Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 23.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2021 Jun 9;143(24):8987–8992. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c04427

Radical Chain Reduction via Carbon Dioxide Radical Anion (CO2•–)

Cecilia M Hendy 1,, Gavin C Smith 2,, Zihao Xu 3, Tianquan Lian 4, Nathan T Jui 5
PMCID: PMC8925913  NIHMSID: NIHMS1786491  PMID: 34102836

Abstract

We have developed an effective method for reductive radical formation that utilizes the radical anion of carbon dioxide (CO2•–) as a powerful single electron reductant. Through a polarity matched hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) between an electrophilic radical and a formate salt, CO2•– formation occurs as a key element in a new radical chain reaction. Here, radical chain initiation can be performed through photochemical or thermal means, and we illustrate the ability of this approach to accomplish reductive activation of a range of substrate classes. Specifically, we have employed this strategy in the intermolecular hydroarylation of unactivated alkenes with (hetero)aryl chlorides/bromides, radical deamination of arylammonium salts, aliphatic ketyl radical formation, and sulfonamide cleavage. We show that the reactivity of CO2•– with electron-poor olefins results in either single electron reduction or alkene hydrocarboxylation, where substrate reduction potentials can be utilized to predict reaction outcome.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1786491-f0004.jpg


Single electron reduction is a key mechanistic step in the formation of radical species from many different electron-poor substrate classes. In this context, dissolving metal conditions1,2 and electrochemical techniques3,4 are outstanding approaches for accomplishing challenging reductions (those of substrates with very negative reduction potentials). However, these strategies are limited in their ability to promote free radical reactivity. Because sequential two-electron reduction occurs rapidly at metal surfaces, overreduction of transient radicals to the corresponding anions occurs. This principle is particularly acute in reductive activation of organic halides,5 as depicted in Figure 1. In contrast, single electron reduction using photoredox catalysis6,7 allows for precise tuning of kinetic factors (e.g. reduction potential, effective reductant concentration), which enables the interception of transient radicals. Although the use of visible light as an energy source is highly appealing, reducing power is inherently limited by the energy contained in a blue photon (up to 2.8 eV).8 To overcome this, strategies that involve photoexcitation of radical anions have been recently developed to yield superreductants that readily perform a range of challenging reductions.911 We were interested in developing a new radical chain approach to single electron reduction. We understood that the value of this technology would largely depend on its ability to engage unreactive substrates and grant reliable access to radical intermediates in a simple manner.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Novel approach to SET through reactivity of CO2•–

The carbon dioxide radical anion (CO2•–) is a highly reactive intermediate that is routinely accessed through electrochemical reduction of CO2.12,13 Given the combination of its very negative reduction potential (E1/2° = –2.2 V vs SCE)14 and reactive radical character, CO2•– is a potentially valuable synthetic intermediate. However, it has not yet been generally deployed in this context. Early studies by Kubiak15 and Barba16 demonstrated that single electron reduction of CO2 can be utilized in carboxylation processes under photochemical or electrochemical conditions, respectively. More recently, the Jamison group developed a continuous flow-based approach that allows for photochemical production and interception of CO2•–.17 We have developed a novel system that utilizes the reducing power of CO2•– to accomplish difficult reduction events that is centered around the ability of thiol catalysts to shuttle hydrogen atoms. This radical chain mechanism allows for direct production of CO2•– through hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) from formate. Under these conditions, CO2•– acts as a potent reductant for single electron activation of many different substrate classes that are typically redox inert (shown in Figure 1). This method utilizes inexpensive inputs (no metal required), and accomplishes a range of valuable radical processes.

We envisioned the mechanistic scenario that is outlined in Figure 2A, where the radical chain is comprised of hydrogen shuttling from a thiol catalyst. Reaction of thiyl radical with formate affords the key reductant (CO2•–) that is able to accomplish general substrate reduction. For example, single electron transfer to an aryl chloride would give rise to the corresponding arene radical anion, along with carbon dioxide (providing a thermodynamic driving force). This HAT event is essentially thermoneutral (formate C–H BDE: 88 kcal/mol, thiol S–H BDE: 88–90 kcal/mol, see SI). Mesolytic C–Cl fragmentation would generate the corresponding aryl radical, which would undergo reduction through H-atom abstraction from the catalytic thiol, propagating the radical chain. Importantly, as indicated in Figure 2B, the principal feature of this approach is thiyl formation in the presence of formate. This can be conveniently accomplished from a thiol using the combination of a photoredox catalyst and visible light. In addition, chain initiation can be easily conducted by other means. For example, direct photolysis of disulfides or thermal decomposition of persulfate (in the presence of catalytic thiol) are equally effective.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

A) Proposed mechanistic scenario for radical chain SET activation of aryl chloride substrates. B) Methods for radical chain initiation. C) Experimental data in support of this radical chain proposal.

To interrogate this proposal, we considered the reductive dechlorination of methyl-2-chloro benzoate (Figure 2C). Subjecting this aryl chloride to sodium formate (5 equiv) in the presence of different combinations of photoredox catalysts and HAT catalysts resulted in radical hydrodechlorination. With mesna (an inexpensive and odorless alkyl thiol), a range of photoredox catalysts accomplished this transformation in nearly quantitative yield (as determined by 1H NMR). These data illustrate the value of this radical chain approach; while SET from CO2•– to substrate would be expected to occur with ease (based on reduction potential), SET from these photocatalysts would be highly unfavored. Indicated in Figure 2C are the most strongly reducing states (ground state radical anions, given by reductive quenching), which are at least ca. 600 mV more positive than that of the chloride (–2.1 V vs SCE).18A range of thiols were found to perform this reaction as was DABCO (albeit to a lesser extent), and no conversion was observed in the absence of HAT catalyst. While light and formate were critical to substrate conversion under these conditions (see the SI for details), quantitative reduction was observed when thiyl generation was performed via photolysis of dimethyl disulfide (no photoredox catalyst) or with thiol and persulfate (20 mol%) at 100 °C. However, because trace amounts of thiol impurities that are present in DMSO1921 are capable of promoting this reaction (indeed, these experiments were conducted with freshly purified DMSO (indeed, solvent from particularly old bottles was capable of promoting this reactivity without added thiol co-catalyst). We found the quantum yield (Φ) of the reaction under our standard conditions (P1, mesna) to be 2.63, which strongly indicates radical chain character. Using transient absorption spectroscopy (see SI for details), we determined the rate of thiyl formation under the standard (photoredox initiation) conditions (4.0 × 103 M–1•s–1), as well as the quantum yield of the triplet excited state (Φ= 0.0072). These rates indicate the average radical chain length to be greater than or equal to 365, under standard conditions.

With the understanding that CO2•– can be accessed under mild conditions, we sought to utilize this radical chain reduction in other valuable synthetic processes. First, we considered the intermolecular coupling of aryl radical species with unactivated olefins (radical hydroarylation). As shown in Table 1, reaction of 4-chlorobenzonitrile (Ep/2 = –2.1 V vs SCE)18 with 1-octene afforded alkylation product 1 in 66% yield with photoredox initiation. Though slightly less efficient for intermolecular radical coupling, alternative initiation systems also promoted the desired reactivity (disulfide: 50% yield, persulfate: 42% yield). We have reported a number of radical hydroarylation systems;2224 however, these conditions are unique in that they allow for coupling of benzene-derived radicals with simple olefins. Monosubstituted alkenes bearing alcohol and alkyl chloride functional groups reacted to give alkylated products 2 and 3 in 46% and 85% yield, respectively, where the remaining material was direct arene reduction. The more electron-rich olefins 2-methyl-2-butene and isopropenyl acetate also underwent smooth hydroarylation to yield 4 (66%) and 5 (81%). Evaluation of the aryl radical scope with 1-octene revealed that a number of electron-poor aryl and heteroaryl chlorides can be engaged under this protocol (614, 32–80% yield) with the primary limitation being the diminished yield with ortho-chloromethylbenzoate (10, 32% yield). In addition, aryl radical coupling reactions employing bromobenzene, 4-chlorobenzonitrile, and 2-bromothiazole all smoothly engaged tert-butylvinyl carbamate (3 equiv) to afford the corresponding phenethylamines (1517, 74–98% yield).

Table 1:

Radical Reactivity via CO2•– Radical Chain Conditions: Coupling of Radicals with Olefins and Hydrogen Atom

graphic file with name nihms-1786491-t0005.jpg
a

Reaction conditions: substrate (1 equiv), olefin (5 equiv), P1 (1 mol%), mesna (20 mol%), sodium formate (5 equiv), MeCN/DMSO (1:1, v/v), blue light, 16 h.

b

Yield determined by 1H NMR with internal standard.

c

Reaction conducted with aryl bromide.

d

Reaction conducted at 100 °C.

e

DMSO used as solvent.

f

20% H2O/DMSO (v/v) used as solvent.

To further illustrate the value of this radical chain, we applied it to the reduction of other challenging substrates. For example, aryl trimethylammonium salts have been demonstrated as electrophilic coupling partners25 that also undergo deamination under Birch conditions. Under standard conditions, we found that electron-poor arylammonium salts undergo clean deamination (1820, 70–94% yield). At present, this process is limited to substrates that contain electron-withdrawing groups in the meta-position. This limitation stems from competitive nucleophilic demethylation processes and challenges associated with trialkylammonium salt formation. Nicewicz recently demonstrated a consecutive photoinduced electron transfer process of acridinium salts that effectively cleaves arylsulfonamide N–S bonds.9 We found that CO2•– is a competent reductant in achieving the same, where radical chain deprotection gave 2123 in 52–84% yield. This system also accomplishes defluoroalkylation of trifluoromethyl aromatics, a strategy that our group has developed,26,27 to give difluoroalkyl products 2426 (30–59% yield). Finally, we found that these conditions effectively achieve reduction of aliphatic aldehydes, where ketyl formation is presumably followed by protonation and HAT to deliver the corresponding alcohol products (2729, 70–87% yield).

Photochemical reduction of electron-deficient olefins has been established as a powerful method for directly accessing radical character at the β-position of Michael acceptors.28,29 We posited that our radical chain method would reductively engage a broad range of olefin substrates, through SET (Figure 3). Indeed, we observed efficient transformation of a pyridyl cinnamate ester (Ep/2 = –1.6 V vs SCE) to the hydrogenated product 34 (95% yield). To understand this reductive process, we prepared a β-cyclopropyl enone substrate with a reduction potential within range of CO2•–. Reaction of this system under standard conditions resulted in effective ring opening, giving rise to 33 (79% yield), in strong support of the proposed SET event. With the analogous ester, a substrate outside the reducing power of the CO2•–, we instead observed very clean formation of Giese type addition product 32 (66% yield), where cyclopropyl ring opening was not observed. These data indicate that olefin reduction potential and reaction outcome are correlated, where more electron-poor olefins (E1/2° ≥ – 2.1 V vs SCE) undergo SET and less electron-poor olefins (E1/2° ≤ – 2.1 V vs SCE) undergo radical hydrocarboxylation. In line with this assertion, CO2 incorporation was observed with both an α,β-unsaturated nitrile and amide to afford the subsequent hyrdocarboxylated products (31 to 30, 67–69% yield) with complete regiocontrol. While electrophilic carboxylation reactions are commonplace (e.g. nucleophile trapping with CO2), this approach leverages nucleophilic behavior of CO2•– in the construction of 1,4-dicarbonyls, motifs that are valuable in the synthesis of hetoercycles,3032 and bioactive small molecules.33

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Reaction of carbon dioxide radical anion with electron-deficient alkenes: Divergent reactivity based on reduction potential

In summary, we have developed a novel radical chain mechanism in which CO2•– is easily produced from formate through thiol-mediated HAT. This highly-reducing intermediate readily activates a broad array of challenging substrates, where single electron reduction grants access to radical reactivity. This radical chain can be initiated using either photochemical or thermal pathways, where SET reactivity generically occurs with substrates with reduction potentials ≥ – 2.1 V vs SCE. In the presence of Michal acceptors that possess more negative reduction potentials, we observed clean hydrocarboxylation, demonstrating the nucleophilic character of CO2•–.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Financial support for this work was provided by Emory University and the National Institutes of Health (GM129495), and NMR data were collected under support of the National Science Foundation (CHE-1531620). We acknowledge the financial support from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Solar Photochemistry Program under Award Number DE-FG02-07ER-15906 (to T. L)

Footnotes

Supporting Information

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website.

Experimental procedures, characterization data, and spectra (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Contributor Information

Cecilia M. Hendy, Department of Chemistry, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States.

Gavin C. Smith, Department of Chemistry, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States.

Zihao Xu, Department of Chemistry, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States.

Tianquan Lian, Department of Chemistry, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States.

Nathan T. Jui, Department of Chemistry and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States..

REFERENCES

  • (1).Birch AJ Reduction by Dissolving Metals. Part I. J. Chem. Soc. 1942, No. 430, 430–436. [Google Scholar]
  • (2).Hook JM; Mander LN Recent Developments in the Birch Reduction of Aromatic Compounds: Applications to the Synthesis of Natural Products. Nat. Prod. Rep. 1986, 3, 35–85. [Google Scholar]
  • (3).Möhle S; Zirbes M; Rodrigo E; Gieshoff T; Wiebe A; Waldvogel SR Modern Electrochemical Aspects for the Synthesis of Value-Added Organic Products. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 6018–6041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).Peters BK; Rodriguez KX; Reisberg SH; Beil SB; Hickey DP; Kawamata Y; Collins M; Starr J; Chen L; Udyavara S; et al. Scalable and Safe Synthetic Organic Electroreduction Inspired by Li-Ion Battery Chemistry. Science 2019, 363, 838–845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Nelleborg Pelle, Lund Henning, Photochemical JE Vs. Electrochemical Electron Transfer Reactions. One-Electron Reduction of Aryl Halides by Photoexcited Anion Radicals. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 1773–1776. [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Prier CK; Rankic DA; MacMillan DWC Visible Light Photoredox Catalysis with Transition Metal Complexes: Applications in Organic Synthesis. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 5322–5363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).Romero NA; Nicewicz DA Organic Photoredox Catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 10075–10166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Arias-Rotondo DM; McCusker JK The Photophysics of Photoredox Catalysis: A Roadmap for Catalyst Design. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 5803–5820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (9).MacKenzie IA; Wang L; Onuska NPR; Williams OF; Begam K; Moran AM; Dunietz BD; Nicewicz DA Discovery and Characterization of an Acridine Radical Photoreductant. Nature 2020, 580, 76–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (10).Cowper NGW; Chernowsky CP; Williams OP; Wickens ZK Potent Reductants via Electron-Primed Photoredox Catalysis: Unlocking Aryl Chlorides for Radical Coupling. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 2093–2099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).Kim H; Kim H; Lambert TH; Lin S. Reductive Electrophotocatalysis: Merging Electricity and Light to Achieve Extreme Reduction Potentials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 2087–2092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Stevens GB; Reda T; Raguse B. Energy Storage by the Electrochemical Reduction of CO2 to CO at a Porous Au Film. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2002, 526, 125–133. [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Franco F; Rettenmaier C; Jeon HS; Cuenya BR Transition Metal-Based Catalysts for the Electrochemical CO2 reduction: From Atoms and Molecules to Nanostructured Materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 6884–6946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Koppenol WH; Rush JD Reduction Potential Of the Carbon Dioxide/Carbon Dioxide Radical Anion: A Comparison with Other C1 Radicals. J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 87, 4429–4430. [Google Scholar]
  • (15).Morgenstern DA; Wittrig RE; Fanwick PE; Kubiak CP Photoreduction of Carbon Dioxide to Its Radical Anion by [Ni3(μ3-I)2(dppm)3]: Formation of Two Carbon-Carbon Bonds via Addition of CO2•− to Cyclohexene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 6470–6471. [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Otero MD; Batanero B; Barba F. CO2 Anion-Radical in Organic Carboxylations. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 2171–2173. [Google Scholar]
  • (17).(a) Seo H; Katcher MH; Jamison TF Photoredox Activation of Carbon Dioxide for Amino Acid Synthesis in Continuous Flow. Nature Chem. 2017, 9, 453–456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Seo H; Liu A; Jamison TF Direct β-Selected Hydrocarboxylation of Styrenes with CO2 Enabled by Continuous Flow Photoredox Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 13969–13972. See also: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Kang G; Romo D. Photocatalyzed, β-Selective Hydrocarboxylation of α,β-Unsaturated Esters with CO2 Under flow for β-Lactone Synthesis. ACS Catal. 2021, 11, 1309–1315. [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Enemærke RJ; Christensen TB; Jensen H; Daasbjerg K. Application of a New Kinetic Method in the Investigation of Cleavage Reactions of Haloaromatic Radical Anions. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans 2, 2001, 1620–1630. [Google Scholar]
  • (19).Garusinghe GSP; Bessey SM; Boyd C; Aghamoosa M; Frederick BG; Bruce MRM; Bruce AE Identification of Dimethyl Sulfide in Dimethyl Sulfoxide and Implications for Metal-Thiolate Disulfide Exchange Reactions. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 40603–40606. [Google Scholar]
  • (20).Wang Z; Liu J; Dai Y; Dong W; Zhang S; Chen J. Dimethyl Sulfide Photocatalytic Degradation in a Light-Emitting-Diode Continuous Reactor: Kinetic and Mechanistic Study. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 7977–7984. [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Deguchi Y; Kono M; Koizumi Y; Izato YI; Miyake A. Study on Autocatalytic Decomposition of Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO). Org. Process Res. Dev. 2020, 24, 1614–1620. [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Boyington AJ; Seath CP; Zearfoss AM; Xu Z; Jui NT Catalytic Strategy for Regioselective Arylethylamine Synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 4147–4153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (23).Boyington AJ; Riu MLY; Jui NT Anti-Markovnikov Hydroarylation of Unactivated Olefins via Pyridyl Radical Intermediates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 6582–6585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (24).Aycock RA; Wang H; Jui NT A Mild Catalytic System for Radical Conjugate Addition of Nitrogen Heterocycles. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 3121–3125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (25).Blakey SBB; MacMillan DWC The First Suzuki Cross-Couplings of Aryltrimethylammonium Salts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 6046–6047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (26).Wang H; Jui NT Catalytic Defluoroalkylation of Trifluoromethylaromatics with Unactivated Alkenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 163–166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (27).Vogt DB; Seath CP; Wang H; Jui NT Selective C-F Functionalization of Unactivated Trifluoromethylarenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 13203–13211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (28).Ischay MA; Anzovino ME; Du J; Yoon TP Efficient Visible Light Photocatalysis of [2+2] Enone Cycloadditions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 12886–12887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (29).Du J; Yoon TP Crossed Intermolecular [2+2] Cycloadditions of Acyclic Enones via Visible Light Photocatalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 14604–14605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (30).Minetto G; Raveglia LF; Sega A; Taddei M. Microwave-Assisted Paal-Knorr Reaction-Three-Step Regiocontrolled Synthesis of Polysubstituted Furans, Pyrroles and Thiophenes. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 5277–5288. [Google Scholar]
  • (31).Knorr L. Synthese Von Pyrrolderivaten. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1884, 17, 1635–1642. [Google Scholar]
  • (32).O’Reilly E; Iglesias C; Ghislieri D; Hopwood J; Galman JL; Lloyd RC; Turner NJ A Regio- and Stereoselective ω-Transaminase/Monoamine Oxidase Cascade for the Synthesis of Chiral 2,5-Disubstituted Pyrrolidines. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 2447–2450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (33).DeMartino MP; Chen K; Baran PS Intermolecular Enolate Heterocoupling: Scope, Mechanism, and Application. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 11546–11560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

RESOURCES