Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 21;10(3):725. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10030725

Table 1.

List of circRNAs reported as potential biomarkers in breast cancer.

circRNA circBase ID Tissue
Comparison
Expression in T Clinical Interest Diagnostic/Prognostic Value (ROC/KM Curve) Experimental Approach
circABCB10 hsa_circ_008717 T vs. N up diagnosis - ex vivo, in vitro, in silico [51]
circDENND4C - diagnosis, prognosis - ex vivo, in vitro, in vivo, in silico [52,53]
circHIPK3 hsa_circ_0000284 diagnosis, prognosis - ex vivo, in vitro, in vivo, in silico [54,55,56]
circHMCU hsa_circ_0000247 diagnosis, prognosis HR = 3.09, p = 0.039 ex vivo, in vitro, in vivo, in silico [57]
circPTCD3 hsa_circ_0055478 diagnosis - ex vivo, in vitro, in vivo [58]
cirRNF20 hsa_circ_0087784 diagnosis, prognosis - ex vivo, in vitro, in vivo [59]
circRPPH1_015 hsa_circ_0000517 diagnosis, prognosis - ex vivo, in vitro, in vivo, in silico [60]
- hsa_circ_0001791 early stage diagnosis AUC = 1.0, p < 0.0001 ex vivo, in silico [61]
- hsa_circ_0002496 early stage diagnosis - ex vivo, in silico [62]
- hsa_circ_0005046 early stage diagnosis AUC = 0.77, p = 0.02 ex vivo, in silico [61]
- hsa_circ_0005230 diagnosis, prognosis HR = 1.945, p = 0.042 ex vivo, in vitro, in silico [63]
- hsa_circ_0006743 early stage diagnosis - ex vivo, in silico [62]
- hsa_circ_103110 diagnosis AUC = 0.63, p = 0.016 ex vivo, in silico [64]
- hsa_circ_103552 diagnosis, prognosis - ex vivo, in vitro, in silico [65]
- hsa_circ_104689 diagnosis AUC = 0.61, p = 0.041 ex vivo, in silico [64]
- hsa_circ_104821 diagnosis AUC = 0.60, p = 0.031 ex vivo, in silico [64]
circCCDC85A down diagnosis - ex vivo, in vitro, in vivo, in silico [66]
circLARP4 - diagnosis, prognosis - ex vivo, in vitro, in silico [67]
circVRK1 hsa_circ_0141206 diagnosis, prognosis AUC = 0.720, Sensitivity = 61.7%, Specificity = 79.1%, HR = 0.375, p = 0.002 ex vivo, in vitro, in silico [68]
- hsa_circ_006054 diagnosis AUC = 0.71, p < 0.001 ex vivo, in silico [64]
- hsa_circ_0072309 diagnosis, prognosis - ex vivo, in vitro, in vivo, in silico [69]
- hsa_circ_100219 diagnosis AUC = 0.78, p < 0.001 ex vivo, in silico [64]
- hsa_circ_406697 diagnosis AUC = 0.64, p < 0.008 ex vivo, in silico [64]
circRNA circBase ID Tissue
comparison
Expression in TNBC Clinical interest Diagnostic/prognostic value (ROC/KM curve) Experimental approach
circAGFG1 - TNBC vs. N up diagnosis, prognosis AUC = 0.767, HR = 6.072, p < 0.001 ex vivo, in vitro, in vivo, in silico [70]
circEPSTI1 - - ex vivo, in vitro, in vivo, in silico [71]
circFBXW7 hsa_circ_0001451 HR = 0.215, p = 0.001 ex vivo, in vitro, in vivo, in silico [72]
circGFRA1 hsa_circ_005239 - ex vivo, in vitro, in vivo, in silico [73,74]
circKIF4A - - ex vivo, in vitro, in vivo, in silico [75]
circPDCD11 hsa_circ_0019853 - ex vivo, in vitro, in vivo, in silico [76]
circSEPT9 hsa_circ_0005320 AUC = 0.711, Specificity = 75%, Sensitivity = 63.3%, HR = 3.042, p = 0.012 ex vivo, in vitro, in vivo, in silico [77]
circUBAP2 hsa_circ_0001846 - ex vivo, in vitro, in vivo, in silico [78]
circUBE2D2 hsa_circ_0005728 - ex vivo, in vitro, in vivo, in silico [79]
circTADA2A-E6 hsa_circ_0006220 down AUC = 0.855, p < 0.0001 ex vivo, in vitro, in vivo, in silico [80]
circTADA2A-E5/E6 hsa_circ_0043278 AUC = 0.94, p < 0.001 ex vivo, in vitro, in vivo, in silico [80]
circRNA circBase ID Cell line comparison Expression in TNBC Clinical interest Diagnostic/prognostic value (ROC/KM curve) Experimental approach
circSLC8A1 - TNBC vs. luminal up diagnosis, BC subtypedistinction - ex vivo, in vitro, in vivo, in silico [81]
- hsa_circ_001783 TNBC vs. luminal/HER2 diagnosis, prognosis HR = 9.114, p = 0.001 ex vivo, in vitro, in silico [82]
circASS1 hsa_circ_0089105 TNBC vs. luminal down diagnosis - in vitro, in silico [83]
circNR3C2 hsa_circ_0071127 TNBC vs. luminal diagnosis, prognosis - ex vivo, in vitro, in vivo, in silico [84]
- hsa_circ_0044234 TNBC vs. non-TNBC diagnosis, BC subtype distinction AUC = 0.82, p < 0.0001, Sensitivity = 72.5%, Specificity = 83.6%, HR = 0.47, p = 0.058 ex vivo, in vitro, in silico [85]
circRNA circBase ID Cell line
comparison
Expression in luminal/epithelial TNBC Clinical interest Diagnostic/prognostic value (ROC/KM curve) Experimental approach
circDOCK1-1 hsa_circ_0020397 luminal/epithelial TNBC vs. mesenchymal TNBC cell lines up diagnosis, BC subtype distinction - in vitro, in silico [86]

Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; BC, breast cancer; circRNAs, circular RNAs; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR, hazard ratio; N, normal breast tissue; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; T, breast tumor tissue; TNBC, triple-negative breast cancer.