Abstract
Bone is difficult to image using traditional histopathological methods, leading to challenges in intraoperative pathological evaluation that is critical in guiding surgical treatment, particularly in orthopedic oncology. In this study, we demonstrate that a multimodal quantitative imaging approach that combines stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy, two-photon fluorescence (TPF) microscopy, and second harmonic generation (SHG) microscopy can provide useful diagnostic information regarding intact bone tissue fragments from surgical excision or biopsy specimens. We imaged bone samples from 17 patient cases and performed quantitative chemical and morphological analyses of both mineral and organic components of bone. Our main findings show that carbonate content combined with morphometric analysis of bone organic matrix can separate several major classes of bone cancer associated diagnostic categories with an average accuracy of 92%. This proof-of-principle study demonstrate that quantitative multimodal imaging and machine learning-based analysis of bony tissue can provide crucial diagnostic information for guiding clinical decisions in orthopedic oncology. Moreover, the general methodology of morphological and chemical imaging combined with machine learning can be readily extended to other tissue types for tissue diagnosis in intraoperative and other clinical settings.
Intraoperative consultation of bone specimens plays an important role in orthopedic surgery. One of the main reasons for intraoperative consultation on a bone specimen is to determine whether an intra-osseous lesion is benign or malignant.1 In the case of a malignant lesion, separating primary bone cancer from metastasis becomes another challenge.2 An accurate intraoperative diagnosis guides subsequent clinical decisions on operative procedures and clinical management.
Current intraoperative pathology consultations rely heavily on gross examination, cytologic preparations, and frozen sections. However, these approaches do not work well on bone samples due to their mineralized content. Sectioning-dependent techniques are not feasible for histologic evaluation in an intraoperative setting, as de-mineralization protocols for bone specimens can take up to one week. Additionally, the de-mineralization procedure destroys the DNA/RNA necessary for clinical molecular tests and compromises the histologic quality of tissue sections, making definitive pathologic diagnosis difficult.3 Although soft tissue and relevant cellular materials can sometimes supplement and guide medical treatment of musculoskeletal lesions4,5, they are often insufficient for making clinical decisions. Without the ability to interrogate bone tissue intraoperatively, the patient must wait for post-surgical tissue processing and possibly undergo additional procedures based on pending pathology diagnosis. Thus, there is an unmet need to develop tools capable of providing intraoperative diagnosis of bone specimens to better inform surgeons as they decide on a surgical treatment option.
Bone is an important specialized connective tissue composed of mineralized extracellular material (primarily type I collagen). The mineral content of bone consists mainly of hydroxyapatite [Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2], with variable amounts of carbonate and magnesium.6 Conventional light microscopy relies on H&E staining for morphology and various special stains (e.g., Masson’s trichrome and von Kossa) to visualize collagen and mineralization. Special stains require time-consuming processing procedures, which is why such approaches are only used for permanent processing of specimens after surgery. To visualize the internal structures of bone specimens, several ultrastructure-geared techniques including scanning electron microscopy and small-angle x-ray scattering microscopy have been used for characterization. Both techniques are time consuming and destructive and thus are not feasible for timely clinical diagnosis.
Optical techniques such as second harmonic generation (SHG) microscopy7, third harmonic generation (THG) microscopy8, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR)9, and Raman spectroscopy10–14 allow for noninvasive qualitative and quantitative evaluation of bone specimens. These techniques have been used to study mostly non-neoplastic processes of bone including healing, aging, osteoporosis, and osteomyelitis.12,15–18 A few reports have probed chemical changes of mineral components occurring in a very limited collection of cancers.19,20 Nonetheless, our understanding of chemical changes in bone related to primary neoplastic processes such as osteosarcoma and chondrosarcoma remains limited. Moreover, there has been no attempt to explore chemical changes for assessing pathological conditions of bone specifically for intraoperative applications.
Stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy, a powerful label-free technique capable of providing chemical information at submicron spatial resolution21, has shown tremendous promise for label-free histopathology applications. One emerging variation is Stimulated Raman histology (SRH), which works by exploiting lipid and protein Raman contrasts to generate H&E equivalent images.21,22 Applications of SRH to diagnosis of brain tumors22–24, laryngeal cancer25, and gastrointestinal cancer26 demonstrate the promise of SRH as an alternative to H&E. However, the lack of contrast between bone matrix and typical cellular structures within bone makes it challenging to translate SRH to bone imaging. More recently, we have shown that SRS imaging of chemical changes of mineral content of calcified breast tissue can also provide critical diagnostic information.27 In particular, lower carbonate levels of calcifications are strongly correlated with malignancy. We hypothesize that the chemical changes of bone composition are also reflective of underlying pathology, and SRS could potentially be used for intraoperative diagnosis of bone cancer.
This study aims to demonstrate the diagnostic utility of a multimodal approach to visualizing and analyzing the structure and chemical compositions of various bone specimens using SRS microscopy combined with two-photon fluorescence (TPF) and SHG. We used SRS to visualize unsectioned bone specimens containing both organic and mineralized components at high spatial resolution and chemical specificity. Because minimal or no processing of surgical specimens is needed, we were able to produce an unprecedented level of detail about bone in association with pathologic features frequently encountered in intraoperative settings. A simple staining procedure and robust TPF process allowed us to highlight nuclear details to assist pathologists in extracting the relevant diagnostic information. In addition, we acquired SHG to evaluate collagen organization as an additional metric of bone structure in different physiological and pathological conditions.28 Because SRS, TPF, and SHG share the same laser source and microscope, they can be acquired simultaneously, which greatly simplifies the imaging workflow and reduces imaging time. Our results show that quantitative chemical and morphological features obtained from the multimodal imaging method can distinguish specific categories of bone cancer with >90% accuracy and provide critical information needed for intraoperative consultation. Because our non-destructive imaging approach does not interfere with downstream histological and molecular analysis, it has the potential to fulfill a much-needed role in intraoperative diagnosis for bone diseases.
METHODOLOGY
Multimodal imaging with SRS, TPF, and SHG
The details for the broadband SRS set up were outlined in previous publications.27,29 Briefly, we used broadband femto-second dual-beam laser system (Insight DS+ from Spectra-Physics) where a tunable beam (pump) was centered at 798 nm for CH Raman region and 944 nm for fingerprint Raman region and a fixed beam (Stokes) was centered at 1040 nm. A home-built laser scanning microscope equipped with a 25× Olympus water immersion objective (NA=1.05) was used to image the sample (Fig. S1). The SRS signal is detected in epi mode with a large area silicon photodiode, while epi-fluorescence from TPF and SHG are detected simultaneously by a photo-multiplier tube (Hamamatsu H10770PA-40). At the focus, the pump and Stokes beams had an average power of 50 mW each. For SRS imaging, a stack of frames with a field of view (FOV) of 285 μm × 285 μm (512 × 512 pixels) was acquired with a frame rate of 0.5 frames/sec. The acquisition time for images ranges from seconds to minutes, depending on the size of the area of interest. The frames are acquired every 2 cm−1 for total of 90 frames on average. For SHG and TPF imaging a bandpass filter (520 nm +/− 20 nm) was used.
Bone specimen is placed into an aluminum sample holder covered with a glass coverslip (Fig. S2A). The tissue was photographed to map imaged areas. For each sample, an area of ~2 × 2 mm at the bone-soft tissue border was imaged with SRS at ~2930 cm−1 corresponding to the protein vibrational peak, TPF from acridine orange stained nuclei and SHG from collagen (Fig. S2B–F). Detailed SRS data was collected in both high-wavenumber and fingerprint Raman regions as hyperspectral stacks in selected regions of interest (ROI). The high-wave-number SRS images on C-H stretching were used to determine lipid and protein components in studied tissues. The SRS fingerprint images were used to determine mineralization species present in our samples (Fig. S2G–H). The recorded locations of imaged tissue within the sample was correlated with histology after the experiment to confirm diagnosis and establish microenvironment for imaged bone.
Bone tissue specimens
Bone tissue samples was obtained from 19 patient cases with IRB approval from the University of Washington. The cases were de-identified and curated by Northwest Biotrust Biorepository. The case selection was based on the pathology report to include normal (rib, mandible, femoral head), non-neoplastic pathology (avascular necrosis, fracture, hypertrophic bone), primary neoplastic (osteosarcoma and chondrosarcoma), and secondary neoplastic (metastatic cancer to bone) and verification of the diagnosis through slide review by a board-certified pathologist (EC). Table S1 includes additional details of the samples. The bone tissue was cut into 2–4 mm sections with a band saw and fixed in 10% neutrally buffered formalin. Two cases with sarcoma and metastatic to bone lung cancer were excluded due to inadequate bone available in samples. Before imaging, bone tissue was stained with acridine orange (5 μg/mL as dissolved in phosphate buffered saline). The bone tissue was stained for ~10 min and thoroughly washed in phosphate buffered saline before imaging. For imaging, bone tissue was imbedded into agar gel to immobilize the specimen. Agar gel (15 mg agarose/mL) was prepared by mixing 125 mmol/L NaCl, 10 mmol/L glucose, 10 mmol/L HEPES, 3.1 mmol/L CaCl2, and 1.3 mmol/L MgCl2 with agar (Sigma Aldrich). The mixture was heated to 60 °C to liquify the gel for the embedding procedure.
Calibration of SRS imaging to determine carbonate content of bone mineral
Chemical imaging and carbonate content determination was previously described.27 Briefly, calcium hydroxyapatite (HAP) and 10% carbonated hydroxyapatite (CHAP) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich and Clarkson Chromatography Products respectively. Grounded powders were mixed and prepared for calibration (0%, 2.5%, 5.0%, 7.5%, 10% carbonate content). To determine carbonate content in bone samples (Fig. S2H), we used ratiometric SRS images at (~1070 cm−1) and (~960 cm−1).27
Morphometric analysis of organic bone matrix
Using a combination of manual selection and interactive machine learning and segmentation toolkit, Ilastik30, the osteocyte lacunae were segmented and stored as individual regions of interest (ROIs). Using Particle Analyze in ImageJ, the lacunae aspect ratio, area, and angle of major axis relative to horizontal were determined. Collagen organization was interrogated through SHG images. Using ImageJ FibrilTool31 and in-house algorithms written in Matlab and ImageJ, we determined the angle of lacunae relative to collagen as well as local anisotropy. To generate a map, a sliding box (64 × 64 pixels) with sampling every 8 pixels was used. Using the ROI manager in ImageJ, angle and anisotropy data were determined for each individual lacuna.
Statistical analysis
Using the parameters (aspect ratio, lacunae area, anisotropy, and angle) from the morphometric analysis and the carbonate content % obtained from SRS fingerprint data, a Random Forest classification model was generated. Specifically, we employed the TreeBagger algorithm in Matlab. We used 70% of original data for training and the remaining 30% for testing the final accuracy.
RESULTS and DISCUSSION
Imaging morphological and architectural features of bone specimen with SRS and TPF
One of the most useful diagnostic features of H&E is the morphology and architecture of cellular organization. For conventional H&E to work, bone must be demineralized and thinly sectioned. SRH does not require tissue processing. However, the same protein and lipid contrasts used in SRH for visualizing soft tissue do not generate sufficient contrasts for bone tissue (Fig. S3). An additional challenge is that un-sectioned bone tissue is highly scattering. It requires imaging in the epi-mode, instead of transmission mode which is employed in most SRH applications to date.
Here we demonstrate that using SRS imaging at ~2930 cm−1 (a CH vibrational mode predominantly for protein) and TPF of acridine orange we can visualize the morphology of bone and cellular structures within and nearby.32 Together SRS and TPF provide a simulacrum of the typical H&E, highlighting histologic features of bone tissue including cell type, stroma, and matrix at high resolution. Both imaging modalities are implemented in the epi-mode (Fig. S1), which is amenable to surgical tissue of any size and shape with an imaging depth of ~ 100 μm without additional processing. The optical penetration depth is mainly limited by tissue scattering, but it is typically sufficient to examine the sample in areas of interest. The agar gel, described in Methodology section affords appropriate index matching, sample immobilization, and ability to navigate uneven surface of the sample.
Pathological bone tissues exhibit distinct morphological features. Chondrosarcoma is a malignant cartilage-forming tumor that is a common bone malignancy and is presumed to arise from mesenchymal cells that differentiate along the chondrocytic lineage.33 Our case of chondrosarcoma (case 11 in Table S1) shows the characteristic gross appearance of cartilaginous neoplasm with glistening gray-white lobules (Fig. 1A, below the red dashed line) invading bone (Fig. 1A, above the red dashed line). Corresponding H&E (Fig. 1B) confirms the presence of polygonal to spindled neoplastic cells (green box in Fig. 1B) in a loose cartilaginous matrix invading adjacent cortical and medullary bone. The combination of SRS and TPF images are consistent with H&E, clearly showing neoplastic cells in a cartilaginous matrix invading bone (Fig. 1C). Our findings demonstrate that the integration of SRS/TPF imaging modalities allows for the visualization of cellular structures of neoplasm in bone specimens with high resolution, which correlates well with the histologic features seen in conventional H&E staining.
Figure 1.

Imaging morphology of bone specimen. (A), (B) Gross image of bone adjacent to chondrosarcoma focus with corresponding H&E. Scale bars are 70 μm. (C) SRS/TPF imaging of the same geographical area (greys - SRS at ~2930 cm-1 and gold – TPF from AO stained nuclei). Scale bars are 70 μm for larger view and two close ups (in blue and cyan). Scale bar is 20 μm for cellular features close up. The acquisition time for the larger image is < 3 min. (D) 3D stack of bone remodeled by osteoclasts as indicated by cyan arrows (the space between stacks is 2 μm).
In addition to being able to image a thick tissue specimen, SRS/TPF also provides 3D information. This is a major advantage over conventional histology, where the information is mostly confined to the 2D plane. If a pathologist encounters a diagnostically challenging scenario where additional H&E sections can be beneficial, it is likely to take additional time for sampling, sectioning, and processing to produce additional tissue sections for evaluation. 3D imaging with SRS/TPF can be readily achieved in near real-time. The bone and its microenvironment are composed of various cell types. Our 3D reconstruction shows the spatial patterns of bone trabeculae lined by osteoblasts, the cell type responsible for bone formation (Fig. 1D, indicated by a cyan arrow). We also observe osteoclasts within resorption pits, arranged at different orientations and angles. Similarly, pathologist can use SRS/TPF 2D and 3D capability to identify other cell types including osteocytes and chondrocytes (Fig. S4).
Overall, we show that SRS and TPF provide diagnostically useful morphological and architectural information that can assist a pathologist’s evaluation of bone specimens intraoperatively. The intrinsic optical sectioning of SRS and TPF enables 3D assessments of specimens when desired.
SRS based chemical imaging of mineral content shows that carbonate level correlates with pathology
In current pathology practice, one of the most underutilized diagnostic components of bone tissue is mineral content. Several publications suggest that the mineral component of bone is altered during cancer development.19,20,34 Here, we explore the diagnostic utility of chemical information provided by SRS in the fingerprint region as we interrogate unprocessed mineralized tissue involved in both non-neoplastic and neoplastic pathologic conditions.
Using a case with avascular necrosis as an example of new bone formation in a non-neoplastic condition (Fig. 2A–D; case 5 in Table S1), we showed that SRS/TPF imaging visualizes multiple foci of newly-formed bone, arising from endochondral ossification. A representative focus of maturing bone is shown in Fig. 2B–D (indicated by star). SRS imaging at the hydroxyapatite peak ~960 cm−1 (Fig. 2C) demonstrates gradual mineralization of the newly formed bone (indicated with pink star) with the decrease in image intensity corresponding to bone maturation gradient (more mature bone indicated by a pink arrow). The corresponding carbonate content % map shows a low carbonate content in newly formed bone to be closer to 0 (Fig. 2D). The spectra from those two distinct areas of endochondral ossification (Fig. 2M) show the difference in carbonate and phosphate SRS intensity at 1070 cm−1 to 960 cm−1, respectively. Our result is consistent with previous finding showing that newly mineralized bone consists of predominantly hydroxyapatite.35
Figure 2.

Chemical imaging of mineral bone component. (A) H&E of bone healing after avascular necrosis with endochondral ossification focus shown here. (B)-(D) Representative area showing new bone formation with contrasts from morphology (B, greys - SRS at ~2930 cm-1, gold – TPF from AO stained nuclei and SHG from collagen), mineralization (C, cyan – SRS at ~960 cm-1), and mineral content (D, carbonate level), respectively. Pink/white arrow corresponds to the mature bone. Pink/white star corresponds to osteoid forming new bone. (E) Spectra of two different areas identified in (D). White arrow corresponds to the spectrum in red. White star corresponds to spectrum in blue. (F) H&E of osteosarcoma case with the residual neoplastic bone matrix. (G)-(I) Representative area showing neoplastic bone morphology, mineralization, and mineral content of the osteosarcoma case. (J) H&E of bone involved by chondrosarcoma. (K)-(M) Representative area showing bone morphology, mineralization, and mineral content adjacent to neoplastic cells for the chondrosarcoma case. (N) Bar chart of carbonate content % across groups imaged in this study (NM-normal bone, NN- non-neoplastic pathological process including bone fracture or avascular bone necrosis, OS – osteosarcoma, CS – chondrosarcoma, Met – metastatic cancer). Two-sided t-test is performed and *** - p-value<0.001. Error bar is represented by standard deviation.
In contrast, the analysis of carbonate content in a case of osteosarcoma (Table S1, case 9; representative area shown in Fig. 2F–I) shows that the entire neoplastic bone matrix has low carbonate content. This is likely attributed to the higher acidity of the cancer microenvironment precluding the inclusion of carbonate ions.36 Our result suggests that neoplastic bone growth is distinct from normal bone growth, where mature bone has substantially higher carbonate content.
Interestingly, the carbonate level and heterogeneity also reflect the type of neoplastic process. For comparison, we show that the bone adjacent to the neoplastic cells in a case of chondrosarcoma (Table S1, case 11) mostly retains high carbonate mineral content (representative area in Fig. 2J–M). Only regions close to the neoplastic cells display lower carbonate content, indicating distinct chemical change of the cancer microenvironment. Chondrosarcoma does not produce osteoid. Thus, the observed spatial gradient of carbonate content is likely a direct result of the underlying neoplastic process.
To evaluate the variations in carbonate content for different pathological conditions, we compared the average carbonate content across all groups of non-neoplastic and neoplastic cases included in this study (Fig. 2N). The non-neoplastic pathologic conditions are avascular necrosis, abnormal bone hypertrophy, and fracture. The neoplastic samples analyzed are primary bone neoplasms (osteosarcoma and chondrosarcoma) and metastatic cancer to bone. All pathologic conditions show statistically significant difference from normal. The osteosarcoma cases appear to have the lowest carbonate content relative to normal and other groups. Our results confirm our hypothesis that chemical changes of bone composition reflect underlying pathology and can be used to differentiate selective neoplastic cases from others.
Organic matrix changes are indicative of bone pathology
The organic matrix of bone is primarily composed of type I collagen and is typically formed by osteoblasts. Newly formed bone matrix, osteoid, lacks mineralization. When osteoblasts are surrounded by osteoid, they differentiate into osteocytes. The lacunae, spaces where osteocytes remain for the duration of their lifetime, vary in shape and size. Lacunae are typically round to almond-shaped and then often become more oblong as they mature.37 Because bone formation, remodeling, and repair are dynamic processes responsive to the microenvironment, we hypothesize that morphological changes of lacunae and collagen are indicative of underlying pathological processes and can be used as diagnostic parameters.
To test our hypothesis, we performed morphometric analysis of osteocyte lacunae for different pathological conditions (Fig. 3A). Several parameters of interests for lacunae and collagen can be determined from SRS/SHG imaging, including lacuna area A, aspect ratio (AR, defined as the ratio between the major axis and the minor axis of a lacuna), collagen anisotropy Φ31, and the angle between lacuna and collagen. The lacunae in the SRS image appeared dark and were segmented either manually or with Ilastik (Fig. 3A).30 Using particle analysis in ImageJ, we determined aspect ratios and areas of segmented lacunae as well as the angle of the major axis along a lacuna relative to the horizontal (βL). We used SHG from collagen to measure matrix organization (Fig. 3B). Using FibrilTool31, we determined the average angle of collagen relative to horizontal (βC) and anisotropy value (Φ) of the collagen fibers. Φ of 1 represents complete co-alignment and Φ of 0 represents complete lack of co-alignment. To generate a map of βC and Φ, an in-house algorithm was used to apply FibrilTool to 64 × 64 pixels2 regions while scanning across the image (Fig. 3C–D, see methods section for additional detail). The area of lamellar growth highlighted with SHG corresponds to Φ approaching 0.5. In comparison, a basketweave pattern of collagen has lower anisotropy. Such difference highlights the potential to identify pathological conditions where collagen growth is impaired or significantly different.
Figure 3.

Morphometric analysis of organic bone matrix. (A) Lacunae aspect ratio AR and angle for major axis of lacunae with horizontal βL are determined from SRS (2930 cm−1) data. (B) Imaging of collagen orientation with SHG. βC is the angle of collagen with horizontal. (C), (D) Resulting βC and anisotropy maps determined from FibrilTool in ImageJ. The ellipse indicates the location of a lacuna. (E)-(G) H&E, SRS/TPF, and SHG images of normal bone. (H)-(J) H&E, SRS/TPF and SHG images of hypertrophic bone. (K) Histograms for aspect ratio of lacunae AR, lacunae area A, angle of nearby collagen and the major axis of lacunae βT, and anisotropy Φ for normal bone (red) and hypertrophic bone (blue).
When comparing normal mandible and hypertrophic mandible from abnormal development, hypertrophic mandible shows a much more disorganized collagen arrangement. In addition, its lacunae are smaller and rounder (Fig. 3E–J, Fig. S5 with confirmatory H&E). From the histogram, we can observe that normal bone has a broader distribution of AR values and lacunae sizes compared to hypertrophic bone (Fig. 3K). Normal bone generally has larger osteocyte lacunae with better coaligned lacunae and nearby collagen (quantified by coalignment angle βT = |βC-βL|). In contrast, in abnormal bone, the coalignment angle has a broader distribution. Collagen also has a higher degree of disorganization (lower anisotropy Φ) in abnormal bone compared to normal bone (Fig. 3K).
Applying the same analysis across all samples, we summarized the differences in morphological parameters among different pathological conditions (Fig. 4). The aspect ratio of lacunae across all pathological categories shows the most differences between normal and non-neoplastic pathology as well as bone involved by metastatic cancer (Fig. 4A). These findings are consistent with visual observations where lacunae in osteoid or newly formed bone appear to have lower aspect ratio relative to mature bone. Moreover, the area of lacunae is variable across all groups with the most significant differences occurring between normal cases and cases that include healing bone and neoplastic bone matrix (Fig. 4B). When evaluating collagen organization, normal bone and bone involved by metastatic cancer show the largest difference in the coalignment angle (βT) (Fig. 4C) and anisotropy (Φ) (Fig. 4D). It is plausible that these parameters are capturing higher bone turnover and subsequent disorganization of the matrix in metastatic cases.38
Figure 4.

Summary of morphometric analysis for bone specimens. (A) Bar chart for aspect ratio of lacune AR averages. (B) Bar chart for lacunae area A. (C) Bar chart for angle of nearby collagen and major axis of lacunae βT. (D) Bar chart for anisotropy Φ. Error bar is reflective of standard deviation. Two-sided t-test is performed and * denotes p-value < 0.05, ** – p-value <0.01, and *** - p-value<0.001. NM-normal bone (n = 274 lacunae), NN- non-neoplastic pathological process (n = 178 lacunae), OS – osteosarcoma (n = 119 lacunae), CS – chondrosarcoma (n = 114 lacunae), Met – metastatic cancer (n = 106 lacunae).
Combined morphometric and chemical analysis enables highly accurate classification of bone pathologies
As shown in the previous sections, both mineral components and morphometric analysis of lacunae and collagen matrix provide diagnostically useful information. In an intraoperative setting, it is important to determine if the lesion is benign or malignant and in the case of malignant, further subdivide into primary and metastatic disease. We demonstrate that by combining chemical and morphological analysis enabled by multimodal imaging, we can achieve highly accurate classification of specific bone cancer types. To build a robust classification algorithm with multiple parameters, we employed a supervised machine learning model. The advantage of a machine learning algorithm is that once a model is trained, predictions can be generated in almost real time which can be applied in clinical settings in guiding intraoperative pathological diagnosis and subsequent patient treatment in a timely manner. We performed Random Forest classification using TreeBagger in Matlab. It is a bootstrap-aggregated (bagged) decision tree where multiple decision trees are created using randomized subsets of the data and features from the training set for each tree. The ensemble of trees can then be applied to new data where each tree “votes” on the correct prediction where the final category is determined by the greatest number of votes. By selecting a random subset of predictors for the generation of each tree, the algorithm is able to reduce the effects of overfitting and improves generalization.39
We combined the data from the morphometric analysis (including aspect ratio, area of lacunae, nearby collagen anisotropy, and the coalignment angle between collagen and lacunae central axis) with carbonate content for each lacuna. Using these parameters for 791 lacunas, we constructed a classification model using a training data set consisting of randomly selected observations from the full dataset (70% of the original data) and retained a separate validation data set consisting of the remaining data (30% of the data).
By determining the minimum number of trees needed to reach an adequately reduced Out-of-Bag (OOB) classification error (Fig. 5A), we minimize the possibility of overfitting the data. The final number of trees that was chosen for our classification model was 15. There was no significant difference in error when considering more than 15 trees.
Figure 5.

Random forest classification of different bone conditions. (A) OOB classification error vs number of grown trees. (B) OOB features importance versus features index (1 - AR, 2 - Φ, 3 - βT, 4-A, 5 - carbonate content of mineral portion of bone). (C)-(G) ROC curves for diagnostic groups used in this study (NM-normal bone, NN- non-neoplastic pathological process including bone fracture and avascular necrosis, OS – osteosarcoma, CS – chondrosarcoma, Met – metastatic cancer). TPR – true positive rate. FPR – false positive rate.
Based on the results of OOB feature importance assessment (Fig. 5B), AR, anisotropy, and the angle between collagen and lacunae central axis contribute similar weight to final decisions. The area is less important, probably due to that fact that SRS/TPF imaging has optical sectioning effect. Depending on the location of the sectioning, the area can be quite variable and thus not reliable for differentiation. The carbonate content percentage as determined by SRS imaging is most indicative of the underlying pathologic bone condition. The results of the model built without carbonate data is included in supplemental (Fig. S6). This is consistent with our observation that carbonate level is significantly different among various pathological conditions, even without spatially resolved information.
The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is used to evaluate the model effectiveness for identifying a particular diagnosis among different diagnostic entities including normal bone, non-neoplastic pathologic bone conditions, primary malignant bone tumors and metastatic cancer to bone (results in Fig. 5C–G). The area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8 to 0.9 is considered excellent and above 0.9 is considered outstanding in medical practice.40 The areas under the curve (AUCs) were calculated to determine how well a given diagnostic group can be separated from others. Overall accuracy of predictions was calculated by comparing known diagnostic category with model-predicted category and resulted to be ~90 ± 2%.
In summary, the results of the classification model show that lacunae associated parameters obtained by morphometric analysis in conjunction with carbonate content for the mineral portion of bone can provide a solid basis for assessing various bone cancer conditions.
CONCLUSION
Interrogation of bone specimens is severely limited by conventional histological methods due to their reliance on sectioning of tissue into 4–6 μm sections. Without the ability to visualize pathological processes of bone tissue, intraoperative consultations are hindered and can rely only on soft tissue, if present. These limitations often lead to difficulties in surgical decisions and the need for multiple surgeries in many cases. In this study, we conduct the first-in-class study to demonstrate how multimodal non-linear optical imaging have a remarkable potential to provide a much-needed tool to help facilitate diagnostic classification and clinical decisions. By using multimodal imaging, we can visualize bone structure and chemistry in a non-destructive manner. TPF from acridine orange and SRS of proteins allow us to generate images that could be used similarly to those from H&E. Using distinct Raman features of mineral components, particularly phosphate and carbonate, we can probe mineral composition of bone and study how changes in mineral content correlate with bone pathology, including neoplastic processes. By collecting SHG from collagen fibers, we augment collected data on neoplastic and non-neoplastic bone specimens with important information about surrounding collagen fiber organization.
Our main findings show that carbonate content varies across different pathological categories, particularly in osteosarcoma. Being able to diagnose osteosarcoma and separate this entity from fractures or other processes that do not warrant complete excision offers much-needed actionable information to the surgeon. Additionally, morphometric analysis of bone organic matrix provides additional parameters (lacunae aspect ratio, angle of collagen relative to lacunae major axes, and collagen anisotropy) that are useful in identifying cases with abnormal organic matrix, especially the cases with abnormal bone healing/growth and metastatic cancer. In the cases where excision is warranted, non-destructive imaging in combination with analysis can potentially provide diagnostic information necessary for surgical margin assessment. By combining morphological and chemical features with a machine learning approach (Random Forest classification), we demonstrate that an overall accuracy of >90% can be achieved in classifying specific classes of pathology including non-neoplastic condition, primary malignant bone tumors (osteosarcoma and chondrosarcoma), and metastatic cancer to bone. Our results suggest that multimodal non-linear optical imaging has the potential to address the major gap in intraoperative pathology involving bony specimens.
One limitation of the current study is the sample size. A larger study involving many more patients will be necessary to fully validate the method for bone cancer classification and develop a robust algorithm for clinical applications. In an intraoperative setting, it is necessary to have miniatured laser and rugged microscope without stringent environmental control. Such efforts are already underway for brain cancer surgery.22 The other limitation is data acquisition speed. With multimodal imaging, multiple contrasts are generated simultaneously. However, the hyperspectral SRS imaging takes extra time due to the acquisition at multiple Raman transition regions. Excessive time on the order of many hours is still needed for imaging large tissue samples (cm in size) at the moment. The multimodal and hyperspectral imaging approach generates a large swath of spatial-spectral features, and we only use part of the data available in the analysis. Unbiased and robust diagnosis will benefit from advances in machine learning approaches that deal with large datasets, particularly deep learning, when large-scale testing is available.24,25,41 Machine learning will also help extract parameters that are most important for diagnosis and minimize the amount of data required, thus shortening the data acquisition time in an intraoperative setting. Ultimately, combining advances in multimodal chemical imaging and machine learning, we can potentially enable surgeons and pathologists to quickly determine the correct diagnosis and necessary treatment, as well as reducing unnecessary surgery and delay in arriving at the final diagnosis, especially in orthopedic oncology.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors of the paper especially appreciate the work done in support of our work by Marlie Reinmuth, Piper Driskell, and Sarah Bowell from Northwest Biotrust, Seattle, WA. This study was funded by NIH R35 GM133435 to D.F. and University of Washington Pathology Department internal funds to E.C.
Footnotes
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Supplementary Figures of experimental setup, imaging workflow, SRH image, cell type differentiation, H&E reference, and additional machine learning results. Supplementary Table showing patient diagnoses.
REFERENCES
- (1).Bui MM; Smith P; Agresta SV; Cheong D; Letson GD Practical Issues of Intraoperative Frozen Section Diagnosis of Bone and Soft Tissue Lesions. Cancer Control 2008, 15 (1), 7–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (2).Bhaker P; Mohan H; Handa U; Kumar S Role of Intraoperative Pathology Consultation in Skeletal Tumors and Tumor-Like Lesions. Sarcoma 2014, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (3).Bauer HCF; Kreicbergs A Feulgen DNA Stainability of Bone Tumors after Demineralization. Cytometry 1987, 8 (6), 590–594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).Estrada-Villaseñor EG; Delgado Cedillo E; Linares González LM; Rico Martínez G Accuracy of Intraoperative Consultation for Bone Tumors: Experience in an Orthopedic Hospital. Journal of Orthopaedic Science 2007, 12 (2), 123–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (5).Wallace MT; Lin PP; Bird JE; Moon BS; Satcher RL; Lewis VO The Accuracy and Clinical Utility of Intraoperative Frozen Section Analysis in Open Biopsy of Bone. JAAOS - Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2019, 27 (11), 410–417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (6).Wopenka B; Pasteris JD A Mineralogical Perspective on the Apatite in Bone. Materials Science and Engineering: C 2005, 25 (2), 131–143. [Google Scholar]
- (7).Ambekar R; Chittenden M; Jasiuk I; Toussaint KC Quantitative Second-Harmonic Generation Microscopy for Imaging Porcine Cortical Bone: Comparison to SEM and Its Potential to Investigate Age-Related Changes. Bone 2012, 50 (3), 643–650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (8).Genthial R; Beaurepaire E; Schanne-Klein M-C; Peyrin F; Farlay D; Olivier C; Bala Y; Boivin G; Vial J-C; Débarre D; Gourrier A Label-Free Imaging of Bone Multiscale Porosity and Interfaces Using Third-Harmonic Generation Microscopy. Scientific Reports 2017, 7 (1), 3419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).Paschalis EP; Shane E; Lyritis G; Skarantavos G; Mendelsohn R; Boskey AL Bone Fragility and Collagen Cross-Links. J Bone Miner Res 2004, 19 (12), 2000–2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (10).Morris MD; Mandair GS Raman Assessment of Bone Quality. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011, 469 (8), 2160–2169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (11).Moura CC; Tare RS; Oreffo ROC; Mahajan S Raman Spectroscopy and Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering Imaging: Prospective Tools for Monitoring Skeletal Cells and Skeletal Regeneration. Journal of The Royal Society Interface 2016, 13 (118), 20160182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (12).Khalid M; Bora T; Ghaithi AA; Thukral S; Dutta J Raman Spectroscopy Detects Changes in Bone Mineral Quality and Collagen Cross-Linkage in Staphylococcus Infected Human Bone. Scientific Reports 2018, 8 (1), 9417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (13).Khan AF; Awais M; Khan AS; Tabassum S; Chaudhry AA; Rehman IU Raman Spectroscopy of Natural Bone and Synthetic Apatites. Applied Spectroscopy Reviews 2013, 48 (4), 329–355. [Google Scholar]
- (14).Mandair GS; Morris MD Contributions of Raman Spectroscopy to the Understanding of Bone Strength. BoneKEy Reports 2015, 4, 620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (15).Makowski AJ; Granke M; Ayala OD; Uppuganti S; Mahadevan-Jansen A; Nyman JS Applying Full Spectrum Analysis to a Raman Spectroscopic Assessment of Fracture Toughness of Human Cortical Bone: Applied Spectroscopy 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (16).Unal M; Uppuganti S; Leverant CJ; Creecy A; Granke M; Voziyan P; Nyman JS Assessing Glycation-Mediated Changes in Human Cortical Bone with Raman Spectroscopy. Journal of Biophotonics 2018, 11 (8), e201700352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (17).Esmonde-White KA; Mandair GS; Raaii F; Jacobson JA; Miller BS; Urquhart AG; Roessler BJ; Morris MD Raman Spectroscopy of Synovial Fluid as a Tool for Diagnosing Osteoarthritis. J. Biomed. Opt 2009, 14 (3), 034013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (18).Faibish D; Ott SM; Boskey AL Mineral Changes in Osteoporosis A Review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 443, 28–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (19).Ding H; Nyman JS; Sterling JA; Perrien DS; Mahadevan-Jansen A; Bi X Development of Raman Spectral Markers to Assess Metastatic Bone in Breast Cancer. J. Biomed. Opt 2014, 19 (11), 111606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (20).Zhang C; Jr PTW; Dasari S; Kominsky SL; Doucet M; Jayaraman S; Raman V; Barman I Label-Free Raman Spectroscopy Provides Early Determination and Precise Localization of Breast Cancer-Colonized Bone Alterations. Chemical Science 2018, 9 (3), 743–753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (21).Ji M; Lewis S; Camelo-Piragua S; Ramkissoon SH; Snuderl M; Venneti S; Fisher-Hubbard A; Garrard M; Fu D; Wang AC; Heth JA; Maher CO; Sanai N; Johnson TD; Freudiger CW; Sagher O; Xie XS; Orringer DA Detection of Human Brain Tumor Infiltration with Quantitative Stimulated Raman Scattering Microscopy. Sci. Transl. Med 2015, 7 (309), 309ra163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (22).Orringer DA; Pandian B; Niknafs YS; Hollon TC; Boyle J; Lewis S; Garrard M; Hervey-Jumper SL; Garton HJL; Maher CO; Heth JA; Sagher O; Wilkinson DA; Snuderl M; Venneti S; Ramkissoon SH; McFadden KA; Fisher-Hubbard A; Lieberman AP; Johnson TD; Xie XS; Trautman JK; Freudiger CW; Camelo-Piragua S Rapid Intraoperative Histology of Unprocessed Surgical Specimens via Fibre-Laser-Based Stimulated Raman Scattering Microscopy. Nat. Biomed. Eng 2017, 1 (2), 0027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (23).Shin KS; Francis AT; Hill AH; Laohajaratsang M; Cimino PJ; Latimer CS; Gonzalez-Cuyar LF; Sekhar LN; Juric-Sekhar G; Fu D Intraoperative Assessment of Skull Base Tumors Using Stimulated Raman Scattering Microscopy. Scientific Reports 2019, 9 (1), 1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (24).Hollon TC; Pandian B; Adapa AR; Urias E; Save AV; Khalsa SSS; Eichberg DG; D’Amico RS; Farooq ZU; Lewis S; Petridis PD; Marie T; Shah AH; Garton HJL; Maher CO; Heth JA; McKean EL; Sullivan SE; Hervey-Jumper SL; Patil PG; Thompson BG; Sagher O; McKhann GM; Komotar RJ; Ivan ME; Snuderl M; Otten ML; Johnson TD; Sisti MB; Bruce JN; Muraszko KM; Trautman J; Freudiger CW; Canoll P; Lee H; Camelo-Piragua S; Orringer DA Near Real-Time Intraoperative Brain Tumor Diagnosis Using Stimulated Raman Histology and Deep Neural Networks. Nat. Med 2020, 26 (1), 52–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (25).Zhang L; Wu Y; Zheng B; Su L; Chen Y; Ma S; Hu Q; Zou X; Yao L; Yang Y; Chen L; Mao Y; Chen Y; Ji M Rapid Histology of Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Deep-Learning Based Stimulated Raman Scattering Microscopy. Theranostics 2019, 9 (9), 2541–2554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (26).Sarri B; Poizat F; Heuke S; Wojak J; Franchi F; Caillol F; Giovannini M; Giovannini M; Rigneault H; Rigneault H Stimulated Raman Histology: One to One Comparison with Standard Hematoxylin and Eosin Staining. Biomed. Opt. Express, 2019, 10 (10), 5378–5384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (27).Shin KS; Laohajaratsang M; Men S; Figueroa B; Dintzis SM; Fu D Quantitative Chemical Imaging of Breast Calcifications in Association with Neoplastic Processes. Theranostics 2020, 10 (13), 5865–5878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (28).Campagnola P Second Harmonic Generation Imaging Microscopy: Applications to Diseases Diagnostics. Anal Chem 2011, 83 (9), 3224–3231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (29).Figueroa B; Fu W; Nguyen T; Shin K; Manifold B; Wise F; Fu D Broadband Hyperspectral Stimulated Raman Scattering Microscopy with a Parabolic Fiber Amplifier Source. Biomed. Opt. Express, 2018, 9 (12), 6116–6131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (30).Berg S; Kutra D; Kroeger T; Straehle CN; Kausler BX; Haubold C; Schiegg M; Ales J; Beier T; Rudy M; Eren K; Cervantes JI; Xu B; Beuttenmueller F; Wolny A; Zhang C; Koethe U; Hamprecht FA; Kreshuk A Ilastik: Interactive Machine Learning for (Bio)Image Analysis. Nat. Methods 2019, 16 (12), 1226–1232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (31).Boudaoud A; Burian A; Borowska-Wykręt D; Uyttewaal M; Wrzalik R; Kwiatkowska D; Hamant O FibrilTool, an ImageJ Plug-in to Quantify Fibrillar Structures in Raw Microscopy Images. Nat. Protocols 2014, 9 (2), 457–463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (32).Cahill LC; Giacomelli MG; Yoshitake T; Vardeh H; Faulkner-Jones BE; Connolly JL; Sun C-K; Fujimoto JG Rapid Virtual H&E Histology of Breast Tissue Specimens Using a Compact Fluorescence Nonlinear Microscope. Lab. Invest 2018, 98 (1), 150–160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (33).de Andrea CE; San-Julian M; Bovée JV M. G. Integrating Morphology and Genetics in the Diagnosis of Cartilage Tumors. Surg. Pathol. Clin 2017, 10 (3), 537–552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (34).Bi X; Sterling JA; Merkel AR; Perrien DS; Nyman JS; Mahadevan-Jansen A Prostate Cancer Metastases Alter Bone Mineral and Matrix Composition Independent of Effects on Bone Architecture in Mice--a Quantitative Study Using MicroCT and Raman Spectroscopy. Bone 2013, 56 (2), 454–460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (35).Stewart S; Shea DA; Tarnowski CP; Morris MD; Wang D; Franceschi R; Lin D-L; Keller E Trends in Early Mineralization of Murine Calvarial Osteoblastic Cultures: A Raman Microscopic Study. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy 2002, 33 (7), 536–543. [Google Scholar]
- (36).Kato Y; Ozawa S; Miyamoto C; Maehata Y; Suzuki A; Maeda T; Baba Y Acidic Extracellular Microenvironment and Cancer. Cancer Cell Int. 2013, 13, 89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (37).McCreadie BR; Hollister SJ; Schaffler MB; Goldstein SA Osteocyte Lacuna Size and Shape in Women with and without Osteoporotic Fracture. J. Biomech 2004, 37 (4), 563–572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (38).Fornetti J; Welm AL; Stewart SA Understanding the Bone in Cancer Metastasis. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 2018, 33 (12), 2099–2113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (39).Breiman L Random Forests. Machine Learning 2001, 45 (1), 5–32. [Google Scholar]
- (40).Mandrekar JN Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve in Diagnostic Test Assessment. Journal of Thoracic Oncology 2010, 5 (9), 1315–1316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (41).Manifold B; Men S; Hu R; Fu D A Versatile Deep Learning Architecture for Classification and Label-Free Prediction of Hyperspectral Images. Nat. Mach. Intel 2021, 3, 306–315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
