Skip to main content
Medical Mycology logoLink to Medical Mycology
. 2022 Feb 21;60(4):myac016. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myac016

Effect of copper on the antifungal activity of disulfiram (Antabuse®) in fluconazole-resistant Candida strains

Claire N Shanholtzer 1, Cameron Rice 2, Katherine Watson 3, Hannah Carreon 4, Timothy E Long 5,6,
PMCID: PMC8929679  PMID: 35188195

Abstract

Disulfiram (Antabuse®) is an alcohol use disorder medication that exhibits antifungal activity against Candida species. The purpose of this investigation was to determine if copper potentiates the antifungal effects of disulfiram based on prior observations that the combination demonstrates increased antitumor activity. Our findings revealed that copper addition conferred up to an eight-fold reduction in the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of disulfiram by broth microdilution assessment. Unexpectedly, copper was also found to nullify the fungicidal activity of disulfiram despite the significant reduction in MICs. It was therefore concluded that copper likely increased the antifungal potency of disulfiram through formation of a fungistatic chelation complex.

Lay summary

The effect of copper on the antifungal activity of disulfiram was evaluated against fluconazole-resistant Candida species. The study establishes that copper addition confers greater inhibition of disulfiram-treated Candida cultures, but the combination antagonizes the killing effects of disulfiram.

Keywords: disulfiram, copper, Candida, antifungal, resistance

Introduction

Opportunistic yeasts from the Candida genus are the most frequent cause of systemic mycoses in hospitals. Risk factors for healthcare-associated candidiasis include intravascular or indwelling urinary catheter use, prolonged treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics, and immunocompromised status due to transplantation or cancer chemotherapy.1 Candidiasis often develops as an endogenous infection by C. albicans, which is considered susceptible to first-line fluconazole at MICs ≤ 2 μg mg−1.2 Fluconazole-resistance is primarily observed in other Candida species, including C. auris, C. glabrata, and intrinsically resistant C. krusei. A significant concern is the global emergence of multidrug-resistant C. auris strains that exhibit MICs above CLSI resistance breakpoints for drugs represented by the three main antifungal classes comprised of the azoles (e.g., fluconazole, FLU), echinocandins (e.g., caspofungin, CAS), and polyenes (i.e., amphotericin B, AMB).3 Accordingly, there is a need for additional mechanistic classes of safe antifungals with coverage against drug-resistant Candida species.

A strategy to accelerate development is to repurpose drugs that are deemed safe by regulatory agencies for human use. The daily maintenance medication disulfiram (Antabuse®) for alcohol use disorder4 is an example of an oral drug that has been assessed in clinical trials for alternative indications including cocaine dependence,5 small cell lung cancer,6 recurrent glioblastoma,7 and latent HIV infections.8 In cancer trials, disulfiram (DSF) with copper (Cu2+) salt supplements were evaluated due to the enhanced antitumor effects conferred through formation of a cytotoxic, dimeric complex between Cu2+ and the cleavage product, diethyldithiocarbamate (DDTC) (Fig. 1).9–11 These findings prompted us to determine if Cu2+ increases the antifungal activity of DSF against Candida species including FLU-resistant C. glabrata and C. auris.12,13

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Disulfiram forms a dimeric complex on treatment with copper.

Methods

Susceptibility testing

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined by the microdilution assay method according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) standards in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 2% glucose and buffered with 0.165 M morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS) to pH 7.0.2 Stocks of test compounds were prepared in DMSO (DSF, FLU, and AMB) or ultrapure water (DDTC, CAS) prior to testing. Overnight cultures of Candida isolates (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2) diluted to 103 cells/ml in RPMI were treated with two-fold dilutions of the test compounds in 96-well plates. Following incubation at 35°C in a water-jacketed incubator, the MICs were recorded as the lowest drug concentration that conferred apparent visual growth inhibition after 24 h. Minimum fungicidal concentrations (MFCs) were determined by applying 5 μl of treated inoculums on yeast extract peptone dextrose (YPD) agar to detect for microbial growth after 48-h incubation.

Growth studies

Overnight cultures diluted to 103 cells/ml in RPMI were used in the following growth studies. Experiments comparing growth by turbidity of 100 μl treated vs. untreated cultures were performed in flat-bottom 96 well plates at 35°C. Optical density (OD) readings were recorded at 530 nm on a Molecular Devices SpectraMax® 384 plate reader following 10 s agitation every 0.5 h. The 2-h interval absorbances were recorded and plotted using Prism 9.0.2 (GraphPad Software, Inc). Time-kill studies were performed on cultures treated with DSF + Cu2+ combinations in 1 ml of RPMI at 35°C with shaking (200 rpm). At time points 0, 8, and 24 h, colony counts were determined from 20 μl of serially diluted samples in saline and grown on YPD agar. The mean cfu/ml for each cohort following 48-h incubation at 35°C is reported.

Flow cytometry studies

An overnight culture of C. glabrata HM-1123 diluted to 106 cells/ml in either RPMI or RPMI with 10 μM CuSO4 was dispensed (984 μl) in 1.5 ml microfuge tubes containing 16 μl of either 0.5 μg ml−1 DSF or 1 μg ml−1 DDTC. Following incubation (35°C, 18 h, 200 rpm), the tubes were centrifuged (15 000 rpm, 2 min) and the supernatant carefully discarded. The cells were washed twice with PBS (500 μl), resuspended in 1 ml of PBS, and stained with 1 μl of 20 μM propidium iodide (PI) and 3.34 μM SYTO 9 for 0.5 h at 35°C in the dark.14 Cell viability was then assessed using Novocyte 2000R flow cytometer (ACEA Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA) equipped with a 488 nm excitation laser and 530/30 (green fluorescence) and 675/30 (red fluorescence) emission filters to detect for SYTO 9 and PI, respectively. Forward scatter (FSC) and side scatter (SSC) plot comparison of unstained cells with PBS was used to calibrate the acquisition gate and minimize background noise. For each sample, ca. 90 000 events were collected and plotted using NovoExpress 1.3.0 software.

Results

Susceptibility testing

Table 1 compares the effect of Cu2+ treatment on Candida susceptibility to DSF, DDTC and FLU. The MIC range of DSF was found to be 2 to 4 μg ml−1 (MIC50 4 μg ml−1) for the ten isolate panel that included FLU-resistant C. albicans (P60002), C. glabrata (AR0317), and C. auris (AR0390) strains. The data also showed that DDTC was a weaker inhibitor of Candida growth than DSF with a panel MIC range of 8 to > 16 μg ml−1 (MIC50 16 μg ml−1). Further comparisons with Cu2+ treated cultures revealed up to an 8-fold reduction in MICs for both agents, while no change was detected for FLU. The panel MIC ranges for DSF + Cu2+ and DDTC + Cu2+ treated cultures was 0.25 to 1 μg ml−1 (MIC50 0.5 μg ml−1) and 0.5 to 2 μg ml−1 (MIC50 1 μg ml−1), respectively.

Table 1.

Effect of 10 μM CuSO4 on the susceptibility of nine Candida species to DSF, DDTC, and FLU.

DSFa DDTCa FLUa
Species Strain -Cu2+ +Cu2+ -Cu2+ +Cu2+ -Cu2+ +Cu2+
C. albicans P34048 2 0.25 8 0.5 0.5 0.5
C. albicans P60002 4 0.5 8 0.5 >16 >16
C. auris AR0390 4 0.5 16 0.5 >16 >16
C. duobushaemulonii AR0391 2 0.25 16 1 8 8
C. glabrata AR0317 2 0.5 16 1 >16 >16
C. haemulonii AR0395 4 0.5 >16 1 4 4
C. kefyr AR0588 4 1 16 2 1 1
C. lusitaniae AR0398 4 0.5 16 2 1 1
C. pelliculosa AR0586 2 0.25 8 1 4 4
C. tropicalis HM-1124 4 0.25 >16 1 4 4
a

MICs (μg mL-1) of disulfiram (DSF), diethyldithiocarbamate (DDTC), and fluconazole (FLU).

A more comprehensive assessment of antifungal activity was performed with 30 clinical isolates of C. glabrata and C. auris. Table 2 shows that the addition of Cu2+ lowered the MIC90 of DSF from 4 to 1 μg ml−1 against a 20-member C. glabrata panel that included isolates with FKS mutations conferring echinocandin resistance (Supplementary Table 2). A comparable MIC90 value was observed with DDTC + Cu2+; however, the effect of Cu2+ more pronounced with DDTC. Similar MIC reductions were observed for C. auris with both agents exhibiting a MIC90 of 1 μg ml−1 in Cu2+ treated cultures.

Table 2.

Effect of 10 μM copper sulfate on the susceptibility of C. glabrata and C. auris to DSF and DDTC.

C. glabrata (n = 20) C. auris (n = 10)
treatmenta MIC50 MIC90 Range MIC50 MIC90 Range
DSF 2 4 2–8 4 8 2–8
DDTC 16 16 8–16 16 >16 16 – >16
DSF + Cu2+ 1 1 0.5–1 0.5 1 0.25–1
DDTC + Cu2+ 1 2 1–2 1 1 0.5–2
FLU 8 128 4–128 128 >256 4 – >256
AMB 0.25 0.5 <0.25–0.5 0.5 4 0.5–4
CAS 0.5 16 <0.25–16 0.5 1 <0.25–16
a

DSF: disulfiram; DDTC: diethyldithiocarbamate; FLU: fluconazole; AMB: amphotericin B; CAS: caspofungin.

Growth studies

The effect of Cu2+ on the antifungal activity of DSF and DDTC was further examined by growth curve analysis. Figure 2B shows that 0.25× MIC of DSF (left) and DDTC (right) alone delayed C. glabrata growth for up to 8 h when compared to untreated controls. The addition of 10 μM CuSO4 extended the growth inhibition to about 12 h in comparison. Despite these findings, the addition of Cu2+ to DSF and DDTC unexpectedly reduced fungicidal activity. Figure 2B depicts that 5 μM Cu2+ raised the MFC of DSF from 8 μg ml−1 to 16 μg ml−1 for C. glabrata HM-1123. The results further indicate an inverse correlation between the amount of Cu2+ additive and MFC value, suggesting that Cu2+ complexes with DSF and DDTC in situ to decelerate Candida growth in a fungistatic manner.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Effects of copper sulfate on DSF and DDTC growth inhibition of C. glabrata HM-1123. Comparison of altered (a) growth by turbidity measurement over time and (b) fungicidal activity following 24-h treatment.

These findings led us to compare the effect of DSF and DSF + Cu2+ treatments by time-kill kinetics (Table 3). Comprehensive assessment with C. glabrata HM-1123 again confirmed an MFC of 8 μg ml−1 for DSF (i.e., 2× MIC). Comparisons between the 24-h treatment cultures revealed that 10 μM Cu2+ impaired the fungicidal activity of DSF at 1× and 2× MIC, but not 4× MIC. Increased colony counts were also detected for Cu2+-treated cultures of C. albicans and C. auris.

Table 3.

Effect of disulfiram (DSF) and copper sulfate treatment on colony formation.

CFU/ml (mean)
Species Strain DSFμg ml−1 CuSO410 μM 0 h 8 h 24 h
C. glabrata HM-1123 0 2.0 × 103 6.0 × 105 1.5 × 109
0 + 3.0 × 103 5.0 × 105 1.4 × 109
4 4.0 × 103 3.0 × 103 1.2 × 103
4 + 5.0 × 103 1.2 × 103 5.0 × 103
8 3.0 × 103 2.2 × 103 0
8 + 3.0 × 103 2.0 × 103 1.0 × 103
16 4.5 × 103 1.7 × 103 0
16 + 4.5 × 103 1.2 × 103 0
C. auris AR0388 8 1.0 × 103 1.2 × 103 1.0 × 104
8 + 2.0 × 103 2.1 × 103 1.1 × 106
C. albicans AR0761 8 1.2 × 103 4.0 × 102 0
8 + 2.5 × 103 6.0 × 102 1.0 × 102

Flow cytometry studies

Flow cytometry was employed to further characterize the effect of Cu2+ on the fungicidal activity of DSF and DDTC. A two stain technique with propidium iodide (PI) and SYTO 9 was used to differentiate nonviable from viable cells on the basis of membrane integrity.14 Reference plots depicted in Figure 3 (top) show nonviable C. glabrata HM-1123 cells treated with a fungicidal detergent uptake both DNA intercalating dyes (right), while viable cells with intact membranes stained single positive for SYTO 9 only (left). Comparison between the plots of reference and DSF-treated cultures revealed that the addition of Cu2+ to DSF resulted in a significant reduction in the nonviable PI + yeast population (middle). A similar decrease of the PI + C. glabrata population was observed when Cu2+ was added to the DDTC treated culture (bottom).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Effect of copper sulfate on DSF (middle) and DDTC (bottom) on the viability of C. glabrata HM-1123 by flow cytometric analysis. Plots of untreated (null) and fungicidal detergent (DET) cultures were used as reference in the experiment.

Discussion

This investigation established that the addition of Cu2+ decreased the MICs of DSF against nine Candida species including FLU-resistant C. albicans, C. glabrata and C. auris. The data suggests that DSF + Cu2+ possesses synergistic potential and when the fractional inhibitory concentration indices (FICIs) are calculated for combinations up to 50 μM CuSO4, the ΣFICI values are below 0.5 as an indicator of synergy.15 Similar results were obtained for DDTC, the initial product of DSF metabolism generated from gastric acids and thiols (e.g., glutathione) in the body. Although up to an eight-fold increase in potency was observed by differential MIC analyses, the addition of Cu2+ significantly antagonized the killing-effects of both agents.

These collective findings suggest that the fungicidal action of DSF is partly due to thiol-mediated generation of DDTC as a cytotoxic chelator of cellular metals. It is also believed that DSF evokes perturbations in thiol-redox homeostasis by inducing ROS-dependent cellular death.16,17 When combined with Cu2+, it is plausible that generation of the hydrophobic Cu[DDTC]2 complex facilitates the cellular uptake and accumulation of copper resulting in fungistatic effects on growth.11 Future studies will therefore examine the influence of DSF and DSF + Cu2+ on the cellular redox state of C. albicans in an effort to define the fungicidal and fungistatic actions of the respective treatments.

Supplementary Material

myac016_Supplemental_File

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by funding from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health [grant number AI151970 to TEL]. Yeast strains (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2) were provided by the FDA-CDC Antimicrobial Resistance Isolate Bank and BEI Resources, NIAID, NIH.

Contributor Information

Claire N Shanholtzer, Department of Pharmaceutical Science and Research, School of Pharmacy, Marshall University, Huntington, WV 25755-2950, USA.

Cameron Rice, Department of Pharmaceutical Science and Research, School of Pharmacy, Marshall University, Huntington, WV 25755-2950, USA.

Katherine Watson, Department of Pharmaceutical Science and Research, School of Pharmacy, Marshall University, Huntington, WV 25755-2950, USA.

Hannah Carreon, Department of Pharmaceutical Science and Research, School of Pharmacy, Marshall University, Huntington, WV 25755-2950, USA.

Timothy E Long, Department of Pharmaceutical Science and Research, School of Pharmacy, Marshall University, Huntington, WV 25755-2950, USA; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Marshall University, Huntington, WV 25755-2950, USA.

Declaration of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the contents and writing of the paper.

References

  • 1. Pappas PG, Lionakis MS, Arendrup MC, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Kullberg BJ.. Invasive candidiasis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018; 4: 18026. HM-1123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. CLSI . Performance Standards for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts. 2nd ed. CLSI supplement M60. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Arendrup MC, Patterson TF. Multidrug-resistant candida: epidemiology, molecular mechanisms, and treatment. J Infect Dis. 2017; 216: S445–S451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Wright C, Moore RD. Disulfiram treatment of alcoholism. Am J Med. 1990; 88: 647–655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Schottenfeld RS, Chawarski MC, Cubells JF, George TP, Lappalainen J, Kosten TR. Randomized clinical trial of disulfiram for cocaine dependence or abuse during buprenorphine treatment. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014; 136: 36–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Nechushtan H, Hamamreh Y, Nidal Set al. A phase IIb trial assessing the addition of disulfiram to chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Oncologist. 2015; 20: 366–367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Huang J, Chaudhary R, Cohen ALet al. A multicenter phase II study of temozolomide plus disulfiram and copper for recurrent temozolomide-resistant glioblastoma. J Neurooncol. 2019; 142: 537–544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Lee SA, Elliott JH, Mcmahon Jet al. Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Disulfiram on Inducing Latent HIV-1 Transcription in a Phase IIb Trial. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019; 105: 692–702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Viola-Rhenals M, Patel KR, Jaimes-Santamaria L, Wu G, Liu J, Dou QP. Recent advances in antabuse (Disulfiram): the importance of its metal-binding ability to its anticancer activity. Curr Med Chem. 2018; 25: 506–524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Ekinci E, Rohondia S, Khan R, Dou QP. Repurposing disulfiram as an anti-cancer agent: updated review on literature and patents. Recent Pat Anticancer Drug Discov. 2019; 14: 113–132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Dalecki AG, Crawford CL, Wolschendorf F. Copper and Antibiotics: Discovery, Modes of Action, and Opportunities for Medicinal Applications. Adv Microb Physiol. 2017; 70: 193–260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Khan S, Singhal S, Mathur T, Upadhyay DJ, Rattan A. Antifungal potential of disulfiram. Nihon Ishinkin Gakkai Zasshi. 2007; 48: 109–113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Hao W, Qiao D, Han Yet al. Identification of disulfiram as a potential antifungal drug by screening small molecular libraries. J Infect Chemother. 2021; 27: 696–701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Gonçalves S, Silva PM, Felício MR, de Medeiros LN, Kurtenbach E, Santos NC. Psd1 effects on Candida albicans planktonic cells and biofilms. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017; 7: 249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Te Dorsthorst DTA, Verweij PE, Meletiadis Jet al. In vitro interaction of flucytosine combined with amphotericin B or fluconazole against thirty-five yeast isolates determined by both the fractional inhibitory concentration index and the response surface approach. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002; 46: 2982–2989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Lemar KM, Aon MA, Cortassa S, O'Rourke B, Müller CT, Lloyd D. Diallyl disulphide depletes glutathione in Candida albicans: oxidative stress-mediated cell death studied by two-photon microscopy. Yeast. 2007; 24: 695–706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Yousuf S, Ahmad A, Khan A, Manzoor N, Khan LA.. Effect of diallyldisulphide on an antioxidant enzyme system in Candida species. Can J Microbiol. 2010; 56: 816–821 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

myac016_Supplemental_File

Articles from Medical Mycology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES