Skip to main content
NCBI home page
ACS Omega logoLink to ACS Omega
. 2022 Feb 28;7(10):8706–8716. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c06860

Adsorption Behavior of Environmental Gas Molecules on Pristine and Defective MoSi2N4: Possible Application as Highly Sensitive and Reusable Gas Sensors

Chengwei Xiao †, Zuju Ma †,*, Rongjian Sa ‡, Zhitao Cui †,§, Shuaishuai Gao †, Wei Du †, Xueqin Sun †, Qiao-hong Li ∥
PMCID: PMC8928539  PMID: 35309471

Abstract

graphic file with name ao1c06860_0010.jpg

Inspired by the recent practical application of two-dimensional (2D) nanomaterials as gas sensors, catalysts, and materials for waste gas disposal, herein, the adsorption behaviors of environmental gas molecules, including NO, CO, O2, CO2, NO2, H2O, H2S, and NH3, on the 2D pristine and defective MoSi2N4 (MSN) monolayers were systematically investigated using spin-polarized density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Our results reveal that all the gas molecules are physically adsorbed on the MSN surface with small charge transfer, but the electronic structures of NO, NO2, and O2 are obviously modified due to the in-gap states. The introduction of N vacancy on the MSN surface enhances the interaction between gas molecules and the substrate, especially for NO2 and O2. Interestingly, the adsorption type of NO and CO evolves from physisorption to chemisorption, which may be utilized in NO and CO catalytic reaction. Furthermore, the moderate adsorption strength and obvious changes in electronic properties of H2O and H2S on the defective MSN make them have promising prospects in highly sensitive and reusable gas sensors. This work offers several promising gas sensors based on the MSN monolayer and also provides a theoretical reference of other related 2D materials in the field of gas sensors, catalysts, and toxic gas disposal.

1. Introduction

Followed by the successful isolation of graphene,1,2 an upsurge in the study of two-dimensional (2D) materials has started, such as silicene,3−6 phosphorene,7,8 and transition metal dichalcogenides.9−13 Due to the quantum size effect, the 2D materials holding a high surface-to-volume ratio have fascinating physicochemical and electronic properties.14−16 These unique natures endow them with widespread application prospects, including energy conversion or storage,17,18 photo/electrocatalysis,19−22 nanoelectronics,23,24 and gas sensing.25−27 The development of new 2D materials has not stagnated either experimentally or theoretically. Very recently, a new series of 2D van der Waals (vdW) layered materials named MA2Z4 with a septuple-atomic-layer structure (M signifies a transition metal, e.g., W, V, Nb, Ta, Ti, Zr, Hf, or Cr; A represents Si or Ge; Z stands for N, P, or As) have been predicted theoretically through DFT calculations.28 Among them, the MoSi2N4 (MSN) monolayer was even synthesized successfully via chemical vapor deposition (CVD) with a Cu/Mo bilayer as the substrate and NH3 gas as the nitrogen source.28 Both the experiments and theoretical calculations show that the MSN monolayer exhibits outstanding ambient stability and behaves as an indirect semiconductor.28,29 In addition, it was found that the hole and electron mobilities of the monolayer MSN28 are about 4–6 times greater than that of the monolayer MoS2.30 These fascinating properties render the monolayer MSN promising potential in the application of nanoelectronics and optoelectronics. Recently, the electrical contact physics properties of the MSN monolayer were investigated and the ultralow Schottky barrier height of MoSi2N4/NbS2 contact was exhibited, which demonstrates its application prospect in the nanoelectronic devices.31 The tunable electronic structures and piezoelectric coefficients by strain make the monolayer MSN beneficial to the fabrication of nanodevices.32 In addition, previous work also revealed that the MSN monolayer possesses potential application in the field of photocatalysis owing to the suitable band gap and band edge positions.29

The detection of specific small gas molecules, such as NO, CO, O2, CO2, NO2, H2O, H2S, and NH3, is of great significance for public safety, environmental protection, industrial manufacture, and medical diagnosis. 2D materials gain enormous attention for gas sensors due to the high surface-to-volume ratio, exposure of active sites, and high carrier mobility.11,13,33,34 However, as we all know, there exist many small gas molecules on the surface of 2D materials, and it is impossible to completely remove them due to the large surface area.35,36 Interestingly, previous reports show that even the physisorption of small gas molecules also has an effective influence on the electronic and optical properties of 2D materials, which is vital for developing a high-performance gas sensor.37−39 Over the past two decades, the adsorption behaviors of gas molecules on a train of 2D nanomaterials, including graphene,25,40,41 stanene,42,43 blue phosphorus,44 InSe,34,45 and MoS2 monolayer,13,46,47 have been investigated in detail and the graphene-based gas sensors have already been used in practice.48 Earlier this year, Bafekry et al.49 investigated the adsorption behavior of environmental gas molecules on the pristine MSN monolayer and found that the magnetic properties of MSN were changed by adsorption of O2, NO, and NO2; however, the application of gas sensors based on pristine MSN is severely restricted due to the weak interaction and few charge transfer.

In this study, we performed a systemic theoretical study on the adsorption behavior of gas molecules (NO, CO, O2, CO2, NO2, H2O, H2S, and NH3) on MSN and N-defective MSN (d-MSN) monolayers, concentrating on the most stable adsorption configurations, charge transfer and the changes of electronic structures and properties, and possible applications. We found that all the gas molecules are physisorbed on pristine MSN with a little charge transfer. However, the introduction of N vacancy on the MSN surface enhances the interaction between gas molecules and MSN, and the adsorption type of CO and NO changes from physisorption to chemisorption. Furthermore, the d-MSN has moderate adsorption strength on H2O and H2S, which endows them with bright application prospects in H2O and H2S gas sensors.

2. Computational Methods

All the DFT calculations were performed as implemented in the Vienna Ab-initio Simulation Package (VASP).50,51 The ion–electron interaction and exchange-correlation functional were treated by the projected augment wave (PAW) pseudopotentials52 and Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) version of the generalized gradient approximation (GGA),53 respectively. The valence electronic configurations of Mo, Si, N, C, O, S, and H are 4p65s24d4, 3s23p2, 2s22p3, 2s22p2, 2s22p4, 3s23p4, and 1s1, respectively. A vacuum region of 15 Å in the z direction was employed to eliminate the interaction between the periodic layers. The energy cutoff of 500 eV was adopted for plane wave expansion. The gamma-centered 3 × 3 × 1 and 5 × 5 × 1 k-point meshes in the Monkhorst–Pack scheme for the Brillouin zone sampling were used for the geometric optimization and electronic structure calculations of a 4 × 4 × 1 supercell, respectively. The thresholds of energy and force were set to 0.02 eV/Å and 1.0 × 10–5 eV/atom, respectively. The vdW interaction was corrected by utilizing Grimme’s scheme (D3)54 and spin-polarization was considered in the whole calculations.

The stability of gas molecule adsorption on the MSN monolayer was estimated by the adsorption energy (Eads), which is defined as:

2. 1

where Egas – MSN, EMSN, and Egas denote the self-consistent energies of the MSN adsorbing different gas molecules, the pure MSN monolayer, and the free gas molecules. Based on the above equation, the negative value of the adsorption energy illustrates that the adsorption process is exothermic and the adsorption configuration is thermodynamically favorable.55,56 To better elucidate the electronic interaction and visualize the charge transfer between the gas molecules and the MSN monolayer, the charge density difference (CDD) is defined as the following equation:

2. 2

where ρgas – MSN, ρMSN, and ρgas are the total charge densities of the gas molecules adsorbed by the MSN monolayer, those by the pure MSN monolayer, and the free gas molecules, respectively. The CDD plots are drawn by VESTA.57

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. The Geometry and Electronic Structure of the MSN Monolayer

The MSN monolayer can be regarded as a 2H-MoS2-like MoN2 layer sandwiched by two InSe-like N–Si bilayers, forming a 2D honeycomb lattice with a space group of P6̅m2 (no. 187) (see Figure 1a,b). The calculated lattice constants (a = b = 2.90 Å), bond lengths (dN–Si = 1.74–1.75 Å and dN–Mo = 2.09 Å), and the thickness (7.01 Å) of the MSN monolayer are in good agreement with previous work.29 The calculated band structure and density of states (DOS) of the MSN monolayer are illustrated in Figure 1c,d. It is clearly observed that the MSN monolayer is an indirect semiconductor with the valence band maximum (VBM) located at the Γ point (0 0 0) and the conduction band minimum (CBM) at the K point (0.333 0.333 0). The obtained band gap is 1.83 eV, which is in good consistency with a previous experimental result of 1.94 eV28 and a theoretical value of 1.79 eV.29 The band gap calculated by the HSE06 method is 2.35 eV,58−60 which overestimates the experimental data. Therefore, it suggests that the PBE functional can well describe the electronic structure of the MSN monolayer. Both the CBM and VBM of the pristine MSN monolayer are mainly contributed by Mo 4d orbitals, N 2p orbitals, and their hybridizations. Meanwhile, in the deeper region of the valence band, the N 2p states make the main contribution.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(a) Top and (b) side views of the optimized MSN monolayer and the calculated (c) band structure and (d) DOS of the pristine MSN monolayer. The considered possible adsorption sites for gas molecules are shown in panel (a). The Fermi level is set to zero.

3.2. Adsorption Configurations and Adsorption Energies

To obtain the most stable adsorption site for different gas molecules, four possible adsorption sites are considered, including the top site of a N atom or Si atom, the bridge site of a N–Si bond, and the center of a N3Si3 hexagon ring, as illustrated in Figure 1a. In each site, the gas molecules were placed in end-on and side-on ways, respectively. Moreover, the initial adsorption configurations are different for the linear molecules (NO, CO, O2, and CO2) and the nonlinear molecules (NO2, H2O, H2S, and NH3). The details can be found in Figures S1–S3. The free gas molecules are optimized and displayed in Figure S4 with the bond lengths and angles being consistent with previous results.13,42,45 After full optimization of the adsorption models, the most stable adsorption configurations of each molecule and corresponding adsorption energies (Eads) are shown in Figures 2 and 3, respectively. The Eads values of other metastable adsorption structures are listed in Table S1. From Figure 2, we see that all the molecules tend to be adsorbed in a parallel manner to the MSN surface, except H2O, which adopts a vertical alignment with the MSN surface. It is observed that most linear molecules (NO, CO, and O2) and H2S tend to be adsorbed above the center of the Ni3Si3 hexagon ring, while NO2, CO2, and H2O locate on the top site of the N atom. The obtained Eads values are all negative, indicating that adsorption processes for these molecules are thermodynamically favorable. The adsorption strength of the gas molecules on the MSN surface increases in the following order: O2 < CO < NH3 < H2O < NO < CO2 < NO2 < H2S. The results show that the adsorption strength of H2S, NO2, and CO2 on the MSN monolayer stands out in the above gas molecules. Ma et al.45 reported that the Eads of NO2 on the InSe monolayer is −0.21 eV and they supposed that the InSe monolayer has great promise for NO2 sensing due to its higher electron mobility. In addition, Yu et al.56 systematically investigated the adsorption behavior of various gas molecules on the Ti2CO2 monolayer and found that only NH3 can be chemisorbed on Ti2CO2 with the Eads of −0.37 eV, and they predicted that Ti2CO2 has application prospects in the NH3 sensor with high selectivity and sensitivity. Our results exhibit that the adsorption strength of H2S, NO2, and CO2 on MSN is comparable to that of NO2 on InSe and NH3 on Ti2CO2, which reveals that the MSN monolayer may be utilized in H2S, NO2, and CO2 sensing. Moreover, the nearest distance between the adsorbed molecules and the MSN monolayer is in the range of 2.14–3.24 Å. After optimization, the bond lengths and bond angles of NO, CO, O2, CO2, NO2, H2O, H2S, and NH3 slightly changed compared to those of the free gas molecules (see Table S2). The slightly changed bond lengths and angles of gas molecules after adsorption suggest the weak interaction between gas molecules and the MSN surface, indicating that the adsorption type is physisorption.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Top and side views of the most stable adsorption configurations of MSN adsorbing (a) NO, (b) CO, (c) O2, (d) CO2, (e) NO2, (f) H2O, (g) H2S, and (h) NH3.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Eads of NO, CO, O2, CO2, NO2, H2O, H2S, and NH3 on pristine MSN and d-MSN monolayers.

As we all know, there usually exist surface vacancies in the CVD-grown 2D materials, and the defective regions are usually chemically active and proved to enhance the interaction between the gas molecules and the substrate.44,61,62 Qian et al.63 reported that the surface N-defective MSN is much more stable than that of inner N vacancy and surface Si vacancy, and the d-MSN is also proved to be thermodynamically stable via the ab initio molecular dynamics simulation.58 Based on the above results, we further investigate the adsorption behavior of small molecules on the surface of N-defective MSN in this work. Several initial adsorption structures of the d-MSN system are shown in Figures S5 and S6. The most stable adsorption structures and corresponding Eads are illustrated in Figure 4 and Figure 3, respectively. The Eads values of other metastable adsorption structures are summarized in Table S3. It can be clearly observed that NO and CO molecules tend to be vertically adsorbed on the surface of d-MSN with the vacancy occupied by the N or C atom. NO2 dissociates into an O atom and a NO molecule after the full optimization in which the O atom occupies the surface N vacancy and the NO molecule located on the topsite of the Si atom adjacent to the N vacancy. The same phenomenon also occurs in the O2 adsorption case; the two O atoms are dissociated with one O atom occupying the N vacancy and the other locating on the topsite of the Si–Si bond. Moreover, the rest of the molecules including CO2, H2O, H2S, and NH3 tend to be adsorbed in a parallel manner on the top of the Si atom adjacent to the N vacancy. From Figure 3, we can clearly observe that the Eads of the molecules on d-MSN is lower than that of MSN, indicating that adsorption on d-MSN is much stronger than that on MSN. The adsorption capacity of the above molecules on d-MSN is arranged in the following order: CO2 < H2S < H2O < NH3 < CO < NO2 < NO < O2. In addition, we also calculated the adsorption energies of (d-)MSN systems via a more precise hybrid functional (HSE06),64 which is shown in Figure S7. We can clearly observe that the change trend of adsorption strength of the gas molecules on the (d-)MSN surface is consistent with the PBE functional. After optimization, the bond length of NO and CO increases significantly, indicating their activation, while the bond length and angle of CO2, H2O, H2S, and NH3 slightly change compared to that of free gas molecules (see Table S2). Combining the Eads and the change of structural parameters, we find that some gas molecules (NO, CO, O2, and NO2) favor chemisorption on the d-MSN surface, while the rest of gas molecules tend to be adsorbed in the form of physisorption. Interestingly, the calculated Eads values of NO (−5.42 eV) and CO (−2.60 eV) on the d-MSN are more negative than those of the other 2D materials, such as defective graphene (−3.04 eV for NO and −2.33 eV for CO),65 defective Fe3GeTe2 (−3.71 eV for NO and −2.44 eV for CO),61 and defective blue phosphorus (−1.12 eV for NO).44 These results show that the d-MSN has better affinity to NO and CO than the above 2D defective materials, which may be beneficial for NO and CO catalytic reaction. Furthermore, the enhanced adsorption strength of CO2, H2O, H2S, and NH3 on d-MSN might make it have better gas sensing capacity.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Optimized structure of (a) d-MSN and the most stable adsorption configurations of d-MSN adsorbing (b) NO, (c) CO, (d) O2, (e) CO2, (f) NO2, (g) H2O, (h) H2S, and (i) NH3.

3.3. Charge Transfer and Electronic Structures

To gain deeper insight into the adsorption interactions between various gas molecules and the (d-)MSN surface, the charge density difference (CDD) is calculated and illustrated in Figures 5 and 6. The electron depletion and electron accumulation are shown in light-blue and yellow isosurfaces, respectively. As we can see from Figure 5, all the gas molecules (except NH3) are mostly surrounded by electron-accumulation regions accompanied by a small fraction of electron-depletion regions. Moreover, there exist electron-accumulation regions near the interface between most gas molecules (including CO, CO2, NO2, and H2S) and the MSN surface. These results demonstrate that these molecules except NH3 serve as electron acceptors in corresponding adsorption systems. In the case of NH3 adsorption, the charges mainly deplete around the NH3 molecule, whereas most charges accumulate on the N atoms of the MSN surface. This phenomenon suggests that the NH3 molecule donates electrons to the MSN monolayer, acting as an electron donor. The above analysis of charge transfer between gas molecules and MSN is consistent with the Bader charge analysis, which is shown in Figure 2. We can easily observe that NO, NO2, and H2O act as strong acceptors, receiving the greatest number of electrons, while NH3 acts as an effective donor, donating electrons to the substrate. The weak charge transfer between gas molecules and the MSN surface also proves that the adsorption is physisorption.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Calculated charge density difference of MSN adsorbing (a) NO (isovalue: 0.0001 e/Å3), (b) CO (isovalue: 0.00005 e/Å3), (c) O2 (0.00002 e/Å3), (d) CO2 (isovalue: 0.0001 e/Å3), (e) NO2 (isovalue: 0.0001 e/Å3), (f) H2O (isovalue: 0.0001 e/Å3), (g) H2S (isovalue: 0.0001 e/Å3), and (h) NH3 (isovalue: 0.0001 e/Å3). The electron depletion and electron accumulation are illustrated by light-blue and yellow isosurfaces, respectively.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Calculated charge density difference of d-MSN adsorbing (a) NO, (b) CO, (c) O2, (d) CO2, (e) NO2, (f) H2O, (g) H2S, and (h) NH3 (isovalues: 0.005 e/Å3).

As for d-MSN adsorption systems, the CDD is calculated and plotted in Figure 6. In most adsorption cases, such as CO, NO, O2, and NO2 adsorption cases, electrons accumulate near the gas molecules and Si–X bond (X denotes the atoms of the gas molecules), while electrons deplete in the Si atoms around the N vacancy, indicating that these gas molecules act as electron acceptors. However, the remaining adsorption systems have less charge transfer between gas molecules and d-MSN, and the charge mainly transfers within gas molecules. The Bader charge analysis is also applied to investigate the interaction between the d-MSN and gas molecules. Based on Bader charge values, the calculated charge transfer values between these molecules and d-MSN are +2.305e (NO), +2.040e (CO), +3.081e (O2), +0.015e (CO2), +2.346e (NO2), −0.018e (H2O), −0.050e (H2S), and +0.070e (NH3) (the “+” denotes that the charge is transferred from d-MSN to gas molecules and vice versa). The calculated Bader charge results are in good agreement with the above analysis of CDD. Compared with the pristine MSN, the amount of charge transfer is significantly increased in most adsorption systems. According to the lower Eads and more obvious charge transfer, we believe that the d-MSN has a strong bonding capacity to the gas molecules compared to MSN.

The electronic structures of the adsorption systems are also calculated to analyze the interaction mechanism between gas molecules and the substrate and the influence of gas molecule adsorption on the electronic properties of the MSN monolayer. The band structure and DOS (including LDOS) of MSN, d-MSN, and NO and O2 adsorption systems are depicted in Figures 7 and 8, while the rest of adsorption systems are shown in Figures S7 and S8. In MSN adsorption systems, the band gap of the closed-shell molecule adsorption systems (CO, CO2, H2O, H2S, and NH3) increases to ∼2 eV, while the band gaps of MSN decrease to 0.304 eV (NO), 0.663 eV (O2), and 0.242 eV (NO2) after the adsorption of open-shell molecules, which is caused by the new in-gap states (see Figure 7b1,c1). The introduction of N vacancy on the MSN surface would give rise to spin-up and spin-down bands above and below the Fermi level, leading to the decrease in band gap, thus improving the electrical conductivity of the MSN monolayer. However, for NO@d-MSN (d-MSN adsorbs NO), the newly generated in-gap energy bands disappear and the band gap increases, while in O2@d-MSN, the VBM moves up to the Fermi level.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Band structures of (a) (d-)MSN adsorbing (b) NO and (c) O2. The spin-up and spin-down bands are shown in black and blue lines, respectively. The Fermi level is set to zero. (*1) and (*2) represent the MSN and d-MSN adsorption systems, respectively.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

Calculated DOS and local DOS (LDOS) of (a) (d-)MSN adsorbing (b) NO and (c) O2. The Fermi level is set to zero. (*1) and (*2) represent the MSN and d-MSN adsorption systems, respectively. The Fermi level is set to zero.

As shown in Figure 8, we observe that the overall trend of the DOS plots of the adsorption systems is similar to that of the MSN monolayer, that is, the regions around the Fermi level are mainly contributed by Mo 4d and N 2p orbitals as well as their hybridization. The newly generated energy bands near the Fermi level in d-MSN are mainly composed of N 2p orbitals, leading to the decrease in band gap and the increase in electrical conductivity. Therefore, we believe that the d-MSN may have a high charge transfer efficiency than MSN, which makes it more suitable as a catalyst to accelerate the reaction. The NO and O2 adsorption cases are taken as a representative to analyze the difference in electronic structures of (d-)MSN. For the NO@MSN (MSN adsorbs NO) adsorption system, there only exist some orbital hybridizations between O 2p and N 2p states of NO and TDOS of the adsorption system. However, in the NO@d-MSN adsorption system, the strong orbital hybridizations between O 2p and N 2p states of NO and the TDOS of the adsorption system occur, demonstrating that more electronic states get involved in the interaction between the gas molecules and (d-)MSN substrates;66 thus, d-MSN has a strong bonding ability to NO than MSN. Similarly, the same phenomenon occurred in O2@(d-)MSN systems, and the greater intense orbital hybridization level is observed in O2@d-MSN than in NO@d-MSN, indicating the stronger adsorption strength between O2 and d-MSN, which is in good agreement with the calculated result of Eads (Eads (O2@d-MSN) > Eads (NO@d-MSN)). In general, the electronic structures of MSN may change after the adsorption of reactants and the changed electronic properties would affect its optical properties and electrical conductivity,34,42 which might be conducive to gas sensing and catalytic reactions.

3.4. Possible Applications of (d-)MSN

Based on the adsorption behavior of NO, CO, O2, CO2, NO2, H2O, H2S, and NH3 molecules on the (d-)MSN monolayer mentioned above, the potential applications of the (d-)MSN monolayer are discussed in this part. The adsorption of reactants on the catalyst surface, as the prerequisite for subsequent processes of various reactions such as oxygen and carbon monoxide reduction reactions (ORR and CORR, respectively), determines whether the reactants can be activated.67,68 For example, the adsorption capacity for CO and NO of d-MSN is comparable to or even better than those of Fe-anchored graphene66 and Ga-doped Pt/CeO2,69 which was proved to be an excellent catalyst for the conversion and removal of CO and NO. So, we believe that the d-MSN might be a good candidate for NO and CO reduction.

Next, we focus on the potential application of the (d-)MSN monolayer as a gas sensor for the detection and monitoring of specific gas molecules. Previous relevant studies have shown that the sensitivity and reusability are the most important standards for a good gas senor.27,33,70 Herein, the changes in the electrical conductivity of the (d-)MSN monolayer before and after gas molecule adsorption are utilized to assess the sensitivity of a gas sensor, which is described as:27,33,71

3.4. 3

where σ and Eg are the electrical conductivity and band gap of the MSN monolayer adsorbing different gas molecules, respectively, and k and T are the Boltzmann constant and the temperature, respectively. Herein, the k and T are 8.62 × 10–5 eV/K and 300 K, respectively. In general, the greater the change of electrical conductivity of the materials after gas adsorption, the better the sensitivity of gas sensors.70,72 Based on the obtained band gap value and the above formula, we can easily observe that the electrical conductivity of MSN has been greatly changed after NO, O2, and NO2 adsorption (see Table S4). As for d-MSN adsorption systems, the electrical conductivity of d-MSN is sensitive to most of the above gas molecules except CO and O2. Therefore, we can see that the MSN-based gas sensor has higher sensitivity to NO, NO2, and O2 sensing than other gas molecules, while the d-MSN-based gas sensor has good sensitivity to most of the above gas molecules. As we all know, the stronger the adsorption capacity of gas molecules on the (d-)MSN monolayer, the more difficult it is for them to desorb from the (d-)MSN monolayer surface, which may have a severe influence on the reusability of gas sensors. Therefore, a short recovery time is another prerequisite of a good gas sensor. The recovery time (τ) of adsorption systems is evaluated according to the transition state theory and shown in the following equation:73

3.4. 4

where v0, Eads, k, and T represent the attempt frequency, adsorption energy, Boltzmann constant, and temperature, respectively. Herein, for the sake of comparison, the attempt frequency of all the gas molecules is set to the same value as the NO2 molecule (v0 = 1012/s).73 The recovery times of MSN adsorbing NO, CO, O2, CO2, NO2, H2O, H2S, and NH3 are 1.81 × 10–9, 2.30 × 10–10, 9.22 × 10–11, 2.77 × 10–9, 2.88 × 10–9, 1.23 × 10–9, 4.08 × 10–9, and 9.38 × 10–10 s, respectively. It is easy to observe that the adsorption strength of the above gas molecules on MSN is so weak that MSN cannot be utilized for gas sensing and monitoring. As for d-MSN adsorption systems, the O2 and NO2 adsorption systems are not considered due to their dissociation after adsorption, and the recovery times of d-MSN adsorbing NO, CO, CO2, H2O, H2S, and NH3 are 1.02 × 1079 s, 4.28 × 1031 s, 0.37 ms, 6.51 s, 0.16 s, and 5.64 × 105 s, respectively. Our results show that NO, CO, and NH3 on d-MSN have relatively long recovery times, but the recovery time of CO2 on d-MSN is much shorter, which is not suitable to be used for gas detection. However, the adsorption energy of H2O and H2S on d-MSN is moderate, which matches short recovery times of 6.51 and 0.16 s, respectively, and is appropriate for H2O and H2S detection. Based on the analysis of adsorption energies, adsorption structures, charge transfer, and the changes of electronic properties, the d-MSN exhibits bright application prospects in H2O and H2S gas sensors with high sensitivity and reusability.

To explore the effect of gas coverage on reusable gas sensors, we introduced other H2O and H2S molecules to the original adsorption structures, respectively. The fully optimized structures are shown in Figure S9, in which both molecules are located in the vicinity of the N vacancy. Moreover, we also calculated the effect of gas coverage on the band gap of the H2O and H2S adsorption systems (see Figure S10). We see that the band gaps of the double molecule adsorption systems are the same as single molecule ones, indicating that the effect of gas coverage has no effect on the band gap, and thus, it does not affect the sensitivity of the sensor.

4. Conclusions

In this work, the adsorption behavior of NO, CO, O2, CO2, NO2, H2O, H2S, and NH3 on the (d-)MSN monolayer was systematically investigated, focusing on the adsorption structures, charge transfer, the changes of electronic structures, and potential application of the (d-)MSN monolayer. Based on the results of adsorption energies, all the adsorption configurations are thermodynamically favorable and tend to be physisorbed on the MSN surface with small charge transfer. However, the electronic properties of NO, O2, and NO2 adsorption configurations are dramatically modified due to the newly introduced in-gap states. However, the introduction of N vacancy on MSN would obviously affect the interaction between gas molecules and the substrate, especially in NO2 and O2 adsorption systems. Furthermore, the adsorption type of NO and CO changes from physisorption to chemisorption, which may be used as catalysts for NO and CO reduction. Compared with the MSN adsorption systems, the d-MSN has moderate adsorption strength for H2O and H2S, thus possessing quite broad application prospects in highly sensitive and reusable gas sensors. This work provides a vital theoretical reference of the 2D MA2Z4 family in the field of gas sensors, catalysts, and toxic gas disposal.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (nos. 21771182 and 21501177) and the Open Project Program of Structural Chemistry, Fujian Institute of Research on the Structure of Matter, Chinese Academy of Sciences. The authors also gratefully acknowledge the Supercomputing Center in Minjiang University for providing the computing resources. We also gratefully acknowledge HZWTECH for providing computation facilities.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.1c06860.

  • Initial adsorption configurations of gas molecules on (d-)MSN; adsorption energies, band structures, DOS, electrical conductivity, and recovery time of adsorption systems; atomic structures and band structures of bimolecular adsorption systems (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

ao1c06860_si_001.pdf (2.9MB, pdf)

References

  1. Novoselov K. S.; Geim A. K.; Morozov S. V.; Jiang D.; Zhang Y.; Dubonos S. V.; Grigorieva I. V.; Firsov A. A. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 2004, 306, 666–669. 10.1126/science.1102896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Castro Neto A. H.; Guinea F.; Peres N. M. R.; Novoselov K. S.; Geim A. K. The electronic properties of graphene. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2009, 81, 109–162. 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.109. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hu W.; Xia N.; Wu X.; Li Z.; Yang J. Silicene as a highly sensitive molecule sensor for NH3, NO and NO2. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 6957–6962. 10.1039/c3cp55250k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Prasongkit J.; Amorim R. G.; Chakraborty S.; Ahuja R.; Scheicher R. H.; Amornkitbamrung V. Highly Sensitive and Selective Gas Detection Based on Silicene. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 16934–16940. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b03635. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Vogt P.; De Padova P.; Quaresima C.; Avila J.; Frantzeskakis E.; Asensio M. C.; Resta A.; Ealet B.; Le Lay G. Silicene: Compelling Experimental Evidence for Graphenelike Two-Dimensional Silicon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 108, 155501. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.155501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chandiramouli R.; Srivastava A.; Nagarajan V. NO adsorption studies on silicene nanosheet: DFT investigation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 351, 662–672. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.05.166. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cui S.; Pu H.; Wells S. A.; Wen Z.; Mao S.; Chang J.; Hersam M. C.; Chen J. Ultrahigh sensitivity and layer-dependent sensing performance of phosphorene-based gas sensors. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8632. 10.1038/ncomms9632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kou L.; Frauenheim T.; Chen C. Phosphorene as a Superior Gas Sensor: Selective Adsorption and Distinct I–V Response. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 2675–2681. 10.1021/jz501188k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Elías A. L.; Perea-López N.; Castro-Beltrán A.; Berkdemir A.; Lv R.; Feng S.; Long A. D.; Hayashi T.; Kim Y. A.; Endo M.; Gutiérrez H. R.; Pradhan N. R.; Balicas L.; Mallouk T. E.; López-Urías F.; Terrones H.; Terrones M. Controlled Synthesis and Transfer of Large-Area WS2 Sheets: From Single Layer to Few Layers. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 5235–5242. 10.1021/nn400971k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chhowalla M.; Shin H. S.; Eda G.; Li L.-J.; Loh K. P.; Zhang H. The chemistry of two-dimensional layered transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheets. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5, 263–275. 10.1038/nchem.1589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Panigrahi P.; Hussain T.; Karton A.; Ahuja R. Elemental Substitution of Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenides (MoSe2 and MoTe2): Implications for Enhanced Gas Sensing. ACS Sens. 2019, 4, 2646–2653. 10.1021/acssensors.9b01044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhu J.; Zhang H.; Tong Y.; Zhao L.; Zhang Y.; Qiu Y.; Lin X. First-principles investigations of metal (V, Nb, Ta)-doped monolayer MoS2: Structural stability, electronic properties and adsorption of gas molecules. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 419, 522–530. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.04.157. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhao S.; Xue J.; Kang W. Gas adsorption on MoS2 monolayer from first-principles calculations. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2014, 595-596, 35–42. 10.1016/j.cplett.2014.01.043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mananghaya M. R. Adsorption of CO and desorption of CO2 interacting with Pt (111) surface: a combined density functional theory and Kinetic Monte Carlo simulation. Adsorption 2020, 26, 461–469. 10.1007/s10450-020-00202-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mananghaya M. Transport properties of Ag decorated zigzag graphene nanoribbons as a function of temperature: a density functional based tight binding molecular dynamics study. Adsorption 2019, 25, 1655–1662. 10.1007/s10450-019-00166-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mananghaya M. R.; Santos G. N.; Yu D. Small transition metal cluster adsorbed on graphene and graphene nanoribbons: A density functional based tight binding molecular dynamics study. Org. Electron. 2018, 63, 355–361. 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.09.031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pumera M. Graphene-based nanomaterials for energy storage. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 668–674. 10.1039/C0EE00295J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Yang X.; Cheng C.; Wang Y.; Qiu L.; Li D. Liquid-Mediated Dense Integration of Graphene Materials for Compact Capacitive Energy Storage. Science 2013, 341, 534–537. 10.1126/science.1239089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Cui Z.; Du W.; Xiao C.; Li Q.; Sa R.; Sun C.; Ma Z. Enhancing hydrogen evolution of MoS2 basal planes by combining single-boron catalyst and compressive strain. Front Phys. 2020, 15, 63502. 10.1007/s11467-020-0980-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ma Z.; Cui Z.; Lv Y.; Sa R.; Wu K.; Li Q. Three-in-One: Opened Charge-transfer channel, positively shifted oxidation potential, and enhanced visible light response of g-C3N4 photocatalyst through K and S Co-doping. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 4534–4544. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.074. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ma Z.; Cui Z.; Xiao C.; Dai W.; Lv Y.; Li Q.; Sa R. Theoretical screening of efficient single-atom catalysts for nitrogen fixation based on a defective BN monolayer. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 1541–1550. 10.1039/C9NR08969A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Xiao C.; Sa R.; Ma Z.; Cui Z.; Du W.; Sun X.; Li Q.; Deng H. High-throughput screening of transition metal single-atom catalyst anchored on Janus MoSSe basal plane for hydrogen evolution reaction. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 10337–10345. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.12.148. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Liu Z.; Wang H.; Sun J.; Sun R.; Wang Z. F.; Yang J. Penta-Pt2N4: an ideal two-dimensional material for nanoelectronics. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 16169–16177. 10.1039/C8NR05561K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Fiori G.; Bonaccorso F.; Iannaccone G.; Palacios T.; Neumaier D.; Seabaugh A.; Banerjee S. K.; Colombo L. Electronics based on two-dimensional materials. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 768–779. 10.1038/nnano.2014.207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Qin H.; Feng C.; Luan X.; Yang D. First-principles investigation of adsorption behaviors of small molecules on penta-graphene. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2018, 13, 264. 10.1186/s11671-018-2687-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tian B.; Huang T.; Guo J.; Shu H.; Wang Y.; Dai J. Gas adsorption on the pristine monolayer GeP3: A first-principles calculation. Vacuum 2019, 164, 181–185. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2019.03.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Yong Y.; Cui H.; Zhou Q.; Su X.; Kuang Y.; Li X. C2N monolayer as NH3 and NO sensors: A DFT study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 487, 488–495. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.05.040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hong Y.-L.; Liu Z.; Wang L.; Zhou T.; Ma W.; Xu C.; Feng S.; Chen L.; Chen M.-L.; Sun D.-M.; Chen X.-Q.; Cheng H.-M.; Ren W. Chemical vapor deposition of layered two-dimensional MoSi2N4 materials. Science 2020, 369, 670–674. 10.1126/science.abb7023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Bafekry A.; Faraji M.; Hoat D. M.; Shahrokhi M.; Fadlallah M. M.; Shojaei F.; Feghhi S. A. H.; Ghergherehchi M.; Gogova D. MoSi2N4 single-layer: a novel two-dimensional material with outstanding mechanical, thermal, electronic and optical properties. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2021, 54, 155303. [Google Scholar]
  30. Cai Y.; Zhang G.; Zhang Y.-W. Polarity-Reversed Robust Carrier Mobility in Monolayer MoS2 Nanoribbons. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 6269–6275. 10.1021/ja4109787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Cao L.; Zhou G.; Wang Q.; Ang L. K.; Ang Y. S. Two-dimensional van der Waals electrical contact to monolayer MoSi2N4. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2021, 118, 013106 10.1063/5.0033241. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Guo X.-S.; Guo S.-D. Tuning transport coefficients of monolayer MoSi2N4 with biaxial strain. Chin. Phys. B 2021, 30, 067102 10.1088/1674-1056/abdb22. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Yong Y.; Cui H.; Zhou Q.; Su X.; Kuang Y.; Li X. Adsorption of gas molecules on a graphitic GaN sheet and its implications for molecule sensors. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 51027–51035. 10.1039/C7RA11106A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Cai Y.; Zhang G.; Zhang Y.-W. Charge Transfer and Functionalization of Monolayer InSe by Physisorption of Small Molecules for Gas Sensing. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 10182–10193. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b02286. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Cai Y.; Ke Q.; Zhang G.; Zhang Y.-W. Energetics, Charge Transfer, and Magnetism of Small Molecules Physisorbed on Phosphorene. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 3102–3110. 10.1021/jp510863p. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Li H.; Wu J.; Yin Z.; Zhang H. Preparation and Applications of Mechanically Exfoliated Single-Layer and Multilayer MoS2 and WSe2 Nanosheets. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 1067–1075. 10.1021/ar4002312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Huang B.; Li Z.; Liu Z.; Zhou G.; Hao S.; Wu J.; Gu B.-L.; Duan W. Adsorption of Gas Molecules on Graphene Nanoribbons and Its Implication for Nanoscale Molecule Sensor. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 13442–13446. 10.1021/jp8021024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Chen Z.; Darancet P.; Wang L.; Crowther A. C.; Gao Y.; Dean C. R.; Taniguchi T.; Watanabe K.; Hone J.; Marianetti C. A.; Brus L. E. Physical Adsorption and Charge Transfer of Molecular Br2 on Graphene. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 2943–2950. 10.1021/nn500265f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Hu T.; Gerber I. C. Theoretical Study of the Interaction of Electron Donor and Acceptor Molecules with Graphene. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 2411–2420. 10.1021/jp311584r. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhou M.; Lu Y.-H.; Cai Y.-Q.; Zhang C.; Feng Y.-P. Adsorption of gas molecules on transition metal embedded graphene: a search for high-performance graphene-based catalysts and gas sensors. Nanotechnology 2011, 22, 385502. 10.1088/0957-4484/22/38/385502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Leenaerts O.; Partoens B.; Peeters F. M. Adsorption of HO2, NH3, CO, NO2, and NO on graphene: A first-principles study. Phys. Rev. B 2008, 77, 125416. 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.125416. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Chen X.; Tan C.; Yang Q.; Meng R.; Liang Q.; Cai M.; Zhang S.; Jiang J. Ab Initio Study of the Adsorption of Small Molecules on Stanene. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 13987–13994. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b04481. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Garg P.; Choudhuri I.; Pathak B. Stanene based gas sensors: effect of spin–orbit coupling. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 31325–31334. 10.1039/C7CP06133A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Liu N.; Zhou S. Gas adsorption on monolayer blue phosphorus: implications for environmental stability and gas sensors. Nanotechnology 2017, 28, 175708. 10.1088/1361-6528/aa6614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ma D.; Ju W.; Tang Y.; Chen Y. First-principles study of the small molecule adsorption on the InSe monolayer. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 426, 244–252. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.198. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Yue Q.; Shao Z.; Chang S.; Li J. Adsorption of gas molecules on monolayer MoS2 and effect of applied electric field. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2013, 8, 425. 10.1186/1556-276X-8-425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Kou L.; Du A.; Chen C.; Frauenheim T. Strain engineering of selective chemical adsorption on monolayer MoS2. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 5156–5161. 10.1039/C3NR06670C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Novoselov K. S.; Fal’ko V. I.; Colombo L.; Gellert P. R.; Schwab M. G.; Kim K. A roadmap for graphene. Nature 2012, 490, 192–200. 10.1038/nature11458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Bafekry A.; Faraji M.; Fadlallah M. M.; Abdolahzadeh Ziabari A.; Bagheri Khatibani A.; Feghhi S. A. H.; Ghergherehchi M.; Gogova D. Adsorption of habitat and industry-relevant molecules on the MoSi2N4 monolayer. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 564, 150326. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150326. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Kresse G.; Furthmüller J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 11169–11186. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Kresse G.; Furthmüller J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 1996, 6, 15–50. 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Kresse G.; Joubert D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59, 1758–1775. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Perdew J. P.; Chevary J. A.; Vosko S. H.; Jackson K. A.; Pederson M. R.; Singh D. J.; Fiolhais C. Atoms, molecules, solids, and surfaces: applications of the generalized gradient approximation for exchange and correlation. Phys. Rev. B 1992, 46, 6671–6687. 10.1103/PhysRevB.46.6671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Grimme S. Accurate description of van der Waals complexes by density functional theory including empirical corrections. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1463–1473. 10.1002/jcc.20078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Cai X. H.; Yang Q.; Pang Y.; Wang M. Adsorption of CO2, CO, NH3, NO2 and NO on g-C3N5 surface by first-principles calculations. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 537, 147884. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147884. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Yu X.-f.; Li Y.-c.; Cheng J.-b.; Liu Z.-b.; Li Q.-z.; Li W.-z.; Yang X.; Xiao B. Monolayer Ti2CO2: A Promising Candidate for NH3 Sensor or Capturer with High Sensitivity and Selectivity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 13707–13713. 10.1021/acsami.5b03737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Momma K.; Izumi F. VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2011, 44, 1272–1276. 10.1107/S0021889811038970. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. Bafekry A.; Faraji M.; Fadlallah M. M.; Bagheri Khatibani A.; abdolahzadeh Ziabari A.; Ghergherehchi M.; Nedaei S.; Shayesteh S. F.; Gogova D. Tunable electronic and magnetic properties of MoSi2N4 monolayer via vacancy defects, atomic adsorption and atomic doping. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 559, 149862. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149862. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Zeng J.; Xu L.; Yang Y.; Luo X.; Li H.-J.; Xiong S. X.; Wang L.-L. Boosting the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution performance of monolayer C2N coupled with MoSi2N4: density-functional theory calculations. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2021, 23, 8318–8325. 10.1039/D1CP00364J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Bafekry A.; Faraji M.; Abdollahzadeh Ziabari A.; Fadlallah M. M.; Nguyen C. V.; Ghergherehchi M.; Feghhi S. A. H. A van der Waals heterostructure of MoS2/MoSi2N4: a first-principles study. New J. Chem. 2021, 45, 8291–8296. 10.1039/D1NJ00344E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. Cui Z.; Xiao C.; Lv Y.; Li Q.; Sa R.; Ma Z. Adsorption behavior of CO, CO2, H2, H2O, NO, and O2 on pristine and defective 2D monolayer ferromagnetic Fe3GeTe2. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 527, 146894. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146894. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Ma Z.; Xiao C.; Cui Z.; Du W.; Li Q.; Sa R.; Sun C. Defective Fe3GeTe2 monolayer as a promising electrocatalyst for spontaneous nitrogen reduction reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 6945–6954. 10.1039/D0TA10494A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Qian W.; Chen Z.; Zhang J.; Yin L. Monolayer MoSi2N4-x as promising electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction: A DFT prediction. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2022, 99, 215–222. 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.06.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Heyd J.; Scuseria G. E.; Ernzerhof M. Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 8207–8215. 10.1063/1.1564060. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Zhang Y.-H.; Chen Y.-B.; Zhou K.-G.; Liu C.-H.; Zeng J.; Zhang H.-L.; Peng Y. Improving gas sensing properties of graphene by introducing dopants and defects: a first-principles study. Nanotechnology 2009, 20, 185504. 10.1088/0957-4484/20/18/185504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Chen W.; Tang Y.; Zhang H.; Shi J.; Wang Z.; Cui Y.; Teng D.; Li Z.; Dai X. Modulating the stability, electronic and reactivity properties of single-atom catalyst anchored graphene by coordination environments. Phys. E 2022, 135, 114975. 10.1016/j.physe.2021.114975. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  67. Tao H.; Fan Q.; Ma T.; Liu S.; Gysling H.; Texter J.; Guo F.; Sun Z. Two-dimensional materials for energy conversion and storage. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2020, 111, 100637. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100637. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Sun Z.; Ma T.; Tao H.; Fan Q.; Han B. Fundamentals and Challenges of Electrochemical CO2 Reduction Using Two-Dimensional Materials. Chem 2017, 3, 560–587. 10.1016/j.chempr.2017.09.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Feng Y.; Wan Q.; Xiong H.; Zhou S.; Chen X.; Pereira Hernandez X. I.; Wang Y.; Lin S.; Datye A. K.; Guo H. Correlating DFT Calculations with CO Oxidation Reactivity on Ga-Doped Pt/CeO2 Single-Atom Catalysts. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 22460–22468. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b05815. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  70. Mehdi Aghaei S.; Monshi M. M.; Torres I.; Zeidi S. M. J.; Calizo I. DFT study of adsorption behavior of NO, CO, NO2, and NH3 molecules on graphene-like BC3: A search for highly sensitive molecular sensor. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 427, 326–333. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  71. Li S., Semiconductor Physical Electronics; Springer Science & BusinessMedia, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  72. Yong Y.; Su X.; Cui H.; Zhou Q.; Kuang Y.; Li X. Two-Dimensional Tetragonal GaN as Potential Molecule Sensors for NO and NO2 Detection: A First-Principle Study. ACS Omega 2017, 2, 8888–8895. 10.1021/acsomega.7b01586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Peng S.; Cho K.; Qi P.; Dai H. Ab initio study of CNT NO2 gas sensor. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2004, 387, 271–276. 10.1016/j.cplett.2004.02.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ao1c06860_si_001.pdf (2.9MB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Omega are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES