Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine logoLink to Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine
. 2022 Feb 6;10(3):e1872. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.1872

Decreased expression of autophagy‐related genes in the complete remission phase of acute myeloid leukemia

Parisa Tandel 1, Reza Ranjbaran 1, Eqbal Ebrahimi 1, Alireza Rezvani 2, Mani Ramzi 3, Gholamhossein Tamaddon 1,✉
PMCID: PMC8922948  PMID: 35128828

Abstract

Background

Autophagy is a conserved recycling process in cells. However, the effects of autophagy on the remission and treatment response of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients have not been clarified.

Methods

The expression of MAP1LC3B, ATG5, ATG10, RB1CC1, and AMBRA1 genes was assessed in 32 newly diagnosed AML patients, 18 complete remission (CR) patients, and seven relapsed patients, as well as 15 controls, by real‐time polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

Results

The expression of all five genes was significantly higher in the newly diagnosed AML patients as compared to the controls (p < 0.0001). The MAP1LC3B, ATG5, ATG10, RB1CC1, and AMBRA1 gene expression significantly reduced in CR patients compared to newly diagnosed AML patients (p = 0.006, 0.003, 0.0002, 0.006, and 0.004, respectively). The AMBRA1 gene expression was significantly higher in the relapsed cases as compared to both newly diagnosed (p = 0.01) and CR patients (p = 0.03). Moreover, a significant positive correlation was observed between the expression of MAP1LC3B (r = 0.739, p = 0.000001), ATG5 (r = 0.682, p = 0.00001), and ATG10 (r = 0.586, p = 0.0004) genes and white blood cell (WBC) count in patients at diagnosis.

Conclusion

The expression of MAP1LC3B, ATG5, ATG10, RB1CC1, and AMBRA1 genes can be examined to follow‐up the remission of AML and the patient's response to treatment.

Keywords: acute myeloid leukemia, autophagy, follow‐up, remission

Autophagy is known as an effective pathway in biological processes, but their unknowns are still secret in leukemia and response to treatment. The autophagy‐related genes might be changed and useful to remission follow‐up. In this study, we try to introduce the impact of autophagy‐related genes in pathogenesis, treatment response, and remission of acute myeloid leukemia.

graphic file with name MGG3-10-e1872-g001.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Autophagy is a conserved recycling system in cells, which leads to the degradation of damaged cytoplasmic components by lysosomes (Parzych & Klionsky, 2014). It is an important pathway to maintain cellular hemostasis; its activation helps the cells survive when exposed to stressors (Chun & Kim, 2018). This process plays a dual role in cancer initiation and progression. Evidence shows that decreased autophagy can lead to accelerated tumorigenesis. On the other hand, autophagy induction can increase the proliferation and survival of tumor cells under adverse conditions (Chen & Debnath, 2010); therefore, it remains a controversial issue in tumorigenesis and cancer.

Disruption of autophagy may play an important role in the initiation and development of leukemias, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (Auberger & Puissant, 2017). AML is an aggressive hematological malignancy, which results from the accumulation of abnormal myeloid progenitors in the bone marrow and peripheral blood (Saultz & Garzon, 2016). The primary treatment for AML patients is chemotherapy (Tamamyan et al., 2017), and the main goal of treatment is to induce complete remission (CR) and prevent relapse (Dohner et al., 2010).

Despite attaining CR in most patients, the relapse rate remains high after treatment (Bryan & Jabbour, 2015). Recent studies have revealed that drug resistance might be one of the most significant causes of treatment failure in AML patients (Shaffer et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2019). Aberrant activation of several signaling pathways, such as autophagy, contributes to the drug resistance mechanisms of AML (Chen et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2019). Autophagy enhancement can play a role as a chemo‐resistance mechanism during chemotherapy of AML patients (Evangelisti et al., 2015; Piya & Kornblau, 2016; Piya et al., 2017).

According to recent studies, autophagy inhibition via suppression of autophagy‐related genes or using autophagy inhibitory drugs can enhance the cytotoxicity of chemotherapy drugs in AML cell lines (Nourkeyhani et al., 2016; Palmeira‐Dos‐Santos et al., 2014; Piya & Kornblau, 2016). However, the effects of autophagy on response to therapy and remission in AML patients have not been clarified, and further investigation is necessary. The present study aimed to evaluate the expression of MAP1LC3B (OMIM accession number: * 609604), ATG5 (OMIM accession number: * 604261), ATG10 (OMIM accession number: * 610800), RB1CC1 (OMIM accession number: * 606837), and AMBRA1 (OMIM accession number: * 611359) genes as the main genes in the autophagy pathway at diagnosis and in the CR and relapse phases of AML.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Samples and patients

In this case–control study, the whole blood samples were collected from 32 newly diagnosed AML patients (new cases), who did not have a history of chemotherapy. These patients were classified according to the treatment regimen (AML‐M3 and non‐M3 AML) at the Hematology Department of Namazi Hospital, affiliated to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

The patients received the standard‐of‐care regimens (cytarabine + anthracycline for non‐M3 AML patients and all‐trans retinoic acid [ATRA] + arsenic trioxide for AML‐M3 patients), and after the induction phase, 18 patients attained CR. Patients who expired were excluded from the study. We also included seven AML patients in the relapse phase. Moreover, we recruited 15 healthy individuals without cancer or hematological diseases as the control group; they were matched with AML patients in terms of age and gender.

2.2. RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis

Total RNA was extracted from whole blood samples using TRIzol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Subsequently, the extracted RNA concentrations were measured by a NanoDrop instrument (Hellma, Denmark). Next, 0.4 μg of each RNA was reverse‐transcribed into cDNA to a final volume of 10 μl, according to the instructions of the PrimeScript First‐Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Takara, Shiga, Japan).

2.3. Quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qRT‐PCR)

AlleleID 7.0 and Gene Runner were used to design the sequences of specific primers. A qRT‐PCR was performed to evaluate the expression of MAP1LC3B (GenBank Ref Seq no: NM_022818.5), ATG5 (GenBank Ref Seq no: NM_004849.4), ATG10 (GenBank Ref Seq no: NM_031482.5), RB1CC1 (GenBank Ref Seq no: NM_014781.5), and AMBRA1 (GenBank Ref Seq no: NM_001267782.2) genes, using Qiagen real‐time PCR cycler (Rotor Gene, Germany). Beta‐actin was used as an endogenous control for normalization of mRNA expression between different samples. For each RT‐PCR reaction, 1 μl of cDNA, 10 μl of SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (SYBR Premix Ex Taq™II, Tli RNaseH Plus Yektatajhiz, Iran), 8.2 μl of nuclease‐free water, 0.4 μl of forward primer, and 0.4 μl of reverse primer in a final volume of 20 μl were used. The fold changes in MAP1LC3B, ATG5, ATG10, RB1CC1, and AMBRA1 gene expression were analyzed using the 2−∆∆CT method.

2.4. Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 8.0.2 (Graph Pad Software Inc., San Diego, California, USA) and SPSS version 25.0 (SPSS IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). Mann–Whitney test, Wilcoxon test, paired t‐test, and unpaired t‐test were performed to compare the gene expression between each two groups. Fold changes were calculated using the 2−∆∆CT method. Moreover, the correlations between gene expression and the clinical characteristics of patients were analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) test. p‐value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant in all tests.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Patients' clinical characteristics

The clinical characteristics of 32 newly diagnosed AML patients, 18 AML patients in the CR phase, and seven patients in the relapse phase, as well as 15 healthy controls are presented in Table 1. Cytogenetic status of AML pateints at diagnosis and in the CR and relapse phases showed in Table 2.

TABLE 1.

The clinical information of AML patients at diagnosis and in the complete remission and relapse phases and the healthy controls

New case Complete remission Relapse Control
Sex, male/female 16/16 8/10 4/3 9/6
Age, median (range) 52 (24–75) 50 (24–75) 50 (24–78) 44 (27–73)
WBC (*109/L), median (range) 32.8 (0.5–166) 2.6 (0.4–16.9) 5.9 (0.9–15) 6.7 (5.2–10)
PLT(*109/L), median (range) 65.8 (6–227) 87.2 (8–230) 70 (4–200) 252 (196–321)
Hb (g/L), median (range) 7.9 (4.4–11.2) 8.3 (7.2–10.4) 7.9 (5.1–10.3) 14.6 (13.2–15.8)
BM blast %, median (range) 73 (40–90) <5 (1–3) 57 (30–77) –
Classification (AML M3/non‐M3) 5/27 3/15 1/6 –
Open in a new tab

Abbreviations: BM, bone marrow; Hb, hemoglobin; PLT, platelet; WBC, white blood cells.

TABLE 2.

Cytogenetic status of AML pateints at diagnosis and in the complete remission and relapse phases

New case n = 32 Complete remission n = 18 Relapse n = 7
AML‐NOS 16 AML‐NOS 10 AML‐NOS 6
t(15;17) (q24;q21); PML‐RARA 5 t(15;17) (q24;q21); PML‐RARA 3 t(15;17) (q24;q21); PML‐RARA 1
t(8;21) (q22;q22.1);RUNX1‐RUNX1T1 7 t(8;21) (q22;q22.1);RUNX1‐RUNX1T1 4
t(16;16) (p13.1;q22);CBFB‐MYH11 4 t(16;16) (p13.1;q22);CBFB‐MYH11 1
Open in a new tab

Abbreviation: AML‐NOS, acute myeloid leukemia‐not otherwise specified.

3.2. Expression of MAP1LC3B , ATG5 , ATG10 , RB1CC1, and AMBRA1 genes in newly diagnosed AML patients and control groups

The mRNA expression of MAP1LC3B, ATG5, ATG10, RB1CC1, and AMBRA1 genes was evaluated in 32 newly diagnosed AML (new case) patients and 15 healthy controls. The results showed that the expression of MAP1LC3B, ATG5, ATG10, RB1CC1, and AMBRA1 genes was significantly upregulated in AML patients as compared to the control group (7.18, 27.6, 36.8, 69.7, and 3.6 folds, respectively) (p < 0.0001). The details of these results are shown in Figure 1.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Open in a new tab

Comparison of the expression of MAP1LC3B, ATG5, ATG10, RB1CC1, and AMBRA1 genes between newly diagnosed AML patients and controls. The expression of these genes significantly increased in AML patients versus the controls (****p < 0.0001)

3.3. Changes in the expression of MAP1LC3B , ATG5 , ATG10 , RB1CC1, and AMBRA1 genes in AML patients in the different disease phases

The expression of MAP1LC3B, ATG5, ATG10, RB1CC1, and AMBRA1 genes was investigated in 18 newly diagnosed AML patients and 18 AML‐CR patients in the same cases. The results showed that the expression of MAP1LC3B, ATG5, ATG10, RB1CC1, and AMBRA1 genes was significantly downregulated in CR patients as compared to newly diagnosed AML patients (0.71, 0.73, 0.5, 0.72, and 0.75 folds, respectively) (p = 0.006, 0.003, 0.0002, 0.006, and 0.004, respectively). The relative expression of these genes in CR patients compared to newly diagnosed AML patients is shown in Figure 2.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Open in a new tab

The relative expression of MAP1LC3B, ATG5, ATG10, RB1CC1, and AMBRA1 genes in CR patients versus newly diagnosed AML patients. All genes showed significantly lower expression levels in AML‐CR patients compared to newly diagnosed AML cases (**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001)

Moreover, the expression of MAP1LC3B, ATG5, ATG10, RB1CC1, and AMBRA1 genes was assessed in seven AML patients in the relapse phase and compared with that of 32 newly diagnosed AML patients. There was no significant difference in the expression of MAP1LC3B, ATG5, ATG10, and RB1CC1 genes between relapsed and newly diagnosed cases (p > 0.05). The AMBRA1 gene expression significantly increased in patients with relapse as compared to newly diagnosed AML patients (2.1 folds) (p = 0.01); the details are presented in Figure 3.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Open in a new tab

Comparison of the expression of MAP1LC3B, ATG5, ATG10, RB1CC1, and AMBRA1 genes between relapsed and newly diagnosed AML patients. The AMBRA1 gene expression was significantly higher in relapsed patients as compared to newly diagnosed cases (*p < 0.05)

Moreover, to determine the role of autophagy‐related genes in the chemo‐resistance of AML patients, we compared the expression of MAP1LC3B, ATG5, ATG10, RB1CC1, and AMBRA1 genes in seven relapsed cases versus 18 CR cases. The results showed that the expression of MAP1LC3B, ATG5, ATG10, and RB1CC1 genes was not significantly different between the relapse and CR groups (p > 0.05). However, the expression of AMBRA1 gene was significantly higher in relapsed patients as compared to CR patients (2.8‐folds) (p = 0.03); this comparison is presented in Figure 4.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Open in a new tab

The expression of MAP1LC3B, ATG5, ATG10, RB1CC1, and AMBRA1 genes in relapsed AML patients as compared to AML‐CR patients. The expression of AMBRA1 gene was significantly higher in relapsed patients as compared to CR patients (*p < 0.05)

3.4. Correlation of MAP1LC3B , ATG5 , ATG10 , RB1CC1 , and AMBRA1 gene expression with the patients' clinical characteristics

The correlations between the expression of MAP1LC3B, ATG5, ATG10, RB1CC1, and AMBRA1 genes and age, gender, hemoglobin (Hb) level, white blood cell (WBC) count, platelet count, bone marrow blast percentage, and subtype at diagnosis and in the CR and relapse phases were investigated. There was no significant association between the expression of these genes and age, gender, Hb level, platelet count, bone marrow percentage, and subtype of patients at diagnosis.

However, a significant positive correlation was found between the expression of MAP1LC3B (r = 0.739, p = 0.000001), ATG5 (r = 0.682, p = 0.00001), and ATG10 (r = 0.586, p = 0.0004) genes and WBC count. Therefore, upregulation of MAP1LC3B, ATG5, and ATG10 genes was associated with a high WBC count at diagnosis. In CR patients, no significant correlation was observed between the expression of MAP1LC3B, ATG5, ATG10, RB1CC1, and AMBRA1 genes and the patients' clinical characteristics (p > 0.05). Also, the results did not indicate a significant correlation between the expression of these genes and the clinical characteristics of relapsed patients (p > 0.05).

3.5. Correlation between the expression of MAP1LC3B , ATG5 , ATG10 , RB1CC1 , and AMBRA1 genes and CD34+ marker

The relationship between the expression of MAP1LC3B, ATG5, ATG10, RB1CC1, and AMBRA1 genes and CD34+ marker was examined in this study. According to the results, there was no significant correlation between the expression of MAP1LC3B, ATG5, ATG10, RB1CC1, and AMBRA1 genes and CD34+ marker (p > 0.05); the results are presented in Figure 5.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Open in a new tab

Correlation of MAP1LC3B, ATG5, ATG10, RB1CC1, and AMBRA1 gene expression with CD34 marker. There was no significant association between the expression of these genes and CD34 marker (ns, not significant)

3.6. Correlations between autophagy‐related genes

A statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the correlations between MAP1LC3B, ATG5, ATG10, RB1CC1, and AMBRA1 genes. The results showed a significant positive correlation between MAP1LC3B, ATG5, ATG10, and RB1CC1 genes (p < 0.05). Besides, the expression of AMBRA1 gene had a significant positive correlation with ATG5 and RB1CC1 genes (p < 0.05).

4. DISCUSSION

Autophagy is a conserved, self‐degradative, multistep process, which plays a critical role in maintaining cellular hemostasis. This pathway consists of several phases, including induction, autophagosome nucleation, elongation and maturation, and lysosomal fusion and degradation. Various proteins contribute to the autophagy process, called autophagy‐related proteins (ATG). FIP200 is an essential protein for autophagy induction, encoded by the RB1CC1 gene. This protein, along with ULK1, ATG13, and ATG101, forms the ULK complex, which activates autophagy under various conditions, such as starvation and treatment with rapamycin. Autophagosome nucleation is triggered by activation of class III phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinase (PI3KC3) complex. PIK3C3, Beclin1, AMBRA1, and P150 form the core of the PI3KC3 complex. Generally, the vesicle elongation and maturation phase depends on two ubiquitin‐like conjugation reactions: ATG5‐ATG12 and LC3‐PE conjugation. ATG7 (an E1‐like enzyme), as well as ATG10 and ATG3 (E2‐like enzymes), is involved in these conjugation reactions. During the vesicle elongation and maturation phase, ATG4 cleaves LC3 to LC3I. Then, LC3I is converted into LC3II, which remains on the autophagosomes membrane and is used as an autophagy marker (Badadani, 2012; Dikic & Elazar, 2018; Glick et al., 2010).

Autophagy may affect the initiation and progression of leukemias. Leukemic cells can utilize autophagy to provide their metabolic needs for proliferation and survival. Also, autophagy activation can protect leukemic cells against oxidative stress; therefore, it can promote leukemogenesis, as well as drug resistance following treatment (Mourgues et al., 2015; Piya & Kornblau, 2016; Rothe et al., 2014).

The standard initial treatment for AML patients consists of cytarabine in combination with an anthracycline for non‐M3 AML and ATRA in combination with arsenic trioxide for M3‐AML. Despite achieving CR in the majority of patients, the rate of recurrence remains high following treatment (Tamamyan et al., 2017). According to emerging data, drug resistance is known as one of the most important causes of treatment failure in AML patients (Zhang et al., 2019). Recent studies have shown that activation of autophagy upon chemotherapy can be involved in the drug resistance of AML patients (Chen et al., 2016; Niu et al., 2019; Rothe et al., 2019).

In the present study, the expression of key autophagy‐related genes, including MAP1LC3B, ATG5, ATG10, RB1CC1, and AMBRA1, was evaluated at diagnosis and in the CR and relapse phases of AML patients. The results showed that the expression of MAP1LC3B, ATG5, ATG10, RB1CC1, and AMBRA1 genes significantly increased by 7.18, 27.6, 36.8, 69.7, and 3.6‐folds, respectively in AML patients as compared to the healthy controls (p < 0.0001) (Figure 1). This finding is in line with the results reported by Hu XY et al. on acute leukemia patients, which suggested that autophagy activation and expression of BECN1 and MAP1LC3B genes were significantly higher in de novo patients as compared to the controls (Hu et al., 2011). Our results showed that the upregulation of autophagy genes might be related to the pathogenesis of AML.

Additionally, Zare Abdollahi et al. reported that the expression of BECN1 gene was significantly lower in AML patients with intermediate and unfavorable cytogenetic risks as compared to the normal controls. However, in the favorable subtypes of AML, the BECN1 gene expression did not show any significant changes (Zare‐Abdollahi et al., 2016). Yun Lian et al. also found no significant differences in the expression of BECN1 and ATG5 genes between AML patients and controls (Lian et al., 2018). This discrepancy between the results might be due to the dual role of autophagy in leukemogenesis, different AML subtypes, or the genetic background of the studied populations.

In this study, the expression level of AMBRA1 gene was significantly higher in the relapsed cases as compared to both diagnosis and CR cases (2.1 and 2.8‐folds, respectively; p = 0.01 and 0.03, respectively) (Figures 3 and 4); this might be due to the possible role of AMBRA1 gene in the chemo‐resistance of relapsed/refractory AML patients. Moreover, the expression of MAP1LC3B gene, as an important marker of autophagy, increased in patients with relapse compared to newly diagnosed and CR cases; however, it was not statistically significant (Figures 3 and 4). Therefore, further research is required on a larger group of relapsed patients to determine the exact role of MAP1LC3B in relapsed/refractory AML.

Moreover, our results demonstrated that in the CR phase, the expression level of MAP1LC3B, ATG5, ATG10, RB1CC1, and AMBRA1 genes was significantly reduced (0.71, 0.73, 0.5, 0.72, and 0.75‐folds, respectively) as compared to newly diagnosed AML patients (p = 0.006, 0.003, 0.0002, 0.006, and 0.004, respectively) (Figure 2). This finding is in line with our previous study, which revealed that the expression of BECN1 gene in AML‐CR patients was significantly lower than newly diagnosed cases (Tandel et al., 2020). This result shows that decreased autophagy activity might be beneficial in achieving CR in patients. Therefore, targeting autophagy‐related genes might help to ameliorate the treatment outcomes of AML patients.

Additionally, the expression of MAP1LC3B, ATG5, ATG10, RB1CC1, and AMBRA1 genes may be used as a therapeutic biomarker to follow‐up the CR status. In this regard, Palmeira dos Santos et al. revealed that autophagy blockade by 3‐methyladenine (3MA) could enhance cytarabine cytotoxicity against the HL‐60 cell line (Palmeira‐Dos‐Santos et al., 2014). Piya et al. revealed that ATG7 plays a significant role in the AML cell chemo‐resistance. In other words, the suppression of ATG7 increases the sensitivity of these cells to cytarabine‐induced cell death (Piya & Kornblau, 2016). Lian et al. reported that the upregulation of ATG5 and BECN1 genes could be associated with a poor prognosis, and downregulation of these genes could be related to a high CR rate in AML patients (Lian et al., 2018).

The results of this study also revealed that the overexpression of MAP1LC3B (r = 0.739, p = 0.000001), ATG5 (r = 0.682, p = 0.00001), and ATG10 (r = 0.586, p = 0.0004) genes was related to a high WBC count at diagnosis. Based on our results and studies on the role of autophagy in myeloid cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis (Mourgues et al., 2015; Palmeira‐Dos‐Santos et al., 2014; Rothe et al., 2014), an increase in autophagy activity may affect the myeloid cell functions in AML patients; however, further studies are needed to confirm this finding.

The expression of CD34+ marker is associated with multi‐drug resistance (MDR) in AML and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients (List, 1996; Sonneveld et al., 1993). Several studies have shown that the increased number of CD34+ blasts could be related to relapse and disease progression in both AML and MDS (Macedo et al., 1996; Suarez et al., 2004). Moreover, CD34+ blasts show more resistance to chemotherapy and apoptosis compared to normal CD34+ fractions (Konopleva et al., 2002; Suarez et al., 2004). Considering the role of CD34+ marker and autophagy in drug resistance of AML patients, we investigated the correlation between autophagy‐related genes and CD34 marker. However, no significant association was observed between the expression of MAP1LC3B, ATG5, ATG10, RB1CC1, and AMBRA1 genes and CD34 marker (p > 0.05) (Figure 5).

We recommend that future studies focus on the correlation of autophagy‐related genes with the prognosis of AML patients. We could not evaluate the levels of LC3, ATG5, ATG10, RB1CC1, and AMBRA1 proteins because of some limitations. Therefore, future studies need to measure these proteins using the western blot technique. Also, further studies are needed to investigate the relationship between autophagy‐related genes and minimal residual disease (MRD).

5. CONCLUSION

The present results showed that the key autophagy‐related genes, including MAP1LC3B, ATG5, ATG10, RB1CC1, and AMBRA1, could be related to the pathogenesis of AML and the patients' response to treatment. Therefore, these genes may be suggested as therapeutic biomarkers to follow‐up the CR status. Also, inhibition of autophagy‐related genes might be beneficial in inducing remission, preventing relapse, and also, improving the treatment outcomes of AML patients.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Parisa Tandel designed the study, performed the research, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. Gholamhossein Tamaddon designed the study and was responsible for data management and analysis. Reza Ranjbaran revised the article critically and contributed to data analysis. Eqbal Ebrahimi performed the research and analyzed the data. Mani Ramzi and Alireza Rezvani revised the article critically.

ETHICAL COMPLIANCE

The local Ethics Committee of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences approved this study (IR.SUMS.REC.1397.085), and the written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors appreciate all the participants of this study, as well as the leukemia ward staff at Namazi Hospital. The authors also would like to thank the staff of the Diagnostic Laboratory Sciences and Technology Research Center (DLSTRC) for their support.

Tandel, P. , Ranjbaran, R. , Ebrahimi, E. , Rezvani, A. , Ramzi, M., & Tamaddon, G. (2022). Decreased expression of autophagy‐related genes in the complete remission phase of acute myeloid leukemia. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine, 10, e1872. 10.1002/mgg3.1872

Funding information

This article was extracted from the master's thesis by Parisa Tandel and was financially supported by Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (97‐01‐10‐17448)

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The datasets generated during and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

REFERENCES

  1. Auberger, P. , & Puissant, A. (2017). Autophagy, a key mechanism of oncogenesis and resistance in leukemia. Blood, 129(5), 547–552. 10.1182/blood-2016-07-692707 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Badadani, M. (2012). Autophagy mechanism, regulation, functions, and disorders. ISRN Cell Biology, 2012, 11. 10.5402/2012/927064 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bryan, J. C. , & Jabbour, E. J. (2015). Management of relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia in the elderly: Current strategies and developments. Drugs & Aging, 32(8), 623–637. 10.1007/s40266-015-0285-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, N. , & Debnath, J. (2010). Autophagy and tumorigenesis. FEBS Letters, 584(7), 1427–1435. 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.12.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen, P. , Jin, Q. , Fu, Q. , You, P. , Jiang, X. , Yuan, Q. , & Huang, H. (2016). Induction of multidrug resistance of acute myeloid leukemia cells by cocultured stromal cells via upregulation of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Oncology Research, 24(4), 215–223. 10.3727/096504016x14634208143021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chun, Y. , & Kim, J. (2018). Autophagy: An essential degradation program for cellular homeostasis and life. Cell, 7(12), 278. 10.3390/cells7120278 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dikic, I. , & Elazar, Z. (2018). Mechanism and medical implications of mammalian autophagy. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 19(6), 349–364. 10.1038/s41580-018-0003-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Döhner, H. , Estey, E. H. , Amadori, S. , Appelbaum, F. R. , Büchner, T. , Burnett, A. K. , Dombret, H. , Fenaux, P. , Grimwade, D. , Larson, R. A. , Lo‐Coco, F. , Naoe, T. , Niederwieser, D. , Ossenkoppele, G. J. , Sanz, M. A. , Sierra, J. , Tallman, M. S. , Löwenberg, B. , Bloomfield, C. D. , & European LeukemiaNet . (2010). Diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia in adults: Recommendations from an international expert panel, on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet. Blood, 115(3), 453–474. 10.1182/blood-2009-07-235358 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Evangelisti, C. , Evangelisti, C. , Chiarini, F. , Lonetti, A. , Buontempo, F. , Neri, L. M. , McCubrey, J. A. , & Martelli, A. M. (2015). Autophagy in acute leukemias: A double‐edged sword with important therapeutic implications. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1853(1), 14–26. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2014.09.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Glick, D. , Barth, S. , & Macleod, K. F. (2010). Autophagy: Cellular and molecular mechanisms. The Journal of Pathology, 221(1), 3–12. 10.1002/path.2697 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hu, X. Y. , Bai, H. , Pan, Y. Z. , Wnag, C. B. , Wu, B. , Zhao, Q. , Ai, H. , Chen, Z. , & Han, X. (2011). Expression of autophagy related gene Beclin1 and MAPLC3 in bone marrow mononuclear cells isolated from acute leukemia patients and its significance. Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi, 19(3), 598–601. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Konopleva, M. , Zhao, S. , Hu, W. , Jiang, S. , Snell, V. , Weidner, D. , Jackson, C. E. , Zhang, X. , Champlin, R. , Estey, E. , Reed, J. C. , & Andreeff, M. (2002). The anti‐apoptotic genes Bcl‐X(L) and Bcl‐2 are over‐expressed and contribute to chemoresistance of non‐proliferating leukaemic CD34+ cells. British Journal of Haematology, 118(2), 521–534. 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03637.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lian, Y. , Xie, Y. , Hong, M. , Zhu, Y. , Zhao, H. , Zhao, X. , Zhu, H. , Qiao, C. , Li, J. , & Qian, S. (2018). Clinical significance of BECLIN1 and ATG5 expression in acute myeloid leukemia patients. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, 11(3), 1529–1537. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. List, A. F. (1996). Role of multidrug resistance and its pharmacological modulation in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia, 10(6), 937–942. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Macedo, A. , San Miguel, J. F. , Vidriales, M. B. , López‐Berges, M. C. , García‐Marcos, M. A. , Gonzalez, M. , Landolfi, C. , & Orfão, A. (1996). Phenotypic changes in acute myeloid leukaemia: Implications in the detection of minimal residual disease. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 49(1), 15–18. 10.1136/jcp.49.1.15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mourgues, L. , Imbert, V. , Nebout, M. , Colosetti, P. , Neffati, Z. , Lagadec, P. , Verhoeyen, E. , Peng, C. , Duprez, E. , Legros, L. , Rochet, N. , Maguer‐Satta, V. , Nicolini, F. E. , Mary, D. , & Peyron, J. F. (2015). The BMI1 polycomb protein represses cyclin G2‐induced autophagy to support proliferation in chronic myeloid leukemia cells. Leukemia, 29(10), 1993–2002. 10.1038/leu.2015.112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Niu, Y. , Yang, X. , Chen, Y. , Jin, X. , Li, L. , Guo, Y. , Li, X. , Xie, Y. , Zhang, Y. , & Wang, H. (2020). EVI1 induces autophagy to promote drug resistance via regulation of ATG7 expression in leukemia cells. Carcinogenesis, 41, 961–971. 10.1093/carcin/bgz167 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Nourkeyhani, H. , Jason, D. H. P. , Scott, P. , Hanekamp, D. , Johnson, M. , & Wang, E. S. (2016). Targeting autophagy as a therapeutic strategy in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood, 128(22), 3950. [Google Scholar]
  19. Palmeira‐Dos‐Santos, C. , Pereira, G. M. V. , Barbosa, C. , Jurkiewicz, A. , Smaili, S. , & Bincoletto, C. (2014). Comparative study of autophagy inhibition by 3MA and CQ on cytarabine‐induced death of leukaemia cells. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 140, 909–920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Parzych, K. R. , & Klionsky, D. J. (2014). An overview of autophagy: Morphology, mechanism, and regulation. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, 20(3), 460–473. 10.1089/ars.2013.5371 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Piya, S. , Andreeff, M. , & Borthakur, G. (2017). Targeting autophagy to overcome chemoresistance in acute myleogenous leukemia. Autophagy, 13(1), 214–215. 10.1080/15548627.2016.1245263 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Piya, S. , & Kornblau, S. M. (2016). Atg7 suppression enhances chemotherapeutic agent sensitivity and overcomes stroma‐mediated chemoresistance in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood, 128(9), 1260–1269. 10.1182/blood-2016-01-692244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rothe, K. , Lin, H. , Lin, K. B. , Leung, A. , Wang, H. M. , Malekesmaeili, M. , Brinkman, R. R. , Forrest, D. L. , Gorski, S. M. , & Jiang, X. (2014). The core autophagy protein ATG4B is a potential biomarker and therapeutic target in CML stem/progenitor cells. Blood, 123(23), 3622–3634. 10.1182/blood-2013-07-516807 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rothe, K. , Porter, V. , & Jiang, X. (2019). Current outlook on autophagy in human leukemia: Foe in cancer stem cells and drug resistance, friend in new therapeutic interventions. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(3), 461. 10.3390/ijms20030461 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Saultz, J. N. , & Garzon, R. (2016). Acute myeloid leukemia: A concise review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 5(3), 33. 10.3390/jcm5030033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Shaffer, B. , Gillet, J.‐P. , Patel, C. , Baer, M. , Bates, S. , & Gottesman, M. (2012). Drug resistance: Still a daunting challenge to the successful treatment of AML. Drug Resistance Updates, 15, 62–69. 10.1016/j.drup.2012.02.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sonneveld, P. , van Dongen, J. J. , Hagemeijer, A. , van Lom, K. , Nooter, K. , Schoester, M. , Adriaansen, H. J. , Tsuruo, T. , & de Leeuw, K. (1993). High expression of the multidrug resistance P‐glycoprotein in high‐risk myelodysplasia is associated with immature phenotype. Leukemia, 7(7), 963–969. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Suarez, L. , Vidriales, M. B. , Garcia‐Larana, J. , Sanz, G. , Moreno, M. J. , Lopez, A. , Barrena, S. , Martínez, R. , Tormo, M. , Palomera, L. , Lavilla, E. , López‐Berges, M. C. , de Santiago, M. , Pérez de Equiza, M. E. , San Miguel, J. F. , & Orfao, A. (2004). CD34+ cells from acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndromes, and normal bone marrow display different apoptosis and drug resistance‐associated phenotypes. Clinical Cancer Research, 10(22), 7599–7606. 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-04-0598 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tandel, P. , Ebrahimi, E. , Ramzi, M. , Rezvani, A. , Ranjbaran, R. , & Tamaddon, G. (2020). Evaluation of BECN1 gene expression in remission‐induction therapy of acute myeloid leukemia. Shiraz E‐Medical Journal, 21(8), e96683. 10.5812/semj.96683 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Tamamyan, G. , Kadia, T. , Ravandi, F. , Borthakur, G. , Cortes, J. , Jabbour, E. , Daver, N. , Ohanian, M. , Kantarjian, H. , & Konopleva, M. (2017). Frontline treatment of acute myeloid leukemia in adults. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 110, 20–34. 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.12.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Zare‐Abdollahi, D. , Safari, S. , Movafagh, A. , Ghadiani, M. , Tabarraee, M. , Riazi‐Isfahani, S. , Gorji, S. , Keyvan, L. , & Gachkar, L. (2016). Expression analysis of BECN1 in acute myeloid leukemia: Association with distinct cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities. International Journal of Laboratory Hematology, 38(2), 125–132. 10.1111/ijlh.12454 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhang, J. , Gu, Y. , & Chen, B. (2019). Mechanisms of drug resistance in acute myeloid leukemia. Oncotargets and Therapy, 12, 1937–1945. 10.2147/OTT.S191621 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Articles from Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine are provided here courtesy of Blackwell Publishing

RESOURCES