Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) have emerged as a worldwide problem (14). The consumption of vancomycin has been steadily increasing from 2,000 kg in 1984 to 10,312 kg in 1995 in the United States and from 200 to 1,222 kg in France (12). The oral use of avoparcin for growth promotion in pigs increased from 13,644 kg in 1989 to 24,117 kg in 1994 in Denmark (20). The frequency of isolation of VRE has increased (5) since isolation of the first VRE in England in 1986 (18). The mechanism of vancomycin resistance has been well characterized especially for the vanA gene cluster (14). Other resistance mechanisms named vanB, vanC, and vanD have been defined (14). Two theories on the selection for the presence of VRE prevail, and probably a combination of these theories has caused the development of VRE. One theory is that the use of the glycopeptide avoparcin as a growth promoter for animals in Europe has selected for vanA-positive VRE in the animal gut (1, 7, 16). Several studies have confirmed that avoparcin selects for VRE (2, 4). VRE have also been found in the environment (13, 17) and in nonhospitalized humans in Europe (8). The other theory is that the use of vancomycin in hospitals has selected for VRE. Studies of nonhospitalized humans and the environment in the United States, where avoparcin has not been approved for use, have failed to isolate VRE (6, 16). The genetic diversity of the vanA gene cluster encoded by Tn1546 has been investigated, and identical Tn1546-like elements in strains of human and animal origins were found (9, 11, 21). This indicates that these two reservoirs are not distinct and that exchange of Tn1546-like elements occurs. A study on a base pair variation in the vanX gene of Tn1546 suggests that the spread of VRE has occurred from animals to humans. While VRE isolated from humans contained either one or the other variant, pigs and poultry each had a unique base pair variant (10). Indistinguishable pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns of VRE strains isolated from a Dutch farmer and one of his turkeys have been obtained, indicating that humans and animals in close contact could harbor identical VRE (19). In Denmark, VRE is still present at a frequency of 20% among Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs 3 years after the ban of use of avoparcin (3). From humans in Denmark VRE have been isolated in only six cases. One urine and four fecal isolates have been isolated from hospitalized patients, and one fecal isolate has been isolated from a healthy human. None of the patients had been treated with vancomycin. Among the isolates two of fecal origin were from the same patient carrier, isolated 6 months apart, and had identical SmaI PFGE patterns (Fig. 1). A third isolate of fecal origin from a hospitalized patient had a SmaI PFGE pattern (Fig. 1) highly similar to that of a VRE clone that is commonly found in Danish pigs (unpublished data). The Tn1546-like elements of the human and porcine isolates were identical (11). This person was interviewed by her doctor and had no association with any farms in Denmark and eats pork, beef, and poultry products. Since the highly similar PFGE pattern links this human isolate to a common porcine VRE clone, this provides further evidence for food-borne transmission of VRE from animals to humans.
FIG. 1.
PFGE SmaI patterns of VRE isolates of porcine and human origins in Denmark. Lanes 1 and 9, Lambda Ladder PFG Marker (New England Biolabs); lane 2, isolate 17243 (human); lane 3, isolate 17494 (human); lane 4, isolate 109 1A (human); lane 5, isolate 5979 (human); lane 6, isolate 86651 (human); lane 7, isolate 17575 (human); lane 8, isolate E 8 SV 3 (porcine). Isolates 17243 and 17494 (lane 2 and 3) were obtained from the same patient 6 months apart.
REFERENCES
- 1.Aarestrup F M, Ahrens P, Madsen M, Pallesen L V, Poulsen R L, Westh H. Glycopeptide susceptibility among Danish Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis isolates of animal and human origin and PCR identification of genes within the VanA cluster. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:1938–1940. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.8.1938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Aarestrup F M. Occurrence of glycopeptide resistance among Enterococcus faecium isolates from conventional and ecological poultry farms. Microb Drug Resist. 1995;1:255–257. doi: 10.1089/mdr.1995.1.255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Anonymous. DANMAP 1997—consumption of antimicrobial agents and occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from food animals, food and humans in Denmark. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Zoonosis Centre; 1998. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bager F, Madsen M, Christensen J, Aarestrup F M. Avoparcin used as a growth promoter is associated with the occurrence of vancomycin resistant Enterococcus faecium on Danish poultry and pig farms. Prev Vet Med. 1997;31:95–112. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5877(96)01119-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Nosocomial enterococci resistant to vancomycin: United States, 1989–1993. National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance. Morbid Mortal Weekly Rep. 1993;42:597–599. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Coque T M, Tomayko J F, Ricke S C, Okhyusen P C, Murray B E. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci from nosocomial, community, and animal sources in the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:2605–2609. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.11.2605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Devriese L A, Ieven M, Goossend H, Vandamme P, Pot B, Hommez J, Haesebrouck F. Presence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in farm and pet animals. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:2285–2287. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.10.2285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Endtz H P, van den Braak N, van Belkum A, Kluytmans J A J W, Koeleman J G M, Spanjaard L, Voss A, Weersink A J L, Vandenbroucke-Grauls C M J E, Buiting A G M, van Duin A, Verbrugh H A. Fecal carriage of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in hospitalized patients and those living in the community in The Netherlands. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;35:3026–3031. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.12.3026-3031.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Haaheim H, Dahl K H, Simonsen G S, Olsvik Ø, Sundsfjord A. Long PCRs of transposons in the structural analysis of genes encoding acquired glycopeptide resistance in enterococci. BioTechniques. 1998;24:432–437. doi: 10.2144/98243st02. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jensen L B. Differences in the occurrence of two base pair variants of Tn1546 from vancomycin-resistant enterococci from humans, pigs and poultry. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:2463–2464. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.9.2463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jensen L B, Ahrens P, Dons L, Jones R N, Hammerum A M, Aarestrup F M. Molecular analysis of the Tn1546 in Enterococcus faecium isolated from animals and humans. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:437–442. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.2.437-442.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kirst H A, Thompson D G, Nicas T I. Historical yearly usage of vancomycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:1303–1304. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.5.1303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Klare I, Heier H, Claus H, Witte W. Environmental strains of Enterococcus faecium with inducible high-level resistance to glycopeptides. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1993;106:23–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1993.tb05930.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Leclercq R, Courvalin P. Resistance to glycopeptides in enterococci. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;24:545–556. doi: 10.1093/clind/24.4.545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mevius D, Devriese L, Butaye P, Vandamme P, Verschure M, Veldman K. Isolation of glycopeptide resistant Streptococcus gallolyticus strains with vanA, vanB and both vanA and vanB genotypes from faecal samples of veal calves in The Netherlands. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1998;42:275–276. doi: 10.1093/jac/42.2.275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Thal L A, Chow J W, Mahayni R, Bonilla H, Perri M B, Donabedian S A, Silverman J, Taber S, Zervos M J. Characterization of antimicrobial resistance in enterococci of animal origin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:2112–2115. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.9.2112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Torres C, Reguera J A, Sanmartin M J, Pérez-Díaz J C, Baquero F. vanA-mediated vancomycin-resistance Enterococcus spp. in sewage. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994;33:553–561. doi: 10.1093/jac/33.3.553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Uttley A H C, Collins C H, Naidoo J, George R C. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Lancet. 1988;ii:57–58. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)91037-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.van den Bogaard A E, Jensen L B, Stobberingh E E. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci in turkeys and farmers. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1558–1559. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199711203372117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wegener H C. Historical yearly usage of glycopeptides for animals and humans: the American-European paradox revisited. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:3049. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.11.3049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Woodford N, Adebiyi A M, Palepou M F, Cockson B D. Diversity of VanA glycopeptide resistance elements in enterococci from human and nonhuman sources. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:502–508. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.3.502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

