Abstract
Purpose
To quantify the synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A) changes in the whole central nervous system (CNS) under pathophysiological conditions, a high affinity SV2A PET radiotracer with improved in vivo stability is desirable to minimize the potential confounding effect of radiometabolites. The aim of this study was to develop such a PET tracer based on the molecular scaffold of UCB-A, and evaluate its pharmacokinetics, in vivo stability, specific binding, and nonspecific binding signals in nonhuman primate brains, in comparison with [11C]UCB-A, [11C]UCB-J, and [18F]SynVesT-1.
Methods
The racemic SDM-16 (4-(3,5-difluorophenyl)-1-((2-methyl-1H-imidazol-1-yl)methyl)pyrrolidin-2-one) and its two enantiomers were synthesized and assayed for in vitro binding affinities to human SV2A. We synthesized the enantiopure [18F]SDM-16 using the corresponding enantiopure arylstannane precursor. Nonhuman primate brain PET scans were performed on FOCUS 220 scanners. Arterial blood was drawn for the measurement of plasma free fraction (fP), radiometabolite analysis, and construction of the plasma input function. Regional time-activity curves (TACs) were fitted with the one-tissue compartment (1TC) model to obtain the volume of distribution (VT). Nondisplaceable binding potential (BPND) was calculated using either the nondisplaceable volume of distribution (VND) or the centrum semiovale (CS) as the reference region.
Results
SDM-16 was synthesized in 3 steps with 44% overall yield and has the highest affinity (Ki = 0.9 nM) to human SV2A among all reported SV2A ligands. [18F]SDM-16 was prepared in about 20% decay-corrected radiochemical yield within 90 min, with greater than 99% radiochemical and enantiomeric purity. This radiotracer displayed high specific binding in monkey brains and was metabolically more stable than the other SV2A PET tracers. The fP of [18F]SDM-16 was 69%, which was higher than those of [11C]UCB-J (46%), [18F]SynVesT-1 (43%), [18F]SynVesT-2 (41%), and [18F]UCB-H (43%). The TACs were well described with the 1TC. The averaged test–retest variability (TRV) was 7 ± 3%, and averaged absolute TRV (aTRV) was 14 ± 7% for the analyzed brain regions.
Conclusion
We have successfully synthesized a novel SV2A PET tracer [18F]SDM-16, which has the highest SV2A binding affinity and metabolical stability among published SV2A PET tracers. The [18F]SDM-16 brain PET images showed superb contrast between gray matter and white matter. Moreover, [18F]SDM-16 showed high specific and reversible binding in the NHP brains, allowing for the reliable and sensitive quantification of SV2A, and has potential applications in the visualization and quantification of SV2A beyond the brain.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-021-05597-5.
Keywords: SV2A, PET, Metabolically stable, Nonhuman primates, Brain imaging, SDM-16 [18F]SDM-16
Introduction
Proteins in the synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2 (SV2) family located in presynaptic terminals are essential components of synaptic vesicles [1]. As one of the isoforms, SV2A is ubiquitously expressed in virtually all synapse terminals, and involved in the regulation of synaptic exocytosis and endocytosis [2, 3]. SV2A is a known target for anti-epilepsy drugs, such as levetiracetam (Keppra®, LEV) [4]. Positron emission tomography (PET) is a non-invasive quantitative imaging modality that provides functional and physiological information in living systems. SV2A PET tracers can be used to study target occupancy in the clinical development of new drug candidates targeting SV2A, and to measure changes of SV2A in neuropsychiatric diseases [5–10]. SV2A PET has potential applications beyond the brain, as SV2A is expressed in the all central nervous system (CNS) [11]. While the current metabolically labile SV2A PET tracers are suitable for brain PET imaging due to the BBB preventing their radiometabolites from entering the brain, a more metabolically stable and higher binding affinity radiotracer is desirable for the investigation of SV2A expression in the whole CNS, to minimize the potential confounding effect of radiometabolites. For example, the spinal cord expresses SV2A with a much lower Bmax than the brain dose [12], and is protected by blood-spinal cord barrier (BSCB) rather than BBB. The difference between the permeability of BBB and BSCB may render spinal cord potentially more susceptible to the confounding effect of radiometabolites of PET tracers [13, 14].
Several SV2A PET tracers have been synthesized and evaluated in animals and human during the past few years by our group and others (Fig. 1) [7, 15]. [18F]UCB-H (2) [16–18] was the first SV2A PET tracer tested in human [17], followed by [11C]UCB-J (3) [5], [11C]UCB-A (1), [18F]SynVesT-1(a.k.a. [18F]SDM-8 or [18F]MNI-1126) (5) [19, 20], and [18F]SynVesT-2 (a.k.a. [18F]SDM-2) (6) [21]. The isotopologue of 3, [18F]UCB-J was evaluated in rhesus monkeys, but not pursued for clinical evaluation since the harsh labeling conditions and the production process were considered unsuitable for routine production supporting clinical studies [22]. [11C]UCB-J is currently the SV2A PET tracer most widely used in PET imaging investigations of neuropsychiatric disorders, i.e., epilepsy, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and posttraumatic stress disorder [5, 23–25]. Among the available SV2A PET tracers, [11C]UCB-A was arguably the most metabolically stable, even though its prevalent radiometabolite species in the plasma were not identified yet [26, 27]. However, the relatively short radioactive half-life (~ 20 min) of carbon-11 together with the slow kinetics in the brain limited the potential clinical application of [11C]UCB-A [28, 29]. We hypothesized that the slow kinetics of [11C]UCB-A (as reflected in its low K1 and k2 values) was due to its relatively low membrane permeability, which is associated with its low hydrophobicity (LogD: 1.1). To develop a metabolically more stable analog of [11C]UCB-A, with improved pharmacokinetics (PK), we synthesized and evaluated a novel 18F-labeled SV2A PET tracer, [18F]SDM-16 ((R)-[18F]7), in nonhuman primates.
Fig. 1.
Current SV2A radiotracer
Materials and methods
Chemistry
All compounds were prepared from commercially available starting materials. Details are described in the supplemental materials.
Preparation of (R)-4-(3-fluoro-5-(fluoro-18F)phenyl)-1-((2-methyl-1H-imidazol-1-yl)methyl)pyrrolidin-2-one ([18F]SDM-16, (R)-[18F]7)
The cyclotron produced aqueous [18F]fluoride solution in H218O was transferred to a V-vial in a lead-shielded hot cell, where the [18F]fluoride anion was trapped on an anionic exchange resin cartridge (Chromafix-PS-HCO3) pre-activated by elution sequentially with EtOH (5 mL), an aqueous solution of potassium triflate (KOTf, 90 mg/mL, 5 mL), and deionized (DI) water (5 mL). The potassium [18F]fluoride was then eluted off the cartridge into a 2-mL V-vial with the mixture of aqueous solution of KOTf (10 mg/mL, 0.45 mL) and K2CO3 (1 mg/mL, 50 µL), and MeCN (0.5 mL). The eluent was azeotropically dried at 110 °C, with two portions of anhydrous MeCN (1.0 mL × 2) added during the process. A solution of the precursor 17 (1.7–3.0 mg) in anhydrous N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMA, 0.4 mL) was then added to the reaction vial, followed by the solution of pyridine (1 M in DMA, 0.1 mL) and copper(II) triflate (0.2 M in DMA, 67 µL). The reaction mixture was then heated at 110 °C for 20 min, diluted with the HPLC mobile phase (1.5 mL) and purified by HPLC (column: Genesis C18, 4 µm, 10 × 250 mm; mobile phase: 19% MeCN and 81% 0.1 M ammonium formate solution with 0.5% AcOH, pH 4.2; flow rate: 5 mL/min). The eluent was monitored by a UV detector (at 254 nm) and a radioactivity detector. The fraction containing [18F]SDM-16 was collected, diluted with DI water (50 mL), and passed through a C18 SepPak (WTWAT051910, Waters), which was then washed with 0.001 N HCl (10 mL) and dried with 10 cc air. The product was eluted off with EtOH (1 mL), diluted with USP grade saline (3 mL), passed through a sterile membrane filter (0.22 µm), and collected in a sterile vial pre-charged with 7 mL of USP saline and 20 µL of 8.4% NaHCO3 to afford a formulated solution ready for administration. Analytic HPLC conditions (column: Genesis C18, 4 µm, 4.6 × 150 mm; mobile phase: 22% MeCN and 78% 0.1 M ammonium formate solution with 0.5% AcOH, pH 4.2; flow rate: 2 mL/min, retention time = 7.63 min) were used in the quality control step.
Competition radioligand binding assay
Competition binding assays were performed twice independently using separate assay materials, with 4 technical replicates from each independent assay. Compounds were dissolved in DMSO (10 mM), which was diluted in PBS pH 7.4 (Gibco) with 0.1% BSA assay buffer to give 12 half-log dilutions from 10 µM to 32 pM. Duplicate samples of human frontal cortex gray matter were homogenized in PBS buffer (10 mg/mL) for storage at − 80 °C and were diluted to a stock concentration of 4 mg/mL in PBS on the day of the assays. [3H]UCB-J was obtained with a molar activity of 1.29 TBq/mmol (34.9 Ci/mmol) and radiochemical purity of 98.9%, diluted in duplicate to a stock concentration of 6.25 nM. Working stocks of brain homogenate (100 µL; final concentration of 2 mg/mL), blocking ligands (20 µL), and radioligand (80 µL; final concentration 2.5 nM) were combined in quadruplicate wells of 96-well plates, sealed, and incubated at room temperature for 90 min on an orbital shaker set to 250 RPM. Reaction plates were filtered, rapidly washed with cold PBS, and dried. Forty microliters of Microscint-20 scintillation cocktail (Perkin-Elmer) was added to each well, and the plate was counted using a Microbeta2 plate reader (Perkin-Elmer). GraphPad Prism was used for curve fitting using the one-site Ki model.
Measurement of lipophilicity
The logP of [18F]SDM-16 was determined by a method modified from previously published procedures [30]. Briefly, an aliquot of 70 kBq (10 µCi) of the radioligand was added to a 2-mL microtube containing 0.8 mL of octanol and 0.8 mL of 1 × phosphate buffered saline (1 × PBS, pH 7.4). The mixture was vortexed for 30 s and then centrifuged at 2000 g for 2 min. A subsample of the octanol (0.1 mL) and 1 × PBS (0.5 mL) layers was evaluated with a gamma counter. The major portion of the octanol layer (0.5 mL) was diluted with another 0.3 mL of octanol, mixed with a fresh portion of 0.8 mL of PBS, vortexed, centrifuged, and analyzed as described above. This process was repeated until consistent log P values were obtained, with five consecutive equilibration procedures being performed for each logP measurement. Four separate measurements were performed for [18F]SDM-16 on different days.
Measurement of plasma free fraction (fp)
The unbound fraction of [18F]SDM-16 in plasma (fp) of rhesus monkey was measured in triplicate using the ultrafiltration method [19, 21]. Briefly, [18F]SDM-16 solution was added to 3 mL of whole blood. After incubation at ambient temperature for 5 min, the blood sample was centrifuged at 3900 rpm for 5 min. A sample of the supernatant plasma (0.3 mL) was loaded onto the reservoir of a Centrifree® Ultrafiltration device (Merck Millipore Ltd. Tullagreen, Carrigtwohill, Co. Cork, IRELAND) in triplicate and centrifuged at 1228 g for 20 min. The fp value was calculated as the ratio of radioactivity in the filtrate to that in the plasma.
PET imaging experiments in rhesus monkeys
A total of 10 PET imaging experiments with [18F]SDM-16 were performed in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) according to a protocol approved by the Yale University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). Four monkeys were studied. One monkey (8 years old, male, 9.5 kg) underwent two baseline scans and one blocking scan; one monkey (15 years old, female, 11.3 kg) underwent two baseline scans; one monkey (12 years old, male, 17.0 kg) underwent one whole-body scan; and the other monkey (13 years old, female, 9.5 kg) underwent two baseline scans, one displacement scan and one whole-body scan. Rhesus monkeys were fasted overnight and sedated using intramuscular injection of alfaxalone (2 mg/kg), midazolam (0.3 mg/kg), dexmedetomidine (0.01 mg/kg), and anaesthetized with 0.75–2.5% isoflurane approximately 2 h before the PET scan. Anesthesia was subsequently maintained with isoflurane (1.5–2.5%) for the duration of the imaging experiments. Body temperature was maintained by a water-jacket heating pad. The animal was attached to a physiological monitor, and vital signs (heart rate, blood pressure, respirations, SPO2, EKG, ETCO2, and body temperature) were continuously monitored. A venous line was inserted in one limb for administration of radiotracer, displacement, and blocking drugs. A catheter was placed in the femoral artery in the other limb for blood sampling. Dynamic PET brain scans were performed on a Focus 220 system (Siemens Medical Solutions, Knoxville, TN, USA) with a reconstructed image resolution of approximately 1.5 mm. After a 9-min transmission scan, the radioligand was injected i.v. over 3 min. by an infusion pump. Dynamic PET scans were performed for 3 h (baseline and blocking scans) or 4 h (displacement scan). For the blocking scan LEV (30 mg/kg) was administered intravenously at 10 min before tracer injection, while in the displacement scan, the same dose of LEV was infused at 120 min after tracer injection.
PET images were reconstructed with built-in corrections for attenuation, normalization, scatter, randoms, and deadtime. PET brain images were registered to the animal’s MR image, which was subsequently registered to a brain atlas to define the regions of interest. Dynamic images were reconstructed using a Fourier rebinning and filtered back projection algorithm. A rhesus monkey brain atlas was used for generation of regions of interest (ROIs) and time − activity curves (TACs) for the following ROIs: amygdala, brain stem, caudate nucleus, centrum semiovale (CS), cerebellum, cingulate cortex, frontal cortex, globus pallidus, hippocampus, insula, nucleus accumbens, occipital cortex, pons, putamen, substantia nigra, temporal cortex, and thalamus.
Plasma radiometabolite analysis
Arterial blood samples were collected during the PET scans to measure the radioactivity in plasma for generation of the metabolite-corrected arterial plasma input function. Plasma radiometabolite analysis was performed using the column-switching method, following a published protocol [31]. Briefly, arterial blood samples were collected at 3-, 8-, 15-, 30-, 60-, 90-, 120-, and 180-min post-injection (p. i.), treated with urea (8 M), filtered, and injected onto a self-packed short column (4.6 × 19 mm) eluting with 1% MeCN in water at a flow rate of 2 mL/min. The sample was then back flushed onto a Gemini-NX column (5 μm, 4.6 mm × 250 mm) eluting with 40% MeCN/60% 0.1 M ammonium formate (pH 6.4) at a flow rate of 1.2 mL/min. The eluent was fraction-collected using an automated spectrum chromatography CF-1 fraction collector. Activity in the whole blood, plasma, filtrated plasma-urea mix, filters, and HPLC fractions were counted with automatic gamma well-counter (Wizard 2, PerkinElmer). The sample recovery rate, extraction efficiency, and HPLC fraction recovery were monitored. The unmetabolized [18F]SDM-16 parent fraction was determined as the ratio of the sum of radioactivity in fractions containing the parent compound to the total amount of radioactivity collected and fitted with inverted Gamma4 approaches.
Kinetic modeling
Volume of distribution (VT, mL·cm−3) values and the first-order kinetic rate constants of tracer (K1) were derived through 1-tissue (1T) compartment kinetic modeling with the metabolite-corrected arterial plasma input function, which was calculated as the product of the fitted total plasma curve and the parent radiotracer fraction curve. Nondisplaceable volume of distribution (VND) and SV2A occupancy by LEV was calculated using the Lassen plot [32]. Nondisplaceable binding potential (BPND) values were calculated from VT values using CS as reference region, or the VND derived from the blocking study, i.e., BPND = (VT, ROI − VT, CS)/ VT, CS or BPND = (VT/VND) -1.
Radiation dosimetry study
Two whole-body biodistribution studies were performed in two rhesus monkeys (9.4 kg female and 17.0 kg male) to estimate human organ radiation dosimetry. Scans were carried out on a Biograph mCT (hybrid PET/CT, Siemens Medical Systems, Knoxville, TN) scanner following i.v. injections of 187.6 MBq (5.1 mCi) and 173.9 MBq (4.7 mCi) [18F]SDM-16, and mass doses of 0.27 µg and 0.24 µg at time of injection, respectively. Monkeys were scanned for about 4 h in a sequence of 22–24 passes from top of the head to the mid-thigh. Scans were reconstructed and visually inspected for organ activity concentrations exceeding background level. The organs included were the brain, heart, liver, gall bladder, spleen, kidneys, and urinary bladder contents. Regions of interest were delineated on these organs, and mean activity values were computed to form TACs.
Within-pass decay correction was removed to reflect the actual activity in each organ, and cumulative activity (Bq.h/cm3) computed by integration of the data from the scan. The tail portions beyond the end of the scan were extrapolated assuming only physical decay of the tracer. These values were multiplied by the organ volumes of a standard 55-kg adult female reference and 70-kg adult male mathematical phantom, and then normalized to injected activity to obtain organ residence times (N, h). Final values were then entered into the OLINDA software to obtain absorbed doses in all organs, which were computed with different voiding assumptions.
Results
Chemistry
Compounds 9 and 15 were synthesized from commercially available aldehydes 8 and 14, respectively in 3 steps as racemic mixtures (Schemes 1 and 2), following the published procedures [19], with minor modifications. After chiral resolution of the racemic (rac) products, (R)-9 and (R)-15 were obtained with enantiomeric excess (e.e.) greater than 99%. Their absolute configuration was determined by X-ray crystallography. Condensation of compound 9 with formalin, followed by substitution of the intermediate 10 with 2-methyl-1H-imidazole afforded rac SDM-16 (7) in 44% overall yield. Condensation of 2-methyl-1H-imidazole (11) with paraformaldehyde gave (2-methyl-1H-imidazol-1-yl)methanol (12), which was chlorinated by thionyl chloride to give the imidazole salt 13. Nucleophilic substitution of chloride 13 with (R)-9 or (R)-15, gave the SDM-16 standard (R)-7 or the bromo analog 16 in 92% and 90% yield, respectively. It is worth mentioning that when the chlorine atom in 13 was replaced with other leaving groups (Br, OTs, OTf), the substitution reactions did not yield the desired product. As the radiolabeling precursor, arylstannane 17, was obtained from 16 in 47% yield via Pd(0)-catalyzed stannylation reaction. Finally, (R)-[18F]7 was prepared from the enantiopure precursor 17 in ca. 20% decay-corrected radiochemical yield within 90 min, with > 99.9% radiochemical and enantiomeric purity, as determined by reverse phase C18 and chiral HPLC analysis. Molar activity at the end of synthesis (EOS) was 281 ± 43 GBq/µmol (n = 12).
Scheme 1.
Synthesis of the racemic and enantiopure standard compound SDM-16 ((R)-7)
Scheme 2.
Synthesis of the [18F]SDM-16 and its enantiopure labeling precursor (17)
In vitro competition-binding assay
Rac SDM-16 possessed high binding affinity to human SV2A, with Ki of 3.7 nM in our radioligand competition-binding assay using [3H]UCB-J and human frontal cortex tissue homogenate. The R-enantiomer SDM-16 and (S)-SDM-16 bind to human SV2A with Ki of 0.9 nM (95%CI [0.7, 1.1]) and 25.5 nM (95%CI [21, 32]), respectively. Thus, SDM-16 possesses the lowest Ki values among the other SV2A ligands, i.e., Levetiracetam (2.1 µM), UCB-J (2.6 nM, 95%CI [2.2, 3.1]), SynVesT-1 (3.1 nM, 95%CI [2.6, 3.6]), and SynVesT-2 (8.6 nM, 95%CI [7.2, 10.2]) (Fig. 1) [33, 54].
Measurement of lipophilicity
The averaged LogP value of [18F]SDM-16 was 1.65 ± 0.05 (n = 20), which was lower than that of [11C]UCB-J (2.46), [18F]UCB-H (2.31), and [18F]SynVesT-1 (2.32), and higher than [11C]UCB-A (1.10), and within the optimal range for BBB penetration (1 < LogP < 3) [34].
PET imaging experiments in rhesus monkeys
The injected radioactivity ranged from 183 to 188 MBq (n = 10), corresponding to 0.646–0.926 µg of SDM-16. At this microdose level, no adverse events were observed throughout the imaging study. Adverse event was also not observed following LEV (i.v., 30 mg/kg) administration, including the displacement and blocking scan.
Plasma analysis
After the administration of [18F]SDM-16, the tracer concentration in the plasma showed a sharp increase within 5 min, followed by a fast distribution phase and a slow clearance phase. [18F]SDM-16 had higher metabolite-corrected plasma SUV than the other SV2A radiotracers, indicating slower plasma clearance and higher metabolic stability (Fig. 2a). Whole-blood and plasma-input functions were highly consistent between the two animals, with a stable plasma to whole-blood ratio of 0.93 ± 0.13 over the entire 180-min acquisition period (Fig. S1). In rhesus monkeys, [18F]SDM-16 was metabolized slowly, with 89 ± 5% and 80 ± 7% intact radiotracer present in the plasma at 30- and 120-min post-injection (p.i., n = 9, Fig. 2b), respectively, compared with 70 ± 7%, 42 ± 13%, 40 ± 6%, and 30 ± 3% parent fraction at 30-min p.i. for [11C]UCB-A (n = 5), [18F]SynVesT-1 (n = 5), [11C]UCB-J (n = 11), and [18F]UCB-H [35], respectively. All observed radiometabolite fractions in the plasma had shorter retention times than the parent tracer, indicating that they were more hydrophilic and less likely to penetrate the BBB (Fig. 2c).
Fig. 2.
Plasma analysis of the 4 radiotracers in monkey. (a) Metabolite-corrected plasma activity for [18F]SDM-16 (n = 9), [18F]SynVesT-1 (n = 2), [11C]UCB-A (n = 6), and [11C]UCB-J (n = 5), with 2-way ANOVA analysis. (b) Plasma parent fraction over time for [18F]SDM-16 (n = 9), [18F]SynVesT-1 (n = 5), [11C]UCB-A (n = 4), and [11C]UCB-J (n = 5). (c) Radio-HPLC chromatograms of plasma metabolite analysis of [18F]SDM-16 (retention time at 8.5 min). The retention time of the major radiometabolite was 6.8 min and a minor radiometabolite at around 0.5–1.2 min
Brain PET image analysis
Summed SUV images from the baseline and blocking scans of [18F]SDM-16 are shown in Fig. 3. At baseline, high contrast between gray matter and ventricles was clearly visible (Fig. 3a) while blocking with LEV significantly reduced the tracer uptake in gray matters (Fig. 3b). [18F]SDM-16 had an apparently slow kinetic profile, with tracer uptake increasing gradually till the end of the scan to an SUV of about 10 (for frontal cortex and putamen, Fig. 3c), which was higher than for [11C]UCB-A (SUV about 4 in Fig. 3d). Nevertheless, the binding of [18F]SDM-16 was reversible, as demonstrated by the LEV displacement experiment, in which the tracer uptake was reduced by 58 ± 8% (averaged from 5 brain regions), based on the SUV values at the end of the displacement scan (4 h p.i.) and those at 180-min p.i. at the baseline scan of the same monkey (Fig. 3e, Fig. S2). In the pre-blocking study, the preinjected LEV (i.v., 30 mg/kg), also resulted in 57 ± 10% reduced tracer uptake in gray matter regions, based on the normalized terminal SUV values in the blocking and baseline scans (Fig. 3f). Our displacement and pre-blocking PET imaging results confirmed the reversible and SV2A-specific binding of [18F]SDM-16 in nonhuman primates. We did not observe any radioactivity in skull throughout the PET imaging window (up to 4-h p.i.), indicating the lack of in vivo defluorination.
Fig. 3.
Summed SUV images of [18F]SDM-16 in the brain of a rhesus monkey from 150- to 180-min imaging window at (a) baseline scan and (b) blocking scan with LEV (30 mg/kg, i.v.). Representative time activity curves of (c) baseline scans of [18F]SDM-16, (d) baseline scan of [11C]UCB-A, (e) displacement study of [18F]SDM-16, with LEV given at 120 min p.i., and (f) pre-blocking study of [18F]SDM-16 with LEV (30 mg/kg, i.v.)
Kinetic modeling
Regional time-activity curves (TACs) were fitted with 1-tissue compartment (1TC) model to generate binding parameters, using the metabolite-corrected plasma input function. Similar to [11C]UCB-J, [18F]SynVesT-1, and [18F]SynVesT-2, the 1TC model described the TACs well (Fig. 3c) and provided reliable estimates of regional volumes of distribution (VT) for [18F]SDM-16. The [18F]SDM-16 VT values were highest in cingulate cortex (31.3 mL/cm3), followed by putamen, caudate, and thalamus and lowest in centrum semiovale (CS, 6.6 mL/cm3) (Table 1). The rank order of 1TC model generated VT values was consistent with previously reported SV2A PET tracers and in vitro binding results [4, 19], and the monkey brain VT values of [18F]SDM-16 correlated well with those of [11C]UCB-A (Y = 1.75*X − 1.91, R2 = 0.85, P < 0.0001), [18F]SynVesT-1 (Y = 1.53*X − 0.05, R2 = 0.91, P < 0.0001) and [11C]UCB-J (Y = 1.77*X + 1.81, R2 = 0.96, P < 0.0001) (Fig. 4) [36]. Because different monkeys were used in the evaluations of these SV2A PET tracers, we observed more variability in these plots than what has previously been shown in plots using data from the same subject [36].
Table 1.
1TC-derived regional VT values (mean ± SD) from baseline scans (n = 6) and blocking (n = 1) of [18F]SDM-16, along with those from baseline scans of [18F]SynVesT-1 (n = 3) [19], [11C]UCB-J (n = 5) [26], and [11C]UCB-A (n = 5)
VT (baseline) | VT (blocking) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
[11C]UCB-A (n = 5) |
[11C]UCB-J (n = 5) |
[18F]SynVesT-1 (n = 3) |
[18F]SDM-16 (n = 6) |
[18F]SDM-16 (n = 1) |
|
Cingulate cortex | 55.0 ± 24.3 | 55.6 ± 10.0 | 48.5 ± 8.9 | 31.3 ± 7.8 | 10.4 |
Frontal cortex | 49.0 ± 18.2 | 55.4 ± 8.2 | 47.1 ± 9.1 | 27.9 ± 6.8 | 9.5 |
Insular cortex | 57.8 ± 26.9 | 54.6 ± 6.7 | 46.1 ± 9.2 | 29.8 ± 8.0 | 10.3 |
Nucleus accumbens | 34.1 ± 4.8 | 53.9 ± 9.2 | 45.2 ± 7.9 | 29.4 ± 8.5 | 10.5 |
Occipital cortex | 47.0 ± 16.6 | 52.9 ± 7.0 | 43.7 ± 10.7 | 29.5 ± 5.5 | 8.3 |
Temporal cortex | 51.4 ± 26.2 | 50.4 ± 6.9 | 42.2 ± 10.0 | 27.3 ± 5.7 | 8.6 |
Putamen | 48.8 ± 18.8 | 45.2 ± 3.0 | 34.6 ± 4.9 | 26.0 ± 6.8 | 8.8 |
Caudate | 36.6 ± 13.9 | 44.8 ± 4.6 | 35.0 ± 6.3 | 21.6 ± 4.9 | 7.7 |
Thalamus | 31.9 ± 10.1 | 40.3 ± 6.4 | 34.2 ± 3.0 | 21.6 ± 4.9 | 8.2 |
Cerebellum | 30.7 ± 9.9 | 39.5 ± 5.8 | 28.9 ± 6.8 | 21.5 ± 3.0 | 6.6 |
Hippocampus | 31.4 ± 16.6 | 34.4 ± 2.8 | 30.1 ± 5.6 | 17.9 ± 2.5 | 5.9 |
Globus pallidus | 32.2 ± 12.2 | 27.9 ± 3.0 | 21.6 ± 4.2 | 17.2 ± 3.5 | 6.9 |
Brainstem | 21.0 ± 4.9 | 23.5 ± 2.8 | 16.3 ± 3.6 | 14.1 ± 1.7 | 4.5 |
Amygdala | 15.6 ± 8.2 | 24.4 ± 2.0 | 24.8 ± 8.5 | 11.2 ± 2.0 | 4.5 |
Centrum semiovale | 10.9 ± 5.1 | 13.6 ± 2.9 | 8.9 ± 2.0 | 6.6 ± 0.9 | 3.4 |
Fig. 4.
Correlation and linear regression analysis of the baseline 1TC VT values of [18F]SDM-16 with that of [18F]SynVesT-1 [19], [11C]UCB-J [26], and [11C]UCB-A in monkey brain; dotted lines represent 95% confidence intervals
The regional K1 values of [18F]SDM-16 were comparable to those of [11C]UCB-A, and 86% and 82% lower than those of [18F]SynVesT-1 and [11C]UCB-J, respectively (Table 2).
Table 2.
First-order kinetic rate constant (K1) of [18F]SDM-16 (n = 8), [18F]SynVesT-1 (n = 3) and [11C]UCB-J (n = 5), and [11C]UCB-A (n = 5), representing tracer influx from blood to tissue in rhesus monkey
K1 (mL/cm3 per min) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Brain regions | [11C]UCB-A | [11C]UCB-J | [18F]SynVesT-1 | [18F]SDM-16 |
Cingulate cortex | 0.17 ± 0.034 | 1.01 ± 0.56 | 1.01 ± 0.56 | 0.15 ± 0.00 |
Frontal cortex | 0.15 ± 0.03 | 0.66 ± 0.16 | 0.79 ± 0.39 | 0.14 ± 0.00 |
Insular cortex | 0.15 ± 0.01 | 0.75 ± 0.17 | 0.93 ± 0.48 | 0.14 ± 0.01 |
Nucleus accumbens | 0.13 ± 0.02 | 0.77 ± 0.17 | 0.99 ± 0.63 | 0.13 ± 0.01 |
Occipital cortex | 0.19 ± 0.03 | 0.81 ± 0.21 | 0.88 ± 0.47 | 0.18 ± 0.02 |
Temporal cortex | 0.14 ± 0.02 | 0.66 ± 0.14 | 0.74 ± 0.34 | 0.14 ± 0.01 |
Putamen | 0.17 ± 0.03 | 1.03 ± 0.19 | 1.25 ± 0.82 | 0.16 ± 0.02 |
Caudate | 0.13 ± 0.02 | 0.75 ± 0.12 | 0.95 ± 0.49 | 0.13 ± 0.02 |
Thalamus | 0.14 ± 0.03 | 0.72 ± 0.24 | 0.93 ± 0.71 | 0.14 ± 0.02 |
Cerebellum | 0.17 ± 0.03 | 0.81 ± 0.16 | 0.88 ± 0.41 | 0.18 ± 0.02 |
Anterior cingulate | 0.15 ± 0.03 | 0.73 ± 0.20 | 1.05 ± 0.66 | 0.15 ± 0.01 |
Hippocampus | 0.12 ± 0.02 | 0.61 ± 0.12 | 0.68 ± 0.34 | 0.12 ± 0.02 |
Globus pallidus | 0.10 ± 0.01 | 0.65 ± 0.11 | 0.73 ± 0.49 | 0.11 ± 0.01 |
Brainstem | 0.15 ± 0.03 | 0.89 ± 0.17 | 1.37 ± 1.26 | 0.14 ± 0.02 |
Amygdala | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.48 ± 0.14 | 0.56 ± 0.36 | 0.10 ± 0.02 |
Mean ± SD | 0.14 ± 0.03 | 0.72 ± 0.17 | 0.91 ± 0.28 | 0.14 ± 0.03 |
Lassen plot
To examine the in vivo binding specificity, SV2A occupancy, and the extent of nonspecific binding in the monkey brain, we performed the Lassen plot analysis using data from the two baseline scans and one blocking scan in the same monkey. The preinjected SV2A ligand LEV (30 mg/kg, i.v.) blocked 79% of the available SV2A binding sites in all gray matters (R2 = 0.99), indicating high in vivo binding specificity of [18F]SDM-16 (Fig. 5). The degree of SV2A occupancy by LEV was similar to previously reported with other SV2A PET tracers [19, 21, 26]. Based on the Lassen plot, the VND of [18F]SDM-16 in the monkey we imaged was 2.54 mL/cm3, which was lower than we previously determined for [18F]UCB-H (7.89 mL/cm3) [35], [11C]UCB-J (6.27 mL/cm3), [11C]UCB-A (14.67 mL/cm3), and [18F]SynVesT-1 (4.96 mL/cm3), but higher than that of [18F]SynVesT-2 (2.10 mL/cm3).
Fig. 5.
SV2A occupancy plot using the averaged VT values from two baseline scans of [18F]SDM-16 and one blocking scan with preinjected LEV (30 mg/kg, i.v.) in the same rhesus monkey. The estimated SV2A occupancy by LEV (30 mg/kg, i.v.) was 79%, and the estimated nondisplaceable volume of distribution (VND) was 2.54 mL/cm3
Binding potential
The specific to nonspecific binding signal, as reflected by the non-displaceable binding potential (BPND), was calculated either using the nondisplaceable volume of distribution (VND) obtained from the blocking study or using the CS VT (VT(CS)) as the reference. With the VND method, regional BPND values ranged from 2.9 to 15.1 (Table 3). Using CS as the reference region, regional BPND values ranged from 0.69 to 3.90, which was in average 67% lower than those calculated using VND values. This difference is expected due to the substantial partial volume effect in CS, resulting in an overestimation of VND when using CS VT. The regional BPND values of [18F]SDM-16 correlated well with those of [18F]SynVesT-1 (with VND method: Y = 0.50*X + 1.28, R2 = 0.84, p < 0.0001; with VT(CS) method: Y = 1.05*X + 0.31, R2 = 0.84, p < 0.0001), and [11C]UCB-J (with VND method: Y = 0.42*X + 1.2, R2 = 0.89, p < 0.0001; with VT(CS) method: Y = 0.81*X + 0.14, R2 = 0.90, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 6).
Table 3.
Regional binding potentials (BPND) of [18F]SDM-16, [18F]SynVesT-1, and [11C]UCB-J in rhesus monkey brains
Brain regions | [18F]SDM-16 (mean ± SD) |
[18F] SynVesT-1 (mean ± SD) |
[11C]UCB-J (mean ± SD) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VND method (n = 2) | VT(CS) method (n = 6) | VND method (n = 2) | VT(CS) method (n = 3) | VND method (n = 5) |
VT(CS) method (n = 5) |
|
Cingulate cortex | 14.97 ± 0.28 | 3.77 ± 1.28 | 9.04 ± 3.59 | 4.5 ± 0.4 | 7.37 ± 1.18 | 3.17 ± 0.84 |
Frontal cortex | 12.72 ± 0.76 | 3.24 ± 1.07 | 8.64 ± 3.59 | 4.3 ± 0.6 | 7.28 ± 1.00 | 3.17 ± 0.84 |
Insular cortex | 13.77 ± 1.93 | 3.54 ± 1.31 | 8.41 ± 3.27 | 4.2 ± 0.3 | 7.24 ± 0.73 | 3.12 ± 0.81 |
Nucleus accumbens | 14.51 ± 0.23 | 3.48 ± 1.35 | 8.41 ± 3.54 | 4.1 ± 0.4 | 7.16 ± 1.13 | 3.12 ± 0.81 |
Occipital cortex | 12.62 ± 1.09 | 3.49 ± 0.90 | 7.61 ± 2.51 | 3.9 ± 0.2 | 7.01 ± 0.88 | 2.97 ± 0.65 |
Temporal cortex | 12.06 ± 0.54 | 3.15 ± 0.52 | 7.36 ± 2.64 | 3.7 ± 0.3 | 6.57 ± 0.89 | 2.79 ± 0.61 |
Putamen | 11.50 ± 0.8 | 3.00 ± 1.00 | 6.41 ± 2.96 | 2.9 ± 0.4 | 6.00 ± 0.24 | 2.42 ± 0.63 |
Caudate | 8.76 ± 0.68 | 2.27 ± 0.68 | 6.23 ± 2.96 | 3.0 ± 0.4 | 5.78 ± 0.43 | 2.40 ± 0.72 |
Thalamus | 9.46 ± 0.19 | 2.29 ± 0.72 | 6.59 ± 3.72 | 2.9 ± 0.7 | 5.21 ± 0.57 | 2.03 ± 0.62 |
Cerebellum | 9.47 ± 0.65 | 2.28 ± 0.53 | 4.74 ± 1.81 | 2.2 ± 0.2 | 4.43 ± 0.83 | 1.95 ± 0.36 |
Anterior cingulate | 15.13 ± 4.21 | 3.90 ± 1.38 | 8.44 ± 4.27 | 4.1 ± 0.7 | 6.84 ± 0.18 | 2.70 ± 0.74 |
Hippocampus | 6.55 ± 0.97 | 1.72 ± 0.44 | 5.19 ± 2.56 | 2.4 ± 0.4 | 4.47 ± 0.14 | 1.59 ± 0.39 |
Globus pallidus | 6.60 ± 0.33 | 1.61 ± 0.42 | 3.42 ± 1.90 | 1.4 ± 0.3 | 3.31 ± 0.38 | 1.10 ± 0.28 |
Brainstem | 4.93 ± 0.15 | 1.14 ± 0.24 | 2.30 ± 0.99 | 0.8 ± 0.0 | 2.61 ± 0.44 | 0.76 ± 0.21 |
Amygdala | 2.92 ± 0.25 | 0.69 ± 0.23 | 4.24 ± 4.05 | 1.9 ± 1.1 | 2.77 ± 0.06 | 0.85 ± 0.34 |
Fig. 6.
Correlation and linear regression analysis of the regional BPND values from baseline scans of [18F]SDM-16 with [18F]SynVesT-1 and [11C]UCB-J, using VND (a, b) or centrum semiovale as reference region (c, d)
Test–retest reproducibility
For a preliminary evaluation of the reproducibility of the PK parameter estimation, we scanned one monkey twice with 161 days in between, using [18F]SDM-16. The metabolite-corrected plasma input functions and SUV TACs were highly consistent between the two scans. The 1TC VT values of the test and retest scans correlated very well (R2 > 0.98, P < 0.0001), with test–retest variability (TRV) for [18F]SDM-16 of 7 ± 3% and 9 ± 2% for VT and K1, respectively. The absolute test–retest variability (aTRV) for [18F]SDM-16 of 14 ± 7% and 11 ± 2% for VT and K1, respectively (Table 4), indicated good agreement between the two baseline scans.
Table 4.
Absolute test–retest reproducibility (aTRV) of K1 and VT of [18F]SDM-16 derived with the one-tissue compartment model from 180 min PET data. TRV = (test value-retest value)/(test value + retest value) × 2
Brain regions |
K1 (mL/cm3 per min) |
VT (mL/cm3) |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
TRV | aTRV | TRV | aTRV | |
Cingulate cortex | 9.3% | 9.3% | − 3.5% | 3.5% |
Frontal cortex | 10.5% | 10.5% | − 11.1% | 11.1% |
Nucleus accumbens | 6.9% | 6.8% | 2.9% | 2.9% |
Occipital cortex | 12.1% | 12.1% | − 16.0% | 16.0% |
Temporal cortex | 12.0% | 12.0% | − 8.3% | 8.3% |
Putamen | 11.9% | 11.9% | − 13.1% | 13.1% |
Caudate | 6.7% | 6.7% | − 13.9% | 13.9% |
Thalamus | 9.2% | 9.2% | 3.6% | 3.6% |
Cerebellum | 13.1% | 13.1% | − 10.4% | 10.4% |
Hippocampus | 16.8% | 16.8% | − 25.8% | 25.8% |
Brainstem | 13.9% | 13.9% | − 5.0% | 5.0% |
Mean | 11.1% | 11.1% | − 9.2% | 10.0% |
SD | 3.0% | 3.0% | 8.5% | 6.9% |
Dosimetry
In preparation for the evaluation of [18F]SDM-16 in humans, we performed whole-body distribution studies in two rhesus monkeys (one female and one male). Organ residence times are shown in Table S1, while the absorbed doses estimated for the female and male phantom were listed in Table S2. The organ receiving the largest dose was the urinary bladder wall (0.1368 mGy/MBq and 0.0762 mGy/MBq for female and male, respectively), followed by the brain (0.1032 mGy/MBq, 0.0732 mGy/MBq), liver (0.0538 mGy/MBq, 0.0454 mGy/MBq), kidneys (0.0454 mGy/MBq, 0.0478 mGy/MBq), and the gallbladder wall (0.0441 mGy/MBq, 0.0484 mGy/MBq). Based on the urinary bladder wall as the critical organ, the maximum permissible single-study dosage of [18F]SDM-16, to remain below the 21 CFR 361.1 dose limit, is 365.6 MBq (9.88 mCi) for female and 656.0 MBq (17.73 mCi) for male. The estimated effective dose (ED) is 21.1 µSv/MBq for female and 15.6 µSv/MBq for male, which is slightly higher than the reported value of 15.4 µSv/MBq estimated for [18F]UCB-H from human [18], and is similar to the ED value of 20 µSv/MBq for [18F]SynVesT-1 estimated from female rhesus macaques using the 1-h voiding model [37], and is within the range of ED values (15–29 μSv/MBq) reported for [18F]FDG [38–41]. The total ED resulting from a single-study dosage of 185 MBq (5 mCi) [18F]SDM-16 is estimated to be equivalent to 3.9 mSv (0.39 rem). Accordingly, multiple PET scans can be performed within the same research subject based on individual’s whole body annual and total dose commitment of 50 mSv (21 CFR 361.1).
Discussion
A quantitative tool to image the whole CNS synapses will open the opportunity to study the interplay between the brain and spinal cord, under normal and disease conditions. We have previously reported the synthesis and evaluation of a series of fluorine-18-labeled SV2A PET tracers, which all showed excellent brain imaging properties, and some have been translated into first-in-human studies [37, 42, 43]. However, these PET tracers are metabolically labile, with less than 50% parent fraction at 30-min post injection. While our data indicate that the radiometabolites are not brain penetrant and would not interfere with the quantitative analysis of brain SV2A expression levels, these radiotracers are not suitable for imaging of SV2A beyond the brain, due to the difference in permeability between BBB and BSCB. For [11C]UCB-J and [18F]UCB-H, the prevalent radiometabolites in plasma are the corresponding N-oxidation products, which do not enter the brain to a significant extent as reported in LC/MS/MS and small animal PET imaging studies [26] [27]. Thus, we designed a new SV2A radiotracer, based on the structure of UCB-A, which possesses an imidazole ring and lacks the formation of a pyridinyl N-oxide radiometabolite [44, 45]. We modified the structure of UCB-A, in a way to fine-tune the physicochemical properties and further improve its in vivo stability and brain kinetics, because UCB-A’s PK in human brain is too slow to allow for the reliable estimation of PK parameters using data from a C-11 PET scan with reasonable length [46]. Based on the ChemDraw (Version 20.1.0.112)-predicted LogP values of SDM-16 (2.06) and UCB-A (0.96), we expected to see higher membrane permeability of SDM-16 over UCB-A; as in general, within the same series of compounds, higher lipophilicity is associated with higher cell membrane permeability [47]. However, since a higher fraction of SDM-16 is expected to be protonated at physiological pH than UCB-A, the delivery of SDM-16 from plasma to brain could potentially be hampered if the positively charged molecule does not enter the brain as effectively as the uncharged molecule.
The newly designed SV2A ligand SDM-16 binds to human SV2A with high affinity. Based on our experience with the synthesis of [18F]SynVesT-1 [19] and [18F] SynVest-2 using organotin precursors [21], we decided to apply the same radiolabeling strategy for [18F]SDM-16. To our satisfaction, [18F]SDM-16 was synthesized with high radiochemical yield, radiochemical and chemical purities, and molar activities. The relatively higher hydrophilicity of SDM-16 than UCB-J, SynVesT-1, and SynVesT-2 was expected to increase its free fractions in plasma and the brain. Indeed, the plasma free fraction (fP) of [18F]SDM-16 is 69%, which is slightly lower than that of [11C]UCB-A (75%), but much higher than of [11C]UCB-J (46%), [18F]SynVesT-1 (43%), [18F]SynVesT-2 (41%), and [18F]UCB-H (43%) (Fig. 7). The trend in fP is consistent with the relative measured lipophilicity of [11C]UCB-J (LogP: 2.46), [18F]SynVesT-1 (LogP: 2.32), [18F]SynVesT-2 (LogP: 2.17), [18F]SDM-16 (LogP: 1.65), and [11C]UCB-A (LogP: 1.10), with fP negatively correlated with LogP (R2 = 0.87, P = 0.02). The clearance rate of [18F]SDM-16 from plasma is slower than [18F]SynVesT-1, [11C]UCB-J, and [11C]UCB-A, and we observed the highest parent fractions for [18F]SDM-16 among all the SV2A PET tracers we evaluated in monkey. The relatively slower plasma clearance (Fig. 2a) and higher plasma parent fraction (Fig. 2b) indicate the higher metabolic stability of [18F]SDM-16 over the other existing SV2A radiotracers.
Fig. 7.
The influence of pKa on the properties of PET tracers
Because of the high metabolic stability and consistently high tracer concentration in the plasma (Fig. 2a), the brain TACs of [18F]SDM-16 appear similar to tracers with irreversible binding kinetics (Fig. 3c). As for other SV2A PET tracers, the 1TC model provided good fits and reliable estimates of PK parameters of [18F]SDM-16 (Fig. 3c). The excellent 1TC fitting and the efficient displacement by LEV (Fig. 3e) demonstrate the reversible binding kinetics of [18F] SDM-16. Thus, we obtained the K1 and VT parameters using the 1TC model. The K1 values of [18F]SDM-16 are comparable to those of [11C]UCB-A and are much lower than those of [18F]SynVesT-1 and [11C]UCB-J, respectively (Table 2). There are many factors that could influence the delivery of drug molecules from plasma into the brain, e.g., passive membrane permeability, plasma free fraction, ionization state in the plasma or cytosol, active transportation, and efflux. Based on the topological analysis of the structures of the current SV2A PET tracers, both [18F]SDM-16 and [11C]UCB-A are imidazole derivatives; while [18F]SynVesT-1, [18F]SynVesT-2, and [11C]UCB-J share a common lutidine substructure. Considering their common fluorophenylpyrrolidin-2-one pharmacophore, which is unconjugated with the pyridine/imidazole, their acid/base properties are mainly driven by the different heteroaromatic substituents. We speculate that the ionization constants (pKa values) of the conjugate acids of these four SV2A ligands affect their K1 values. According to the calculations using the Advanced Chemistry Development Software (ACD/Labs, V11.02) and reported experimental data [48–50], N-protonated lutidine has higher pKa than N-protonated dimethyl imidazole (Fig. 7). Modification of the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation leads to the equation to calculate the concentration ratio of the tracer in free base form [B] to that of the total [B0]: (Eq. 1). According to Eq. 1, 81% of [18F] SynVesT-1, 49% of [11C]UCB-A, and 30% of [18F]SDM-16 would be present in the plasma as free bases, based on the experimental pKa data of lutidine (6.77) and dimethyl imidazole (7.42, 7.85), and the pH value of plasma being 7.4.
The acid/base property is a critical factor to consider in drug discovery, especially for CNS drugs that have special requirement for BBB penetration [51]. The pKa values of all these SV2A ligands are within the commonly accepted range for pKa of CNS drugs, i.e., from 4 to 10 [34]. While the higher plasma free fraction of SDM-16 favors its delivery from plasma into the brain, the more extensive protonation of SDM-16 and its relatively higher polar surface area could contribute to its lower K1 values than [11C]UCB-J and [18F]SynVesT-1. Considering the nearly identical K1 values of [18F]SDM-16 and [11C]UCB-A (Y = 0.97*X + 0.01, R2 = 0.86, P < 0.0001) and that the averaged VT of [18F]SDM-16 was 59% of that of [11C]UCB-A, [18F]SDM-16 is expected to reach brain-to-blood distribution equilibrium faster than [11C]UCB-A. To estimate the time for [18F]SDM-16 to reach brain equilibration, we calculated the equilibration half-lives for [18F]SDM-16 and [11C]UCB-A in the selected brain regions (t1/2 = ln2/k2, Table S3). The brain equilibration half-life of [18F]SDM-16 is about the half-life of 18F, ranging from 83 ± 18 min in CS to 152 ± 49 min in insular cortex (Table S3). In average, the brain equilibration half-life of [11C]UCB-A is about 1.7-fold longer than that of [18F]SDM-16. Although [18F]SDM-16 displaced relatively slow kinetics in the rhesus monkey brain where SV2A expression level is high (SV2A Bmax of Baboon’ brain ranged from 2.2 pmol/mg protein in the pons to 19.9 pmol/mg protein in the temporal cortex) [5], its kinetics is expected to be faster in tissues with relatively lower SV2A expression, such as spinal cord [12].
Although in the field of PET neuroimaging, the rule of thumb is that the Bmax/Kd of the PET tracer needs to be greater than 10, the ratio of two tracers’ BPND is determined partially by their degree of nonspecific uptake, which is reflected in VND and brain tissue free fraction (fND). While VND can be obtained only through in vivo blocking studies, fND can be obtained either from in vivo blocking study or from in vitro assays using brain homogenates or slides, and fND is considered to be consistent among different species [52]. While decreasing the tracer’s Kd value may eventually leads to undesired slow kinetics (low k2 and long brain-to-plasma equilibrium half-life), increasing fND is an alternative but potentially more challenging approach to boost the specific PET signal, based on the equation BPND = fND*Bmax/Kd. Using the averaged VND and fP values, we calculated the fND value of [18F]SDM-16 to be 27%, which was higher than that of [18F]UCB-H (6.1%, calculated from K1/k2 using 2TCM-c) [35], [11C]UCB-J (7.3%), [18F]SynVesT-1 (10.1%), and [18F]SynVesT-2 (19.5%), assuming that these SV2A ligands enter the brain mainly through passive diffusion and are not subject to active influx or efflux transport, i.e., fND = fP/VND. We did not calculate the VND and fND values of [11C]UCB-A because of the lack of blocking data for [11C]UCB-A. [18F]SDM-16 has the highest fND value among all the current SV2A PET tracers and maintains the brain penetration ability.
To compare the in vivo Kd and BPND of [18F]SDM-16 with those of [18F]SynVesT-1 [19], [11C]UCB-J [26], and [11C]UCB-A in monkey brain, we adopted the Guo plot using their baseline VT values (Fig. 4). The Kd ratios are Kd([18F]SynVesT-1)/Kd([18F]SDM-16) = 0.41 and Kd([11C]UCB-J)/Kd([18F]SDM-16) = 0.38; while the y-intercepts are close to zero, indicating similar BPND of [18F]SDM-16 with [18F]SynVesT-1, [11C]UCB-J, and [11C]UCB-A. The BPND ratios are BPND([18F]SDM-16)/BPND([18F]SynVesT-1) = 0.99 and BPND([18F]SDM-16)/BPND([11C]UCB-J) = 1.41. Because we used different monkeys in the evaluations of these SV2A PET tracers, the BPND ratios or in vivo Kd ratios could be influenced by animal differences.
Next, we calculated the BPND values of the SV2A PET tracers using either CS as reference region or using the VND derived from blocking studies. We noticed that the BPND values calculated using the VT values of CS are 67.2 ± 4.4% lower than the true BPND derived from VND values. Contributing factors to the underestimation of BPND using CS as reference region are the spill-in effect of the PET signal from the gray matter surrounding CS and the presence of SV2A specific uptake in CS. The ranking order of [18F]SDM-16 BPND values in all ROIs (cingulate cortex > insula > frontal cortex > temporal cortex > putamen > caudate > cerebellum > hippocampus > brainstem > amygdala) is basically consistent with those of [11C]UCB-A, [18F]SynVesT-1, and [11C]UCB-J (Table 3). Note that the BPND values of [18F]SDM-16 calculated using VND method are generally higher than those of [11C]UCB-A, [18F]SynVesT-1, and [11C]UCB-J (Table 3 and Fig. 6). However, since the monkeys used in each tracer’s evaluation are different, further studies using the same cohort of monkeys are needed to confirm if [18F]SDM-16 possesses higher specific binding than the other SV2A PET tracers in NHP brains. An SV2A PET tracer with high specific binding signals will be advantageous in the imaging and quantification of SV2A in tissues with relatively low SV2A expression, e.g., spinal cord [12] and pancreas [53]. In fact, the BPND values of [18F]SDM-16 in the LEV blocking scan are relatively high in the gray matters (up to 2.11 in cingulate cortex and nucleus accumbens), even with 79% of the SV2A being occupied by LEV, indicating that [18F]SDM-16 is advantageous in the imaging and quantification of SV2A at much less densities than the cerebrum.
Conclusions
We have successfully synthesized a new 18F-labeled SV2A PET tracer [18F]SDM-16 and evaluated its imaging characteristics in rhesus monkeys. [18F]SDM-16 is metabolically more stable than the current SV2A PET tracers and displayed reversible and high specific binding in NHP brain with relatively low nonspecific binding in white matter. The TACs fitted well with 1TC to allow for reliable estimation of PK parameters. [18F]SDM-16 may have potential applications in the quantification of SV2A in the whole CNS.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the professional technical support by the Yale PET Center staff.
Funding
This study was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Archer Foundation. The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of the funding agencies. Financial support was received from R01AG058773. This publication was made possible by CTSA grant UL1 RR024139 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NIH.
Declarations
Ethical approval
PET imaging experiments were performed in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) according to a protocol approved by the Yale University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. All applicable international, national, and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Neurology
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Bajjalieh SM, Peterson K, Shinghal R, Scheller RH. SV2, a brain synaptic vesicle protein homologous to bacterial transporters. Science. 1992;257:1271–1273. doi: 10.1126/science.1519064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Crowder KM, Gunther JM, Jones TA, Hale BD, Zhang HZ, Peterson MR, et al. Abnormal neurotransmission in mice lacking synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A) Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1999;96:15268. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.26.15268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mendoza-Torreblanca JG, Vanoye-Carlo A, Phillips-Farfán BV, Carmona-Aparicio L, Gómez-Lira G. Synaptic vesicle protein 2A: basic facts and role in synaptic function. Eur J Neurosci. 2013;38:3529–3539. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lynch BA, Lambeng N, Nocka K, Kensel-Hammes P, Bajjalieh SM, Matagne A, et al. The synaptic vesicle protein SV2A is the binding site for the antiepileptic drug levetiracetam. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:9861. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0308208101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Finnema SJ, Nabulsi NB, Eid T, Detyniecki K, Lin S-f, Chen M-K, et al. Imaging synaptic density in the living human brain. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8:348ra96. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf6667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cai Z, Li S, Matuskey D, Nabulsi N, Huang Y. PET imaging of synaptic density: a new tool for investigation of neuropsychiatric diseases. Neurosci Lett. 2019;691:44–50. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.07.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Finnema SJ, Li S, Cai Z, Naganawa M, Chen M-K, Matuskey D, et al. PET Imaging of synaptic vesicle protein 2A. In: Dierckx RAJO, Otte A, de Vries EFJ, van Waarde A, Lammertsma AA, et al., editors. PET and SPECT of Neurobiological Systems. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021. pp. 993–1019. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Heurling K, Ashton NJ, Leuzy A, Zimmer ER, Blennow K, Zetterberg H, et al. Synaptic vesicle protein 2A as a potential biomarker in synaptopathies. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2019;97:34–42. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2019.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kreisl WC, Kim M-J, Coughlin JM, Henter ID, Owen DR, Innis RB. PET imaging of neuroinflammation in neurological disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19:940–950. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30346-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mecca AP, Chen M-K, O’Dell RS, Naganawa M, Toyonaga T, Godek TA, et al. In vivo measurement of widespread synaptic loss in Alzheimers’ disease with SV2A PET. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2020;16:974–982. doi: 10.1002/alz.12097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bajjalieh S, Frantz G, Weimann J, McConnell S, Scheller R. Differential expression of synaptic vesicle protein 2 (SV2) isoforms. J Neurosci. 1994;14:5223–5235. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-09-05223.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lambeng N, Gillard M, Vertongen P, Fuks B, Chatelain P. Characterization of [(3)H]ucb 30889 binding to synaptic vesicle protein 2A in the rat spinal cord. Eur J Pharmacol. 2005;520:70–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2005.07.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rossano S, Bini J, Nabulsi N, Ropchan J, Carson R. Feasibility of imaging synaptic density in the human spinal cord using [11C]-UCB-J PET. J Nucl Med. 2021;62:112. doi: 10.1186/s40658-022-00464-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bartanusz V, Jezova D, Alajajian B, Digicaylioglu M. The blood-spinal cord barrier: morphology and clinical implications. Ann Neurol. 2011;70:194–206. doi: 10.1002/ana.22421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Becker G, Dammicco S, Bahri MA, Salmon E. The rise of synaptic density PET imaging. Molecules. 2020;25:2303–23. doi: 10.3390/molecules25102303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Warnier C, Lemaire C, Becker G, Zaragoza G, Giacomelli F, Aerts J, et al. Enabling efficient positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A) with a robust and one-step radiosynthesis of a highly potent 18F-labeled ligand ([18F]UCB-H) J Med Chem. 2016;59:8955–8966. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Warnock GI, Aerts J, Bahri MA, Bretin F, Lemaire C, Giacomelli F, et al. Evaluation of 18F-UCB-H as a novel PET tracer for synaptic vesicle protein 2A in the brain. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:1336–1341. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.136143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bretin F, Bahri MA, Bernard C, Warnock G, Aerts J, Mestdagh N, et al. Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry for the novel SV2A radiotracer [(18)F]UCB-H: first-in-human study. Mol Imaging Biol. 2015;17:557–564. doi: 10.1007/s11307-014-0820-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Li S, Cai Z, Wu X, Holden D, Pracitto R, Kapinos M, et al. Synthesis and in vivo evaluation of a novel PET radiotracer for imaging of synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A) in nonhuman primates. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2019;10:1544–1554. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Constantinescu CC, Tresse C, Zheng M, Gouasmat A, Carroll VM, Mistico L, et al. Development and in vivo preclinical imaging of Fluorine-18-labeled synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A) PET tracers. Mol Imaging Biol. 2019;21:509–518. doi: 10.1007/s11307-018-1260-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cai Z, Li S, Zhang W, Pracitto R, Wu X, Baum E, et al. Synthesis and preclinical evaluation of an 18F-labeled synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A PET imaging probe: [18F]SynVesT-2. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2020;11:592–603. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.9b00618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Li S, Cai Z, Zhang W, Holden D, Lin S-f, Finnema SJ, et al. Synthesis and in vivo evaluation of [18F]UCB-J for PET imaging of synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A) Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:1952–65. doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04357-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chen MK, Mecca AP, Naganawa M, Finnema SJ, Toyonaga T, Lin SF, et al. Assessing synaptic density in Alzheimer disease with synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A positron emission tomographic imaging. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75:1215–1224. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.1836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Toyonaga T, Smith LM, Finnema SJ, Gallezot J-D, Naganawa M, Bini J, et al. In vivo synaptic density imaging with [11C]-UCB-J detects treatment effects of saracatinib in a mouse model of Alzheimer disease. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:1780. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.223867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Holmes SE, Scheinost D, Finnema SJ, Naganawa M, Davis MT, DellaGioia N, et al. Lower synaptic density is associated with depression severity and network alterations. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1529. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09562-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Nabulsi NB, Mercier J, Holden D, Carré S, Najafzadeh S, Vandergeten M-C, et al. Synthesis and preclinical evaluation of 11C-UCB-J as a PET tracer for imaging the synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A in the brain. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:777. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.168179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Becker G, Warnier C, Serrano ME, Bahri MA, Mercier J, Lemaire C, et al. Pharmacokinetic characterization of [18F]UCB-H PET radiopharmaceutical in the rat brain. Mol Pharm. 2017;14:2719–2725. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.7b00235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Estrada S, Lubberink M, Thibblin A, Sprycha M, Buchanan T, Mestdagh N, et al. [(11)C]UCB-A, a novel PET tracer for synaptic vesicle protein 2A. Nucl Med Biol. 2016;43:325–332. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2016.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lubberink M, Appel L, Daging J, Lindskog K, Danfors T, Larsson E-M, et al. Tracer kinetic analysis of the SV2A ligand C-11-UCBA as a PET marker for synaptic density in humans. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:631. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wilson AA, Jin L, Garcia A, DaSilva JN, Houle S. An admonition when measuring the lipophilicity of radiotracers using counting techniques. Appl Radiat Isot. 2001;54:203–208. doi: 10.1016/S0969-8043(00)00269-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hilton J, Yokoi F, Dannals RF, Ravert HT, Szabo Z, Wong DF. Column-switching HPLC for the analysis of plasma in PET imaging studies. Nucl Med Biol. 2000;27:627–630. doi: 10.1016/S0969-8051(00)00125-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cunningham VJ, Rabiner EA, Slifstein M, Laruelle M, Gunn RN. Measuring drug occupancy in the absence of a reference region: the Lassen plot re-visited. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2010;30:46–50. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2009.190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Patel S, Knight A, Krause S, Teceno T, Tresse C, Li S, et al. Preclinical in vitro and in vivo characterization of synaptic vesicle 2A-targeting compounds amenable to F-18 labeling as potential PET radioligands for imaging of synapse integrity. Mol Imaging Biol. 2020;22:832–841. doi: 10.1007/s11307-019-01428-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Pajouhesh H, Lenz GR. Medicinal chemical properties of successful central nervous system drugs. NeuroRx. 2005;2:541–553. doi: 10.1602/neurorx.2.4.541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Goutal S, Guillermier M, Becker G, Gaudin M, Bramoullé Y, Luxen A, et al. The pharmacokinetics of [18F]UCB-H revisited in the healthy non-human primate brain. EJNMMI Res. 2021;11:36. doi: 10.1186/s13550-021-00777-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Guo Q, Owen DR, Rabiner EA, Turkheimer FE, Gunn RN. A graphical method to compare the in vivo binding potential of PET radioligands in the absence of a reference region: application to [(1)(1)C]PBR28 and [(1)(8)F]PBR111 for TSPO imaging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2014;34:1162–1168. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Li S, Naganawa M, Pracitto R, Najafzadeh S, Holden D, Henry S, et al. Assessment of test-retest reproducibility of [18F]SynVesT-1, a novel radiotracer for PET imaging of synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021 doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-05149-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Icrp. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. Addendum 3 to ICRP Publication 53. ICRP Publication 106. Approved by the Commission in October 2007. Ann ICRP (2008). 38:1–197. 10.1016/j.icrp.2008.08.003 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 39.Deloar HM, Fujiwara T, Shidahara M, Nakamura T, Watabe H, Narita Y, et al. Estimation of absorbed dose for 2-[F-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose using whole-body positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Nucl Med. 1998;25:565–574. doi: 10.1007/s002590050257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hays MT, Watson EE, Thomas SR, Stabin M. MIRD dose estimate report no. 19: radiation absorbed dose estimates from (18)F-FDG. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:210–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Staaf J, Jacobsson H, Sanchez-Crespo A. A revision of the organ radiation doses from 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose with reference to tumour presence. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012;151:43–50. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncr471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Naganawa M, Li S, Nabulsi NB, Henry S, Zheng M-Q, Pracitto R, et al. First-in-human evaluation of 18F-SynVesT-1, a novel radioligand for PET imaging of synaptic vesicle protein 2A. J Nucl Med. 2020 doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.249144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Cai Z, Drake L, Naganawa M, Najafzadeh S, Pracitto R, Lindemann M, et al. First-in-human study of [18F]SynVesT-2, a novel SV2A radioligand with fast kinetics and high specific binding signals. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:462. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.119.235143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Dossetter AG, Douglas A, O'Donnell C. A matched molecular pair analysis of in vitro human microsomal metabolic stability measurements for heterocyclic replacements of di-substituted benzene containing compounds – identification of those isosteres more likely to have beneficial effects. Med Chem Comm. 2012;3:1164–1169. doi: 10.1039/C2MD20155K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lazzara PR, Moore TW. Scaffold-hopping as a strategy to address metabolic liabilities of aromatic compounds. RSC Med Chem. 2020;11:18–29. doi: 10.1039/C9MD00396G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lubberink M, Appel L, Daging J, Lindskog K, Danfors T, Larsson E-M, et al. Tracer kinetic analysis of the SV2A ligand 11C-UCBA as a PET marker for synaptic density in humans. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:631. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Waring MJ. Defining optimum lipophilicity and molecular weight ranges for drug candidates—molecular weight dependent lower logD limits based on permeability. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2009;19:2844–2851. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2009.03.109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Castro EA, Aliaga M, Santos JG. Kinetics and mechanism of the pyridinolysis of 4-nitrophenyl and 2,4-dinitrophenyl S-methyl thiocarbonates. J Org Chem. 2004;69:6711–6714. doi: 10.1021/jo048935b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Asaumi T, Matsuo T, Fukuyama T, Ie Y, Kakiuchi F, Chatani N. Ruthenium- and rhodium-catalyzed direct carbonylation of the ortho C-H bond in the benzene ring of N-arylpyrazoles. J Org Chem. 2004;69:4433–4440. doi: 10.1021/jo049864j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Eisch JJ. Physical methods in heterocyclic chemistry. Volumes 1 and 2 (Katritzky, A. R., ed.). J. Chem. Educ. 1964;41:A126. 10.1021/ed041pA126.1.
- 51.Manallack DT, Prankerd RJ, Yuriev E, Oprea TI, Chalmers DK. The significance of acid/base properties in drug discovery. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42:485–496. doi: 10.1039/c2cs35348b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Di L, Umland JP, Chang G, Huang Y, Lin Z, Scott DO, et al. Species independence in brain tissue binding using brain homogenates. Drug Metab Dispos. 2011;39:1270. doi: 10.1124/dmd.111.038778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Bini J, Naganawa M, Nabulsi N, Huang Y, Ropchan J, Lim K, et al. Evaluation of PET brain radioligands for imaging pancreatic β-cell mass: potential utility of (11)C-(+)-PHNO. J Nucl Med 2018;59:1249–54. 10.2967/jnumed.117.197285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 54.Pracitto R, Wilcox KC, Lindemann M, et al. Further Investigation of Synaptic Vesicle Protein 2A (SV2A) Ligands Designed for Positron Emission Tomography and Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Imaging: Synthesis and StructureActivity Relationship of Substituted Pyridinylmethyl-4-(3,5-difluorophenyl)pyrrolidin-2-ones. ACS Omega 2021. 10.1021/acsomega.1c02433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.