Abstract
The Large Sky Area Multi-Object Fiber Spectroscopic Telescope (LAMOST), also known as the Guoshoujing Telescope, is a major national scientific facility for astronomical research located in Xinglong, China. Beginning with a pilot survey in 2011, LAMOST has been surveying the night sky for more than 10 years. The LAMOST survey covers various objects in the Universe, from normal stars to peculiar ones, from the Milky Way to other galaxies, and from stellar black holes and their companions to quasars that ignite ancient galaxies. Until the latest data release 8, the LAMOST survey has released spectra for more than 10 million stars, ∼220,000 galaxies, and ∼71,000 quasars. With this largest celestial spectra database ever constructed, LAMOST has helped astronomers to deepen their understanding of the Universe, especially for our Milky Way galaxy and the millions of stars within it. In this article, we briefly review the characteristics, observations, and scientific achievements of LAMOST. In particular, we show how astrophysical knowledge about the Milky Way has been improved by LAMOST data.
Keywords: LAMOST, spectroscopic survey, stars, Milky Way, black holes
Graphical abstract

Public summary
-
•
LAMOST is an innovative telescope designed with both a large-aperture and a wide-FOV for astronomical spectroscopic survey
-
•
LAMOST observed over 10 million objects in our Galaxy, and constructed the largest spectroscopic dataset
-
•
LAMOST data changed the astrophysical viewpoint in the fields including stars, the Milky Way, exoplanets, and black holes
Introduction
A direct and effective way to study the Universe is to observe celestial bodies (also called celestial objects) using telescopes. To obtain statistical information about these objects and study the physical rules that govern them, observations are usually performed in such a way that the telescope does not have a specific target or a position to point at; rather, it scans the entirety of the observable sky within several years. This is called a survey.
Surveys are a powerful way to gain knowledge about the Universe; however, they require the telescope to have a large aperture and a wide field of view (FOV) at the same time, which is difficult to design due to the limitation of optical systems.1 A large aperture ensures that the telescope can capture as many photons as possible in a unit of time, thereby achieving a lower detection limit and improving data quality, whereas a wide FOV allows the telescope to capture as large an area as possible in a single exposure, thus improving the efficiency of the survey.
The innovative design of the Large Sky Area Multi-Object Fiber Spectroscopic Telescope (LAMOST) (Figure 1) was proposed in the 1990s by Chinese astronomers.2 To fulfill the aforementioned requirements, LAMOST was specifically designed as an active reflecting Schmidt telescope with the capacity for continuously changing its mirror surface to achieve a series of different reflecting Schmidt systems. LAMOST consists of three major components (Figure 1): an active aspherical correcting mirror (Ma), a spherical primary mirror (Mb), and a focal surface with fibers. These three major components are lined up along the Earth’s longitude (the meridian plane). Ma is located in the north, Mb in the south, and the focal surface is between them. They form a +25° inclination to the horizontal from Ma to Mb. Both mirrors are segmented and Ma can change its surface shape, a property continuously controlled by the active optics technique. LAMOST has a variable effective aperture from 3.6 to 4.9 m and a FOV of 5° (see supplemental information and Table S1 for more details).
Figure 1.
Structure and optical path of LAMOST
The characteristic appearance of LAMOST is evidently different from telescopes using the traditional optical design. The red solid line with arrows indicate the path of light traveling from the objects to the focal surface. CCD, Charge-Coupled Device
To date, LAMOST has released ∼17 million spectra, and this number continues to increase. Since 2014, the LAMOST dataset has been the largest spectral dataset ever obtained. These data have enabled research in a number of cutting-edge topics in astronomy, especially stellar physics and Milky Way (MW) sciences. In this paper, we review the scientific achievements obtained through the LAMOST survey. In the following section, we present information about the LAMOST survey. After that, we review its scientific achievements and show how our understanding of the Universe has changed. A brief perspective is then presented, with a short summary to conclude the article.
LAMOST survey
Observation
The LAMOST survey typically consists of 9–10 months of observing nights during its 1-year cycle. Observations usually begin in September or October and end in June of the following year. After the observing season, the telescope can take a break in July and August for instrument maintenance. The observational strategies are discussed and scheduled by the scientific committee, which consists of scientists from a broad range of astrophysical fields to ensure that all of the scientific cases of interest are covered by the LAMOST survey.3
To improve the instrumental performance, LAMOST initiated the pilot survey in October 2011, which lasted for 9 months. After the pilot survey, LAMOST launched its regular survey from September 2012, which lasted for 5 years. The 1-year pilot survey plus the 5-year regular survey is usually referred to as the low-resolution spectroscopic survey (LRS), as the spectra obtained during this period were at a resolution power of ∼1,800. The LAMOST-LRS consisted of two main parts:3 The LAMOST Experiment for Galactic Understanding and Exploration (LEGUE) survey4 aimed to study the stars and the MW itself. The LAMOST Extra Galactic Survey (LEGAS) focused mainly on the sciences of galaxies and cosmology. There are also several highly specialized programs, such as the LAMOST Spectroscopic Surveys for Galactic Anti-Center5,6 (LSS-GAC) or the LAMOST-Kepler project.7,8 For the LRS, the spectral wavelength coverage was from 370 to 900 nm, and the magnitude range of the targets was 9.0 ≤ rmag ≤ 17.5 mag.
Following a full year of testing, a new survey mode with a resolution power of R ∼7,500 began in September 2018. This new mode was referred to as the medium-resolution spectroscopic survey9 (MRS). It was planned that the LAMOST-MRS would also last for 5 years, until June 2023. In the MRS mode, the spectral wavelength coverage is from 495 to 535 nm for the blue band and from 630 to 680 nm for the red band. The magnitude range of targets for the MRS is 9.0 ≤ Gmag ≤ 15.0 mag. It is noted that approximately half of the observing time was for acquiring MRS spectra since 2018, while the other half was for the LRS mode to cover unobserved areas from the LAMOST-LRS or newly added targets of interest. LAMOST can readily switch between these two modes (see the supplemental information and Table S2 for more details regarding the LRS and MRS).
In Figure 2, we show representative spectra for observed objects (panel A) and the observation footprint (panels B and C) of LAMOST. The coverage of the sky is essentially homogeneous, and the gap between ∼285°–315° of right ascension corresponds to the summer maintenance period. For more detailed information about the survey, readers are referred to Zhao et al. (2012)3 and Liu et al. (2020)9 for the LRS and MRS, respectively.
Figure 2.
LAMOST spectra and observation footprint
Representative spectra for observed objects (A) and the observation footprint (B and C). At the top of (A), we show the blue and red bands of the MRS spectra for a G-type star, followed by the LRS spectra of a quasar (QSO), an emission-line galaxy, a white dwarf (WD), and 7 stars with spectral types O, B, A, F, G, K, and M, respectively. In (B) and (C), we show the footprints of the LRS and MRS, respectively. The dotted lines in (B) and (C) indicate the equatorial coordinate system.
Data release
LAMOST has released ∼17 million spectra to the public before the end of 2021 and has released data every year. In general, the data obtained in an observation season will be released in March of the next year to Chinese users, then to international users after 18 months. The dataset released to the public contains not only new data from the previous observation season but also older data for all of the past seasons that have been reduced and analyzed by the most up-to-date version of the data pipeline (see supplemental information for details), the LAMOST Stellar Parameter Pipeline10 (LASP). Information for the latest data release 8 (DR8) is shown for the LRS and MRS in Tables S3 and S4, respectively. Aside from the LASP, a number of research teams have developed their own pipelines, such as the LAMOST Stellar Parameter Pipeline at Peking University11 (LSP3) and SPAce.12 For more detailed information on the data pipeline, the readers are referred to Luo et al. (2015).10
In Figure 3, we show the overall information derived from LASP for stars in the LRS. Stars observed by LAMOST are dominated by F, G, and K types in either the main sequence (the longest and most stable phase in the lifetime of a star during which hydrogen fusion occurs in the core) or evolved phases (after a star has exhausted the hydrogen in its core).
Figure 3.
Overall distribution of the LAMOST-LRS stars released by DR8 version 1.0
(A) The Hertzsprung-Russell diagram of the entire LAMOST-LRS sample with different number densities coded by different colors (indicated at top left).
(B–D) The distribution of these stars in single dimension of stellar parameters, including effective temperature (blue), surface gravity (green), and metallicity (yellow), respectively.
Comparison with other spectroscopic surveys
A number of other spectroscopic surveys have overlapped in time with LAMOST. For ease of comparison, we divide these surveys into two groups. “Current surveys” consist of survey projects that either have been completed or are still ongoing, while “imminent surveys” consist of surveys that have just started or are planned in the near future, with data products to be released in the early 2020s.
In Table 1, we briefly list the features of these representative survey projects together with those of the LAMOST survey. Among the current surveys,1,13, 14, 15, 16, 17 LAMOST,1 the Sloan Extension for Galactic Understanding and Exploration (SEGUE),14 and the Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment (APOGEE)15 mainly cover the northern sky, while the Radial Velocity Experiment (RAVE),13 Galactic Archaeology High Efficiency and Resolution Multi-Element Spectrograph (GALAH),16 and the Gaia-European Southern Observatory (Gaia-ESO)17 cover the southern sky. The most significant advantage of the LAMOST survey is its uniquely high efficiency in obtaining stellar spectra. The survey products of LAMOST significantly enlarge the current database, providing an important reservoir of stellar spectra in the northern sky, especially in the direction of the anti-Galactic center. However, the LAMOST survey also forms a good complement with the APOGEE, GALAH, and Gaia-ESO surveys in wavelength coverage and sky area. For example, in the current surveys group, the APOGEE survey uniquely provides infrared spectra, which allows astronomers to study the Galactic bulge, while the GALAH survey covers the southern sky, supplementing various Galactic components and structures that cannot be observed from the northern hemisphere.
Table 1.
Large-scale spectroscopic survey projects
| Survey name | R | Wavelength coverage (μm) | No. fibers | Limiting magnitude (mag) | No. spectra (106) | Sky coverage (mainly) | Schedule |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current survey | |||||||
| LAMOSTa | 1,800 | 0.37–0.90 | 4,000 | r ≤ 17.8 | 11.0 | Northern sky | 2011– |
| 7,500 | 0.49–0.54 | G ≤ 15 | 6.0 | 2018– | |||
| 0.60–0.68 | |||||||
| RAVEb | 7,500 | 0.84–0.88 | 400 | I < 12 | 0.5 | Southern sky | 2003–2013 |
| SEGUEc | 2,000 | 0.38–0.92 | 320 | g < 19 | 0.4 | Northern sky | 2004–2009 |
| APOGEEd | 22,500 | 1.51–1.69 | 300 | H < 12.2 | 0.6 | Northern sky | 2011–2020 |
| GALAHe | 28,000 | 0.47–0.49 | 400 | G ≤ 13 | 0.8 | Southern sky | 2015– |
| 0.56–0.59 | |||||||
| 0.64–0.68 | |||||||
| 0.75–0.79 | |||||||
| Gaia-ESOf | 17,000 | 0.40–0.68 | 132 | V ≤ 19 | 0.1 | Southern sky | 2013-2018 |
| 47,000 | 8 | V ≤ 16.5 | |||||
| Imminent surveyl | |||||||
| SDSS-Vg | 2,000 | 0.37–1.00 | 500 | i < 20 | 7.0 | All sky | 2021– |
| 22,000 | 1.51–1.70 | 300 | H < 13.4 | ||||
| DESIh | ∼4,000 | 0.36–0.98 | 5,000 | z < 21.5 | 40.0 | Northern sky | 2021– |
| WEAVEi | 5,000 | 0.37–0.95 | 1,000 | G < 19 | 15.0 | Northern sky | – |
| 20,000 | 0.41–0.46 | ||||||
| 0.60–0.68 | |||||||
| 4MOSTj | 5,000 | 0.40–0.90 | 800 | r ≤ 22 | 10.0 | Southern sky | 2023– |
| 20,000 | 1,600 | V ≤ 16 | |||||
| MOONSk | >4,100 | 0.65–1.80 | 1,000 | H < 24 | 2.0 | Southern sky | 2022– |
| 9,200 | 0.76–0.89 | H < 18.5 | |||||
| 18,300 | 1.52–1.64 | ||||||
RAVE:13 The Radial Velocity Experiment survey, https://www.rave-survey.org.
SEGUE:14 The Sloan Extension for Galactic Understanding and Exploration survey, https://www.sdss.org/surveys/segue/.
APOGEE:15 The Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment survey, https://www.sdss.org/surveys/apogee/.
GALAH:16 The Galactic Archaeology with Hermes survey, https://www.galah-survey.org.
Gaia-ESO:17 The Gaia-European Southern Observatory survey, https://www.gaia-eso.eu.
SDSS-V:18 The Sloan Digital Sky Survey’ fifth generation, https://www.sdss5.org.
DESI:19 The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument survey, https://www.desi.lbl.gov.
WEAVE:20 The William Herschel Telescope Enhanced Area Velocity Explorer, https://www.ing.iac.es//confluence/display/WEAV/The+WEAVE+Project.
4MOST:21 The 4-m Multi-Object Spectroscopic Telescope survey, https://www.4most.eu/cms/.
MOONS:22 The Multi-object Optical and Near-IR Spectrograph survey, https://vltmoons.org.
Not all planned modes are listed.
Although the imminent surveys18, 19, 20, 21, 22 are overall technically superior to those of the current ones, there is nonetheless still great potential for synergy with LAMOST. The imminent surveys will provide spectra at higher resolutions for more distant stars. The specific areas of focus will be the Galactic bulge (Sloan Digital Sky Survey-V [SDSS-V]18), thick disk (SDSS-V and the William Herschel Telescope Enhanced Area Velocity Explorer [WEAVE]20), halo (Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument [DESI]19), nearby galaxies (WEAVE), and very distant galaxies (DESI). Compared with the northern imminent surveys, the current LAMOST data, even without consideration of future updates, provides a competitively large number of spectra for stars in the thin disk and solar vicinity with a similar level of data volume.
Aside from spectroscopic surveys, LAMOST also synergizes with astrometric/photometric surveys and spaceborne missions, which is described using scientific examples in the following section.
Scientific achievements of the LAMOST survey
LAMOST opened a new window for astrophysicists to rediscover the Universe and MW by providing a vast collection of spectra that was previously unachievable. Since its commissioning phase, LAMOST data have produced a number of scientific results.23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 In Figure 4, we show statistical information from the Web of Science (https://www.webofscience.com/) about scientific publications based on LAMOST data. Up to the end of 2021, more than 900 scientific papers had been published in academic journals worldwide. Both the number of papers and citations have been increasing steadily. LAMOST data also gained broad attention from the international astronomical community, with approximately 40% of LAMOST scientific papers published by research teams abroad. In this section, we briefly review the research and scientific achievements accomplished using LAMOST data.
Figure 4.
Information of scientific papers using LAMOST data
Number of scientific papers published using LAMOST data (A) and the citation numbers to these works (B) up to the end of 2021. Data are from the Web of Science.
Obtain fundamental parameters and value-added catalogs
Revealing the physics of stars, planets, and the MW requires accurate characterization of stellar physical properties. In particular, unraveling the structure and assembly history of the MW with LAMOST has been established through obtaining accurate knowledge about the physical information delivered from the spectra for millions of stars, such as their radial velocities (RVs), masses, ages, and chemical compositions. A number of works have demonstrated that precise stellar atmospheric parameters can be estimated from the R ∼1,800 spectra, with a precision of 100 K in effective temperature (Teff), 0.1 dex in surface gravity (logg), 0.1 dex in metallicity ([Fe/H]) given a spectral signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) higher than 50 per pixel.29, 30, 31 Furthermore, for the first time, individual elemental abundances for 16 elements (C, N, O, Na, Mg, Al, Si, Ca, Ti, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, and Ba) have been delivered from the exceptionally large number of LRS spectra.30,32 These achievements have been built on both the innovative spectral modeling30,32,33 and the effective synergy between LAMOST and other surveys, especially the high-resolution spectroscopic surveys such as APOGEE15 and GALAH,16 the photometric transit survey of the Kepler34 mission, and the astrometric survey of the Gaia35 mission. These synergies provide uniform and high-precision training and calibration sets, which provides an important basis for LAMOST stellar parameter estimation.29, 30, 31,36, 37, 38
The stellar age is of vital importance when disentangling stellar populations and tracing the Galactic formation and evolution history. Limited by the availability of precise stellar atmospheric parameters, robust stellar age estimates were restricted to only a small number of stars (∼10,000) in the solar neighborhood.39,40 Precise stellar parameters obtained through LAMOST spectra thus allowed robust age estimates for millions of stars beyond the solar neighborhood41, 42, 43, 44, 45 (Figure 5), providing cornerstone data for unraveling the assembly and evolution history of the MW46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51 and studying stellar astrophysics.52, 53, 54
Figure 5.
Spatial variation of stellar age across our Galaxy in the Galactic coordinates (l,b)
The image center is the Galactic anticenter (l = 180°, b = 0°). The figure was adapted from Figure 17 of Xiang et al. (2017).41
Complementary to the official DR, extensive value-added stellar parameter catalogs created by LAMOST users6,12,30,41,44,55, 56, 57 are publicly available. For example, value-added catalogs for the LSS-GAC5,6 provide RVs, Teff, logg, [Fe/H], [α/Fe], [C/H], and [N/H] derived using LSP3,11,58 as well as the extinction, distance, and orbital parameters further inferred from these data.
Gain deep insights into the stars
Stars with chemical peculiarity
Some stars (usually not in great numbers) show peculiar chemical features—for example, an overabundance of certain elements. Such stars are important since they either reflect formation scenarios different from the classical theory or they may have experienced a distinct evolution history compared to the majority of stars in the MW.
One type of peculiar star is the lithium (Li)-rich low-mass evolved star or the so-called Li-rich giant.59 Approximately 1% of evolved stars show anomalously high Li abundances (ALi) that conflict with the standard stellar evolutionary model.60 The number of Li-rich stars has been dramatically expanded dozens of times using LAMOST data.61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66 LAMOST has discovered the most Li-rich giant stars (Figure 6) in the MW, with an ALi of 4.51 dex.67 The Li content in this star is ∼3,000 times higher than that of the Sun. LAMOST has also found a metal-poor turnoff star with extremely high Li abundance.68 Li-rich giants were previously thought to be mainly red giant branch (RGB) stars; however, such viewpoints have been revolutionized with the help of LAMOST data.69 With the exception of highly evolved stars, ∼80% of Li-rich giants are at the red clump (RC) phase, whereas RGBs are in the minority.62,69 Detailed analyses reveal a series of new features in Li-rich giants,69 indicating different origins of these two types. One possible scenario for the overabundant Li in RC stars was proposed based on the GALAH and LAMOST surveys. The helium (He) flash that ignites the He core of stars may be the same process that enriches Li, indicating that Li production in low-mass evolved stars could be a universal phenomenon.70, 71, 72
Figure 6.
Artist’s depiction of the most Li-rich giant TYC429-2097-1 and its spectrum (bottom left) taken by LAMOST
This star was discovered by the LAMOST-LRS. The Li I line in the subframe is clearly visible from R ∼1,800 spectrum. The spectrum is from Yan et al. (2018).67
The LAMOST survey has enabled systematic searching for stars with peculiar chemical features and greatly expanded the known sample, including carbon stars,73, 74, 75 nitrogen-enriched stars,76,77 α-deficient stars,78 stars enriched in the elements produced by the s- and r-processes,52,79 and magnetic chemically peculiar stars.80 The significantly enlarged samples provide unique opportunities for astronomers to investigate the origins of such objects, often leading to the discovery of new stellar phenomena, previously unknown stellar evolution pathways, and new scientific laws.
Low-mass and massive stars
M dwarf stars are the most abundant objects in the MW. They are perfect tracers of the chemodynamic properties of the solar neighborhood and the most preferred candidates around which to search for exoplanets.81 In addition, being among the most luminous objects in the Universe, M giants are regarded as ideal tracers to explore the structure of the outer disk and distant halo of the MW. A number of efforts have been made to search for M dwarf82, 83, 84 and M giant85 stars using LAMOST data since its pilot survey, which has also resulted in a better understanding of the physical properties of M-type stars.86 Recently, Xiang et al.87 made a further advancement by presenting the largest catalog of M-type stars using LAMOST DR5. In total, 39,796 M giants and 501,152 M dwarfs have been identified. Until the latest DR8, the number of M-type stars released has been increased to more than 700,000. Such a database provides a valuable source for the study of Galactic star formation histories and evolution through the window of M-type stars.
Massive stars (eg, O/B-type stars) are rare, especially in comparison to M-type stars, but are equally important. Through powerful stellar winds and supernova (SN) explosions, massive stars can strongly influence the chemical and dynamic evolution of galaxies. Important progress in the field of O/B stars has also been made based on LAMOST data. Using LAMOST DR5, the largest O/B-type star catalog of 16,032 such stars has been established,88 for which key physical parameters have also been derived.89 A number of peculiar O-type stars were simultaneously discovered, such as the very rare Oe stars, which present O-type spectra with the emission of H lines but without N III λ4634−4640−4642 or He II λ4686 emission features.90
Stars with intrinsic brightness variation
LAMOST offers an opportunity to support spaceborne photometry. A series of projects91, 92, 93 have been performed to combine LAMOST spectra and Kepler photometry, with the expectation of fruitful advances in stellar physics.
Stellar flares and spots, activities that encompass a range of phenomena produced by dynamo action in the interior of a star, are related to stellar magnetism, rotation, differential rotation, and subphotospheric convection. Improving our knowledge of their origin and the prediction of their strength is vital to understanding stellar processes within our Solar System. If a solar superflare were to occur, the survival of the Earth’s atmosphere and human life would be jeopardized. The physical processes of flares and spots can be investigated by monitoring the luminosity variations of stars94 as well as by measuring the strength of particular lines—for instance, Ca II K or Hα, using LAMOST spectra.95 Statistical analyses of a large sample of stars suggest that 10% of superflare events occurring on other stars show magnetic strengths similar to, or even weaker than, solar values.96 Using the dedicated measurements of photometric variability for solar-like stars, another study finds that the Sun is less active than its identical cousins.97,98
Pulsating stars characterized by luminosity variations are found across almost the entire Hertzsprung-Russell diagram; their brightness variations provide a unique opportunity to probe their interiors and chemical profiles via asteroseismology.99 Seismic characterization shapes stellar evolutionary theory by requiring the development of more detailed and precise theories on stellar processes.100 As an input constraint, atmospheric parameters derived from spectra help to reduce the searching space before proceeding with seismic modeling101 or mass estimation of companion stars detected using the pulsation timing method.102 New methods to search for pulsating stars are advanced through well-derived atmospheric parameters such as logg and Teff provided by LAMOST. For instance, the instability stripe of the pulsating H atmosphere white dwarfs is pure—in other words, a star evolving through that region in the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram must be pulsating.103 The LAMOST-observed white dwarfs104 and hot B subdwarfs105,106 have been used to discover pulsating white dwarfs107 and to provide extensive high-quality spectra that compliment photometric observations from ongoing or upcoming spaceborne missions.108,109
Binaries
Repeated measurements of LAMOST RVs allow detection110 and characterization of large samples of binary stars, in particular eclipsing binaries. Investigations of binary systems open the floodgates to a wealth of astrophysical knowledge. For instance, the combination of RV and photometry allows binary star orbital solutions to be comprehensively derived, which is crucial to constrain the theory of stellar evolution (eg, the exemplary case of systems containing a white dwarf and cool subdwarf111). In addition, binaries allow a more detailed analysis of stellar activity;112 however, most binary systems are spatially unresolved and challenging to identify with a high degree of completeness. The synergy between Gaia and LAMOST provides an efficient way of identifying binary systems with high mass ratios via the difference between their geometric parallax and spectrophotometric parallax.57
While direct methods to identify binaries are usually biased to certain types of binaries113 and limited to the solar neighborhood, large-scale surveys such as LAMOST enable statistical studies of binary fractions and properties. For example, by modeling variations in RVs from multiple LAMOST observations, binary fractions are found to be larger for metal-poor and hot stars,114 whereas this conclusion is at odds for wide binaries.115,116 Modeling color offsets with respect to the metallicity-dependent stellar locus, which is sensitive to neither the period nor mass-ratio distributions of binaries, Yuan et al. (2015)117 provided a model-free estimate of the binary fraction for field FGK stars and found that the Galactic halo contains a larger fraction of binaries than the Galactic disk. Using the same technique, Niu et al. (2021)118 found different effects of the chemical abundances on binary fractions for thin- and thick-disk stars, which are likely related to their distinct formation histories. By modeling magnitude offsets with respect to single stars, Liu (2019)119 reported clear evidence of dynamic processes within solar-type field binary stars, which tends to destroy binaries with smaller primary mass, smaller mass-ratio, and wider separation in star clusters.
Hypervelocity stars
The huge number of LAMOST stellar spectra available provide a great opportunity to discover hypervelocity stars. Following the first discovery of a hypervelocity star using LAMOST data in 2014,120 tens of hypervelocity stars or candidates have been identified.121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126 Detailed analyses of this sample will be advantageous to understanding the diversity and origin of hypervelocity stars.
Reshape the understanding of the MW
Constraining the formation and evolution of the galaxies is among the most challenging tasks facing modern astrophysics. Our own galaxy, the MW, provides a unique opportunity to study a galaxy in exquisite detail. The accomplishment of this goal relies on large surveys that characterize the position, motion, chemical compositions, and ages of millions of stars.127 This was the key scientific goal of LAMOST as one of the most efficient spectroscopic survey telescopes in the world.3,4
MW disk
LAMOST has conducted the first deep, spatially contiguous spectroscopic survey of the anticenter disk using a simple but well-defined target selection function.5,6,128 The resulting data products, especially when combining with Gaia and other surveys, are improving our knowledge about the MW disk.
First, LAMOST data enable us to determine and renew some fundamental parameters of the MW disk: (1) new determinations of the velocity of the Sun129 and confirmation that the value of V⊙ is larger than previous results;130 (2) the accurate rotation curve of the MW disk;131 (3) local dark matter density;132,133 and (4) the size of the MW disk is found to be significantly larger than previously known134 (Figure 7).
Figure 7.
Examples of how our understanding of the Milky Way (MW) has been improved by LAMOST data
It is has been realized that the Galactic disk is not flat; rather, it has been warped and perturbated during the evolutionary history of the MW. Mergers with many smaller galaxies is believed to be a key mechanism that has forged the Galactic disk we see today. Smaller galaxies caught by the gravitational potential of the MW were stripped off, and eventually became tidal streams distributed around our Galaxy, which can be clearly seen from telescopes such as LAMOST. The light blue stream refers to one of the historical remains of such events, the remnants of the Sagittarius dwarf spheroidal galaxy. Our Sun is indicated with a red dot in the main frame. The subframe shows the perceived size of the MW, which has been enlarged from ∼50,000 light-years to ∼62,000 light-years, and then to ∼100,000 light-years by LAMOST. The MW disk flaring phenomenon was also clearly revealed by LAMOST, as indicated by the red curve in the subframe. This figure is driven by scientific data but optimized for visualization.
Second, LAMOST has yielded extensive new results about stellar populations, structures, and chemodynamic evolution of the MW disk. Using LAMOST data, a 3-dimensional stellar-mass density distribution to ∼4 kpc from the Sun was precisely estimated for the first time.47 The stellar mass was found to be distributed non-smoothly but highly structured throughout the MW disk. In particular, the stellar-mass density at a radius of ∼8 kpc is significantly higher than previous estimates135 by approximately 0.016 M⊙/pc3.47 The disk flaring phenomenon was clearly revealed by LAMOST47,136,137 (Figure 7), which was found to be a ubiquitous phenomenon for all monoage populations. Complex features in the stellar distribution throughout the outer disk revealed by LAMOST47,138 reflect a significantly perturbated disk (Figure 7) evolution history.139,140
It is believed that the stellar disk has undergone significant external and internal perturbations.141,142 Gaia data have led to discoveries of numerous fine structures in the stellar disk—for example, the “snail shell” feature in the phase-space143 and the diagonal ridge patterns in phase-space;143,144 however, the scientific ability of the Gaia data alone is limited due to its lack of stellar RVs. The synergy between LAMOST and Gaia, as well as other surveys, has led to extensive studies into the disk velocity field.49, 50, 51,141,145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151 For example, Tian et al. (2018)145 found that the snail shell feature may be caused by perturbation during the last 500 million years. Wang et al. (2019)146 found that the snail shell feature becomes more relaxed with increasing radius, consistent with predictions that the perturbation was caused by an external intruder. Wang et al. (2020)50 studied the diagonal ridge pattern of stellar populations with different ages, and found evidence for two types of dynamic origins. The stellar age-velocity dispersion relation was also studied extensively with LAMOST data.152, 153, 154 Wu et al. (2021)51 mapped the relation between kinematics, age, and metallicity, and found that stellar migrators in the solar nearby were not only from the inner disk but also from the outer disk.
Conducting a pioneering study of the radial and vertical metallicity gradients for monoage disk stellar populations from LAMOST, Xiang et al. (2015)46 revealed that the disk assembly had experienced two phases that transited at 8–11 Gyr ago. Wang et al. (2019)48 extended these studies to include full distribution function of the metallicity and α-abundance, revealing a complex disk formation history that consists of both “inside-out” and “upside-down” processes. Huang et al. (2015)155 measured the metallicity gradients for a significant volume of the MW disk and found that the outer disk may have experienced a different enrichment history compared to that at the solar nearby. Combining data from LAMOST and Gaia, Vickers et al. (2021)156 studied the variation of disk radial metallicity gradients with stellar age and found clear evidence of radial migration. The disk metallicity gradients were also studied using LAMOST metallicities of star clusters.157 By investigating the metallicity separation of action-angle pairs using a large sample of LAMOST dwarf stars, Coronado et al. (2020)158 characterized the dissolution of stellar birth associations into the field.
MW halo
During the past 2 decades, our knowledge of the Galactic halo has increased greatly, revealing a halo with large overdensities and many narrow streams.159,160 Gaia DR2 has driven a further revolution with the unexpected discovery that the nearby halo is dominated by debris from a single accretion event with Gaia-Enceladus161,162 (see Helmi, 2020163 for the most recent review).
LAMOST has increased the number and reliability of identified stellar streams. Approximately 2,000 halo K-giants have been identified in LAMOST DR5, which belong to more than 40 groups, including a number of known substructures as well as new ones.164 This first large sample in 6-dimensional phase-space presents the more comprehensive view yet obtained for the MW substructure.
The Sgr stream, the remnants of the Sgr dwarf spheroidal (dSph) galaxy, is the most prominent tidal stream around the MW165 (Figure 7). It can be traced more than 360° across the sky166 and provides a unique window to explore the formation history of the MW.167 Using data from LAMOST and other surveys (eg, SDSS, Gaia), a variety of types of stars has been used to trace the Sgr tidal debris,168, 169, 170, 171 revealing details about the structure of the stream and providing stronger constraints on the complex star formation history of the Sgr dSph.
After stellar streams spread throughout space, their identification could only be made through observing structures in kinematics (e.g., moving groups172 [MGs]). As such, detection becomes difficult, requiring both large sample sizes and effective methods. Based on the LAMOST data, seven new MGs have been identified,142,173 comprising half of the known halo MGs. Follow-up studies enable us to reveal their origins. For example, high-precision abundances of MG LAMOST-N1 indicate that its progenitor may be a relatively large and early accreted dwarf galaxy.174
When stellar streams completely lose their structures in space and kinematics, searching for chemical imprints inherited from parent galaxies is the only way to identify them. LAMOST has enabled the first systematic search of halo stars deficient in α-abundances (typical in dwarf galaxies175). More than 90 α-deficient ([α/Fe] < 0.0) halo stars have been discovered using LAMOST;176,177 in other words, twice the size of the previously existing sample. Very recently, the discovery of an α-deficient and neutron-capture element-enhanced halo star has been reported,78 providing key evidence about its origin from a neutron star merger in a dwarf galaxy.
Using the LAMOST K-giant sample, the halo has been studied in detail. Its number density distribution clearly shows an oblate inner halo and a nearly spherical outer halo,178 confirming its rotational velocity distribution.179 These results also reveal the signal of the interaction between halo and disk, which possibly represents the mechanism that shapes the halo. LAMOST data enabled the first measurement of 3-dimensional velocity dispersion and anisotropy profiles out to 100 kpc from the Galactic center.180,181 It was found that halo stars move along radially dominated orbits in the MW, showing a chemodynamic trend—in other words, metal-rich stars are on more radially dominated orbits than metal-poor stars, which is likely a remnant of the ancient past merge of the Gaia-Enceladus Sausage.161
LAMOST also provides an opportunity to explore the evolution of the MW through very and extremely metal-poor (VMP/EMP, [Fe/H] < −2.0/−3.0) stars. Regarded as records of the early chemical history of the MW,182 these objects have been extensively studied through large-scale surveys and follow-up observations.183, 184, 185 Regrettably, the current sample of VMP/EMP stars is still limited and requires expanding. The most advanced search for VMP stars has been initiated186 with LAMOST and has resulted in the largest bright VMP catalog, which includes more than 10,000 VMP stars and 670 EMP stars.187 This catalog doubles the number of known EMP stars and provides crucial constraints on the evolution of the MW. Follow-up studies on this sample have opened new windows on Galactic history (e.g., the assembly of the oldest components of the MW).188
MW dust
As an important component of the MW, studies of the distribution and properties of dust in the Galaxy not only provide vital clues on Galactic structure and the formation and evolution of dust grains but also are crucial for the precise dereddening of astronomical targets. LAMOST data have made it possible to trace dust distributions and properties along millions of sight lines in unprecedented detail by combining multiband photometry with the star-pair technique189 or the blue-edge method.190 Li et al. (2018)191 conducted accurate modeling of the MW dust component using reddening and distances from the LSS-GAC DR2. The result shows that the overall distribution of interstellar dust in the MW can be clearly described as a disk-like structure with a scale length of approximately 10,000 light-years and a scale height of approximately 330 light-years. Compared to the stellar disks of the MW, the dust disk is stretched more on the radial scale and thinner in the vertical. Chen et al. (2019)192 constructed 3-dimensional interstellar dust-reddening maps of the Galactic plane. A near-UV extinction map of approximately one-third of the sky at high Galactic latitude has also been delineated.193 Reddening distances of hundreds of molecular clouds,194 including those at high Galactic latitudes,195 and tens of SN remnants196 have also been obtained. By careful subtraction of a 2-dimensional foreground dust-reddening map from that of Schlegel et al. (1998)197 toward the M31 and M33 regions, Zhang and Yuan (2020)198 detected dust disks extending to approximately 2.5 times the optical radii of M31 and M33, as well as a large amount of dust in the M31 halo out to 100 kpc. Reddening laws in the UV195,199 and in SN remnants196 have also been well studied, as have the intrinsic color indices of early-type dwarf stars.200
Synergy between MW sciences and other surveys
In addition to large-scale spectroscopic surveys such as LAMOST, wide-field photometric surveys are essential for mapping the stellar populations, structure, and chemistry of the Galaxy. Nonetheless, photometric estimates of stellar parameters are usually limited by systematic errors in photometric calibration. The availability of millions of high-quality stellar spectra and high-precision stellar parameters from the LAMOST survey permits the application of the stellar color regression (SCR) method201, 202, 203 to calibrate photometric surveys to a precision of a few millimag. For example, Niu et al.204,205 applied the SCR method to Gaia data, providing color corrections with millimag precision. The availability of millions of RVs from LAMOST stars also makes it possible to perform precise wavelength calibrations of data from the Chinese Space Station telescope slitless spectroscopic survey using stellar absorption lines;206 this solves one of the most challenging problems in wide-field slitless spectroscopy.
Probe the properties of planets beyond the Solar System
Much progress has been made recently in exoplanet science thanks to the Kepler mission, which has discovered thousands of transiting planets. Spectroscopic observations of planet hosts are crucial to characterize planets (i.e., to determine the radius of a planet, one needs to know the radius of the host star), study their statistics, and reveal connections between planet formation and evolution and stellar properties and environments. The LAMOST-Kepler project7,91,93 has gathered the largest spectroscopic sample of Kepler targets, offering a uniquely large and homogeneous sample for Kepler planet statistics, as demonstrated by Dong et al. (2014)207 and many subsequent works by numerous groups. Here, we review three exoplanet studies using LAMOST-Kepler data: revealing exoplanets’ orbital patterns,208 identifying a new planet population,209 and determining the frequency of Kepler-like planetary systems.210
The orbits of planets in the Solar System are almost circular and coplanar, but hundreds of giant planets found by RV surveys have unusually eccentric orbits (average eccentricity ), presenting a great puzzle—is our Solar System special in this regard? Using LAMOST data and applying transit duration statistics, Xie et al. (2016)208 measured the eccentricity distribution of Kepler planets, finding that single-transiting planets are commonly on eccentric orbits (), whereas multiples are on nearly circular ) and coplanar orbits. This eccentricity dichotomy was later confirmed by studies using asteroseismology211 and Keck spectroscopic data.212 It has important implications for understanding the dynamic evolution of exoplanets.213 Xie et al. (2016)208 also showed that the Kepler multiples and Solar System objects follow a common relation in their orbital patterns (Figure 8A), suggesting that the Solar System is probably not as atypical as once thought.
Figure 8.
Examples of planetary science done by LAMOST data
(A) The comparisons between Kepler multiple transiting systems and objects in the Solar System. It was found that they follow a common relation208 between mean eccentricities and mutual inclinations: . The error bars show the 68% confidence intervals of orbital eccentricity and inclination distributions.
(B) The comparisons between hot Jupiter and Hoptune; the latter is a recently identified exoplanet population.209 A Hoptune is shown with its host star in the artist’s depiction at bottom right.
“Hot Jupiters” are Jovian planets with orbital periods p < 10 days, and their formation mechanisms are actively debated.214 Recently, Dong et al. (2018)209 identified a new population of close-in planets dubbed “Hoptunes” (Figure 8B), which have radii and share several key similarities with hot Jupiters. Both populations have preferentially metal-rich hosts and frequencies of ∼1% that have similar dependence with host [Fe/H]. Also, like hot Jupiters, Hoptunes tend to exist in systems with single-transiting planets. This empirical “kinship” implies that they likely share common migration and formation processes, providing new clues to the formation and evolution of close-in giant planets.214
A basic question addressed by Kepler planet statistics is the fraction of stellar hosting planetary systems detectable by Kepler. This requires knowing the average number of not only planets per star but also planets per Kepler planetary system, which degenerates with mutual inclination distributions when using only Kepler transit data.215,216 Zhu et al. (2018)210 broke this degeneracy by analyzing a homogeneous Kepler sample characterized by LAMOST combined with transit timing variations statistics, finding that systems with fewer transiting planets have higher mutual inclinations. They also found that approximately one-third of Sun-like stars have Kepler-like planetary systems ( and p < 400 days), and each system has on average 3 planets. These statistics are important for understanding the formation efficiency and dynamic evolution of such planetary systems.
Reveal the hidden secrets of the deep Universe
In recent years, much exciting and significant progress has been made in the field of black holes (BHs), from the detection of gravitational waves to the first photograph of a BH. BHs can be divided into three classes according to their mass: stellar-mass BH (<100 M⊙), intermediate mass black hole, and supermassive BH (>106 M⊙, SMBH).
Stellar-mass black holes
Most identified Galactic stellar-mass BHs (∼20) were originally identified using X-rays, which are emitted from the gas that accretes onto the BH from the companion star. However, theories predict that the vast majority of star-BH binaries do not emit X-rays. These X-ray quiescent systems can be identified using RV measurements of the motion of the companion star.
LAMOST provides us with a great opportunity to successfully use this technique to discover BHs. From RV monitoring campaigns aiming to study spectroscopic binaries, Liu et al.217 found that a B-type star, called LB-1, exhibits periodic (∼79 days) RV variation, along with a strong, broad Hα emission line moving in antiphase. Combined with observations by the Gran Telescopio Canarias and Keck spectral observations, Liu et al.217 reported one massive stellar-mass BH in the wide binary system (Figure 9). Furthermore, by conducting a high-resolution, phase-resolved spectroscopic study using the Calar Alto 3.5 m telescope, Liu et al.218 found that the Pa and Pa lines of LB-1 fit closely to a standard double-peaked disk profile, and derived a primary mass that is 4–8 times higher than the secondary mass. It is argued that LB-1 contains either a normal stellar-mass BH (∼5–20 M⊙)219 or a Be star primary, rather than a BH, as well as a hot subdwarf companion.220 The nature of LB-1 is still under debate, and further astrometric Gaia data may be helpful in distinguishing different scenarios.
Figure 9.
Artist’s impression of LB-1 showing the accretion of gas onto a stellar BH from its blue companion star through a truncated accretion disk
The subpanel shows the folded RV curves and binary orbital fits of the visible star (yellow curve with data points) and the dark primary (blue curve with data points). The observed data are from Liu et al. (2019).217
By using LAMOST and photometric data (i.e., All-Sky Automated Survey for SN [ASAS-SN]), Gu et al.221 and Zheng et al.222 proposed a method to search for binaries containing a giant star and a compact object and presented a sample of candidates. In addition, by convolving the visibility of BH binaries with LAMOST detection sensitivity, Yi et al.223 predicted that more than 400 BH binary candidates can be found with the non-time-domain LRS and that approximately 50–350 candidates can be detected with current time-domain MRS.
SMBHs and galaxies
Most large galaxies contain SMBHs, with masses ranging from millions to billions of solar masses in their galactic nuclei. When gas around the galactic center falls toward these SMBHs, an accretion disk forms, and energy is released in the form of electromagnetic radiation having almost all wavelengths. These active Galactic nuclei (AGN) may have luminosities as high as 10,000 times that of their host galaxies, called quasars.
The LAMOST quasar survey has identified more than 40,000 quasars, with the most distant having a redshift of 5.224, 225, 226 LAMOST data has helped to investigate quasar spectral variability and discover unusual quasars. One such example is the changing-look (CL) AGNs, featuring the appearance and disappearance of broad Balmer emission lines within only a few years. CL AGNs are important for understanding the physical mechanism behind this type of transition and thus the evolution of AGNs. Yang et al.227 found 21 new CL AGNs, 10 of which were discovered by LAMOST. By investigating their optical and mid-infrared variability, the authors confirmed a bluer-when-brighter trend in the optical, but also found a redder midinfrared WISE color W1–W2 when brighter, possibly due to a strong contribution from the AGN dust torus when the AGNs turn on.
LAMOST also provides an opportunity to construct large samples of galaxies. By combining SDSS, LAMOST, and Galaxy And Mass Assembly data, Feng et al.228 constructed the largest galaxy pair sample to date and provided the first observational evidence of galaxy merging timescales (1–2 Gyr). By using LAMOST data, Napolitano et al.229 presented estimates of the central velocity dispersion of ∼86,000 galaxies. The derived mass- relation from the LAMOST data for both early-type and late-type galaxies are consistent with previous analyses. This implies that LAMOST spectra are suitable for studying galaxy kinematics and are invaluable for studying the structure and formation of galaxies and determining their central dark matter content.
Scientific perspective
Future observations
Starting in 2018, the LAMOST-MRS will last for 5 years and the plan is to obtain millions of medium-resolution spectra for objects brighter than G = 15 mag. The plan is also to provide 60-epoch observations for ∼200,000 stars. The scheduled survey aims to address a series of cutting-edge research topics, including time-domain astronomy, stellar physics, Galactic archaeology, emission nebulae, exoplanets and host stars, and compact objects. Furthermore, the LAMOST-MRS data will readily fit into the bulk data collected by the entire astronomical community, providing unique information that is complementary to that obtained from ongoing and planned spaceborne telescopes or ground-based survey projects.
Perspectives for stellar physics
Physical parameters of stars
The accurate characterization of stellar physical properties is essential to almost all topics addressed by LAMOST. A number of crucial parameters have been derived from the LAMOST-LRS data, including atmospheric parameters, RVs, the chemical compositions for a dozen elements, and even masses and ages. As observations continue, such information will be presented for millions more stars; most important, they will cover higher dimensions (e.g., abundances for more species, RV variations) with better precision along with the increased resolution and developed analysis techniques. These fundamental parameters will provide the most basic properties of stars in the MW.
Stars with peculiar spectral signatures
The continuous expansion of the LAMOST spectral database assists in the search for and the investigation of stars with various spectral signatures. The data in the LAMOST-LRS have already resulted in the discovery of a series of such objects. With the LAMOST-MRS, we can expand our research to cover a much wider range of topics and to make advances in a series of important questions. For example, the origin of heavy elements, especially elements synthesized through the r-process, is still under debate. Data from the LAMOST-MRS will enable us to search for the r-process elements-enhanced stars, and will help us to understand their true origins.
Variable stars
Combining time-domain spectra and high-quality photometry, variations in RV and atmospheric parameters can be used to constrain the dynamic processes of high-amplitude pulsating stars and orbital solutions to eclipsing binaries, as well as to study variations of stellar activity strength. It is foreseen that examining many such targets will provide a statistically meaningful view of this field.
Binary and multiple stars
With approximately five times more accurate RVs compared to those from low-resolution spectra, the LAMOST-MRS will help us to discover more binaries under various evolutionary stages, obtain their orbital parameters, and further constrain their properties. In addition, massive multiepoch observations will enable statistically significant investigations on the binary fraction and orbital properties for a large sample of stars, as well as their variations with different stellar parameters.
Star-forming regions
A number of important questions regarding star formation have yet to be answered. The LAMOST-MRS will cover several star-forming regions. As well as investigating the binary fraction and possible dynamical processing of young stellar populations by multiepoch observations, the LAMOST-MRS data will also provide an insight into the protoplanetary disks that may surround the newly formed low-mass stars. It will also make it possible to determine the Li evolution of young stars with precise Li abundances measured through the LAMOST-MRS data.
Emission line nebulae
Emission line nebulae connect the evolution of stars with that of the MW in the sense that these objects are either remnants of dead stars (e.g., planetary nebulae; SN remnants) or associated with newly born stars. Studies of emission line nebulae cover a broad range of topics, from stellar physics to the Galactic evolution. The LAMOST-MRS data will provide a valueless database since the spectra cover a number of key emission lines that can be used to characterize the physical properties of the nebulae (eg, Hα, [N II], and [S II]).
Perspectives for MW studies
Chemical tagging
Chemical tagging uses massive stellar abundances seen in the present Galaxy to reveal the history of the Galaxy by identifying its star-forming events. In general, the abundance of each element is treated as a chemical dimension to characterize a particular set of stars. Thus, the information of abundances covering a broad number of elements for millions of stars is ideal for chemical tagging. The LAMOST-MRS data enable us to analyze more elemental species with higher accuracy. In addition, combining these data with RVs and Gaia astrometry will provide a more comprehensive view of the MW.
Constraining the mass distribution of the MW dark halo
Through 6-dimensional phase-space parameters of different types of stars, including K-giants and blue horizontal-branch (BHB) stars, the rotation and anisotropy of velocities can be obtained by adopting dynamical models that can simultaneously fit multiple populations of stars. Combined with the southern sky coverage by SDSS-V, a much larger sky area will be covered than ever before. More reliable measurements will undoubtedly constrain the total mass of the MW more precisely.
Chemokinematic analysis of MW merging history
A new halo star sample will be obtained with 6-dimensional phase-space parameters, metallicities, and abundances of key elements, which will allow the identification of new stellar streams and substructures, and stars with low α-abundances. Compared with high-precision MW dynamic simulation, these merging relics will help constrain the properties of their progenitor stellar systems. Questions such as whether merging processes have dominated the formation of the MW halo and which types of dwarf galaxies have been accreted in the past can be better answered; this will (largely) reproduce the merging history of the MW.
Tracing the early evolution of the MW halo
Larger samples of metal-poor halo stars with broad coverage in metallicities will better represent various halo components and can be used to systematically investigate the metallicity distribution function (MDF). Compared with model predictions, the low-metallicity end of the observed MDF will provide essential constraints on the enrichment history of the early MW. The identification of peculiar chemical sequences within this sample will provide an abundance pattern from which we can constrain basic parameters, such as the stellar masses of their progenitors. Kinematics shall be obtained for the majority, allowing the origin of different components of the MW halo to be revealed.
Perspectives for planetary science
Our knowledge of exoplanets has been expanding from the solar neighborhood to a wider range of the MW. A Galactic census of exoplanets and investigation of their dependence on planet host properties and Galactic environments can shed light on the mechanism of planet formation and evolution. LAMOST spectra combined with Gaia astrometry will play a crucial role in studying exoplanets in the Galactic context. In addition, rich information on the elemental abundances provided by the LAMOST-MRS and time-series RVs will expand the means of understanding the stellar environments of planet formation and evolution.
Perspective for compact object research
For the field of compact objects, the discovery of LB-1 suggests that future similar campaigns will probe a quiescent BH population different from the X-ray-bright population, which may rewrite our current understanding that only approximately five stellar-mass BHs were discovered with RV monitoring.217,230, 231, 232, 233 The LAMOST-MRS time-domain data would be extremely helpful in discovering X-ray-quiescent BHs. Together with the binary stellar-mass BHs discovered by the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory and Virgo, complete mass distribution of BHs will be constructed and should help us to understand the evolutionary history of massive stars and the formation of BHs.
Summary
LAMOST observations have fundamentally modified our understanding of the Universe. Designed in the 1990s and beginning its survey in 2011, LAMOST is one of the most powerful telescopes in the world. LAMOST is innovatively designed with a uniquely large aperture and a wide FOV. LAMOST has released ∼17 million spectra from various celestial objects. Using those data, we have deepened our knowledge of the Universe. LAMOST has changed the astrophysical viewpoint on a number of cutting-edge fields, including stars, the MW, exoplanets, and BHs. With the launch of the LAMOST-MRS, LAMOST has expanded its data application to a much wider research field. Astronomical research is entering a new era featuring both massive data quantities and higher data accuracy with the help of LAMOST and other telescopes.
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the National Key R&D Program of China under grant nos. 2019YFA0405100, 2019YFA0405500, 2019YFA0405502, 2019YFA0405503, 2019YFA0405504, 2016YFA0400804, and 2019YFA0405000; the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, grant nos. XDB34020205 and XDB41000000; and the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant nos. 11988101, 11973049, 11933004, 11890694, 12090040, 12090042, 12090043, 12090044, 11833002, 11833006, 12022304, 11835057, 11973052, 11633005, 12173007, 11933001, 11703035, U2031203, and U1531244. H. Yan, H.L., S.W., and Hailong Yuan. acknowledge support from the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (nos. 2019060, Y202017, 2019057, and 2020060, respectively). H. Yan and H.L. are supported by the NAOC Nebula Talents Program. We greatly thank Dr. S.A. Bird for the language editing, and Dr. D. Wang, Dr. S. Li, Dr. Q. Gao, and C. Li. for providing the statistical materials of LAMOST. Guoshoujing Telescope (LAMOST) is a National Major Scientific Project built by the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Funding for the project has been provided by the National Development and Re-form Commission. LAMOST is operated and managed by the National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Author contributions
Y.Z. proposed and supervised the project with the help of H. Yan. H. Yan, H.L., S.W., W.Z., H. Yuan, M.X., Y.H., J.X., S.D., and Hailong Yuan prepared the manuscript with the help of S.B., Y.C., X.C., L.D., J.F., Z.H., J.H., G.L., C.L., J.L., X.L., A.L., J.S., X.W., H.Z., and G.Z. All of the authors discussed and helped to revise the manuscript.
Declaration of interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Published Online: March 8, 2022
Footnotes
Supplemental information can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2022.100224.
Lead contact website
Supplemental information
References
- 1.Cui X.-Q., Zhao Y.-H., Chu Y.-Q., et al. The large sky area multi-object fiber spectroscopic telescope (LAMOST) Res. Astron. Astrophys. 2012;12:1197–1242. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wang S.-G., Su D.-Q., Chu Y.-Q., et al. Special configuration of a very large Schmidt telescope for extensive astronomical spectroscopic observation. Appl. Opt. 1996;35:5155–5161. doi: 10.1364/AO.35.005155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zhao G., Zhao Y.-H., Chu Y.-Q., et al. LAMOST spectral survey - an overview. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 2012;12:723–734. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Deng L.-C., Newberg H.J., Liu C., et al. LAMOST experiment for Galactic understanding and exploration (LEGUE) - the survey’s science plan. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 2012;12:735–754. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Liu X.-W., Yuan H.-B., Huo Z.-Y., et al. Vol. 298. Cambridge University Press; 2014. LSS-GAC - a LAMOST spectroscopic survey of the Galactic anti-center. Setting the scene for Gaia and LAMOST; pp. 310–321.https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/proceedings-of-the-international-astronomical-union/article/lssgac-a-lamost-spectroscopic-survey-of-the-galactic-anticenter/F6F112F42EF8D90D9095304F747695C4 (Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union, IAU Symposium). [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yuan H.-B., Liu X.-W., Huo Z.-Y., et al. LAMOST spectroscopic survey of the Galactic anticentre (LSS-GAC): target selection and the first release of value-added catalogues. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2015;448:855–894. [Google Scholar]
- 7.De Cat P., Fu J.N., Ren A.B., et al. Lamost observations in the Kepler field. I. Database of low-resolution spectra. Astrophys. J. (Suppl.) 2015;220:19. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zong W., Fu J.-N., De Cat P., et al. LAMOST observations in the Kepler field. II. Database of the low-resolution spectra from the five-year regular survey. Astrophys. J. (Suppl.) 2018;238:30. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Liu C., Fu J., Shi J., et al. LAMOST medium-resolution spectroscopic survey (LAMOST-MRS): scientific goals and survey plan. arXiv. 2020 https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.07210 Preprint at. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Luo A.-L., Zhao Y.-H., Zhao G., et al. The first data release (DR1) of the LAMOST regular survey. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 2015;15:1095. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Xiang M.S., Liu X.W., Yuan H.B., et al. The LAMOST stellar parameter pipeline at Peking University - LSP3. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2015;448:822–854. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Boeche C., Smith M.C., Grebel E.K., et al. Lamost DR1: stellar parameters and chemical abundances with SPAce. Astron. J. 2018;155:181. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Steinmetz M., Zwitter T., Siebert A., et al. The radial velocity experiment (RAVE): first data release. Astron. J. 2006;132:1645–1668. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yanny B., Rockosi C., Newberg H.J., et al. SEGUE: a spectroscopic survey of 240,000 stars with g = 14-20. Astron. J. 2009;137:4377–4399. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Majewski S.R., Schiavon R.P., Frinchaboy P.M., et al. The Apache point observatory galactic evolution experiment (APOGEE) Astron. J. 2017;154:94. [Google Scholar]
- 16.De Silva G.M., Freeman K.C., Bland-Hawthorn J., et al. The GALAH survey: scientific motivation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2015;449:2604–2617. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gilmore G., Randich S., Asplund M., et al. The Gaia-ESO public spectroscopic survey. Messenger. 2012;147:25–31. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kollmeier J.A., Zasowski G., Rix H.-W., et al. SDSS-V: pioneering panoptic spectroscopy. arXiv. 2017 doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1711.03234. Preprint at. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.DESI Collaboration. Aghamousa A., Aguilar J., Ahlen, et al. The DESI experiment part I: science, targeting, and survey design. arXiv. 2016 doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1611.00036. Preprint at. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Dalton G., Trager S.C., Abrams D.C., et al. WEAVE: the next generation wide-field spectroscopy facility for the William Herschel telescope. Proc. SPIE. 2012;8446:84460P. [Google Scholar]
- 21.de Jong R.S., Agertz O., Berbel A.A., et al. 4MOST: project overview and information for the first call for proposals. The Messenger. 2019;175:3–11. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cirasuolo M., Afonso J., Carollo M., et al. MOONS: the multi-object optical and near-infrared spectrograph for the VLT. Proc. SPIE. 2014;9147:91470N. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wu X.-B., Chen Z.-Y., Jia Z.-D., et al. A very bright (i = 16.44) quasar in the ‘redshift desert’ discovered by the Guoshoujing telescope (LAMOST) Res. Astron. Astrophys. 2010;10:737–744. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wu X.-B., Jia Z.-D., Chen Z.-Y., et al. Eight new quasars discovered by the Guoshoujing telescope (LAMOST) in one extragalactic field. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 2010;10:745–752. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Li H.-N., Zhao G., Christlieb N., et al. Test observations that search for metal-poor stars with the Guoshoujing telescope (LAMOST) Res. Astron. Astrophys. 2010;10:753–760. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yuan H.-B., Liu X.-W., Huo Z.-Y., et al. New planetary nebulae in the outskirts of the Andromeda galaxy discovered with the Guoshoujing telescope (LAMOST) Res. Astron. Astrophys. 2010;10:599–611. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Huo Z.-Y., Liu X.-W., Yuan H.-B., et al. New background quasars in the vicinity of the Andromeda galaxy discovered with the Guoshoujing telescope (LAMOST) Res. Astron. Astrophys. 2010;10:612–620. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zou H., Yang Y.-B., Zhang T.-M., et al. Kinematics and stellar population properties of the Andromeda galaxy by using the spectroscopic observations of the Guoshoujing telescope. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 2011;11:1093–1110. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Xiang M.-S., Liu X.-W., Shi J.-R., et al. Estimating stellar atmospheric parameters, absolute magnitudes and elemental abundances from the LAMOST spectra with Kernel-based principal component analysis. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2017;464:3657–3678. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Xiang M., Ting Y.-S., Rix H.-W., et al. Abundance estimates for 16 elements in 6 million stars from LAMOST DR5 low-resolution spectra. Astrophys. J. (Suppl.) 2019;245:34. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhang B., Liu C., Deng L.-C. Deriving the stellar labels of LAMOST spectra with the Stellar LAbel Machine (SLAM) Astrophys. J. (Suppl.) 2020;246:9. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ting Y.-S., Rix H.-W., Conroy C., et al. Measuring 14 elemental abundances with R = 1800 LAMOST spectra. Astrophys. J. (Lett.) 2017;849:L9. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ting Y.-S., Conroy C., Rix H.-W., et al. Prospects for measuring abundances of >20 elements with low-resolution stellar spectra. Astrophys. J. 2017;843:32. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Borucki W.J., Koch D., Basri G., et al. Kepler planet-detection mission: introduction and first results. Science. 2010;327:977. doi: 10.1126/science.1185402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gaia Collaboration. Prusti T., de Bruijne J.H.J., Brown A.G.A., et al. The Gaia mission. Astron. Astrophys. 2016;595:A1. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Liu C., Fang M., Wu Y., et al. Asteroseismic-based estimation of the surface gravity for the LAMOST giant stars. Astrophys. J. 2015;807:4. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wu Y., Xiang M., Bi S., et al. Mass and age of red giant branch stars observed with LAMOST and Kepler. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2018;475:3633–3643. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wheeler A., Ness M., Buder S., et al. Abundances in the milky way across five nucleosynthetic channels from 4 million LAMOST stars. Astrophys. J. 2020;898:58. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Nordström B., Mayor M., Andersen J., et al. The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the solar neighbourhood. Ages, metallicities, and kinematic properties of ∼14 000 F and G dwarfs. Astron. Astrophys. 2004;418:989–1019. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Soderblom D.R. The ages of stars. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2010;48:581–629. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Xiang M., Liu X., Shi J., et al. The ages and masses of a million Galactic-disk main-sequence turnoff and subgiant stars from the LAMOST Galactic spectroscopic surveys. Astrophys. J. (Suppl.) 2017;232:2. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ho A.Y.Q., Rix H.-W., Ness M.K., et al. Masses and ages for 230,000 LAMOST giants, via their carbon and nitrogen abundances. Astrophys. J. 2017;841:40. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sanders J.L., Das P. Isochrone ages for ∼3 million stars with the second Gaia data release. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2018;481:4093–4110. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wu Y., Xiang M., Zhao G., et al. Ages and masses of 0.64 million red giant branch stars from the LAMOST Galactic spectroscopic survey. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2019;484:5315–5329. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Huang Y., Schönrich R., Zhang H., et al. Mapping the Galactic disk with the LAMOST and Gaia red clump sample. I. Precise distances, masses, ages, and 3D velocities of ∼140,000 red clump stars. Astrophys. J. (Suppl.) 2020;249:29. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Xiang M.-S., Liu X.-W., Yuan H.-B., et al. The evolution of stellar metallicity gradients of the Milky Way disk from LSS-GAC main sequence turn-off stars: a two-phase disk formation history? Res. Astron. Astrophys. 2015;15:1209. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Xiang M., Shi J., Liu X., et al. Stellar mass distribution and star formation history of the Galactic disk revealed by mono-age stellar populations from LAMOST. Astrophys. J. (Suppl.) 2018;237:33. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wang C., Liu X.-W., Xiang M.-S., et al. Metallicity distributions of mono-age stellar populations of the Galactic disc from the LAMOST Galactic spectroscopic surveys. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2019;482:2189–2207. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Wang H.-F., López-Corredoira M., Huang Y., et al. Mapping the Galactic disc with the LAMOST and Gaia red clump sample: II. 3D asymmetrical kinematics of mono-age populations in the disc between 6-14 kpc. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2020;491:2104–2118. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wang H.-F., Huang Y., Zhang H.-W., et al. Diagonal ridge pattern of different age populations found in Gaia-DR2 with LAMOST main-sequence turnoff and OB-type stars. Astrophys. J. 2020;902:70. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wu Y., Xiang M., Chen Y., et al. Age-metallicity dependent stellar kinematics of the Milky Way disc from LAMOST and Gaia. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2021;501:4917–4934. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Xiang M.-S., Rix H.-W., Ting Y.-S., et al. Chemically peculiar A and F stars with enhanced s-process and iron-peak elements: stellar radiative acceleration at work. Astrophys. J. 2020;898:28. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Sun W.-X., Huang Y., Wang H.-F., et al. Mapping the Galactic disk with the LAMOST and Gaia red clump sample. V. On the origin of the ‘young’ [α/Fe]-enhanced stars. Astrophys. J. 2020;903:12. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Zhao G., Chen Y.-Q. Low-α metal-rich stars with sausage kinematics in the LAMOST survey: are they from the Gaia-Sausage-Enceladus galaxy? Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 2021;64:239562. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Liu C., Deng L.-C., Carlin J.L., et al. The K giant stars from the LAMOST survey data. I. Identification, metallicity, and distance. Astrophys. J. 2014;790:110. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Xiang M.-S., Liu X.-W., Yuan H.-B., et al. LAMOST spectroscopic survey of the Galactic anticentre (LSS-GAC): the second release of value-added catalogues. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2017;467:1890–1914. [Google Scholar]
- 57.Xiang M., Rix H.-W., Ting Y.-S., et al. Data-driven spectroscopic estimates of absolute magnitude, distance, and binarity: method and catalog of 16,002 O- and B-type stars from LAMOST. Astrophys. J. (Suppl.) 2021;253:22. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Li J., Han C., Xiang M.-S., et al. A method of measuring the [α/Fe] ratios from the spectra of the LAMOST survey. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 2016;16:110. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wallerstein G., Sneden C. A K giant with an unusually high abundance of lithium : HD112127. Astrophys. J. 1982;255:577–584. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Iben I. Stellar evolution. VI. Evolution from the main sequence to the red-giant branch for stars of mass 1 , 1.25 , and 1.5 . Astrophys. J. 1967;147:624. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Gao Q., Shi J.-R., Yan H.-L., et al. Lithium-rich giants in LAMOST survey. I. The catalog. Astrophys. J. (Suppl.) 2019;245:33. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Casey A.R., Ho A.Y.Q., Ness M., et al. Tidal Interactions between binary stars can drive lithium production in low-mass red giants. Astrophys. J. 2019;880:125. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Singh R., Reddy B.E., Bharat Kumar Y., et al. Survey of Li-rich giants among Kepler and LAMOST fields: determination of Li-rich giants’ evolutionary phase. Astrophys. J. (Lett.) 2019;878:L21. [Google Scholar]
- 64.Zhou Y., Yan H., Shi J., et al. High-resolution spectroscopic analysis of a large sample of Li-rich giants found by LAMOST. Astrophys. J. 2019;877:104–1210. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Zhou Z.-M., Shi J.-R., Yan H.-L., et al. LAMOST/HRS spectroscopic analysis of two new Li-rich giants. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 2021;21:020. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Gao Q., Shi J.-R., Yan H.-L., et al. The lithium abundances from the large sky area multi-object fiber spectroscopic telescope medium-resolution survey. I. The method. Astrophys. J. 2021;914:116. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Yan H.-L., Shi J.-R., Zhou Y.-T., et al. The nature of the lithium enrichment in the most Li-rich giant star. Nat. Astron. 2018;2:790–795. [Google Scholar]
- 68.Li H., Aoki W., Matsuno T., et al. Enormous Li enhancement preceding red giant phases in low-mass stars in the Milky Way halo. Astrophys. J. (Lett.) 2018;852:L31. [Google Scholar]
- 69.Yan H.-L., Zhou Y.-T., Zhang X., et al. Most lithium-rich low-mass evolved stars revealed as red clump stars by asteroseismology and spectroscopy. Nat. Astron. 2021;5:86–93. [Google Scholar]
- 70.Kumar Y.B., Reddy B.E., Campbell S.W., et al. Discovery of ubiquitous lithium production in low-mass stars. Nat. Astron. 2020;4:1059–1063. [Google Scholar]
- 71.Schwab J. A helium-flash-induced mixing event can explain the lithium abundances of red clump stars. Astrophys. J. (Lett.) 2020;901:L18. [Google Scholar]
- 72.Zhang J., Shi J.-R., Yan H.-L., et al. Lithium evolution of giant stars observed by LAMOST and Kepler. Astrophys. J. (Lett.) 2021;919:L3. [Google Scholar]
- 73.Si J., Luo A., Li Y., et al. Search for carbon stars and DZ white dwarfs in SDSS spectra survey through machine learning. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 2014;57:176–186. [Google Scholar]
- 74.Ji W., Cui W., Liu C., et al. Carbon stars from LAMOST DR2 data. Astrophys. J. (Suppl.) 2016;226:1. [Google Scholar]
- 75.Li Y.-B., Luo A.-L., Du C.-D., et al. Carbon stars Identified from LAMOST DR4 using machine learning. Astrophys. J. (Suppl.) 2018;234:31. [Google Scholar]
- 76.Tang B., Liu C., Fernández-Trincado J.G., et al. Chemical and kinematic analysis of CN-strong metal-poor field stars in LAMOST DR3. Astrophys. J. 2019;871:58. [Google Scholar]
- 77.Tang B., Fernández-Trincado J.G., Liu C., et al. On the chemical and kinematic consistency between N-rich metal-poor field stars and enriched populations in globular clusters. Astrophys. J. 2020;891:28. [Google Scholar]
- 78.Xing Q.-F., Zhao G., Aoki W., et al. Evidence for the accretion origin of halo stars with an extreme r-process enhancement. Nat. Astron. 2019;3:631–635. [Google Scholar]
- 79.Chen T.-Y., Shi J.-R., Beers T.C., et al. Searching for r-process-enhanced stars in the LAMOST survey I: the method. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 2021;21:036. [Google Scholar]
- 80.Paunzen E., Hümmerich S., Bernhard K. New mercury-manganese stars and candidates from LAMOST DR4. Astron. Astrophys. 2021;645:A34. [Google Scholar]
- 81.Anglada-Escudé G., Amado P.J., Barnes J., et al. A terrestrial planet candidate in a temperate orbit around Proxima Centauri. Nature. 2016;536:437–440. doi: 10.1038/nature19106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Zhong J., Lépine S., Hou J., et al. Automated identification of 2612 late-K and M dwarfs in the LAMOST commissioning data using classification template fits. Astron. J. 2015;150:42. [Google Scholar]
- 83.Guo Y.-X., Yi Z.-P., Luo A.-L., et al. M dwarf catalog of LAMOST general survey data release one. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 2015;15:1182. [Google Scholar]
- 84.Galgano B., Stassun K., Rojas-Ayala B. Fundamental parameters of ∼30,000 M dwarfs in LAMOST DR1 using data-driven spectral modeling. Astron. J. 2020;159:193. [Google Scholar]
- 85.Zhong J., Lépine S., Li J., et al. M-giant star candidates identified in LAMOST DR 1. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 2015;15:1154. [Google Scholar]
- 86.Yi Z.-P., Luo A.-L., Zhao J.-K., et al. Kinematics and activity of M dwarfs in LAMOST DR1. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 2015;15:860. [Google Scholar]
- 87.Zhong J., Li J., Carlin J.L., et al. Value-added catalogs of M-type stars in LAMOST DR5. Astrophys. J. (Suppl.) 2019;244:8. [Google Scholar]
- 88.Liu Z., Cui W., Liu C., et al. A catalog of OB Stars from LAMOST spectroscopic survey. Astrophys. J. (Suppl.) 2019;241:32. [Google Scholar]
- 89.Xiang M., Rix H.-W., Ting Y.-S., et al. Stellar labels for hot stars from low-resolution spectra - I. the HotPayne method and results for 330,000 stars from LAMOST DR6. arXiv. 2021 doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2108.02878. Preprint at. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Li G.-W., Shi J.-R., Yanny B., et al. New Oe stars in LAMOST DR5. Astrophys. J. 2018;863:70. [Google Scholar]
- 91.Fu J.-N., Cat P.D., Zong W., et al. Overview of the LAMOST-Kepler project. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 2020;20:167. [Google Scholar]
- 92.Wang J., Fu J.-N., Zong W., et al. LAMOST observations in 15 K2 campaigns. I. Low-resolution spectra from LAMOST DR6. Astrophys. J. (Suppl.) 2020;251:27. [Google Scholar]
- 93.Zong W., Fu J.-N., De Cat P., et al. Phase II of the LAMOST-Kepler/K2 survey. I. Time series of medium-resolution spectroscopic observations. Astrophys. J. (Suppl.) 2020;251:15. [Google Scholar]
- 94.Yang H., Liu J., Qiao E., et al. Do long-cadence data of the Kepler spacecraft capture basic properties of flares? Astrophys. J. 2018;859:87. [Google Scholar]
- 95.Fang X.-S., Zhao G., Zhao J.-K., et al. Stellar activity with LAMOST - II. Chromospheric activity in open clusters. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2018;476:908–926. [Google Scholar]
- 96.Karoff C., Knudsen M.F., De Cat P., et al. Observational evidence for enhanced magnetic activity of superflare stars. Nat. Comm. 2016;7:11058. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Reinhold T., Shapiro A.I., Solanki S.K., et al. The Sun is less active than other solar-like stars. Science. 2020;368:518–521. doi: 10.1126/science.aay3821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Zhang J., Shapiro A.I., Bi S., et al. Solar-type stars observed by LAMOST and Kepler. Astrophys. J. (Lett.) 2020;894:L11. [Google Scholar]
- 99.Aerts C. Probing the interior physics of stars through asteroseismology. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2021;93:015001. [Google Scholar]
- 100.Giammichele N., Charpinet S., Fontaine G., et al. A large oxygen-dominated core from the seismic cartography of a pulsating white dwarf. Nature. 2018;554:73–76. doi: 10.1038/nature25136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Cunha M.S., Aerts C., Christensen-Dalsgaard J., et al. Asteroseismology and interferometry. Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 2007;14:217–360. [Google Scholar]
- 102.Murphy S.J., Bedding T.R., Shibahashi H. A planet in an 840 day orbit around a Kepler main-sequence A star found from phase modulation of its pulsations. Astrophys. J. (Lett.) 2016;827:L17. [Google Scholar]
- 103.Van Grootel V., Dupret M.-A., Fontaine G., et al. The instability strip of ZZ Ceti white dwarfs. I. Introduction of time-dependent convection. Astron. Astrophys. 2012;539:A87. [Google Scholar]
- 104.Zhao J.K., Luo A.L., Oswalt T.D., et al. 70 DA white dwarfs identified in LAMOST pilot survey. Astron. J. 2013;145:169. [Google Scholar]
- 105.Luo Y., Németh P., Li Q. Hot subdwarf stars identified in Gaia DR2 with spectra of LAMOST DR6 and DR7. II. Kinematics. Astrophys. J. 2020;898:64. [Google Scholar]
- 106.Lei Z., Zhao J., Németh P., et al. New hot subdwarf stars Identified in Gaia DR2 with LAMOST DR5 spectra. Astrophys. J. 2019;881:135. [Google Scholar]
- 107.Su J., Fu J., Lin G., et al. New ZZ Ceti stars from the LAMOST survey. Astrophys. J. 2017;847:34. [Google Scholar]
- 108.Ricker G.R., Winn J.N., Vanderspek R., et al. Transiting exoplanet survey satellite (TESS) Proc. SPIE. 2014;9143:914320. [Google Scholar]
- 109.Wang J., Fu J.-N., Zong W., et al. Asteroseismology of RRab variable star EZ Cnc from K2 photometry and LAMOST spectroscopy. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2021;506:6117–6124. [Google Scholar]
- 110.Tian Z., Liu X., Yuan H., et al. A catalog of RV variable star candidates from LAMOST. Astrophys. J. (Suppl.) 2020;249:22. [Google Scholar]
- 111.Rebassa-Mansergas A., Parsons S.G., Dhillon V.S., et al. Accurate mass and radius determinations of a cool subdwarf in an eclipsing binary. Nat. Astron. 2019;3:553–560. doi: 10.1038/s41550-019-0746-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Pan Y., Fu J.-N., Zong W., et al. Starspot modulation detected in the detached eclipsing binary KIC 8301013. Astrophys. J. 2020;905:67. [Google Scholar]
- 113.Li C.-Q., Shi J.-R., Yan H.-L., et al. Double- and triple-line spectroscopic candidates in the LAMOST medium-resolution spectroscopic survey. Astrophys. J. (Suppl.) 2021;256:31. [Google Scholar]
- 114.Gao S., Zhao H., Yang H., et al. The binarity of Galactic dwarf stars along with effective temperature and metallicity. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2017;469:L68–L72. [Google Scholar]
- 115.El-Badry K., Rix H.-W. The wide binary fraction of solar-type stars: emergence of metallicity dependence at a < 200 au. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2019;482:L139. [Google Scholar]
- 116.Hwang H.-C., Ting Y.-S., Schlaufman K.C., et al. The non-monotonic, strong metallicity dependence of the wide-binary fraction. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2021;501:4329–4343. [Google Scholar]
- 117.Yuan H., Liu X., Xiang M., et al. Stellar Loci II. A model-free estimate of the binary fraction for field FGK stars. Astrophys. J. 2015;799:135. [Google Scholar]
- 118.Niu Z., Yuan H., Wang S., et al. Binary fractions of G and K dwarf stars based on Gaia EDR3 and LAMOST DR5: impacts of the chemical abundances. Astrophys. J. 2021;922:211. [Google Scholar]
- 119.Liu C. Smoking gun of the dynamical processing of solar-type field binary stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2019;490:550–565. [Google Scholar]
- 120.Zheng Z., Carlin J.L., Beers T.C., et al. The first hypervelocity star from the LAMOST survey. Astrophys. J. (Lett.) 2014;785:L23. [Google Scholar]
- 121.Zhong J., Chen L., Liu C., et al. The nearest high-velocity stars revealed by LAMOST data release 1. Astrophys. J. (Lett.) 2014;789:L2. [Google Scholar]
- 122.Huang Y., Liu X.-W., Zhang H.-W., et al. Discovery of two new hypervelocity stars from the LAMOST spectroscopic surveys. Astrophys. J. (Lett.) 2017;847:L9. [Google Scholar]
- 123.Du C., Li H., Liu S., et al. The high-velocity stars in the local stellar halo from Gaia and LAMOST. Astrophys. J. 2018;863:87. [Google Scholar]
- 124.Li Y.-B., Luo A.-L., Zhao G., et al. A new hyper-runaway star discovered from LAMOST and Gaia: ejected almost in the Galactic rotation direction. Astron. J. 2018;156:87. [Google Scholar]
- 125.Huang Y., Li Q., Zhang H., et al. Discovery of a candidate hypervelocity star originating from the Sagittarius dwarf spheroidal galaxy. Astrophys. J. (Lett.) 2021;907:L42. [Google Scholar]
- 126.Li Y.-B., Luo A.-L., Lu Y.-J., et al. 591 High-velocity stars in the Galactic halo selected from LAMOST DR7 and Gaia DR2. Astrophys. J. (Suppl.) 2021;252:3. [Google Scholar]
- 127.Bland-Hawthorn J., Gerhard O. The Galaxy in context: structural, kinematic, and integrated properties. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2016;54:529–596. [Google Scholar]
- 128.Chen B.-Q., Liu X.-W., Yuan H.-B., et al. The selection function of the LAMOST spectroscopic survey of the Galactic anti-centre. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2018;476:3278–3289. [Google Scholar]
- 129.Huang Y., Liu X.-W., Yuan H.-B., et al. Determination of the local standard of rest using the LSS-GAC DR1. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2015;449:162–174. [Google Scholar]
- 130.Dehnen W., Binney J.J. Local stellar kinematics from HIPPARCOS data. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1998;298:387–394. [Google Scholar]
- 131.Huang Y., Liu X.-W., Yuan H.-B., et al. The Milky Way’s rotation curve out to 100 kpc and its constraint on the Galactic mass distribution. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2016;463:2623–2639. [Google Scholar]
- 132.Xia Q., Liu C., Mao S., et al. Determining the local dark matter density with LAMOST data. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2016;458:3839–3850. [Google Scholar]
- 133.Guo R., Liu C., Mao S., et al. Measuring the local dark matter density with LAMOST DR5 and Gaia DR2. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2020;495:4828–4844. [Google Scholar]
- 134.Liu C., Xu Y., Wan J.-C., et al. Mapping the Milky way with LAMOST I: method and overview. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 2017;17:096. [Google Scholar]
- 135.Holmberg J., Flynn C. The local density of matter mapped by Hipparcos. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2000;313:209. [Google Scholar]
- 136.Yu Y., Wang H.-F., Cui W.-Y., et al. The flare and warp of the young stellar disk traced with LAMOST DR5 OB-type stars. Astrophys. J. 2016;922:80. [Google Scholar]
- 137.Xu Y., Liu C., Tian H., et al. Exploring the perturbed Milky Way disk and the substructures of the outer disk. Astrophys. J. 2020;905:6. [Google Scholar]
- 138.Wang H.-F., Liu C., Xu Y., et al. Mapping the Milky Way with LAMOST- III. complicated spatial structure in the outer disc. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2018;478:3367. [Google Scholar]
- 139.Minchev I. Constraining the Milky way assembly history with galactic archaeology. Ludwig Biermann Award Lecture. Astronom. Nachr. 2016;337:703. [Google Scholar]
- 140.Gómez F.A., Minchev I., O’Shea B.W., et al. Vertical density waves in the Milky Way disc induced by the Sagittarius dwarf galaxy. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2013;429:159–164. [Google Scholar]
- 141.Carlin J.L., DeLaunay J., Newberg H.J., et al. Substructure in bulk velocities of Milky Way disk stars. Astrophys. J. (Lett.) 2013;777:L5. [Google Scholar]
- 142.Zhao J.K., Zhao G., Chen Y.Q., et al. Three moving groups detected in the LAMOST DR1 archive. Astrophys. J. 2014;787:31. [Google Scholar]
- 143.Antoja T., Helmi A., Romero-Gómez M., et al. A dynamically young and perturbed Milky Way disk. Nature. 2018;561:360–362. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0510-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Kawata D., Baba J., Ciucǎ I., et al. Radial distribution of stellar motions in Gaia DR2. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2018;479:L108–L112. [Google Scholar]
- 145.Tian H.-J., Liu C., Wu Y., et al. Time stamps of vertical phase mixing in the Galactic disk from LAMOST/Gaia stars. Astrophys. J. (Lett.) 2018;865:L19. [Google Scholar]
- 146.Wang C., Huang Y., Yuan H.-B., et al. The Galactic disk phase spirals at different Galactic positions revealed by Gaia and LAMOST data. Astrophys. J. (Lett.) 2019;877:L7. [Google Scholar]
- 147.Wang H.-F., López-Corredoira M., Huang Y., et al. Mapping the Galactic disk with the LAMOST and Gaia red clump sample. VI. Evidence for the long-lived nonsteady warp of nongravitational scenarios. Astrophys. J. 2020;897:119. [Google Scholar]
- 148.Yan Y., Du C., Liu S., et al. Chemical and kinematic properties of the Galactic disk from the LAMOST and Gaia sample stars. Astrophys. J. 2019;880:36. [Google Scholar]
- 149.Sun N.-C., Liu X.-W., Huang Y., et al. Galactic disk bulk motions as revealed by the LSS-GAC DR2. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 2015;15:1342. [Google Scholar]
- 150.Ding P.-J., Zhu Z., Liu J.-C. Solar neighborhood kinematics from Gaia-LAMOST dwarf stars. Astron. J. 2019;158:247. [Google Scholar]
- 151.Ding P.-J., Xue X.-X., Yang C.-Q., et al. Vertical structure of Galactic disk kinematics from LAMOST K giants. Astron. J. 2021;162:112. [Google Scholar]
- 152.Yu J., Liu C. The age-velocity dispersion relation of the Galactic discs from LAMOST-Gaia data. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2018;475:1093–1103. [Google Scholar]
- 153.Sharma S., Hayden M.R., Bland-Hawthorn J., et al. Fundamental relations for the velocity dispersion of stars in the Milky Way. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2021;506:1761–1776. [Google Scholar]
- 154.Chen D.-C., Xie J.-W., Zhou J.-L., et al. Planets across space and time (PAST). I. Characterizing the memberships of Galactic components and stellar ages: revisiting the kinematic methods and applying to planet host stars. Astrophys. J. 2021;909:115. [Google Scholar]
- 155.Huang Y., Liu X.-W., Zhang H.-W., et al. On the metallicity gradients of the Galactic disk asrevealed by LSS-GAC red clump stars. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 2015;15:1240. [Google Scholar]
- 156.Vickers John J., Shen J.-T., Li Z.-Y. The flattening metallicity gradient in the Milky Way’s thin disk. Astrophys. J. 2021;922:189. [Google Scholar]
- 157.Zhong J., Chen L., Wu D., et al. Exploring open cluster properties with Gaia and LAMOST. Astron. Astrophys. 2020;640:A127. [Google Scholar]
- 158.Coronado J., Rix H.-W., Trick W.H., et al. From birth associations to field stars: mapping the small-scale orbit distribution in the Galactic disc. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2020;495:4098–4112. [Google Scholar]
- 159.Bernard E.J., Ferguson A.M.N., Schlafly E.F., et al. A synoptic map of halo substructures from the Pan-STARRS1 3π survey. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2016;463:1759–1768. [Google Scholar]
- 160.Shipp N., Drlica-Wagner A., Balbinot E., et al. Stellar streams discovered in the dark energy survey. Astrophys. J. 2018;862:114. [Google Scholar]
- 161.Helmi A., Babusiaux C., Koppelman H.H., et al. The merger that led to the formation of the Milky Way’s inner stellar halo and thick disk. Nature. 2018;563:85–88. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0625-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Haywood M., Di Matteo P., Lehnert M.D., et al. In disguise or out of reach: first clues about in situ and accreted stars in the stellar halo of the Milky Way from Gaia DR2. Astrophys. J. 2018;863:113. [Google Scholar]
- 163.Helmi A. Streams, substructures, and the early history of the Milky Way. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2020;58:205–256. [Google Scholar]
- 164.Yang C., Xue X.-X., Li J., et al. Identifying Galactic halo substructure in 6D phase space using ∼13,000 LAMOST K giants. Astrophys. J. 2019;880:65. [Google Scholar]
- 165.Ibata R.A., Gilmore G., Irwin M.J. A dwarf satellite galaxy in Sagittarius. Nature. 1994;370:194–196. [Google Scholar]
- 166.Majewski S.R., Skrutskie M.F., Weinberg M.D., et al. A two micron all kky survey view of the Sagittarius dwarf galaxy. I. Morphology of the Sagittarius core and tidal arms. Astrophys. J. 2003;599:1082–1115. [Google Scholar]
- 167.Ibata R.A., Wyse R.F.G., Gilmore G., et al. The kinematics, orbit, and survival of the Sagittarius dwarf spheroidal galaxy. Astron. J. 1997;113:634–655. [Google Scholar]
- 168.Shi W.B., Chen Y.Q., Carrell K., et al. The kinematics and chemistry of red horizontal branch stars in the Sagittarius streams. Astrophys. J. 2012;751:130. [Google Scholar]
- 169.Carlin J.L., Sheffield A.A., Cunha K., et al. Chemical abundances of hydrostatic and explosive alpha-elements in Sagittarius stream stars. Astrophys. J. (Lett.) 2018;859:L10. [Google Scholar]
- 170.Li J., Liu C., Xue X., et al. Detecting the Sagittarius stream with LAMOST DR4 M giants and Gaia DR2. Astrophys. J. 2019;874:138. [Google Scholar]
- 171.Yang C., Xue X.-X., Li J., et al. Tracing kinematic and chemical properties of Sagittarius stream by K-giants, M-giants, and BHB stars. Astrophys. J. 2019;886:154. [Google Scholar]
- 172.Helmi A., White S.D.M., de Zeeuw P.T., et al. Debris streams in the solar neighbourhood as relicts from the formation of the Milky Way. Nature. 1999;402:53–55. [Google Scholar]
- 173.Zhao J.-K., Zhao G., Chen Y.-Q., et al. Halo stream candidates in the LAMOST DR2. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 2015;15:1378. [Google Scholar]
- 174.Zhao J.K., Zhao G., Aoki W., et al. Tracing the origin of moving groups. II. Chemical abundance of six stars in the halo stream LAMOST-N1. Astrophys. J. 2018;868:105. [Google Scholar]
- 175.Tolstoy E., Hill V., Tosi M. Star-formation histories, abundances, and kinematics of dwarf galaxies in the local group. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2009;47:371–425. [Google Scholar]
- 176.Xing Q.F., Zhao G. Newly discovered alpha-poor stars in the solar neighborhood. Astrophys. J. 2015;805:146. [Google Scholar]
- 177.Xing Q.-F., Zhao G., Zhang Y., et al. A search for Mg-poor stars using LAMOST survey data. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 2015;15:1275. [Google Scholar]
- 178.Xu Y., Liu C., Xue X.-X., et al. Mapping the Milky way with LAMOST - II. The stellar halo. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2018;473:1244–1257. [Google Scholar]
- 179.Tian H., Liu C., Wang Y., et al. Differential rotation of the halo traced by K-giant stars. Astrophys. J. 2020;899:110. [Google Scholar]
- 180.Bird S.A., Xue X.-X., Liu C., et al. Anisotropy of the Milky Way’s stellar halo using K giants from LAMOST and Gaia. Astron. J. 2019;157:104. [Google Scholar]
- 181.Bird S.A., Xue X.-X., Liu C., et al. Constraints on the assembly history of the Milky Way’s smooth, diffuse stellar halo from the metallicity-dependent, radially dominated velocity anisotropy profiles probed with K giants and BHB stars using LAMOST, SDSS/SEGUE, and Gaia. Astrophys. J. 2021;919:66. [Google Scholar]
- 182.Frebel A., Norris J.E. Near-field cosmology with extremely metal-poor stars. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2015;53:631–688. [Google Scholar]
- 183.Yong D., Norris J.E., Bessell M.S., et al. The most metal-poor stars. III. The metallicity distribution function and carbon-enhanced metal-poor fraction. Astrophys. J. 2013;762:27. [Google Scholar]
- 184.Aoki W., Beers T.C., Lee Y.S., et al. High-resolution spectroscopy of extremely metal-poor stars from SDSS/SEGUE. I. Atmospheric parameters and chemical compositions. Astron. J. 2013;145:13. [Google Scholar]
- 185.Venn K.A., Kielty C.L., Sestito F., et al. The Pristine survey - IX. CFHT ESPaDOnS spectroscopic analysis of 115 bright metal-poor candidate stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2020;492:3241–3262. [Google Scholar]
- 186.Li H.-N., Zhao G., Christlieb N., et al. Spectroscopic analysis of metal-poor stars from LAMOST: early results. Astrophys. J. 2015;798:110. [Google Scholar]
- 187.Li H., Tan K., Zhao G. A catalog of 10,000 very metal-poor stars from LAMOST DR3. Astrophys. J. (Suppl.) 2018;238:16. [Google Scholar]
- 188.Sestito F., Martin N.F., Starkenburg E., et al. The Pristine survey - X. A large population of low-metallicity stars permeates the Galactic disc. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2020;497:L7–L12. [Google Scholar]
- 189.Yuan H.B., Liu X.W., Xiang M.S. Empirical extinction coefficients for the GALEX, SDSS, 2MASS and WISE passbands. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2013;430:2188–2199. [Google Scholar]
- 190.Wang S., Jiang B.W. Universality of the near-infrared extinction law based on the APOGEE survey. Astrophys. J. (Lett.) 2014;788:L12. [Google Scholar]
- 191.Li L., Shen S., Hou J., et al. Three-dimensional structure of the Milky Way dust: modeling of LAMOST data. Astrophys. J. 2018;858:75. [Google Scholar]
- 192.Chen B.-Q., Huang Y., Yuan H.-B., et al. Three-dimensional interstellar dust reddening maps of the Galactic plane. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2019;483:4277–4289. [Google Scholar]
- 193.Sun M., Jiang B., Yuan H., et al. The ultraviolet extinction map and dust properties at high Galactic latitude. Astrophys. J. (Suppl.) 2021;254:38. [Google Scholar]
- 194.Chen B.-Q., Li G.-X., Yuan H.-B., et al. A large catalogue of molecular clouds with accurate distances within 4 kpc of the Galactic disc. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2020;493:351–361. [Google Scholar]
- 195.Sun M., Jiang B., Zhao H., et al. The extinction and distance of the MBM molecular clouds at high Galactic latitude. Astrophys. J. (Suppl.) 2021;256:46. [Google Scholar]
- 196.Zhao H., Jiang B., Li J., et al. A systematic study of the dust of Galactic supernova remnants. I. The distance and the extinction. Astrophys. J. 2020;891:137. [Google Scholar]
- 197.Schlegel D.J., Finkbeiner D.P., Davis M. Maps of dust infrared emission for use in estimation of reddening and cosmic microwave background radiation foregrounds. Astrophys. J. 1998;500:525. [Google Scholar]
- 198.Zhang R., Yuan H. Detections of dust in the outskirts of M31 and M33. Astrophys. J. (Lett.) 2020;905:L20. [Google Scholar]
- 199.Sun M., Jiang B.W., Zhao H., et al. The ultraviolet extinction in the GALEX bands. Astrophys. J. 2018;861:153. [Google Scholar]
- 200.Deng D., Sun Y., Jian M., et al. Intrinsic color indices of early-type dwarf stars. Astron. J. 2020;159:208. [Google Scholar]
- 201.Yuan H., Liu X., Xiang M., et al. Stellar color regression: a spectroscopy-based method for color calibration to a few millimagnitude accuracy and the recalibration of Stripe 82. Astrophys. J. 2015;799:133. [Google Scholar]
- 202.Huang Y., Yuan H., Li C., et al. Milky Way tomography with the SkyMapper southern survey. II. Photometric recalibration of SMSS DR2. Astrophys. J. 2021;907:68. [Google Scholar]
- 203.Huang B., Yuan H. Photometric recalibration of the SDSS Stripe 82 to a few milimagnitude precision with the stellar color regression method and Gaia EDR3. arXiv. 2022 doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2112.14956. Preprint at. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Niu Z., Yuan H., Liu J. Correction to the photometric colors of the Gaia data release 2 with the stellar color regression method. Astrophys. J. 2021;909:48. [Google Scholar]
- 205.Niu Z., Yuan H., Liu J. Correction to the photometric colors of Gaia early data release 3. Astrophys. J. 2021;908:14L. [Google Scholar]
- 206.Yuan H., Deng D., Sun Y. A star-based method for precise wavelength calibration of the Chinese Space Station Telescope (CSST) slitless spectroscopic survey. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 2021;21:3. [Google Scholar]
- 207.Dong S., Zheng Z., Zhu Z., et al. On the metallicities of Kepler stars. Astrophys. J. (Lett.) 2014;789:L3. [Google Scholar]
- 208.Xie J.-W., Dong S., Zhu Z., et al. Exoplanet orbital eccentricities derived from LAMOST-Kepler analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2016;113:11431–11435. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1604692113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Dong S., Xie J.-W., Zhou J.-L., et al. LAMOST telescope reveals that Neptunian cousins of hot Jupiters are mostly single off spring of stars that are rich in heavy elements. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2018;115:266–271. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1711406115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Zhu W., Petrovich C., Wu Y., et al. About 30% of Sun-like stars have Kepler-like planetary systems: a study of their intrinsic architecture. Astrophys. J. 2018;860:101. [Google Scholar]
- 211.Van Eylen V., Albrecht S., Huang X., et al. The orbital eccentricity of small planet systems. Astron. J. 2019;157:61. [Google Scholar]
- 212.Mills S.M., Howard A.W., Petigura E.A., et al. The California-Kepler survey. VIII. Eccentricities of Kepler planets and tentative evidence of a high-metallicity preference for small eccentric planets. Astron. J. 2019;157:198. [Google Scholar]
- 213.Zhu W., Dong S. Exoplanet statistics and theoretical implications. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2021;59:291–336. [Google Scholar]
- 214.Dawson R.I., Johnson J.A. Origins of hot Jupiters. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2018;56:175–221. [Google Scholar]
- 215.Lissauer J.J., Ragozzine D., Fabrycky D.C., et al. Architecture and dynamics of Kepler’s candidate multiple transiting planet systems. Astrophys. J. (Suppl.) 2011;197:8. [Google Scholar]
- 216.Tremaine S., Dong S. The statistics of multi-planet systems. Astron. J. 2012;143:94. [Google Scholar]
- 217.Liu J., Zhang H., Howard A.W., et al. A wide star-black-hole binary system from radial-velocity measurements. Nature. 2019;575:618–621. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1766-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Liu J., Zheng Z., Soria R., et al. Phase-dependent study of near-infrared disk emission lines in LB-1. Astrophys. J. 2020;900:42. [Google Scholar]
- 219.El-Badry K., Quataert E. Not so fast: LB-1 is unlikely to contain a 70 black hole. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2020;493:L22–L27. [Google Scholar]
- 220.Shenar T., Bodensteiner J., Abdul-Masih M., et al. The “hidden” companion in LB-1 unveiled by spectral disentangling. Astron. Astrophys. 2020;639:L6. [Google Scholar]
- 221.Gu W.-M., Mu H.-J., Fu J.-B., et al. A method to search for black hole candidates with giant companions by LAMOST. Astrophys. J. (Lett.) 2019;872:L20. [Google Scholar]
- 222.Zheng L.-L., Gu W.-M., Yi T., et al. Searching for black hole candidates by LAMOST and ASAS-SN. Astron. J. 2019;158:179. [Google Scholar]
- 223.Yi T., Sun M., Gu W.-M. Mining for candidates of Galactic stellar-mass black hole binaries with LAMOST. Astrophys. J. 2019;886:97. [Google Scholar]
- 224.Dong X.Y., Wu X.-B., Ai Y.L., et al. The large sky area multi-object fibre spectroscopic telescope (LAMOST) quasar survey: quasar properties from data release two and three. Astron. J. 2018;155:189. [Google Scholar]
- 225.Yao S., Wu X.-B., Ai Y.L., et al. The large sky area multi-object fiber spectroscopic telescope (LAMOST) quasar survey: the fourth and fifth data releases. Astrophys. J. (Suppl.) 2019;240:6. [Google Scholar]
- 226.Ai Y.L., Wu X.-B., Yang J., et al. The large sky area multi-object fiber spectroscopic telescope quasar survey: quasar properties from the first data release. Astron. J. 2016;151:24. [Google Scholar]
- 227.Yang Q., Wu X.-B., Fan X., et al. Discovery of 21 new changing-look AGNs in the northern sky. Astrophys. J. 2018;862:109. [Google Scholar]
- 228.Feng S., Shen S.-Y., Yuan F.-T., et al. Bivariate luminosity function of galaxy pairs. Astrophys. J. 2019;880:114. [Google Scholar]
- 229.Napolitano N.R., D’Ago G., Tortora C., et al. Central velocity dispersion catalogue of LAMOST-DR7 galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2020;498:5704–5719. [Google Scholar]
- 230.Casares J., Negueruela I., Ribo M., et al. A Be-type star with a black-hole companion. Nature. 2014;505:378–381. doi: 10.1038/nature12916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231.Thompson T.A., Kochanek C.S., Stanek K.Z., et al. A noninteracting low-mass black hole–giant star binary system. Science. 2019;366:637–640. doi: 10.1126/science.aau4005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232.Rivinius T., Baade D., Hadrava P., et al. A naked-eye triple system with a nonaccreting black hole in the inner binary. Astron. Astrophys. 2020;637:L3. [Google Scholar]
- 233.Jayasinghe T., Stanek K.Z., Thompson T.A., et al. A unicorn in monoceros: the 3 dark companion to the bright, nearby red giant V723 Mon is a non-interacting, mass-gap black hole candidate. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2021;504:2577. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.









