Abstract
Background
Tongue cancer is the most prevalent of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas, including base of tongue cancer (BOT) and oral squamous cell carcinoma of the mobile tongue (OTSCC). We aimed to investigate the role of RIPOR3 in tumorigenesis and its development as a potential prognostic biomarker for tongue cancer, especially OTSCC.
Material/Methods
Associations of expression, clinical pathologic features, and overall survival were analyzed by logistic regression, multivariate Cox analysis, and Kaplan-Meier methods. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and the CIBERSORT algorithm were performed to determine the correlation between RIPOR3 and tumor immune infiltration. cBioPortal was used for methylation and copy number variation (CNV) analysis. The Human Protein Atlas (HPA) and GSE31056 dataset were used for further external validation.
Results
RIPOR3 expression in OTSCC was significantly associated with various clinicopathological parameters. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that OTSCC with low RIPOR3 expression had a worse prognosis than that with high RIPOR3 expression. Multivariate analysis revealed that lower RIPOR3 expression was an independent prognostic factor for poor prognosis. GSEA and Neighbor Gene Network analysis showed RIPOR3 expression was related with the modulation and function of the immune-related pathway. Methylation level and CNV analysis showed that the downregulated expression of RIPOR3 was significantly related to hypermethylation but not to CNV. Finally, high RIPOR3 expression was validated at the protein level using the HPA database and GSE31056 dataset.
Conclusions
These findings suggested that RIPOR3 might serve as a promising prognostic biomarker and is related to the immune cell infiltration of OTSCC.
Keywords: Immunity, Prognosis, Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck, Tongue Diseases
Background
Head and neck tumors, 90% of which are composed of squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), are the sixth most common cancer worldwide [1]. Oral cancer accounts for 24% of HNSCC and is a major source of morbidity and mortality [2–4]. The tongue has a special anatomical position and is the main organ that participates in eating and taste feedback. When a patient encounters any discomfort, such as ulcers or pain, the patient should be evaluated for oral cancer at the first occurrence [5]; however, the incidence of advanced tumors (stage III–IV TNM) is still about 30% to 35% [6]. In patients under 40 years of age, the incidence of oral tongue cancer has increased significantly, by 60% [7]. Anatomically, the tongue is divided into the anterior two-thirds of the mobile body and the posterior third of the oropharyngeal area (the base of the tongue) by the V-shaped line, the sulcus terminalis. Pathologically, the cancer of the mobile tongue belongs to oral cancer, and tongue base cancer belongs to oropharyngeal cancer, which is completely different from oral cancer in terms of treatment methods, disease progression, malignancy degree, and clinical prognosis. In view of the high incidence of tongue cancer metastasis, avoiding cancer metastasis to oropharyngeal cancer, which has higher mortality, is important [2,8]. Therefore, it is of great significance to detect the occurrence of OTSCC as early as possible to prevent the tumor from spreading to the tongue base and distant metastasis and to improve the diagnosis rate and survival rate of patients.
RIPOR3, RIPOR family member 3, is also known as FAM65C, which presents in 2 subtypes produced by alternative splicing [9]. Previous studies indicated that RIPOR3 was involved in molecular alterations in HER2-positive and HER2-negative gastric cancers, including the somatic single nucleotide variant and somatic structural variation [10]. As a gain gene with high, frequent copy number variations (CNV), it is easier to detect in HER2+ samples, indicating that it promotes the progression of gastric cancer. Some studies have shown that as an age-related DNA methylation marker, RIPOR3 is in a gradual state of hypomethylation with aging. These findings suggest RIPOR3 may play an important role in various age-related diseases and cancer [11]. However, the relationship between RIPOR3 and clinical features of tongue cancer has not been studied.
Thus, we sought to comprehensively evaluate the influence of RIPOR3 expression on the prognosis of tongue cancer and explore the possible mechanism of this gene based on the data collected from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Furthermore, we preliminarily explored the correlation of RIPOR3 with genetic and epigenetic mechanisms, including methylation level and CNVs. Finally, the Human Protein Atlas (HPA) database and GSE31056 dataset were used for further external validation.
Material and Methods
Analysis Data Acquisition and Bioinformatics Analysis
The gene expression profiles and clinical data (workflow type: HTSeq FPKM) were downloaded from the TCGA (http://cancergenome.nih.gov/) and TCGA Pan-Cancer (PANCAN) (https://xena.ucsc.edu/) datasets, including OTSCC data (140 cases) and OTSCC paired-sample data (normal samples and cancer samples from the same patient).
Survival Analysis and Cox Analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using R (v.3.6.3). The Wilcoxon rank-sum test and logistic regression were used to analyze the relationship between RIPOR3 and clinicopathological characteristics (age, sex, grade, stage, tumor size, regional lymph nodes, surgery treatment, and radiation therapy). Cox regression and the Kaplan-Meier method were used to analyze the relationship between overall survival (OS), progression-free interval (PFI), disease-specific survival (DSS), and the clinical features of patients with tongue cancer.
Gene Set Enrichment Analysis
Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) is a computational method that identifies whether a priori defined sets of genes show statistically concordant differences between 2 biological functions or phenotypes [12]. In our study, GSEA firstly generated an ordered list on the classification of all genes according to their correlation with RIPOR3 expression. GSEA was applied to calculate the statistically significant survival difference observed between RIPOR3 high- and low-expression groups. Gene sets with a false discovery rate (FDR) q-value <0.05 were considered to be significantly enriched [13].
Immune Scores and Stromal Scores with RIPOR3 Expression
The Estimation of Stromal and Immune cells in Malignant Tumor tissues using Expression data (ESTIMATE) algorithm was used to calculate the immune and stromal scores [14]. ESTIMATE can predict tumor purity by calculating immune and stromal scores, thereby predicting the content of stromal cells and immune cells. Using the R packages “ggplot2”, “ggpubr”, and “ggExtra” and the Spearman method, we quantified the association of RIPOR3 expression with immune scores and stromal scores.
Correlation Analysis of RIPOR3 Expression with the Immune Response of 22 Tumor-Infiltrating Immune Cells
We analyzed the immune response of 22 tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) in OTSCC via the CIBERSORT algorithm (http://cibersort.stanford.edu/), with the algorithm running with its default signature matrix at 1000 permutations [15]. In addition to analyzing the general analysis of immune cell type, we analyzed the correlation between RIPOR3 expression and several immune cell markers to identify the potential subtypes of infiltrating immune cells. The Spearman method was used to determine the correlation coefficient.
cBioPortal
The cBioPortal (www.cbioportal.org/) is a comprehensive web resource that can visualize and analyze multidimensional cancer genomics data [16,17]. Based on the TCGA database, the CNVs, co-expression, and methylation data of the RIPOR3 gene were obtained from cBioPortal. When performing epigenetic analysis, we only performed statistical analysis of 127 tumor samples, and excluded 13 normal samples included in the 140 samples. The threshold of the z score of mRNA expression (RNA Seq V2 RSEM) was ±2.0.
Validation of the HPA and Gene Expression Omnibus Databases
The HPA database (http://www.proteinatlas.org/) provides information on the expression profiles of human proteins in various tissue types and organs. In the database, protein expression was scored by comprehensively evaluating the proportion of stained cells and staining intensity. Therefore, we compared the RIPOR3 protein level in normal and OTSCC tissues. The Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) GSE31056 dataset was downloaded and analyzed to validate the accuracy and precision of the independent predictor from the TCGA cohort as a prognostic predictor for OTSCC.
Results
Tumorigenic Effect and Prognosis Value of RIPOR3 Low Expression
We obtained the data of TCGA, processed the expression data of mRNA, and found that the transcripts of RIPOR3 in OTSCC tumor tissue were significantly higher than that in normal tissue (P=3.396E-06) (Figure 1A). The trend of gene overexpression was also observed in OTSCC paired samples (P=0.002) (Figure 1B) by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
Survival Outcomes and Prognostic Value of RIPOR3
All tongue cancer patients were divided into 2 groups based on the median expression value of RIPOR3: a high-expression group and a low-expression group. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed the high-expression group in OTSCC had a significantly positive correlation with OS, PFI, and DSS (Figure 1C–1E). The univariate analysis revealed that low RIPOR3 expression was significantly correlated with poor OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.256, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.109–0.643, P=0.003; Table 1). By multivariate analysis, RIPOR3 remained independently associated with OS, with an HR of 0.276 (P=0.007), along with advanced grade and tumor size, regional lymph node, surgery treatment, and radiation therapy (Figure 2D).
Table 1.
Parameters | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HR | 95% CI | P value | HR | 95% CI | P value | |
Age | 1.007 | 0.977–1.038 | 0.625 | |||
Sex | 0.645 | 0.307–1.355 | 0.247 | |||
Stage | 1.470 | 0.974–2.219 | 0.067 | |||
Grade | 1.902 | 0.998–3.626 | 0.050 | 2.941 | 1.359–6.366 | 0.006 |
T | 1.804 | 1.197–2.719 | 0.005 | 2.352 | 1.271–4.351 | 0.006 |
N | 1.390 | 0.925–2.088 | 0.113 | 1.957 | 1.027–3.727 | 0.041 |
Surgery | 0.212 | 0.080–0.566 | 0.002 | 0.113 | 0.030–0.431 | 0.001 |
Radiation | 0.442 | 0.207–0.944 | 0.035 | 0.206 | 0.084–0.504 | <0.001 |
RIPOR3 | 0.256 | 0.109–0.643 | 0.003 | 0.276 | 0.107–0.708 | 0.007 |
HR – hazard ratio; CI – confidence interval; T – tumor; N – lymph node.
Clinical Characteristics and Multivariate Analysis with RIPOR3 Expression
Subsequently, we examined the correlation between gene and clinicopathological features, and the results showed that the expression of RIPOR3 was significantly correlated with tumor stage (P=0.029), tumor size (P=0.005), and tumor histological grade (P=0.022) (Figure 2A–2C). As shown in Table 1, univariate Cox regression analysis showed that grade, tumor size, regional lymph nodes, surgery treatment, and radiation therapy were significantly correlated with the rate of OS. In multivariate analysis, RIPOR3 expression was an independent prognostic factor (Figure 2D).
GSEA Analysis of RIPOR3-Related Signaling Pathway
To identify signaling pathways that were differentially activated in OTSCC, we conducted GSEA between RIPOR3 datasets with low and high expression. We selected the most significantly enriched signaling pathways based on their FDR q-val in the high-expression samples, but no significant pathway was found in the low-expression group. As shown in Figure 3A–3I, the B-cell receptor signaling pathway, T-cell receptor signaling pathway, natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity, pathway in cancer, primary immunodeficiency, TGF-β signaling pathway, Toll-like receptor pathway, JAK-STAT signaling pathway, and MAPK signaling pathway were differentially enriched in the RIPOR3 high-expression phenotype.
Association with the Expression of RIPOR3 and Tumor Microenvironment
From the results of GSEA, it was seen that the RIPOR3 gene was significantly enriched in the immune-related signaling pathway; therefore, we divided the tumor samples into high- and low-expression groups based on the median value of RIPOR3 expression and further evaluated the relationship between the RIPOR3 and tumor microenvironment by quantifying the tumor stromal cell score, immune cell score, and RIPOR3 expression level. More interestingly, as shown in Figure 4C and 4D, the scores of stromal cells and immune cells were positively correlated with the expression of RIPOR3 in the tumor groups (R=0.62, P<2.2e-16; R=0.47, P=4.7e-08), which indirectly indicated that the gene was related to the tumor microenvironment and immune activity.
TIICs and RIPOR3 Expression
To further confirm the correlation of RIPOR3 expression with the immune microenvironment, we analyzed the content difference of 22 TIICs in the 2 groups with the CIBERSORT algorithm. The results showed that the fraction of naive B cells and resting mast cells increased significantly in the high-expression group (Figure 4A), which was similar and complementary to the GSEA function analysis results. Figure 4B shows the barplot of the proportion of the 22 TIICs in each sample of the high-expression group and low-expression group. The correlation heatmap of immune cells in patients with OTSCC, as shown in Figure 5A and 5B, provided us with the interaction between the expression of different immune cells. It can be seen that there were significant positive and negative correlations between a variety of immune cells, such as CD8 T cells with activated memory T cells, activated dendritic cells with monocytes, and CD8 T cells with macrophages M0 (Figure 5B). In addition, we determined that naive B cells (R=0.29, P=0.00085) and resting mast cells (R=0.2, P=0.025) were significantly positively correlated with RIPOR3 expression and activated mast cells (R=−0.17, P=0.058) and follicular helper T cells (R=0.16, P=0.079) showed certain correlations (Figure 5C–5F). These results further supported that the levels of RIPOR3 affected the immune-dominant status for the tumor microenvironment.
Relationship Between Immune Cells and Clinical Features
Based on the above confirmed correlation between RIPOR3 expression and tumor microenvironment and immune cell infiltration, we further confirmed, by analyzing the relationship between immune cells and clinicopathological characteristics, that immune cells infected by RIPOR3 did participate in and played a certain role in the occurrence and development of OTSCC. Resting CD4 memory T cells and lymph node status (P=0.0019), regulatory T cells (Tregs) and tumor size (P=0.025), and resting dendritic cells and tumor size (P=0.0017) were significantly correlated (Figure 6A–6C).
Neighbor Genes, CNVs, Methylation, and Interaction Analyses of RIPOR3 in Patients with OTSCC
The most frequently altered neighbor genes (FDR q-value<0.05) associated with RIPOR3 expression were isolated with cBioPortal. Enrichment analysis of these related genes showed that multiple functional enrichment was significantly enriched in immune-related pathways, such as Th1 and Th2 cell differentiation, Th17 cell differentiation, B-cell receptor signaling pathway, and T-cell receptor signaling pathway. The methylation and CNV analysis data of 127 tumor samples of OTSCC were also obtained from cBioPortal. As shown in Figure 7, Spearman and Pearson analyses both showed that the mRNA level of RIPOR3 was significantly negatively correlated with the degree of methylation, and RIPOR3 expression in the hypermethylation group was lower (Figure 7B). However, no correlation between the change of copy number type and gene expression was found (Figure 7A).
Validation of the HPA and GSE31056 Databases
We evaluated the expression of RIPOR3 protein in 20 cancer tissues from the HPA database and found that most cancer tissues displayed weak to moderate nuclear and occasional cytoplasmic positivity, and a relatively higher protein expression ratio in head and neck cancer and thyroid cancer (Figure 8A). As shown in Figure 8C and 8D, negative and moderate RIPOR3 staining were observed in the normal tongue tissue, while low (stage II, T2) or moderate (stage III, T3) protein expression was reflected in tumor tissues (Figure 8E, 8F). We used the GSE31056 dataset as an external cohort to identify the differential expression level of RIPOR3 in tumor and normal tissues (Figure 8B). The results were consistent with the conclusions of the TCGA cohort analysis, showing significantly higher expression in tumor than in normal tissues (P=0.005).
Discussion
RIPOR3, RIPOR family member 3, is located on chromosome 20 [18], with broad expression in the bone marrow, kidney, and 22 other tissues. Protein FAM65C, a member of the extracellular region, regulates cellular processes in response to stimuli [19]. At present, the reports in the literature on the RIPOR3 gene are limited. Recently, Zhou analyzed the lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA ceRNA network in squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue and found some mRNA, lncRNA, and miRNA are significantly related to survival, including RIPOR3; this was one of the few reports on the relationship between this gene and tongue cancer [20]. In view of the high incidence of tongue cancer, differential tumor prognosis in the anterior tongue (mobile body of the tongue) and base of the tongue, and the effect on the quality of life of patients, we systematically conducted the first-ever analysis of the role of RIPOR3 in tongue cancer, especially OTSCC, in the present study.
We found that the RIPOR3 expression in samples from patients with OTSCC was significantly higher than that in normal samples and also showed statistically significant differences in matched samples, as verified in the GEO and HPA databases. It was identified that an increased RIPOR3 expression contributed to favorable OS; the PFS also showed a higher proportion of survival in the high-expression group with the same time from randomization to tumor progression. Similarly, DSS reflected that patients who died of OTSCC had a shorter survival time in the low-expression group. Multivariate analysis also showed that high RIPOR3 expression was an independent predictive factor associated with favorable OS in cohorts. In addition, low expression of RIPOR3 in OTSCC was positively related with advanced tumor stage and regional lymph nodes but negatively correlated with tumor grade, which could be seen from hazard ratio confidence intervals, indicating that different clinical traits had multiple adaptive reactions to RIPOR3. GSEA analysis showed that B-cell and T-cell receptor signaling pathways, natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity, pathway in cancer, and primary immunodeficiency in KEGG were enriched in the high RIPOR3 expression phenotype pathway, which suggested that this gene might be related to the immune-related regulatory pathway. Since the research on the function of the RIPOR3 gene was quite limited, we evaluated 2 other members of the RIPOR3 family, FAM65A and FAM65B. Megrelis et al found that the expression and phosphorylation of FAM65B can well regulate the number of active RhoA, which was conducive to the best movement of T lymphocytes and enhanced immune function [21]. Froehlich et al proved that FAM65B was related to T-cell migration and proliferation [22]. FAM65A played a role in regulating Golgi reorientation during cell migration [23]. Relevant literature showed that immune cells were an important part of tumor tissue, and the infiltration of immune cells varied greatly among different tumor types and histological subtypes [24]. Therefore, based on the immune pathway enriched by GSEA and the role of FAM65 family members in cell migration and immunity, we speculated that the relatively longer survival of tumor patients with high expression of RIPOR3 was due to the fact that immune cells play a certain role, thus affecting the progression of the disease.
Another study showed strongly associated gene expression in different immune cells [25]. We analyzed the relationship between the RIPOR3 gene in the tumor microenvironment and immune cell infiltration and found that diverse immune marker sets and immune infiltration levels in OTSCC were correlated with high RIPOR3 expression and the contents of naive B cells and resting mast cells were significantly increased in patients with upregulated expression. In addition, the correlation heatmap showed some strong correlations between immune cells, and we found that certain immune cells were significantly associated with clinical traits; for instance, different T-cell subtypes were remarkably correlated with tumor size, regional lymph nodes, and tumor stage. A strong correlation between the expression of immune signals in different types of immune cells showed diverse but quite predictable and consistent tumor immune infiltration [26]. Finally, function enrichment analysis of differentially expressed neighbor genes related to RIPOR3 showed that multiple immune pathways played a certain role in tumor progression.
Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms play an important role in the process of tumorigenesis [27]. Genetic mechanisms mainly include aberrant gene expression. Epigenetic mechanisms include methylation modification and post-transcriptional regulation [28]. Gene methylation will block the initiation of transcription and prevent the transcription process, which is characterized by hypomethylation that activates gene transcription [29], while hypermethylation hinders gene transcription and leads to gene silencing [30]. Therefore, we preliminarily studied the possible mechanism of RIPOR3 expression from the CNV and methylation level of the gene. Different types of CNVs had no significant effect on gene expression, but DNA methylation was significantly negatively correlated with the expression of RIPOR3. The hypermethylation level inhibited the transcription of mRNA and reduced RIPOR3 expression. We speculated that the downregulated expression of RIPOR3 in OTSCC patients with poor prognosis was partly due to hypermethylation modification. Through the HPA and GEO databases, it was confirmed that the gene had higher expression in tumor tissues and increased RIPOR3 contributed to favorable OS.
Therefore, we suggested that RIPOR3 may have a potential effect on tumor immunology. When the carcinogenic factors appear, the gene will be differentially expressed in patients, affecting and regulating immune-related pathways, thus playing an anti-tumor role. Therefore, based on the above results, the RIPOR3 gene may be a favorable gene that affects and regulates varieties of immune cells and is a promising tumor biomarker.
Our research had some limitations, such as a small sample size, incomplete clinical data, and lack of some etiology. Therefore, the molecular mechanisms involved may be the focus of our future work.
Conclusions
Taken together, our study results suggested that RIPOR3 might serve as a promising prognostic biomarker and is correlated with immune cell infiltration and DNA methylation. These results may provide new insights for the prognosis and immunotherapy of tongue cancer.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest: None declared
Declaration of Figures’ Authenticity
All figures submitted have been created by the authors, who confirm that the images are original with no duplication and have not been previously published in whole or in part.
Financial support: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 81870736, 81801040, 81500816, and 81570951)
References
- 1.Carlisle JW, Steuer CE, Owonikoko TK, et al. An update on the immune landscape in lung and head and neck cancers. Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:505–17. doi: 10.3322/caac.21630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.da Silva Souto AC, Vieira Heimlich F, Lima de Oliveira L, et al. Epidemiology of tongue squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study. Oral Dis. 2021 doi: 10.1111/odi.13897. [Online ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Taneja N, Alam A, Patnaik RS, et al. Understanding nanotechnology in the treatment of oral cancer: A comprehensive review. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 2021;38:1–48. doi: 10.1615/CritRevTherDrugCarrierSyst.2021036437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Farid H, Khan M, Jamal S, et al. Oral manifestations of COVID-19-A literature review. Rev Med Virol. 2021 doi: 10.1002/rmv.2248. [Online ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Balasubramanian D, Subramaniam N, Missale F, et al. Predictive nomograms for oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma applying the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union Internationale Contre le Cancer 8th edition staging system. Head Neck. 2021;43:1043–55. doi: 10.1002/hed.26554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Miller C, Shay A, Tajudeen B, et al. Clinical features and outcomes in young adults with oral tongue cancer. Am J Otolaryngol. 2019;40:93–96. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2018.09.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cohen Goldemberg D, de Araújo LHL, Antunes HS, et al. Tongue cancer epidemiology in Brazil: Incidence, morbidity and mortality. Head Neck. 2018;40:1834–44. doi: 10.1002/hed.25166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yamaguchi T, Hosomichi K, Yano K, et al. Comprehensive genetic exploration of selective tooth agenesis of mandibular incisors by exome sequencing. Hum Genome Var. 2017;4:17005. doi: 10.1038/hgv.2017.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhou C, Feng X, Yuan F, et al. Difference of molecular alterations in HER2-positive and HER2-negative gastric cancers by whole-genome sequencing analysis. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:3945–54. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S172710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Alsaleh H, Haddrill PR. Identifying blood-specific age-related DNA methylation markers on the Illumina MethylationEPIC® BeadChip. Forensic Sci Int. 2019;303:109944. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zito A, Lualdi M, Granata P, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis of interaction networks weighted by node centrality. Front Genet. 2021;12:577623. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.577623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Li J, Ye M, Zhou C. Expression profile and prognostic values of HOXA family members in laryngeal squamous cell cancer. Front Oncol. 2020;10:368. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Reichling C, Taieb J, Derangere V, et al. Artificial intelligence-guided tissue analysis combined with immune infiltrate assessment predicts stage III colon cancer outcomes in PETACC08 study. Gut. 2020;69:681–90. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nie RC, Yuan SQ, Wang Y, et al. Robust immunoscore model to predict the response to anti-PD1 therapy in melanoma. Aging (Albany NY) 2019;11:11576–90. doi: 10.18632/aging.102556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Buechner P, Hinderer M, Unberath P, et al. Requirements analysis and specification for a molecular tumor board platform based on cBioPortal. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020;10(93):15. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10020093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ahluwalia P, Mondal AK, Bloomer C, et al. Identification and clinical validation of a novel 4 gene-signature with prognostic utility in colorectal cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(15):3818. doi: 10.3390/ijms20153818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Deloukas P, Matthews LH, Ashurst J, et al. The DNA sequence and comparative analysis of human chromosome 20. Nature. 2001;414:865–71. doi: 10.1038/414865a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Diaz-Horta O, Abad C, Cengiz FB, et al. Ripor2 is involved in auditory hair cell stereociliary bundle structure and orientation. J Mol Med (Berl) 2018;96:1227–38. doi: 10.1007/s00109-018-1694-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhou RS, Zhang EX, Sun QF, et al. Integrated analysis of lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA ceRNA network in squamous cell carcinoma of tongue. BMC Cancer. 2019;19:779. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5983-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Megrelis L, El Ghoul E, Moalli F, et al. Fam65b phosphorylation relieves tonic RhoA inhibition during T cell migration. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2001. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhou LY, Zhai M, Huang Y, et al. The circular RNA ACR attenuates myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury by suppressing autophagy via modulation of the Pink1/FAM65B pathway. Cell Death Differ. 2019;26:1299–315. doi: 10.1038/s41418-018-0206-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mardakheh FK, Self A, Marshall CJ. RHO binding to FAM65A regulates Golgi reorientation during cell migration. J Cell Sci. 2016;129:4466–79. doi: 10.1242/jcs.198614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.DeBerardinis RJ. Tumor microenvironment, metabolism, and immunotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:869–71. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcibr1914890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ghraichy M, Galson JD, Kelly DF, et al. B-cell receptor repertoire sequencing in patients with primary immunodeficiency: A review. Immunology. 2018;153:145–60. doi: 10.1111/imm.12865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Montfort A, Pearce O, Maniati E, et al. A strong B-cell response is part of the immune landscape in human high-grade serous ovarian metastases. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:250–62. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Syeda ZA, Langden SSS, Munkhzul C, et al. Regulatory mechanism of microRNA expression in cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(5):1723. doi: 10.3390/ijms21051723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yépez VA, Mertes C, Müller MF, et al. Detection of aberrant gene expression events in RNA sequencing data. Nat Protoc. 2021;16:1276–96. doi: 10.1038/s41596-020-00462-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mahmood N, Rabbani SA. Targeting DNA hypomethylation in malignancy by epigenetic therapies. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1164:179–96. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-22254-3_14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hu YH, Ma S, Zhang XN, et al. Hypermethylation of ADHFE1 promotes the proliferation of colorectal cancer cell via modulating cell cycle progression. Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:8105–15. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S223423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]