Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2022 Mar 23;12:4966. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08479-4

Metabolomics-based profiling of 4 avocado varieties using HPLC–MS/MS and GC/MS and evaluation of their antidiabetic activity

Inas Y Younis 1,✉,#, Amira R Khattab 2,#, Nabil M Selim 1, Mansour Sobeh 3,✉, Seham S Elhawary 1, Mahitab H El Bishbishy 4
PMCID: PMC8943142  PMID: 35322072

Abstract

Seven avocado “Persea americana” seeds belonging to 4 varieties, collected from different localities across the world, were profiled using HPLC–MS/MS and GC/MS to explore the metabolic makeup variabilities and antidiabetic potential. For the first time, 51 metabolites were tentatively-identified via HPLC–MS/MS, belonging to different classes including flavonoids, biflavonoids, naphthodianthrones, dihydrochalcones, phloroglucinols and phenolic acids while 68 un-saponified and 26 saponified compounds were identified by GC/MS analysis. The primary metabolic variabilities existing among the different varieties were revealed via GC/MS-based metabolomics assisted by unsupervised pattern recognition methods. Fatty acid accumulations were proved as competent, and varietal-discriminatory metabolites. The antidiabetic potential of the different samples was explored using in-vitro amylase and glucosidase inhibition assays, which pointed out to Gwen (KG) as the most potent antidiabetic sample. This could be attributed to its enriched content of poly-unsaturated fatty acids and polyphenolics. Molecular docking was then performed to predict the most promising phytoligands in KG variety to be posed as antidiabetic drug leads. The highest in-silico α-amylase inhibition was observed with chrysoeriol-4′-O-pentoside-7-O-rutinoside, apigenin-7-glucuronide and neoeriocitrin which might serve as potential drug leads for the discovery of new antidiabetic remedies.

Subject terms: High-throughput screening, Drug screening, Target identification, Diseases

Introduction

Avocado “Persea americana Mill.” is an evergreen subtropical tree native to southern Mexico and the Pacific Coast of Central America and is currently cultivated in many other places worldwide far from America1. Avocado fruit is a berry characterized by a dark green leathery skin with a very large seed. It has a high economic value in the international trade owing to its high nutrition profile and the remarkable compositional features, which are a mixture of proteins, sterols, fatty acids and coumarins2. Many health benefits were reported including anti-cancer, anti-oxidant and anti-microbial actions3.

Avocado by-products have gained a great interest as a useful agro-industrial waste. The seeds and peels are rich sources of a myriad of bioactive metabolites, including phytosterols, triterpenes, catechins, hydroxycinnamic acids, proanthocyanidins and glycosylated abscisic acid derivatives, which impart their therapeutic effects3. As a result, efficient, economical, and environmentally-friendly management of this agro-industrial waste constitutes a reasonable approach not only to reduce its environmental impact, but also to treat the seeds to obtain therapeutically-valuable constituents from their extract.

The chemical and biological diversities existing between the different avocado cultivars are attributed to many genetic and environmental factors enquiring scientific interest for further exploration of the avocado metabolome2. With the current advanced developments in analytical techniques such as LC–MS/MS and GC–MS, it has become possible to simultaneously annotate hundreds of compounds and thus identify the variance among samples4–6.

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic metabolic disorder characterized by hyperglycemia and the development of many vascular and neuropathic complications. It is globally ranked as the 8th chronic disease with high mortality rate. It was responsible for more than 1.4 million (2.6%) deaths in 2011 worldwide7. The global prevalence of type 2 diabetes increased markedly with a high level of insulin resistance, which was closely linked to the upsurge in obesity. The burden of these diseases is particularly high in middle-income countries8. Carbohydrate digestion has been targeted as means to manage both the postprandial elevation in blood sugar and weight gain. Indeed, α-amylases and α-glucosidases are needed for the breakdown of dietary carbohydrates into glucose. Therefore, inhibiting these enzymes is an effective strategy to lower blood glucose and control the obesity9. The well-known anti-diabetic drugs, clinically in use now, are α-glucosidase and α-amylase inhibitors such as acarbose, miglitol and voglibose. Nevertheless, these drugs have been reported to cause gastrointestinal side effects. In clinical treatments, acarbose, an α-glucosidase inhibitor that decreases postprandial hyperglycemia, may present risks associated with lower cardiovascular disease10. Therefore, natural inhibitors with minimal side effects can be regarded as an effective therapy for postprandial hyperglycemia11.

To the best of our knowledge, the discrimination between different varieties of avocado seeds using untargeted approach for metabolite profiling has not been reported yet. Thus, we aimed in the current study to investigate the varietal differences between seven studied avocado seeds collected from different geographical localities using GC/MS and LC/MS/MS analyses assisted by unsupervised pattern recognition tools. Moreover, we explored the antidiabetic action of the studied avocado varieties in-silico and in-vitro against two crucial enzymes involved in diabetes, namely α-amylase and α-glucosidase.

Results and discussion

HPLC–PDA/MS/MS based metabolite profiling of avocado seeds

In total, fifty-one individual metabolites were tentatively identified in the studied avocado seed hydro-ethanolic extracts via HPLC-PDA/MS/MS analysis. The UV maxima of the metabolites along with their MS/MS parent peaks, daughter fragments, elemental compositions, and distribution in the different extracts are listed in Table 1, Figure S1.

Table 1.

Tentative identification of secondary metabolites in the studied avocado seed extracts using HPLC–PDA/MS/MS.

No UV max [M-H]- (m/z) MSn product ions El. Composition Identification Distribution in Avocado species
SA-1 LH-2 UH-3 EH-4 MH-5 RE-5 KG-7 Ref.
Flavanols
1 279 288.99 145.06, 159.44, 187.11, 221.04, 245.01 C15H14O6 Catechin − − − −  +  − − 37
2 278 289.16 159.37, 187.23, 221.06, 245.03 C15H14O6 Epicatechin − − − −  +  − − 37
3 279 441.15 159.03, 174.75, 189.04, 203.07, 221.22, 245.08, 271.03, 289.05 C22H18O10 Catechin gallate  +   +  −  +   +   +   +  37
4 277 456.70 148.82, 159.06, 192.97, 204.05, 244.35, 269.04, 287.02, 304.74 C22H18O11 Epigallocatechin-3-gallate −  +   +  − −  +   +  37
5 269 305.15 158.79. 167.02, 179.02, 186.03, 203.01, 219.07, 261.03 C15H14O7 Gallocatechin − − − −  +  − − 37
Flavones
6 269, 335 563.12 353.27, 383.18, 443.16, 473.04, 503.25, 544.99 C26H28O14 Apigenin 6-C-glucopyranosyl-8-C-arabinopyranoside (Schaftoside)  +   +   +   +   +  − − 38
7 271, 329 563.00 353.29, 383.14, 443.05, 473.42, 503.17, 544.82 C26H28O14 Isoschaftoside (Isomer of schaftoside)  +   +   +   +   +  − − 38
8 269, 322 592.89 353.41, 383.17, 473.21, 503.25 C27H30O15 Apigenin-6,8-C-diglucoside (Vicenin 2)  +  −  +  −  +  − − 38
9 271, 331 563.16 354.44, 443.07, 473.32 C26H28O14 Apigenin 8-C-xyloside-6-C-glucoside (Vicenin 3)  +  −  +  −  +  − − 38
10 266, 325 431.14 310.89, 341.07 C21H20O10 Apigenin 8-C-glucoside (Vitexin) − −  +  −  +  − − 38
11 266, 334 431.10 191.15, 283.74, 311.22, 341.01, 413.43 C21H20O10 Apigenin 6-C-glucoside (Isovitexin) − −  +  −  +  − − 38
12 255, 329 592.87 294.12, 412.93 C27H30O15 Vitexin-4''-O- glucoside −  +  − −  +  − − 38
13 269 577.43 269.04, 293.17, 402.35 C27H30O14 Apigenin 7-O-neohesperidoside (Rhoifolin) − −  +   +   +  −  +  38
14 266, 336 445.10 225.02, 269.11 C21H18O11 Apigenin-7-glucouronide − −  +   +  −  +   +  39
15 271, 343 447.25 327.13, 356.55 C21H20O11 Luteolin-8-C-glucoside (Orientin)  +   +   +   +   +   +  − 38
16 209, 254, 345 299.13 227.43, 256.14, 283.64 C16H12O6 Chrysoeriol  +   +   +   +   +   +  − 40
17 254, 266, 347 461.17 162.28, 298.72, 327.48, 357.21, 415.23 C22H22O11 Chryseriol-6-C-glucoside  +   +   +   +   +   +  − 41
18 255, 268, 345 623.04 161.65, 298.94, 327.23, 368.76, 399.34, 428.91, 446.95 C28H32O16 Chrysoeriol-C-hexoside- O-hexoside − − −  +   +  −  +  41
19 255, 268, 345 607.07

161.75,282.79, 298.54, 326.87,

341.11, 429.46

 C28H32O15 Chrysoeriol-7-O-neohesperidoside − −  +  −  +  − − 13
20 255, 268, 345 739.49 299.23, 307.9, 327.18, 429.13, 461.0 C33H40O19 Chrysieriol-4′-O-pentoside-7′-O-rutinoside  +   +   +   +   +  −  +  13
21 274, 321 373.04 179.21, 314.88, 343.33 C20H20O7 Sinensetin − −  +  − − − − 42
Flavanone
22 261. 372 753.41 301.18, 548.22, 608.99, 651.14,705.21 C34H42O19 Bruteridin  +   +   +   +   +  − − 43
23 n.d 723.25 271.12, 578.84, 621.17, 654.22, 708.34 C33H40O18 Melitidin  +   +   +  −  +   +  − 43
24 264, 355 595.45 286.74, 459.21 C27H32O15 Neoeriocitrin − −  +   +  −  +   +  43
25 285 271.26 253.04, 271.26 C15H12O5 Naringenin  +  − −  +  − − − 38
26 275, 341 433.09 151.31, 270.67 C21H22O10 Naringenin-O-hexoside − −  +   +   +   +  − 39
27 277 579.23 177.27, 270.84, 447.18 C27H32O14 Naringin −  +   +  − − −  +  38
28 283, 340 741.31 151.18, 270.75, 433.06, 578.83 C33H42O19 Narirutin-4′-O-glucoside  +   +   +   +   +  − − 44
Dihydroflavonols
29 285, 331 303.35 285.44 C15H12O7 Taxifolin (Dihydroquercetin)  +   +  38
30 241, 378 454.99 285.31, 303.11, 454.99 C22H16O11 7-O-galloyl taxifolin  +   +   +   +  45
Biflavonoids
31 n.d 537.08 385.42, 443.17, 491.15 C30H17O10 Amentoflavone  +  −  +   +   +   +   +  46
Naphthodianthrones
32 331, 547, 592 503.14 459.17, 477.31 C30H15O8 Hypericin  +  −  +   +   +   +  − 46
33 321, 545, 588 519.33 459.19, 477.12, 503.61 C30H15O9 Pseudohypericin  +  −  +   +   +   +  − 46
Dihydrochalcones
34 324 435.19 166.87, 273.18, 296.64, 304.11, 389.25 C21H24O10 Phloridizin −  +   +   +   +  − − 47
35 252, 278 272.67 151.21, 166.83 C15H14O5 Phloretin −  +   +   +   +  − − 47
Phloroglucinols
36 232 466.95 287.41, 329.13, 442.06 C30H43O4 Hyperfirin  +  − − − − − − 46
37 236, 292 535.15 382.67, 466.18, 489.28 C35H51O4 Hyperforin – –  +   +   +   +  – 46
38 227, 295 548.73 397.21, 437.24, 479.16, 506.14 C36H53O4 Adhyperforin  +  −  +   +   +   +  − 46
Phenolic acids and derivatives
39 291 311.35 149.35 C13H12O9 Caftaric acid −  +   +  − − − − 48
40 245, 281 331.23 331.23 C20H28O4 Carnosic acid − −  +  − − − − 49
41 213, 283, 315 178.87 134.97 C9H8O4 Caffeic acid  +  − − −  +  −  +  16
42 n.d 355.43 178.88 C15H16O10 Caffeic acid-3-O-glucuronide −  +  − − − − 49
43 317 352.61 127.13, 135.32, 161.39,179.38,190.92 C16H18O9 Chlorogenic acid − −  +  −  +  − − 16
44 325 352.62 135.38, 173.17, 179.11, 191.21 C16H18O9 Cryptochlorogenic acid − −  +  −  +  −  +  16
45 322 352.61 127.13, 173.42 179.38, 190.98 C16H18O9 Neochlorogenic acid − −  +  −  +  − − 16
46 316 337.04 191.34, 172.74, 163.25 C16H18O8 5-O-p-Coumaroylquinic acid − − − −  +  − − 38
47 215, 341 498.59 161.17, 163.78, 481.23 C25H25O11 4-O-caffeoyl-5-O-p-coumaroylquinic acid − − − −  +  − − 15
48 278, 325 515.45 179.24, 191.15, 335.16, 352.71 C25H24O12 1,3-Dicaffeoylquinic acid −  +   +  −  +  − − 16
49 n.d 677.16 134.97, 161.04, 173.25 C34H30O15 3,4,5-tri-O-caffeoylquinic acid − −  +   +  − − − 50
50 222, 273 367.29 161.34, 173.25 C17H20O9 5-feruloylquinic acid −  +  − − − − − 50
51 245, 299, 354 529.02 142.22, 510.78 C26H27O12 3-O-feruloyl-5-O-caffeoylquinic acid  +   +  − − − − − 15
Open in a new tab

(+) and (−) indicate the presence and absence of the metabolites, n.d; not detected.

Initial analyses of UV–Vis spectra showed the presence of different polyphenolic metabolites. The identified metabolites were classified according to their chemical classes into nine categories, viz., flavanols, flavones, flavanones, dihydroflavonols, biflavonoids, naphthodianthrones, dihydrochalcones, phloroglucinols, and phenolic acids.

Considering the identified flavanols; four monomeric flavan-3-ol aglycones and a flavan-3-ol conjugate were assigned in the studied extracts based on their structural feature peaks in MS2 annotations. According to the characterized metabolites, C-glycoside flavones could be considered as one of the landmarks of the avocado seed extracts, exhibiting the key fragmentation ions at m/z [(M-H)-150]-, [(M-H)-120]-, [(M-H)-90)]-, [(M-H)-60]- along with or without the loss of H2O molecules at m/z [(M-H)-18].

Likewise, C-di-glycoside flavones, showed common daughter ions of [aglycone + 113] and [aglycone + 83]. However, in case of O-flavone and flavanone glycosides, the characteristic losses of 308, 162, 146 and 132 Da indicated the loss of a disaccharide structure, hexose (glucose or galactose), rhamnose, and pentose (arabinose or xylose), respectively12,13. Naringenin, was one of the major flavanones detected together with its glycosides; naringenin-O-hexoside and naringin, all sharing the aglycone fragment at m/z 271 with different isobaric fragments. Consistent with our previous study, naringenin was quantified in EH fruit and documented as a unique marker of this species with a promising anti-MRSA activity14.

Intriguingly, only two dihydro-flavonols were detected and identified as taxifolin and 7-O-galloyl taxifolin, with a characteristic fragment at m/z 285. Interestingly, only one biflavonoid was detected, and annotated as amentoflavone with (M-H) ion at m/z 537 and a base peak at m/z 385. Concerning the naphthodianthrones, hypericin, and pseudohypericin were detected, both sharing a characteristic base peak at m/z 459. Along with two dihydrochalcones, i.e., phloridizin and phloretin were identified according to their fragmentation patterns and molecular ion at m/z 435 and 272, respectively. In addition, three phloroglucinols; hyperfirin, hyperforin, and adhyperforin, were assigned according to their molecular ion peaks at m/z 467, 535 and 549, respectively. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report about the identification of amentoflavone, phloroglucinols, and naphthodianthrones in avocado seeds.

Structurally, quinic acid was the major phenolic acid that was tentatively identified in the investigated samples. Six derivatives of quinic acid were annotated based on the presence of the diagnostic ion at m/z 19115. Unambiguous identification of caffeic acid and its derivatives was established based on their base peak at m/z 179, which undergoes decarboxylation to produce m/z 135 [M-H-H2O-CO]-. Despite the structural similarity of the three isomers of chlorogenic acids, they showed a characteristic base peak at m/z 353 with quite different abundance of the fragmentation ions. As previously reported, this diagnostic fragment was used to discriminate between them16. In line with the findings of Di Stefano et al. (2016), who discovered significant variations in the metabolic profiles of Italian avocado cultivars. Chlorogenic acid, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid, and protocatechuic acid were detected in the ripe fruits. On the contrary, only epicatechin tended to decrease along with fruit ripening17.

GC/MS metabolite profiling of avocado seeds

The analysis of un-saponified and saponified compounds detected in the avocado samples by GC/MS led to the identification of 68 un-saponified and 26 saponified compounds. Table 2 illustrates that saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons were the major constituents among all the samples represented by tetradecane, hexadecane, pentadecane, and trimethyl dodecane. Egyptian reed (ER) and Morocco (MH) and Lebanese Hass (LH) were the most abundant seeds with hydrocarbons. Whereas, EH (Egyptian Hass) and KG (Gwen avocado from Kenya) showed minor content of aliphatic hydrocarbons.

Table 2.

Relative percentage of the un-saponified compounds in the studied avocado seed extracts using GC/MS.

No Compounds Rt (min) SA LH UH EH MH RE KG
Saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons
1 Dodecane 16.13 1.41 − − − − − −
2 Undecane, 2,6-dimethyl 16.36 0.86 − − − − 0.6 −
3 Tridecane 17.53 0.77 − − − − − −
4 Tridecane, 7-methyl- 18.0 3.54 − − − − − −
5 Dodecane, 4,6-dimethyl- 18.81 − − − − 1.26 2.69 0.96
66 Tridecane 18.88 7.33 1.32 − − − 8.79 1.69
7 Tetradecane 19.26 1.2 − − − − 1.03 −
8 Tetradecane, 2,6,10-trimethyl 19.76 − 0.95 − 2.7 − −
9 Eicosane, 10-methyl- 20.58 2.27 1.14 − − − − −
10 Dodecane, 2,6,10-trimethyl- 20.82 8.62 7.11 2.95 1.43 10.11 7.46 2.57
11 Tetradecane 21.57 15.49 13.92 6.62 2.17 17.25 20.78 5.07
12 Octadecane, 1-chloro- 22.8 0.73 1.19 0.47 − 0.79 − 0.53
13 Hexadecane 23.05 5.58 11.08 5.39 − 10.4 5.58 −
14 Heptadecane, 2,6,10,14-tetramethyl- 23.36 − − − 2.68 − − 1.45
15 Tetradecane, 2,6,10-trimethyl- 23.41 2.35 0.9 1.55 − 1.04 − −
16 Tetradecane, 3-methyl- 23.88 − 3.63 − − − − −
17 Tetradecane, 2-methyl- 23.99 − 1.01 − − 1.83 1.34 −
18 Heptadecane 24.03 − 1.99 − − − − −
19 Pentadecane 24.18 5.67 11.63 6.01 6.01 8.0 7.76 2.28
20 Dotriacontane 26.31 − − 0.58 − 1.02 − −
21 Pentacosane 44.56 − 0.67 − − − − −
22 Tetratetracontane 47.43 − 0.64 0.52 1.05 − − 0.4
23 Octadecane, 3-ethyl-5-(2-ethylbutyl)- 50.5 − 0.67 − 0.71 0.89 − −
Total saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons 55.82 57.18 24.09 13.34 54.4 56.03 14.95
Unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbons
24 Cyclohexene, 3-(1-hexenyl) 33.71 − − − 5.57 − − −
25 Cyclohexene, 3-(3-methyl-1-butenyl) 37.31 − − 11.73 9.83 − − 10.81
26 1-Nonadecene 35.73 − − − 2.4 − − −
27 5-Eicosyne 36.1 − 1.92 3.83 − − − −
28 10-Heneicosene 42.97 − − − 1.03 − − −
Total Unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbons − 1.92 15.56 18.83 − − 10.81
Monoterpene hydrocarbons
29 l-Limonene 12.66 − − − − 1.15 1.2 0.71
30 à-Humulene 23.8 − − − − − − 0.86
31 Total monoterpene hydrocarbons − − − − 1.15 1.2 1.57
32 Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons
33 à-Cubebene 20.39 3.9 − − − − − 3.66
34 α -Copaene 21.62 − − − − − − 1.53
35 Trans-Caryophyllene 22.52 1.09 − − − − − −
36 Trans-à-Bergamotene 22.66 3.11 − − − − − −
37 á-elemene 32.26 2.52 − − − − 1.73 8.51
Total sesquiterpene hydrocarbons 10.62 − − − − 1.73 13.7
Oxygenated sesquiterpenes
38 Caryophyllene oxide 26.82 1.23 − 1.55 2.73 − − 1.22
39 Isoaromadendrene epoxide 30.16 − − − 1.27 − − −
Total oxygenated sesquiterpenes 1.23 − 1.55 4.0 − − 1.22
Alcohols
40 2-Methyl-cetyl alcohol 22.79 − 0.86 − − 0.82 − −
41 Cetyl alcohol 31.68 − − − 1.92 − − −
42 Trans-Geranylgeraniol 32.88 − − − − 1.83 − −
43 epi-á-Santalol 33.24 6.41 − − − − − 7.27
44 α-Santalol 34.02 − − − − − − 1.08
45 Phytol 38.1 0.49 − 0.49 2.61 − − −
46 Ethanol, 2-(9,12-octadecadienyloxy) 35.75 − − 0.58 3.94 0.99 0.93 1.88
Total alcohols 6.9 0.86 1.07 6.55 3.64 0.93 11.45
Ethers
47 7-Dodecynyl tetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-yl ether 40.62 1.06 − − − − − −
Total ethers 1.06 − − − − − −
Epoxides
48 Humulene oxide or Humulene epoxide I 27.74 − − − − − − 0.53
Total epoxides − − − − − − 0.53
Aldehydes/ketones
49 Pregan-20-one,2-hydroxy-5,6-epoxy-15-methyl 29.29 − − − 0.6 − − −
50 9,17-Octadecadienal 31.98 − − 8.71 − − − 7.89
51 Bicyclo[3.2.2]nona-2,6-dien-5-ol-4-one 33.87 − − − − 4.2 − −
52 Iso-jasmone 36.81 − − 2.29 − − − −
53 Koiganal II 35.71 1.37 − − − − − −
Total aldehydes/ketones 1.37 − 11.0 0.6 4.2 − 7.89
Esters
54 Ethyl iso-allocholate 27.3 − 1.36 − 0.52 1.6 − −
55 Omega-3-arachidonic acid methyl ester 27.46 − − 0.85 − − − −
56 NerolidoL-epoxyacetate 30.22 − − − − − 0.71 −
57 3,13-Octadecadien-1-ol acetate 31.44 7.72 − − − − − −
58 3,7,11,Trimethyl-8,10-dodecedienylacetate 31.97 − − − 13.61 − − −
59 Methyl-8,11,14,17-eicosatetraenoate 32.69 − − − 10.05 − − −
60 3,15-Octadecadien-1-ol acetate 32.02 − 1.64 − − − − −
61 Methyl 5,9,12-octadecatrienoate 44 − − − − − 1.37 −
62 Methyl -5,11,14,17-eicosatetraenoate 40.48 1.85 3.12 10.86 6.22 1.55 6.58 16.2
63 Ethyl linoleate 43.56 − − − − − − 2.18
64

Cyclo propaneoctanoic acid,2-[[2-[(2-ethylcyclopropyl)methyl]

cyclopropyl]methyl]-, methyl ester

 43.81 − 2.1 − − − − −
Total esters 9.57 6.86 11.71 30.4 3.15 8.66 18.38
Acyclic carotene
65 Lycopersen 49.44 − − − 0.68 − − −
Total acyclic carotene − − − 0.68 − − −
Sterols
66 Campesterol 57.98 − − − 0.64 − − −
67 Sitosterol 59.51 1.57 2.2 2.1 6.89 2.02 0.61 1.14
Total sterols 1.57 2.2 2.1 7.53 2.02 0.61 1.14
Vitamins
68 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D2 42.65 − − − 0.55 − − −
Total vitamins − − − 0.55 − − −
Open in a new tab

The main compounds for each species are underlined and bolded.

The separation was performed on TG-5MS column (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 μm film thickness).

Aliphatic esters constituted the second major class identified among un-saponified compounds in seed samples. Methyl -5,11,14,17-eicosatetraenoate was the main ester in KG accounting for 16.2% of the total identified compounds. Aliphatic alcohols, aldehydes, and ketones were also identified in many samples. Santalol was the representative sesquiterpenoid alcohol detected in a relatively high concentration in both SA (Pinkerton avocado of South Africa) and KG only. Importantly, α-santalol, the major constituent of sandalwood oil, showed efficient antioxidant and anti-hyperglycemic activity in alloxan-induced diabetic animal models18.

Regarding the saponified compounds, fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) were the major compounds detected among all samples especially methyl linoleate and methyl oleate. Table 3 illustrates that methyl linoleate (18:2 omega 6) was the most abundant ester among the samples. Their concentrations were in the following order: KG > RE > EH > SA > UH > MH > LH. It constituted 63.24% of the total identified compounds in KG. Therefore, it could be considered as a valuable source of healthy omega-6 fatty acid. As primary precursors of lipid mediators, both omega-6 fatty acid and omega-3 arachidonic acid methyl esters are considered important structural elements of cell membranes19.

Table 3.

Relative percentage of the saponified compounds in the studied avocado seed extracts using GC/MS.

No Compounds Rt (min) SA LH UH EH MH RE KG
Esters
1 Oxiraneun decanoic acid, 3-pentyl-methyl ester 26.89 0.16 − − − 0.16 − −
2 Cyclooctasiloxane, hexadecamethyl 27.45 − − − 0.09 − − −
3 Tridecanoic acid, methyl ester 28.48 0.37 0.17 0.06 0 0.58 0.21 0.09
4 Methyl tetradecanoate 31.18 0.32 0.7 0.15 0.53 0.85 0.36 0.35
5 Pentadecanoic acid, methyl ester 33.92 0.12 0.3 0.09 0.28 0.45 0.15 0.09
6 13,16-Octadecadiynoic acid, methyl 34.06 0.09 − − − − 0.1 −
7 Methyl arachidonate 34.51 − − − − − − 0.1
8 Methyl palmitoleate 35.98 0.72 2.17 1.2 2.22 2.79 0.35 0.76
9 Methyl-7)-Hexadecenoate 36.23 23.45 − − − − 2.14 −
10 Methyl palmitate 36.52 0.62 44.79 22 23.65 25.89 21.59 17.18
11 Methyl isostearate 39.14 33.68 0.26 0.17 0.55 0.23 − 0.08
12 9,12-Octadecadienoyl chloride , 40.08 − − − − − 0.56 0.17
13 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid), methyl ester(methyl linoleate) 40.82 30.99 13.22 28.72 35.91 17.96 44.38 63.24
14 Methyl oleate 41.11 1.48 24.33 37.97 26.98 37.09 25.16 12.81
15 13-Tetradecynoic acid, methyl ester 41.85 − − − 0.61 − 0.3 0.33
16 Eicosanoic acid, methyl ester 46.43 0.12 0.37 0.29 0.91 0.91 − −
17 13-Docosenoic acid, methyl ester 50.71 0.59 0.59 0.58 0 − − 0.17
18 Docosanoic acid, methyl ester 50.76 − − − − 0.15 0.38 0
19 Eicosanoic acid, methyl ester 52.77 − − 0.83 0.35 1.93 0.07 0.13
20 Tetracosanoic acid, methyl ester 54.92 0.84 2.92 1.06 − 2.92 0.55 0.53
21 Cyclo pentanetridecanoic acid, methyl ester 58.76 0.42 0.05 0.31 − 0.37 0.12 0.12
22 Octacosanoic acid, methyl ester 62.4 0.17 0.25 0.13 0.31 − − −
Total esters 94.14 89.87 93.56 92.39 92.28 96.42 96.15
Monoterpenes hydrocarbons
23 Terpinene 10.5 − − − 0.17 − − −
Total monoterpenes hydrocarbons − − − 0.17 − − −
Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons
24 Trans-calamenene 25.58 − − − − − 0 0.09
Total sesquiterpene hydrocarbons − − − − − 0 0.09
Miscellaneous compounds
25 3-Butoxy-1,1,1,7,7,7-hexamethyl-3,5,5 tris(trimethylsiloxy)tetrasiloxane 21.87 − 0 0 0.1 − − −
26

1-Hydroxy-6-(3-isopropenyl-cycloprop

-1-enyl)-6-methyl-heptan-2-one

 26.41 − − − − − 0.08 −
Open in a new tab

The separation was established on TG-5MS column (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 μm film thickness).

The main compounds for each species are underlined and bolded.

Consistent with our results, a recent report by Soledad et al., 2021 demonstrated that methyl esters of linoleic, and linolenic acids were the predominant phytochemicals in Mexican avocado seeds. β-sitosterol content was significantly varied (0.61–6.89%) among the seed samples19. Sitosterol, stearic and linoleic acids were the most predominant compounds in the ripe fruits of Spanish avocado cultivars20. In contrast, Salazar-López et al., 2020 reported that stigmast-5-en-3-ol was the main phytosterol of Hass avocado21.

More recently, methyl lineoleate, β-sitosterol and campesterol were reported to ameliorate the glucose level in sucrose induced diabetes in rats by regulation of glucose transporter proteins and insulin receptor due to their lipophilic nature22. Hydrocarbons and esters were important volatile components of avocado that contributed to the quality and flavor of the fruits21. Monoterpene and sesquiterpene hydrocarbons were identified as minor constituents among all samples. α-elemene, was the most important sesquiterpene hydrocarbons identified in KG with the highest threshold (8.51%). To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first comprehensive volatile profiling of the seven species of avocado seeds belonging to different geographic origins.

Avocado varietal discrimination via PCA and HCA analysis of GC/MS data matrix

Owing to the complexity of the acquired data, multivariate data analysis, viz. HCA and PCA were performed to define both similarities and differences amongst the studied avocado seed samples. The metabolic variability of the different avocado seed varieties was characterized using untargeted GC/MS based metabolomics assisted by multivariate data analyses. Data matrices obtained from the combined un-saponified and saponified seeds metabolites were employed.

PCA of the combined GC/MS datasets produced a model (Fig. 1) prescribed by PC1/PC2 accounting for 66% of the variance in compositional makeup among the different seed varieties. Score plot (Fig. 1A) revealed the general structure of the dataset and the samples grouping where Pinkerton variety represented by “SA” sample obtained from South Africa was located distant from the other samples. The most influential metabolites responsible for this separation were revealed from the PCA loading plot (Fig. 1B) as being (Z)-7-hexadecenoic acid and heptadecanoic acid, as implied by their high factor loadings over the positive side of PC1, which were more abundant in “SA” sample. Gwen variety “KG sample obtained from Kenya”, located in the upper right side of the PCA score, was shown to be the most enriched in 9,12-octadecadienoic acid (linoleic acid). However, the four Hass varieties “EH, LH, UH & MH” obtained from Egypt, Lebanon, Morocco, and USA clustered close to each other and found more abundant in hexadecanoic (palmitic acid) and 9-octadecenoic acids.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering of the studied avocado seed extracts based on the combined GC/MS datasets derived from saponified and unsaponified metabolites. (A) Score plot of PC1 vs. PC2 scores. (B) Loading plot for PC1 & PC2 contributing metabolites and their assignments. (C)- HCA dendrogram.

HCA, another unsupervised pattern recognition method with different graphical presentation revealed a comparable varietal classification to PCA. HCA-derived dendrogram (Fig. 1C) depicted three clusters (I–III), in which Pinkerton variety “SA” was clustered in a separate cluster exhibiting a long distance compared with the other samples on the cluster scale. Cluster II included 2 Hass varieties i.e., “LH and MH” avocado samples obtained from Lebanon and Morocco while cluster III included Gwen variety “KG sample from Kenya” and the other sub-tree contained Reed variety “RE sample from Egypt” and the other two Hass samples “UH and EH collected from USA and Egypt” indicating their comparable fatty acid profile.

From the PCA & HCA analyses, it can be concluded that the variabilities in fatty acid accumulation in the studied seed samples obtained from a wide regional divergence were efficient in the discrimination between the different seed varieties.

Antidiabetic activity of avocado seeds

Diabetes is a chronic metabolic syndrome and is considered a life- threatening disease characterized by the inability of the pancreas to secrete insulin or insulin resistance. Uncontrolled hyperglycemia is directly associated with a high risk of diabetic related complications such ischemic heart disease, stroke, and diabetic retinopathy. According to a recent estimate by the World Health Organization (WHO), more than 422 million patients suffered from diabetes worldwide in 2014 and the prevalence of the disease threatening will increase dramatically by 2040 to exceed 642 million23.

α-glycosidase and α-amylase are the key enzymes which play an essential role in the dietary digestion of carbohydrates. Enzyme inhibitors were believed to be the most effective strategy for the management of diabetes and reducing its complications. Unfortunately, acarbose, the first approved enzyme inhibitor suffered from unexpected side-effects such as stomach-ache, flatulence, and diarrhea24. Recently, the trends toward natural phytoconstituents as enzyme inhibitors have gained a special interest in many scientific studies over the synthetic hypoglycemic agents23,24. As shown in Table S2, Gwen avocado (KG) showed the highest inhibitory activity against both α-glycosidase and α-amylase with IC50 of 55.07 ± 2.48 and 95.3 ± 2.02 µg/ml, respectively, compared to acarbose. On the other hand, Egyptian reed (RE) showed the lowest glucosidase inhibitory activity, with almost no significant activity against amylase.

Our results are shedding the light on understanding the vital role of polyunsaturated fatty acids such as linoleic acid, and its methyl ester as antidiabetic compounds identified in a high concentration in KG (ca. 63.24%) of the saponified compounds. In agreement with a recent study of Smorowskaet al., 2021 that highlighted the potential activity of oleic and linoleic fatty acids rich fraction of blue corn extract as α-amylase inhibitor25.

In the same line, β-sitosterol identified in Syzygium cumini L. leaves was responsible for the antidiabetic activity26. α-Humulene, a natural monocyclic sesquiterpene, and 9,12-octadecadienoic acid methyl ester as well as linoleic acid esters, identified in KG extract, were previously reported as natural antioxidants with antidiabetic and neuroprotective activities in the essential oil of Elaeagnus umbellata Thunb. fruits27.

In addition, epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) was identified by HPLC-MS/MS analysis as a unique component in KG extract which may contribute to its potential anti-diabetic activity. In a randomized placebo-controlled clinical study, catechins of green tea especially EGCG demonstrated a non-competitive α-glucosidase inhibitory activity higher than acarbose28. Recently, many polyphenolic compounds have been detected in cereals as quercetin, kaempferol, luteolin, naringenin and apigenin glycosides, which were reported as potent inhibitors of both amylase and glucosidase enzymes29.

Ultimately, the synergistic activity of both major and minor bioactive metabolites in KG was responsible for its potential activity as an amylase and glucosidase inhibitors.

Virtual screening of avocado phytoligands as potential α-amylase inhibitors

Sixteen compounds were docked into the active site of α-amylase, a crucial enzyme involved in diabetes (Fig. 2 and Table 4). The docking simulations results showed that apigenin-7-O-rhamnoglucoside exhibited the highest α-amylase inhibitory activity, possessing a binding score of − 20.58 kcal/mol which was higher than that of acarbose (− 19.40 kcal/mol), followed by naringenin which exhibited a binding score of – 20.06 Kcal/mol. Other compounds displayed a relatively low binding energy compared to the reference drug, acarbose. These include catechin gallate, chrysoeriol 7-rutinoside, eriodictyol-7-O-neohesperidoside, and epigallocatechin gallate. They also shared similar interactions like those shown from acarbose such as Glu 200 (Hydrogen bonding), Glu 207 (Hydrogen bonding), and Asn 174 (Hydrogen bonding). A moderate inhibitory activity on amylase enzyme was observed by amentoflavone, caffeic acid, and 4-caffeoylquinic acid, (Fig. 2 and Table 4). Accordingly, 15 phytoligands Fig. 2 showed strong interactions with the active site residues of the α-amylase enzyme. As a result, they might be considered as the potential drug candidates for the discovery of novel α-amylase inhibitors after they are screened for their safety profile and efficacy via in-vivo and clinical studies.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Figure 2

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Interaction diagrams of the docked phytoligands i.e., 15 compounds with the active sites of α-amylase (PDB: 1Kxh). Green arrow represents side chain acceptor/donor; blue arrow represents backbone acceptor/donor; blue shadow represents ligand exposure. The studied phytoligands are depicted in Table 4.

Table 4.

Docking simulations results of the studied phytoligands identified by GC/MS and HPLC-MS/MS analysis, respectively using acarbose as a co-ligand.

CID phytoligands Free energy of binding (∆G)
(Kcal/mol)		 Interactions at the binding interface
41,774 Acarbose − 19.40

Glu 200 (Hydrogen bonding through solvent)

Glu 207 (Hydrogen bonding)

Asn 124 (Hydrogen bonding)

Asn 174 (Hydrogen bonding)

Lys 177 (Hydrogen bonding)
6,419,835 Catechin gallate − 19.12

Glu 200 (Hydrogen bonding)

Glu 207 (Hydrogen bonding)

His 269 (Hydrophobic interaction)
5,282,150 Apigenin-7-O-rhamnoglucoside − 20.58

Glu 200 (Hydrogen bonding through solvent)

Asn 174 (Hydrogen bonding)

Asp 264 (Hydrogen bonding through solvent)

His 263 (Hydrogen bonding through solvent)
14,374,725 Chrysoeriol 7-rutinoside − 18.96

Glu 200 (Hydrogen bonding through solvent)

Asn 274 (Hydrogen bonding through solvent)

Ala 272 (Hydrogen bonding through solvent)
114,627 Eriodictyol-7-O-neohesperidoside − 19.54

Asn 174 (Hydrogen bonding)

Trp 47 (Hydrophobic interaction)
5,281,600 Amentoflavone − 14.19 Asp 264 (Hydrogen bonding)
9,798,666 4-Caffeoylquinic acid − 13.79

Glu 200 (Hydrogen bonding)

Trp 47 (Hydrophobic interaction)
689,043 Caffeic acid − 14.64

Glu 200 (Hydrogen bonding)

Lys 177 (Hydrogen bonding)
442,428 Naringin − 20.06

Lys 177 (Hydrogen bonding)

Asn 174 (Hydrogen bonding)

Gly (Hydrophobic interaction)

Trp 46 (Hydrophobic interaction)
65,064 Epigallocatechin gallate − 18.21

Asn 174 (Hydrogen bonding)

Trp 47 (Hydrophobic interaction)

Glu 200 (Hydrogen bonding through solvent)

Tyr 50 (Hydrogen bonding)
5,281,520 Alpha-Humulene Failed
10,704,181 Humulene oxide II − 10.81

Asn 174 (Hydrogen bonding)

Asp 264 (Hydrogen bonding through solvent)

His 263 (Hydrogen bonding through solvent)
5,282,184 Linoleic acid ethyl ester − 9.07 Tyr 127 (Hydrophobic interaction)
6,421,258 Arachidonic acid methyl ester − 8.80 Lys 177 (Hydrogen bonding)
5,284,421 Linoleic acid methyl ester − 9.58 Lys 177 (Hydrogen bonding)
14,122,970 Methyl 8,11,14,17-eicosatetraenoate − 8.12 His 269 (Hydrophobic interaction)
Open in a new tab

*The best ligand-receptor complex binding free energy at RMSD < 2 .

Conclusion

Agro-industrial by-products represent a global challenge due to their impact on economic, social, and environmental sectors. The green recycling of these by-products poses a crucial strategy to fight diseases. In our study, compositional differences existing among the investigated avocado varieties were assessed using GC/MS and HPLC–MS/MS analysis assisted by unsupervised pattern recognition tools. Gwen seeds exhibited the highest antidiabetic potential against two diabetic marker enzymes, i.e., α-amylase and α-glucosidase, compared to acarbose drug. This activity could be attributed to the presence of high levels of polyunsaturated fatty acids as well as several polyphenolic compounds as revealed by the molecular docking study.

Our findings revealed that Gwen's variety of avocado represents a promising, low cost, and readily available natural source of bioactives to be used as an antidiabetic remedy. Further studies are still required for the successful commercial use of Gwen avocado by-products as a sustainable source of antidiabetic metabolites. Moreover, comprehensive studies are still required to investigate the effect of fruit ripening on the metabolic profile of the seeds, especially Gwen cultivar.

Material and methods

Plant material

Seven well characterized samples of avocado fruits were purchased in June 2016 from different geographical localities across the world. Three avocado varieties, i.e., Reed, Pinkerton and Gwen were obtained from Egypt, South Africa, and Kenya, respectively. In addition to, Hass cultivar was obtained from Egypt, Lebanon, USA and Morocco. They were selected at the full ripening stage. All fruits were collected and identified with permission from the Agriculture Research Center, Giza, Egypt at "9 Cairo University Road, Giza District, Giza Governorate". The fruit collection process has been established according to the national guidelines. The plant material was kindly validated by Dr. Essam Abel Karim (Tropical Fruit Research Institute, Giza, Egypt).

The voucher specimens were deposited at Faculty of Pharmacy Herbarium, Cairo University, under the identification numbers listed in Table S1. The seeds were separated from their fruit and weighted using a sensitive balance. The variation in weights was listed in Table S1. They were dried at 50 °C and grounded to fine powder. The powdered seeds (5 gm) were defatted using hexane (3 × 150 ml), which were then extracted with methanol (3 × 100 ml). Hexane extracts of all samples were subjected to esterification for the preparation of fatty acid methyl ester (FAME). For HPLC-MS/MS analysis, powdered seeds (10 mg) were extensively extracted with methanol. The solvents were evaporated under reduced pressure using Buchi®R-300, USA.

Chemicals and reagents

All chemicals such as methanol, hydrocarbons (HC) and DMSO (LC-MS/MS grade), fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) standards and acarbose (≥ 95%) were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Similarly, Saccharomyces cerevisiae α-glucosidase (EC 3.2.1.20) of 0.05 U/ml (type I, ≥ 10 units/mg protein) and α-amylase (EC 3.2.1.1) (type VI-B, ≥ 10 units/mg solid) used for biological assays were obtained from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Other chemicals, viz., sodium hydroxide, sodium chloride, sodium acetate, sodium potassium tartrate, di-nitro salicylic acid solution, sucrose, Tris buffer pH 8.0, and boron trifluoride (BF3) were of analytical grade and were obtained from El-Gomhouria Co. for trading chemicals and medical supplies (Cairo-Egypt).

High-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometer (HPLC-MS/MS)

The LC system was Thermo Finnigan (Thermo Electron Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with a reversed-phase column (Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C18, 4.6 × 150 mm, 3.5 µm, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) as described before30. Briefly, LC instrument was connected to the mass spectrometer (LCQ-Duo ion trap) with an electrospray ionization source. Water and acetonitrile (ACN) with 0.1% formic acid in both solvents were used to create a gradient flow of the mobile phase. A gradual increment of ACN, from 5 to 30% for 60 min and increased to 90% in the last 30 min, was performed at a flow rate of 1 ml/min with a split ratio of 1:1. The full scan acquisition method was established, and the spectra scan range was acquired at m/z 50–2000 in the negative mode. The browser X-calibur software (X-calibur ™ 2.0.7, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Ma, USA) was used to evaluate the data.

Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) for preparation of fatty acid methyl ester (FAMEs)

The GC/MS system was equipped with a TG-5MS column (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 μm film thickness). Helium was used as carrier gas at for the analysis of the methyl esters of fatty acids. The analysis was established using a TRACE GC Ultra Gas Chromatograph (THERMO Scientific Corp., USA), was coupled with a thermo mass spectrometer detector (ISQ Single Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer). Helium was used as the inert carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/ min and a split ration of 1:10. The temperature was programmed as follows: 80 °C for 1 min; raised at 4.0 °C/min to 300 °C and held for 5 min. A volume of 0.2 μl of the diluted samples (1:10 hexane, v/v) was injected. The injector and the detector were both kept at 240 °C. Mass spectra were obtained by electron ionization (EI) at 70 eV, using a spectral range of m/z 40–450. Samples containing fatty acids were esterified to more volatile methyl esters by methanol:BF3 as previously described31.

GC/MS of the un-saponified fraction

The same spectrophotometric parameters were established as described in previous section except in the following: the temperature was programmed at 55 °C for 1 min; raised at 5.0 °C/min to 300 °C and held for 15 min. Both the injector and detector temperatures were held at 280 °C. Silylated compounds were identified by GC/MS volatile analysis as previously described and their contents were calculated based on peak areas relative to summed peak areas of identified metabolites.

Multivariate statistical analysis

The relative peak areas of the phytochemicals identified by GC/MS analysis were subjected to exploratory analysis using SIMCA-P version 13.0 software package (Umetrics, Umeå, Sweden). An exploratory analysis of the data was carried out using principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA), which were used to explore the metabolic profiles' heterogeneity/similarity between the different avocado samples based on their varietal region. All variables were mean-centered and scaled to Pareto variance32.

In-vitro α-amylase inhibition assay

The in-vitro α-amylase inhibition assay was quantitatively assayed by a colorimetric method according to the previously described method33.

In-vitro α-glucosidase inhibition assay

The in-vitro α- glucosidase inhibitory activity was determined using a spectrometric based assay according to the method established by Pandithurai et al.33.

Molecular docking of avocado phytoligands

The docking simulations were performed, using Molecular Operating Environment (MOE) software package version 2013.08; (available from Chemical Computing Group Inc., Montreal, QC, Canada) on the phytochemicals characteristic to the avocado sample (KG) showing the highest in-vitro α-amylase activity as identified by GC/MS and HPLC-MS/MS analysis. Three-dimensional (3D) structures of all the studied phytoligands were retrieved from the PubChem database (http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), which were then docked into the rigid α-amylase binding pocket. The 3D crystal structure of α-amylase was downloaded from Protein Data Bank (PDB code: 1KXH) bound to acarbose. The structure of chain A was processed using the Structure Preparation application in MOE34. The docking protocol was followed as previously applied in35,36.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information. (480.7KB, docx)

Author contributions

I.Y. and N.S. conceived and designed the experiments; performed the extraction of samples and GC/MS interpretation. M.S. and A.K. performed HPLC-MS/MS analysis of the experiments, chemometric analysis of GC/MS data matrix and docking simulation of the identified avocado phytoligands. M.E. did the identification of HPLC/MS data. S.E. supervised the whole work and revised the final version. I.Y., N.S., A.K., M.S. and M.E. wrote the paper; Data curation, Formal analysis, Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data. All authors wrote the original draft and revised the final version of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the drafting of the article and approved the final Ms.

Funding

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information files).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Inas Y. Younis and Amira R. Khattab.

Contributor Information

Inas Y. Younis, Email: inas.younis@pharma.cu.edu.eg

Mansour Sobeh, Email: Mansour.sobeh@um6p.ma.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-022-08479-4.

References

  • 1.The avocado: botany, production and uses. The avocado: botany, production and uses (2013). doi:10.1079/9781845937010.0000
  • 2.Contreras-Gutiérrez PK, et al. Determination of changes in the metabolic profile of avocado fruits (Persea americana) by two CE-MS approaches (targeted and non-targeted) Electrophoresis. 2013;34:2928–2942. doi: 10.1002/elps.201200676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rodríguez-Carpena JG, Morcuende D, Andrade MJ, Kylli P, Estevez M. Avocado (Persea americana Mill.) phenolics, in vitro antioxidant and antimicrobial activities, and inhibition of lipid and protein oxidation in porcine patties. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011;59:5625–5635. doi: 10.1021/jf1048832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Farag MA, Hegazi N, Dokhalahy E, Khattab AR. Chemometrics based GC-MS aroma profiling for revealing freshness, origin and roasting indices in saffron spice and its adulteration. Food Chem. 2020;331:127358. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Farag MA, Khattab AR, Shamma S, Afifi SM. Profiling of primary metabolites and volatile determinants in mahlab cherry (Prunus mahaleb l.) seeds in the context of its different varieties and roasting as analyzed using chemometric tools. Foods. 2021;10:728. doi: 10.3390/foods10040728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Farrag ARH, et al. Antiulcer activity of Cyperus alternifolius in relation to its HPLC-MS metabolite fingerprint: A mechanistic study. Phytomedicine. 2019;62:152970. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2019.152970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.WHO Screening for type 2 diabetes: Report of a world health organization and international diabetes federation meeting. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:5167–5175. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Galicia-Garcia U, et al. Pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:1–34. doi: 10.3390/ijms21176275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Preuss HG. Bean amylase inhibitor and other carbohydrate absorption blockers: Effects on diabesity and general health. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2009;28:266–276. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2009.10719781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hanefeld M, Schaper F. Acarbose: Oral antidiabetes drug with additional cardiovascular benefits. Expert Rev. Cardiovasc. Ther. 2008;6:153–163. doi: 10.1586/14779072.6.2.153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nhiem NX, et al. α-Glucosidase inhibition properties of cucurbitane-type triterpene glycosides from the fruits of Momordica charantia. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2010;58:720–724. doi: 10.1248/cpb.58.720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Brito A, Ramirez JE, Areche C, Sepúlveda B, Simirgiotis MJ. HPLC-UV-MS profiles of phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of fruits from three citrus species consumed in Northern Chile. Molecules. 2014;19:17400–17421. doi: 10.3390/molecules191117400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hassan WHB, Abdelaziz S, Al Yousef HM. Chemical composition and biological activities of the aqueous fraction of Parkinsonea aculeata L. growing in Saudi Arabia. Arab. J. Chem. 2019;12:377–387. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Younis IY, Hifnawy MS, El-Hawary SS, El Bishbishy MH, Elateek SY. Bioactive metabolites of hass and reed avocados targeting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin-like X via molecular modeling and cytotoxicity assessments. Nat. Prod. Res. 2020 doi: 10.1080/14786419.2020.1817013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Asamenew G, et al. Comprehensive characterization of hydroxycinnamoyl derivatives in green and roasted coffee beans: A new group of methyl hydroxycinnamoyl quinate. Food Chem. X. 2019;2:100033. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2019.100033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yu F, Qian H, Zhang J, Sun J, Ma Z. Simultaneous quantification of eight organic acid components in Artemisia capillaris Thunb (Yinchen) extract using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with diode array detection and high-resolution mass spectrometry. J. Food Drug Anal. 2018;26:788–795. doi: 10.1016/j.jfda.2017.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Di Stefano V, et al. Quantitative evaluation of the phenolic profile in fruits of six avocado (Persea americana) cultivars by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-heated electrospray-mass spectrometry. Int. J. Food Prop. 2017;20:1302–1312. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Misra BB, Dey S. Evaluation of in vivo anti-hyperglycemic and antioxidant potentials of α-santalol and sandalwood oil. Phytomedicine. 2013;20:409–416. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2012.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Soledad CPT, et al. Avocado seeds (Persea americana cv. Criollo sp.): Lipophilic compounds profile and biological activities. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021;28:3384–3390. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.02.087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hurtado-Fernández E, Pacchiarotta T, Mayboroda OA, Fernández-Gutiérrez A, Carrasco-Pancorbo A. Metabolomic analysis of avocado fruits by GC-APCI-TOF MS: Effects of ripening degrees and fruit varieties. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2015;407:547–555. doi: 10.1007/s00216-014-8283-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Salazar-López NJ, et al. Avocado fruit and by-products as potential sources of bioactive compounds. Food Res. Int. 2020;138:109774. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Oh KK, Adnan M, Cho DH. Network pharmacology of bioactives from Sorghum bicolor with targets related to diabetes mellitus. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0240873. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Liu SK, et al. Discovery of New α-Glucosidase Inhibitors: Structure-Based Virtual Screening and Biological Evaluation. Front. Chem. 2021;9:639279. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2021.639279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lakshmanasenthil S, Vinoth Kumar T, Geetharamani D, Shanthi Priya S. α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitoryactivity of tetradecanoic acid (TDA) from Sargassum wightii with relevance to type 2 diabetes mellitus. J. Biol. Act. Prod. from Nat. 2018;8:180–191. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Smorowska AJ, Żołnierczyk AK, Nawirska-Olszańska A, Sowiński J, Szumny A. Nutritional properties and in vitro antidiabetic activities of blue and yellow corn extracts: A comparative study. J. Food Qual. 2021;2021:1–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chhikara N, et al. Bioactive compounds and pharmacological and food applications of: Syzygium cumini-a review. Food Funct. 2018;9:6096–6115. doi: 10.1039/c8fo00654g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nazir N, Zahoor M, Uddin F, Nisar M. Chemical composition, in vitro antioxidant, anticholinesterase, and antidiabetic potential of essential oil of Elaeagnusumbellata Thunb. BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 2021 doi: 10.1186/s12906-021-03228-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lochocka K, et al. Green tea extract decreases starch digestion and absorption from a test meal in humans: A randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:2. doi: 10.1038/srep12015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gong L, et al. Inhibitors of α-amylase and α-glucosidase: Potential linkage for whole cereal foods on prevention of hyperglycemia. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020;8:6320–6337. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sobeh M, et al. Albizia harveyi: Phytochemical profiling, antioxidant, antidiabetic and hepatoprotective activities of the bark extract. Med. Chem. Res. 2017;26:3091–3105. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wang X, et al. GC/MS-based metabolomics analysis reveals active fatty acids biosynthesis in the Filippi’s gland of the silkworm, Bombyx mori, during silk spinning. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2019;105:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2018.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Farag MA, Afifi SM, Rasheed DM, Khattab AR. Revealing compositional attributes of Glossostemonbruguieri Desf. root geographic origin and roasting impact via chemometric modeling of SPME-GC-MS and NMR metabolite profiles. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2021;102:104073. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pandithurai, Murugesan, Bhuvaneswari, Thennarasan S. In vitro α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibition activity of methanolic extract of marine brown alga Spatoglossum asperum. Int. J. Adv. Pharm. 2015;4:83–87. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Aghajari N, Roth M, Haser R. Crystallographic evidence of a transglycosylation reaction: Ternary complexes of a psychrophilic α-amylase. Biochemistry. 2002;41:4273–4280. doi: 10.1021/bi0160516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.El Hawary SS, et al. In silico identification of SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein-ACE2 complex inhibitors from eight Tecoma species and cultivars analyzed by LC-MS. RSC Adv. 2020;10:43103–43108. doi: 10.1039/d0ra08997d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shady NH, et al. Hepatitis c virus ns3 protease and helicase inhibitors from red sea sponge (Amphimedon) species in green synthesized silver nanoparticles assisted by in silico modeling and metabolic profiling. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020;15:3377–3389. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S233766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Yuzuak S, Ballington J, Xie DY. HPLC-qTOF-MS/MS-based profiling of flavan-3-ols and dimeric proanthocyanidins in berries of two muscadine grape hybrids FLH 13–11 and FLH 17–66. Metabolites. 2018;8:57. doi: 10.3390/metabo8040057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Elhawary SS, Younis IY, El Bishbishy MH, Khattab AR. LC–MS/MS-based chemometric analysis of phytochemical diversity in 13 Ficus spp. (Moraceae): Correlation to their in vitro antimicrobial and in silico quorum sensing inhibitory activities. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018;126:261–271. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Pereira OR, Peres AM, Silva AMS, Domingues MRM, Cardoso SM. Simultaneous characterization and quantification of phenolic compounds in Thymus x citriodorus using a validated HPLC-UV and ESI-MS combined method. Food Res. Int. 2013;54:1773–1780. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Friščić M, Bucar F, Hazler Pilepić K. LC-PDA-ESI-MSn analysis of phenolic and iridoid compounds from Globularia spp. J. Mass Spectrom. 2016;51:1211–1236. doi: 10.1002/jms.3844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wojakowska A, Perkowski J, Góral T, Stobiecki M. Structural characterization of flavonoid glycosides from leaves of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using LC/MS/MS profiling of the target compounds. J. Mass Spectrom. 2013;48:329–339. doi: 10.1002/jms.3160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Nurmeilis Harahap Y, Saputri FC, Munim A, Setiabudy R. Determination of irbesartan and sinensetin simultaneously by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry and their application to drug interaction study in rat plasma. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2016;8:96–100. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Salerno R, Casale F, Calandruccio C, Procopio A. Characterization of flavonoids in Citrus bergamia (Bergamot) polyphenolic fraction by liquid chromatography–high resolution mass spectrometry (LC/HRMS) PharmaNutrition. 2016;4:S1–S7. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zeng X, et al. UFLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS-based screening and identification of flavonoids and derived metabolites in human urine after oral administration of exocarpium citri grandis extract. Molecules. 2018;23:895. doi: 10.3390/molecules23040895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Vrba J, et al. A novel semisynthetic flavonoid 7-O-galloyltaxifolin upregulates heme oxygenase-1 in RAW264.7 cells via MAPK/Nrf2 pathway. J. Med. Chem. 2013;56:856–866. doi: 10.1021/jm3013344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Porzel A, Farag MA, Mülbradt J, Wessjohann LA. Metabolite profiling and fingerprinting of Hypericum species: A comparison of MS and NMR metabolomics. Metabolomics. 2014;10:574–588. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Stefova M, Petkovska A, Ugarkovic S, Stanoeva JP. Strategy for optimized use of LC-MSn for determination of the polyphenolic profiles of apple peel, flesh and leaves. Arab. J. Chem. 2019;12:5180–5186. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Chen HJ, Inbaraj BS, Chen BH. Determination of phenolic acids and flavonoids in Taraxacumformosanumkitam by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry coupled with a post-column derivatization technique. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012;13:260–285. doi: 10.3390/ijms13010260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Tang J, Dunshea FR, Suleria HAR. LC-ESI-QTOF/MS characterization of phenolic compounds from medicinal plants (Hops and Juniper Berries) and their antioxidant activity. Foods. 2020;9:7. doi: 10.3390/foods9010007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ruan J, et al. Comprehensive chemical profiling in the ethanol extract of Pluchea indica aerial parts by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry analysis of its silica gel column chromatography fractions. Molecules. 2019;24:2784. doi: 10.3390/molecules24152784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information. (480.7KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information files).

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES