Abstract
PIWI‐interacting RNAs (piRNAs) are abundantly expressed in heart. However, their functions and molecular mechanisms during myocardial infarction remain unknown. Here, a heart‐apoptosis‐associated piRNA (HAAPIR), which regulates cardiomyocyte apoptosis by targeting N‐acetyltransferase 10 (NAT10)‐mediated N4‐acetylcytidine (ac4C) acetylation of transcription factor EC (Tfec) mRNA transcript, is identified. HAAPIR deletion attenuates ischemia/reperfusion induced myocardial infarction and ameliorate cardiac function compared to WT mice. Mechanistically, HAAPIR directly interacts with NAT10 and enhances ac4C acetylation of Tfec mRNA transcript, which increases Tfec expression. TFEC can further upregulate the transcription of BCL2‐interacting killer (Bik), a pro‐apoptotic factor, which results in the accumulation of Bik and progression of cardiomyocyte apoptosis. The findings reveal that piRNA‐mediated ac4C acetylation mechanism is involved in the regulation of cardiomyocyte apoptosis. HAAPIR‐NAT10‐TFEC‐BIK signaling axis can be potential target for the reduction of myocardial injury caused by cardiomyocyte apoptosis in ischemia heart diseases.
Keywords: ac4C acetylation, cardiomyocyte apoptosis, heart‐apoptosis‐associated piRNA (HAAPIR), piRNA, transcription factor EC (Tfec)
Heart‐apoptosis‐associated piRNA (HAAPIR) promotes cardiomyocyte apoptosis by regulating RNA N4‐acetylcytidine (ac4C) modifications. Mechanistically, HAAPIR promotes Tfec mRNA acetylation modifications by recruiting NAT10. This results in Tfec mRNA more stable and increases its translation efficiency, and increased expression of transcription factor TFEC, which, in turn promotes the transcription of Bik, a pro‐apoptotic factor that participates in the apoptosis process.
1. Introduction
Heart diseases are the leading cause of death around the world. Recent studies indicate that the epigenetic modifications of mRNAs play an important role in the development of cardiovascular diseases.[ 1 , 2 , 3 ] mRNA methylation is the most abundant post‐transcriptional modification of mRNAs in mammals, and the internal methylation/demethylation of mRNA are strongly associated with both cardiac physiological and pathological processes.[ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ] N4‐acetylcytidine (ac 4 C) previously was characterized in eukaryotic tRNAs and 18S rRNA.[ 8 , 9 ] In a recent study, Arango and colleagues identify N4‐acetylcytidine (ac 4 C) as a new mRNA modification catalyzed by N‐acetyltransferase 10 (NAT10), which increases mRNA stability and enhance its translation efficiency.[ 10 ] Nevertheless, how modules of ac 4 C modifications are dysregulated in the heart diseases remain unknown.
Piwi‐interacting RNAs (piRNAs) are a class of single‐stranded small ncRNA with 26–32 nucleotides. They are best known for their function in silencing transposons and preserve genome integrity during germ cell development, however, their functions in mammalian somatic cells remain elusive.[ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ] PiRNAs are abundantly expressed in the cardiac muscle tissue, and their expression is also highly altered during various stress conditions such as myocardial infarction and hypertrophy.[ 15 , 16 ] PiRNAs also exhibit a dynamic and a specific expression pattern during cardiac differentiation from pluripotent embryonic stem cells.[ 17 ] So far, the biological functions of piRNAs in the cardiac physiology and pathogenesis of various diseases remains largely unknown. In this study, we systematically investigated previously unrecognized function of piRNA in regulating cardiomyocyte apoptosis in myocardial ischemia‐reperfusion injury and uncovered the underlying mechanism of piRNA‐mediated mRNA acetylation modification (N4‐acetylcytidine).
In the present study, we show that piRNA HAAPIR is a critical regulator of cardiomyocyte apoptosis in response to ischemia and reperfusion injury. HAAPIR mediates cardiomyocyte apoptosis by directly interacting with NAT10 and promoting its RNA N4‐acetylcytidine acetylation (ac4C) activity, which leads to the upregulation of TFEC expression through ac4C acetylation of Tfec mRNA and increase of TFEC‐dependent activation of BIK, a pro‐apoptotic factor. Our study reveals that HAAPIR‐mediated RNA ac4C modification has a significant contribution in the cardiomyocyte apoptosis and myocardial infarction. Thus, HAAPIR could be an efficient potential target to attenuate the myocardial infarction and ameliorate cardiac function upon ischemia and reperfusion injury.
2. Results
2.1. Identification and Characterization of Cardiac Ischaemia/Reperfusion Associated piRNA(s)
To investigate the functions of piRNAs associated with apoptosis in cardiomyocyte, we selected piRNAs that are highly expressed under physiological conditions from the sham group (with raw intensity >20 000 in Sham hearts) based on our previous piRNA microarray data (GSE153445),[ 3 ] and verified their expression pattern and function in ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injured mouse hearts. We found that 19 piRNAs were increased (Figure 1a; and Figure S1a,b, Supporting Information) and 5 piRNAs were decreased (Figure 1b) in I/R injured mice hearts compared to sham hearts. Further, we detected the expression levels of these piRNAs in H2O2 treated cardiomyocytes (Figure 1c,d). Among them, the expression level of DQ542443 was significantly increased in H2O2 treated cardiomyocytes. We then tested the expression levels of DQ542443 in different tissues and found that it is abundantly expressed in the heart than in other organs (Figure 1e). Comparison between cardiomyocyte and heart fibroblast, DQ542443 mainly expressed in cardiomyocyte (Figure S1c, Supporting Information). We thus speculate that DQ542443 has a potential regulatory role in I/R induced heart injury and selected DQ542443 for further study. We named this uncharacterized piRNA as heart‐apoptosis‐associated piRNA (HAAPIR) and confirmed that HAAPIR consists 2′‐O‐methylation at 3′‐end [ 18 ] (Figure 1f). Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) test showed that HAAPIR was distributed in both the nucleus and cytoplasm of cardiomyocytes (Figure 1g).
2.2. Inhibition of HAAPIR Blocks H2O2‐Induced Cardiomyocyte Apoptosis
To confirm the role of HAAPIR in the regulation of cardiomyocytes apoptosis, we used an in vitro H2O2‐induced apoptosis model. In isolated neonatal mouse cardiomyocytes, knockdown of HAAPIR (Figure 2a) with inhibitor (anta) attenuated H2O2‐induced increase of HAAPIR expression (Figure 2b). HAAPIR knockdown repressed H2O2‐induced increase of cardiomyocyte apoptosis, which were detected by TUNEL (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling) assay (Figure 2c,d). The mitochondrion is a highly dynamic organelle, and mitochondrial fragmentation play an important role in mitochondrial injury during apoptosis.[ 19 ] The growing body of evidence reveals that abnormal mitochondrial fusion and fission participate in the regulation of apoptosis and mitochondrial fission is involved in the initiation of apoptosis.[ 20 , 21 , 22 ] We thus test whether HAAPIR participates in the regulation of mitochondrial fission in cardiomyocytes and found that knockdown of HAAPIR suppressed H2O2‐induced increase of mitochondrial fragmentation (Figure 2e). In contrast, the overexpression of HAAPIR (Figure 2f) caused cardiomyocyte apoptosis (Figure 2g; and Figure S1d, Supporting Information) and mitochondrial fragmentation (Figure 2h; and Figure S1e, Supporting Information).
To better simulate the condition of ischemia/reperfusion in vitro, we used the hypoxia/reoxygenation (H/R) model [ 23 , 24 ] to induce apoptosis. In isolated neonatal mouse cardiomyocytes, the expression level of HAAPIR was increased following H/R exposure (Figure S2a, Supporting Information), and HAAPIR knockdown inhibited H/R‐induced increase of cardiomyocyte apoptosis (Figure S2b–d, Supporting Information). In addition, we also investigated the effect of HAAPIR on cardiomyocyte necrosis, and we observed that knockdown of HAAPIR could not suppress H/R‐induced necrosis in cardiomyocytes as indicated by PI‐positive cells and LDH activity (Figure S2e,f, Supporting Information). These results suggest that HAAPIR participates in the regulation of cardiomyocyte apoptosis. And it does not affect cardiomyocytes necrosis.
2.3. HAAPIR Deficiency Ameliorates I/R Induced Apoptosis and Myocardial Injury
To investigate whether HAAPIR is associated with myocardial injury and its functional role in vivo, we generated HAAPIR knockout (HAAPIR KO) mice using CRISPR/Cas9 technology (Figure 3a). Genotyping by sequencing and gene expression analysis by RT‐PCR confirmed the loss of HAAPIR in KO mice (Figure 3b,c). We did not observe any morphological or functional phenotype changes in HAAPIR KO hearts under basal conditions (Figure 3d). Compared with wild‐type (WT) hearts, HAAPIR KO mice hearts exhibited a dramatic reduction of cardiomyocyte apoptosis and fragmented mitochondria with I/R injury (Figure 3e,f). Furthermore, a reduced infarct size (Figure 3g) and an improved ventricle function (Figure 3h) were observed in HAAPIR KO hearts compared to WT hearts with I/R injury. Together, these results indicate that HAAPIR deficiency blocks cardiomyocytes apoptosis and attenuates myocardial dysfunction caused by I/R injury.
2.4. HAAPIR Binds to NAT10 and Regulates Its N4‐Acetylcytidine Acetylation Activity
We next sought to investigate the molecular mechanisms by which HAAPIR regulates cardiomyocyte apoptosis. Recently, epigenetic modifications of mRNAs have a great impact on multiple fundamental biological processes.[ 25 , 26 , 27 ] We previously demonstrated that piRNA is involved in the regulation of METTL3‐dependent m6A methylation.[3 ] To further investigate the functional relevance of piRNA and mRNA epigenetic regulation, we examined the epigenetics‐related molecules interacting with HAAPIR in cardiomyocytes using biotinylated HAAPIR and performed RNA pull‐down assay. Among those molecules, only N‐acetyltransferase 10 (NAT10), an RNA cytidine acetyltransferase, was detected in biotinylated HAAPIR pulldown product (Figure 4a), which indicates that HAAPIR bound with NAT10 in cardiomyocytes. Reversely, RIP followed by qPCR showed the enrichment of HAAPIR in NAT10, but not in other protein‐RNA precipitates (Figure S3a,b, Supporting Information), which validates the direct interaction HAAPIR with NAT10 in vivo. Also, the overexpression or knockout of HAAPIR did not affect the expression levels of mRNA and protein of NAT10 in cardiomyocytes (Figure S3c–f, Supporting Information). Together, these results reveal that HAAPIR interacts with NAT10 and might be associated with the regulation of N4‐acetylcytidine acetylation activity.
2.5. ac4C Acetylation in HAAPIR Knockout Mice Hearts
To elucidate the molecular mechanism by which HAAPIR regulates N4‐acetylcytidine modification, we performed acetylated RNA immunoprecipitation and sequencing (acRIP‐seq) in HAAPIR KO and WT mice hearts (Table S1, Supporting Information). HAAPIR KO and WT mice hearts shared 2139 common ac4C peaks, which accounted for 63.02% of total acetylated peaks in HAAPIR KO hearts and 51.62% in WT hearts (Figure 4b). Ac4C mostly occurred in mRNAs and majority of mRNAs contain one or two ac4C peaks (Figure 4c). The sequential analysis of ac4C peaks showed that U(A)UCCAGG and CAGCA(U)G(C) motifs were highly enriched within ac4C sites (Figure 4d). Ac4C peaks were predominantly distributed in coding sequences (CDSs), near stop codon and 3’ untranslated regions (3’UTRs) (Figure 4e; and Figure S4a, Supporting Information). Gene Ontology (GO) analysis showed that genes with upregulated ac4C modification were mainly involved in cardiovascular system development, positive regulation of signal transduction and cell death. (Figure S4b, Supporting Information). Genes with downregulated ac4C modification were mainly involved of regulation of molecular function, regulation of cell differentiation, and cell death (Figure S4c, Supporting Information). These results indicate that the genes with ac4C modification are related to cellular function or regulation of gene expression in heart. To determine the relationship between ac4C modification and gene expression, the RNA‐seq data was performed in HAAPIR KO and WT mice hearts (Figure 4f; and Table S2, Supporting Information). For correlating the gene expression level with ac4C modification level, we plotted ac4C peaks data against RNA‐seq data of gene expression (Figure 4g).
2.6. HAAPIR Promotes NAT10‐Mediated ac4C Modification and Expression of Tfec mRNA
Next, we conducted acRIP‐qPCR and qPCR assays for some differentially acetylated genes and differentially expressed genes reported to be associated with apoptosis (Figure 5a,b). Among them, TFEC had the lowest ac4C modification and dramatically decreased expression in HAAPIR KO hearts (Figure 5a–c; and Figure S4d, Supporting Information). In contrast, ac4C enrichment at Tfec was increased (Figure 5d) along with an increase in the levels of Tfec mRNA and protein (Figure 5e) in HAAPIR overexpressed cardiomyocytes. Based on the above results, we then chose Tfec as a candidate ac4C target in the regulation of cardiomyocyte apoptosis for further studies.
We then investigated how HAAPIR upregulates Tfec expression. In HAAPIR KO hearts, the binding of NAT10 to Tfec mRNA was remarkably decreased compared to WT mice hearts (Figure 5f). In addition, the enforced expression of NAT10 in cardiomyocytes increased ac4C modification in Tfec mRNA and elevated Tfec protein level, and these effects were reinforced upon HAAPIR overexpression (Figure 5g,h). These results indicate that HAAPIR mediates ac4C modification in Tfec mRNA through NAT10, and this acetylation modification enforce its stability and translation capacity.
2.7. Inhibition of Tfec Attenuates Cardiomyocyte Apoptosis In Vitro and In Vivo
TFEC is a member of the MiTF/TFE (Microphthalmia/TFE) family of basic/helix‐loop‐helix/leucine zipper (bHLH‐LZ) transcription factors.[ 28 , 29 ] The MiTF/TFE are known to play an important role in organelle biogenesis and energy metabolism,[ 29 ] while the function of TFEC remains unknown in cardiac tissue. In cardiomyocytes, Tfec expression were increased in response to H2O2 stimulus (Figure 6a), and silencing of Tfec blocked H2O2‐induced cardiomyocyte apoptosis (Figure 6b; and Figure S5a, Supporting Information) and mitochondrial fragmentation (Figure 6c,d). In vivo, the levels of Tfec mRNA and protein were increased following myocardial I/R injury (Figure 6e) and Tfec knockdown markedly reduced Tfec levels (Figure 6e), cardiomyocyte apoptosis (Figure 6f; and Figure S5b, Supporting Information)) and infarct size (Figure 6g). In addition, knockdown of Tfec suppressed H/R‐induced apoptosis (Figure S6a,b, Supporting Information) and did not affect necrosis (Figure S6c,d, Supporting Information) in cardiomyocytes. Further, HAAPIR knockdown attenuated H2O2‐induced increase of Tfec expression (Figure 6h; and Figure S7a,b, Supporting Information) and apoptosis (Figure 6i), while these effects were attenuated upon NAT10 overexpression (Figure 6h,i). The enforced expression of HAAPIR increased Tfec protein levels and apoptosis in cardiomyocytes, and this increase was reversed upon NAT10 knockdown (Figure S7c,d, Supporting Information). Together, our data suggest that Tfec participates in the regulation of cardiomyocyte apoptosis, and Tfec is direct downstream molecule of HAAPIR and NAT10.
2.8. Tfec Regulates Bik Expression During Cardiomyocyte Apoptosis
To explore the downstream signaling of Tfec, we performed a Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Sequencing (ChIP‐seq) assay using TFEC antibody in Tfec‐overexpressed cardiomyocytes subjected to H2O2 stimulation. ChIP‐seq identified thousands of differentially TFEC‐bound chromatin regions (Figure 7a). Motif discovery using these TFEC‐bound regions yielded the consensus TFEC motif (CACGTG), providing validation for the ChIP‐seq dataset (Figure 7b). To further identify TFEC‐mediated downstream genes, we performed a transcriptome analysis (RNA‐Seq), and RNA‐Seq analysis identified 694 upregulated and 959 downregulated differentially expressed mRNAs in H2O2 treated Tfec‐overexpressed cardiomyocytes compared to control (Figure S8a, Supporting Information). The intersection of genes associated with TFEC‐bound chromatin regions and regulated downstream of TFEC in differential expression datasets contained 376 genes (Figure S8b and Table S3, Supporting Information). In order to narrow the number of TFEC‐mediated genes, we screened genes associated with TFEC‐bound promoter region and genes with apoptosis regulation function. We focused on Bik, a pro‐apoptotic protein and a member of the BCL2 family.[ 30 , 31 , 32 ] ChIP‐seq analysis revealed a significant TFEC‐binding promoter region in the Bik gene (Figure 7c). We validated TFEC binding to the identified sequence by ChIP‐qPCR and confirmed marked enrichment of Bik promotor region over normal IgG following TFEC overexpression (Figure 7d). Overexpression of Tfec dramatically increased H2O2‐induced Bik mRNA expression (Figure 7e), whereas knockdown of TFEC reduced the increase of H2O2‐stimulated Bik expression (Figure 7f), suggesting this transcription factor TFEC stimulates Bik expression. Consistent with these in vitro findings, Bik mRNA and protein expression were remarkably decreased in HAAPIR KO mice hearts with I/R injury compared to WT hearts (Figure 7g). In addition, Knockdown of Bik attenuated H2O2‐induced cardiomyocyte apoptosis (Figure S8c, Supporting Information) and mitochondrial fragmentation (Figure S8d, Supporting Information). In cardiomyocytes, HAAPIR increased the levels of Bik protein and apoptosis, while these increases were reversed upon TFEC knockdown (Figure 7h) or NAT10 knockdown (Figure S8e, Supporting Information).
To further validate the effect of activating the HAAPIR‐NAT10‐TFEC‐BIK pathway on cardiac ischaemia/reperfusion injury, we examined the effect of TFEC knockdown on I/R‐induced myocardial injury in HAAPIR KO mice. The results showed that HAAPIR knockout inhibited I/R‐induced increases of Bik expression, cardiomyocytes apoptosis and infarct size. And knockdown of TFEC enhanced the effects of HAAPIR knockout in I/R‐treated mice hearts (Figure S9a–c, Supporting Information). Similarly, echocardiography analysis revealed that the left ventricular function was further ameliorated in TFEC knockdown‐treated HAAPIR KO mice with I/R (Figure S9d, Supporting Information). Together, these results suggest that TFEC promotes Bik expression through its direct binding to the promoter region of Bik, and TFEC and Bik are direct downstream molecules of HAAPIR in the regulation of cardiomyocyte apoptosis and myocardial infarction with I/R injury.
3. Discussion
Here, we have identified that HAAPIR, an apoptosis‐associated piRNA, promotes cardiomyocyte apoptosis by regulating RNA N4‐acetylcytidine (ac4C) modifications. Mechanistically, HAAPIR promotes Tfec mRNA acetylation modifications by recruiting NAT10. This results in Tfec mRNA more stable and increases its translation efficiency, and increased expression of transcription factor TFEC, which, in turn promotes the transcription of Bik, a pro‐apoptotic factor that participates in the apoptosis process (Figure 7i). Overall, the findings in our study propose that HAAPIR is an important pro‐apoptotic factor by RNA epigenetic modification of Tfec mRNA.
Previous reports demonstrate that many piRNAs are abundantly and differentially expressed in cardiac tissue during myocardial infarction and the progression of hypertrophy.[ 15 , 16 ] The dynamic expression pattern of piRNA was observed during cardiac differentiation from pluripotent embryonic stem cells.[ 17 ] The somatic cell functions of most piRNAs have not been well characterized to date, and hence their functions in the cardiac physiological and pathological process are seldom identified. Here, our results show that HAAPIR expression in the heart tissue and cardiomyocytes is relatively high compared to other organs and cardiac fibroblasts, respectively, indicating that HAAPIR has cardiac‐specific functions. Here, we found that HAAPIR directly binds to NAT10, an RNA acetyltransferase, but not affects its expression or stability. Generally, piRNAs regulated the gene expression rely on PIWI proteins.[ 13 , 33 ] Hence, we speculate that HAAPIR, PIWI proteins, and NAT10 form complex, and influences its RNA acetylation functions. Notably, our findings demonstrate that NAT10‐dependent ac4C mRNA acetylation is essential for controlling cardiomyocyte apoptotic response. However, HAAPIR acts as a pro‐apoptotic factor, and influences RNA acetylation functions of NAT10 during cardiomyocyte apoptosis.
In present study, we show that Tfec mRNA is a downstream ac4C acetylation target of HAAPIR‐NAT10 complex, which upregulates its expression. We observed that overexpression of HAAPIR increase ac4C acetylation modification of Tfec mRNA along with the increase of its mRNA and protein level. Hence, we speculate ac4C acetylation modification of Tfec mRNA increase Tfec expression through modulation of its stability and translation, which is consistent with the results from previous reports.[ 10 , 34 ] TFEC is a MiTF/TFE (Microphthalmia/TFE) family transcription factors.[ 28 , 29 ] The MiTF/TFE family member play an important role in organelle biogenesis and energy metabolism,[ 29 ] and regulates cardiac growth and hypertrophy.[ 35 ] The expression level of TFEC is low in heart compared to other organs,[ 36 ] and antioxidant treatment significantly suppressed the expression of Tfec in the infarcted myocardium.[ 37 ] Our results show that Tfec knockdown reduces pathological stimuli‐induced cardiomyocyte apoptosis, which imply that TFEC may serve as a pro‐apoptotic transcription factor in the development of heart diseases.
Our present study demonstrates that TFEC can positively regulate the transcription of Bik during H2O2‐induced cardiomyocyte apoptosis and I/R‐induced myocardial injury. BIK is a member of the BH3‐only pro‐apoptotic proteins,[ 38 ] which is predominantly localized in the ER[ 39 ] and induces apoptosis through the mitochondrial pathway.[ 40 ] BIK can mobilize calcium influx from ER to the mitochondria, and induce apoptosis and the remodeling of the mitochondrial cristae.[ 40 , 41 ] BIK is also reported that involves in Osteopontin‐stimulated cardiomyocyte apoptosis by mitochondrial death pathway.[ 42 ] Consist with these reports, our present data shows that Bik participates in the regulation of cardiomyocyte apoptosis. Besides, we demonstrated that Bik acts as a transcriptional target of TFEC, participating in the regulation of myocardial injury.
Thus, our study reinforces the crucial role of mRNA ac4C modifications in regulation of cardiomyocyte apoptosis and provides new insights into the mechanisms of piRNA directed post‐transcriptional gene regulation. Our findings reveal that, except mRNA methylation,[ 3 ] mRNA acetylation modifications also involve in the pathological process of heart diseases. Further, a remarkable improvement of cardiac function along with a significant reduction of infarction area in HAAPIR‐deficient mice hearts suggests that targeting HAAPIR could be a useful therapeutic strategy to alleviate ischemia injury in the heart.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Author Contributions
K.W., L.‐Y.Z., F.L., L.L., and J.J., contributed equally to this work. K.W., J.T., and Y.Z. designed research. K.W., L.Z., F.L., L.L., J.J., P. T., C.L., X.L., X.C., T.W., F.W., and S.W. performed experiments. K.W., L.Z., F.L., L.L., J.T., and J.Z. analyzed the data. F.L., L.Z., K.W., and J. Z. wrote the manuscript.
Supporting information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81770275, 82070313, 81770406, 81873472, 81800272, 81870236, and 82160063); Taishan Scholar Program of Shandong Province and Qingdao public domain science and technology support plan project (No. 19‐6‐1‐6‐nsh); Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (No. 2017GSF18127). All animal experiments were conducted according to the protocols approved by Laboratory Animal Welfare Ethics Committee of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China. Figure 5f of this manuscript was corrected on the March 15, 2022, after initial online publication.
Wang K., Zhou L.‐Y., Liu F., Lin L., Ju J., Tian P.‐C., Liu C.‐Y., Li X.‐M., Chen X.‐Z., Wang T., Wang F., Wang S.‐C., Zhang J., Zhang Y.‐H., Tian J.‐W., Wang K., PIWI‐Interacting RNA HAAPIR Regulates Cardiomyocyte Death After Myocardial Infarction by Promoting NAT10‐Mediated ac4C Acetylation of Tfec mRNA. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, 2106058. 10.1002/advs.202106058
Contributor Information
Yu‐Hui Zhang, Email: zhangyuhui2022@yeah.net.
Jin‐Wei Tian, Email: jinweitian1220@yeah.net.
Kun Wang, Email: wangk696@qdu.edu.cn.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available in the supplementary material of this article.
References
- 1. Dorn L. E., Tual‐Chalot S., Stellos K., Accornero F., J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 2019, 129, 272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Stellos K., Cardiovasc. Res. 2017, 113, e2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Gao X. Q., Zhang Y. H., Liu F., Ponnusamy M., Zhao X. M., Zhou L. Y., Zhai M., Liu C. Y., Li X. M., Wang M., Shan C., Shan P. P., Wang Y., Dong Y. H., Qian L. L., Yu T., Ju J., Wang T., Wang K., Chen X. Z., Wang Y. H., Zhang J., Li P. F., Wang K., Nat. Cell Biol. 2020, 22, 1319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Song H., Feng X., Zhang H., Luo Y., Huang J., Lin M., Jin J., Ding X., Wu S., Huang H., Yu T., Zhang M., Hong H., Yao S., Zhao Y., Zhang Z., Autophagy 2019, 15, 1419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Mathiyalagan P., Adamiak M., Mayourian J., Sassi Y., Liang Y., Agarwal N., Jha D., Zhang S., Kohlbrenner E., Chepurko E., Chen J., Trivieri M. G., Singh R., Bouchareb R., Fish K., Ishikawa K., Lebeche D., Hajjar R. J., Sahoo S., Circulation 2019, 139, 518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Dorn L. E., Lasman L., Chen J., Xu X., Hund T. J., Medvedovic M., Hanna J. H., van Berlo J. H., Accornero F., Circulation 2019, 139, 533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Carnevali L., Graiani G., Rossi S., Al Banchaabouchi M., Macchi E., Quaini F., Rosenthal N., Sgoifo A., PLoS One 2014, 9, e95499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Dong C., Niu L., Song W., Xiong X., Zhang X., Zhang Z., Yang Y., Yi F., Zhan J., Zhang H., Yang Z., Zhang L. H., Zhai S., Li H., Ye M., Du Q., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 476, 340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Sharma S., Langhendries J. L., Watzinger P., Kotter P., Entian K. D., Lafontaine D. L., Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, 2242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Arango D., Sturgill D., Alhusaini N., Dillman A. A., Sweet T. J., Hanson G., Hosogane M., Sinclair W. R., Nanan K. K., Mandler M. D., Fox S. D., Zengeya T. T., Andresson T., Meier J. L., Coller J., Oberdoerffer S., Cell 2018, 175, 1872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Czech B., Munafo M., Ciabrelli F., Eastwood E. L., Fabry M. H., Kneuss E., Hannon G. J., Annu. Rev. Genet. 2018, 52, 131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Peng J. C., Lin H., Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2013, 25, 190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Watanabe T., Lin H., Mol. Cell. 2014, 56, 18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Rouget C., Papin C., Boureux A., Meunier A. C., Franco B., Robine N., Lai E. C., Pelisson A., Simonelig M., Nature 2010, 467, 1128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Rajan K. S., Velmurugan G., Gopal P., Ramprasath T., Babu D. D., Krithika S., Jenifer Y. C., Freddy A., William G. J., Kalpana K., Ramasamy S., Heart Lung Circ. 2016, 25, 1013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Yang J., Xue F. T., Li Y. Y., Liu W., Zhang S., Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2018, 22, 7952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Li Y., Zeng A., Li G., Guan Y. N., Yang H. T., Shen B., Jing Q., Genom. Data. 2017, 12, 136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Dong Z. W., Shao P., Diao L. T., Zhou H., Yu C. H., Qu L. H., Nucl. Acids Res. 2012, 40, e157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Brooks C., Cho S. G., Wang C. Y., Yang T., Dong Z., Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2011, 300, C447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Suen D. F., Norris K. L., Youle R. J., Genes Dev. 2008, 22, 1577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Tanaka A., Youle R. J., Mol. Cell 2008, 29, 409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Wang K., Long B., Zhou L. Y., Liu F., Zhou Q. Y., Liu C. Y., Fan Y. Y., Li P. F., Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Xie M., Kong Y., Tan W., May H., Battiprolu P. K., Pedrozo Z., Wang Z. V., Morales C., Luo X., Cho G., Jiang N., Jessen M. E., Warner J. J., Lavandero S., Gillette T. G., Turer A. T., Hill J. A., Circulation 2014, 129, 1139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Wang Z. V., Deng Y., Gao N., Pedrozo Z., Li D. L., Morales C. R., Criollo A., Luo X., Tan W., Jiang N., Lehrman M. A., Rothermel B. A., Lee A. H., Lavandero S., Mammen P. P. A., Ferdous A., Gillette T. G., Scherer P. E., Hill J. A., Cell 2014, 156, 1179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Geula S., Moshitch‐Moshkovitz S., Dominissini D., Mansour A. A., Kol N., Salmon‐Divon M., Hershkovitz V., Peer E., Mor N., Manor Y. S., Ben‐Haim M. S., Eyal E., Yunger S., Pinto Y., Jaitin D. A., Viukov S., Rais Y., Krupalnik V., Chomsky E., Zerbib M., Maza I., Rechavi Y., Massarwa R., Hanna S., Amit I., Levanon E. Y., Amariglio N., Stern‐Ginossar N., Novershtern N., Rechavi G., et al., Science 2015, 347, 1002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Su R., Dong L., Li C., Nachtergaele S., Wunderlich M., Qing Y., Deng X., Wang Y., Weng X., Hu C., Yu M., Skibbe J., Dai Q., Zou D., Wu T., Yu K., Weng H., Huang H., Ferchen K., Qin X., Zhang B., Qi J., Sasaki A. T., Plas D. R., Bradner J. E., Wei M., Marcucci G., Jiang X., Mulloy J. C., Jin J., et al., Cell 2018, 172, 90.e123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Bertero A., Brown S., Madrigal P., Osnato A., Ortmann D., Yiangou L., Kadiwala J., Hubner N. C., de Los Mozos I. R., Sadée C., Lenaerts A. S., Nakanoh S., Grandy R., Farnell E., Ule J., Stunnenberg H. G., Mendjan S., Vallier L., Nature 2018, 555, 256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Zhao G. Q., Zhao Q., Zhou X., Mattei M. G., de Crombrugghe B., Mol. Cell. Biol. 1993, 13, 4505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Martina J. A., Diab H. I., Li H., Puertollano R., Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2014, 71, 2483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Hur J., Bell D. W., Dean K. L., Coser K. R., Hilario P. C., Okimoto R. A., Tobey E. M., Smith S. L., Isselbacher K. J., Shioda T., Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 10153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Li W., Laishram R. S., Ji Z., Barlow C. A., Tian B., Anderson R. A., Mol. Cell 2012, 45, 25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. López I., Tournillon A. S., Prado Martins R., Karakostis K., Malbert‐Colas L., Nylander K., Fåhraeus R., Cell Death Differ. 2017, 24, 1717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Rojas‐Rios P., Simonelig M., Development 2018, 145, dev161786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Li X., Peng J., Yi C., Biochemistry 2019, 58, 1553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Tshori S., Gilon D., Beeri R., Nechushtan H., Kaluzhny D., Pikarsky E., Razin E., J. Clin. Invest. 2006, 116, 2673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Kuiper R. P., Schepens M., Thijssen J., Schoenmakers E. F., van Kessel A. G., Nucl. Acids Res. 2004, 32, 2315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Zhao W., Zhao T., Chen Y., Qu Y., Gerling I. C., Sun Y., Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2013, 379, 243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Boyd J. M., Gallo G. J., Elangovan B., Houghton A. B., Malstrom S., Avery B. J., Ebb R. G., Subramanian T., Chittenden T., Lutz R. J., Chinnadurai G., Oncogene 1995, 11, 1921. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Germain M., Mathai J. P., Shore G. C., J.Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 18053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Germain M., Mathai J. P., McBride H. M., Shore G. C., EMBO J. 2005, 24, 1546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Chinnadurai G., Vijayalingam S., Rashmi R., Oncogene 2008, 27, S20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Dalal S., Zha Q., Singh M., Singh K., Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2016, 418, 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available in the supplementary material of this article.