Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2022 Feb 16;14(2):e22283. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22283

A Novel Technique Debulking Vegetations in Tricuspid Endocarditis and Venacava Utilizing AngioVac Aspiration System

Nitish Mittal 1, Rohan Mittal 1, Mikal C Ramon 1, Zhaunn Sly 1, Mohammad M Ansari 1,
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC8933142  PMID: 35350488

Abstract

The AngioVac system (AngioDynamics Inc., Latham, NY) is used for the removal of commonly encountered intravascular material, such as thrombus or vegetations in the right atrium, right ventricle, superior vena cava, and inferior vena cava. Patients with high surgical risk having tricuspid endocarditis and superior vena cava thrombus can be treated with the AngioVac system, hence mitigating the risks for this patient population. We present a case series with the utilization of the AngioVac device to reduce the vegetation size and decrease the risk of emboli with effective antibiotic penetration. Transesophageal echocardiography shows a reduction in the size of the vegetations in all three cases with no postoperative complications. This case series demonstrates a novel technique debulking vegetations in tricuspid endocarditis and vena cava.

Keywords: endocarditis, superior vena cava, tricuspid valve, vegetations, angiovac

Introduction

The AngioVac system (AngioDynamics Inc., Latham, NY) consists of two entities: the AngioVac Cannula and AngioVac Circuit. This new directed suction catheter device is employed to perform percutaneous thrombo-embolectomy with decreased mortality rate [1]. It is composed of a cannula and extracorporeal circuit with a filter for pump-assisted removal of intravascular debris [2]. The system also features a self-expanding nitinol funnel-shaped tip that enhances drainage flow and prevents clogging of the cannula [3]. Direct imaging with echocardiography is utilized for successful catheter deployment to target thromboembolism while simultaneously avoiding iatrogenic injury [4].

Right-sided native valve infective endocarditis (IE) involves the tricuspid and pulmonic valves; right-side IE accounts for approximately 10% of all the IE cases [5]. Some common risk factors include injection drug use, infected pacemaker leads of a cardiac implantable electronic device, presence of intravascular devices, such as central line or intra-aortic balloon pump, and underlying right-sided cardiac anomaly [6]. Staphylococcus aureus is the most common microbe accounting for 70% of the infections, followed by Streptococci, Enterococcus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [7]. In all IE cases, surgical consultation is warranted, especially with large vegetations and recurrent infections. However, patients are considered at high risk for surgery in some instances due to severe valve disease. That is what transforms this case series into an informative application of the AngioVac device in the setting of contraindication for the surgical approach.

Case presentation

Case one

An African American man, aged 56, initially presented to the hospital due to fluid coming out of the pacemaker site, fever, chills, and diarrhea. He had a previously diagnosed history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, and recurrent implantable cardio-defibrillator infections. On initial workup, the blood culture grew P. aeruginosa. Subsequently, the lead extraction procedure was performed that revealed vegetations on the atrial and the ventricular aspect of the tricuspid valve with the help of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) (Figure 1).

Figure 1. TEE showing the vegetations on tricuspid valve: 3 × 1.5 cm and 1.5 × 1.2 cm.

Figure 1

TEE: transesophageal echocardiography

A decision was taken to approach with a minimally invasive approach for removal of the vegetations with AngioVac assistance, due to comorbidities making him a high-risk surgical case. The purpose of this procedure was to reduce the vegetation size and decrease the risk of emboli with effective antibiotic penetration. To begin with, access was obtained at the right common femoral vein and the right internal jugular vein (IJV). The venotomy was serially dilated followed by placement of a 19 French size (Fr) reinfusion cannula through the IJV. The venotomy was serially dilated followed by placement of a Gore (Gore & Associates, Inc., Newark) 26 Fr dry seal sheath into the inferior vena cava. The AngioVac circuit was started, and debulking of the tricuspid valve vegetation was done under TEE with fluoroscopic guidance. TEE showed a significant reduction in the vegetation of the tricuspid valve (Figure 2).

Figure 2. TEE showing significant reduction (>80%) of vegetation.

Figure 2

TEE: transesophageal echocardiography

After that, the AngioVac system was stopped, and the filtered blood from the circuit was returned to the patient by perfusion. Postoperatively, no complications were observed, and the patient remained hemodynamically stable. The repeat transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) showed mild tricuspid regurgitation with no other complications. He was discharged home with 6 weeks of intravenous cefepime outpatient treatment as per infectious disease recommendation. He was given a follow-up appointment but did not show up.

Case two

A 39-year-old woman with a history of hepatitis C and intravenous drug use presented to the hospital with septic shock secondary to IE. She was found to have two large vegetations with methicillin-resistant S. aureus bacteremia and severe tricuspid regurgitation. The lesion on the anterior leaflet measured 1.5 × 0.9 cm, and the lesion on the septal tricuspid valve leaflet measured 0.8 × 0.4 cm with the help of TEE (Figure 3).

Figure 3. TEE showing lesions on the anterior and septal leaflet of the tricuspid valve.

Figure 3

TEE: transesophageal echocardiography

A decision was taken to approach with a minimally invasive approach for removal of the vegetations with AngioVac assistance due to critical ill status. A similar procedural approach was taken to advance the AngioVac catheter into the right atrium and debulking of the vegetations was performed. TEE demonstrated a significant reduction, greater than 80% debulking of the septal leaflet vegetations and 50% reduction of the anterior leaflet vegetation (Figure 4).

Figure 4. TEE demonstrates reduction of vegetations on the anterior and the septal leaflet.

Figure 4

TEE: transesophageal echocardiography

Postoperatively, no complications were observed, and the patient remained hemodynamically stable. The repeat TTE showed a significant decrease in vegetation size with no complications. She was discharged to inpatient rehabilitation with 4 weeks of intravenous antibiotic treatment as per infectious disease recommendation. The follow-up appointment was scheduled but she did not show up.

Case three

Woman, aged 70, with a history of coronary artery disease with stents, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis, sick sinus syndrome status post pacemaker placement, and peripheral arterial disease presented to the hospital with sepsis and was found to have methicillin-sensitive S. aureus bacteremia. Further investigation revealed a large 2.7 × 1.0 cm echo-density in the superior vena cava (SVC), 0.9 × 0.1 cm mobile echo-density on the pacemaker leads, and vegetation at the tip of the tunneled catheter under TEE (Figure 5).

Figure 5. TEE indicates 2.7 × 1.0 cm vegetation in the superior vena cava.

Figure 5

TEE: transesophageal echocardiography

A decision was taken to approach with a minimally invasive approach for removal of the vegetations with AngioVac assistance due to patient’s comorbidities. As mentioned in previous cases, the purpose of this procedure was to decrease the vegetation, and a similar procedural approach was taken to debulk the vegetation from all three sources. After that, TEE demonstrated a significant reduction, greater than 70% debulking of the SVC vegetation with the removal of pacemaker leads and replacement of tunneled catheter with the triple lumen central line (Figure 6).

Figure 6. TEE showing greater than 70% debulking of the superior vena cava vegetation.

Figure 6

TEE: transesophageal echocardiography

Postoperatively, no complications were observed, and the patient remained hemodynamically stable. The repeat TTE showed mild to moderate tricuspid regurgitation with no pericardial effusion. She was discharged home with 6 weeks of intravenous nafcillin treatment as per infectious disease recommendation. During the follow-up appointment, she was feeling much better with no additional complaints.

Discussion

In patients with right-sided IE, tricuspid valve endocarditis is more common than pulmonic valve endocarditis. Fever is the most common symptom, in addition to headache, malaise, chills, dyspnea, night sweats, abdominal pain, and weight loss. Moreover, septic pulmonary emboli are common in patients with tricuspid involvement (up to 75% cases) having clinical manifestations of cough, hemoptysis, dyspnea, and pleuritic chest pain [8]. The cardiac examination should include any heart murmurs or jugular venous distension, and the pulmonary examination should include any variations in breath sounds. A focal neuro examination should be performed, and a thorough abdominal examination should include pain related to an infarction or septic emboli. The most common imaging is chest radiography which usually demonstrates septic pulmonary emboli in more than half of cases, in addition to abscesses and pleural effusions [9].

The initial evaluation for patients of IE includes blood cultures and TEE to visualize the vegetation burden. Blood cultures from three different sites (spaced 30-60 minutes from each other) are obtained prior to the initiation of antibiotic therapy. Successful management of tricuspid endocarditis requires parenteral antibiotic therapy and removal of any indwelling intravascular devices, such as the infected pacemaker lead and the tunneled catheter. Some common indications for the surgical approach to remove vegetations include immense vegetation size (>20 mm), recurrent septic pulmonary emboli, highly resistant organisms, or persistent bacteremia despite targeted antibiotics [10]. On the contrary, patients who are considered at high risk for surgery due to comorbidities or vegetation burden opt for an alternative approach.

The AngioVac device uses a venovenous bypass circuit for percutaneous thrombectomy [11]. It has been applied in the setting of iliocaval, pulmonary embolus, and right heart thrombus in patients who fail medical therapy or have high surgical risk [11]. The study found that iliocaval and right heart thrombi were most amenable to AngioVac thrombectomy with 100% and 60% success rates, respectively [11]; while pulmonary embolus had a 33% success rate [11]. Another study reports the AngioVac device case series describing the outcomes in evacuating large caval thrombi or intracardiac masses in pulmonary embolism with no pulmonary hemorrhages, strokes, or myocardial infarctions [2]. Finally, a case report was published using the AngioVac aspiration device to remove a right atrial thrombus from a high surgical risk patient for open removal with no complications confirming the safety and efficacy of this procedure for the treatment of unwanted intracardiac and intravascular masses [12]. Hence, our case illustrates the integral use of the AngioVac device in the medical field.

Conclusions

The AngioVac device is used to remove a variety of materials, such as vegetations, thrombi, or emboli. IE is a prevalent disease, with tricuspid valve involvement being more common in intravenous drug users and patients with infected intravascular lines. Treatment varies depending on the surgical risk and severity of the disease. Utilizing the AngioVac system has opened an alternative approach for high surgical risk patients. Thus, our case series illustrates debulking vegetations in tricuspid endocarditis and vena cava using the AngioVac aspiration system.

The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study

References

  • 1.Single center Experience with the AngioVac aspiration system. Salsamendi J, Doshi M, Bhatia S, Bordegaray M, Arya R, Morton C, Narayanan G. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015;38:998–1004. doi: 10.1007/s00270-015-1152-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Thrombectomy using suction filtration and veno-venous bypass: single center experience with a novel device. Donaldson CW, Baker JN, Narayan RL, et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;86:0–7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.AngioVac Cannula and Circuit: AngioDynamics, Inc. [ Jan; 2022 ];https://www.angiovac.com/overview-gen-3/ 2020
  • 4.Transesophageal echocardiography guidance for atrial-caval thrombus removal with the AngioVac system. Miller SD, Lee DC, Dollar BT, Schepel SR, Shestopalov A, Culp WC Jr. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2020;33:85–86. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2019.1673920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Right-sided infective endocarditis and pulmonary infiltrates: an update. Chahoud J, Sharif Yakan A, Saad H, Kanj SS. Cardiol Rev. 2016;24:230–237. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0000000000000095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Infections associated with permanent pacemakers and implanted cardioverter-defibrillator devices. A 10-year regional study in Denmark. Smit J, Korup E, Schønheyder HC. Scand J Infect Dis. 2010;42:658–664. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2010.482943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Current profile of infective endocarditis in intravenous drug users: The prognostic relevance of the valves involved. Ortiz-Bautista C, López J, García-Granja PE, et al. Int J Cardiol. 2015;187:472–474. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Isolated right-sided valvular endocarditis in non-intravenous drug users. Revilla A, Lopez J, Villacorta E, et al. Rev Esp Cardiol (English edition) 2008;61:1253–1259. doi: 10.1016/s1885-5857(09)60052-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Factors other than the Duke criteria associated with infective endocarditis among injection drug users. Palepu A, Cheung SS, Montessori V, Woods R, Thompson CR. http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12220038/. Clin Invest Med. 2002;25:118–125. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Infective endocarditis in adults: diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, and management of complications: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Baddour LM, Wilson WR, Bayer AS, et al. Circulation. 2015;132:1435–1486. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Factors associated with successful thrombus extraction with the AngioVac device: an institutional experience. D'Ayala M, Worku B, Gulkarov I, Sista A, Horowitz J, Salemi A. Ann Vasc Surg. 2017;38:242–247. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Non-surgical extraction of right atrial mass by AngioVac aspiration device under fluoroscopic and transesophageal echocardiographic guidance. Enezate TH, Kumar A, Aggarwal K, Balla S, Omran J. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017;7:331–335. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2016.09.03. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES