Abstract
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a large group of manmade chemicals that impose emerging environmental concerns. Among them, short-chain per- and polyfluorinated carboxylic acids represent an important subgroup used as building blocks of biologically active chemicals and functional materials. Some are also considered PFAS alternatives, and some could be byproducts of the physicochemical treatment of PFAS. However, little is known about the environmental fate of short-chain fluorinated carboxylic acids (FCAs) and their defluorination/transformation by microorganisms. To fill the knowledge gap, we investigated the structure–reactivity relationships in the aerobic defluorination of C3–C5 FCAs by activated sludge communities. Four structures exhibited greater than 20% defluorination, with 3,3,3-trifluoropropionic acid being almost completely defluorinated. We further analyzed the defluorination/transformation pathways and inferred the structures susceptible to aerobic microbial defluorination. We also demonstrated that the defluorination was via cometabolism. The findings advance the fundamental understanding of aerobic microbial defluorination and help assess the environmental fate of PFAS. Since some short-chain PFAS, such as 3,3,3-trifluoropropionic acid, are the incomplete defluorination byproducts of advanced reduction processes, their defluorination by activated sludge communities sheds light on the development of cost-effective chemical–biological PFAS treatment train systems.
Graphical Abstract

INTRODUCTION
Organofluorines, particularly per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), have caused a rapidly growing concern in public health and ecosystems.1–6 Short-chain PFAS are synthesized as important building blocks and intermediates of biologically active compounds and functional materials.7–9 Also, as long-chain legacy PFAS have led to increasing regulatory attention, structurally similar short-chain PFAS have been adopted as alternatives for commercial manufacturing.1 Meanwhile, some short-chain PFAS may be formed as the incomplete defluorination byproducts during physicochemical treatment of PFAS10–12 and the biotransformation products of other synthetic organofluorines.13 The environmental fate, transport, and biotransformation of ≥ C7 PFAS have been extensively studied.14–18 Compared to those long-chain ones, shorter-chain PFAS possess higher motility in water and lower adsorption potential to particles, which enable them to easily transport through water bodies and soil in long distance and be detected in increasing presence in aquatic environments.19,20 However, their biodegradability by environmental microorganisms and activated sludge communities in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) is largely unknown.
Given the broad applications and increasing occurrence of short-chain PFAS, we aimed to explore the defluorination of select short-chain fluorinated carboxylic acids (FCAs) by activated sludge communities and determine the structure–reactivity relationship in the aerobic microbial defluorination, hence providing critical fundamental knowledge to assess the environmental fate of short-chain PFAS and guide the design of cost-effective treatment strategies. We investigated 14 commercially available C3–C5 FCAs and identified the defluorination pathways of the transformed ones. We further summarized the specific PFAS structures susceptible to aerobic microbial defluorination and discussed the critical implications of our findings to the understanding of the environmental fate of PFAS and the application of biological approaches in treating PFAS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Chemicals.
The 14 short-chain FCAs (Figure 1A and details in Table S1 and Figure S1) were purchased from SynQuest Laboratories (Alachua, FL).
Figure 1.

Parent compound removal and defluorination degree of all tested short-chain FCAs after 72 h (A) and temporal parent compound decay and fluoride formation for the four structures with defluorination activities (B, C3a; C, C3b; D, C5a; E, C5b; n = 3).
Biotransformation/Biodefluorination Batch Experiments.
Activated sludge samples (~4400 mg/L as mixed liquor suspended solids) were obtained in the aeration tank of a local municipal WWTP the same day of the experiment. The biotransformation experiments were conducted in batch reactors (150 mL, loosely capped) for 3–14 days, with the dissolved oxygen (DO) above 3 mg/L (Figure S2) over 14 days. Each biotransformation reactor contained 50 mL of fresh activated sludge and 50 μM individual FCAs. Heat-inactivated controls were prepared using autoclaved (121 °C, 40 min) sludge filtrate (0.22 μm filter). A no-FCA sludge control reactor was also performed to obtain the sludge matrix and correct the fluoride measurement. Details of the cosubstrate experiment and the activated sludge treatment of the effluent from a photochemical reactor treating perfluoropropionic acid (PFPrA) are described in the Supporting Information.
Triplicated reactors were set up for all the above experiments. The reactors were shaken on an open-air shaker at 150 rpm at room temperature. The culture suspension was sampled (~3 mL) up to 14 days. Sampling after an extended incubation of 14 days was done for structures that did not show significant removal after 72 h (methanol and ammonium were supplied to maintain the sludge activity after 3 days). Samples were centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant (~2.5 mL) was collected for fluoride quantification and analysis of the parent compound and transformation products. The cell pellets were subject to methanol extraction for analysis of adsorbed and intracellular parent compounds and transformation products (see the detailed procedure in the Supporting Information).
Fluoride Measurement.
Fluoride ions were measured using an ion-selective electrode (ISE) (HACH). The quantification limit was 0.01 mg/L (c.a. 0.53 μM). The ISE results were cross-validated using ion chromatography (IC). Details of the two methods are provided in the Supporting Information. The differences between the two were within 10% (Figure S3). The defluorination degree for the removed portion of PFAS was determined using the formula below
Analytical Methods.
The parent FCAs and transformation product suspects were analyzed by an ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography coupled to a high-resolution quadrupole orbitrap mass spectrometer (UHPLC-HRMS/MS, Q Exactive, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Here, a 2 μL sample was injected into a Hypersil Gold column (particle size 1.9 μm, 2.1 mm × 100 mm, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and eluted at 0.30 mL/min with water (A) and methanol (B), each containing 10 mM ammonium acetate. The analytical method details and transformation product analysis are described in the Supporting Information.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Biodefluorination of Short-Chain PFAS by Activated Sludge Communities Was Structure Dependent.
We investigated a series of commercially available C3–C5 FCAs (14 total), which have various fluorine substitution degrees, linear and branched, and saturated and unsaturated structures. Six compounds showed a significant removal (>20%) after 14 days compared to the heat-inactivated abiotic controls (Figure 1A and Figure S4). Slight adsorption or uptake of those compounds was observed on day 0, which was further accumulated and accounted for less than 10% of the total amount after 3 days (Figure S5). For C3a, C3b, and C5a, the bioaccumulated portion was depleted after 3 days, consistent with their complete removal. Two C3 structures (C3a and C3b) and two C5 structures (C5a and C5b) showed significant microbial defluorination with a maximum fluoride formation of greater than 10 μM after a 3-day incubation, compared to a nearly zero fluoride formation in the heat-inactivated control (Figure 1B–E). The other structures did not exhibit defluorination (<6%) even after 14 days. Although not being defluorinated, C4b and C4c were biotransformed (Figure 1A).
According to Figure 1A, the C–H bonds at the α-carbon seemed to facilitate the initial microbial attack. C3a with −CH2– at the α-position achieved a much higher defluorination degree than C3b with one fluorine substitution at the α-position. C3d and C3e with two α-fluorine substitutions did not show any defluorination activity. The defluorination inefficiency of C4d and C4e also likely resulted from the lack of C–H bonds at the α-position. Interestingly, different from C3a and C5a, the C4 structure with −CH2– at the α-position (C4a) did not show any defluorination activity. The slight 72 h removal (~14%) was largely due to the adsorption (~10%) and evaporation (~6%) (Figure S4). The removal increased to 20% after 14 days, which could be due to continuing adsorption/cell uptake. Even if a small amount of C4a could undergo β-oxidation, trifluoroacetate will be the product, which cannot be defluorinated.21 In contrast, the β-oxidation of C5a could form C3a, which could be defluorinated. This implies that microbial aerobic defluorination was more likely to occur for odd-chain structures similar to C5a (CF3(CH2)n-2COOH) than even-chain ones. Neither the C=C double bond in C4c nor the single H substitution at the −CF3 in C4b changed the defluorination inefficiency of C4a. However, the two structures did exhibit significantly higher removal via nondefluorinating pathways.
Additionally, the degree of fluorine substitution affected the microbial defluorination at the α-position. For instance, C3b and C3c both have one α-fluorine substitution, but C3c with −CF3 in place of −CH3 in C3b was not microbially defluorinated (Figure 1A). It seems that the 2-haloacid C3b underwent hydrolytic defluorination, which can be catalyzed by 2-haloacid dehalogenases.22 If so, the additional fluorine substitutions in C3c might negatively affect the substrate affinity of 2-haloacid dehalogenases, rendering no defluorinating activity. Perfluorinated compounds (C4–C8) are known to be recalcitrant to aerobic biotransformation;23–25 thus, it was within our expectation that C3f was not defluorinated. Significant biotransformation/biodefluorination was observed for C5a and C5b but not for C5c with two more fluorine substitutions.
Defluorination/Transformation Pathways.
We further examined the defluorination pathways of the four defluorinated structures. On the basis of the defluorination degree and identified β-oxidation intermediates, we proposed β-oxidation-like pathways for C3a, C5a, and C5b, using the initial step of typical β-oxidation (HS–CoA activation) (Figure 2). Since no intermediates containing −S−CoA were identified, further evidence will be needed in future studies to validate the proposed pathway. The 3,3,3-trifluoropropionic acid (C3a) exhibited the highest defluorination degree (84% ± 10%), suggesting that the three C–F bonds were almost all cleaved. As the fluoride formation and C3a decay showed an approximately 3:1 molar ratio (Figure 1B) and the defluorination ceased upon C3a depletion, the cleavage of the three C–F bonds likely occurred simultaneously or very rapidly stepwise. A defluorination pathway was proposed in Figure 2A. After the activation of C3a (reaction ①), an HF elimination (reaction ②) occurred at the α-carbon, similar to the first step proposed for the 6:2 and 8:2 fluorotelomer carboxylic acids (FTCAs).16,26 Then, hydration (reaction ③) occurred at the C=C bond, forming a difluoroalcohol, which was unstable27 and quickly defluorinated into malonyl-CoA via spontaneous HF elimination (reaction ④) followed by hydrolysis (reaction ⑤). No transformation products were detected in the culture suspension or the cells, probably due to quick uptake, defluorination, and utilization of the formed small fatty acids by the cells or due to the small size and volatile property of the products that cannot be detected by the LC-HRMS.
Figure 2.

Proposed defluorination pathway of C3a (A), C5b (B), and C5a (C). Note: In the boxes are the proposed intermediates whose hydrolyzed products (the 3-hydroxyl acids) were detected; in brackets are unstable intermediates.
The defluorination degree of the unsaturated structure (C5b) and the detection of the β-oxidation intermediate (3-hydroxyl acid) (Figures S6 and S7) support the proposed pathway of C3a. C5b could first undergo β-oxidation, forming a two-carbon-shortened structure with unsaturated α- and β-carbons (Figure 2B). It was then subject to a similar hydration reaction as reaction ③ in Figure 2A, followed by spontaneous cleavage of two C–F bonds at the end carbon, ending up with monofluoromalonyl-CoA (Figure 2B). A defluorination degree of ~70% was observed for C5b (Figure 1A and D), consistent with the proposed pathway where two out of the three C–F bonds are cleaved. The incomplete transformation of C5b suggests that monofluoromalonyl-CoA could be toxic to cells and cause a halt of substrate uptake and turnover,28 similar to the toxic fluoroacetate/fluoroacetyl-CoA.29
Trifluoropentanoic acid (C5a) was removed completely with some fluoride formation within 3 h. Then, the defluorination continued to a significant level (Figure 1C), indicating that it occurred to the primary transformation product of C5a, which could be 3,3,3-trifluoropropionic acid (C3a) via β-oxidation (Figure 2C) given the detection of 3-hydroxyl acid (Figures S6 and S7). However, the defluorination degree of C5a was only 37%, instead of nearly 100% for C3a. The reason could be a partial transformation of C5a via β-oxidation, and the rest was transformed via unclear nondefluorinating pathways. C5a could undergo α-oxidation similar to that previously reported, forming C4a that cannot be defluorinated.18 However, no intermediates of α-oxidation of C5a or the product C4a were detected.
As a 2-haloacid, 2-fluoropropionic acid (C3b) is like monofluoroacetate and may also undergo hydrolytic defluorination (forming lactate), which can be catalyzed by 2-haloacid dehalogenases in aerobic bacteria.22,30,31 C3b was completely transformed but only showed ~20% defluorination after 72 h (Figure 1A). It indicates that 80% of C3b underwent nondefluorinating transformation pathways, which remain elusive as no plausible transformation products were identified. C3b could undergo decarboxylation, forming the volatile fluorinated alkane, which cannot be detected by LC-MS. Decarboxylation without defluorination could also occur to C4b and c that were biotransformed but not defluorinated, as well as C3a, which exhibited less than 100% defluorination.
Thus far, tremendous efforts have been invested in understanding the environmental fate and transport of FCAs using microcosms and microbial isolates.16,33,34,36–39,42–51 In Table 1, we summarized the aerobic defluorination reported in the literature and this study for C2–C10 FCAs and the alcohol precursors oxidizable to carboxylic acids. In the table, all defluorinated structures share a common feature: a functional group subject to enzymatic defluorination or nondefluorinating reactions that form unstable intermediates with fluoroalcohol moieties causing spontaneous C–F cleavage. Such functional groups include (i) C–H bonds at the α-position and (ii) sp2 C–F bonds at the β-position. The n:2 fluorotelomer alcohols (FTOHs) and carboxylic acids (FTCAs) have α-C–H bonds. Their initial defluorination steps (n = 4, 6, 8) (Figure S8)32,35 were similar to those proposed for C3a (1:2 FTCA) (Figure 2A). After the cleavage of two C–F bonds, n:2 FTCAs (n ≥ 2) are turned into the two-carbon shorter perfluorinated acids, which are resistant to microbial oxidation. The reported maximum aerobic defluorination degrees for 6:2 (16%, 2 out of 13 F) and 8:2 (12%, 2 out of 17 F) FTOH/FTCA (Table 1) agree with the two C–F bond cleavage pathways. It also implies that defluorination via the other deeper defluorination pathways, such as forming three-carbon shorter perfluorinated acid and the “one-carbon removal” pathway,18,40 were minor (Figure S8). Defluorination via the minor pathways could increase for shorter chain structures, as 4:2 FTOH had a 37% aerobic defluorination degree (3 out of 9 F), higher than that for two F removal (22%).32 Besides the microbially attackable C–H bonds at the α-position, unsaturated α- and β-carbons tend to be subject to enzymatic hydration, which leads to spontaneous cleavage of the β-C–F bond(s) from the formed fluoroalcohol moiety.
Table 1.
Aerobic Microbial Defluorination of Polyfluorinated Carboxylic Acids and Precursors
| FCA | Max. defluorination degree | Parent compound removal | Proposed defluorination pathway |
|---|---|---|---|
|
100% | 100%21 | Hydrolytic defluorination |
|
21% | 100%a | Hydrolytic defluorination |
|
|
85% | 100%a | HF elimination and Simultaneous cleavage of two sp3 C–F bonds |
|
|
37%a 47%24 |
100%a 6.3%24 |
Beta-oxidation→HF elimination and Simultaneous cleavage of two sp3 C–F bondsa |
|
|
71% | 30%a | Cleavage of the two sp2 C–F bonds at the last carbon |
|
37% | 74–91 %32,33 | HF elimination |
|
16% | 84–100%33–40 | HF elimination |
|
12% | 35–100%16,26,41–46 | HF elimination |
|
9% | 7–100%14,23,47,48 | Desulfonation + HF elimination |
|
N.A. | 22%18 | “One-carbon” removal pathway (alpha oxidation→HF elimination→reductive defluorination) |
This study. N.A.: not available.
Defluorination of C3a by Activated Sludge Was via Cometabolism.
A cometabolic process is referred to as the degradation of nongrowth substrates with the obligate presence of a growth substrate.52 We demonstrated that the nearly complete defluorination of C3a was cometabolic using biodefluorination experiments with C3a as the sole external substrate and with a growth substrate. When providing C3a (2 mM) as the sole external substrate in the fresh activated sludge, only 10% C3a was removed with ~0.3 mM fluoride released after 72 h (Figure S9). It suggests that C3a was not able to sustain metabolic activities and support cell growth as the sole energy and carbon source. Since the first three steps of the C3a defluorination pathway (Figure 2A) were enzyme mediated, without growth substrates to conserve energy and synthesize new enzymes, the activities of the existing enzymes would decrease over time, rendering incomplete defluorination (50%). Also, the high concentration of C3a could be toxic and inhibit enzyme activities.
We further investigated the defluorination of C3a in 2% (v/v) sludge subcultures with and without a growth substrate. With C3a (50 μM) as the sole substrate, no defluorination or transformation of C3a was observed, whereas both propionate and glucose induced C3a defluorination (Figure S10), indicating cometabolism. Propionate led to a higher fluoride formation (41 vs 28 μM for glucose) (Figure S10), suggesting it is a better growth substrate to induce the propionate-utilizing enzymes, which seemed to cometabolize the structurally similar C3a. However, the defluorination degree was less than 30% after 18 days, which was much lower than that in the original activated sludge community (>80% after 3 days). It could be due to the reduced initial biomass, and the added growth substrate did not activate and maintain the cometabolic defluorination enzymes at a similar level as in the original activated sludge community. Cometabolic defluorination of FTOHs (n = 4, 6, 8) was also reported in Pseudomonas strains supplied with alkanes as the growth substrate.32
Environmental Implications.
This study expands our fundamental knowledge of aerobic microbial defluorination of short-chain FCAs by activated sludge communities. The first implication of our findings is to the environmental fate of PFAS; the microbial aerobic defluorination, if any, is only to a limited degree for many PFAS structures. Only C–F bonds in specific structures are vulnerable to microbial cleavage, for example, β-C–F bonds with α-C–H bond(s) in carboxylic acids (or alcohols). To date, the reported aerobic defluorination of polyfluorinated structures was via either enzymatic HF elimination likely by acyl-CoA dehydrogenases41 or spontaneous defluorination of unstable fluorinated intermediates, which are typically formed from enzymatic reactions at other functional moieties than C–F bonds.16,17,26,41 Unless novel biocatalysts capable of cleaving C–F bonds at other positions could be discovered, aerobic microbial transformation of PFAS by activated sludge would end up with the accumulation of more persistent products from partial defluorination of the weak C–F bonds. Extensive screening of PFAS structures and biocatalysts is needed. The understanding of microbially susceptible C–F bonds can help predict the environmental fate of PFAS structures, thus guiding environmental risk assessment and regulations.
The second implication is to the treatment strategies of PFAS; although it may not be a stand-alone approach, microbial treatment could be integrated with physiochemical treatment for cost-effective performance. Perfluorinated structures can be defluorinated via advanced reduction by UV-generated hydrated electrons.11 However, the unintended H/F exchange pathway forms more recalcitrant polyfluorinated byproducts, rendering incomplete defluorination.11 Thus, microbial defluorination may be an economical post-treatment step to enhance the overall defluorination. C3a has been reported as the major byproduct of PFPrA after the advanced reduction treatment by a UV reactor.12 We employed activated sludge to treat the PFPrA treatment effluent. Over 80% of organofluorine byproducts in the effluent were removed, mostly due to C3a defluorination (Figure S11). It achieved an additional 10%–15% defluorination (80%–85% defluorination combined). This result provides initial proof for the cost-effective chemical–biological PFAS treatment train system. Various polyfluorinated byproducts may be formed from incomplete chemical destruction of PFAS, many of which were not structurally elucidated.11,12,53,54 Further demonstrations of the integrated chemical–biological treatment is needed via systematic investigation of the structures and biodefluorination efficacy of chemical treatment byproducts.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study is supported by the Initial Complement from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and the University of California, Riverside (for Y.M.), the National Science Foundation (Award No. CHE-1709286 for S.C. and Y.M.), the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (Grant No. R01 ES 032668 for S.C. and Y.M.), and the Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (ER18-1289 for Z.L. and J.L.; ER20-1541 for Y.Y., B.J., and Y.M.).
Footnotes
Supporting Information
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00511.
Supplementary methods, detailed information on FCAs, DO levels, cross-validation of fluoride ISE measurement using IC, LC-HRMS/MS results of parent compounds and transformation products, defluorination with C3a as the sole substrate and with a cosubstrate, and defluorination of PFPrA chemical treatment effluent by the activated sludge community (PDF)
Complete contact information is available at: https://pubs.acs.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00511
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Contributor Information
Shun Che, Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, United States; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States.
Yaochun Yu, Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, United States; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States;.
Jinyong Liu, Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, United States.
Yujie Men, Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, United States; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States;.
REFERENCES
- (1).Wang ZY; DeWitt J; Higgins CP; Cousins IT A never-ending story of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs)? Environ. Sci. Technol 2018, 52 (5), 3325–3325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (2).Dreyer A; Weinberg I; Temme C; Ebinghaus R Polyfluorinated compounds in the atmosphere of the Atlantic and Southern Oceans: evidence for a global distribution. Environ. Sci. Technol 2009, 43 (17), 6507–6514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (3).Hu XC; Andrews DQ; Lindstrom AB; Bruton TA; Schaider LA; Grandjean P; Lohmann R; Carignan CC; Blum A; Balan SA; Higgins CP; Sunderland EM Detection of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in U.S. drinking water linked to industrial sites, military fire training areas, and wastewater treatment plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett 2016, 3 (10), 344–350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).Braun JM; Chen A; Romano ME; Calafat AM; Webster GM; Yolton K; Lanphear BP Prenatal perfluoroalkyl substance exposure and child adiposity at 8 years of age: The HOME study. Obesity 2016, 24 (1), 231–237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (5).Barry V; Winquist A; Steenland K Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) exposures and incident cancers among adults living near a chemical plant. Environ. Health Perspect 2013, 121 (11–12), 1313–1318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (6).Klaunig JE; Shinohara M; Iwai H; Chengelis CP; Kirkpatrick JB; Wang Z; Bruner RH Evaluation of the chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity of perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA) in Sprague-Dawley rats. Toxicol. Pathol 2015, 43 (2), 209–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (7).Hong J; Lai H; Liu Y; Yuan C; Li Y; Liu P; Fang Q New organic dyes containing E- or Z-trifluoromethyl acrylic acid as the electron acceptors for dye-sensitized solar cell applications: an investigation of the effect of molecular configuration on the power conversion efficiency of the cells. RSC Adv. 2013, 3 (4), 1069–1072. [Google Scholar]
- (8).Inoue M; Shiosaki M; Muramaru H Synthesis of ethyl 3,3,3-trifluoropropionate from 2-bromo-3,3,3-trifluoropropene. J. Fluorine Chem 2014, 167, 135–138. [Google Scholar]
- (9).Kong W-Y; Chen X-F; Shi J; Baloch SK; Qi J-L; Zhu H-L; Wang X-M; Yang Y-H Design and synthesis of fluoroacylshikonin as an anticancer Agent. Chirality 2013, 25 (11), 757–762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (10).Lewis AJ; Joyce T; Hadaya M; Ebrahimi F; Dragiev I; Giardetti N; Yang J; Fridman G; Rabinovich A; Fridman AA; McKenzie ER; Sales CM Rapid degradation of PFAS in aqueous solutions by reverse vortex flow gliding arc plasma. Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol 2020, 6 (4), 1044–1057. [Google Scholar]
- (11).Bentel MJ; Yu Y; Xu L; Li Z; Wong BM; Men Y; Liu J Defluorination of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) with hydrated electrons: structural dependence and implications to PFAS remediation and management. Environ. Sci. Technol 2019, 53 (7), 3718–3728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (12).Bentel MJ; Liu Z; Yu Y; Gao J; Men Y; Liu J Enhanced Degradation of Perfluorocarboxylic Acids (PFCAs) by UV/Sulfite Treatment: Reaction Mechanisms and System Efficiencies at pH 12. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett 2020, 7 (5), 351–357. [Google Scholar]
- (13).Bayer T; Amberg A; Bertermann R; Rusch GM; Anders MW; Dekant W Biotransformation of 1,1,1,3,3-Pentafluoropropane (HFC-245fa). Chem. Res. Toxicol 2002, 15 (5), 723–733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (14).Wang N; Liu J; Buck RC; Korzeniowski SH; Wolstenholme BW; Folsom PW; Sulecki LM 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate aerobic biotransformation in activated sludge of waste water treatment plants. Chemosphere 2011, 82 (6), 853–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (15).Rhoads KR; Janssen EML; Luthy RG; Criddle CS Aerobic biotransformation and fate of N-ethyl perfluorooctane sulfonamidoethanol (N-EtFOSE) in activated sludge. Environ. Sci. Technol 2008, 42 (8), 2873–2878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (16).Wang N; Szostek B; Folsom PW; Sulecki LM; Capka V; Buck RC; Berti WR; Gannon JT Aerobic biotransformation of 14C-labeled 8–2 telomer B alcohol by activated sludge from a domestic sewage treatment plant. Environ. Sci. Technol 2005, 39 (2), 531–538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (17).Liu J; Mejia Avendano S Microbial degradation of polyfluoroalkyl chemicals in the environment: a review. Environ. Int 2013, 61, 98–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (18).Wang N; Buck RC; Szostek B; Sulecki LM; Wolstenholme BW 5:3 Polyfluorinated acid aerobic biotransformation in activated sludge via novel ″one-carbon removal pathways″. Chemosphere 2012, 87 (5), 527–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (19).Yeung LWY; Stadey C; Mabury SA Simultaneous analysis of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances including ultrashort-chain C2 and C3 compounds in rain and river water samples by ultra performance convergence chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2017, 1522, 78–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (20).Llorca M; Farre M; Pico Y; Muller J; Knepper TP; Barcelo D Analysis of perfluoroalkyl substances in waters from Germany and Spain. Sci. Total Environ 2012, 431, 139–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (21).Alexandrino DAM; Ribeiro I; Pinto LM; Cambra R; Oliveira RS; Pereira F; Carvalho MF Biodegradation of mono-, diand trifluoroacetate by microbial cultures with different origins. New Biotechnol. 2018, 43, 23–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (22).KURIHARA T A Mechanistic Analysis of Enzymatic Degradation of Organohalogen Compounds. Biosci., Biotechnol., Biochem 2011, 75 (2), 189–198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (23).Key BD; Howell RD; Criddle CS Defluorination of organofluorine sulfur compounds by Pseudomonas sp. strain D2. Environ. Sci. Technol 1998, 32 (15), 2283–2287. [Google Scholar]
- (24).Ochoa-Herrera V; Field JA; Luna-Velasco A; Sierra-Alvarez R Microbial toxicity and biodegradability of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and shorter chain perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs). Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts 2016, 18 (9), 1236–1246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (25).Liou J-C; Szostek B; DeRito C; Madsen E Investigating the biodegradability of perfluorooctanoic acid. Chemosphere 2010, 80 (2), 176–183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (26).Wang N; Szostek B; Buck RC; Folsom PW; Sulecki LM; Capka V; Berti WR; Gannon JT Fluorotelomer alcohol biodegradation - direct evidence that perfluorinated carbon chains breakdown. Environ. Sci. Technol 2005, 39 (19), 7516–7528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (27).Seppelt K Trifluoromethanol, CF3OH. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl 1977, 16 (5), 322–323. [Google Scholar]
- (28).Chari-Bitron A A study on the toxicity and the biochemical effects of monofluoromalonate. Biochem. Pharmacol 1961, 6 (3), 169–176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (29).Goncharov NV; Jenkins RO; Radilov AS Toxicology of fluoroacetate: a review, with possible directions for therapy research. J. Appl. Toxicol 2006, 26 (2), 148–161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (30).Chan PWY; Yakunin AF; Edwards EA; Pai EF Mapping the reaction coordinates of enzymatic defluorination. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2011, 133 (19), 7461–7468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (31).Goldman P The enzymatic cleavage of the carbon-fluorine bond in fluoroacetate. J. Biol. Chem 1965, 240, 3434–3438. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (32).Kim MH; Wang N; McDonald T; Chu KH Biodefluorination and biotransformation of fluorotelomer alcohols by two alkane-degrading Pseudomonas strains. Biotechnol. Bioeng 2012, 109 (12), 3041–3048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (33).Sun M; Cui J; Guo J; Zhai Z; Zuo P; Zhang J Fluorochemicals biodegradation as a potential source of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) to the environment. Chemosphere 2020, 254, 126894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (34).Merino N; Wang M; Ambrocio R; Mak K; O’Connor E; Gao A; Hawley EL; Deeb RA; Tseng LY; Mahendra S Fungal biotransformation of 6:2 fluorotelomer alcohol. Remediation J. 2018, 28 (2), 59–70. [Google Scholar]
- (35).Liu JX; Wang N; Szostek B; Buck RC; Panciroli PK; Folsom PW; Sulecki LM; Bellin CA 6–2 Fluorotelomer alcohol aerobic biodegradation in soil and mixed bacterial culture. Chemosphere 2010, 78 (4), 437–444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (36).Tseng N; Wang N; Szostek B; Mahendra S Biotransformation of 6:2 fluorotelomer alcohol (6:2 FTOH) by a wood-rotting fungus. Environ. Sci. Technol 2014, 48 (7), 4012–4020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (37).Zhang S; Merino N; Wang N; Ruan T; Lu XX Impact of 6:2 fluorotelomer alcohol aerobic biotransformation on a sediment microbial community. Sci. Total Environ 2017, 575, 1361–1368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (38).Zhao L; McCausland PK; Folsom PW; Wolstenholme BW; Sun H; Wang N; Buck RC 6:2 Fluorotelomer alcohol aerobic biotransformation in activated sludge from two domestic wastewater treatment plants. Chemosphere 2013, 92 (4), 464–470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (39).Liu J; Wang N; Buck RC; Wolstenholme BW; Folsom PW; Sulecki LM; Bellin CA Aerobic biodegradation of [14C] 6:2 fluorotelomer alcohol in a flow-through soil incubation system. Chemosphere 2010, 80 (7), 716–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (40).Kim MH; Wang N; Chu KH 6:2 Fluorotelomer alcohol (6:2 FTOH) biodegradation by multiple microbial species under different physiological conditions. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol 2014, 98 (4), 1831–1840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (41).Dinglasan MJA; Ye Y; Edwards EA; Mabury SA Fluorotelomer alcohol biodegradation yields poly- and perfluorinated acids. Environ. Sci. Technol 2004, 38 (10), 2857–2864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (42).Liu J; Lee LS; Nies LF; Nakatsu CH; Turco RF Biotransformation of 8:2 fluorotelomer alcohol in soil and by soil bacteria isolates. Environ. Sci. Technol 2007, 41 (23), 8024–8030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (43).Russell MH; Berti WR; Szostek B; Buck RC Investigation of the biodegradation potential of a fluoroacrylate polymer product in aerobic soils. Environ. Sci. Technol 2008, 42 (3), 800–807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (44).Wang N; Szostek B; Buck RC; Folsom PW; Sulecki LM; Gannon JT 8–2 fluorotelomer alcohol aerobic soil biodegradation: pathways, metabolites, and metabolite yields. Chemosphere 2009, 75 (8), 1089–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (45).Yu X; Takabe Y; Yamamoto K; Matsumura C; Nishimura F Biodegradation property of 8:2 fluorotelomer alcohol (8:2 FTOH) under aerobic/anoxic/anaerobic conditions. J. Water Environ. Technol 2016, 14 (3), 177–190. [Google Scholar]
- (46).Yu X; Nishimura F; Hidaka T Enhanced generation of perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids (PFCAs) from fluorotelomer alcohols (FTOHs) via ammonia-oxidation process. Chemosphere 2018, 198, 311–319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (47).Yin T; Tran NH; Huiting C; He Y; Gin KY Biotransformation of polyfluoroalkyl substances by microbial consortia from constructed wetlands under aerobic and anoxic conditions. Chemosphere 2019, 233, 101–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (48).Shaw DMJ; Munoz G; Bottos EM; Duy SV; Sauve S; Liu JX; Van Hamme JD Degradation and defluorination of 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonamidoalkyl betaine and 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate by Gordonia sp. strain NB4–1Y under sulfur-limiting conditions. Sci. Total Environ 2019, 647, 690–698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (49).Liu J; Zhong G; Li W; Mejia Avendano S Isomer-specific biotransformation of perfluoroalkyl sulfonamide compounds in aerobic soil. Sci. Total Environ 2019, 651, 766–774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (50).Harding-Marjanovic KC; Houtz EF; Yi S; Field JA; Sedlak DL; Alvarez-Cohen L Aerobic Biotransformation of Fluorotelomer Thioether Amido Sulfonate (Lodyne) in AFFF-Amended Microcosms. Environ. Sci. Technol 2015, 49 (13), 7666–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (51).Hamid H; Li LY; Grace JR Aerobic biotransformation of fluorotelomer compounds in landfill leachate-sediment. Sci. Total Environ 2020, 713, 136547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (52).Dalton H; Stirling DI Co-metabolism. Philos. Trans. R. Soc., B 1982, 297 (1088), 481–496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (53).Merino N; Qu Y; Deeb RA; Hawley EL; Hoffmann MR; Mahendra S Degradation and removal methods for perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances in water. Environ. Eng. Sci 2016, 33 (9), 615–649. [Google Scholar]
- (54).Vecitis CD; Park H; Cheng J; Mader BT; Hoffmann MR Treatment technologies for aqueous perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA). Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. China 2009, 3 (2), 129–151. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
