Skip to main content
Current Issues in Molecular Biology logoLink to Current Issues in Molecular Biology
. 2022 Jan 23;44(2):559–577. doi: 10.3390/cimb44020039

Doxycycline Alters the Porcine Renal Proteome and Degradome during Hypothermic Machine Perfusion

Leonie van Leeuwen 1,2,*, Leonie H Venema 1, Raphael Heilig 2, Henri G D Leuvenink 1, Benedikt M Kessler 2,3
Editor: Reza Alaghehbandan
PMCID: PMC8928973  PMID: 35723325

Abstract

Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is a hallmark for tissue injury in donation after circulatory death (DCD) kidneys. The implementation of hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) provides a platform for improved preservation of DCD kidneys. Doxycycline administration has shown protective effects during IRI. Therefore, we explored the impact of doxycycline on proteolytic degradation mechanisms and the urinary proteome of perfused kidney grafts. Porcine kidneys underwent 30 min of warm ischemia, 24 h of oxygenated HMP (control/doxycycline) and 240 min of ex vivo reperfusion. A proteomic analysis revealed distinctive clustering profiles between urine samples collected at T15 min and T240 min. High-efficiency undecanal-based N-termini (HUNTER) kidney tissue degradomics revealed significantly more proteolytic activity in the control group at T-10. At T240, significantly more proteolytic activity was observed in the doxycycline group, indicating that doxycycline alters protein degradation during HMP. In conclusion, doxycycline administration during HMP led to significant proteomic and proteolytic differences and protective effects by attenuating urinary NGAL levels. Ultimately, we unraveled metabolic, and complement and coagulation pathways that undergo alterations during machine perfusion and that could be targeted to attenuate IRI induced injury.

Keywords: renal transplantation, ischemia/reperfusion injury, machine perfusion, proteomics, degradomics

1. Introduction

Renal transplantation is the most effective treatment for patients suffering from end-stage renal disease [1]. Due to the shortage of donors, suboptimal kidneys, such as circulatory death donor (DCD) kidneys, are increasingly used to enlarge the donor pool [2,3,4]. Unfortunately, DCD kidneys are more likely to develop ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI), which can result in short-term complications such as delayed graft function (DGF) or early graft failure [5,6]. IRI as consequence of a period of warm ischemia prior to organ retrieval is an important impeller of tissue injury in DCD kidneys. The pathogenesis of IRI is complex and involves acute hypoxia in the ischemic phase. Although reperfusion is essential for the reintroduction of oxygen, reperfusion itself causes additional injury due to massive mitochondrial production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), ATP depletion, cytoskeletal dysfunction and intracellular Ca2+ accumulation, which subsequently leads to activation of various injury pathways [7,8,9].

ROS production is not only detrimental to cells in many ways, it is an important modulator of protein function as well. It has been shown that high levels of ROS drive both matrix metalloprotease (MMP) expression and MMP activation [10]. More specifically, ROS induces the expression and activation of MMP-2 and MMP-9 [11,12,13,14], two proteases that play a prominent role in acute and chronic renal injury [15,16]. It has been shown that targeting MMP-9 greatly reduces renal tissue damage after IRI [14,17]. Doxycycline is a widely used antibiotic that, in addition to its anti-bacterial properties, inhibits MMP-9. MMP-9 exerts protective effects during renal IRI [18,19,20], however, the exact underlying mechanisms are still unclear.

As of 2016, static cold storage (SCS) has been replaced by hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) as the standard of clinical care in The Netherlands for all kidneys donated by deceased donors. Multicenter randomized controlled trials have shown improved outcome in terms of a reduced incidence of DGF for HMP preserved kidneys compared to SCS [21,22]. Additionally, trials have shown that oxygenated HMP reduces post-transplant complications and significantly increases the one year graft survival rate compared to HMP without oxygen [23]. Besides improved preservation, HMP offers a therapeutic platform during organ preservation.

In this study, we explored the effect of doxycycline on proteolytic degradation mechanisms and urinary proteome of perfused kidney grafts. We performed an in-depth unbiased urinary proteomics and renal tissue degradomics analysis to assess whether doxycycline influences renal function at a molecular level during machine perfusion. Furthermore, we assessed renal function during ex vivo reperfusion, corroborating the altered metabolic, coagulation and complement pathways affected by doxycycline.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Design

Porcine kidneys (n = 7) were retrieved from a local abattoir and exposed to 30 min of warm ischemic time (WIT). Next, kidneys were preserved with oxygenated hypothermic machine perfusion for 24 h with (DOXY group) or without (control group) the addition of 100 µM doxycycline (Vibramycin SF 100 mg/5 mL, Pfizer BV, Capelle aan den Ijssel, The Netherlands) at a mean pressure of 25 mmHg at 4 °C using 100% oxygenated (100 mL/min) University of Wisconsin machine perfusion solution (Belzer MPS, Bridge to Life, Northbrook, IL, USA) and a Kidney Assist portable (XVIVO, Gothenburg, Zweden) perfusion machine. Currently the maximum HMP preservation time applied in the clinics in The Netherlands is 24 h. Thereafter, kidneys were reperfused in an ex vivo normothermic perfusion setup for 240 min with a mean arterial pressure of 80 mmHg at 37 °C using a custom-made perfusion machine. NMP specifications and analyses are shown in Appendix A Table A1. Samples were collected throughout HMP and reperfusion for renal function, proteomics and degradomics analysis.

2.2. Proteomic Analysis of Urine Using an In-Solution Digestion

To analyze the effect of doxycycline on the urinary proteome, urine samples collected at timepoint T15, T60, T120, T180 and T240 min of ex vivo reperfusion were concentrated and resuspended in 100 mM tetraethylammonium bromide (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Each sample was individually denatured and reduced using 5 mM dithiothreitol and alkylated using 20 mM iodoacetamide. Afterwards, all samples were cleaned up using a methanol-chloroform precipitation, and protein concentrations were determined using Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). 20 μg of protein per sample was digested using 0.4 μg of trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Samples were acidified using trifluoroacetic acid, and cleaned up using the EVOSEP ONE (EVOSEP, Odense, Denmark) and Evotips following manufacturers instructions before high throughput label-free quantification using the timsTOF Pro (Bruker, MA, USA).

Raw data files were searched against a UniProt proteome database (Sus Scrofa, 2019) compiled from Uniprot using MaxQuant [24] with the following parameters: trypsin for enzyme specificity, allowing up to 2 missed cleavages and a minimum peptide length of 6, precursor mass tolerance at 10 ppm and fragment mass tolerance at 0.5 Da. Comprehensive analysis of the obtained data was performed using Perseus v1.6.7.0 [25]. Data was log2(x) transformed for normalization, and data was imputed by replacing missing data from normal distribution.

2.3. Tissue Degradome Analysis Using a TMT-HUNTER Workflow

To analyze protein degradation, snap frozen renal cortex tissue was collected before start of reperfusion (T-10) and after 240 min of reperfusion (T240) using a 23 mm needle biopsy gun (Invivo, Best, The Netherlands). Proteins were labelled using tandem mass tags (TMT) and prepared according to a high efficiency undecanal N-terminal enrichment (HUNTER) degradomics workflow as described by Weng et al. 2019 [26].

In short, tissue was homogenized in RIPA Lysis and Extraction Buffer (ThermoFisher) with 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and cOmplete™ Mini EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) using Precellys 24 homogenizer (Bertin Instruments, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France). Benzonase was added to degrade all DNA and RNA. Protein concentrations were determined using Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific). 150 µg of protein per sample was precipitated using acetone-methanol precipitation. Protein pellets were resuspended in 30 µL 6 M guanidine hydrochloride, 50 µL nanopure H2O, and 20 µL 1 M HEPES pH 8. Each sample was individually denatured and reduced using 10 mM tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine and alkylated using 25 mM iodoacetamide. Whole protein labelling at N-terminal α-amines site was performed using TMT 11-plex™ isobaric label reagents (Thermo Scientific). Labels were dissolved in anhydrous DMSO equal to sample volume and added to each sample and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. Samples were then quenched using 25 µL 1 M ethanolamine. Afterwards, all samples were combined creating three sample pools, cleaned up using an acetone-methanol precipitation, and digested using 30 µg of trypsin (Promega) per sample pool for 20 h. The combined sample was enriched for protein N-termini using 50:1 w/w undecanal and 40 mM sodium cyanoborohydride. Samples were acidified with 0.5% trifluoroacetic acid in 40% ethanol and the undecanal with bound tryptic peptides was removed using 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in 40% ethanol and SOLA™ HRP Cartridges (Thermo Scientific). Samples were desalted using SOLA™ HRP Cartridges, dried down using vacuum centrifugation and resuspended in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. A nano-flow reversed phase chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis (nLC-MS/MS) was performed using an Ultimate 3000 UPLC system coupled to a Q Exactive HF with mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) as described previously by Fye et al. [27]. In short, samples were separated on an EASY-Spray PepMap RSLC C18 column (500 mm × 75 mm, 2 mm particle size, Thermo Scientific) over a 60-min gradient of 2–35% acetonitrile in 5% DMSO, 0.1% formic acid at 250 nL/min.

Raw data files were searched against a UniProt proteome database (Sus Scrofa, 2019) compiled from Uniprot using Thermo Proteome Discoverer v2.3 software (Thermo Scientific). The following parameters were used: semi-trypsin for enzyme specificity, allowing up to 2 missed cleavages and a minimum peptide length of 6. Precursor mass tolerance at 10 ppm and fragment mass tolerance at 0.05 Da. Samples were normalized against corresponding pool. Comprehensional analysis was performed using Perseus v1.6.7.0 [25]. Data was log2(x) transformed, and data was imputed by replacing missing data from normal distribution.

2.4. Visualization and Statistics of Proteomics and Degradomics Data

Heatmaps were created by Z-scoring for normalization, and hierarchical clustering using Pearson correlation with average linkage for both row and column tree using Perseus. For visualizing the volcano plots, a two-sample T-test was performed using Perseus. GraphPad Prism 7.02 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) was used for plotting the log2 difference between the doxycycline group and the control group on the x-axis, and the −log10 (p-value) on the y-axis. The cut-off for statistical significance was set for −log10 (p-value) > 1.3. Pathway analysis and functional enrichment of proteins was performed using STRING 10.5 [28], PANTHER [29], and Cytoscape 3.8.2 [30]. TopFind [31] and Merops [32] were used for predicting and matching proteolytic events to most probable responsible protease for peptides searched against a human proteome database (Uniprot, Geneva, Switzerland, 2021) as sus scrofa is not supported yet.

3. Results

3.1. Kidney Urine Proteomics and Tissue Degradomics Profiles

The experimental workflow is shown in Figure 1. We first analyzed the urinary proteome. Global analysis resulted in 2955 identified peptides that were matched to 303 unique proteins at a 1% false discovery rate (FDR).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Urine proteomics & kidney tissue degradomics experimental workflows. Porcine kidneys (n = 7 per group) were retrieved from a local abattoir and exposed to 30 min of warm ischemia, 24 h of oxygenated hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) with or without the addition of doxycycline, and 4 h of ex vivo reperfusion for functionality assessment. Perfusate, tissue and urine samples were collected during HMP and ex vivo reperfusion for various analyses. Protein degradation was analyzed using renal cortex tissue collected before and after ex vivo reperfusion and using a HUNTER [26] degradomics workflow. Urinary proteomics was performed on collected ultra-filtrate during ex vivo reperfusion using a label-free quantitative proteomics workflow. Illustration is original and created using www.biorender.com (accessed on January 2022).

Next, we analyzed the kidney tissue degradome using high-efficiency undecanal-based N-termini enrichment (HUNTER) [26]. Global analysis resulted in 717 identified peptides, potentially reflecting freshly cleaved N-termini of degradation products. 605 peptides were quantifiable due to labelled N-terminal α-amines. This means that after N-terminome enrichment, 85% of the sample represented the quantifiable degradome. These 605 degradation products belong to 265 unique proteins.

3.2. Doxycycline Causes Molecular Alterations in Urine during Machine Perfusion

We first analyzed the urinary proteome. Pathway analysis of the 303 identified proteins showed that most of these proteins belonged to metabolic pathways and complement and coagulation cascades. Unsupervised clustering was performed to examine data uniformity. No clustering was observed between the treatment groups, however clustering of urine samples taken at time point 15 min was observed (Figure 2a). Expression profiling showed that the addition of doxycycline caused significantly more downregulation of proteins in the urine compared to control at T120, T180 and T240 min.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Urinary proteomic analysis of ex vivo reperfused kidneys revealed altered complement & coagulation, ECM and metabolic pathways. (a) Heat map and hierarchical clustering of proteins at T15, T60, T120, T180 and T240. (b) Heat map and hierarchical clustering of proteins in urine samples only at T15 (beginning) and T240 (end). Protein expression is clustered into A and B. (c) Gene ontology term enrichment analysis of proteins in cluster A. (d) Gene ontology term enrichment analysis of proteins in cluster B. (e) log2 Fold Change in abundance between DOXY and the control was plotted on the x-axis and the statistical significance of these changes on the y-axis as the −log10 (p-value). DOXY: doxycycline treated.

To analyze whether the urinary proteome differs between the beginning and the end of kidney reperfusion, unsupervised clustering using urine samples of T15 and T240 was performed. Distinctive clustering was observed between the two timepoints (Figure 2b). Based on hierarchical clustering of the protein expression, two row clusters were identified. Cluster A consists of 34 proteins that are mostly located in extracellular regions and proteins that play a role in complement and coagulation pathways (Figure 2c). These proteins were upregulated at T240. Cluster B consists of 72 proteins that are mostly located in the cytoplasm and play a role in metabolic pathways (Figure 2d). These proteins were upregulated at T15. Figure 2e and Table S1 show significant differentially expressed proteins in the urine between the two experimental groups. C1s, TGF-β1, and Calpastatin were significantly more secreted into the urine of kidneys treated with doxycycline.

3.3. Doxycycline Alters Renal Degradome

Next, we analyzed the kidney tissue degradome. Unsupervised clustering of identified degradation products was performed to examine data uniformity. No clustering was observed between experimental groups (Figure 3a). Figure 3b shows the degradation products significantly up- and downregulated in the doxycycline group compared to control (Table S2). At T-10, more degradation products were observed in the control group. At T240, more degradation products were observed in the doxycycline group (Figure 3c; Table S3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Renal tissue degradomics during ex vivo reperfusion modulated by doxycycline. (a) Heat map and hierarchical clustering of degradation products across all tissue samples. (b) Represents the log2 fold change of degradation products between DOXY and the control group pre-reperfusion (T-10). (c) Represents the log2 fold change of degradation products between DOXY and the control group post-reperfusion (T240). (d) Represents a KEGG pathways analysis of degradation products identified as significantly downregulated and (e) upregulated pre-reperfusion. (f) Represents a KEGG pathways analysis of degradation products identified as significantly upregulated post-reperfusion. DOXY; doxycycline treated.

At T-10, 72 significant degradation products were identified in the control group (Figure 3d). String pathway analysis showed that the majority of these proteins belonged to metabolic processes. A total of 19 significant degradation products were identified in the doxycycline group (Figure 3e). String pathway analysis showed that the majority of these proteins belonged to oxidative phosphorylation.

At T240, 3 significant degradation products were identified in the control group, namely GPI-anchor transamidase, histone H1t and aquaporin-1 (Figure 3c). 51 significant degradation products were identified in the doxycycline group (Figure 3f). String pathway analysis showed that the majority of these proteins belonged to metabolic processes.

3.4. Protease Activity in Experimental Groups

PANTHER protein class analysis of both groups led to the identification of 20 proteases. These proteases belong to cysteine, metallo and serine proteases (Table 1). Using a human database in combination with TopFind [31] analysis, responsible proteases for the identified substrates in each sample were predicted. At T-10, 17 substrates could be linked to the responsible protease in the doxycycline group and 15 substrates in the control group (Table 2). At T240, 2 substrates could be linked to the responsible protease in the doxycycline group (Table 2). No predictions could be made for the control group at T240.

Table 1.

Identified proteases in both sample groups using Panther pathway analysis.

Cysteine Proteases Metallo Proteases Serine Proteases
CTSB FOLH1 PLG
USP37 ANPEP APEH
CTSH MMP1 DPP4
CAPN1 THOP1 CFD
CAPN2 NLN HP
UCHL3 ENPEP ESD
CTSL
UCHL1

Table 2.

Proteases identified in experimental groups and their proteolytic activity.

Doxycycline T-10 Control T-10
Accession Number
Gene Name
Meprin α/β Metalloproteinase
Cleavage Sites
Accession Number
Gene Name
Meprin α/β Metalloproteinase
Cleavage Sites
P10809
HSPD1
graphic file with name cimb-44-00039-i001.jpg P10809
HSPD1
graphic file with name cimb-44-00039-i002.jpg
Q99497
PARK7
graphic file with name cimb-44-00039-i003.jpg P37802
TAGLN2
graphic file with name cimb-44-00039-i004.jpg
Q15651
HMGN
graphic file with name cimb-44-00039-i005.jpg P11142
HSPA8
graphic file with name cimb-44-00039-i006.jpg
P22626
HNRNPA2B1
graphic file with name cimb-44-00039-i007.jpg P08670
VIM
graphic file with name cimb-44-00039-i008.jpg
Accession number
Gene name
Serine protease HTRA2
Cleavage sites
P06396
GSN
graphic file with name cimb-44-00039-i009.jpg
P68371
TUBB4B
graphic file with name cimb-44-00039-i010.jpg P14866
HNRNPL
graphic file with name cimb-44-00039-i011.jpg
P63267
ACTG2
graphic file with name cimb-44-00039-i012.jpg Accession number
Gene name
Serine protease HTRA2
cleavage sites
P68366
TUBA4A
graphic file with name cimb-44-00039-i013.jpg P68363
TUBA1B
graphic file with name cimb-44-00039-i014.jpg
Accession number
Gene name
Cathepsin S
cleavage sites
P68371
TUBB4B
graphic file with name cimb-44-00039-i015.jpg
P60709
ACTB
graphic file with name cimb-44-00039-i016.jpg Accession number
Gene name
Caspase 3
cleavage sites
O60749 graphic file with name cimb-44-00039-i017.jpg P63267
ACTG2
graphic file with name cimb-44-00039-i018.jpg
Accession number
Gene name
Granzyme M
cleavage sites
Accession number
Gene name
Granzyme M
cleavage sites
O75367
H2AFY
graphic file with name cimb-44-00039-i019.jpg P16402
HIST1H1D
graphic file with name cimb-44-00039-i020.jpg
P16402
HIST1H1D
graphic file with name cimb-44-00039-i021.jpg P16402
HIST1H1D
graphic file with name cimb-44-00039-i022.jpg
P60709
ACTB
graphic file with name cimb-44-00039-i023.jpg P16402 graphic file with name cimb-44-00039-i024.jpg
Accession number
Gene name
Cathepsin B
cleavage sites
Accession number
Gene name
Granzyme B
cleavage sites
P52272
HNRNPM
graphic file with name cimb-44-00039-i025.jpg P68104
EEF1A1
graphic file with name cimb-44-00039-i026.jpg
Accession number
Gene name
Mitochondrial-processing peptidase β cleavage sites Accession number
Gene name
Cathepsin D
cleavage sites
Q99643
SDHC
graphic file with name cimb-44-00039-i027.jpg P68871
HBB
graphic file with name cimb-44-00039-i028.jpg
Accession number
Gene name
Tripeptidyl-peptidase 1
cleavage sites
O14773
TPP1
graphic file with name cimb-44-00039-i029.jpg Doxycycline T240
Accession number
Gene name
Cathepsin L1
cleavage sites
Accession number
Gene name
Meprin α/β metalloproteinase
cleavage sites
P53634
CTSC
graphic file with name cimb-44-00039-i030.jpg P14866
HNRNPL
graphic file with name cimb-44-00039-i031.jpg
Accession number
Gene name
Matrix metalloprotease 11
cleavage sites
Accession number
Gene name
Cathepsin S
cleavage sites
P62937 graphic file with name cimb-44-00039-i032.jpg O00193
SMAP
graphic file with name cimb-44-00039-i033.jpg

3.5. Protein Degradation during Ex Vivo Reperfusion

To characterize the effect of ex vivo reperfusion, the significant differences in degradome pre- and post-reperfusion were analyzed in just the control group. Significantly more proteins were degraded after HMP (T-10) compared to after reperfusion (T240) (Figure 4a). At T-10, 69 degradation products were significantly more abundant. String pathway analysis showed that the majority of these products were intracellular (Figure 4b). At T240, 16 degradation products were significantly more abundant. String pathway analysis showed that the majority of these products were localization proteins (Figure 4c).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Kidney degradome dynamics during ex vivo reperfusion. (a) Log2 Fold Change in abundance between post (T240) and pre (T-10) reperfusion was plotted on the x-axis and the statistical significance of these changes on the y-axis as the -log10 (p-value). Significantly downregulated degradation products (blue). Significantly upregulated degradation products (red). (b) String cluster and KEGG pathway analysis of degradation products significantly downregulated after reperfusion. (c) String clustering and KEGG pathway analysis of degradation products significantly upregulated after reperfusion.

3.6. Renal Function and Injury Markers during HMP and Reperfusion

There were no significant differences observed in renal function during HMP (Figure 5). During reperfusion, urinary neutrophil gelatinase–associated lipocalin (NGAL) levels were significantly lower in doxycycline group at T180 min (p = 0.0430) and T240 min (p = 0.0297) compared to control (Figure 5h).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Renal function during hypothermic machine perfusion and ex vivo reperfusion. (a) Arterial flow during hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) shown in mL/min/100 gr. of kidney weight over time. (b) LDH levels in perfusate in U/L during HMP. (c) Fractional sodium excretion shown in % during reperfusion. (d) ATP levels in cortex tissue shown in pmol per ug protein at time point: HMP0h, HMP24h or pre-reperfusion, 120 min into reperfusion and 240 min into reperfusion or post-reperfusion. (e) Oxygen consumption shown in mL O2/min/100 gr. of kidney weight during reperfusion. (f) Gelatinase activity after 240 min of reperfusion. (g) Absolute accumulative urinary protein levels in mg. (h) Absolute accumulative urinary NGAL levels in pg. (i) delta LDH levels in perfusate in U/L during reperfusion. (j) delta ASAT levels in perfusate in U/L during reperfusion. * = p < 0.05. Data shown as mean ± SEM. DOXY; doxycycline treated.

4. Discussion

Ischemia-reperfusion injury in renal transplantation is detrimental for the recipient as it can lead to short- and long-term graft failure [5,33]. Unfortunately, research into targeting IRI as well as identifying novel drug targets is limited. Omics technologies are used for discovering specific molecular processes that play a role in disease [34]. The goal of proteomics is to acquire a more global overview by examining as many proteins of a cell as possible, instead of each one individually [35]. Proteases such as the MMPs are enzymes that cause protein degradation and therefore play essential roles in biological processes and pathological implications [36]. Determining the degradome and responsible proteases can provide molecular clues about the functionality of a biological pathway. In addition, proteases are druggable targets, thereby offering pharmacological intervention strategies to modulate proteolytic pathways [37,38]. However, generally, endogenous expression levels of proteases and protease inhibitors are low, which makes them challenging to detect efficiently. Weng et al., 2019 developed a high-efficiency undecanal-based N-termini enrichment (HUNTER) method for degradome analysis of microscale samples [26]. HUNTER allows mapping of the exact location of the biologically generated N-termini, generated through the cleavage of a peptide bond by the protease that is responsible for this proteolytic activity. Proteomic profiling with the use of mass spectrometry has been widely adapted in medical research including the field of kidney failure and transplantation [39,40]. Our goal was to observe the effect of doxycycline addition during HMP on renal proteome and degradome during ex vivo normothermic machine perfusion. Furthermore, we explored the general effect of machine perfusion on the renal degradome.

4.1. Protein Secretion during Ex Vivo Reperfusion

Proteinuria is a common phenomenon after renal transplantation and is correlated with post-transplant graft survival [41]. Rising urinary protein levels were also observed during ex vivo reperfusion (Figure 5). To our knowledge, urine collected during ex vivo reperfusion has never been thoroughly analyzed. As urine is the direct ultra- filtrate of the kidneys especially in an ex vivo setting, it provides accurate information on kidney functionality. Therefore, we analyzed the effect of doxycycline on urinary proteome. Furthermore, we analyzed the urinary proteome during ex vivo reperfusion. When globally observing the urinary proteome, no clustering occurred between groups. However, when looking per time point, significantly more proteins were secreted in the control group.

4.2. Changes in Metabolic Pathways

Interestingly, the urinary proteome of both groups at T15 consisted mostly of proteins belonging to metabolic pathways. Renal cells require high levels of energy due to their ATP-dependent functions like reabsorption and secretion [42]. Hypoxic injury during ischemia causes production of ROS [43]. Excessive ROS production alters the cellular redox potential and causes impairment in electron transport, energy metabolism and causes ATP depletion. Many of the identified degradation products belong to metabolic pathways as well, indicating that metabolism is disturbed during IRI. Treatment that protects metabolic pathways should therefore be administrated at an early stage of ex vivo machine perfusion.

4.3. Changes in Complement and Coagulation Cascades

The urinary proteome at T240 of both groups consisted of many proteins belonging to complement and coagulation cascades. It has been shown that the complement system is associated with the inflammatory response to IRI [44,45]. IRI causes the release of danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), neo-antigen formation, and immune complex formation that then can activate the complement system by any of the three complement pathways [46]. Even though the underlying mechanisms are still unclear, complement activation due to IRI contributes to the pathogenesis of renal fibrosis. Significant upregulation of C1s secretion in the urine of the doxycycline group was observed. This could indicate that there is detachment of remnant classical complement attack complexes in the doxycycline group. Interestingly, our group has shown that upregulation of C1s secretion during hypothermic machine perfusion correlates with a good kidney function 1-year post transplantation [47]. Furthermore, we identified significant downregulation of C3 degradation products before reperfusion and significant upregulation C3 degradation products after reperfusion (Figure 3b,c). It has been shown that C3 formation, and degradation after complement activation by all three pathways plays a role in renal ischemic injury [48,49]. Inhibition of complement activation could provide novel therapeutic targets to ameliorate fibrosis during ex vivo reperfusion.

4.4. Protein Degradation during Ex Vivo Reperfusion

Protein degradation plays an important role in physiological functioning of the kidney [50,51]. Excessive protein degradation can lead to loss of tissue integrity and subsequent loss of renal function. However, lack of protein degradation can lead to the accumulation of proteins and fibrosis formation which in turn can also lead to loss of renal function. The delicate balance between synthesis and degradation is therefore key for renal function. To our knowledge, no studies have focused on protein degradation in a renal transplant setting. We therefore studied protein degradation in our controlled experimental setup. More degradation products were observed in the control group after HMP. These results indicate that the addition of doxycycline possibly attenuates protein degradation during HMP. Additionally, more degradation products were observed after hypothermic compared to normothermic perfusion. This indicates that degradation products are not all flushed out during HMP and that they are most likely recycled during ex vivo reperfusion for tissue repair.

4.5. Proteases as Possible Molecular Targets

The protease class that was most active in both groups were cysteine proteases. Both calpain-1 and 2 were identified during ex vivo reperfusion (Table 1). Calpains play a role in Ca2+ signaling and are activated by accumulated intracellular Ca2+ during ischemia [9,52]. Activated calpain-1 and 2 selectively cleave cytoskeletal and membrane proteins [53]. We observed many degradation products of cytoskeletal proteins after HMP (Figure 4), possibly caused by activated calpains. Furthermore, we identified significantly more urinary secretion of calpastatin in the doxycycline group. Calpastatin is an endogenous inhibitor protein that targets the Calpains [54]. Previous studies have shown that calpastatin is downregulated in heart and brain tissue after ischemia-reperfusion injury [55,56]. Overexpression of calpastatin and thus secretion could potentially have a protective effect against IRI; and targeting calpains during NMP could possibly protect the kidney against ischemia [57,58].

TopFind analysis predicted that the identified actin and tubulin substrates were most probably cleaved by Serine protease HTRA2, granzyme M, cathepsin S and caspase 3 (Table 2). Interestingly, research has shown that proteolysis of calpastatin by caspase 3 may regulate calpain activity during IRI [59], suggesting interplay between these proteases, calpastatin and cytoskeletal integrity. The prediction was based on a human database so validation studies need to be performed to identify the exact responsible proteases.

Meprin α/β metalloproteinases were predicted to be active in both groups. They are extracellular proteases that are involved in connective tissue homeostasis, intestinal barrier function and immunological processes. Dysregulation is associated with acute kidney injury, chronic inflammation and fibrosis [60,61]. Targeting meprin α/β metalloproteinases during machine perfusion could therefore potentially benefit the kidney.

4.6. Effect of Doxycycline

The addition of doxycycline during HMP did not affect renal function during HMP (Figure 5a,b). Doxycycline did result in significant attenuation of urinary NGAL levels during ex vivo reperfusion (Figure 5h). NGAL is a protein covalently bound to gelatinase from neutrophils [62]. It is an acute tubular damage marker after ischemia, and an early fibrosis marker with a great predictive value of post-transplant function [63,64,65,66], indicating that doxycycline does potentially have renal protective effects during HMP. These results are in line with Moser et al. 2016. [67]. They showed that the addition of doxycycline under hypothermic conditions has protective effects on rat kidneys as it attenuated injury markers such as secretion of NGAL and reduction of MMP-2 and MMP-9 activity. Furthermore, Cortes et al. 2018 showed that doxycycline treatment attenuated renal injury, and downregulated MMP-2 and -9 levels in rat kidneys [20]. We did not see the same effects on gelatinase inhibition in our porcine kidneys (Figure 5f). This could be due to interspecies differences, or the dose-response and thermodynamics of doxycycline under hypothermic conditions. Furthermore, the enzymatic activity of the MMPs is significantly influenced by temperature [68]. As normothermic machine perfusion is now increasingly used, it would be beneficial to analyze whether doxycycline shows more prominent effects under normothermic conditions when the kidney graft is 100% metabolically active [42].

4.7. Clinical Implementation

Although further studies are needed to confirm whether the addition of doxycycline is beneficial during machine perfusion, the emergence of machine perfusion itself provides opportunities for marginal graft repair by means of ex vivo targeted drug delivery [69]. We have identified multiple pathways such as metabolic pathways and complement and coagulation pathways that show upregulated degradation during NMP. Furthermore, we have identified several relevant proteases that would make interesting drug targets during NMP. Ultimately, this novel approach will lead to better short and long-term graft function and improve the patient’s quality of life.

4.8. Limitations

We were not able to analyze the effects of doxycycline beyond NMP, as these kidneys were obtained from an abattoir and thus transplantation was impossible. However, our model has shown to be a valid technique for assessment of kidney quality during reperfusion [70,71,72,73,74,75]. Kidneys obtained from waste material provide a great platform to test early hypotheses without the need of laboratory animals, thereby reducing both costs and animals for research.

Unfortunately, many cleavage sites within the proteome are still unidentified, and we could only match a handful of substrates to their possible responsible protease. Especially for proteolytic activity in porcine samples, as the prediction software is currently not compatible for the sus scrofa degradome. It would be interesting to unravel all proteases responsible for the identified proteolytic activity. Furthermore, it would be valuable to validate these predictions by spiking the protein of interest with the protease of interest. This way we can see if this protease is really responsible for the identified proteolytic activity.

In addition, this pilot study consisted of a small sample size. Validation using larger groups will be needed to further unravel the underlying pathophysiological pathways of IRI.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the addition of doxycycline during HMP led to significant proteomic differences. We unraveled multiple pathways that undergo alterations during machine perfusion. Pathways that could be targeted using ex vivo machine perfusion to attenuate IRI induced injury. Furthermore, we showed that doxycycline administration during HMP shows protective effects by attenuating urinary NGAL levels. More validation studies need to be conducted before implementing doxycycline supplementation during machine perfusion preservation.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for butchery Kroon Vlees and thank Henk Luinge for providing kidneys for this research. We thank members of the Leuvenink and Kessler group for assistance of experiments and insightful discussions. We thank members of the Discovery Proteomics Facility (DPF), led by Roman Fischer and Iolanda Vendrell, for expert help with mass spectrometry analysis. We thank Ulrich auf dem Keller and Fabio Sabino for their help on analyzing degradomics data.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cimb44020039/s1, Table S1. Identified proteins in the urine during NMP; Table S2. Identified degradation products pre-reperfusion (T-10). Table S3. Identified degradation products post-reperfusion (T240).

Appendix A

Table A1.

NMP specifications.

Perfusate Composition:
Heparinized and leukocyte depleted autologous blood 500 mL
Ringers lactate solution (Baxter) 280 mL
Amoxicillin/Clavulanic acid (1000 mg/200 mg) 1 ampule
8.4% Sodium Bicarbonate (B. Braun) 10 mL
5% glucose (Baxter) 10 mL
Dexamethasone (20 mg/mL) (Centrafarm) 333 μL
Mannitol (Merck) 6 mg
Creatinine (Merck) 90 mg
Sodium Nitroprusside (Merck) 2 mg
Infusion solution: 20 mL/h
Aminoplasmal (B. Braun) 90 mL
8.4% Sodium Bicarbonate 2.75 mL
Insulin (100 IU/mL) (NovoRapid) 0.186 mL
Corrections based on blood gas values:
If glucose < 8 mmol/L, 5% glucose administrated to a concentration of 8 mmol/L.
If pH under 7.3, 8.4% sodium bicarbonate administrated using Henderson–Hasselbalch equation to obtain a pH of 7.35.
Renal function analysis:
Fractional sodium excretion Creatinine and sodium concentrations were determined in perfusate samples and corresponding urine samples, in a routine fashion at the lab of clinical chemistry (UMCG). Calculated as: (urinary sodium levels × urinary flow)/(creatinine clearance × perfusate sodium levels).
Oxygen consumption Calculated using pO2 differences between arterial and venous sites, measured with a pH-blood gas analyzer ABL90 FLEX (Radiometer, Brønshøj, Denmark) and expressed as mL O2/min/100 r. according to trans-renal flow and kidney mass pre-reperfusion using the equation as described by Venema et al. 2019 [77].
ATP/Protein Tissue samples collected after 30 min of warm ischemia, 24 h of HMP, 120 min of reperfusion and 240 min of reperfusion were stored in sonification solution (0.372 g EDTA in 130 mL H2O and NaOH, pH 10.9 + 370 mL 96% ethanol). A bioluminescence kit was used (Roche Diagnostics). Luminescence was measured using a luminometer (Packerd LumiCountä, IL, USA). The obtained ATP value was normalized to the total protein content using PierceTM BCA protein assay kit. The final ATP content was expressed as pmol ATP/μg protein.
LDH & ASAT Concentrations were measured in HMP and NMP perfusate in a routine fashion at the lab of clinical chemistry (UMCG).
Urinary protein concentrations Determined using Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific) according to manufacturer’s instructions.
Urinary NGAL Determined using an ELISA kit (Eurobio, Les Ulis, France) according to manufacturer’s instructions.
MMP activity Measured using the Gelatinase (Gelatin Degradation/Zymography) Assay Kit (BioVision, San Francisco, CA, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions.
Statistics GraphPad Prism 7.02 (GraphPad Software, USA) was used for visualizing data and statistical analyses. Values are shown as means with corresponding standard error of the mean. Continuous variables were plotted over time. Statistical differences between groups for each timepoint were determined using 2 way ANOVA and Fisher’s LSD for multiple comparisons. The cut-off for statistical significance was set at p < 0.5.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.v.L., L.H.V., H.G.D.L. and B.M.K.; Data curation, L.v.L., R.H. and B.M.K.; Formal analysis, L.v.L.; Funding acquisition, B.M.K.; Methodology, L.v.L., R.H. and B.M.K.; Supervision, H.G.D.L. and B.M.K.; Visualization, L.v.L.; Writing—original draft, L.v.L.; Writing—review & editing, L.v.L., L.H.V., R.H., H.G.D.L. and B.M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Work in the BMK laboratory was funded by the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) Innovation Fund for Medical Science (CIFMS), China (grant number: 2018-I2M-2-002) and by Novo Nordisk. Travel to Oxford was supported by the Dutch Kidney Foundation and the European Society for Organ Transplantation.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org (accessed on: 30 November 2021)) via the PRIDE partner repository [76] with the dataset identifier PXD029599.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Schaubel D., Desmeules M., Mao Y., Jeffery J., Fenton S. Survival experience among elderly end-stage renal disease patients. A controlled comparison of transplantation and dialysis. Transplantation. 1995;60:1389–1394. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199560120-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Filiopoulos V., Boletis J.N. Renal transplantation with expanded criteria donors: Which is the optimal immunosuppression? World J. Transplant. 2016;6:103. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i1.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Saidi R.F., Elias N., Kawai T., Hertl M., Farrell M.-L., Goes N., Wong W., Hartono C., Fishman J.A., Kotton C.N., et al. Outcome of Kidney Transplantation Using Expanded Criteria Donors and Donation After Cardiac Death Kidneys: Realities and Costs. Am. J. Transplant. 2007;7:2769–2774. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01993.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Venkat K.K., Eshelman A.K. The evolving approach to ethical issues in living donor kidney transplantation: A review based on illustrative case vignettes. Transplant. Rev. 2014;28:134–139. doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2014.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Matas A.J., Gillingham K.J., Humar A., Kandaswamy R., Sutherland D.E.R., Payne W.D., Dunn T.B., Najarian J.S. 2202 kidney transplant recipients with 10 years of graft function: What happens next? [(accessed on 12 October 2017)];Am. J. Transplant. 2008 8:2410–2419. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02414.x. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18925907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pascual M., Theruvath T., Kawai T., Tolkoff-Rubin N., Cosimi A.B. Strategies to Improve Long-Term Outcomes after Renal Transplantation. [(accessed on 12 October 2017)];N. Engl. J. Med. 2002 346:580–590. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra011295. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11856798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Weight S.C., Bell P.R.F., Nicholson M.L. Renal ischaemia-reperfusion injury. Br. J. Surg. 1996;83:162–170. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1996.02182.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nieuwenhuijs-Moeke G.J., Pischke S.E., Berger S.P., Sanders J.S.F., Pol R.A., Struys M.M.R.F., Ploeg R.J., Leuvenink H.G.D. Ischemia and Reperfusion Injury in Kidney Transplantation: Relevant Mechanisms in Injury and Repair. [(accessed on 5 March 2021)];J. Clin. Med. 2020 9:253. doi: 10.3390/jcm9010253. Available online: www.mdpi.com/journal/jcm. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Malek M., Nematbakhsh M. Renal ischemia/reperfusion injury; from pathophysiology to treatment. J. Renal Inj Prev. 2015;4:20–27. doi: 10.12861/jrip.2015.06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nelson K.K., Melendez J.A. Mitochondrial redox control of matrix metalloproteinases. [(accessed on 9 October 2018)];Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2004 37:768–784. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2004.06.008. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891584904004617?via%3Dihub#aep-section-id17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dejonckheere E., Vandenbroucke R.E., Libert C. Matrix metalloproteinases as drug targets in ischemia/reperfusion injury. [(accessed on 25 September 2018)];Drug Discov. Today. 2011 16:762–778. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2011.06.009. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21745586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Basile D.P., Fredrich K., Weihrauch D., Hattan N., Chilian W.M. Angiostatin and matrix metalloprotease expression following ischemic acute renal failure. [(accessed on 25 September 2018)];Am. J. Physiol. Physiol. 2004 286:F893–F902. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00328.2003. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15075185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Caron A., Desrosiers R.R., Langlois S., Béliveau R. Ischemia–reperfusion injury stimulates gelatinase expression and activity in kidney glomeruli. [(accessed on 25 September 2018)];Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2005 83:287–300. doi: 10.1139/y05-011. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15870843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cavdar Z., Ozbal S., Celik A., Ergur B., Guneli E., Ural C., Camsari T., Guner G. The effects of alpha-lipoic acid on MMP-2 and MMP-9 activities in a rat renal ischemia and re-perfusion model. [(accessed on 8 June 2018)];Biotech. Histochem. 2014 89:304–314. doi: 10.3109/10520295.2013.847498. Available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/10520295.2013.847498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tan Kui T., Zheng G., Hsu T.-T., Wang Y., Lee V.W.S., Tian X., Wang Y., Cao Q., Wang Y., Harris D.C.H. Macrophage Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 Mediates Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Vitro in Murine Renal Tubular Cells. [(accessed on 4 June 2018)];Am. J. Pathol. 2010 176:1256–1270. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090188. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20075196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kui Tan T., Zheng G., Hsu T.-T., Ra Lee S., Zhang J., Zhao Y., Tian X., Wang Y., Min Wang Y., Cao Q., et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 of tubular and macrophage origin contributes to the pathogenesis of renal fibrosis via macrophage recruitment through osteopontin cleavage. [(accessed on 4 June 2018)];Lab. Investig. 2013 93:434–449. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2013.3. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23358111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Novak K.B., Le H.D., Christison-Lagay E.R., Nose V., Doiron R.J., Moses M.A., Puder M. Effects of metalloproteinase inhibition in a murine model of renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. [(accessed on 8 June 2018)];Pediatric Res. 2010 67:257–262. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181ca0aa2. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19915515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Roach D.M., Fitridge R.A., Laws P.E., Millard S.H., Varelias A., Cowled P.A. Up-regulation of MMP-2 and MMP-9 Leads to Degradation of Type IV Collagen During Skeletal Muscle Reperfusion Injury; Protection by the MMP Inhibitor, Doxycycline. [(accessed on 16 June 2018)];Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2002 23:260–269. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.2002.1598. Available online: http://www.idealibrary.com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Saglam F., Celik A., Tayfur D., Cavdar Z., Yilmaz O., Sargioglu S., Kolatan E., Oktay G., Camsari T. Decrease in cell proliferation by an matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, doxycycline, in a model of immune-complex nephritis. [(accessed on 16 June 2018)];Nephrology. 2010 15:560–567. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2010.01289.x. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20649877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cortes A.L., Gonsalez S.R., Rioja L.S., Oliveira S.S.C., Santos A.L.S., Prieto M.C., Melo P.A., Lara L.S. Protective outcomes of low-dose doxycycline on renal function of Wistar rats subjected to acute ischemia/reperfusion injury. [(accessed on 16 June 2018)];Biochim. Biophys. Acta -Mol. Basis Dis. 2018 1864:102–114. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2017.10.005. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28987762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Moers C., Smits J.M., Maathuis M.-H.J., Treckmann J., Van Gelder F., Napieralski B.P., Van Kasterop-Kutz M., Homan Van Der Heide J.J., Squifflet J.-P., Van Heurn E., et al. Machine Perfusion or Cold Storage in Decreased-Donor Kidney Transplantation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;360:7–19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jochmans I., Moers C., Smits J.M., Leuvenink H.G.D., Treckmann J., Paul A., Rahmel A., Squifflet J.-P., van Heurn E., Monbaliu D., et al. Machine Perfusion Versus Cold Storage for the Preservation of Kidneys Donated After Cardiac Death. Ann. Surg. 2010;252:756–764. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ffc256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jochmans I., Brat A., Davies L., Hofker H.S., van de Leemkolk F.E.M., Leuvenink H.G.D., Knight S.R., Pirenne J., Ploeg R.J., Abramowicz D., et al. Oxygenated versus standard cold perfusion preservation in kidney transplantation (COMPARE): A randomised, double-blind, paired, phase 3 trial. [(accessed on 11 March 2021)];Lancet. 2020 396:1653–1662. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32411-9. Available online: www.eurotransplant.org. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tyanova S., Temu T., Cox J. The MaxQuant computational platform for mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics. [(accessed on 7 May 2021)];Nat. Protoc. 2016 11:2301–2319. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.136. Available online: https://thermo.flexnetoperations.com/control/ [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tyanova S., Temu T., Sinitcyn P., Carlson A., Hein M.Y., Geiger T., Mann M., Cox J. The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote)omics data. [(accessed on 17 March 2020)];Nat. Methods. 2016 13:731–740. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3901. Available online: http://www.nature.com/articles/nmeth.3901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Weng S.S.H., Demir F., Ergin E.K., Dirnberger S., Uzozie A., Tuscher D., Nierves L., Tsui J., Huesgen P.F., Lange P.F. Sensitive Determination of Proteolytic Proteoforms in Limited Microscale Proteome Samples. [(accessed on 17 March 2020)];Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2019 18:2335–2347. doi: 10.1074/mcp.TIR119.001560. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31471496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fye H.K.S., Mrosso P., Bruce L., Thézénas M.L., Davis S., Fischer R., Rwegasira G.L., Makani J., Kessler B.M. A robust mass spectrometry method for rapid profiling of erythrocyte ghost membrane proteomes. Clin. Proteom. 2018;15:14. doi: 10.1186/s12014-018-9190-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Szklarczyk D., Morris J.H., Cook H., Kuhn M., Wyder S., Simonovic M., Santos A., Doncheva N.T., Roth A., Bork P., et al. The STRING database in 2017: Quality-controlled protein–protein association networks, made broadly accessible. [(accessed on 20 March 2018)];Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 45:D362–D368. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw937. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27924014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mi H., Huang X., Muruganujan A., Tang H., Mills C., Kang D., Thomas P.D. PANTHER version 11: Expanded annotation data from Gene Ontology and Reactome pathways, and data analysis tool enhancements. [(accessed on 5 April 2018)];Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 45:D183–D189. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1138. Available online: https://academic.oup.com/nar/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/nar/gkw1138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Shannon P., Markiel A., Ozier O., Baliga N.S., Wang J.T., Ramage D., Amin N., Schwikowski B., Ideker T. Cytoscape: A software Environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. [(accessed on 6 May 2021)];Genome Res. 2003 13:2498–2504. doi: 10.1101/gr.1239303. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14597658/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fortelny N., Yang S., Pavlidis P., Lange P.F., Overall C.M. Proteome TopFIND 3.0 with TopFINDer and PathFINDer: Database and analysis tools for the association of protein termini to pre- and post-translational events. [(accessed on 6 May 2018)];Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 43:D290–D297. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1012. Available online: http://academic.oup.com/nar/article/43/D1/D290/2435434/Proteome-TopFIND-30-with-TopFINDer-and-PathFINDer. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rawlings N.D., Barrett A.J., Thomas P.D., Huang X., Bateman A., Finn R.D. The MEROPS database of proteolytic enzymes, their substrates and inhibitors in 2017 and a comparison with peptidases in the PANTHER database. [(accessed on 6 May 2018)];Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 46:D624–D632. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1134. Available online: http://academic.oup.com/nar/article/46/D1/D624/4626772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Dinis P., Nunes P., Marconi L., Furriel F., Parada B., Moreira P., Figueiredo A., Bastos C., Roseiro A., Dias V., et al. Kidney Retransplantation: Removal or Persistence of the Previous Failed Allograft? [(accessed on 6 October 2017)];Transplant. Proc. 2014 46:1730–1734. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.05.029. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25131023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Anderson N.G., Anderson N.L. Twenty years of two-dimensional electrophoresis: Past, present and future. [(accessed on 24 October 2017)];Electrophoresis. 1996 17:443–453. doi: 10.1002/elps.1150170303. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8740157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Graves P.R., Haystead T.A.J. Molecular biologist’s guide to proteomics. [(accessed on 24 October 2017)];Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2002 66:39–63. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.66.1.39-63.2002. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11875127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.López-Otín C., Overall C.M. Protease degradomics: A new challenge for proteomics. [(accessed on 22 October 2017)];Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002 3:509–519. doi: 10.1038/nrm858. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12094217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Coppo R. Proteasome inhibitors in progressive renal diseases. [(accessed on 31 October 2017)];Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 2014 29:25–30. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gft271. Available online: https://oup.silverchair-cdn.com/oup/backfile/Content_public/Journal/ndt/29/suppl_1/10.1093_ndt_gft271/3/gft271.pdf?Expires=1509553937&Signature=bRec1EGIsaSFJxmA3Q9n7Y-sTHt2qe4VAn80-YBucmq5bd~OzjsbR36R~aPHCsWisFxJn-k0LqbFBVTyGbBqZaYcuv4QRfMogZ-61sCYHrDk60Re9yPW4WotXPji3St1AqtvA4jIjkLlq1rIbtP4yDHk26RNbac5UQipA1JYK7IU0sTw~ozGnvlqZLPcCcdzBrc9QpN-yQP16chUB2yNC-R-pBjnQEkIWoi6M84gZqsBG886G1eb075se0jtjuEVy5v41sk9-P7CJHtD94t7O3BGuzaVa9Hng7w~v0zit6JxBXWBpRtNx80vAcckbYI7vT5Lyjcf7HsVetl32I9UYw__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAIUCZBIA4LVPAVW3Q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Abbenante G., Fairlie D.P. Protease inhibitors in the clinic. [(accessed on 24 October 2017)];Med. Chem. 2005 1:71–104. doi: 10.2174/1573406053402569. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16789888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sigdel T.K., Lee S., Sarwal M.M. Profiling the proteome in renal transplantation. [(accessed on 24 October 2017)];Proteomics. Clin. Appl. 2011 5:269–280. doi: 10.1002/prca.201000117. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21520424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Späth M.R., Bartram M.P., Palacio-Escat N., Hoyer K.J.R., Debes C., Demir F., Schroeter C.B., Mandel A.M., Grundmann F., Ciarimboli G., et al. The proteome microenvironment determines the protective effect of preconditioning in cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury. Kidney Int. 2019;95:333–349. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.08.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Amer H., Fidler M.E., Myslak M., Morales P., Kremers W.K., Larson T.S., Stegall M.D., Cosio F.G. Proteinuria after kidney transplantation, relationship to allograft histology and survival. [(accessed on 26 November 2020)];Am. J. Transplant. 2007 7:2748–2756. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.02006.x. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17941956/ [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Coskun A., Baykal A.T., Kazan D., Akgoz M., Senal M.O., Berber I., Titiz I., Bilsel G., Kilercik H., Karaosmanoglu K., et al. Proteomic Analysis of Kidney Preservation Solutions Prior to Renal Transplantation. [(accessed on 25 April 2018)];PLoS ONE. 2016 11:e0168755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168755. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28036361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Devarajan P. Update on Mechanisms of Ischemic Acute Kidney Injury. [(accessed on 21 March 2018)];J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2006 17:1503–1520. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006010017. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16707563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Diepenhorst G.M.P., Van Gulik T.M., Hack C.E. Complement-mediated ischemia-reperfusion injury: Lessons learned from animal and clinical studies. Ann. Surg. 2009;249:889–899. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181a38f45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.McCaughan J.A., O’Rourke D.M., Courtney A.E. The complement cascade in kidney disease: From sideline to center stage. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2013;62:604–614. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.12.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Gasque P. Complement: A unique innate immune sensor for danger signals. Mol. Immunol. 2004;41:1089–1098. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2004.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Van Leeuwen L.L., Spraakman N.A., Brat A., Huang H., Thorne A.M., Bonham S., van Balkom B.W.M., Ploeg R.J., Kessler B.M., Leuvenink H.G.D. Proteomic analysis of machine perfusion solution from brain dead donor kidneys reveals that elevated complement, cytoskeleton and lipid metabolism proteins are associated with 1-year outcome. [(accessed on 9 September 2021)];Transpl. Int. 2021 34:1618–1629. doi: 10.1111/tri.13984. Available online: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/tri.13984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Stowell S.R., Winkler A.M., Maier C.L., Arthur C.M., Smith N.H., Girard-Pierce K.R., Cummings R.D., Zimring J.C., Hendrickson J.E. Initiation and Regulation of Complement during Hemolytic Transfusion Reactions. Clin. Dev. Immunol. 2012;2012:12. doi: 10.1155/2012/307093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Danobeitia J.S., Djamali A., Fernandez L.A. The role of complement in the pathogenesis of renal ischemia-reperfusion injury and fibrosis. Fibrogenes. Tissue Repair. 2014;7:16. doi: 10.1186/1755-1536-7-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Debigaré R., Price S.R. Proteolysis, the ubiquitin-proteasome system, and renal diseases. [(accessed on 29 October 2017)];Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 2003 285:F1–F8. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00244.2002. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12788783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Rajan V., Mitch W.E. Ubiquitin, proteasomes and proteolytic mechanisms activated by kidney disease. [(accessed on 7 May 2021)];BBA -Mol. Basis Dis. 2008 1782:795–799. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2008.07.007. Available online: http://nobelprize.org/chemistry/laureates/2004/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sorimachi H., Ishiura S., Suzuki K. Structure and physiological function of calpains. Biochem. J. 1997;328:721–732. doi: 10.1042/bj3280721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Saido T.C., Sorimachi H., Suzuki K. Calpain: New perspectives in molecular diversity and physiological-pathological involvement. [(accessed on 26 June 2020)];FASEB J. 1994 8:814–822. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.8.11.8070630. Available online: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1096/fasebj.8.11.8070630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ma H., Yang H.Q., Takano E., Lee W.J., Hatanaka M., Maki M. Requirement of different subdomains of calpastatin for calpain inhibition and for binding to calmodulin-like domains. [(accessed on 6 May 2018)];J. Biochem. 1993 113:591–599. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a124088. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8340353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Saido T.C., Kawashima S., Tani E., Yokota M. Up- and down-regulation of calpain inhibitor polypeptide, calpastatin, in postischemic hippocampus. [(accessed on 6 May 2018)];Neurosci. Lett. 1997 227:75–78. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(97)00309-1. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9180207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sorimachi Y., Harada K., Saido T.C., Ono T., Kawashima S.-I., Yoshida K.-I. Downregulation of Calpastatin in Rat Heart after Brief Ischemia and Reperfusion1. [(accessed on 6 May 2018)];J. Biochem. 1997 122:743–748. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a021818. Available online: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/biochemistry1922/122/4/122_4_743/_pdf. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Chatterjee P.K., Brown P.A.J., Cuzzocrea S., Zacharowski K., Stewart K.N., Mota-Filipe H., Mcdonald M.C., Thiemermann C. Calpain inhibitor-1 reduces renal ischemia/reperfusion injury in the rat. Kidney Int. 2001;59:2073–2083. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.00722.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Vaughan R.H., Kresse J.-C., Farmer L.K., Thézénas M.L., Kessler B.M., Lindeman J.H.N., Sharples E.J., Welsh G.I., Nørregaard R., Ploeg R.J., et al. Cytoskeletal protein degradation in brain death donor kidneys associates with adverse post-transplant outcomes. Am. J. Transplant. 2021 doi: 10.1111/ajt.16912. Published ahead of print. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Shi Y., Melnikov V.Y., Schrier R.W., Edelstein C.L. Downregulation of the calpain inhibitor protein calpastatin by caspases during renal ischemia-reperfusion. [(accessed on 9 June 2018)];Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 2000 279:F509–F517. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.2000.279.3.F509. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10966930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Arnold P., Otte A., Becker-Pauly C. Meprin metalloproteases: Molecular regulation and function in inflammation and fibrosis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta -Mol. Cell Res. 2017;1864:2096–2104. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2017.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kaushal G.P., Haun R.S., Herzog C., Shah S.V. Meprin A metalloproteinase and its role in acute kidney injury. Am. J. Physiol. -Ren. Physiol. 2013;304:F1150. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00014.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Mishra J., Dent C., Tarabishi R., Mitsnefes M.M., Ma Q., Kelly C., Ruff S.M., Zahedi K., Shao M., Bean J., et al. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) as a biomarker for acute renal injury after cardiac surgery. [(accessed on 4 March 2019)];Lancet. 2005 365:1231–1238. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)74811-X. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014067360574811X?via%3Dihub. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Parikh C.R., Hall I.E., Bhangoo R.S., Ficek J., Abt P.L., Thiessen-Philbrook H., Lin H., Bimali M., Murray P.T., Rao V., et al. Associations of Perfusate Biomarkers and Pump Parameters With Delayed Graft Function and Deceased Donor Kidney Allograft Function. Am. J. Transplant. Off. J. Am. Soc. Transplant. Am. Soc. Transpl. Surg. 2016;16:1526–1539. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Mishra J., Ma Q., Prada A., Mitsnefes M., Zahedi K., Yang J., Barasch J., Devarajan P. Identification of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as a novel early urinary biomarker for ischemic renal injury. [(accessed on 4 March 2019)];J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2003 14:2534–2543. doi: 10.1097/01.ASN.0000088027.54400.C6. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14514731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Saito H., Tanaka T., Tanaka S., Higashijima Y., Yamaguchi J., Sugahara M., Ito M., Uchida L., Hasegawa S., Wakashima T., et al. Persistent expression of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and M2 macrophage markers and chronic fibrosis after acute kidney injury. [(accessed on 4 March 2019)];Physiol. Rep. 2018 6:e13707. doi: 10.14814/phy2.13707. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29845768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Nakagawa S., Nishihara K., Miyata H., Shinke H., Tomita E., Kajiwara M., Matsubara T., Iehara N., Igarashi Y., Yamada H., et al. Molecular Markers of Tubulointerstitial Fibrosis and Tubular Cell Damage in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0136994. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Moser M.A.J., Arcand S., Lin H.-B., Wojnarowicz C., Sawicka J., Banerjee T., Luo Y., Beck G.R., Luke P.P., Sawicki G. Protection of the Transplant Kidney from Preservation Injury by Inhibition of Matrix Metalloproteinases. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0157508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Decaneto E., Suladze S., Rosin C., Havenith M., Lubitz W., Winter R. Pressure and Temperature Effects on the Activity and Structure of the Catalytic Domain of Human MT1-MMP. Biophys. J. 2015;109:2371–2381. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.10.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.van Leeuwen L.L., Leuvenink H.G.D., Olinga P., Ruigrok M.J.R. Shifting paradigms for suppressing fibrosis in kidney transplants: Supplementing perfusion solutions with antifibrotic drugs. Front. Med. 2021;8:2917. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.806774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Maassen H., Hendriks K.D.W., Venema L.H., Henning R.H., Hofker S.H., van Goor H., Leuvenink H.G.D., Coester A.M. Hydrogen sulphide-induced hypometabolism in human-sized porcine kidneys. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0225152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Pool M., Eertman T., Parraga J.S., ’t Hart N., van Rhijn M.R., Eijken M., Jespersen B., Reinders M., Hoogduijn M., Ploeg R., et al. Infusing mesenchymal stromal cells into porcine kidneys during normothermic machine perfusion: Intact MSCs can be traced and localised to Glomeruli. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:3607. doi: 10.3390/ijms20143607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Huijink T.M., Venema L.H., Posma R.A., de Vries N.J., Westerkamp A.C., Ottens P.J., Touw D.J., Nijsten M.W., Leuvenink H.G.D. Metformin Preconditioning and Postconditioning to Reduce Ischemia Reperfusion Injury in an Isolated Ex Vivo Rat and Porcine Kidney Normothermic Machine Perfusion Model. Clin. Transl. Sci. 2020;14:222–230. doi: 10.1111/cts.12846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Posma R.A., Venema L.H., Huijink T.M., Westerkamp A.C., Wessels A.M.A., de Vries N.J., Doesburg F., Roggeveld J., Ottens P.J., Touw D.J., et al. Increasing metformin concentrations and its excretion in both rat and porcine ex vivo normothermic kidney perfusion model. BMJ Open Diabetes Res. Care. 2020;8:e000816. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Hendriks K.D.W., Brüggenwirth I.M.A., Maassen H., Gerding A., Bakker B., Porte R.J., Henning R.H., Leuvenink H.G.D. Renal temperature reduction progressively favors mitochondrial ROS production over respiration in hypothermic kidney preservation. J. Transl. Med. 2019;17:265. doi: 10.1186/s12967-019-2013-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Venema L.H., van Leeuwen L.L., Posma R.A., van Goor H., Ploeg R.J., Hannaert P., Hauet T., Minor T., Leuvenink H.G.D. Impact of Red Blood Cells on Function and Metabolism of Porcine Deceased Donor Kidneys during Normothermic Machine Perfusion. [(accessed on 9 September 2021)];Transplantation. 2021 doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003940. Published ahead of print. Available online: https://journals.lww.com/transplantjournal/Fulltext/9000/Impact_of_Red_Blood_Cells_on_Function_and.95170.aspx. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Perez-Riverol Y., Csordas A., Bai J., Bernal-Llinares M., Hewapathirana S., Kundu D.J., Inuganti A., Griss J., Mayer G., Eisenacher M., et al. The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: Improving support for quantification data. [(accessed on 18 June 2021)];Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 47:D442–D450. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1106. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30395289/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Venema L.H., Brat A., Moers C., ’t Hart N.A., Ploeg R.J., Hannaert P., Minor T., Leuvenink A.H.G.D. Effects of Oxygen During Long-term Hypothermic Machine Perfusion in a Porcine Model of Kidney Donation After Circulatory Death. Transplantation. 2019;103:2057–2064. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org (accessed on: 30 November 2021)) via the PRIDE partner repository [76] with the dataset identifier PXD029599.


Articles from Current Issues in Molecular Biology are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES