Abstract
Background
Chronic liver injury induces pathological repair, resulting in fibrosis, during which hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) are activated and transform into myofibroblasts. CD248 is mainly expressed on myofibroblasts and was considered as a promising target to treat fibrosis. The primary aim of this study was to generate a CD248 specific antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) and evaluate its therapeutic efficacy for liver fibrosis and its safety in vivo.
Methods
CD248 expression was examined in patients with liver cirrhosis and in mice with CCl4-induced liver fibrosis. The ADC IgG78-DM1, which targets CD248, was prepared and its bioactivity on activated primary HSCs was studied. The anti-fibrotic effects of IgG78-DM1 on liver fibrosis were evaluated in CCl4-induced mice. The reproductive safety and biosafety of IgG78-DM1 were also evaluated in vivo.
Results
CD248 expression was upregulated in patients with liver cirrhosis and in CCl4-induced mice, and was mainly expressed on alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA)+ myofibroblasts. IgG78-DM1 was successfully generated, which could effectively bind with and kill CD248+ activated HSCs in vitro and inhibit liver fibrosis in vivo. In addition, IgG78-DM1 was demonstrated to have qualified biosafety and reproductive safety in vivo.
Conclusions
Our study demonstrated that CD248 could be an ideal target for myofibroblasts in liver fibrosis, and CD248-targeting IgG78-DM1 had excellent anti-fibrotic effects in mice with liver fibrosis. Our study provided a novel strategy to treat liver fibrosis and expanded the application of ADCs beyond tumors.
Graphic Abstract
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10020-022-00460-1.
Keywords: Liver fibrosis, Myofibroblasts, CD248, Antibody-drug conjugate, IgG78-DM1
Introduction
Fibrosis is the pathological repair response of a tissue to chronic injury, which is characterized by excessive accumulation and deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, leading to organ dysfunction. Fibrosis can be triggered by many factors, including viral and parasitic infections, autoimmune inflammation, and drugs/toxic effects, and different organs can be affected, resulting in diseases such as liver fibrosis (Bataller and Brenner 2005; Distler et al. 2019). Liver fibrosis can lead to liver cirrhosis, decompensation of liver function, and ultimately, death. However, there is no effective treatment strategy for liver fibrosis, and existing treatment strategies cannot meet clinical needs (Friedman et al. 2013; Schuppan and Kim 2013). Thus, there is an urgent need to explore novel anti-fibrotic treatment strategies.
The occurrence of liver fibrosis is accompanied by chronic inflammation, during which the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines are upregulated and released to activate hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), among which transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) are the most potent pro-fibrotic cytokines (Bonner 2004; Meng et al. 2016; Stewart et al. 2018). Activation of HSCs is considered as the pivotal event driving and aggravating liver fibrosis. During chronic liver injury, the resident quiescent HSCs are activated and transform into highly proliferative, motile, and contractile myofibroblasts, which are the main source of ECM proteins, occupying up to 90% of the fibrotic liver (Bataller and Brenner 2005; Higashi et al. 2017). Activated HSCs have been considered as a target for anti-fibrotic therapy because of their central role in liver fibrosis.
The resistance of myofibroblasts to apoptosis is considered critical for the aberrant accumulation of these cells in fibrotic diseases, and different strategies to induce apoptosis of myofibroblasts have been examined in different fibrotic diseases (Hinz and Lagares 2020). Recently, Aghajanian et al. reported that in an angiotensin II and phenylephrine (AngII/PE)-induced cardiac fibrosis model, fibroblast activation protein (FAP) was expressed specifically in activated cardiac fibroblasts. In addition, they confirmed that the specific killing of activated cardiac fibroblasts by FAP-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells could reduce cardiac fibrosis and restore cardiac function in mice (Aghajanian et al. 2019). That report indicated that specific killing of myofibroblasts could be an effective strategy to inhibit tissue fibrosis. However, developing strategies to kill myofibroblasts specifically in liver fibrosis is limited by the lack of effective therapeutic targets (Bansal et al. 2016).
CD248, also known as endosialin or tumor endothelial marker 1 (TEM1), is a type I transmembrane glycoprotein (Christian et al. 2001). Previously, CD248 was found to be expressed specifically in pericytes, cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), and some tumor cells, such as sarcomas, with very low or limited expression in normal tissue; therefore, CD248 has been considered as a specific target for cancer therapy (Bagley et al. 2008; MacFadyen et al. 2005; O'Shannessy et al. 2016; Rouleau et al. 2008). Later studies showed that CD248 expression was also upregulated specifically in liver fibrosis, and CD248 was expressed mainly in activated HSCs, but not in quiescent HSCs, indicating that CD248 could be an effective therapeutic target for liver fibrosis (Wilhelm et al. 2016). To realize specific killing of activated HSCs, we aimed to generate an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) by conjugating a CD248-specific antibody, IgG78, with the microtubule inhibitor mertansine (DM1) via non-cleavable succinimidyl 4-(N-maleimidomethyl) cyclohexane-1-carboxylate (SMCC) linker.
In this study, we first examined CD248 expression in the liver tissue of patients with hepatic cirrhosis and in carbon tetrachloride (CCl4)-induced liver fibrosis in C57BL/6 mice, and confirmed that CD248 was mainly expressed in alpha smooth actin (α-SMA)+ myofibroblasts. We then demonstrated that CD248 expression was increased in TGF-β activated primary HSCs and freshly isolated HSCs from CCl4-induced mice. The ADC IgG78-DM1 was then generated through conjugating IgG78 with DM1 via the non-cleavable SMCC linker. After confirming its binding affinity and specific cytotoxicity toward CD248 positive HSCs in vitro, we verified that IgG78-DM1 could alleviate CCl4-induced liver fibrosis in vivo. The biosafety and reproductive safety of IgG78-DM1 were also examined in vivo. The present study demonstrated that CD248 is an ideal target for anti-fibrotic therapy and specific killing of CD248+ myofibroblasts using IgG78-DM1 could be a novel and effective strategy to treat liver fibrosis.
Materials and methods
Human tissue samples and animal models
A human liver tissue microarray (HC-Liv00006) was purchased from Avila Biotech (Xi’an, China). Male C57BL/6 mice were purchased from experimental animal center, Fourth Military Medical University (Xi’an, China). Liver fibrosis in the mice was induced by intraperitoneal injection of CCl4 (2.5 mL/kg body weight, dissolved in olive oil at the ratio of 1:9) twice a week for 6 weeks (n = 5 mice in each group). Mice were sacrificed 3 days after the final injection.
Histological staining
Mouse liver tissue slides were prepared as 5 μm-thick paraffin sections and 8 μm-thick frozen sections. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and Masson staining were performed by Servicebio Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China) The primary antibodies used for immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining and immunofluorescent (IF) staining were as follows: anti-human CD248 (#ab67273, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-mouse CD248 (#18160-1-AP, Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, USA), anti-mouse α-SMA (#ab124964, Abcam), Lysotracker™ Red DND 99 (#L7528, Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA), Alexa Fluor 488 conjugated α-tubulin (11H10) Rabbit monoclonal antibody (mAb) (#5063, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA). Apoptotic cells were stained using a Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase nick-end-labeling (TUNEL) Cell Apoptosis Detection Kit (#G1501-50, Servicebio). At 24 h after a single injection of IgG78-DM1, liver tissues were isolated and used to examine the co-location of IgG78-DM1 and CD248 by dual IF staining and cell apoptosis by TUNEL assay. Images were captured under a fluorescence microscope or a confocal laser scanning microscope. Quantification was performed according to the percentage and intensity in IHC staining and the percentage of the positive area in the IF staining using Image J v1.52a (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).
Purification of IgG78 and preparation of IgG78-DM1
A plasmid containing the DNA sequence encoding IgG78 was transiently transfected into HEK293F cells using the FreeStyle™ MAX Reagent (#16447100, Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) and cultured for 7 days before supernatants were collected. IgG78 was purified from the supernatant using a HiTrap Protein A FF column (#28-9343-88, GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) and an AKTA fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC) Protein Purifier (#03009481, GE Healthcare). After being dialyzed in conjugating buffer (50 mM Trisodium phosphate, 50 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA dissolved in 1 L ddH2O, PH = 7.2), IgG78 was then conjugated with SMCC-DM1 dissolved in N, N-dimethylacetamide (DMA) at room temperature for 3 h. Then, IgG78-DM1 was dialyzed for 24 h to replace the solvent with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The ratio of DM1 to IgG78 was calculated as follows (CDM1 = Molar concentration of DM1; εab = Molar extinction coefficient of IgG78, εab@252 = 82,880 M−1 cm−1, εab@280 = 224,000 M−1 cm−1; εDM1 = Molar extinction coefficient of DM1, εDM1@252 = 26,790 M−1 cm−1, εDM1@280 = 5700 M−1 cm−1):
The heavy and light chains of IgG78-DM1 was resolved by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) for Coomassie blue staining and western blotting.
Culture of cell lines and isolation of primary HSCs
The mouse macrophage cell line RAW264.7 and mouse hepatocyte cell line AML12 were purchased from American type culture collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA, USA). The mouse HSC cell line JS-1 was purchased from Fenghbio Co., Ltd (Changsha, China). Cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (#A3161002C, Gibco) and 1% penicillin–streptomycin (#P1400, Solarbio). Primary HSCs were isolated from C57BL/6 mice according to a previously described protocol (Castello-Cros and Cukierman 2009; Mederacke et al. 2015). Primary HSCs were maintained in fibroblast-specific medium (#2301, Sciencell, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and were activated by TGF-β1 (#AF-100-21C, Peprotech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA) for 48 h before further analysis.
Flow cytometry
Primary HSCs were incubated with Alexa fluor 647-conjugated Vimentin (D21H3) rabbit mAb (#9856, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-mouse CD248 primary antibody (#ab217535, Abcam) or 100 nM IgG78-DM1 at 4 °C for 30 min, followed by incubation with FITC anti-rabbit IgG Fc (Abcam, #ab6717) and FITC anti-human IgG Fc (Abcam, #96907) at 4 °C for 30 min in the dark before flow cytometry analysis. Hepatocytes and macrophages were incubated with 100 nM IgG78-DM1 at 4 °C for 30 min, followed by incubation with Phycoerythrin (PE) anti-human IgG Fc (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA #410708).
Cellular ELISA and CCK-8 assay
Activated HSCs were counted to adjust the cell density to 1 × 104/mL, and the cells were plated at 200 μL/well in 96-well plates coated with 2% Gelatin. Then, HSCs were washed and incubated with IgG78-DM1 or control hIgG-DM1 (DM1 conjugated to non-specific human IgG) at 4 °C for an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or at 37 °C for a CCK-8 (Cell Counting Kit-8) assay. For ELISA, HSCs were then incubated with peroxidase-labeled secondary antibody (#A21050, Abbkine, Wuhan, China) for 1 h at 4 °C before colorimetric signals were developed by incubation with 3,3ʹ,5,5ʹ-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB; #P0209, Beyotime, Jiangsu, China) and stopped by 2 M H2SO4 for 15 min (#P0215, Beyotime). The CCK-8 kit (#BS350A, Biosharp, Anhui, China) was used to count live HSCs. Absorbance was then measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader, and the binding affinity and IC50 of IgG78-DM1 were calculated with GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA).
Quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)
Total RNA was extracted using the Trizol reagent, and reverse transcription (RT) was performed using PrimeScript™ RT Master Mix (#RR036A, Takara, Shiga, Japan). The resultant cDNA was quantified using qPCR, performed using a TB Green® Premix Ex Taq™ II kit (#RR820A, Takara). The primers used for qPCR are listed in Table 1.
Table 1.
Target | Forward primer | Reverse primer |
---|---|---|
Cd248 | CTCAACCAACTATCCCCAAGTC | GCCTGGGTTCTGATACCTGG |
Acta2 | CCGCCATGTATGTGGCTATT | CAGTTGTACGTCCAGAGGCATA |
Col1a1 | AGACATGTTCAGCTTTGTGGAC | GCAGCTGACTTCAGGGATG |
Tgfbr1 | CACAGAGTGGGAACAAAAAGGT | CCAATGGAACATCGTCGAGCA |
Pdgfrα | ATGAGAGTGAGATCGAAGGCA | CGGCAAGGTATGATGGCAGAG |
Western blotting
Cells and tissues were lysed using Radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (#P0013B, Beyotime) and the protein was quantified using a bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay kit (#P0010, Beyotime). Proteins were subjected to 8% SDS-PAGE and then transferred to a PVDF membrane for western blotting. The primary antibodies used were: anti-mouse CD248 (#ab48185, Abcam), anti-mouse α-SMA (#ab124964, Abcam), anti-mouse collagen I (#ab34710, Abcam), anti-mouse glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; #10494-1-AP, Proteintech).
Statistical analysis
All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Before analysis, quantitative data were tested for normality and homogeneity of variance using GraphPad Prism 8. Statistical analyses were performed using Student’s test or linear correlation. Differences were considered significant when p < 0.05.
Results
CD248 was mainly expressed on myofibroblasts in liver fibrosis
To determine CD248 expression in liver fibrosis, we performed Sirius red and IHC staining for CD248 in the tissue array, which contained 40 cirrhotic liver tissues and 9 healthy controls. The results showed CD248 expression was significantly increased in human cirrhotic livers (Fig. 1A, B, p < 0.001) and the CD248 staining level correlated positively with the severity of liver fibrosis (Additional file 1: Fig. S1A, B, p < 0.0001). Next, we examined CD248 expression in 6-week CCl4-induced mice. IHC staining showed that CD248 levels were markedly upregulated in liver fibrosis (Fig. 1C, D, p < 0.0001). We then confirmed the upregulated expression of Acta2 (encoding actin alpha 2, smooth muscle) and Col1a1 (encoding collagen type I alpha 1 chain), which are fibrosis-related genes, and Cd248 using qRT-PCR; and assessed α-SMA, Collagen I, and CD248 protein levels using western blotting (Fig. 1E, F). IF staining was also performed to localize CD248 expression. As shown in Fig. 1G, CD248 was mainly expressed on α-SMA+ myofibroblasts in liver fibrosis.
CD248 expression was upregulated on activated primary HSCs
In CCl4-induced liver fibrosis, HSCs are the main source of myofibroblasts. To confirm the expression of CD248 in activated HSCs, we isolated primary HSCs from healthy mouse livers. Freshly isolated HSCs were subjected to flow cytometry analysis to observe the auto-fluorescence of Vitamin A, which is a marker of HSCs (Fig. 2A). HSCs are normally considered to be in a quiescent state, and their CD248 expression was low. However, after being activated by the potent pro-fibrotic cytokine TGF-β, the expression levels of CD248 and fibrosis-related genes, such as those encoding α-SMA and Collagen I, were upregulated significantly in the mouse HSC cell line JS-1 (Additional file 2: Fig. S2A–C). Similar results were also observed in freshly isolated HSCs (Fig. 2B, C). The increased CD248 expression was confirmed using flow cytometry (Fig. 2D). In addition, we isolated primary HSCs from CCl4-induced fibrotic mice and control mice to examine the expression of CD248 and other fibrosis-related genes. As shown in Fig. 2E–G, compared with those in the control mice, the expression levels of CD248 and other fibrosis-related genes were significantly increased in CCl4-induced fibrotic mice. These results confirmed that CD248 expression was upregulated in activated primary HSCs both in vitro and in vivo.
Purification of IgG78 and preparation of IgG78-DM1
To explore whether specific killing of myofibroblasts could effectively alleviate liver fibrosis, we first expressed and purified the fully human antibody IgG78, which specifically recognizes CD248. Then, we generated the ADC, IgG78-DM1, in which IgG78 was linked to DM1 via the stable thioether bond linker SMCC (Fig. 3A). The concentration of IgG78-DM1 was measured using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer, and the drug antibody ratio (DAR) of DM1 to IgG78 was calculated as 3.09, indicating that each IgG78 was conjugated with three DM1 molecules (Fig. 3B). To examine whether the conjugation process might destroy the structure and stability of IgG78, we performed SDS-PAGE, which showed that both IgG78 and IgG78-DM1 could be dissociated into heavy and light chains without other bands, indicating that the structure and stability of IgG78 was not influenced by the conjugation process (Fig. 3C). The stability of IgG78 was also confirmed by western blotting after DM1 conjugation, which showed that both IgG78 and IgG78-DM1 had a clear heavy chain, indicating that the DM1 conjugation did not influence the stability of IgG78 (Fig. 3D).
Bioactivity of IgG78-DM1 toward primary HSCs in vitro
To study the bioactivity of IgG78-DM1, we examined its binding with primary HSCs using flow cytometry. The results showed that IgG78-DM1 could bind effectively to activated HSCs, which have upregulated CD248 expression (Fig. 4A). Then, we examined the binding affinity of IgG78-DM1 using a cellular ELISA, which showed that IgG78-DM1 had relatively high binding affinity with activated HSCs, with a Kd value of 0.061 nM (Fig. 4B). Dual IF staining was then carried out to confirm whether IgG78-DM1 could internalize into activated HSCs, which showed that IgG78-DM1 co-localized mainly with lysosomes, indicating that it could be internalized into CD248+ HSCs (Fig. 4C).
The CCK-8 assay was then used to assess the specific killing of activated HSCs by IgG78-DM1, which showed that IgG78-DM1 had obvious cytotoxicity toward activated HSCs, with an IC50 of 0.5294 nM (Fig. 4D). Flow cytometry and CCK-8 assay were also used to examine the binding and cytotoxicity of IgG78-DM1 toward mouse hepatocytes or macrophages. The results showed that IgG78-DM1 could not bind with hepatocytes or macrophages and had no obvious cytotoxicity toward them (Additional file 3: Fig. S3A–D). These results further demonstrated the specificity of IgG78-DM1. We also evaluated the intracellular microtubule network in activated HSCs. As shown in Fig. 4E, the cells started to shrink and the microtubule structure was gradually destroyed after IgG78-DM1 treatment. Transmission electron microscopy observation revealed the condensation and fragmentation of nuclear chromatin in activated HSCs after IgG78-DM1 treatment (Fig. 4F). These results demonstrated that IgG78-DM1 has a high binding affinity for CD248+ HSCs and could effectively induce their apoptosis in vitro.
IgG78-DM1 could alleviate liver fibrosis in CCl4-induced fibrotic mice through specific killing of myofibroblasts
Given that IgG78-DM1 could effectively kill CD248+ HSCs in vitro, we next examined whether it could alleviate liver fibrosis in vivo. For prophylactic treatment, mice were injected intravenously with IgG78-DM1 or hIgG-DM1 during the process of CCl4-induced liver fibrosis (Fig. 5A). We performed pre-experiment to determine the appopriate dosage of IgG78-DM1 for treatment and found 2.5 mg/kg, twice a week could effectively alleviate liver fibrosis. To confirm whether IgG78-DM1 could specifically distribute in liver tissue, we labelled IgG78-DM1 with IRDye 800CW dye and observed its distribution in vivo. Results showed that IgG78-DM1 could specifically enrich in the liver tissue 24 h after injection and fluorescent signal maintained after 96 h (Additional file 4: Fig. S4). To confirm whether IgG78-DM1 could specifically bind with CD248+ myofibroblasts in vivo, we treated 6-week CCl4-induced mice with IgG78-DM1 for just once and examined the localization of IgG78-DM1 in liver tissue by dual IF staining using frozen sections. The results showed that IgG78-DM1 were mainly colocalized with CD248+ cells in vivo (Fig. 5B). Sirius red staining and the Ishak score showed that the deposition of collagen was markedly inhibited after IgG78-DM1 treatment (Fig. 5C–E). Inhibition of liver fibrosis was confirmed by the greatly decreased Masson staining-positive area and reduced α-SMA expression (Additional file 5: Fig. S5A–D). In addition, the content of hydroxyproline in liver tissue and the serum level of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), which indicate the severity of liver fibrosis and impaired liver function, respectively, were decreased markedly in the IgG78-DM1 treatment group, indicating that liver fibrosis was inhibited while liver function was improved (Fig. 5F, G).
The expression levels of CD248 and fibrosis-related factors in liver tissues were then examined using qRT-PCR and western blotting. The results showed that the expression levels of CD248 and fibrosis-related factors [α-SMA, Collagen I, platelet-derived growth factor receptor-alpha (PDGFRα), and transforming growth factor beta receptor 1 (TGF-βR1)] were decreased significantly in the IgG78-DM1 treatment group compared with those in the controls (Fig. 5H and I). To evaluate whether IgG78-DM1 indeed induced specific killing of myofibroblasts in vivo, 6-week CCl4-induced mice were treated with IgG78-DM1 or hIgG-DM1 just once and liver tissue was isolated to examine apoptosis using the TUNEL assay. The results showed significantly increased levels of apoptosis of α-SMA+ myofibroblasts in the IgG78-DM1 treated group compared with that in the controls (Fig. 5J and K).
In addition, to evaluate whether IgG78-DM1 could be used as a therapeutic treatment, we treated the mice with IgG78-DM1 for the last 2 weeks of the 6-week CCl4 treatment (Fig. 6A). The results showed that, compared with the hIgG-DM1-treated group, mice treated with IgG78-DM1 showed a significant decrease in Masson and Sirius red positive areas, the Ishak score, and hydroxyproline and serum ALT levels (Fig. 6B–G). Consistently, the expression levels of CD248 and fibrosis-related factors were reduced in IgG78-DM1-treated mice, as assessed using qRT-PCR and western blotting analyses (Fig. 6H, J).
IgG78-DM1 showed ideal biosafety and reproductive safety in vivo
To evaluate the safety of IgG78-DM1 in vivo, a primary safety study was performed in normal C57BL/6 mice. IgG78-DM1 (10 mg/kg) was injected into mice through the tail vein twice a week for 6 weeks; injection of PBS and hIgG-DM1 were used as negative controls. Food intake and the body weight of the mice were analyzed after administration, and no significant difference was observed among the three groups (Fig. 7A and B). At the end of the experiment, all the mice were sacrificed, and the liver of each mouse was weighed to calculate the liver index, for which no obvious difference was found among the three groups. Serum from each mouse was separated to examine indicators of liver and kidney functions, and no obvious toxicity was observed (Fig. 7C–E). In addition, H&E staining revealed that IgG78-DM1 caused no obvious tissue toxicity in important organs, such as the brain, heart, liver, lung, kidney, and spleen, as shown by the relatively normal structure of these organs (Fig. 7F).
We also examined the safety of IgG78-DM1 during embryonic development in normal C57BL/6 mice, because CD248 expression has been reported in several tissues of mouse embryos. Female C57BL/6 mice were mated with male mice and IgG78-DM1 was injected intravenously at 10 mg/kg twice a week from the first day of pregnancy until delivery. No anatomical or histological abnormalities were found in any of the embryos among the different groups during gestation, as shown by the results of H&E staining of the embryos (Fig. 7G). Furthermore, IgG78-DM1 had no obvious influence on gestation time, change of body weight of the pregnant mice, or the number and weight of pups at birth (Fig. 7H–K). These results confirmed that IgG78-DM1 had ideal biosafety and reproductive safety when applied in vivo.
Discussion
Fibrosis, or excessive tissue scarring, is a common feature of most chronic tissue injuries, among which liver fibrosis is the most common fibrotic disease. However, no antifibrotic therapy has been approved to date. Although several pro-fibrotic cytokines such as TGF-β and PDGF, have been found to play essential roles in the process of fibrosis, systemic inhibition of these cytokines, for example TGF-β, could also impair tumor suppression or cause chronic inflammation because their critical function in normal homeostasis (Dewidar et al. 2019; Friedman et al. 2013). Thus, it is vitally important to explore novel specific anti-fibrotic strategies.
HSCs play an essential role in the progression of liver fibrosis, and activated HSCs are considered an ideal target for anti-fibrotic therapy (Higashi et al. 2017). HSCs are normally considered to be in a quiescent state and do not express α-SMA. After being activated, HSCs will transform into myofibroblasts and the expression of α-SMA and ECM proteins will significantly increase. Several strategies targeting activated HSCs have been designed and evaluated. For example, Zhang et al. (2020) designed pPB peptide-modified, HMGB1 (high mobility group box 1)-siRNA (small interfering RNA) loaded nanoparticles to alleviate liver fibrosis by inhibiting the activation and proliferation of HSCs. Luo et al. (2019) used chondroitin sulfate nanomicelles (CSmicelles) to target HSCs by binding with CD44, and retinoic acid (RA) and doxorubicin (DOX) were encapsulated to mediate specific cytotoxicity toward HSCs to alleviate liver fibrosis. Bangen et al. (2017) reported that injection of an siRNA targeting the Cyclin E1 mRNA into mice could effectively block Cyclin E1 expression and the proliferation of HSCs, hepatocytes, and leukocytes, resulting in significantly ameliorated liver fibrosis. However, these studies are still in the preclinical stage. More importantly, the lack of a specific target might limit their further application. Therefore, it is important to identify ideal targets that are specifically expressed on activated, but not quiescent, HSCs (Yazdani et al. 2017).
CD248 is a transmembrane glycoprotein that belongs to C-type lectin-like receptor family (Christian et al. 2001). During development, CD248 is specifically expressed on interstitial fibroblasts and pericytes, but its expression largely disappears in adults (Lax et al. 2007). However, CD248 expression is upregulated on activated HSCs during liver fibrosis, while in Cd248 knockout mice, CCl4-induced liver fibrosis was obviously alleviated and the expression of collagen I, α-SMA, and TGF-β were all inhibited significantly (Mogler et al. 2015; Wilhelm et al. 2016). These findings indicated that CD248 might play an important role in the progression of liver fibrosis and could be an ideal therapeutic target for fibrotic diseases (Teicher 2019).
Recently, it was found that resistance of myofibroblasts to apoptosis played a critical role in fibrotic diseases, and the induction of apoptosis in myofibroblasts could be an effective strategy to alleviate liver fibrosis (Hinz and Lagares 2020; Li et al. 2019, 2020; Oh et al. 2016). In addition, Aghajanian et al. (2019) reported that cardiac fibrosis could be alleviated through specific killing of activated cardiac fibroblasts by FAP-specific CAR T cells, indicating that specific killing of activated fibroblasts could also be an effective way to inhibit tissue fibrosis. Inspired by these findings, we speculated that specifically killing of activated HSCs might have an anti-fibrotic effect in liver fibrosis. To realize specific killing, we generated an ADC named IgG78-DM1, in which the CD248 specific antibody IgG78 was conjugated with the microtubule inhibitor DM1 through an SMCC linker. We examined whether IgG78-DM1 could effectively alleviate CCl4-induced liver fibrosis in vivo.
First, we confirmed that CD248 expression was upregulated in the fibrotic liver tissues of both patients with hepatic cirrhosis and in CCl4-induced mice. We also confirmed that CD248 was expressed mainly on α-SMA-positive HSCs, which was consistent with previous reports (Mogler et al. 2015; Wilhelm et al. 2016). Next, CD248 expression was demonstrated to be markedly upregulated in activated HSCs, either in TGF-β1 stimulated normal HSCs or in freshly isolated HSCs from 6-week CCl4-induced mice. Thus, CD248 was confirmed to be specifically expressed on activated HSCs and could be used as a target to treat liver fibrosis.
To exert specific killing on activated HSCs, ADC IgG78-DM1 was generated. To construct the ADC, the same structure as Tratuzumab-DM1 (T-DM1) was used, in which the antibody was conjugated with DM1 through a non-cleavable SMCC linker (von Minckwitz et al. 2019). CD248-mediated antibody internalization has been reported (Rybinski et al. 2015), and our results demonstrated that IgG78-DM1 could specifically bind with and be internalized into CD248-positive activated HSCs. In addition, IgG78-DM1 could induce specific cytotoxicity of activated HSCs. DM1 is a potent cytotoxic drug; therefore, it could kill target cells effectively, even at very low dose. The use of the non-cleavable SMCC linker to tether DM1 to IgG78 ensured that only CD248-positive activated HSCs were destroyed, while hepatocytes and other normal cells were not affected.
In vivo, after IgG78-DM1 was injected into CCl4-induced mice, it was distributed specifically in the fibrotic liver and colocalized with CD248 positive cells, as shown by IF staining of frozen liver sections. In addition, IgG78-DM1 alleviated liver fibrosis significantly in both prophylactic and therapeutic treatment models, as shown by the decreased deposition of collagen and decreased expression of fibrosis-related proteins. The results of TUNEL staining indicated that the inhibition of liver fibrosis by IgG78-DM1 was caused by the specific killing of activated HSCs. During our study, we observed that hIgG-DM1 also had some anti-fibrotic effect, which was hypothesized to be caused by metabolism of the ADC in liver tissue. However, the anti-fibrotic effect in IgG78-DM1 treated group was significantly stronger than that of hIgG-DM1.
Besides evaluating the effectiveness of this strategy to alleviate liver fibrosis, we also examined the biosafety and reproductive safety of IgG78-DM1 in vivo. The results of liver and kidney function data and H&E staining of important organs indicated that IgG78-DM1 did not cause obvious tissue toxicity in vivo. In mice, the normal embryo development and the normal gestation time, number, and weight of pups at birth indicated that IgG78-DM1 did not induce reproductive toxicity when applied in vivo.
Conclusions
In summary, our study demonstrated that CD248 was specifically expressed on activated hepatic stellate cells in liver fibrosis and CD248 could be used as an effective target for anti-fibrotic therapy. A CD248-specific antibody-drug conjugate (IgG78-DM1) was generated that could bind specifically with and kill CD248-positive hepatic stellate cells in vitro, could alleviate liver fibrosis in vivo, and had a good safety profile. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to alleviate fibrosis using an ADC, and we believe that this strategy could also be applied to treat other fibrotic diseases.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge Mr. Jintao Hu (Department of Immunology, Fourth Military Medical University, China) for flow cytometry analysis and Mr. Yong Zhao (Laboratory Animal Center, Fourth Military Medical University, China) for assistance with the animal study.
Abbreviations
- HSCs
Hepatic stellate cells
- ADC
Antibody-drug conjugates
- ECM
Extracellular matrix
- TGF-β
Transforming growth factor-β
- PDGF
Platelet-derived growth factor
- α-SMA
α-Smooth muscle actin
- AngII/PE
Angiotensin II and phenylephrine
- FAP
Fibroblast activation protein
- CAR
Chimeric antigen receptor
- TEM1
Tumor endothelial marker 1
- DM1
Mertansine
Authors’ contributions
LS, XC, HD Performed experiments and collected and interpreted data; YF, LY and ZK made data analysis and constructive discussions; SC, ZR, YA and ZA contributed to technical discussion and suggestions; ZX, ZJ, LT and LS prepared reagents and materials and assisted with experiments; WW, YB and QW designed this study and experiments; LS, YB and WW contributed to manuscript writing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant numbers 82173204; 81772734), the Innovation Capability Support Program of Shaanxi (Grant number 2020PT-021), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant number G2021KY05102).
Availability of data and materials
The data and materials of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon request.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The protocol for the animal study was approved by the Animal Welfare and Ethics Committee of the Fourth Military Medical University (Xi’an, China).
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
All authors declare no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this study.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Shaojie Liu, Donghui Han and Chao Xu contributed equally to this work
Contributor Information
Weijun Qin, Email: qinwj@fmmu.edu.cn.
Bo Yang, Email: xiybfmmu@163.com.
Weihong Wen, Email: weihongwen@nwpu.edu.cn.
References
- Aghajanian H, Kimura T, Rurik JG, Hancock AS, Leibowitz MS, Li L, Scholler J, Monslow J, Lo A, Han W, Wang T, Bedi K, Morley MP, Linares Saldana RA, Bolar NA, McDaid K, Assenmacher CA, Smith CL, Wirth D, June CH, Margulies KB, Jain R, Pure E, Albelda SM, Epstein JA. Targeting cardiac fibrosis with engineered T cells. Nature. 2019;573(7774):430–433. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1546-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bagley RG, Honma N, Weber W, Boutin P, Rouleau C, Shankara S, Kataoka S, Ishida I, Roberts BL, Teicher BA. Endosialin/TEM 1/CD248 is a pericyte marker of embryonic and tumor neovascularization. Microvasc Res. 2008;76(3):180–188. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2008.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bangen JM, Hammerich L, Sonntag R, Baues M, Haas U, Lambertz D, Longerich T, Lammers T, Tacke F, Trautwein C, Liedtke C. Targeting CCl4-induced liver fibrosis by RNA interference-mediated inhibition of cyclin E1 in mice. Hepatology. 2017;66(4):1242–57. 10.1002/hep.29275 (c) 2017 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Bansal R, Nagorniewicz B, Prakash J. Clinical advancements in the targeted therapies against liver fibrosis. Mediat Inflamm. 2016;2016:7629724. doi: 10.1155/2016/7629724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bataller R, Brenner DA. Liver fibrosis. J Clin Invest. 2005;115(2):209–218. doi: 10.1172/jci24282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bonner JC. Regulation of PDGF and its receptors in fibrotic diseases. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2004;15(4):255–273. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2004.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Castello-Cros R, Cukierman E. Stromagenesis during tumorigenesis: characterization of tumor-associated fibroblasts and stroma-derived 3D matrices. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;522:275–305. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-413-1_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Christian S, Ahorn H, Koehler A, Eisenhaber F, Rodi HP, Garin-Chesa P, Park JE, Rettig WJ, Lenter MC. Molecular cloning and characterization of endosialin, a C-type lectin-like cell surface receptor of tumor endothelium. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(10):7408–7414. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M009604200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dewidar B, Meyer C, Dooley S, Meindl-Beinker AN. TGF-beta in hepatic stellate cell activation and liver fibrogenesis-updated 2019. Cells. 2019;8(11):1419. doi: 10.3390/cells8111419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Distler JHW, Gyorfi AH, Ramanujam M, Whitfield ML, Konigshoff M, Lafyatis R. Shared and distinct mechanisms of fibrosis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2019;15(12):705–730. doi: 10.1038/s41584-019-0322-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Friedman SL, Sheppard D, Duffield JS, Violette S. Therapy for fibrotic diseases: nearing the starting line. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5(167):167sr1. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Higashi T, Friedman SL, Hoshida Y. Hepatic stellate cells as key target in liver fibrosis. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017;121:27–42. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2017.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hinz B, Lagares D. Evasion of apoptosis by myofibroblasts: a hallmark of fibrotic diseases. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2020;16(1):11–31. doi: 10.1038/s41584-019-0324-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lax S, Hou TZ, Jenkinson E, Salmon M, MacFadyen JR, Isacke CM, Anderson G, Cunningham AF, Buckley CD. CD248/Endosialin is dynamically expressed on a subset of stromal cells during lymphoid tissue development, splenic remodeling and repair. FEBS Lett. 2007;581(18):3550–3556. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.06.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li Q, Ding Y, Guo X, Luo S, Zhuang H, Zhou J, Xu N, Yan Z. Chemically modified liposomes carrying TRAIL target activated hepatic stellate cells and ameliorate hepatic fibrosis in vitro and in vivo. J Cell Mol Med. 2019;23(3):1951–1962. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.14097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li R, Li Z, Feng Y, Yang H, Shi Q, Tao Z, Cheng J, Lu X. PDGFRbeta-targeted TRAIL specifically induces apoptosis of activated hepatic stellate cells and ameliorates liver fibrosis. Apoptosis. 2020;25(1–2):105–119. doi: 10.1007/s10495-019-01583-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luo J, Zhang P, Zhao T, Jia M, Yin P, Li W, Zhang ZR, Fu Y, Gong T. Golgi apparatus-targeted chondroitin-modified nanomicelles suppress hepatic stellate cell activation for the management of liver fibrosis. ACS Nano. 2019;13(4):3910–3923. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b06924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MacFadyen JR, Haworth O, Roberston D, Hardie D, Webster MT, Morris HR, Panico M, Sutton-Smith M, Dell A, van der Geer P, Wienke D, Buckley CD, Isacke CM. Endosialin (TEM1, CD248) is a marker of stromal fibroblasts and is not selectively expressed on tumour endothelium. FEBS Lett. 2005;579(12):2569–2575. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.03.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mederacke I, Dapito DH, Affo S, Uchinami H, Schwabe RF. High-yield and high-purity isolation of hepatic stellate cells from normal and fibrotic mouse livers. Nat Protoc. 2015;10(2):305–315. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2015.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meng XM, Nikolic-Paterson DJ, Lan HY. TGF-beta: the master regulator of fibrosis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2016;12(6):325–338. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2016.48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mogler C, Wieland M, Konig C, Hu J, Runge A, Korn C, Besemfelder E, Breitkopf-Heinlein K, Komljenovic D, Dooley S, Schirmacher P, Longerich T, Augustin HG. Hepatic stellate cell-expressed endosialin balances fibrogenesis and hepatocyte proliferation during liver damage. EMBO Mol Med. 2015;7(3):332–8. 10.15252/emmm.201404246 (c) 2015 The Authors. Published under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Oh Y, Park O, Swierczewska M, Hamilton JP, Park JS, Kim TH, Lim SM, Eom H, Jo DG, Lee CE, Kechrid R, Mastorakos P, Zhang C, Hahn SK, Jeon OC, Byun Y, Kim K, Hanes J, Lee KC, Pomper MG, Gao B, Lee S. Systemic PEGylated TRAIL treatment ameliorates liver cirrhosis in rats by eliminating activated hepatic stellate cells. Hepatology. 2016;64(1):209–223. doi: 10.1002/hep.28432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O'Shannessy DJ, Dai H, Mitchell M, Huntsman S, Brantley S, Fenstermacher D, Reed DR. Endosialin and associated protein expression in soft tissue sarcomas: a potential target for anti-endosialin therapeutic strategies. Sarcoma. 2016;2016:5213628. doi: 10.1155/2016/5213628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rouleau C, Curiel M, Weber W, Smale R, Kurtzberg L, Mascarello J, Berger C, Wallar G, Bagley R, Honma N, Hasegawa K, Ishida I, Kataoka S, Thurberg BL, Mehraein K, Horten B, Miller G, Teicher BA. Endosialin protein expression and therapeutic target potential in human solid tumors: sarcoma versus carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(22):7223–7236. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-08-0499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rybinski K, Imtiyaz HZ, Mittica B, Drozdowski B, Fulmer J, Furuuchi K, Fernando S, Henry M, Chao QM, Kline B, Albone E, Wustner J, Lin JM, Nicolaides NC, Grasso L, Zhou YH. Targeting endosialin/CD248 through antibody-mediated internalization results in impaired pericyte maturation and dysfunctional tumor microvasculature. Oncotarget. 2015;6(28):25429–25440. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schuppan D, Kim YO. Evolving therapies for liver fibrosis. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(5):1887–1901. doi: 10.1172/jci66028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stewart AG, Thomas B, Koff J. TGF-beta: master regulator of inflammation and fibrosis. Respirology. 2018;23(12):1096–1097. doi: 10.1111/resp.13415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Teicher BA. CD248: a therapeutic target in cancer and fibrotic diseases. Oncotarget. 2019;10(9):993–1009. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.26590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- von Minckwitz G, Huang CS, Mano MS, Loibl S, Mamounas EP, Untch M, Wolmark N, Rastogi P, Schneeweiss A, Redondo A, Fischer HH, Jacot W, Conlin AK, Arce-Salinas C, Wapnir IL, Jackisch C, DiGiovanna MP, Fasching PA, Crown JP, Wulfing P, Shao Z, Rota Caremoli E, Wu H, Lam LH, Tesarowski D, Smitt M, Douthwaite H, Singel SM, Geyer CE, Jr, Investigators K Trastuzumab emtansine for residual invasive HER2-Positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(7):617–628. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1814017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilhelm A, Aldridge V, Haldar D, Naylor AJ, Weston CJ, Hedegaard D, Garg A, Fear J, Reynolds GM, Croft AP, Henderson NC, Buckley CD, Newsome PN. CD248/endosialin critically regulates hepatic stellate cell proliferation during chronic liver injury via a PDGF-regulated mechanism. Gut. 2016;65(7):1175–85. 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308325. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Yazdani S, Bansal R, Prakash J. Drug targeting to myofibroblasts: implications for fibrosis and cancer. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017;121:101–116. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2017.07. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang J, Shen H, Xu J, Liu L, Tan J, Li M, Xu N, Luo S, Wang J, Yang F, Tang J, Li Q, Wang Y, Yu L, Yan Z. Liver-targeted siRNA lipid nanoparticles treat hepatic cirrhosis by dual antifibrotic and anti-inflammatory activities. ACS Nano. 2020;14(5):6305–6322. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c02633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data and materials of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon request.