Statement
In situ simulation (ISS) (simulation in the workplace) helps to improve participants' knowledge, behaviour and confidence by providing multidisciplinary training1 in real clinical environment. ISS also contributes towards identification of hidden errors in the system called latent errors.2 ISS has been successfully used to test run newly established healthcare facilities.3 There is emerging evidence that ISS helps in reducing morbidity and mortality4 thus could improve quality of patient care.5
Effective delivery of ISS requires proper planning, collaboration and execution. As ISS is a relatively new educational tool, there are very few resources available that would highlight key components of ISS.
We have created a video that would highlight various aspects related to ISS. The steps highlighted should be given due consideration before undertaking simulation in the workplace.
The components shown are: identification of stakeholders, needs analysis, timing, faculty assignment, resources, parent team collaboration, technical team familiarity with clinical settings, set up, pre briefing, scenario, debriefing, faculty debriefing, highlighting identified latent errors using risk managements tools to clinical managers and drafting plans to tackle the highlighted risks.
These steps are by no means applicable to all ISS sessions but they do provide a benchmark around which an ISS session could be planned. We hope that visual display of the steps would help in better understanding of the process.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Marina Flynn, Kathleen Merrick, Sue Sallis, Julia Chambers, Chris Gay, Matthew Graby, Stuart Riby, Olivia Charlton, Jane Backhouse and Anindita Hom-Choudhury for their contribution towards production of this video.
Footnotes
This is the video link https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6zIR1Sy0DBMTUxMTmdoOElwWkk
Competing interests: None declared.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
References
- 1.Patterson MD, Geis GL, LeMaster T, et al. Impact of multidisciplinary simulation-based training on patient safety in a paediatric emergency department. BMJ Qual Saf 2013;22:383–93. http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/22/5/383.full.pdf http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000951 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Patterson M, Geis G, Falcone R, et al. In situ simulation: detection of safety threats and teamwork training in a high risk emergency department. BMJ Qual Saf 2013;22:468–77. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspxdirect=true&db=ccm&AN=2012166804&site=ehost live&scope=site\n http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23258390 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ventre K, Barry J, Davis D, et al. Using in situ simulation to evaluate operational readiness of a children's hospital-based obstetrics unit. Simul Healthc 2014;9:102–11. 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fent G, Blythe J, Farooq O, et al. In situ simulation as a tool for patient safety: a systematic review identifying how it is used and its effectiveness. BMJ STEL doi:10.1136/bmjstel-2015-000065. 10.1136/bmjstel-2015-000065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Patterson MD, Blike GT, Nadkarni VM. In situ simulation: challenges and results. In: Advances in patient safety: new directions and alternative approaches. Vol 3. 2003:1–18. https://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patient-safety-resources/resources/advances-in-patient-safety-2/vol3/Advances-Patterson_48.pdf [Google Scholar]
