Skip to main content
JCO Oncology Practice logoLink to JCO Oncology Practice
editorial
. 2021 Sep 23;18(3):169–172. doi: 10.1200/OP.21.00525

Incorporating Reproductive Health in the Clinical Management of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer

Andreana N Holowatyj 1,2,, Cathy Eng 1,2, Mark A Lewis 3
PMCID: PMC8932489  PMID: 34554830

The potential for long-term side effects of overtreatment on gonadal function and sexual health because of therapies designed for patients older than 50 years presents a clinical environment mismatch for young patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). This is of increasing importance as CRC incidence rates among adults age 18-49 years (early-onset CRC) have steadily increased over the past few decades with causes unexplained1-3 and the number of young CRC survivors has also risen—nearly 60,000 adults are living in the United States with a previous early-onset CRC diagnosis.4 Yet despite this alarming disease burden and demography, there remains a paucity of data to understand the effects of CRC therapies on reproductive health, including fertility and sexual health, within this population. Consequently, the distinct reproductive health needs that face patients after an early-onset CRC diagnosis as they attempt to maintain or return to normative lifestyles and to improve survivorship are poorly understood and are crucial to address to incorporate oncofertility and sexual health in the clinical management of early-onset CRC.

Reproductive Health as an Unmet Need Among Early-Onset CRC Survivors

The early-onset cancer experience is unique. In particular, the clinical management of early-onset cancers is comparatively more demanding than that for cancers diagnosed among individuals age 50 years and older. Among young patients, there is a greater need to treat the whole patient for whom multiple life domains (eg, sexual health and fertility)5 are significantly affected by the cancer diagnosis.6 Yet when asked about their experience of being diagnosed with cancer, lesser than two thirds of adolescent and young adult patients are informed that cancer treatment could pose an infertility risk.7 McKay et al also recently illustrated the extent of unmet reproductive health care needs among 43 adolescent and young adult cancer patients, having observed that only 29% and 40% of patients had electronic health record–documented discussions about sexual health and fertility, respectively, with their provider.8 Moreover, this care need is essential from early-onset cancer diagnosis and treatment to surveillance and survivorship as well as long-term outcomes for all patients. Although the traditional upper age bound for young adult cancer in the United States is 39 years, it is imperative to also include individuals between ages 40 and 49 years when evaluating reproductive health among patients with cancer given the current shift toward later motherhood and rising age of paternity.9 Along with increasing family size, motherhood rates have nearly tripled in the past two decades among never-married women in their forties—across all racial and ethnic groups. Similarly, the birth rate for fathers age 30-49 years has increased 15% (30-34 years) to 52% (45-49 years).10 The biologic potential for reproduction also continues for most of men's lives, as about 9% of fathers are older than 40 years and nearly 40,000 newborns have a father older than 50 years annually.11

Gonadotoxicity and sexual dysfunction are well-documented for patients with cancer across other tumor types (eg, lymphoma, breast, and germ cell).12-20 However, the population of patients with early-onset CRC differs as rates of sexual dysfunction are higher in CRC (across all age groups, including early-onset CRC) compared with all cancer survivors.21 This is because of altering physiology as a result of CRC-specific therapies—pelvic radiation, abdominoperineal resection, mesorectal surgery, and cytotoxic chemotherapies.22,23 As a result of these CRC-specific treatment regimens, young patients with CRC may encounter unique survivorship challenges that can detrimentally affect fertility and/or sexual health. For example, patients with CRC may have an intestinal stoma after surgery24 and/or may experience unique complications (eg, intra-abdominal sepsis)23 that can lead to reproductive health complications. A qualitative analysis has identified impact on quality of life—including physical side effects (eg, sexual dysfunction)—as the highest area of concern resulting from an early-onset CRC diagnosis.25 Results from the Colorectal Cancer Alliance cross-sectional survey26 also tell us that two thirds of patients with early-onset CRC currently suffer from some level of sexual dysfunction because of CRC treatment. Nearly half (48%) of all respondents reported that sexual dysfunction put a strain on their relationships and one third of individuals felt they are not a complete person because of sexual dysfunction, including that stemming from anatomic reconfiguration.

This initial evidence illuminates the importance of addressing fertility preservation and offering counseling for sexual health, including function and satisfaction, to patients with CRC age 18-49 years. Concurrently, it also sheds light on our limited knowledge of the unparalleled challenges (eg, severity and type of sexual dysfunction) that patients face after an early-onset CRC diagnosis—which stands as a substantial roadblock in tailoring support strategies to this population. Coupled with the projection that 11% of colon cancers and 23% of rectal cancers in the United States will occur among adults younger than 50 years by 2030,2 it will be imperative to differentiate this population of young patients with CRC from other malignancies to comprehensively evaluate the potential physiologic impact of CRC-specific therapies on gonadal function and sexual health.

Current CRC Treatment Modalities May Cause Gonadotoxicity Among Patients of Reproductive Age

The gonads are susceptible to deleterious effects of CRC therapy among both men and women. Compared with older age patients with CRC who have similar clinicopathologic tumor features, patients of reproductive age receive more adjuvant chemotherapy27,28—which carries potential gonadotoxicity and other detrimental effects on fertility and sexual health.29-31 Chemotherapy can result in primordial cell death in the ovary, leading to premature ovarian failure and high infertility risk.30,32 This risk is especially high among women who receive chemotherapy later in reproductive years as this treatment accelerates natural age-related decline in follicle reserve.31 Retrospective pharmacy record review and questionnaires from 49 women with CRC who received adjuvant infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) therapy observed that 41% of women had infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin-induced amenorrhea—including one quarter of women age 41-50 years.33 In men, fluorouracil may also cause a temporary reduction in male fertility.34

Abdominal and/or pelvic radiation therapy can also cause damage to the ovaries and/or testicles,35,36 often leading to premature menopause and/or infertility.37-39 Although shielding the gonads or adjusting the radiation field is possible to avoid direct irradiation to the gonads, in cases with pelvic involvement (eg, rectal cancers), pelvic radiation is unavoidable.5,40 In men, the testes receive 3%-17% of the administered dose given for rectal cancer.36,41,42 As a result, testicular exposure to radiation and testicular function in men with primary rectal cancer of all ages may cause impaired physical, psychologic, and sexual function after CRC treatment.43 The limitations of these bodies of work are that the assessment of hormonal markers was conducted in small cohorts (fewer than 30 men) with median age more than 60 years. In women, pelvic radiation—as used in rectal cancer—exposes the ovaries to high doses of radiation.44,45 This exposure is one of the highest risks for acute ovarian failure and premature menopause.5,45,46 Thus, to fully understand the effects of CRC treatment on gonadal function among patients of reproductive age, a careful and longitudinal assessment of hormonal markers paired with reproductive health–related data is essential specifically within the early-onset CRC patient population to yield significant advances in delivering support strategies that improve survivorship for this patient population.

Path Forward

Despite the number of adults within their childbearing years diagnosed with, treated for, and surviving CRC, reproductive health care needs stand unmet among early-onset CRC survivors and their families. As of 2020, only 15 states (30%) have laws requiring private insurance coverage for infertility or in vitro fertilization procedures.47 Twelve states (24%) have mandated some form of insurance coverage for infertility treatments—yet this coverage sharply varies from only reproductive health counseling and education to infertility assessment and laboratory tests or, rarely, fertility-preservation procedures. Furthermore, no federal legislature exists that addresses universal insurance coverage for these costly fertility-preservation procedures specific to patients with CRC facing potential iatrogenic infertility. In the absence of universal coverage of infertility treatment, and in light of the profound financial impact of a cancer diagnosis among young patients,25 epidemiologic studies designed to primarily and comprehensively investigate fertility and sexual health specifically among patients with early-onset CRC are essential. Prospective cohort studies will allow us to address this gap by elucidating the impact of CRC therapies on psychosocial and physiologic dimensions of fertility and sexual health among individuals of reproductive age along the cancer continuum.48 Together, such studies harbor immense potential to (1) deliver timely evidence that insurance coverage of fertility preservation for young patients with CRC is necessary, (2) drive significant advances toward concordant, comprehensive reproductive health care assessment and delivery of personalized resources and support (eg, physical, mental and social) strategies, and (3) improve long-term clinical outcomes for this growing population after cancer diagnosis.

Cathy Eng

Consulting or Advisory Role: GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead/Forty Seven, Mirati Therapeutics, Bayer Health, Pfizer, Hookipa Biotech

Mark A. Lewis

Employment: Medscape

Consulting or Advisory Role: Boehringer Ingelheim, Shire, Exelixis, QED Therapeutics, HalioDx, Natera, Ipsen

Other Relationship: Medscape

No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

The companions to this editorial were published in the June 2021 issue JCO Oncology Practice. See accompanying articles on pages 355 and 362

SUPPORT

A.N.H. was supported by the National Institutes of Health K12 HD043483 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. This work was also supported by the American Cancer Society (grant no. IRG-19-139-59) to A.N.H.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conception and design: Andreana N. Holowatyj

Administrative support: Andreana N. Holowatyj, Cathy Eng

Provision of study materials or patients: Andreana N. Holowatyj

Collection and assembly of data: Andreana N. Holowatyj

Data analysis and interpretation: All authors

Manuscript writing: All authors

Final approval of manuscript: All authors

Accountable for all aspects of the work: All authors

AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Incorporating Reproductive Health in the Clinical Management of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer

The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated unless otherwise noted. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or ascopubs.org/op/authors/author-center.

Open Payments is a public database containing information reported by companies about payments made to US-licensed physicians (Open Payments).

Cathy Eng

Consulting or Advisory Role: GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead/Forty Seven, Mirati Therapeutics, Bayer Health, Pfizer, Hookipa Biotech

Mark A. Lewis

Employment: Medscape

Consulting or Advisory Role: Boehringer Ingelheim, Shire, Exelixis, QED Therapeutics, HalioDx, Natera, Ipsen

Other Relationship: Medscape

No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Siegel RL, Fedewa SA, Anderson WF, et al. : Colorectal cancer incidence patterns in the United States, 1974-2013. J Natl Cancer Inst 109:djw322, 2017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bailey CE, Hu CY, You YN, et al. : Increasing disparities in the age-related incidences of colon and rectal cancers in the United States, 1975-2010. JAMA Surg 150:17-22, 2015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Meyer JE, Narang T, Schnoll-Sussman FH, et al. : Increasing incidence of rectal cancer in patients aged younger than 40 years: An analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. Cancer 116:4354-4359, 2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Miller KD, Nogueira L, Mariotto AB, et al. : Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin 69:363-385, 2019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kort JD, Eisenberg ML, Millheiser LS, et al. : Fertility issues in cancer survivorship. CA Cancer J Clin 64:118-134, 2014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.You YN, Lee LD, Deschner BW, et al. : Colorectal cancer in the adolescent and young adult population. JCO Oncol Pract 16:19-27, 2020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jacobsen RL, Macpherson CF, Pflugeisen BM, et al. : Care experience, by site of care, for adolescents and young adults with cancer. JCO Oncol Pract 17:e817-e826, 2021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.McKay GE, Zakas AL, Osman F, et al. : Disparities between provider assessment and documentation of care needs in the care of adolescent and young adult patients with sarcoma. JCO Oncol Pract 17:e891-e900, 2021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pew Research Center : They're Waiting Longer, but U.S. Women Today More Likely to Have Children Than a Decade Ago, 2018. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2018/01/18/theyre-waiting-longer-but-u-s-women-today-more-likely-to-have-children-than-a-decade-ago/ [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Eisenberg ML, Meldrum D: Effects of age on fertility and sexual function. Fertil Steril 107:301-304, 2017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Khandwala YS, Zhang CA, Lu Y, et al. : The age of fathers in the USA is rising: An analysis of 168 867 480 births from 1972 to 2015. Hum Reprod 32:2110-2116, 2017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hickey M, Peate M, Saunders CM, et al. : Breast cancer in young women and its impact on reproductive function. Hum Reprod Update 15:323-339, 2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Berjeb KK, Debbabi L, Braham M, et al. : Evaluation of ovarian reserve before and after chemotherapy. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 50:102035, 2020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dezellus A, Barriere P, Campone M, et al. : Prospective evaluation of serum anti-Müllerian hormone dynamics in 250 women of reproductive age treated with chemotherapy for breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 79:72-80, 2017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lambertini M, Demeestere I, Viglietti G, et al. : Oncofertility counselling in premenopausal women with HER2-positive breast cancer. Oncotarget 10:926-929, 2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Silva C, Ribeiro Rama AC, Reis Soares S, et al. : Adverse reproductive health outcomes in a cohort of young women with breast cancer exposed to systemic treatments. J Ovarian Res 12:102, 2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Eghbali H, Papaxanthos-Roche A: The impact of lymphoma and treatment on male fertility. Expert Rev Hematol 3:775-788, 2010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sieniawski M, Reineke T, Nogova L, et al. : Fertility in male patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma treated with BEACOPP: A report of the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG). Blood 111:71-76, 2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Amin MSA, Brunckhorst O, Scott C, et al. : ABVD and BEACOPP regimens' effects on fertility in young males with Hodgkin lymphoma. Clin Transl Oncol 23:1067-1077, 2021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chovanec M, Vasilkova L, Petrikova L, et al. : Long-term sexual functioning in germ-cell tumor survivors. BMC Cancer 20:779, 2020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Averyt JC, Nishimoto PW: Addressing sexual dysfunction in colorectal cancer survivorship care. J Gastrointest Oncol 5:388-394, 2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nishizawa Y, Ito M, Saito N, et al. : Male sexual dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 26:1541-1548, 2011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tekkis PP, Cornish JA, Remzi FH, et al. : Measuring sexual and urinary outcomes in women after rectal cancer excision. Dis Colon Rectum 52:46-54, 2009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ramirez M, McMullen C, Grant M, et al. : Figuring out sex in a reconfigured body: Experiences of female colorectal cancer survivors with ostomies. Women Health 49:608-624, 2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Blum-Barnett E, Madrid S, Burnett-Hartman A, et al. : Financial burden and quality of life among early-onset colorectal cancer survivors: A qualitative analysis. Health Expect 22:1050-1057, 2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yarden R, Newcomer KL, Peterson D, et al. : A population-based study of young-onset colorectal cancer patients: Effect of knowledge gaps among patients and providers on stage at diagnosis and quality of life. J Clin Oncol 38, 2020. (suppl; abstr 4095) [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Quah HM, Joseph R, Schrag D, et al. : Young age influences treatment but not outcome of colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14:2759-2765, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bailey CE, Tran Cao HS, Hu CY, et al. : Functional deficits and symptoms of long-term survivors of colorectal cancer treated by multimodality therapy differ by age at diagnosis. J Gastrointest Surg 19:180-188, 2015; discussion 188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Letourneau JM, Ebbel EE, Katz PP, et al. : Acute ovarian failure underestimates age-specific reproductive impairment for young women undergoing chemotherapy for cancer. Cancer 118:1933-1939, 2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Smith KL, Gracia C, Sokalska A, et al. : Advances in fertility preservation for young women with cancer. Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed Book 38:27-37, 2018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bedoschi G, Navarro PA, Oktay K: Chemotherapy-induced damage to ovary: Mechanisms and clinical impact. Future Oncol 12:2333-2344, 2016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wan J, Gai Y, Li G, et al. : Incidence of chemotherapy- and chemoradiotherapy-induced amenorrhea in premenopausal women with stage II/III colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 14:31-34, 2015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cercek A, Siegel CL, Capanu M, et al. : Incidence of chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea in premenopausal women treated with adjuvant FOLFOX for colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 12:163-167, 2013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Levi M, Shalgi R, Brenner B, et al. : The impact of oxaliplatin on the gonads: From bedside to the bench. Mol Hum Reprod 21:885-893, 2015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wo JY, Viswanathan AN: Impact of radiotherapy on fertility, pregnancy, and neonatal outcomes in female cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 73:1304-1312, 2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bruheim K, Svartberg J, Carlsen E, et al. : Radiotherapy for rectal cancer is associated with reduced serum testosterone and increased FSH and LH. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 70:722-727, 2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bath LE, Wallace WH, Shaw MP, et al. : Depletion of ovarian reserve in young women after treatment for cancer in childhood: Detection by anti-Mullerian hormone, inhibin B and ovarian ultrasound. Hum Reprod 18:2368-2374, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wallace WH, Thomson AB, Kelsey TW: The radiosensitivity of the human oocyte. Hum Reprod 18:117-121, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Critchley HO, Wallace WH, Shalet SM, et al. : Abdominal irradiation in childhood; the potential for pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 99:392-394, 1992 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gareer W, Gad Z, Gareer H: Needle oophoropexy: A new simple technique for ovarian transposition prior to pelvic irradiation. Surg Endosc 25:2241-2246, 2011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hermann RM, Henkel K, Christiansen H, et al. : Testicular dose and hormonal changes after radiotherapy of rectal cancer. Radiother Oncol 75:83-88, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Dueland S, Guren MG, Olsen DR, et al. : Radiation therapy induced changes in male sex hormone levels in rectal cancer patients. Radiother Oncol 68:249-253, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Buchli C, Martling A, Arver S, et al. : Testicular function after radiotherapy for rectal cancer—A review. J Sex Med 8:3220-3226, 2011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Spanos CP, Mamopoulos A, Tsapas A, et al. : Female fertility and colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:735, 2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Maltaris T, Seufert R, Fischl F, et al. : The effect of cancer treatment on female fertility and strategies for preserving fertility. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 130:148-155, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Nies M, Cantineau AEP, Arts E, et al. : Long-term effects of radioiodine treatment on female fertility in survivors of childhood differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid 30:1169-1176, 2020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kaiser Family Foundation : Mandated Coverage of Infertility Treatment, 2020. https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/state-indicator/infertility-coverage/ [Google Scholar]
  • 48.The Preserving Fertility After Colorectal Cancer (PREFACE) Study , 2021. https://www.theprefacestudy.org [Google Scholar]

Articles from JCO Oncology Practice are provided here courtesy of American Society of Clinical Oncology

RESOURCES