Abstract
Predictors of needle-knife pre-cut papillotomy (NKP) failure for patients with difficult biliary cannulation has not been reported. Between 2004 and 2016, 390 patients with difficult biliary cannulation undergoing NKP were included in this single-center study. Following NKP, deep biliary cannulation failed in 95 patients (24.4%, NKP-failure group) and succeeded in 295 patients (75.6%, NKP-success group). Patient and technique factors were used to identify the predictors of initial NKP failure. Compared with the NKP-success group, periampullary diverticulum (28.4% vs. 18%, p = 0.028), surgically altered anatomy (13.7% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.049), number of cases performed by less experienced endoscopists, and bleeding during NKP (38.9% vs. 3.4%, p < 0.001), were significantly more frequent in the NKP-failure group. On multivariate analysis, surgically altered anatomy (OR 2.374, p = 0.045), endoscopists’ experience (OR 3.593, p = 0.001), and bleeding during NKP (OR 21.18, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with initial failure of NKP. In conclusion, NKP is a highly technique-sensitive procedure, as endoscopists’ experience, bleeding during NKP, and surgically altered anatomy were predictors of initial NKP failure.
Subject terms: Gastrointestinal diseases, Gastrointestinal system
Introduction
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been considered as the most important therapeutic procedure for biliary disease1. Deep bile duct cannulation is a key step in the success of therapeutic ERCP, but it cannot be always achieved2. It can be difficult or even impossible in approximately 5–20% of patients by using conventional cannulation methods3. Patients with such difficulties generally have papillary stenosis, impacted stones in the distal end of the common bile duct (CBD), a displaced papillary orifice caused by periampullary tumor or diverticulum, abnormal papillary position, or surgically altered anatomy4–7. In such cases, pre-cut techniques are most often used as a salvage procedure after failure of conventional methods of bile duct cannulation8,9. Needle-knife pre-cut sphincterotomy, including needle-knife pre-cut papillotomy (NKP) and needle-knife fistulotomy (NKF), is probably the most widely used pre-cut technique9–11. NKP is preferred by some centers or some endoscopists. However, mastering the skills required for NKP is difficult12. On literature search, the reported initial success rate of NKP in difficult cannulation cases ranged widely from 71.3 to 92%10,13–19. Therefore, some factors may contribute to the initial failure of NKP, on which there are no reported studies. We conducted this study to analyze the factors associated with the initial failure of NKP in patients with difficult bile duct cannulation.
Materials and methods
Between January 2004 and December 2016, a total of 8979 patients with an intact major papilla who underwent ERCP due to biliary tract diseases were selected from the database of the Therapeutic Endoscopic Center of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan. Among them, 469 (5.2%) patients underwent needle knife pre-cut sphincterotomy. Patients who had an indwelling biliary stent (n = 34) or a nasobiliary drainage tube (n = 5) before pre-cut sphincterotomy, or who had impacted stones in the ampulla of Vater receiving pre-cut sphincterotomy without an attempt of conventional cannulation methods (n = 33), were excluded from the study. Therefore, 397 patients who met the definition of difficult biliary cannulation (as described below) and underwent pre-cut sphincterotomy were enrolled. Because the patient number was small, seven patients who underwent NKF were further excluded in the study. The study was approved by the institutional review board of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (202000751B0C601). Since this is a retrospective study using clinical routine treatment or diagnostic medical records, and no human immunodeficiency virus-positive cases were involved, the Chang Gung Medical Foundation Institutional Review Board approved the waiver of the participant's consent. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.
ERCP and NKP procedures
All patients underwent ERCP in the prone position and intravenous sedation with midazolam and fentanyl (meperidine in the early period). The duodenoscopes used were either TJF-240/260 or JF-240/260 (Olympus Optical Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan). All procedures were performed by five endoscopists (A–E). The annual mean number of ERCP cases for endoscopists A, B, C, D, and E was 300, 200, 200, 200, and 130, respectively. Only endoscopist A (performing ERCP since 1995) had NKP experience before the study. Because endoscopists B, C, D, and E learned the ERCP/NKP techniques of endoscopist A, there was no difference in the choice of initial cannulation method among endoscopists. Initial selective cannulation of the CBD was attempted with a cannula or pull-type sphincterotome, depending on the preference of the individual endoscopist. Contrast-assisted cannulation was performed in the early stages of the study, while wire-guided cannulation was the preferred method in the later stages. Bile duct cannulation using a cannula or sphincterotomy with contrast guidance and guidewire assistance is generally considered the standard cannulation technique20,21. When these methods failed, the double guidewire technique was sometimes performed by some of the endoscopists if the pancreatic duct (P-duct) was cannulated. Since the double guidewire technique was not difficult, the endoscopists could perform bile duct cannulation in the usual way (standard technique) after placing the guidewire in the P-duct. Therefore, the standard technique together with the double guide wire technique was considered as the conventional cannulation methods in this study. Difficult bile duct cannulation was defined when the conventional cannulation methods failed to achieve deep bile duct cannulation. In this case, the late pre-cut strategy (cannulation time often exceeded 20 min) was carried out prior to 2015, and early pre-cut strategy was frequently adopted after 20158,22. Early NKP was performed when cannulation time was > 5–10 min or unintentional P-duct cannulation was performed more than once21,23.
NKP was performed immediately after the failure of the conventional cannulation methods during the same endoscopic session. The NKP method was the same as that described in our previous study24, as shown in Fig. 1. The needle-knife sphincterotome (Rx Needle-Knife XL; Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, USA) and an ICC 200 or VIO 200D electrosurgical unit (ERBE, Tübingen, Germany), which produced blended current, were used for NKP. After puncturing the papilla above the orifice, the incision was made upward along the axis of the bile duct from the papillary orifice. The incision was extended until the CBD was exposed, followed by a small incision in the biliary sphincter muscle. The CBD was then cannulated directly with the closed needle-knife or with a wire-guided cannula/sphincterotome. The success of the NKP procedure was defined as the deep placement of a catheter or a sphincterotome into the CBD with the acquisition of a satisfactory cholangiogram. After achieving deep cannulation, a pull-type sphincterotomy was used to extend it towards the duodenal wall superiorly. Whether to place a P-duct stent before NKP depended on whether the P-duct had been cannulated or as per the judgment of the endoscopist.
Figure 1.
Needle-knife pre-cut papillotomy. (a) Original major papilla. (b) The incision is made upward along the axis of the bile duct from the papillary orifice. (c) The overlying mucosa is incised, and the bile duct is exposed. (d) Successful biliary cannulation is achieved.
Predictors
Both patient and technique factors were used to identify the predictors associated with the failure of initial NKP25. Patient factors were similar to those of difficult biliary cannulation, including age, sex, the diameter of CBD, major papilla status, and indications of ERCP4,5. Major papilla status included periampullary diverticulum, enlarged or swollen papilla, low-set papilla, impacted stone at the ampulla of Vater, periampullary tumor, and surgically altered anatomy. The indications of ERCP included choledocholithiasis, malignant or benign biliary stricture, bile leak, and suspected Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Technique factors, based on few individual reports, were decided on consensus by the authors, including the endoscopists’ experience in NKP, bleeding during NKP, early vs. late pre-cut, and placement of a P-duct stent before NKP25–27. Bleeding during NKP was defined as bleeding induced by NKP, which could interfere with or eventually cause interruption of NKP (due to blocking of the endoscopic view, Fig. 2)26.
Figure 2.
Bleeding during needle-knife pre-cut papillotomy could result in failure of the procedure.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test (when appropriate) and independent Student’s t-test for categorical and continuous variables, respectively, between the groups of patients with failed and successful NKP. Continuous variables were expressed as median with range. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with initial NKP failure. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 20.0; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A two-tailed p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Informed consent statement
Due to the retrospective nature of the study, the institutional review board waived the requirement for patient consent.
Results
The percentage of difficult cannulation requiring NKP was 4% (199/5367) in the contrast-guided cohort and 6.2% (191/3063) in the guidewire-assisted cohort (p = 0.462). During the initial ERCP session, after NKP, deep bile duct cannulation failed in 95 patients (24.4%, NKP-failure group) and was successful in 295 patients (75.6%, NKP-success group). According to the baseline characteristics of patients as listed in Table 1, the median age of 390 patients was 72 years, and the difference was not significant between the two groups. Male patients comprised 52.3%, and the ratio between the two groups was similar. Choledocholithiasis was the most common indication of ERCP (56.4%), followed by malignant biliary stricture (33.6%). There was no significant difference between the two groups on any indication of ERCP. The median CBD diameter was 1.2 cm, which was similar between the two groups. Periampullary diverticulum accounted for 20.5% of the study population, and it was significantly more frequent in the NKP-failure group (28.4% vs. 18.0%, p = 0.028). An enlarged or swollen papilla was present in 11.3% of the patients, and the ratios of the two groups were similar. Thirteen patients (3.3%) had impacted CBD stones in the ampulla of Vater, and all were in the NKP-success group (0 vs. 4.4%, p = 0.037). The proportions of patients with periampullary tumors and a low-set papilla were 5.4% and 3.6%, respectively, which were not statistically significant between the two groups. Surgically altered anatomy accounted for 8.7% of the study population, and it was significantly more frequent in the NKP-failure group (13.7% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.049).
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of the patients.
| Variables | Total (n = 390) | NKP failure group (n = 95) | NKP success group (n = 295) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median age, years (range) | 72 (21–96) | 72 (27–93) | 71 (21–96) | 0.875 |
| Male, n | 204(52.3%) | 51(53.7%) | 153 (51.9%) | 0.757 |
| Indications of ERCP | ||||
| Choledocholithiasis, n | 220(56.4%) | 56 (58.9%) | 164 (55.6%) | 0.566 |
| Malignant biliary stricture, n | 131(33.6%) | 32 (33.7%) | 99 (33.6%) | 0.982 |
| Benign biliary stricture, n | 23 (5.9%) | 4 (4.2%) | 19 (6.4%) | 0.422 |
| Bile leak, n | 14 (3.6%) | 2 (2.1%) | 12 (4.1%) | 0.371 |
| Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, n | 2 (0.5%) | 1 (1.1%) | 1 (0.3%) | 0.397 |
| Median CBD diameter, cm (range) | 1.2 (0.4–4.1) | 1.2 (0.4–4.1) | 1.2 (0.4–2.9) | 0.866 |
| Major papilla status | ||||
| Periampullary diverticulum, n | 80 (20.5%) | 27 (28.4%) | 53 (18.0%) | 0.028 |
| Enlarged or swelling, n | 44 (11.3%) | 12 (12.6%) | 32 (10.8%) | 0.633 |
| Impacted stone, n | 13 (3.3%) | 0 (0%) | 13 (4.4%) | 0.037 |
| Tumor, n | 21 (5.4%) | 7 (7.4%) | 14 (4.7%) | 0.325 |
| Low set papilla, n | 14 (3.6%) | 3 (3.2%) | 11 (3.7%) | 0.795 |
| Surgically altered anatomy, n | 34 (8.7%) | 13 (13.7%) | 21 (7.1%) | 0.049 |
CBD common bile duct, NKP needle-knife pre-cut papillotomy, ERCP endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedure.
Technique factors and NKP-related complications were listed in Table 2. During the study period, endoscopists A, B, C, D, and E performed 186, 93, 49, 43, and 19 NKP procedures, respectively, with success rates of 80.1% (149/186), 76.3% (71/93), 73.5% (36/49), 62.8% (27/43), and 63.2% (12/19), respectively. For statistical analysis, endoscopist A was used as a reference, B and C were considered to have intermediate experience, and D and E together were considered inexperienced. There was a significant difference between the two groups regarding the endoscopists’ experience (p = 0.024). The occurrence of bleeding during NKP was significantly more frequent in the NKP-failure group than that in the success group (38.9% vs. 3.4%, p < 0.001). A P-duct stent was placed before NKP in 39 (10%) patients. The ratio of P-duct stent placement was not significantly different between the two groups (8.4% vs. 10.5%, p = 0.694). Ninety-six patients underwent early pre-cut and 294 patients underwent late pre-cut. There was no difference in NKP success between the early and late pre-cut groups (74.8% or 75/96 vs. 78.1% or 220/294, p = 0.555). Early pre-cut was used in 22.1% of NKP-failure group and 25.4% in NKP-success group (p = 0.514).
Table 2.
Technique factors, and adverse events of needle knife pre-cut papillotomy.
| Variables | Total (n = 390) | NKP failure group (n = 95) | NKP success group (n = 295) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endoscopists, n | 0.024 | |||
| A | 186 (47.7%) | 37 (38.9%) | 149 (50.5%) | |
| B + C | 142 (36.4%) | 35 (36.8%) | 107 (36.3%) | |
| D + E | 62 (15.9%) | 23 (24.2%) | 39 (13.2%) | |
| Bleeding during NKP, n | 47 (12.1%) | 37 (38.9%) | 10 (3.4%) | < 0.001 |
| P-duct stent | 39 (10%) | 8 (8.4%) | 31 (10.5%) | 0.694 |
| Early pre-cut | 96 (24.6%) | 21 (22.1%) | 75 (25.4%) | 0.514 |
| Overall adverse events, n | 27(6.9%) | 4 (4.2%) | 23 (7.8%) | 0.496 |
| Perforation | 2 (0.5%) | 1 (1.1%) | 1 (0.3%) | 0.397 |
| Pancreatitis | 4 (1.0%) | 1 (1.1%) | 3 (1.0%) | 0.976 |
| Delayed bleeding | 13 (3.3%) | 1 (1.1%) | 12 (4.1%) | 0.154 |
| Cholangitis | 8 (2.1%) | 1 (1.1%) | 7 (2.4%) | 0.430 |
NKP needle-knife pre-cut papillotomy, P-duct pancreatic duct.
Adverse events occurred in 6.9% (27/390) of patients, with no significant difference between the two groups (4.2% vs 7.8%, p = 0.496). Adverse events included perforation (1.1% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.397), pancreatitis (1.1% vs. 1%, p = 0.976), delayed bleeding (1.1% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.154), and cholangitis (1.1% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.43).
In the NPK failure group (n = 95), 34 patients (36.8%) received interval ERCP, 16 patients (16.8%) received bile duct surgery, and 23 patients (24.2%) received percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. The remaining 22 patients (23.2%) did not receive any other salvage therapy due to patient refusal or MRCP (performed after initial ERCP) without bile duct lesions. The mean interval between initial and interval ERCPs was 4.3 days (range 1–9 days). A successful interval ERCP was performed in 28 patients (82.4%).
On univariate analysis, the predictive factors of initial NKP failure were periampullary diverticulum, surgically altered anatomy, endoscopists’ experience, and bleeding during NKP (Table 3). On multivariate analysis, surgically altered anatomy (odds ratio [OR] 2.374, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.020–5.526, p = 0.045), endoscopists’ experience (OR 3.593, 95% CI 1.746–7.394, p = 0.001 for endoscopists D + E), and bleeding during NKP (OR 21.18, 95% CI: 9.614–46.68, p < 0.001) remained statistically significant.
Table 3.
Univariate and multivariate analyses of the factors associated with the initial failure of needle-knife pre-cut sphincterotomy.
| Variables | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | p-value | OR (95% CI) | p-value | ||
| Age | > 70 years | 1.107 (0.696–1.761) | 0.667 | ||
| ≤ 70 years | Referent | ||||
| Sex | Female | 0.930 (0.585–1.478) | 0.757 | ||
| Male | Referent | ||||
| Choledocholithiasis | Yes | 1.147 (0.718–1.833) | 0.567 | ||
| No | Referent | ||||
| Malignant biliary stricture | Yes | 1.006 (0.616–1.640) | 0.982 | ||
| No | Referent | ||||
| Benign biliary stricture | Yes | 0.639 (0.212–1.926) | 0.426 | ||
| No | Referent | ||||
| CBD diameter | ≤ 6 mm | 0.874 (0.415–1.839) | 0.723 | ||
| > 6 mm | Referent | ||||
| Periampullary diverticulum | Yes | 1.813 (1.061–3.098) | 0.030 | 1.485 (0.784–2.815) | 0.225 |
| No | Referent | Referent | |||
| Impacted stone in the ampulla of Vater | Yes | 1.147 (0.718–1.833) | 0.567 | ||
| No | Referent | ||||
| Surgically altered anatomy | Yes | 2.069 (0.993–4.311) | 0.052 | 2.374 (1.020–5.526) | 0.045 |
| No | Referent | ||||
| Endoscopists | D + E | 2.375 (1.267–4.453) | 0.007 | 3.593 (1.746–7.394) | 0.001 |
| B + C | 1.317 (0.779–2.226) | 0.303 | 1.556 (0.830–2.917) | 0.168 | |
| A | Referent | Referent | |||
| Bleeding during NKP | Yes | 18.18 (8.559–38.62) | < 0.001 | 21.18 (9.614–46.68) | < 0.001 |
| No | Referent | Referent | |||
| P-duct stent before NKP | Yes | 0.783 (0.347–1.768) | 0.556 | ||
| No | Referent | ||||
| Early pre-cut | Yes | 0.832 (0.480–1.444) | 0.514 | ||
| No | Referent | ||||
CBD common bile duct, NKP needle-knife pre-cut papillotomy, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, P-duct pancreatic duct.
Discussion
NKP is an important and indispensable procedure for ERCP endoscopists as it is a promising option for deep bile duct cannulation in cases wherein conventional cannulation methods fail5,12. As NKP is difficult and potentially dangerous, especially when performed by inexperienced endoscopists, it is important to understand the predictors of initial NKP failure to facilitate quality improvement. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report the predictors of initial NKP failure. Our results indicated that technical factors, such as bleeding during NKP and the endoscopists’ experience, were the main factors associated with initial NKP failure. Surgically altered anatomy was the only patient factor associated with initial NKP failure on multivariate analysis.
Bleeding as a complication of needle knife pre-cut sphincterotomy was 3.03% in a systematic review of 7 randomized clinical trials (1 study with NKF or NKP, 2 with NKF, and the remaining 4 with NKP)28. Although in most cases, bleeding induced by NKP is reportedly mild and does not require blood transfusion, bleeding during NKP is a strong predictor of initial NKP failure in this study29. The key to the success of NKP is to identify the exposed CBD. However, when bleeding occurs and the endoscopic view is blocked, NKP usually results in failure. Kim et al. reported that 13% of the initial NKP failure reported in 69 patients were attributed to bleeding during the procedure26. In the present study, the incidence of bleeding during NKP was 12.1% in the entire population, but in the NKP-failure group, this rate increased to 38.9%. In contrast, the bleeding rate was only 3.4% in the NKP-success group. Therefore, during NKP, we recommend to control bleeding before it blocks the endoscopic field due to continuous bleeding as this may increase the success rate of NKP. According to our experience, due to the small caliber of most bleeding vessels, a needle knife (forced coagulation 30 W) can be used to stop the bleeding first. If the bleeding was relatively brisk or the needle knife was difficult to stop bleeding, we performed thermal coagulation using a heat probe (20 J) or hot biopsy forceps (soft coagulation 80 W).
Endoscopists’ experience is another important factor in initial NKP failure30. Like ERCP, it is difficult for beginners to master the skills required for NKP. Inexperienced endoscopists, for example, those performing not more than one sphincterotomy per week, had an initial NKP success rate of only 52%, but the complication rate could be as high as 24%31. Several studies have reported a learning curve involved in mastering the NKP technology; however, NKP was performed by a single endoscopist in their studies2,32,33. Unlike the above studies, the NKP procedures in this study were performed by five endoscopists. Each endoscopist might have different innate abilities and variations in learning style; hence, the number of cases of NKP treated by them would affect the success rate of the procedure. Our results further confirm that even among different endoscopists, mastering NKP involves a learning curve.
The surgically altered anatomy is an obstacle to the success of ERCP because it requires complete understanding of the reconstructed anatomy as well as in-depth knowledge regarding endoscopic intubation techniques or devices6,34. The direction of the biliary duct in patients with B-II gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y anastomosis is inferior, which is completely different from that in the general population35,36. Besides, an end-view endoscope rather than a side-view endoscope may be frequently used in the procedure34. As a result, many ERCP endoscopists may not have enough experience to be familiar with the correct bile duct axis, leading to the failure of NKP.
P-duct stents are increasingly used to reduce the risk or severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis, particularly before NKP or if cannulation is difficult37. Theoretically, the use of a P-duct stent as a guide for pre-cut may facilitate the performance of NKP4. However, due to a lack of studies, it is not clear whether the P-duct stent used for pre-cut will increase the success rate of NKP. Kubota et al. reported that NKF over a P-duct stent significantly increased the success rate of deep bile duct cannulation to 96.9% (95/98) compared with that of NKP without a pancreatic stent (86.1% [31/36], p = 0.0189)27. It was uncertain whether the higher success rate was attributed to NKF or the placement of P-duct stent, or both. In the present study, a P-duct stent before pre-cut did not affect the success rate of NKP. This might be due to the fact that only 10% of the study cohort received a P-duct stent, resulting in an insignificant result. Further randomized controlled studies are needed to clarify this issue.
There are several limitations to our study. First, this was a retrospective study from a single center. There were no uniform criteria for the definition of difficult cannulation. However, owing to the infeasibility of a prospective study and lack of similar studies, this study is valuable because of its large sample size. Furthermore, this study included five endoscopists with varying experiences in the NKP technique, and not a single operator.
In conclusion, NKP is a highly technique-sensitive procedure, as technique factors rather than patient factors are the major factors responsible for its initial failure. Therefore, NKP may only be reserved for experienced ERCP endoscopists.
Author contributions
T.Y.K. designed research and analyzed data; H.S.H., L.C.H., L.N.J., S.K.F., and W.C.H. performed research and contributed analytic tools; L.M.H. wrote the main manuscript text, analyzed the data, and prepared the figure. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Data availability
Deidentified individual participant data are available and will be provided on reasonable request to the corresponding author. The study protocol and analytic codes are also available.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Chandrasekhara V, et al. Adverse events associated with ERCP. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2017;85:32–47. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.06.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Harewood G, Baron T. An assessment of the learning curve for precut biliary sphincterotomy. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1708–1712. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05829.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chen Q, Jin P, Ji X, Du H, Lu J. Management of difficult or failed biliary access in initial ERCP: A review of current literature. Clin. Res. Hepatol. Gastroenterol. 2019;43:365–372. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2018.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Freeman ML, Guda NM. ERCP cannulation: A review of reported techniques. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2005;61:112–125. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(04)02463-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Saritas U, Ustundag Y, Harmandar F. Precut sphincterotomy: A reliable salvage for difficult biliary cannulation. World J. Gastroenterol. 2013;19:1. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fung BM, Pitea TC, Tabibian JH. Difficult biliary cannulation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: Definitions, risk factors, and implications. Eur. Med. J. Hepatol. 2021;9:64. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tabak F, Ji G-Z, Miao L. Impact of periampullary diverticulum on biliary cannulation and ERCP outcomes: A single-center experience. Surg. Endosc. 2021;35:5953–5961. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08080-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cennamo V, et al. Can early precut implementation reduce endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related complication risk? Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Endoscopy. 2010;42:381–388. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1243992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Freeman ML, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N. Engl. J. Med. 1996;335:909–919. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199609263351301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rabenstein T, Ruppert T, Schneider HT, Hahn EG, Ell C. Benefits and risks of needle-knife papillotomy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1997;46:207–211. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(97)70087-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Baillie J. Needle-knife papillotomy revisited. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1997;46:282–284. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Anastassiades CP, Saxena A. Precut needle-knife sphincterotomy in advanced endoscopy fellowship. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2013;77:637–640. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Testoni PA, et al. Precut sphincterotomy, repeated cannulation and post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with bile duct stone disease. Dig. Liver Dis. 2011;43:792–796. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2011.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Foutch PG. A prospective assessment of results for needle-knife papillotomy and standard endoscopic sphincterotomy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1995;41:25–32. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(95)70272-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cennamo V, et al. Timing of precut procedure does not influence success rate and complications of ERCP procedure: A prospective randomized comparative study. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2009;69:473–479. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tang S-J, et al. Precut papillotomy versus persistence in difficult biliary cannulation: A prospective randomized trial. Endoscopy. 2005;37:58–65. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-826077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Catalano MF, Linder JD, Geenen JE. Endoscopic transpancreatic papillary septotomy for inaccessible obstructed bile ducts: Comparison with standard pre-cut papillotomy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2004;60:557–561. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(04)01877-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Halttunen J, Keränen I, Udd M, Kylänpää L. Pancreatic sphincterotomy versus needle knife precut in difficult biliary cannulation. Surg. Endosc. 2009;23:745–749. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0056-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bailey AA, et al. Needle-knife sphincterotomy: Factors predicting its use and the relationship with post-ERCP pancreatitis (with video) Gastrointest. Endosc. 2010;71:266–271. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Reddy DN, Nabi Z, Lakhtakia S. How to improve cannulation rates during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology. 2017;152:1275–1279. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.03.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Liao WC, et al. International consensus recommendations for difficult biliary access. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2017;85:295–304. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.09.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sundaralingam P, Masson P, Bourke MJ. Early precut sphincterotomy does not increase risk during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with difficult biliary access: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2015;13:1722–1729. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.06.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Testoni PA, et al. Papillary cannulation and sphincterotomy techniques at ERCP: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2016;48:657–683. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-108641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lo M-H, et al. Management of biliary diseases after the failure of initial needle knife precut sphincterotomy for biliary cannulation. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:1–7. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79139-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Archibugi L, et al. Needle-knife fistulotomy vs standard biliary sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis: Common bile duct stone recurrence and complication rate. Endosc. Int. Open. 2019;7:E1733–E1741. doi: 10.1055/a-1024-3789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kim J, et al. Results of repeat endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography after initial biliary cannulation failure following needle-knife sphincterotomy. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2012;27:516–520. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06914.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kubota K, et al. Needle-knife precut papillotomy with a small incision over a pancreatic stent improves the success rate and reduces the complication rate in difficult biliary cannulations. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Sci. 2013;20:382–388. doi: 10.1007/s00534-012-0552-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tang Z, Yang Y, Yang Z, Meng W, Li X. Early precut sphincterotomy does not increase the risk of adverse events for patients with difficult biliary access: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Medicine. 2018;97:e12213. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kaffes AJ, Sriram PV, Rao GV, Santosh D, Reddy DN. Early institution of pre-cutting for difficult biliary cannulation: A prospective study comparing conventional vs a modified technique. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2005;62:669–674. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Liu Y, et al. Causes and countermeasures of difficult selective biliary cannulation: A large sample size retrospective study. Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. Percutan. Tech. 2021;31:533–538. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Freeman ML. Toward improving outcomes of ERCP. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1998;48:96–102. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(98)70143-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Robison LS, Varadarajulu S, Wilcox CM. Safety and success of precut biliary sphincterotomy: Is it linked to experience or expertise? World J. Gastroenterol. 2007;13:2183. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i15.2183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Fukatsu H, et al. Quantitative assessment of technical proficiency in performing needle-knife precut papillotomy. Surg. Endosc. 2009;23:2066–2072. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9969-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Enestvedt BK, et al. Devices and techniques for ERCP in the surgically altered GI tract. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2016;83:1061–1075. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tsou Y-K, et al. Double-balloon enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for Roux-en-Y reconstruction patients with papilla of Vater or bilioenteric anastomosis. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2016;51:95–102. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2015.1056223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bove V, et al. ERCP in patients with prior Billroth II gastrectomy: Report of 30 years’ experience. Endoscopy. 2015;47:611–616. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1391567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zhang H, Cho J, Buxbaum J. Update on the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Curr. Treat. Opt. Gastroenterol. 2018;16:428–440. doi: 10.1007/s11938-018-0194-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Deidentified individual participant data are available and will be provided on reasonable request to the corresponding author. The study protocol and analytic codes are also available.