Skip to main content
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives logoLink to Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
. 2022 Mar 14;10(2):e00923. doi: 10.1002/prp2.923

Dexamethasone promotes breast cancer stem cells in obese and not lean mice

Stephanie Annett 1,, Orla Willis Fox 1, Damir Vareslija 2, Tracy Robson 1
PMCID: PMC8921699  PMID: 35289104

Abstract

Obesity is highly prevalent in breast cancer patients and is associated with increased recurrence and breast cancer‐specific mortality. Glucocorticoids (GC) are used as an adjuvant in cancer treatment and are associated with promoting breast cancer metastasis through activation of stemness‐related pathways. Therefore, we utilized the synergetic allograft E0771 breast cancer model to investigate if treatment with GCs had differential effects on promoting cancer stem cells in lean and diet‐induced obese mice. Indeed, both lean mice treated with dexamethasone and obese mice with no treatment had no effect on the ex vivo colony‐forming ability, mammosphere formation, or aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) bright subpopulation. However, treatment of obese mice with dexamethasone resulted in a significant increase in ex vivo colony formation, mammosphere formation, ALDH bright subpopulation, and expression of pluripotency transcription factors. GC transcriptionally regulated genes were not altered in the dexamethasone‐treated groups compared to treatment controls. In summary, these results provide initial evidence that obesity presents a higher risk of GC‐induced cancer stemness via non‐genomic GC signaling which is of potential translational significance.

Keywords: breast cancer, cancer stem cells, glucocorticoids, obesity, tumour initiating cells


Dexamethasone promotes breast cancer stem cells in obese and not lean mice.

graphic file with name PRP2-10-e00923-g003.jpg


Abbreviations

ALDH

aldehyde dehydrogenase

GC

Glucocorticoids

GR

glucocorticoid receptor

HFD

high‐fat diet

1. INTRODUCTION

Steroids are routinely used in patients with solid tumors as adjuvant therapy to manage tumor and treatment‐related symptoms. However, a meta‐analysis of >80  000 patients found that the use of steroids in solid tumors was associated with reduced overall and progression‐free survival. 1 One explanation for this is the observation is that glucocorticoids (GCs) promote a stem cell phenotype. 2 , 3 , 4 In breast cancer, plasma levels of cortisol (an endogenous GC) increase during breast cancer progression, inducing activation of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) resulting in increased metastatic colonization. 5 Worryingly, treatment with dexamethasone (a clinically used GC drug) also activated the GR causing increased metastatic burden and decreased survival. 5 Obesity affects more than half a billion adults worldwide and it is a well‐known risk factor for breast cancer and an indicator of poorer prognosis. 6 , 7 Indeed, obese breast cancer patients have an increased relative risk of recurrence of 40% to 50%, however, the underlying biology behind the link between obesity and breast cancer progression remains unclear. 8 Obesity causes chronic inflammation in the adipose tissue and elevated levels of cortisol in both the local adipose tissue and the systemic circulation. 9 , 10 Given the role of GCs in breast cancer metastasis, we hypothesized that obesity may increase the risk of GC‐induced breast cancer reoccurrence by further promoting cancer stem cells.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

Female 8‐week‐old C57BL/6N mice (Charles Rivers) were fed a normal chow diet (Lab Supply, Advanced Protocol PicoLab Verified 75) or high‐fat diet (Datesand, Mouse Diet High Fat Pellets) for 12 weeks. E0771 cells (CH3 BioSystems) were authenticated by short tandem repeat profiling, screened for pathogens by the manufacturer, and maintained in DMEM (Sigma) with 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma) and 20 mM HEPES (Invitrogen) at 37°C in an atmosphere of 95% air/5% CO2. 1 × 106 E0771 murine breast cancer cells were resuspended in 100 μl Matrigel:PBS (1:1) and injected into the 4th mammary fat pad. Mice were randomly assigned to treatment groups (Figure 1A). In vivo dexamethasone treatment (water‐soluble dexamethasone; D2915, Sigma) was commenced when tumors were ~150 mm3 (21 days post tumor implantation) at a clinically relevant dose of 0.1 mg/kg in drinking water for 5 out of 7 consecutive days for a total of 3 weeks. 5 Treatment groups of mice were normal chow diet (n = 8), normal chow diet + dexamethasone (n = 7), high‐fat diet (n = 6), high‐fat diet/dexamethasone (n = 5). Tumor volumes were measured and calculated three times weekly and excised when the tumor reached a mean diameter of 12 mm. For all in vivo experiments, mice were housed in individually ventilated cages according to EU Directive 2010/63 at constant temperature and humidity with a 12‐h light/dark cycle and fed standard chow. The welfare of all the mice was monitored daily and health screening was carried out regularly as per the policy of the licensed establishment. Two mice were removed from the study in the normal chow diet‐only treatment group due to no tumor uptake. No mortality was observed in any treatment group and mice were euthanized using exposure to CO2. No adverse events were noted for in vivo experiments. The experimental protocols were compliant with the ARRIVE guidelines and Individual License Number I181 under the Project License Number P045. Tumors were dissociated and ex vivo analysis of mammospheres, colony‐forming ability, and aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) was determined as previously described. 11 , 12 , 13 RNA was isolated using the RNAeasy kit (Qiagen) and gene expression was quantified by real‐time PCR with primers listed in Table S1.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

High fat diet and dexamethasone does not alter tumor growth but promotes ex vivo mammosphere and colony formation. (A) Overview of experimental design. Female C57BL/6N mice were fed a normal chow diet (n = 17) or high fat diet (HFD) for 12 weeks (n = 11). E0771 murine tumor cells were implanted into the mammary fat pad and mice were randomly allocated no treatment or dexamethasone (0.1 mg/kg) in the drinking water for 5 out of 7 days for 3 weeks. Tumors were excised for ex vivo analysis. (B) Weight of mice following 12 weeks of normal chow diet or HFD. (C) Tumor growth rate of mice in the following treatment groups; normal chow diet and no treatment (n = 10), normal chow diet and dexamethasone (n = 7), HFD and no treatment (n = 6), HFD and dexamethasone (n = 5). (D) Expression of mRNA Cd31 within excised E0771 tumors following normal diet or HFD and treatment with dexamethasone. (E) Ex vivo colony‐forming ability and (F) Mammosphere formation following different diets or treatment with dexamethasone. Data points are mean ± SEM. n ≥ 3. *p < .05; **p < .01 (one‐way ANOVA or two‐tailed Student t‐test)

3. RESULTS

Female mice fed a high‐fat diet (HFD) for 12 weeks were significantly heavier than mice fed a normal diet (Figure 1B; p < .0001). Contrary to the previous reports of diet‐induced obesity‐promoting E0771 tumor growth 14 , 15 we found no difference in the tumor growth rate between any of the groups; normal diet and no treatment (n = 8), normal diet and dexamethasone (n = 7), HFD, and no treatment (n = 6), HFD and dexamethasone (n = 5) (Figure 1C). GCs were previously reported to have anti‐angiogenic activity in solid tumors 16 and, therefore, we measured the gene expression of the endothelial marker Cd31 (also known as Pecam‐1). There was no difference in Cd31 gene expression between mice on a normal diet treated with or without dexamethasone (Figure 1D). However, mice fed a HFD had a significantly increased expression (Figure 1D, p = .0073), in line with previous reports of obesity inducing angiogenesis in breast cancer, 15 and this was partially inhibited by dexamethasone treatment although it did not reach significance (Figure 1D, p = .0657). Ex vivo analysis of the dissociated tumor cells found there was no increase in colony‐forming ability in the mice on a normal diet treated with dexamethasone or mice fed a HFD (Figure 1E). However, there was a significant increase in colony‐forming ability, indicative of enhanced clonogenicity, in the mice fed a HFD and treated with dexamethasone (Figure 1E, p = .0432). In addition, mammosphere forming efficiency was analyzed in the dissociated tumor cells. Similarly, there was no increase in mammospheres in mice on a normal diet treated with dexamethasone or those on a HFD (Figure 1F). However, there was an approximately 10‐fold increase in mammospheres in mice on a HFD treated with dexamethasone, compared to the other treatment groups, indicative of enhanced stemness (Figure 1E, p = .0001). Together these results indicate that tumor cells from obese mice treated with dexamethasone have increased self‐renewal activity and cell survival compared to mice on a normal diet treated with dexamethasone. ALDH has been extensively studied in breast cancer as a marker for cancer stem cells. In addition, it is associated with chemoresistance and poor survival in patients. 17 Mice on a normal diet, or a HFD, did not have an increased ALDH+ bright population (Figure 2A). However, in line with previous results mice fed a HFD and treated with dexamethasone had an increased ALDH+ bright subpopulation compared to the other treatment groups (Figure 2A; p = .0302). Next, we measured the pluripotency transcription factors Nanog, Oct4 (also known as Pou5F1), and Sox2. Oct4 expression was not detectable in the tumors of mice from any treatment group. Sox2 gene expression was induced ~6‐fold by both dexamethasone in the mice fed a normal diet and in the mice fed a HFD and this increased to 10‐fold in mice fed a HFD and treated with dexamethasone (Figure 2B; normal diet vs. normal diet + dexamethasone p = .0003; normal diet vs. HFD p = .0003; HFD vs. HFD + dexamethasone p = .0025). Furthermore, HFD mice treated with dexamethasone also had a ~10‐fold increase in Nanog expression, compared to the other treatment groups (Figure 2B; p < .0001). It has been reported that GCs increase stemness and metastasis through activation of the non‐canonical Wnt signaling axis 4 , 5 and therefore we investigated if Ror1, and its ligand Wnt5a, was also activated in our tumors. Treatment with dexamethasone on a normal diet increased expression of Wnt5A (Figure 2C; p = .0506), but this was not increased by HFD (Figure 2C). Ror1 expression was not altered in any of the treatment groups (Figure 2C). In addition, genes classically regulated by GCs, Nrcl1, and Fkbp51, 18 were not induced in the tumors of any group (Figure 2D). Together, this indicates that dexamethasone promotes a cancer stem cell phenotype in obesity through upregulation of pluripotency transcription factor via non‐classical GC signaling.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

High fat diet and dexamethasone promotes an ALDH+ bright subpopulation and pluripotency transcription factors. (A, B) Ex vivo analysis of an ALDH bright subpopulation of cells in excised E0771 tumors from mice fed either a normal or high fat diet and/or treated with dexamethasone (0.1 mg/kg) in the drinking water for 5 out of 7 days for 3 weeks. Expression of mRNA (C) Sox2 and Nanog, (D) Ror1 and Wnt5a and (E) Nr3cl1 and Fkbp51 from excised E0771 tumors following normal diet or HFD and treatment with dexamethasone. Data points are mean ± SEM. n ≥ 3. *p < .05; **p < .01 (one‐way ANOVA or two‐tailed Student's t‐test). SSC, side scatter

4. DISCUSSION

Adjuvant GC drugs (such as dexamethasone) are routinely used during the treatment of cancer to mitigate the undesirable effects of chemotherapy such as nausea and fatigue and to stimulate appetite. 19 In addition, they reduce hypersensitivity reactions to some chemotherapy agents and enhance tolerability to allow higher chemotherapy doses and more frequent cycles. 19 However, studies have revealed that GCs can promote cancer progression, nevertheless, the literature remains conflicting, and it is not clear how GCs either promote or inhibit tumor progression in different cancer types and by different mechanisms. Here, for the first time, we describe that obesity also has a profound effect on the ability of dexamethasone to promote the cancer stem cell phenotype, that does not occur in lean mice. Interestingly, overall, we found that obesity or dexamethasone alone had a limited effect on promoting cancer stem cells (Figure 1F, Figure 2A). This is in contrast to previous reports demonstrating that both obesity and dexamethasone alone promote metastasis via stem cell‐related signaling. 3 , 4 , 14 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 In our study, we found that dexamethasone promoted expression of the pluripotency transcription factor Sox2 in both normal diet and obese mice (Figure 2B), potentially indicating that a longer treatment time may promote stemness in lean mice. On the contrary, several studies have shown that dexamethasone decreases Sox2 and thereby inhibits cancer stem cells. 24 , 25 In addition, similar to our study, dexamethasone did not promote Ror1 expression in pancreatic cells 24 (Figure 2C). Together these results indicate that GCs are a regulator of Sox2 expression, however, its activation or inhibition is dependent upon the cell type and/or microenvironment. Indeed, a recent preprint on BioRxiv demonstrates, through single‐cell transcriptomics, that following acute GC exposure, cerebral organoids elicit differential effects depending on cell type. 26 Similar experiments utilizing single‐cell sequencing will aid our understanding of the cell type‐specific effects of GCs within the tumor microenvironment. Patients living with obesity make up a substantial proportion of individuals with breast cancer, however, they may not benefit equitably from established therapies. It is well‐described that there is a reduced efficacy of cancer treatment among obese patients, particularly for chemotherapy in which the dose is often based on ideal body weight rather than actual body weight because of toxicity concerns. 27 We now provide initial evidence that GCs may have an altered mechanism of action in obesity resulting in expansion of breast cancer stem cells, which can promote recurrence and metastasis. Initially, we hypothesized that obesity‐induced activation of classical GC signaling which may promote stemness. However, known GR transcription targets Nr3cl1 (glucocorticoid receptor) and Fkbp51 were not altered in the tumors following dexamethasone treatment (Figure 2D). This indicates that dexamethasone use in obesity may promote stemness via a non‐genomic signaling mechanism. This may involve either membrane or cytoplasmic GR that does not require nuclear translation and subsequent GR‐mediated transcription. GR interacts with several kinases such as JNK, Src, PI3K, 19 and this may play an important role in the GC regulation of stemness, however, the non‐genomic activities of GCs are not well understood. In summary, we provide pre‐clinical evidence that administration of dexamethasone in obesity results in an increased cancer stem cell‐like subpopulation in mice, and GCs may promote tumor reoccurrence in breast cancer patients also living with obesity.

DISCLOSURE

No conflicts of interest.

AUTHORS CONTRIBUTIONS

The authors were involved in the following tasks: SA (conception and design of the study, data acquisition, data interpretation, statistical analysis of the manuscript, data interpretation, writing, and final approval of the manuscript); OF; (data acquisition, statistical analysis of data, data interpretation, and final approval of the manuscript); DM (data acquisition); TR (conception and final approval of the manuscript).

ETHICS STATEMENT

All in vivo experiments were completed under HPRA project license P045, Individual license number I181 and complied with ARRIVE guidelines.

Supporting information

Table S1

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

I would like to thank all the technical staff that aided with the completion of this study during the COVID‐19 pandemic.

Annett S, Fox OW, Vareslija D, Robson T. Dexamethasone promotes breast cancer stem cells in obese and not lean mice. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2022;10:e00923. doi: 10.1002/prp2.923

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study is available on request.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Petrelli F, Bukovec R, Perego G, et al. Association of steroid use with survival in solid tumours. Eur J Cancer. 2020;141:105‐114. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.09.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Sorrentino G, Ruggeri N, Zannini A, et al. Glucocorticoid receptor signalling activates YAP in breast cancer. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1‐14. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Kostopoulou ON, Mohammad AA, Bartek J, et al. Glucocorticoids promote a glioma stem cell‐like phenotype and resistance to chemotherapy in human glioblastoma primary cells: biological and prognostic significance. Int J Cancer. 2018;142:1266‐1276. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Karvonen H, Arjama M, Kaleva L, et al. Glucocorticoids induce differentiation and chemoresistance in ovarian cancer by promoting ROR1‐mediated stemness. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-03009-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Obradović MMS, Hamelin B, Manevski N, et al. Glucocorticoids promote breast cancer metastasis. Nature. 2019;567:540‐544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Obesity and overweight . Accessed May 27, 2021. https://www.who.int/news‐room/fact‐sheets/detail/obesity‐and‐overweight
  • 7. Barone I, Giordano C, Bonofiglio D, Andò S, Catalano S. The weight of obesity in breast cancer progression and metastasis: clinical and molecular perspectives. Semin Cancer Biol. 2020;60:274‐284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Kroenke CH, Chen WY, Rosner B, Holmes MD. Weight, weight gain, and survival after breast cancer diagnosis. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:1370‐1378. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Wester VL, Staufenbiel SM, Veldhorst MAB, et al. Long‐term cortisol levels measured in scalp hair of obese patients. Obesity. 2014;22:1956‐1958. doi: 10.1002/oby.20795 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Lee MJ, Pramyothin P, Karastergiou K, Fried SK. Deconstructing the roles of glucocorticoids in adipose tissue biology and the development of central obesity. Biochim Biophys Acta ‐ Mol Basis Dis. 2014;1842:473‐481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Annett S, Moore G, Short A, et al. FKBPL‐based peptide, ALM201, targets angiogenesis and cancer stem cells in ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer. 2020;122(3):361‐371. doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0649-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. McClements L, Annett S, Yakkundi A, et al. FKBPL and its peptide derivatives inhibit endocrine therapy resistant cancer stem cells and breast cancer metastasis by downregulating DLL4 and Notch4. BMC Cancer. 2019;19:351. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5500-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. McClements L, Yakkundi A, Papaspyropoulos A, et al. Targeting treatment‐resistant breast cancer stem cells with FKBPL and its peptide derivative, AD‐01, via the CD44 pathway. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:3881‐3893. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0595 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Bousquenaud M, Fico F, Solinas G, Rüegg C, Santamaria‐Martínez A. Obesity promotes the expansion of metastasis‐initiating cells in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2018;20:1‐11. doi: 10.1186/s13058-018-1029-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Kolb R, Kluz P, Tan ZW, et al. Obesity‐associated inflammation promotes angiogenesis and breast cancer via angiopoietin‐like 4. Oncogene. 2019;38:2351‐2363. doi: 10.1038/s41388-018-0592-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Liu B, Goodwin JE. The effect of glucocorticoids on angiogenesis in the treatment of solid tumors. J Cell Signal. 2020;1:42. doi: 10.33696/signaling.1.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Clark DW, Palle K. Aldehyde dehydrogenases in cancer stem cells: potential as therapeutic targets. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4(24):518. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.11.82 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Annett S, Moore G, Robson T. FK506 binding proteins and inflammation related signalling pathways; basic biology, current status and future prospects for pharmacological intervention. Pharmacol Ther. 2020;215:107623. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2020.107623 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Lin KT, Wang LH. New dimension of glucocorticoids in cancer treatment. Steroids. 2016;111:84‐88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Hillers‐Ziemer LE, McMahon RQ, Hietpas M, et al. Obesity promotes cooperation of cancer stem‐like cells and macrophages to enhance mammary tumor angiogenesis. Cancers. 2020;12(2):502. doi: 10.3390/cancers12020502 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Sorrentino G, Ruggeri N, Zannini A, et al. Glucocorticoid receptor signalling activates YAP in breast cancer. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14073. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Liu LI, Aleksandrowicz E, Schönsiegel F, et al. Dexamethasone mediates pancreatic cancer progression by glucocorticoid receptor, TGFβ and JNK/AP‐1. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8:e3064. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.455 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Annett S, Moore G, Robson T. Obesity and cancer metastasis: molecular and translational perspectives. Cancers. 2020;12:3798. doi: 10.3390/cancers12123798 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Suzuki S, Okada M, Sanomachi T, et al. Therapeutic targeting of pancreatic cancer stem cells by dexamethasone modulation of the MKP‐1–JNK axis. J Biol Chem. 2020;295:18328‐18342. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA120.015223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Jiang Z, Zhang C, Liu X, et al. Dexamethasone inhibits stemness maintenance and enhances chemosensitivity of hepatocellular carcinoma stem cells by inducing deSUMOylation of HIF‐1α and Oct4. Int J Oncol. 2020;57:780‐790. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2020.5097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Cruceanu C, Dony L, Krontira AC, et al. Cell‐type specific impact of glucocorticoid receptor activation on the developing brain. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2020.01.09.897868 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Ross KH, Gogineni K, Subhedar PD, Lin JY, McCullough LE. Obesity and cancer treatment efficacy: existing challenges and opportunities. Cancer. 2019;125:1588‐1592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study is available on request.


Articles from Pharmacology Research & Perspectives are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES