Abstract
Introduction
Although carcinomatous degeneration is a rare occurrence, some authors support the need for a histopathological examination after pilonidal cyst excision. Today, minimally invasive techniques are widely spread for the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease but opposed to standard procedures, these techniques could not allow to perform a histopathological examination because of the absence of a specimen. The aim of this two-institutions study is to evaluate whether histopathological examination of the pilonidal sinus excision material can be successfully performed after an endoscopic ablation of the cyst.
Materials and Methods
We identified all consecutive patients from January 2021 to September 2021 with diagnosis of pilonidal sinus disease who underwent Video Assisted Ablation of Pilonidal Sinus (VAAPS) followed by histopathological examination.
Results
A total of 45 patients were included in the study. All patients were Caucasians and aged below 50 years. Nine of them underwent surgery due to recurrence of PSD. No evidence of malignancy was detected in the histopathological examination of the pilonidal sinus sampling material.
Discussion
We were able to send pilonidal sinus sampling material for a histopathological examination in all patients who underwent minimally invasive technique for the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease. No evidence of malignancy was found in any of the 45 samples. Our findings prove that minimally invasive ablation of pilonidal sinus does not preclude histopathological examination of the cysts.
Keywords: pilonidal disease, EPSiT, malignant degeneration, VAAPS, histopathological examination (HPE)
Introduction
Pilonidal cyst is a benign disease that arise in the sacrococcygeal region with a variable prevalence between 0 and 5%. Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) progresses with inflammation of the skin and subcutaneous tissue and it may have an acute onset and chronic course with no treatment.
Carcinomatous degeneration of pilonidal cysts is rare and it is probably triggered by chronic inflammatory process. Although the incidence of this condition is estimated at 0.1%, some authors emphasize the need for histopathological examination (1–3).
Today, minimally invasive techniques are widely spread for the treatment of PSD (4–9). These procedures generally involve removing debris and ablation of the granulation tissue under direct vision (10, 11).
Some authors affirm that opposed to a standard procedure, these techniques don't allow to perform histopathological examination because of the absence of a specimen (12).
The aim of this two-institutions study is to evaluate whether histopathological examination of the pilonidal sinus sampling material can be successfully performed after an endoscopic ablation of the cyst.
Materials and Methods
Utilizing prospectively maintained databases of two centres, we identified all consecutive patients from January 2021 to September 2021 with diagnosis of PSD who underwent Video Assisted Ablation of Pilonidal Sinus (VAAPS) followed by histopathological examination.
As most common low complexity surgical procedures (13–19), all operations were performed in day surgery and under local anaesthesia with 30–60 mL of mepivacaine (Carbosen, 20 mg/mL; Galenica Senese). Patients were placed in prone position with the hips slightly flexed and the buttocks retracted with adhesive tape. The endoscope was inserted through the lower orifice and the sinus cavity was irrigated with a continue flow of saline solution. The debris were removed and mechanical adhesiolysis was performed with the grasping forceps. Then the granulation tissue was completely ablated using a 5-Fr bipolar electrode under direct vision (10, 11, 20) and a complete cleaning of the sinus cavity was performed with the Volkmann spoon. According to current literature, no surgical drain was positioned at the end of the procedure (21).
Pilonidal sinus sampling material harvested by endoscopic ablation and extracted with Volkmann spoon was sent for histopathological examination after surgery in all patients.
Institutional Review Board approval and written informed consent were obtained before review of any patient material.
Patients' characteristics analyzed were: gender, age, BMI, ethnicity, risk factors for pilonidal sinus disease, recurrence of PSD and histopathological examination reports.
Age and BMI were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Numerical data were expressed as percentage (%).
Results
Forty-five patients were included in the study, 35 (77.8%) were men and 10 (22.2%) were women. All the patients were Caucasians and they were all aged below 50 years. Mean age was 27.8 ± 9.17 (min = 14 and max = 49) years. Mean BMI was 26.5 ± 4,034 kg/m2.
Twelve (26.7%) patients had risk factors for developing PSD: 8 (17.8%) were obese (BMI > 30), 4 (8.9%) had diabetes and hirsutism and 1 (2.2%) had Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS).
The number of patients that underwent surgery due to recurrence of PSD was determined as 9 (20%), 7 males and 2 females.
Patients' demographics and clinicopathological characteristics are shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
Variable | N = 45 |
---|---|
Gender (%) | |
Male | 35 (77.8%) |
Female | 10 (22.2%) |
Age (mean ± SD) (years) | 27.8 ± 9.17 |
BMI (mean ± SD) (kg/m2) | 26.5 ± 4.34 |
Pilonidal sinus disease | |
Primary (%) | 36 (80%) |
Recurrent (%) | 9 (20%) |
Histopathological examination reports | |
Benign (%) | 45 (100%) |
Malignant (%) | 0 (0%) |
No evidence of malignancy was detected in the histopathological examination of the pilonidal sinus excision materials in any of the 45 patients as detailed described in Table 2.
Table 2.
Histopathology | Primary disease | Recurrence | Total |
---|---|---|---|
(n = 36) | (n = 9) | (n = 45) | |
Benign (%) | 36 (100%) | 9 (100%) | 45 (100%) |
Pilonidal sinus | 24 (66.7%) | 0 (0%) | 24 (53.3%) |
Pilonidal sinus, chronic inflammatory tissue | 5 (13.8%) | 2 (22.2%) | 7 (15.6%) |
Abscess | 2 (5.6%) | 1 (11.1%) | 3 (6.7%) |
Fibroadipose tissue | 2 (5.6%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (4.4%) |
Scar tissue | 3 (8.3%) | 6 (66.7%) | 9 (20%) |
Malignant (%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
Of interest, regarding histopathological results of patients with primary disease, pilonidal sinus was reported in 24 (53.3%) of them and fibroadipose tissue was found in two (4.4%) of them. Chronic inflammatory tissue was described in a total of seven (15.6%) patients; of them, five had primary disease and two had recurrence. Abscess was detected in three (6.7%) cases of which one was a recurrence. Ultimately, scar tissue was identified in nine (20%) patients; of them, six had recurrent disease.
Discussion
Pilonidal cyst is a benign disease that arises in the sacrococcygeal region with a prevalence that varies between 0 and 5%. Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) progresses with the inflammation of the skin and subcutaneous tissue and may have an acute onset and chronic course with no treatment. The most common complications are related to infectious processes as local cellulitis, abscess formation and recurrence.
According to recent literature, validated surgical techniques for the management of pilonidal sinus are open healing, off-midline primary closure and minimally invasive techniques (sinusectomy and endoscopic approaches).
Surgical management should be individualized and tailored according to the individual PSD. Particularly, minimally invasive techniques are recommended in cases of limited pilonidal cyst with single or multiple pits on the midline while traditional open healing is recommended for complex cases (22). As we know from literature, open healing and midline closure should not be considered effective for their higher frequency of relapse disease, while out-midline primary closure should be preferred (23).
Carcinomatous degeneration of pilonidal cysts is a rare eventuality. Since the first case of malignant degeneration of pilonidal cyst described by Wolff in 1900 (24), the total number of reported cases in lituerature is fewer than 100. The most common histological type is squamous cell carcinoma, occurring in ~90% of cases (25).
The mechanism of malignant degeneration of pilonidal cyst is probably related to chronic inflammatory processes, such as skin ulcers and fistulas, scar tissue (26, 27). Activated inflammatory cells generate free oxygen radicals, which lead to a DNA repair defect associated with malignant transformation in tissues exposed to chronic inflammation (1).
Malignant degeneration of pilonidal sinus is often associated to male gender with a mean age of 50 years and a long period of symptoms with a mean duration of 20 years prior to diagnosis (28, 29). It has also been reported a particular association with immunosuppression and HPV infection (30).
Although carcinomatous degeneration is a rare occurrence, some authors support the need for histopathological examination after pilonidal cyst excision (1–3, 31).
Today, minimally invasive procedures have widely spread for the treatment of PSD (4–8, 32) even in case of complicated and recurrent diseases (32–35).
Opposed to standard surgical intervention, these techniques could not allow to perform histopathological examination because of the absence of a resected specimen (12).
In this study we sent pilonidal sinus harvested material for histopathological examination in all patients who underwent minimally invasive technique for the treatment of PSD.
Being the study conducted during Coronavirus pandemic, histopathological examination reports were notified to all patients by chat or via mail. Nowadays, telemedicine is a powerful tool that allows continuity of care, helping surgeons to curb waiting times for consultation and to glean insights into patients' reported outcomes (36).
Reviewing the reports, we have been able to have all 45 histologic responses. Specifically, no evidence of malignancy was found in any of the samples.
Our findings prove that minimally invasive ablation of pilonidal sinus does not preclude histopathological examination of the cysts.
Nevertheless, the great limit of analyzing incisional samples is the inability to diagnose malignant degeneration with assurance.
The other main limitation of this study is the involvement of only two institutions with resulting lack of patients.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics Statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Comitato Etico Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author Contributions
SV, MMi, MD'A, LS, and GD contributed to conception and design of the study. GC, AC, NG, FM, and PS organized the database. MMa analyzed the data. SV and PA wrote the first draft of the manuscript. AD'A, AM, and CS wrote sections of the manuscript. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
- 1.Parpoudi SN, Kyziridis DS, Patridas DC, Makrantonakis AN, Iosifidis P, Mantzoros IG, et al. Is histological examination necessary when excising a pilonidal cyst? Am J Case Rep. (2015) 16:164–8. 10.12659/AJCR.892843 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yuksel ME, Tamer F. All pilonidal sinus surgery specimens should be histopathologically evaluated in order to rule out malignancy. J Visc Surg. (2019) 156:469–70. 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2019.04.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pandey MK, Gupta P, Khanna AK. Squamous cell carcinoma arising from pilonidal sinus. Int Wound J. (2014) 11:354–6. 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01096.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Milone M, Velotti N, Manigrasso M, Vertaldi S, di Lauro K, de Simone G, et al. Long-term results of a randomized clinical trial comparing endoscopic versus conventional treatment of pilonidal sinus. Int J Surg. (2020) 74:81–5. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.12.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Velotti N, Manigrasso M, di Lauro K, Araimo E, Calculli F, Vertaldi S, et al. Minimally invasive pilonidal sinus treatment: a narrative review. Open Med. (2019) 14:532–6. 10.1515/med-2019-0059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Milone M, Fernandez LMS, Musella M, Milone F. Safety and efficacy of minimally invasive video-assisted ablation of pilonidal sinus: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. (2016) 151:547–53. 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.5233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gallo G, Carpino A, de Paola G, Fulginiti S, Novelli E, Ferrari F, Sammarco G. Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment: a tertiary care academic center experience. Front Surg. (2021) 8:e723050. 10.3389/fsurg.2021.723050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Milone M, Velotti N, Manigrasso M, Milone F, Sosa Fernandez LM, de Palma GD. Video-assisted ablation of pilonidal sinus (VAAPS) versus sinusectomy for treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus disease: a comparative study. Updates Surg. (2019) 71:179–83. 10.1007/s13304-018-00611-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tien T, Athem R, Arulampalam T. Outcomes of endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSiT): a systematic review. Tech Coloproctol. (2018) 22:325–31. 10.1007/s10151-018-1803-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Milone M, Sosa Fernandez LM, Vertaldi S, de Simone G, Servillo G, Manigrasso M, et al. Video-assisted ablation of pilonidal sinus – a video vignette. Colorectal Dis. (2020) 22:597–8. 10.1111/codi.14956 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Meinero P, Mori L, Gasloli G. Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSiT). Tech Coloproctol. (2014) 18:389–92. 10.1007/s10151-013-1016-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Akin T, Akin M, Ocakli S, Birben B, Er S, Tez M. Is it necessary to perform a histopathological examination of pilonidal sinus excision material? Am Surg. (2021) 3134821991974. 10.1177/0003134821991974. [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Milone M, Salvatore G, Maietta P, Sosa Fernandez LM, Milone F. Recurrent varicose veins of the lower limbs after surgery. Role of surgical technique (stripping vs. CHIVA) and surgeon's experience. Il Giornale di chirurgia. (2011) 32:460–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ellinides A, Manolopoulos PP, Hajymiri M, Sergentanis TN, Trompoukis P, Ntourakis D. Outpatient hysterectomy versus inpatient hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invas Gynecol. (2022) 29:23–40.e7. 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.06.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bemelmans YFL, Keulen MHF, Heymans M, van Haaren EH, Boonen B, Schotanus MGM. Safety and efficacy of outpatient hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Arch Orthopaed Trauma Surg. (2021). 10.1007/s00402-021-03811-5. [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pigg RA, Fazendin JM, Porterfield JR, Chen H, Lindeman B. Patient satisfaction is equivalent for inpatient and outpatient minimally-invasive adrenalectomy. J Surg Res. (2022) 269:207–11. 10.1016/j.jss.2021.08.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Milone M, di Minno MND, Musella M, Maietta P, Salvatore G, Iacovazzo C, et al. Outpatient inguinal hernia repair under local anaesthesia: feasibility and efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block. Hernia. (2013) 17:749–55. 10.1007/s10029-012-1022-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Salciccia S, del Giudice F, Maggi M, Eisenberg ML, Chung BI, Conti SL, et al. Safety and feasibility of outpatient surgery in benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol. (2021) 35:395–408. 10.1089/end.2020.0538 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cimino AM, Hawkins JK, McGwin G, Brabston EW, Ponce BA, Momaya AM. Is outpatient shoulder arthroplasty safe? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. (2021) 30:1968–76. 10.1016/j.jse.2021.02.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Milone M, Musella M, di Spiezio Sardo A, Bifulco G, Salvatore G, Sosa Fernandez LM, et al. Video-assisted ablation of pilonidal sinus: a new minimally invasive treatment - a pilot study. Surgery. (2014) 155:562–6. 10.1016/j.surg.2013.08.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Milone M, Musella M, Salvatore G, Leongito M, Milone F. Effectiveness of a drain in surgical treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease. Results of a randomized and controlled clinical trial on 803 consecutive patients. Int J Colorectal Dis. (2011) 26:1601–7. 10.1007/s00384-011-1256-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Milone M, Basso L, Manigrasso M, Pietroletti R, Bondurri A, la Torre M, et al. Consensus statement of the Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of pilonidal disease. Tech Coloproctol. (2021) 25:1269–80. 10.1007/s10151-021-02487-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Milone M, Velotti N, Manigrasso M, Anoldo P, Milone F, de Palma GD. Long-term follow-up for pilonidal sinus surgery: a review of literature with metanalysis. Surgeon. (2018) 16:315–20. 10.1016/j.surge.2018.03.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wolff H. Carcinom auf dem Boden des dermoids. Arch klin Chir. (1900) 62:731–8. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Otutaha B, Park B, Xia W, Hill AG. Pilonidal sinus: is histological examination necessary? ANZ J Surg. (2021) 91:1413–6. 10.1111/ans.16446 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Nunes LF, Vasconcelos RAT, Castilho J, Noguera WS, Castro Neto AKP de, Cajaraville F, et al. Degeneração carcinomatosa do cisto pilonidal com destruição do sacro e invasão da parede do reto. An Bras Dermatol. (2013) 88:59–62. 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20132140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Michalopoulos N, Sapalidis K, Laskou S, Triantafyllou E, Raptou G, Kesisoglou I. Squamous cell carcinoma arising from chronic sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease: a case report. World J Surg Oncol. (2017) 15:65. 10.1186/s12957-017-1129-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Frost BM, Riddell AD, Austin S, Stephenson BM. Malignancy in an old pilonidal sinus [9]. Colorectal Dis. (2007) 9:857. 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01270.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Abboud B, Ingea H. Recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma arising in sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus tract: report of a case and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum. (1999) 42:525–8. 10.1007/BF02234181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Malek MM, Emanuel PO, Divino CM. Malignant degeneration of pilonidal disease in an immunosuppressed patient: report of a case and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum. (2007) 50:1475–7. 10.1007/s10350-007-0267-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Boulanger G, Abet E, Brau-Weber AG, Leclair F, Denimal F, Jean MH, et al. Is histological analysis of pilonidal sinus useful? Retrospective analysis of 731 resections. J Visceral Surg. (2018) 155:191–4. 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2017.10.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Foti N, Passannanti D, Libia A, Campanile FC A. minimally invasive approach to pilonidal disease with endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSiT): a single-center case series with long-term results. Tech Coloproctol. (2021) 25:1045–54. 10.1007/s10151-021-02477-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Meinero P, la Torre M, Lisi G, Stazi A, Carbone A, Regusci L, et al. Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSiT) in recurrent pilonidal disease: a prospective international multicenter study. Int J Colorectal Dis. (2019) 34:741–6. 10.1007/s00384-019-03256-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Milone M, Bianco P, Musella M, Milone F. A technical modification of video-assisted ablation for recurrent pilonidal sinus. Colorectal Dis. (2014) 16:0404–6. 10.1111/codi.12770 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Manigrasso M, Velotti N, Sosa Fernandez LM, Vertaldi S, Maione F, Gennarelli N, et al. Endoscopic approach to recurrent pilonidal sinus: a retrospective analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. (2021) 31:41–53. 10.1089/lap.2020.0252 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Gallo G, Grossi U, Sturiale A, di Tanna GL, Picciariello A, Pillon S, et al. E-consensus on telemedicine in proctology: a RAND/UCLA-modified study. Surgery. (2021) 170:405–11. 10.1016/j.surg.2021.01.049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.