Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2022 Mar 16;60(3):e00980-21. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00980-21

Answer to March 2022 Photo Quiz

Melissa Richard-Greenblatt a,b,c, Rebecca Wang d, Andrea Worrall b, Emily Blumberg d, Peter Liu d, Jeffrey Doyon d, Aaron Richterman d, Kathleen Murphy d, Kester Haye a, Kyle G Rodino a,b, Laurel Glaser a,b,
Editor: Erik Munsone
PMCID: PMC8925899  PMID: 35293786

Ghost cells of Mycobacterium spp. in the stool. Ghost cells were visualized on the microsporidia modified trichrome stain (Fig. 1A in the Photo Quiz), a phenomenon that results when Mycobacterium spp. resist stain uptake due to the high lipid content present in the cell wall. Observations from the modified acid-fast stain (Fig. 1B) further confirmed the presence of many positive acid-fast bacilli (AFB) in the stool. In contrast, no ghost cells were observed by the Wheatley trichrome method for intestinal amebae and flagellates (data not shown). Because the observation of AFB on stool smears is uncommon, these findings prompted the clinical team to submit a fresh stool specimen for AFB culture and further identification. The fluorochrome stain direct from the specimen demonstrated 3+ AFB. On day 6 of culture incubation, heavy growth (4+ AFB) of Kinyoun positive bacteria was observed from Middlebrook 7H10, Mitchison, and the Mycobacterium Growth Indicator Tube. The organism was identified as Mycobacteroides (Mycobacterium) chelonae by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry.

Reports of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) disease have increased in hematopoietic stem cell transplant and solid organ transplant recipients (1). Sites of infection vary from pleuropulmonary disease to skin and soft tissue, intraabdominal, and disseminated disease; however, intestinal NTM infection remains quite rare (2, 3). In this patient, following identification of these positive stool studies, a colonoscopy was undertaken, and histopathology from nodules in the sigmoid colon identified the presence of rare AFB positive organisms on a background of a dense lymphocytic infiltrate, the latter of which was consistent with intestinal posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder. In addition, mycobacterial blood and respiratory cultures were collected to assess for disseminated disease; however, both were negative. Given concern for NTM colitis, the patient was treated with tobramycin, moxifloxacin, and azithromycin.

Stool is not routinely submitted for mycobacterial culture; this test is generally reserved for patients with AIDS suspected to have disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infection (4). Previous recommendations proposed stool be cultured for mycobacteria only if the direct smear of unprocessed stool is positive for AFB (5). However, due to limited sensitivity (32% to 34%) (6), screening smears may not be effective for identifying patients at risk of an invasive gastrointestinal NTM infection. Current practice guidance recommends emulsifying ∼1 g of stool in saline and allowing gravitational separation of fecal particles before further processing the supernatant to improve smear and culture sensitivity (4). The prevalence and clinical significance of NTMs in stool specimens remain relatively unknown in healthy and immunocompromised patients. One US study reported an 18% stool AFB culture positivity rate from human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients (n = 2,176), with 90% of isolates identified as MAC (6).

In our case, special parasite stains led to the unexpected finding of AFB-positive organisms that were subsequently identified on culture to be M. chelonae resulting in an uncommon diagnosis of M. chelonae colitis. Therefore, we highlight the importance of recognizing the presence of ghost cells and/or poorly staining organisms, as their identification may lead to a critical diagnosis of an unexpected mycobacterial infection.

Footnotes

See https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00976-21 in this issue for photo quiz case presentation.

Contributor Information

Laurel Glaser, Email: laurel.glaser@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.

Erik Munson, Marquette University.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Longworth SA, Vinnard C, Lee I, Sims KD, Barton TD, Blumberg EA. 2014. Risk factors for nontuberculous mycobacterial infections in solid organ transplant recipients: a case-control study. Transpl Infect Dis 16:76–83. doi: 10.1111/tid.12170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yamazaki R, Mori T, Nakazato T, Aisa Y, Imaeda H, Hisamatsu T, Hibi T, Okamoto S. 2010. Non-tuberculous mycobacterial infection localized in small intestine developing after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Intern Med 49:1191–1193. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.49.3288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yuen KY, Woo PC, Liang RH, Chiu EK, Chen FF, Wong SS, Lau YL, Ha SY, Peiris JS, Siau H, Chan TK. 1998. Clinical significance of alimentary tract microbes in bone marrow transplant recipients. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 30:75–81. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(97)00213-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Forbes BA, Hall GS, Miller MB, Novak SM, Rowlinson MC, Salfinger M, Somoskovi A, Warshauer DM, Wilson ML. 2018. Practice Guidelines for Clinical Microbiology Laboratories: mycobacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev 31:e00038-17. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00038-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Roberts GD, Koneman EW, Kim YY. 1991. Procedure for decontamination of fecal material. In Balows AHWJ, Herrmann KL, Isenberg HD, Shadomy HJ. (ed), Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 5th ed American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Morris A, Reller LB, Salfinger M, Jackson K, Sievers A, Dwyer B. 1993. Mycobacteria in stool specimens: the nonvalue of smears for predicting culture results. J Clin Microbiol 31:1385–1387. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.5.1385-1387.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES