Skip to main content
Archives of Medical Science : AMS logoLink to Archives of Medical Science : AMS
. 2022 Feb 23;18(2):545–552. doi: 10.5114/aoms/146827

Biochemical and cardiovascular predictors of PIMS-TS risk in children after COVID-19 recovery: preliminary results of the LATE-COVID-Kids Study

Izabela Jatczak-Pawlik 1,2, Joanna Lewek 1,2, Elżbieta Czkwianianc 3, Agnieszka Blomberg 4, Natalia Krysiak 4, Krzysztof Zeman 4, Piotr Jankowski 5,6, Maciej Banach 1,2,; for the LATE-COVID-Kids Study
PMCID: PMC8924832  PMID: 35316904

Abstract

Introduction

We aimed to characterize biochemical and cardiovascular predictors of the paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with SARS-CoV-2 (PIMS-TS) risk based on the data from the LATE-COVID-Kids study.

Methods

148 consecutive COVID-19 convalescents hospitalized for the clinical evaluation after the acute phase of COVID-19 were classified into two groups related to symptoms: 33 children finally diagnosed with PIMS-TS and 115 children without PIMS-TS (control group).

Results

PIMS-TS children were significantly younger (6.79 ±4.57 vs. 9.10 ±4.94 years). After adjustment, in comparison to those without, PIMS-TS children had a higher level of antithrombin III (111 ±9.30 vs. 105 ±11.4), higher heart rate (HR)/min (100 (89.0–111) vs. 90 (79.7–100)) and sinus rhythm (p = 0.03) but lower PQ interval (p = 0.02) on admission to hospital. The lymphocytes (absolute count and percentage) were significantly higher in children with PIMS-TS, and the opposite results were obtained for IgA and neutrophils. Furthermore, children with PIMS-TS had a higher level of thyroid stimulating hormone (2.76 (2.16–4.18) vs. 2.36 (1.73–2.83)) and red cell distribution width (p < 0.005) compared to those without.

Conclusions

It is the first data on the possible predictors of PIMS-TS risk in the Long-COVID period. These results need to be further validated to next create the PIMS SCORE algorithm, which might enable the effective prediction of children with the risk of PIMS-TS occurrence after COVID-19 recovery.

Keywords: coronavirus, pandemic, PIMS-TS, predictors, prevention, SARS-CoV-2


Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has rapidly spread throughout the world and within a few months caused a global pandemic [1]. During the early months of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, it was suggested that children are not susceptible to COVID-19 infection. Later, during the pandemic, paediatric COVID-19 was described as asymptomatic or with mild symptoms (such as fever, cough, sore throat, diarrhoea) causing very few paediatric hospitalizations [2, 3]. Currently (especially during the infection of delta and omicron variants), more and more children have been infected with the coronavirus and they have often ended up in hospital intensive care units (ICU) with alarming symptoms that begin appearing weeks after the initial infection of COVID-19. This new condition develops very quickly and can attack multiple systems and organs causing high fever, cutaneous manifestations, abdominal symptoms, and cardiovascular problems [4, 5]. Gastrointestinal manifestations are very common and include abdominal pain, diarrhoea, and vomiting [6]. Some patients may also have neurological symptoms (e.g., headache, conjunctivitis) [7]. This new clinical entity was for the first time identified in April 2020 as a paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection (PIMS-TS) [36]. Due to the wide range of its symptoms and the possible imitation of other diseases [8], PIMS-TS is still diagnosed too late, what can increase the risk of morbidity, long-term complications, and even mortality. Therefore, it seems that children with PIMS-TS should be well characterized and described to potentially predict the occurrence of this life-threatening condition. Thus, in the present analysis we aimed to characterize biochemical and cardiovascular predictors of PIMS risk in children recovered from COVID-19 based on the first data from the LATE-COVID-Kids study (NCT04799444).

Methods

148 consecutive (by 15 March 2021) COVID-19 convalescents (mean age: 8.58 ±4.96; 75 boys and 73 girls) hospitalized for the clinical evaluation after the acute phase of the COVID-19 were classified into two groups related to symptoms: 33 children finally diagnosed with PIMS and 115 children with non-PIMS. All patients had confirmed coronavirus infection based on the positive results of the nucleic acid test (reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction – RT-PCR), and they were serologically tested for antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. They had detailed laboratory testing, electrocardiography, echocardiography, lung ultrasound and spirometry.

Statistical analysis

Normal distribution was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. The obtained results were presented as mean ± standard deviation or median (25–75% percentiles) for continuous variables, as appropriate, and as proportions in case of discrete variables. Comparisons between groups were performed using the Student’s t-test for independent variables, the Mann-Whitney U test or χ2 test with Yates correction, as appropriate. Generalized linear model was used to calculate p adjusted for sex and age. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistica v.13 software (TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA).

Results

The time from COVID-19 recovery was from 1 to 13 months (4.00 (3.00–6.00)); for children with PIMS was 2.5 months (2.00–3.37) and for children with no PIMS was 5 months (4.00–6.00; p = 0.00003). Patients with PIMS were significantly younger in comparison to those without PIMS (6.79 ±4.57 vs. 9.10 ±4.94 years, p = 0.018). We did not observe any male predominance within the studied groups. In the PIMS group of patients there were 19 boys (57.6%) and in the non-PIMS group 56 boys (48.7%) (Table I). Most of the young patients with PIMS had no comorbidities (81.8%) similar to the non-PIMS group of children (65.2%). Furthermore, we did not observe any significant difference in the incidence of mild disorders of the immune (21.2% vs. 21.7%), circulatory (9.10% vs. 6.96%) and respiratory systems (12.1% vs. 3.48%) between the investigated groups (Table I). Interestingly, some diseases (e.g., hypothyroidism, epilepsy, ADHD, autism, anxiety disorders, bile reflux, celiac disease, insulin resistance, hypertriglyceridemia, abdominal pain) occurred only in children without PIMS (Table I).

Table I.

Clinical characteristics and comorbidities of children with PIMS and no PIMS after COVID-19 recovery

Variable Patients with PIMS n, n/N Proportion or Med (25–75% percentiles) Patients with non-PIMS n, n/N Proportion or Med (25–75% percentiles) P-value P adj (sex and age) Total n, n/N Proportion or Med (25–75% percentiles)
Patients’ main characteristics:
 Age [years] 33
6.79 (2.00–10.0)
115
10.0 (5.25–13.0)
0.018 148
9.00 (5.00–13.0)
 Boys 19/33
57.6%
56/115
48.7%
0.37 75/148
50.7%
 Time from disease [months] 29/33
2.50 (2.00–3.37)
101/115
5.00 (4.00–6.00)
0.00003 0.10 130/148
4.00 (3.00–6.00)
 Weight [kg] 29/33
33.4 (19.7–45.6)
100/115
38.1 (20.0–60.0)
0.36 0.06 129/148
35.1 (20.0–59.1)
 Height [cm] 29/33
131 (112–153)
100/115
148 (114–167)
0.25 0.025 129/148
142 (114–165)
 Body mass index [kg/m2] 29/33
17.8 (15.6–18.6)
100/115
17.8 (15.5–21.1)
0.24 0.38 129/148
17.4 (15.5–20.8)
 Systolic blood pressure [mm Hg] 19/33
110 (103–115)
57/115
114 (108–121)
0.25 0.61 76/148
113 (106–121)
 Diastolic blood pressure [mm Hg] 19/33
70.5 (65.7–80.0)
57/115
68.0 (62.0–71.0)
0.11 0.15 76/148
69.0 (63.0–79.0)
 Heart rate on admission [/min] 27/33
100 (89.0–111)
80/115
90.0 (87.7–100)
0.007 0.008 107/148
90.0 (80.0–100)
Comorbidities*:
 Immune system 7/33
21.2%
25/115
21.7%
0.95 0.96 32/148
21.6%
 Circulatory system 3/33
9.10%
8/115
6.96%
0.68 0.74 11/148
7.43%
 Respiratory system 4/33
12.1%
4/115
3.48%
0.054 0.12 8/148
5.40%
 Endocrine system 0/33
0%
3/115
2.60%
0.35 0.44 3/148
2.03%
 Nervous system 0/33
0%
8/115
6.96%
0.12 0.20 8/148
5.40%
 Digestive system 0/33
0%
13/115
11.3%
0.04 0.10 13/148
8.78%
 Without comorbidities 27/33
81.8%
75/115
65.2%
0.07 0.14 102/148
68.9%
*

Explanation: Immune system diseases – immunodeficiencies, allergies, erythema, atopic dermatitis (AD), leukopenia; Circulatory system diseases – heart defect, tachycardia, ischemic stroke, anaemia, vascular diathesis, hypertension; Respiratory system diseases – chronic lung disease, asthma, frequent infections of the upper respiratory tract; Endocrine system diseases – hypothyroidism; Nervous system diseases – epilepsy, depression, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism, anxiety disorders, hyperactivity; Digestive system diseases – bile reflux, Gilbert’s syndrome, celiac disease, fructose intolerance, overweight, insulin resistance, hypertriglyceridemia, abdominal pain.

Both analysed groups of children (PIMS and non-PIMS) did not differ in terms of any symptoms on hospital admission (51.5% vs. 56.5%, respectively). The prevalence of mild complications of respiratory symptoms (weakness, pulmonary distension, cough, shortness of breath, decreased exercise tolerance) was 24.2% vs. 27.8%, gastrointestinal manifestations (enlarged liver, diarrhoea, eating disorder, abdominal pain) – 9.10% vs. 10.4%, neurological symptoms (headache, concentration disorders, insomnia) – 15.1% vs. 7.83%, dermatological symptoms (rash, hair falling, lumps on the toes) – 6.10% vs. 6.10%, and cardiovascular symptoms (low contraction murmur under the heart, sinus bradycardia, arrhythmia, fainting) – 6.10% vs. 2.60% in children with PIMS and non-PIMS, respectively. The immune system symptoms (such as enlarged lymph nodes, enlarged tonsils) appeared more often in the PIMS group than in the non-PIMS group (6.01% vs. 0.87%, respectively). Spirometry in these two investigated groups showed some signs of lung obstruction similarly to lung ultrasound, which revealed only post-inflammatory pulmonary lesions found in PIMS as well as non-PIMS children (Table II). The above pulmonary lesions were not considered as pathological.

Table II.

Symptoms on hospital admission of the patients with PIMS and non-PIMS after COVID-19 recovery

Variable Patients with PIMS n/N Proportion Patients with non-PIMS n/N Proportion P-value P adj (sex and age) Total n/N Proportion
*Symptoms on admission:
 Respiratory 8/33
24.2%
32/115
27.8%
0.69 0.74 40/148
27.0%
 Gastrointestinal 3/33
9.10%
12/115
10.4%
0.82 0.85 15/148
10.1%
 Neurological 5/33
15.1%
9/115
7.83%
0.21 0.31 14/148
9.46%
 Dermatological 2/33
6.10%
7/115
6.10%
1.00 0.99 9/148
6.10%
 Cardiovascular 2/33
6.10%
3/115
2.61%
0.34 0.44 5/148
3.38%
 Immunological 2/33
6.01%
1/115
0.87%
0.06 0.13s 3/148
2.03%
 No symptoms 17/33
51.5%
65/115
56.5%
0.15 0.25 82/148
55.4%
Lung ultrasound:
 Post-inflammatory pulmonary lesions 16/33
48.5%
24/57
42.1%
0.56 0.61 40/90
44.4%
*

Explanation: Respiratory symptoms – weakness, pulmonary distension, cough, shortness of breath, decreased exercise tolerance; Gastrointestinal symptoms – enlarged liver, diarrhoea, eating disorder, abdominal pain; Neurological symptoms – headache, concentration disorders, insomnia: Dermatological symptoms – rash, hair loss, lumps on the toes; Cardiovascular symptoms – low contraction murmur under the heart, sinus bradycardia, arrhythmia; Immunological symptoms – enlarged lymph nodes, enlarged tonsils.

In comparison to the non-PIMS group, children with PIMS had a higher level of antithrombin III (111 ±9.30 vs. 105 ±11.4, p = 0.02), higher heart rate (HR)/min (100 (89.0–111) vs. 90.0 (79.7–100), p = 0.007) and sinus rhythm (100 (86.0–122) vs. 85.0 (75.0–105), p = 0.03) but lower PQ interval (120 (112–120) vs. 130 (120–140), p = 0.02) on admission to hospital. Moreover, the immunological parameters: lymphocytes (absolute count and percentage) were higher in children with PIMS vs. without PIMS (3.32 (2.37–5.34) vs. 2.60 (2.18–3.28), p = 0.03, and 51.7 (41.6–60.6) vs. 44.0 (34.6–50.2), p = 0.004), but IgA and neutrophils (%) were significantly lower (0.69 (0.47–0.87) vs. 1.11 (0.66–1.47), p = 0.0003 and (37.0 ±13.4 vs. 43.3 ±12.0; p = 0.004), respectively). Some acid-base balance parameters were higher in children with PIMS vs. non-PIMS children group: pO2 (50.5 (40.4–60.8) vs. 40.0 (28.3–50.0), p = 0.003), and O2Sat (84.5 (74.1–93.9) vs. 64.1 (44.3–82.6), p = 0.002) and concentration of potassium (4.60 (4.40–4.70) vs. 4.30 (4.10–4.52), p = 0.006; however, pCO2 (41.3 ±5.50 vs. 44.8 ±7.10, p = 0.02) was lower in the PIMS group of children. Finally, children with PIMS had a higher level of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH: 2.76 (2.16–4.18) vs. 2.36 (1.73–2.83), p = 0.03) and red cell distribution width – coefficient of variation (RDW-CV: 12.9 (12.3–13.9) vs. 12.4 (12.1–12.9), p = 0.005) compared to children without PIMS (Table III).

Table III.

Comparison of laboratory test results, electrocardiography, and echocardiography in patients with PIMS and non-PIMS after COVID-19 recovery

Variable Patients following PIMS Patients following non-PIMS P-value P adj* Total
N Mean ± SD or median (25–75% percentiles) N Mean ± SD or median (25–75% percentiles) N Mean ± SD or median (25–75% percentiles)
Laboratory test results:
 Alanine aminotransferase [U/l] 26 16.0 (14.0–18.0) 112 16.0 (12.7–20.0) 0.76 0.43 138 16.0 (13.0–20.0)
 Aspartate transaminase [U/l] 23 34.0 (30.5–41.5) 101 32.0 (27.0–39.0) 0.46 0.34 124 33.0 (27.0–40.2)
 Albumin [g/dl] 22 4.60 (4.50–4.80) 54 4.60 (4.43–4.80) 0.76 0.64 76 4.60 (4.50–4.80)
 Lactate dehydrogenase [U/l] 28 232 ±45.2 98 226 ±49.4 0.50 0.45 126 226 ±48.2
 Creatine kinase [U/l] 23 78.0 (44.5–155) 96 87.0 (61.7–113) 0.72 0.93 119 86.0 (57.5–117)
 Creatine kinase-MB [U/l] 26 28.5 (18.0–36.0) 76 21.0 (15.0–30.2) 0.06 0.07 102 23.0 (16.0–32.7)
 NT-proBNP [pg/dl] 30 47.0 (26.7–80.2) 97 39.0 (18.5–69.0) 0.23 0.54 127 40.0 (19.0–69.5)
 APTT-SP [s] 26 31.5 (29.5–31.9) 102 30.8 (29.1–33.1) 0.56 0.33 128 30.8 (29.1–33.0)
 Prothrombin time [s] 26 12.3 ±0.77 103 12.5 ±0.74 0.33 0.40 129 12.4 ±0.75
 Indicator PT 26 90.0 ±5.53 102 88.8 ±5.33 0.31 0.38 128 89.0 ±5.39
 INR 26 1.11 ±0.07 101 1.13 ±0.07 0.35 0.41 127 1.12 ±0.07
 D-dimers [ng/ml] 27 390 (260–582) 102 262 (192–387) 0.005 0.21 129 284 (200–413)
 Ferritin [g/l] 27 28.0 (17.9–40.3) 48 38.4 (20.1–57.9) 0.32 0.76 75 34.1 (19.2–54.9)
 Fibrinogen [g/l] 28 2.27 (2.11–2.53) 103 2.20 (1.95–2.54) 0.33 0.45 131 2.22 (2.00–2.53)
 γ-glutamyl transpeptidase [U/l] 16 14.0 (11.7–17.2) 73 14.0 (12.0–17.0) 0.91 0.69 89 14.0 (12.0–17.0)
 Serum glucose [mg/dl] 20 85.0 ±9.21 92 84.5 ±10.5 0.63 0.88 112 83.9 ±10.7
 Serum creatinine [mg/dl] 28 0.33 (0.25–0.42) 106 0.44 (0.33–0.54) 0.014 0.45 134 0.41 (0.31–0.54)
 Glomerular filtration rate [ml/min/1.73 m2] 22 190 ±29.1 80 183 ±32.8 0.36 0.24 102 185 ±32.1
 Urea [mg/dl] 24 24.8 ±5.96 100 26.8 ±6.30 0.16 0.25 124 26.4 ±6.28
 Total cholesterol [mg/dl] 22 161 ±31.8 100 162 ±25.5 0.89 0.85 122 162 ±26.7
 High density lipoprotein cholesterol [mg/dl] 21 51.0 ±11.8 100 55.3 ±12.6 0.16 0.23 121 54.6 ±12.6
 Triglycerides [mg/dl] 24 87.5 (69.7–114) 100 76.5 (60.0–101) 0.10 0.38 124 79.0 (61.5–102)
 Low density lipoprotein cholesterol [mg/dl] 21 85.7 ±24.7 100 90.0 ±23.8 0.46 0.56 121 89.3 ±24.0
 Non-HDL cholesterol [mg/dl] 20 107 ±27.9 98 107 ±24.5 0.95 0.98 118 107 ±25.1
 IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 [AU/ml] 16 57.9 (24.7–103) 93 88.0 (49.0–123) 0.15 0.94 109 77.0 (48.5–123)
 IgG [g/l] 30 10.5 ±2.50 96 9.74 ±2.93 0.18 0.21 126 9.93±2.85
 IgA [g/l] 29 0.69 (0.47–0.87) 81 1.11 (0.66–1.47) 0.0003 0.0004 110 0.94 (0.61–1.41)
 IgM [g/l] 28 0.88 (0.72–1.38) 77 0.98 (0.71–1.40) 0.98 0.90 105 0.97 (0.71–1.40)
 Complement component 3 [mg/dl] 25 98.0 (91.0–107) 74 99.5 (93.0–116) 0.70 0.72 99 99.0 (92.0–114)
 Complement component 4 [mg/dl] 27 22.0 (18.0–25.8) 95 22.0 (19.0–29.0) 0.71 0.77 122 22.0 (19.0–29.0)
 Thyroid-stimulating hormone [μUl/ml] 21 2.76 (2.16–4.18) 98 2.36 (1.73–2.83) 0.03 0.01 119 2.43 (1.76–2.89)
 Free thyroxine 4 [ng/dl] 18 1.20 (1.15–1.38) 79 1.23 (1.14–1.33) 0.57 0.52 97 1.23 (1.14–1.33)
 Vitamin D25-OH [ng/ml] 20 25.6 (22.8–31.1) 100 24.0 (18.8–31.8) 0.32 0.87 120 24.3 (19.2–31.7)
 Antithrombin III (%) 24 111 ±9.30 84 105 ±11.4 0.02 0.03 108 106 ±11.2
 Urine specific gravity [g/l] 30 1.016 (1.011–1.020) 98 1.018 (1.013–1.024) 0.20 0.27 128 1.018 (1.012–1.023)
 Urine pH 30 6.50 (6.00–7.00) 98 6.00 (5.00–6.50) 0.03 0.09 128 6.00 (5.00–6.50)
 White blood count [103/μl] 32 6.85 (5.24–9.42) 112 6.60 (5.49–7.87) 0.68 0.53 144 6.60 (5.44–8.46)
 Red blood count [106/μl] 32 4.57 (4.41–4.79) 112 4.80 (4.48–4.97) 0.07 0.25 144 4.74 (4.46–4.94)
 Haemoglobin [g/dl] 32 12.8 (12.1–13.3) 112 13.3 (12.6–13.8) 0.02 0.08 144 13.1 (12.5–13.7)
 Haematocrit (%) 32 36.9 (35.0–38.9) 112 38.4 (36.7–40.4) 0.02 0.08 144 38.0 (36.4–40.3)
 Mean corpuscular volume [fl] 32 80.5 ±4.34 112 81.5 ±3.66 0.19 0.09 144 81.3 ±3.85
 Mean corpuscular haemoglobin [pg] 32 27.8 (26.7–28.6) 112 28.1 (27.1–29.1) 0.38 0.48 144 27.9 (27.1–29.1)
 Mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration [g/dl] 32 34.4 ±0.88 112 34.4 ±0.99 0.86 0.77 144 34.4 ±0.97
 Platelet count [103/μl] 32 329 (297–380) 112 300 (260–348) 0.04 0.89 144 309 (262–353)
 Red cell distribution width – coefficient of variation [%] 32 12.9 (12.3–13.9) 112 12.4 (12.1–12.9) 0.005 0.0005 144 12.5 (12.1–13.0)
 Platelet distribution width [fl] 32 11.9 (10.3–12.9) 112 12.2 (10.7–13.1) 0.2 0.25 144 12.1 (10.5–13.1)
 Mean platelet volume [fl] 32 10.3 (9.48–10.8) 112 10.5 (9.88–11.1) 0.18 0.17 144 10.4 (9.72–11.0)
 Platelet large cell ratio (%) 32 27.7 (20.8–31.8) 112 28.8 (23.8–33.5) 0.20 0.21 144 28.5 (22.2–33.4)
 Platelet crit (%) 32 0.34 (0.31–0.38) 112 0.30 (0.27–0.36) 0.08 0.05 144 0.32 (0.28–0.37)
 Absolute neutrophil count [103/μl] 32 2.07 (1.77–2.95) 112 2.80 (2.20–3.77) 0.007 0.11 144 2.67 (2.05–3.60)
 Neutrophils (%) 32 37.0 ±13.4 112 44.3 ±12.0 0.004 0.005 144 42.7 ±12.7
 Absolute lymphocyte count [103/μl] 32 3.32 (2.37–5.34) 112 2.60 (2.18–3.28) 0.03 0.03 144 2.62 (2.20–3.50)
 Lymphocytes (%) 32 51.7 (41.6–60.6) 112 44.0 (34.6–50.2) 0.004 0.002 144 45.7 (35.4–52.1)
 Absolute monocyte count [103/μl] 32 0.56 (0.42–0.75) 112 0.48 (0.43–0.66) 0.50 0.58 144 0.50 (0.43–0.66)
 Monocytes (%) 32 7.80 (6.40–8.72) 112 7.80 (6.58–9.13) 0.76 0.85 144 7.80 (6.50–9.10)
 Absolute eosinophils [103/μl] 32 0.13 (0.08–0.27) 112 0.20 (0.11–0.30) 0.17 0.25 144 0.16 (0.11–0.30)
 Eosinophils (%) 32 2.15 (1.23–3.32) 112 2.70 (1.50–4.30) 0.14 0.16 144 2.60 (1.50–4.27)
 Absolute basophil count [103/μl] 32 0.04 (0.03–0.06) 112 0.04 (0.03–0.05) 0.19 0.19 144 0.04 (0.03–0.05)
 Basophils (%) 32 0.60 (0.40–0.80) 112 0.60 (0.40–0.73) 0.49 0.59 144 0.60 (0.40–0.80)
Acid-base balance parameters:
 pH 29 7.37 (7.35–7.39) 61 7.35 (7.34–7.37) 0.10 0.16 90 7.36 (7.35–7.38)
 pCO2 29 41.3 ±5.50 61 44.8 ±7.10 0.02 0.01 90 43.7 ±6.80
 BE 29 –1.55 ±1.69 61 –0.84 ±2.05 0.11 0.08 90 –1.07 ±1.97
 HCO3 - 29 23.7 (22.5–24.2) 61 24.3 (22.8–26.2) 0.02 0.46 90 24.1 (22.7–25.9)
 pO2 29 50.5 (40.4–60.8) 61 40.0 (28.3–50.0) 0.003 0.006 90 42.7 (30.8–54.5)
 O2Sat 29 84.5 (74.1–93.9) 61 64.1 (44.3–82.6) 0.002 0.001 90 76.2 (50.7–87.5)
 Sodium [mmol/l] 29 139 (138–141) 67 140 (139–141) 0.27 0.33 96 140 (139–141)
 Potassium [mmol/l] 29 4.60 (4.40–4.70) 68 4.30 (4.10–4.52) 0.006 0.03 97 4.40 (4.20–4.70)
 Chlorides [mmol/l] 30 107 (105–109) 68 107 (014–109) 0.98 0.60 98 107 (104–109)
Electrocardiography:
 PQ [ms] 24 120 (112–120) 63 130 (120–140) 0.02 0.04 87 120 (110–140)
 QRS [ms] 24 80.0 (67.5–80.0) 63 80.0 (60.0–80.0) 0.53 0.56 87 80.0 (60.0–80.0)
 QTC [ms] 24 388 (358–401) 63 380 (360–409) 0.78 0.61 87 385 (359–406)
 Sinus rhythm [/min] 24 100 (86.0–122) 63 85.0 (75.0–105) 0.03 0.009 87 91.0 (76.0–108)
Echocardiography:
 EF (%) 18 70.9 (65.2–75.7) 60 72.0 (68.0–77.9) 0.23 0.26 78 72.0 (66.7–77.0)
*

p adj – p adjusted for sex and age.

Discussion

Nowadays, especially in the time of delta and omicron infections, children with COVID-19 are more and more often developing PIMS [9]. Due to the heterogeneous clinical spectrum and appearance of new symptoms all the time, this disease is still not diagnosed quickly. Additionally, what is very important we do not know anything about the long-term consequences of this new disease. Therefore, we have attempted to assess the long-term follow-up studies of children after they recovered from PIMS. We focused on laboratory testing, electrocardiography, echocardiography, lung ultrasound, and spirometry performed in patients with COVID-19 associated with PIMS in comparison to non-PIMS children. The time from disease was over 4 months. We observed that PIMS occurs in younger children with an average age of about 7 years. Laboratory findings showed the increase in antithrombin III, lymphocytes (absolute count and percentage) and some acid-base balance parameters such as partial pressure of oxygen (pO2), oxygen saturation (O2Sat) and potassium level, and a slight decrease in the number of neutrophils, immunoglobulins A and partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO2) what can paradoxically indicate better condition in PIMS children. However, cardiac parameters including a higher heart rate and sinus rhythm, and lower PQ interval observed in electrocardiography can suggest abnormalities in the circulatory system in the future linked to PIMS-TS, which was also indicated by Leung et al. [10]. Moreover, the level of thyroid stimulating hormone and red cell distribution width – coefficient of variation were increased in the PIMS group of patients compared to children without PIMS. Based on our best knowledge it is the first attempt to report on the possible predictors of PIMS risk in children recovered from COVID-19.

Unfortunately, it is still difficult to explain why a relatively small ratio of children develop PIMS, while the overwhelming majority of children with COVID-19 recover without long-term complications. This is not indicated by comorbidities that may be associated with the faster COVID-19 progression and development of PIMS, or complications after the disease. We did not observe any significant difference in the incidence of mild disorders of the immune, circulatory, and respiratory, endocrine, nervous, and digestive systems between PIMS and non-PIMS children. Similarly, the investigated groups did not differ statistically in terms of symptoms on admission to hospital. Some authors have pointed out that most children with PIMS-TS have not exhibited respiratory complaints unlike children with no PIMS [11], but we observed post-inflammatory pulmonary lesions detected by ultrasound found both in PIMS and non-PIMS children. Likewise, spirometry in two studied groups of patients who could be tested showed some signs of lung obstruction. Thus, it seems that the explanation why a small ratio of children with COVID-19 developed PIMS might be genetic predisposition [12]. However, social, and demographic factors are also likely to play a large role in this disparity [13]. To summarize, children with PIMS-TS have an overall good prognosis rather without any severe complications despite more frequent hospitalization and intensive medical care. Further research and long-term follow-up studies of PIMS children are necessary.

In conclusion, we showed that children with PIMS have significantly higher levels of antithrombin III, higher HR, sinus rhythm as well as lymphocytes, pO2 and O2Sat, potassium, TSH, RDW-CV on admission to hospital and lower levels of PQ interval, IgA, neutrophils, and pCO2 concentration. Our research is continued to confirm these results and next to create the PIMS SCORE algorithm to enable the prediction of children with the risk of PIMS occurrence after COVID-19 recovery.

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by internal grants of the Polish Mother’s Memorial Hospital Research Institute (5 GW/2021, 10GW/2021, 11GW/2021 – statutory funding).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Lewek J, Jatczak-Pawlik I, Maciejewski M, Jankowski P, Banach M. COVID-19 and cardiovascular complications – preliminary results of the LATE-COVID study. Arch Med Sci. 2021;17:818–22. doi: 10.5114/aoms/134211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Castagnoli R, Votto M, Licari A, et al. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in children and adolescents: a systematic review. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174:882–9. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.1467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ludvigsson JF. Systematic review of COVID-19 in children shows milder cases and a better prognosis than adults. Acta Paediatr. 2020;109:1088–95. doi: 10.1111/apa.15270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bapst T, Romano F, Müller M, Rohr M. Special dermatological presentation of paediatric multisystem inflammatory syndrome related to COVID-19: erythema multiforme. BMJ Case Rep. 2020;13:e236986. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-236986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Alsaied T, Tremoulet AH, Burns JC, et al. Review of cardiac involvement in multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children. Circulation. 2020;143:78–88. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.049836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rostad CA, Chahroudi A, Mantus G, et al. Quantitative SARS-CoV-2 serology in children with multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C) Pediatrics. 2020;146:e2020018242. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-018242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Abdel-Mannan O, Eyre M, Löbel U, et al. Neurologic and radiographic findings associated with COVID-19 infection in children. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77:1440–5. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.2687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gupta A, Gill A, Sharma M, Garg M. Multi-system inflammatory syndrome in a child mimicking Kawasaki disease. J Trop Pediatr. 2020;67:fmaa060. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmaa060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Curatola A, Ferretti S, Gatto A, Chiaretti A. Will cases of multisystem inflammatory syndrome rise with the greater spread of the Omicron variant among children? Acta Paediatr. 2022 doi: 10.1111/apa.16304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Leung TYM, Chan AYL, Chan EW, et al. Short- and potential long-term adverse health outcomes of COVID-19: a rapid review. Emerging Microbes Infect. 2020;9:2190–9. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1825914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hoste L, Van Paemel R, Haerynck F. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children related to COVID-19: a systematic review. Eur J Pediatr. 2021;180:2019–34. doi: 10.1007/s00431-021-03993-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Papadopoulou A, Musa H, Sivaganesan M, McCoy D, Deloukas P, Marouli E. COVID-19 susceptibility variants associate with blood clots, thrombophlebitis and circulatory diseases. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0256988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bianconi V, Bronzo P, Banach M, Sahebkar A, Mannarino MR, Pirro M. Particulate matter pollution and the COVID-19 outbreak: results from Italian regions and provinces. Arch Med Sci. 2020;16:985–92. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2020.95336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Medical Science : AMS are provided here courtesy of Termedia Publishing

RESOURCES