Skip to main content
Preventing Chronic Disease logoLink to Preventing Chronic Disease
. 2022 Mar 10;19:E11. doi: 10.5888/pcd19.210303

National Veterans Health Administration MOVE! Weight Management Program Participation During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Kristen E Gray 1,2,, Katherine D Hoerster 1,2,3,4, Stephanie A Spohr 5, Jessica Y Breland 6, Susan D Raffa 5,7
PMCID: PMC8937622  PMID: 35271436

Abstract

Introduction

In response to COVID-19, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) converted appropriate outpatient visits to virtual care, including MOVE! Weight Management Program for Veterans (MOVE!) visits. Before the pandemic, most veterans participated in MOVE! in person, with several telehealth modalities available. We sought to describe national trends in MOVE! participation during the pandemic (March 2020–January 2021) overall and by modality and to compare participation to prepandemic levels.

Methods

We conducted a national retrospective cohort study of veterans who participated in MOVE! from January 2018 through January 2021. We examined MOVE! participation across VHA aggregated at the national level by month, including the number of visits, participants, and new participants in person and via telehealth, including telephone, clinic-to-clinic synchronous video, anywhere-to-anywhere (eg, provider home to patient home) synchronous video, and remote education and monitoring. We also determined the percentage of all MOVE! visits attributable to each modality and the monthly percentage change in participation during the pandemic compared with monthly averages in prior years.

Results

Before March 2020, 20% to 30% of MOVE! was delivered via telehealth, which increased to 90% by April 2020. Early in the pandemic, telephone-delivered MOVE! was the most common modality, but anywhere-to-anywhere synchronous video participation increased over time. Compared with the same months in prior years, total monthly MOVE! participation remained 20% to 40% lower at the end of 2020 and into January 2021.

Conclusion

The VHA MOVE! program rapidly shifted to telehealth delivery of weight management services in response to the pandemic. However, a gap remained in the number of veterans receiving these services compared with prior years, suggesting potential unmet needs for weight management.


Summary.

What is already known on this topic?

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected physical activity and eating behaviors, resulting in weight gain. Health systems may be able to address this problem through behavioral weight management. Little is known about the pandemic’s effects on participation in weight management programs.

What is added by this report?

In the Veterans Health Administration, in-person weight management participation declined sharply because of COVID-19, whereas telehealth participation increased, accounting for 90% of participation during the pandemic versus 20% to 30% before. Total participation remained substantially lower into 2021 compared with prior years.

What are the implications for public health practice?

The demand for weight management services may increase in the postpandemic recovery period, which could be met by health care systems offering telehealth or hybrid options.

Introduction

Since 2006, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has offered the MOVE! Weight Management Program for Veterans (MOVE!) to veterans receiving care at all facilities to support the more than 80% who have a body mass index (BMI) of 25 or more (1). MOVE! is an evidence-based comprehensive lifestyle intervention combining dietary, physical activity, and behavioral strategies targeting clinically meaningful weight loss (≥5%) delivered in individual or group formats. Patients can participate in person or by using various technologies, including telephone, video conferencing, in-home monitoring with support, and a self-directed mobile app (2,3). MOVE! is effective, resulting in weight loss of 5% or more among 20% to 25% of participants at 12 months (4); telehealth individual modalities have been as effective as in-person group options (5). Before the COVID-19 pandemic, most MOVE! participation was through in-person group sessions at local VHA facilities. In response to the pandemic, on March 15, 2020, VHA leadership directed all facilities to convert in-person care to virtual care where appropriate (6). As of April 2, 2020, in-person MOVE! visits were suspended nationwide and transitioned to telehealth modalities.

Given that higher BMI is associated with increased risk of severe COVID-19 among veterans with a BMI of 30 or more (7), understanding the effect of the pandemic on weight management is critical for anticipating future behavioral weight management needs. This knowledge will help the VHA and other health care systems better understand how to address future local or national disruptions in care. Despite widespread availability of telehealth weight management options in the VHA, little is known about how the COVID-19 pandemic affected trends in MOVE! participation and the uptake of telehealth modalities. With pandemic-associated unintended weight gains and decreases in physical activity (8), there is likely a greater need for weight management services in the postpandemic recovery period, which telehealth may be well-suited to address. This study aims to 1) describe trends in national MOVE! participation overall and by modality and 2) compare participation with prepandemic levels. We hypothesized that in-person program participation would decrease and telehealth participation would increase.

Methods

We conducted a descriptive retrospective cohort study using VHA clinical and administrative data on MOVE! participation from the VHA Support Service Center MOVE! Visits Report. We examined MOVE! participation aggregated at the national level by month from January 2018 through January 2021. We considered the period of March 2020–January 2021 as “during the pandemic” and before March 2020 as “prepandemic.” This project was considered quality improvement and, per VHA policy, did not require institutional review board approval or waiver. We obtained a nonresearch determination (per VHA Handbook 1058.05) from the VHA National Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention.

MOVE! participation

We examined several dimensions of MOVE! participation each month, including the number of MOVE! visits, the number of MOVE! participants, and the number of new MOVE! participants. We identified MOVE!-related visits by clinic stop codes, which are administrative codes for identifying outpatient care. The combination of up to 2 stop codes indicated the MOVE! visit format (group [373] vs individual [372]) and the delivery modality. The combination of visit format and delivery modality resulted in more than 100 different stop code pairs.

We defined delivery modality as in person, telephone, Clinical Video Telehealth (clinic-to-clinic), VHA Video Connect (anywhere-to-anywhere [eg, provider home to veteran home]), or TeleMOVE! home telehealth. We also created a composite telehealth category, which aggregated telephone, Clinical Video Telehealth, VHA Video Connect, and TeleMOVE! home telehealth. Telephone involves delivery of the standard in-person MOVE! curriculum via telephone. Clinical Video Telehealth and VHA Video Connect are synchronous video sessions. TeleMOVE! home telehealth is an individual remote education and monitoring program completed by veterans at home using an in-home messaging device, browser-based technology, or mobile device and scale. Veterans receive daily education and transmit weight and other relevant health data for monitoring by a care coordinator, who assists participants with behavior change.

The number of MOVE! participants can include veterans more than once across stop codes. If a veteran has a MOVE! visit with a different stop code in the same month, they contribute data to each combination of stop codes (eg, to individual in-person visits and individual telephone visits). Therefore, totals summed across modalities will overestimate the unique number of participants in each month. Veterans are considered new MOVE! participants when they make their first ever MOVE! visit, and they are counted only once for this dimension of MOVE! participation.

Data analysis

We examined MOVE! participation from January 2018 through January 2021. We first characterized changes over time in the number of visits, participants, and new participants by MOVE! modality (in-person or telehealth), as well as the monthly distribution of MOVE! participation by modality (eg, percentage of all MOVE! visits attributable to each modality). We further examined trends in participation in each telehealth modality by group format versus individual format. To compare MOVE! participation during the COVID-19 pandemic to typical years, we averaged monthly participation in 2018 and 2019, assigning equal weight to each year, and calculated the percentage change in 2020 relative to the prior years’ average for that month. We calculated percentage change in January 2021 relative to the average across January 2019 and 2020, both of which were in the prepandemic period and were most proximal to January 2021 (vs averaging January 2018 and January 2019 for comparisons). We compared data from the same months in prior years because of seasonal variation in MOVE! participation, which precluded comparing data from the height of the pandemic to the months preceding it.

Results

Visits

We found 695,050 MOVE! visits in 2018, 727,585 visits in 2019, and 489,939 visits in 2020. The monthly number of MOVE! visits began to decline sharply in March 2020 because of declines in in-person visits to a nadir in May 2020 of 30,436 visits across modalities (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Trends in national Veterans Health Administration MOVE! Weight Management Program participation by modality, January 2018 through January 2021. A, Number of MOVE! visits. B, Number of MOVE! participants. C, Number of new MOVE! participants. Note that the scale in C differs from the scale in A and B.

Date No. of visits
No. of participants
No. of new participants
In person Telehealth Total In person Telehealth Total In person Telehealth Total
2018-Jan 41,323 15,937 57,260 23,547 11,825 35,372 3,948 887 4,835
2018-Feb 40,245 15,504 55,749 23,337 11,520 34,857 3,468 752 4,220
2018-Mar 44,465 17,139 61,604 24,963 12,357 37,320 3,726 847 4,573
2018-Apr 43,940 16,813 60,753 25,206 12,075 37,281 3,769 740 4,509
2018-May 46,487 16,939 63,426 25,252 12,296 37,548 3,695 858 4,553
2018-Jun 42,833 15,978 58,811 24,694 11,665 36,359 3,779 701 4,480
2018-Jul 40,329 15,106 55,435 23,446 11,178 34,624 3,443 748 4,191
2018-Aug 45,175 16,008 61,183 25,216 11,666 36,882 3,760 763 4,523
2018-Sep 39,182 14,421 53,603 23,088 10,947 34,035 3,308 626 3,934
2018-Oct 47,682 16,936 64,618 24,945 11,499 36,444 3,596 885 4,481
2018-Nov 39,412 15,513 54,925 22,141 10,982 33,123 2,913 793 3,706
2018-Dec 33,782 13,901 47,683 19,838 10,315 30,153 2,508 767 3,275
2019-Jan 45,350 16,539 61,889 23,730 11,492 35,222 3,607 1,010 4,617
2019-Feb 43,204 15,771 58,975 23,466 11,006 34,472 3,405 841 4,246
2019-Mar 46,812 16,984 63,796 24,664 11,454 36,118 3,533 987 4,520
2019-Apr 49,546 17,729 67,275 25,607 11,650 37,257 3,721 955 4,676
2019-May 48,224 16,926 65,150 25,240 11,344 36,584 3,854 959 4,813
2019-Jun 44,562 16,120 60,682 24,061 11,180 35,241 3,479 879 4,358
2019-Jul 45,670 16,505 62,175 23,692 11,118 34,810 3,479 901 4,380
2019-Aug 46,175 16,436 62,611 24,397 11,169 35,566 3,478 953 4,431
2019-Sep 42,625 15,360 57,985 23,302 10,667 33,969 3,223 822 4,045
2019-Oct 47,892 16,419 64,311 23,818 10,757 34,575 3,124 873 3,997
2019-Nov 38,838 14,595 53,433 21,295 10,145 31,440 2,699 768 3,467
2019-Dec 35,267 14,036 49,303 19,527 9,846 29,373 2,636 744 3,380
2020-Jan 47,061 16,768 63,829 23,467 10,851 34,318 3,577 988 4,565
2020-Feb 44,447 16,501 60,948 23,329 10,910 34,239 3,144 1,013 4,157
2020-Mar 26,393 20,250 46,643 17,005 15,114 32,119 2,169 1,372 3,541
2020-Apr 2,557 28,719 31,276 1,546 17,958 19,504 194 1,750 1,944
2020-May 1,334 29,102 30,436 809 18,240 19,049 126 1,677 1,803
2020-Jun 1,571 32,011 33,582 984 19,197 20,181 216 2,094 2,310
2020-Jul 2,381 32,887 35,268 1,503 19,393 20,896 283 2,293 2,576
2020-Aug 2,737 33,660 36,397 1,731 19,914 21,645 255 2,549 2,804
2020-Sep 3,406 36,023 39,429 2,145 20,610 22,755 391 2,851 3,242
2020-Oct 3,879 35,631 39,510 2,571 21,048 23,619 460 2,912 3,372
2020-Nov 3,242 32,141 35,383 2,279 20,412 22,691 399 2,725 3,124
2020-Dec 2,775 34,463 37,238 1,842 21,472 23,314 356 3,035 3,391
2021-Jan 3,038 37,730 40,768 2,000 23,128 25,128 383 3,200 3,583

Figure 1

We found concomitant increases in telehealth MOVE! modalities, particularly individual telephone visits and group VHA Video Connect visits (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Trends in national Veterans Health Administration telehealth MOVE! Weight Management Program participation by format (group vs individual) and modality, January 2018 through January 2021. A, Number of MOVE! visits. B, Number of MOVE! participants. C, Number of new MOVE! participants. Note that the scale in C differs from the scale in A and B. Abbreviations: VVC, VHA Video Connect; CVT, Clinical Video Telehealth.

Date Group telephone Individual telephone Group VHA Video Connect Individual VHA Video Connect Group Clinical Video Telehealth Individual Clinical Video Telehealth TeleMOVE!
No. of visits
2018-Jan 246 3,630 15 144 5,506 433 5,963
2018-Feb 228 3,252 28 161 5,698 387 5,750
2018-Mar 292 3,785 38 174 6,468 401 5,981
2018-Apr 287 3,621 34 176 6,645 375 5,675
2018-May 295 3,759 36 192 6,475 387 5,795
2018-Jun 249 3,428 23 173 6,150 375 5,580
2018-Jul 263 3,408 16 164 5,556 332 5,367
2018-Aug 317 3,724 9 178 6,094 368 5,318
2018-Sep 276 3,221 19 175 5,295 322 5,113
2018-Oct 497 4,193 28 229 6,120 378 5,491
2018-Nov 478 3,864 24 238 5,262 319 5,328
2018-Dec 410 3,473 6 241 4,390 296 5,085
2019-Jan 511 4,458 30 352 5,605 361 5,222
2019-Feb 502 3,951 49 335 5,597 380 4,957
2019-Mar 524 4,331 47 382 6,344 440 4,916
2019-Apr 604 4,328 53 456 6,774 385 5,129
2019-May 464 4,345 52 419 6,251 391 5,004
2019-Jun 523 4,134 58 452 5,696 351 4,906
2019-Jul 476 4,389 60 449 5,887 304 4,940
2019-Aug 512 4,127 73 473 5,857 307 5,087
2019-Sep 446 4,030 67 391 5,413 307 4,706
2019-Oct 543 4,465 105 475 5,821 376 4,634
2019-Nov 384 3,924 73 437 4,855 315 4,607
2019-Dec 360 4,064 73 484 4,376 317 4,362
2020-Jan 441 4,741 187 608 5,826 366 4,599
2020-Feb 495 4,283 198 535 5,850 322 4,818
2020-Mar 1,118 8,912 1,107 1,055 3,048 225 4,785
2020-Apr 3,484 13,664 5,416 1,769 11 2 4,373
2020-May 3,212 12,754 6,968 1,929 6 2 4,231
2020-Jun 3,448 13,058 9,039 2,161 33 13 4,259
2020-Jul 2,786 12,233 10,865 2,477 221 30 4,275
2020-Aug 2,766 11,846 12,273 2,615 250 30 3,880
2020-Sep 2,688 12,169 13,779 3,005 277 33 4,072
2020-Oct 2,567 11,636 14,433 2,994 267 31 3,703
2020-Nov 2,107 10,605 12,665 2,948 226 37 3,553
2020-Dec 2,248 11,618 13,502 3,131 134 25 3,805
2021-Jan 2,344 11,807 16,290 3,416 169 24 3,680

No. of participants
2018-Jan 127 2,777 9 119 2,655 408 5,730
2018-Feb 108 2,465 14 138 2,873 351 5,571
2018-Mar 131 2,755 15 139 3,128 385 5,804
2018-Apr 129 2,720 17 140 3,180 356 5,533
2018-May 124 2,829 16 141 3,219 352 5,615
2018-Jun 126 2,627 14 143 3,045 330 5,380
2018-Jul 116 2,609 7 131 2,818 316 5,181
2018-Aug 129 2,834 5 144 3,060 339 5,155
2018-Sep 131 2,582 9 148 2,798 301 4,978
2018-Oct 219 2,842 17 178 2,905 320 5,018
2018-Nov 228 2,628 11 175 2,687 285 4,968
2018-Dec 210 2,516 4 187 2,428 261 4,709
2019-Jan 215 3,027 11 244 2,864 319 4,812
2019-Feb 226 2,803 21 246 2,780 325 4,605
2019-Mar 249 3,010 20 266 2,985 371 4,553
2019-Apr 252 2,912 24 317 3,067 326 4,752
2019-May 236 2,924 23 307 2,921 316 4,617
2019-Jun 259 2,933 25 327 2,779 305 4,552
2019-Jul 234 3,015 28 324 2,690 272 4,555
2019-Aug 205 2,941 29 329 2,740 259 4,666
2019-Sep 218 2,900 32 292 2,589 260 4,376
2019-Oct 226 3,001 42 335 2,669 297 4,187
2019-Nov 188 2,730 37 330 2,457 272 4,131
2019-Dec 198 2,772 35 349 2,262 262 3,968
2020-Jan 214 3,094 75 413 2,620 311 4,124
2020-Feb 231 2,952 84 401 2,784 280 4,178
2020-Mar 667 6,443 691 769 2,043 196 4,305
2020-Apr 1,613 9,241 1,920 1,198 7 2 3,977
2020-May 1,585 8,897 2,636 1,317 3 2 3,800
2020-Jun 1,554 8,946 3,390 1,484 22 12 3,789
2020-Jul 1,278 8,328 4,144 1,728 94 28 3,793
2020-Aug 1,332 8,196 4,927 1,807 107 25 3,520
2020-Sep ,1223 8,200 5,365 2,037 126 30 3,629
2020-Oct 1,230 8,130 5,892 2,172 139 26 3,459
2020-Nov 1,194 7,801 5,766 2,203 125 32 3,291
2020-Dec 1,201 8,399 5,928 2,316 82 24 3,522
2021-Jan 1,197 8,770 7,015 2,566 85 22 3,473

No. of new participants
2018-Jan 10 507 0 5 49 8 308
2018-Feb 6 385 2 2 61 5 291
2018-Mar 9 476 0 3 68 8 283
2018-Apr 1 412 1 6 58 10 252
2018-May 11 477 0 7 55 12 296
2018-Jun 8 401 0 4 42 2 244
2018-Jul 8 409 0 3 61 4 263
2018-Aug 9 441 0 13 37 0 263
2018-Sep 6 379 2 7 42 6 184
2018-Oct 22 423 4 7 174 27 228
2018-Nov 14 381 5 10 177 15 191
2018-Dec 13 359 0 10 169 22 194
2019-Jan 11 473 4 22 231 23 246
2019-Feb 19 385 3 16 177 26 215
2019-Mar 18 472 1 21 216 30 229
2019-Apr 14 451 2 28 205 22 233
2019-May 11 451 3 19 222 23 230
2019-Jun 16 461 2 26 167 25 182
2019-Jul 9 464 2 22 176 17 211
2019-Aug 7 423 4 18 211 13 277
2019-Sep 12 401 1 21 178 15 194
2019-Oct 17 424 5 19 187 27 194
2019-Nov 8 377 0 14 156 12 201
2019-Dec 10 387 3 16 130 16 182
2020-Jan 12 456 15 36 226 17 226
2020-Feb 12 427 9 22 202 16 325
2020-Mar 25 868 38 70 115 14 242
2020-Apr 123 1,213 89 129 0 0 196
2020-May 119 1,097 157 130 2 0 172
2020-Jun 136 1,316 281 178 1 1 181
2020-Jul 107 1,348 409 235 4 1 189
2020-Aug 135 1,468 542 270 2 4 128
2020-Sep 143 1,581 533 310 4 2 278
2020-Oct 156 1,536 704 328 13 6 169
2020-Nov 163 1,410 625 345 9 3 170
2020-Dec 163 1,609 688 337 13 0 225
2021-Jan 162 1,512 999 355 7 2 163

Figure 2

Before March 2020, telehealth modalities made up approximately 30% of MOVE! visits, which then expanded to 90% or more (Figure 3). In the initial months of the pandemic, telephone visits accounted for the largest proportion of visits, but the proportion declined over time, from 54.8% in April 2020 to 34.7% in January 2021, while the proportion of VHA Video Connect visits increased, from 23.0% in April 2020 to 48.3% in January 2021.

Figure 3.

Distribution of national Veterans Health Administration MOVE! Weight Management Program participation by modality, January 2019 through January 2021. A, MOVE! visits. B, MOVE! participants. C, New MOVE! participants. Abbreviations: VVC, VHA Video Connect; CVT, Clinical Video Telehealth.

Date Percentage of total
In person Telephone VHA Video Connect Clinical Video Telehealth TeleMOVE!
Visits
2019-Jan 73.3 8.0 0.6 9.6 8.4
2019-Feb 73.3 7.6 0.7 10.1 8.4
2019-Mar 73.4 7.6 0.7 10.6 7.7
2019-Apr 73.6 7.3 0.8 10.6 7.6
2019-May 74.0 7.4 0.7 10.2 7.7
2019-Jun 73.4 7.7 0.8 10.0 8.1
2019-Jul 73.5 7.8 0.8 10.0 7.9
2019-Aug 73.7 7.4 0.9 9.8 8.1
2019-Sep 73.5 7.7 0.8 9.9 8.1
2019-Oct 74.5 7.8 0.9 9.6 7.2
2019-Nov 72.7 8.1 1.0 9.7 8.6
2019-Dec 71.5 9.0 1.1 9.5 8.8
2020-Jan 73.7 8.1 1.2 9.7 7.2
2020-Feb 72.9 7.8 1.2 10.1 7.9
2020-Mar 56.6 21.5 4.6 7.0 10.3
2020-Apr 8.2 54.8 23.0 0.0 14.0
2020-May 4.4 52.5 29.2 0.0 13.9
2020-Jun 4.7 49.2 33.4 0.1 12.7
2020-Jul 6.8 42.6 37.8 0.7 12.1
2020-Aug 7.5 40.1 40.9 0.8 10.7
2020-Sep 8.6 37.7 42.6 0.8 10.3
2020-Oct 9.8 35.9 44.1 0.8 9.4
2020-Nov 9.2 35.9 44.1 0.7 10.0
2020-Dec 7.5 37.2 44.7 0.4 10.2
2021-Jan 7.5 34.7 48.3 0.5 9.0

Participants
2019-Jan 67.4 9.2 0.7 9.0 13.7
2019-Feb 68.1 8.8 0.8 9.0 13.4
2019-Mar 68.3 9.0 0.8 9.3 12.6
2019-Apr 68.7 8.5 0.9 9.1 12.8
2019-May 69.0 8.6 0.9 8.8 12.6
2019-Jun 68.3 9.1 1.0 8.8 12.9
2019-Jul 68.1 9.3 1.0 8.5 13.1
2019-Aug 68.6 8.8 1.0 8.4 13.1
2019-Sep 68.6 9.2 1.0 8.4 12.9
2019-Oct 68.9 9.3 1.1 8.6 12.1
2019-Nov 67.7 9.3 1.2 8.7 13.1
2019-Dec 66.5 10.1 1.3 8.6 13.5
2020-Jan 68.4 9.6 1.4 8.5 12.0
2020-Feb 68.1 9.3 1.4 8.9 12.2
2020-Mar 52.9 22.1 4.5 7.0 13.4
2020-Apr 7.9 55.7 16.0 0.0 20.4
2020-May 4.2 55.0 20.8 0.0 19.9
2020-Jun 4.9 52.0 24.2 0.2 18.8
2020-Jul 7.2 46.0 28.1 0.6 18.2
2020-Aug 8.0 44.0 31.1 0.6 16.3
2020-Sep 9.4 41.4 32.5 0.7 15.9
2020-Oct 10.9 39.6 34.1 0.7 14.6
2020-Nov 10.0 39.6 35.1 0.7 14.5
2020-Dec 7.9 41.2 35.4 0.5 15.1
2021-Jan 8.0 39.7 38.1 0.4 13.8

New participants
2019-Jan 78.1 10.5 0.6 5.5 5.3
2019-Feb 80.2 9.5 0.4 4.8 5.1
2019-Mar 78.2 10.8 0.5 5.4 5.1
2019-Apr 79.6 9.9 0.6 4.9 5.0
2019-May 80.1 9.6 0.5 5.1 4.8
2019-Jun 79.8 10.9 0.6 4.4 4.2
2019-Jul 79.4 10.8 0.5 4.4 4.8
2019-Aug 78.5 9.7 0.5 5.1 6.3
2019-Sep 79.7 10.2 0.5 4.8 4.8
2019-Oct 78.2 11.0 0.6 5.4 4.9
2019-Nov 77.8 11.1 0.4 4.8 5.8
2019-Dec 78.0 11.7 0.6 4.3 5.4
2020-Jan 78.4 10.3 1.1 5.3 5.0
2020-Feb 75.6 10.6 0.7 5.2 7.8
2020-Mar 61.3 25.2 3.0 3.6 6.8
2020-Apr 10.0 68.7 11.2 0.0 10.1
2020-May 7.0 67.4 15.9 0.1 9.5
2020-Jun 9.4 62.9 19.9 0.1 7.8
2020-Jul 11.0 56.5 25.0 0.2 7.3
2020-Aug 9.1 57.2 29.0 0.2 4.6
2020-Sep 12.1 53.2 26.0 0.2 8.6
2020-Oct 13.6 50.2 30.6 0.6 5.0
2020-Nov 12.8 50.4 31.0 0.4 5.4
2020-Dec 10.5 52.3 30.2 0.4 6.6
2021-Jan 10.7 46.7 37.8 0.3 4.5

Figure 3

When compared with the monthly average in the years before the pandemic, the number of visits dropped by more than 50% in April 2020, driven by a 95% decline in in-person visits (Figure 4). In subsequent months, in-person visits remained 92% to 97% lower than averages for corresponding months in previous years. In the same period, telehealth visits increased relative to averages in previous years, with percentage increases ranging from 66% in April to 147% in December 2020. This increase mitigated some of the decline in total MOVE! visits compared with prior years, such that differences in total number of visits generally declined over time from 51% lower in April 2020 compared with averages in April 2019 and 2018 to 35% lower in January 2021 compared with January 2020 and 2019.

Figure 4.

Monthly percentage change in national Veterans Health Administration MOVE! Weight Management Program participation by modality in January 2020 through January 2021 relative to monthly average in prior years. A, MOVE! visits. B, MOVE! participants. C, New MOVE! participants. Note that the scale in C differs from the scale in A and B.

Date Visits, % change
Participants, % change
New participants, % change
In person Telehealth Total In person Telehealth Total In person Telehealth Total
2020-Jan 9 3 7 −1 −7 −3 −5 4 −3
2020-Feb 7 6 6 0 −3 −1 −9 27 −2
2020-Mar −42 19 −26 −31 27 −13 −40 50 −22
2020-Apr −95 66 −51 −94 51 −48 −95 106 −58
2020-May −97 72 −53 −97 54 −49 −97 85 −61
2020-Jun −96 99 −44 −96 68 −44 −94 165 −48
2020-Jul −94 108 −40 −94 74 −40 −92 178 −40
2020-Aug −94 107 −41 −93 74 −40 −93 197 −37
2020-Sep −92 142 −29 −91 91 −33 −88 294 −19
2020-Oct −92 114 −39 −89 89 −33 −86 231 −20
2020-Nov −92 114 −35 −90 93 −30 −86 249 −13
2020-Dec −92 147 −23 −91 113 −22 −86 302 2
2021-Jan −93 127 −35 −92 107 −28 −89 220 −22

Figure 4

Participants

Trends in the number of participants were similar to trends in the number of visits: declines began in March 2020 for the number of in-person and total participants, with the lowest numbers in May 2020 (Figure 1). The number of telehealth participants increased starting in March 2020 and continued through January 2021, with increases most pronounced in individual telephone participants and group VHA Video Connect participants (Figure 2). Before the pandemic, telehealth accounted for slightly more than 30% of participants in MOVE! but increased to 90% or more after March 2020 (Figure 3). Starting in April 2020, telephone participants accounted for the largest proportion; however, the proportion of VHA Video Connect participants increased over time, from 16% in April 2020 to 38% in January 2021 (Figure 3). Patterns in monthly participants compared with prior years were similar to patterns in visits: total participants declined by nearly 50% for April and May 2020, driven by declines in in-person participants (Figure 4). Compared with averages in prior years, telehealth participants generally increased over time, peaking at 113% in December 2020. In general, deficits compared with previous years became smaller over time, with above-noted 50% fewer total participants in April and May 2020, compared with prior years, down to 28% fewer in January 2021 relative to prior years.

New participants

The number of new MOVE! participants was 51,280 in 2018, 50,930 in 2019, and 36,829 in 2020. Declines in the number of new participants in telehealth and in-person modalities caused by the pandemic reached lows in May 2020 such that only 1,803 patients began MOVE! in that month compared with 4,813 in May 2019 (Figure 1). Increases in telehealth modalities began in March 2020 and continued through January 2021, with the most notable increases among new participants using individual telephone and group VHA Video Connect (Figure 2). Before the pandemic, telehealth accounted for approximately 20% of new participants and increased to 90% from April 2020 onward (Figure 3). Although telephone was the most common modality for new participants throughout the pandemic (69% in April 2020 and 47% in January 2021 [Figure 3]), the share attributable to VHA Video Connect continued to increase over time, from 11% in April 2020 to 38% in January 2021. When comparing the monthly number of new participants to averages in prior years, the nadir was in May 2020, when the number of new participants was 61% of the average across May 2018 and 2019, attributable to a 97% decline in in-person MOVE! relative to prior years (Figure 4). Starting in March 2020, participants seen via telehealth increased substantially, compared with previous years, and peaked at 302% in December 2020. Declines in monthly new participants compared with prior years decreased over time, such that in December 2020, there was a slight increase in new participants relative to December of prior years (2%). However, in January 2021 this dipped back to 22% lower than previous years.

Discussion

We examined national trends in VHA MOVE! Weight Management Program participation before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, from January 2018 through January 2021. As anticipated, we found dramatic declines in MOVE! participation overall, particularly for in-person modalities, beginning in March 2020. This coincided with general national VHA guidance in mid-March 2020 to convert appropriate outpatient appointments to virtual modalities (6) and subsequent MOVE!-specific national guidance to suspend in-person MOVE! visits for at least 30 days. The MOVE! program and providers responded rapidly, with 90% of participation transitioning to telehealth modalities by April 2020. In the initial months of the pandemic, telephone modalities accounted for the greatest proportion of MOVE! participation, but the share of anywhere-to-anywhere synchronous video (VHA Video Connect) participation increased over time. Compared with the same month in prior years, total monthly MOVE! participation (in person and telehealth) was 50% to 60% lower in April and May 2020. After May 2020, deficits relative to prior years generally became smaller over time (eg, approximately 40% lower in July and August 2020). However, MOVE! participation remained 20% to 30% lower in the latter months of 2020 and into January of 2021 compared with the same months in prior years.

The increase in VHA Video Connect participation over time was likely influenced by efforts to educate providers and patients on this newer technology as well as infrastructure improvements to increase bandwidth available for video appointments (6). The high utilization of telephone visits, particularly early in the pandemic, may reflect initial national guidance to use the modality with the lowest technology requirement (such as secure messaging or telephone) unless video visits had been established for MOVE! or a veteran preferred a video visit. Home telehealth (ie, TeleMOVE!) remained relatively stable over time. This stability was likely related to new COVID-19 home telehealth monitoring protocols that were developed and guidance to facilities to consider COVID-19 monitoring needs before enrolling new TeleMOVE! participants. At facilities where clinician resources were limited (eg, MOVE! staff reassigned to provide COVID-19 care), MOVE! teams were encouraged to prioritize telehealth options according to patient need and local context.

Our findings highlight that, although the VHA had existing telehealth infrastructure and programming, MOVE! participation in 2020 was 30% lower than in previous years. Therefore, many patients who would have otherwise received weight management services did not because of the pandemic. Given COVID-19–related declines in physical activity, increases in sedentary behaviors, and changes in eating patterns, there is a pressing need for accessible weight management services now and in the future (9,10). Contributors to changes in health behaviors may include COVID-19 restrictions leading to shifts in routine or access to healthy foods and safe spaces for physical activity (eg, lack of access to gyms or exercise partners). Psychological distress also increased markedly during the pandemic, which may be a factor in worsening activity and eating behaviors, given that conditions such as depression and posttraumatic stress disorder affect health behaviors and weight (1013). Pandemic-associated stress may also lead patients to prioritize other aspects of their health (eg, coping with distress by eating comfort foods) and lives (eg, virtual schooling of children) over weight management. Related to these and other factors, 42% of US adults reported gaining unwanted weight during the pandemic, with an average gain of 29 pounds (8). With high rates of mental health conditions, food insecurity, and limited social support, veterans may be especially vulnerable to COVID-19–related behavior change and weight gain (1418). Weight management programs, including MOVE!, may need to incorporate additional strategies to help participants overcome the challenges to modifying health behaviors in the context of heightened pandemic-related stress and anxiety (19).

Our findings also suggest that barriers to telehealth may remain at the patient, provider, or health care system level. One such potential barrier is the lack of technology necessary for telehealth weight management services. The most common telehealth MOVE! modality early in the pandemic was telephone, but use of anywhere-to-anywhere synchronous video increased over time. Veteran preferences for MOVE! participation format and modality during and after the pandemic have not been broadly assessed. However, a survey among 58 veterans who were seen during the pandemic in an intensive weight management clinic that provides interdisciplinary pre- and postbariatric surgery care may provide some insights (20). In that study, half of participants indicated telephone visits were as good as in-person visits, and a similar proportion said they would prefer to have all visits over the telephone even after pandemic-related restrictions to in-person visits were lifted (20). Although participants were not offered video visits, they were queried about preferences for video. Nearly half indicated they would have preferred video to telephone visits if they were available, and 37% endorsed a preference for all video visits after restrictions were lifted (20). A substantial number of veterans lack the technology needed for video visits, including compatible devices or high-speed internet (21). These barriers differentially affect older, unhoused, and rural veterans (22). To address these gaps, the VHA implemented the Digital Divide Consult, which enables patients to obtain internet services or technology needed for VHA telehealth and provides robust technology support and digital skills classes (23). However, the VHA will need to evaluate the extent to which the pandemic exacerbated disparities in access and the success of the Digital Divide Consult in addressing these disparities. Given anticipated long-term shifts toward reliance on telehealth, the VHA must continue to ensure equitable access for all veterans.

Strategies to promote weight management access for VHA patients may include prioritizing a return to face-to-face modalities as soon as it is safe to do so and ensuring safe practices for face-to-face visits, especially group programs, in accordance with local and federal guidance, including use of face masks, social distancing, proper ventilation, hand hygiene, and encouraging vaccination and boosters. Other strategies could include offering hybrid models with in-person and telehealth options; continuing to provide MOVE! via synchronous video and telephone; and expanding self-directed options, like app, online, or DVD-based programs, which have been effective in non-VHA settings and are currently being tested in the VHA (2426). Offering telehealth or hybrid options may also enhance access to weight management services in non-VHA settings, where telehealth modalities may be less robust than in the VHA. For example, of the nearly 2,000 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention–recognized Diabetes Prevention Programs, which lead to clinically significant weight loss (27), less than one-quarter have telehealth options (28). Health care systems can also consider delivering weight management programs — in person, telehealth, or hybrid — in nontraditional settings, such as within mental health care, to promote access among specific patient populations (29).

Our study has several important strengths and limitations. We had readily available data on a nationally implemented weight management program with hundreds of thousands of visits over several years, allowing for investigation of trends over time. We also had information on types of program participation, including several different telehealth options, which facilitated examination of uptake of individual telehealth modalities before and during the pandemic. Limitations include use of data aggregated at the national level, precluding examination of the influence of patient-, facility-, or regional-level characteristics on MOVE! participation or understanding variation in the effects of COVID-19 on MOVE! participation. Furthermore, our study did not allow for evaluation of patient attitudes about access and preferred modalities, barriers to service delivery, or patient outreach during the pandemic. Future work should seek to understand patient perspectives on weight management program participation during COVID-19 and evaluate facility- and regional-level differences in the effects of COVID-19 on participation. We also were not able to examine trends in self-directed MOVE! participation (eg, the MOVE! app), although there is insufficient evidence to determine whether self-directed weight management programs without a clinical component are as effective as clinical interventions (30). Our findings reflect data from a single large integrated health care system and may not be generalizable to other health care systems or weight management programs, particularly those that did not offer telehealth options before the pandemic. Lastly, information on one dimension of participation — the number of monthly MOVE! participants — was limited by the potential for participants to be counted more than once in a given month if they participated in 2 or more MOVE! modalities or formats. Because of the transition of MOVE! to telehealth in March 2020, patients were more likely to be duplicated in the early months of the pandemic, because they were more likely to participate in more than 1 modality. Relatedly, we could not calculate yearly totals for participants, because individuals would contribute data to each month in which they participated in MOVE!, leading to substantial overestimates of the total annual number of participants.

In this study, we found a rapid transition of the VHA MOVE! Weight Management Program to telehealth modalities at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. Although the VHA had been delivering MOVE! via telehealth before the pandemic, we found a sizable gap in total MOVE! participation compared with prior years that persisted into January 2021. Findings suggest potential unmet needs for weight management now and into the future, some of which telehealth may be able to address. Additional research is needed to understand whether these gaps continue and the factors driving them (eg, patient-, facility-, and regional-level factors) to promote equitable access to weight management services.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Career Development Award number 16-154 (K.E.G.) and number 15-257 (J.Y.B.) from the US Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research and Development Program. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the US government. No copyrighted materials were used in this article.

Footnotes

The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions.

Suggested citation for this article: Gray KE, Hoerster KD, Spohr SA, Breland JY, Raffa SD. National Veterans Health Administration MOVE! Weight Management Program Participation During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Prev Chronic Dis 2022;19:210303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd19.210303.

References

  • 1. Breland JY, Phibbs CS, Hoggatt KJ, Washington DL, Lee J, Haskell S, et al. The obesity epidemic in the Veterans Health Administration: prevalence among key populations of women and men veterans. J Gen Intern Med 2017;32(Suppl 1):11–7. 10.1007/s11606-016-3962-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Chan SH, Raffa SD. Examining the dose-response relationship in the Veterans Health Administration’s MOVE!® weight management program: a nationwide observational study. J Gen Intern Med 2017;32(Suppl 1):18–23. 10.1007/s11606-017-3992-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Kinsinger LS, Jones KR, Kahwati L, Harvey R, Burdick M, Zele V, et al. Design and dissemination of the MOVE! weight-management program for Veterans. Prev Chronic Dis 2009;6(3):A98. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Maciejewski ML, Shepherd-Banigan M, Raffa SD, Weidenbacher HJ. Systematic review of behavioral weight management program MOVE! for veterans. Am J Prev Med 2018;54(5):704–14. 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.01.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Rutledge T, Skoyen JA, Wiese JA, Ober KM, Woods GN. A comparison of MOVE! versus TeleMOVE programs for weight loss in veterans with obesity. Obes Res Clin Pract 2017;11(3):344–51. 10.1016/j.orcp.2016.11.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Heyworth L, Kirsh S, Zulman D, Ferguson JM, Kizer KW. Expanding access through virtual care: the VA’s early experience with COVID-19. NEJM Catalyst. July 1, 2020. https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/cat.20.0327. Accessed July 15, 2021.
  • 7. Breland JY, Wong MS, Steers WN, Yuan AH, Haderlein TP, Washington DL. BMI and risk for severe COVID-19 among Veterans Health Administration patients. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2021;29(5):825–8. 10.1002/oby.23121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. American Psychological Association. Stress in America: one year later, a new wave of pandemic health concerns. 2021. https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/stress/2021/sia-pandemic-report.pdf. Accessed July 15, 2021.
  • 9. Stockwell S, Trott M, Tully M, Shin J, Barnett Y, Butler L, et al. Changes in physical activity and sedentary behaviours from before to during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown: a systematic review. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 2021;7(1):e000960. 10.1136/bmjsem-2020-000960 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Robinson E, Boyland E, Chisholm A, Harrold J, Maloney NG, Marty L, et al. Obesity, eating behavior and physical activity during COVID-19 lockdown: a study of UK adults. Appetite 2021;156:104853. 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104853 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Stanton R, To QG, Khalesi S, Williams SL, Alley SJ, Thwaite TL, et al. Depression, anxiety and stress during COVID-19: associations with changes in physical activity, sleep, tobacco and alcohol use in Australian adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17(11):E4065. 10.3390/ijerph17114065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Hall KS, Hoerster KD, Yancy WS Jr. Post-traumatic stress disorder, physical activity, and eating behaviors. Epidemiol Rev 2015;37(1):103–15. 10.1093/epirev/mxu011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Hoerster KD, Campbell S, Dolan M, Stappenbeck CA, Yard S, Simpson T, et al. PTSD is associated with poor health behavior and greater body mass index through depression, increasing cardiovascular disease and diabetes risk among U.S. veterans. Prev Med Rep 2019;15:100930. 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100930 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Hoerster KD, Lehavot K, Simpson T, McFall M, Reiber G, Nelson KM. Health and health behavior differences: U.S. military, veteran, and civilian men. Am J Prev Med 2012;43(5):483–9. 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.07.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Lehavot K, Hoerster KD, Nelson KM, Jakupcak M, Simpson TL. Health indicators for military, veteran, and civilian women. Am J Prev Med 2012;42(5):473–80. 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.01.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Wang EA, McGinnis KA, Goulet J, Bryant K, Gibert C, Leaf DA, et al. ; Veterans Aging Cohort Study Project Team. Food insecurity and health: data from the Veterans Aging Cohort Study. Public Health Rep 2015;130(3):261–8. 10.1177/003335491513000313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Kuwert P, Knaevelsrud C, Pietrzak RH. Loneliness among older veterans in the United States: results from the National Health and Resilience in Veterans Study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2014;22(6):564–9. 10.1016/j.jagp.2013.02.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Campbell SB, Gray KE, Hoerster KD, Fortney JC, Simpson TL. Differences in functional and structural social support among female and male veterans and civilians. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2021;56(3):375–86. 10.1007/s00127-020-01862-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Caldwell AE, Thomas EA, Rynders C, Holliman BD, Perreira C, Ostendorf DM, et al. Improving lifestyle obesity treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: new challenges for weight management. Obes Sci Pract 2021;10.1002/osp4.540. 10.1002/osp4.540 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Lohnberg JA, Salcido L, Frayne S, Mahtani N, Bates C, Hauser ME, et al. Rapid conversion to virtual obesity care in COVID-19: impact on patient care, interdisciplinary collaboration, and training. Obes Sci Pract 2021;28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Wireline Competition Bureau. Promoting broadband internet access service for veterans. May 2019. https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-357270A1.pdf. Accessed July 15, 2021.
  • 22. Ferguson JM, Jacobs J, Yefimova M, Greene L, Heyworth L, Zulman DM. Virtual care expansion in the Veterans Health Administration during the COVID-19 pandemic: clinical services and patient characteristics associated with utilization. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021;28(3):453–62. 10.1093/jamia/ocaa284 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Connected Care. Connecting veterans to telehealth care. 2021. https://connectedcare.va.gov/sites/default/files/telehealth-digital-divide-fact-sheet.pdf. Accessed June 25, 2021.
  • 24. Islam MM, Poly TN, Walther BA, Jack Li YC. Use of mobile phone app interventions to promote weight loss: meta-analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(7):e17039. 10.2196/17039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Hoerster KD, Collins MP, Au DH, Lane A, Epler E, McDowell J, et al. Testing a self-directed lifestyle intervention among veterans: The D-ELITE pragmatic clinical trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2020;95:106045. 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Ma J, Yank V, Xiao L, Lavori PW, Wilson SR, Rosas LG, et al. Translating the Diabetes Prevention Program lifestyle intervention for weight loss into primary care: a randomized trial. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173(2):113–21. 10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.987 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, Hamman RF, Lachin JM, Walker EA, et al. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med 2002;346(6):393–403. 10.1056/NEJMoa012512 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Registry of all recognized organizations. Diabetes prevention recognition program application. https://dprp.cdc.gov/Registry. Accessed July 12, 2021.
  • 29. Aschbrenner KA, Naslund JA, Reed JD, Fetter JC. Renewed call for lifestyle interventions to address obesity among individuals with serious mental illness in the COVID-19 era and beyond. Transl Behav Med 2021;11(7):1359–64. 10.1093/tbm/ibab076 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. LeBlanc EL, Patnode CD, Webber EM, Redmond N, Rushkin M, O’Connor EA. Behavioral and pharmacotherapy weight loss interventions to prevent obesity-related morbidity and mortality in adults: an updated systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2018. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Preventing Chronic Disease are provided here courtesy of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

RESOURCES