
Keywords: exosomes, liver disease, role, therapeutic potential
Abstract
Exosomes are small nanovesicles with a size of approximately 40–120 nm that are secreted from cells. They are involved in the regulation of cell homeostasis and mediate intercellular communication. In addition, they carry proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids that regulate the biological activity of receptor cells. Recent studies have shown that exosomes perform important functions in liver diseases. This review will focus on liver diseases (drug-induced liver injury, hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury, liver fibrosis, acute liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma) and summarize the therapeutic potential of exosomes from different cell sources in liver disease.
INTRODUCTION
The morbidity and mortality associated with liver disease have increased, and more than 2 million people die from liver disease worldwide each year, accounting for ∼4% of all deaths globally (1). Despite the availability of multiple treatment methods for liver disease, acute and chronic liver disease continue to pose major healthcare challenges. Moreover, drug treatment is often ineffective in end-stage liver disease. Although many patients with end-stage liver disease benefit from liver transplantation, the shortage of suitable organ donors remains an ongoing challenge (2–5). Therefore, new liver disease treatment methods are urgently needed.
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are membranous granules secreted by all types of cells. EVs are found in blood, urine, milk, and tissues (6, 7). On the basis of their biogenesis, EVs are generally categorized as exosomes, microvesicles, and apoptotic bodies (8). Since EVs are present in almost all bodily fluids, they also show great potential as disease biomarkers (9), as do exosomes (10, 11). Exosomes are small vesicles that are between 40 and 120 nm in size and wrapped in phospholipid bilayers (12). In this article, we focus on the therapeutic potential of exosomes derived from different cell sources in liver disease.
EXOSOMAL TREATMENT OF DRUG-INDUCED LIVER INJURY
Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) occurs during clinical medication and is induced by various chemical drugs, biological agents, traditional Chinese medicines (TCM), natural medicines (NM), health products (HP), dietary supplements (DS), and their metabolites. DILI is a common cause of clinical liver disease (especially acute liver injury) and can result in drug research and development failure or drug withdrawal from the market (13–16). DILI can be further classified into liver injury caused by the drug itself and idiopathic liver injury (17). The former occurs due to the liver damage caused by the direct toxicity of drugs or their metabolites to the liver, which can be shown in animal models (18). However, most DILIs are idiopathic, and conventional animal toxicology assessments cannot predict the subsequent clinical toxicity risk (19).
Treatment of DILI with Exosomes Derived from Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are a type of pluripotent stem cells that possess all the typical characteristics of stem cells, namely, self-renewal and multidirectional differentiation. Simultaneously, they can also regulate immunity. In comparison with MSC transplantation therapy, treatment with MSC-derived exosomes is less risky, since it avoids the potential for carcinogenicity (20), promotion of tumor growth (21, 22), cell rejection (23), thrombi formation (24), unexpected differentiation (25), or spread of infection. A study by Tamura et al. (26) showed that exosomes derived from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (hBM-MSCs-Ex) have an inhibitory effect on immune-mediated liver injury. In a mouse model, exosome treatment was shown to increase the production of regulatory T cells (Tregs), upregulate the expression of transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) and hepatocyte growth factor mRNA, downregulate the expression of the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin (IL)-2, and reduce hepatocyte apoptosis and promote tissue regeneration, thereby inhibiting liver cell damage. The findings obtained after three injections of exosomes confirmed that the protective effects of exosomes on the liver are dose dependent and depend on the characteristics of the cells that secrete them because the exosomes derived from fibroblasts did influence the regulation of immunity in the concanavalin-A-mediated liver injury model. A study by Jiang et al. (27) showed that in a carbon tetrachloride (CCl4)-induced acute liver injury model, in comparison with the commonly used hepatoprotective agent bidentate (DDB), exosomes derived from umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (huc-MSCs-Ex) exhibited powerful antioxidant and hepatoprotective activities by reducing liver inflammation and increasing liver cell regeneration.
Treatment of DILI with Hepatocyte-Derived Exosomes
Hepatocyte-derived exosomes may show therapeutic activity by promoting liver immune tolerance (28). In addition, exosome mimetic nanovesicles from hepatocytes, similar to hepatocyte-secreted exosomes, promote hepatocyte proliferation (29). However, Nojima et al. (30) found that only exosomes derived from primary hepatocytes can promote hepatocyte proliferation, and their effect is dose dependent. In contrast, exosomes derived from Kupffer cells show inhibitory effects on hepatocyte proliferation.
EXOSOMAL TREATMENT OF HEPATIC ISCHEMIA-REPERFUSION INJURY
Liver oxygen supply is related to the blood oxygen content perfused to the liver and the total blood flow. Liver ischemia occurs when the oxygen supply and demand are out of balance (31). In vitro experiments and animal models have suggested that due to their higher metabolic rate, hepatocytes are more susceptible to hypoxic damage than other types of liver cells such as sinusoidal endothelial cells, Kupffer cells, or bile duct cells at physiological temperature (32).
Nutritional status also has an important influence on the sensitivity of liver cells to hypoxia. In comparison with customarily fed rats, fasted rats were shown to be less prone to hepatic ischemia. One possible reason is that the liver glycogen stores of fasted rats are reduced, resulting in reduced substrates of anaerobic glycolysis and decreased intracellular lactate production (33). Ischemia also promotes the conversion of cytosolic xanthine dehydrogenase to xanthine oxidase, which causes the accumulated xanthine to produce superoxide and hydrogen peroxide (34). Reperfusion of the ischemic liver will further promote liver damage since ischemic liver cells exposed to reoxygenation produce reactive oxygen species, which leads to liver cell damage through lipid peroxidation (32). In addition, Kupffer cells produce cytokines during ischemia, including tumor necrosis factor-α, which triggers the recruitment and activation of polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Thus, the treatment of hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) remains a clinical challenge. In recent years, some progress has been made in the treatment of hepatic IRI by using exosomes.
Treatment of Hepatic IRI with Exosomes Derived from MSCs
Du et al. (35) showed that exosomes secreted by human pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC-MSCs-Ex) have a significant dose-dependent protective effect on hepatic IRI. The hiPSC-MSCs-Ex can significantly reduce the levels of the hepatocyte injury markers aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) and significantly increase the levels of the hepatocyte proliferation markers proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and phosphohistone H3 (pHH3) in the ischemia-reperfusion model. HiPSC-MSCs-Ex activates the hepatocyte sphingosine kinase and sphingosine-1-phosphate signaling pathways to promote cell proliferation and reduce hepatic IRI. In addition, exosomes derived from BM-MSCs have been shown to reduce hepatic IRI by inhibiting liver cell apoptosis and stimulating liver cell regeneration (36). This effect can be enhanced by glycyrrhetinic acid (37). Another study showed that miR-20a, an exosome derived from umbilical cord mesenchymal cells (huc-MSCs-Ex), plays a protective role in hepatic IRI. The mechanism of action underlying this finding was shown to involve inhibition of hepatocyte apoptosis (38). A similar mechanism of action has also been attributed to exosomes from adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs-Ex). Researchers have confirmed in a rat ischemia-reperfusion model that ADSCs-Ex can regulate mitochondrial dynamics and biogenesis, maintain mitochondrial stability, and inhibit liver cell apoptosis (39). Liang et al. (40) found that exosomes released by MSCs can regulate immune response and promote liver self-repair during ischemia-reperfusion. In addition, Xie et al. (41) demonstrated that exosomes derived from huc-MSCs transport miR-1246 through the Wnt/β-catenin pathway mediated by GSK3β, inhibiting hepatocyte apoptosis and reducing inflammation, and thereby reducing hepatic IRI.
Treatment of Hepatic IRI with Hepatocyte-Derived Exosomes
In the IRI model, Nojima et al. (30) showed that only exosomes derived from primary hepatocytes could induce dose-dependent hepatocyte proliferation in vivo and in vitro. The primary mechanism involves the direct fusion of hepatocyte exosomes with target cells, transportation of neutral ceramidase and sphingosine kinase 2 (SK2), and increased levels of sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) in target cells to promote the proliferation of liver cells (30).
Treatment of Hepatic IRI with Exosomes Derived from Dendritic Cells
In the study by Zheng et al. (42), exosomes produced by bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (DCs) mainly regulated the PI3K/mTOR axis through Hsp70, maintaining a balance between Treg differentiation and Th17 cells, thereby alleviating IRI.
EXOSOMAL TREATMENT OF LIVER FIBROSIS
Fibrosis is a wound-healing reaction in which the damaged area is wrapped by an extracellular matrix (ECM) or scar. Almost all patients with chronic liver injury have fibrosis, but the rate of fibrosis occurrence is variable (43–46). The occurrence of liver fibrosis usually requires continuous damage over several months to years. Liver fibrosis can be reversed in the initial stage, whereas progressive liver fibrosis can lead to liver cirrhosis. However, the exact time point of the development of irreversible liver fibrosis is still unclear. Nevertheless, increasing evidence shows that early hepatic cirrhosis may be reversible (47–49). Therefore, treatment of liver fibrosis and early cirrhosis is crucial. Recent studies have investigated the utility of exosomes in the treatment of liver fibrosis.
Treatment of Liver Fibrosis with Exosomes Derived from MSCs
Rong et al. (50) used CCL4 to induce hepatic fibrosis in rats. By administering exosomes derived from human bone marrow mesenchymal cells (hBM-MSCs-Ex) in vivo, they found that hBM-MSCs-Ex can effectively alleviate liver fibrosis. Furthermore, they confirmed that the mechanism involves inhibition of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway that reduces the expression of α-smooth muscle actin (SMA) and collagen I. These exosomes reduce collagen accumulation, inhibit inflammation, and increase liver cell regeneration, thereby improving liver function and reducing liver fibrosis. In the in vivo experiments conducted by Li et al. (51), huc-MSCs-Ex transplantation was shown to significantly protect liver function and reduce liver fibrosis, which primarily manifested as a significant recovery of serum AST activity. In addition, the expression of ALT and TGF-β1 decreased, and the phosphorylation of Smad2 decreased. At the same time, huc-MSCs-Ex can also improve CCL4-induced liver fibrosis by inhibiting epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Moreover, in the CCL4-induced mouse liver fibrosis model, exosomes from ADSCs modified by miR-181-5p were shown to inhibit the STAT3/Bcl-2/Beclin 1 pathway of HST cells to increase autophagy and reduce the liver fibrosis induced by TGF-β1 (52). Similarly, the exosomes derived from ADSCs modified by mmu_circ_0000623 can also prevent liver fibrosis by activating autophagy (53).
Exosomes derived from amniotic MSCs have been shown to significantly reduce the activation of Kupffer cells and hepatic stellate cells in the liver of nonalcoholic fatty liver rat models, resulting in decreased inflammation, hepatic fibrosis, and fiber formation (54). Furthermore, Povero et al. (55) confirmed that exosomes derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells could also inhibit liver fibrosis through the mechanisms mentioned earlier.
Treatment of Liver Fibrosis with Exosomes Derived from Myeloid Cells
Myeloid cell-specific IL-6 can induce macrophages and neutrophils, release mir-223-enriched exosomes, transfer to hepatocytes to inhibit liver fibrosis, and provide a target for treating nonalcoholic fatty liver (56). Wang et al. (57) found that exosomes derived from natural killer (NK) cells (NK-92MI) can inhibit the proliferation and activation of hepatic stellate cells induced by TGF-β1 and reduce CCL4-induced liver fibrosis. In addition, NK cells can induce hepatic stellate cell apoptosis, thereby mediating antifibrotic effects (58, 59).
Treatment of Liver Fibrosis with Exosomes Derived from Hepatocytes
Exosomes derived from human liver stem cells (HLSCs) can improve liver fibrosis and inflammation by recoding liver gene expression. In a mouse model of nonalcoholic fatty liver, treatment with exosomes derived from HLSCs significantly reduced the percentage of liver fibrosis and significantly increased the expression of the anti-inflammatory, immune-regulatory cytokine IL-10 (60). In addition, another study (61) reported that exosomes derived from HLSCs can increase the expression of miR-146a-5p in a human hepatic stellate cell line (LX-2). miR-146a-5p is an antifibrotic RNA that can weaken the activation phenotype of hepatic stellate cells and reduce liver fibrosis. The miR-146a-5p-regulated fibrosis-related pathways identified to date include Wnt/β-catenin (62), TGF-β/SMAD (63, 64), PTPRA-SRC (65), and LPS/TLR4/NF-κB (66–68).
EXOSOMAL TREATMENT OF ACUTE LIVER FAILURE
Acute liver failure (ALF) is characterized by the development of severe acute liver injury with encephalopathy and impaired synthetic function [international normalized ratio (INR) ≥ 1.5] in a patient without cirrhosis or preexisting liver disease (69, 70). It is also referred to as fulminant hepatic failure, acute hepatic necrosis, fulminant hepatic necrosis, or fulminant hepatitis. The prognosis of untreated ALF is poor (71). With acute care clinical management, over 55% of patients survive without the need for liver transplantation (72). The management for ALF includes treatment of the underlying causes and complications, including metabolic abnormalities, hepatic encephalopathy, and cerebral edema. For patients who show deterioration, liver transplantation offers the best chance for recovery and survival. In the United States and Europe, patients with ALF requiring transplantation are given high priority on the transplantation list. However, a lack of available donor livers remains the biggest challenge in the field of liver transplantation (73). Attempts have been made to develop artificial hepatic assist devices (74–77), but the results in patients using these systems have been disappointing, and they are not widely available (78, 79).
Exosomes may be sensitive markers to predict early DILI, which remains an unmet need (80–82). They may also play a role in treatment of ALF, and further studies are required to determine if they can serve as a promising treatment approach.
Treatment of ALF with Exosomes Derived from MSCs
In a mouse model induced by lipopolysaccharide and d-galactosamine (LPS/GalN), adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell (AMSC)-derived exosomes colocalized with liver macrophages after intravenous administration, and they inhibited the activation of inflammasomes to reduce the secretion of inflammatory factors. In addition, the abundant exosomal shuttle miR-17 inhibits NLRP3 inflammasome activation by targeting TXNIP, thereby reducing serum ALT and AST levels (83). A recent study constructed quercetin- and vitamin A-loaded AMSC-derived exosomes to treat ALF in mice, showing that quercetin enhanced the therapeutic efficacy and vitamin A enhanced the liver targeting of exosomes. The loaded exosomes could reduce the rapid senescence-like response induced by ALF (84).
Exosomes derived from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (huc-MSCs) pretreated by TNF-α could reduce serum ALT, AST, and proinflammatory cytokine levels and inhibit the activation of NLRP3 inflammation-associated pathway proteins in the ALF mouse model (85). Moreover, another study showed that hucMSC-derived exosomes could downregulate the expression of NLRP3, caspase-1, IL-1β, and IL-6 in the ALF mouse model, which reduced ALT and AST levels (86). In addition, ERK1/2 and IGF-1R/PI3K/AKT signaling pathways were also reported to be involved when hucMSC exosomes inhibited oxidative stress-induced apoptosis both in vitro and in vivo (87).
BM-MSC-derived exosomes increased the expression of the autophagy marker proteins LC3 and Beclin-1 and decreased the expression of the proapoptotic proteins Bax and cleaved caspase-3, promoting autophagosome formation and reducing hepatocyte apoptosis in the ALF mouse model (88). In addition, these exosomes could also confer cytoprotective effects, reduce the oxidative stress generated due to injury conditions in vitro, and improve liver regeneration and recovery from liver injury in rats (89).
In an ALF rat model induced by bile duct ligation (BDL), exosomes from placenta-derived mesenchymal stem cells (PD-MSCs) were involved in liver regeneration. The C-reactive protein (CRP) in exosomes excreted by PD-MSCs regulated the Wnt pathway and vascularization in BDL rat hepatocytes by interacting with endothelial cells (90).
Exosomes from human menstrual blood-derived stem cells provide the advantage of being easy to collect and isolate. In the ALF mouse model, MSC exosomes markedly improved liver function, enhanced survival rates, and inhibited apoptosis of liver cells at 6 h after administration (91).
Treatment of ALF with Exosomal Nanoparticles Derived from Plants
Dietary exosome-like nanoparticles (ELNs) have been also hypothesized to be involved in disease mechanisms, representing a promising class of agents with the potential to ameliorate ALF. An animal experiment found that shiitake mushroom-derived ELNs (S-ELNs) could substantially inhibit NLRP3 inflammasome activation by preventing inflammasome formation in primary macrophages. In addition, S-ELNs also suppressed the secretion of IL-6 and both protein and mRNA levels of the IL-1b gene (92).
EXOSOMAL TREATMENT OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still a global health challenge, and its incidence is increasing worldwide (93–95). Risk factors for HCC include hepatitis B virus infection (96, 97), hepatitis C virus infection (98–100), fatty liver (101, 102), alcoholic cirrhosis (103), smoking, diabetes, obesity (104–106), and various dietary exposures. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with sorafenib is currently used for treating advanced liver cancer, but the overall results obtained with this regimen are modest. Liver transplantation is offered for stage II HCC at most transplant centers, but donor liver organ availability is a rate-limiting factor for the application of this technique.
Therefore, there is an urgent need to find new treatments for liver cancer.
Treatment of HCC with Exosomes Derived from Hepatocytes/Tumor Cells
Rao et al. (107) demonstrated that exosomes derived from HCC cells could be used as broad-spectrum antigen carriers to induce DC-mediated tumor rejection in mouse models of ectopic and orthotopic liver cancer. Yang et al. (108) reported that a tumor-derived exosome (TEX) combined with CpG could be used to promote specific antitumor immunity by increasing CD4+ and CD8+ T cell tumor infiltration. Cheng et al. (109) treated exosomes derived from liver cancer with melatonin and found that the treated exosomes can attenuate the tumor-induced immunosuppressive state of macrophages through the STAT3 pathway. A subsequent study (110) demonstrated that p120-catenin (p120ctn), a membrane protein abnormally expressed in many solid tumors, plays a critical role in regulating the progression of HCC. The expression of p120ctn is downregulated in liver cancer tissues, and p120ctn derived from tumor cells inhibits liver cancer cell invasion, migration, and proliferation by inhibiting STAT3 signal transduction. Cho et al. (111) found that exosomes derived from DILI mice can promote the cytotoxicity of primary hepatocytes or hepatocellular carcinoma cells, induce receptor cell apoptosis, and promote liver damage in animals.
Treatment of HCCs with Exosomes Derived from MSCs
Most primary liver cancers are at an advanced stage by the time they are diagnosed, and they show a poor prognosis and limited response to chemotherapy (112). However, one study demonstrated that exosomes (122-Exo) secreted by AMSCs modified by miR-122 could effectively improve the chemotherapy sensitivity of HCC (113). Factors such as ADAM10, IGF1R, and CCNG1 affect tumor development and drug sensitivity and participate in the antitumor activity of sorafenib in vivo (114, 115). In vitro experiments have shown that when combined with sorafenib, 122-Exo can improve the chemotherapy sensitivity of HCC cells by downregulating the expression of target genes inducing cell apoptosis and cell cycle arrest (116). However, in vivo experiments have confirmed that 122-Exo alone cannot inhibit tumor growth. This may be because the effect of 122-Exo is based on the presence of a sorafenib growth-arresting effect on HCC.
Treatment of HCC with Exosomes Derived from Dendritic Cells
Lu et al. (117) injected the exosomes of α-fetoprotein (AFP)-expressing dendritic cells (DEXAFP) into an HCC mouse model and found that DEXAFP induced a solid antigen-specific immune response. The number of CD8+ T lymphocytes expressing interferon (IFN) increased significantly at the tumor site, and the levels of IFN and IL-2 in mice also increased significantly. Conversely, the levels of CD25 + Foxp3+ Tregs, IL-10, and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) at the tumor site reduced. Thus, DEXAFP significantly limited tumor growth in a murine liver cancer model and prolonged survival. In this study, the choice of the AFP antigen was crucial, but one limitation was that AFP is only expressed by ∼50% of human HCCs (118).
Conclusions
Exosomes have significant potential in treating liver disease and have also been shown to be useful as adjuvants. For example, exosomes used as an adjuvant with recombinant hepatitis B antigen enhanced the Th1 response to hepatitis B antigen (119). DNA vectors generating engineered exosomes have been shown to serve as hepatitis B vaccine candidates by activating cytotoxic T lymphocytes (120, 121). In addition, exosomes can also participate in drug delivery, increase delivery efficiency, and treat diseases (122, 123).
Interestingly, one study found that in a variety of mouse models of pancreatic cancer, genetically engineered exosomes (iExosomes) targeted oncogenic KRAS, inhibited tumor growth in mouse models, and significantly improved the overall survival rate (124). Although exosomes show promise for the treatment of liver diseases, much research is needed to overcome the current obstacles, including reproducibility, lack of separation methods, low extraction efficiency, and standard detection methods. Furthermore, distinction of the various extracellular vesicle subgroups and the functional differences among the subgroups is challenging (125). Therefore, future research should focus on the application of exosomes in clinical practice and defining scientific and practical separation methods as well as detection methods to provide new strategies for treating clinical liver diseases.
GRANTS
This study is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission Grant 18ZR1400100, the Natural Science Foundation of China Grant 82072647, the Natural Science Foundation of China Grant 81970565, the Basic Research projects of Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission Grant 18JC1414000), the Shanghai Pujiang Program Grant 18PJ1409300, the Basic Research projects of Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission Grant 18JC1414000, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) LTCDS N276201200017C (to D.A.G.), and NIH NIDDK Pittsburgh Liver Research Center P30 Grants 1P30DK120531-01 (to D.A.G.).
DISCLOSURES
No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the authors.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Y.P., W.T., and M.Y. conceived and designed research; W.T. and M.Y. prepared figures; Y.P. and W.T. drafted manuscript; Y.P. edited and revised manuscript; Y.P., W.T., M.Y., J.L., and D.A.G. approved final version of manuscript.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Graphical abstract created with Biorender.com.
REFERENCES
- 1.Xiao J, Wang F, Wong N-K, He J, Zhang R, Sun R, Xu Y, Liu Y, Li W, Koike K, He W, You H, Miao Y, Liu X, Meng M, Gao B, Wang H, Li C. Global liver disease burdens and research trends: analysis from a Chinese perspective. J Hepatol 71: 212–221, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gaston RS, Cecka JM, Kasiske BL, Fieberg AM, Leduc R, Cosio FC, Gourishankar S, Grande J, Halloran P, Hunsicker L, Mannon R, Rush D, Matas AJ. Evidence for antibody-mediated injury as a major determinant of late kidney allograft failure. Transplantation 90: 68–74, 2010. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181e065de. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lee DD, Singh A, Burns JM, Perry DK, Nguyen JH, Taner CB. Early allograft dysfunction in liver transplantation with donation after cardiac death donors results in inferior survival. Liver Transpl 20: 1447–1453, 2014. doi: 10.1002/lt.23985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Merion RM, Pelletier SJ, Goodrich N, Englesbe MJ, Delmonico FL. Donation after cardiac death as a strategy to increase deceased donor liver availability. Ann Surg 244: 555–562, 2006. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000239006.33633.39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Patel R, Terasaki PI. Significance of the positive crossmatch test in kidney transplantation. N Engl J Med 280: 735–739, 1969. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196904032801401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Schorey JS, Cheng Y, Singh PP, Smith VL. Exosomes and other extracellular vesicles in host-pathogen interactions. EMBO Rep 16: 24–43, 2015. doi: 10.15252/embr.201439363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lässer C, Alikhani VS, Ekström K, Eldh M, Paredes PT, Bossios A, Sjöstrand M, Gabrielsson S, Lötvall J, Valadi H. Human saliva, plasma and breast milk exosomes contain RNA: uptake by macrophages. J Transl Med 9: 9, 2011. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-9-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Crescitelli R, Lässer C, Szabó TG, Kittel A, Eldh M, Dianzani I, Buzás EI, Lötvall J. Distinct RNA profiles in subpopulations of extracellular vesicles: apoptotic bodies, microvesicles and exosomes. J Extracell Vesicles 2, 2013. doi: 10.3402/jev.v2i0.20677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Urabe F, Kosaka N, Kimura T, Egawa S, Ochiya T. Extracellular vesicles: toward a clinical application in urological cancer treatment. Int J Urol 25: 533–543, 2018. doi: 10.1111/iju.13594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kowal J, Tkach M, Théry C. Biogenesis and secretion of exosomes. Curr Opin Cell Biol 29: 116–125, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2014.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mathivanan S, Ji H, Simpson RJ. Exosomes: extracellular organelles important in intercellular communication. J Proteomics 73: 1907–1920, 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2010.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zaborowski MŁaj. P, Balaj L, Breakefield XO, Lai CP. Extracellular vesicles: composition, biological relevance, and methods of study. Bioscience 65: 783–797, 2015. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biv084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.European Association for the Study of the Liver, Clinical Practice Guideline Panel: Chair, Panel members; EASL Governing Board representative. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: drug-induced liver injury. J Hepatol 70: 1222–1261, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chalasani NP, Hayashi PH, Bonkovsky HL, Navarro VJ, Lee WM, Fontana RJ; Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. ACG Clinical Guideline: the diagnosis and management of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury. Am J Gastroenterol 109: 950–966; quiz 967, 2014. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yu Y-C, Mao Y-M, Chen C-W, Chen J-J, Chen J, Cong W-M, et al. CSH guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of drug-induced liver injury. Hepatol Int 11: 221–241, 2017. doi: 10.1007/s12072-017-9793-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Devarbhavi H, Aithal G, Treeprasertsuk S, Takikawa H, Mao Y, Shasthry SM, Hamid S, Tan SS, Philips CA, George J, Jafri W, Sarin SK; Asia Pacific Association of Study of Liver. Drug-induced liver injury: Asia Pacific Association of Study of Liver consensus guidelines. Hepatol Int 15: 258–282, 2021. doi: 10.1007/s12072-021-10144-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Katarey D, Verma S. Drug-induced liver injury. Clin Med (Lond) 16: s104–s109, 2016. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.16-6-s104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Larson AM. Acetaminophen hepatotoxicity. Clin Liver Dis 11: 525–548, vi, 2007. doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2007.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Verma S, Kaplowitz N. Diagnosis, management and prevention of drug-induced liver injury. Gut 58: 1555–1564, 2009. doi: 10.1136/gut.2008.163675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Miura M, Miura Y, Padilla-Nash HM, Molinolo AA, Fu B, Patel V, Seo BM, Sonoyama W, Zheng JJ, Baker CC, Chen W, Ried T, Shi S. Accumulated chromosomal instability in murine bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells leads to malignant transformation. Stem Cells 24: 1095–1103, 2006. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Prockop DJ, Brenner M, Fibbe WE, Horwitz E, Le Blanc K, Phinney DG, Simmons PJ, Sensebe L, Keating A. Defining the risks of mesenchymal stromal cell therapy. Cytotherapy 12: 576–578, 2010. doi: 10.3109/14653249.2010.507330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Volarevic V, Markovic BS, Gazdic M, Volarevic A, Jovicic N, Arsenijevic N, Armstrong L, Djonov V, Lako M, Stojkovic M. Ethical and safety issues of stem cell-based therapy. Int J Med Sci 15: 36–45, 2018. doi: 10.7150/ijms.21666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Eggenhofer E, Luk F, Dahlke MH, Hoogduijn MJ. The life and fate of mesenchymal stem cells. Front Immunol 5: 148, 2014. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Furlani D, Ugurlucan M, Ong LLee, Bieback K, Pittermann E, Westien I, Wang W, Yerebakan C, Li W, Gaebel R, Li RK, Vollmar B, Steinhoff G, Ma N. Is the intravascular administration of mesenchymal stem cells safe? Mesenchymal stem cells and intravital microscopy. Microvasc Res 77: 370–376, 2009. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2009.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kurtz A. Mesenchymal stem cell delivery routes and fate. Int J Stem Cells 1: 1–7, 2008. doi: 10.15283/ijsc.2008.1.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tamura R, Uemoto S, Tabata Y. Immunosuppressive effect of mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes on a concanavalin A-induced liver injury model. Inflamm Regen 36: 26, 2016. doi: 10.1186/s41232-016-0030-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Jiang W, Tan Y, Cai M, Zhao T, Mao F, Zhang X, Xu W, Yan Z, Qian H, Yan Y. Human umbilical cord MSC-derived exosomes suppress the development of CCl4-induced liver injury through antioxidant effect. Stem Cells Int 2018: 6079642, 2018. doi: 10.1155/2018/6079642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Holman NS, Church RJ, Nautiyal M, Rose KA, Thacker SE, Otieno MA, Wolf KK, LeCluyse E, Watkins PB, Mosedale M. Hepatocyte-derived exosomes promote liver immune tolerance: possible implications for idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury. Toxicol Sci 170: 499–508, 2019. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfz112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wu J-Y, Ji A-L, Wang Z-X, Qiang G-H, Qu Z, Wu J-H, Jiang CP. Exosome-mimetic nanovesicles from hepatocytes promote hepatocyte proliferation in vitro and liver regeneration in vivo. Sci Rep 8: 2471, 2018. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20505-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nojima H, Freeman CM, Schuster RM, Japtok L, Kleuser B, Edwards MJ, Gulbins E, Lentsch AB. Hepatocyte exosomes mediate liver repair and regeneration via sphingosine-1-phosphate. J Hepatol 64: 60–68, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.07.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ross RM. Hepatic dysfunction secondary to heart failure. Am J Gastroenterol 76: 511–518, 1981. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Rosser BG, Gores GJ. Liver cell necrosis: cellular mechanisms and clinical implications. Gastroenterology 108: 252–275, 1995. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(95)90032-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Frederiks WM, Fronik GM, Marx F, James J. Influence of nutritional state on ischemic damage in rat liver. Liver 5: 342–347, 1985. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0676.1985.tb00257.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Jones SM, Thurman RG. L-arginine minimizes reperfusion injury in a low-flow, reflow model of liver perfusion. Hepatology 24: 163–168, 1996. doi: 10.1002/hep.510240127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Du Y, Li D, Han C, Wu H, Xu L, Zhang M, Zhang J, Chen X. Exosomes from human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (hiPSC-MSCs) protect liver against hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury via activating sphingosine kinase and sphingosine-1-phosphate signaling pathway. Cell Physiol Biochem 43: 611–625, 2017. doi: 10.1159/000480533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kanazawa H, Fujimoto Y, Teratani T, Iwasaki J, Kasahara N, Negishi K, Tsuruyama T, Uemoto S, Kobayashi E. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury in a rat model. PLoS One 6: e19195, 2011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wei X, Zheng W, Tian P, Liu H, He Y, Peng M, Liu X, Li X. Administration of glycyrrhetinic acid reinforces therapeutic effects of mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosome against acute liver ischemia-reperfusion injury. J Cell Mol Med 24: 11211–11220, 2020. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.15675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zhang L, Song Y, Chen L, Li D, Feng H, Lu Z, Fan T, Chen Z, Livingston MJ, Geng Q. MiR-20a-containing exosomes from umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells alleviates liver ischemia/reperfusion injury. J Cell Physiol 235: 3698–3710, 2020. doi: 10.1002/jcp.29264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhang Q, Piao C, Ma H, Xu J, Wang Y, Liu T, Liu G, Wang H. Exosomes from adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells alleviate liver ischaemia reperfusion injury subsequent to hepatectomy in rats by regulating mitochondrial dynamics and biogenesis. J Cell Mol Med 25: 10152–10163, 2021. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.16952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Liang X, Ding Y, Zhang Y, Tse H-F, Lian Q. Paracrine mechanisms of mesenchymal stem cell-based therapy: current status and perspectives. Cell Transplant 23: 1045–1059, 2014. doi: 10.3727/096368913X667709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Xie K, Liu L, Chen J, Liu F. Exosomes derived from human umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cells improve hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury via delivering miR-1246. Cell Cycle 18: 3491–3501, 2019. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2019.1689480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zheng L, Li Z, Ling W, Zhu D, Feng Z, Kong L. Exosomes derived from dendritic cells attenuate liver injury by modulating the balance of Treg and Th17 cells after ischemia reperfusion. Cell Physiol Biochem 46: 740–756, 2018. doi: 10.1159/000488733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Friedman SL. Evolving challenges in hepatic fibrosis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 7: 425–436, 2010. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2010.97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hillebrandt S, Goos C, Matern S, Lammert F. Genome-wide analysis of hepatic fibrosis in inbred mice identifies the susceptibility locus Hfib1 on chromosome 15. Gastroenterology 123: 2041–2051, 2002. doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.37069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Bataller R, North KE, Brenner DA. Genetic polymorphisms and the progression of liver fibrosis: a critical appraisal. Hepatology 37: 493–503, 2003. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Poynard T, Mathurin P, Lai C-L, Guyader D, Poupon R, Tainturier M-H, Myers RP, Muntenau M, Ratziu V, Manns M, Vogel A, Capron F, Chedid A, Bedossa P; PANFIBROSIS Group. A comparison of fibrosis progression in chronic liver diseases. J Hepatol 38: 257–265, 2003. doi: 10.1016/S0168-8278(02)00413-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Veldt BJ, Heathcote EJ, Wedemeyer H, Reichen J, Hofmann WP, Zeuzem S, Manns MP, Hansen BE, Schalm SW, Janssen HL. Sustained virologic response and clinical outcomes in patients with chronic hepatitis C and advanced fibrosis. Ann Intern Med 147: 677–684, 2007. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-10-200711200-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Mallet V, Gilgenkrantz H, Serpaggi J, Verkarre V, Vallet-Pichard A, Fontaine H, Pol S. Brief communication: the relationship of regression of cirrhosis to outcome in chronic hepatitis C. Ann Intern Med 149: 399–403, 2008. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-6-200809160-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Dienstag JL, Goldin RD, Heathcote EJ, Hann HWL, Woessner M, Stephenson SL, Gardner S, Gray DF, Schiff ER. Histological outcome during long-term lamivudine therapy. Gastroenterology 124: 105–117, 2003. doi: 10.1053/gast.2003.50013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Rong X, Liu J, Yao X, Jiang T, Wang Y, Xie F. Human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes alleviate liver fibrosis through the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Stem Cell Res Ther 10: 98, 2019. doi: 10.1186/s13287-019-1204-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Li T, Yan Y, Wang B, Qian H, Zhang X, Shen L, Wang M, Zhou Y, Zhu W, Li W, Xu W. Exosomes derived from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells alleviate liver fibrosis. Stem Cells Dev 22: 845–854, 2013. doi: 10.1089/scd.2012.0395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Qu Y, Zhang Q, Cai X, Li F, Ma Z, Xu M, Lu L. Exosomes derived from miR-181-5p-modified adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells prevent liver fibrosis via autophagy activation. J Cell Mol Med 21: 2491–2502, 2017. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.13170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zhu M, Liu X, Li W, Wang L. Exosomes derived from mmu_circ_0000623-modified ADSCs prevent liver fibrosis via activating autophagy. Hum Exp Toxicol 39: 1619–1627, 2020. doi: 10.1177/0960327120931152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ohara M, Ohnishi S, Hosono H, Yamamoto K, Yuyama K, Nakamura H, Fu Q, Maehara O, Suda G, Sakamoto N. Extracellular vesicles from amnion-derived mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate hepatic inflammation and fibrosis in rats. Stem Cells Int 2018: 3212643, 2018. doi: 10.1155/2018/3212643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Povero D, Pinatel EM, Leszczynska A, Goyal NP, Nishio T, Kim J, Kneiber D, de Araujo Horcel L, Eguchi A, Ordonez PM, Kisseleva T, Feldstein AE. Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles reduce hepatic stellate cell activation and liver fibrosis. JCI Insight 5: e125652, 2019. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.125652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Hou X, Yin S, Ren R, Liu S, Yong L, Liu Y, Li Y, Zheng M-H, Kunos G, Gao B, Wang H. Myeloid-cell-specific IL-6 signaling promotes microRNA-223-enriched exosome production to attenuate NAFLD-associated fibrosis. Hepatology 74: 116–132, 2021. doi: 10.1002/hep.31658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Wang L, Wang Y, Quan J. Exosomes derived from natural killer cells inhibit hepatic stellate cell activation and liver fibrosis. Hum Cell 33: 582–589, 2020. doi: 10.1007/s13577-020-00371-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Gur C, Doron S, Kfir-Erenfeld S, Horwitz E, Abu-Tair L, Safadi R, Mandelboim O. NKp46-mediated killing of human and mouse hepatic stellate cells attenuates liver fibrosis. Gut 61: 885–893, 2012. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Glässner A, Eisenhardt M, Krämer B, Körner C, Coenen M, Sauerbruch T, Spengler U, Nattermann J. NK cells from HCV-infected patients effectively induce apoptosis of activated primary human hepatic stellate cells in a TRAIL-, FasL- and NKG2D-dependent manner. Lab Invest 92: 967–977, 2012. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2012.54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Bruno S, Pasquino C, Herrera Sanchez MB, Tapparo M, Figliolini F, Grange C, Chiabotto G, Cedrino M, Deregibus MC, Tetta C, Camussi G. HLSC-derived extracellular vesicles attenuate liver fibrosis and inflammation in a murine model of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Mol Ther 28: 479–489, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.10.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Chiabotto G, Ceccotti E, Tapparo M, Camussi G, Bruno S. Human liver stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles target hepatic stellate cells and attenuate their pro-fibrotic phenotype. Front Cell Dev Biol 9: 777462, 2021.doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.777462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Du J, Niu X, Wang Y, Kong L, Wang R, Zhang Y, Zhao S, Nan Y. MiR-146a-5p suppresses activation and proliferation of hepatic stellate cells in nonalcoholic fibrosing steatohepatitis through directly targeting Wnt1 and Wnt5a. Sci Rep 5: 16163, 2015.doi: 10.1038/srep16163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Zou Y, Cai Y, Lu D, Zhou Y, Yao Q, Zhang S. MicroRNA-146a-5p attenuates liver fibrosis by suppressing profibrogenic effects of TGFβ1 and lipopolysaccharide. Cell Signal 39: 1–8, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2017.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.He Y, Huang C, Sun X, Long X-R, Lv X-W, Li J. MicroRNA-146a modulates TGF-beta1-induced hepatic stellate cell proliferation by targeting SMAD4. Cell Signal 24: 1923–1930, 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2012.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Yuan B-Y, Chen Y-H, Wu Z-F, Zhuang Y, Chen G-W, Zhang L, Zhang H-G, Cheng JC, Lin JQ, Zeng ZC. MicroRNA-146a-5p attenuates fibrosis-related molecules in irradiated and TGF-beta1-treated human hepatic stellate cells by regulating PTPRA-SRC signaling. Radiat Res 192: 621–629, 2019. doi: 10.1667/RR15401.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Zou Y, Li S, Li Z, Song D, Zhang S, Yao Q. MiR-146a attenuates liver fibrosis by inhibiting transforming growth factor-β1 mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition in hepatocytes. Cell Signal 58: 1–8, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2019.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Niu H, Zhang L, Chen Y-H, Yuan B-Y, Wu Z-F, Cheng JC-H, Lin Q, Zeng Z-C. Circular RNA TUBD1 acts as the miR-146a-5p sponge to affect the viability and pro-inflammatory cytokine production of LX-2 cells through the TLR4 pathway. Radiat Res 193: 383–393, 2020. doi: 10.1667/RR15550.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Chen Y, Wu Z, Yuan B, Dong Y, Zhang L, Zeng Z. MicroRNA-146a-5p attenuates irradiation-induced and LPS-induced hepatic stellate cell activation and hepatocyte apoptosis through inhibition of TLR4 pathway. Cell Death Dis 9: 22, 2018. doi: 10.1038/s41419-017-0038-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Lee WM, Stravitz RT, Larson AM. Introduction to the revised American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Position Paper on acute liver failure 2011. Hepatology 55: 965–967, 2012. doi: 10.1002/hep.25551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.European Association for the Study of the Liver, Clinical practice guidelines panel, EASL Governing Board representative. EASL Clinical Practical Guidelines on the management of acute (fulminant) liver failure. J Hepatol 66: 1047–1081, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Lee WM, Squires RH, Nyberg SL, Doo E, Hoofnagle JH. Acute liver failure: summary of a workshop. Hepatology 47: 1401–1415, 2008. doi: 10.1002/hep.22177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Reuben A, Tillman H, Fontana RJ, Davern T, McGuire B, Stravitz RT, et al. Outcomes in adults with acute liver failure between 1998 and 2013: an observational cohort study. Ann Intern Med 164: 724–732, 2016. doi: 10.7326/M15-2211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Patel P, Okoronkwo N, Pyrsopoulos NT. Future approaches and therapeutic modalities for acute liver failure. Clin Liver Dis 22: 419–427, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2018.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Xu X, Liu X, Ling Q, Wei Q, Liu Z, Xu X, Zhou L, Zhang M, Wu J, Huang J, Sheng J, Zheng S, Li L. Artificial liver support system combined with liver transplantation in the treatment of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure. PLoS One 8: e58738, 2013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 75.Qin G, Shao J-G, Wang B, Shen Y, Zheng J, Liu X-J, Zhang Y-Y, Liu Y-M, Qin Y, Wang L-J. Artificial liver support system improves short- and long-term outcomes of patients with HBV-associated acute-on-chronic liver failure: a single-center experience. Medicine (Baltimore) 93: e338, 2014. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Stockmann HB, Hiemstra CA, Marquet RL, IJzermans JN. Extracorporeal perfusion for the treatment of acute liver failure. Ann Surg 231: 460–470, 2000. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200004000-00003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Nyberg SL, Misra SP. Hepatocyte liver-assist systems–a clinical update. Mayo Clin Proc 73: 765–771, 1998. doi: 10.4065/73.8.765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Liu JP, Gluud LL, Als-Nielsen B, Gluud C. Artificial and bioartificial support systems for liver failure. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004: CD003628, 2004. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003628.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Kjaergard LL, Liu J, Als-Nielsen B, Gluud C. Artificial and bioartificial support systems for acute and acute-on-chronic liver failure: a systematic review. JAMA 289: 217–222, 2003. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.2.217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Zhang Y, Wang D, Shen D, Luo Y, Che Y-Q. Identification of exosomal miRNAs associated with the anthracycline-induced liver injury in postoperative breast cancer patients by small RNA sequencing. PeerJ 8: e9021, 2020. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Duan L, Ramachandran A, Akakpo JY, Weemhoff JL, Curry SC, Jaeschke H. Role of extracellular vesicles in release of protein adducts after acetaminophen-induced liver injury in mice and humans. Toxicol Lett 301: 125–132, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2018.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Stravitz RT, Bowling R, Bradford RL, Key NS, Glover S, Thacker LR, Gabriel DA. Role of procoagulant microparticles in mediating complications and outcome of acute liver injury/acute liver failure. Hepatology 58: 304–313, 2013. doi: 10.1002/hep.26307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Liu Y, Lou G, Li A, Zhang T, Qi J, Ye D, Zheng M, Chen Z. AMSC-derived exosomes alleviate lipopolysaccharide/d-galactosamine-induced acute liver failure by miR-17-mediated reduction of TXNIP/NLRP3 inflammasome activation in macrophages. EBioMedicine 36: 140–150, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.08.054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Fang J, Liang W. ASCs -derived exosomes loaded with vitamin A and quercetin inhibit rapid senescence-like response after acute liver injury. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 572: 125–130, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.07.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Zhang S, Jiang L, Hu H, Wang H, Wang X, Jiang J, Ma Y, Yang J, Hou Y, Xie D, Zhang Q. Pretreatment of exosomes derived from hUCMSCs with TNF-alpha ameliorates acute liver failure by inhibiting the activation of NLRP3 in macrophage. Life Sci 246: 117401, 2020.doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Jiang L, Zhang S, Hu H, Yang J, Wang XY, Ma Y, Jiang JH, Wang JH, Zhong L, Chen M, Wang H, Hou Y, Zhu RR, Zhang Q. Exosomes derived from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells alleviate acute liver failure by reducing the activity of the NLRP3 inflammasome in macrophages. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 508: 735–741, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.11.189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Wu H-Y, Zhang X-C, Jia B-B, Cao Y, Yan K, Li J-Y, Li T, Jie Z-G, Liu Q-W. Exosomes derived from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells alleviate acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure through activating ERK and IGF-1R/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. J Pharmacol Sci 147: 143–155, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.jphs.2021.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Zhao S, Liu Y, Pu Z. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes attenuate D-GaIN/LPS-induced hepatocyte apoptosis by activating autophagy in vitro. Drug Des Devel Ther 13: 2887–2897, 2019. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S220190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Damania A, Jaiman D, Teotia AK, Kumar A. Mesenchymal stromal cell-derived exosome-rich fractionated secretome confers a hepatoprotective effect in liver injury. Stem Cell Res Ther 9: 31, 2018. doi: 10.1186/s13287-017-0752-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Jun JH, Kim JY, Choi JH, Lim J-Y, Kim K, Kim GJ. Exosomes from placenta-derived mesenchymal stem cells are involved in liver regeneration in hepatic failure induced by bile duct ligation. Stem Cells Int 2020: 5485738, 2020. doi: 10.1155/2020/5485738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Chen L, Xiang B, Wang X, Xiang C. Exosomes derived from human menstrual blood-derived stem cells alleviate fulminant hepatic failure. Stem Cell Res Ther 8: 9, 2017. doi: 10.1186/s13287-016-0453-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Liu B, Lu Y, Chen X, Muthuraj PG, Li X, Pattabiraman M, Zempleni J, Kachman SD, Natarajan SK, Yu J. Protective role of shiitake mushroom-derived exosome-like nanoparticles in D-galactosamine and lipopolysaccharide-induced acute liver injury in mice. Nutrients 12: 477, 2020.doi: 10.3390/nu12020477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Villanueva A. Hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 380: 1450–1462, 2019. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1713263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA A Cancer J Clin 69: 7–34, 2019. doi: 10.3322/caac.21551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Llovet JM, Zucman-Rossi J, Pikarsky E, Sangro B, Schwartz M, Sherman M, Gores G. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2: 16018, 2016. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Park J‐W, Chen M, Colombo M, Roberts LR, Schwartz M, Chen P‐J, Kudo M, Johnson P, Wagner S, Orsini LS, Sherman M. Global patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma management from diagnosis to death: the BRIDGE Study. Liver Int 35: 2155–2166, 2015. doi: 10.1111/liv.12818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Kulik L, El-Serag HB. Epidemiology and management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 156: 477–491.e1, 2019. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Yang JD, Mohamed EA, Aziz AOA, Shousha HI, Hashem MB, Nabeel MM, et al. Characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in Africa: a multicountry observational study from the Africa Liver Cancer Consortium. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2: 103–111, 2017. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30161-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Heffernan A, Cooke GS, Nayagam S, Thursz M, Hallett TB. Scaling up prevention and treatment towards the elimination of hepatitis C: a global mathematical model. Lancet 393: 1319–1329, 2019. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32277-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Duffell EF, Hedrich D, Mardh O, Mozalevskis A. Towards elimination of hepatitis B and C in European Union and European Economic Area countries: monitoring the World Health Organization's global health sector strategy core indicators and scaling up key interventions. Euro Surveill 22: 30476, 2017. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2017.22.9.30476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Younossi ZM, Otgonsuren M, Henry L, Venkatesan C, Mishra A, Erario M, Hunt S. Association of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the United States from 2004 to 2009. Hepatology 62: 1723–1730, 2015. doi: 10.1002/hep.28123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Loomba R, Lim JK, Patton H, El-Serag HB. AGA clinical practice update on screening and surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: expert review. Gastroenterology 158: 1822–1830, 2020. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.12.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Mancebo A, González–Diéguez ML, Cadahía V, Varela M, Pérez R, Navascués CA, Sotorríos NG, Martínez M, Rodrigo L, Rodríguez M. Annual incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma among patients with alcoholic cirrhosis and identification of risk groups. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 11: 95–101, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Yang JD, Mohamed HA, Cvinar JL, Gores GJ, Roberts LR, Kim WR. Diabetes mellitus heightens the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma except in patients with hepatitis C cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol 111: 1573–1580, 2016. [Erratum in Am J Gastroenterol 112: 402, 2017]. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Hui L, Zatloukal K, Scheuch H, Stepniak E, Wagner EF. Proliferation of human HCC cells and chemically induced mouse liver cancers requires JNK1-dependent p21 downregulation. J Clin Invest 118: 3943–3953, 2008. doi: 10.1172/JCI37156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Huang S-F, Chang I-C, Hong C-C, Yen T-C, Chen C-L, Wu C-C, Tsai C-C, Ho M-C, Lee W-C, Yu H-C, Shen Y-Y, Eng H-L, Wang J, Tseng H-H, Jeng Y-M, Yeh C-T, Chen C-L, Chen P-J, Liaw Y-F. Metabolic risk factors are associated with non-hepatitis B non-hepatitis C hepatocellular carcinoma in Taiwan, an endemic area of chronic hepatitis B. Hepatol Commun 2: 747–759, 2018. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Rao Q, Zuo B, Lu Z, Gao X, You A, Wu C, Du Z, Yin HF. Tumor-derived exosomes elicit tumor suppression in murine hepatocellular carcinoma models and humans in vitro. Hepatology 64: 456–472, 2016. doi: 10.1002/hep.28549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Yang M-Q, Du Q, Varley PR, Goswami J, Liang Z, Wang R, Li H, Stolz DB, Geller DA. Interferon regulatory factor 1 priming of tumour-derived exosomes enhances the antitumour immune response. Br J Cancer 118: 62–71, 2018. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Cheng L, Liu J, Liu Q, Liu Y, Fan L, Wang F, Yu H, Li Y, Bu L, Li X, Wei W, Wang H, Sun G. Exosomes from melatonin treated hepatocellularcarcinoma cells alter the immunosupression status through STAT3 pathway in macrophages. Int J Biol Sci 13: 723–734, 2017. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.19642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Cheng Z, Lei Z, Yang P, Si A, Xiang D, Tang X, Guo G, Zhou J, Hüser N. Exosome-transmitted p120-catenin suppresses hepatocellular carcinoma progression via STAT3 pathways. Mol Carcinog 58: 1389–1399, 2019. doi: 10.1002/mc.23022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Cho Y-E, Seo W, Kim D-K, Moon P-G, Kim S-H, Lee B-H, Song B-J, Baek M-C. Exogenous exosomes from mice with acetaminophen-induced liver injury promote toxicity in the recipient hepatocytes and mice. Sci Rep 8: 16070, 2018. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34309-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Wang Z, Shao D, Chang Z, Lu M, Wang Y, Yue J, Yang D, Li M, Xu Q, Dong W-F. Janus gold nanoplatform for synergetic chemoradiotherapy and computed tomography imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma. ACS Nano 11: 12732–12741, 2017. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b07486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Lou G, Song X, Yang F, Wu S, Wang J, Chen Z, Liu Y. Exosomes derived from miR-122-modified adipose tissue-derived MSCs increase chemosensitivity of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hematol Oncol 8: 122, 2015. doi: 10.1186/s13045-015-0220-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Zhang W, Liu S, Liu K, Ji B, Wang Y, Liu Y. Knockout of ADAM10 enhances sorafenib antitumor activity of hepatocellular carcinoma in vitro and in vivo. Oncol Rep 32: 1913–1922, 2014. doi: 10.3892/or.2014.3418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Ou D-L, Lee B-S, Chang Y-C, Lin L-I, Liou J-Y, Hsu C, Cheng A-L. Potentiating the efficacy of molecular targeted therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma by inhibiting the insulin-like growth factor pathway. PLoS One 8: e66589, 2013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Kimura SH, Ikawa M, Ito A, Okabe M, Nojima H. Cyclin G1 is involved in G2/M arrest in response to DNA damage and in growth control after damage recovery. Oncogene 20: 3290–3300, 2001.doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Lu Z, Zuo B, Jing R, Gao X, Rao Q, Liu Z, Qi H, Guo H, Yin HF . Dendritic cell-derived exosomes elicit tumor regression in autochthonous hepatocellular carcinoma mouse models. J Hepatol 67: 739–748, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Cany J, Barteau B, Tran L, Gauttier V, Archambeaud I, Couty J-P, Turlin B, Pitard B, Vassaux G, Ferry N, Conchon S. AFP-specific immunotherapy impairs growth of autochthonous hepatocellular carcinoma in mice. J Hepatol 54: 115–121, 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.06.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Jesus S, Soares E, Cruz MT, Borges O. Exosomes as adjuvants for the recombinant hepatitis B antigen: first report. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 133: 1–11, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2018.09.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Anticoli S, Manfredi F, Chiozzini C, Arenaccio C, Olivetta E, Ferrantelli F, Capocefalo A, Falcone E, Ruggieri A, Federico M. An exosome-based vaccine platform imparts cytotoxic T lymphocyte immunity against viral antigens. Biotechnol J 13: e1700443, 2018. doi: 10.1002/biot.201700443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Ferrantelli F, Manfredi F, Chiozzini C, Anticoli S, Olivetta E, Arenaccio C, Federico M. DNA vectors generating engineered exosomes potential CTL vaccine candidates against AIDS, hepatitis B, and tumors. Mol Biotechnol 60: 773–782, 2018. doi: 10.1007/s12033-018-0114-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Momen-Heravi F, Bala S, Bukong T, Szabo G. Exosome-mediated delivery of functionally active miRNA-155 inhibitor to macrophages. Nanomedicine 10: 1517–1527, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2014.03.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Li L, Piontek K, Ishida M, Fausther M, Dranoff JA, Fu R, Mezey E, Gould SJ, Fordjour FK, Meltzer SJ, Sirica AE, Selaru FM. Extracellular vesicles carry microRNA-195 to intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and improve survival in a rat model. Hepatology 65: 501–514, 2017. doi: 10.1002/hep.28735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Kamerkar S, LeBleu VS, Sugimoto H, Yang S, Ruivo CF, Melo SA, Lee JJ, Kalluri R. Exosomes facilitate therapeutic targeting of oncogenic KRAS in pancreatic cancer. Nature 546: 498–503, 2017. doi: 10.1038/nature22341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Jia S, Zocco D, Samuels ML, Chou MF, Chammas R, Skog J, Zarovni N, Momen-Heravi F, Kuo WP. Emerging technologies in extracellular vesicle-based molecular diagnostics. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 14: 307–321, 2014. doi: 10.1586/14737159.2014.893828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
