Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2022 Mar 23;12:5042. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08932-4

Energy transfer of trapped electron turbulence in tokamak fusion plasmas

Lei Qi 1,
PMCID: PMC8942984  PMID: 35322113

Abstract

The first principle gyrokinetic simulations of trapped electron turbulence in tokamak fusion plasmas demonstrate the energy transfers from the most linearly unstable modes at high kθρi1 to intermediate kθ via parametric decay process in a short period of linear-nonlinear transition phase. Dominant nonlinear wave-wave interactions occur near the mode rational surface mnq. In fully nonlinear turbulence, inverse energy cascade occurs between a cutoff wave number kc and kθρi1 with a power law scaling |ϕ(kθ)|2k-3, while modes with k<kc are suppressed. The numerical findings show fair agreement with both the weak turbulence theory and realistic experiments on Tore Supra tokamak.

Subject terms: Magnetically confined plasmas, Nuclear fusion and fission, Computational science, Nonlinear phenomena


Physics of microturbulence in tokamak is a crucial subject for fusion plasmas1. Energy transfer of turbulent fluctuations is a fundamental and key property. Understanding the energy transfer in microturbulence can be beneficial for controlling the anomalous transport and improving the energy confinement in tokamak. Besides, the wave number spectrum is a basic physical quantity that is predictable from analytical theories and measurable in both numerical and realistic experiments. This allows us to acquire a thorough investigation of the energy transfer from analytics, simulations and experiments.

Energy transfer through nonlinear wave-wave interactions requires the conservation of energy and momentum, which can be characterized by the matching criteria of frequency ω0=ω1+ω2 and wave number k0=k1+k2 respectively in common triad interactions2. There are two distinct phenomena in nonlinear wave-wave interactions. One is parametric decay, which characterizes a three-wave interaction process involving a pump wave (ωp,kp) with high amplitude over some threshold and two daughter wave modes (ωd1,kd1) and (ωd2,kd2). In the parametric decay process, the pump wave decays, and the two daughter wave modes grow by gaining energy from the pump wave. The three waves involved satisfy the matching conditions ωp=ωd1+ωd2 and kp=kd1+kd2. This process is commonly observed in various plasma waves in astrophysics3, solar4, dusty5, laser6,7 and magnetized confined plasmas8. The other is cascading in turbulence. Kraichnan and Kolmogorov9 proposed the classic energy-enstrophy cascade in 2D turbulence, which shows the power spectrum of energy intensity E(k)k-5/3 in the inverse energy cascading range and E(k)k-3 in the forward enstrophy cascading range. The Kraichnan-Kolmogorov scaling law was reproduced in the Charney–Hasegawa–Mima (CHM) 2D turbulent plasmas10. CHM equation can be reduced to the 2D Navier–Stokes (NS) equation in the limit of λ0. Here λ is a parameter characterize the wave number corresponding to the ratio of system size to ion Larmor radius (ρi). Equivalently, the Kraichnan-Kolmogorov scaling corresponds to the power laws of the electrostatic potential intensity |ϕ(k)|2k-8/3 for the inverse energy cascade and |ϕ(k)|2k-4 for the forward enstrophy cascade in the CHM 2D turbulence system. Here the electrostatic energy intensity E(k) connects to the electrostatic potential intensity |ϕ(k)|2 by E(k)=k|ϕ(k)|2, and the total electrostatic energy E=0E(k)dk. This cascade picture is a result of local interactions. With disparate scale interactions it was shown |ϕ(k)|2k-3/(1+k2)2 in drift-wave turbulence by a simple shell model11.

Turbulence driven by trapped electron magnetic curvature drift resonance is primary in tokamak plasmas with a typical poloidal scale normalized to ion Larmor radius kθρi112. Here ρi=miTi/|q|B0 with mi,Ti,|q| being the ion mass, temperature, charge respectively, and B0 is the magnetic filed. The trapped electron turbulence is in the ion scale. Understanding the energy transfer in trapped electron turbulence is of interest for tokamak plasmas, but still remains unclear. Especially, turbulence fluctuation characteristics in the short regime from late linear growth phase to early nonlinear saturation phase has not been touched yet. This transition period is therefore of particular interest. Weak turbulence theory of collisionless trapped electron (CTEM) turbulence demonstrated the cascade |ϕ(k)|2k-3 due to ion Compton scattering13,14. It was also shown the cascading scaling |ϕ(k)|2|δn(k)|2k-3 in the range kθρi1 with TEM turbulence dominant from experimental measurements on Tore Supra tokamak15.

In this paper, we investigate the properties of energy transfer in collisionless trapped electron turbulence. Turbulent fluctuation spectrum is found near the mode rational surface mnq, where dominant wave-wave interactions occur. Here mnq are poloidal, toroidal mode number and magnetic safety factor respectively. Energy transfers from high kθρi1 modes to a transitional intermediate k modes in a short period of linear-nonlinear transition via parametric decay process. Inverse energy cascade is eventually observed with |ϕ(k)|2k-3 starting between a finite cutoff wave number kc and kθρi1, while modes with k<kc are suppressed. The cutoff wave number kc can be defined and measured as the wave number where the spectral intensity |ϕ(k)|2 peaks and starts decaying monotonically to higher k. These findings show fairly good agreement with weak turbulence theory and experimental measurements on Tore Supra tokamak.

Methods

Numerical experiment platform

All simulations presented in this article were conducted on the numerical experiment platform gKPSP16,17. gKPSP is a global gyrokinetic particle-in-cell (PIC) code to simulate electrostatic turbulence in general tokamak configurations. In this program, ions are evolved following the gyrokinetic equations18,19, while kinetic trapped electrons are governed by the bounce-averaged kinetic theory20 with drift-kinetic passing electrons passively responding to fluctuations. A zonal flow conserving Krook operator21 is employed to control discrete particle noises and to provide source energy for maintaining the temperature and density profiles so that their averages in time remain close to initial values. The simulation program has been successfully applied to study CTEM turbulence in various situations2224.

Simulation setup

Electron temperature gradient Te provides the main source energy for the trapped electron turbulence in this study. The normalized electron temperature gradient R/LTe varies from 5 to 9, while ion temperature gradient R/LTi=2.2 and electron (ion) density gradient R/Ln=2.2 are fixed. R=1.86m is the tokamak major radius and Lα-(dlnα/dr)-1. The minor radius is a=0.666m with a/ρi220 at middle radius, and the magnetic field B0=1.91T. Hydrogen plasma is used in the simulation with mass ratio mi/me=1836. Radial profiles of the safety factor q, magnetic shear s^q, R/Ln, R/LTi, R/LTe=6.9, ion (electron) temperature Ti (Te) are presented in Fig. 1. Finite density and temperature gradients are set up in the range r/a[0.25,0.75], where micro-instability and turbulence can be destabilized. The radial profiles are set up to assure at the middle radius r=0.5a, q1.4, s^q=0.78 and Ti=Te. In nonlinear simulations, we set up the maximum toroidal wave number nmax=116, which corresponds to a maximum poloidal wave number kθρi slightly larger than 1.0 at mid-radius, while modes with n>nmax are sunk. Zonal flow (n=0) self-consistently driven by the CTEM turbulence is included in all nonlinear simulations. Collision operator is turned off, thus collisionless trapped electron turbulence can be destabilized with the spatial scale kθρi1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Simulation setup of radial profiles. Safety factor q and magnetic shear s^q (top figure), normalized gradients R/Ln=R/LTi=2.2 and R/LTe=6.9 (middle figure), ion Ti and electron Te temperature (bottom figure).

Results

Parametric decay in linear-nonlinear transition

The spectra of electrostatic potential fluctuation ϕ(t,kθ,kζ) is measured at the middle radius r/a=0.5 in the numerical experiment of the case with R/LTe=6.9. Three typical time regimes are selected, the late linear phase at time t=17.0R/VTi (Here VTi=Ti/mi is the ion thermal velocity.), the early nonlinear saturation t=30.7R/VTi and the fully nonlinear phase t=90.0R/VTi. Contours of log(|ϕ|) in poloidal-toroidal wave number (kθ,kζ) domain are plotted for the three selected time regimes as well as the time-average one in the nonlinear stage in Fig. 2. The most linearly growing mode can be found at t=17.0R/VTi as k0(kθ0ρi,kζ0ρi)(1.08,0.142). This mode decays right away entering the nonlinear stage, and the two most dominant modes can be recognized at t=30.7R/VTi as k1(kθ1ρi,kζ1ρi)(0.525,0.066) and k2(kθ2ρi,kζ2ρi)(0.558,0.071). These three modes can match the parametric decay criteria k0k1+k2. Frequency of the most linearly unstable modes is shown by circles in Fig. 3 as a function of poloidal wave number kθρi. The poloidal mode number is calculated by kθ=nq/r, and the frequency is measured at different n values. Red dashed line in the figure indicates the linear relation between frequency and wave number, i.e., ωkθ. Therefore, for three wave modes matching the wave number condition kθ0kθ1+kθ2, the frequency criteria of triad interactions can be matched up consistently ω0ω1+ω2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Contour plots of the turbulence electrostatic potential spectra log(|ϕ(kθ,kζ)|) in the poloidal-toroidal wave number (kθρi-kζρi) domain. At time t=17.0R/VTi (late linear phase), 30.7R/VTi (early nonlinear phase), 90.0R/VTi (fully nonlinear phase) and time-averaged spectrum in the nonlinear saturation. Black dash lines indicate the approximate mode rational surface.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Frequency (depicted as circles) of the most linearly unstable modes as a function of poloidal wave number kθρi. Red dash line shows the approximate linear relation ωkθ.

The parametric decay process in the linear-nonlinear transition phase can be clearly observed from the time evolution plots of log(|ϕ(k)|) for the three modes k0 (top), k1 (middle) and k2 (bottom), as shown in Fig. 4. After the linear growth, wave modes enter the linear-nonlinear transition phase, where waves cease growing and saturate. This phase is very short 1 period, and the system starts the nonlinear evolution. The most linearly unstable mode k0 decays within a couple of periods and transfers energy to two daughter wave modes k1 and k2 by the matching criteria. The daughter modes absorb the energy and grow in the mean time. The parametric decay process is the dominant energy transfer mechanism in the early trapped electron turbulence.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Parametric decay process. Time evolutions of log|ϕ| in the linear-nonlinear transition phase for the most linearly growing mode k0 (top-black), the two daughter wave modes k1 (middle-blue) and k2 (bottom-red).

Since in the tokamak configuration, poloidal wave number km-nq, k0 around the mode rational surface m-nq0. Therefore, from the theoretical point of view, the Landau damping becomes weaker as k approaches 0, which has also been demonstrated in the experiment25 showing that large k modes are Landau damped. Due to the minimum Landau damping, the most unstable modes locate around the rational surface mnq, which indicates the surface kζαkθ (α a constant). This is also demonstrated from the simulations and shown by the black dashed lines in Fig. 2. Other gyrokinetic codes such as GT5D and ORB5 demonstrated that keeping 2Δm+1=11 poloidal modes per toroidal mode and per magnetic surface is sufficient to converge the ion heat diffusivity and the turbulence spectra from ion temperature gradient (ITG) driven turbulence26, which is consistent with the aforementioned findings for TEM. Here |m-nq|<Δm defines the parameter Δm. Since the linear frequency of trapped electron instability ωkθ, the triad wave-wave interactions can automatically occur on the mode rational surface. Therefore, the energy is distributed around the rational surface, even in the nonlinear turbulence as shown by the t=90.0R/VTi and time-average spectra in Fig. 2. Poloidal spectrum broadening can be observed at some high amplitude kζ modes in the figure.

Inverse energy cascade scaling law

Inverse energy cascade |ϕ(kθ)|2kθ-3 can be observed in the poloidal wave number spectrum in the regime kθρi1 as shown in Fig. 5. For the sake of generality, we present three cases with different electron temperature gradients R/LTe=5.0 (green), 6.9 (black) and 9.0 (blue). The spectra are obtained by time averaging in the saturation stage from t=40R/VTi up to t=300R/VTi, when the turbulence has been fully evolved. The power law scaling kθ-3 fits well for all cases, as indicated by red dash lines. This cascade scaling from the simulations agrees well with the weak turbulence kinetic theory of trapped electron drift wave turbulence, e.g. Eq. (81) in Ref.13 and Eq. (27) in Ref.14. The kinetic theories predict the inverse energy cascading |ϕ(kθ)|2kθ-3 due to ion Compton scattering. This power law scaling factor -3 is close to the classic Kolmogorov inverse energy cascade scaling factor -8/3. On the other hand, the shell model11 of drift wave turbulence predicts the inverse energy cascade scaling |ϕ(k)|2k-3/(1+k2)2, which is also close to our simulation results |ϕ(kθ)|2kθ-3 in trapped electron turbulence for kθρi<1.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Poloidal wave number spectra of |ϕ(kθ)|2 for three cases R/LTe=5.0 (green), 6.9 (black) and 9.0 (blue) in log-log scale. Red dash lines indicate the scaling of inverse energy cascade |ϕ(kθ)|2kθ-3. Vertical dash-dot lines depict the cutoff wave numbers for cases with the same color.

Measurements on Tore Supra tokamak show the spectrum power law scaling of density fluctuation |δn(k)|2k-3±0.5 in the length scale regime kρi115. The analysis of the experimental parameters also show the dominance of trapped electron drift wave instability. Therefore, the cascade |ϕ(kθ)|2kθ-3 from our simulations of trapped electron turbulence agrees well with the experimental measurements on Tore Supra tokamak. We have so far demonstrated consistent inverse energy cascade |ϕ(kθ)|2kθ-3 of trapped electron turbulence with kθρi1 from gyrokinetic simulations, weak turbulence theories and experiments.

One can also observe from Fig. 5 that the inverse energy cascade starts at a cutoff wave number kc, while spectra in the range kθ<kc are suppressed. Nonlinear interactions between disparate kθ scales via trapped electron scattering, which is a resonance process between the beat wave and the trapped electron precession drift frequencies, is believed to be the mechanism suppressing modes with kθ<kc14. Vertical dash-dot lines depict approximately the cutoff wave number kcρi0.2-0.4 for the three cases with the same color in Fig. 5. The cutoff wave number increases with electron temperature gradient R/LTe. This finding agrees fairly with the prediction from weak turbulence theory. Eq. (33) in Ref.14 gives the theoretical expression of the cutoff wave number kc (kL in the equation). We can obtain the dependence of the cutoff wave number kc on ηeLn/LTe by evaluating the derivative dkc/dηe>0 from the Eq. (33) in Ref.14. It is straight forward to yield dkc/dηe>0 if R/GLn-3/2>0. G0.64s^+0.57=1.07 by averaging over the azimuthal angle with the magnetic shear s^=0.78 in the simulations, and R/Ln=2.2. So with simulation parameters, we have the cutoff wave number increases monotonically with R/LTe. The simulation results are consistent with the theoretical predictions.

On the other hand, the experiments on Tore Supra tokamak also demonstrate the cutoff wave number, where the inverse energy cascade |δn(k)|2k-3±0.5 starts, e.g., Figures 2,3, 5–7 in Ref.15. The cutoff wave number kcρi0.3-0.5 is close to our simulation observations considering the difference of parameters. The spectra with k<kc is suppressed to be near a constant from the experimental measurements.

From simulations, theories and experiments, we show consistent feature of cutoff wave number in the turbulence spectra. Modes with k<kc is suppressed via trapped electron scattering, while spectra in the regime k>kc to kρi1 decay monotonically with a cascading scaling k-3. We note that this characteristic supports the trapped electron turbulence as a potential candidate for the quasi-coherent mode (QCM) observed in experiments27. The trend of the cutoff wave number kc on ηe observed from the simulation as well as the weak turbulence theory predictions (eg. Eq. (33) in Ref.14) can be inspiring for the experimental study of trapped electron turbulence in tokamaks.

Discussions

Figure 6 presents the overall picture of the energy transfer in the trapped electron turbulence. Near the end of the linear phase t=28R/VTi, the most growing mode locates at high kθ1. The energy transfers from the most linearly unstable mode to intermediate kθ modes via parametric decay process within a short period of linear-nonlinear transition phase. The blue line depicts the spectrum at t=33R/VTi after the parametric decay. The turbulence eventually evolves to an inverse cascade |ϕ(kθ)|2kθ-3 between the cutoff wave number kc and kθρi1 due to ion Compton scattering. Modes with k<kc are suppressed by disparate nonlinear interactions via trapped electron scattering. Dominant nonlinear wave-wave interactions occur near the mode rational surface mnq. Findings from simulations agree well with both analytical weak turbulence theory and realistic experiments on Tore Supra Tokamak.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Overall picture of the energy transfer process. Plot of |ϕ(kθ)|2 for three different time t=28R/VTi (black), 33R/VTi (blue) and 90R/VTi (red) shows the energy transfer in trapped electron turbulence.

For the future work, characteristics of energy transfer in ITG turbulence and ITG-TEM co-existence turbulence comparing to CTEM turbulence draw us the further interest. We also note that it has been extensively studied in experiments28,29 showing that the inverse energy cascade has strong effects on the generation of zonal flow and therefore the evolution and suppression of plasma turbulence. The findings inspire us to study the impacts of energy transfer on the zonal flow generation in micro-turbulence with our numerical experimental platform in future research.

Acknowledgements

The author L. Qi would like to acknowledge T. S. Hahm for useful discussion. This work is supported by the R&D Program through Korea Institute of Fusion Energy (KFE) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning of the Republic of Korea (KFE-EN2141-7). Partial of simulations were run on KFE KAIROS super computer.

Author contributions

L.Q. made full contributions to this article including conducting the numerical experiments, analyzing the data, interpreting the physics, writing the manuscript etc.

Data availability

The data is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Horton W. Drift waves and transport. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1999;71:735. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.71.735. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tsytovich V. Nonlinear Effects in Plasma. Springer; 1970. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chen L, Zonca F. Gyrokinetic theory of parametric decays of kinetic Alfvén waves. EPL. 2011;96:35001. doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/96/35001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shoda M, Yokiyama T, Suzuki TK. Frequency-dependent Alfvén-wave propagation in the solar wind: Onset and suppression of parametric decay instability. ApJ. 2018;860:17. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac218. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jamil M, et al. The parametric decay of dust ion acoustic waves in non-uniform quantum dusty magnetoplasmas. Phys. Plasmas. 2011;18:063705. doi: 10.1063/1.3595235. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rosenbluth MN, Liu CS. Excitation of plasma waves by two laser beams. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1972;29:701. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.29.701. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Grebogi C, Liu CS. Parametric decay of extraordinary electromagnetic waves into two upper hybrid plasmons. J. Plasma Phys. 1980;23:147–156. doi: 10.1017/S0022377800022212. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Baek SG, et al. Measurements of ion cyclotron parametric decay of lower hybrid waves at the high-field side of Alcator C-Mod. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion. 2013;55:052001. doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/55/5/052001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kraichnan RH. Inertial ranges in two-dimensional turbulence. Phys. Fluids. 1967;10:1417. doi: 10.1063/1.1762301. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Watanabe T, Fujisaka H. Dynamical scaling law in the development of drift wave turbulence. Phys. Rev. E. 1997;55:5575. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.55.5575. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gürcan ÖD, et al. Wave-number spectrum of drift-wave turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009;102:255002. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.255002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Adam JC, Tang WM, Rutherford PH. Destabilization of the trapped-electron mode by magnetic curvature drift resonances. Phys. Fluids. 1976;19:561. doi: 10.1063/1.861489. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gang FY, Diamond PH, Rosenbluth MN. A kinetic theory of trapped-electron-driven drift wave turbulence in a sheared magnetic field. Phys. Fluids B Plasma Phys. 1991;3:68. doi: 10.1063/1.859957. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hahm TS, Tang WM. Weak turbulence theory of collisionless trapped electron driven drift instability in tokamaks. Phys. Fluids B Plasma Phys. 1991;3:989. doi: 10.1063/1.859854. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hennequin P, et al. Scaling laws of density fluctuations at high-k on Tore Supra. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion. 2004;46:B121–B133. doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/46/12B/011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Qi L, Kwon JM, Hahm TS, Jo G. Gyrokinetic simulations of electrostatic microinstabilities with bounce-averaged kinetic electrons for shaped tokamak plasmas. Phys. Plasmas. 2016;23:062513. doi: 10.1063/1.4954050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kwon JM, Qi L, Yi S, Hahm TS. ITG-TEM turbulence simulation with bounce-averaged kinetic electrons in tokamak geometry. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2017;215:81. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2017.02.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hahm TS. Nonlinear gyrokinetic equations for tokamak microturbulence. Phys. Fluids. 1988;31:2670. doi: 10.1063/1.866544. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Brizard A. Nonlinear gyrokinetic Maxwell–Vlasov equations using magnetic coordinates. J. Plasma Phys. 1989;41:541–59. doi: 10.1017/S0022377800014070. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fong BH, Hahm TS. Bounce-averaged kinetic equations and neoclassical polarization density. Phys. Plasmas. 1999;6:188. doi: 10.1063/1.873272. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.McMillan BF, et al. Long global gyrokinetic simulations: Source terms and particle noise control. Phys. Plasmas. 2008;15:052308. doi: 10.1063/1.2921792. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Qi L, Kwon JM, Hahm TS, Yi S. Bounce-averaged gyrokinetic simulation of trapped electron turbulence in elongated tokamak plasmas. Nucl. Fusion. 2017;57:124002. doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/aa88e1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Qi L, Kwon JM, Jhang H, Hahm TS, Leconte M. Nonlinear gyrokinetic analysis of linear ohmic confinement to saturated ohmic confinement transition. Nucl. Fusion. 2020;60:036009. doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ab66dc. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Qi L, Choi MJ, Kwon JM, Hahm TS. Role of zonal flow staircase in electron heat avalanches in KSTAR L-mode plasmas. Nucl. Fusion. 2020;61:026010. doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/abc976. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zweben SJ, Medley SS. Visible imaging of edge fluctuations in the TFTR tokamak. Phys. Fluids B. 1989;1:2058. doi: 10.1063/1.859070. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jolliet S, et al. Parallel filtering in global gyrokinetic simulations. J. Comput. Phys. 2012;231:745. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2011.01.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lee W, et al. Study of the origin of quasi-coherent modes in low-density KSTAR ECH plasmas. Nucl. Fusion. 2021;61:016008. doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/abbdc0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Xia H, Shats MG. Spectral energy transfer and generation of turbulent structures in toroidal plasma. Phys. Plasmas. 2004;11:561. doi: 10.1063/1.1637607. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shen Y, et al. The scale-to-scale energy transfers correlated with the development of turbulence in toroidal plasmas. Nucl. Fusion. 2019;59:044001. doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/aafaac. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES