ABSTRACT
The draft genome sequences of two Sphingobium strains that are hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) degraders are presented. The strains were isolated from HCH-contaminated soil in Kitengela, Kenya. Both genomes possess the lin genes responsible for HCH degradation and gene clusters for degradation of other xenobiotic compounds.
ANNOUNCEMENT
Bioremediation of biodegradable lindane (γ-hexachlorocyclohexane [HCH]) is a viable detoxification strategy for maintaining environmental health (1, 2). Several microorganisms can degrade HCH isomers (3, 4). Sphingomonadaceae seem to play a central role in the complete mineralization of HCH, with the catabolic genes initially identified in Sphingobium japonicum UT26 (5).
Here, two Sphingobium species (Sphingobium sp. strains S6 and S8) were isolated from HCH-contaminated soil collected from an obsolete former pesticide store in Kitengela, Kenya (01.49 S, 37.048 E). For bacterial isolation, we used a minimum salt medium (MSM) (6) spiked with 100 μg/mL γ-HCH. Pure colonies were obtained by spreading serial dilutions (10−3 to 10−6) of the enrichment cultures onto 1:10 diluted Luria-Bertani (LB) agar plates supplemented with 100 μg/mL γ-HCH, followed by incubation at 30°C for 72 h. The HCH degradation capacity was assessed by dechlorinase assay according to the method of Phillips et al. (7) and in the liquid medium following Boltner et al. (8).
Genomic DNA was extracted from 48-h LB cultures grown at 30°C using a Wizard genomic DNA purification kit (Promega, USA). DNA was quantified using a Qubit fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). According to the manufacturer’s instructions, a NEBNext Ultra II FS DNA library kit (New England Biolabs, USA) was used to prepare a paired-end 300-bp library for genome sequencing on an Illumina MiSeq platform. We used Sickle v1.33 (9) with a Phred quality score of >30 for sequence trimming. De novo sequence assembly was performed using SPAdes v3.15.2 (10), while CheckM v1.0.18 and RefineM v0.0.25 (11) were used for quality checking and to provide completeness and contamination information, respectively. The genomes were annotated using PROKKA v1.14.5 (12) and the Rapid Annotation using Subsystems Technology toolkit (RASTtk) v2.0 (13). Unless otherwise stated, default parameter settings were applied for all software used.
The draft genomes of Sphingobium sp. strains S6 and S8 had 42 and 44 contigs, with total lengths of 4,173,956 bp and 4,170,555 bp, respectively. Both genomes showed 99.2% completeness and 2.06% contamination. The GC contents of Sphingobium sp. strains S6 and S8 were 62.4% and 62.53%, respectively. The annotations are summarized in Table 1. Previous reports show that HCH-degrading sphingomonads share the same degradation pathway that requires genes linA through linF (3, 8). Analysis of the draft genomes of the Sphingobium species described in this study revealed the presence of one copy each of linA, linB, linC, linD, linE, and linF, and two copies each of linG, linH, linJ, and linX per genome. Annotation using RASTtk showed gene clusters for the potential degradation of xenobiotic compounds such as 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(4-chlorophenyl) ethane (DDT); 1,4-dichlorobenzene; tetrachloroethene; 2,4-dichlorobenzoate; fluorobenzoate; benzoate; toluene; and xylene. In addition, the genetic potential for the production of carotenoids was predicted using antiSMASH v6.0.0 (14) in both strains.
TABLE 1.
Summary of the draft whole-genome sequences of HCH-degrading Sphingobium strains isolated from an HCH-contaminated site in Kitengela, Kenya
| Strain | GenBank accession no. | No. of contigs | N50 (bp) | Avg coverage (×) | Genome size (bp) | %GC | No. of rRNAs | No. of tRNAs | No. of tmRNAsa | No. of coding sequences | Transposon families | Closest phylogenetic neighbors (%ANI)b |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sphingobium sp. strain S6 | CAJHOG000000000 | 44 | 538,820 | 48.72 | 4,173,956 | 62.40 | 3 | 49 | 1 | 4,015 | IS21 (n = 2), ISNCY (n = 1), IS3 (n = 2), IS5 (n = 1), IS630 (n = 1), IS256 (n = 1), IS481 (n = 1) | Sphingobium sp. strain S8 (99.96), Sphingobium indicum B90A (85.93) (16), Sphingobium japonicum UT26S (85.51) (17), Sphingobium quisquiliarum P25 (83.88) (18), Sphingobium chlorophenolicum L-1 (83.65) (19) |
| Sphingobium sp. strain S8 | CAJHOH000000000 | 48 | 454,689 | 36.73 | 4,170,555 | 62.53 | 3 | 47 | 1 | 4,039 | IS21 (n = 2), IS5 (n = 1), IS630 (n = 1), IS256 (n = 1), IS481 (n = 1) | Sphingobium sp. strain S6 (99.96), Sphingobium indicum B90A (85.76) (16), Sphingobium japonicum UT26S (85.41) (17), Sphingobium quisquiliarum P25 (83.85) (18), Sphingobium chlorophenolicum L-1 (83.57) (19) |
tmRNAs, transfer-messenger RNAs.
Phylogenetically related neighbors were computed based on average nucleotide identity (ANI) [20] analysis.
The availability of the genome sequences of the two Sphingobium species may be instrumental in promoting HCH degradation by mixed (multidomain) microbial communities such as fungal bacterial associations (15).
Data availability.
These whole-genome shotgun projects have been deposited at ENA/DDBJ/GenBank under accession numbers CAJHOG000000000 and CAJHOH000000000 for Sphingobium sp. strains S6 and S8, respectively. The versions described in this paper are CAJHOG000000000.1 and CAJHOH000000000.1 for Sphingobium sp. strains S6 and S8, respectively. The raw data are available at ENA under SRA accession numbers ERR4392070 and ERR4392071. All project data are available under BioProject accession number PRJEB39494.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The Helmholtz Association supported this project through the Helmholtz Young Investigator grant NG-1248, Micro “Big Data.” N. Khan was supported by funding from the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) and a grant from the International Federation of Science (IFS grant W/5798-1).
We thank Birgit Würz for her help with GC-MS analysis and Jana Reichenbach and Rita Remer for skilled experimental assistance.
Contributor Information
Ulisses Nunes da Rocha, Email: ulisses.rocha@ufz.de.
Frank J. Stewart, Montana State University
REFERENCES
- 1.Girish K, Kunhi AAM. 2013. Microbial degradation of gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane (lindane). Afr J Microbiol Res 7:1635–1643. doi: 10.5897/AJMRx12.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pant G, Mistry SK, Sibi G. 2013. Isolation, identification and characterization of p, p′-DDT degrading bacteria from soil. J Env Sci Technol 6:130–137. doi: 10.3923/jest.2013.130.137. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lal R, Pandey G, Sharma P, Kumari K, Malhotra S, Pandey R, Raina V, Kohler H-PE, Holliger C, Jackson C, Oakeshott JG. 2010. Biochemistry of microbial degradation of hexachlorocyclohexane and prospects for bioremediation. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 74:58–80. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00029-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bumpus JA, Tien M, Wright D, Aust SD. 1985. Oxidation of persistent environmental pollutants by a white rot fungus. Science 228:1434–1436. doi: 10.1126/science.3925550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nagata Y, Endo R, Ito M, Ohtsubo Y, Tsuda M. 2007. Aerobic degradation of lindane (γ-hexachlorocyclohexane) in bacteria and its biochemical and molecular basis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 76:741–752. doi: 10.1007/s00253-007-1066-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Senoo K, Wada H. 1989. Isolation and identification of an aerobic γ-HCH-decomposing bacterium from soil. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 35:79–87. doi: 10.1080/00380768.1989.10434739. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Phillips TM, Seech AG, Lee H, Trevors JT. 2001. Colorimetric assay for Lindane dechlorination by bacteria. J Microbiol Methods 47:181–188. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7012(01)00299-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Boltner D, Moreno-Morillas S, Ramos J-L. 2005. 16S rDNA phylogeny and distribution of lin genes in novel hexachlorocyclohexane-degrading Sphingomonas strains. Environ Microbiol 7:1329–1338. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00820.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Joshi N, Fass JN. 2011. Sickle—a sliding-window, adaptive, quality-based trimming tool for FastQ files (version 1.33). https://github.com/najoshi/sickle.
- 10.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Brettin T, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Overbeek R, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Shukla M, Thomason JA, III, Stevens R, Vonstein V, Wattam AR, Xia F. 2015. RASTtk: a modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes. Sci Rep 5:8365. doi: 10.1038/srep08365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Blin K, Shaw S, Steinke K, Villebro R, Ziemert N, Lee SY, Medema MH, Weber T. 2019. antiSMASH 5.0: updates to the secondary metabolite genome mining pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 47:W81–W87. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Espinosa-Ortiz EJ, Rene ER, Gerlach R. 29 Jul 2021. Potential use of fungal-bacterial co-cultures for the removal of organic pollutants. Crit Rev Biotechnol doi: 10.1080/07388551.2021.1940831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Anand S, Sangwan N, Lata P, Kaur J, Dua A, Singh AK, Verma M, Kaur J, Khurana JP, Khurana P, Mathur S, Lal R. 2012. Genome sequence of Sphingobium indicum B90A, a hexachlorocyclohexane-degrading bacterium. J Bacteriol 194:4471–4472. doi: 10.1128/JB.00901-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nagata Y, Ohtsubo Y, Endo R, Ichikawa N, Ankai A, Oguchi A, Fukui S, Fujita N, Tsuda M. 2010. Complete genome sequence of the representative γ-hexachlorocyclohexane-degrading bacterium Sphingobium japonicum UT26. J Bacteriol 192:5852–5853. doi: 10.1128/JB.00961-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kumar Singh A, Sangwan N, Sharma A, Gupta V, Khurana JP, Lal R. 2013. Draft genome sequence of Sphingobium quisquiliarum strain P25T, a novel hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH)-degrading bacterium isolated from an HCH dumpsite. Genome Announc 1:e00717-13. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00717-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Copley SD, Rokicki J, Turner P, Daligault H, Nolan M, Land M. 2012. The whole genome sequence of Sphingobium chlorophenolicum L-1: insights into the evolution of the pentachlorophenol degradation pathway. Genome Biol Evol 4:184–198. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evr137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P, Tiedje JM. 2007. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:81–91. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64483-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
These whole-genome shotgun projects have been deposited at ENA/DDBJ/GenBank under accession numbers CAJHOG000000000 and CAJHOH000000000 for Sphingobium sp. strains S6 and S8, respectively. The versions described in this paper are CAJHOG000000000.1 and CAJHOH000000000.1 for Sphingobium sp. strains S6 and S8, respectively. The raw data are available at ENA under SRA accession numbers ERR4392070 and ERR4392071. All project data are available under BioProject accession number PRJEB39494.
