Abstract
Vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques of the artery wall that pose a significant risk of cardio-cerebral vascular accidents remain the global leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Thus, early delineation of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques is of clinical importance for prevention and treatment. The currently available imaging technologies mainly focus on the structural assessment of the vascular wall. Unfortunately, several disadvantages in these strategies limit the improvement in imaging effect. Nanoparticle technology is a novel diagnostic strategy for targeting and imaging pathological biomarkers. New functionalized nanoparticles that detect hallmarks of vulnerable plaques are promising for advance further control of this critical illness. The review aims to address the current opportunities and challenges for the use of nanoparticle technology in imagining vulnerable plaques.
Keywords: Atherosclerosis, Vulnerable plaque, Nanoparticle, Imaging, Hallmark
Graphical abstract
Schematic representation of nanoparticle technology in the imaging of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque.

1. Introduction
Atherosclerosis, characterized by the formation of plaques causing progressive degeneration of the vessel wall, is the primary pathogenic basis underlying coronary and cerebrovascular diseases [1]. In general, the phenotypes of most atherosclerotic plaques are stable. On the one hand, one may experience a long symptom-free period or just mild stenosis in the bloodstream. On the other hand, the vulnerable plaque phenotype can trigger sudden and life-threatening events, including myocardial infarction or stroke, the leading cause of mortality worldwide. This imposes an enormous burden on society [[1], [2], [3], [4]]. Despite widely promoting remediation interventions, the cardiovascular episodes continually yield substantial consequences [5]. Thus, advanced interventions before the clinical manifestation are necessary and the role of imaging of vulnerable plaques must be highlighted in this context.
The role of routine imaging platforms for the detection of atherosclerotic plaques, including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound and so on, has been evaluated. their ability to distinguish the vulnerable from the stable plaques remains unsatisfactory. Theoretically, the reason can be attributed to the fact that the existing imaging methods essentially rely on the presence of structural abnormalities. However, most commonly, many plaques with suspicious structural abnormalities might not lead to rupture. In addition, there are some limitations to the current imaging platforms, including invasiveness, insufficient coverage breadth, and spatial resolution, which should be considered. Therefore, in the future, a new imaging technology to identify vulnerable plaques warrants attention. It is expected to bring substantial improvements to the protocols of screening, follow-up, and clinical intervention.
In addition to the structural imaging, molecular imaging is increasingly playing an innovative role in the early diagnoses of several diseases. Given that typical pathogenic processes occur during the formation of vulnerable plaque, probes targeting specific biological features are expected to provide additional information on the suspected plaques. Thanks to that, breakouts may advance our ability to diagnosis vulnerable plaques.
Nanotechnology is rapidly evolving in imaging science domain. The detectable characteristics, targeting capability and pharmaceutical stability of nanoparticles confer them with properties of exceptional contrast agents. Over the past decades, advancements in medicine based on nanoparticles have received tremendous attention, especially for the treatment and diagnosis of cancer. Recently, the application of nanoparticles and their promising value for imaging atherosclerotic plaques has been brought forth. Numerous high-quality studies using various bioengineering designs are employed. However, only a few studies emphasize their peculiar function in distinguishing the vulnerable from the stable atherosclerotic plaques, wherein, the design principle is to target and visualize the specific features of the vulnerable plaques. In this review, we focus on the strengths and current challenge in nanoparticle-mediated vulnerable plaque imaging based on the specific hallmarks (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
Schematic representation of nanoparticle technology in the imaging of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques. Several pathological factors contribute to the thinning of the fibrous cap and the enlargement of the necrotic core, thereby leading to the formation of vulnerable plaque in the vessel wall. These include infiltration of macrophages, release of hydrolytic enzymes (matrix metalloproteins, MMPs), collagen alterations, apoptosis of macrophages, calcification, intraplaque hemorrhage, neo-angiogenesis and activation of the endothelium. Synthetic nanoparticles enter the plaques and bind to the aforementioned pathological factors. Using magnetic resonance and other equipment, nanoparticles accumulate resulting in the imaging of the suspected plaque.
2. Basic conception of vulnerable plaque
The formation of atherosclerotic plaques arises from cholesterol deposition and lipoprotein retention, gradually evolving into progressive inflammation. Other multifaceted mechanisms include leukocyte recruitment, foam cell transformation, programmed cell death, and smooth muscle cell proliferation [6]. The complex and uneven development of these mechanisms yields heterogeneous hallmarks and functional outcomes in these plaques.
A vulnerable plaque is described as a special phenotype of atherosclerotic plaques associated with a high risk. Unlike stable plaques, the vulnerable plaques are not limited to stenosis, even though they can contribute to more than 60% stenosis area of the lumen [7]. The vulnerable plaques located in the unobstructed lumen can also rupture or activate thrombosis suddenly, resulting in the majority of the acute cardiovascular and cerebrovascular episodes [8,9]. Thus far, most evidence on the biological features of vulnerable plaques is from the rupture-prone plaques owing to their distinctive features [10].
3. The hallmarks of vulnerable plaque
Consensus on the concept indicates that the basic morphological hallmarks of vulnerable plaques focus on the fibrous cap and the necrotic core [11], the essence of which causes the imbalance in forces in vulnerable plaques. If the resistance of the fibrous cap is overcome by the outward expansion of the necrotic core, the probability of rupture becomes considerably high. The underlying mechanism is attributed to the thinning of the fibrous cap or/and an enlargement in the necrotic core. Accumulating evidence suggests that several cells and molecules contribute to fibrous cap thinning or necrotic core enlargement. These have been documented as the biological hallmarks for assessing the vulnerable plaques [12].
3.1. The hallmarks of fibrous cap thinning
The thinning of the fibrous cap reduces the tolerance of plaque, thus increasing the possibility of a rupture. Thus, the exposure of the necrotic core lying beneath the fibrous cap to blood leads to thrombus and ischemia [13]. At least three mechanisms underlying the thinning of the fibrous cap have been confirmed.
First, macrophages are recruited into the lesion, which is the primary mechanism for the thinning of the fibrous cap [14]. Phenotypes may change due to macrophage polarization, causing pro-inflammatory effects [15,16]. It has been postulated that inflammation favors the formation of vulnerable plaque and is also associated with clinical outcomes [17]. As a proof of principle, pathological studies confirm the abundance of macrophages in the ruptured or rupture-prone plaques [18,19].
Second, the proteolytic enzymes secreted by the recruitment of immune cells directly affect fibrous cap thinning. In particular, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), can degenerate and hydrolyze the components of the matrix in a neutral pH environment [20,21]. Increasing evidence supports that despite differences in MMPs among species and animal models, the important role of these enzymes is executed [21]. Indeed, the level of MMPs that destabilized the coronary plaque may result in acute coronary syndrome [22].
Lastly, the inward resistance of apical cap in plaques is mainly dependent on the tight connective tissues of the arterial intima [23]. Collagen belongs to a classic family of proteins whereby long stretches unfold in fibrous formatio [24]n. During plaque progression, the connective tissue often adaptively thickens [23]. The collagen-rich tissue, mainly enriched with collagen type I, and the proliferation of smooth muscle cells facilitates plaque stabilization. Conversely, a reduction in fiber collagen is a hallmark of plaque vulnerability [25]. Therefore, assessing the expression or amount of collagen during fibrous formation is representative of the thickness of the fibrous cap. In addition, another member of the collagen family, type IV collagen, is known to be the most abundant component occupying half of the area of the vascular basement membrane [24]. The exposure of collagen IV indicates increased permeability during plaque formation [26]. Thus, a change of collagen thickness or its exposure is an interesting hallmark for accessing the plaque.
Taken together, the morphological and molecular features of fibrous cap thinning, including macrophages recruitment, overexpression of MMPs, and changes of in collagen are implicated as potential biomarkers of a vulnerable plaque.
3.2. The hallmarks of necrotic core enlargement
The expansion of necrotic core inside vulnerable plaque is also known to be responsible for the rupture. A necrotic core is defined as the accumulation of lipid and foam cells in the intima. The enlargement of the necrotic core irreversibly destroys the tight tissues, leaving behind a loose gruel of lipids. Several following factors contribute to the enlargement of the necrotic core.
First, the theory of necrotic core development supports that apoptosis in macrophages and smooth muscle cells plays play important roles. At an early stage during plaque formation, apoptosis inhibits cell transformation into foam cells as an endogenous protective mechanism [27]. However, further enrichment of lipid and lipoprotein cause excessive apoptosis, leaving too many remnants in the lesion, due to the defective efferocytosis, eventually exacerbating necrosis and enlargement of the necrotic core [28,29]. Indeed, previous studies address that regulation of macrophage apoptosis prevents plaque rupture [30]. Beside, several pieces of evidence suggest apoptosis as a hallmark to evaluate the vulnerability of plaques [31].
Second, calcification is a common component in the advanced plaques, especially among the elderly [32]. According to histological reports, owing to the accumulation in the matrix and necrotic core, lumps and plates of calcium deposits increase the volume in the intima [33]. Furthermore, the localization of calcium deposits is positively correlated with vulnerability [34]. Although studies evaluating the pivotal role of the calcification as a hallmark mainly focus on the coronary artery and aortic diseases, nevertheless, they confirm its involvement in elevating cardiovascular risk [35].
Third, the reason underlying enhanced plaque vulnerability due to intraplaque hemorrhage is the rapid increase in the volume of plaque [36]. In addition, the extravasation of the blood into plaque also results in the accumulation of iron, cholesterol, and hemoglobin, which in turn, promotes the development of plaque due to reactive oxygen species and inflammation [37]. According to a recently published meta-analysis, the presence of intraplaque hemorrhage increases the risk of future stroke regardless of gender and stenosis area [38]. Thus, this is among the most reliable morphological hallmarks associated with the potential risk of cerebrovascular events.
Finally, neo-angiogenesis is another independent risk factors for the vulnerability of plaques. These deficient blood vessels which originate from the adventitia and extend to the base of plaque are more susceptible to rupture [39]. Moreover, they facilitate the entry of inflammatory cells because of their loose endothelium [40]. These sequential events result in hemorrhage and inflammation as outcomes [41]. A clinical study confirms increased progression of clinical symptoms in presence of angiogenesis [42]. Nowadays, the best molecular hallmarks to target neo-angiogenesis are αvβ3 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEFG) [43,44].
3.3. Other hallmark of vulnerable plaques
Despite the aforementioned hallmarks, several other molecules may play a role in the formation of a vulnerable plaque. For instance, endothelial cells are activated and express vascular cell adhesion protein 1 (VCAM-1) in the early stage of vulnerable plaque formation [45]. VCAM-1 binds to the granulocytes and activates intracellular signaling cascade, thereby inducing changes in the shape of endothelial cells facilitating granulocyte migration [10]. An analysis of the carotid plaque specimens demonstrates that the expression of VCAM-1 on the endothelium is indicative of significantly high risk in humans [46]. Similarly, several potential hallmarks, including hypoxia, lipids and proteases, are also under evaluation in the context of vulnerable plaques.
4. Current imaging methods and their limitations of vulnerable plaques
In the light of above-mentioned typical hallmarks, many modalities have been evaluated to improve the diagnostic efficiency of imaging vulnerable plaques. To date, most of these investigations are dependent on the identification of abnormal structures of suspected plaques (Fig. 2).
Fig. 3.
An examples of nanoparticles functionalized for targeting macrophages the imaging of vulnerable plaques. A) Scheme illustration of the synthesis of multifunctional pathological mapping of theranostic nanoparticles targeting macrophages. B) Treatment of thrombus using nanoparticles. C) Release of Fe for MRI and PFP for US imaging triggered by ultrasound. D) T2-weighted MRI scans by T2W of nanoparticles at various Fe concentrations. E) Scheme illustration of interaction between the nanoparticles and macrophages. F) The images of nanoparticles in macrophages as detected by transmission electron microscopy. Reprinted with permission from ref. 104. Copyright 2021 Royal Society of Chemistry.
Fig. 2.
A figure summarizing the current imaging methods depending on hallmarks of vulnerable plaques. A) A vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque contains a thin cap and a large necrotic core. Reprinted with permission from ref. 11. Copyright 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health. B) CT angiography and reformation images show spotty calcification in the plaque of a patient with acute coronary syndrome. Reprinted with permission from ref. 51. Copyright 2009 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. C) A 3T MRI in vivo indicates necrotic core (arrows) with thick fibrous cap (arrow heads). Reprinted with permission from ref. 123. Copyright 2009, Wolters Kluwer Health. D) Imaging the stenting site of coronary artery using PET and CTA. Reprinted with permission from ref. 67. Copyright 2012 Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. E) OCT image shows a fibrous plaque with homogeneous rich signal band. Reprinted with permission from ref. 63. Copyright 2006 Elsevier Inc.
4.1. Structural imaging and limitations
Traditional platforms, including computed tomographic (CT) scanning and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remain the primary methods for imaging plaque lesions.
Accumulated evidence demonstrates that CT scanning can be used for the detection of atherosclerotic burden, stenosis degree, and in particular, plaque calcification of the coronary artery [47,48]. Its advantages include non-invasiveness and practicality. Thus, it is a widely used screening method to predict the incidence of atherectomy [49]. Nevertheless, there exist some disadvantages. For example, CT scan utilizes radiation posing potential medical risks. Further, the contrast agents that aid in enhanced CT imaging may also cause renal injury [50]. Moreover, due to limited imaging resolution, CT scanning fails to report the fibrotic and lipid components in the plaque, thereby exhibiting a low sensitivity for the identification of a vulnerable plaque [51]. Taken together, CT scanning is often used for the evaluation of coronary artery calcification despite an insufficient spatial resolution for imaging all the microstructures of the lesion.
MR is considered the gold standard for the non-invasive examination of substantive structure [52]. Generally, paramagnetic metallic agents, such as gadolinium reduce the T1 relaxation property, while super-paramagnetic metallic agents influence the T2 relaxation properties. Owing to these contrast agents, shortened T1 and T2 result in improved signals in the MR scans. Higher resolution for soft tissues as compared to CT scan, yield greater information of vascular structure including necrotic core, fibrous cap, and intraplaque hemorrhage from MRI scans. Moreover, contrast-enhanced MRI further improves the efficiency for the identification of plaque microvasculature, markedly greater than the non-enhanced T-weight imaging [53]. Data from a recent study of vulnerable carotid plaques suggest that MR offers a high-quality comparison in the lesion. However, the direct value of MR for predicting subsequent stroke requires further investigation [54]. Additionally, there are some disadvantages of MRI. First, MRI scans typically take more time, and the imaging procedure for large regions or multiple vessels is difficult, especially due to the dynamical motion artifacts of small vessels [55]. Second, special coils or protocols of vascular scanning are expensive for non-specialized operators or centers [56]. Third, metal implants, often being employed for patients with cardiovascular problems, limit MRI [57]. In general, MR a promising non-invasive modality having a higher resolution for the identification of typical structure of vulnerable plaques.
To overcome the flaws of CT scans and MRI, two technical solutions have been proposed. One of them aims to further enhance spatial resolution. Great efforts have been made in this direction.
To pursue enhanced spatial resolution and the ability to distinguish the plaque volume and structure, some invasive approaches have been designed considering the risk of tolerable complications. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) are the main platforms among these attempts, are the main leading platforms among these attempts, characterized by catheter-based invasive methods [58]. With regard to the deep penetrating imaging capability, IVUS can offer a real-time and two-dimensional image portrait to identify the necrotic core. In addition, it is a valuable tool to compare volume of plaques in vivo because of its quantification and reproducibility [59]. However, the resolution of IVUS is limited to 100–200 μm, which still limits the imaging of micro biomarkers in the vulnerable plaques, including the thin fibrous cap, micro-calcification, and inflammation [58]. More advanced and specified applications with IVUS, such as virtual histology (VH)-IVUS based on the radiofrequency analysis of ultrasound signals, can detect the presence of calcification [60]. Fluorescence lifetime images (FLIM)-IVUS based on fluorescence spectroscopy technique may enhance the ability to distinguish the thin fibrous cap [61]. Another promising invasive modality, OCT, improves the resolution at 10–20 μm. It can detect thin fibrous caps, micro-calcification, inflammation, and neo-angiogenesis formation, allowing for a reliable evaluation of plaque vulnerability. Unfortunately, there are some limitations to OCT imaging as well. The major limitation is its low penetration depth which is only 2–3 mm [62]. This implies that OCT imaging in vivo tends to be blocked by the surrounding blood and vessels, making it difficult to obtain an ideal large-scale image. In addition, the OCT imaging often confuse the presence of calcium deposits and lipid pools [63,64]. Therefore, reliable clinical trials are rarely performed to validate if IVUS and OCT constitute a qualified evaluation strategy for vulnerable plaques.
In general, structural imaging is still depending on improving spatial resolution to directly visualize the plaque. Current modalities including MRI and intravascular imaging are well developed for assessing plaque volume or massive structures, such as the necrotic core. However, insufficient resolution and non-specific signal imaging limit their discriminating abilities, along with their respective inadequacies. Therefore, to make microstructures easily identifiable, molecular imaging modalities for vulnerable plaques are evolving rapidly.
4.2. Molecular imaging and limitations
As mentioned previously, the other technical solution to overcome the shortcomings of structural imaging is molecular imaging. In past decades, molecular diagnostic technology has been gaining popularity. It becomes a new trend allowing for characteristically tracing in vivo as a noninvasive method [65,66]. Emerging platforms of molecular imaging are providing a biological evaluation of the ongoing functional status for assessing vulnerability-prone regions.
For molecular imaging, positron emission tomography (PET) is an eligible platform, based on the positron signals emitted from the radio-labeled tracers. Recently, for a series of molecules as markers for vulnerable plaque formation, including inflammation, micro-calcification, angiogenesis, vascular cell adhesion, and collagen loss, it has been demonstrated that these can be traced by PET [[67], [68], [69], [70], [71]]. To better assess vascular inflammation, systems for quantitative assessment using PET has been developed. For example, a perivascular attenuation index is a promising tool for the evaluation of vascular inflammation of human coronary arteries [72]. In addition, novel contrast agents such as 68Ga-labeled somatostatin receptor ligand are in early stage of human studies [73]. Nevertheless, the use of PET for imaging vulnerable plaques remains in the preclinical stage. The following disadvantages are the main causes of concern. First, a low spatial resolution implies that the PET image loses structural information, especially for the tiny blood vessels such as coronary arteries [74]. Second, the undesirable attenuation of signal imposed by the dynamics of cardiac and respiratory affect the observation of subtle lesions [75]. Third, the radiation, cost, equipment maintenance, and other matters should also be taken into consideration [76]. Taken together, it is difficult for PET as a single modality to popularize vulnerable imaging.
Therefore, additional work is required due to the limitations of both structural and molecular imaging platforms. Some advantages and limitations of clinical imaging modalities have been summarized in Table 1. Developing systems drawing on the advantages of both imaging platforms, also referred to as hybrid multimodal imaging, is a potential solution, that is expected to provide the most comprehensive information from imaging of vulnerable plaques [77]. As such, PET/CT and PET/MR facilitating this hypothesis have been purposed for applications. Unfortunately, only very few medical centers implement such instruments. Relatively, the usual MRI or CT scan devices combined with novel contrast agents which are functionalized for molecular tracing have broader impacts [78].
Table 1.
Summary of the advantages and limitations of different clinical imaging modalities.
| Imaging Modality | Advantages | limitations | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Structural imaging | Computed tomography | High specificity. Detection of atherosclerotic burden, stenosis degree and plaque calcification. | Low spatial resolution to distinguish soft tissue. |
| High reproducibility. | Risk of exposure to radiation and iodinated contrast agents. | ||
| Magnetic resonance imaging | Greater morphological information, including necrotic core and hemorrhage. | Long scanning time with artifacts due to motion of small vessels. | |
| No radiation. | Metal implants are limited. | ||
| Intravascular ultrasound | Deeper penetration. | Low spatial resolution. Invasiveness. | |
| Ability to distinguish luminal dimensions and plaque burden. | Dependence on operator technology. | ||
| Optical coherence tomography | High resolution. | Low penetration. | |
| Fast data acquisition rate. | Invasiveness. | ||
| Visualization of the adjacent tissue. | Dependence on operator technology. | ||
| Molecular imaging | positron emission tomography | Distinguishing micro-calcification, angiogenesis, vascular cell adhesion, and collagen loss. | Not used widely and expensive. |
| High sensitivity. | Risk of radiation exposure. | ||
| Severe loss of structural information. | |||
5. Nanotechnology-based imaging of vulnerable plaques
Nanotechnology is another promising technology platform for molecular imaging [79,80]. Knowledge of the several advantages of this technology for novel contrast agents is well documented. First, the nanoparticles can be used to image the lesions of interest with conventional equipment, whereby metallic elements are synthesized into superparamagnetic or paramagnetic particles. Non-invasive imaging devices that are widely used, including MRI or CT scans, can simultaneously yield structural and molecular information [81]. Second, the surface functionalization and synthesis methods have been highly improved in recent years. The size, shape and electronic charge of nanoparticles are effectively controlled, which directly affect the non-specific uptake, bio-distribution of nanoparticles. PEG or zwitterionic polymers are the most common materials one can use to modify the nanoparticle surfaces [[82], [83], [84]]. Over decades, several nanoparticles-based formulations have been developed, such as polymeric, chitosan, nanogels, nanocapsules and solid lipid nanoparticles and so on [85]. Furthermore, specific peptide can be engineered and coated onto the surface of the nanoparticles. These properties offer high penetration into to the lesion and bonding affinity towards the biomarkers [86].
Third, limited toxicity and the absence of radioactivity further encourage the development of nanotechnology [87]. Taken together, the physical and biological advantages make nanoparticles attractive candidates for molecular imaging.
In recent times, emerging research of nanotechnology in the field of imaging of vulnerable plaque imaging has attracted attention [88]. Nanoparticles have been designed to target a wide range of hallmarks of vulnerable plaques, barely less than the radio-labeled platforms. Since the 2000s, given the optimistic results, the disagreement and interest remain focused on the most appropriate selection of signature for targeting [89]. In the following sections, we review the current advances in diagnostic imaging techniques using nanoparticles based on different characteristics of vulnerable plaques.
5.1. Imaging by targeting the thin fibrous cap
The thinning of the fibrous cap is one of the main hallmarks of a vulnerable plaque. Autopsy-based studies indicate that the rupture of plaque often occurs at the margin or shoulder spot of the cap thinner than 65 μm [90]. Some published reports also conclude that the thickness of cap reaching less than 200 μm is a red flag [91]. Based on the preliminary evaluation by T1-weighted imaging, gadolinium-based contrast agents further improve the efficiency of structural visualization of the atherosclerotic lesions [92]. Nevertheless, limited by the resolution, identification of the microstructures of the plaque by MRI is undesirable. The measurement of cap thickness remains challenging in clinical settings.
The integrity of fibrin is critical for the vulnerability of plaque in vivo [93]. Several authors have used nanotechnology to further assess the fibrin content in cap tissue based on which the nanoparticles targeting fibrin have been designed in animal and human studies. For example, Flacke et al. demonstrate the sensitivity of detection for a thin layer of fiber over the clot surface of plaque using paramagnetic nanoparticles targeting fibrin through an MRI scan [89]. In another study comprising 20 patients with carotid stenosis, a greater signal drop in asymptomatic cases suggests stability in vulnerability using ultra-small super-paramagnetic iron oxide [94]. What is more, gold nanoparticles, owing to their biocompatibility, modification ability, and superior optical properties, have been used to amplify the signal in MRI as ultrasmall metal-based contrast agents [95]. Jeong-Yeon et al. published an example of fibrin-targeting imaging using glycol-chitosan-coated gold nanoparticles for the detection of cerebrovascular thrombi, showing a signal enhancement after injection of nanoparticles [96]. Herein, these data suggest that the designed magnetic nanoparticles detected by MR can identify fibrous caps for the detection of vulnerable plaques.
Recruitment of massive macrophages in the plaque is another hallmark linked to fibrous cap thinning. Owing to its important role in the formation of plaques, along with the technical facility for binding, this has been favorable for researchers [97]. Years ago, nanoparticles are designed for targeting macrophages mainly by phagocytosis effect [98]. To reduce the non-specific interception by other immune organs, the use of nanoparticles designed to bind specific receptors on the cellular surface has received traction in the last five years [99]. Some recent and representative work emphasized on imaging vulnerability plaques are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2.
Summary of recently published studies on nanoparticles targeting macrophages in imaging of vulnerable plaques.
| Target | Nanoparticles | Results | Years |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phagocytosis | |||
| Phagocytosis | Ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide | Reduction in standard signal intensity in T2WI MRI is associated with plaque stability | 2020 [100] |
| Phagocytosis | Very small superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles and Gd-BOPTA | Contrast agent based on Gd indicates arterial calcification and characterizes plaque vulnerability. | 2020 [101] |
| Phagocytosis | Ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide with rhodamine | T2 signal loss and spontaneous fluorescence appeared in the aortic plaque. | 2019 [102] |
| Phagocytosis | Very small iron oxide particles using acids | Nanoparticles developed for MR were allowed for plaque identification | 2015 [103] |
| Surface molecular of macrophages | |||
| Scavenger receptors (SR-A) | Nanoparticles capsuling Fe3O4 and perfluoropentane | Nanoparticles show good imaging properties in ultrasound and MRI. Apoptosis of macrophages and disaggregation of platelets are observed (Fig. 3). | 2021 [104] |
| SR-AI | Magnetic mesoporous silica nanoparticles | particles target and quantify macrophage enrichment in the plaque | 2021 [105] |
| CD36 | Hydrogel nanoparticles encapsulating Gd-DTPA | Ex vivo electron microscopy indicates atherosclerotic plaque associated macrophages targeted by nanoparticles. | 2021 [106] |
| CD44 | Single-dispersed iron oxide nanoparticles | An intelligent in vivo switch in T1-T2 enhancement modes shows that the vulnerable plaques exhibit | 2021 [107] |
| SR-AI | Gadolinium-integrated gold nanoclusters | In vivo MR/fluorescence images demonstrated robust and prolonged contrast enhancement of signal. | 2019 [108] |
| Osteopontin | Nanoparticles containing perfluorooctyl bromide and Cy5.5 | Ultrasound and optical imaging reveal nanoparticles are accumulated in vivo. | 2019 [109] |
| MARCO | Upconversion nanoparticles by conjugating MARCO antibody | High signal intensity on T1-weighted MR images are determined by 7.0T MRI. | 2019 [110] |
| SR-A | Nanoparticles combined with the phase transitional material | Nanoparticles reduce the T2 signal in MRI scans and phase transition treatment leads to the apoptosis of macrophages. | 2019 [111] |
| CD68 | Fe-doped hollow silica nanoparticles | US/MRI platform indicates that the contrast agent is beneficial for identifying the macrophages in aorta. | 2018 [112] |
| Osteopontin | An osteopontin specific MRI/optical dual-modality probe | MR displays T2 enhancement after injection. | 2017 [113] |
| Osteopontin | Upconversion nanoparticles | The signals of vulnerability induced by lowered shear stress presented different signal intensities. | 2017 [114] |
As mentioned earlier, MMP levels in vivo represent the enzymatic changes in the weak fibrous cap. Although the number of relative studies assessing MMP expression is unremarkable, some of them suggest that the nanotechnology platform can be used as a promising tool. For instance, Kiyuk et al. have constructed an MMP-targeting nanoparticle for a carotid plaque, wherein a sensor activated by MMP was tracked by fluorescence microscopy [115]. In addition, some proteins involved in the processing of MMP is also used as a biomarker. For example, a previous study suggests that gadolinium paramagnetic nanoparticles incorporating a binding peptide, targeting an inducer of MMP, EMMPRIN, qualifies for plaque evaluation [116]. The magnetic resonance sequences were allowed in the imaging when the signals in plaques significantly reduced (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4.
An examples of nanoparticles functionalized for targeting matrix metalloproteinases for imaging vulnerable plaques. A) Scheme illustration of synthesis of nanoparticles with NAP9 peptides to visualize EMMPRIN. B) Confocal microscopy-based detection of EMMPRIN (green) and NAP9 (red). C) MRI images of gadolinium-enriched nanoparticles in the atherosclerotic aortic arch. D) Oil Red O staining in the atherosclerotic specimen. Reprinted with permission from ref. 116. Copyright 2018 Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.
Given the association between the hallmark of collagen and vulnerable plaques, some research groups have established that nanoparticles targeting collagen are a vulnerable fiber in mice. For instance, a previous study on high-density lipoprotein nanoparticles reports a strong affinity for binding collagen. There is a significant increase in the MRI signal in the regression plaque [117] (Fig. 5A1, A2). Likewise, a new type of organic nanoparticle coating the platelet membrane also interacts with collagen [118]. Its live detection demonstrates its utility in MRI of atherosclerotic plaque. Alternatively, several studies suggest that the exposure of collagen IV facilitates nanoparticles to target the atherosclerosis plaques [119]. In a comparative study that evaluated different potential targets, nanoparticles conjugated by collagen IV-targeting peptides were found to enhance the image, though lower efficiency was observed in the early stages of atherosclerosis [120]. Additional particulate studies of nanoparticles targeting collagen IV for drug delivering have been reported [121,122].
Fig. 5.
Examples of nanoparticles functionalized for targeting collagen for imaging vulnerable plaques. A1) Scheme illustration of nanoparticles based on high-density lipoprotein functionalized with collagen-specific with peptides (EP3553). A2) MRI of abdominal aorta by injection of collagen-specific nanoparticles (EP3533). Reprinted with permission from ref. 117. Copyright 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. B1) Schematic illustration of platelet membrane-coated nanoparticles targeting collagen and multiple hallmarks. B2) MRI of ApoE KO mice after administration of nanoparticles (orange arrows: positive contrast in aorta). Reprinted with permission from ref. 118. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.
5.2. Imaging by targeting necrotic core enlargement
The large necrotic core is a morphological hallmark of a vulnerable plaque. The size and volume of the necrotic core are key predictors of prognosis [123]. Although there is no valid study that evaluates the role of nanotechnology for the assessment of the necrotic core, the MRI platform, widely used for nanoparticles, yields satisfactory images. This establishment is especially reliable for suspected blood vessels located in a certain position, such as the carotid artery, based on hypo-intense T2w images or CE-T1w images [124]. Recently, considerable efforts have been made to determine the threshold for defining a large necrotic core. According to a clinical study consisting of 120 carotid plaque subjects, the necrotic core with a volume larger than 40% was found to more likely rupture during the three-year follow-up [125]. In contrast, others suggest a volume greater than 10% of the necrotic core as a high-risk factor [126].
Additionally, intraplaque hemorrhage is emerging as another feature of necrotic core enlargement and vulnerable plaques [127]. Based on existing knowledge, MRI scans with standard coils and procedures can detect the existing intraplaque hemorrhage, the value of which has been determined by high-grade evidence [38]. The T1 weighted or hyper-T1 contrast weighted MRI procedure is performed depending on the oxidative state of hemoglobin [128,129]. Taken together, the current desire to examine novel applications of nanoparticles targeting large necrotic core or intraplaque hemorrhage is relatively low.
Annexin V representing apoptosis in the plaque, especially in the shoulder region of the fibrous cap, increases the vulnerability of plaque [130]. A high expression of annexin V is emerging as a hallmark for targeting. For instance, Burtea et al. have designed an ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle targeting apoptosis in macrophages and show that it can localize to the vulnerable plaques [131]. This result has been confirmed in a similar study, wherein a hybrid nanoparticle targeting annexin V in macrophages has been constructed [132] (Fig. 6). Findings from a previous study on high-density lipoprotein mimicking nanoparticles support that stimulating apoptosis through the mitochondrial membrane potential facilitates the detection of vulnerable plaques [133]. Gold nanoparticles with enhanced targeting ability for annexin V have also been successfully synthesized to image vulnerable plaques [134].
Fig. 6.
A hybrid nanoparticle system verified using a single-photon-emission computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging multimodal probe targeting annexin V. A) The protocols preparation of nanoparticles. B) The BSGI images have been confirmed by a corresponding Oil Red O staining in C57 and ApoE−/− mice. C) The images of nanoparticles targeting annexin V are seen in the aorta of ApoE−/− mice, but not in those of the C57 mice. Reprinted with permission from ref. 132. Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society.
Over the last decades, calcification in the vascular system is referred to as a significant gauge of fibrous cap rupture [135]. Mechanistically, the orientation, location, and size of spotty calcification are related to the rigid stress of the lesion [136]. However, there is still no reliable imaging method for a detailed evaluation of calcification due to the limited resolution of non-invasive instruments and the risk of invasive inspection [137]. Hence, several studies on nanoparticles targeting calcium or hydroxyapatite, a calcium phosphate mineral found in calcified vessels, have been evaluated. For example, several in vivo studies have highlighted novel nanoparticles functionalized with bisphosphonate-derivatizing. They can be used to visualize the osteogenic activity and provide a possible solution for the identification of micro-calcifications [138]. In another recent study with gold nanoparticles which allows for the evaluation of plaque calcification, the image is also found to be enhanced [139].
Neo-angiogenesis in the plaque contributes to its potential rupture. The present clinical evidence for neo-vascularization detection is typically based on the contrast-enhanced ultrasound method [140]. An ordinary MRI scan is not advantageous unless preceded by a specialized technique like dynamic contrast enhancement perfusion [55]. The nanoparticles targeting neo-vascularization have been energized by some authors. A study using rabbits, whereby they were injected with paramagnetic nanoparticles targeting αvβ3, a signature of neo-angiogenesis, suggests an increased and heterogeneous distribution of positive signals along the longitudinal and transverse planes [43]. A recent study shows that the iron oxide nanoparticles conjugated with peptides that bind to αvβ3 are more efficient relative to those targeting collagen in the early stages of atherosclerosis [120] (Fig. 7). Thus, neo-angiogenesis is another potential biomarker that can be targeted using nanoparticle technology.
Fig. 7.
An examples of nanoparticles functionalized for targeting neo-angiogenesis for imaging vulnerable plaques. A) Scheme illustration of nanoparticles of cRGD peptide to bind with the αvβ3 of the neo-vasculature. B) The fluorescence and C) MRI scan of aorta from apoE−/- mice injected with nanoparticles, IONP-cRGD-NC (targeting neo-angiogenesis), or IONP-NC(control). D) Atherosclerotic plaque staining with Prussian blue in apoE−/- mice. Black arrows indicate IONP nano-carrier. Reprinted with permission from ref. 120. Copyright 2017 Elsevier BV.
5.3. Imaging by targeting the activated endothelium
An important adhesion molecule that mediates leukocyte adhesion response, VCAM-1, is found to be overexpressed when the endothelium is activated in atherosclerosis. Thus, in numerous studies, VCAM-1 has been the target of nanoparticles. For example, Carmen et al. have evaluated the ultra-small superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles conjugated to VCAM-1 and report that these can be effectively used to image the vulnerable plaques [131]. Likewise, in a previous study using liposomes conjugated with antibodies against cell adhesion molecules, the authors have detected atherosclerotic potentially vulnerable plaques in the early stage [141]. Interestingly, using plant viral nanoparticles to target VCAM-1, the findings indicate that the cargo raises the detection limit of atherosclerotic plaques [142] (Fig. 8).
Fig. 8.
An example of nanoparticles functionalized for targeting adhesion molecules for imaging vulnerable plaques. A) Scheme illustration of nanoparticle-based tobacco mosaic virus to target vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM-1). B) The MRI scans of the aorta wall in apoE−/- mice injected with nanoparticles targeting VCAM (1st line) and Gd ions control (2nd line). C) Representative confocal images from ApoE−/− mice injected with PEG-TMV (control) or VCAM-TMV; the particles are colored green. Reprinted with permission from ref. 142. Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.
6. The preclinical challenges to the application of nanoparticles
Over the past decades, great efforts have been made to promote the transformation of nanotechnology in clinical settings. However, the exciting findings using nanotechnology are just mainly staying at the preclinical stage for animal species. Only a few pioneering products have been approved by the FDA or other authorities after being evaluated for their safety in humans [143]. In addition, most of these pioneering products have focused on the diagnosis or treatment of tumors, and some for the treatment of patients with iron-deficient anemia [144,145]. While only a limited number of clinical trials for imaging atherosclerosis using nanotechnology have been underway, these suggest their safety and feasibility [[146], [147], [148], [149]]. There are also some have been registered and are underway (such as NCT05032937).
There are many vascular similarities between humans and experimental animal, however, a huge gap may exist [150]. Thus, the necessity of determining the practical feasibility of nanotechnology through trials for imaging human plaque has emerged. The continuous discovery from these trials will aid the evolution of nanoparticle synthesis and imaging technologies. To date, several major challenges in clinical transformation remain unaddressed.
The first of them is the safety of nanoparticles for atherosclerotic vessels. For nanoparticles, the notion of toxicity has been initially investigated based on environmental exposure [151]. Some studies reveal the influence of various newly designed nanoparticles on the human body, but the inferences have not yet been fully elucidated [152]. In contrast to the nanoparticles used in cancer treatment, those targeting vascular structures need better biological adaptability, especially as their deposition can cause vascular inflammation [153]. Moreover, for clinical follow-up, there may arise a need for injecting the nanoparticles repeatedly in the same individual, which may cause a higher dose of deposition and serious complications. Thus, these newly designed nanoparticles must be strictly evaluated for toxicity. The solution to this challenge is contingent on engineering developments and innovations.
The second challenge is to identify a more valuable hallmark for the vulnerable plaques for clinical decision-making. The majority of the current positive evidence for vulnerable plaques is based on structural imaging [154]. On the contrary, the results of animal experiments for identifying predictive molecular features have not been verified in long-term follow-up or human trials. In addition, researchers have to continuously discover new molecular targets in pursuit of novelty. Thus, there is no persuasive consensus on the best molecular features [155]. Additionally, owing to the complexity of the underlying mechanisms, it may be difficult to represent the overall state of plaques only based on a single molecular phenotype [156]. Therefore, biotech companies employing nanotechnology may not support a clinical trial without a solid evidence base. To solve this problem, as a starting point, studies focused on comparative efficacy are expected to provide novel insights. Furthermore, the nanoparticles targeting multiple properties warrant consideration [118](Fig. 5 B1, B2).
The third challenge is to acquire sophisticated equipment, which accommodates the contradiction between a wider screening range and a higher local resolution. Thus far, the spatial resolution of equipment based on nanotechnology is inadequate. As with all the other devices capable of molecular imaging, their expertise primarily deals with the imaging of large blood vessels, including the aorta and carotid arteries [157]. However, imaging the vessels smaller than the spatial resolution of cameras, like coronary arteries, poses difficulties, especially when they are in motion [158]. As for the MRI machines using nanoparticles, the largest benefits are proven convenience and penetration. However, the challenge of identifying the microvascular structure remains unaddressed, raising the need for improved equipment. In addition, combining other instruments with an improved local resolution, such as OCT, may also aid in overcoming this challenge [159].
Lastly, quantification and analysis of results from nanoparticle imaging tests pose another challenge. The heterogeneity in vulnerable plaque may exist, causing an inconsistent level of characteristic expression in individuals [160]. For example, different amounts of VCAM-1 can be expressed in stable plaque as well, resulting in the accumulation of nanoparticles and boosting the signal [161]. Thus, the threshold value defining these “positive results” are hardly unified depending on decentralized experimental designs. Meanwhile, imperfect properties of pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics may result in unexpected uptake by non-target tissues or clearance times in the target tissues, leading to over-interpretation and distrust in the conclusions [162]. Therefore, more preclinical studies, along with more sophisticated design, a larger number of samples, and wider period coverage, are needed to understand these potential biases.
7. Conclusion and future directions
Atherosclerotic vulnerable plaques have more potential risks than stable plaques owing to their structural and molecular biology features. Nanotechnology offers a promising opportunity to identify the hallmarks representing the vulnerable plaque formation, thereby endowing them as qualified biological contrast agents. Considering the adaptability and limitation of different platforms, we believe that MRI enhanced by nanoparticle contrast is the most practical and comprehensive choice to date. Although many positive results in support have been demonstrated in animal studies, the evidence remains insufficient for the transformation of nanotechnology for human use. For example, several studies highlighted in this review do not point out their disadvantages or specify the accuracy. Moreover, no valid data are reported in human studies with sufficiently large sample size. Therefore, more studies are needed to examine the limitation of these types of biomaterials, their advanced nature, the terms for safety, biological targets, higher-resolution equipment, and quantitative systems among others. Major efforts are anticipated in the pharmaceutical, bioengineering, pathophysiology, and clinical settings.
Future clinical studies are also needed to elucidate their adaptability in humans. For example, the predictive value of nanoparticles for plaque rupture needs to be determined by prospective clinical trials along with a follow-up. A comprehensive scoring system, similar to coronary scoring, that considers multiple hallmarks or risk factors should be developed to improve diagnostic effectiveness [163]. Another potential direction is to evaluate hybrid imaging methods PET/MR to minimize the limitations of the equipment. Furthermore, multifunctional nanoparticles that enable the integration of diagnosis and treatment may expand their scope for clinical applications [164].
Funding
This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81870337, 82160092) and Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (821RC709).
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Contributor Information
Han Zhang, Email: hzhang@szu.edu.cn.
Guojun Zhao, Email: zhaoguojun@gzhmu.edu.cn.
References
- 1.Libby P., Buring J., Badimon L., Hansson G., Deanfield J., Bittencourt M., Tokgözoğlu L., Lewis E. Atherosclerosis, Nature Rev. Dis. primers. 2019;5:56. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0106-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Grant P., Cosentino F. The 2019 ESC guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD: new features and the ‘ten commandments’ of the 2019 guidelines are discussed by professor peter J. Grant and professor francesco cosentino, the task force chairmen. Eur. Heart J. 2019;40:3215–3217. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Virani S., Alonso A., Benjamin E., Bittencourt M., Callaway C., Carson A., Chamberlain A., Chang A., Cheng S., Delling F., Djousse L., Elkind M., Ferguson J., Fornage M., Khan S., Kissela B., Knutson K., Kwan T., Lackland D., Lewis T., Lichtman J., Longenecker C., Loop M., Lutsey P., Martin S., Matsushita K., Moran A., Mussolino M., Perak A., Rosamond W., Roth G., Sampson U., Satou G., Schroeder E., Shah S., Shay C., Spartano N., Stokes A., Tirschwell D., VanWagner L., Tsao C. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2020 update: a report from the American heart association. Circulation. 2020;141:e139–e596. doi: 10.1161/cir.0000000000000757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Araki M., Yonetsu T., Kurihara O., Nakajima A., Lee H., Soeda T., Minami Y., McNulty I., Uemura S., Kakuta T., Jang I. Predictors of rapid plaque progression: an optical coherence tomography study. JACC. Cardiovascular imaging. 2020;14:1628–1638. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jernberg T., Johanson P., Held C., Svennblad B., Lindbäck J., Wallentin L. Association between adoption of evidence-based treatment and survival for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2011;305:1677–1684. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gisterå A., Hansson G. The immunology of atherosclerosis, Nature reviews. Nephrology. 2017;13:368–380. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2017.51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jia H., Dai J., Hou J., Xing L., Ma L., Liu H., Xu M., Yao Y., Hu S., Yamamoto E., Lee H., Zhang S., Yu B., Jang I. Effective anti-thrombotic therapy without stenting: intravascular optical coherence tomography-based management in plaque erosion (the EROSION study) Eur. Heart J. 2017;38:792–800. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Arbab-Zadeh A., Nakano M., Virmani R., Fuster V. Acute coronary events. Circulation. 2012;125:1147–1156. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.111.047431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fox K., Metra M., Morais J., Atar D. The myth of 'stable' coronary artery disease, Nature reviews. Cardiology. 2020;17:9–21. doi: 10.1038/s41569-019-0233-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Folco E., Mawson T., Vromman A., Bernardes-Souza B., Franck G., Persson O., Nakamura M., Newton G., Luscinskas F., Libby P. Neutrophil extracellular traps induce endothelial cell activation and tissue factor production through interleukin-1α and cathepsin G. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2018;38:1901–1912. doi: 10.1161/atvbaha.118.311150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bentzon J., Otsuka F., Virmani R., Falk E. Mechanisms of plaque formation and rupture. Circ. Res. 2014;114:1852–1866. doi: 10.1161/circresaha.114.302721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nayor M., Brown K., Vasan R. The molecular basis of predicting atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk. Circ. Res. 2021;128:287–303. doi: 10.1161/circresaha.120.315890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Badimon L., Vilahur G. Thrombosis formation on atherosclerotic lesions and plaque rupture. J. Intern. Med. 2014;276:618–632. doi: 10.1111/joim.12296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.van der Wal A., Becker A., van der Loos C., Das P. Site of intimal rupture or erosion of thrombosed coronary atherosclerotic plaques is characterized by an inflammatory process irrespective of the dominant plaque morphology. Circulation. 1994;89:36–44. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.89.1.36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Folco E., Sukhova G., Quillard T., Libby P. Moderate hypoxia potentiates interleukin-1β production in activated human macrophages. Circ. Res. 2014;115:875–883. doi: 10.1161/circresaha.115.304437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ding S., Lin N., Sheng X., Zhao Y., Su Y., Xu L., Tong R., Yan Y., Fu Y., He J., Gao Y., Yuan A., Ye L., Reiter R., Pu J. Melatonin stabilizes rupture-prone vulnerable plaques via regulating macrophage polarization in a nuclear circadian receptor RORα-dependent manner. J. Pineal Res. 2019;67 doi: 10.1111/jpi.12581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mourouzis K., Oikonomou E., Siasos G., Tsalamadris S., Vogiatzi G., Antonopoulos A., Fountoulakis P., Goliopoulou A., Papaioannou S., Tousoulis D. Pro-inflammatory cytokines in acute coronary syndromes. Curr. Pharmaceut. Des. 2020;26:4624–4647. doi: 10.2174/1381612826666200413082353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Libby P., Pasterkamp G., Crea F., Jang I. Reassessing the mechanisms of acute coronary syndromes. Circ. Res. 2019;124:150–160. doi: 10.1161/circresaha.118.311098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fernández-Ortiz A., Badimon J., Falk E., Fuster V., Meyer B., Mailhac A., Weng D., Shah P., Badimon L. Characterization of the relative thrombogenicity of atherosclerotic plaque components: implications for consequences of plaque rupture. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1994;23:1562–1569. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90657-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lahdentausta L., Leskelä J., Winkelmann A., Tervahartiala T., Sorsa T., Pesonen E., Pussinen P. Serum MMP-9 diagnostics, prognostics, and activation in acute coronary syndrome and its recurrence. Journal of cardiovascular translational research. 2018;11:210–220. doi: 10.1007/s12265-018-9789-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Quillard T., Araújo H., Franck G., Tesmenitsky Y., Libby P. Matrix metalloproteinase-13 predominates over matrix metalloproteinase-8 as the functional interstitial collagenase in mouse atheromata. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2014;34:1179–1186. doi: 10.1161/atvbaha.114.303326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Galis Z., Sukhova G., Lark M., Libby P. Increased expression of matrix metalloproteinases and matrix degrading activity in vulnerable regions of human atherosclerotic plaques. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1994;94:2493–2503. doi: 10.1172/jci117619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kragel A., Reddy S., Wittes J., Roberts W. Morphometric analysis of the composition of atherosclerotic plaques in the four major epicardial coronary arteries in acute myocardial infarction and in sudden coronary death. Circulation. 1989;80:1747–1756. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.80.6.1747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kalluri R. Basement membranes: structure, assembly and role in tumour angiogenesis. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2003;3:422–433. doi: 10.1038/nrc1094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Migdalski A., Jawien A. New insight into biology, molecular diagnostics and treatment options of unstable carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a narrative review. Ann. Transl. Med. 2021;9:1207. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-7197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Murata K., Motayama T., Kotake C. Collagen types in various layers of the human aorta and their changes with the atherosclerotic process. Atherosclerosis. 1986;60:251–262. doi: 10.1016/0021-9150(86)90172-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gautier E., Huby T., Witztum J., Ouzilleau B., Miller E., Saint-Charles F., Aucouturier P., Chapman M., Lesnik P. Macrophage apoptosis exerts divergent effects on atherogenesis as a function of lesion stage. Circulation. 2009;119:1795–1804. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.108.806158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Seimon T., Nadolski M., Liao X., Magallon J., Nguyen M., Feric N., Koschinsky M., Harkewicz R., Witztum J., Tsimikas S., Golenbock D., Moore K., Tabas I. Atherogenic lipids and lipoproteins trigger CD36-TLR2-dependent apoptosis in macrophages undergoing endoplasmic reticulum stress. Cell Metabol. 2010;12:467–482. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Moore K., Tabas I. Macrophages in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Cell. 2011;145:341–355. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Poels K., Schnitzler J., Waissi F., Levels J., Stroes E., Daemen M., Lutgens E., Pennekamp A., De Kleijn D., Seijkens T., Kroon J. Inhibition of PFKFB3 hampers the progression of atherosclerosis and promotes plaque stability. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020;8:581641. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.581641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.González-Ramos S., Fernández-García V., Recalde M., Rodríguez C., Martínez-González J., Andrés V., Martín-Sanz P., Boscá L. Deletion or inhibition of NOD1 favors plaque stability and attenuates atherothrombosis in advanced atherogenesis. Cells. 2020;9 doi: 10.3390/cells9092067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mori H., Torii S., Kutyna M., Sakamoto A., Finn A., Virmani R. Coronary artery calcification and its progression: what does it really mean?, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging. 2018;11:127–142. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Stary H. Natural history and histological classification of atherosclerotic lesions: an update. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2000;20:1177–1178. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.20.5.1177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cocker M., Spence J., Hammond R., Wells G., deKemp R., Lum C., Adeeko A., Yaffe M., Leung E., Hill A., Nagpal S., Stotts G., Alturkustani M., Hammond L., DaSilva J., Hadizad T., Tardif J., Beanlands R. [F]-NaF PET/CT identifies active calcification in carotid plaque, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging. 2017;10:486–488. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nasir K., Cainzos-Achirica M. Role of coronary artery calcium score in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 2021;373:n776. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kim S., Kwak H., Hwang S., Chung G. Dynamic change of carotid intraplaque hemorrhage volume in subjects with mild carotid stenosis. Eur. J. Radiol. 2018;105:15–19. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.05.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cornelissen A., Guo L., Sakamoto A., Virmani R., Finn A. New insights into the role of iron in inflammation and atherosclerosis. EBioMedicine. 2019;47:598–606. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.08.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Schindler A., Schinner R., Altaf N., Hosseini A., Simpson R., Esposito-Bauer L., Singh N., Kwee R., Kurosaki Y., Yamagata S., Yoshida K., Miyamoto S., Maggisano R., Moody A., Poppert H., Kooi M., Auer D., Bonati L., Saam T. Prediction of stroke risk by detection of hemorrhage in carotid plaques: meta-analysis of individual patient data. JACC. Cardiovascular imaging. 2020;13:395–406. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.03.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Horie N., Morofuji Y., Morikawa M., Tateishi Y., Izumo T., Hayashi K., Tsujino A., Nagata I. Communication of inwardly projecting neovessels with the lumen contributes to symptomatic intraplaque hemorrhage in carotid artery stenosis. J. Neurosurg. 2015;123:1125–1132. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.Jns142371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mao Y., Liu X., Song Y., Zhai C., Xu X., Zhang L., Zhang Y. Fibroblast growth factor-2/platelet-derived growth factor enhances atherosclerotic plaque stability. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2020;24:1128–1140. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.14850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Camaré C., Pucelle M., Nègre-Salvayre A., Salvayre R. Angiogenesis in the atherosclerotic plaque. Redox Biol. 2017;12:18–34. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2017.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Camps-Renom P., Prats-Sánchez L., Casoni F., González-de-Echávarri J., Marrero-González P., Castrillón I., Marín R., Jiménez-Xarrié E., Delgado-Mederos R., Martínez-Domeño A., Guisado-Alonso D., Martí-Fàbregas J. Plaque neovascularization detected with contrast-enhanced ultrasound predicts ischaemic stroke recurrence in patients with carotid atherosclerosis. Eur. J. Neurol. 2020;27:809–816. doi: 10.1111/ene.14157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Winter P., Morawski A., Caruthers S., Fuhrhop R., Zhang H., Williams T., Allen J., Lacy E., Robertson J., Lanza G., Wickline S. Molecular imaging of angiogenesis in early-stage atherosclerosis with alpha(v)beta3-integrin-targeted nanoparticles. Circulation. 2003;108:2270–2274. doi: 10.1161/01.Cir.0000093185.16083.95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hu Z., Zhao G., Gou W., Cheng H. Myricitrin inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor-induced angiogenesis of human umbilical vein endothelial cells and mice. Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie. 2020;130:110726. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Mlinar L., Chung E., Wonder E., Tirrell M. Active targeting of early and mid-stage atherosclerotic plaques using self-assembled peptide amphiphile micelles. Biomaterials. 2014;35:8678–8686. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.06.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Weinkauf C., Concha-Moore K., Lindner J., Marinelli E., Hadinger K., Bhattacharjee S., Berman S., Goshima K., Leon L., Matsunaga T., Unger E. Endothelial vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 is a marker for high-risk carotid plaques and target for ultrasound molecular imaging. J. Vasc. Surg. 2018;68:105S–113S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Voros S., Elashoff M., Wingrove J., Budoff M., Thomas G., Rosenberg S. A peripheral blood gene expression score is associated with atherosclerotic Plaque Burden and Stenosis by cardiovascular CT-angiography: results from the PREDICT and COMPASS studies. Atherosclerosis. 2014;233:284–290. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.12.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ihdayhid A., Goeller M., Dey D., Nerlekar N., Yap G., Thakur U., Adams D., Cameron J., Seneviratne S., Achenbach S., Ko B. Comparison of coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden and composition as assessed on coronary computed tomography angiography in east asian and European-origin caucasians. Am. J. Cardiol. 2019;124:1012–1019. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.06.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Yu M., Li Y., Li W., Lu Z., Wei M., Zhang J. Calcification remodeling index characterized by cardiac CT as a novel parameter to predict the use of rotational atherectomy for coronary intervention of lesions with moderate to severe calcification. Korean J. Radiol. 2017;18:753–762. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2017.18.5.753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Aycock R., Westafer L., Boxen J., Majlesi N., Schoenfeld E., Bannuru R. Acute kidney injury after computed tomography: a meta-analysis. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2018;71:44–53. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.06.041. e4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Motoyama S., Sarai M., Harigaya H., Anno H., Inoue K., Hara T., Naruse H., Ishii J., Hishida H., Wong N., Virmani R., Kondo T., Ozaki Y., Narula J. Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009;54:49–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Brinjikji W., Huston J., Rabinstein A., Kim G., Lerman A., Lanzino G. Contemporary carotid imaging: from degree of stenosis to plaque vulnerability. J. Neurosurg. 2016;124:27–42. doi: 10.3171/2015.1.Jns142452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gaens M., Backes W., Rozel S., Lipperts M., Sanders S., Jaspers K., Cleutjens J., Sluimer J., Heeneman S., Daemen M., Welten R., Daemen J., Wildberger J., Kwee R., Kooi M. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of carotid atherosclerotic plaque: model selection, reproducibility, and validation. Radiology. 2013;266:271–279. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Zhang R., Zhang Q., Ji A., Lv P., Zhang J., Fu C., Lin J. Identification of high-risk carotid plaque with MRI-based radiomics and machine learning. Eur. Radiol. 2021;31:3116–3126. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07361-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Yuan J., Makris G., Patterson A., Usman A., Das T., Priest A., Teng Z., Hilborne S., Prudencio D., Gillard J., Graves M. Relationship between carotid plaque surface morphology and perfusion: a 3D DCE-MRI study. Magma. 2018;31:191–199. doi: 10.1007/s10334-017-0621-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Brinjikji W., DeMarco J., Shih R., Lanzino G., Rabinstein A., Hilditch C., Nicholson P., Huston J. Diagnostic accuracy of a clinical carotid plaque MR protocol using a neurovascular coil compared to a surface coil protocol. J. Magn. Reson. Imag. : JMRI. 2018;48:1264–1272. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Koch K., Bhave S., Gaddipati A., Hargreaves B., Gui D., Peters R., Bedi M., Mannem R., Kaushik S. Multispectral diffusion-weighted imaging near metal implants. Magn. Reson. Med. 2018;79:987–993. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Ono M., Kawashima H., Hara H., Gao C., Wang R., Kogame N., Takahashi K., Chichareon P., Modolo R., Tomaniak M., Wykrzykowska J., Piek J., Mori I., Courtney B., Wijns W., Sharif F., Bourantas C., Onuma Y., Serruys P. Advances in IVUS/OCT and future clinical perspective of novel hybrid catheter system in coronary imaging. Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine. 2020;7:119. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.00119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wykrzykowska J., Mintz G., Garcia-Garcia H., Maehara A., Fahy M., Xu K., Inguez A., Fajadet J., Lansky A., Templin B., Zhang Z., de Bruyne B., Weisz G., Serruys P., Stone G. Longitudinal distribution of plaque burden and necrotic core-rich plaques in nonculprit lesions of patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging. 2012;5:S10–S18. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Shan P., Mintz G., Witzenbichler B., Metzger D., Rinaldi M., Duffy P., Weisz G., Stuckey T., Brodie B., Généreux P., Crowley A., Kirtane A., Stone G., Maehara A. Does calcium burden impact culprit lesion morphology and clinical results? An ADAPT-DES IVUS substudy. Int. J. Cardiol. 2017;248:97–102. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.08.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Fatakdawala H., Gorpas D., Bishop J., Bec J., Ma D., Southard J., Margulies K., Marcu L. Fluorescence lifetime imaging combined with conventional intravascular ultrasound for enhanced assessment of atherosclerotic plaques: an ex vivo study in human coronary arteries. Journal of cardiovascular translational research. 2015;8:253–263. doi: 10.1007/s12265-015-9627-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Maehara A., Matsumura M., Ali Z., Mintz G., Stone G. IVUS-guided versus OCT-guided coronary stent implantation: a critical appraisal, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging. 2017;10:1487–1503. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Manfrini O., Mont E., Leone O., Arbustini E., Eusebi V., Virmani R., Bugiardini R. Sources of error and interpretation of plaque morphology by optical coherence tomography. Am. J. Cardiol. 2006;98:156–159. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.01.097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Subban V., Raffel O. Optical coherence tomography: fundamentals and clinical utility. Cardiovasc. Diagn. Ther. 2020;10:1389–1414. doi: 10.21037/cdt-20-253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Montesi S. Molecular imaging of pulmonary fibrosis: another step forward. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2021;203:6–8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202007-2897ED. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Pereira S., Oldfield L., Ney A., Hart P., Keane M., Pandol S., Li D., Greenhalf W., Jeon C., Koay E., Almario C., Halloran C., Lennon A., Costello E. Early detection of pancreatic cancer, the lancet. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020;5:698–710. doi: 10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30416-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Cheng V., Slomka P., Le Meunier L., Tamarappoo B., Nakazato R., Dey D., Berman D. Coronary arterial 18F-FDG uptake by fusion of PET and coronary CT angiography at sites of percutaneous stenting for acute myocardial infarction and stable coronary artery disease. J. Nucl. Med. 2012;53:575–583. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.097550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Joshi N., Vesey A., Williams M., Shah A., Calvert P., Craighead F., Yeoh S., Wallace W., Salter D., Fletcher A., van Beek E., Flapan A., Uren N., Behan M., Cruden N., Mills N., Fox K., Rudd J., Dweck M., Newby D. 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography for identification of ruptured and high-risk coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a prospective clinical trial. Lancet (London, England) 2014;383:705–713. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61754-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Beer A., Pelisek J., Heider P., Saraste A., Reeps C., Metz S., Seidl S., Kessler H., Wester H., Eckstein H., Schwaiger M. PET/CT imaging of integrin αvβ3 expression in human carotid atherosclerosis, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging. 2014;7:178–187. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Bala G., Blykers A., Xavier C., Descamps B., Broisat A., Ghezzi C., Fagret D., Van Camp G., Caveliers V., Vanhove C., Lahoutte T., Droogmans S., Cosyns B., Devoogdt N., Hernot S. Targeting of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 by 18F-labelled nanobodies for PET/CT imaging of inflamed atherosclerotic plaques, European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging. 2016;17:1001–1008. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Ohshima S., Petrov A., Fujimoto S., Zhou J., Azure M., Edwards D., Murohara T., Narula N., Tsimikas S., Narula J. Molecular imaging of matrix metalloproteinase expression in atherosclerotic plaques of mice deficient in apolipoprotein e or low-density-lipoprotein receptor. J. Nucl. Med. : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine. 2009;50:612–617. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.055889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Elnabawi Y., Oikonomou E., Dey A., Mancio J., Rodante J., Aksentijevich M., Choi H., Keel A., Erb-Alvarez J., Teague H., Joshi A., Playford M., Lockshin B., Choi A., Gelfand J., Chen M., Bluemke D., Shirodaria C., Antoniades C., Mehta N. Association of biologic therapy with coronary inflammation in patients with psoriasis as assessed by perivascular fat attenuation index. JAMA cardiology. 2019;4:885–891. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.2589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Wan Mys E.R., Michopoulou S., Shortman R., Rodriguez-Justo M., Menezes L., Yusuf S., Richards T., Wild D., Waser B., Reubi J.C., Groves A. PET/CT imaging of unstable carotid plaque with 68 Ga-labeled somatostatin receptor ligand. J. Nucl. Med. 2017;58:774–780. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.181438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Polycarpou I., Tsoumpas C., King A., Marsden P. Impact of respiratory motion correction and spatial resolution on lesion detection in PET: a simulation study based on real MR dynamic data. Phys. Med. Biol. 2014;59:697–713. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/3/697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Robson P., Trivieri M., Karakatsanis N., Padilla M., Abgral R., Dweck M., Kovacic J., Fayad Z. Correction of respiratory and cardiac motion in cardiac PET/MR using MR-based motion modeling. Phys. Med. Biol. 2018;63:225011. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaea97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Berg E., Cherry S. Innovations in instrumentation for positron emission tomography. Semin. Nucl. Med. 2018;48:311–331. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2018.02.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Palmisano A., Vignale D., Peretto G., Busnardo E., Calcagno C., Campochiaro C., De Luca G., Sala S., Ferro P., Basso C., Del Maschio A., De Cobelli F., Esposito A. Hybrid FDG-PET/MR or FDG-PET/CT to detect disease activity in patients with persisting arrhythmias after myocarditis. JACC. Cardiovascular imaging. 2021;14:288–292. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Ehman E., Johnson G., Villanueva-Meyer J., Cha S., Leynes A., Larson P., Hope T. PET/MRI: where might it replace PET/CT? J. Magn. Reson. Imag. : JMRI. 2017;46:1247–1262. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Fanti S., Minozzi S., Antoch G., Banks I., Briganti A., Carrio I., Chiti A., Clarke N., Eiber M., De Bono J., Fizazi K., Gillessen S., Gledhill S., Haberkorn U., Herrmann K., Hicks R., Lecouvet F., Montironi R., Ost P., O'Sullivan J., Padhani A., Schalken J., Scher H., Tombal B., van Moorselaar R., Van Poppel H., Vargas H., Walz J., Weber W., Wester H., Oyen W. Consensus on molecular imaging and theranostics in prostate cancer, the Lancet. Oncology. 2018;19:e696–e708. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30604-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Li F., Li J., Dong B., Wang F., Fan C., Zuo X. DNA nanotechnology-empowered nanoscopic imaging of biomolecules. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021;50:5650–5667. doi: 10.1039/d0cs01281e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Zeng L., Wu D., Zou R., Chen T., Zhang J., Wu A. Paramagnetic and superparamagnetic inorganic nanoparticles for T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Curr. Med. Chem. 2018;25:2970–2986. doi: 10.2174/0929867324666170314124616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Zhang F., Lu G., Wen X., Li F., Ji X., Li Q., Wu M., Cheng Q., Yu Y., Tang J., Mei L. Magnetic nanoparticles coated with polyphenols for spatio-temporally controlled cancer photothermal/immunotherapy. J. Contr. Release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society. 2020;326:131–139. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Li B., Xie J., Yuan Z., Jain P., Lin X., Wu K., Jiang S. Mitigation of inflammatory immune responses with hydrophilic nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. 2018;57:4527–4531. doi: 10.1002/anie.201710068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Liu P., Boyle A., Lu Y., Adams J., Chi Y., Reilly R., Winnik M. Metal-chelating polymers (MCPs) with zwitterionic pendant groups complexed to trastuzumab exhibit decreased liver accumulation compared to polyanionic MCP immunoconjugates. Biomacromolecules. 2015;16:3613–3623. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b01066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Li Z., Yang Y., Wei H., Shan X., Wang X., Ou M., Liu Q., Gao N., Chen H., Mei L., Zeng X. Charge-reversal biodegradable MSNs for tumor synergetic chemo/photothermal and visualized therapy. J. Contr. Release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society. 2021 doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Chan H., Xiao L., Yeung K., Ho S., Zhao D., Chan W., Li H. Effect of surface-functionalized nanoparticles on the elongation phase of beta-amyloid (1-40) fibrillogenesis. Biomaterials. 2012;33:4443–4450. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.03.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Yang W., Wang L., Mettenbrink E., DeAngelis P., Wilhelm S. Nanoparticle toxicology. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2021;61:269–289. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-032320-110338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Ge X., Cui H., Kong J., Lu S., Zhan R., Gao J., Xu Y., Lin S., Meng K., Zu L., Guo S., Zheng L. A non-invasive nanoprobe for in vivo photoacoustic imaging of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque. Adv. Mater. 2020;32 doi: 10.1002/adma.202000037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Flacke S., Fischer S., Scott M., Fuhrhop R., Allen J., McLean M., Winter P., Sicard G., Gaffney P., Wickline S., Lanza G. Novel MRI contrast agent for molecular imaging of fibrin: implications for detecting vulnerable plaques. Circulation. 2001;104:1280–1285. doi: 10.1161/hc3601.094303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Burke A., Farb A., Malcom G., Liang Y., Smialek J., Virmani R. Coronary risk factors and plaque morphology in men with coronary disease who died suddenly. N. Engl. J. Med. 1997;336:1276–1282. doi: 10.1056/nejm199705013361802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Redgrave J., Gallagher P., Lovett J., Rothwell P. Critical cap thickness and rupture in symptomatic carotid plaques: the oxford plaque study. Stroke. 2008;39:1722–1729. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.107.507988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Kwee R., van Engelshoven J., Mess W., ter Berg J., Schreuder F., Franke C., Korten A., Meems B., van Oostenbrugge R., Wildberger J., Kooi M. Reproducibility of fibrous cap status assessment of carotid artery plaques by contrast-enhanced MRI. Stroke. 2009;40:3017–3021. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.109.555052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Li H., Xiao L., He H., Zeng H., Liu J., Jiang C., Mei G., Yu J., Chen H., Yao P., Tang Y. Quercetin attenuates atherosclerotic inflammation by inhibiting galectin-3-NLRP3 signaling pathway. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2021;65 doi: 10.1002/mnfr.202000746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Howarth S., Tang T., Trivedi R., Weerakkody R., U-King-Im J., Gaunt M., Boyle J., Li Z., Miller S., Graves M., Gillard J. Utility of USPIO-enhanced MR imaging to identify inflammation and the fibrous cap: a comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. Eur. J. Radiol. 2009;70:555–560. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.01.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Miladi I., Alric C., Dufort S., Mowat P., Dutour A., Mandon C., Laurent G., Bräuer-Krisch E., Herath N., Coll J., Dutreix M., Lux F., Bazzi R., Billotey C., Janier M., Perriat P., Le Duc G., Roux S., Tillement O. The in vivo radiosensitizing effect of gold nanoparticles based MRI contrast agents. Small. 2014 doi: 10.1002/smll.201302303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Kim J., Ryu J., Schellingerhout D., Sun I., Lee S., Jeon S., Kim J., Kwon I., Nahrendorf M., Ahn C., Kim K., Kim D. Direct imaging of cerebral thromboemboli using computed tomography and fibrin-targeted gold nanoparticles. Theranostics. 2015;5:1098–1114. doi: 10.7150/thno.11679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Childs B., Baker D., Wijshake T., Conover C., Campisi J., van Deursen J. Senescent intimal foam cells are deleterious at all stages of atherosclerosis. Science (New York, N.Y.) 2016;354:472–477. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf6659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Flores A., Hosseini-Nassab N., Jarr K., Ye J., Zhu X., Wirka R., Koh A., Tsantilas P., Wang Y., Nanda V., Kojima Y., Zeng Y., Lotfi M., Sinclair R., Weissman I., Ingelsson E., Smith B., Leeper N. Pro-efferocytic nanoparticles are specifically taken up by lesional macrophages and prevent atherosclerosis. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2020;15:154–161. doi: 10.1038/s41565-019-0619-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Prilepskii A., Serov N., Kladko D., Vinogradov V. Nanoparticle-based approaches towards the treatment of atherosclerosis. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12:1056. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12111056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Hu Z., Fang X., Sheng B., Guo Y., Yu Y. Melatonin inhibits macrophage infiltration and promotes plaque stabilization by upregulating anti-inflammatory HGF/c-Met system in the atherosclerotic rabbit: USPIO-enhanced MRI assessment. Vasc. Pharmacol. 2020;127:106659. doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2020.106659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Uca Y., Hallmann D., Hesse B., Seim C., Stolzenburg N., Pietsch H., Schnorr J., Taupitz M. Microdistribution of magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents in atherosclerotic plaques determined by LA-ICP-MS and SR-μxrf imaging. Mol. Imag. Biol. 2021;23:382–393. doi: 10.1007/s11307-020-01563-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Li Y., Pan Y., Wu X., Li Y., Wang H., Zhu H., Jiang L. Dual-modality imaging of atherosclerotic plaques using ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide labeled with rhodamine. Nanomedicine. 2019;14:1935–1944. doi: 10.2217/nnm-2019-0062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Scharlach C., Kratz H., Wiekhorst F., Warmuth C., Schnorr J., Genter G., Ebert M., Mueller S., Schellenberger E. Synthesis of acid-stabilized iron oxide nanoparticles and comparison for targeting atherosclerotic plaques: evaluation by MRI, quantitative MPS, and TEM alternative to ambiguous Prussian blue iron staining. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2015;11:1085–1095. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2015.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Gao B., Xu J., Zhou J., Zhang H., Yang R., Wang H., Huang J., Yan F., Luo Y. Multifunctional pathology-mapping theranostic nanoplatforms for US/MR imaging and ultrasound therapy of atherosclerosis. Nanoscale. 2021;13:8623–8638. doi: 10.1039/d1nr01096d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Wu M., Li X., Guo Q., Li J., Xu G., Li G., Wang J., Zhang X. Magnetic mesoporous silica nanoparticles-aided dual MR/NIRF imaging to identify macrophage enrichment in atherosclerotic plaques. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2021;32:102330. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2020.102330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Costagliola di Polidoro A., Grassia A., De Sarno F., Bevilacqua P., Mollo V., Romano E., Di Taranto M., Fortunato G., Bracale U., Tramontano L., Diomaiuti T., Torino E. Targeting nanostrategies for imaging of atherosclerosis. Contrast Media Mol. Imaging. 2021;2021:6664471. doi: 10.1155/2021/6664471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Pan C., Lin J., Zheng J., Liu C., Yuan B., Akakuru O., Zubair Iqbal M., Fang Q., Hu J., Chen J., Lin J., Dai Q., Guo X., Li Z., Zhang T., Xu C., Ma X., Chen T., Wu A., Jin Y. An intelligent T-T switchable MRI contrast agent for the non-invasive identification of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques. Nanoscale. 2021;13:6461–6474. doi: 10.1039/d0nr08039j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Wang J., Wu M., Chang J., Li L., Guo Q., Hao J., Peng Q., Zhang B., Zhang X., Li X. Scavenger receptor-AI-targeted ultrasmall gold nanoclusters facilitate in vivo MR and ex vivo fluorescence dual-modality visualization of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2019;19:81–94. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2019.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Li S., Gou T., Wang Q., Chen M., Chen Z., Xu M., Wang Y., Han D., Cao R., Liu J., Liang P., Dai Z., Cao F. Ultrasound/optical dual-modality imaging for evaluation of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques with osteopontin targeted nanoparticles. Macromol. Biosci. 2020;20 doi: 10.1002/mabi.201900279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Wang Y., Zhang Y., Wang Z., Zhang J., Qiao R., Xu M., Yang N., Gao L., Qiao H., Gao M., Cao F. Optical/MRI dual-modality imaging of M1 macrophage polarization in atherosclerotic plaque with MARCO-targeted upconversion luminescence probe. Biomaterials. 2019;219:119378. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Ye M., Zhou J., Zhong Y., Xu J., Hou J., Wang X., Wang Z., Guo D. SR-A-Targeted phase-transition nanoparticles for the detection and treatment of atherosclerotic vulnerable plaques. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2019;11:9702–9715. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b18190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Ji R., Li X., Zhou C., Tian Q., Li C., Xia S., Wang R., Feng Y., Zhan W. Identifying macrophage enrichment in atherosclerotic plaques by targeting dual-modal US imaging/MRI based on biodegradable Fe-doped hollow silica nanospheres conjugated with anti-CD68 antibody. Nanoscale. 2018;10:20246–20255. doi: 10.1039/c8nr04703k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Qiao H., Wang Y., Zhang R., Gao Q., Liang X., Gao L., Jiang Z., Qiao R., Han D., Zhang Y., Qiu Y., Tian J., Gao M., Cao F. MRI/optical dual-modality imaging of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque with an osteopontin-targeted probe based on FeO nanoparticles. Biomaterials. 2017;112:336–345. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Qiao R., Qiao H., Zhang Y., Wang Y., Chi C., Tian J., Zhang L., Cao F., Gao M. Molecular imaging of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques in vivo with osteopontin-specific upconversion nanoprobes. ACS Nano. 2017;11:1816–1825. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6b07842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Chang K., Francis S., Aikawa E., Figueiredo J., Kohler R., McCarthy J., Weissleder R., Plutzky J., Jaffer F. Pioglitazone suppresses inflammation in vivo in murine carotid atherosclerosis: novel detection by dual-target fluorescence molecular imaging. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2010;30:1933–1939. doi: 10.1161/atvbaha.110.206342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Ramirez-Carracedo R., Tesoro L., Hernandez I., Diez-Mata J., Filice M., Toro R., Rodriguez-Piñero M., Zamorano J., Saura M., Zaragoza C. Non-invasive detection of extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer EMMPRIN, a new therapeutic target against atherosclerosis, inhibited by endothelial nitric oxide. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:3248. doi: 10.3390/ijms19103248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Chen W., Cormode D., Vengrenyuk Y., Herranz B., Feig J., Klink A., Mulder W., Fisher E., Fayad Z. Collagen-specific peptide conjugated HDL nanoparticles as MRI contrast agent to evaluate compositional changes in atherosclerotic plaque regression, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging. 2013;6:373–384. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.06.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Wei X., Ying M., Dehaini D., Su Y., Kroll A., Zhou J., Gao W., Fang R., Chien S., Zhang L. Nanoparticle functionalization with platelet membrane enables multifactored biological targeting and detection of atherosclerosis. ACS Nano. 2018;12:109–116. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b07720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Fredman G., Kamaly N., Spolitu S., Milton J., Ghorpade D., Chiasson R., Kuriakose G., Perretti M., Farokzhad O., Tabas I. Targeted nanoparticles containing the proresolving peptide Ac2-26 protect against advanced atherosclerosis in hypercholesterolemic mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015;7 doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa1065. 275ra20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Kim M., Sahu A., Kim G., Nam G., Um W., Shin S., Jeong Y., Kim I., Kim K., Kwon I., Tae G. Comparison of in vivo targeting ability between cRGD and collagen-targeting peptide conjugated nano-carriers for atherosclerosis. J. Contr. Release. 2018;269:337–346. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.11.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Yu M., Amengual J., Menon A., Kamaly N., Zhou F., Xu X., Saw P., Lee S., Si K., Ortega C., Choi W., Lee I., Bdour Y., Shi J., Mahmoudi M., Jon S., Fisher E., Farokhzad O. Targeted nanotherapeutics encapsulating liver X receptor agonist GW3965 enhance antiatherogenic effects without adverse effects on hepatic lipid metabolism in ldlr mice. Advanced healthcare materials. 2017;6:10. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201700313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Lobatto M., Fuster V., Fayad Z., Mulder W. Perspectives and opportunities for nanomedicine in the management of atherosclerosis, Nature reviews. Drug discovery. 2011;10:835–852. doi: 10.1038/nrd3578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Ota H., Yu W., Underhill H., Oikawa M., Dong L., Zhao X., Polissar N., Neradilek B., Gao T., Zhang Z., Yan Z., Guo M., Zhang Z., Hatsukami T., Yuan C. Hemorrhage and large lipid-rich necrotic cores are independently associated with thin or ruptured fibrous caps: an in vivo 3T MRI study. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2009;29:1696–1701. doi: 10.1161/atvbaha.109.192179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Kassem M., Florea A., Mottaghy F., van Oostenbrugge R., Kooi M. Magnetic resonance imaging of carotid plaques: current status and clinical perspectives. Ann. Transl. Med. 2020;8:1266. doi: 10.21037/atm-2020-cass-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Doradla P., Otsuka K., Nadkarni A., Villiger M., Karanasos A., Zandvoort L., Dijkstra J., Zijlstra F., Soest G., Daemen J., Regar E., Bouma B., Nadkarni S. Biomechanical stress profiling of coronary atherosclerosis: identifying a multifactorial metric to evaluate plaque rupture risk, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging. 2020;13:804–816. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.01.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Costopoulos C., Huang Y., Brown A., Calvert P., Hoole S., West N., Gillard J., Teng Z., Bennett M. Plaque rupture in coronary atherosclerosis is associated with increased plaque structural stress, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging. 2017;10:1472–1483. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.04.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.van Dijk A., Truijman M., Hussain B., Zadi T., Saiedie G., de Rotte A., Liem M., van der Steen A., Daemen M., Koudstaal P., Nederkoorn P., Hendrikse J., Kooi M., van der Lugt A. Intraplaque hemorrhage and the plaque surface in carotid atherosclerosis: the plaque at RISK study (PARISK), AJNR. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2015;36:2127–2133. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Chu B., Kampschulte A., Ferguson M., Kerwin W., Yarnykh V., O'Brien K., Polissar N., Hatsukami T., Yuan C. Hemorrhage in the atherosclerotic carotid plaque: a high-resolution MRI study. Stroke. 2004;35:1079–1084. doi: 10.1161/01.Str.0000125856.25309.86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Saba L., Yuan C., Hatsukami T., Balu N., Qiao Y., DeMarco J., Saam T., Moody A., Li D., Matouk C., Johnson M., Jäger H., Mossa-Basha M., Kooi M., Fan Z., Saloner D., Wintermark M., Mikulis D., Wasserman B. Carotid artery wall imaging: perspective and guidelines from the ASNR vessel wall imaging study group and expert consensus recommendations of the American society of neuroradiology. AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology. 2018;39:E9–E31. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Kolodgie F., Narula J., Burke A., Haider N., Farb A., Hui-Liang Y., Smialek J., Virmani R. Localization of apoptotic macrophages at the site of plaque rupture in sudden coronary death. Am. J. Pathol. 2000;157:1259–1268. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)64641-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Burtea C., Ballet S., Laurent S., Rousseaux O., Dencausse A., Gonzalez W., Port M., Corot C., Vander Elst L., Muller R. Development of a magnetic resonance imaging protocol for the characterization of atherosclerotic plaque by using vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and apoptosis-targeted ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide derivatives. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2012;32:e36–48. doi: 10.1161/atvbaha.112.245415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Cheng D., Li X., Zhang C., Tan H., Wang C., Pang L., Shi H. Detection of vulnerable atherosclerosis plaques with a dual-modal single-photon-emission computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging probe targeting apoptotic macrophages. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015;7:2847–2855. doi: 10.1021/am508118x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Marrache S., Dhar S. Biodegradable synthetic high-density lipoprotein nanoparticles for atherosclerosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013;110:9445–9450. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1301929110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Li X., Wang C., Tan H., Cheng L., Liu G., Yang Y., Zhao Y., Zhang Y., Li Y., Zhang C., Xiu Y., Cheng D., Shi H. Gold nanoparticles-based SPECT/CT imaging probe targeting for vulnerable atherosclerosis plaques. Biomaterials. 2016;108:71–80. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.08.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Sangiorgi G., Rumberger J., Severson A., Edwards W., Gregoire J., Fitzpatrick L., Schwartz R. Arterial calcification and not lumen stenosis is highly correlated with atherosclerotic plaque burden in humans: a histologic study of 723 coronary artery segments using nondecalcifying methodology. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1998;31:126–133. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00443-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Hoshino T., Chow L., Hsu J., Perlowski A., Abedin M., Tobis J., Tintut Y., Mal A., Klug W., Demer L. Mechanical stress analysis of a rigid inclusion in distensible material: a model of atherosclerotic calcification and plaque vulnerability. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2009;297:H802–H810. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00318.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Dweck M., Doris M., Motwani M., Adamson P., Slomka P., Dey D., Fayad Z., Newby D., Berman D. Imaging of coronary atherosclerosis - evolution towards new treatment strategies, Nature reviews. Cardiology. 2016;13:533–548. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2016.79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Aikawa E., Nahrendorf M., Figueiredo J., Swirski F., Shtatland T., Kohler R., Jaffer F., Aikawa M., Weissleder R. Osteogenesis associates with inflammation in early-stage atherosclerosis evaluated by molecular imaging in vivo. Circulation. 2007;116:2841–2850. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.107.732867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Si-Mohamed S., Sigovan M., Hsu J., Tatard-Leitman V., Chalabreysse L., Naha P., Garrivier T., Dessouky R., Carnaru M., Boussel L., Cormode D., Douek P. In vivo molecular K-edge imaging of atherosclerotic plaque using photon-counting CT. Radiology. 2021;300:98–107. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021203968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Huang R., Abdelmoneim S., Ball C., Nhola L., Farrell A., Feinstein S., Mulvagh S. Detection of carotid atherosclerotic plaque neovascularization using contrast enhanced ultrasound: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2016;29:491–502. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2016.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Danila D., Partha R., Elrod D., Lackey M., Casscells S., Conyers J. Antibody-labeled liposomes for CT imaging of atherosclerotic plaques: in vitro investigation of an anti-ICAM antibody-labeled liposome containing iohexol for molecular imaging of atherosclerotic plaques via computed tomography. Tex. Heart Inst. J. 2009;36:393–403. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Bruckman M., Jiang K., Simpson E., Randolph L., Luyt L., Yu X., Steinmetz N. Dual-modal magnetic resonance and fluorescence imaging of atherosclerotic plaques in vivo using VCAM-1 targeted tobacco mosaic virus. Nano Lett. 2014;14:1551–1558. doi: 10.1021/nl404816m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Krauss A., Gao X., Li L., Manning M., Patel P., Fu W., Janoria K., Gieser G., Bateman D., Przepiorka D., Shen Y., Shord S., Sheth C., Banerjee A., Liu J., Goldberg K., Farrell A., Blumenthal G., Pazdur R. FDA approval summary: (daunorubicin and cytarabine) liposome for injection for the treatment of adults with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia. Clin. Cancer Res. : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2019;25:2685–2690. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-18-2990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Soetaert F., Korangath P., Serantes D., Fiering S., Ivkov R. Cancer therapy with iron oxide nanoparticles: agents of thermal and immune therapies. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2020;163–164:65–83. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2020.06.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Schwenk M. Ferumoxytol: a new intravenous iron preparation for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease. Pharmacotherapy. 2010;30:70–79. doi: 10.1592/phco.30.1.70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Li Z., Tang T., Jiang F., Zhang Y., Gillard J. Reduction in arterial wall strain with aggressive lipid-lowering therapy in patients with carotid artery disease. Circ. J. : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society. 2011;75:1486–1492. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-10-1210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Kooi M., Cappendijk V., Cleutjens K., Kessels A., Kitslaar P., Borgers M., Frederik P., Daemen M., van Engelshoven J. Accumulation of ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide in human atherosclerotic plaques can be detected by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2003;107:2453–2458. doi: 10.1161/01.Cir.0000068315.98705.Cc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Zhu S., Wen C., Bai D., Gao M. Diagnostic efficacy of intravascular ultrasound combined with GdO-EPL contrast agent for patients with atherosclerosis. Exp. Ther. Med. 2020;20:136. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.9265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Smits L., Tiessens F., Zheng K., Stroes E., Nederveen A., Coolen B. Evaluation of ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron-oxide (USPIO) enhanced MRI with ferumoxytol to quantify arterial wall inflammation. Atherosclerosis. 2017;263:211–218. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2017.06.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Qi C., Du L., Wu W., Li D., Hao J., Gong L., Deng L., Zhang T., Zhang C., Zhang Y. Detection of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques in experimental atherosclerosis with the USPIO-enhanced MRI. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 2015;73:331–337. doi: 10.1007/s12013-015-0591-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Donaldson K., Aitken R., Tran L., Stone V., Duffin R., Forrest G., Alexander A. Carbon nanotubes: a review of their properties in relation to pulmonary toxicology and workplace safety. Toxicol. Sci. : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology. 2006;92:5–22. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfj130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Rodríguez-Hernández A., Vazquez-Duhalt R., Huerta-Saquero A. Nanoparticle-plasma membrane interactions: thermodynamics, toxicity and cellular response. Curr. Med. Chem. 2020;27:3330–3345. doi: 10.2174/0929867325666181112090648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Yao H., Zhang Y., Liu L., Xu Y., Liu X., Lin J., Zhou W., Wei P., Jin P., Wen L. Inhibition of lanthanide nanocrystal-induced inflammasome activation in macrophages by a surface coating peptide through abrogation of ROS production and TRPM2-mediated Ca(2+) influx. Biomaterials. 2016;108:143–156. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.08.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Goeller M., Achenbach S., Cadet S., Kwan A., Commandeur F., Slomka P., Gransar H., Albrecht M., Tamarappoo B., Berman D., Marwan M., Dey D. Pericoronary adipose tissue computed tomography attenuation and high-risk plaque characteristics in acute coronary syndrome compared with stable coronary artery disease. JAMA cardiology. 2018;3:858–863. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Zhang Y., Bai D., Du J., Jin L., Ma J., Yang J., Cai W., Feng Y., Xing C., Yuan L., Duan Y. Ultrasound-guided imaging of junctional adhesion molecule-A-targeted microbubbles identifies vulnerable plaque in rabbits. Biomaterials. 2016;94:20–30. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.03.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Dweck M., Fayad Z. Multitarget vulnerable plaque imaging, circulation. Cardiovascular imaging. 2017;10 doi: 10.1161/circimaging.117.006491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Robson P., Dweck M., Trivieri M., Abgral R., Karakatsanis N., Contreras J., Gidwani U., Narula J., Fuster V., Kovacic J., Fayad Z. Coronary artery PET/MR imaging: feasibility, limitations, and solutions, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging. 2017;10:1103–1112. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.09.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Farashahi A., Zare-Sadeghi A., Shakeri-Zadeh A., Kamran Kamrava S., Maleki S., Ghaznavi H., Faeghi F. Real-time mapping of heat generation and distribution in a laser irradiated agar phantom loaded with gold nanoparticles using MR temperature imaging. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 2019;25:66–73. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2018.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.De-Pablo-Gómez-de-Liaño L., Fernández-Vigo J., Merino-Menéndez S., Duque-Muñoz M., Gómez-de-Liaño R. Correlation between optical coherence tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of rectus muscle thickness measurements in graves' ophthalmopathy. J. Pediatr. Ophthalmol. Strabismus. 2019;56:319–326. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20190607-01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Xie H., Chen L., Liu H., Cui Y., Cui L., Zhang P., Chen S. Expression of Mac-2 binding protein in human carotid atheroma is associated with plaque instability and clinical manifestations. Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie. 2019;110:465–472. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.12.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Geronimo F., Barter P., Rye K., Heather A., Shearston K., Rodgers K. Plaque stabilizing effects of apolipoprotein A-IV. Atherosclerosis. 2016;251:39–46. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.04.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Park E., Lee G., Yoon C., Jeong U., Kim Y., Chang J., Kim D. Tissue distribution following 28 day repeated oral administration of aluminum-based nanoparticles with different properties and the in vitro toxicity. J. Appl. Toxicol. : JAT. 2017;37:1408–1419. doi: 10.1002/jat.3509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Pawade T., Sheth T., Guzzetti E., Dweck M., Clavel M. Why and how to measure aortic valve calcification in patients with aortic stenosis. JACC. Cardiovascular imaging. 2019;12:1835–1848. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.01.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Xie Z., Zhang B., Ge Y., Zhu Y., Nie G., Song Y., Lim C.K., Zhang H. PN prasad, Chemistry, functionalization, and applications of recent monoelemental two-dimensional materials and their heterostructures. Chem. Rev. 2021;15 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]








