present, four PARPis have been approved by the FDA, including olaparib, rucaparib, talazoparib and niraparib. SCLC, which is highly sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy, usually express high levels of PARP1, suggesting the important role of DNA damage repair [193]. A phase II randomized clinical trial showed that combination treatment with the PARPi veliparib and standard chemotherapy achieved an ORR of 39% in SCLC patients [194]. Other representative clinical trials combining PARPi and PD-(L)1 inhibitors include TOPACIO/Keynote-162, NCT04681469, NCT04837209, NCT03824704, NCT02873962, NCT03694262, NCT03737643, NCT03642132 and NCT03598270. Currently, the application of PARPis combined with ICIs in the treatment of SCLC is in its infancy, and the specific mechanisms need further investigation. In addition, combination treatment with ICB and inhibitors of DDR, ATR, ATM, CHK1 and MK2 requires in-depth examination.
Combination with other targeted therapy
ICB with anti-G-CSF antibodies and Src inhibitors is capable of blocking neutrophil infiltration, thereby preventing pY696-EZH2-driven brain metastases. EZH2 is upregulated in brain metastases and phosphorylated at tyrosine 696 by Src tyrosine kinase, which changes its binding preference from histone H3 to RNA polymerase II and switches EZH2’s function from a methyltransferase to a transcription factor responsible for upregulating c-JUN. Upregulation of c-JUN further triggers the activation of carcinogenic inflammatory cytokines such as granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), which accelerates brain metastases by recruiting Arg1-positive and PD-L1-positive immunosuppressive neutrophils into the brain [195]. The therapeutic efficacy of combination treatment with anti-G-CSF antibodies or ICB for treating brain metastases has been verified in multiple mouse models.
PGE2 driven by cyclooxygenases is produced by various types of cancers and consequently induces malignant growth by escaping type I interferon and/or T cell-induced eradication of cancer cells. The synergistic effect of cyclooxygenase inhibitors combined with ICB has been proven to significantly induce cancer cell eradication [196].
Combination treatment with ICB and MDSC-targeted therapy in primary and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) presents a strong synergistic response by upregulating interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptor antagonists and inhibiting proinflammatory cytokines released by prostate cancer cells [197].
Reasonable sequencing assists in overcoming innate and acquired drug resistance following combination treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and MAPK-targeted therapy. Clinical benefits obtained from MAPK inhibitors (MAPKis) are linked with prior ICI treatment. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody lead-in before MAPKi treatment not only inhibits melanoma brain metastasis (MBM) but also enhances the survival rate of mice through the potent clonal expansion of T cells in intracranial and extracranial metastasis sites [198].
The KEYNOTE-775 phase III clinical trial showed that patients with advanced endometrial cancer treated with the anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody Pembrolizumab plus the oral multi-receptor TKI Lenvatinib exhibited significant improvements in OS and PFS compared to that seen with chemotherapy alone. The median PFS (7.2 months vs. 3.8 months) and median OS (18.3 months vs. 11.4 months) of the Pembrolizumab/Lenvatinib group were significantly higher than that for the chemotherapy group.
Studies have shown that intermittent PI3K inhibition can attenuate the inherent immunosuppressive activity of Pten-null cancer cells and transform cold tumors into a state of high T cell infiltration, paving the way for successful immune checkpoint therapy [199].
Pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) are molecules central to initiating and maintaining innate immunity and which include TLRs, the RGR family and cGAS-STING; they monitor local infection and/or tissue damage, thereby preventing systemic infection the production of malignant cells. TLRs are the best-studied PRRs and central to the activation of the innate immune response. TLRs agonists are a major direction for anti-tumor immunotherapy. In addition, as TLRs agonists activate innate immunity and are the cornerstone of activation of the adaptive immune response, they have an inherent advantage when combined with anti-PD-(L)1 therapy.
Intratumoral immunotherapy using TLR agonists aims to induce or enhance local tumor inflammation and immunity by mimicking intracellular microorganisms (viruses or bacteria), thereby evoking cytotoxic CD8 + T cell responses, promoting the infiltration of TILs, and stimulating CD4 + T cells to produce effector molecules such as IFN-γ, which in turn enhances the anticancer effects of anti-PD-1 antibodies. In addition, the use of TLR agonists as vaccine adjuvants is also a direction of future development. However, as the systemic administration of TLR agonists may lead to systemic inflammation and treatment-related side effects, current clinical development has focused on local intratumoral injection to localize inflammation to the tumor [200, 201].
Combination therapy with anti-angiogenic drugs
Local hypoxia and low pH levels caused by the abnormal structure and function of tumor blood vessels result in an inhibitory tumor immune microenvironment. Hypoxia triggers the accumulation of MDSCs and accelerates the differentiation of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) into immunosuppressive M2 macrophages [202]. In addition, hypoxia indirectly stimulates the aggravation of Tregs by upregulating CC chemokine ligands. It also upregulates PD-L1 expression in cancer cells and TIM-3 and CTLA4 expression in TAMs, MDSCs and Tregs and indirectly upregulates PD-1 expression in CD8+ T cells, thus inhibiting the activation of immune cells. The increased tumor vascular permeability and decreased lymphatic vessels contribute to the high tumor interstitial fluid pressure (TIFP), which hinders immune effector cells from entering the cancer lesion [203].
Anti-angiogenic drugs reprogram the TME by normalizing immature blood vessels and reducing the activities of immunosuppressive cells such as MDSCs and Tregs [204]. T cells that bind to tumor antigens are more effectively activated through blocking VEGF-induced inhibition of DC maturation. The normalized tumor vascular structure is favorable to the infiltration of CTLs into cancer lesions. However, high-dose antiangiogenic drugs result in excessive vascular pruning, which further exacerbates the hypoxia and acidosis of the TME. In addition, high-dose anti-VGEF drugs can also accelerate the deposition of ECM, local hypoxia and immunosuppression [204]. However, low-dose vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors can reduce the sprouting of immature blood vessels and make them structurally and functionally normal, facilitating the delivery of chemotherapy drugs and promoting the infiltration of killer T cells into tumors [205].
Anti-angiogenesis therapy promotes the intratumoral infiltration of PD-1+ Tregs. There are two types of TAMs. They are derived from monocytes or alveolar cells. The former type relies on CSF-1R, and the latter is sensitive to cisplatin and contributes to the establishment of a TGF-β-rich TME. Dual inhibition of TAMs with CSF1R inhibitors and cisplatin suppresses Tregs, which redirect anti-PD-1 antibodies to CD8+ T cells. As a result, immunotherapy with antiangiogenic drugs exerts an excellent efficacy to eradicate cancer lesions in most cases [206].
Anti-angiogenic therapy can enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy by downregulating immunosuppressive factors during tumor angiogenesis and reversing the de-energized state of endothelial cells [207]. As a malignant ecosystem, the TME is composed of “normal cells” that behave extremely abnormally in addition to cancer cells. Endothelial cells in tumor vasculature are a good example. Despite its abundant vasculature, the tumor is still highly hypoxic due to the abnormal function and structure of these blood vessels. Some multi-target TKIs can simultaneously inhibit fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFR) and platelet-derived growth factor receptors (PDGFR), thereby reducing the activity of cancer-associated fibroblasts [208]. How to combine targeted therapy that brings “normalized microenvironment” with immunotherapy to exert excellent efficacies in cancer patients still needs to be explored.
The clinical trial IMpower150 assessed the efficacy and safety of combination treatment with atezolizumab and bevacizumab/chemotherapy on newly treated stage IV nonsquamous NSCLC. Compared with bevacizumab + carboplatin + paclitaxel, the addition of atezolizumab to the above regimen presents controllable side effects and satisfactory anticancer activity, which provides a novel option for treating nonsquamous NSCLC patients [209]. The phase 1a/b JVDF clinical trial explored the efficacy of ramucirumab combined with pembrolizumab on advanced NSCLC and found it achieved an ORR of 30% with controllable side effects [175]. Taken together, these studies suggest that combination treatment with ICIs and antiangiogenic drugs is a promising strategy, and its efficacy, safety and mechanisms should be further analyzed.
The influence of dietary composition on immunotherapy
The effect of diet composition on immunotherapy has shown broad importance in cancer treatment.
Vitamin C is an electron donor involved in the biochemical reactions of cancer stem cells and the synthesis of collagens and hypoxia-inducible factors, which are important for metastasis as they regulate ECM reprogramming [210]. Specific doses of vitamin C are able to prevent glycolysis in cancer cells as well as the synthesis of nitroso groups, indicating the importance of this vitamin for cancer treatment [210]. Recent studies have shown that vitamin C indirectly enhances the anticancer immune response of anti-PD-L1 antibodies [211]. High-dose vitamin C regulates the infiltration of immune cells in the TME and delays malignant growth in a T cell-dependent manner. Vitamin C not only enhances the cytotoxic activity of adoptively transferred CD8+ T cells but also has promoted the therapeutic efficacy of immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) [212]. The synergistic effect of vitamin C and anti-PD-1 antibodies has been validated in mouse models of lymphoma [211, 213]; it enhances the intratumoral infiltration of CD8+ T lymphocytes, macrophages, DCs and NK cells and upregulates the expression of granzyme B and IL-12 [211].
Stimulator of interferon genes (STING) agonists derived from the microbiota regulate macrophage polarization and NK cell-DC crosstalk by inducing the production of type I interferon (IFN-I) in intratumoral monocytes. Microbiota modulation with a high-fiber diet enhances anticancer the efficacy of ICB by triggering the IFN-I/NK cell/DC cell axis [214].
Ketogenic diet is becoming popular. A recent study reported that energy change induced by a ketogenic diet enhanced the efficacy of anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapy by downregulating PD-L1 expression and upregulating expression of IFN-I and antigen presentation genes. The activated AMPK pathway is responsible for phosphorylating PD-L1 at Ser283, which in turn disrupt its interaction with CMTM4 and degrades PD-L1. Moreover, activated AMPK also represses PRC2 by phosphorylating EZH2 and eventually upregulates the expression of IFN-I and antigen presentation genes [202].
The recently proposed fasting/fasting-mimicking diet reduces the survival of cancer stem cells and delays the progression of TNBC by inhibiting the activity of glucose-dependent protein kinase A. In differentiated tumor cells, the activation of starvation escape signaling pathways can be blocked using certain inhibitors to inhibit tumor progression and improve patient outcomes [215].
Alcohol consumption induces ALDH2 and subsequently upregulates PD-L1 expression in CRC, thereby protecting it from immune surveillance. Therefore, the combination of ALDH2 inhibition and anti-PD-1 therapy enhances the anti-tumor immunity and can be used as a novel strategy to enhance the efficacy of ICB in CRC patients, especially those who consume alcohol [216].
Combination therapy with TIL adoptive cell therapy
Although great progress have been made in utilizing ICB for treating NSCLC, a considerable number of NSCLC patients do not benefit from the treatment. Additionally, its efficacy in combination treatment is far from satisfactory. A relevant study reported that most NSCLC cases relapsed within 12 months of combination treatment with ICB and platinum-based chemotherapy [217]. Notably, some NSCLCs are cold tumors that lack activated tumor-specific T cells, which is a vital reason of primary resistance to ICB. More effective combination treatment regimens are needed to turn the cold advanced NSCLC into hot tumors. Some studies proposed that adoptive cell therapy (ACT) using the patient's own T cells may be ideal for regulating the TME.
A previous study demonstrated that some melanoma patients benefitted from ACT using TILs extracted from tumor tissue from patients [218]; this therapeutic strategy has also been reported to be effective in treating cholangiocarcinoma [219], cervical cancer [220], colorectal cancer [221] and breast cancer [222]. A recent phase 1 clinical trial (NCT03215810) was the first study to analyze the efficacy of TILs combined with nivolumab in advanced NSCLC patients and found that 2 patients achieved sustained complete remission 1.5 years later [223].
Combination with cell therapy
The combination of PD-1 blockade and third-generation anti-GD2-CAR-T cell therapy produced robust responses in melanoma patients [224]. A preclinical study showed that CAR-T cell therapy targeting PD-1-blocking scFv improves the viabilities of tumor-specific T cells. The scFv secreted by CAR-T cells are localized in the tumor, which may prevent the cytotoxicity associated with systemic checkpoint inhibition [225].
Combination with oncolytic virus therapy
Oncolytic virus therapy can increase the activities tumor-specific effector and memory T cells that attack tumor cells [226, 227]. Therefore, oncolytic virus therapy is also considered a type of immunotherapy. Engineered oncolytic viruses recombinantly expressing monoclonal antibodies against the immunosuppressive molecule TIGIT have been constructed in a previous study. These recombinant oncolytic viruses could turn the “cold” TME to “hot” and induce an effective anti-tumor immune response [228]. In addition, combination of these viruses with PD-1 inhibitors or LAG-3 inhibitors resulted in better efficacy and caused tumor regression.
A novel combination of the colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF-1R) inhibitor PLX3397, oncolytic viruses and anti-PD-1 antibodies has been analyzed and significantly controls malignant growth and prolongs the survival of colorectal cancer (CRC) mouse models. Approximately 43% and 82% of CRC mice implanted with CT26 and MC38 cells survived long-term after the triple combination treatment, respectively, which can be attributed to reprogrammed antitumor immunity by enhancing T cell infiltration and CD8+ T cell function [229].
Combination with mechanical immune checkpoint blockade
In addition to traditional immune checkpoints, one study have proposed the concept of mechanical immune checkpoints, which can be used for developing a new generation of targeted therapies, thereby improving the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy [230]. The study found that cancer-cell stiffening could serve as a mechanical immune checkpoint. By depleting the cholesterol level in the plasma membrane of tumor cells to increase the stiffness of cancer cells, the cytotoxicity against stiffened cancer cells can be augmented, and the effect of adoptive T cell therapy can be improved.
Combination with immunomodulatory vaccines
A phase I/II clinical study showed that the combination of nivolumab and IO102/IO103, an investigational vaccine targeting indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase (IDO) and PD-L1, showed an ORR of up to 80% in metastatic melanoma patients [231]. This combination of immunomodulatory vaccine with PD-1 inhibitor significantly reduced tumor burden and increased the PFS to 26 months.
The effects of circadian rhythm on the efficacy of immunotherapy
A recent study found for the first time an evident correlation between the body's biological clock and circadian rhythm and the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. If at least 20% of the dose was infused after 16:30 pm during treatment, the patient's risk of death was doubled, and the 5-year survival rate was also reduced by 20% [232]. Some small-scale clinical studies showed that the immune response activated by the injection of a vaccine between 09:00 and 11:00 a.m. was significantly better than that injected between 15:00 and 17:00 p.m. [233]. Cytokine immunotherapy with recombinant human IL-2 injections also seems to exhibit differences in efficacy at different times of day [234].
Combination with DNA damage response (DDR)-targeted therapy
Immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment and dramatically improved the outcomes in patients with multiple tumor types. However, most patients still do not benefit from these treatments, especially those lacking pre-existing T cell infiltration. Loss of DDR is a major determinant of tumor immunogenicity. Growing evidence supports the following roles of DDR-targeted therapy in tumor immunity [235]: (1) promoting antigenicity by increasing mutability and genomic instability, (2) enhancing adjuvanticity by activating cytosolic immunity and immunogenic cell death and (3) favoring reactogenicity by modulating of factors that control the tumor-immune cell synapse.
Combination with inhibition of M2 macrophages
Histamine from allergic reactions can activate macrophages and inhibit the anti-tumor immune response of T cells, thereby causing resistant to PD-1 inhibitors. HRH1-activated macrophages polarize to an M2-like immunosuppressive phenotype and increased expression of the immune checkpoint VISTA, leading to T cell dysfunction [236]. H1-antihistamines can effectively reverse the immunosuppressive effects of M2 macrophages, thereby restoring T cell activity and the therapeutic efficacy of anti-PD-1/CTLA-4 treatment. Targeting HRH1 and VISTA may identify powerful combination therapies to overcome ICB resistance.
Improvement of ICI efficacy by regulating the expression of PD-L1
In addition to combination treatment with ICIs, other interventions that influence the expression of PD-L1 also affected the efficacies of PD-(L)1 blockade. PD-L1 is upregulated on the surface of many types of cancer cells by IFN-γ and TNF-α, and the regulation involves some endogenous carcinogenic pathways (e.g., the PI3K-AKT and AMPK pathways). Upregulated PD-L1 assists cancer cells in immune escape by negatively regulating antitumor immunity after binding to PD-1 [174]. Altered PD-L1 expression (either through upregulation or downregulation) yields better efficacy in combination with immunotherapy. After downregulation of PD-L1 expression, the inhibited PD-L1/PD-1 axis releases the brake on the immune system. In contrast, upregulated PD-L1 turns cold tumors into hot tumors; therefore, the PD-L1/PD-1 axis might have more power to inhibit the anti-tumor immune system. Targeting this pathway can also produce good therapeutic effects.
Targeting PD-L1 regulation can also produce good therapeutic effects. A multistage sensitive nanocomplex (MUSE) loaded with PD-L1/CD47 multiple targeting CRISPR/Cas9 system was developed for coactivation of both T cells and macrophages-mediated antitumor immune response [237]. The prepared MUSE has some beneficial characteristics, including prolonged blood circulation, rapid response to the MMP-9-rich TME, enhanced lysosomal escape, rapid nuclear localization and high transfection efficiency. With these advantages, MUSE loaded with MT-CRISPR/Cas9 demonstrated effective elimination of PD-L1 and CD47 in tumor cells and activated both innate and adaptive antitumor immunity, thereby significantly improving overall survival in mouse model of melanoma with no detectable off-target effects. This study provides new avenues for the development of anticancer treatment regimens and paves the way for CRISPR-based anticancer therapies in the future.
Signaling pathways for regulating the expression level of PD-L1
Several factors have been found to abnormally enhance PD-L1 expression, including genomic alterations, constitutive activation of oncogenic pathways (e.g., activation of EGFR, mTOR, PI3K, AKT and AMPK pathways and deficiency of PTEN) [175–179] and exogenous factors (e.g., IFN-γ, TGFβ1, TNF-α and IL-17) [85, 179–181].
Factors that regulate the expression level of PD-L1
Many factors affect the expression levels of PD-L1 in the TME and circulation and thus can affect the efficacy of ICB. Here, we categorize these factors as endogenous factors, signaling pathway changes and external factors. Table 3 summarizes representative preclinical studies of influencing factors. From these studies, we can see that the expression of PD-L1 is complexly regulated. In addition, most studies provide strategies to exploit the expression changes of PD-L1 to enhance the therapeutic effect of ICB.
Table 3.
Factors that affect PD-L1 expression
| Modulator | Effect of the modulator on PD-L1 expression | Tumor model | Combined immunotherapy | Mechanism and results | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ketogenic diet | Downregulation | TNBC and CRC | anti-CTLA-4 therapy |
1. Energy stress or ketogenic diet treatment decreases PD-L1 protein abundance 2. AMPK phosphorylates PD-L1 at Ser283 to disrupt its interaction with CMTM4 3. AMPK enhances IFNs and antigen-presentation gene expression via repressing PRC2 4. AMPK agonists or ketogenic diets enhance the efficacy of anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapy |
[202] |
| Metformin | Downregulation | TNBC | anti-CTLA-4 therapy |
1. Metformin enhances antitumor CTL immunity by blocking PD-L1/PD-1 axis 2. Metformin-activated AMPK directly binds to and phosphorylates PD-L1 at S195 3. Abnormal PD-L1 glycosylation induced by pS195 leads to PD-L1 degradation by ERAD 4. Combination therapy with metformin and anti-CTLA4 has a synergistic antitumor effect |
[203] |
| Ruxolitinib | Downregulation | GBM | MV-s-NAP-uPA + anti-PD-1 therapy |
1. Infection with MV-s-NAP led to PD-L1 upregulation and an increase in the levels of MHC class I molecules in glioma cells 2. Intratumoral MV-s-NAP overcomes resistance and synergizes with anti-PD1 blockade 3. Localized MV-s-NAP-uPA infection with systemic anti-PD1 blockade leverages abscopal therapeutic effect 4. Pharmacological inhibition of the JAK1/JAK2 signaling pathway with ruxolitinib improves GBM cure rates by abrogating PD-L1 expression on MDSCs |
[238] |
| mTOR inhibitor (rapamycin) | Downregulation | NSCLC | anti-PD-1 therapy |
1. The activation of AKT and mTOR is associated with PD-L1 expression in NSCLC cell lines that harbor a wide spectrum of driver mutations 2. Inhibition of PI3K, AKT or mTOR decreases PD-L1 expression in NSCLC cell lines. Rapamycin decreases PD-L1 expression in murine lung tumors 3. EGF and IFN-γ increase PD-L1 expression through activation of mTOR 4. The combination of rapamycin and a PD-1 blocking antibody decreases lung tumor growth |
[175] |
| CSN5 inhibitor | Downregulation | TNBC | Anti-CTLA-4 therapy |
1. TNF-α stabilizes cancer cell PD-L1 in response to chronic inflammation 2. Activation of NF-kB by TNF-α induces CSN5 expression that lead to PD-L1 stabilization 3. CSN5 suppresses the activities of T cell via PD-L1 deubiquitination 4. Destabilization of PD-L1 by CSN5 inhibitor curcumin benefits anti-CTLA4 therapy |
[239] |
| Copper-chelating drugs (Dextran–Catechin and TEPA) | Downregulation | Neuroblastoma | Not applicable |
1. Copper transporter 1(CTR-1) and PD-L1 expression in cancer is positively correlated 2. Intracellular Cu levels influence PD-L1 expression in cancer cells 3. Dextran–Catechin and TEPA downregulate PD-L1 expression by inhibiting EGFR and STAT phosphorylation 4. Cu-chelation enhances infiltration of anticancer immune cells and improves the survival of mice with neuroblastoma by downregulating PD-L1 |
[179] |
| Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) | Downregulation | NSCLC | Not applicable |
1. EGCG reduced PD-L1 expression via inhibition of the JAK2/STAT1 pathway 2. EGCG partially restored T cell activity by suppressing PD-L1/PD-1 signaling 3. Oral administration of green tea extract reduced PD-L1-positive cells and inhibited tumor growth in the lungs of NNK treated A/J mice 4. EGCG downregulation EGF-induced PD-L1 through inhibition of Akt phosphorylation in Lu99 cells |
[240] |
| Pin1 inhibitor (ATO, ATRA, Sulfopin) | Upregulation | Pancreatic cancer | Pin1 inhibitor + anti-PD-1 antibody + gemcitabine |
1. Pin1 is overexpressed in both PDAC cells and CAFs and correlates with poor prognosis of patients 2. Pin1 inhibition disrupts the desmoplastic and immunosuppressive TME by affecting CAFs 3. Pin1 inhibition upregulates PD-L1 and ENT1 expression in cancer cells by regulating HIP1R 4. Pin1 inhibition makes aggressive PDAC eradicable by synergizing with immunotherapy and chemotherapy |
[241] |
| N6-methyladen-osine (M6A) Demethylase (ALKBH5) | Upregulation | Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) | ALKBH5 inhibitor + anti-PD-1 therapy |
1. PD-L1 is regulated by ALKBH5, which is a direct target of m6A modification 2. ALKBH5 deficiency promotes PD-L1 mRNA degradation 3. ALKBH5 suppresses anti-tumor T cell immunity in PD-L1-dependent manner 4. ALKBH5 and PD-L1 is positively correlated in clinical ICC specimens |
[242] |
| Peripheral serotonin | Upregulation | CRC and pancreatic cancer | Peripheral serotonin inhibitor + anti-PD-1 therapy |
1. Platelet-derived serotonin enhances growth of murine MC38 and Panc02 tumors 2. Peripheral serotonin impairs accumulation of CD8+ T cells within mouse tumors and dampens the function of CD8+ T cells 3. Serotonin promotes tumor growth in mouse models by enhancing PD-L1 expression 4. Pharmacological inhibition of serotonin dampens growth of tumors and enhances efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy in mice |
[223] |
| EGF/EGFR | EGF/EGFR stimulates PD-L1 glycosylation | TNBC | Drug-conjugated glycosylated-PD-L1(gPD-L1) antibody |
1. N-linked glycosylation is required for interaction between PD-L1 and PD-1 2. EGF/EGFR induces PD-L1 glycosylation via B3GNT3 glycosyltransferase 3. gPD-L1 antibody stimulates PD-L1 internalization 4. gPD-L1-ADC shows potent toxicities to cancer cells and bystander effects |
[243] |
| MYC | Upregulation | Leukemia and lymphomas | Not applicable |
1. MYC regulates the expression of CD47 and PD-L1 2. Suppression of MYC in tumor cells caused reduced mRNA and protein levels of CD47 and PD-L1 3. MYC directly bind to the promoters of the CD47 and PD-L1 |
[94] |
| MUSE for MT-CRISPR/Cas9 (targeting both PD-L1 and CD47) | Downregulation | Melanoma | Not applicable |
1. MUSE synergistically boosting CD8+ T cells and M1 macrophages-mediated adaptive and innate anticancer immunity 2. The MUSE-nano-CRISPR system showed efficient disruption efficiency of PD-L1 and CD47 in vitro and in vivo |
[237] |
| Multispecific Platinum (IV) Complex DNP | Downregulation | Breast cancer (BC) | Not applicable |
1. COX-2 plays an important role in the progression of breast cancer, correlating with the levels of PD-L1 2. DNP reduces the expression of COX-2 and PD-L1 in vitro and in vivo 3. DNP displayed potent antitumor activity and almost no general toxicity in mice bearing TNBC |
[244] |
| Curcumin | Downregulation | HCC | anti-PD-1 therapy |
1. Curcumin reduced P300-induced histone acetylation in the promoter region of TGF-β1, thereby inhibiting PD-L1 expression 2. The combination of curcumin and anti-PD-1 antibodies showed better anticancer effects in vitro and in vivo by activating lymphocytes, inhibiting immune evasion and downregulating TGF-β1 expression |
[245] |
| TAM-targeted biomimetic nano-RBC system | Downregulation | TNBC and CRC | Not applicable |
1. TAM depletion and hypoxia alleviation with TAM-targeted biomimetic nano-RBC system synergistically reprogram the immunosuppressive TME 2. This system downregulates PD-L1 expression of tumor cells, decreases immunosuppressive cytokines and increases the immunostimulatory IFN-γ and boost CTL response |
[246] |
| Sunitinib | Downregulation | Melanoma and NSCLC | Anti-CTLA-4 therapy |
1. Sunitinib modulates the expression of tumor PD-L1 via p62, which binds to PD-L1 and specifically enhances its translocation into autophagic lysosomes for degradation 2. Sunitinib showed synergistic anticancer efficacy with CTLA-4 blockade in immunocompetent mice models of melanoma and NSCLC by increasing tumor-infiltrating T cell activity |
[247] |
TNBC triple negative breast cancer, CRC colorectal cancer, NSCLC non-small-cell lung cancer, BC breast cancer, HCC hepatocellular carcinoma, MV measles virus, B3GNT3 b-1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyl transferase, ADC antibody–drug conjugate, MUSE multistage sensitive nanocomplex, COX-2 cyclooxygenase-2, Erk1/2 extracellular signal-regulated kinases ½, TAM tumor-associated macrophage, nano-RBC nano-red blood cell, IFN interferon, mAb monoclonal antibody
Endogenous factors
Endogenous factors refer to changes in oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes that enhance the expression of PD⁃L1 in cancer cells, such as overexpression of MYC, mutation of the RAS oncogene and activation mutation of the EGFR, which can upregulate PD-L1 expression and thus promote immune escape.
The transcription factor Myc is usually overexpressed in human cancers and regulates many genes associated with cell proliferation and survival [186]. Casey et al. [94] found that Myc directly activated the transcription of CD47 (also known as IAP) and PD-L1, which are involved in innate and adaptive immune escape. CD47 is an antiphagocytic protein that is overexpressed in multiple types of cancers and transmits a “do not eat me” signal to macrophages and DCs [188, 190]. The expression levels of CD47 and PD-L1 are related to anti-angiogenesis and the induction of senescence in T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) cells [190].
The RAS-EGFR pathway is a classic intracellular signaling pathway, and carcinogenic RAS signaling has been shown to regulate the mRNA stability of PD-L1 to promote tumor immune reactivity [95]. In TNBC, EGF-induced interaction between PD-L1 and PD-1 requires the expression of β-1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyl transferase (B3GNT3). Downregulation of B3GNT3 can enhance the antitumor immune effect of cytotoxic T cells. Monoclonal antibodies against glycosylated PD-L1 (gPD-L1) blocked the PD-L1/PD-1 interaction and promoted the internalization and degradation of PD-L1 [243].
Caspase 8 is a caspase involved in cell apoptosis and other cellular behaviors. Its mutation is linked with increased cancer risk, and low expression of Caspase 8 is closely correlated with poor prognosis. Caspase 8 induces the degradation of PD-L1 by upregulating TNFAIP3 (A20) expression, which is an ubiquitin editing enzyme that results in PD-L1 ubiquitination. Caspase 8 is a promising biomarker for predicting the sensitivity to anti-PD-L1/PD-1 immunotherapy [219].
Multispecific platinum (IV) complex DNP exhibits high cytotoxicities and anti-inflammatory properties that are superior to those of NP (another multispecific platinum [IV] complex), cisplatin and naproxen. Cyclooxygenase-2(COX-2) plays an important role in the progression of breast cancer, correlating with the levels of PD-L1. Mechanistic studies revealed that DNP reduces the expression of COX-2 and PD-L1 in vitro and in vivo, suppresses the secretion of prostaglandin, reduces the expression of BRD4 and phosphorylated Erk1/2 and blocks the oncogene c-Myc in breast cancer cells [244].
The targets of sunitinib and inhibitory immune checkpoints and suppressive immune cells were significantly positively correlated. Sunitinib modulates the expression of tumor PD-L1 via p62, which binds to PD-L1 and specifically enhance its translocation into autophagic lysosomes for degradation. Sunitinib showed synergistic anticancer efficacy with CTLA-4 blockade in immunocompetent mice models of melanoma and NSCLC by increasing tumor-infiltrating T cell activity. In anti-PD-1-treated NSCLC patients, higher PD-L1 levels and lower p62 levels was observed in the tumor of responders compared to those of nonresponders [247].
Signaling pathway changes
Multiple oncogenic pathways are involved in the posttranscriptional regulation of PD-L1FGFR2 is highly expressed in CRC and upregulated PD-L1 expression in CRC xenograft in the mice through the JAK/STAT pathway [191]. Loss of function or mutations of the JAK/STAT pathway induce loss of PD-L1 expression in cancer cells, leading to primary and acquired resistance to anti-PD-1 antibodies. In addition, the inactivated IFNGR/JAK/STAT pathway is detected in recurrent patients following ICB [192]. The PTEN/PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is responsible for the transcription of PD-L1. PTEN deficiency or mutations of PIK3CA upregulate PD-L1 expression by activating the AKT/mTOR pathway in glioma, breast cancer and prostate cancer [193]. Interestingly, upregulated PD-L1 expression in a mouse model of lung squamous cell carcinoma accelerated PTEN deficiency [194]. Thus, PTEN has been suggested to interact with PD-L1 in cancer.
Ketogenic diet activates AMPK pathway through inducing energy changes, which enhances the immunotherapy efficacy by downregulating PD-L1 expression and upregulating expression of IFN and antigen presentation genes [202]. Metformin is able to activate AMPK, which directly phosphorylates S195 on PD-L1. S195 phosphorylation impairs glycosylation of PD-L1, leading to its accumulation in the endoplasmic reticulum and the degradation of endoplasmic reticulum-associated proteins (ERAD). In breast cancer patients treated with metformin, activated AMPK and downregulated PD-L1 expression were observed in the tumor tissue [203]. Blocking the inhibitory signal of PD-L1 by metformin can enhance the activity of CTLs against cancer cells. Therefore, ketogenic diet or AMPK agonists are recommended for combination treatment with immunotherapy in cancer patients.
Curcumin inhibits the growth and reduces surface PD-L1 expression in Hep3B cells. Curcumin has a synergistic effect with anti-PD-1 antibodies in slowing Hep3B cell proliferation, activating lymphocytes, inhibiting immune evasion and downregulating TGF-β1 expression. Curcumin inhibits thrombin to reduce P300-induced histone acetylation in the promoter region of TGF-β1, which is known to induce PD-L1 expression. Anti-PD-1 antibodies suppress the binding of PD-1 and PD-L1 to promote anticancer immune activity. Therefore, the combination of curcumin and anti-PD-1 antibodies showed better anticancer effects in vitro. The combination also slowed tumor growth and improved the TME in mouse model of HCC [245].
External factors
Proinflammatory cytokines in the TME inhibit antitumor immunity. IFN-γ and TNF-α are two key factors for triggering immunosuppression and resistance to immunosurveillance of T cells [85, 179–181].
IFN-γ exerts its critical role in cancer through the JAK/STAT1/interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF-1) pathway [204]. The IFN-γ pathway is important in inducing PD-L1 expression in the TME. Endogenous IFN-γ has been reported to upregulate PD-L1 expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma through the IFNAR1/STAT1 pathway, thereby promoting immune escape [209]. JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib inhibits the IFN-γ pathway, which enhances anti-PD-1 efficacy by downregulating PD-L1 expression in MDSCs [238].
Both cancer cells and IFN-γ-induced expression of PD-L1 are dependent on the mTOR pathway. The AKT/mTOR pathway promotes immune escape by driving PD-L1 expression [175]. Therefore, combination treatment with mTOR inhibitors and ICIs may enhance the efficacies of immunotherapies.
NF-κB p65-induced COP9 signalosome 5 (CSN5) is essential for maintaining TNF-α-induced stability of PD-L1 in cancer cells. CSN5 inhibits the ubiquitination and degradation of PD-L1. By downregulating CSN5, curcumin enhances the sensitivity of cancer to anti-CTLA-4 treatment and the function of antitumor T cells by downregulating PD-L1 expression, thus alleviating cancer growth [239].
Intra-tumoral copper levels promoted PD-L1 expression at mRNA and protein levels in tumor cells. Copper chelator downregulates PD-L1 expression by inhibiting the response of cancer cells to proinflammatory cytokines such as IFN-γ, TNF-α and TNF-α/β. Copper-chelating drugs inhibits the expression of PD-L1 by downregulating phosphorylated STAT3, EGFR, AKT and GSK3β and mediates the ubiquitination and degradation of PD-L1 in cancer cells [179]. Dietary composition also affects PD-L1 expression. Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), the most abundant ingredient in green tea, downregulates PD-L1 expression in NSCLC induced by IFN-γ and EGF [240].
TAM depletion and hypoxia alleviation synergistically reprogram the TME. This combination concurrently downregulates PD-L1 expression in tumor cells, decreases the levels of immunosuppressive cytokines such as IL-10 and TGF-β, elevates immunostimulatory IFN-γ, enhances the CTL response and boosts the memory response. TAM-targeted chemoimmunotherapy markedly inhibit cancer metastasis and recurrence [246].
Others
In addition to the abovementioned mechanisms, other mechanisms are involved in the anticancer effects through regulation of PD-L1. Unique proline isomerase Pin1 drives immunosuppressive TME by influencing CAFs and induces lysosomal degradation of PD-L1. Inhibition of the Pin1 simultaneously blocks multiple cancer pathways, disrupts the immunosuppressive TME and upregulates the expression of PD-L1 and gemcitabine transporter ENT1, thus benefiting PDAC patients undergoing immunochemotherapy [241].
N6 methyladenosine (m6A) is an important posttranscriptional regulator. ALKBH5 is an m6A demethylase that coordinates PD-L1 expression in human intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). N6-methyladenosine sequencing (m6A-seq) confirmed that PD-L1 mRNA is the direct target of m6A modification, which is regulated by ALKBH5. ALKBH5 inhibits T cell expansion and cytotoxicity by stabilizing the expression level of PD-L1 in cancer cells [242].
Serotonin [5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)] is an inflammatory mediator associated with the proliferation and invasion of multiple types of cancer cells [248, 249]. Serotonin promoted expression of PD-L1 on cancer cells in vitro via serotonylation and its levels at metastatic sites of abdominal cancer were negatively correlated with the proportion of tumor-infiltrating cytotoxic T cells. Depletion of serotonin cargo enhanced CD8+ T cell infiltration and decreased PD-L1 expression. Pharmacological serotonin depletion enhances anticancer effects of PD-1 inhibitors in mice with colorectal and pancreatic cancer [223].
Preclinical models used in research about PD-1/PD-L1 blockade
The success of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in cancer treatment is inseparable from the foundation laid by preclinical experiments. In preclinical research, the selection of tumor cells and animal models is critical to obtain clinically translational data. Therefore, we will briefly describe the tumor cells and animal tumor models used in preclinical studies on PD-1/PD-L1 interaction. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have high response rates in melanoma relative to other cancer types. Lung cancer is currently the second most common cancer, and some PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have also achieved good therapeutic effects in specific lung cancer patients. Table 4 summarizes the representative cell lines and animal models for PD-1/PD-L1 interaction studies in melanoma and lung cancer. The information in the table indicates that many mouse and human tumor cells were used in in vitro experiments. For studies in mice, most experiments established xenograft models using mouse tumor cells in immunocompetent C57BL/6 mice and BALB/c mice. Other studies used NSG mice with/without human CD34+ human stem cell-engrafted to establish xenograft models of human tumor cells [250, 251]. However, one of the limitations of the xenograft model is that it is too far from the real process of tumorigenesis, and the conclusions obtained in those models cannot be better translated into clinical research. Therefore, the regulation of PD-1/PD-L1 signaling pathway has also been investigated using a transgenic mouse tumor model [252]. Several studies have also established metastasis models by i.v. injection to study the therapeutic effect of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade on tumor metastasis [253, 254]. Most studies have examined the effects of modulating PD-1/PD-L1 in tumor therapy, some of which include the combination of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade with other therapeutic strategies [251, 255].
Table 4.
Representative cell lines and animal models for PD-1/PD-L1 interaction studies in melanoma and lung cancer
| Cancer type | Cancer cell line | Mouse strain | Method for establishing mouse tumor model | Immunotherapy strategy or other treatment | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colon cancer | CT26, SK-MEL-28, B16-F10 | BALB/c mice, NSG mice | Xenograft models | Anti-PD-L1Ab | [270] |
| Lung cancer | A549, LL/2 | C57/BL/6 mice | Intravenous (i.v.) injection | Anti-PD-1Ab | [253] |
| Lung cancer | HCC827 | BALB/c nude mice | Xenograft models | Photothermal therapy | [271] |
| Lung cancer | LLC, | C57BL/6 J mice | Xenograft models | Anti-PD-1mAb, chemotherapy | [272] |
| Lung cancer | CMT167, LL/2, LL/2-luc-M38 | C57BL/6 mice and green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing mice [C57BL/6-Tg(UBC-GFP)30Scha/J] | Orthotopic tumors and subcutaneous tumors | PD-1/PD-L1 antibody | [273] |
| Lung cancer | NCI-H460, A549 | n.a | n.a | PD-L1 regulation with siRNA | [274] |
| Lung cancer | A549, H1299 | n.a | n.a | PD-L1 knockdown with shRNA | [275] |
| Lung cancer | A549, PC-9 | NOD/SCID mice | Patient-derived xenograft mice | PD-L1 knockdown with shRNA | [276] |
| Lung cancer and other cancer types | PC-3,A549, HepG2, SiHa | NU/J male mice, NSG mice | Xenograft models | CAR T cell, oncolytic adenovirus, anti-PD-L1Ab | [251] |
| Lung cancer and other cancer types | LLC, EL4, EL4-OVA, MC-38, MC38-OVA | C57BL/6 mice, BALB/c mice | Xenograft models | Anti-PD-L1Ab, anti-CTLA-4Ab | [277] |
| Lung cancer and other cancer types | NCI-H292, HCC827, OV79, A204 | NSG mice, NOG mice | Xenograft models | Anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody LY3300054 | [278] |
| Lung cancer and other cancer types | LLC, H1944, CALU-6, H2030, H441, H358, Hop62 | C57BL/6J mice, DBA/2 mice | Xenograft models | Anti-PD-1Ab, Targeted therapy | [279] |
| Lung cancer and other cancer types | PC-9, SW480, MC38 | C57BL/6 | Xenograft models | Anti-PD-1Ab, anti-PD-L1Ab | [280] |
| Lung cancer and other cancer types | HT1080, A549, MCF-7, NIH:OVCAR-3, PANC-1 | n.a | n.a | Anti-PD-1Ab | [281] |
| Lung cancer and other cancer types | A375, A549, CAKI-1, H1299, H1975, HCC827, HCT116, KU-19–19, MDA-MB-231, RKO | NSG mice | Xenograft models | Anti-PD-L1Ab | [282] |
| Lung cancer, breast cancer, liver cancer | A549/CDDP, MCF7/ADR, HepG2/ADR | BALB/C nude mice | Xenograft models | Anti-PD-L1Ab | [283] |
| Lung cancer, Melanoma and other cancer types | B16-F10, CT26, 4T1, L12, A549, H1299, PC9 | C57BL/6 mice, BALB/c mice | Xenograft models, intraperitoneally (i.p.) injection | Other treatment | [284] |
| Lung cancer, melanoma and other cancer types | MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, HepG2, A549, A375, HeLa | n.a | n.a | Targeted therapy | [285] |
| Lung cancer, melanoma, colorectal cancer, breast cancer | PC-9, A375, SW116, H1975, 4T1 | n.a | n.a | PD-L1 knockdown with shRNA, SiRNA, plasmid and small molecule drug(PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitor 1, BMS1166) | [286] |
| Lung cancer, melanoma, prostate cancer | HCC827, A549, H2228, PC9, LLC, A375, A431, SK-MEL-5, SK-MEL-28, DU145 | C57BL/6 | Xenograft models | Anti-PD-L1Ab, PD-L1 knockdown with SiRNA | [287] |
| Lung cancer, prostate cancer | NCI-H460, A549, PC-3, NCI-H1299, NCI-H446 | n.a | n.a | PD-L1 detection | [288] |
| Lung cancer, TNBC | A549, MDA-MB-231 | NSG mice | Xenograft models | Anti-CD137 × PD-L1 bispecific Ab, anti-PD-1Ab, anti-PD-L1Ab | [250] |
| Melanoma | A375, A431 | n.a | n.a | Other treatment | [289] |
| Melanoma | B16-F0, B16-F1 | n.a | n.a | Anti-PD-L1Ab | [290] |
| Melanoma | B16-PD-L1 | C57BL/6 mice | Xenograft models | Chemotherapy, other treatment | [255] |
| Melanoma | PD-L1 KO B16-OVA | C57BL/6J mice, hPD-L1 KI mice | Xenograft models | Anti-hPD-L1Ab, anti-CD8Ab, anti-CD4Ab, anti-F4/80Ab | [291] |
| Melanoma | B16-F10 | C57BL/6 mice | Xenograft models | Anti-PD-L1Ab | [292] |
| Melanoma and other cancer types | HepG2-Luc, HepG2, B16 | C57BL/6 mice | Xenograft models | Other treatment | [293] |
| Melanoma and other cancer types | AT-3, 4T1, B16-F10, MC38, | C57BL/6 mice, Pmel-1 TCR-transgenic mice, Batf3 − / − mice, BALB/c − AnNCr mice | Xenograft models, orthotopic model | Anti-PD-L1Ab,anti-CD4Ab, anti-CD8βAb, anti-NK1.1Ab, anti-IL-12p40Ab, anti-IFN-γAb, Targeted therapy, Radiotherapy | [294] |
| Melanoma, lung cancer and other cancer types | B16, LLC, GL261, MC38, Pan02, MethA, CT26 | C57BL/6 N and BALB/c inbred mice | Bilateral xenograft models model | Anti-PD-L1Ab | [295] |
| Melanoma, Cervical cancer, Colorectal cancer | HeLa, HCC827, PC3, NCI-H2023, 4T1, B16.F10, CT26 | BALB/c | Xenograft models | Anti-PD-1Ab, anti-PD-L1Ab, PD1-Fc-OX40L | [296] |
| Melanoma, Colon cancer | MC38-hPD-L1, A375 | NOG mice, human PD-L1/LAG-3 double knock-in mice | Xenograft models | Anti-PD-L1 × LAG-3 bispecific Ab, anti-PD-L1Ab | [252] |
| Melanoma, Colon cancer | B16, CT26 | C57BL/6 mice, BALB/c mice | Genetically modified mouse model, xenograft models, intravenous (i.v.) injection | Anti-PD-1Ab | [297] |
| Melanoma, Colon cancer | B16-F10, CT26 | C57BL/6 mice, BALB/c mice | Xenograft models | Anti-PD-L1 mAb, anti-TRP-1 mAb | [298] |
| NSCLC | HCC827, H1975, PC-9 | BALB/c athymic nude mice | Xenograft models, i.v. injection | PD-L1 knockdown with shRNA | [254] |
| NSCLC | HCC827, H1975 | n.a | n.a | Targeted therapy | [299] |
| NSCLC | A549, H460, H1975 | C57/BL/6 mice | Xenograft models | PD-L1 knockout | [300] |
| NSCLC | A549, NCI-H23, NCI-H460, NCI-H226 | n.a | n.a | PD-L1 quantification on tumor biopsies | [301] |
| PD-L1-positive solid tumors | K562, Jurkat, A549, NCI-H292, SKOV3, HEK293T | B-NDG mice | Xenograft dual-tumor models | CAR T cell, PD-L1 chimeric costimulatory receptor | [302] |
n.a. not applicable, NSCLC non-small-cell lung cancer, Ab antibody
Organoids are tiny, self-organized three dimensional multicellular in vitro tissue construct that displays realistic micro-anatomy and mimics their corresponding in vivo organs. Such cultures have the ability to replicate much of the complexity of an organ and recapitulate certain functions of the represented organ [256]. Reliable methods for predicting treatment response are urgently needed in clinical oncology. Cancer organoids can accurately reproduce important genetic and phenotypic characteristics of the tissue from which they are derived, tumor subtypes, and maintain intra- and inter-tumor heterogeneity, and thus have the potential to be used to predict individualized treatment response [257]. In recent years, many studies have used cancer organoids, especially patient-derived cancer organoids (PDO) to conduct comprehensive studies of PD-1/PD-L1 interaction. Table 5 summarizes this aspect of research conducted in cancer organoids. Most cancer organoids were derived from cancer tissues of patients with gastrointestinal tumors. Organoid/immune cell co-cultures can model tumor-immune microenvironment. Most studies used cancer organoids to mimic the interaction of cancer cells with the human immune system in vitro. When conducting in vivo studies, NSG mice are required. After establishing tumor models in mice by orthotopic transplantation, these cancer organoids can predict the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade as well as other treatment regimens [258–261]. These studies used organoids to investigate PD-1/PD-L1 interaction in various aspects, including testing the anticancer efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors [261–263], analyzing the regulation mechanism of PD-L1 expression [258, 259], finding strategies to enhance the therapeutic effect of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade [260, 264–268], finding new immune checkpoints [269]. Through these studies, we can see that cancer organoids can be used to simulate the immune microenvironment in cancer patients, providing an effective tool for improving the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade.
Table 5.
Published studies that investigated PD-L1/PD-1 signal pathways in cancer organoids
| Cancer type | Source of cancer organoids | Mouse strain receiving organoid | Method for establishing mouse tumor model from organoid | Immunotherapy strategy or other treatment in cancer organoid | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRC | Biopsies from patient | n.a | n.a | Anti-PD-L1 Ab | [264] |
| CRC | Tumor tissue from patient | n.a | n.a | Pembrolizumab, nivolumab, atezolizumab | [262] |
| CRC | Tumor tissues of dMMR CRCs | n.a | n.a | Anti-PD-1 Ab, Anti-DKK1 Ab | [265] |
| Diverse tumor types | Biopsies from patient or mouse tumors (B16-SIY, MC38, A20-OVA) | NSG mice | Injected subcutaneously | Anti-PD-1 Ab, anti-PD-L1 Ab | [261] |
| Gastric cancer | Biopsied or resected tumor tissues | NSG mice | Orthotopic transplantation | Nivolumab, targeted therapy | [258] |
| Gastric cancer | Tumor tissue from patient | NSG mice | Orthotopic transplantation | Nivolumab, targeted therapy | [259] |
| Gastric cancer | human gastric tissue, induced pluripotent stem cells | n.a | n.a | Targeted therapy, nivolumab | [267] |
| Gastric cancer | Gastric glands from normal mouse stomach, cancer tissue of transgenic mouse | n.a | n.a | n.a | [303] |
| Gastric cancer | Tumor tissue from patient | n.a | n.a | Dexamethasone, pembrolizumab, | [268] |
| NSCLC | Biopsies from patient | n.a | n.a | Anti-PD-L1 Ab (atezolizumab, avelumab), targeted therapy | [266] |
| Ovarian cancer | Tumor tissue from patient | n.a | n.a | Bispecific anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody, pembrolizumab, anti-PD-L1 Ab (LY3300054) | [263] |
| Pancreatic cancer, TNBC | Tumor tissue from patient and mouse | n.a | n.a | Anti-PD-1, PD-L1 and TIM3 Ab or NKG2A, TIM3, TIGIT and LAG3 protein | [269] |
| PDAC | Tumor tissue from patient and mouse | NSG mice | Orthotopic transplantation | Anti-PD-1 Ab, targeted therapy, chemotherapy | [260] |
n.a. not applicable, CRC colorectal cancer, NSCLC non-small-cell lung cancer, TNBC triple negative breast cancer, PDAC pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, dMMR different mismatch repair, NSG NOD scid gamma, Ab antibody
Adverse events of ICIs
Although ICIs induce the immune system to fight against cancer cells by activating T cells, they may also help to attack normal cells and thus result in immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The infiltration of immune cells, especially T cells, caused by combination treatment with anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies leads to irAEs.
Some irAEs caused by immunotherapy may be similar to AEs of other therapeutic strategies. However, similar AEs (e.g., diarrhea, enteritis, rashes and itching) can be caused by different mechanisms. The occurrence of irAEs is related to inflammatory responses, especially those mediated by CD8+ T cell activation. Other types of inflammatory cells such as Th17 may also be involved. An immunohistochemistry assay revealed the infiltration of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in damaged skins and organs, and highly activated effector T cells are correlated with the incidence of AEs [29, 304–306]. Generally, irAEs are classified into organ-specific AEs (e.g., colitis, hepatitis and pneumonia), common AEs (e.g., fatigue, diarrhea and rashes) and others related to systemic inflammation. Most irAEs are mild to moderate, but serious or life-threatening irAEs have also occurred, with the highest fatality rates due to AEs in the nervous system and heart [307].
Compared with AEs caused by conventional chemotherapy, irAEs are characterized by delayed onset, long-term duration and different toxicity spectra. Pneumonia and arthralgia are the most common irAEs [29, 307–310]. The incidence of all-grade AEs caused by PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors is lower than that of chemotherapy, and that of grade 3–4 AEs accounts for 7–13% with a relatively high safety [310–312]. Although the incidence of AEs increases in combination treatment, most of them are well tolerated [130, 313]. At present, management strategies for irAEs have been published, and most irAEs can be controlled or even reversed by withdrawal with or without corticosteroid hormone medication [309, 314].
Compared with those of conventional treatment, AEs caused by ICIs mainly affect the skin, endocrine system and lungs [315, 316]. Of the common ICIs, nivolumab is considered the safest, followed by atezolizumab, pembrolizumab, ipilimumab and tremelimumab. Their main AEs are summarized as follows: atezolizumab (hyperthyroidism, nausea and vomiting), nivolumab (endocrine toxicity), pembrolizumab (arthralgia, pneumonia and hepatotoxicity), ipilimumab (skin, gastrointestinal and kidney toxicity) and tremelimumab (rashes, diarrhea and fatigue). Taken together, these findings indicate that nivolumab is the safest ICI that is specifically suitable for lung cancer treatment. In conclusion, irAEs are insidious onset, lack specificity and have a wide spectrum of toxicity. Clinicians need to strengthen the management of irAEs from five aspects: prevention, assessment, examination, treatment and detection, so as to effectively control the disease.
Conclusion
Based on the regulatory mechanisms in T cells, PD-1/PD-L1 blockade has greatly advanced cancer treatment by enhancing the antitumor immune response. Its efficacy in the treatment of melanoma and NSCLC, in particular, is extraordinary, as it achieves long-term remission in a portion of cancer patients without recurrence.
Hot tumors identified by relevant biomarkers, such as T cell infiltration and PD-L1 expression, are closely linked with the clinical benefits of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. In cold tumors, anti-CTLA-4 treatment creates a TME that is favorable to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody treatment by recruiting T cells to target cancer lesions and inducing PD-L1 expression, which provides a rationale for combination therapy. Currently, great effort is directed to identifying predictive biomarkers for ICB.
PD-1/PD-L1 blockade has low response rates in many cancer patients due to innate and acquired resistance. Therefore, based on the resistance mechanism, PD-1/PD-L1 blockade combined with other treatment regimens is an effective strategy to improve anticancer efficacy and reduce side effects. Combining approved PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with other approved treatments may facilitate rapid approval of an effective combination. On the other hand, combining approved/investigational PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with other investigational treatment will lead to many breakthroughs. The expression of PD-L1 in TME also affects the effect of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. This review introduces the factors affecting PD-L1 expression and strategies to regulate its expression. The success of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in cancer therapy relies on extensive preclinical research. The selection of cell lines, animal strains and cancer models is critical for obtaining translational data. Therefore, this review describes the models used in preclinical studies of PD-1/PD-L1 interaction in melanoma and lung cancer. Notably, many studies have utilized cancer organoids to mimic the interaction of cancer cells with the human immune system in vitro, and these organoids are able to accurately replicate key genetic and phenotypic features of patient cancer tissue while maintaining heterogeneity. They can be used to simulate the immune microenvironment of cancer patients and provide an effective tool for improving PD-1/PD-L1 blockade.
PD-1/PD-L1 blockade and its combination therapy can control or even cure malignant diseases in the long term, providing new insights into cancer treatment. Specific agents or interventions can modulate the level of PD-1 and PD-L1, so as to exert a similar effect to ICIs. Owing to the inherent specificity, adaptability and memory of the immune system, researchers are able to continuously target and precisely kill cancer cells. The next goal of preclinical and clinical research is to find reasonable combinations of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade and other treatments to reduce toxic side effects, exert stronger anti-tumor immune responses and precisely kill cancer cells, so that cancer can become a type of curable chronic disease.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- PD-1
Programmed cell death 1 receptor
- PD-L1
Programmed cell death ligand 1
- CTLA-4
Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4
- ICB
Immune checkpoint blockade
- TME
Tumor microenvironment
- ICIs
Immune checkpoint inhibitors
- DCs
Dendritic cells
- IgV
Ig variable-type
- ITIM
Immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motifs
- ITSM
Immunoreceptor tyrosine-based switch motifs
- TCR
T cell receptor
- MHCs
Major histocompatibility complexes
- APC
Antigen presenting cell
- BCR
B cell receptor
- NSCLC
Non-small-cell lung cancer
- RCC
Renal cell carcinoma
- Teff
Effector T cells
- Tm
Memory T cells
- Treg
Regulatory T cells
- Tex
Exhaustion T cells
- ECM
Extracellular matrix
- EMT
Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition
- LCMV
Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus
- TGF-β
Transforming growth factor β
- IFN-α
Interferon-α
- ISRE
Interferon-sensitive responsive element
- CTLs
Cytotoxic lymphocytes
- IFN-γ
Interferon-γ
- TNF-α
Tumor necrosis factor-α
- ILs
Interleukins
- EGFR
Epithelial growth factor receptor
- EGF
Epithelial growth factor
- T-ALL
T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia
- FDA
Food and Drug Administration
- AEs
Adverse events
- ORR
Overall response rate
- mPFS
Median progression-free survival
- irAEs
Immune-related AEs
- ICD
Immunogenic cell death
- DAMPs
Damage-associated molecular patterns
- MDSCs
Myeloid-derived suppressor cells
- SC
Systemic chemotherapy
- LC
Local chemotherapy
- SCLC
Small-cell lung cancer
- TNBC
Triple negative breast cancer
- IFNs
Type I interferons
- SBRT
Stereotactic body radiation therapy
- OS
Overall survival
- BA
Bintrafusp alfa
- BART
Breathing adapted radiotherapy
- MPR
Main pathological response
- pCR
Pathological complete remission
- PR
Partial remission
- TKIs
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors
- TILs
Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes
- DDR
DNA damage response
- PARP
Poly ADP-ribose polymerase
- CHK1
Checkpoint kinase 1
- CRPC
Castration-resistant prostate cancer
- MAPKi
MAPK inhibitors
- MBM
Melanoma brain metastasis
- CSF-1R
Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor
- CRC
Colorectal cancer
- TAMs
Tumor-associated macrophages
- TIFP
Tumor interstitial fluid pressure
- ICT
Immune checkpoint therapy
- STING
Stimulator of interferon genes
- IFN-I
Type I interferon
- ACT
Adoptive cell therapy
- MUSE
Multistage sensitive nanocomplex
- B3GNT3
β-1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyl transferase
- gPD-L1
Glycosylated PD-L1
- COX-2
Cyclooxygenase-2
- Erk1/2
Extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2
- Erk1/2
Extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2
- ERAD
Endoplasmic reticulum-associated proteins
- IRF-1
Interferon regulatory factor 1
- CSN5
COP9 signalosome 5
- EGCG
Epigallocatechin gallate
- PDAC
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
- m6A
N6 methyladenosine
- ICC
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
- 5-HT
5-Hydroxytryptamine
- TPH
Tryptophan hydroxylase
Authors' contributions
MW, QH, YX and HM prepared tables and figures. MW and YX conceptualized and wrote the manuscript. QH, YX, XW and YZ helped with conceptualization of the manuscript. All authors participated in manuscript editing and read and approved the final version.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82173280), the Chengdu Science and Technology Bureau International Cooperation Project (Grant Number: 2019-GH02-00036-HZ) and the Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province (Grant Number: 2021YJ0450).
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Mengling Wu, Qianrui Huang and Yao Xie contributed equally to this work
Contributor Information
Yiwen Zhang, Email: yiwenzhang@scu.edu.cn.
Yong Xia, Email: yxia4@scu.edu.cn.
References
- 1.Ghosh C, Luong G, Sun Y. A snapshot of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway. J Cancer. 2021;12:2735–2746. doi: 10.7150/jca.57334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cao L, Prithviraj P, Shrestha R, Sharma R, Anaka M, Bridle KR, et al. Prognostic role of immune checkpoint regulators in cholangiocarcinoma: a pilot study. J Clin Med. 2021;10:2191. doi: 10.3390/jcm10102191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hossain MA, Liu G, Dai B, Si Y, Yang Q, Wazir J, et al. Reinvigorating exhausted CD8(+) cytotoxic T lymphocytes in the tumor microenvironment and current strategies in cancer immunotherapy. Med Res Rev. 2021;41:156–201. doi: 10.1002/med.21727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pitt JM, Vetizou M, Daillere R, Roberti MP, Yamazaki T, Routy B, et al. Resistance mechanisms to immune-checkpoint blockade in cancer: tumor-intrinsic and -extrinsic factors. Immunity. 2016;44:1255–1269. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sun S, Xu L, Zhang X, Pang L, Long Z, Deng C, et al. Systematic assessment of transcriptomic biomarkers for immune checkpoint blockade response in cancer immunotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13:1639. doi: 10.3390/cancers13071639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sehrawat N, Yadav M, Singh M, Kumar V, Sharma VR, Sharma AK. Probiotics in microbiome ecological balance providing a therapeutic window against cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. 2021;70:24–36. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Budhu S, Giese R, Gupta A, Fitzgerald K, Zappasodi R, Schad S, et al. Targeting phosphatidylserine enhances the anti-tumor response to tumor-directed radiation therapy in a preclinical model of melanoma. Cell Rep. 2021;34:108620. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kim HJ, Cantor H, Cosmopoulos K. Overcoming immune checkpoint blockade resistance via EZH2 inhibition. Trends Immunol. 2020;41:948–963. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2020.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Patel SA, Minn AJ. Combination cancer therapy with immune checkpoint blockade: mechanisms and strategies. Immunity. 2018;48:417–433. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Colom B, Herms A, Hall MWJ, Dentro SC, King C, Sood RK, et al. Mutant clones in normal epithelium outcompete and eliminate emerging tumours. Nature. 2021;598:510–514. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03965-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Baggiolini A, Callahan SJ, Montal E, Weiss JM, Trieu T, Tagore MM, et al. Developmental chromatin programs determine oncogenic competence in melanoma. Science. 2021;373:eabc1048. doi: 10.1126/science.abc1048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ho WJ, Wood LD. Opposing roles of the immune system in tumors. Science. 2021;373:1306–1307. doi: 10.1126/science.abl5376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sato E, Olson SH, Ahn J, Bundy B, Nishikawa H, Qian F, et al. Intraepithelial CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and a high CD8+/regulatory T cell ratio are associated with favorable prognosis in ovarian cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:18538–18543. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509182102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chen DS, Mellman I. Oncology meets immunology: the cancer-immunity cycle. Immunity. 2013;39:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wang M, Liu Y, Cheng Y, Wei Y, Wei X. Immune checkpoint blockade and its combination therapy with small-molecule inhibitors for cancer treatment. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2019;1871:199–224. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2018.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ishida Y, Agata Y, Shibahara K, Honjo T. Induced expression of PD-1, a novel member of the immunoglobulin gene superfamily, upon programmed cell death. EMBO J. 1992;11:3887–3895. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05481.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Filippone A, Lanza M, Mannino D, Raciti G, Colarossi C, Sciacca D, et al. PD1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint as a potential target for preventing brain tumor progression. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 18.Sharpe AH, Wherry EJ, Ahmed R, Freeman GJ. The function of programmed cell death 1 and its ligands in regulating autoimmunity and infection. Nat Immunol. 2007;8:239–245. doi: 10.1038/ni1443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tarhini AA, Zahoor H, Yearley JH, Gibson C, Rahman Z, Dubner R, et al. Tumor associated PD-L1 expression pattern in microscopically tumor positive sentinel lymph nodes in patients with melanoma. J Transl Med. 2015;13:319. doi: 10.1186/s12967-015-0678-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Laurent C, Charmpi K, Gravelle P, Tosolini M, Franchet C, Ysebaert L, et al. Several immune escape patterns in non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Oncoimmunology. 2015;4:e1026530. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2015.1026530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Said EA, Dupuy FP, Trautmann L, Zhang Y, Shi Y, El-Far M, et al. Programmed death-1-induced interleukin-10 production by monocytes impairs CD4+ T cell activation during HIV infection. Nat Med. 2010;16:452–459. doi: 10.1038/nm.2106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zak KM, Grudnik P, Magiera K, Domling A, Dubin G, Holak TA. Structural biology of the immune checkpoint receptor PD-1 and its ligands PD-L1/PD-L2. Structure. 2017;25:1163–1174. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2017.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lee HT, Lee SH, Heo YS. Molecular interactions of antibody drugs targeting PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4 in immuno-oncology. Molecules. 2019;24:1190. doi: 10.3390/molecules24061190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Guzik K, Tomala M, Muszak D, Konieczny M, Hec A, Blaszkiewicz U, et al. Development of the inhibitors that target the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction-a brief look at progress on small molecules, peptides and macrocycles. Molecules. 2019;24:2071. doi: 10.3390/molecules24112071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Francisco LM, Sage PT, Sharpe AH. The PD-1 pathway in tolerance and autoimmunity. Immunol Rev. 2010;236:219–242. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2010.00923.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Shinohara T, Taniwaki M, Ishida Y, Kawaichi M, Honjo T. Structure and chromosomal localization of the human PD-1 gene (PDCD1) Genomics. 1994;23:704–706. doi: 10.1006/geno.1994.1562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Dong H, Zhu G, Tamada K, Chen L. B7–H1, a third member of the B7 family, co-stimulates T-cell proliferation and interleukin-10 secretion. Nat Med. 1999;5:1365–2136. doi: 10.1038/70932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tseng SY, Otsuji M, Gorski K, Huang X, Slansky JE, Pai SI, et al. B7-DC, a new dendritic cell molecule with potent costimulatory properties for T cells. J Exp Med. 2001;193:839–846. doi: 10.1084/jem.193.7.839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Keir ME, Butte MJ, Freeman GJ, Sharpe AH. PD-1 and its ligands in tolerance and immunity. Annu Rev Immunol. 2008;26:677–704. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.26.021607.090331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cai J, Wang D, Zhang G, Guo X. The role of PD-1/PD-L1 axis in treg development and function: implications for cancer immunotherapy. Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:8437–8445. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S221340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jiang X, Wang J, Deng X, Xiong F, Ge J, Xiang B, et al. Role of the tumor microenvironment in PD-L1/PD-1-mediated tumor immune escape. Mol Cancer. 2019;18:10. doi: 10.1186/s12943-018-0928-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hofmeyer KA, Jeon H, Zang X. The PD-1/PD-L1 (B7–H1) pathway in chronic infection-induced cytotoxic T lymphocyte exhaustion. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011;2011:1–9. doi: 10.1155/2011/451694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Patsoukis N, Li L, Sari D, Petkova V, Boussiotis VA. PD-1 increases PTEN phosphatase activity while decreasing PTEN protein stability by inhibiting casein kinase 2. Mol Cell Biol. 2013;33:3091–3098. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00319-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wartewig T, Kurgyis Z, Keppler S, Pechloff K, Hameister E, Ollinger R, et al. PD-1 is a haploinsufficient suppressor of T cell lymphomagenesis. Nature. 2017;552:121–125. doi: 10.1038/nature24649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Seto T, Sam D, Pan M. Mechanisms of primary and secondary resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer. Med Sci (Basel) 2019;7:14. doi: 10.3390/medsci7020014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Jubel JM, Barbati ZR, Burger C, Wirtz DC, Schildberg FA. The role of PD-1 in acute and chronic infection. Front Immunol. 2020;11:487. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Riella LV, Paterson AM, Sharpe AH, Chandraker A. Role of the PD-1 pathway in the immune response. Am J Transplant. 2012;12:2575–2587. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04224.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sakuishi K, Apetoh L, Sullivan JM, Blazar BR, Kuchroo VK, Anderson AC. Targeting Tim-3 and PD-1 pathways to reverse T cell exhaustion and restore anti-tumor immunity. J Exp Med. 2010;207:2187–2194. doi: 10.1084/jem.20100643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sun S, Fei X, Mao Y, Wang X, Garfield DH, Huang O, et al. PD-1(+) immune cell infiltration inversely correlates with survival of operable breast cancer patients. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2014;63:395–406. doi: 10.1007/s00262-014-1519-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Muenst S, Soysal SD, Gao F, Obermann EC, Oertli D, Gillanders WE. The presence of programmed death 1 (PD-1)-positive tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes is associated with poor prognosis in human breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;139:667–676. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2581-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hawkes EA, Grigg A, Chong G. Programmed cell death-1 inhibition in lymphoma. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:e234–e245. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70103-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Velcheti V, Schalper KA, Carvajal DE, Anagnostou VK, Syrigos KN, Sznol M, et al. Programmed death ligand-1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer. Lab Investig. 2014;94:107–116. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2013.130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Boland JM, Kwon ED, Harrington SM, Wampfler JA, Tang H, Yang P, et al. Tumor B7–H1 and B7–H3 expression in squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. Clin Lung Cancer. 2013;14:157–163. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2012.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Spranger S, Spaapen RM, Zha Y, Williams J, Meng Y, Ha TT, et al. Up-regulation of PD-L1, IDO, and T(regs) in the melanoma tumor microenvironment is driven by CD8(+) T cells. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5:200ra116. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Thompson RH, Kuntz SM, Leibovich BC, Dong H, Lohse CM, Webster WS, et al. Tumor B7–H1 is associated with poor prognosis in renal cell carcinoma patients with long-term follow-up. Cancer Res. 2006;66:3381–3385. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-4303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Sfanos KS, Bruno TC, Meeker AK, De Marzo AM, Isaacs WB, Drake CG. Human prostate-infiltrating CD8+ T lymphocytes are oligoclonal and PD-1+ Prostate. 2009;69:1694–1703. doi: 10.1002/pros.21020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Soliman H, Khalil F, Antonia S. PD-L1 expression is increased in a subset of basal type breast cancer cells. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e88557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Liu Y, Carlsson R, Ambjorn M, Hasan M, Badn W, Darabi A, et al. PD-L1 expression by neurons nearby tumors indicates better prognosis in glioblastoma patients. J Neurosci. 2013;33:14231–14245. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5812-12.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Efremova M, Rieder D, Klepsch V, Charoentong P, Finotello F, Hackl H, et al. Targeting immune checkpoints potentiates immunoediting and changes the dynamics of tumor evolution. Nat Commun. 2018;9:32. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02424-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wherry EJ. T cell exhaustion. Nat Immunol. 2011;12:492–499. doi: 10.1038/ni.2035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Chen G, Huang AC, Zhang W, Zhang G, Wu M, Xu W, et al. Exosomal PD-L1 contributes to immunosuppression and is associated with anti-PD-1 response. Nature. 2018;560:382–386. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0392-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zhou J, Mahoney KM, Giobbie-Hurder A, Zhao F, Lee S, Liao X, et al. Soluble PD-L1 as a biomarker in malignant melanoma treated with checkpoint blockade. Cancer Immunol Res. 2017;5:480–492. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-16-0329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Theodoraki M-N, Yerneni SS, Hoffmann TK, Gooding WE, Whiteside TL. Clinical significance of PD-L1+ exosomes in plasma of head and neck cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24:896–905. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Chen DS, Mellman I. Elements of cancer immunity and the cancer-immune set point. Nature. 2017;541:321–330. doi: 10.1038/nature21349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Daskivich TJ, Belldegrun A. Words of wisdom. Re: safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer. Eur Urol. 2015;67:816–817. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Brahmer JR, Tykodi SS, Chow LQ, Hwu WJ, Topalian SL, Hwu P, et al. Safety and activity of anti-PD-L1 antibody in patients with advanced cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2455–2465. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1200694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Topalian SL. Targeting immune checkpoints in cancer therapy. JAMA. 2017;318:1647–1648. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.14155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Liu B, Song Y, Liu D. Recent development in clinical applications of PD-1 and PD-L1 antibodies for cancer immunotherapy. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10:174. doi: 10.1186/s13045-017-0541-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wei F, Wu Y, Tang L, He Y, Shi L, Xiong F, et al. BPIFB1 (LPLUNC1) inhibits migration and invasion of nasopharyngeal carcinoma by interacting with VTN and VIM. Br J Cancer. 2018;118:233–247. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wang JP, Tang YY, Fan CM, Guo C, Zhou YH, Li Z, et al. The role of exosomal non-coding RNAs in cancer metastasis. Oncotarget. 2017;9:12487–12502. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Wang M, Zhao J, Zhang L, Wei F, Lian Y, Wu Y, et al. Role of tumor microenvironment in tumorigenesis. J Cancer. 2017;8:761–773. doi: 10.7150/jca.17648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Shao C, Yang F, Miao S, Liu W, Wang C, Shu Y, et al. Role of hypoxia-induced exosomes in tumor biology. Mol Cancer. 2018;17:120. doi: 10.1186/s12943-018-0869-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Majo S, Auguste P. The Yin and Yang of discoidin domain receptors (DDRs): implications in tumor growth and metastasis development. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13:1725. doi: 10.3390/cancers13071725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Selenko-Gebauer N, Majdic O, Szekeres A, Hofler G, Guthann E, Korthauer U, et al. B7–H1 (programmed death-1 ligand) on dendritic cells is involved in the induction and maintenance of T cell anergy. J Immunol. 2003;170:3637–3644. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.7.3637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Tsushima F, Yao S, Shin T, Flies A, Flies S, Xu H, et al. Interaction between B7–H1 and PD-1 determines initiation and reversal of T-cell anergy. Blood. 2007;110:180–185. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-11-060087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Bengsch B, Johnson AL, Kurachi M, Odorizzi PM, Pauken KE, Attanasio J, et al. Bioenergetic insufficiencies due to metabolic alterations regulated by the inhibitory receptor PD-1 are an early driver of CD8(+) T cell exhaustion. Immunity. 2016;45:358–373. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.07.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Barber DL, Wherry EJ, Masopust D, Zhu B, Allison JP, Sharpe AH, et al. Restoring function in exhausted CD8 T cells during chronic viral infection. Nature. 2006;439:682–687. doi: 10.1038/nature04444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Francisco LM, Salinas VH, Brown KE, Vanguri VK, Freeman GJ, Kuchroo VK, et al. PD-L1 regulates the development, maintenance, and function of induced regulatory T cells. J Exp Med. 2009;206:3015–3029. doi: 10.1084/jem.20090847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Yao S, Wang S, Zhu Y, Luo L, Zhu G, Flies S, et al. PD-1 on dendritic cells impedes innate immunity against bacterial infection. Blood. 2009;113:5811–5818. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-02-203141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Wei SC, Duffy CR, Allison JP. Fundamental mechanisms of immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Cancer Discov. 2018;8:1069–1086. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-0367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Azuma T, Yao S, Zhu G, Flies AS, Flies SJ, Chen L. B7–H1 is a ubiquitous antiapoptotic receptor on cancer cells. Blood. 2008;111:3635–3643. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-11-123141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Kleffel S, Posch C, Barthel SR, Mueller H, Schlapbach C, Guenova E, et al. Melanoma cell-intrinsic PD-1 receptor functions promote tumor growth. Cell. 2015;162:1242–1256. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Rekik R, Belhadj Hmida N, Ben Hmid A, Zamali I, Kammoun N, Ben AM. PD-1 induction through TCR activation is partially regulated by endogenous TGF-beta. Cell Mol Immunol. 2015;12:648–649. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2014.104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Heyner M, Schreier S, Kröger A. The brain-immune cells axis controls tissue specific immunopathology. Cell Mol Immunol. 2019;16:101–103. doi: 10.1038/s41423-018-0176-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Freeman GJ, Long AJ, Iwai Y, Bourque K, Chernova T, Nishimura H, et al. Engagement of the PD-1 immunoinhibitory receptor by a novel B7 family member leads to negative regulation of lymphocyte activation. J Exp Med. 2000;192:1027–1034. doi: 10.1084/jem.192.7.1027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Bally AP, Tang Y, Lee JT, Barwick BG, Martinez R, Evavold BD, et al. Conserved region C functions to regulate PD-1 expression and subsequent CD8 T cell memory. J Immunol. 2017;198:205–217. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1601464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Bommarito D, Hall C, Taams LS, Corrigall VM. Inflammatory cytokines compromise programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)-mediated T cell suppression in inflammatory arthritis through up-regulation of soluble PD-1. Clin Exp Immunol. 2017;188:455–466. doi: 10.1111/cei.12949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Cho HY, Lee SW, Seo SK, Choi IW, Choi I, Lee SW. Interferon-sensitive response element (ISRE) is mainly responsible for IFN-alpha-induced upregulation of programmed death-1 (PD-1) in macrophages. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1779:811–819. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2008.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Terawaki S, Chikuma S, Shibayama S, Hayashi T, Yoshida T, Okazaki T, et al. IFN-alpha directly promotes programmed cell death-1 transcription and limits the duration of T cell-mediated immunity. J Immunol. 2011;186:2772–2779. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Deng X, Xiong F, Li X, Xiang B, Li Z, Wu X, et al. Application of atomic force microscopy in cancer research. J Nanobiotechnol. 2018;16:102. doi: 10.1186/s12951-018-0428-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Weber EW, Parker KR, Sotillo E, Lynn RC, Anbunathan H, Lattin J, et al. Transient rest restores functionality in exhausted CAR-T cells through epigenetic remodeling. Science. 2021;372:eaba1786. doi: 10.1126/science.aba1786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Spaccarelli N, Rook AH. The use of interferons in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Dermatol Clin. 2015;33:731–745. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2015.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Mandai M, Hamanishi J, Abiko K, Matsumura N, Baba T, Konishi I. Dual faces of IFNγ in cancer progression: a role of PD-L1 induction in the determination of pro- and antitumor immunity. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:2329–2334. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Bo H, Fan L, Li J, Liu Z, Zhang S, Shi L, et al. High expression of lncRNA AFAP1-AS1 promotes the progression of colon cancer and predicts poor prognosis. J Cancer. 2018;9:4677–4683. doi: 10.7150/jca.26461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Wang X, Yang L, Huang F, Zhang Q, Liu S, Ma L, et al. Inflammatory cytokines IL-17 and TNF-α up-regulate PD-L1 expression in human prostate and colon cancer cells. Immunol Lett. 2017;184:7–14. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2017.02.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Yee D, Shah KM, Coles MC, Sharp TV, Lagos D. MicroRNA-155 induction via TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma suppresses expression of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) in human primary cells. J Biol Chem. 2017;292:20683–20693. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.809053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Zhang N, Zeng Y, Du W, Zhu J, Shen D, Liu Z, et al. The EGFR pathway is involved in the regulation of PD-L1 expression via the IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signaling pathway in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Oncol. 2016;49:1360–1368. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2016.3632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Shen MJ, Xu LJ, Yang L, Tsai Y, Keng PC, Chen Y, et al. Radiation alters PD-L1/NKG2D ligand levels in lung cancer cells and leads to immune escape from NK cell cytotoxicity via IL-6-MEK/Erk signaling pathway. Oncotarget. 2017;8:80506–80520. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Xu L, Chen X, Shen M, Yang DR, Fang L, Weng G, et al. Inhibition of IL-6-JAK/Stat3 signaling in castration-resistant prostate cancer cells enhances the NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity via alteration of PD-L1/NKG2D ligand levels. Mol Oncol. 2018;12:269–286. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Eriksson E, Milenova I, Wenthe J, Moreno R, Alemany R, Loskog A. IL-6 signaling blockade during CD40-mediated immune activation favors antitumor factors by reducing TGF-beta, collagen type I, and PD-L1/PD-1. J Immunol. 2019;202:787–798. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1800717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Wang Y, Hu J, Wang Y, Ye W, Zhang X, Ju H, et al. EGFR activation induced Snail-dependent EMT and myc-dependent PD-L1 in human salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma cells. Cell Cycle. 2018;17:1457–1470. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2018.1489177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Wang J, Jia Y, Zhao S, Zhang X, Wang X, Han X, et al. BIN1 reverses PD-L1-mediated immune escape by inactivating the c-MYC and EGFR/MAPK signaling pathways in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncogene. 2017;36:6235–6243. doi: 10.1038/onc.2017.217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Li J, Gu J. PD-L1 expression and EGFR status in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors: a meta-analysis. Future Oncol (Lond, Engl) 2019;15:1667–1678. doi: 10.2217/fon-2018-0639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Casey SC, Tong L, Li Y, Do R, Walz S, Fitzgerald KN, et al. MYC regulates the antitumor immune response through CD47 and PD-L1. Science (New York, NY) 2016;352:227–231. doi: 10.1126/science.aac9935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Mazzarella L, Morganti S, Marra A, Trapani D, Tini G, Pelicci P, et al. Master protocols in immuno-oncology: do novel drugs deserve novel designs? J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8:e000475. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2019-000475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Akbay EA, Koyama S, Carretero J, Altabef A, Tchaicha JH, Christensen CL, et al. Activation of the PD-1 pathway contributes to immune escape in EGFR-driven lung tumors. Cancer Discov. 2013;3:1355–1363. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Glorieux C, Xia X, He YQ, Hu Y, Cremer K, Robert A, et al. Regulation of PD-L1 expression in K-ras-driven cancers through ROS-mediated FGFR1 signaling. Redox Biol. 2021;38:101780. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Valadi H, Ekstrom K, Bossios A, Sjostrand M, Lee JJ, Lotvall JO. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9:654–659. doi: 10.1038/ncb1596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Lo Cicero A, Stahl PD, Raposo G. Extracellular vesicles shuffling intercellular messages: for good or for bad. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2015;35:69–77. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2015.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Gu W, Wang L, Wu Y, Liu JP. Undo the brake of tumour immune tolerance with antibodies, peptide mimetics and small molecule compounds targeting PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint at different locations for acceleration of cytotoxic immunity to cancer cells. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2019;46:105–115. doi: 10.1111/1440-1681.13056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Gabrusiewicz K, Li X, Wei J, Hashimoto Y, Marisetty AL, Ott M, et al. Glioblastoma stem cell-derived exosomes induce M2 macrophages and PD-L1 expression on human monocytes. Oncoimmunology. 2018;7:e1412909. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2017.1412909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Haderk F, Schulz R, Iskar M, Cid LL, Worst T, Willmund KV, et al. Tumor-derived exosomes modulate PD-L1 expression in monocytes. Sci Immunol. 2017;2:eaah5509. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aah5509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Latchman Y, Wood CR, Chernova T, Chaudhary D, Borde M, Chernova I, et al. PD-L2 is a second ligand for PD-1 and inhibits T cell activation. Nat Immunol. 2001;2:261–268. doi: 10.1038/85330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Viricel C, Ahmed M, Barakat K. Human PD-1 binds differently to its human ligands: a comprehensive modeling study. J Mol Graph Model. 2015;57:131–142. doi: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2015.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Philips EA, Garcia-Espana A, Tocheva AS, Ahearn IM, Adam KR, Pan R, et al. The structural features that distinguish PD-L2 from PD-L1 emerged in placental mammals. J Biol Chem. 2020;295:4372–4380. doi: 10.1074/jbc.AC119.011747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Yearley JH, Gibson C, Yu N, Moon C, Murphy E, Juco J, et al. PD-L2 expression in human tumors: relevance to anti-PD-1 therapy in cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:3158–3167. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Messal N, Serriari NE, Pastor S, Nunès JA, Olive D. PD-L2 is expressed on activated human T cells and regulates their function. Mol Immunol. 2011;48:2214–2219. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2011.06.436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Zhang Y, Chung Y, Bishop C, Daugherty B, Chute H, Holst P, et al. Regulation of T cell activation and tolerance by PDL2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:11695–11700. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601347103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Liu X, Gao JX, Wen J, Yin L, Li O, Zuo T, et al. B7DC/PDL2 promotes tumor immunity by a PD-1-independent mechanism. J Exp Med. 2003;197:1721–1730. doi: 10.1084/jem.20022089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Saunders PA, Hendrycks VR, Lidinsky WA, Woods ML. PD-L2:PD-1 involvement in T cell proliferation, cytokine production, and integrin-mediated adhesion. Eur J Immunol. 2005;35:3561–3569. doi: 10.1002/eji.200526347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Bardhan K, Anagnostou T, Boussiotis VA. The PD1:PD-L1/2 pathway from discovery to clinical implementation. Front Immunol. 2016;7:550. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Chinai JM, Janakiram M, Chen F, Chen W, Kaplan M, Zang X. New immunotherapies targeting the PD-1 pathway. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2015;36:587–595. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2015.06.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Qin W, Hu L, Zhang X, Jiang S, Li J, Zhang Z, et al. The diverse function of PD-1/PD-L pathway beyond cancer. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2298. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Kane LP, Weiss A. The PI-3 kinase/Akt pathway and T cell activation: pleiotropic pathways downstream of PIP3. Immunol Rev. 2003;192:7–20. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-065x.2003.00008.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Marasco M, Berteotti A, Weyershaeuser J, Thorausch N, Sikorska J, Krausze J, et al. Molecular mechanism of SHP2 activation by PD-1 stimulation. Sci Adv. 2020;6:eaay4458. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aay4458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Chemnitz JM, Parry RV, Nichols KE, June CH, Riley JL. SHP-1 and SHP-2 associate with immunoreceptor tyrosine-based switch motif of programmed death 1 upon primary human T cell stimulation, but only receptor ligation prevents T cell activation. J Immunol. 2004;173:945–954. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.2.945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Marcq E, Pauwels P, van Meerbeeck JP, Smits EL. Targeting immune checkpoints: new opportunity for mesothelioma treatment? Cancer Treat Rev. 2015;41:914–924. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Villanueva MT. Immunotherapy: searching in the immune checkpoint black box. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17:511. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2017.75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Nishino M, Ramaiya NH, Hatabu H, Hodi FS. Monitoring immune-checkpoint blockade: response evaluation and biomarker development. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017;14:655–668. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Galon J, Costes A, Sanchez-Cabo F, Kirilovsky A, Mlecnik B, Lagorce-Pages C, et al. Type, density, and location of immune cells within human colorectal tumors predict clinical outcome. Science. 2006;313:1960–1964. doi: 10.1126/science.1129139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Topalian SL, Hodi FS, Brahmer JR, Gettinger SN, Smith DC, McDermott DF, et al. Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2443–2454. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1200690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Llosa NJ, Cruise M, Tam A, Wicks EC, Hechenbleikner EM, Taube JM, et al. The vigorous immune microenvironment of microsatellite instable colon cancer is balanced by multiple counter-inhibitory checkpoints. Cancer Discov. 2015;5:43–51. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-0863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Kroemer G, Galluzzi L, Zitvogel L, Fridman WH. Colorectal cancer: the first neoplasia found to be under immunosurveillance and the last one to respond to immunotherapy? Oncoimmunology. 2015;4:e1058597. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2015.1058597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Schoenfeld AJ, Hellmann MD. Acquired resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cancer Cell. 2020;37:443–455. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.03.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Gettinger S, Choi J, Hastings K, Truini A, Datar I, Sowell R, et al. Impaired HLA class I antigen processing and presentation as a mechanism of acquired resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer. Cancer Discov. 2017;7:1420–1435. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-17-0593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Gao J, Shi LZ, Zhao H, Chen J, Xiong L, He Q, et al. Loss of IFN-gamma pathway genes in tumor cells as a mechanism of resistance to anti-CTLA-4 therapy. Cell. 2016;167:397–404.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Rosenthal R, Cadieux EL, Salgado R, Bakir MA, Moore DA, Hiley CT, et al. Neoantigen-directed immune escape in lung cancer evolution. Nature. 2019;567:479–485. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1032-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Minn AJ, Wherry EJ. Combination Cancer Therapies With Immune Checkpoint Blockade: Convergence On Interferon Signaling. Cell. 2016;165:272–275. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Zhou X, Yao Z, Bai H, Duan J, Wang Z, Wang X, et al. Treatment-related adverse events of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitor-based combination therapies in clinical trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:1265–1274. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00333-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Gandhi L, Rodriguez-Abreu D, Gadgeel S, Esteban E, Felip E, De Angelis F, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:2078–2092. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Galon J, Bruni D. Approaches to treat immune hot, altered and cold tumours with combination immunotherapies. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18:197–218. doi: 10.1038/s41573-018-0007-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Warner AB, Postow MA. Combination controversies: checkpoint inhibition alone or in combination for the treatment of melanoma? Oncology (Williston Park) 2018;32:228–234. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Overman MJ, Lonardi S, Wong KY, Lenz HJ, Gelsomino F, Aglietta M, et al. Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab Achieves Responses in dMMR/MSI-H Tumors. Cancer Discov. 2018;8:263. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 134.Vacchelli E, Ma Y, Baracco EE, Sistigu A, Enot DP, Pietrocola F, et al. Chemotherapy-induced antitumor immunity requires formyl peptide receptor 1. Science. 2015;350:972–978. doi: 10.1126/science.aad0779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Steven A, Fisher SA, Robinson BW. Immunotherapy for lung cancer. Respirology. 2016;21:821–833. doi: 10.1111/resp.12789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Cascone T, William WN, Jr, Weissferdt A, Leung CH, Lin HY, Pataer A, et al. Neoadjuvant nivolumab or nivolumab plus ipilimumab in operable non-small cell lung cancer: the phase 2 randomized NEOSTAR trial. Nat Med. 2021;27:504–514. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-01224-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Passaro A, Attili I, de Marinis F. CheckMate 9LA: broadening treatment options for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:157–159. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30701-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC), Phase III POSEIDON Trial Shows Positive Results for Patients Taking Chemotherapy Plus Durvalumab and Tremelimumab. https://www.iaslc.org/iaslc-news/press-release/phase-iii-poseidon-trial-shows-positive-resultspatients-taking. 2021. Accessed 19 Feb 2022.
- 139.Doki Y, Ajani JA, Kato K, Xu J, Wyrwicz L, Motoyama S, et al. Nivolumab combination therapy in advanced esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:449–462. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2111380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Tawbi HA, Forsyth PA, Hodi FS, Algazi AP, Hamid O, Lao CD, et al. Long-term outcomes of patients with active melanoma brain metastases treated with combination nivolumab plus ipilimumab (CheckMate 204): final results of an open-label, multicentre, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:1692–1704. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00545-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.O'Malley DM, Neffa M, Monk BJ, Melkadze T, Huang M, Kryzhanivska A, et al. Dual PD-1 and CTLA-4 checkpoint blockade using balstilimab and zalifrelimab combination as second-line treatment for advanced cervical cancer: an open-label phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2021:Jco2102067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 142.Galluzzi L, Buque A, Kepp O, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G. Immunogenic cell death in cancer and infectious disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2017;17:97–111. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Apetoh L, Ghiringhelli F, Tesniere A, Criollo A, Ortiz C, Lidereau R, et al. The interaction between HMGB1 and TLR4 dictates the outcome of anticancer chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Immunol Rev. 2007;220:47–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2007.00573.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Vincent J, Mignot G, Chalmin F, Ladoire S, Bruchard M, Chevriaux A, et al. 5-Fluorouracil selectively kills tumor-associated myeloid-derived suppressor cells resulting in enhanced T cell-dependent antitumor immunity. Cancer Res. 2010;70:3052–3061. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Wang W, Kryczek I, Dostal L, Lin H, Tan L, Zhao L, et al. Effector T cells abrogate stroma-mediated chemoresistance in ovarian cancer. Cell. 2016;165:1092–1105. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Galluzzi L, Buque A, Kepp O, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G. Immunological effects of conventional chemotherapy and targeted anticancer agents. Cancer Cell. 2015;28:690–714. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Mathios D, Kim JE, Mangraviti A, Phallen J, Park CK, Jackson CM, et al. Anti-PD-1 antitumor immunity is enhanced by local and abrogated by systemic chemotherapy in GBM. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8:370ra180. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aag2942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Langer CJ, Gadgeel SM, Borghaei H, Papadimitrakopoulou VA, Patnaik A, Powell SF, et al. Carboplatin and pemetrexed with or without pembrolizumab for advanced, non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised, phase 2 cohort of the open-label KEYNOTE-021 study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:1497–1508. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30498-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Schmid P, Adams S, Rugo HS, Schneeweiss A, Barrios CH, Iwata H, et al. Atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in advanced triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:2108–2121. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1809615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Miles D, Gligorov J, Andre F, Cameron D, Schneeweiss A, Barrios C, et al. Primary results from IMpassion131, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised phase III trial of first-line paclitaxel with or without atezolizumab for unresectable locally advanced/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021;32:994–1004. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.05.801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Zhang Y, Chen H, Mo H, Hu X, Gao R, Zhao Y, et al. Single-cell analyses reveal key immune cell subsets associated with response to PD-L1 blockade in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Cell. 2021;39(12):1578–1593. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2021.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Yang Q, Shi G, Chen X, Lin Y, Cheng L, Jiang Q, et al. Nanomicelle protects the immune activation effects of Paclitaxel and sensitizes tumors to anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy. Theranostics. 2020;10:8382–8399. doi: 10.7150/thno.45391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Paz-Ares L, Vicente D, Tafreshi A, Robinson A, Soto Parra H, Mazieres J, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic squamous NSCLC: protocol-specified final analysis of KEYNOTE-407. J Thorac Oncol. 2020;15:1657–1669. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Felip E, Altorki N, Zhou C, Csőszi T, Vynnychenko I, Goloborodko O, et al. Adjuvant atezolizumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in resected stage IB-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (IMpower010): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet (London, England) 2021;398:1344–1357. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02098-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Provencio M, Nadal E, Insa A, García-Campelo MR, Casal-Rubio J, Dómine M, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and nivolumab in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NADIM): an open-label, multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:1413–1422. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30453-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Jabbour SK, Lee KH, Frost N, Breder V, Kowalski DM, Pollock T, et al. Pembrolizumab plus concurrent chemoradiation therapy in patients with unresectable, locally advanced, stage III non-small cell lung cancer: the phase 2 KEYNOTE-799 nonrandomized trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7:1–9. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.2301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Janjigian YY, Kawazoe A, Yanez P, Li N, Lonardi S, Kolesnik O, et al. The KEYNOTE-811 trial of dual PD-1 and HER2 blockade in HER2-positive gastric cancer. Nature. 2021;600:727–730. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04161-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Zhao JJ, Yap DWT, Chan YH, Tan BKJ, Teo CB, Syn NL, et al. Low programmed death-ligand 1-expressing subgroup outcomes of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors in gastric or esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40:392–402. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Zhou C, Wang Z, Sun Y, Cao L, Ma Z, Wu R, et al. Sugemalimab versus placebo, in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy, as first-line treatment of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (GEMSTONE-302): interim and final analyses of a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 clinical trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23:220–233. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00650-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Mai HQ, Chen QY, Chen D, Hu C, Yang K, Wen J, et al. Publisher Correction: Toripalimab or placebo plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicenter randomized phase 3 trial. Nat Med. 2022;28:214. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01673-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Nishio M, Barlesi F, West H, Ball S, Bordoni R, Cobo M, et al. Atezolizumab plus chemotherapy for first-line treatment of nonsquamous NSCLC: results from the randomized phase 3 IMpower132 trial. J Thorac Oncol. 2021;16:653–664. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.11.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Kim S, Sanders PD, Weihe E, Purcell T, Kato S, Patel S, et al. Analysis of immune correlates using anti-PD-1 checkpoint blockade immunotherapy combined with stereotactic body radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;99:E602-E3. [Google Scholar]
- 163.Gong X, Li X, Jiang T, Xie H, Zhu Z, Zhou F, et al. Combined radiotherapy and anti-PD-L1 antibody synergistically enhances antitumor effect in non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12:1085–1097. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Vanneste BGL, Van Limbergen EJ, Dubois L, Samarska IV, Wieten L, Aarts MJB, et al. Immunotherapy as sensitizer for local radiotherapy. Oncoimmunology. 2020;9:1832760. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2020.1832760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Ban Y, Markowitz GJ, Zou Y, Ramchandani D, Kraynak J, Sheng J, et al. Radiation-activated secretory proteins of Scgb1a1+ club cells increase the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade in lung cancer. Nature Cancer. 2021;2:919–931. doi: 10.1038/s43018-021-00245-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Lan Y, Moustafa M, Knoll M, Xu C, Furkel J, Lazorchak A, et al. Simultaneous targeting of TGF-beta/PD-L1 synergizes with radiotherapy by reprogramming the tumor microenvironment to overcome immune evasion. Cancer Cell. 2021;39:1388–403e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2021.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Ciardiello D, Vitiello PP, Cardone C, Martini G, Troiani T, Martinelli E, et al. Immunotherapy of colorectal cancer: challenges for therapeutic efficacy. Cancer Treat Rev. 2019;76:22–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2019.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Bear AS, Vonderheide RH, O'Hara MH. Challenges and opportunities for pancreatic cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Cell. 2020;38:788–802. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Parikh AR, Szabolcs A, Allen JN, Clark JW, Wo JY, Raabe M, et al. Radiation therapy enhances immunotherapy response in microsatellite stable colorectal and pancreatic adenocarcinoma in a phase II trial. Nat Cancer. 2021;2:1124–1135. doi: 10.1038/s43018-021-00269-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Theelen W, Peulen HMU, Lalezari F, van der Noort V, de Vries JF, Aerts J, et al. Effect of pembrolizumab after stereotactic body radiotherapy vs pembrolizumab alone on tumor response in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: results of the PEMBRO-RT phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5:1276–1282. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Foster CC, Fleming GF, Karrison TG, Liao CY, Desai AV, Moroney JW, et al. Phase I study of stereotactic body radiotherapy plus nivolumab and urelumab or cabiralizumab in advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:5510–5518. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-0810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Forde PM, Chaft JE, Smith KN, Anagnostou V, Cottrell TR, Hellmann MD, et al. Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade in resectable lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1976–1986. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Pircher A, Gamerith G, Amann A, Reinold S, Popper H, Gachter A, et al. Neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy modifies CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells (Treg) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Lung Cancer. 2014;85:81–87. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Yousefi H, Yuan J, Keshavarz-Fathi M, Murphy JF, Rezaei N. Immunotherapy of cancers comes of age. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2017;13:1001–1015. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2017.1366315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Lastwika KJ, Wilson W, 3rd, Li QK, Norris J, Xu H, Ghazarian SR, et al. Control of PD-L1 expression by oncogenic activation of the AKT-mTOR pathway in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res. 2016;76:227–238. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-3362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Song M, Chen D, Lu B, Wang C, Zhang J, Huang L, et al. PTEN loss increases PD-L1 protein expression and affects the correlation between PD-L1 expression and clinical parameters in colorectal cancer. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e65821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Jiang X, Zhou J, Giobbie-Hurder A, Wargo J, Hodi FS. The activation of MAPK in melanoma cells resistant to BRAF inhibition promotes PD-L1 expression that is reversible by MEK and PI3K inhibition. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2013;19:598–609. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Chen N, Fang W, Zhan J, Hong S, Tang Y, Kang S, et al. Upregulation of PD-L1 by EGFR activation mediates the immune escape in EGFR-driven NSCLC: implication for optional immune targeted therapy for NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;10:910–923. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Voli F, Valli E, Lerra L, Kimpton K, Saletta F, Giorgi FM, et al. Intratumoral copper modulates PD-L1 expression and influences tumor immune evasion. Cancer Res. 2020;80:4129–4144. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-0471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Alsuliman A, Colak D, Al-Harazi O, Fitwi H, Tulbah A, Al-Tweigeri T, et al. Bidirectional crosstalk between PD-L1 expression and epithelial to mesenchymal transition: significance in claudin-low breast cancer cells. Mol Cancer. 2015;14:149. doi: 10.1186/s12943-015-0421-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Garcia-Diaz A, Shin DS, Moreno BH, Saco J, Escuin-Ordinas H, Rodriguez GA, et al. Interferon receptor signaling pathways regulating PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression. Cell Rep. 2017;19:1189–1201. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.04.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Wu SY, Xiao Y, Wei JL, Xu XE, Jin X, Hu X, et al. MYC suppresses STING-dependent innate immunity by transcriptionally upregulating DNMT1 in triple-negative breast cancer. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9:e002528. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Kwon J, Bakhoum SF. The cytosolic DNA-sensing cGAS-STING pathway in cancer. Cancer Discov. 2020;10:26–39. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-19-0761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Bakhoum SF, Cantley LC. The multifaceted role of chromosomal instability in cancer and its microenvironment. Cell. 2018;174:1347–1360. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Mackenzie KJ, Carroll P, Martin CA, Murina O, Fluteau A, Simpson DJ, et al. cGAS surveillance of micronuclei links genome instability to innate immunity. Nature. 2017;548:461–465. doi: 10.1038/nature23449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Sen T, Rodriguez BL, Chen L, Corte CMD, Morikawa N, Fujimoto J, et al. Targeting DNA damage response promotes antitumor immunity through STING-mediated T-cell activation in small cell lung cancer. Cancer Discov. 2019;9:646–661. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-1020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Dang CV. MYC on the path to cancer. Cell. 2012;149:22–35. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Jaiswal S, Jamieson CH, Pang WW, Park CY, Chao MP, Majeti R, et al. CD47 is upregulated on circulating hematopoietic stem cells and leukemia cells to avoid phagocytosis. Cell. 2009;138:271–285. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.05.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Shen J, Zhao W, Ju Z, Wang L, Peng Y, Labrie M, et al. PARPi triggers the STING-dependent immune response and enhances the therapeutic efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade independent of BRCAness. Cancer Res. 2019;79:311–319. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-1003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Spranger S, Gajewski TF, Kline J. MYC—a thorn in the side of cancer immunity. Cell Res. 2016;26:639–640. doi: 10.1038/cr.2016.50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Li P, Huang T, Zou Q, Liu D, Wang Y, Tan X, et al. FGFR2 promotes expression of PD-L1 in colorectal cancer via the JAK/STAT3 signaling pathway. J Immunol. 2019;202:3065–3075. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1801199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Kearney CJ, Vervoort SJ, Hogg SJ, Ramsbottom KM, Freeman AJ, Lalaoui N, et al. Tumor immune evasion arises through loss of TNF sensitivity. Sci Immunol. 2018;3:eaar3451. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aar3451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Sumimoto H, Takano A, Teramoto K, Daigo Y. RAS-mitogen-activated protein kinase signal is required for enhanced PD-L1 expression in human lung cancers. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0166626. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Grenda A, Nicos M, Szczyrek M, Krawczyk P, Kucharczyk T, Jarosz B, et al. MicroRNAs aid the assessment of programmed death ligand 1 expression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Oncol Lett. 2019;17:5193–5200. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.10207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Zhang L, Yao J, Wei Y, Zhou Z, Li P, Qu J, et al. Blocking immunosuppressive neutrophils deters pY696-EZH2-driven brain metastases. Sci Transl Med. 2020;12:eaaz5387. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaz5387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Zelenay S, van der Veen AG, Bottcher JP, Snelgrove KJ, Rogers N, Acton SE, et al. Cyclooxygenase-dependent tumor growth through evasion of immunity. Cell. 2015;162:1257–1270. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Lu X, Horner JW, Paul E, Shang X, Troncoso P, Deng P, et al. Effective combinatorial immunotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer. Nature. 2017;543:728–732. doi: 10.1038/nature21676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Wang Y, Liu S, Yang Z, Algazi AP, Lomeli SH, Wang Y, et al. Anti-PD-1/L1 lead-in before MAPK inhibitor combination maximizes antitumor immunity and efficacy. Cancer Cell. 2021;39:1375–1387. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2021.07.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Qi Z, Xu Z, Zhang L, Zou Y, Li J, Yan W, et al. Overcoming resistance to immune checkpoint therapy in PTEN-null prostate cancer by intermittent anti-PI3Kalpha/beta/delta treatment. Nat Commun. 2022;13:182. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27833-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Marabelle A, Tselikas L, de Baere T, Houot R. Intratumoral immunotherapy: using the tumor as the remedy. Ann Oncol. 2017;28:xii33–xii43. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Karapetyan L, Luke JJ, Davar D. Toll-like receptor 9 agonists in cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2020;13:10039–10060. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S247050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Dai X, Bu X, Gao Y, Guo J, Hu J, Jiang C, et al. Energy status dictates PD-L1 protein abundance and anti-tumor immunity to enable checkpoint blockade. Mol Cell. 2021;81:2317–2331. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.03.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Cha JH, Yang WH, Xia W, Wei Y, Chan LC, Lim SO, et al. Metformin promotes antitumor immunity via endoplasmic-reticulum-associated degradation of PD-L1. Mol Cell. 2018;71:606–20e7. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.07.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Li N, Wang J, Zhang N, Zhuang M, Zong Z, Zou J, et al. Cross-talk between TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma signaling in induction of B7–H1 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2018;67:271–283. doi: 10.1007/s00262-017-2086-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Hanna RM, Abdelnour L, Hasnain H, Selamet U, Kurtz I. Intravitreal bevacizumab-induced exacerbation of proteinuria in diabetic nephropathy, and amelioration by switching to ranibizumab. SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2020;8:2050313X20907033. doi: 10.1177/2050313X20907033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Martinez-Usatorre A, Kadioglu E, Boivin G, Cianciaruso C, Guichard A, Torchia B, et al. Overcoming microenvironmental resistance to PD-1 blockade in genetically engineered lung cancer models. Sci Transl Med. 2021;13:eabd1616. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abd1616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Huinen ZR, Huijbers EJM, van Beijnum JR, Nowak-Sliwinska P, Griffioen AW. Anti-angiogenic agents—overcoming tumour endothelial cell anergy and improving immunotherapy outcomes. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021;18:527–540. doi: 10.1038/s41571-021-00496-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Li X, Li Y, Lu W, Chen M, Ye W, Zhang D. The Tumor vessel targeting strategy: a double-edged sword in tumor metastasis. Cells. 2019;8:1602. doi: 10.3390/cells8121602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Ma H, Yang W, Zhang L, Liu S, Zhao M, Zhou G, et al. Interferon-alpha promotes immunosuppression through IFNAR1/STAT1 signalling in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2019;120:317–330. doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0352-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Moghanizadeh-Ashkezari M, Shokrollahi P, Zandi M, Shokrolahi F, Daliri MJ, Kanavi MR, et al. Vitamin C loaded poly(urethane-urea)/ZnAl-LDH aligned scaffolds increase proliferation of corneal keratocytes and up-regulate vimentin secretion. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11:35525–35539. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b07556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Fu J, Wu Z, Liu J, Wu T. Vitamin C: a stem cell promoter in cancer metastasis and immunotherapy. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;131:110588. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Magri A, Germano G, Lorenzato A, Lamba S, Chila R, Montone M, et al. High-dose vitamin C enhances cancer immunotherapy. Sci Transl Med. 2020;12:eaay8707. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aay8707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Luchtel RA, Bhagat T, Pradhan K, Jacobs WR, Jr, Levine M, Verma A, et al. High-dose ascorbic acid synergizes with anti-PD1 in a lymphoma mouse model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117:1666–1677. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1908158117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Lam KC, Araya RE, Huang A, Chen Q, Di Modica M, Rodrigues RR, et al. Microbiota triggers STING-type I IFN-dependent monocyte reprogramming of the tumor microenvironment. Cell. 2021;184:5338–56e21. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.09.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215.Caffa I, Spagnolo V, Vernieri C, Valdemarin F, Becherini P, Wei M, et al. Fasting-mimicking diet and hormone therapy induce breast cancer regression. Nature. 2020;583:620–624. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2502-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Zhang H, Xia Y, Wang F, Luo M, Yang K, Liang S, et al. Aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 mediates alcohol-induced colorectal cancer immune escape through stabilizing PD-L1 expression. Adv Sci (Weinh) 2021;8:2003404. doi: 10.1002/advs.202003404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Addeo A, Banna GL, Metro G, Di Maio M. Chemotherapy in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and literature-based meta-analysis. Front Oncol. 2019;9:264. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Rosenberg SA, Yang JC, Sherry RM, Kammula US, Hughes MS, Phan GQ, et al. Durable complete responses in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic melanoma using T-cell transfer immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:4550–4557. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219.Tran E, Turcotte S, Gros A, Robbins PF, Lu YC, Dudley ME, et al. Cancer immunotherapy based on mutation-specific CD4+ T cells in a patient with epithelial cancer. Science. 2014;344:641–645. doi: 10.1126/science.1251102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220.Stevanovic S, Draper LM, Langhan MM, Campbell TE, Kwong ML, Wunderlich JR, et al. Complete regression of metastatic cervical cancer after treatment with human papillomavirus-targeted tumor-infiltrating T cells. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:1543–1550. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.58.9093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221.Tran E, Robbins PF, Lu YC, Prickett TD, Gartner JJ, Jia L, et al. T-cell transfer therapy targeting mutant KRAS in cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:2255–2262. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1609279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222.Zacharakis N, Chinnasamy H, Black M, Xu H, Lu YC, Zheng Z, et al. Immune recognition of somatic mutations leading to complete durable regression in metastatic breast cancer. Nat Med. 2018;24:724–730. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0040-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223.Creelan BC, Wang C, Teer JK, Toloza EM, Yao J, Kim S, et al. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte treatment for anti-PD-1-resistant metastatic lung cancer: a phase 1 trial. Nat Med. 2021;27:1410–1418. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01462-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224.Gargett T, Yu W, Dotti G, Yvon ES, Christo SN, Hayball JD, et al. GD2-specific CAR T cells undergo potent activation and deletion following antigen encounter but can be protected from activation-induced cell death by PD-1 blockade. Mol Ther. 2016;24:1135–1149. doi: 10.1038/mt.2016.63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 225.Rafiq S, Yeku OO, Jackson HJ, Purdon TJ, van Leeuwen DG, Drakes DJ, et al. Targeted delivery of a PD-1-blocking scFv by CAR-T cells enhances anti-tumor efficacy in vivo. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36:847–856. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226.Chon HJ, Lee WS, Yang H, Kong SJ, Lee NK, Moon ES, et al. Tumor microenvironment remodeling by intratumoral oncolytic vaccinia virus enhances the efficacy of immune-checkpoint blockade. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:1612–1623. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227.Kaufman HL, Kohlhapp FJ, Zloza A. Oncolytic viruses: a new class of immunotherapy drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2015;14:642–662. doi: 10.1038/nrd4663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228.Zuo S, Wei M, Xu T, Kong L, He B, Wang S, et al. An engineered oncolytic vaccinia virus encoding a single-chain variable fragment against TIGIT induces effective antitumor immunity and synergizes with PD-1 or LAG-3 blockade. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9:e002843. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229.Shi G, Yang Q, Zhang Y, Jiang Q, Lin Y, Yang S, et al. Modulating the tumor microenvironment via oncolytic viruses and CSF-1R inhibition synergistically enhances anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Mol Ther. 2019;27:244–260. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.11.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230.Lei K, Kurum A, Kaynak M, Bonati L, Han Y, Cencen V, et al. Cancer-cell stiffening via cholesterol depletion enhances adoptive T-cell immunotherapy. Nat Biomed Eng. 2021;5:1411–1425. doi: 10.1038/s41551-021-00826-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231.Kjeldsen JW, Lorentzen CL, Martinenaite E, Ellebaek E, Donia M, Holmstroem RB, et al. A phase 1/2 trial of an immune-modulatory vaccine against IDO/PD-L1 in combination with nivolumab in metastatic melanoma. Nat Med. 2021;27:2212–2223. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01544-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232.Qian DC, Kleber T, Brammer B, Xu KM, Switchenko JM, Janopaul-Naylor JR, et al. Effect of immunotherapy time-of-day infusion on overall survival among patients with advanced melanoma in the USA (MEMOIR): a propensity score-matched analysis of a single-centre, longitudinal study. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:1777–1786. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00546-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233.Long JE, Drayson MT, Taylor AE, Toellner KM, Lord JM, Phillips AC. Morning vaccination enhances antibody response over afternoon vaccination: a cluster-randomised trial. Vaccine. 2016;34:2679–2685. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.04.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234.Re GL, Santeufemia DA, Re FL, Bortolus R, Doretto P, Marus W, et al. Interleukin-2 chronotherapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results of a phase I-II study. Cytokine. 2020;128:154984. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2019.154984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235.Chabanon RM, Rouanne M, Lord CJ, Soria JC, Pasero P, Postel-Vinay S. Targeting the DNA damage response in immuno-oncology: developments and opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer. 2021;21:701–717. doi: 10.1038/s41568-021-00386-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236.Li H, Xiao Y, Li Q, Yao J, Yuan X, Zhang Y, et al. The allergy mediator histamine confers resistance to immunotherapy in cancer patients via activation of the macrophage histamine receptor H1. Cancer Cell. 2022;40:36–52.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2021.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 237.Wang N, Liu C, Lu Z, Yang W, Li L, Gong S, et al. Multistage sensitive nanoCRISPR enable efficient intracellular disruption of immune checkpoints for robust innate and adaptive immune coactivation. Adv Funct Mat. 2020;30:2004940. [Google Scholar]
- 238.Panagioti E, Kurokawa C, Viker K, Ammayappan A, Anderson SK, Sotiriou S, et al. Immunostimulatory bacterial antigen-armed oncolytic measles virotherapy significantly increases the potency of anti-PD1 checkpoint therapy. J Clin Investig. 2021;131:141614. doi: 10.1172/JCI141614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 239.Lim SO, Li CW, Xia W, Cha JH, Chan LC, Wu Y, et al. Deubiquitination and stabilization of PD-L1 by CSN5. Cancer Cell. 2016;30:925–939. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.10.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 240.Rawangkan A, Wongsirisin P, Namiki K, Iida K, Kobayashi Y, Shimizu Y, et al. Green tea catechin is an alternative immune checkpoint inhibitor that inhibits PD-L1 expression and lung tumor growth. Molecules. 2018;23:2071. doi: 10.3390/molecules23082071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241.Koikawa K, Kibe S, Suizu F, Sekino N, Kim N, Manz TD, et al. Targeting Pin1 renders pancreatic cancer eradicable by synergizing with immunochemotherapy. Cell. 2021;184:4753–71e27. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.07.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 242.Qiu X, Yang S, Wang S, Wu J, Zheng B, Wang K, et al. M(6)A demethylase ALKBH5 regulates PD-L1 expression and tumor immunoenvironment in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 2021;81:4778–4793. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-0468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 243.Li CW, Lim SO, Chung EM, Kim YS, Park AH, Yao J, et al. Eradication of triple-negative breast cancer cells by targeting glycosylated PD-L1. Cancer Cell. 2018;33:187–201e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 244.Jin S, Muhammad N, Sun Y, Tan Y, Yuan H, Song D, et al. Multispecific platinum(IV) complex deters breast cancer via interposing inflammation and immunosuppression as an inhibitor of COX-2 and PD-L1. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2020;59:23313–23321. doi: 10.1002/anie.202011273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 245.Guo L, Li H, Fan T, Ma Y, Wang L. Synergistic efficacy of curcumin and anti-programmed cell death-1 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Life Sci. 2021;279:119359. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 246.Wang Y, Yu J, Luo Z, Shi Q, Liu G, Wu F, et al. Engineering endogenous tumor-associated macrophage-targeted biomimetic nano-RBC to reprogram tumor immunosuppressive microenvironment for enhanced chemo-immunotherapy. Adv Mater. 2021;33:e2103497. doi: 10.1002/adma.202103497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 247.Li H, Kuang X, Liang L, Ye Y, Zhang Y, Li J, et al. The beneficial role of sunitinib in tumor immune surveillance by regulating tumor PD-L1. Adv Sci (Weinh) 2021;8:2001596. doi: 10.1002/advs.202001596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 248.Shajib MS, Khan WI. The role of serotonin and its receptors in activation of immune responses and inflammation. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 2015;213:561–574. doi: 10.1111/apha.12430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 249.Sarrouilhe D, Mesnil M. Serotonin and human cancer: a critical view. Biochimie. 2019;161:46–50. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2018.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 250.Geuijen C, Tacken P, Wang LC, Klooster R, van Loo PF, Zhou J, et al. A human CD137xPD-L1 bispecific antibody promotes anti-tumor immunity via context-dependent T cell costimulation and checkpoint blockade. Nat Commun. 2021;12:4445. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24767-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 251.Tanoue K, Rosewell Shaw A, Watanabe N, Porter C, Rana B, Gottschalk S, et al. Armed oncolytic adenovirus-expressing PD-L1 mini-body enhances antitumor effects of chimeric antigen receptor T cells in solid tumors. Cancer Res. 2017;77:2040–2051. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-1577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 252.Jiang H, Ni H, Zhang P, Guo X, Wu M, Shen H, et al. PD-L1/LAG-3 bispecific antibody enhances tumor-specific immunity. Oncoimmunology. 2021;10:1943180. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2021.1943180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 253.Heim L, Friedrich J, Engelhardt M, Trufa DI, Geppert CI, Rieker RJ, et al. NFATc1 promotes antitumoral effector functions and memory CD8(+) T-cell differentiation during non-small cell lung cancer development. Cancer Res. 2018;78:3619–3633. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-3297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 254.Zhang Y, Zeng Y, Liu T, Du W, Zhu J, Liu Z, et al. The canonical TGF-beta/Smad signalling pathway is involved in PD-L1-induced primary resistance to EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer. Respir Res. 2019;20:164. doi: 10.1186/s12931-019-1137-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 255.Krueger J, Santinon F, Kazanova A, Issa ME, Larrivee B, Kremer R, et al. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) decreases the benefit of anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint blockade in tumor immunotherapy. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0251731. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 256.Simian M, Bissell MJ. Organoids: a historical perspective of thinking in three dimensions. J Cell Biol. 2017;216:31–40. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201610056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 257.Verduin M, Hoeben A, De Ruysscher D, Vooijs M. Patient-derived cancer organoids as predictors of treatment response. Front Oncol. 2021;11:641980. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.641980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 258.Chakrabarti J, Koh V, Steele N, Hawkins J, Ito Y, Merchant JL, et al. Disruption of Her2-induced PD-L1 inhibits tumor cell immune evasion in patient-derived gastric cancer organoids. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13:6158. doi: 10.3390/cancers13246158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 259.Koh V, Chakrabarti J, Torvund M, Steele N, Hawkins JA, Ito Y, et al. Hedgehog transcriptional effector GLI mediates mTOR-induced PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer organoids. Cancer Lett. 2021;518:59–71. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2021.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 260.Holokai L, Chakrabarti J, Lundy J, Croagh D, Adhikary P, Richards SS, et al. Murine- and human-derived autologous organoid/immune cell co-cultures as pre-clinical models of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2020;12:3816. doi: 10.3390/cancers12123816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 261.Neal JT, Li X, Zhu J, Giangarra V, Grzeskowiak CL, Ju J, et al. Organoid modeling of the tumor immune microenvironment. Cell. 2018;175:1972–88.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.11.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 262.Hong HK, Yun NH, Jeong YL, Park J, Doh J, Lee WY, et al. Establishment of patient-derived organotypic tumor spheroid models for tumor microenvironment modeling. Cancer Med. 2021;10:5589–5598. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 263.Wan C, Keany MP, Dong H, Al-Alem LF, Pandya UM, Lazo S, et al. Enhanced efficacy of simultaneous PD-1 and PD-L1 immune checkpoint blockade in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 2021;81:158–173. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-1674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 264.Gao Y, Bi D, Xie R, Li M, Guo J, Liu H, et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum enhances the efficacy of PD-L1 blockade in colorectal cancer. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6:398. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00795-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 265.Sui Q, Liu D, Jiang W, Tang J, Kong L, Han K, et al. Dickkopf 1 impairs the tumor response to PD-1 blockade by inactivating CD8+ T cells in deficient mismatch repair colorectal cancer. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9:e001498. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 266.Della Corte CM, Barra G, Ciaramella V, Di Liello R, Vicidomini G, Zappavigna S, et al. Antitumor activity of dual blockade of PD-L1 and MEK in NSCLC patients derived three-dimensional spheroid cultures. J Exp Clin Cancer Research CR. 2019;38:253. doi: 10.1186/s13046-019-1257-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 267.Holokai L, Chakrabarti J, Broda T, Chang J, Hawkins JA, Sundaram N, et al. Increased programmed death-ligand 1 is an early epithelial cell response to helicobacter pylori infection. PLoS Pathog. 2019;15:e1007468. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 268.Xiang Z, Zhou Z, Song S, Li J, Ji J, Yan R, et al. Dexamethasone suppresses immune evasion by inducing GR/STAT3 mediated downregulation of PD-L1 and IDO1 pathways. Oncogene. 2021;40:5002–5012. doi: 10.1038/s41388-021-01897-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 269.Meng Q, Xie S, Gray GK, Dezfulian MH, Li W, Huang L, et al. Empirical identification and validation of tumor-targeting T cell receptors from circulation using autologous pancreatic tumor organoids. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 270.Maute RL, Gordon SR, Mayer AT, McCracken MN, Natarajan A, Ring NG, et al. Engineering high-affinity PD-1 variants for optimized immunotherapy and immuno-PET imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:E6506–E6514. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1519623112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 271.Liu B, Cao W, Qiao G, Yao S, Pan S, Wang L, et al. Effects of gold nanoprism-assisted human PD-L1 siRNA on both gene down-regulation and photothermal therapy on lung cancer. Acta Biomater. 2019;99:307–319. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.08.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 272.Liu C, Zheng S, Jin R, Wang X, Wang F, Zang R, et al. The superior efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in KRAS-mutant non-small cell lung cancer that correlates with an inflammatory phenotype and increased immunogenicity. Cancer Lett. 2020;470:95–105. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.10.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 273.Li HY, McSharry M, Bullock B, Nguyen TT, Kwak J, Poczobutt JM, et al. The tumor microenvironment regulates sensitivity of murine lung tumors to PD-1/PD-L1 antibody blockade. Cancer Immunol Res. 2017;5:767–777. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-16-0365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 274.Mao R, Tan X, Xiao Y, Wang X, Wei Z, Wang J, et al. Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 promotes expression of programmed cell death-ligand 1 in non-small-cell lung cancer cells. Cancer Sci. 2020;111:3174–3183. doi: 10.1111/cas.14529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 275.Jiang X, Xu Y, Ren H, Jiang J, Wudu M, Wang Q, et al. KLHL18 inhibits the proliferation, migration, and invasion of non-small cell lung cancer by inhibiting PI3K/PD-L1 axis activity. Cell Biosci. 2020;10:139. doi: 10.1186/s13578-020-00499-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 276.Zhang P, Ma Y, Lv C, Huang M, Li M, Dong B, et al. Upregulation of programmed cell death ligand 1 promotes resistance response in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer Sci. 2016;107:1563–1571. doi: 10.1111/cas.13072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 277.Lim EL, Cugliandolo FM, Rosner DR, Gyori D, Roychoudhuri R, Okkenhaug K. Phosphoinositide 3-kinase delta inhibition promotes antitumor responses but antagonizes checkpoint inhibitors. JCI Insight. 2018;3(11):e120626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 278.Li Y, Carpenito C, Wang G, Surguladze D, Forest A, Malabunga M, et al. Discovery and preclinical characterization of the antagonist anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody LY3300054. J Immunother Cancer. 2018;6:31. doi: 10.1186/s40425-018-0329-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 279.Suresh S, Chen B, Zhu J, Golden RJ, Lu C, Evers BM, et al. eIF5B drives integrated stress response-dependent translation of PD-L1 in lung cancer. Nat Cancer. 2020;1:533–545. doi: 10.1038/s43018-020-0056-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 280.Gong B, Kiyotani K, Sakata S, Nagano S, Kumehara S, Baba S, et al. Secreted PD-L1 variants mediate resistance to PD-L1 blockade therapy in non-small cell lung cancer. J Exp Med. 2019;216:982–1000. doi: 10.1084/jem.20180870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 281.Teruya K, Kusumoto Y, Eto H, Nakamichi N, Shirahata S. Selective suppression of cell growth and programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression in HT1080 fibrosarcoma cells by low molecular weight fucoidan extract. Mar Drugs. 2019;17:421. doi: 10.3390/md17070421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 282.Rios-Doria J, Stevens C, Maddage C, Lasky K, Koblish HK. Characterization of human cancer xenografts in humanized mice. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8:e000416. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2019-000416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 283.Wang H, Fu C, Du J, Wang H, He R, Yin X, et al. Enhanced histone H3 acetylation of the PD-L1 promoter via the COP1/c-Jun/HDAC3 axis is required for PD-L1 expression in drug-resistant cancer cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res CR. 2020;39:29. doi: 10.1186/s13046-020-1536-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 284.Chen MC, Pangilinan CR, Lee CH. Salmonella breaks tumor immune tolerance by downregulating tumor programmed death-ligand 1 expression. Cancers (Basel) 2019;12:57. doi: 10.3390/cancers12010057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 285.Zheng Y, Fang YC, Li J. PD-L1 expression levels on tumor cells affect their immunosuppressive activity. Oncol Lett. 2019;18:5399–5407. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.10903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 286.Chen FF, Li Z, Ma D, Yu Q. Small-molecule PD-L1 inhibitor BMS1166 abrogates the function of PD-L1 by blocking its ER export. Oncoimmunology. 2020;9:1831153. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2020.1831153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 287.Lu S, Sun Z, Hu W, Yin S, Zhao C, Hu H. PD-L1 positively regulates MET phosphorylation through inhibiting PTP1B. Cancer Sci. 2021;112:1878–1887. doi: 10.1111/cas.14844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 288.Fujisawa T, Tsuta K, Yanagimoto H, Yagi M, Suzuki K, Nishikawa K, et al. Quantitative immunohistochemical assay with novel digital immunostaining for comparisons of PD-L1 antibodies. Mol Clin Oncol. 2019;10:391–396. doi: 10.3892/mco.2019.1801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 289.Clemen R, Heirman P, Lin A, Bogaerts A, Bekeschus S. Physical plasma-treated skin cancer cells amplify tumor cytotoxicity of human natural killer (NK) cells. Cancers (Basel) 2020;12:3575. doi: 10.3390/cancers12123575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 290.Zheng F, Dang J, Zha H, Zhang B, Lin M, Cheng F. PD-L1 promotes self-renewal and tumorigenicity of malignant melanoma initiating cells. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:1293201. doi: 10.1155/2017/1293201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 291.Zhang X, Cheng C, Hou J, Qi X, Wang X, Han P, et al. Distinct contribution of PD-L1 suppression by spatial expression of PD-L1 on tumor and non-tumor cells. Cell Mol Immunol. 2019;16:392–400. doi: 10.1038/s41423-018-0021-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 292.Chen G, Kim YH, Li H, Luo H, Liu DL, Zhang ZJ, et al. PD-L1 inhibits acute and chronic pain by suppressing nociceptive neuron activity via PD-1. Nat Neurosci. 2017;20:917–926. doi: 10.1038/nn.4571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 293.Wang C, Shi X, Song H, Zhang C, Wang X, Huang P, et al. Polymer-lipid hybrid nanovesicle-enabled combination of immunogenic chemotherapy and RNAi-mediated PD-L1 knockdown elicits antitumor immunity against melanoma. Biomaterials. 2021;268:120579. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 294.Oba T, Long MD, Keler T, Marsh HC, Minderman H, Abrams SI, et al. Overcoming primary and acquired resistance to anti-PD-L1 therapy by induction and activation of tumor-residing cDC1s. Nat Commun. 2020;11:5415. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19192-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 295.Kumar A, Chamoto K, Chowdhury PS, Honjo T. Tumors attenuating the mitochondrial activity in T cells escape from PD-1 blockade therapy. Elife. 2020;9:e52330. doi: 10.7554/eLife.52330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 296.Fromm G, de Silva S, Johannes K, Patel A, Hornblower JC, Schreiber TH. Agonist redirected checkpoint, PD1-Fc-OX40L, for cancer immunotherapy. J Immunother Cancer. 2018;6:149. doi: 10.1186/s40425-018-0454-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 297.Iwai Y, Terawaki S, Honjo T. PD-1 blockade inhibits hematogenous spread of poorly immunogenic tumor cells by enhanced recruitment of effector T cells. Int Immunol. 2005;17:133–144. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxh194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 298.Sockolosky JT, Dougan M, Ingram JR, Ho CC, Kauke MJ, Almo SC, et al. Durable antitumor responses to CD47 blockade require adaptive immune stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:E2646–E2654. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1604268113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 299.Jiang L, Guo F, Liu X, Li X, Qin Q, Shu P, et al. Continuous targeted kinase inhibitors treatment induces upregulation of PD-L1 in resistant NSCLC. Sci Rep. 2019;9:3705. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-38068-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 300.Kim DH, Kim H, Choi YJ, Kim SY, Lee JE, Sung KJ, et al. Exosomal PD-L1 promotes tumor growth through immune escape in non-small cell lung cancer. Exp Mol Med. 2019;51:1–13. doi: 10.1038/s12276-019-0295-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 301.Hinterleitner C, Strahle J, Malenke E, Hinterleitner M, Henning M, Seehawer M, et al. Platelet PD-L1 reflects collective intratumoral PD-L1 expression and predicts immunotherapy response in non-small cell lung cancer. Nat Commun. 2021;12:7005. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27303-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 302.Liao Q, Mao Y, He H, Ding X, Zhang X, Xu J. PD-L1 chimeric costimulatory receptor improves the efficacy of CAR-T cells for PD-L1-positive solid tumors and reduces toxicity in vivo. Biomarker Res. 2020;8:57. doi: 10.1186/s40364-020-00237-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 303.Chakrabarti J, Holokai L, Syu L, Steele N, Chang J, Dlugosz A, et al. Mouse-derived gastric organoid and immune cell co-culture for the study of the tumor microenvironment. Methods Mol Biol (Clifton, NJ) 2018;1817:157–168. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8600-2_16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 304.Waterhouse P, Penninger JM, Timms E, Wakeham A, Shahinian A, Lee KP, et al. Lymphoproliferative disorders with early lethality in mice deficient in Ctla-4. Science (New York, NY) 1995;270:985–988. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5238.985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 305.Tivol EA, Borriello F, Schweitzer AN, Lynch WP, Bluestone JA, Sharpe AH. Loss of CTLA-4 leads to massive lymphoproliferation and fatal multiorgan tissue destruction, revealing a critical negative regulatory role of CTLA-4. Immunity. 1995;3:541–547. doi: 10.1016/1074-7613(95)90125-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 306.Hodi FS, Mihm MC, Soiffer RJ, Haluska FG, Butler M, Seiden MV, et al. Biologic activity of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 antibody blockade in previously vaccinated metastatic melanoma and ovarian carcinoma patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:4712–4717. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0830997100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 307.Champiat S, Lambotte O, Barreau E, Belkhir R, Berdelou A, Carbonnel F, et al. Management of immune checkpoint blockade dysimmune toxicities: a collaborative position paper. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol. 2016;27:559–574. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 308.Eigentler TK, Hassel JC, Berking C, Aberle J, Bachmann O, Grunwald V, et al. Diagnosis, monitoring and management of immune-related adverse drug reactions of anti-PD-1 antibody therapy. Cancer Treat Rev. 2016;45:7–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 309.Haanen J, Carbonnel F, Robert C, Kerr KM, Peters S, Larkin J, et al. Management of toxicities from immunotherapy: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2018;29:iv264–iv266. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 310.Fehrenbacher L, Spira A, Ballinger M, Kowanetz M, Vansteenkiste J, Mazieres J, et al. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel for patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (POPLAR): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387:1837–1846. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00587-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 311.Barlesi F, Garon EB, Kim DW, Felip E, Han JY, Kim JH, et al. Health-related quality of life in KEYNOTE-010: a phase II/III study of pembrolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated advanced, programmed death ligand 1-expressing NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol. 2019;14:793–801. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 312.Vokes EE, Ready N, Felip E, Horn L, Burgio MA, Antonia SJ, et al. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 017 and CheckMate 057): 3-year update and outcomes in patients with liver metastases. Ann Oncol. 2018;29:959–965. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 313.Frederickson AM, Arndorfer S, Zhang I, Lorenzi M, Insinga R, Arunachalam A, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for first-line treatment of metastatic nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis. Immunotherapy. 2019;11:407–428. doi: 10.2217/imt-2018-0193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 314.Thompson JA. New NCCN Guidelines: recognition and management of immunotherapy-related toxicity. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2018;16:594–596. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.0047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 315.Postow MA, Sidlow R, Hellmann MD. Immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint blockade. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:158–168. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1703481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 316.Martins F, Sofiya L, Sykiotis GP, Lamine F, Maillard M, Fraga M, et al. Adverse effects of immune-checkpoint inhibitors: epidemiology, management and surveillance. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2019;16:563–580. doi: 10.1038/s41571-019-0218-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.