Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2022 Mar 21;17(3):e0264366. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264366

A three-dimensional immune-oncology model for studying in vitro primary human NK cell cytotoxic activity

Nontaphat Thongsin 1,2, Methichit Wattanapanitch 1,*
Editor: Muller Fabbri3
PMCID: PMC8936498  PMID: 35312698

Abstract

Immunotherapy has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach for treating several forms of cancer. Adoptive cell transfer of immune cells, such as natural killer (NK) cells, provides a powerful therapeutic potential against tumor cells. In the past decades, two-dimensional (2D) tumor models have been used to investigate the effectiveness of immune cell killing. However, the 2D tumor models exhibit less structural complexity and cannot recapitulate the physiological condition of the tumor microenvironment. Thus, the effectiveness of immune cells against tumor cells using these models cannot fully be translated to clinical studies. In order to gain a deeper insight into immune cell-tumor interaction, more physiologically relevant in vivo-like three-dimensional (3D) tumor models have been developed. These 3D tumor models can mimic the dynamic cellular activities, making them a much closer representation of the in vivo tumor profiles. Here, we describe a simple and effective protocol to study the cytotoxic activity of primary human NK cells toward the 3D tumor spheroids. Our protocol includes isolation and expansion of human NK cells, labeling and formation of tumor spheroids, co-culture of NK cells and tumor spheroids, and evaluation of cytotoxic activity using a confocal microscope. This protocol is also applicable to other types of tumors and immune cells.

Introduction

Cancer immunotherapy is a treatment strategy that aims to manipulate immune cells to recognize and attack tumor cells either alone or in combination with other standard treatments such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy [1]. Adoptive cell transfer (ACT) is emerging as one of the practical therapeutic approaches for cancer therapy. Several types of immune cells, such as T cells, B cells, natural killer (NK) cells, dendritic cells (DC), and macrophages, have been used in pre-clinical and clinical studies [2]. NK cells, which are the subset of lymphocytes that provide the first-line defense against infected and tumor cells, have been investigated for their potential to induce cytotoxicity in tumor cells [3, 4]. Unlike T cells, NK cells can recognize tumor cells in a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-independent manner. Data from several clinical studies demonstrated great therapeutic outcomes without graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) after administering allogeneic NK cells to patients with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia or several solid tumors such as renal cell carcinoma, ovarian cancer, and non-small lung cancer [57]. Therefore, allogeneic NK cells represent an alternative therapeutic cell source as off-the-shelf cell products [8]. Moreover, genetic modification can be performed to improve cytotoxicity, specificity, and persistence of the NK cell products [9, 10]. For these reasons, validation of NK cell effector functions using an appropriate tumor model is required.

Previously, the in vitro 2D tumor models have been widely used to determine the cytotoxicity of human immune cells. However, these models do not recapitulate the complexity of the tumor environment due to the lack of cellular interaction and the interaction with extracellular matrices [11, 12]. To overcome these limitations, a more relevant 3D tumor model to study the efficacy of human immune cells has been developed. The first 3D tumor model has been shown to mimic the physiological properties of the cells in terms of topographical and mechanical forces, rendering the cellular responses to stimuli differently [1316]. More recently, several studies indicated that the 3D tumor model altered various cellular activities, including morphology, signal transduction, gene and protein expression, and drug sensitivity when compared to the 2D models [1719]. Notably, the structural complexity of tumor spheroids can prevent the infiltration of immune cells, making them a versatile in vivo-like model [20, 21]. Thus, the use of 3D tumor spheroids provides a reliable tool for assessing the therapeutic efficacy of immune cells. Here, we describe a simple protocol for generating 3D tumor spheroids to evaluate the in vitro cytotoxicity of primary human NK cells (PB-NK) against the cholangiocarcinoma cell line (KKU213A) [22]. We also provide a step-by-step protocol for the cytotoxicity assay, including isolation and expansion of NK cells, labeling and formation of tumor spheroids, and evaluation of the cytotoxic activity of NK cells against tumor spheroids. This protocol can be easily adapted for other tumor and immune cells, including primary and genetically modified human immune cells.

Materials and methods

The protocol described in this peer-reviews article is published on protocols.io, dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.b2ufqetn and is included for printing as S1 File with this article.

Ethics statement

All procedures complied with ethical regulations for research in humans. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB), Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University (Si 320/2021). All patients were informed about using their samples and provided with a participant information sheet and signed the informed consent.

Results

In this protocol, we utilized the 3D tumor spheroid model to evaluate the cytotoxic activity of primary human NK cells from two healthy donors (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Schematic diagram of cytotoxicity assay using PB-NK cells toward the 3D tumor spheroids.

Fig 1

The PB-NK cells were isolated using magnetic beads and expanded using a genetically modified mIL-21-K562 cell line. The purity of the isolated and expanded PB-NK cells was determined by flow cytometric analysis. The 3D tumor spheroids were formed using the CFSE-labeled KKU213A cell line and cultured in the medium containing 2.5% Matrigel on an ultra-low attachment round-bottom 96-well plate for two days. The spheroids were co-cultured with PB-NK cells supplemented with propidium iodide (PI) for three days. The cytotoxic activity of NK cells was evaluated using mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of PI, which stained positive on dead cells using a confocal microscope.

PB-NK cells were isolated by negative selection using magnetic beads. The cells were then processed for flow cytometric analysis to ensure that the majority of the post-sorted cells were CD56+ NK cells. The isolated cells were 97.7% positive for the NK cell markers (CD45+ CD3- CD56+) (Fig 2A).

Fig 2. Evaluation of NK cell cytotoxic activity toward 3D tumor spheroids.

Fig 2

(A) Flow cytometric analysis of the NK cell-related markers (CD45, CD3, and CD56) of the post-sorted PB-NK cells. (B) Proliferation and flow cytometric analysis of the PB-NK cells in the presence of the genetically modified mIL-21-K562 cell line and hIL-2 (PB-NK cells were isolated from 2 donors, n = 2). (C) Fluorescent and phase-contrast images of the CFSE-labeled KKU213A tumor spheroids in the culture medium containing 2.5% Matrigel® matrix on day 2. Green = tumor cells (CFSE), Red = dead cells (PI), scale bar = 20 μm. (D) Representative fluorescent images of the PB-NK cells and the 3D tumor spheroids at different effector to target ratios (E: T) (1:1, 2.5:1, 5:1, and 10:1). Green = tumor cells (CFSE). Red = dead cells (PI), scale bar = 20 μm. (E) Cytotoxic activity of the PB-NK cells against 3D tumor spheroids at 1:1, 2.5:1, 5:1, and 10:1. The PB-NK cells were obtained from 2 donors. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 2).

Afterward, NK cells were expanded by co-culturing with the irradiated genetically modified mIL-21-K562 cell line in the presence of hIL-2. Proliferation of NK cells was observed within six days, and the number consistently increased over 12 days. Our protocol could generate 3.4 × 107 NK cells from 1 × 106 cells (34-fold expansion), and on day 12 after expansion, the cells were 99.6% positive for NK cell markers (CD45+ CD3- CD56+) (Fig 2B).

For the 3D spheroid formation, the KKU213A cell line (obtained from the Japanese Collection of Research Bioresources (JCRB) cell bank, Osaka, Japan), was labeled with 2.5 μM Carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE), resuspended with 2.5% Matrigel® matrix, and seeded onto the ultra-low attachment round-bottom 96-well plate. The CFSE-labeled KKU213A cell line spontaneously aggregated to form tumor spheroids within two days (Fig 2C). On day 2, the spheroids were co-cultured with PB-NK cells for another three days using four different effector to target (E: T) ratios (1:1, 2.5:1, 5:1, and 10:1) in the presence of 1 μg/ml propidium iodide (PI). On day 5 of the assay, the tumor spheroids were imaged using a confocal microscope, and the cytotoxic activity was calculated using the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of PI. In the presence of PB-NK cells, the PI-positive tumor cells within the tumor spheroids can be observed in every E: T ratio (Fig 2D), indicating that the PB-NK cells were capable of inducing cytotoxicity toward the KKU213A tumor spheroids. Notably, the number of PI-positive tumor cells increased with the increasing E: T ratios (Fig 2D). We then evaluated the anti-tumor activity of the PB-NK cells against the 3D tumor spheroids using the MFI of PI. After three days of co-culture, the PB-NK cells exhibited an increase in killing activity in a dose-dependent manner. The killing activity of NK cells reached 79.1 ± 12.7% at 10:1 E: T ratio (Fig 2E). In summary, we have established a simple and feasible protocol to study primary human NK cell cytotoxic activity against 3D tumor spheroids, which can be adapted to other types of tumor and human immune cells to study an in vitro cytotoxic activity in a 3D tumor model.

Supporting information

S1 File. Step-by-step protocol, also available on protocol.io.

(PDF)

S2 File

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Nattaporn Phanthaphol for helpful advice on tumor spheroid formation and Dr. Koollawat Chupradit for technical support with the use of confocal microscope.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by Thailand Research Fund (grant no. RSA6280090 to MW), Siriraj Research Fund, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University (grant number (IO) R016333015 to MW), the National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT): NRCT5-RGJ63012-126 to NT and MW, and the Distinguished Research Professor Grant (NRCT 808/2563 to MW), the Program Management Unit for Human Resources & Institutional Development, Research and Innovation (grant no. B05F630080 to MW) and Mahidol University under the New Discovery and Frontier Research Grant to MW. NT is supported by Siriraj Graduate Scholarship, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University. MW is supported by Chalermphrakiat Grant, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University. The funders had and will not have a role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Riley RS, June CH, Langer R, Mitchell MJ. Delivery technologies for cancer immunotherapy. Nature reviews Drug discovery. 2019;18(3):175–96. doi: 10.1038/s41573-018-0006-z . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gorabi AM, Hajighasemi S, Sathyapalan T, Sahebkar A. Cell transfer-based immunotherapies in cancer: A review. IUBMB life. 2020;72(4):790–800. doi: 10.1002/iub.2180 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vivier E, Tomasello E, Baratin M, Walzer T, Ugolini S. Functions of natural killer cells. Nature Immunology. 2008;9(5):503–10. doi: 10.1038/ni1582 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Campbell KS, Hasegawa J. Natural killer cell biology: an update and future directions. The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology. 2013;132(3):536–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.07.006 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rubnitz JE, Inaba H, Ribeiro RC, Pounds S, Rooney B, Bell T, et al. NKAML: a pilot study to determine the safety and feasibility of haploidentical natural killer cell transplantation in childhood acute myeloid leukemia. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2010;28(6):955–9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.4590 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Leung W. Infusions of Allogeneic Natural Killer Cells as Cancer Therapy. Clinical Cancer Research. 2014;20(13):3390. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-1766 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yang Y, Lim O, Kim TM, Ahn YO, Choi H, Chung H, et al. Phase I Study of Random Healthy Donor-Derived Allogeneic Natural Killer Cell Therapy in Patients with Malignant Lymphoma or Advanced Solid Tumors. Cancer immunology research. 2016;4(3):215–24. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-15-0118 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lupo KB, Matosevic S. Natural Killer Cells as Allogeneic Effectors in Adoptive Cancer Immunotherapy. Cancers. 2019;11(6). doi: 10.3390/cancers11060769 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rezvani K. Adoptive cell therapy using engineered natural killer cells. Bone marrow transplantation. 2019;54(Suppl 2):785–8. doi: 10.1038/s41409-019-0601-6 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shimasaki N, Jain A, Campana D. NK cells for cancer immunotherapy. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2020;19(3):200–18. doi: 10.1038/s41573-019-0052-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gopal S, Kwon S-J, Ku B, Lee DW, Kim J, Dordick JS. 3D tumor spheroid microarray for high-throughput, high-content natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Communications Biology. 2021;4(1):893. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02417-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Habanjar O, Diab-Assaf M, Caldefie-Chezet F, Delort L. 3D Cell Culture Systems: Tumor Application, Advantages, and Disadvantages. International journal of molecular sciences. 2021;22(22). doi: 10.3390/ijms222212200 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Petersen OW, Rønnov-Jessen L, Howlett AR, Bissell MJ. Interaction with basement membrane serves to rapidly distinguish growth and differentiation pattern of normal and malignant human breast epithelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89(19):9064–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.19.9064 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Antoni D, Burckel H, Josset E, Noel G. Three-dimensional cell culture: a breakthrough in vivo. International journal of molecular sciences. 2015;16(3):5517–27. doi: 10.3390/ijms16035517 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kim JB. Three-dimensional tissue culture models in cancer biology. Seminars in cancer biology. 2005;15(5):365–77. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2005.05.002 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Baker BM, Chen CS. Deconstructing the third dimension: how 3D culture microenvironments alter cellular cues. Journal of cell science. 2012;125(Pt 13):3015–24. doi: 10.1242/jcs.079509 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Katt ME, Placone AL, Wong AD, Xu ZS, Searson PC. In Vitro Tumor Models: Advantages, Disadvantages, Variables, and Selecting the Right Platform. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2016;4:12-. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2016.00012 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sant S, Johnston PA. The production of 3D tumor spheroids for cancer drug discovery. Drug Discov Today Technol. 2017;23:27–36. doi: 10.1016/j.ddtec.2017.03.002 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lovitt CJ, Shelper TB, Avery VM. Advanced cell culture techniques for cancer drug discovery. Biology (Basel). 2014;3(2):345–67. doi: 10.3390/biology3020345 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Giannattasio A, Weil S, Kloess S, Ansari N, Stelzer EHK, Cerwenka A, et al. Cytotoxicity and infiltration of human NK cells in in vivo-like tumor spheroids. BMC Cancer. 2015;15(1):351. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1321-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sherman H, Gitschier HJ, Rossi AE. A Novel Three-Dimensional Immune Oncology Model for High-Throughput Testing of Tumoricidal Activity. Front Immunol. 2018;9:857-. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00857 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sripa B, Seubwai W, Vaeteewoottacharn K, Sawanyawisuth K, Silsirivanit A, Kaewkong W, et al. Functional and genetic characterization of three cell lines derived from a single tumor of an Opisthorchis viverrini-associated cholangiocarcinoma patient. Human cell. 2020;33(3):695–708. doi: 10.1007/s13577-020-00334-w . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 File. Step-by-step protocol, also available on protocol.io.

(PDF)

S2 File

(PDF)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES