Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2022 Mar 7;87(6):4305–4315. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.1c03158

Selective α-Methylation of Aryl Ketones Using Quaternary Ammonium Salts as Solid Methylating Agents

Johanna Templ 1, Michael Schnürch 1,*
PMCID: PMC8938946  PMID: 35253422

Abstract

graphic file with name jo1c03158_0007.jpg

We describe the use of phenyl trimethylammonium iodide (PhMe3NI) as an alternative methylating agent for introducing a CH3 group in α-position to a carbonyl group. Compared to conventional methylating agents, quaternary ammonium salts have the advantages of being nonvolatile, noncancerogenic, and easy-to-handle solids. This regioselective method is characterized by ease of operational setup, use of anisole as green solvent, and yields up to 85%.

Introduction

Incorporating a methyl group into small organic or bioactive molecules can positively affect their physical properties and biological effectiveness.1,2 The latter feature is commonly referred to as the “magic methyl effect”.3 This renders the methyl group a prevalent structural motif in small-molecule drugs.4,5 Owing to its considerable impact, a late-stage introduction of a CH3 group has become a particularly promising strategy in drug discovery.68 Hence, the development of efficient and new strategies for selective methylation attracts broad interest in medicinal chemistry and basic research, respectively.913

Traditionally applied methylating agents often suffer from inconvenient physical properties (e.g., MeBr, b.p. 4 °C, MeI, b.p. 42 °C) or high toxicity (e.g., MeI, Me2SO4). Several organometallic reagents used for methylation (e.g., MeB(OH)2, Me4Sn, Me3Al, MeMgCl, or Me2Zn) are quite challenging to handle, as some are air-sensitive, show low functional group tolerance, or have to be freshly prepared.14,15 These toxicological and safety concerns encouraged us to search for a novel, safe, and easy-to-handle reagent for direct methylation. From previous findings in our group, we established different quaternary ammonium salts as alkylating agents in metal-catalyzed C–H activation reactions.16,17

The predominant role of quaternary ammonium salts in organic reactions is their application as phase transfer catalysts18 and ionic liquids.19 However, their use as alkylating agents in general and methylating agents in particular is quite an unexplored field. There are a few reports on O-methylation of phenolic compounds with tetramethylammonium chloride (Me4NCl, Figure 1, I)20,21 or hydroxide (Me4NOH)22 and phenyl trimethylammonium (PhMe3NCl) chloride.21N-Methylation via ammonium salts was achieved in azaheterocycles using tetramethylammonium bromide (Me4NBr)23 and more recently in amides, N-heterocycles, alcohols, and thiols using tetramethylammonium fluoride (Me4NF, Figure 1, II).24 Direct methylation of C(sp2)–H bonds using phenyl trimethylammonium iodide and bromide as methyl source was realized by Uemura et al.25 under NiII-catalysis (Figure 1, III).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Methylation strategies using quaternary ammonium salts.

With the below-described novel, safe, and metal-free method for α-methylation, we want to set a starting point in the relatively uncharted field of using quaternary ammonium salts as alkylating agents for C(sp3)–H bonds (Figure 1, IV).

Results and Discussion

We started by investigating the methylation of benzyl 4-fluorophenyl ketone 1a since quantification in all optimization steps can be accomplished via19F NMR using trifluoro toluene as an internal standard without preceding workup or solvent removal. Initially, Me4NBr was used as the methylating agent and KOH as the base in toluene at 130 °C. Here, we observed the methyl enol ether 2a and the α-methylated product 3a forming in a 1.2:1 ratio (Table 1, Entry 1). In a next step, it was investigated whether switching the solvent could shift the product distribution toward the desired product 3a. Since the process should be as benign as possible, we aimed to find a suitable green solvent in combination with an inexpensive base. 2-Methyl-THF, anisole,26 and cyclopentylmethylether27 are considered green solvents and were tested (among others; see the SI for full list) in this transformation. Anisole (entry 3) showed the highest overall conversion and additionally slightly favored the desired product 3a (entry 3, 1:1.08 ratio of 2a and 3a). 2-Methyl-THF and cyclopentylmethylether gave lower conversion and additionally favored the undesired product 2a (entries 2 and 4). Other benign solvents proved to be inefficient (see complete solvent screening list in the SI). We further investigated the influence and efficiency of different bases. Hydroxy bases gave the best yields, with the initially used KOH surpassing NaOH. KOtBu and Cs2CO3 showed significantly lower conversion. The other bases tested turned out to be inefficient (see the SI for details).

Table 1. Optimization of the Reaction Conditionsa.

graphic file with name jo1c03158_0005.jpg

      yield (%)b
entry solvent ammonium salt 1a 2a 3a
1 toluene Me4NBr 0 41 34
2 MeTHFc Me4NBr 25 14 11
3 anisole Me4NBr 0 40 43
4 CPME Me4NBr 4 36 24
5 anisole Me4NCl 0 43 42
6 anisole Me4NI 30 23 29
7d anisole Me4NOAc 0 49 9
8 anisole PhMe3NCl 0 47 48
9 anisole PhMe3NBr 0 38 50
10 anisole PhMe3NI 0 18 78
11 anisole Bu3MeNCl 6 25e 39
12 anisole BnMe3NCl 0 0 0f
13 anisole (C16H33)Me3NBr 0 47 25
14 anisole betaine 30 2 5
a

Reactions were performed on a 0.23 mmol scale, with KOH (2 equiv) as base, and 1.5 equiv of the ammonium salt under Ar atmosphere; reaction times: 22 h (entries 1–4) and 18 h (entries 5–15), 130 °C.

b

Yield was determined by 19F NMR using trifluoro toluene as internal standard.

c

100 °C.

d

Reaction time 3 h.

e

13% OnBu-ether formation.

f

64% α-benzylation.

Before continuing with optimization of the methylating reagent, it was tested whether the O- and the α-methylated products 2a and 3a are formed independently or whether 2a might be the actual methylating agent. The kinetic profile showed that both the O- and the α-methylated product are formed simultaneously under the given reaction conditions within 30 minutes, and no shift in product ratio could be observed at prolonged reaction times (see Figure 2). Furthermore, enol ether 2a was subjected to the reaction conditions without any formation of 3a.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Reaction time screening; conditions: Me4NBr (1.5 equiv), KOH (2 equiv), anisole (0.2 M), 130 °C.

And finally, a 1:1 mixture of 1a and 2a was subjected to the reaction conditions in the absence of Me4NBr without any formation of 3a. This excludes that the two products are interconvertible under the applied conditions and are indeed formed independently (cf.Table 2).

Table 2. Studies for Interconversion of Products 2a and 3a.

graphic file with name jo1c03158_0006.jpg

  substrate
yield (%)b
entry 1a [mmol] 2a [mmol] 1a 2a 3a
1 0.093   0 42 43
2 0.047 0.044 0 73 9
3   0.088 0 86 0
4a 0.047 0.044 30 44 0
a

The reaction was performed in the absence of the methylating agent (Me4NBr).

b

Yield was determined by 19F NMR using trifluoro toluene as internal standard.

Next, we screened for different ammonium salts as methyl sources. We found that Me4NCl and Me4NBr gave equal yields and product ratios, whereas Me4NI gave incomplete conversion (entries 5 and 6). Tetramethylammonium acetate favored the O-methyl enol ether (entry 7). When using ammonium salts with different substituents on the quaternary nitrogen, we observed additional O-butylation (13%) with Bu3MeNCl (entry 11) and mainly α-benzylation (64%) with BnMe3NCl (entry 12). When using (C16H33)Me3NBr as an alkylating agent, only 2a and 3a were formed, but no hexadecylated compound of any kind (entry 13). The naturally occurring ammonium salt betaine was practically ineffective (entry 14). Gratifyingly, we identified phenyl trimethylammonium salts giving significantly higher overall yields. Going from the chloride and bromide to the iodide salt, we observed a shift towards the desired α-methylated product 3a (entries 8–10). Compared with tetramethylammonium salts, a phenyl substituent on the ammonium most probably withdraws electron density from the adjacent methyl substituents, which then, in turn, are more prone to react with the “soft” α-carbon of the enolate rather than being attacked by the carbonyl oxygen. Finally, we found the optimal reaction conditions being PhMe3NI (1.5 equiv) and KOH (2 equiv) in anisole (0.23 M) at 130 °C, wherein the desired 1-(4-fluorophenyl)-2-phenyl-1-propanone (3a) was obtained in 78% yield after 18 h (entry 10) determined by 19F NMR.

The outcome of the optimization efforts corresponds to previous studies on quaternary ammonium compounds as alkylating agents present in the literature.28,29 Accordingly, for ammonium salts with different organic substituents on the nitrogen, a benzyl group is transferred preferentially from the ammonium salt to a nucleophile, followed by methyl substituents, and finally, other primary alkyl chains. The substituents on the ammonium ion further impact the cleavage rate of neighboring alkyl groups. If an aryl substituent is present within the ammonium salt, an adjacent alkyl group is transferred more readily compared to an aliphatic chain from tetraalkylammonium salts.

To exclude a reaction pathway via thermal decomposition of the ammonium salt to the respective methyl halide, which could act as the actual methylating reagent, we choose a reaction setup that would allow transfer of gaseous reactants between two spatially divided reaction vessels. For this purpose, a COware vial (Skrydstrup vial30) was used, with two separate reaction chambers connected at their upper part for gas exchange. Chamber 1 was charged with the ammonium salt, base, and anisole as solvent, and chamber 2 was charged with substrate 1a, base, and solvent. The whole vessel was heated to 130 °C, where possibly formed methyl halide from chamber 1 should reach chamber 2 via the gas phase. However, no methylated product could be observed, and solely starting material was recovered. Furthermore, methylation occurred when Me4NOAc was used as CH3 source, which again corroborates the hypothesis of direct nucleophilic substitution rather than thermal decomposition to a methylating agent. Additionally, when methylating phenyl benzyl ketone by MeI, solely the α-mono- and α-bis-methylated products form, but no O-methylation is observed.31 Furthermore, we successfully performed α-methylation using PhMe3NI at lower temperatures by exploiting microwave irradiation. A decrease of reaction temperature as low as 90 °C still afforded the desired product 3 in comparable yields (see the SI for details).

With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, we performed α-methylation reactions on various substrates to demonstrate the scope of this direct transformation (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1. Scope of α-Methylation.

Scheme 1

1 equiv PhMe3NI.

PhEt3NI (2 equiv) as ammonium salt.

Reaction time 6 h, addition of KOH (2 equiv) and PhMe3NI (2 equiv) after 3 h.

Addition of KOH (2 equiv) and PhMe3NI (2 equiv) after 3 h and 48 h; reaction time, 4 days.

BnMe3NCl (1 equiv) as ammonium salt

3 equiv KOH, reaction time 24 h.

Isolated yields are shown. Standard conditions: Substrate (100 mg, 1 equiv), PhMe3NI (2 equiv), KOH (2 equiv), in anisole (2 mL, 0.2 M) at 130 °C, 2–5 h, closed vessel, inert atmosphere.

In this reaction N,N-dimethylaniline is formed stoichiometrically from the methylating agent PhMe3NI. This byproduct, however, can be easily quenched in situ and fully separated from the desired product in form of its water-soluble HCl salt by a mild acidic workup procedure. The desired methylated compounds were obtained in isolated yields up to 85%. Interestingly, the formation of any α,α-dimethylated products was never observed. We performed the methylation of benzyl 4-fluorophenyl ketone 1a on a 1.4 mmol scale to prove the scalability of this method. The desired product 3a was isolated in a yield of 85%. Significantly lower yields were observed for the sterically more hindered substrate 1-(pentamethylphenyl)-2-phenylethanone (product 3d). Substrates that are less susceptible to enolization, e.g., 4-phenylcyclohexanone 3t, also resulted in diminished yields, and mainly starting material was recovered. A variety of functional groups, including halides (products 3a, 3e, 3f, and 3q), CF3 (product 3i), ether (products 3g & 3h, 3m–3p), and phenyl groups (product 3r) were well tolerated in different positions of the aryl ring. Substrates bearing even more reactive functional groups on the aryl ring, e.g., ester moieties, can also be methylated in moderate yields (product 3v and 3w). As assumed, when 1-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-phenylethanone was subjected to the respective conditions, methylation initially occurred at the phenolic oxygen, and subsequently at the α-position of the carbonyl (product 3x and 3p). Our method, however, is not only limited to bisaromatic compounds but can also be applied for monoaromatic substrates. 4-Methyl-1-phenyl-2-pentanone was methylated regioselectively at the benzylic position giving product 3u in 77% yield. Aliphatic ketones without any benzylic α-carbons, e.g., 8-pentadecanone, formed only the aldol product and hence are not mentioned in this paper. As a proof of concept, we performed late-stage methylation of the biologically active compound fenbufen. Herein, the carboxylic acid moiety is preferentially methylated (product 3y). Upon addition of fresh reagent after prolonged reaction times, however, the fenbufen methyl ester could be further methylated at the α-position (product 3z; see the SI for details).

Finally, we wanted to briefly outline the applicability of this new protocol for introducing larger substituents than methyl. Selective α-ethylation can be accomplished accordingly, using phenyltriethylammonium iodide (PhEt3NI) as the alkyl source. Benzyl 4-fluorophenyl ketone 1a was successfully ethylated at the α-position in 78% yield using PhEt3NI (product 4a). Substrates containing electron-donating substituents on the aryl ring (product 4b), as well as monoaromatic compounds (product 4c) can also be ethylated in yields of 68 and 57%, respectively. Benzylation is of interest since the phenyl benzyl ketone motif can be found in several drugs or promising drug candidates, as, for example, desoxybenzoin derivatives32 or ring-truncated deguelin analogues.33 SAR studies identified the latter as promising candidates for HIF-1α inhibitors.34 One of those analogues, SH-1242, further inhibits Hsp90 activity and shows potent anticancer efficacy.35 We could demonstrate the applicability of this method for benzylation of selected substrates using BnMe3NCl as a benzylating agent. Products 5a–5c were obtained in high yields of 84, 89, and 78%, respectively. Since methylating agents, however, are by far more hazardous than traditionally applied ethylating and benzylating reagents, we did not further investigate the latter strategies.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we described the use of quaternary ammonium salts as alternative alkylating and benzylating agents. Phenyl trimethylammonium iodide and related salts were successfully established as selective, highly efficient, safe, and easy-to-handle methylating reagents for direct C(sp3)–C(sp3) bond formation.

Experimental Section

General

All chemicals were purchased from commercial suppliers and, unless noted otherwise, used without further purification. NaOtBu, Pd2(dba)3, and DPE-Phos were strictly stored and handled in a glovebox under argon atmosphere. Degassed and dry THF was stored over molecular sieves under argon using AcroSeal septum. Glass vials (8 mL) were sealed with Wheaton screw caps containing a PTFE faced 14B styrene-butadiene rubber liner for small-scale reaction above room temperature and heated in a metallic reaction block. All reaction temperatures refer to external temperatures.

1H NMR, 13C NMR, and 19F NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance UltraShield 400 at ambient temperature. Chemical shifts (δ) are reported in ppm, using Me4Si as internal standard. Coupling constants (J) are given in hertz (Hz), and multiplicities are assigned as s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, q = quartet, and m = multiplet.

Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) analysis was performed on aluminum-backed unmodified Merck silica gel 60 F245 plates. Visualization was realized under UV irradiation or via heat staining using a ceric ammonium molybdate aqueous solution. For flash column chromatography, Merck silica gel 60 (40–63 μm) was used and purification was either done by hand column or on a Büchi Pure C-850 FlashPrep System.

HRMS analysis was performed on an Agilent 6230 LC TOFMS mass spectrometer equipped with an Agilent Dual AJS ESI-Source. The mass spectrometer was connected to a liquid chromatography system of the 1100/1200 series from Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA. The system consisted of a 1200SL binary gradient pump, a degasser, a column thermostat, and an HTC PAL autosampler (CTC Analytics AG, Zwingen, Switzerland). A silica-based Phenomenex C-18 Security Guard Cartridge was used as a stationary phase. Data evaluation was performed using Agilent MassHunter Qualitative Analysis B.07.00. Identification was based on peaks obtained from extracted-ion chromatograms (extraction width, ±20 ppm).

Optimization Screening

The optimization of reaction conditions was conducted following the general procedure A (see the SI for details). Yields were determined by 19F NMR using trifluoro toluene as internal standard.

1-Fluoro-4-(1-methoxy-2-phenylethenyl)benzene36 (2a)

An 8 mL glass vial equipped with a magnetic stirring bar was charged with benzyl 4-fluorophenyl ketone (1) (100 mg, 0.467 mmol, 1 equiv), Me4NBr (119 mg, 770 mmol, 1.65 equiv), and KOH (79 mg, 1.4 mmol, 3 equiv). The vial was sealed with a septum screw cap. Using a cannula, the vial was evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. The toluene (2 mL, 0.23 M) was added via a syringe. Evacuation and backfilling with argon were repeated three times under vigorous stirring that no boiling delay occurred. Subsequently, the septum screw cap was exchanged for a closed Wheaton cap, and the vial was sealed tightly. The resulting inhomogeneous mixture was heated to 130 °C in a metallic heating block. After 18 h at respective temperatures, the reaction was cooled to room temperature and solids were centrifuged off. The supernatant solution was transferred to a round-bottom flask, and the solid residue was washed three times with small amounts DCM. The combined organic phases were concentrated. The crude oil was further purified via hand column chromatography (8 g silica LP/Et3N 100:1) to yield 46 mg (43%) of the title compound as white crystals. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.74–7.67 (m, 2H), 7.60–7.50 (m, 2H), 7.42–7.32 (m, 2H), 7.28–7.19 (m, 1H), 7.16–7.03 (m, 2H), 6.06 (s, 1H), 3.63 (s, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 163.0 (d, J = 247.9 Hz), 155.4, 135.9, 132.6 (d, J = 3.3 Hz), 128.7, 128.6, 128.5 (d, J = 8.1 Hz), 126.8, 115.6 (d, J = 21.7 Hz), 112.8 (d, J = 1.4 Hz), 58.0. 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ = −113.2 HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C15H14FO: 229.1023; found: 229.1000

General Procedure B for Precursor Synthesis

In the glovebox, a flame-dried 8 mL glass vial equipped with a magnetic stirring bar was charged with NaOtBu (2.6 mmol, 1.3 equiv), Pd2(dba)3 (5 mol %), and DPE-Phos (10 mol %). THF (2 mL, 1 M) was added, and the dark brownish-green mixture was stirred for 5 min at ambient temperatures. The aryl bromide (2 mmol, 1 equiv) was added via Eppendorf pipette, followed by rapid addition of the acetophenone (2.4 mmol, 1.2 equiv) in one portion as solid or via Eppendorf pipette if liquid. Immediate solid formation could be observed. The vial was closed with a Wheaton screw cap and transferred out of the glovebox. The mixture was heated to 70 °C in a metallic reaction block and stirred for 2–18 h at respective temperatures. After complete consumption of the starting material (GC-MS monitoring), water (10 mL) was added and the mixture was extracted three times with diethyl ether (30 mL each). The combined organic phases were washed once with sat. NH4Cl solution and once with brine, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated. The crude product was purified via gradient flash column chromatography on silica gel using a mixture of light petroleum (LP) and EtOAc.

1-(3,4-Dimethoxyphenyl)-2-phenylethanone37 (1g)

Prepared following the general procedure B from 3,4-dimethoxyacetophenone and bromobenzene heated for 2 h. The crude product was purified via flash column chromatography (90 g silica, LP, and EtOAc 0–40%) to yield 443 mg (86%) of the title compound as a slightly yellow oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.68 (dd, J = 8.4, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 7.58 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 7.39–7.22 (m, 5H), 6.89 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 4.26 (s, 2H), 3.95 (s, 3H), 3.93 (s, 3H).13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 196.3, 153.3, 149.1, 135.1, 129.7, 129.3, 128.6, 126.8, 123.5, 110.7, 110.0, 56.0, 55.9, 45.2.

1-(3-Methoxyphenyl)-2-phenylethanone38 (1h)

Prepared following the general procedure B from 3-methoxyacetophenone and bromobenzene heated for 3 h. The crude product was purified via flash hand column chromatography (60 g silica, LP/EtOAc 70:1, 60:1, 40:1) to yield 305 mg (67%) of the title compound as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.65–7.58 (m, 1H), 7.55 (dd, J = 2.7, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.43–7.31 (m, 3H), 7.31–7.26 (m, 3H), 7.11 (ddd, J = 8.2, 2.7, 0.9 Hz, 1H), 4.28 (s, 2H), 3.84 (s, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 197.5, 159.9, 138.0, 134.6, 129.6, 129.5, 128.7, 126.9, 121.3, 119.7, 112.9, 55.4, 45.7.

2-Phenyl-1-[3-(trifluormethyl)phenyl]ethenone39 (1i)

Prepared following the general procedure B from 3-trifluoromethylacetophenone and bromobenzene heated for 4 h. The crude product was purified via flash column chromatography (90 g silica, LP, and EtOAc 0–15%) to yield 391 mg (74%) of the title compound as an orange oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.26 (tt, J = 1.8, 0.8 Hz, 1H), 8.16 (dt, J = 7.3, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.81–7.70 (m, 1H), 7.56 (tt, J = 7.9, 0.8 Hz, 1H), 7.38–7.29 (m, 2H), 7.29–7.18 (m, 3H), 4.29 (s, 2H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 196.3, 137.1, 133.9, 131.9 (d, J = 1.4 Hz), 131.2 (q, J = 34.0 Hz), 129.6 (q, J = 3.6 Hz), 129.5, 129.4, 128.9, 127.3, 125.5 (q, J = 3.8 Hz), 123.7 (d, J = 274.8 Hz), 45.70.

1-[4-(2-Methylpropyl)phenyl]-2-phenylethanone (1j)

Prepared following the general procedure B from 4′-isobutylacetophenone and bromobenzene heated for 4 h. The crude product was purified via flash column chromatography (90 g silica, LP, and EtOAc 0–20%) to yield 415 mg (82%) of the title compound as a yellow oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.03–7.96 (m, 2H), 7.42–7.23 (m, 7H), 4.30 (s, 2H), 2.57 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.04–1.86 (m, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 0.96 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 6H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 197.2, 147.6, 134.8, 134.4, 129.5, 129.3, 128.6, 126.8, 45.3, 30.1, 22.3.

1-(4-Methylphenyl)-2-phenylethanone40 (1k)

Prepared following the general procedure B from 4-methylacetophenone and bromobenzene heated for 3 h. The crude product was purified via flash hand column chromatography (55 g silica, LP/EtOAc 80:1, 70:1, 60:1, 40:1) to yield 302 mg (72%) of the title compound as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.94 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.36–7.24 (m, 7H), 4.28 (s, 2H), 2.42 (s, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 197.4, 144.1, 134.9, 134.2, 129.5, 129.4, 128.8, 128.7, 126.9, 45.5, 21.7.

1-(2-Naphthalenyl)-2-phenylethanone40 (1l)

Prepared following the general procedure B from 2-acetylnaphthalene and bromobenzene heated for 18 h. The crude product was purified via flash column chromatography (90 g silica, LP, and EtOAc 0–40%) to yield 396 mg (80%) of the title compound as an off-white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.47 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 8.00 (dd, J = 8.6, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.88 (dd, J = 8.1, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.85–7.73 (m, 2H), 7.57–7.41 (m, 2H), 7.32–7.15 (m, 5H), 4.34 (s, 2H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 197.6, 135.6, 134.7, 134.0, 132.5, 130.4, 129.7, 129.5, 128.7, 128.6, 128.6, 127.8, 126.9, 126.8, 124.3, 45.6.

1-(1,3-Benzodioxol-5-yl)-2-phenylethanone40 (1n)

Prepared following the general procedure B from 5-acetyl-1,3-benzodiocole and bromobenzene heated for 10 h. The crude product was purified via flash column chromatography (90 g silica, LP and EtOAc 0–40%) to yield 471 mg (98%) of the title compound as a slightly yellow oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.64 (dd, J = 8.2, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.49 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 1H), 7.39–7.29 (m, 2H), 7.29–7.21 (m, 3H), 6.85 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.03 (s, 2H), 4.21 (s, 2H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 195.8, 151.9, 148.3, 134.9, 131.5, 129.4, 128.7, 128.7, 126.9, 125.1, 108.8, 108.4, 107.9, 101.9, 45.4.

2-(3-Methoxyphenyl)-1-phenylethanone40 (1o)

Prepared following the general procedure B from acetophenone and 4-bromoanisole heated for 18 h. The crude product was purified via flash column chromatography (90 g silica, LP, and EtOAc 0–40%) to yield 267 mg (59%) of the title compound as a yellow oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.06–7.97 (m, 2H), 7.60–7.51 (m, 1H), 7.51–7.41 (m, 2H), 7.25 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 6.91–6.77 (m, 3H), 4.26 (s, 2H), 3.79 (s, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 197.5, 159.8, 136.6, 136.1, 133.2, 129.7, 128.7, 121.9, 115.2, 112.4, 55.2, 45.6.

2-(4-Fluorphenyl)-1-phenylethanone38 (1q)

Prepared following the general procedure B from acetophenone and 1-bromo-4-fluorobenzene heated for 18 h. The crude product was purified via flash column chromatography (90 g silica, LP, and EtOAc 0–40%) to yield 255 mg (60%) of the title compound as a slightly yellow oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.06–7.94 (m, 2H), 7.62–7.52 (m, 1H), 7.52–7.39 (m, 2H), 7.28–7.19 (m, 2H), 7.08–6.97 (m, 2H), 4.27 (s, 2H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 197.5, 162.0 (d, J = 245.2 Hz), 136.6, 133.4, 131.2 (d, J = 8.0 Hz), 130.3 (d, J = 3.3 Hz), 128.8, 128.6, 115.6 (d, J = 21.4 Hz), 44.6.

1-[1,1′-Biphenyl]-4-yl-2-phenylethanone40 (1r)

Prepared following the general procedure B from 4′-phenylacetophenone and bromobenzene heated for 18 h. The crude product was purified via flash column chromatography (90 g silica, LP, and EtOAc 0–40%) to yield 207 mg (38%) of the title compound as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.12–8.04 (m, 2H), 7.70–7.64 (m, 2H), 7.64–7.59 (m, 2H), 7.50–7.43 (m, 2H), 7.43–7.22 (m, 6H), 4.31 (s, 2H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 197.2, 145.8, 139.8, 135.3, 134.7, 129.5, 129.3, 129.0, 128.7, 128.3, 127.3, 127.3, 126.9, 45.6

Methyl 4-(2-Oxo-2-phenylethyl)benzoate41 (1v)

Prepared following the general procedure B from acetophenone methyl 4-iodobenzoate heated for 4 h. The crude product was purified via flash column chromatography (90 g silica, LP, and EtOAc 0–20%) to yield 285 mg (37%) of the title compound as a white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.04–7.98 (m, 4H), 7.62–7.54 (m, 1H), 7.51–7.44 (m, 2H), 7.37–7.32 (m, 2H), 4.35 (s, 2H), 3.90 (s, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 196.9, 167.0, 139.9, 136.5, 133.5, 130.0, 129.7, 129.0, 128.8, 128.6, 77.4, 52.2, 45.5.

Ethyl 4-(2-Oxo-2-phenylethyl)benzoate42 (1w)

Prepared following the general procedure B from acetophenone ethyl 4-iodobenzoate heated for 4 h. The crude product was purified via flash column chromatography (90 g silica, LP, and EtOAc 0–20%) to yield 360 mg (45%) of the title compound as a white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.04–7.97 (m, 4H), 7.62–7.53 (m, 1H), 7.51–7.42 (m, 2H), 7.37–7.31 (m, 2H), 4.41–4.31 (m, 4H), 1.38 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H) 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 196.9, 166.5, 139.8, 136.5, 133.5, 130.0, 129.6, 128.8, 128.6, 61.0, 45.5, 14.4.

General Procedure C for Methylation, Ethylation, and Benzylation Reactions

An 8 mL glass vial equipped with a magnetic stirring bar was charged with the respective diaryl ethanone (100 mg, 1 equiv), the ammonium salt (1.1 for BnMe3NCl or 2 equiv for PhMe3NI and PhEt3NI), and KOH (2 equiv). The vial was sealed with a septum screw cap. Using a cannula, the vial was evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Anisole (2 mL, 0.2 M) was added via a syringe. Evacuation and backfilling with argon were repeated three times under vigorous stirring that no boiling delay occurred. Subsequently, the septum screw cap was exchanged for a closed Wheaton cap and the vial was sealed tightly. The resulting inhomogeneous mixture was heated to 130 °C in a metallic heating block for 2–4 h. After complete consumption of the starting material (TLC analysis), the reaction was cooled to room temperature. HCl (2 N, 2 mL) was added, and the mixture was extracted three times with EtOAc (5 mL each). The combined organic phases were washed twice with 2 N HCl (1 mL each) and once with brine, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated. For benzylation reactions, the mixture was not subjected to aqueous workup but filtered over a short plug of silica, washed with EtOAc, and concentrated. The obtained crude product was purified via hand column with unmodified silica.

1-(4-Fluorophenyl)-2-phenyl-1-propanone43 (3a)

Prepared following the general procedure C from commercially available starting material with a reaction time of 3 h. The crude product was purified via column chromatography (8 g silica LP/EtOAc 50:1, 45:1, 40:1) to yield 83 mg (78%) of the title compound.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.97–7.87 (m, 2H), 7.28–7.18 (m, 4H), 7.18–7.11 (m, 1H), 7.03–6.93 (m, 2H), 4.57 (q, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 1.48 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 198.8, 165.6 (d, J = 254.6 Hz), 141.5, 133.0 (d, J = 3.0 Hz), 131.5 (d, J = 9.3 Hz), 129.20, 127.8, 127.1, 115.7 (d, J = 21.7 Hz), 48.1, 19.6.19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ = −105.6. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C15H14FO: 229.1023; found: 229.1000

Compound 3a was also prepared on a 1.4 mmol scale as follows: A 25 mL round-bottom flask was charged with benzyl 4-fluorophenyl ketone (1a) (300 mg, 1.4 mmol, 1 equiv), PhMe3NI (751 mg, 2.8 mmol, 2 equiv), and KOH (157 mg, 2.8 mmol, 2 equiv). The flask was closed with a septum. Using a cannula, the flask was evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Anisole (6 mL, 0.23 M) was added via a syringe. Evacuation and backfilling with argon were repeated three times under vigorous stirring that no boiling delay occurred. The resulting inhomogeneous mixture was heated to 130 °C in an oil bath. After 5 h at respective temperatures, the reaction was cooled to room temperature. HCl (2 N, 10 mL) were added, and the mixture was extracted three times with EtOAc (25 mL each). The combined organic phases were washed twice with 2 N HCl (3–5 mL each) and once with brine, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated. The obtained crude product was purified via flash column chromatography (90 g silica, LP, and EtOAc 0–40%) to yield 273 mg (85%) of the title compound as a colorless oil. Analytical data were in accordance with the previous finding.

1,2-Diphenyl-1-propanone38 (3b)

Prepared following the general procedure C from commercially available starting material with a reaction time of 3 h. The crude product was purified via column chromatography (8 g silica, LP/EtOAc 50:1, 40:1) to yield 73 mg (68%) of the title compound as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.01–7.93 (m, 2H), 7.53–7.43 (m, 1H), 7.43–7.34 (m, 2H), 7.30 (d, J = 4.3 Hz, 4H), 7.21 (ddd, J = 8.8, 4.8, 3.9 Hz, 1H), 4.70 (q, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 1.55 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 200.4, 141.6, 136.6, 132.9, 129.1, 128.9, 128.6, 127.9, 127.0, 48.0, 19.6.

2-(4-Methylphenyl)-1-phenyl-1-propanone44 (3c)

Prepared following the general procedure C from commercially available starting material with a reaction time of 2 h. The crude product was purified via column chromatography (8 g silica, LP/EtOAc 50:1) to yield 76 mg (74%) of the title compound as a slightly yellow oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.01–7.94 (m, 2H), 7.52–7.43 (m, 1H), 7.43–7.34 (m, 2H), 7.23–7.16 (m, 2H), 7.15–7.08 (m, 2H), 4.67 (q, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 2.30 (s, 3H), 1.54 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 200.5, 138.6, 136.6, 136.6, 132.8, 129.8, 128.9, 128.6, 127.7, 47.6, 21.1, 19.6. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C16H17O: 225.1274; found: 225.1265

2-(2,3,4,5,6-Pentamethylphenyl)-1-phenyl-1-propanone (3d)

Prepared following the general procedure C from commercially available starting material with a reaction time of 3.5 h. The crude product was purified via column chromatography (8 g silica, LP/EtOAc 50:1) to yield 31 mg (31%) of the title compound as off-white crystals. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.32–7.16 (m, 5H), 4.13 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 2.23 (s, 15H), 1.64 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 211.1, 140.1, 138.7, 135.5, 132.8, 128.8, 128.5, 127.1, 54.9, 16.9, 16.8, 16.0. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C20H25O: 281.1900; found: 281.1895

1-(4-Chlorophenyl)-2-phenyl-1-propanone45 (3e)

Prepared following the general procedure C from commercially available starting material with a reaction time of 2 h. The crude product was purified via column chromatography (8 g silica, LP/EtOAc 50:1) to yield 87 mg (85%) of the title compound. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.92–7.84 (m, 2H), 7.38–7.16 (m, 7H), 4.62 (q, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 1.53 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 199.1, 141.3, 139.3, 134.9, 130.3, 129.2, 128.9, 127.8, 127.2, 48.2, 19.5. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C15H14ClO: 245.0728; found: 245.0712

1-(4-Bromophenyl)-2-phenyl-1-propanone45 (3f)

Prepared following the general procedure C from commercially available starting material with a reaction time of 2 h. The crude product was purified via column chromatography (8 g silica, LP/EtOAc 50:1) to yield 75 mg (74%) of the title compound. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.84–7.76 (m, 2H), 7.56–7.46 (m, 2H), 7.36–7.25 (m, 3H), 7.25–7.16 (m, 2H), 4.61 (q, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 1.53 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 199.3, 141.3, 135.2, 131.9, 130.4, 129.2, 128.0, 127.8, 127.2, 48.2, 19.5. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C15H14BrO: 289.0223; found: 289.0218

1-(3,4-Dimethoxyphenyl)-2-phenyl-1-propanone46 (3g)

Prepared following the general procedure C from compound 1g with a reaction time of 2 h. The crude product was purified via column chromatography (8 g silica, LP/EtOAc 40:1, 20:1, 10:1) to yield 72 mg (68%) of the title compound. Rf = 0.54 (LP/EtOAc 2:1) 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.59 (dd, J = 8.4, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.29 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, 4H), 7.19 (ddd, J = 8.6, 4.9, 3.9 Hz, 1H), 6.80 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 4.65 (q, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 3.88 (d, J = 4.1 Hz, 6H), 1.52 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 199.0, 153.1, 149.0, 142.2, 129.7, 129.1, 127.7, 126.9, 123.5, 111.1, 110.0, 56.1, 56.0, 47.6, 19.7. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C17H19O3: 271.1329; found: 271.1323

1-(3-Methoxyphenyl)-2-phenyl-1-propanone47 (3h)

Prepared following the general procedure C from compound 1h with a reaction time of 2 h. The crude product was purified via column chromatography (8 g silica, LP/EtOAc 70:1) to yield 88 mg (83%) of the title compound as a slightly orange oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.51 (ddd, J = 7.7, 1.6, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.47 (dd, J = 2.7, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.34–7.21 (m, 5H), 7.21–7.12 (m, 1H), 6.99 (ddd, J = 8.3, 2.7, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 4.64 (q, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 3.76 (s, 3H), 1.51 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 200.2, 159.8, 141.6, 138.0, 129.5, 129.1, 127.8, 127.0, 121.5, 119.4, 113.2, 55.4, 48.1, 19.6. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C16H17O2: 241.1223; found: 241.1205

2-Phenyl-1-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-1-propanone44 (3i)

Prepared following the general procedure C from compound 1i with a reaction time of 2 h. The crude product was purified via column chromatography (8 g silica, LP/EtOAc 80:1) to yield 73 mg (69%) of the title compound. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.21 (tt, J = 1.8, 0.8 Hz, 1H), 8.11–8.04 (m, 1H), 7.73–7.66 (m, 1H), 7.52–7.43 (m, 1H), 7.33–7.28 (m, 1H), 7.28–7.25 (m, 2H), 7.25–7.15 (m, 2H), 4.65 (q, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 1.54 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 199.0, 140.9, 137.1, 132.0 (d, J = 1.5 Hz), 131.2 (q, J = 32.8 Hz), 129.3, 129.3 (q, J = 3.8 Hz), 129.2, 127.8, 127.3, 125.7 (q, J = 3.9 Hz), 123.0 (d, J = 275.8 Hz), 48.43, 19.47. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C16H14F3O: 279.0991; found: 279.0986

1-[4-(2-Methylpropyl)phenyl]-2-phenyl-1-propanone (3j)

Prepared following the general procedure C from compound 1j with a reaction time of 2 h. The crude product was purified via column chromatography (8 g silica, LP/EtOAc 100:1) to yield 78 mg (74%) of the title compound. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.93–7.85 (m, 2H), 7.35–7.25 (m, 4H), 7.25–7.18 (m, 1H), 7.18–7.12 (m, 2H), 4.69 (q, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 2.48 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.85 (dh, J = 13.4, 6.7 Hz, 1H), 1.54 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H), 0.88 (dd, J = 6.6, 0.6 Hz, 6H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 200.0, 147.3, 141.7, 134.3, 129.3, 128.9, 128.8, 127.8, 126.8, 47.7, 45.4, 30.1, 22.4, 22.3, 19.6. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C19H23O: 267.1743; found: 267.1739

1-(4-Methylphenyl)-2-phenyl-1-propanone48 (3k)

Prepared following the general procedure C from compound 1k with a reaction time of 2 h. The crude product was purified via column chromatography (8 g silica, LP/EtOAc 70:1) to yield 82 mg (77%) of the title compound as a yellow oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.91–7.84 (m, 2H), 7.34–7.25 (m, 4H), 7.25–7.14 (m, 3H), 4.68 (q, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 2.35 (s, 3H), 1.54 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 200.0, 143.6, 141.8, 134.1, 129.3, 129.0, 129.0, 127.8, 126.9, 47.8, 21.7, 19.6. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C16H17O: 225.1274; found: 225.1252

1-(2-Naphthyl)-2-phenyl-1-propanone49 (3l)

Prepared following the general procedure C from compound 1l with a reaction time of 2 h. The crude product was purified via column chromatography (8 g silica, LP/EtOAc 80:1) to yield 64 mg (61%) of the title compound. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.52–8.47 (m, 1H), 8.03 (dd, J = 8.7, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.90 (dd, J = 8.1, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.82 (dd, J = 8.6, 1.8 Hz, 2H), 7.58-7.49 (m, 2H), 7.40–7.24 (m, 4H), 7.24–7.15 (m, 1H), 4.86 (q, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 1.61 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 200.4, 141.7, 135.5, 134.0, 132.6, 130.6, 129.7, 129.1, 128.5, 128.4, 127.9, 127.8, 127.0, 126.8, 124.7, 48.1, 19.7. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C19H17O: 261.1274; found: 261.1267

1,2-Bis(4-methoxyphenyl)-1-propanone50 (3m)

Prepared following the general procedure C from commercially available starting material with a reaction time of 4 h. The crude product was purified via column chromatography (8 g silica, LP/EtOAc 10:1) to yield 76 mg (74%) of the title compound. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.98–7.90 (m, 2H), 7.24–7.16 (m, 2H), 6.90–6.78 (m, 4H), 4.60 (q, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 3.81 (s, 3H), 3.75 (s, 3H), 1.49 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 199.2, 163.3, 158.5, 134.1, 131.2, 129.6, 128.8, 114.5, 113.8, 55.5, 55.3, 46.7, 19.7. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C17H19O3: 271.1329; found: 271.1326

1-(2H-1,3-Benzodioxol-5-yl)-2-phenyl-1-propanone51 (3n)

Prepared following the general procedure C from compound 1n with a reaction time of 2 h. The crude product was purified via column chromatography (8 g silica, LP/EtOAc 80:1) to yield 65 mg (61%) of the title compound as white crystals. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.57 (dd, J = 8.2, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.44 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 1H), 7.34–7.22 (m, 4H), 7.22–7.15 (m, 1H), 6.76 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 5.98 (s, 2H), 4.59 (q, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 1.51 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 198.5, 151.6, 148.2, 141.9, 131.4, 129.1, 127.8, 127.0, 125.1, 108.7, 107.9, 101.9, 47.8, 19.7. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C16H15O3: 255.1016; found: 255.1006

2-(3-Methoxyphenyl)-1-phenyl-1-propanone44 (3o)

Prepared following the general procedure C from compound 1o with a reaction time of 3 h. The crude product was purified via column chromatography (8 g silica, LP/EtOAc 80:1) to yield 75 mg (71%) of the title compound as a yellow oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.01–7.93 (m, 2H), 7.53–7.42 (m, 1H), 7.42–7.33 (m, 2H), 7.26–7.16 (m, 1H), 6.89 (ddd, J = 7.7, 1.7, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 6.84 (dd, J = 2.6, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 6.75 (ddd, J = 8.2, 2.6, 0.9 Hz, 1H), 4.66 (q, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 3.76 (s, 3H), 1.54 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 200.2, 160.1, 143.1, 136.6, 132.9, 130.1, 128.8, 128.6, 120.3, 113.6, 112.2, 55.3, 48.0, 19.5. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C16H17O2: 241.1223; found: 241.1217

1-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-2-phenyl-1-propanone44 (3p)

Prepared following the general procedure C from commercially available starting material with a reaction time of 3 h. The crude product was purified via column chromatography (8 g silica, LP/EtOAc 60:1, 50:1) to yield 73 mg (70%) of the title compound as a slightly yellow oil.

Procedure for One-Pot O- and α-Methylation

Prepared following the general procedure C from commercially available 1-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-phenylethanone with a reaction time of 6 h. After 3 h reaction time and before the workup, another 2 equiv of PhMe3NI and KOH each were added at room temperature, and the reaction was subsequently heated up again to 130 °C for another 3 h. The crude product was purified via column chromatography (8 g silica, LP/EtOAc 70:1-50:1) to yield 95 mg (84%) of the title compound as a slightly yellow oil. Spectra were according to compound 3p. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.00–7.91 (m, 2H), 7.33–7.24 (m, 4H), 7.24–7.15 (m, 1H), 6.90–6.81 (m, 2H), 4.65 (q, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 3.81 (s, 3H), 1.52 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 199.0, 163.3, 142.0, 131.2, 129.6, 129.0, 127.8, 126.9, 113.8, 55.5, 47.6, 19.7. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C16H17O2: 241.1223; found: 241.1236

2-(4-Fluorophenyl)-1-phenyl-1-propanone44 (3q)

Prepared following the general procedure C from compound 1q with a reaction time of 2.5 h. The crude product was purified via column chromatography (8 g silica, LP/EtOAc 80:1) to yield 82 mg (77%) of the title compound as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.98–7.91 (m, 2H), 7.54–7.45 (m, 1H), 7.44–7.34 (m, 2H), 7.31–7.21 (m, 2H), 7.04–6.93 (m, 2H), 4.70 (q, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 1.53 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 200.3, 161.9 (d, J = 245.4 Hz), 137.2 (d, J = 3.3 Hz), 136.4, 133.0, 129.4 (d, J = 8.0 Hz), 128.8, 128.7, 115.9 (d, J = 21.3 Hz), 47.0, 19.7. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C15H14FO: 229.1023; found: 229.1003

1-[1,1′-Biphenyl]-4-yl-2-phenyl-1-propanone44 (3r)

Prepared following the general procedure C from compound 1r with a reaction time of 2.5 h. The crude product was purified via column chromatography (8 g silica, LP/EtOAc 75:1) to yield 55 mg (52%) of the title compound as an off-white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.09–8.02 (m, 2H), 7.65–7.55 (m, 4H), 7.48–7.36 (m, 4H), 7.36–7.28 (m, 4H), 7.28–7.19 (m, 1H), 4.74 (q, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 1.59 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 199.9, 145.5, 141.6, 139.9, 135.2, 129.4, 129.1, 129.0, 128.2, 127.8, 127.3, 127.2, 127.0, 48.0, 19.6. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C21H19O: 287.1430; found: 287.1439

2-Methyl-1,3-diphenyl-1,3-propanedione52 (3s)

Prepared following the general procedure C from commercially available starting material with a reaction time of 2.5 h. The crude product was purified via column chromatography (LP/EtOAc 80:1, 50:1, 20:1) to yield 36 mg (35%) of the title compound as white crystals. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.00–7.92 (m, 4H), 7.60–7.50 (m, 2H), 7.49–7.39 (m, 4H), 5.28 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 1.60 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 197.3, 135.7, 133.5, 128.9, 128.6, 51.0, 14.4. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C16H15O2: 239.1067; found: 239.1052

2-Methyl-4-phenylcyclohexanone53 (3t)

Prepared following the general procedure C from commercially available starting material with a reaction time of 18 h. The crude product was purified via column chromatography (8 g silica LP/EtOAc 80:1-10:1) to yield 18 mg (17%) of the title compound as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.33–7.23 (m, 2H), 7.23–7.14 (m, 3H), 3.10 (tt, J = 12.4, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 2.64–2.53 (m, 1H), 2.53–2.42 (m, 2H), 2.26–2.14 (m, 2H), 1.98–1.81 (m, 1H), 1.69–1.57 (m, 1H), 1.03 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 212.7, 144.9, 128.7, 126.8, 126.7, 44.9, 43.6, 43.5, 41.7, 35.1, 14.6. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C13H17O: 189.1274; found: 189.1277

5-Methyl-2-phenyl-3-hexanone54 (3u)

Prepared following the general procedure C from commercially available starting material with a reaction time of 16 h. The crude product was purified via flash column chromatography (15 g silica, LP/EtOAc 80:1) to yield 80 mg (77%) of the title compound as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.36–7.27 (m, 2H), 7.29–7.19 (m, 1H), 7.21–7.16 (m, 2H), 3.71 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 2.30–2.15 (m, 2H), 2.09 (dp, J = 13.4, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 1.38 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H), 0.84 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H), 0.75 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 210.5, 140.6, 128.9, 128.0, 127.2, 53.4, 50.1, 24.5, 22.7, 22.4, 17.5.

Methyl 4-(1-Methyl-2-oxo-2-phenylethyl)benzoate55 (3v)

Prepared following the general procedure C from compound 1v with a reaction time of 2 h. The crude product was purified via flash column chromatography (15 g silica, LP/EtOAc 20:1, 10:1) to yield 34 mg (32%) of the title compound as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.00–7.89 (m, 4H), 7.53–7.44 (m, 1H), 7.43–7.32 (m, 4H), 4.74 (q, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 3.87 (s, 3H), 1.55 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H) 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 199.79, 166.89, 146.74, 136.33, 133.17, 130.41, 128.99, 128.84, 128.71, 127.97, 52.19, 47.97, 19.42. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C17H17O3: 269.1172; found: 269.1196

Ethyl 4-(1-Methyl-2-oxo-2-phenylethyl)benzoate51 (3w)

Prepared following the general procedure C from compound 1w with a reaction time of 2 h. The crude product was purified via flash column chromatography (15 g silica, LP/EtOAc 20:1, 10:1) to yield 37 mg (37%) of the title compound as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.01–7.95 (m, 2H), 7.95–7.89 (m, 2H), 7.52–7.44 (m, 1H), 7.43–7.32 (m, 4H), 4.74 (q, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 4.34 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.55 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H), 1.35 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 199.79, 166.41, 146.63, 136.34, 133.14, 130.38, 129.35, 128.84, 128.70, 127.91, 61.03, 48.00, 27.90, 19.42, 14.44. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C18H19O3: 283.1329; found: 283.1338

1-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-2-phenylethanone56 (3x)

Prepared following the general procedure C, with the deviation of using only 1 equiv of PhMe3NI, from commercially available starting material with a reaction time of 2 h. The crude product was purified via column chromatography (LP/EtOAc 70:1–50:1) to yield 68 mg (64%) of the title compound as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.02–7.94 (m, 2H), 7.34–7.17 (m, 5H), 6.95–6.86 (m, 2H), 4.21 (s, 2H), 3.82 (s, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 196.3, 163.6, 135.1, 131.0, 129.7, 129.5, 128.7, 126.9, 113.9, 55.5, 45.3.

Methyl 4-(Biphenyl-4-yl)-4-oxobutanoate57 (3y)

Prepared following the general procedure C, with the deviation of using 3 equiv of KOH, from commercially available fenbufen with a reaction time of 24 h. The crude product was purified via column chromatography (LP/EtOAc 30:1–1:1) to yield 72 mg (68%) of the title compound as yellow crystals. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.10–8.02 (m, 2H), 7.73–7.66 (m, 2H), 7.66–7.59 (m, 2H), 7.52–7.43 (m, 2H), 7.43–7.36 (m, 1H), 3.72 (s, 3H), 3.35 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H), 2.80 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 197.7, 173.5, 146.0, 139.9, 135.3, 129.1, 128.7, 128.4, 127.4, 51.9, 33.5, 28.2. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C18H19O3: 283.1329; found: 283.1333

Methyl 3-Methyl-4-oxo-4-(4-phenylphenyl)butanoate (3z)

An 8 mL glass vial equipped with a magnetic stirring bar was charged with fenbufen (100 mg, 1 equiv), PhMe3NI (2 equiv), and KOH (3 equiv). The vial was sealed with a septum screw cap. Using a cannula, the vial was evacuated and backfilled with argon three times. Anisole (2 mL, 0.2 M) was added via a syringe. Evacuation and backfilling with argon were repeated three times under vigorous stirring that no boiling delay occurred. Subsequently, the septum screw cap was exchanged for a closed Wheaton cap, and the vial was sealed tightly. The resulting inhomogeneous mixture was heated to 130 °C in a metallic heating block for 3 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, and additional PhMe3NI (2 equiv) and KOH (2 equiv) were added. Subsequently, the reaction was heated up to 130 °C and stirred for 4 days (with further addition of 2 equiv PhMe3NI and 2 equiv KOH after 48 h). The reaction was cooled to room temperature. HCl (2 N, 2 mL) were added, and the mixture was extracted three times with EtOAc (20 mL each). The combined organic phases were washed twice with 2 N HCl (3 mL each) and once with brine, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated. The obtained crude product was purified via hand column with unmodified silica gel (15 g silica, LP/EtOAc 30:1–1:1), yielding 34 mg (31%) of the title compound as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.11–8.04 (m, 2H), 7.74–7.67 (m, 2H), 7.67–7.59 (m, 2H), 7.52–7.43 (m, 2H), 7.43–7.36 (m, 1H), 3.99 (dqd, J = 8.5, 7.2, 5.7 Hz, 1H), 3.66 (s, 3H), 3.00 (dd, J = 16.8, 8.4 Hz, 1H), 2.49 (dd, J = 16.8, 5.7 Hz, 1H), 1.27 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H) 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 202.3, 172.9, 145.8, 140.0, 134.6, 129.1, 129.0, 128.3, 127.4, 127.3, 51.8, 37.3, 37.3, 18.0. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C19H21O3: 297.1485; found: 297.1490

1-(4-Fluorophenyl)-2-phenyl-1-butanone53 (4a)

Prepared following the general procedure C, except for the use of PhEt3NI (2 equiv) instead of PhMe3NI, from commercially available starting material with a reaction time of 5 h. The crude product was purified via column chromatography (8 g silica LP/EtOAc 50:1–40:1) to yield 83 mg (78%) of the title compound. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.96 (dd, J = 8.9, 5.4 Hz, 2H), 7.52–7.11 (m, 5H), 7.03 (dd, J = 9.0, 8.3 Hz, 1H), 4.36 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.17 (dp, J = 12.8, 7.3 Hz, 1H), 1.83 (dp, J = 13.6, 7.4 Hz, 1H), 0.88 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 198.6, 165.6 (d, J = 254.6 Hz), 139.6, 133.5, 131.4 (d, J = 9.2 Hz), 129.0, 128.3, 127.2, 115.7 (d, J = 21.8 Hz), 55.6, 27.2, 12.4 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ = −105.7 HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C16H16FO: 243.1180; found: 243.1186

1,2-Bis(4-methoxyphenyl)-1-butanone58 (4b)

Prepared following the general procedure C, except for the use of PhEt3NI (2 equiv) instead of PhMe3NI, from commercially available starting material with a reaction time of 4 h. The crude product was purified via column chromatography (15 g silica LP/EtOAc 30:1–20:1) to yield 74 mg (68%) of the title compound. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.00–7.91 (m, 2H), 7.25–7.17 (m, 2H), 6.90–6.78 (m, 4H), 4.35 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 3.81 (s, 3H), 3.75 (s, 3H), 2.23–2.08 (m, 1H), 1.82 (dq, J = 13.6, 7.4 Hz, 1H), 0.89 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 198.9, 163.2, 158.6, 132.2, 131.0, 130.1, 129.3, 114.3, 113.7, 55.5, 55.3, 54.2, 27.2, 12.4. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C18H21O3: 285.1485; found: 285.1492

2-Methyl-5-phenyl-4-heptanone (4c)

Prepared following the general procedure C, except for the use of PhEt3NI (2 equiv) instead of PhMe3NI, from commercially available starting material with a reaction time of 18 h. The crude product was purified via column chromatography (15 g silica LP/Et2O 100:1–100:3) to yield 65 mg (57%) of the title compound as a slightly yellow oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.38–7.30 (m, 2H), 7.29–7.24 (m, 1H), 7.24–7.18 (m, 2H), 3.51 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 2.33–2.17 (m, 2H), 2.17–2.00 (m, 2H), 1.72 (dp, J = 13.7, 7.5 Hz, 1H), 0.89–0.80 (m, 6H), 0.76 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 210.2, 139.0, 128.8, 128.4, 127.1, 61.3, 51.0, 25.3, 24.3, 22.7, 22.3, 12.2. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C14H21O: 205.1587; found: 205.1593

1-(4-Fluorophenyl)-2,3-diphenylpropan-1-one59 (5a)

Prepared following the general procedure C, except for the use of BnMe3NCl (1.1 equiv) instead of PhMe3NI, from commercially available starting material with a reaction time of 1 h. The crude product was purified via column chromatography (15 g silica, LP/EtOAc 150:1–100:1) to yield 119 mg (84%) of the title compound as white crystals. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.99–7.89 (m, 2H), 7.32–7.13 (m, 8H), 7.13–7.06 (m, 2H), 7.05–6.96 (m, 2H), 4.78 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 3.58 (dd, J = 13.7, 7.5 Hz, 1H), 3.08 (dd, J = 13.7, 7.0 Hz, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 197.7, 165.6 (d, J = 254.9 Hz), 139.7, 139.0, 133.2 (d, J = 3.0 Hz), 131.4, 131.3, 129.2, 129.1, 128.3 (d, J = 4.6 Hz), 127.3, 126.3, 115.6 (d, J = 21.9 Hz), 56.0, 40.2. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C21H18FO: 305.1336; found: 305.1354

1,2-Bis-(4-methoxy-phenyl)-3-phenyl-propan-1-one60 (5b)

Prepared following the general procedure C, except for the use of BnMe3NCl (1.1 equiv) instead of PhMe3NI, from commercially available starting material with a reaction time of 2 h. The crude product was purified via column chromatography (15 g silica, LP/EtOAc 100:1, 40:1, 20:1, 10:1) to yield 121 mg (89%) of the title compound as white crystals.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.96–7.87 (m, 2H), 7.24–7.11 (m, 5H), 7.11–7.04 (m, 2H), 6.87–6.75 (m, 4H), 4.72 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.75 (s, 3H), 3.53 (dd, J = 13.7, 7.3 Hz, 1H), 3.04 (dd, J = 13.7, 7.2 Hz, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 198.0, 163.3, 158.6, 140.1, 131.6, 131.0, 129.8, 129.3, 129.2, 128.2, 126.1, 114.3, 113.7, 55.5, 55.2, 54.7, 40.2. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C23H23O3: 347.1642; found: 347.1650

5-Methyl-1,2-diphenyl-3-hexanone (5c)

Prepared following the general procedure C, except for the use of BnMe3NCl (1.1 equiv) instead of PhMe3NI, from commercially available starting material with a reaction time of 2 h. The crude product was purified via column chromatography (15 g silica, LP/Et2O 100:1–100:3) to yield 115 mg (78%) of the title compound as white crystals. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.47–7.29 (m, 7H), 7.29–7.23 (m, 1H), 7.22–7.16 (m, 2H), 4.07–3.98 (m, 1H), 3.56 (ddd, J = 13.7, 7.9, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 3.03 (ddd, J = 13.7, 6.8, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 2.29 (dt, J = 6.3, 1.3 Hz, 2H), 2.25–2.09 (m, 1H), 0.89 (dd, J = 6.6, 1.2 Hz, 3H), 0.79 (dd, J = 6.5, 1.2 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 209.3, 139.9, 138.5, 129.1, 128.9, 128.5, 128.3, 128.0, 127.3, 127.1, 126.1, 61.3, 51.4, 38.7, 24.2, 22.6, 22.1. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C19H23O: 267.1743; found: 267.1755

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF, project number P33064-N).

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.joc.1c03158.

  • Detailed procedure for quantitative 19F NMR measurements, complete optimization screening data, experimental procedures, and characterization data for all compounds isolated (PDF)

Author Contributions

The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

Open Access is funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF).

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

jo1c03158_si_001.pdf (3.5MB, pdf)

References

  1. Barreiro E. J.; Kümmerle A. E.; Fraga C. A. M. The Methylation Effect in Medicinal Chemistry. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 5215–5246. 10.1021/cr200060g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gomtsyan A.; Bayburt E. K.; Keddy R.; Turner S. C.; Jinkerson T. K.; Didomenico S.; Perner R. J.; Koenig J. R.; Drizin I.; McDonald H. A.; Surowy C. S.; Honore P.; Mikusa J.; Marsh K. C.; Wetter J. M.; Faltynek C. R.; Lee C.-H. α-Methylation at benzylic fragment of N-aryl-N′-benzyl ureas provides TRPV1 antagonists with better pharmacokinetic properties and higher efficacy in inflammatory pain model. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 3894–3899. 10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.04.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Schönherr H.; Cernak T. Profound Methyl Effects in Drug Discovery and a Call for New C□H Methylation Reactions. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 12256–12267. 10.1002/anie.201303207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sun S.; Fu J. Methyl-containing pharmaceuticals: Methylation in drug design. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2018, 28, 3283–3289. 10.1016/j.bmcl.2018.09.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Smith D.; Delost M.; Qureshi H.; Njarđarson J.. Top 200 pharmaceutical products by retail sales in 2016, 2017. http://njardarson.lab.arizona.edu/sites.
  6. Aynetdinova D.; Callens M. C.; Hicks H. B.; Poh C. Y. X.; Shennan B. D. A.; Boyd A. M.; Lim Z. H.; Leitch J. A.; Dixon D. J. Installing the “magic methyl”–C–H methylation in synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 5517–5563. 10.1039/D0CS00973C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Börgel J.; Ritter T. Late-Stage Functionalization. Chem 2020, 6, 1877–1887. 10.1016/j.chempr.2020.07.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cernak T.; Dykstra K. D.; Tyagarajan S.; Vachal P.; Krska S. W. The medicinal chemist’s toolbox for late stage functionalization of drug-like molecules. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 546–576. 10.1039/C5CS00628G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Feng K.; Quevedo R. E.; Kohrt J. T.; Oderinde M. S.; Reilly U.; White M. C. Late-stage oxidative C(sp3)–H methylation. Nature 2020, 580, 621–627. 10.1038/s41586-020-2137-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Friis S. D.; Johansson M. J.; Ackermann L. Cobalt-catalysed C–H methylation for late-stage drug diversification. Nat. Chem. 2020, 12, 511–519. 10.1038/s41557-020-0475-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ni S.; Hribersek M.; Baddigam S. K.; Ingner F. J. L.; Orthaber A.; Gates P. J.; Pilarski L. T. Mechanochemical Solvent-Free Catalytic C–H Methylation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 6660–6666. 10.1002/anie.202010202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Vasilopoulos A.; Krska S. W.; Stahl S. S. C(sp3)-H methylation enabled by peroxide photosensitization and Ni-mediated radical coupling. Science 2021, 372, 398–403. 10.1126/science.abh2623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Tsukamoto Y.; Itoh S.; Kobayashi M.; Obora Y. Iridium-Catalyzed α-Methylation of α-Aryl Esters Using Methanol as the C1 Source. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 3299–3303. 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b01025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen Y. Recent Advances in Methylation: A Guide for Selecting Methylation Reagents. Chem. - Eur. J. 2019, 25, 3405–3439. 10.1002/chem.201803642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Moulay S. C-Methylation of Organic Substrates: A Comprehensive Overview. Part II—Methyl Metals as Methylating Agents. Chem. Afr. 2020, 3, 845–880. 10.1007/s42250-020-00172-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Spettel M.; Pollice R.; Schnürch M. Quaternary Ammonium Salts as Alkylating Reagents in C–H Activation Chemistry. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 4287–4290. 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b01946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schönbauer D.; Spettel M.; Pollice R.; Pittenauer E.; Schnürch M. Investigations of the generality of quaternary ammonium salts as alkylating agents in direct C–H alkylation reactions: solid alternatives for gaseous olefins. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019, 17, 4024–4030. 10.1039/C9OB00243J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jones R. A.Quaternary Ammonium Salts: Their Use in Phase-Transfer Catalysis; Elsevier, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  19. Holbrey J. D.; Seddon K.. Ionic liquids. In Clean Products and Processes; Springer, 1999; Vol. 1, pp 223–236. [Google Scholar]
  20. Maraš N.; Polanc S.; Kočevar M. Microwave-assisted methylation of phenols with tetramethylammonium chloride in the presence of K2CO3 or Cs2CO3. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 11618–11624. 10.1016/j.tet.2008.10.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Maraš N.; Polanc S.; Kočevar M. Synthesis of aryl alkyl ethers by alkylation of phenols with quaternary ammonium salts. Acta Chim. Slov. 2010, 57, 29–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gholipour F.; Rahmani M.; Panahi F. Efficient and selective microwave-assisted O-methylation of phenolic compounds using tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAH). Green Process. Synth. 2019, 8, 584–589. 10.1515/gps-2019-0028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Khalafi-Nezhad A.; Zare A.; Parhami A.; Hasaninejad A.; Zare A. M. Quaternary ammonium salts as highly efficient and green alkylating agents for N-alkylation of azaheterocycles under microwave irradiation. J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 2008, 5, S40–S46. 10.1007/BF03246487. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Cheng H.-G.; Pu M.; Kundu G.; Schoenebeck F. Selective Methylation of Amides, N-Heterocycles, Thiols, and Alcohols with Tetramethylammonium Fluoride. Org. Lett. 2020, 22, 331–334. 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b04400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Uemura T.; Yamaguchi M.; Chatani N. Phenyltrimethylammonium Salts as Methylation Reagents in the Nickel-Catalyzed Methylation of C–H Bonds. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 3162–3165. 10.1002/anie.201511197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Prat D.; Hayler J.; Wells A. A survey of solvent selection guides. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 4546–4551. 10.1039/C4GC01149J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. deGonzalo G.; Alcántara A. R.; DomínguezdeMaría P. Cyclopentyl Methyl Ether (CPME): A Versatile Eco-Friendly Solvent for Applications in Biotechnology and Biorefineries. ChemSusChem 2019, 12, 2083–2097. 10.1002/cssc.201900079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Aitken R. A.et al. Product Class 29: Arylammonium Salts. In Science of Synthesis: Houben-Weyl Methods of Molecular Transformations Vol. 31b: Arene-X (X= N, P), 1st ed.; Georg Thieme Verlag: Stuttgart, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  29. Umwandlung B.von quartären Ammoniumverbindungen. In Stickstoffverbindungen 2, 4th ed.; Georg Thieme Verlag: Stuttgart, 1958; Vol. XI/2. [Google Scholar]
  30. Friis S. D.; Lindhardt A. T.; Skrydstrup T. The Development and Application of Two-Chamber Reactors and Carbon Monoxide Precursors for Safe Carbonylation Reactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 2016, 49, 594–605. 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Artaud I.; Torossian G.; Viout P. Alkylation directe de cetones et d’aldehydes en presence de potasse solide en suspension. Tetrahedron 1985, 41, 5031–5037. 10.1016/S0040-4020(01)96749-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kumar S.; Reddy L C. S.; Kumar Y.; Kumar A.; Singh B. K.; Kumar V.; Malhotra S.; Pandey M. K.; Jain R.; Thimmulappa R.; Sharma S. K.; Prasad A. K.; Biswal S.; Van der Eycken E.; DePass A. L.; Malhotra S. V.; Ghosh B.; Parmar V. S. Arylalkyl Ketones, Benzophenones, Desoxybenzoins and Chalcones Inhibit TNF-α Induced Expression of ICAM-1: Structure-Activity Analysis. Arch. Pharm. 2012, 345, 368–377. 10.1002/ardp.201100279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhou H.; Dong Y.; Ma X.; Xu J.; Xu S. Development of a novel truncated deguelin derivative possessing nitric oxide donor as a potential anti-lung cancer agent. Fitoterapia 2020, 146, 104670 10.1016/j.fitote.2020.104670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. An H.; Lee S.; Lee J. M.; Jo D. H.; Kim J.; Jeong Y.-S.; Heo M. J.; Cho C. S.; Choi H.; Seo J. H.; Hwang S.; Lim J.; Kim T.; Jun H. O.; Sim J.; Lim C.; Hur J.; Ahn J.; Kim H. S.; Seo S.-Y.; Na Y.; Kim S.-H.; Lee J.; Lee J.; Chung S.-J.; Kim Y.-M.; Kim K.-W.; Kim S. G.; Kim J. H.; Suh Y.-G. Novel Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1α (HIF-1α) Inhibitors for Angiogenesis-Related Ocular Diseases: Discovery of a Novel Scaffold via Ring-Truncation Strategy. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61, 9266–9286. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b00971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lee S.-C.; Min H.-Y.; Choi H.; Bae S. Y.; Park K. H.; Hyun S. Y.; Lee H. J.; Moon J.; Park S.-H.; Kim J. Y.; An H.; Park S.-J.; Seo J. H.; Lee S.; Kim Y.-M.; Park H.-J.; Lee S. K.; Lee J.; Lee J.; Kim K.-W.; Suh Y.-G.; Lee H.-Y. Deguelin Analogue SH-1242 Inhibits Hsp90 Activity and Exerts Potent Anticancer Efficacy with Limited Neurotoxicity. Cancer Res. 2016, 76, 686–699. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-1492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Battace A.; Feuerstein M.; Lemhadri M.; Zair T.; Doucet H.; Santelli M. Heck Reactions of α- or β-Substituted Enol Ethers with Aryl Bromides Catalysed by a Tetraphosphane/Palladium Complex – Direct Access to Acetophenone or 1-Arylpropanone Derivatives. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 2007, 3122–3132. 10.1002/ejoc.200700152. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ding Y.; Zhang W.; Li H.; Meng Y.; Zhang T.; Chen Q.-Y.; Zhu C. Metal-free synthesis of ketones by visible-light induced aerobic oxidative radical addition of aryl hydrazines to alkenes. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 2941–2944. 10.1039/C7GC01083D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Mehta V. P.; García-López J.-A.; Greaney M. F. Ruthenium-Catalyzed Cascade C□H Functionalization of Phenylacetophenones. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1529–1533. 10.1002/anie.201309114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Janeček M.; Rossmann M.; Sharma P.; Emery A.; Huggins D. J.; Stockwell S. R.; Stokes J. E.; Tan Y. S.; Almeida E. G.; Hardwick B.; Narvaez A. J.; Hyvönen M.; Spring D. R.; McKenzie G. J.; Venkitaraman A. R. Allosteric modulation of AURKA kinase activity by a small-molecule inhibitor of its protein-protein interaction with TPX2. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 28528 10.1038/srep28528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Huang K.; Li G.; Huang W.-P.; Yu D.-G.; Shi Z.-J. Arylation of α-pivaloxyl ketones with arylboronic reagents viaNi-catalyzed sp3 C–O activation. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 7224–7226. 10.1039/c1cc11193k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Shu B.; Wang X.-T.; Shen Z.-X.; Che T.; Zhong M.; Song J.-L.; Kang H.-J.; Xie H.; Zhang L.; Zhang S.-S. Iridium-catalyzed arylation of sulfoxonium ylides and arylboronic acids: a straightforward preparation of α-aryl ketones. Org. Chem. Front. 2020, 7, 1802–1808. 10.1039/D0QO00543F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. He C.; Guo S.; Huang L.; Lei A. Copper Catalyzed Arylation/C–C Bond Activation: An Approach toward α-Aryl Ketones. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 8273–8275. 10.1021/ja1033777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Lu H.-Y.; Shen A.; Li Y.-Q.; Hu Y.-C.; Ni C.; Cao Y.-C. N-Heterocyclic carbene-palladium-imine complex catalyzed α-arylation of ketones with aryl and heteroaryl chlorides under air atmosphere. Tetrahedron Lett. 2020, 61, 152124 10.1016/j.tetlet.2020.152124. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. PichetteDrapeau M.; Fabre I.; Grimaud L.; Ciofini I.; Ollevier T.; Taillefer M. Transition-Metal-Free α-Arylation of Enolizable Aryl Ketones and Mechanistic Evidence for a Radical Process. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 10587–10591. 10.1002/anie.201502332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Peng C.; Zhang W.; Yan G.; Wang J. Arylation and Vinylation of α-Diazocarbonyl Compounds with Boroxines. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 1667–1670. 10.1021/ol900362d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Artaud I.; Ben-Aziza K.; Mansuy D. Iron porphyrin-catalyzed oxidation of 1, 2-dimethoxyarenes: a discussion of the different reactions involved and the competition between the formation of methoxyquinones or muconic dimethyl esters. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 3373–3380. 10.1021/jo00064a026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Cherney A. H.; Reisman S. E. Pd-catalyzed Fukuyama cross-coupling of secondary organozinc reagents for the direct synthesis of unsymmetrical ketones. Tetrahedron 2014, 70, 3259–3265. 10.1016/j.tet.2013.11.104. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Yang Y.; Wang L.; Chen Y.; Dai Y.; Sun Z. One-pot synthesis of α,α-disubstituted Aryl-1-ethanones via the Wittig-Horner reaction. Phosphorus, Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 2018, 193, 121–126. 10.1080/10426507.2017.1415899. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Buckland S.; Halton B.; Mei Q.; Stang P. Studies in the Cycloproparene Series: Reactions of Alkylidenecycloproparenes With Electrophiles. Aust. J. Chem. 1987, 40, 1375–1387. 10.1071/CH9871375. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Liu F.; Hu Y.-Y.; Li D.; Zhou Q.; Lu J.-M. N-Heterocyclic carbene-palladacyclic complexes: synthesis, characterization and their applications in the C-N coupling and α-arylation of ketones using aryl chlorides. Tetrahedron 2018, 74, 5683–5690. 10.1016/j.tet.2018.07.052. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Lou S.; Fu G. C. Nickel/Bis(oxazoline)-Catalyzed Asymmetric Kumada Reactions of Alkyl Electrophiles: Cross-Couplings of Racemic α-Bromoketones. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 1264–1266. 10.1021/ja909689t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Hashmi A. S. K.; Wang T.; Shi S.; Rudolph M. Regioselectivity Switch: Gold(I)-Catalyzed Oxidative Rearrangement of Propargyl Alcohols to 1,3-Diketones. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 7761–7767. 10.1021/jo301381z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Li B. X.; Le D. N.; Mack K. A.; McClory A.; Lim N.-K.; Cravillion T.; Savage S.; Han C.; Collum D. B.; Zhang H.; Gosselin F. Highly Stereoselective Synthesis of Tetrasubstituted Acyclic All-Carbon Olefins via Enol Tosylation and Suzuki–Miyaura Coupling. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 10777–10783. 10.1021/jacs.7b05071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Cherney A. H.; Kadunce N. T.; Reisman S. E. Catalytic Asymmetric Reductive Acyl Cross-Coupling: Synthesis of Enantioenriched Acyclic α,α-Disubstituted Ketones. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 7442–7445. 10.1021/ja402922w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Ueda Y.; Iwai T.; Sawamura M. Nickel-Copper-Catalyzed Hydroacylation of Vinylarenes with Acyl Fluorides and Hydrosilanes. Chem. - Eur. J. 2019, 25, 9410–9414. 10.1002/chem.201900822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Su Y.; Sun X.; Wu G.; Jiao N. Catalyst-Controlled Highly Selective Coupling and Oxygenation of Olefins: A Direct Approach to Alcohols, Ketones, and Diketones. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 9808–9812. 10.1002/anie.201303917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Audubert C.; Lebel H. Mild Esterification of Carboxylic Acids via Continuous Flow Diazotization of Amines. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 4407–4410. 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b02231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Waibel M.; De Angelis M.; Stossi F.; Kieser K. J.; Carlson K. E.; Katzenellenbogen B. S.; Katzenellenbogen J. A. Bibenzyl- and stilbene-core compounds with non-polar linker atom substituents as selective ligands for estrogen receptor beta. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 44, 3412–3424. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2009.02.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Han W.; Chen J.; Jin F.; Yuan X. Iodide-Catalyzed Carbonylation–Benzylation of Benzyl Chlorides with Potassium Aryltrifluoroborates under Ambient Pressure of Carbon Monoxide. Synlett 2018, 29, 369–374. 10.1055/s-0036-1591502. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Liu T.-L.; Ng T. W.; Zhao Y. Rhodium-Catalyzed Enantioselective Isomerization of Secondary Allylic Alcohols. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 3643–3646. 10.1021/jacs.7b01096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

jo1c03158_si_001.pdf (3.5MB, pdf)

Articles from The Journal of Organic Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES