Abstract
Background
Catheter-associated urinary tract infection is the leading cause of hospital-acquired infections. They remain the second most common healthcare-associated infection in critically sick patients.
Objective
To determine the prevalence of catheter-associated urinary tract infection, the spectrum of etiological agents, antibiotic sensitivity profile of bacterial pathogens among adult patients admitted to intensive care units.
Materials and methods
Patients admitted to the intensive care unit of hospitals in Addis Ababa who were on urethral indwelling catheters for >48 hours from October 2020 to September 2021 were included in the study. Urine specimens were aseptically collected and processed as per standard protocols. Microorganisms were isolated, identified, and subjected to antibiotic susceptibility testing.
Results
In all 220 pateints included in the study development of significant bacteriuria/candiduria was not affected by sex, age, and prior antibiotic therapy. However, the length of stay in the intensive care unit was significantly associated with bacteriuria /candiduria (P-value < 0.001). The overall prevalence of bacteriuria/candiduria was 51.4% among which 21.0%, 19.1%, and 11.4% were bacteriuria, candiduria, and polymicrobial infections, respectively. About 138 organisms were recovered of which 79 (57.25%) were bacteria and 59 (42.75%) were yeast isolates. Acinetobacter species, Pseudomonas species, Klebsiella species E. coli, and Enterococcus species were the dominant bacterial isolates. Candida. albicans, Candida. krusei and Candida. tropicalis were the commonest yeasts. Many gram-negative bacterial isolates were resistant to ceftriaxone 36(94.7%), ampicillin 21(91.3%) followed by cefotaxime34(89.5%), amikacin (16.0%), nitrofurantoin (17.4%), meropenem (20.0%) and imipenem (20.0%). Out of 79 bacterial pathogens, 52(65.8%) were multiple antibiotic resistant of which 37(71.0%) were Gram-negative bacteria and 15(29%%) were Gram-positive bacteria. About 13(86.7%) isolates of Acinetobacter, all isolates of Klebsiella species (100%) and E. coli (100%) were multiple antibiotic-resistant. Out Of 18,10(55.56%), isolates of Enterococcus were multiple antibiotic-resistant.
Conclusions
A very high prevalence of bacteriuria/ candiduria was demonstrated in this study. This warrants the establishment of multidimensional infection control approach on catheter associated urinary tract infection in ICU. In addition to high prevalence of candiduria, recovery of non-albicans candida species almost in equal proportion with candida albicans in the present study was an important finding as non-albicans candida species distinct to C. albicans are intrinsically resistant to the commonly used azole antifungal drugs in Ethiopia. The prevalence of rate MDR bacteria in our ICU particularly of E. coli, Klebsiella spp, Pseudomonas and Acetobacter spp was very high. In order to combat this problem, proper antibiotic policies should be formulated.
Introduction
Health-care-associated infections (HCAIs) are among the most serious health problems as they are associated with high morbidity and mortality rates, prolonged hospital stay, and increased costs of therapy [1, 2]. They are primarily classified as ward or intensive care unit (ICU) acquired infections. Intensive care units present a specific setting in which HCAIs are acquired at a higher rate and exhibit higher mortality [3]. The prevalence of ICU-acquired infections (ICUAI) is significantly higher in developing countries than in developed countries [4, 5]. According to the World Health Organization [5] factsheet, the frequency of ICUAI in developing countries is 2–3 times higher than in developed countries.
Healthcare-associated urinary tract infection (HCAUTI) is one of the six major HCAIs [6] and also one of the most common health problems in patients admitted to intensive care units [7–10]. Salgado et al [10] and Foxman [11] reported that this condition accounts for up to 40% of the 2 million HCAIs each year.
Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) has been described as one of the most common device-associated HCAIs developed frequently by patients hospitalized in the ICU. Closely 75% of patients admitted to hospitals undergo urinary catheterization in the course of their hospital stay, making prevention and control of CAUTI difficult [12]. In the intensive care unit, 95% of UTIs are CAUTIs and despite efforts to reduce CAUTI incidence, they remain the second most important HCAIs in critically ill patients [12, 13]. Left undiagnosed and untreated, CAUTI increases the risk for complications and ultimately decreases the efficiency of health care delivery. Therefore, timely intervention is needed to prevent complications such as cystitis, acute or chronic pyelonephritis, bacteremia, and urosepsis [14].
Among several etiological agents of ICUAUTI, Gram-positive bacteria such as Staphylococcus species, Enterococcus faecalis and Gram-negative bacteria such Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas specis, Proteus mirabilis, Klebsiella species, Enterobacter species, and yeasts such as Candida species are the most frequently reported [15]. Drug resistance development in urinary tract infection causing pathogens is a growing problem and the rate of development is much faster in the ICUs compared with other hospital wards and outpatient clinics demonstrating that hospitalization in ICUs may be an independent risk factor for acquiring infection by multiantibiotic-resistant strains [16].
Despite a high global burden of CAUTI, there has been no study conducted on UTI in critically ill patients in Ethiopia. To this effect, the objectives of the current study are to determine the prevalence of CAUTI, the spectrum of etiological agents, antibiotic resistance profile of bacterial pathogens, and major risk factors associated with CAUTI.
Operational definitions
Individual bacteriuria and candiduria were defined by the presence of a positive urine culture collected in ICU, with no more than two pathogens, not isolated previously, and at ≥ 105 colony-forming units (cfu)/ml [17]
Hospital-acquired or healthcare-associated bacteriuria/candiduria were defined as positive urine cultures occurring after 48 h of hospital admission in patients admitted from home.
Positive urine cultures were classified as ward-acquired bacteriuria/candiduria when collected within the first 48 h of ICU stay and ICU-acquired bacteriuria/ candiduria when collected after 48 h of ICU stay.
Multi-drug resistance (MDR): non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories.
Significant bacteriuria/ candiduria is defined as a urine sample containing more than 105 colony-forming units/ml of urine in pure culture using a standard calibrated bacteriological loop.
Materials and methods
Study area, design, and period
This hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted on 220 catheters indwelled adult ICU patients in three tertiary care hospitals, i.e., St Paul’s Millennium Medical College with six beds, Ras Desta Damtew Memorial Hospital with six beds, and Aabet Hospital with twelve beds from October 2020 to September 2021, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. The urine specimens were brought to the Ethiopian Public Health Institutes National clinical bacteriology and mycology reference laboratory for culture and antimicrobial susceptibility.
Inclusion criteria
Patients ≥ 16 years of age, having at least two calendar days of urinary catheterization after being admitted to the intensive care unit, and giving informed written consent were included in the study. Patients with positive urine culture before catheterization and less than 2 calendar days of urinary catheterization were excluded from the study.
Demographic characteristics of patients
Demographic information such as age, sex, clinical diagnosis, reasons for hospitalization and sources of admission to the ICU, and history of systemic antibiotic treatment were recorded.
Clinical sample collection and Inoculation
Sterile urethral indwelling catheters were aseptically applied to the patients by trained physicians in a way that minimizes the risk of introducing microorganisms to the bladder following the hospital guidelines or standard operating procedures of the hospitals.
About 10 ml of urine sample was aspirated from an indwelling catheter near the urethral site under aseptic precautions from all patients. Urine specimens were collected from each patient with a sterile urine container by trained nurses or physicians. Immediately after collection, the samples were brought to the microbiology laboratory of the Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI) for further processing. Part of the sample was inoculated onto MacConkey agar plate (Oxide, Basingstoke, and Hampshire, England) and sheep blood agar medium using a calibrated loop with a capacity of 1 μl in a safety cabinet. The remaining sample was inoculated onto Brain Heart Infusion agar supplemented with chloramphenicol (100μgml-1) and gentamycin (50 μgml-1) (Oxide, Basingstoke, and Hampshire, England).
Incubation
All inoculated plates were incubated at 37°C for 18–48 hours aerobically and inspected for the growth of bacteria and/or yeasts. Colony counts yielding bacterial or yeast growth of ≥104 and ≥105/ ml for single uropathogen and two uropathogens respectively were regarded as significant for bacteriuria or candiduria. Urine samples that yielded three or more species were not considered for further investigation.
Bacterial identification
Pure culture isolates of the bacterial pathogen were preliminarily characterized by colony morphology and Gram stain. Bacterial isolates were identified down to the species level by using standard biochemical tests.
Yeast identification
Yeasts were identified by employing conventional routine diagnostic methods such as Gram stain, Germ tube test, carbohydrate fermentation, and assimilation test, and by employing chromogenic medium (CHROMagar Candida medium, bioM´erieux, France) as per the instruction of the manufacturer.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing
Antimicrobial susceptibility test was carried out by standardized Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method as per Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M100 guidelines [18] on Muller Hinton agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, England). Bacterial suspension of each isolate was prepared in 0.5 ml of nutrient broth medium and the turbidity was adjusted to match that of 0.5 McFarland standards. A sterile swab was dipped into the suspension and then the swab was applied to the center of the Muller Hinton agar plate and evenly spread on the medium. Antibiotic discs were placed onto Muller Hinton agar seeded with each isolate and were incubated for 24 hours at 35–37°C. Inhibition zone (IZ) diameter was measured using a caliper and interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline [18] as susceptible (S), intermediate (I), or resistant (R). Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923), Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) were used as quality control strains.
Classes of antibiotics used
Antibiotic disc used in the present study were: Aminoglycosides (Gentamicin 10μg, Amikacin 10μg, Tobramycin 10μg), Cephalosporins (Cefotaxime 30μg, Ceftazidime 30μg Ceftriaxone 30μg) Nitrofurantoin (Nitrofurantoin 300μg),tetracyclines (tetracycline 30μg),Folate Pathway Inhibitors (trimethoprim- sulfamethoxazole 25μg), Penicillins (oxacillin 30μg, penicillin10μg, Ampicillin 10μg), Glycopeptides (vancomycin 30μg), Carbapenems (Imipenem 10μg, Meropenem 10μ), Fluoroquinolones(ciprofloxacin 5μg). All the antibiotics used in the study were the products of Oxoid, Basingstoke, and Hampshire, England
Statistical analysis
All data from the investigation were coded, double entered, and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 23. Descriptive statistics and logistical regressions were used to estimate the crude ratio with a 95% confidence interval to the different variables. P-value < 0.05 was considered significant.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
Ethical clearance was obtained from the Department Research and Ethical Review Committee of the Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University (MLS/215/19). Permission was obtained from the Ethiopian Public Health Institute. The written informed consent was obtained from patients, their names and other personal identifiers were encrypted.
Results
Patient characteristics
As shown in Table 1, two hundred and twenty (220) patients that met the selection criteria were recruited into the study. The number of male study participants (144; 65.5%) outnumbered that of female study participants (76; 34.5%) where the male-female ratio was 1.9: 1. The number of study subjects enrolled per age group was variable in which patients with an age group of 25–64 were the highest (136;61.8%. The study subjects were urban dominated, where the urban-rural ratio being 2.4:1. Most of the patients were admitted into the ICU from the emergency department and surgical wards. Similarly, diseases of the circulatory system, the respiratory system, and injury were the major reasons for hospitalization. About 115 patients stayed in the ICU for less than 5 days while 105 stayed four about six or more days in the ICU where the duration of stay in the ICU was between 2 and 50 days, with a median of 5 ± 8 days. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision (ICD-10)-WHO Version for; 2016 [19] was used for the classification of reasons of hospitalization.
Table 1. Patients demographic data and clinical history.
Variables | Number | % | |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 144 | 65.5 |
Female | 76 | 34.5 | |
Age | 16–24 | 49 | 22.3 |
25–64 | 136 | 61.8 | |
≥ 65 | 35 | 15.9 | |
Residence | Urban | 156 | 70.9 |
Rural | 64 | 29.1 | |
Antibiotic treatment | Yes | 192 | 87.3 |
No | 28 | 12.7 | |
Length of the day in the ICU | ≥6 | 105 | 47.7 |
≤5 | 115 | 52.3 | |
Source of admission to the ICU | Emergency | 137 | 62.3 |
Medical | 14 | 6.4 | |
Surgical | 38 | 17.3 | |
Gynecology and Obstetrics | 5 | 2.3 | |
Community | 15 | 6.8 | |
Operation room | 11 | 5 | |
Cause of hospitalization (18) | Certain infectious and parasitic diseases | 29 | 13.2 |
Endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases | 23 | 10.5 | |
Injury, Poison, External causes | 34 | 17 | |
Diseases of the circulatory system | 50 | 22.7 | |
Diseases of the Respiratory system | 40 | 18.2 | |
Diseases of the Digestive system | 12 | 5.5 | |
Diseases of the genitourinary system | 9 | 4.1 | |
Diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs | 5 | 2.3 | |
Cancer, nervous system, other diseases | 18 | 8.2 |
Prevalence of bacteriuria/ candiduria
Out of two hundred and twenty (220), urine samples collected bacteriuria/ candiduria were observed in 113 samples giving an overall prevalence of 51.4% (113/220). The prevalence of bacteriuria and candiduria was 21.0% (46/2220), and 19.0% (42/220), respectively. The remaining 11.4% (25/220) were polymicrobial infections among which five samples yielded two different yeast pathogens each, 13 samples yielded two different bacterial pathogens, and the remaining seven samples yielded bacterial and yeast pathogen concurrently (Table 2).
Table 2. The prevalence of catheter-associated bacteriuria/candiduria and the spectrum of etiologic agents.
Micro-organism | Pure | Mixed | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Acinetobacter spp | 9 | 6 | 15 |
Citrobacter spp. | 0 | 4 | 4 |
E. coli | 5 | 3 | 8 |
Enterobacter spp. | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Klebsiella oxytoca | 2 | - | 2 |
Klebsiella pneumonia | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Klebsiella ozaenae | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Pseudomonas spp. | 8 | 4 | 12 |
Enterococcus spp. | 11 | 7 | 18 |
S. epidermidis | 8 | 3 | 11 |
Total bacterial isolates | 46 | 33 | 79 |
Candida albicans | 21 | 8 | 29 |
Candida krusei | 15 | 3 | 18 |
Candida tropicalis | 4 | 6 | 10 |
Cryptococcus neoformans | 2 | - | 2 |
Total yeast isolates | 42 | 17 | 59 |
Mixed cultures | |||
Acinetobacter spp and Enterococcus spp. | 1 | 1 | |
Acinetobacter spp and S. epidermidis | 1 | 1 | |
Acinetobacter spp and Citrobacter spp. | 1 | 1 | |
Citrobacter spp. and Pseudomonas spp. | 1 | 1 | |
Citrobacter spp. and Enterobacter spp. | 2 | 2 | |
E. coli and Acinetobacter spp | 1 | 1 | |
E. coli and Pseudomonas spp. | 1 | 1 | |
Klebsiella ozaenae and Acinetobacter spp | 1 | 1 | |
Klebsiella ozaenae and Pseudomonas spp. | 1 | 1 | |
Klebsiella pneumonia and Enterococcus spp. | 1 | 1 | |
Pseudomonas spp. and Enterococcus spp. | 1 | 1 | |
S. epidermidis and Enterococcus spp. | 1 | 1 | |
Candida albicans and Candida krusei | 1 | 1 | |
Candida krusei and Candida tropicalis | 2 | 2 | |
Candida tropicalis and Candida albicans | 2 | 2 | |
Acinetobacter spp and Candida albicans | 1 | 1 | |
E. coli and Candida albicans | 1 | 1 | |
Enterococcus spp. and Candida tropicalis | 2 | 2 | |
Enterococcus spp. and Candida albicans | 1 | 1 | |
Klebsiella ozaenae and Candida albicans | 1 | 1 | |
S. epidermidis and Candida albicans | 1 | 1 | |
Total | 25 |
Diversity of microbial isolates
A total of 138 bacteria and yeasts were recovered of which 79 (57.25%) were bacterial and 59 (42.75%) were yeast isolates. Of 79 bacterial isolates, 50 (63.3%) were Gram-negative bacteria and 29 (36.7%) were Gram-positive bacteria. Among Gram-negative bacterial isolates, Acinetobacter species was the predominant species consisting of 30.0% of bacterial isolates and this was followed by Pseudomonas species, (24.0%), Klebsiella species (22.0%), and E. coli (16.0%). Of Gram-positive bacteria, Enterococcus species were the dominant one accounting for 62.1% of the total Gram-positive bacterial isolates followed by S. epidermidis with 37.9%. Among the 59 yeast isolates, the most frequently isolated species was Candida albicans accounting for 29 (49.2%) followed by C. krusei, and C. tropicalis consisting of 18 (30.5%) and 10 (16.9%) isolates, respectively (Table 2).
Risk factors
The statistical analysis of the possible risk factor for CAUTI in ICU patients is shown in (Table 3). The prevalence of bacteriuria/candiduria was the highest in the age group of 25–64 years of age and females with 60.5% as compared to males 46.5%. Similarly, UTI was higher in patients admitted from urban than from rural regions. However, the differences in the male to female ratio and age between the bacteriuric/candiduric and non-bacteriuric/candiduric patients were not statistically significant (P value:0.05. and p P value:0.92, respectively). The ICU length of stay was significant between bacteriuric/candiduric and non-bacteriuric/candiduric patients ((p = < 0.001).
Table 3. Association bacteriuria/candiduria with possible risk factors.
Variable | Frequency | Growth | P value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes | No | ||||
Gender | Female | 76 | 46 | 30 (39.5) | 0.05 |
Male | 144 | 67 | 77 (53.5) | ||
Age | 16–24 | 49 | 26 | 23(46.9) | 0.92 |
25–64 | 136 | 70 | 66(48.5) | ||
> = 65 | 35 | 17 | 18(51.4) | ||
Residential | Urban | 156 | 83 | 73(46.8) | 0.39 |
Rural | 64 | 30 | 34(53.1) | ||
Age in years (Mean) | 41+ | 95 | 51 | 44(46.3) | 0.64 |
< = 40 | 125 | 62 | 63(50.4) | ||
Length in the ICU in days | ≥6 | 105 | 73 | 32(30.5) | 0.00 |
< = 5 | 115 | 40 | 75(65.2) | ||
Prior antibiotic treatment | Yes | 192 | 97 | 95(49.5) | 0.51 |
No | 28 | 16 | 12(42.9) | ||
Total | 220 (100) | 113(51.4) | 107(48.6) |
Antimicrobial susceptibility profile of bacterial isolates
The overall antibiotic resistance pattern of Gram-negative bacteria against the thirteen antibiotics evaluated is depicted in Table 4. Gram-negative bacteria were resistant toceftriaxone 36(94.7%), ampicillin 21(91.3%), cefotaxime 34(89.5%), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 34(81.6%) among the antibiotics tested. Amikacin 8(16.0%), nitrofurantoin 4(17.4%), meropenem 10 (20.0%), and imipenem 10(20.0%) were the most effective antibiotics against Gram-negative bacteria tested. Acinetobacter species, the most commonly recovered species were more resistant to Ceftazidime (100%), Ceftriaxone (100%), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (80.0%). However, these isolates were sensitive toaminoglycosides and carbapenems with a resistance rate ranging from 20–34%. The isolates of Pseudomonas species, the next dominant Gram-negative bacteria were less resistant to aminoglycosides and carbapenems with a resistance rate of 16.7%. All isolates of E. coli were 100% susceptible to aminoglycosides, carbapenems, and nitrofurantoin. Klebsiella species were better sensitive against aminoglycosides, carbapenems, and nitrofurantoin with a resistance rate extending from 0–60%. Gram-positive bacteria were relatively less resistant compared to Gram-negative bacteria (Table 5).
Table 4. Percentage antimicrobial resistance profile of Gram-negative bacteria against 13 antibiotics.
Number resistant (Percentage) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Isolate (number) | Ampicillin | Ceftazidime | Ceftriaxone | Cefotaxime | Ciprofloxacin | Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole | Gentamicin | Tobramycin | Amikacin | Imipenem | Meropenem | Nitrofurantoin | Tetracycline | |
Acinetobacter spp(15) | NT | 15(100) | 15(100) | 13(86.7) | 8(53.3) | 12(80) | 5(33.3) | 5(33.3) | 3(20) | 5(33.3) | 5(33.3) | NT | 7(46.7) | |
K.oxytoca (2) | 2(100) | 2(100) | 2(100) | 2(100) | 1(50) | 2(100) | 2(100) | 2(100) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 2(100) | |
K.pneumoniae (2) | 2(100) | 2(100) | 2(100) | 2(100) | 2(100) | 2(100) | 2(100) | 1(100) | 1(50) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 1(50) | 1(50) | |
E. coli (8) | 8(100) | 3(37.5) | 8(100) | 8(100) | 5(62.5) | 8(100) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 4(57.1) | |
Pseudomonas spp. (12) | NT | 10(83.3) | NT | NT | 7(58.3) | NT | 5(41.7) | 5(41.7) | 2(16.7) | 2(16.7) | 2(16.7) | NT | - | |
K.ozaenae (5) | 5(100) | 3(60) | 5(100) | 5(100) | 3(60) | 5(100) | 3(60) | 3(60) | 2(40) | 3(60) | 3(60) | 1(20) | 5(100) | |
Citrobacter spp. (4) | 3(75) | 1(25) | 3(75) | 3(75) | 1(25) | 3(75) | 1(25) | 1(25) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 2(50) | 2(50) | |
Enterobacter spp. (2) | 1(50) | 0(0) | 1(50) | 1(50) | 0(0) | 2(100) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 1(50) | |
Total 50 | 21(91.3) | 36(72.0) | 36(94.7) | 34(89.5) | 27(54.0) | 34(89.5) | 18(36.0) | 17(34.0) | 8(16.0) | 10(20.0) | 10(20.0) | 4(17.4) | 22(57.9) |
NT: Not tested
Table 5. Percentage antibiotic resistance profile of Gram-positive bacteria against ten antibiotics.
Number resistant (Percentage) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Isolate(number) | Ampicillin | Oxacillin | Penicillin | Ciprofloxacin | trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole | Gentamycin | Nitrofurantoin | Tetracycline | Vancomycin |
Enterococcus spp.(18) | 13(72.2) | NT | 12(66.7) | 8(44.4) | NT | NT | 4(22.2) | 11(61.1) | 6(33.3) |
S. epidermidis (11) | NT | 9(81.8) | 7(63.6) | 3(27.3) | 7(63.6) | 3(27.3) | 1(9.1) | 2(18.2) | NT |
Total 29 | - | - | 19(65.5) | 11(38) | - | - | 5(17.2) | 13(44.8) | - |
NT = Not tested
The prevalence rate of MDR in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria is shown in Table 6. Out of 79 bacterial pathogens, 52(65.8%) were MDR. Of this 37(71.0%) were Gram-negative bacteria whereas 15(28.2%%) were Gram-positive bacteria. Out of 15 isolates of Acinetobacter species, 13 (86.7%) were MDR while all isolates of Klebsiella species (100%) and E. coli (100%) were MDR. The isolates of Enterococcus which is the commonest Gram-positive bacterium 10 in 18(55.6%) were MDR (Table 6).
Table 6. Prevalence of multi-antibiotic resistance Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.
Bacterial Isolate (n) | Level of Resistance (n, %) | MDR | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R0 | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | R5 | R6 | R7 | R8 | No N (%) | Yes N (%) | |
Acinetobacter spp (15) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 2(13,3) | 7(46.7) | 4(26.7) | 1(6.7) | 1(6.7) | -- | -- | 2(13.3) | 13(86.7) |
Citrobacter spp (4). | 0(0) | 0 (0) | 1(25.0) | 0(0) | 2(50.0) | 1(25.0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 1(25.0) | 3(75.0) |
Enterobacter spp (2) | 0(0.0) | 0.(0.0) | 1(50.) | 1(50.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0 | 0(0.0) | 1(50.0) | 1(50.0) |
Klebsiella oxytaca (2) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 1(50.0) | 1(50.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 2(100.0) |
Klebsiella pneumoniae (2) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 2(100.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 2(100.0) |
E. coli (8) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 2(25.0) | 3(37.5) | 3(37.5) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 8(100.0) |
Pseudomonas spp (12) | 1(8.3) | 2(16.7) | 6(50.0) | 2(16.7) | 1(8.3) | -- | -- | -- | -- | 9(75.0) | 3(25.5) |
Klebsiella ozaenae (5) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 2(40.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0 | 2(40.0) | 1(20.0) | 0(0.0) | 5(100.0) |
Total Gram-negative (50) | 1(2.0) | 2(4.0) | 10(20.) | 12(24.0) | 12(24. | 6(12.0) | 4.(8.0) | 2(4.0) | 1(2.0) | 13(26.0) | 37(71.0) |
Enterococcus spp. (18) | 1(5.6) | 3(16.7) | 4(22.2) | 6(33.3) | 4(22.2) | 0(0.0) | -- | -- | -- | 8(44.4) | 10(55.6) |
S. epidermidis (11) | 1(9.1 | 3(27.3) | 2(18.2) | 1(9.1) | 4(36.4) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | -- | -- | 6(54.6) | 5(45.4) |
Total Gram-positive (29) | 2(6.9) | 6(20.7) | 6(20.7) | 7(24.1) | 8(27.6) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | -- | - | 14(48.3) | 15(29) |
Total | 3(3.8) | 8(10.1) | 16(20.3) | 19(24.1) | 20(25.3) | 6(7.6) | 4(5.1) | 2(2.5) | 1(1.3) | 27(34.2) | 52(65.8) |
Discussion
The overall prevalence rate of catheter-associated bacteriuria/ candiduria in the ICU patients in our study was 51.4%. Our result was comparable with the overall prevalence rate of 49.9% ICU acquired bacteriuria/ candiduria reported in a similar study conducted by Aubron et al [20]. A prevalence rate of 21.0% catheter-associated bacteriuria acquired in the adult ICU in the current study was similar to the prevalence rate of 20% ICU-acquired bacteriuria reported by Vinoth et al [21]. Candidauria is very common in the intensive care unit (ICU) of a hospital. The prevalence rate of adult ICU-acquired catheter-associated candiduria in the current study (19.1%) was within the range of the prevalence rates (19.1%-44.4%) reported by previous similar studies [22, 23]. The absence of an established infection control strategy and proper antibiotic management policies in our ICU settings may explain the overall high prevalence rate of catheter-associated bacteriuria/ candiduria. In the present study, 14.4% of ICU-acquired CAUTI was poly-microbial infections. Our findings contradict those of Simpson et al [24] who found that the prevalence of polymicrobial candiduria was 5–10% and that C. glabrata was the most prevalent isolate in conjunction with C. albicans.
Gender, extremes of age, antibiotic use, length of stay in the ICU, diabetes mellitus, immunosuppressive therapy, and indwelling urinary devices have been identified as risk factors associated with an increase of bacteriuria/candiduria in the ICU patients. However, gender was not a risk factor for catheter-associated bacteriuria/candiduria in our ICU patients, as the male to female ratio depicted that no significant difference between the bacteriuric/ candiduric and non-bacteriuric/candiduric patients. Many studies conducted in general hospitals and some ICUs [25, 26] have shown that device-associated UTIs are more common in women, but this risk factor has not been shown in studies specific to ICU patients [27]. There was also no significant difference in age between individuals who developed an ICU-acquired UTI and those who did not. A similar result was reported in ICU patients by Laupland et al [28]. The lack of association of UTI with sex and age may be described by the predominant age bracket of the recruited patients. The ICU length of stay was statistically associated with the developing ICU-acquired UTI in our catheterized patients and our result was in good agreement with results reported from previous studies [27, 29].
Consistent with the results of numerous studies around the globe [21, 29–32], this study also revealed that Gram-negative bacteria were the main causative agents of bacteriuria. Of 79 bacterial isolates, 50 (63.3%) were Gram-negative bacteria of which isolates Acinetobacter spp were the predominant bacterial isolates and this was followed by Pseudomonas species, Klebsiella species, and E. coli in their descending order. Our result in terms of the predominant bacterial isolates was contradictory with many other studies that reported E. coli, Klebsiella, and Enterobacter species as predominant bacterial isolates. In most of the studies that have been carried out on UTI till today, the most common organism isolated in UTI is E. coli with a reduction in the frequency in patients with indwelling catheters [33]. Of Gram-positive bacteria, Enterococcus species were the dominant spp accounting for 62.1% of the totalGgram-positive bacterial isolates followed by S. epidermidis. Staphylococci and Enterococcus species as dominant bacteria in urine culture have been reported by many similar studies [31].
Multiple studies showed that within hospital settings at least 10%–15% of hospital-acquired UTIs are caused by Candida species and candiduria is especially common ICUs [34–36]. In our study, candiduria represented 44.6% (47/220 including polymicrobial infections) of CAUTIs and C. albicans was the leading cause of candiduria. Although C. albicans has been the commonest etiologic agent, non-albicans species were isolated in 50.8% of the urine samples. The emergence of non-albicans species may represent the selection of less susceptible species by antifungal agents as fluconazole in particular. Some Candida strains as C. krusei are less susceptible to fluconazole than C. albicans [37]. Similar results about emerging species occurrence have been observed in hospitalized patients [38]. Environmental conditions, patient population, host factors, prior antimicrobial exposure, and the organisms unique to each facility may govern the similarity and or differences in the spectrum of pathogens implicated in causing catheter-associated bacteriuria and/or candiduria in the ICU patients [34].
The degree of antimicrobial resistance against both Gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria in our study was striking. Gram-negative bacteria demonstrated a high percentage of antibiotic resistance to almost all antibiotic categories tested with a relatively lower prevalence of resistance to amikacin 8(16.0%), nitrofurantoin 4(17.4%), meropenem 10 (20.0%), and imipenem 10(20.0%). The highest percentage of resistance against gram-negative bacteria was exhibited towards ceftriaxone 36(94.7%), ampicillin 21(91.3%), cefotaxime34(89.5%), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 34(81.6%). Contrary to our finding, however, Fahim [39] reported a comparable high percentage of antibiotic resistance towards nitrofurantoin (52.5%), amikacin (58.0%), imipenem (59.7%), and meropenem (62.0%) in Gram-negative bacteria recovered from ICU patients. The degree of antimicrobial resistance against Gram-positive bacteria was relatively low. Indiscriminate use of broad-spectrum antibiotics empirically since there is no culture facility in our ICU and lack of an antibiotic stewardship program may all have contributed to the high antibiotic resistance rates in this study.
The most worrisome finding in this study was that almost all the gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria developed MDR strains at varying frequencies. Multi-antibiotic resistance has been identified as one of the ten threats and it has been increasing at a very high-rate worldwide [40] it is more common in healthcare-associated infections than community-acquired infections. In line with this, the percentage prevalence rate of MDR in Gram-negative bacteria, particularly in Enterobacteriaceae was extremely high. For example, all isolates of E. coli and Klebsiella species were multiantibiotic-resistant. The ubiquity of Enterobacteriaceae in our settings and animal hosts and the relative ease acquisition of plasmids containing genes that encode for Extended Spectrum β- Lactams (ESBLs) and other resistance genes that confer resistance to many other classes of antibiotics contributed to a high percentage prevalence rate of MDR in our current study [41–44]. The antimicrobial resistance patterns and the high percentage of MDR reported in our study towards non- fermentative Gram-negative bacteria such as species of Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter also demonstrated a series of concerns of this group of Gram-negative bacteria in CAUTI in ICU patients. The overall percentage prevalence of MDR against gram-positive bacteria was lower than Gram-negative bacteria (28.9 vs 55.6%) in which most of them were accounted for by Enterococcus strains.
Conclusions
A very high prevalence of bacteriuria/ candiduria was demonstrated in this study. This warrants the establishment of a multidimensional infection control approach on catheter-associated urinary tract infection in ICU. In addition to a high prevalence rate of candiduria, recovery of non-albicans candida species almost in equal proportion with candida albicans in the present study was an important finding as non-albicans candida species are intrinsically resistant to the commonly used azole antifungal drugs in Ethiopia. The prevalence of rate MDR bacteria in our ICU particularly of E. coli, Klebsiella spp, Pseudomonas, and Acetobacter spp was very high. To combat this problem, proper antibiotic policies should be formulated.
Supporting information
(SAV)
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the nursing and supporting staff of the adult ICU of the three tertiary hospitals. Sincere thanks should also go to the ICU patients for providing us with urine and other relevant information.
Limitations of the study
Limitations of this study include the relatively small size of the study population which is a reflection of the limited ICU beds available. The morbidity of candiduria has become as important as bacteriuria now as in the past. This is mainly associated with increased numbers of immune-compromised human hosts. Hence, the lack of data about the immune status of the patient was the second major limitation of the study since yeasts are opportunistic pathogens. Due to lack of facilities and resources, unable to determine the antifungal susceptibility profile of yeast isolates in the present study was another limitation of our study.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
References
- 1.Ozer B, Akkurt CO, Duran N, Onlen Y, Savas L, Turhanoglu S. Evaluation of nosocomial infections and risk factors in critically ill patients. Medical science monitor: international medical journal of experimental and clinical research. 2011;17(3):PH17. doi: 10.12659/msm.881434 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bearman GM, Sessler CN, Munro C, Wenzel RP. Infection control and the prevention of nosocomial infections in the intensive care unit. In Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine 2006 Jun (Vol. 27, No. 03, pp. 310–324). Copyright© 2006 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Surveillance Report- Annual Epidemiological Report for 2016—Healthcare-Associated Infections in Intensive Care Units. 2016:11. Available at: https://ecdc.europa.eu/sites/portal/files/documents/AER_for_2016-HAI_0.pdf. Accessed July 20, 2019.
- 4.Tutuncu EE, Gurbuz Y, Sencan I, Ozturk B, Senturk GC, Kilic AU. Device-associated infection rates and bacterial resistance in the intensive care units of a Turkish referral hospital. Saudi medical journal. 2011. May 1;32(5):489–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.World Health Organization. Healthcare-associated infections fact sheet. Available at: http://www.who.int/gpsc/country_work/gpsc_ccisc_fact_sheet_en.pdf, 2016.
- 6.Cassini A, Plachouras D, Eckmanns T, Abu Sin M, Blank H-P, Tanja Ducomble T et al. Burden of six healthcare-associated infections on European population health: estimating incidence-based disability-adjusted life years through a population prevalence-based modeling study. PLoS. Med. 2016; 13:1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Galiczewski JM, Shurpin KM. An intervention to improve the catheter-associated urinary tract infection rate in a medical intensive care unit: Direct observation of catheter insertion procedure. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2017; 40:26–34.?. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2016.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kumar N, Singh Y, Yadav G, Muthur Sk, Rhadani UK. Role of neomycin polymyxin sulfate solution bladder wash for prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infection in traumatic brain injury patient admitted to Intensive Care Unit: a prospective randomized study. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci 2018; 8:17–21. doi: 10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_24_17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Malt G, Robertson-Malt SA. Rapid Quality Control Initiative to reduce the incidence of urinary tract infection in the pediatric intensive care patient: part one. Int J Nurs Pract. 2007; 13:348–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2007.00649.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Salgado CD, Karchmer TB, Farr BM. Wenzel RP. Prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Prevention and Control of Nosocomial Infections 4th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA: 2003; 297–311. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Foxman B. Epidemiology of urinary tract infections: incidence, morbidity, and economic costs. Am J Med. 2002; 8: 5–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Burton DC, Edwards JR, Srinivasal A, Fridkin SK, Gould CV. Trends in catheter-associated urinary tract infections in adult intensive care units–the United States, 1990–2007. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 2011; 32: 748–756. doi: 10.1086/660872 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Leblebicioglu H, Ersoz G, Rosenthal VD, Yalcin AN, Akan OA, Sirmatel F, et al. Impact of a multidimensional infection control approach on catheter-associated urinary tract infection rates in adult intensive care units in 10 cities of Turkey: International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium findings (INICC). Am J Infect Cont 2013; 41: 885–891. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2013.01.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kang CI, Chung DR, Son JS, Ko KS, Peck KR, Song JH, et al. Korean network for the study of infectious diseases. Clinical significance of nosocomial acquisition in urinary tract-related bacteremia caused by gram-negative bacilli. Am J Infect Cont. 2011; 39:135–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Laupland KB, Bagshaw SM, Gregson DB, Kirkpatrick AW, Ross T, Church DL. Intensive care unit-acquired urinary tract infections in a regional critical care system. Crit Care 2005;9: R60–65. doi: 10.1186/cc3023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Barchitta M, Quattrocchi A, Maugeri A, La Rosa MC, La Mastra C, Sessa L. et al. Antibiotic Consumption and Resistance during a 3-Year Period in Sicily, Southern Italy. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2253. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. American Journal of Infection Control 2008; 36: 309–332. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 29th ed. CLSI supplement M100. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2019. [Google Scholar]
- 19.International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision (ICD-10)-WHO Version for; 2016 [51].
- 20.Aubron C, Suzuki S, Glassford NJ, Garcia- Alvaraz M, Howden BP, Bellomo R et al. Epidemiology of Bacteriuria and Candiduria in critically ill patients. Epidemiol. Infec. 2015; 143:655–662. doi: 10.1017/S0950268814000934 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Vinoth M, Prabagaravarthanan R, Bhaskar M. Prevalence of microorganisms causing catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) among catheterized patients admitted in a tertiary care hospital. Int J Res Med Sci. 2017; 5:2367–2372. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Alkilani A, Shalakany AH, EI, El-Masry EA, Elham T. Awad ET, Mohamad EA EA. Nosocomial Candiduria in Critically Ill Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Units in Menoufia University Hospitals, Egypt. BJMMR 2016; 15: 1–15. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Passos XS, Sales WS, Maciel PJ, Costa CR, Miranda KC*, Lemos JD et al. Candida colonization in intensive care unit patients’ urine. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 2005. 100: 925–928. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762005000800016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Simpson C, Blitz S, Shafran SD. The effect of current management on morbidity and mortality in hospitalized adults with funguria. J Infect 2004; 49:248–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2003.08.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Merle V, Germain JM, Bugel H, Nouvellon M, Lemeland JF, Czernichow P, et al. Nosocomial urinary tract infections in urologic patients: assessment of a prospective surveillance program including 10,000 patients. Eur Urol 2002;41: 483–489. doi: 10.1016/s0302-2838(02)00069-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tissot E, Limat S, Cornette C, Capellier G. Risk factors for catheter-associated bacteriuria in a medical intensive care unit. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2001; 20:260–2. doi: 10.1007/s100960100480 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rosser CJ, Bare RL, Meredith JW. Urinary tract infections in the critically ill patient with a urinary catheter. Am J Surg 1999;177: 287–90. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)00048-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Laupland KB, Bagshaw SM, Gregson DB, Kirkpatrick AW, Ross T, Church DL. Intensive care unit-acquired urinary tract infections in a regional critical care system. Crit Care 2005;9:R60–5. doi: 10.1186/cc3023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Negromote GR, Nascimento JS, Brigido JV, Carvalho AM, Farias RL. Study of variables involved in hospital-acquired urinary tract infections at a university hospital. Rev Soc Bras Clin Med. 2015; 13:90–93. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hanumantha S, Pilli HK. Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI)–Incidence and microbiological profile in a tertiary care hospital in Andhra Pradesh. Indian J Microbiol Res. 2016; 3:454–457. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Duszyńska W, Rosenthal VD, Szczęsny A, Woźnica E, Ulfik K, Ostrowska E et al. Urinary tract infections in intensive care unit patients—a single-center, 3-year observational study according to the INICC project. Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy 2016; 48: 1–6. doi: 10.5603/AIT.2016.0001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bagchi I, Jaitly NK, Thombare VR. Microbiological Evaluation of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection in a Tertiary Care Hospital. People’s Journal of Scien. 2015; 8:23–29. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Shah LJ, Vaghela GM, Mahida H. Urinary tract infection: Bacteriological profile and its antibiotic susceptibility in Western India. National J Med Res. 2015; 5: 71–7. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Alvarez-Lerma F, Nolla-Salas J, Leon C, Palomar M, Jorda R, Carrasco N et al. Candiduria in critically ill patients admitted to intensive care medical units. Intensive Care Med. 2003; 29:1069–76. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1807-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kauffman CA. Candiduria. Clin Infect Dis. 2005; 41: S371–6. doi: 10.1086/430918 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kauffman CA, Vasquez JA, Sobel JD, Jack D, Sobel D. Prospective multicenter surveillance study of funguria in hospitalized patients. The National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group. Clin Infect Dis. 2000; 30:14–18. doi: 10.1086/313583 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bitew A and Abebaw Y. Vulvovaginal candidiasis: species distribution of Candida and their antifungal susceptibility pattern. BMC Women’s Health.2018: 18:94. doi: 10.1186/s12905-018-0607-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Rezende JCP, Rezende MA, Saliba JL 2002. Prevalence of Candida spp. in hospitalized patients and their risk factors. Mycoses. 2001; 45: 306–312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Fahim NA. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of multiantibiotic-resistant bacteria among intensive care units patients at Ain Shams University Hospitals in Egypt—a retrospective study. J Egyptian Publ Healt Assoc 2021; 96:1–10. doi: 10.1186/s42506-020-00065-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.World Health Organization. Ten Threats to Global Health in 2019. WHO, 2019. Available online: https://www.who.int/emergencies/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019 (accessed on 1 May 2019). [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ben-Ami R, Rodriguez-Bano J, Arslan H, Pitout JDD, Quentint CE, Azap OK et al. A multinational survey of risk factors for infection with Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in non-hospitalized patients. Clin infect Dis. 2009: 49: 682–690. doi: 10.1086/604713 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bradford PA. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in the 21st century: characterization, epidemiology, and detection of this important resistance threat,” Clin Microbiol Rev 14, 2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Perez F, Van Duin D. “Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: a menace to our most vulnerable patients,” Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine. 2013; 4: 225–233. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.80a.12182 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Brolund A A., “Overview of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae from a Nordic perspective,” Infection Ecology & Epidemiol. 2014;4. doi: 10.3402/iee.v4.24555 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
(SAV)
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.