Abstract
Objective
Hypocalcemia after parathyroidectomy (PTX) results in tetany, diarrhea, cardiac arrhythmia, and even sudden death. However, a meta-analysis or systematic evaluation of risk factors with the occurrence and development of hypocalcemia in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) after PTX has never been performed.
Methods
A thorough search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE, was performed to retrieve relevant studies from database inception to June 2021. Quality of the included studies was assessed by two independent reviewers using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 16.0 were used for meta-analysis. The random-effects model was adopted to calculate the 95% CIs (I2> 50% or p < 0.05) of the combined effect size and the corresponding homogeneous data. Otherwise, a fixed-effects model was used.
Results
Thirteen studies including 2990 participants who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the present meta-analysis. The overall quality of the enrolled studies had a score of >7 points. Risk factors significantly related to hypocalcemia in patients with SHPT after PTX were preoperative serum calcium (OR 0.19, 95%CI 0.11–0.31), preoperative alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.01–1.02), and preoperative intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) (OR 1.38, 95%CI 1.20–1.58). Meanwhile, age (OR 0.97, 95%CI 0.87–1.10) was not significantly correlated with hypocalcemia after PTX.
Conclusions
Based on the current evidence, preoperative serum calcium, preoperative ALP, and preoperative iPTH were significant predictors of hypocalcemia in patients with SHPT after PTX. More attention should be given to patients with these risk factors for the prevention of postoperative hypocalcemia.
Keywords: Secondary hyperparathyroidism, risk factors, hypocalcemia, meta-analysis
1. Introduction
Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is a common complication in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Hyperplasia of the parathyroid glands and abnormal increase in intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) secretion are the primary manifestations of SHPT [1]. Complications often seen in this condition include refractory pruritus, bone pain, muscular weakness, progressive soft tissue calcification, kidney stones, constipation, peptic ulcer disease, spontaneous long bone fracture, psychosis, dementia, and even risk of death [2–4]. Control of SHPT in the early stages is achieved through medical therapies including calcium supplements, vitamin D supplements, phosphate-poor diets, phosphate-binders, and the calcimimetic agents [5–7]. Despite the emergence of new therapeutic agents, most guidelines still recommend PTX as the treatment of choice in SHPT patients’ refractory to medical therapy. PTX can effectively decrease iPTH, relieve bone pain, improve quality of life, and reduce complications and mortality rates.
Hypocalcemia or even hungry bone syndrome (HBS) after PTX is a well-known and severe complication [5,8–10] reported to affect most patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Hypocalcemia may trigger weakness, headache, paresthesia, muscle cramps, laryngeal stridor, seizures, cardiac arrhythmias, and tetany. In severe situations, hypocalcemia may even cause sudden death [11]. Thus, it is beneficial and clinically significant to identify the high-risk patient group susceptible to postoperative hypocalcemia for more vigilant postoperative monitoring [5].
At present, several reports have explored the risk factors for hypocalcemia in patients with SHPT after PTX. However, results from these studies are controversial due to the small sample size and limited outcome indicators. This meta-analysis enrolled 13 eligible studies to analyze and compare the risk factors for hypocalcemia and non-hypocalcemia after PTX, with the aim of providing more reliable evidence for clinical practice.
2. Methods
2.1. Data collection
A thorough search of electronic databases, including the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science was performed. Relevant articles published till June 2021 related to the risk factors for hypocalcemia in patients with SHPT after PTX were identified. The search terms used were [Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary OR Secondary Hyperparathyroidism OR Hyperparathyroidisms, Secondary OR Secondary hyperparathyroidisms] AND [Risk Factors OR Factor, Risk OR Risk Factor OR Health Correlates OR Correlates, Health OR Risk Scores OR Risk Score OR Score, Risk OR Risk Factor Scores OR Risk Factor Score OR Score, Risk Factor OR Population at Risk OR Populations at Risk] (Supplementary Documents). All the confirmed works were imported into EndNote X20.1 for management. An additional search for the reference lists in the included studies and recent reviews or meta-analyses was done.
2.2. Inclusion criteria
The inclusion criteria for the study are as follows: (a) the study was a case-control or cohort study; (b) the study focused on the risk factors for hypocalcemia in patients with SHPT after PTX; (c) patients at the CKD-5D stage who met the diagnostic criteria for refractory SHPT and underwent PTX were also considered; (d) the surgical methods included total PTX, subtotal PTX, with or without parathyroid autotransplantation, or ultrasound-guided microwave ablation (MWA); and (e) the outcomes reported were adjusted or non-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) on multiple logistic regression analysis. Hypocalcemia after surgery was defined as the minimum serum calcium level lower than 2.1 mmol/L (8.4 mg/dL) within three days postoperatively. The search was limited to English language manuscripts.
2.3. Exclusion criteria
Studies that met the following criteria were excluded: (a) duplicate studies; (b) reports, reviews, or meeting abstracts; (c) no diagnostic criteria for hypocalcemia; and (d) insufficient data for the calculation of ORs and 95% CIs.
2.4. Data extraction
The baseline information were extracted and evaluated by two reviewers (Dan Gao and Yan Lou). Any disagreement between the reviewers was resolved through mutual discussion. Data extracted included author, year of publication, study time and country, study design, number of cases and controls, and data on risk factors. Moreover, the extracted risk factors were age, male sex, body weight, preoperative serum calcium, preoperative ALP, preoperative iPTH, preoperative serum phosphorus, pruritus, preoperative serum albumin, weight of resected glands, and volume of resected glands.
2.5. Quality assessment
Quality assessment of the enrolled studies was done independently by two reviewers (Dan Gao and Yan Lou) using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) [12]. The NOS consists of three parts namely four points for selection, two points for comparability, and three points for outcome and exposure. Studies were then classified according to their quality into poor (0–4), moderate (5–6), or high quality (7–9). Only high-quality studies were included in the meta-analysis.
2.6. Statistical analysis
Review Manager 5.3 (Cochrane Cooperative in Copenhagen, Denmark) was used for statistical analysis of data. The risk factors for hypocalcemia in patients with SPTH after PTX were assessed through calculation of pooled ORs. The Z-test was used to determine the significance of differences. Heterogeneity in the analysis was evaluated using the χ2 test and I2 statistic. In addition, the random-effects model was adopted to calculate the 95% CIs (I2> 50% or p < 0.05) of the combined effect size and the corresponding homogeneous data. Otherwise, a fixed-effects model was used. Sensitivity analysis was performed by omitting one study each time and exchanging the effect models. The result was considered robust if no significant difference was observed in the P-value of the corresponding combined effect size. Moreover, Egger’s test of Stata 16.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX) was used to check for publication bias. A p-value > 0.05 was obtained, indicating that there was no publication bias in this study. Typically, the combined exposure rate of the control was used to replace the exposure rate of the overall population.
3. Results
3.1. Study selection
A total of 3836 potentially relevant studies were discovered by searching the electronic databases, 2142 of which were excluded due to duplication, 1870 were excluded after title screening, 237 were excluded after abstract screening, and 22 were excluded due to inability to meet the inclusion criteria after a full-text review. Finally, 13 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The flowchart of the study selection process is presented in Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The flow diagram of the study identification and inclusion and exclusion process.
3.2. Study characteristics
In total, 13 studies published from 2013 to 2021 involving 2990 participants (1739 patients and 1251 controls) that investigated 11 risk factors were included in the study. Of these, nine were published in China, while the other four originated from Thailand, Tunisia, Mexico, and Malaysia. Eleven of these studies were case-control studies, whereas two were cohort studies. There were complete basic research data on factors including preoperative serum calcium, preoperative ALP, preoperative iPTH, and age, which were mentioned in more than three studies. However, other risk factors such as preoperative serum phosphorus, pruritus, preoperative serum albumin, weight of resected glands, body weight, male sex, and volume of resected glands were not analyzed in detail. This is due to the lack of original data or limited references which could possibly lead to bias. Two of the cohort studies were grouped, which might be considered as two groups of analysis data. Specific information of studies included in this meta-analysis is presented in Table 1.
Table 1.
The general characteristics of the included studies.
| Study | Year | Country | Design | Study period | Sample size | Case/controls | Surgical method | Hypocalcemiastandard (mmol/L) | Risk factors |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guang Yang | 2018 | China | Case-control | 2013.01–2017.04 | 252 | 180/72 | PTX + AT | <2.000 | ①③ |
| Jorge l.Fonseca-Correa | 2021 | Mexico | Case-control | 2003.10–2019.10 | 87 | 67/20 | PTX | <1.870 | ③⑩ |
| KittraweeKritmetapak | 2020 | Thailand | Case-control | 2014.01–2020.01 | 130 | 107/23 | PTX | <2.100 | ①③④⑥ |
| Lo-Yi Ho | 2017 | China | Case-control | 2004.01–2014.02 | 62 | 17/45 | T-PTX | <2.100 | ①⑥⑨ |
| M.Hamouda | 2013 | Tunisia | Case-control | – | 70 | 48/22 | PTX | <2.000 | ③⑥⑦ |
| Mingjun Wang | 2020 | China | Case-control | 2016.10–2018.10 | 114 | 87/27 | PTX + AT | <2.100 | ①③④⑧ |
| Ping Wen | 2020 | China | Case-control | 2008.01–2018.12 | 1095 | 811/284 | T-PTX | <1.780 | ③④ |
| Poh Guan Tan | 2020 | Malaysia | Case-control | 2007.01–2014.12 | 68 | 25/43 | PTX | <2.000 | ③⑥ |
| Wan-Chuan Tsai | 2015 | China | Case-control | 2001.02–2012.09 | 420 | 157/263 | PTX | <1.875 | ②③④ |
| Wei Gong | 2021 | China | Case-control | 2013.05–2020.02 | 87 | 18/69 | PTX + AT | <2.100 | ③④⑥ |
| Yifei Ge | 2019 | China | Case-control | 2015.07–2017.12 | 115 | 101/14 | PTX + AT | <2.100 | ①③ |
| Ying Wei (reference #8) | 2020 | China | Cohort | 2018.03–2019.05 | 286 | 76/210 | WMA/TPTX | <1.875 | WMA:①③⑦ |
| TPXT:①③⑪ | |||||||||
| Ying Wei (reference #16) | 2020 | China | Cohort | 2015.07–2018.05 | 204 | 45/159 | MWA | <1.875 | model.1:①④⑧ |
| model.2:①④⑧ |
PTX: parathyroidectomy; T-PTX:total-parathyroidectomy;PTX + AT: parathyroidectomy with forearm autograft; MWA: microwave ablation. ①preoperative serum calcium ②preoperative serum phosphorus ③preoperative ALP ④preoperative intact parathormone ⑤Pruritus ⑥Age ⑦preoperative serum albumin ⑧Weight of resected glands ⑨Body weight ⑩Males ⑪Volume of resected glands.
3.3. Assessment of study quality
All studies were considered high-quality, as evaluated by NOS (Table 2).
Table 2.
Quality assessment of studies included in this meta-analysis by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
| Study | Year | Selection | Comparability | Exposure/Outcome | Quality evaluation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guang Yang | 2018 | ★★★★ | ★★ | ★★ | 8 |
| Jorge l.Fonseca-Correa | 2021 | ★★★ | ★ | ★★★ | 7 |
| KittraweeKritmetapak | 2020 | ★★★★ | ★ | ★★★ | 8 |
| Lo-Yi Ho | 2017 | ★★★ | ★★ | ★★ | 7 |
| M.Hamouda | 2013 | ★★★ | ★★ | ★★ | 7 |
| Ying Wei (reference #16) | 2020 | ★★★★ | ★★ | ★★ | 8 |
| Mingjun Wang | 2020 | ★★★★ | ★ | ★★ | 7 |
| Ping Wen | 2020 | ★★★★ | ★ | ★★★ | 8 |
| Poh Guan Tan | 2020 | ★★★ | ★★ | ★★★ | 8 |
| Wan-Chuan Tsai | 2015 | ★★★ | ★★ | ★★ | 7 |
| Wei Gong | 2021 | ★★★ | ★★ | ★★★ | 8 |
| Yifei Ge | 2019 | ★★★ | ★★ | ★★★ | 8 |
| Ying Wei (reference #08) | 2020 | ★★★ | ★★ | ★★ | 7 |
3.4. Results of meta-analysis
3.4.1. Preoperative serum calcium
Results of preoperative serum calcium were reported in six studies (including eight groups of data) [8,13–17]. The statistical heterogeneity was high (I2 = 61%, p = 0.01), and a random-effects model was used to conduct a meta-analysis on the unadjusted data. The results showed a negative correlation between preoperative serum calcium levels and hypocalcemia after PTX. Simply put, preoperative hypocalcemia was a risk factor for postoperative hypocalcemia, and the results of the meta-analysis were statistically significant [OR = 0.19, 95%CI (0.11,0.31)] (p < 0.00001) (Figure 2). In addition, individual studies were separately excluded for the sensitivity analysis. The results revealed no significant difference in the meta-analysis results before and after excluding one single study, indicating the stability of the pooled results (Table 3).
Figure 2.
Forest plot of preoperative serum calcium.OR = odds ratio.
Table 3.
Sensitivity analysis for the meta-analysis of preoperative serum calcium by excluding one study at a time.
| Study | Results of meta-analysis |
Heterogeneity of study design |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95%CI) | p Value | χ2 | p Value | I2(%) | |
| Original Meta Study | 0.19 (0.11,0.31) | <0.00001 | 18.10 | 0.01 | 61 |
| (delete)Guang Yang | 0.20 (0.13,0.32) | <0.00001 | 14.53 | 0.02 | 59 |
| (delete)Lo-Yi Ho | 0.20 (0.13,0.33) | <0.00001 | 14.65 | 0.02 | 59 |
| (delete)Ying Wei (#16) (model.1) | 0.17 (0.09,0.33) | <0.00001 | 17.70 | 0.007 | 66 |
| (delete)Ying Wei (#08)(MWA) | 0.19 (0.11,0.33) | <0.00001 | 17.28 | 0.008 | 65 |
| (delete)Ying Wei (#08)(TPTX) | 0.16 (0.09,0.28) | <0.00001 | 13.94 | 0.03 | 57 |
| (delete)KittraweeKritmetapak | 0.16 (0.09,0.29) | <0.00001 | 16.36 | 0.01 | 63 |
| (delete)Ying Wei (#16) (model.2) | 0.17 (0.09,0.33) | <0.00001 | 17.56 | 0.007 | 66 |
| (delete)Mingjun Wang | 0.22 (0.14,0.36) | <0.00001 | 12.64 | 0.05 | 53 |
3.4.2. Age
In total, five studies mentioned the results of age [5,14,15,18,19]. The statistical heterogeneity was high (I2=82%, p = 0.0002), and a random-effects model was used to perform a meta-analysis was performed on the unadjusted data. Results from the analysis show no statistical difference in the pooled results [OR = 0.97, 95%CI (0.87,1.10)] (p = 0.66) (Figure 3). Individual studies were later eliminated one at a time for sensitivity analysis (Table 4). Although most of the data did not change, the statistical heterogeneity was reduced to 74% upon removal of the study by Gong (p = 0.01). Therefore, a random-effects model was used for meta-analysis, and the pooled results revealed no statistical difference [OR = 0.93, 95%CI (0.82,1.05)] (p = 0.22). This suggests that age is not a risk factor for hypocalcemia after PTX.
Figure 3.
Forest plot of age. OR = odds ratio.
Table 4.
Sensitivity analysis for the meta-analysis of age by excluding one study at a time.
| Study | Results of meta-analysis |
Heterogeneity of study design |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95%CI) | p Value | χ2 | p Value | I2(%) | |
| Original Meta Study | 0.97 (0.87,1.10) | 0.66 | 21.97 | 0.00002 | 82 |
| (delete)KittraweeKritmetapak | 1.00 (0.90,1.10) | 0.95 | 14.21 | 0.003 | 79 |
| (delete)Lo-Yi Ho | 0.98 (0.81,1.20) | 0.86 | 19.66 | 0.0002 | 85 |
| (delete)M.Hamouda | 0.97 (0.86,1.08) | 0.54 | 18.83 | 0.0003 | 84 |
| (delete)Poh Guan Tan | 0.96 (0.76,1.21) | 0.71 | 21.26 | <0.0001 | 86 |
| (delete)Wei Gong | 0.93 (0.82,1.05) | 0.22 | 11.39 | 0.010 | 74 |
3.4.3. Preoperative ALP
A total of 11 studies (including 13 groups of data) provided the results of preoperative ALP [2,5,8,13,14,17–22]. The statistical heterogeneity was high with I2=90% (p < 0.00001). Therefore, a meta-analysis was conducted on the unadjusted data using a random-effects model. According to the results, preoperative ALP was a risk factor for postoperative hypocalcemia, and results of the meta-analysis were statistically significant [OR = 1.01, 95%CI (1.01,1.02)] (p = 0.0002) (Figure 4). Individual studies were later excluded one at a time for sensitivity analysis. The results revealed no significant difference in the meta-analysis results before and after elimination of one single study, indicating the stability of the pooled results (Table 5).
Figure 4.
Forest plot of preoperative ALP.OR = odds ratio.
Table 5.
Sensitivity analysis for the meta-analysis of preoperative ALP by excluding one study at a time.
| Study | Results of meta-analysis |
Heterogeneity of study design |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95%CI) | p Value | χ2 | p Value | I2(%) | |
| Original Meta Study | 1.01 (1.01,1.02) | 0.0002 | 126.22 | <0.00001 | 90 |
| (delete)Guang Yang | 1.01 (1.00,1.02) | 0.005 | 112.20 | <0.00001 | 90 |
| (delete)Jorge l.Fonseca-Correa(model.1) | 1.01 (1.01,1.02) | 0.0002 | 122.43 | <0.00001 | 91 |
| (delete)Jorge l.Fonseca-Correa(model.2) | 1.01 (1.01,1.02) | 0.0002 | 120.98 | <0.00001 | 91 |
| (delete)KittraweeKritmetapak | 1.01 (1.01,1.02) | 0.0003 | 123.51 | <0.00001 | 91 |
| (delete)M.Hamouda | 1.01 (1.01,1.02) | 0.0002 | 124.09 | <0.00001 | 91 |
| (delete)Mingjun Wang | 1.01 (1.01,1.02) | 0.0002 | 121.75 | <0.00001 | 91 |
| (delete)Ping Wen | 1.01 (1.00,1.02) | 0.0004 | 73.4 | <0.00001 | 85 |
| (delete)Poh Guan Tan | 1.02 (1.01,1.03) | <0.0001 | 125.48 | <0.00001 | 91 |
| (delete)Wan-Chuan Tsai | 1.01 (1.00,1.02) | 0.008 | 98.96 | <0.00001 | 89 |
| (delete)Wei Gong | 1.01 (1.01,1.02) | 0.0003 | 121.22 | <0.00001 | 91 |
| (delete)Yifei Ge | 1.00 (1.00,1.00) | 0.002 | 119.64 | <0.00001 | 91 |
| (delete)Ying Wei(#08)(MWA) | 1.02 (1.01,1.03) | <0.0001 | 126.22 | <0.00001 | 91 |
| (delete)Ying Wei(#08)(TPTX) | 1.02 (1.01,1.04) | <0.0001 | 122.62 | <0.00001 | 91 |
3.4.4. Preoperative iPTH
In total, six studies (including seven groups of data) reported the results of preoperative iPTH2 [14,16,17,19,21],. Due to the high statistical heterogeneity (I2=94%) (p < 0.00001), a random-effects model was utilized for the meta-analysis of the unadjusted data. As revealed by the results, preoperative iPTH level was a risk factor for postoperative hypocalcemia, and the meta-analysis results were statistically significant [OR = 1.38, 95%CI (1.20,1.58)] (p < 0.00001) (Figure 5). Individual studies were then eliminated one at a time for the sensitivity analysis. Results show that there was no significant difference in the meta-analysis results before and after eliminating one study, indicating the stability of the pooled results (Table 6).
Figure 5.
Forest plot of preoperative iPTH. OR = odds ratio.
Table 6.
Sensitivity analysis for the meta-analysis of preoperative iPTH by excluding one study at a time.
| Study | Results of meta-analysis |
Heterogeneity of study design |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95%CI) | p Value | χ2 | p Value | I2(%) | |
| Original Meta Study | 1.38 (1.20,1.58) | <0.00001 | 101.99 | <0.00001 | 94 |
| (delete)KittraweeKritmetapak | 1.36 (1.19,1.55) | <0.00001 | 97.98 | <0.00001 | 95 |
| (delete)Ying Wei (#16) (model.1) | 1.25 (1.09,1.42) | 0.001 | 75.56 | <0.00001 | 93 |
| (delete)Ying Wei (#16) (model.2) | 1.23 (1.09,1.40) | 0.001 | 72.97 | <0.00001 | 93 |
| (delete)Mingjun Wang | 2.51 (1.47,4.29) | 0.0008 | 95.60 | <0.00001 | 95 |
| (delete)Ping Wen | 1.26 (1.12,1.41) | <0.0001 | 63.96 | <0.00001 | 92 |
| (delete)Wan-Chuan Tsai | 2.51 (1.46,4.33) | 0.0009 | 101.31 | <0.00001 | 95 |
| (delete)Wei Gong | 1.37 (1.18,1.57) | <0.0001 | 98.69 | <0.00001 | 95 |
3.5. Publication bias of the included studies
Egger’s test was used to evaluate the publication bias of the studies enrolled in the meta-analysis. The results revealed no obvious evidence of publication bias (Z = 0.31, p = 0.755 > 0.05) (Supplementary Figure 1).
4. Discussion
This study explored the risk factors of postoperative hypocalcemia after PTX. Although postoperative hypocalcemia is a well-known severe complication after PTX [23–25], the incidence rate of hypocalcemia varies greatly between studies, with postoperative hypocalcemia among patients with SHPT reported to range from 26% to 95% [18,23,26,27]. The main reasons for this observation are as follows: first, the definition of hypocalcemia varied among the enrolled studies. Second, the definition of HBS in some studies was based solely on serum calcium concentration immediately after PTX. However, it is important to note that some patients with HBS experience substantially reduced postoperative serum calcium concentrations from baseline. Moreover, clinical symptoms may develop despite these concentrations falling within the normal range. Therefore, the latter definition of HBS may have limited validity and lead researchers to underestimate its actual incidence [14]. In other words, hypocalcemia may develop at a later time, regardless of the modest drop in serum calcium level early after surgery [15]. Third, the parathyroid procedures performed are rather variable in these studies, including subtotal PTX, total PTX with autotransplantation, total PTX, and radiofrequency ablation [15]. The selected operative method definitely affects the postoperative serum calcium content. In example, patients who underwent subtotal PTX will have a slightly higher postoperative serum calcium level than those receiving total PTX. Fourth, preoperative interventions such as the type of dialysis, time on dialysis, calcimimetics, vitamin D supplementations, and calcium tablets may also affect outcomes.
Multiple factors are involved in the pathogenesis of postoperative hypocalcemia. A total of 11 risk factors associated with postoperative hypocalcemia were identified in these 13 studies, including preoperative serum calcium, phosphorus, ALP, iPTH, ALB, pruritus, age, weight of resected glands, body weight, male sex, and volume of resected glands. Among those mentioned, four risk factors were involved in more than three studies namely preoperative serum calcium, age, ALP, and iPTH. Therefore, a meta-analysis of these four risk factors was performed in this study. None of the remaining factors evaluated were predictive of the development of postoperative hypocalcemia in patients with SHPT after total PTX.
Hypoparathyroidism after PTX results in a rapid shift of calcium from the circulation to the skeletal system. Therefore, patients with preoperative hypocalcemia are more likely to develop hypocalcemia after PTX [28,29]. A higher preoperative serum calcium level predicts more active bone remodeling, a greater risk of postoperative HBS, and a higher risk of hypocalcemia after PTX. This meta-analysis concluded that preoperative hypocalcemia was a risk factor for hypocalcemia after PTX. The results of this study strongly suggest that appropriate calcium supplement therapy should be provided in patients with hypocalcemia before PTX to alleviate the postoperative complications of hypocalcemia. However, considering the small number of studies included in the meta-analysis, further studies with a larger sample size are still required to confirm this conclusion.
The authors discovered that the findings in some studies supported those in the majority of previous reports that younger patients with SHPT are at an increased risk of HBS [15,23,28,30]. They consider that a younger age is associated with a higher amount of sex hormone secretion, stronger osteoblast function, higher renal 1α-hydroxylase activity, and greater calcium utilization efficiency of bone tissue. This leads to the absorption of a large amount of serum calcium, causing relatively severe hypocalcemia after PTX [27,31]. Conversely, other researchers have reported the association between advanced age and HBS19. They considered that the higher prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and inadequate oral intake in elderly patients is associated with an increased risk of postoperative hypocalcemia [32]. However, the present meta-analysis revealed no association between age and postoperative hypocalcemia. To date, the consideration of age being a risk factor for hypocalcemia after PTX remains controversial, and more studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to verify this conclusion.
ALP activity is important for appropriate bone mineralization. In addition, it is also a well-recognized biomarker of renal osteodystrophy. Notably, ALP is the term given to a group of isoenzymes mainly found in the liver and bone. It is widely distributed in the skeletal system of the human body, with serum ALP level increasing upon activation of osteoblasts. Most patients with SHPT have metabolic bone diseases with active osteoblasts. In this case, the increased serum ALP level correlated with the severity of bone disease. On the contrary, higher ALP levels in patients with hypocalcemia before surgery suggest a more active bone remodeling state in patients with hypocalcemia after PTX [33,34]. Based on the results of this meta-analysis, it is concluded that a high preoperative ALP level was a risk factor for hypocalcemia after PTX. However, the meta-analysis exhibited strong heterogeneity. The very small OR value of multivariate logistic regression results in some studies is also a significant factor that led unsatisfactory results in the final meta-analysis. Despite the great heterogeneity of the meta-analysis, all the included studies consistently suggested that a high preoperative ALP level was a risk factor for postoperative hypocalcemia, thus confirming our conclusion. This preoperative variable allows physicians to accurately identify dialysis patients who are at a greater risk of hypocalcemia after PTX, and to aggressively monitor and treat patients who possess any of these factors in the postoperative period. An example of treatment is the supplementation of calcium and active vitamin D analogs.
Numerous studies have confirmed that preoperative iPTH concentrations and the magnitude of postoperative iPTH reduction in patients with HBS are higher than those in patients without HBS. This finding is consistent with the physiological functions of iPTH. Under stimulation by excessive iPTH, both bone formation and bone resorption exhibited an increase despite a marked negative balance [35–37]. Upon rapid decrease in iPTH level, the activity of osteoclasts in vivo decreases. This stops the osteolytic action, with a concurrent increase in osteoblast activity. A large amount of circulating calcium ions are then transferred to the bone to participate in osteogenesis. Thereafter, the serum calcium level declined after PTX, which was confirmed in a previous in vitro study [38–41]. Based on the results of this meta-analysis, it was concluded that a high preoperative iPTH level was a risk factor for postoperative hypocalcemia. Moreover, the reasons for high heterogeneity might be similar to that of ALP, including factors such as definition, surgical method, and continuous variables. However, all included studies consistently suggested that a high preoperative iPTH level was a risk factor for postoperative hypocalcemia, which also confirmed our conclusion. Clinicians should be aware of the important predictive role of preoperative iPTH level, better understand the postoperative course, and improve perioperative management to avoid the occurrence of hypocalcemia and minimize any adverse consequences.
Several limitations were noted in this meta-analysis. First, this was a retrospective observational study. Thus, the results were associated with possible selection bias and were limited by suboptimal data collection. Second, the potentially significant associations among variables could have been masked due to the relatively small sample size. Third, due to the heterogeneous definitions of significant postoperative hypocalcemia or HBS, results of this meta-analysis should be compared with other similar studies with caution. Fourth, most studies only focused on individual aspects such as the occurrence of early hypocalcemia immediately after the operation, whereas few studies addressed the problem from other perspectives, such as the length of postoperative hospital stay, hospital readmission, and total calcium requirement. Since these studies only concentrated on a particular area in the postoperative course, the data might not be reflective of the whole situation. Fifth, most of the 13 enrolled studies were from China, which might introduce geographical limitations in the results of this meta-analysis. Sixth, it is a pity that this review could not be registered online before the analysis.
5. Conclusions
Hypocalcemia after PTX is quite common, and the risk factors involved in its occurrence vary. In this study, a systematic search of major foreign medical databases was conducted, and 13 items were identified as possible risk factors for hypocalcemia in patients with SHPT after PTX. In conclusion, results of this meta-analysis show that preoperative serum Ca, ALP, and iPTH levels are significant risk factors for the occurrence of hypocalcemia after PTX. Full understanding of the conditions of individual patients and related risk factors should be possessed by medical staff. This allows early prediction and identification of high-risk groups and administration of scientific and targeted intervention measures which lead to improved standardization and effectiveness of disease diagnosis and treatment. Some examples of targeted intervention measures include early withdrawal of calcimimetics before surgery, monitoring of blood calcium level at intervals of 6 h after surgery, and early placement of intravenous access for high-dose calcium supplementation.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
Dan Gao thanks Professor. Ping Luo, Hongbin Zou for their constant encouragements, suggestions and support throughout the study.
Author contributions
Dan Gao contributed to conceptualization and manuscript writing. Yan Lou, Yingchun Cui, and Shengmao Liu equally contributed to draft reviewing and critical modifications. Wenpeng Cui and Guangdong Sun were in charge of modifying the manuscript. All authors had read and approved the final manuscript.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
References
- 1.Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes CKDMBDUWG. Clinical practice guideline update for the diagnosis, evaluation, prevention, and treatment of chronic kidney Disease-Mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD). Kidney Int Suppl. 2017;7(1):1–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wen P, Xu L, Zhao S, et al. Risk factors for severe hypocalcemia in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism after total parathyroidectomy. Int J Endocrinol. 2021;2021:6613659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Goodman WG, Goldin J, Kuizon BD, et al. Coronary-artery calcification in young adults with end-stage renal disease who are undergoing dialysis. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(20):1478–1483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Raggi P, Boulay A, Chasan-Taber S, et al. Cardiac calcification in adult hemodialysis patients. A link between end-stage renal disease and cardiovascular disease? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39(4):695–701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tan PG, Ab Hadi IS, Zahari Z, et al. Predictors of early postoperative hypocalcemia after total parathyroidectomy in renal hyperparathyroidism. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2020;98(1):1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lindberg JS, Culleton B, Wong G, et al. Cinacalcet HCl, an oral calcimimetic agent for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16(3):800–807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Palmer SC, Nistor I, Craig JC, et al. Cinacalcet in patients with chronic kidney disease: a cumulative Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS Med. 2013;10(4):e1001436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wei Y, Yu MA, Qian LX, et al. Hypocalcemia after ultrasound-guided microwave ablation and total parathyroidectomy for secondary hyperparathyroidism: a retrospective study. Int J Hyperthermia. 2020;37(1):819–825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Narayan R, Perkins RM, Berbano EP, et al. Parathyroidectomy versus cinacalcet hydrochloride-based medical therapy in the management of hyperparathyroidism in ESRD: a cost utility analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007;49(6):801–813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Moldovan D, Racasan S, Kacso IM, et al. Survival after parathyroidectomy in chronic hemodialysis patients with severe secondary hyperparathyroidism. Int Urol Nephrol. 2015;47(11):1871–1877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ding Y, Wang H, Zou Q, et al. Factors associated with calcium requirements after parathyroidectomy in chronic kidney disease patients. Int Urol Nephrol. 2018;50(3):535–540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25(9):603–605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yang G, Zha X, Mao H, et al. Hypocalcemia-based prediction of hungry bone syndrome after parathyroidectomy in hemodialysis patients with refractory secondary hyperparathyroidism. J Int Med Res. 2018;46(12):4985–4994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kritmetapak K, Kongpetch S, Chotmongkol W, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for post-parathyroidectomy hungry bone syndrome in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism. Ren Fail. 2020;42(1):1118–1126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ho LY, Wong PN, Sin HK, et al. Risk factors and clinical course of hungry bone syndrome after total parathyroidectomy in dialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism. BMC Nephrol. 2017;18(1):12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wei Y, Peng LL, Zhao ZL, Li Y, et al. Risk factors of severe hypocalcemia after US-Guided percutaneous microwave ablation of the parathyroid gland in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism. J Bone Miner Res. 2020;35(4):691–697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wang M, Chen B, Zou X, et al. A nomogram to predict hungry bone syndrome after parathyroidectomy in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism. J Surg Res. 2020;255:33–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hamouda M, Dhia NB, Aloui S, et al. Predictors of early post-operative hypocalcemia after parathyroidectomy for secondary hyperparathyroidism. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2013;24(6):1165–1169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gong W, Lin Y, Xie Y, et al. Predictors of early postoperative hypocalcemia in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism undergoing total parathyroidectomy. J Int Med Res. 2021;49(5):3000605211015018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fonseca-Correa JI, Nava-Santana C, Tamez-Pedroza L, et al. Clinical factors associated with early and persistent hypocalcaemia after parathyroidectomy in patients on dialysis with severe hyperparathyroidism. Nephrology.2021;26(5):408–419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tsai WC, Peng YS, Chiu YL, et al. Risk factors for severe hypocalcemia after parathyroidectomy in prevalent dialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism. Int Urol Nephrol. 2015;47(7):1203–1207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ge Y, Yang G, Wang N, et al. Bone metabolism markers and hungry bone syndrome after parathyroidectomy in dialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism. Int Urol Nephrol. 2019;51(8):1443–1449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mittendorf EA, Merlino JI, McHenry CR.. Post-parathyroidectomy hypocalcemia: incidence, risk factors, and management. Am Surg. 2004;70(2):114–119. discussion 119-120. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Stewart ZA, Blackford A, Somervell H, et al. 25-hydroxyvitamin D deficiency is a risk factor for symptoms of postoperative hypocalcemia and secondary hyperparathyroidism after minimally invasive parathyroidectomy. Surgery. 2005;138(6):1018–1025. discussion 1025–1016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kim WY, Lee JB, Kim HY, et al. Achievement of the national kidney foundation kidney disease outcomes quality initiative: recommended serum calcium, phosphate and parathyroid hormone values with parathyroidectomy in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism. J Korean Surg Soc. 2013;85(1):25–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kobiela J, Łaski D, Stróżyk A, et al. From four-parathyroid gland exploration to a minimally invasive technique. Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy as a current approach in surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism. Endokrynol Pol. 2014;65(3):240–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yang M, Zhang L, Huang L, et al. Factors predictive of critical value of hypocalcemia after total parathyroidectomy without autotransplantation in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism. Ren Fail. 2016;38(8):1224–1227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Viaene L, Evenepoel P, Bammens B, et al. Calcium requirements after parathyroidectomy in patients with refractory secondary hyperparathyroidism. Nephron Clin Pract. 2008;110(2):c80–c85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sun X, Zhang X, Lu Y, et al. Risk factors for severe hypocalcemia after parathyroidectomy in dialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):7743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Goldfarb M, Gondek SS, Lim SM, et al. Postoperative hungry bone syndrome in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism of renal origin. World J Surg. 2012;36(6):1314–1319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Eric L. Epidemiology of osteoporosis. Rev Prat. 2020;70(9):1018–1022. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Erbil Y, Bozbora A, Ozbey N, et al. Predictive value of age and serum parathormone and vitamin d3 levels for postoperative hypocalcemia after total thyroidectomy for nontoxic multinodular goiter. Arch Surg. 2007;142(12):1182–1187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Guo CY, Holland PA, Jackson BF, et al. Immediate changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover and circulating interleukin-6 after parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism. Eur J Endocrinol. 2000;142(5):451–459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sun L, He X, Liu T.. Preoperative serum alkaline phosphatase: a predictive factor for early hypocalcaemia following parathyroidectomy of primary hyperparathyroidism. Chin Med J. 2014;127(18):3259–3264. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.National kidney F. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for bone metabolism and disease in chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;42(4 Suppl 3):S1–S201. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Cheng SP, Liu CL, Chen HH, et al. Prolonged hospital stay after parathyroidectomy for secondary hyperparathyroidism. World J Surg. 2009;33(1):72–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Yajima A, Ogawa Y, Takahashi HE, et al. Changes of bone remodeling immediately after parathyroidectomy for secondary hyperparathyroidism. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;42(4):729–738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Liu S, Zhu W, Li S, et al. The effect of bovine parathyroid hormone withdrawal on MC3T3-E1 cell proliferation and phosphorus metabolism. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0120402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kaya C, Tam AA, Dirikoc A, et al. Hypocalcemia development in patients operated for primary hyperparathyroidism: Can it be predicted preoperatively? Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2016;60(5):465–471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lu KC, Ma WY, Yu JC, et al. Bone turnover markers predict changes in bone mineral density after parathyroidectomy in patients with renal hyperparathyroidism. Clin Endocrinol. 2012;76(5):634–642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Urena P, De Vernejoul MC.. Circulating biochemical markers of bone remodeling in uremic patients. Kidney Int. 1999;55(6):2141–2156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.





