Skip to main content
Anaesthesia Reports logoLink to Anaesthesia Reports
letter
. 2022 Mar 22;10(1):e12155. doi: 10.1002/anr3.12155

Near total intrathoracic airway obstruction managed with a Tritube (R) and flow‐controlled ventilation: a reply.

L Böttinger 1, J Uriarte 2, J W A van der Hoorn 3,
PMCID: PMC8941302  PMID: 35360362

We would like to thank the Editor for the opportunity to respond to the report by Dr Mallam and colleagues. The ultrathin Tritube (R) in combination with both mechanical ventilator Evone (R) and manual ventilator Ventrain (R) (all Ventinova Medical BV, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) were chosen for airway management and ventilation in a patient with acute, near total airway obstruction. The authors describe unexpected complications related to the use of the devices, which we address in this correspondence.

We would like to acknowledge the stressful situation encountered by the authors during this case. Following this case an immediate correspondence was initiated by the hospital’s senior airway surgeon and the hospital’s senior airway lead. Thanks to a clear and open communication to the manufacturer, appropriate measures were expedited. A field safety notice was filed, and all affected Evone devices were temporarily placed under quarantine. Upon identification of the root cause, a solution was implemented through a software upgrade which addressed the challenges described in this publication. Competent authorities, including the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency were subsequently satisfied with the handling of the problem and the solution provided, and all Evone devices were released from quarantine. To date, no comparable incidences have been reported to the manufacturer. Ventinova is aware of frequent use of Evone and Tritube for various indications in many countries.

Apart from the technical issues related to Evone the authors describe sudden ventilatory problems, which could not directly be linked to an obvious obstruction of Tritube. Based on the description provided, such issues might occur due to an altered positioning of Tritube, such as upon surgical manipulation too close to the carina with the mucous membrane and/or viscous secretions (that are likely with described pathology) causing a valve mechanism occlusion. However, as more data are lacking, the exact reason remains unclear.

Additionally, questions were raised on the suitability of Ventrain as a backup tool for ventilation in obstructed airways. We agree with the authors that proper use of Ventrain and Tritube requires careful monitoring of intra‐tracheal pressures, which can be easily done by connecting a manometer to the pressure lumen of the Tritube [1]. Alternatively, in a sealed or (nearly) obstructed airway, it is recommended to include a sufficiently long equilibration period every five ventilation cycles to avoid excessive positive or negative pressure in the lungs (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Cross section of Ventrain. 1: Gas inlet connected to oxygen source. 2: Jet nozzle accelerating the velocity of oxygen flow. 3: Exhaust pipe facilitating the exit of gas during expiration and equilibration. 4: Side‐port connected to patient. 5: Bypass allowing air to enter the ejector (on/off switch). (a) Equilibration position with open bypass. No clinically‐relevant flow to and from the patient (= equilibration with atmosphere). (b) Inspiration position with both exhaust pipe and bypass closed. (c) Expiration position with exhaust pipe open and bypass closed. Used with permission of Ventinova Medical BV, Eindhoven, the Netherlands

The clinical application of Ventrain, including its potential advantages over alternative techniques, has been described in detail [2]. Several studies have demonstrated that Ventrain is the safest and most efficient device for ventilation in a (near) complete airway obstruction [3, 4, 5], and its successful use in emergency situations has been published [6, 7]. However, we would like to emphasise that Ventinova strongly advises users to complete the required training before device use to assure safe application of Ventrain in emergencies.

Finally, we agree with the authors that flow‐controlled ventilation using Evone in combination with Tritube represents a valuable solution for managing complex difficult airway cases, as it has been successfully used by others for this purpose [8, 9, 10].

Acknowledgements

No external funding or competing interests declared.

References

  • 1. Kristensen MS, de Wolf MWP, Rasmussen LS. Ventilation via the 2.4 mm internal diameter Tritube® with cuff ‐ new possibilities in airway management. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavia 2017; 61: 580–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Morrison S, Aerts S, Saldien V. The Ventrain device: a future role in difficult airway algorithms? A&A Practice 2019; 13: 362–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Paxian M, Preussler NP, Reinz T, Schlueter A, Gottschall R. Transtracheal ventilation with a novel ejector‐based device (Ventrain) in open or totally closed upper airways in pigs. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2015; 115: 308–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Hamaekers AE, van der Beek T, Theunissen M, Enk D. Rescue ventilation through a small‐bore transtracheal cannula in severe hypoxic pigs using expiratory ventilation assistance. Anesthesia Analgesia 2015; 120: 890–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Mann CM, Baker PA, Sainsbury DM, Taylor R. A comparison of cannula insufflation device performance for emergency front of neck airway. Pediatric Anesthesia 2021; 31: 482–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Heuveling DA, Mahieu HF, Jongsma‐van Netten HG, Gerling V. Transtracheal use of the cricath cannula in combination with the Ventrain device for prevention of hypoxic arrest due to severe upper airway obstruction: a case report. A&A Practice 2018; 11: 344–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Morrison S, Aerts S, Rompaey DV, Vanderveken O. Failed awake intubation for critical airway obstruction rescued with the Ventrain device and an arndt exchange catheter. A&A Practice. 2019; 13: 23–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Shallik N, Elarref M, Khamash O, et al. Management of critical tracheal stenosis with a straw sized tube (Tritube): case report. Qatar Medical Journal 2020; 2020: 48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Yilbas AA, Melek A, Canbay O, Kanbak M. Experience with Tritube and flow‐controlled ventilation during airway surgery. Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation 2021; 49: 269–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Bailey JR, Lee C, Nouraei R, et al. Laryngectomy with a Tritube® and flow‐controlled ventilation. Anaesthesia Reports 2021; 9: 86–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Anaesthesia Reports are provided here courtesy of Association of Anaesthetists and Wiley

RESOURCES