Significance
In a polymicrobial battlefield where different species compete for nutrients and colonization niches, antimicrobial compounds are the sword and shield of commensal microbes in competition with invading pathogens and each other. The identification of an Escherichia coli–produced genotoxin, colibactin, and its specific targeted killing of enteric pathogens and commensals, including Vibrio cholerae and Bacteroides fragilis, sheds light on our understanding of intermicrobial interactions in the mammalian gut. Our findings elucidate the mechanisms through which genotoxins shape microbial communities and provide a platform for probing the larger role of enteric multibacterial interactions regarding infection and disease outcomes.
Keywords: colibactin, Vibrio cholerae, microbiome
Abstract
Members of complex microbial communities that reside in environments such as the mammalian gut have evolved mechanisms of interspecies competition, which may be directed at resident microbial and host cells. While previous work has focused mainly on metabolic or niche competition, few specific intermicrobial targeting mechanisms have been elucidated in the mammalian gut. Here, we show that a genotoxin produced by commensal Escherichia coli, colibactin, which was previously shown to induce DNA damage in host intestinal cells, is also able to target via a contact-dependent mechanism a variety of enteric pathogens and commensals, including the important human diarrheal pathogen Vibrio cholerae. We find that colibactin-mediated killing depends on accumulation of intracellular reactive oxygen species, leading to DNA damage and loss of target cell fitness. We also show that the presence of colibactin is associated with cholera outcomes in a large human metagenomic dataset and that colibactin can shape the microbiome by species-specific targeting of a common human gut-associated microbe Bacteroides fragilis, suggesting that genotoxin-mediated mechanisms may have broad effects in the complex polymicrobial interactions that shape commensal microbial communities and their effects on host health and disease.
The human gut hosts a complex gastrointestinal ecosystem, consisting of a diverse array of commensal microbial populations. One role of this ecosystem is safeguarding gut health by defending against invading pathogens (1). This protection, known as colonization resistance, has been long documented in rodents (2) and can be achieved via diverse mechanisms, including nutrient competition, niche occupation, immunomodulation, and production of antimicrobial toxins (3–6). Recent studies of gut microbiota illustrate that bacterial antagonism is pervasive and that, in addition to warding off pathogens, it also affects the overall structure, dynamics, and composition of host-associated microbial communities (3, 7).
Vibrio cholerae is an enteropathogen that infects the human small intestine and causes the severe acute diarrheal disease cholera by using cholera toxin and toxin-coregulated pilus as the primary factors for virulence and colonization, respectively (8). Over the years, several engineered or natural commensals directly targeting virulence factors or virulence signaling have been reported that enable colonization resistance toward or clearance of V. cholerae infection in animal models (6, 9–11). In other cases, commensals known to produce acidic metabolites also effectively protect hosts from V. cholerae infection (12–14). While the role of human-associated microbes has been characterized in some detail (5, 6), the level of colonization resistance is not as profound as that observed in mice. The high resistance of the mouse gut microbiota to V. cholerae infection (2) thus offers the possibility of identifying insights into mechanisms of microbiome-mediated colonization resistance.
In this study, we began by identifying enteric commensals in the mouse intestine with deleterious effects upon V. cholerae infection. Through screening more than 100 lactose-fermenting enteric bacterial isolates from both the small and large intestines of adult mice, we found a handful of strains that could potently inhibit V. cholerae growth. In-depth analysis of one isolate, a B2 phylogroup Escherichia coli harboring a polyketide synthase (pks) island, demonstrated that the genotoxin colibactin encoded by the pks island is essential for antagonizing V. cholerae in vitro and during mouse colonization. Produced by commensal and pathogenic enterobacteria, colibactin is a natural genotoxin that damages double-stranded DNA via DNA cross-linking (15, 16). It is closely linked to tumorigenic effects in colorectal cancer (17), but its effects on other microbes or the gut microbiota are largely unknown. Here, we determine the DNA-damaging effects of pks E. coli on V. cholerae and explore their ecological effects on the gut microbiota.
Results
Contact-Dependent Killing of Vibrio by an E. coli Isolate from the Mouse Intestines.
To investigate how commensal bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract affect V. cholerae growth, we spread the intestinal contents of 10 CD-1 mice on MacConkey agar plates and selected over 140 pink colonies representing lactose-fermenting enterobacteria, such as E. coli and Klebsiella. These colonies were grown in Luria–Bertani (LB) medium overnight and mixed with V. cholerae C6706 (referred as Vc hereafter) in 96-well plates containing M9 minimal medium. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h without shaking (mimicking the microaerobic condition that Vc may encounter during colonization of the small intestine), and the cultures were diluted and spotted on selective LB polymyxin B agar plates that only permit Vc growth. We identified nine isolates that significantly inhibited Vc growth (Fig. 1A). We then performed quantitative liquid assays and confirmed that these strains inhibited Vc growth, effectively reducing Vc populations from three to five orders of magnitude compared to Vc monoculture (Fig. 1B). Then, 16S rRNA sequencing indicated that all nine highly Vc-inhibiting strains were E. coli. As controls, coculture of either E. coli K12 strain MG1655 or MP1, a mouse commensal previously isolated from CD-1 fecal samples (18), had no effect on Vc growth (Fig. 1B). We selected F10, which was isolated from the small intestine, for further studies, as it was susceptible to P1 transduction with higher efficiency (SI Appendix, Fig. S1), which facilitated downstream genetic manipulation. We named this E. coli strain E. coli mouse small intestine isolate 1 (EMS1). Genome sequencing of EMS1 (19) revealed it to be a member of the phylogenetic group B2. Whole-genome alignment of EMS1 with other E. coli strains showed homology with human uropathogenic E. coli CFT073 and 536 as well as with the probiotic human fecal isolate Nissle 1917 (SI Appendix, Fig. S2A). Average nucleotide identity (ANI) analysis of EMS1 with representatives of phylogenetic groups A, B1, B2, D, E, and S showed clustering of EMS1 with B2 strains with >98% ANI (SI Appendix, Fig. S2B).
Fig. 1.
Anti-Vibrio activities exhibited by gut commensal E. coli. (A) Screening. Mouse-isolated E. coli strains were grown to saturation in 96-well plates and then inoculated into minimal medium containing V. cholerae. The cultures were incubated at standing 37 °C for 24 h, and viable V. cholerae was determined by plating a four-log dilution of the mixed culture on selective LB agar. (B) Confirmation of selected mouse E. coli isolates on V. cholerae growth. E. coli isolates identified by the screen and controls (MG1655 and MP1) were coincubated with V. cholerae at a 10:1 ratio in minimal medium and incubated at standing 37 °C for 24 h. V. cholerae CFU values were determined by serial dilution and plating on selective LB agar plates. The mean of three independent assays is shown. (C and D) EMS1 kills V. cholerae in a dose-dependent manner. V. cholerae alone or V. cholerae with different ratios of EMS1 was inoculated into M9 medium and incubated without shaking at 37 °C for 24 h. V. cholerae CFU values were then determined. The mean of three independent assays is shown, and error bars represent the SD. *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001 (one-way ANOVA). (E) Contact-dependent killing. EMS1 and V. cholerae were separately inoculated into 10-kDa–cutoff dialysis bags in minimal medium or coinoculated into the medium and incubated for 24 h before V. cholerae CFU determination. The survival rate was calculated by normalizing CFU of V. cholerae cocultured with EMS1 against that of V. cholerae cultured alone. The mean of four independent assays is shown; ***P < 0.001 (t test). (F) EMS1 inhibitory effects on various Vibrio strains. Overnight cultures (106 CFU/mL) of Vibrio strains were inoculated into M9 medium without and with 107 CFU/mL EMS1 and incubated for 24 h. CFU of Vibrio were then determined. The mean of three independent assays is shown, and error bars represent the SD.
EMS1 Kills V. cholerae In Vitro.
We then more closely examined the effects of EMS1 on Vc growth. Coculture of Vc and EMS1 at different ratios displayed an EMS1 dose-dependent inhibition of Vc growth (Fig. 1C). Importantly, in the presence of EMS1, Vc populations grew to mid-log phase before crashing (Fig. 1D), suggesting that EMS1 effectively kills Vc. Vc is sensitive to low pH, but the killing effect from EMS1 was not due to growth medium acidification, as the pH was similar between cultures with and without EMS1 cocultivation (SI Appendix, Fig. S3). When we separated Vc and EMS1 using dialysis membranes with a 10-kDa molecular weight cutoff, EMS1 no longer exhibited bactericidal effects toward Vc (Fig. 1E), suggesting that the killing effect is likely contact dependent. An alternative explanation is that the membrane may prevent the active compounds produced by EMS1 from reaching Vc.
V. cholerae has over 200 known serotypes, but only strains with O1 and O139 antigens are known to cause epidemic disease (20). The O1 serogroup is further divided into O1 Classical and El Tor biotypes on the basis of other physiological properties. We examined whether EMS1 affected the growth of different V. cholerae strains. We mixed EMS1 with various V. cholerae strains (SI Appendix, Table S1) and found that EMS1 exhibited a killing effect toward all V. cholerae strains tested (Fig. 1F). Moreover, EMS1 also inhibited the growth of other Vibrio species, such as V. fischeri, V. fluvialis, and V. harveyi. These data suggest that EMS1 has a broad spectrum of anti-Vibrio activity.
EMS1-Produced Colibactins Are Responsible for the Anti-Vibrio Activity.
To investigate the molecular mechanism responsible for EMS1 killing of Vc, we performed a genetic screen by transposon mutagenizing EMS1 and screening for mutants that lost the anti-Vibrio activity (Fig. 2A). From ∼3,000 Tn5 mutants, we obtained 3 candidates in which anti-Vibrio activity was abolished (Fig. 2B). Sequencing analysis showed that these mutants all had transposons inserted in different loci of the pks genomic island (Fig. 2C, triangles represent transposon insertion), encoding a putative hybrid nonribosomal peptide synthetase–polyketide synthase assembly line that is responsible for synthesis of colibactin (21). Alignment of the biosynthetic gene cluster (BGC) for colibactin shows that EMS1 harbors a colibactin BGC analogous to those of Nissle 1917, CFT073, and 536 (SI Appendix, Fig. S2A). To confirm the involvement of colibactin synthesis in EMS1’s anti-Vibrio activity, we constructed in-frame deletion mutants in clbN, encoding a synthase involved in the initiation of colibactin biosynthesis (22), and in clbL, encoding an amidase that is required for colibactin maturation (23). Deletions in either clbN or clbL in EMS1 completely abolished the vibriocidal effect (Fig. 2D). Complementation of clbN or clbL in trans restored the observed killing. These data suggest that the anti-Vibrio activity of EMS1 is contingent upon colibactin synthesis.
Fig. 2.
EMS1 produces colibactin that inhibits V. cholerae growth. (A) Screening scheme for EMS1 genes responsible for anti-Vibrio activity. (B) Effects of coculturing transposon mutants of EMS1 on V. cholerae growth. V. cholerae alone or V. cholerae with different EMS1 mutants were inoculated into M9 medium and incubated standing at 37 °C for 24 h. V. cholerae CFU were then determined. (C) BGC of colibactin. The EMS1 colibactin BGC was extracted and plotted using Easyfig (65). Commonly observed colibactin intermediates (or hydrolysis byproducts) (1 to 4) are drawn as products of clbN, clbB, clbC, and clbJ. Triangles represent transposon insertions from the screen performed in A. (D) The importance of EMS1 clb genes in killing V. cholerae. V. cholerae was cultured alone or cocultured with EMS1 clb mutants and their complements for 24 h; ****P < 0.0001 (one-way ANOVA). ns, no significance. (E) Colibactin metabolites from wild-type (WT), ΔclbN, and ΔclbL strains of EMS1. Culture extracts were analyzed by LC–MS for the presence of colibactin intermediates 1 to 4 (as shown in C), and extracted ion chromatograms and mass spectra (Insets) are shown. NRPS, nonribosomal peptide synthetase; AAM, genes involved in biosynthesis of 1-aminocyclopropanecarboxylic acid moiety; PPTase, 4′-phosphopantetheinyl transferase; MATE, multidrug and toxic compound extrusion transporter; Reg/res, genes involved in regulation and resistance; TE, thioesterase.
The colibactin BGC produces several intermediates that can be detected in crude cellular extracts of E. coli source strains. Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) analysis of a crude extract of EMS1 showed the presence of C14-d-Asn, an abundant diagnostic metabolite of the colibactin BGC (Fig. 2E). C14-d-Asn is both the hydrolysis product of an intermediate synthesized on ClbN as well as the ClbP-catalyzed cleavage product of precolibactin-1492 (24). Deletion of clbN abolishes production of C14-d-Asn, and deletion of the late-stage clbL gene retains production, as was previously observed using a plasmid-based colibactin BGC (25). We also observed several other characteristic colibactin BGC metabolites characterized previously (22, 26–28). It should be noted that proteins encoded in the colibactin BGC are involved in the biosynthesis of other metabolites that are potentially bioactive (29, 30). However, both clbN and clbL mutants were deficient for killing Vibrio, suggesting that EMS1 produces classical colibactin that directly antagonizes Vibrio. We could detect both left and right ends of pks genomic islands in the other eight E. coli isolates (Fig. 1) that inhibited Vc growth (SI Appendix, Fig. S4), implying that these strains likely utilize the same inhibitory mechanisms as that of EMS1.
EMS1-Produced Colibactin Inhibits V. cholerae Colonization of the Small Intestine.
Next, we used a streptomycin-treated adult mouse model to test whether EMS1 impacts Vc colonization in vivo. One day before Vc infection, we preinoculated mice with either a blank control or overnight cultures of either EMS1 or ΔclbN mutant. We examined Vc colonization of the small intestine 5 d postinfection. We found that compared to the blank inoculation, Vc colonization was reduced nearly 100-fold in the mice preinoculated with EMS1, whereas precolonization with ΔclbN mutants did not affect Vc colonization (Fig. 3A). However, this result was not due to differential colonization of EMS1 itself, since both the wild-type EMS1 and the ΔclbN mutant colonized equally well in the mouse small intestine (Fig. 3B). These data suggest that EMS1 inhibits Vc colonization in vivo and that the inhibition is dependent on the production of colibactin.
Fig. 3.
Colibactin affects V. cholerae colonization, and colibactin biosynthetic genes are negatively correlated to cholera symptoms in human populations. (A and B) Six-week-old CD-1 mice were treated with streptomycin and colonized without or with either EMS1 or ΔclbN E. coli. Wild-type V. cholerae was then inoculated after 1 d. After 5 d, small intestines were retrieved, and CFU values of colonized V. cholerae (A) and E. coli (Ec) (B) were enumerated. Horizontal lines represent the average number of colonized bacteria from 5 mice. *P < 0.05 (two-way ANOVA). ns, no significance. SI, small intestine. w/, with. (C) Log relative abundance values of pks genes in human shotgun fecal microbiomes of cholera patients (62) or their household contacts that remained uninfected or asymptomatically colonized are shown. Of all the samples, pks genes were not detected in 21 of 45 UNI, 10 of 24 ASYM, and 8 of 13 SYM individuals; edgeR: *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001.
The Presence of Colibactin in the Gut Microbiome Is Associated with Less Severe Outcomes of V. cholerae Exposure in Human Populations.
To examine whether genes involved in colibactin production are associated with divergent cholera outcomes in human populations, we performed an analysis of a shotgun metagenomic deep-sequencing study (Dataset S1) examining the fecal metagenome of a prospective human cholera exposure cohort. Household contacts were enrolled within 6 h of presentation of the index household cholera case and tracked for infection status. Individuals who developed diarrhea were categorized as exposed and symptomatic (“SYM”), and those without diarrhea but whose culture and/or serum tested positive were considered exposed and asymptomatic (“ASYM”). The rest were classified as uninfected (“UNI”). Our analysis of the published shotgun metagenomics sequencing of fecal specimens from these cohorts showed that the relative abundance of reads mapping to the clb biosynthetic cluster differed based on exposure outcome; clb reads were significantly lower in the fecal microbiomes of SYM contacts than in both ASYM and UNI (Fig. 3C). These results thus suggest that the presence of colibactin in the gut microbiome may be associated with different outcomes to V. cholerae exposure in humans.
Colibactin Produced by EMS1 Induces DNA Damage in Mammalian Cells and Waxworm Larvae.
A signature property of colibactin is the induction of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in mammalian cells (16). To confirm that EMS1 also produces colibactin with this feature, we first monitored the phosphorylation of histone H2AX (γH2AX), a sensitive marker of DSBs (21), in HeLa cells infected with EMS1 or ΔclbN mutants for 4 h. We found that EMS1, but not ΔclbN mutants, induced γH2AX foci (green) on mitotic chromosomes (stained by pH3-red) (31), suggesting that EMS1 produces colibactin that can induce DNA damage in mammalian cells in vitro (SI Appendix, Fig. S5A).
We used larvae of the wax moth Galleria mellonella as a model to examine whether EMS1 induces DNA damage in vivo. We injected 10 µL (104 colony-forming units [CFU]) of either EMS1 wild type or ΔclbN mutant into the larvae. Only 25% of larvae were alive at 48 h after infection for wild type, whereas more than 75% of larvae survived ΔclbN injection, indicative of colibactin-induced lethality in wax moth larvae (SI Appendix, Fig. S5B). We quantified plasma phenoloxidase (PO) activity, a proxy for immune response, in EMS1-infected insects. We found that PO levels in larvae infected with wild-type EMS1 were significantly higher than in ΔclbN-treated insects (SI Appendix, Fig. S5C). Similarly, the levels of antimicrobials in the hemolymph of larvae infected with EMS1 were higher than those found in ΔclbN-infected larvae (SI Appendix, Fig. S5D), suggesting that colibactin triggers the production of antimicrobial factors. To examine whether EMS1 infection induces DNA damage in larvae, we performed comet assays (32) to detect DNA lesions in larval hemolymph cells exposed to EMS1 or ΔclbN for 48 h. The comet tail moment increased in EMS1-infected cells compared with the phosphate-buffered saline and ΔclbN controls (SI Appendix, Fig. S5 E and F), indicating that colibactin produced by EMS1 induces DNA damage in vivo.
Colibactin Induces V. cholerae’s SOS Response and Reactive Oxygen Species Accumulation under Microaerobic Conditions.
Next, we investigated how EMS1-produced colibactin serves as an antibiotic against V. cholerae. We first examined whether oxygen levels affect colibactin function. Compared to microaerobic conditions, EMS1 grown under aerobic conditions was incapable of killing Vc (Fig. 4A). clbB is the first gene of the clb operon. We measured the expression of a clbB–lacZ transcriptional fusion and found that clbB was more highly expressed under oxygen-limiting conditions (Fig. 4B), consistent with the observation that more effective killing occurred under static microaerobic conditions, which V. cholerae encounters during infection.
Fig. 4.
Colibactin induces SOS response and ROS accumulation in V. cholerae. (A) O2 affects EMS1 inhibition of V. cholerae growth. V. cholerae alone or cocultured with EMS1 was grown aerobically or microaerobically in M9 medium for 24 h. Viable V. cholerae CFU values were then determined. The mean of three independent assays is shown, and error bars represent the SD; *P < 0.05 (t test). (B) clb expression. EMS1 harboring a chromosomal clbB–lacZ transcriptional fusion was grown aerobically and microaerobically. At the growth phase indicated, samples were withdrawn, and β-galactosidase activity was measured. The mean of three independent assays is shown, and error bars represent the SD; ****P < 0.0001 (one-way ANOVA). (C) Induction of SOS response. V. cholerae harboring chromosomal PrecA-gfp and Ptet-mCherry reporters was inoculated alone or with either EMS1 or ΔclbN mutants into M9 medium. The cultures were grown for 16 h, and then green fluorescent protein (GFP) and mCherry intensity of each V. cholerae cell was measured using a Nikon NiU fluorescence microscope. For each condition, 200 cells were analyzed; ****P < 0.0001 (two-way ANOVA). (D) ROS accumulation staining assay of V. cholerae when cocultured with EMS1 and colibactin-deficient clbN mutant. V. cholerae harboring a chromosomal Ptet-mCherry reporter was inoculated alone and with EMS1 or ΔclbN mutants in M9 medium. The cultures were grown for 24 h, and DCFDA staining was performed and visualized using the GFP filter and normalized against mCherry intensity. For each condition, 100 cells were analyzed; ****P < 0.0001 (two-way ANOVA).
Colibactin induces DSBs in eukaryotic cells (SI Appendix, Fig. S5 and ref. 16). We examined whether EMS1-produced colibactin might similarly induce DNA damage in V. cholerae cells. We constructed a chromosomal recA–gfp transcriptional fusion in Vc to monitor DNA damage. DNA-damaging agents such as fluoroquinolones activate the SOS response pathway, including recA (33); as expected, sublethal doses of ciprofloxacin strongly activated recA expression in Vc (SI Appendix, Fig. S6). Compared to Vc alone, cocultivation with EMS1, but not with ΔclbN, significantly induced recA–gfp expression in Vc cells (Fig. 4C). These results suggest that colibactin produced by EMS1 may cause DNA damage in Vc cells. We also measured intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation using the redox-sensitive, cell-permeable dye 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFDA). Compared to monocultured Vc, the presence of wild-type EMS1, but not of ΔclbN, resulted in significantly more accumulated ROS in Vc (Fig. 4D). Although it is disputed whether ROS production is a common effect of antibiotics that cause antimicrobial killing (34–36), we speculate that elevated ROS levels due to EMS1-produced colibactin are likely detrimental to Vc survival.
Colibactin-Dependent Growth Inhibition toward Other Bacterial Species.
To test whether EMS1 inhibits the growth of bacteria other than Vibrio in a clb-dependent manner, we cocultured either wild-type EMS1 or ΔclbN mutants with a panel of mostly pathogenic bacteria (Fig. 5A and SI Appendix, Table S2). We found that EMS1 did not affect the growth of other E. coli strains tested nor did it affect Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Enterococcus, or Streptococcus. However, EMS1 inhibited growth of one Enterobacter aerogenes strain and three Staphylococcus strains tested (Fig. 5A). It also mildly affected two Clostridium difficile strains. In one previous study (37), it has been shown that pks+ E. coli elicits antibiotic activity against a number of Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates, but the killing efficiency is relatively low (∼fourfold). Here, EMS1 inhibited S. aureus growth by one to three orders of magnitude. This could be due to the potency of colibactin production by EMS1 or differences in tested culturing conditions.
Fig. 5.
The effects of colibactin on the growth of different bacterial species. (A) Inhibitory effects of EMS1. Approximately 106 CFU/mL overnight cultures of bacteria tested were inoculated into M9 plus 1% LB with 107 CFU/mL of either EMS1 or ΔclbN and incubated at 37 °C microaerobically, except C. difficile, which was incubated in an anaerobic chamber. After 24 h, the CFU values of assayed strains were determined, and the survival rate was calculated by dividing CFU with EMS1 by CFU with ΔclbN. The mean of three independent assays is shown, with error bars representing SD. (B) Screening scheme for the E. coli EMS1-resistant factors. (C) The genomic structure of the recG region in MG1655. (D) E. coli RecG confers V. cholerae resistance to EMS1. V. cholerae with an E. coli expression library plasmid containing a recG fragment or Ptac-recG plasmid was grown with EMS1 in M9 for 24 h. CFU values of viable V. cholerae were determined. ns, no significance; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01 (one-way ANOVA). (E) Reduced ROS accumulation in recG-overexpressing V. cholerae via staining assay of V. cholerae when cocultured with EMS1 and colibactin-deficient clbN mutant. V. cholerae harboring chromosomal Ptet-mCherry reporter and containing either vector or plasmid-overexpressing recG were inoculated alone or with EMS1 into M9 medium. The cultures were grown for 24 h, and DCFDA staining was performed and visualized using the GFP filter and normalized against mCherry intensity. For each condition, 100 cells were analyzed; ****P < 0.0001 (two-way ANOVA).
To better understand why EMS1 can kill some bacteria but not others, we conducted a genomic library screen (Fig. 5B). We first constructed a plasmid-based genomic library of E. coli MG1655, which is resistant to EMS1 (Fig. 5A), and introduced the library into Vc. The resulting Vc transconjugants were screened for resistance to EMS1. From ∼5,000 clones, we identified 1 Vc isolate harboring a ∼6-kilobase MG1655 fragment (Fig. 5C) that increased Vc EMS1 survival rate by 100-fold over the vector control (Fig. 5D). Sequencing of the E. coli fragment revealed it to contain the recG gene, encoding a DNA helicase in E. coli that plays a role in DNA DSB repair. Overexpressing this E. coli recG in Vc effectively prevented EMS1 killing (Fig. 5D) and reduced EMS1-mediated ROS accumulation (Fig. 5E). These results reinforce the idea that the mechanism of colibactin killing of Vc is through induction of DNA damage and that the bacteria resistant to EMS1 killing may have more efficient endogenous DNA repair machineries with faster induction in response to damaging stimuli. In addition, many other factors that control bacterial SOS response may also contribute to differential sensitivity toward colibactin.
Colibactin Expression and Specific Microbial Targeting Is Associated with Altered Microbiota Composition in Humans and Mice.
In cholera-endemic areas, human gut microbiomes recurrently enter a dysbiotic state characterized by low microbial diversity after disruption by cholera and noncholeric diarrhea, malnutrition, and other regular environmental insults (6, 38). This has been demonstrated to be a driver of disease susceptibility through the loss of key biochemical functions, such as microbial quorum sensing and bile acid metabolism (5). Colibactin-specific effects on the gut microbiome under specific conditions have been previously reported in mice. A prior study inoculated pregnant mice with colibactin-producing or colibactin-knockout E. coli and evaluated the response of the gut microbiome of the resulting pups (39). Using this mother-to-pup transmission mouse model, they observed colibactin-dependent phylum-level changes and a reduction in overall abundance 35 d after birth. While this is a measure of the effect of colibactin-producing microbes on microbial succession, or the ordered colonization of microbes after birth, the microbes found within immature animals and humans can differ dramatically from those of adults (40, 41). The long time horizons of these studies, coinciding with early life development and dietary transition after weaning, may also obscure specific colibactin-dependent changes in the gut microbial community. To probe commensal–colibactin interactions that are diet and host development independent that may be relevant in human populations, we colonized streptomycin-treated mice with either EMS1 or ΔclbN mutant. One day before E. coli was inoculated, streptomycin was removed from the drinking water, and the fecal gut microbial community was monitored by 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing (42) (Dataset S2). We found that both EMS1 and ΔclbN mutants colonized the colon similarly (SI Appendix, Fig. S7), suggesting that colibactin is not required for EMS1 colonization in this model. In contrast to Tronnet et al. (39), we identified rapid and strong community-level differences and species-level microbial taxa in the fecal microbiome of these animals that varied strongly as a function of the presence of EMS1 versus the isogenic ΔclbN strain. Using principal coordinates analysis of weighted UniFrac distances between fecal microbiomes, we demonstrated that fecal microbial communities diverged strongly and significantly between mice colonized with EMS1 and ΔclbN 5 d postcolonization (Fig. 6A). At the species level, our data show a dramatic depletion of Bacteroides fragilis and Enterococcus species in mice and the simultaneous enrichment of Aerococcus sp., Clostridium paraputrificum, Actinomycetales sp., and Coprococcus sp. (Fig. 6B and SI Appendix, Fig. S8).
Fig. 6.
Colibactin drives changes in the gut microbiome in mice and humans and specifically kills B. fragilis. (A) PCoA of mouse microbial communities from fecal samples based on weighted UniFrac distance. Ellipses show 95% confidence intervals. Statistical tests by permutational multivariate ANOVA indicate significantly different microbiome structures between the ΔclbN mutant and EMS1; ΔclbN, n = 4; EMS1, n = 5. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01. ns, no significance. (B) Relative abundance of B. fragilis in EMS1- and ΔclbN-treated animals day 5 after inoculation. Mann–Whitney U test; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01. (C) Extrapolated B. fragilis relative abundances by MetaPhlAn3 analysis in presymptomatic fecal samples of humans exposed to V. cholerae by presence of colibactin biosynthetic genes; **P < 0.01 edgeR. (D) Colibactin effects on B. fragilis growth in vitro. Approximately 106 CFU/mL overnight cultures of B. fragilis tested were inoculated into M9 plus 1% BHI (Brain Heart Infusion) with 107 CFU/mL of EMS1, ΔclbN, or ΔclbL and incubated at 37 °C anaerobically. After 24 h, CFU values of assayed strains were determined, and the survival rate was calculated by dividing CFU with E. coli by CFU without E. coli. The mean of three independent assays is shown, with error bars representing SDs; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.0005; ****P < 0.0001 (one-way ANOVA). (E) Effects of coinoculation of EMS1 and ΔclbN in suckling mice. Levels of B. fragilis in small intestine determined by plating after 16 h of colonization. Mann–Whitney U test; *P < 0.05. (F) Colibactin does not kill related Bacteroides commensals. Commensal Bacteroides strains were incubated with EMS1, ΔclbN, or ΔclbL at 37 °C anaerobically. After 24 h, CFU values of assayed strains were determined, and the survival rate was calculated by dividing CFU with E. coli by CFU with Bacteroides grown alone. The mean of three independent assays is shown, with error bars representing SD. (G) Distribution of the species in genera exhibiting highest colibactin-dependent changes in mice from household contacts of confirmed cholera patients in Bangladesh. Species with relative abundance >1% in at least one sample across the whole dataset (Dataset S3) are shown; edgeR: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Since several recent studies have demonstrated that the structure of the human gut microbiome can be a driver of V. cholerae infection outcomes, we next aimed to describe commensal gut microbiome changes associated with microbial colibactin production. We used MetaPhlAn3 analysis, which predicts the taxonomic composition of microbiomes from the human prospective cholera cohort metagenomic data to examine taxa that exhibited differential relative abundance between clb+ and clb− individuals in either SYM, ASYM, or UNI groups (SI Appendix, Fig. S8). In general, we observed more similar microbial abundance patterns within the ASYM and SYM groups than in the UNI population, which exhibited higher intragroup variation. Several species belonging to the genera Corynebacterium and Prevotella were more likely to coexist with the colibactin-producing strains in SYM microbiomes, but intragenus variation was observed, with Corynebacterium afermentans and Prevotella disiens exhibiting lower relative abundance in the presence in clb+ individuals. Treponema berlinense, Campylobacter jejuni, and Trueperella bernardiae abundance was higher in the clb+ subpopulation of the UNI group, while Bifidobacterium bifidum, Tissierellia bacterium KA00581, and Mycoplasma hominis were reduced. Species belonging to Enterococcus displayed decreased abundance in clb+-infected contacts except Enterococcus cecorum in ASYM individuals. Among species in the genus Bacteroides, Bacteroides caccae and Bacteroides plebeius were higher. Strikingly, levels of B. fragilis were lower in clb+ ASYM individuals, similar to in vitro and in vivo killing results in microcosms with EMS1 or clb− mutants (Fig. 6C).
We confirmed that colibactin-producing E. coli are able to target B. fragilis by repeating our in vitro assays with B. fragilis and either EMS1 or ΔclbN and showed strong colibactin-driven killing of B. fragilis by EMS1 (Fig. 6D). To confirm that this interaction occurs in vivo, we cointroduced B. fragilis and either EMS1 or ΔclbN into suckling mice that had their native microflora cleared with streptomycin treatment before gavage; the presence of functional colibactin biosynthesis again corresponded to significantly reduced B. fragilis colonization (Fig. 6E). Interestingly, this effect is species specific, as in vitro assays demonstrated no colibactin-dependent killing of other Bacteroides species, such as Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron and Bacteroides vulgatus (Fig. 6F). Taken together with in vitro survival assays (Fig. 5A), these findings again suggest that colibactin antibacterial effects may be highly species or strain specific outside of Vibrio. In complex fecal communities, colibactin-driven differences in individual species abundance may also be indirectly mediated via targeting of members of microbial syntrophic relationships or overall changes in gut environmental conditions.
Further comparisons of murine and human microbiome datasets revealed additional similarities in pattern. We examined clb+ and clb− humans by exposure outcome class for the abundance of species belonging to the genera Bacteroides, Clostridium, Enterococcus, and Coprococcus and order Actinomycetales, which showed the strongest colibactin-dependent differences in vivo in colonized mice (Fig. 6G and SI Appendix, Fig. S9). In accordance with the mouse gut microbiome findings, B. fragilis was significantly reduced in the clb+ individuals in both ASYM and SYM groups. Species specificity in association with clb status was again observed, with clb+ individuals showing higher relative abundance of B. plebeius and B. caccae in the ASYM group and Bacteroides coagulans in SYM individuals. Actinomycetales, T. bernardiae, and Actinomyces turicensis were enriched in SYM/UNI and ASYM individuals separately. Enterococcus hirae was observed at a lower abundance in the ASYM clb+ population, while E. cecorum exhibited the opposite trend. Taken together these data demonstrate that in vitro and in vivo in humans and mice, colibactin production is associated with strong effects on gut commensal bacteria, providing direct evidence that this commensal-derived genotoxin plays a role in shaping the enteric microbiome and in modulating the infectiousness of pathogenic bacteria.
Discussion
The host gut microbiota has a significant impact on the susceptibility of hosts to infection by enteropathogens, including V. cholerae (43, 44). Gut commensals are known to produce antagonistic metabolites against V. cholerae infections. Here, we identified a pks+ B2 family commensal E. coli, EMS1, from the adult mouse intestine that can antagonize V. cholerae growth in vitro and gut colonization in vivo. The anti-Vibrio activity of EMS1 depends on the production of the genotoxin colibactin. We demonstrated that EMS1 colibactin damages bacterial DNA and reshapes the host gut microbiota, thus exemplifying the multifaceted role of a commensal-produced genotoxin in contributing to the dynamics of the host gut microbiome.
Anti-Vibrio Commensals and Their Mechanisms of Action.
Commensal microbiotas protect hosts from V. cholerae colonization and infection (2, 45). Studies of individual gut microbes have revealed a number of possible mechanisms contributing to colonization resistance against V. cholerae. Lactobacillus species from cholera patient fecal samples (13) or from the stool of healthy children (46) were reported to produce diffusible compounds inhibitory against V. cholerae or its in vitro biofilm formation and dispersal. Oral feeding of infant mice with Lactococcus lactis reduced V. cholerae growth and colonization in vivo, depending on the production of lactic acid (9). A commensal E. coli from a healthy human gut or probiotic E. coli Nissle 1917 can metabolize glucose to lower pH to kill V. cholerae in vitro (47) or reduce V. cholerae colonization in a zebrafish model (12). V. cholerae is sensitive to acidic pH (pH < 5), and lowering local environmental pH by gut microbes provides an effective mechanism to prevent V. cholerae infection. The mouse commensal EMS1 potently inhibited V. cholerae growth in vitro (Fig. 1) and conferred colonization resistance in vivo (Fig. 3), and it is likely to use a different antagonistic mechanism because coculture did not lower pH compared to Vc monoculture (SI Appendix, Fig. S3).
Gut commensals can also secrete small molecules to interfere with the virulence signaling of V. cholerae. Blautia obeum, a human gut commensal, provided major colonization resistance to V. cholerae via production of autoinducer-2 (AI-2) (6). AI-2 is a cell density–dependent signal molecule that mediates bacterial cell–cell communication; B. obeum AI-2 led to repression of several factors critical for V. cholerae colonization. You et al. (14) reported that a mouse commensal B. vulgatus suppresses V. cholerae infection in mice by competing for compounds that enhance V. cholerae proliferation and promoting the accumulation of compounds inhibitory toward V. cholerae growth, including short-chain fatty acids. Here, we found that EMS1-mediated antagonism relies on a pks genomic island frequently found in E. coli belonging to the B2 phylogroup and encoding the genotoxin colibactin. pks+ E. coli have been linked to human colorectal cancer, as the secondary metabolite colibactin, functioning as a genotoxin, cross-links DNA, transforms gut epithelial cells, and contributes to tumorigenesis (15, 16). The discovery of bactericidal activity of pks+ E. coli suggested that this family of bacteria may protect the host from pathogen infections as well as affect the composition of gut microbiota more generally.
pks+ E. coli and Colibactin.
EMS1 was isolated from the small intestine of an adult mouse, a niche where V. cholerae colonization takes place. EMS1 shares extensive genomic synteny with pks+ B2 E. coli, including uropathogenic E. coli CFT073 and the probiotic E. coli Nissle 1917 (SI Appendix, Fig. S2), both of which are pks+ B2 E. coli. These pks+ E. coli strains all produce colibactin and are frequently found in colon cancer patients and, to a lesser extent, in healthy individuals. EMS1 colibactin potently killed Vibrio spp. and moderately inhibited other pathogens, including E. aerogenes and a subgroup of Staphylococcus spp. These findings expand upon a recent report that found that colibactin exhibited modest antibiotic activity to S. aureus (37) and also suggest that colibactin is able to act like a bacteriocin against diverse microbial targets in the gut. In V. cholera, colibactin killing is cell contact dependent (Fig. 1E and ref. 21), and this may result from the highly unstable nature of colibactin or contact requirements for colibactin secretion or delivery. Production of colibactin in other pks+ E. coli is affected by a number of genetic and environmental cues (15), including iron and carbon sources. We found that EMS1 clbB gene expression and colibactin killing was activated when EMS1 was grown in low-nutrient medium with glucose microaerobically (Fig. 4), but no killing effect was detected in rich LB medium or aerobically (shaking). Such differences again may reflect the unstable and contact-dependent nature of colibactin. Colibactin cross-links interstrand DNA and induces DNA DSBs due to a unique structure that has two electrophilic cyclopropane warheads at both ends (48, 49). EMS1 colibactin caused DNA damage responses in HeLa cells and in hemolymph cells of wax moth (SI Appendix, Fig. S5), as expected due to its known role in damaging eukaryotic DNA. EMS1 colibactin also damaged V. cholerae DNA, activated the SOS response, and induced intracellular ROS accumulation (Fig. 4), suggesting that a possible mechanism of colibactin-mediated bacterial killing is through DSB-caused cell death. Interestingly, many bacteria, including E. coli, are resistant to colibactin killing due to production of a cyclopropane hydrolase ClbS that directly inactivates colibactin (50, 51). The discovery that ectopic expression of recG, an E. coli DNA helicase gene that repairs DNA DSBs (52), can suppress ROS accumulation and protect Vc from killing by colibactin (Fig. 5) further supports a role for colibactin in inducing DSBs to kill bacteria. We speculate that bacteria possessing either clbS or a robust DNA repair system may be more resistant to pks+ E. coli antagonism.
Colibactin and the Gut Microbiota.
In addition to an inhibitory effect toward both V. cholerae and other gut-associated bacteria in vitro, EMS1 directly inhibited V. cholerae colonization and affected gut microbiome composition by driving lower levels of B. fragilis in an adult mouse model, which was confirmed in direct in vitro killing assays. These data provide direct evidence that E. coli–derived colibactin plays a role in shaping the enteric microbiome, thereby potentially modulating the metabolic functions of the gut commensal communities and thus interactions with invading pathogens. An analysis of the metagenomic data of household contacts of cholera patients showed a relatively lower abundance of pks islands in infected SYM contacts as opposed to those infected ASYM or UNI household contacts, suggesting that the effects of colibactin may be associated with cholera outcomes in human populations. Using antibiotic-treated adult mice, we identified potential species that respond to colibactin, observing depletion especially of B. fragilis and Enterococcus sp. but enrichment of Aerococcus sp., C. paraputrificum, Actinomycetales sp., and Coprococcus sp. These findings were mirrored in the human gut microbiome data, where we found that B. fragilis and E. hirae were decreased in communities containing the clb cluster, results that were confirmed with B. fragilis using in vitro colibactin-dependent killing assays. B. fragilis is a common enteric commensal that is able to modulate the maturation of the immune system (53), although toxigenic strains are responsible for anaerobic infections in several body sites (54) and for infectious diarrhea in Bangladesh (55, 56). An association of B. fragilis with colibactin-producing E. coli in interspecies biofilms exists in colorectal cancer patients (57), with an interaction between colibactin+ E. coli and toxigenic B. fragilis leading to modulation of tumorigenesis in susceptible animals. However, previous work has not identified a role for colibactin-driven killing of either toxigenic or commensal B. fragilis; no significant changes in the levels of B. fragilis and pks+ E. coli were noted upon cocolonization. Other genotoxins have also been associated with microbiome changes in mice, including the cytolethal distending toxin (CDT) from C. jejuni (58). C. jejuni was enriched in communities containing clb in UNI individuals. While specific microbial CDT targeting is not described, these findings highlight the possibility of specific interactions between microbial genotoxins in modifying complex gut communities. In contrast to prior studies, we demonstrated the growth-inhibiting effects on V. cholerae of colibactin derived from a native mouse isolate, expanding the functional range of colibactin to include antibacterial functions in addition to activity against eukaryotes.
Serving as a disruptive and competitive factor, colibactin can affect the species composition and thus the biochemical environment of host environments encountered by pathogenic bacteria. Colibactin-dependent effects on commensal and pathogenic bacteria may work via different mechanisms, whether by direct contact- or proximity-dependent killing for V. cholerae or indirectly through modulation of the fitness or metabolic activities of commensals that produce necessary metabolites for other members of the community. Bactericidal function may also be modulated by other environmental factors besides proximity; in studies of colorectal cancer tissues (57), an association with pks+ E. coli and enterotoxigenic B. fragilis was noted, although no colonization differences as a function of cocolonization were observed. Our findings also highlight the strain specificity of commensal–pathogen interactions and the limits of 16S amplicon sequencing approaches in identifying these. Previous studies showed that the presence of some murine commensal E. coli was able to promote virulence (59); highly strain-specific associations of E. coli with infection outcomes are likely in human populations, especially given that phylotype B2 group E. coli are variably distributed in humans (60) and that the observed intragenus variance in the ability of colibactin to kill both pathogenic and commensal gut-associated bacteria. The regulation of colibactin production by nutrient condition further complicates our understanding of how this factor integrates into interspecies dynamics in complex microbiomes; rapid changes in the nutritional environment of the gut can be driven by host diet and commensal microbial metabolism. Further experimentation will be required to elucidate the complex potential interactions between specific commensal genotoxin targets and their subsequent effects on gut microbiome structure.
Materials and Methods
Strains, Plasmids, and Culture Conditions.
V. cholerae El Tor C6706 was used as the primary wild-type strain in this study. The E. coli strain EMS1 was isolated from the small intestine of a CD-1 adult mouse. Both V. cholerae and E. coli were propagated in LB Miller medium with appropriate antibiotics at 30 °C and 37 °C, respectively, unless otherwise noted. All other bacterial strains used in this study are described in SI Appendix, Tables S1 and S2. The detailed description of constructs of deletion strains and transcriptional reporters is provided in the SI Appendix, Supplemental Methods and Materials.
V. cholerae Inhibitory Assays by EMS1.
Unless otherwise indicated, 105 CFU/mL V. cholerae from overnight cultures was inoculated alone or with 106 CFU/mL EMS1 or EMS1-derived mutants into M9-glucose medium (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, was added to buffer pH). The cultures were incubated at 37 °C microaerobically (no shaking) for 24 h. Viable V. cholerae cells were determined by serial dilution and plating on selective LB plates (usually containing streptomycin [100 µg/mL] and polymyxin B [6 µg/mL]).
Screens of EMS1 Mutants that Lost Anti-Vibrio Activity.
Approximately 3,000 Tn5 insertional mutants of EMS1 were inoculated into 96-well plates containing M9 medium with C6706 (pBAD-lux) and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. LB medium containing 0.1% arabinose (to induce PBAD-lux) and streptomycin (to inhibit EMS1 growth) was added, and the plates were incubated at 37 °C with shaking for 2 h. Luminescence was then measured. Transposon mutants that were unable to inhibit V. cholerae growth, as identified by high luminescence wells, were then purified, and transposon insertion was determined using arbitrary PCR (61) and sequencing.
Identification of Colibactin-Resistant Factors.
The E. coli MG1655 genomic library plasmids were introduced into V. cholerae by conjugal transfer. The V. cholerae library was then incubated with EMS1 (pMal-c2x) in M9 medium microaerobically for 24 h at 37 °C. The recovered V. cholerae cells were incubated with EMS1 for another round of selection. The resistant V. cholerae isolates were purified, and the plasmid was extracted for sequencing analysis.
Human Metagenomic Data Analysis.
The Bangladesh human metagenomic data were obtained from Levade et al. (62), accession number PRJNA608678. The results from a total of 82 individuals, for individuals that had multi–time point samples, were summed up. To test the presence of clb, the human metagenomic reads were aligned to the clb cluster (clbA-S) using blastn, with the E value cutoff of 0.00001. MetaPhlAn3 (63) was then used to profile the composition of the gut microbial community of each individual at day 2. To obtain species that might respond to colibactin, edgeR (64) was used to calculate the fold change and significance of intergroup differences. Species reaching a maximum relative abundance of at least 1% in at least one sample were retained for further analysis.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Drs. Anna Cobian Guemes, Frederick Bushman, Zane Liu, and Jessie Larios Valencia for helpful discussions and technical support. We would also like to thank Dr. Joseph Zackular for providing many strains used in the study. This study is supported by NIH Grants AI137283, AI120489 (J.Z.), AI157106 (J.Z., A.H.), GM124724 (A.H.), and GM080279 (M.G.).
Footnotes
The authors declare no competing interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
Data Availability
The complete genome sequence of E. coli EMS1 is deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GenBank (accession no. CP072942). The 16S sequence data have been deposited in NCBI under BioProject number PRJNA768438. All other study data are included in the article and/or supporting information.
References
- 1.Sekirov I., Russell S. L., Antunes L. C., Finlay B. B., Gut microbiota in health and disease. Physiol. Rev. 90, 859–904 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Freter R., Experimental enteric Shigella and Vibrio infections in mice and guinea pigs. J. Exp. Med. 104, 411–418 (1956). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.García-Bayona L., Comstock L. E., Bacterial antagonism in host-associated microbial communities. Science 361, eaat2456 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lawley T. D., Walker A. W., Intestinal colonization resistance. Immunology 138, 1–11 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Alavi S., et al. , Interpersonal gut microbiome variation drives susceptibility and resistance to cholera infection. Cell 181, 1533–1546 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hsiao A., et al. , Members of the human gut microbiota involved in recovery from Vibrio cholerae infection. Nature 515, 423–426 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Peterson S. B., Bertolli S. K., Mougous J. D., The central role of interbacterial antagonism in bacterial life. Curr. Biol. 30, R1203–R1214 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zhu J., et al. , Quorum-sensing regulators control virulence gene expression in Vibrio cholerae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 3129–3134 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mao N., Cubillos-Ruiz A., Cameron D. E., Collins J. J., Probiotic strains detect and suppress cholera in mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 10, eaao2586 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Duan F., March J. C., Engineered bacterial communication prevents Vibrio cholerae virulence in an infant mouse model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 11260–11264 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Focareta A., Paton J. C., Morona R., Cook J., Paton A. W., A recombinant probiotic for treatment and prevention of cholera. Gastroenterology 130, 1688–1695 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nag D., Breen P., Raychaudhuri S., Withey J. H., Glucose metabolism by Escherichia coli inhibits Vibrio cholerae intestinal colonization of zebrafish. Infect. Immun. 86, e00486-18 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Silva S. H., Vieira E. C., Dias R. S., Nicoli J. R., Antagonism against Vibrio cholerae by diffusible substances produced by bacterial components of the human faecal microbiota. J. Med. Microbiol. 50, 161–164 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.You J. S., et al. , Commensal-derived metabolites govern Vibrio cholerae pathogenesis in host intestine. Microbiome 7, 132 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dougherty M. W., Jobin C., Shining a light on colibactin biology. Toxins (Basel) 13, 346 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Faïs T., Delmas J., Barnich N., Bonnet R., Dalmasso G., Colibactin: More than a new bacterial toxin. Toxins (Basel) 10, E151 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wassenaar T. M., E. coli and colorectal cancer: A complex relationship that deserves a critical mindset. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 44, 619–632 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lasaro M., et al. , Escherichia coli isolate for studying colonization of the mouse intestine and its application to two-component signaling knockouts. J. Bacteriol. 196, 1723–1732 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.J. Zhu et al., Data from: Escherichia coli strain EMS1 chromosome. National Center for Biotechnology Information. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/CP072942. Deposited 26 August 2021. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Reidl J., Klose K. E., Vibrio cholerae and cholera: Out of the water and into the host. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 26, 125–139 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nougayrède J. P., et al. , Escherichia coli induces DNA double-strand breaks in eukaryotic cells. Science 313, 848–851 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Brotherton C. A., Balskus E. P., A prodrug resistance mechanism is involved in colibactin biosynthesis and cytotoxicity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 3359–3362 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jiang Y., et al. , Reactivity of an unusual amidase may explain colibactin’s DNA cross-linking activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 11489–11496 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Xue M., et al. , Structure elucidation of colibactin and its DNA cross-links. Science 365, eaax2685 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bian X., et al. , In vivo evidence for a prodrug activation mechanism during colibactin maturation. ChemBioChem 14, 1194–1197 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bian X., Plaza A., Zhang Y., Müller R., Two more pieces of the colibactin genotoxin puzzle from Escherichia coli show incorporation of an unusual 1-aminocyclopropanecarboxylic acid moiety. Chem. Sci. (Camb.) 6, 3154–3160 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Vizcaino M. I., Engel P., Trautman E., Crawford J. M., Comparative metabolomics and structural characterizations illuminate colibactin pathway-dependent small molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 9244–9247 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Li Z. R., et al. , Critical intermediates reveal new biosynthetic events in the enigmatic colibactin pathway. ChemBioChem 16, 1715–1719 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pérez-Berezo T., et al. , Identification of an analgesic lipopeptide produced by the probiotic Escherichia coli strain Nissle 1917. Nat. Commun. 8, 1314 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kim C. S., Turocy T., Moon G., Shine E. E., Crawford J. M., Escherichia coli-derived γ-lactams and structurally related metabolites are produced at the intersection of colibactin and fatty acid biosynthesis. Org. Lett. 23, 6895–6899 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cuevas-Ramos G., et al. , Escherichia coli induces DNA damage in vivo and triggers genomic instability in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 11537–11542 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lammert C. R., et al. , AIM2 inflammasome surveillance of DNA damage shapes neurodevelopment. Nature 580, 647–652 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Drlica K., Zhao X., DNA gyrase, topoisomerase IV, and the 4-quinolones. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 61, 377–392 (1997). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kohanski M. A., Dwyer D. J., Hayete B., Lawrence C. A., Collins J. J., A common mechanism of cellular death induced by bactericidal antibiotics. Cell 130, 797–810 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Liu Y., Imlay J. A., Cell death from antibiotics without the involvement of reactive oxygen species. Science 339, 1210–1213 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Keren I., Wu Y., Inocencio J., Mulcahy L. R., Lewis K., Killing by bactericidal antibiotics does not depend on reactive oxygen species. Science 339, 1213–1216 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Faïs T., et al. , Antibiotic activity of Escherichia coli against multiresistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 60, 6986–6988 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.David L. A., et al. , Gut microbial succession follows acute secretory diarrhea in humans. mBio 6, e00381-15 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Tronnet S., et al. , The genotoxin colibactin shapes gut microbiota in mice. mSphere 5, e00589-20 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Koenig J. E., et al. , Succession of microbial consortia in the developing infant gut microbiome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 4578–4585 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wang J., et al. , Core gut bacteria analysis of healthy mice. Front. Microbiol. 10, 887 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.A. Hsiao et al., Data from: Colibactin modulating gut microbiome. National Center for Biotechnology Information. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/?term=PRJNA768438. Deposited 4 October 2021. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Cho J. Y., Liu R., Macbeth J. C., Hsiao A., The interface of Vibrio cholerae and the gut microbiome. Gut Microbes 13, 1937015 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Qin Z., Yang X., Chen G., Park C., Liu Z., Crosstalks between gut microbiota and Vibrio cholerae. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 10, 582554 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Freter R., The fatal enteric cholera infection in the guinea pig, achieved by inhibition of normal enteric flora. J. Infect. Dis. 97, 57–65 (1955). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kaur S., Sharma P., Kalia N., Singh J., Kaur S., Anti-biofilm properties of the fecal probiotic Lactobacilli against Vibrio spp. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 8, 120 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sengupta C., et al. , Cross feeding of glucose metabolism byproducts of Escherichia coli human gut isolates and probiotic strains affect survival of Vibrio cholerae. Gut Pathog. 9, 3 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bossuet-Greif N., et al. , The colibactin genotoxin generates DNA interstrand cross-links in infected cells. mBio 9, e02393-17 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Vizcaino M. I., Crawford J. M., The colibactin warhead crosslinks DNA. Nat. Chem. 7, 411–417 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Tripathi P., et al. , ClbS is a cyclopropane hydrolase that confers colibactin resistance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 17719–17722 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Bossuet-Greif N., et al. , Escherichia coli ClbS is a colibactin resistance protein. Mol. Microbiol. 99, 897–908 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Azeroglu B., et al. , RecG directs DNA synthesis during double-strand break repair. PLoS Genet. 12, e1005799 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Troy E. B., Kasper D. L., Beneficial effects of Bacteroides fragilis polysaccharides on the immune system. Front. Biosci. 15, 25–34 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Wexler H. M., Bacteroides: The good, the bad, and the nitty-gritty. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 20, 593–621 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Pathela P., et al. , Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis-associated diarrhea in children 0-2 years of age in rural Bangladesh. J. Infect. Dis. 191, 1245–1252 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Sears C. L., et al. , Association of enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis infection with inflammatory diarrhea. Clin. Infect. Dis. 47, 797–803 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Dejea C. M., et al. , Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis harbor colonic biofilms containing tumorigenic bacteria. Science 359, 592–597 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.He Z., et al. , Campylobacter jejuni promotes colorectal tumorigenesis through the action of cytolethal distending toxin. Gut 68, 289–300 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Zhao W., Caro F., Robins W., Mekalanos J. J., Antagonism toward the intestinal microbiota and its effect on Vibrio cholerae virulence. Science 359, 210–213 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Martinson J. N. V., Walk S. T., Escherichia coli residency in the gut of healthy human adults. Ecosal Plus 9, 10.1128/ecosalplus.ESP-0003-2020 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Judson N., Mekalanos J. J., Transposon-based approaches to identify essential bacterial genes. Trends Microbiol. 8, 521–526 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Levade I., et al. , Predicting Vibrio cholerae infection and disease severity using metagenomics in a prospective cohort study. J. Infect. Dis. 223, 342–351 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Beghini F., et al. , Integrating taxonomic, functional, and strain-level profiling of diverse microbial communities with bioBakery 3. eLife 10, e65088 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Robinson M. D., McCarthy D. J., Smyth G. K., edgeR: A Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Sullivan M. J., Petty N. K., Beatson S. A., Easyfig: A genome comparison visualizer. Bioinformatics 27, 1009–1010 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The complete genome sequence of E. coli EMS1 is deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GenBank (accession no. CP072942). The 16S sequence data have been deposited in NCBI under BioProject number PRJNA768438. All other study data are included in the article and/or supporting information.






