Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is more prevalent in south-central Asian countries, particularly the Afghan population. Screening for CRC in the Afghan population has always been challenging, primarily due to the tribal and social cultures, lack of facilities, and lack of education. The United States (US) will soon face a significantly massive influx of Afghan refugees. It becomes imperative to initiate and implement effective measures regarding CRC screening in these refugee populations. The current review article aims to identify the most likely challenges faced for CRC screening in this Afghan refugee population in the US and address the possible measures to overcome these challenges.
Keywords: limitations, colorectal cancer, challenges, screening, afghan population
Introduction and background
The Afghan population is exceptionally prone to gastrointestinal malignancies, with an overall cancer-related age-adjusted mortality rate of 5.13/100,000 in the general population [1]. Screening for CRC is always challenging, and on top of that, screening the refugee population can be very demanding [2]. It is well-known that refugee populations of various ethnic backgrounds deal with even more obstacles to CRC screening than their American-born counterparts [3]. Also, very little is known about CRC screening in the Afghan refugee population, as they mostly get assistance from resettlement organizations momentarily [4].
Moreover, various factors, such as living in a low-income neighborhood, language barriers, immigration status, and not being enlisted in primary healthcare, are associated with reduced CRC screening in refugee populations [4-5]. Although breast cancer is the most frequently reported cancer in the Afghan people, followed by gastrointestinal tract malignancies, screening for CRC is not well-practiced due to cultural and social values [1]. Additionally, recently published data related to the insurance status of the refugees revealed that up to 50% of refugees remain uninsured for the first few years of resettlement and often had reduced access beyond the first eight months [6].
Surprisingly, Afghan refugees have higher health insurance coverage rates than the overall immigrant population [7]. In 2019, just 8% of immigrants from Afghanistan were uninsured, compared to 20% of the total refugee population [8]. Also, Afghan immigrants are more likely to be covered by public health insurance than the overall foreign and US-born populations [7]. Facing the recent massive influx of Afghan refugees in the US, the current review article focuses on determining and addressing the challenges for CRC testing in the refugee population.
Review
Materials and methods
Literature Search
An extensive literature search was conducted using PubMed and various national and international conference websites from 1966 to 2021. Only articles published in English were selected for review. Different keywords were used, including refugees, Afghan, immigrants, cancer, colon, rectal, colorectal, screening, and challenges. We mainly focused on findings studies related to colorectal cancer screening in Afghan refugees and excluded studies that did not include colorectal cancer screening (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) diagram.
Abbreviation: N = Number
Articles abstracted were assessed for quality from the internal sources. Three authors of this manuscript evaluated the validity of the included studies. In case of disagreement regarding the study selection, a third author's judgment and agreement were considered.
Quality of Articles
Demographic characteristics of the studies: A total of two studies related to the challenges faced for colorectal cancer screening in the Afghan refugee population were included in the current review. Siddiq et al. interviewed a total of 19 female patients over the age of 50 while Otoukesh et al. included 23,152 participants in their study, comprising 10,997 male participants and 12,155 female participants.
Potential challenges faced in colorectal cancer screening: Based on the data from the studies included in the current review, most of the barriers faced were related to the cultural, educational, social, and accessibility to the healthcare facilities.
Discussion
Afghanistan has historically been a landlocked country with an estimated population of 32.5 million [1]. Recently, the US has faced a massive influx of Afghan refugees primarily due to regional political instability, and the vast majority of these refugees are settled in California [9-10]. Sacramento County, Fairfax County in Virginia, Alameda County, and Contra Costa County in California accommodate most Afghan refugees in the US [10]. After implementing the US immigration law in 1965, the US has been the international leader in resettling refugees from throughout the globe [11-12]. According to recent data from the United Nations (UN) Department of Financial and Social Affairs, so far >47 million refugees have been settled in the US, which stands for >19% of approximately 244 million global immigrants, and likewise >14% of the US population [13]. With this massive influx of Afghan refugees, assessing CRC screening will pose significant challenges to the US economy and healthcare system.
Furthermore, many obstacles, such as lack of disease expertise, socioeconomic status, time constraints, language obstacles, cultural misconceptions, and perceptions concerning CRC screening, pose added challenges in screening these communities [14]. Likewise, another major challenge the refugee population faces is accessing long-term healthcare assistance to receive routine CRC screening and follow-up care [15]. In a recent study related to the access to the CRC screening by the refugee population, Punzo et al. reported that CRC screening in the refugee population is far less than the native population, which might be due to the lack of access to healthcare facilities [16].
Likewise, CRC screening also depends on the culture and geographical location around the globe [17]. Wang et al., in a mixed-method study of breast and CRC screening barriers, reported that screening programs in countries other than western countries are mainly irregular and heterogeneous [4]. Based on previously published data and the fact that CRC screening behavior varies among people of different origins, developing unique culturally and regional specific screening protocols can be extremely helpful [4].
Additionally, the time spent in the US has been recognized as a substantial forecaster of CRC screening in refugees of different ethnic backgrounds [18-20]. Wong et al. reported that the years settled in the US and English language efficiency was directly correlated to each other, and those refugees who have been living in the US for <15 years are not efficient in the English language [21]. In addition, they reported that those refugees residing in the US for <15 years are about half as probable to have ever gone through CRC screening [21]. Since most Afghan refugees are not fluent in English, as their native language is either Pashto and Persian, we can predict that unfamiliarity with the English language presents an incredible difficulty in understanding the significance of CRC testing in this subset of refugees [22].
The effectiveness of proper language translators and healthcare patient navigators for cancer screening in rural non-Afghan refugee populations has been well-published [23]. Similarly, Afghan refugees will likely benefit from using healthcare patient navigators and proficient translators, easing cultural misconceptions and language barriers, and discussing CRC screening [24-25]. The new influx of Afghan refugees poses an opportunity to address these barriers and better understand the obstacles preventing these populations from participating in long-term screening opportunities, ultimately reducing colorectal cancer-related mortality and overall healthcare costs [26]. This particular group would benefit from developing a culturally unique approach to providing CRC screening services by addressing language barriers and cultural misconceptions [27-28].
Table 1 lists the demography of participants and quality of the identified studies while Table 2 summarizes all the potential challenges faced in the studies included in this review while interacting with the Afghan refugee populations.
Table 1. Demography of participants and quality of the identified studies.
Abbreviation: N = Number; F = Female; M = Male
Table 2. List of barriers to colorectal cancer screening and underlying rationale in the refugee population, particularly in the Afghan community.
Abbreviation: F = Female
| Barriers to Screening Challenges | ||
| Challenges Faced | Rationale | |
| Older age [26-27] | An increased reluctance of discussion around benefits of colorectal screening | |
| Gender, F [26-27] | Associated cultural influence in interacting with healthcare workers | |
| Language barriers [26-27] | English not being the primary language | |
| Education [26-27] | Limited education | |
| Type of insurance [26-27] | Lack of insurance on arrival | |
| Knowledge related to colorectal screening [26-27] | Lack of medical knowledge surrounding benefits of colorectal screening and associated procedures | |
| Cultural issues [26-27] | Hesitancy related to physical interaction with physicians and healthcare workers mainly associated with the colorectal region | |
| Societal support [26-27] | Lack of understanding of sociocultural understanding of refugee communities by local populations. | |
| Absence of focus groups [26-27] | Absence of focus groups based on the primary language due to multiple languages within the refugee community. | |
Limitation
Although an extensive literature search was performed, our study still has a few limitations. As with most of the database, there might be some studies that we missed during our extensive review on this topic, which may have limited the identification of some challenges that need to be identified. Although all the studies were validated through the interval review process, the external validation of the studies was not performed in this review.
Conclusions
The Afghan refugee population in the US may be at significant risk for increased rates of colorectal carcinoma due to low levels of CRC screening. Barriers to screening and follow-up among refugee populations are multifactorial and must be better understood to implement new approaches and outreach services. These barriers can be overcome using outreach programs, healthcare patient navigators, translators, and understanding of the various socio-cultural obstacles. The implementation of less invasive testing methods, such as fecal occult blood test (FOBT), may increase adherence to screening in refugee populations, particularly those with access to health insurance. The most recent influx of Afghan refugees presents an opportunity to address these obstacles and provide improved access to essential CRC screening services, reducing related morbidity, mortality, and overall healthcare costs for the US healthcare system.
Acknowledgments
We want to thank Dr. Abdul Tahir and Dr. Zarmina Bibi for organizing the tables for the current study.
The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.
Footnotes
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
References
- 1.The leading cancer types in Afghanistan. Safi A. J Cancer Ther. 2019;10:877–881. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Adjuvant Radiation Survival Benefits in Patients with Stage 1B Rectal Cancer: A Population-based Study from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Result Database (1973-2010) Waheed A, Cason FD. Cureus. 2019;11:0. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.The validity of self-reported cancer screening history and the role of social disadvantage in Ontario, Canada. Lofters A, Vahabi M, Glazier RH. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:28. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1441-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening Barriers Among Immigrants and Refugees: A Mixed-Methods Study at Three Community Health Centres in Toronto, Canada. Wang AM, Yung EM, Nitti N, Shakya Y, Alamgir AK, Lofters AK. J Immigr Minor Health. 2019;21:473–482. doi: 10.1007/s10903-018-0779-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Challenges and possible solutions to colorectal cancer screening for the underserved. Gupta S, Sussman DA, Doubeni CA, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106:0. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cancer on the global stage: incidence and cancer-related mortality in Afghanistan. https://ascopost.com/issues/january-25-2016/cancer-on-the-global-stage-incidence-and-cancer-related-mortality-in-afghanistan/. 2016
- 7.Health coverage options for Afghan evacuees. https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/eligibility/downloads/hlth-cov-option-afghan-evac-fact-sheet.pdf 2021
- 8.Amerasian & SIV arrivals by nationality and state. https://www.wrapsnet.org/documents/Amerasian%20and%20SIV%20Arrivals%20by%20Nationality%20and%20State%20as%20of%2031%20Jul%202021.pdf 2021
- 9.Afghan immigrants in the United States. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/afghan-immigrants-united-states 2021
- 10.California's Afghan population is already the largest in the U.S. The community is preparing to welcome many more. https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/California-is-home-to-the-U-S-s-largest-16415531.php 2021
- 11.State-level immigration and immigrant-focused policies as drivers of Latino health disparities in the United States. Philbin MM, Flake M, Hatzenbuehler ML, Hirsch JS. Soc Sci Med. 2018;199:29–38. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.04.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Unintended consequences of US immigration policy: explaining the post-1965 surge from Latin America. Massey DS, Pren KA. Popul Dev Rev. 2012;38:1–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2012.00470.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.The U.S. immigration debate. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/us-immigration-debate-0 2021
- 14.Disparities in colorectal cancer mortality for rural populations in the United States: Does screening matter? Carmichael H, Cowan M, McIntyre R, Velopulos C. Am J Surg. 2020;219:988–992. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.09.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Screen to save: results from NCI's colorectal cancer outreach and screening initiative to promote awareness and knowledge of colorectal cancer in racial/ethnic and rural populations. Whitaker DE, Snyder FR, San Miguel-Majors SL, Bailey LO, Springfield SA. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020;29:910–917. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Punzo O, Rosano A. Access to Primary Care and Preventative Health Services of Migrants. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. Access to colon cancer screening of migrants in four European countries; pp. 33–42. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cancer disparities by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Ward E, Jemal A, Cokkinides V, Singh GK, Cardinez C, Ghafoor A, Thun M. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004;54:78–93. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.54.2.78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cancer risks and prevention practices among Vietnamese refugees. Jenkins CN, McPhee SJ, Bird JA, Bonilla NT. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1002463/ West J Med. 1990;153:34–39. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Predictors of older Korean Americans' participation in colorectal cancer screening. Juon HS, Han W, Shin H, Kim KB, Kim MT. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/S15430154JCE1801_13. J Cancer Educ. 2003;18:37–42. doi: 10.1207/s15430154jce1801_13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Colorectal cancer screening. Knowledge and practices among Korean Americans. Kim K, Yu ES, Chen EH, Kim J, Brintnall RA. Cancer Pract. 1998;6:167–175. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-5394.1998.006003167.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Disparities in colorectal cancer screening rates among Asian Americans and non-Latino whites. Wong ST, Gildengorin G, Nguyen T, Mock J. Cancer. 2005;104:2940–2947. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Health profile of pediatric Special Immigrant Visa holders arriving from Iraq and Afghanistan to the United States, 2009-2017: A cross-sectional analysis. Wien SS, Kumar GS, Bilukha OO, Slim W, Burke HM, Jentes ES. PLoS Med. 2020;17:0. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Use of a patient navigator to increase colorectal cancer screening in an urban neighborhood health clinic. Jandorf L, Gutierrez Y, Lopez J, Christie J, Itzkowitz SH. J Urban Health. 2005;82:216–224. doi: 10.1093/jurban/jti046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Barriers and facilitators of providing primary health care to Afghan refugees: A qualitative study from the perspective of health care providers. Azizi N, Delgoshaei B, Aryankhesal A. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2021;35:1. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.35.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Barriers and facilitators to improving access to healthcare for recently resettled Afghan refugees: a transformative qualitative study. Reihani AR, Fernando N, Saunders DR, Edberg M, Carter E. https://journalhss.com/wp-content/uploads/jhss_59-72.pdf J Health Soc Sci. 2021;6:59–72. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Beyond Resettlement: Sociocultural Factors Influencing Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Afghan Refugee Women. Siddiq H, Pavlish C, Alemi Q, Mentes J, Lee E. J Cancer Educ. 2020 doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01822-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Literature Review and Profile of Cancer Diseases Among Afghan Refugees in Iran: Referrals in Six Years of Displacement. Otoukesh S, Mojtahedzadeh M, Figlin RA, et al. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4662241/ Med Sci Monit. 2015;21:3622–3628. doi: 10.12659/MSM.895173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Incidence, survival analysis and future perspective of primary peritoneal mesothelioma (PPM): a population-based study from SEER database. Ullah A, Waheed A, Khan J, et al. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/14/4/942. Cancer. 2022;14:942. doi: 10.3390/cancers14040942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

