Abstract
The efficient and regioselective hydrosilylation of epoxides co-catalyzed by a pentacarboxycyclopentadienyl (PCCP) diamide nickel complex and Lewis acid is reported. This method allows for the reductive opening of terminal, monosubstituted epoxides to form unbranched, primary alcohols. A range of substrates including both terminal and non-terminal epoxides are shown to work, and a mechanistic rationale is provided. This work represents the first use of a PCCP derivative as a ligand for transition metal catalysis.
Graphical Abstract

Epoxide-opening reactions offer a versatile means to access a variety of functional group patterns.1 Among the myriad possibilities, one simple yet underdeveloped transformation is the conversion of epoxides to alcohols via catalytic reductive epoxide opening, 2 especially of terminal epoxides 1 to form primary alcohols 2 (Figure 1a).3 Coupled with epoxidation,4 such a reaction could serve as an attractive alternative to the traditional hydroboration/oxidation approach for the anti-Markovnikov hydration of alkenes 3.5 Unfortunately, catalytic reductive epoxide opening has proven to be very difficult, particularly in regard to the regioselective reaction of terminal, non-styrenyl epoxides. Hydrogenolysis has been successfully applied to epoxide reduction, but these methods generally suffer from limited scope, are selective towards the Markovnikov product, and require forcing conditions.6 Methods which favor the formation of Anti-Markovnikov epoxides are generally limited in scope. Recently, Norton reported the generation of anti-Markovnikov alcohols via radical-based reduction of epoxides,7 although the method did not extend to terminal, mono-substituted epoxides. Beller reported major advances in this area with an iron-catalyzed hydrogenation of terminal epoxides with anti-Markovnikov selectivity and a cobalt-catalyzed regioselective hydrogenation of epoxides.8 Although the yields were generally high, these reactions required high pressure and elevated temperatures. Similarly, Warner reported an efficient isomerization-transfer hydrogenation sequence for the efficient generation of anti-Markovnikov alcohols.9 Thus, the development of direct regioselective epoxide reductions that occur at ambient temperature and pressure with broad substrate applicability remains a synthetic challenge.10
Figure 1.

(a) Conversion of terminal alkenes to primary alcohols. (b) PCCP 4 and PCCP-diamide 5 metal complexes.
In this regard, a number of reports have focused on catalytic hydrosilylation11 as a milder approach to epoxide reduction, but none have achieved a generalized method for the regioselective reduction of terminal, monosubstituted epoxides.12 To address this problem, we reasoned that increasing the Lewis acidity of a metal complex through new ligand development might be beneficial for both reactivity and regioselectivity.
One class of ligands that has a long and eminent history is the cyclopentadienyl (CP) anions, which participate in a variety of binding modes, most famously the η5-mode canonically found in ferrocene.13 In addition to the parent compound, substituted-CP ligands continue to offer useful new tools for reaction design.14 On the other hand, one distinct category of CP ligands that has not been exploited for catalysis is the pentacarboxycyclopentadienes (PCCPs) 4, despite their established ability to ligate metals via a variety of different binding modes (Figure 1b).15 Our group has exploited the highly electron-deficient nature, synthetic accessibility, and broad structural diversity16 of PCCPs in the development of a novel class of Brønsted acid catalysts.17 Furthermore, the multiple Lewis basic sites on the PCCP framework offer the possibility of cooperative activation via interaction with Lewis acidic additives, which we speculated might be particularly useful for reactions with epoxide substrates.18 Here, we show that derivatives of these intriguing materials, PCCP diamides 5, can also be useful as ligands for transition metal catalysis by offering a platform for the catalytic, regioselective hydrosilylation of terminal epoxides.
For this work, we first examined the reaction of 1-decene oxide 6 (Table 1). Reactions were conducted by mixing 5 mol% Ni(OAc)2, 5 mol% ligand, 10 mol% KO-t-Bu, and 1.1 equiv Ph2SiH2, followed by addition of the epoxide. Our initial attempt to use pentacarbomethoxycyclopentadiene L1 as ligand was unproductive (entry 1). On the other hand, the use of PCCP diamide ligands led to appreciable product formation. Aniline-derived ligand L2 enabled 36% conversion over 16 h at 80 °C (entry 2), albeit with a 1:2 regioselectivity in favor of the secondary product 8. Interestingly, reducing the temperature led to a reversal of selectivity (entries 2–5); at room temperature, the ratio of products 7:8 was 85:15 (entry 5). Unfortunately, modifications to the phenyl substituents of L2 were universally detrimental.19 Meanwhile, of the solvents screened, acetonitrile proved optimal for both reactivity and selectivity (entries 5-7). To increase reactivity, we found that the addition of up to 15 mol% BF3•OEt2 dramatically increased the reaction rate, albeit with a small decrease in regioselectivity (entries 8-10).17 Importantly, the BF3•OEt2 on its own did not result in conversion of the epoxide (entry 11).20 Utilizing acetylacetone as the ligand in place of the PCCP ligand also resulted in only trace conversion of the epoxide (entry 12). Finally, we found that ligand L3 provided higher levels of selectivity than L2 while still retaining high reactivity (entry 13).
Table 1.
Optimization for Ni-PCCP catalyzed hydrosilylative opening of 1-decene oxide.a
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| entry | ligand | solvent | temp (°C) | additive | conv(%) | selectivity (7:8) |
| 1 | L1 | MeCN | 80 | – | 0 | – |
| 2 | L2 | MeCN | 80 | – | 36 | 39:61 |
| 3 | L2 | MeCN | 60 | – | 30 | 48:52 |
| 4 | L2 | MeCN | 40 | – | 23 | 84:16 |
| 5 | L2 | MeCN | rt | – | 11 | 85:15 |
| 6 | L2 | PhMe | rt | – | 7 | 62:40 |
| 7 | L2 | CH2Cl2 | rt | – | 8 | 80:20 |
| 8 | L2 | MeCN | rt | 5% BF3 •OEt2 | 67 | 76:24 |
| 9 | L2 | MeCN | rt | 10% BF3 •OEt2 | 100b | 75:25 |
| 10 | L2 | MeCN | rt | 15% BF3 •OEt2 | 100c | 78:22 |
| 11 | – | MeCN | rt | 15% BF3 •OEt2 | 0d | – |
| 12 | – | MeCN | rt | 15% BF3 •OEt2 | <5e | – |
| 13 | L3 | MeCN | rt | 15% BF3 •OEt2 | 100 | 85:15 |
Reaction Conditions: 5 mol% Ni(OAc)2, 5 mol% PCCP ligand, 10 mol% KO-t-Bu, 1.1 eq silane at room temperature for 16 h. Conversion was determined by 1H NMR against mesitylene internal standard.
43% conversion after 4 h.
65% conversion after 4 h.
Reaction was performed without Ni(OAc)2 or KO-t-Bu.
5 mol% acetylacetone used in place of PCCP ligand
We next examined the scope of this method (Table 2). In addition to 1-decanol (9, entry 1), 1-hexanol was also formed in good yield (10, entry 2). Branching near the epoxide was tolerated (entries 3 and 4), although a small drop in regioselectivity was observed when the branch point was next to the site of reduction (entry 4). 3-Phenylpropene oxide gave rise to 3-phenylpropanol (13) with good yield and selectivity (entry 5). In terms of functional group compatibility, we found that halogens and ethers were tolerated (entries 6-8), with minimal effect on regioselectivity. Strongly electron-withdrawing phenylsulfonyl and phosphine oxide groups led to a single regioisomer of product (17 and 18, entries 9 and 10). Notably, alkenyl and alkynyl substrates furnished products 19 and 20 with no hydrosilylation across the π-bonds (entries 11 and 12). However, in the case of substrate 21, in which the alkene was in closer proximity to the epoxide, hydrosilylation across the alkene was observed.21 Additionally, we note that reactions with substrates bearing sensitive (e.g. 22) or significantly Lewis basic (23-26) functionality were not viable substrates for this catalyst system.
Table 2.
Scope studies for hydrosilylation of mono-substituted terminal epoxides.a
|
Reaction Conditions: 5 mol% Ni(OAc)2, 5 mol% L3 ligand, 10 mol% KO-t-Bu, 1.1 eq silane at room temperature for 16 h. Yields determined on purified products of major isomer. Selectivity determined by 1H NMR of crude reaction mixture. Hydrolysis Conditions: 15% NaOH (aq) and MeOH at room temperature for 8 h.
Yields determined by 1H NMR versus mesitylene as an internal standard.
We also examined the ability of this catalyst system to reduce other types of epoxides (Table 3) In these cases, the more synthetically accessible ligand L2 was suitable. As shown a variety of 1,1-disubstituted (entries 1 and 2), cyclic disubstituted (entries 3-5), trisubstituted (entry 6), and tetrasubstituted (entry 7) epoxides reacted with high efficiency and complete regioselectivity. Styrenyl epoxides led to the anti-Markovnikov products 34–36 exclusively in each case (entries 8-10). Finally, both ester and amide functionality were compatible with this chemistry (entries 11 and 12), albeit with lower efficiencies.
Table 3.
Scope studies for hydrosilylation of non-terminal and 1,1-disubstituted epoxides.a
|
Reaction Conditions: 5 mol% Ni(OAc)2, 5 mol% L2 ligand, 10 mol% KO-t-Bu, 15 mol% BF3•OEt2, 1.1 eq silane at room temperature for 16h. Yields determined on purified products. In all cases, a single regioisomer was detected by 1H NMR on crude reaction mixtures. Hydrolysis Conditions: 15% NaOH (aq) and MeOH at room temperature for 8h.
Yield determined by 1H NMR versus mesitylene internal standard.
TBAF deprotection used for desilylation.
Our proposed mechanism invokes the mechanism proposed by Gade for the nickel-catalyzed hydrosilylation of styrenic epoxides.12 The mechanistic rationale involves the initial reaction of the PCCP ligand (L2 or L3), Ni(OAc)2, two equivalents of KO-t-Bu, and an equivalent of silane to generate the active nickel hydride intermediate 41 (Figure 2).22 We speculate that coordination of 41 to the epoxide 1 (cf. 42) followed by insertion of the hydride leads to the nickel alkoxide 43 in the regioselectivity determining step, which then engages another equivalent of silane to furnish product 44 and regenerate the complex 41. We speculate that the electron-deficient metal center activates the epoxide towards insertion by the nickel-hydride. We propose that BF3•OEt2 increases the Lewis acidity of the complex by coordinating to one of the ligand carboxyl oxygens, e.g. 41.17 This interaction helps to weaken the internal C–O bond of the epoxide and thereby improve the reaction rate while maintaining the regioselectivity. Further, we speculate that the regioselectivity arises from the sterics surrounding the metal center where a smaller ligand promotes hydride addition at the more sterically hindered site.
Figure 2.

Proposed mechanistic rationale for Ni-PCCP diamide / BF3•OEt2 catalyzed hydrosilylation of epoxides.
In addition to the in-situ generation of the catalyst, the presumed nickel-alkoxide species 40b was isolated to assess its reactivity directly. Ligand complexation of Ni(OAc)2 and L2 followed by reaction with KO-t-Bu resulted in the observed precipitation of KOAc and a paramagnetic solid, presumed to be 40b. A comparison of the infrared spectra of 39b and 40b revealed a new stretch at 1006 cm−1, consistent with the C-O stretching frequency of previously reported nickel alkoxide species.23 Due to the generation of paramagnetic intermediates, we were unable to characterize the catalyst by NMR and all attempts to grow single crystals for x-ray crystallography failed. Previous attempts to characterize nickel-PCCP complexes by single x-ray crystallography have also been unsucsessful.15 In addition, 40b was found to be active for the reduction of 1-decene oxide under the standard conditions (97% conversion after 16 h to furnish a 77:23 mixture of 1-decanol and 2-decanol). Because the Ni-PCCP complex was found to be viable after removal of the KOAc byproduct, we propose that the role of BF3•OEt2 is to not to sequester the acetate byproduct of ligation.
Alternatively, we considered that the product might also arise by way of Meinwald rearrangement (cf. 45→46) followed by carbonyl hydrosilylation (Figure 2b),24 although we viewed this possibility as less likely since catalytic BF3•OEt2 itself did not affect such a rearrangement (eq. 1), which has been reported previously.20,25 In further evidence against this mechanism, when the reactions of terminal epoxide 49 was conducted with PhSiD2 (Figure 2c), the only observed product was 2-d-18. The absence of the regioisomeric product 1-d-18 is consistent with the pathway shown in Figure 2a.
In conclusion, we have developed a method for the regioselective reduction of terminal, monosubstituted epoxides. This effort was enabled by the use of PCCP-diamides as a new class of ligand, which in conjunction with a co-catalytic Lewis acid allowed for the generation of a highly active nickel complex.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgement:
Financial support for this work was provided by NIGMS (R35 GM127135).
Footnotes
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and product characterization data. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
Contributor Information
Keri A. Steiniger, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, United States
Tristan H. Lambert, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, United States.
References
- (1).(a) Parker RE; Isaacs NS “Mechanisms of epoxide reactions.” Chem. Rev 1959, 59, 737–799. [Google Scholar]; (b) Smith JH “Synthetically useful reactions of epoxides.” Synthesis. 1984, 8, 629–656. [Google Scholar]; (c) He J; Ling J; Chiu P “Vinyl epoxides in organic synthesis.” Chem. Rev 2014, 114, 8037–8128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (2).(a) Alvarez-Builla J, Vaquero JJ, Barluenga J; Modern Heterocyclic Chemistry; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2011, pp 55–109. [Google Scholar]; (b) Florio S; Perna FM; Vitale P Reduction of Epoxides. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis; Knochel P; Molander GA: Elsevier, 2014; Vol. 2, pp 1086–1122 [Google Scholar]
- (3).Huang C.-Y. (Dennis); Doyle AG “The chemistry of transition metals with three-membered ring heterocycles.” Chem. Rev 2014, 114, 8153–8198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).Rao AS; Paknikar SK; Kirtane JG “Recent advances in the preparation and synthetic applications of oxiranes.” Tetrahedron 1983, 39, 2323–2367. [Google Scholar]
- (5).(a) Burgess K; Ohlmeyer MJ “Transition-metal promoted hydroborations of alkenes, emerging methodology for organic transformations.” Chem. Rev 1991, 91, 1179–1191 [Google Scholar]; (b) Crudden CM; Edwards D “Catalytic asymetric hydroboration: Recent advances and applications in carbon-carbon bond forming reactions.” Eur. J. Org. Chem 2003, 4695–4712. [Google Scholar]
- (6).(a) Ley SV; Mitchell C; Pears D; Ramarao C; Yu J-Q; Zhou W “Recyclable polyurea-micoencapsulated pd(0) nanoparticles: An efficient catalyst for hydrogenolysis of epoxides.” Org. Lett 2003, 5, 4665–4668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Ricci M; Slama A “Transfer hydrogenation of simple epoxides.” Journal of Molecular Catalysis. 1994, 89, L1–L3. [Google Scholar]; (c) Ito M; Hirakawa M; Osaku A; Ikariya T “Highly efficient chemoselective hydrogenolysis of epoxides catalyzed by a (η1-C5(CH3)5)Ru complex bearing a 2-(diphenylphosphine)ethylamine ligand.” Organometallics 2003, 22, 4190–4192. [Google Scholar]; (d) Fujitsu H; Shirahama S; Matsumura E; Takeshita K; Mochida I “Catalytic hydrogenation of styrene oxide with cationic rhodium complexes.” J. Org. Chem 1981, 46, 2287–2290. [Google Scholar]; (e) Rainsberry AN; Sage JG; Scheuermann ML “Iridium-promoted conversion of terminal epoxides to primary alcohols under acidic conditions using hydrogen.” Catal. Sci. Technol 2019, 9, 3020–3022. [Google Scholar]
- (7).Yao C; Dahmen T; Gansäuer A; Norton J “Anti-Makovnikov alcohols via epoxide hydrogenation through cooperative catalysis.” Science. 2019, 364, 764–767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (8).(a) Liu W; Li W; Spannenberg A; Junge K; Beller M “Iron-catalysed regioselective hydrogenation of terminal epoxides to alcohols under mild conditions.” Nat. Catal 2019, 2, 523–528. [Google Scholar]; (b) Liu W; Leischner T; Li W; Junge K; Beller M “A General Regioselective Synthesis of Alcohols by Cobalt-Catalyzed Hydrogenation of Epoxides.” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2020, 59, 11321–11324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).Liu X: Longwitz L; Spiegelberg B; Tönjes J; Beweries, Thomas Werner T “Erbium-Catalyzed Regioselective Isomerization–Cobalt-Catalyzed Transfer Hydrogenation Sequence for the Synthesis of Anti-Markovnikov Alcohols from Epoxides under Mild Conditions.” ACS Catalysis 2020, 10, 13659–13667 [Google Scholar]
- (10).For additional examples of catalytic epoxide reduction:; (a) Zhang J; Park S; Chang S “Piers’ borane-mediated hydrosilylation of epoxides and cyclic ethers.” Chem. Commun 2018, 54, 7243–7246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Nikitin OM; Magdesieva TV “Electrochemically induced titanocene-mediated reductive opening of epoxides.” Mendeleev Commun. 2011, 21, 194–195. [Google Scholar]; (c) Desnoyer AN, Geng J, Drover MW, Patrick BO, Love JA. “Catalytic functionalization of styrenyl epoxides via 2-nickela(II)oxetanes.” Chem. Eur. J 2017, 23, 11509–11512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Gansäuer A; Klatte M; Brändle GM; Friedrich J “Catalytic Hydrogen Atom Transfer (HAT) for Sustainable and Diastereoselective Radical Reduction.” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed, 2012, 51, 8891–8894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (11).Du X; Huang Z “Advances in Base-Metal-Catalyzed Alkene Hydrosilylation.” ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 1227–1243. [Google Scholar]
- (12).(a) Nagashima H; Suzuki A; Iura T; Ryu K; Matsubara K “Stoichiometric and catalytic activation of Si-H bonds by a triruthenium carbonyl cluster, (μ3,η2:η3:η5-acenaphthylene)Ru3(CO)7: Isolation of the oxidative adducts, catalytic hydrosilylation of aldehydes, ketones, acetals, and catalytic polymerization of cyclic ethers.” Organometallics 2002, 19, 3579–3590. [Google Scholar]; (b) Kang K-T; Weber WP Co2(CO)8 catalyzed reactions of styrene oxide with trialkylsilanes. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 5415–5416. [Google Scholar]; (c) Mimoun H “Selective Reduction of Carbonyl Compounds by Polymethylhydrosiloxane in the Presence of Metal Hydride Catalysts.” J. Org. Chem 1999, 64, 2582–2589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Park S; Brookhart M “Hydrosilylation of epoxides catalyzed by a cationic η1-silane iridium(III) complex.” Chem. Commun 2011, 47, 3643–3645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) J Wenz J; Wadepohl H; Gade LH “ Regioselective hydrosilylation of epoxides catalyzed by nickel(II) hydrido complexes.” Chem. Commun 2017, 53, 4308–4311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (13).(a) Togni A, Halterman RL, Metallocenes: Synthesis, Reactivity, Applications; Wiley-VCH: New York, 1998; Vols. 1 and 2. [Google Scholar]; (b) Liu R; Zhou X “Selective transformations of cyclopentadienyl ligands of transition-metal and rare-earth metal complexes.” Chem. Commun 2013, 49, 3171–3187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Arndt S; Okuda J “Mono(cyclopentadienyl) complexes of the rare-earth metals.” Chem. Rev 2002, 102, 1953–1976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (14).(a) Xie Z “Cyclopentadienyl–Carboranyl Hybrid Compounds: A New Class of Versatile Ligands for Organometallic Chemistry.” Acc. Chem. Res 2003, 36, 1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Piou T; Rovis T “Electronic and Steric Tuning of a Prototypical Piano Stool Complex: Rh(III) Catalysis for C-H Functionalization.” Acc. Chem. Res 2018, 51, 170–180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (15).Bruce MI; White AH “Some Chemistry of Pentakis(methoxycarbonyl)cyclopentadiene, HC5(CO2Me)5, and Related Molecules.” Aust. J. Chem 1990, 43, 949–995. [Google Scholar]
- (16).Gheewala CD; Radtke MA; Hui J; Hon AB; Lambert TH “Methods for the Synthesis of Functionalized Pentacarboxycyclopentadienes.” Org. Lett 2017, 19, 4227–4230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (17).For examples of PCCP-catalyzed transformations:; (a) Gheewala CD; Hirschi JS; Lee W-H; Paley DW; Vetticatt MJ; Lambert TH “Asymmetric induction via a helically chiral anion: Enantioselective pentacarboxcyclopentadiene Brønsted acid-catalyzed inverse-electron-demand diels-alder cycloaddition of oxocarbenium ions.” J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 3523–3527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Gheewala CD; Collins BE; Lambert TH “An aromatic ion platform for enantioselective Brønsted acid catalysis.” Science. 2016, 351, 961–965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Kottisch V; O’Leary J; Michaudel Q; Stache EE; Lambert TH; Fors BP “Controlled Cationic Polymerization: Single-Component Initiation under Ambient Conditions.” J. Am. Chem. Soc 2019, 141, 10605–10609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (18);Maity A; Teets TS “Main Group Lewis Acid-Mediated Transformations of Transition-Metal Hydride Complexes.” Chem. Rev 2016, 116, 8873–8911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (19).Full ligand screen is shown in the the SI. Electronic changes to the ligand structure are detrimental to selectivity. Tuning the sterics demonstrated that smaller amide substituents favored desired primary alcohol product.
- (20).Suda K; Baba K; Nakajima S; Takanami T “Metalloporphyrin-catalyzed regioselective rearrangement of monoalkyl-substituted epoxides into aldehydes.” Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 7243–7246. [Google Scholar]
- (21).For examples of directed alkyne hydrosilylations see:; (a) Kawasaki Y; Ishikawa Y; Igawa K; Tomooka K “Directing group-controlled hydrosilylation: regioselective functionalization of alkyne.” J. Am. Chem. Soc 2011, 133, 20712–20715 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Rummelt SM; Radkowski K; Roşca D-A; Fürstner A “Interligand Interactions Dictate the Regioselectivity of trans-Hydrometalations and Related Reactions Catalyzed by [Cp*RuCl]. Hydrogen Bonding to a Chloride Ligand as a Steering Principle in Catalysis.”J. Am. Chem. Soc 2015, 137, 5506–5519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (22).For examples and mechanistic discussion of nickel-catalyzed carbonyl hydrosilylation see:; (a) Chakraborty S; Krause JA; Guan H “Hydrosilylation of aldehydes and ketones catalyzed by Nickel PCP-Píncer hydride complexes.” Organometallics 2009, 28, 582–586. [Google Scholar]; (b) Tran BL; Pink M; Mindiola DJ “Catalytic hydrosilylation of the carbonyl functionality via a transient nickel hydride complex.” Organometallics 2009, 28, 2234–2243. [Google Scholar]; (c) Wei Y; Liu S-X; Mueller-Bunz H; Albrecht M “Synthesis of Triazolylidene Nickel Complexes and Their Catalytic Application in Selective Aldehyde Hydrosilylation.” ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 8192–8200. [Google Scholar]
- (23).(a) Chadha SL; Sharma V “Reaction of nickel(II) alkoxide with ligands. Synthesis and characterization of complexes of Ni(OCH3)(OCH2CCl3) with ligands.” Inorganica Chim. Acta 1987, 131, 101–103. [Google Scholar]; (b) Barraclough CG; Bradley DC; Lewis J; Thomas IM “The infrared spectra of some metal alkoxides, trialkylsilyloxides, and related silanols.” J. Chem. Soc 1961, 2601–2506. [Google Scholar]; (c) Baranwal BP; Mehrotra RC “Synthesis and Characterization of Some Alkoxide Derivatives of Nickel(II).” Aust. J. Chem 1980, 33, 37–43. [Google Scholar]
- (24).Rickborn B Acid-Catalyzed Rearrangements of Epoxides. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis; Trost BM; Fleming I; Pattenden G; Pergamon: Oxford, 1991; Vol. 3, pp 733–775. [Google Scholar]
- (25).For select examples of Lewis acid promoted rearrangements of aliphatic terminal epoxides:; (a) Karamé I; Tommasino ML; Lemaire M “Iridium-catalyzed alternative of the Meinwald rearrangement.” Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 7687–7689. [Google Scholar]; (b) Yanagisawa A; Yasue K; Yamamoto H “Selective isomerization of 1,2-epoxyalkanes to aldehydes with lithium dialkylamides.” J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun 1994, 2103–2104. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
