Skip to main content
BMJ Open Gastroenterology logoLink to BMJ Open Gastroenterology
. 2022 Mar 15;9(1):e000624. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2021-000624

Managing hepatic complications of pregnancy: practical strategies for clinicians

Maura Alice Morrison 1, Yooyun Chung 1, Michael A Heneghan 1,
PMCID: PMC8928321  PMID: 35292523

Abstract

Liver disorders specific to pregnancy are rare but can have potentially serious consequences for mother and fetus. Pregnancy-related liver disorders are the most common cause of liver disease in otherwise healthy pregnant women and pose a challenge to physicians because of the need to take into account both maternal and fetal health. A good knowledge of these disorders is necessary as prompt diagnosis and appropriate management results in improved maternal and fetal outcomes. This review will focus on pregnancy-specific disorders and will aim to serve as a guide for physicians in their diagnosis, management and subsequent monitoring.

Keywords: liver disease in pregnancy, liver, clinical decision making


Key points.

  • Pregnancy-specific liver diseases can be differentiated based on their timing within pregnancy, clinical features and laboratory values.

  • In hypertension-related disease, differentiating between haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets (HELLP) syndrome and acute fatty liver of pregnancy (AFLP) is challenging and criteria for both diseases have been developed to aid diagnosis.

  • Prompt delivery of the fetus is the most important management for pre-eclampsia with liver involvement, HELLP syndrome and AFLP.

  • Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy is managed pharmacologically and with early delivery at 37 weeks gestation.

  • Management of hyperemesis gravidarum is supportive.

  • Prognosis of pregnancy-specific liver diseases has improved in recent years with earlier diagnosis and improvements in multidisciplinary management.

  • In the majority of cases, pregnancy-specific liver diseases have no long-term impact on liver function.

Introduction

Liver disease occurs in up to 3% of all pregnancies and can be directly related to pregnancy, coincidental or associated with a previous established diagnosis.1 The majority of liver disease that occurs during pregnancy in otherwise healthy women is pregnancy related, and includes hyperemesis gravidarum (HG), intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (IHCP), hypertension-related diseases such as pre-eclampsia and eclampsia, the syndrome of haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets (HELLP syndrome) and acute fatty liver of pregnancy (AFLP). This review will provide an update on the diagnosis, management and prognosis of these liver diseases that are unique to pregnancy. This review focuses on the hepatologist’s role in caring for pregnant women with liver diseases. However, for all conditions discussed in this review, it is important that the hepatologist is working within a multidisciplinary team with obstetrics, midwifery and in some cases, intensive care.

Normal physiological changes during pregnancy

Physiological changes occur in pregnancy, which impact the normal ranges for liver function tests (LFTs) (table 1).2 Therefore, interpretation of LFTs during pregnancy must take these changes into account. Maternal alkaline phosphatase concentration increases as it is produced by the placenta and fetal bone maturation. Maternal alpha fetoprotein concentrations increase as it is produced by the fetal liver. There is haemodilution of serum albumin, whereas the concentrations of aminotransferases (alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST)), bilirubin and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) remain within the normal prepregnancy range or are slightly decreased, and therefore, any elevation in these tests requires further investigation. Haemoglobin is often slightly reduced because of haemodilution. Clotting factors and fibrinogen are typically increased. Platelet counts tend to gradually decrease as the pregnancy progresses.

Table 1.

Reference ranges for biochemical tests by trimester of pregnancy

Biochemical test Non-pregnant First trimester Second trimester Third trimester
Haemoglobin (g/L) 120–158 116–139 97–148 95–150
White cell count (×109/L) 3.5–9.1 5.7–13.6 5.6–14.8 5.9–16.9
Platelets (×109/L) 165–415 174–391 155–409 146–429
Prothrombin time (s) 12.7–15.4 9.7–13.5 9.5–13.4 9.6–12.9
ALP (U/L) 33–96 17–88 25–126 38–229
Albumin (g/L) 41–53 31–51 26–45 23–42
ALT (IU/L) 7–41 3–30 2–33 2–25
AST (IU/L) 12–38 3–23 3–33 4–32
GGT (U/L) 9–58 2–23 4–22 3–26
Bilirubin, total (µmol/L) 5–22 1–7 1–14 1–19
Bile acids (µmol/L) 0.3–4.8 0–4.9 0–9.1 0–11.3

ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; GGT, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase.

Hyperemesis gravidarum

Nausea and vomiting are common symptoms during pregnancy. A total of 0.3%–3.6% of pregnant women develop severe or protracted nausea and vomiting, termed HG.3 Risk factors include hyperthyroidism, psychiatric illness, molar pregnancy, pre-existing diabetes and multiple pregnancy.4 The aetiology is poorly understood, but is thought to involve hormonal, immunological and psychological factors.5

Diagnosis

The most commonly used definition of HG is severe or protracted nausea and vomiting leading to dehydration, electrolyte abnormalities and loss of at least 5% of prepregnancy body weight.6 7 HG develops in the first trimester and is a clinical diagnosis after excluding other causes of nausea and vomiting.7

Abnormal LFTs develop in approximately 50% of patients from mild elevation in serum aminotransferases to 20 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) (table 2).1 8 Jaundice and hepatic synthetic dysfunction are rare. Hypokalaemia, hypomagnesaemia, hypophosphataemia, raised serum urea and creatinine are common. Biochemical and liver function abnormalities should normalise on resolution of symptoms and persistently deranged LFTs warrant consideration of an alternative diagnosis, such as viral hepatitis.9

Table 2.

Typical features and differential diagnoses of pregnancy-specific liver diseases

Hyperemesis gravidarum Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy Pre-eclampsia with hepatic impairment HELLP syndrome Acute fatty liver of pregnancy
Timing of presentation in pregnancy First trimester Second/third trimester After 20 weeks Third trimester Third trimester
Main clinical findings Severe nausea and vomiting, dehydration, weight loss Pruritus, jaundice Abdominal pain, hypertension, proteinuria, headache Abdominal pain, vomiting, hypertension, proteinuria, headache Abdominal pain, vomiting, jaundice, encephalopathy
AST/ALT 1–5 × ULN 1–8 × ULN 2–10 × ULN 2–30 × ULN 5–15 × ULN
Bilirubin Normal 1–6 × ULN Normal 1.5–6 × ULN 6–8 × ULN
Bile acids Normal >10 µmol/L Normal Normal Normal
Platelets Normal Normal Normal - ↓ ↓ - ↓↓
Haemolysis No No No + +
LDH Normal Normal Normal - ↑
Fibrinogen Normal Normal Normal Normal ↓↓
Hypoglycaemia No No No No +
Uric acid Normal Normal
Creatinine Normal Normal - ↑ Normal - ↑ ↑ - ↑↑
Key steps in management Supportive, rehydration, antiemetics UDCA,
delivery at 37 weeks
Blood pressure control,
delivery after 34 weeks
Delivery,
platelet transfusion, blood pressure control
Delivery, intensive care
Differential diagnosis Hepatitis, cholecystitis, peptic ulcers, gastroenteritis, pancreatitis Cholelithiasis, viral hepatitis, autoimmune liver disease HUS, TTP, SLE exacerbation, septic shock HUS, TTP, SLE exacerbation, septic shock HUS, TTP, paracetamol toxicity, hepatitis, SLE exacerbation
Complications Preterm birth, fetal growth restriction, Wernicke’s encephalopathy Preterm birth, fetal distress, stillbirth Liver haematoma, rupture, infarction,
Pulmonary oedema, cerebral haemorrhage, preterm birth, fetal growth restriction
Liver haematoma, rupture, infarction,
Pulmonary oedema, cerebral haemorrhage, DIC, preterm birth, fetal growth restriction
Acute liver failure, DIC, postpartum haemorrhage, acute renal failure, gastrointestinal bleeding

ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; DIC, disseminated intravascular coagulation; HELLP, haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets; HUS, haemolytic uraemic syndrome; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; SLE, systemic lupus erythematous; TTP, thrombotic thrombocytopaenic purpura; UDCA, ursodeoxycholic acid; ULN, upper limit of normal.

Management

Treatment of HG is supportive with intravenous rehydration, electrolyte replacement and antiemetics.1 7 9 There is varying guidance on antiemetic therapy and a Cochrane meta-analysis has found that no single antiemetic is superior to others.10 Specific medications for first-line to fourth-line therapy recommended for use are demonstrated in table 3. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) recommend pyridoxine alone or in combination with doxylamine as first-line therapy.1 11 The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) does not recommend use of pyridoxine based on a lack of evidence on efficacy.7 Corticosteroids should only be used after standard treatment has failed and are recommend by ACOG, RCOG, EASL and the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), although the evidence for their effectiveness is conflicting.1 7 9–12 Thiamine supplementation is required to prevent Wernicke’s encephalopathy, which is recommended by AASLD, RCOG, ACOG and EASL.1 7 9 11

Table 3.

Medications recommended for treatment of hyperemesis gravidarum by major authoritative bodies

RCOG ACOG EASL
First line Antihistamines:
  • Promethazine

  • Cyclizine


Phenothiazines:
  • Prochlorperazine

  • Chlorpromazine

Pyridoxine (vitamin B6) alone or in combination with doxylamine Pyridoxine (vitamin B6) alone or in combination with doxylamine
Second line
  • Metoclopramide

  • Domperidone

  • Ondansetron

  • Dimenhydrinate

  • Diphenhydramine

  • Prochlorperazine

  • Promethazine

Dopamine antagonists
  • Metoclopramide


Phenothiazines
  • Chlorpromazine

  • Prochlorperazine


Anticholinergics
  • Dicycloverine


Antihistamine
  • Cyclizine

Third line Corticosteroids:
  • Initially hydrocortisone intravenously

  • Prednisolone orally with clinical improvement

  • Taper dose gradually until at lowest maintenance dose that controls symptoms

  • Metoclopramide

  • Ondansetron

  • Trimethobenzamide (only recommended if dehydration not present)

  • Ondansetron

  • Glucocorticoids

Fourth line
  • Chlorpromazine

  • Methylprednisolone orally or intravenously for 3 days. Taper over 2 weeks to lowest effective dose. If beneficial, limit total duration of use to 6 weeks.

ACOG, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; EASL, European Association for the Study of the Liver; RCOG, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Ongoing vomiting, despite medical therapies, should prompt consideration of enteral or parenteral nutrition.7 11 There are no established criteria for enteral or parenteral feeding. Enteral feeding with nasogastric, nasoduodenal or nasojejunal tubes is safer, leaving total parenteral nutrition as a last resort.7 13

Serum urea and electrolytes should be checked daily and maternal body weight should be monitored.7 The Pregnancy-Unique Quantification of Emesis score is a validated system based on three parameters including (1) duration of nausea, (2) number of vomiting episodes and (3) number of dry heaves (in the preceding 12 hours) which can be used to monitor progress.14

Prognosis

Poor weight gain in HG is associated with fetal growth restriction, preterm birth, small for gestational age babies and low Apgar scores.15–17 Maternal complications are uncommon and include Wernicke’s encephalopathy, which presents with confusion and nystagmus. HG typically resolves by 20 weeks gestation but may in rare cases persist throughout the pregnancy.18 There are no long-term consequences on liver function.1 Recurrence of HG in subsequent pregnancies is common.15 19

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy

IHCP, also termed obstetric cholestasis, is the the most common pregnancy-specific liver disease and affects 0.3%–5% of pregnancies.20 It is characterised by pruritus with elevated serum bile acids or abnormal LFTs in the second half of pregnancy.21 Pathophysiology involves reduced bile flow, leading to bile salt deposition in the skin and placenta. A combination of hormonal, genetic and environmental factors are thought to contribute to this reduction in bile flow.22 Risk factors include previous cholestasis secondary to the contraceptive pill (OCP), pre-existing hepatitis C viral infection, advanced maternal age, multiple pregnancy and a family history of the disorder.23

Diagnosis

There is no international consensus on diagnostic criteria for IHCP, but generally the diagnosis is based on unexplained pruritus in pregnancy with raised bile acids or abnormal LFTs.24 The predominant symptom is pruritus, especially of the palms and soles and is usually worst at night.20 It typically develops in the third trimester, however, presentations as early as week 7 of gestation have been documented.1 There may be excoriation marks, but any other rash should lead to consideration of alternative skin conditions, such as eczema and pruritic eruption of pregnancy.25 The pruritus is followed by generalised symptoms, such as fatigue, nausea and jaundice in <25% of IHCP.26 Alternative diagnoses should be sought if jaundice is the presenting symptom.26 There may be other features of cholestasis such as steatorrhoea and dark urine.27

The onset of pruritus typically precedes biochemical abnormalities.28 LFTs should be checked in pregnant woman with pruritus and repeated if normal.21 29 Elevated fasting serum bile acids are the most sensitive indicator of IHCP.21 Abnormalities in LFTs are common, with aminotransferases elevated up to 10 times the ULN, and can be as high as 1000 IU/L. When jaundice does occur, it is often mild with bilirubin <100 µmol/L. Raised GGT is rare. Prothrombin time (PT) is normal unless there is vitamin K malabsorption. Liver biopsy is generally not indicated.21

The American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) advises that liver ultrasonography should be performed in all cases to rule out cholelithiasis, whereas AASLD and RCOG recommend only in select cases.9 26 29 RCOG advises screening for viral hepatitis and autoimmune liver disease according to individual risk factors.29 AASLD advise that all women should be tested for hepatitis C, if not done previously, given the higher prevalence of hepatitis C in IHCP.9 23 30 Pre-eclampsia and AFLP should be considered in atypical cases.21

Management

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the first-line treatment recommended for IHCP by ACG, ACOG, AASLD and EASL.9 21 26 31 ACG and AASLD advise UDCA at a dose of 10–15 mg/kg of maternal body weight per day.9 26 ACOG advises starting at 10–15 mg/kg/day in 2–3 daily doses, which can be uptitrated to a maximum of 21 mg/kg/day.31 EASL advises 10–20 mg/kg/day, which can be uptitrated to 25 mg/kg/day.21 Despite the largest trial of UDCA identifying no benefit in maternal symptoms,32 a recent systematic review and meta-analysis has detected a reduction in stillbirth and preterm birth with UDCA.33

Second-line therapies include S-adenosyl-methionine (recommended by AASLD, RCOG, ACOG and EASL), rifampicin (recommended by AASLD, ACOG and EASL) cholestyramine (recommended by AASLD and ACOG) and dexamethasone (recommended by RCOG).9 21 29 31 All of these therapies lack robust evidence for improvement in pruritus.9 29 EASL do not advise dexamethasone on the basis that it is an inadequate treatment for IHCP.21 Antihistamines (diphenhydramine and hydroxyzine suggested by ACOG, chlorphenamine suggested by RCOG) can be used for sedation at night but do not improve pruritus.9 29 31 Topical emollients are also safe for use.21 29 31 Vitamin K supplementation at 5–10 mg daily is recommended if the PT is prolonged, with more frequent monitoring of PT in women taking cholestyramine.9 29

Delivery at 37 weeks prevents stillbirth after this point. RCOG advises that a discussion regarding the induction of labour after 37 weeks should be made with the patient.29 ACOG advises delivery at 36 weeks if bile acids are ≥100 µmol/L or between 36 and 39 weeks if bile acids are <100 µmol/L.31 Monitoring of the disease as advised by the RCOG includes weekly measurements of LFTs.29 ACOG advises repeated bile acid measurements to guide timing of delivery, but does not recommend weekly testing.31

Prognosis

Biochemical tests and antenatal fetal monitoring are poor predictors of adverse fetal outcome including fetal death.29 However, high bile acid concentrations >40 µmol/L show some correlation with adverse fetal outcomes which include fetal distress, preterm birth and meconium-stained amniotic fluid.34 35 A small additional risk of stillbirth is associated with serum bile acids >100 µmol/L.36

Symptoms and LFTs generally resolve within 4–6 weeks after delivery.21 LFTs and serum bile acid concentrations should be checked at 6 weeks after delivery.29 If there are persistent symptoms or deranged LFTs post-delivery, other liver diseases such as primary biliary cholangitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis should be excluded.9 21 26 29 For severe disease with persistence post-delivery, genetic analysis should be considered for mutations associated with paediatric familial cholestatic disorders such as ABCB4 (encoding the multidrug resistance protein 3), ABCB11 (ATP binding cassette subfamily B encoding the Bile Salt Export Pump), ATP8B1 (ATPase class 8B member 1 encoding a phosphatidyl serine flippase), ABCC2 (the multidrug resistance-associated protein 2), and TJP2 (encoding tight junctional proteins).37

IHCP has a high rate of recurrence of up to 90% of subsequent pregnancies.24 It is also associated with an increased risk of cholestasis with the use of the combined OCP,24 higher rates of cholelithiasis23 and a slightly increased risk of developing hepatobiliary cancer.38

Hypertension-related liver diseases in pregnancy

Hypertension in pregnancy is defined as a blood pressure of greater than 140/90 mm Hg on at least two occasions. Hypertension-related liver diseases in pregnancy include pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, HELLP syndrome and hepatic haematoma, rupture and infarction.

Pre-eclampsia and eclampsia

Pre-eclampsia is defined as the development of hypertension after 20 weeks of gestation with proteinuria (>300 mg/24 hours), other maternal organ dysfunction or fetal growth restriction.39 40 It develops in 3%–5% of all pregnancies.41 It is a multisystem disorder, where placental ischaemia leads to endothelial dysfunction and coagulation activation.42 The presence of seizures with no other explanation differentiates eclampsia from pre-eclampsia. There is hepatic involvement in 20%–30% of cases of pre-eclampsia, thought to be secondary to vasoconstriction of the hepatic vascular bed.43

Prevention

High-risk factors for developing pre-eclampsia include40:

  • Hypertensive disease during a previous pregnancy.

  • Chronic kidney disease.

  • Autoimmune disease such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), antiphospholipid syndrome or autoimmune liver diseases.

  • Type 1 or 2 diabetes.

  • Chronic hypertension.

Factors denoting moderate risk:

  • First pregnancy.

  • Age 40 years or older.

  • Pregnancy interval of more than 10 years.

  • Body mass index of 35 kg/m2 or more at first visit.

  • Family history of pre-eclampsia.

  • Multifetal pregnancy.

A large randomised controlled trial has shown low-dose aspirin to reduce the incidence of preterm pre-eclampsia in women with high risk factors.44 Women with one high risk factor or more than one moderate risk factor should be advised to take low-dose aspirin (75–150 mg daily) from 12 weeks of pregnancy until delivery.40 45

Diagnosis

Symptoms of liver involvement are non-specific and include right upper quadrant or epigastric pain (due to stretching of Glisson’s capsule from hepatic swelling), nausea, vomiting and headaches.26 Elevations of AST and ALT can be up to 10 times the ULN (table 2). AST is typically increased to a greater extent than ALT which can be helpful in differentiating pre-eclampsia from other liver diseases.45 Bilirubin and albumin usually remain within the normal range.

Management

There is no specific medical treatment for liver involvement in pre-eclampsia. Abnormal LFTs with abdominal pain meets the criteria for severe pre-eclampsia and immediate delivery is required if beyond 34 weeks gestation, and considered at earlier gestations.40 45 Prior to delivery, tight control of maternal blood pressure should be achieved with labetalol, nifedipine or hydralazine.40 45 Intravenous magnesium sulphate should be administered for seizure prophylaxis if delivery is planned within 24 hours.45 Monitoring of LFTs should be performed until results return to the normal range.40

Prognosis

Liver-related maternal complications include liver infarction, rupture and haemorrhage. Other maternal complications include pulmonary oedema, renal dysfunction and cerebral haemorrhage. The severity of LFT derangement can help to predict adverse maternal but not fetal outcomes.46 Fetal complications include preterm delivery, intrauterine growth restriction and intrauterine death.40

Post-delivery, LFTs usually normalise within 2 weeks. There is significant evidence to suggest that women who have had pre-eclampsia have a higher long-term risk of developing cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and renal disease in later life.47–49

HELLP syndrome

HELLP syndrome was first described by Weinstein and constitutes an important and severe sub-section of pre-eclampsia.50 HELLP syndrome occurs in 10%–20% of women with severe pre-eclampsia, but can also develop in women without pre-eclampsia.51 Overall incidence is up to 0.9% of pregnancies.52 53 Risk factors are advanced maternal age, nulliparity, multiple pregnancy and previous pre-eclampsia or HELLP syndrome.54

Diagnosis

HELLP syndrome usually presents between 28 and 36 weeks of gestation but may develop in the first week post partum. Patients may be asymptomatic or have non-specific symptoms including right upper quadrant or epigastric pain, nausea, vomiting, headache, and malaise.52 Hypertension and proteinuria are present in up to 85% of cases.26

Diagnostic criteria for HELLP syndrome, such as the Tennessee and Mississippi criteria (table 4), include the triad of haemolysis, thrombocytopaenia and deranged LFTs.55–57 When the triad is not fulfilled, it is termed incomplete HELLP or ELLP syndrome.56 58 There is typically a moderate increase in aminotransferases and a mild elevation in unconjugated bilirubin (table 2). Other features include an elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), schistocytosis on peripheral smear and an elevated uric acid.56 PT can be raised in severe liver injury or disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). The elevation of aminotransferases is much greater in HELLP syndrome than in pre-eclampsia. Elevation of aminotransferases, rising LDH and uric acid in severe pre-eclampsia might indicate progression to HELLP syndrome which is important to recognise because of the potentially life-threatening nature of this syndrome. Liver biopsy is not indicated for diagnosis of HELLP syndrome and would be hazardous because of the risk of bleeding.1 9

Table 4.

Mississippi and Tennessee systems for diagnosis of HELLP syndrome

Mississippi system Tennessee system
Class 1 (severe):
  • AST or ALT > 70 U/L

  • LDH > 600 U/L

  • Platelets < 50 × 109 /L


Class 2 (moderate):
  • AST or ALT > 70 U/L

  • LDH > 600 U/L

  • Platelets 50–100 × 109 /L


Class 3 (mild)
  • AST or ALT > 40 U/L

  • LDH > 600 U/L

  • Platelets 100–150 × 109 /L

  • AST > 70 U/L

  • LDH > 600 U/L

  • Platelets < 100 × 109 /L

Complete HELLP syndrome: all three criteria met
Partial HELLP syndrome: 1–2 criteria met

ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; HELLP, haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase.

Other differential diagnoses to consider include haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS), thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) and AFLP.59

Management

Women with HELLP syndrome generally require care in a high-dependency setting because of the risk of complications of bleeding, DIC, hepatic encephalopathy, hepatic rupture and acute renal dysfunction.40 Tight blood pressure control is crucial.40 45 Magnesium sulphate infusion is advised by ACOG, whereas the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) advise consideration of magnesium sulphate.40 45 Platelet transfusion is advised by ACG and ACOG to maintain platelet counts above 40 000–50 000 cell/µL if bleeding or when invasive procedures, such as Caesarean section, are planned.26 60 It has been thought that corticosteroids would treat the proinflammatory component of HELLP syndrome. However, a Cochrane review found that despite improved platelet counts, dexamethasone did not improve maternal morbidity and mortality or perinatal death,61 and so is not recommended by NICE.40 ACOG also note that there is insufficient evidence for usage of steroids.45 Delivery is the only curative therapy and should take place as soon as the maternal condition has been stabilised.45

Laboratory results should be performed every 12 to 24 hours postpartum.45 AASLD advise that HELLP syndrome resulting in hepatic rupture or acute liver failure (ALF) should warrant transfer to a liver transplant centre for assessment.9 Indications for liver transplantation include persistent bleeding from a hepatic haematoma, hepatic rupture or ALF.62 63

Prognosis

Maternal mortality rate ranges between 1% and 3%.64 Liver-related complications include hepatic haematoma, rupture or infarction. Other maternal complications include stroke, acute kidney injury (AKI), DIC, placental abruption and pulmonary oedema.52 Fetal prognosis is related to gestational age at delivery, birth weight and neonatal condition at birth. Perinatal mortality is estimated to be between 8% and 34%.58

LFTs should start to resolve within 48 hours postpartum.52 Recurrence rate of HELLP syndrome in future pregnancies is probably in the region of 2%–6%.65 However, at least 20% of those with HELLP syndrome will develop some form of pre-eclampsia in a subsequent pregnancy.65

Liver haematoma, rupture, infarction

Liver-related complications of both pre-eclampsia and HELLP syndrome include subcapsular haematoma, rupture and infarction. Development of a subcapsular haematoma is thought to complicate 0.9%–1.6% of cases of HELLP syndrome.66 Haematomas can remain contained or can rupture and haemorrhage into the peritoneal cavity, which is one of the most life-threatening complications of HELLP syndrome. Because of the rarity of these complications, the literature is limited to case reports.

Diagnosis

Subcapsular liver haematomas usually develop in the late second or third trimester. Patients can present with epigastric or right upper quadrant pain radiating to the right shoulder, nausea, vomiting and hypotension.65 When hepatic rupture occurs, patients develop abdominal distension from haemoperitoneum and hypovolaemic shock.67 Bloods typically show a severe thrombocytopaenia and moderate elevations of aminotransferase concentrations, but elevations to 4000–5000 IU/L have been reported.65 Imaging should be performed in any patient with HELLP syndrome or pre-eclampsia with right upper quadrant pain, shoulder pain or shock, regardless of the LFTs as they do not correlate with findings on imaging.68 CT or MRI of the liver confirm the diagnosis. CT is the imaging of choice, as it is faster and safer for the unstable patient.66

Hepatic infarction is less common than hepatic haematoma but can also complicate pre-eclampsia and HELLP syndrome.69 Infarction can present with right upper quadrant pain and fever, associated with severe elevations in aminotransferases (1000–2000 IU/L or higher) and leukocytosis.65 The diagnosis is also confirmed with liver imaging, where infarction is typically seen in a peripheral location of the right liver.70

Management

Contained subcapsular haematomas with haemodynamic stability should be managed conservatively with close observations and repeat imaging to monitor the size of the haematoma.1 71 Blood transfusions and coagulation support should be used as required and prophylactic antibiotics considered.1 9 Patients with hepatic rupture should be transferred to a transplant centre.9

Haemodynamic instability suggests active bleeding and urgent hepatic angiography should be performed.9 Haemostasis can be achieved by embolisation of the hepatic artery or surgical methods, such as packing of the liver, hepatic artery ligation or resection of the affected liver.71 72 Transplant should be considered in cases of refractory haemorrhage or rapidly progressing ALF and has been successful in case reports.62 63

Prognosis

Consequences can be severe and the maternal mortality rate is thought to be 17%–59% for a haematoma, depending on whether it ruptures, when it is diagnosed and availability of therapy.66 Complications in the acute period include hypovolaemic shock, AKI and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). For conservatively managed haematomas, complete resolution can take up to several months.66 Infarctions also typically resolve on imaging after delivery.69

Acute fatty liver disease of pregnancy

AFLP is a serious and rare pregnancy-related liver disease. AFLP resulting in hepatic failure is a medical and obstetric emergency. Incidence varies from 1:7000 to 1:20 000 pregnancies.73 74 It is most strongly linked with a fetal homozygous mutation for the long-chain 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase (LCHAD).74 75 This leads to the accumulation of fatty acid metabolites in the placenta, which are then shunted into the maternal circulation and accumulate in the maternal liver. The mother is typically heterozygous for this mutation, and also has reduced fatty acid oxidation.76 However, women who are negative for the mutation can still develop AFLP.77 Other risk factors include multiple pregnancy and male fetus.73 76

Diagnosis

AFLP may present with non-specific symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, headache, anorexia and abdominal pain. Some women will rapidly progress to liver failure with hepatic encephalopathy, jaundice, hypoglycaemia and coagulopathy. Symptoms almost always develop in the third trimester; however, cases have been reported in the late second trimester or postpartum period.73 There is also an association with pre-eclampsia but the reason for this is not well understood.

Biochemical tests often show a raised AST, ALT, bilirubin, creatinine, ammonia, lactate and serum uric acid (table 2).78 Aminotransferases are usually in the range of 300–500 IU/L. Haematological tests typically demonstrate a leukocytosis, low to normal platelets and a normocytic normochromic anaemia. The coagulopathy is usually severe, with a prolonged PT, hypofibrinogenaemia and elevated D-dimer.76 79 Coagulopathy or DIC occur in approximately 70% of cases.78 The role of liver ultrasound is unclear, as a prospective study showed that only 25% of women had the classic echogenic findings.73 CT scan is more sensitive, however, only 50% of cases show typical features on CT scan.80 Liver biopsy is not required to confirm the diagnosis but can be useful in indeterminate cases to guide the need for an early delivery.9 81

AFLP can be challenging to distinguish from HELLP syndrome, as they share many clinical and laboratory features. Women with AFLP are more likely to have synthetic liver dysfunction with coagulopathy, hypofibrinogenaemia, lower cholesterol levels, higher bilirubin levels, hypoglycaemia, hepatic encephalopathy, hyperammonaemia, DIC and more severe AKI.82 83 Other differentials include HUS, TTP, paracetamol toxicity, exacerbation of SLE and overlap with pre-eclampsia and HELLP syndrome.59

The Swansea criterion (box 1) is a validated system to help diagnose AFLP but only in the absence of other liver diseases, such as HELLP syndrome, thus limiting its application.84 85 One recent study found that the Swansea criteria were fulfilled in women presenting with any cause of ALF.86

Box 1. Swansea criteria for diagnosis of AFLP.

Vomiting.

Abdominal pain.

Polydipsia/polyuria.

Encephalopathy.

Elevated bilirubin >14 µmol/L.

Hypoglycaemia <4 mmol/L.

Elevated urea >340 µmol/L.

Leukocytosis >11×106 cells/L.

Elevated transaminases (AST or ALT)>42 U/L.

Elevated ammonia >47 µmol/L.

Renal impairment; creatinine >150 umol/L.

Coagulopathy; PT >14 s or APTT>34 s.

Ascites or bright liver on ultrasound scan.

Microvesicular steatosis on liver biopsy.

(Six or more criteria are required in the absence of another explanation.)

AFLP, acute fatty liver of pregnancy; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; AST, aspartate aminotransaminase; PT, prothrombin time.

Management

Delivery is the only curative treatment as liver failure will continue until the fetus has been delivered.9 26 76 Before delivery, maternal stabilisation should be achieved with correction of hypoglycaemia, coagulopathy and hypertension.76 87 Maternal intensive supportive care in a multidisciplinary team is required following the delivery. Six-hourly LFTs, renal function and haematological parameters should be performed within the first 24–48 hours after delivery.76 78 In non-randomised trials, plasma exchange has been associated with hastening hepatic improvement and decreasing intensive care stay, but not with improved maternal mortality.88 89

Patients with ongoing deterioration in liver function after emergency delivery or patients who develop hepatic rupture should be transferred to a liver transplant centre for assessment.9 Transplantation should be considered in cases of ALF or hepatic rupture.9 Elevated lactate with hepatic encephalopathy appeared to be best predictors of maternal death or need of liver transplantation in one retrospective study.90

Prognosis

Maternal mortality has improved to <10% in recent years from as high as 80%–90% in the 1980s.73 78 This improvement is likely secondary to advances in obstetric care and earlier diagnosis. However, life-threatening complications remain including ALF, DIC, postpartum haemorrhage, acute renal failure and gastrointestinal bleeding.91 92 Cases of hepatic rupture and hepatic infarction in AFLP have also been documented in the literature.93

Fetal mortality rates are estimated to be up to 20%.78 All children of mothers with AFLP should be longitudinally monitored for symptoms of LCHAD deficiency.26 AASLD and ACG recommend that all children of mothers with AFLP should be screened at birth for LCHAD deficiency.9 26 The long-term outcomes in LCHAD deficiency are variable as most symptoms resolve with sufficient energy supply while some studies have reported the development of retinopathy, cardiomyopathy, metabolic crises, hypotonia and muscle pains.26 94 95

LFTs typically begin to fall within 1–2 days after delivery.96 Cholesterol and bilirubin levels lag by 3–4 days.97 Transaminases continue to decline to <100 IU/L, where they may plateau for up to 4 weeks.96 Complete normalisation of LFTs is expected in the majority of women, with no signs of chronic liver disease or major adverse events at 54 months postdelivery.98 In those who required liver transplantation, survival is comparable to liver transplantation for other causes of ALF.99 Recurrence of AFLP occurs in a minority of women in future pregnancies and may take a milder course.100

Conclusion

Pregnancy-related liver diseases are challenging for both the physician and the obstetrician. This review has focused predominantly on the diagnostic challenges facing the physician and the management options available. Early diagnosis and initiation of appropriate management with a multidisciplinary approach are important for preventing maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality.

Footnotes

Twitter: @The Liver Dude

Contributors: MAM wrote and edited the review. YC reviewed and edited the review. MAH wrote, edited and helped to supervise the preparation of the review. MAH is responsible for the overall content as guarantor.

Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interests: None declared.

Provenance and peer review: Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Data availability statement

No data are available. Not applicable—no datasets were generated or analysed for this study.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval

This study does not involve human participants.

References

  • 1.Westbrook RH, Dusheiko G, Williamson C. Pregnancy and liver disease. J Hepatol 2016;64:933–45. 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.11.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Abbassi-Ghanavati M, Greer LG, Cunningham FG. Pregnancy and laboratory studies: a reference table for clinicians. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:1326–31. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c2bde8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Einarson TR, Piwko C, Koren G. Quantifying the global rates of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy: a meta analysis. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol 2013;20:e171–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fell DB, Dodds L, Joseph KS, et al. Risk factors for hyperemesis gravidarum requiring hospital admission during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:277–84. 10.1097/01.AOG.0000195059.82029.74 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.London V, Grube S, Sherer DM, et al. Hyperemesis gravidarum: a review of recent literature. Pharmacology 2017;100:161–71. 10.1159/000477853 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Koot MH, Boelig RC, Van't Hooft J, et al. Variation in hyperemesis gravidarum definition and outcome reporting in randomised clinical trials: a systematic review. BJOG 2018;125:1514–21. 10.1111/1471-0528.15272 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists . The management of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy and hyperemesis gravidarum: Green-top guideline No. 69, 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Conchillo JM, Pijnenborg JMA, Peeters P. Liver enzyme elevation induced by hyperemesis gravidarum: aetiology, diagnosis and treatment. Neth J Med 2002;60:374–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sarkar M, Brady CW, Fleckenstein J, et al. Reproductive health and liver disease: practice guidance by the American association for the study of liver diseases. Hepatology 2021;73:318–65. 10.1002/hep.31559 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Boelig RC, Barton SJ, Saccone G, et al. Interventions for treating hyperemesis gravidarum: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2018;31:2492–505. 10.1080/14767058.2017.1342805 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics . ACOG practice Bulletin No. 189: nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2018;131): :e15–30. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002456 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nelson-Piercy C, Fayers P, de Swiet M. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of corticosteroids for the treatment of hyperemesis gravidarum. BJOG 2001;108:9–15. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00017.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Holmgren C, Aagaard-Tillery KM, Silver RM, et al. Hyperemesis in pregnancy: an evaluation of treatment strategies with maternal and neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:56.e1–56.e4. 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.06.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lacasse A, Rey E, Ferreira E, et al. Validity of a modified Pregnancy-Unique quantification of emesis and nausea (PUQE) scoring index to assess severity of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:71.e1–71.e7. 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.05.051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dodds L, Fell DB, Joseph KS, et al. Outcomes of pregnancies complicated by hyperemesis gravidarum. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:285–92. 10.1097/01.AOG.0000195060.22832.cd [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Veenendaal MVE, van Abeelen AFM, Painter RC, et al. Consequences of hyperemesis gravidarum for offspring: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2011;118:1302–13. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03023.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Koudijs HM, Savitri AI, Browne JL, et al. Hyperemesis gravidarum and placental dysfunction disorders. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016;16:374. 10.1186/s12884-016-1174-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mullin PM, Ching C, Schoenberg F, et al. Risk factors, treatments, and outcomes associated with prolonged hyperemesis gravidarum. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;25:632–6. 10.3109/14767058.2011.598588 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Trogstad LIS, Stoltenberg C, Magnus P, et al. Recurrence risk in hyperemesis gravidarum. BJOG 2005;112:1641–5. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00765.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kenyon AP, Tribe RM, Nelson-Piercy C, et al. Pruritus in pregnancy: a study of anatomical distribution and prevalence in relation to the development of obstetric cholestasis. Obstet Med 2010;3:25–9. 10.1258/om.2010.090055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.European Association for the Study of the Liver . EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of cholestatic liver diseases. J Hepatol 2009;51:237–67. 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.04.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Smith DD, Rood KM. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2020;63:134–51. 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000495 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Marschall H-U, Wikström Shemer E, Ludvigsson JF, et al. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and associated hepatobiliary disease: a population-based cohort study. Hepatology 2013;58:1385–91. 10.1002/hep.26444 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bicocca MJ, Sperling JD, Chauhan SP. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: review of six national and regional guidelines. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2018;231:180–7. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.10.041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ambros-Rudolph CM, Müllegger RR, Vaughan-Jones SA, et al. The specific dermatoses of pregnancy revisited and reclassified: results of a retrospective two-center study on 505 pregnant patients. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006;54:395–404. 10.1016/j.jaad.2005.12.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tran TT, Ahn J, Reau NS. Acg clinical guideline: liver disease and pregnancy. Am J Gastroenterol 2016;111:176–94. 10.1038/ajg.2015.430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Reyes H, Radrigan ME, Gonzalez MC, et al. Steatorrhea in patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Gastroenterology 1987;93:584–90. 10.1016/0016-5085(87)90922-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kenyon AP, Piercy CN, Girling J, et al. Pruritus may precede abnormal liver function tests in pregnant women with obstetric cholestasis: a longitudinal analysis. BJOG 2001;108:1190–2. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2003.00281.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists . Obstetric cholestasis: Green-top guideline No. 43, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wijarnpreecha K, Thongprayoon C, Sanguankeo A, et al. Hepatitis C infection and intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2017;41:39–45. 10.1016/j.clinre.2016.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mara Greenberg, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM). Electronic address: pubs@smfm.org . Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #53: Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: Replaces Consult #13, April 2011. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021;224:B2–9. 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chappell LC, Bell JL, Smith A, et al. Ursodeoxycholic acid versus placebo in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (PITCHES): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2019;394:849–60. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31270-X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ovadia C, Sajous J, Seed PT, et al. Ursodeoxycholic acid in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021;6:547–58. 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00074-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Glantz A, Marschall H-U, Mattsson L-A. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: relationships between bile acid levels and fetal complication rates. Hepatology 2004;40:467–74. 10.1002/hep.20336 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Geenes V, Chappell LC, Seed PT, et al. Association of severe intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with adverse pregnancy outcomes: a prospective population-based case-control study. Hepatology 2014;59:1482–91. 10.1002/hep.26617 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ovadia C, Seed PT, Sklavounos A, et al. Association of adverse perinatal outcomes of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with biochemical markers: results of aggregate and individual patient data meta-analyses. Lancet 2019;393:899–909. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31877-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dixon PH, Sambrotta M, Chambers J, et al. An expanded role for heterozygous mutations of ABCB4, ABCB11, ATP8B1, ABCC2 and TJP2 in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Sci Rep 2017;7:11823. 10.1038/s41598-017-11626-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wikström Shemer EA, Stephansson O, Thuresson M, et al. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and cancer, immune-mediated and cardiovascular diseases: a population-based cohort study. J Hepatol 2015;63:456–61. 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.03.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tranquilli AL. Early and late-onset pre-eclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens 2014;4:241. 10.1016/j.preghy.2014.04.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence . Hypertension in pregnancy: diagnosis and management. NICE guideline [NG133], 2019. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mol BWJ, Roberts CT, Thangaratinam S, et al. Pre-Eclampsia. Lancet 2016;387:999–1011. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00070-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Phipps EA, Thadhani R, Benzing T, et al. Pre-Eclampsia: pathogenesis, novel diagnostics and therapies. Nat Rev Nephrol 2019;15:275–89. 10.1038/s41581-019-0119-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Alese MO, Moodley J, Naicker T. Preeclampsia and HELLP syndrome, the role of the liver. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2021;34:117–23. 10.1080/14767058.2019.1572737 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rolnik DL, Wright D, Poon LC, et al. Aspirin versus placebo in pregnancies at high risk for preterm preeclampsia. N Engl J Med Overseas Ed 2017;377:613–22. 10.1056/NEJMoa1704559 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia: ACOG practice Bulletin, number 222. Obstet Gynecol 2020;135:e237–60. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003891 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Thangaratinam S, Koopmans CM, Iyengar S, et al. Accuracy of liver function tests for predicting adverse maternal and fetal outcomes in women with preeclampsia: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011;90:574–85. 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01112.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Grandi SM, Filion KB, Yoon S, et al. Cardiovascular disease-related morbidity and mortality in women with a history of pregnancy complications. Circulation 2019;139:1069–79. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036748 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lo CCW, Lo ACQ, Leow SH, et al. Future cardiovascular disease risk for women with gestational hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2020;9:e013991. 10.1161/JAHA.119.013991 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.McDonald SD, Malinowski A, Zhou Q, et al. Cardiovascular sequelae of preeclampsia/eclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Am Heart J 2008;156:918–30. 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.06.042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Weinstein L. Syndrome of hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count: a severe consequence of hypertension in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;142:159–67. 10.1016/S0002-9378(16)32330-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Vigil-De Gracia P. Pregnancy complicated by pre-eclampsia-eclampsia with HELLP syndrome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2001;72:17–23. 10.1016/S0020-7292(00)00281-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sibai BM, Ramadan MK, Usta I, et al. Maternal morbidity and mortality in 442 pregnancies with hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets (HELLP syndrome). Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:1000–6. 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90043-I [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Erdemoğlu M, Kuyumcuoğlu U, Kale A, et al. Factors affecting maternal and perinatal outcomes in HELLP syndrome: evaluation of 126 cases. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2010;37:213–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Fitzpatrick KE, Hinshaw K, Kurinczuk JJ, et al. Risk factors, management, and outcomes of hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets syndrome and elevated liver enzymes, low platelets syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:618–27. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000140 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Martin JN, Brewer JM, Wallace K, et al. Hellp syndrome and composite major maternal morbidity: importance of Mississippi classification system. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013;26:1201–6. 10.3109/14767058.2013.773308 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sibai BM. Diagnosis, controversies, and management of the syndrome of hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:981–91. 10.1097/01.AOG.0000126245.35811.2a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Martin JN, Rinehart BK, May WL, et al. The spectrum of severe preeclampsia: comparative analysis by HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzyme levels, and low platelet count) syndrome classification. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:1373–84. 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70022-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Haram K, Svendsen E, Abildgaard U. The HELLP syndrome: clinical issues and management. A review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2009;9:8. 10.1186/1471-2393-9-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Sibai BM. Imitators of severe pre-eclampsia. Semin Perinatol 2009;33:196–205. 10.1053/j.semperi.2009.02.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.ACOG practice Bulletin No. 207: thrombocytopenia in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2019;133:e181–93. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Woudstra DM, Chandra S, Hofmeyr GJ. Corticosteroids for HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets) syndrome in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;9:CD008148. 10.1002/14651858.CD008148.pub2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Shames BD, Fernandez LA, Sollinger HW, et al. Liver transplantation for HELLP syndrome. Liver Transpl 2005;11:224–8. 10.1002/lt.20285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Zarrinpar A, Farmer DG, Ghobrial RM, et al. Liver transplantation for HELLP syndrome. Am Surg 2007;73:1013–6. 10.1177/000313480707301020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Martin JN, Rose CH, Briery CM. Understanding and managing HELLP syndrome: the integral role of aggressive glucocorticoids for mother and child. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:914–34. 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.08.044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Barton JR, Sibai BM. Gastrointestinal complications of pre-eclampsia. Semin Perinatol 2009;33:179–88. 10.1053/j.semperi.2009.02.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Ditisheim A, Sibai BM. Diagnosis and management of HELLP syndrome complicated by liver hematoma. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2017;60:190–7. 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000253 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Escobar Vidarte MF, Montes D, Pérez A, et al. Hepatic rupture associated with preeclampsia, report of three cases and literature review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2019;32:2767–73. 10.1080/14767058.2018.1446209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Barton JR, Sibai BM. Hepatic imaging in HELLP syndrome (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count). Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:1820–7. 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70216-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Guo Q, Yang Z, Guo J, et al. Hepatic infarction induced by HELLP syndrome: a case report and review of the literature. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018;18:191. 10.1186/s12884-018-1799-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Chou M-M, Chen Y-F, Kung H-F, et al. Extensive hepatic infarction in severe preeclampsia as part of the HELLP syndrome (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets): evolution of CT findings and successful treatment with plasma exchange therapy. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2012;51:418–20. 10.1016/j.tjog.2012.07.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Chandrasekaran S, Simon R. Hepatic complications in preeclampsia. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2020;63:165–74. 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000501 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Grand'Maison S, Sauvé N, Weber F, et al. Hepatic rupture in hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 2012;119:617–25. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318245c283 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Knight M, Nelson-Piercy C, Kurinczuk JJ, et al. A prospective national study of acute fatty liver of pregnancy in the UK. Gut 2008;57:951–6. 10.1136/gut.2008.148676 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Natarajan SK, Ibdah JA. Role of 3-hydroxy fatty acid-induced hepatic lipotoxicity in acute fatty liver of pregnancy. Int J Mol Sci 2018;19. 10.3390/ijms19010322. [Epub ahead of print: 22 Jan 2018]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Ibdah JA, Bennett MJ, Rinaldo P, et al. A fetal fatty-acid oxidation disorder as a cause of liver disease in pregnant women. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1723–31. 10.1056/NEJM199906033402204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Nelson DB, Byrne JJ, Cunningham FG. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2020;63:152–64. 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000494 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Lamprecht A, Morton A, Laurie J, et al. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy and concomitant medical conditions: a review of cases at a quaternary obstetric hospital. Obstet Med 2018;11:178–81. 10.1177/1753495X18764816 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Nelson DB, Byrne JJ, Cunningham FG. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2021;137:535–46. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004289 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Naoum EE, Leffert LR, Chitilian HV, et al. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy: pathophysiology, anesthetic implications, and obstetrical management. Anesthesiology 2019;130:446–61. 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002597 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Castro MA, Fassett MJ, Reynolds TB, et al. Reversible peripartum liver failure: a new perspective on the diagnosis, treatment, and cause of acute fatty liver of pregnancy, based on 28 consecutive cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:389–95. 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70567-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Liu J, Ghaziani TT, Wolf JL. Acute fatty liver disease of pregnancy: updates in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Am J Gastroenterol 2017;112:838–46. 10.1038/ajg.2017.54 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Vigil-De Gracia P, liver Afatty. Acute fatty liver and HELLP syndrome: two distinct pregnancy disorders. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2001;73:215–20. 10.1016/S0020-7292(01)00364-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Byrne JJ, Seasely A, Nelson DB, et al. Comparing acute fatty liver of pregnancy from hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets syndrome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2020:1–11. 10.1080/14767058.2020.1754790 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Ch'ng CL, Morgan M, Hainsworth I, et al. Prospective study of liver dysfunction in pregnancy in Southwest Wales. Gut 2002;51:876–80. 10.1136/gut.51.6.876 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Goel A, Ramakrishna B, Zachariah U, et al. How accurate are the Swansea criteria to diagnose acute fatty liver of pregnancy in predicting hepatic microvesicular steatosis? Gut 2011;60:138–9. 10.1136/gut.2009.198465 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Casey LC, Fontana RJ, Aday A, et al. Acute liver failure (ALF) in pregnancy: how much is pregnancy related? Hepatology 2020;72:1366–77. 10.1002/hep.31144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Cunningham FG, Nelson DB. Disseminated intravascular coagulation syndromes in obstetrics. Obstet Gynecol 2015;126:999–1011. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Tang W, Huang Z, Wang Y, et al. Effect of plasma exchange on hepatocyte oxidative stress, mitochondria function, and apoptosis in patients with acute fatty liver of pregnancy. Artif Organs 2012;36:E39–47. 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2011.01417.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Yu C-B, Chen J-J, Du W-B, et al. Effects of plasma exchange combined with continuous renal replacement therapy on acute fatty liver of pregnancy. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2014;13:179–83. 10.1016/s1499-3872(14)60028-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Westbrook RH, Yeoman AD, Joshi D, et al. Outcomes of severe pregnancy-related liver disease: Refining the role of transplantation. Am J Transplant 2010;10:2520–6. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03301.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Chang L, Wang M, Liu H, et al. Pregnancy outcomes of patients with acute fatty liver of pregnancy: a case control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020;20:282. 10.1186/s12884-020-02980-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Ang SX, Chen C-P, Sun F-J, et al. Comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes between acute fatty liver of pregnancy and hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets syndrome: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021;21:293. 10.1186/s12884-021-03761-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Minuk GY, Lui RC, Kelly JK. Rupture of the liver associated with acute fatty liver of pregnancy. Am J Gastroenterol 1987;82:457–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.den Boer MEJ, Wanders RJA, Morris AAM, et al. Long-Chain 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency: clinical presentation and follow-up of 50 patients. Pediatrics 2002;109:99–104. 10.1542/peds.109.1.99 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Karall D, Brunner-Krainz M, Kogelnig K, et al. Clinical outcome, biochemical and therapeutic follow-up in 14 Austrian patients with long-chain 3-hydroxy acyl CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (LCHADD). Orphanet J Rare Dis 2015;10:21. 10.1186/s13023-015-0236-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Nelson DB, Yost NP, Cunningham FG. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy: clinical outcomes and expected duration of recovery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;209:456.e1–456.e7. 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Rolfes DB, Ishak KG. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy: a clinicopathologic study of 35 cases. Hepatology 1985;5:1149–58. 10.1002/hep.1840050615 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Xiong H-F, Liu J-Y, Guo L-M, et al. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy: over six months follow-up study of twenty-five patients. World J Gastroenterol 2015;21:1927–31. 10.3748/wjg.v21.i6.1927 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Kushner T, Tholey D, Dodge J, et al. Outcomes of liver transplantation for acute fatty liver disease of pregnancy. Am J Transplant 2019;19:2101–7. 10.1111/ajt.15401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Glavind J, Boie S, Glavind E, et al. Risk of recurrent acute fatty liver of pregnancy: survey from a social media group. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2020;2:100085. 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100085 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No data are available. Not applicable—no datasets were generated or analysed for this study.


Articles from BMJ Open Gastroenterology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES