Abstract
Background
While most Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are saprophytic, several species have been associated with human diseases, from localized infection to disseminated diseases. Pulmonary NTM infections lead to TB-like disease called NTM pulmonary disease (NTM-PD). Due to variation in treatment options among NTM species, it is necessary to identify the species and determine drug susceptibility profiles to inform the choice of appropriate regimen for the disease.
Design
A total of 188 culture-positive isolates from patients diagnosed with TB were screened for NTM at the Central Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory. All NTM were further speciated using GenoType® Mycobacterium—Common Mycobacterium and Additional species (GenoType® CM/AS) kit. Mycobacteria avium complex (MAC) and Mycobacteria abscessus complex (MABC) which could not be identified with the test to species were subjected to GenoType® Mycobacteria NTM-DR for further speciation. Using the same test, identified MAC and MABC were genotyped to determine the drug susceptibility profile for each isolate to macrolide and aminoglycosides.
Results
Of all isolates identified as mycobacteria, 24 (13%) were NTM. Fifteen isolates could be identified to species level of which prevalent species was M. avium sub. intracellulare 4 (27%). A total of 10 isolates were MAC (n = 6) and MABC (n = 4) were subjected to GenoType® Mycobacteria NTM-DR for determination of macrolide and aminoglycoside susceptibility. Three of the four MABC had a mutation at the T28 position of the erm (41). All MAC were susceptible to both drugs.
Conclusion
In this study, MAC was the most frequently isolated NTM species followed by MABC. While all MAC and MABC identified, were susceptible to aminoglycosides, three MABC were resistant to the macrolides due to mutation at position 28 of the erm (41) gene. For this, it is important for clinicians need to rule out NTM, understand species and their drug susceptibility for optimal case management.
Background
Non-tuberculous mycobacteria pulmonary disease (NTM-PD) results from lung infection of atypical mycobacteria. These bacteria have also been known as Mycobacteria other than tuberculosis (MOTT) or environmental mycobacteria. On the other hand, Mycobacteria tuberculosis complex species (MTBC) cause Tuberculosis while Mycobacterium leprae cause leprosy. This disease presents with similar features to TB and has frequently been referred to as atypical TB [1, 2]. A study in 2013 reported a total of 140 NTM species [3] in 2019 but there are more than 200 species [4]. While some NTM species cause disease especially in people with other underlying diseases, most of them are saprophytic [5].
More than 30 NTM spp. have been found to have clinical implications on human health [6–9]. These can further be categorized into two groups: slow-growing and rapid growing [10]. In Tanzania, a case that was misdiagnosed as MDR-TB after relapse and failure of first-line TB drugs regimen was later discovered to be a result of M. yongonense infection, one of the novel NTM [11]. Studies carried out in Kilimanjaro and Arusha discovered NTM causing septicemia and lymphadenitis [12, 13].
There is currently no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of NTM-PD documented [7, 14]. A multicenter NTM prevalence study among people with CF indicated no strong enough strain similarity to prove human to human transmission [15]. In general, MAC are among the most isolated spp. of NTM; more specifically M. avium, M. intracellular, and M. kansasii [16]. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 37 articles on NTM in the Southern Saharan region revealed a prevalence of 7.5% of pulmonary NTM with MAC prevailing by 28% and in 19 of the studies [17]. A study similar to the current which was done on culture-positive samples from a National TB prevalence survey revealed an NTM proportion of 54.3% with M. fortuitum being the most isolated species [18].
The proportion of cases of NTM is significantly high among TB presumptive cases in Tanzania. Two studies that were carried out in Tanga indicated 9.7% and 8.1% of presumptive TB patients had NTM. M. interjectum isolates were found the leading NTM in the catchment (16.7%) followed by M. intracelallare 11.1%. The prevalence was high among patients with other underlying diseases like AIDS and Cystic Fibrosis (CF) [19, 20]. Non-tuberculous mycobacteria diversity has also been investigated from human-animal interaction in the Serengeti ecosystem where 36.7% were M. intracellulare [21].
Success in the management of NTM is largely limited by a lack of knowledge on species circulating and their drug susceptibility profiles. This is because the treatment regimen is species-dependent and most of the clinically relevant NTM species are naturally resistant to conventional TB drugs [22, 23]. While some clinically relevant NTM species can respond to conventional TB drugs such as M. kansasii, the rest are naturally resistant to these drugs [24]. This poses a high risk of unsuccessful treatment outcomes and long hospitalization of NTM cases misdiagnosed as TB.
The current study sought to identify species and drug susceptibility profiles of non-tuberculous mycobacteria commonly isolated at the Central Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory (CTRL) in Tanzania.
Material and methods
Study site
Testing of TB in Tanzania is organized into different levels of laboratories from National/central, zonal, regional, district, health center, and dispensary level. However, this study was conducted at the Central Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory (CTRL) in Dar es Salaam. In addition to receiving culture-positive isolates from the zonal laboratories for comprehensive routine surveillance of drug resistance, CTRL serves as zonal in its catchment, Eastern zone (Dar es Salaam, Pwani, Morogoro, Lindi, and Mtwara). Others include; Kibong’oto Hospital Laboratory (Northern zone), Pemba Public Health Laboratory (Pemba and Unguja), Bugando Medical Centre Laboratory (Lake Zone), Mbeya Referral hospital laboratory (Southern highlands), and Dodoma Regional Referral Hospital laboratory (Central zone).
In implementing universal drug susceptibility testing (DST) coverage strategy, Tanzania implements a culture of sputum specimens from bacteriologically confirmed TB patients for comprehensive conventional DST. For 2018 a total of 27,201 pulmonary TB cases were bacteriologically confirmed in Tanzania for which drug susceptibility status to at least one drug was required [25]. Samples are received at CTRL for various reasons including DR-TB surveillance (by Xpert MTB/Rif, Hain line probe assay and/or conventional DST), TB diagnosis (from clinically diagnosed patients), and treatment monitoring. A total of 2624 sputa and 538 isolates were received at CTRL in 2018 for culture and DST respectively [26].
Study design and sampling
This was a cross-sectional study in which isolates from culture-positive sputa specimens were conveniently selected and screened for NTM. Identified NTM were speciated and tested for genotypic drug susceptibility. Only pulmonary TB patients who were bacteriologically confirmed and their isolates available were included in this study. On the other hand, pulmonary TB patients who turned culture-negative and those whose isolates could not be found were excluded from this study. A priority was given to isolates that grew on a culture medium containing para-aminobenzoic acid (PNB) during conventional DST as these were the most probable NTMs. The isolates were genotyped using GenoType® Mycobacterium, Common Mycobacteria, and Additional species (GenoType® CM/AS) for NTM species identification, and then the species were genotyped using GenoType® Mycobacteria NTM-DR for drug susceptibility to the recommended drugs. CTRL culture registers and the list of culture-positive isolates received between November 2019 and August 2020 provided the sampling frame from which samples were conveniently selected. Each of the selected positive cultures (mycobacteria isolate) from primary culture media were transferred to a 2ml cryotube containing 15% glycerol in Tryptic Soya Broth (TSB). These isolates were then stored at– 200C until used.
This study only included isolates received at CTRL for diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and conventional TB DST. While most of the isolates were from newly diagnosed patients before treatment initiation, few were isolates from patients under treatment monitoring (follow up). This is because NTM, especially MAC, has been frequently isolated from patients under TB treatment [26]. Based on the formula below at least 134 AFB culture positive isolates were supposed to be analyzed for this study.
Where;
N = Sample size t = 1.96 L = 0.05 P = 0.097
T = student t–value
L = Significance level
SD = Standard Deviation
n ≥ 134
Data collection
Patients information (from patients’ test request/report forms)
Patients’ demographic characteristics (age, gender, district, region, etc.) and clinical information such as HIV status, the diagnostic test used, initial local GeneXpert or AFB smear, and culture results were collected. Laboratory test request form and TB LIS (electronic laboratory information system) provided a source of patients’ data.
Extraction and storage of DNA
For genotyping, DNA were extracted chemically using GenoLyse® (Hain Lifescience, Nehren, Germany) protocol [27]. In case DNA could not be GenoTyped® on the same day of extraction, it was stored in a deep freezer at– 20°C. After genotyping, the DNA was transferred to– 80°C for long-term storage.
Species identification
PCR was carried out in the GTQ Cycler 96 using the protocol in the user guide (Hain Lifescience, Nehren, Germany). Speciation was carried out using GenoType®CM/AS (Hain Lifescience, Nehren, Germany) protocol on TwinCubator (Hain Lifescience, Nehren, Germany). Species-specific probes are mounted to the DNA strips to determine complementary strands from amplified DNA samples [28, 29]. Table 1 below shows that MAC and Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MABC) that could not be speciated by this technique were further speciated using GenoType® NTM-DR (Hain Lifescience, Nehren, Germany) protocol [30]. DNA amplicon that could not be identified to species level the same day of amplification were stored at– 200C. On the other hand, isolates that GenoType® CM/AS assay could not GenoType® to species level are stored at– 800C for sequencing of 16S rRNA gene.
Table 1. Banding pattern and presumed species.
Band pattern | Frequency | Band pattern | Band pattern | Presumed species |
---|---|---|---|---|
CM | AS | NTM-DR | ||
1,2 | 9 | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | Negative for Mycobacteria |
1,2,3,10,16 | 155 | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | MTBC |
1,2,3,5,6,10 | 3 | Not Applicable | SP4, SP5, SP6, SP9, SP10 | M. abscessus sub. abscessus |
1,2,3,5,6,10 | 1 | Not Applicable | SP5, SP6, SP7, SP9, SP10 | M. abscessus sub. bolletti |
1,2,3,9 | 4 | Not Applicable | SP2 | M. avium sub. intracelluare |
1,2,3,7,14 | 2 | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | M. fortuitum group |
1,2,3,10,11 | 1 | 1,2,3,4,6 | Not Applicable | M. simiae |
1,2,3,6,10,11 | 1 | 1,2,3 | Not Applicable | M. szulgai |
1,2,3,10 | 4 | 1,2,3 | Not Applicable | Indeterminate* |
1,2,3,10 | 3 | 1,2,3,12 | Not Applicable | Indeterminate* |
1,2,3,5,6,10,16 | 1 | 1,2,3,12 | Not Applicable | (Mixed MTBC and NTM) |
1,2,3 | 1 | 1,2,3 | Not Applicable | Indeterminate* |
1,2,3,4 | 2 | Not Applicable | SP1 | M. avium |
1,2,3,10,12 | 1 | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | M. kansasii |
* Need targeted sequencing of 16S rRNA gene to identify species
Drug susceptibility testing of NTM
Molecular drug susceptibility profiles of Mycobacteria avium Complex and M. abscessus complex isolates were carried out using the GenoType® NTM-DR. This PCR technique involves amplification of the erm (41) (erythromycin ribosomal methylase) gene which encodes for 23S peptidyl transferase of the large (50S) subunit of rRNA. GenoType® NTM-DR detects mutation that may result in the development of resistance to macrolides. However, erm (41) is available only in MABC with exception of a few spp. Moreover, this also involves amplification of the rrs gene. Mutation(s) in the rrs gene which encodes for 16S rRNA results in resistance to aminoglycosides [31].
Quality control
For each investigation, known positive control strains M. fortuitum (ATCC® 6841™) and M. kansasii (ATCC® 12478™) were included. On other hand, DNAse-free water (molecular grade) was used as a negative control for quality assurance. The machines used for testing of samples had passed method validation that ensures they produce reproducible results and match manufacturer specifications.
Data management, confidentiality, and statistical analysis
Patients’ descriptive data and genotyping analytical data were collected and cleaned in Microsoft Excel® 2010 and then imported to R software for analysis. These include independent variables such as age, gender, NTM species, HIV status, patients’ category, and reason for testing (diagnosis or treatment monitoring). Dependent (response) variables include; NTM species and drug susceptibility (i.e. susceptible or resistant).
Ethical clearance
This study protocol was approved by the Sokoine University of Agriculture Institutional Research Review Board and ethical clearance was provided by the Institutional Research Ethical Committee of the National Institute for Medical Research (NIMR) (NIMR/HQ/R.8a/Vol. IX/3245). The need for participants’ consent for this study was waived by the ethical committee. Study Identification numbers, and laboratory serial numbers were used instead of patients’ names so the identity of each participant remained fully anonymous. Data obtained was kept in a computer having its access protected using a password and hard copies were kept in a lockable draw.
Study results
Patients’ demographic characteristics
Specimen analyzed in this study came from 188 patients diagnosed with pulmonary TB of whom 45 (24%) were females. Overall mean age was 43 (STD: 15) years with females being 38 and males 48. The 35 to 44 years age group had the largest number (30%) of study subjects. The mean age of patients with NTM was 47 (STD: 15). Fig 1 indicates study subjects’ distribution by age groups. The number of patients who had a known HIV status was 144 of whom 34 (24%) were positive for the virus. While of 110 who were HIV-negative, 11 (10%) had NTM, of the 34 patients with HIV, 10 (29%) had NTM infection. The remaining three isolates had their patients with unknown HIV statuses. About treatment history, a total of 176 patients records were available of which 113 (64%) were new TB patients while 63 (36%) had previously been treated for the disease.
Non-tuberculous mycobacteria species and drug susceptibility
Isolates analyzed in this study resulted from culture-positive sputum from patients diagnosed with pulmonary TB. Of the 188 isolates tested, 179 (95%) were positive for the genus mycobacteria while the remaining were negative. Among the positive samples, 24 (13%) were NTM while the rest were MTBC. GenoType® Mycobacterium CM/AS and GenoType® Mycobacterium NTM-DR could identify 15 (63%) NTMs to their species levels. This study revealed Mycobacterium Avium Complex (MAC) as the most prevalent group. There were six (25%) species belonging to this group (four M. intracellulare and two M. avium). On the other hand, there were four (17%) Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MABC), three M. abscessus sub. abscessus, one M. bollettii, and two (8%) in the Fortuitum group. Other species included one (4%) M. kansasii, one (4%), M. simiae, and one (4%) M. szulgai.
All MAC and MABC (10 isolates) were subjected to GenoType® NTM-DR for susceptibility testing to macrolides (azithromycin and capreomycin) and aminoglycosides (kanamycin, amikacin, and gentamycin). While MABC resistance to macrolides results from mutation conferred in either or both of rrl and erm (41) genes, MAC resistance to this drug results from a mutation in the rrl gene only. Of the 10 NTMs tested for drug susceptibility, 3 were found to have a mutation (T28 point mutation) in the erm (41) of which Cytosine is replaced by Thymine at position 28 of the gene. However, there was no macrolide resistance mutation detected in the rrl gene. Likewise, no mutation was detected for aminoglycosides resistance (in the rrs gene) for both MABC and MAC (Table 2).
Table 2. Summary wild type bands and associated mutations in the GenoType® Mycobacterium NTM-DR assay.
Gene | Macrolides | Aminoglycosides | Frequency | |||||||
MAC/MABC Species | erm (41) | rrl | rrs | |||||||
C28 | T28 | WT | MUT | WT | MUT | |||||
Intracellulaire | NA | NA | + | - | + | - | S | S | 4 | |
Abscessus | - | + | + | - | + | - | R | S | 2 | |
Abscessus | + | - | + | - | + | - | S | S | 1 | |
Bollettii | - | + | + | - | + | - | R | S | 1 | |
Avium | NA | NA | + | - | + | - | S | S | 2 |
WT–Wild type, MUT–Mutation, S–Susceptible, R–Resistant and
NA–Not applicable
Factors associated with non-tuberculous mycobacterial infection
Fig 2 illustrates NTM proportions among levels of some important variables investigated in this study. The prevalence of NTM was higher among people who were previously treated (category) for TB 14 (58%) compared to new patients (p = 0.0656). Most cases of NTM were in the reproductive age between 35 and 44 years which is similar to TB. There was a significant relationship between gender and NTM infection where males were more likely to be positive than females (p = 0.008655). While 11(46%) tested positive for NTM among patients for specimen collected just before treatment initiation, 6 (25%) patients tested positive for NTM after some months of treatment (p = 0.004426) suggesting that more NTM are recovered at diagnosis than during treatment monitoring. NTM were recovered in 9 (26.5%) patients among those who were positive for HIV (n = 34, 18%). This study could not find a significant relationship between the type of mycobacterial infection (MTBC or NTM) and HIV status (p = 0.1708).
Discussion
Increasing numbers and burden of NTM among presumptive TB cases makes it of paramount importance for National TB Programs (NTP) to consider screening for NTMs from among TB presumptive cases especially for patients at risk [32, 33]. Furthermore, knowledge of prevailing species and their drug susceptibility pattern is critical for correct diagnosis and selection of appropriate drug regimens [6].
The current study aimed at determining NTM species circulating among patients diagnosed with TB and their drug susceptibility profiles. Drug susceptibility profiles were specifically performed to MAC and MABC on the recommended drugs. There have been several reports of NTM among patients on TB treatment in Tanzania [11, 34]. In this particular study, the interest was in characterizing NTM often recovered from sputum of presumed pulmonary TB patients received at CTRL for species and molecular drug susceptibility tests.
In this study, M. intracellulare (MAC) was the most prevalent species as has been observed in previous studies [6, 16, 35]. This was followed by MABC species which have also been well documented in the causation of NTM-PD. Moreover recovered M. kansasii has commonly been associated with pulmonary disease. The fact that coinfection occurs between MTBC and NTM was also complemented in our findings where one of the isolates had both of these mycobacteria strains [36]. For this, the use of rapid chromatographic assays to screen- out NTM among mycobacteria culture-positive, and exclusion of NTM in laboratory reporting in Tanzania blinds the existence of these pathogenic NTM among the patients. To remedy the situation, it will be advisable to report culture-positive NTM among patients with chronic or acute pulmonary disease. This study is the first to recover Mycobacterium abscessus sub. bolletii and M. szulgae isolates in Tanzania [12, 20, 37, 38]. The greater number of species identified (eight different species) indicates the diversity of NTM species circulating among patients treated for TB in Tanzania. A national NTM prevalence survey is warranted to enable the estimation of the burden and treatment options in Tanzania.
In this study, NTM were more frequently isolated from males (twice) when compared to females. This finding is similar to what has been reported by González et al. [39] but contrary to this study, Park et al., and Dodd et al [40, 41] reported that NTM was isolated from more females than males. Findings from this study are similar for Tuberculosis on gender where more males contract the disease than females with the reason being a higher number of daily close and casual contacts in men [41]. NTM distribution by age group is also similar to the distribution of TB where more patients are within the ages of 35 to 44 years. We observed a proportional increase with age where patients with higher age were more likely to have NTM-PD [42].
Our results support the fact that patients previously treated for TB (relapse, loss to follow-up, treatment failure, and MDR contact) have higher chances of being positive for NTM infection than new cases [43]. More epidemiological studies are required to investigate the factors that favor NTM colonization and infection in this group of patients. While most of the recovered NTM were from samples collected at the time of TB diagnosis, some were identified from samples of patients after several months of TB drug administration. On the other hand, despite the high number of NTMs among HIV infected compared to non-infected, the current study could not support the hypothesis that people with HIV have higher chances of NTM infection in comparison to HIV-negative, a similar observation to the one made earlier [44]. This might have resulted from differences in the sample size and sampling methods employed.
Erythromycin resistance methylase gene (erm (41)) exists in MABC species like M. abscessus sub. abscessus and M. abscessus sub. bollettii [35]. Other species in this group like M. massilience lack the target base at position 28 which results from a large deletion of a 397 base-pair sequence in which this target region is included. Such species have a nonfunctional erm (41) gene thus do not express resistance to macrolides. Mutation at nucleotide position 28 of this gene where Cytosine is replaced by Thymine results in phenotypic drug resistance of these two species to macrolides [45, 46]. Two of the three identified M. abscessus sub. abscessus and one M. bollettii were detected with this mutation indicating prevailing resistance among the MABC population. However, these strains were all susceptible to the aminoglycosides. Management of MABC that are resistant to macrolide can follow other recommended guidelines [22]. On the other hand, no mutation was detected in both rrl and rrs genes in this study. This indicates the susceptibility of the remaining identified MABC and MAC to both drugs. A study carried out in Ghana on National prevalence survey samples also revealed susceptibility of all isolated MAC and MABC to aminoglycosides [18].
Study limitations
While most of the isolates characterized in this study came from patients within their first month of TB treatment, few were from patients after some months of treatment. There is no evidence of these isolates to meet diagnostic criteria for non-tuberculous mycobacteria causation of lung disease as described in the ATS/IDSA Statement (Griffith et al., 2007) and the British Thoracic Society Guideline for the management of non-tuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD) (Haworth et al., 2017). Moreover, the genotyping techniques employed in this study could not identify all isolated NTM to species level; nine isolates were left un-speciated. Aminoglycosides and macrolides are the recommended important components treatment of NTM-PD however many other drugs can be combined in developing an efficient regimen.
Conclusion
This study recovered a total of eight different NTM species from sputum of pulmonary TB patients submitted for routine culture and drug susceptibility testing. Mycobacteria avium complex was the most frequent, (n = 6) isolate followed by MABC (n = 4). Both of these require medical attention when diagnosed as they have been associated with pulmonary disease. On the other hand, while all MAC and MABC were susceptible to aminoglycosides, three MABC had a mutation that causes resistance to macrolides.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the management of the Central Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory (CTRL) in Tanzania for accepting and giving permission on the use of the archived samples. Moreover, to the laboratory staff for support, they gave during retrieving the archived samples, DNA extraction, and genotyping. Also, we acknowledge the CTRL data management team who assisted in accessing the patients’ data and in analysis. Lastly but not least we acknowledge the TB patients whose samples were used in this analysis.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
The research for this paper was carried out within the framework of the DELTAS Africa Initiative [Afrique One-ASPIRE /DEL-15-008]. Afrique One-ASPIRE is funded by a consortium of donor including the African Academy of Sciences (AAS) Alliance for Accelerating Excellence in Science in Africa (AESA), the New Partnership for Africa’s Development Planning and Coordinating (NEPAD) Agency, the Wellcome Trust [107753/A/15/Z] and the UK government. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Ryu YJ, Koh WJ, Daley CL. Diagnosis and treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease: Clinicians’ perspectives. Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases. Korean National Tuberculosis Association. 2016;79: 74–84. doi: 10.4046/trd.2016.79.2.74 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kendall BA, Varley CD, Choi D, Maureen CP, Hedberg K, Ware MA, et al. Distinguishing tuberculosis from nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease, Oregon, USA. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2011. Mar;17(3):506–9. doi: 10.3201/eid1703.101164 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.van Ingen J. Diagnosis of nontuberculous mycobacterial infections. Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2013;34(1):103–9. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1333569 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Parte AC, Carbasse JS, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2020;70(11):5607–12. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Honda JR, Virdi R, Chan ED. Global environmental nontuberculous mycobacteria and their contemporaneous man-made and natural niches. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2018;9. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Griffith DE, Aksamit T, Brown-Elliott BA, Catanzaro A, Daley C, Gordin F, et al. An official ATS/IDSA statement: Diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2007;175(4):367–416. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200604-571ST [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Honda JR, Knight V, Chan ED. Pathogenesis and risk factors for nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease. Clinics in Chest Medicine. W.B. Saunders; 2015; 36:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2014.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kim C, Park SH, Oh SY, Kim SS, Jo KW, Shim TS, et al. Comparison of chest CT findings in nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases vs. Mycobacterium tuberculosis lung disease in HIV-negative patients with cavities. PLoS ONE. 2017. Mar 1;12(3). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Evans SA, Colville A, Evans AJ, Crisp AJ, Johnston IDA. Pulmonary Mycobacterium kansasii infection: Comparison of the clinical features, treatment, and outcome with pulmonary tuberculosis. Thorax. 1996;51(12):1248–52. doi: 10.1136/thx.51.12.1248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Forbes BA, Hall GS, Miller MB, Novak SM, Rowlinson MC, Salfinger M, et al. Practice guidelines for clinical microbiology laboratories: Mycobacteria. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2018. Apr 1;31(2). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mnyambwa NP, Kim D, Corporation B, Ngadaya E, Chun J. Genome sequence of Mycobacterium yongonense RT 955–2015 isolate from a patient misdiagnosed with multi-drug resistant tuberculosis: first clinical isolate in Tanzania. 2018;(May). doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2018.04.796 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Crump JA, Ingen J van, Morrissey AB, Boeree MJ, Mavura DR, Swai B, et al. Caused by Nontuberculous. 2009;15(1):53–5. doi: 10.3201/eid1501.081093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mfinanga SGM, Morkve O, Kazwala RR., Cleaveland S, Sharp MJ, Kunda J, and Nilsen R. Mycobacterial Adenitis: Role of Mycobacterium Bovis, Non-Tuberculous Mycobacteria, HIV Infection, and Risk Factors in Arusha, Tanzania. E African, Journal M. 2004;81(4):171–8. doi: 10.4314/eamj.v81i4.9150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Harris KA, Underwood A, Kenna DTD, Brooks A, Kavaliunaite E, Kapatai G, et al. Whole-Genome Sequencing and Epidemiological Analysis Do Not Provide Evidence for Cross- transmission of Mycobacterium abscessus in a Cohort of Pediatric Cystic Fibrosis Patients. 2015;60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Olivier KN, Weber DJ, Jr RJW, Faiz AR, Lee J, Zhang Y, et al. Multicenter Prevalence Study in Cystic Fibrosis. 2003;167:828–34. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200207-678OC [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Okoi C, Anderson STB, Antonio M, Mulwa SN, Gehre F, Adetifa IMO. Non-tuberculous Mycobacteria isolated from Pulmonary samples in sub-Saharan Africa—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. Scientific Reports. 2017. Dec 1;7(1). doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12175-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Okoi C, Anderson STB, Antonio M, Mulwa SN, Gehre F, Adetifa IMO. Non-tuberculous Mycobacteria isolated from Pulmonary samples in sub-Saharan Africa—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. Scientific Reports. 2017;(September):1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-016-0028-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Addo KK, Addo SO, Mensah GI, Mosi L, Bonsu FA. Genotyping and drug susceptibility testing of mycobacterial isolates from population-based tuberculosis prevalence survey in Ghana. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2017. Dec 2;17(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.McShane PJ, Glassroth J. Pulmonary disease due to nontuberculous mycobacteria current state and new insights. Chest. 2015;148(6):1517–27. doi: 10.1378/chest.15-0458 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hoza AS, Mfinanga SGM, Rodloff AC, Moser I, König B. Increased isolation of nontuberculous mycobacteria among TB suspects in Northeastern, Tanzania: Public health and diagnostic implications for control programs. BMC Research Notes. 2016. Feb 17;9(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Katale BZ, Mbugi EV, Botha L, Keyyu JD, Kendall S, Dockrell HM, et al. Species diversity of non-tuberculous mycobacteria isolated from humans, livestock, and wildlife in the Serengeti ecosystem, Tanzania. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2014;14(1):616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Haworth CS, Banks J, Capstick T, Fisher AJ, Gorsuch T, Laurenson IF, et al. British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of non-tuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD). 2017. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-210927 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Brown-Elliott BA, Nash KA, Wallace RJ. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, drug resistance mechanisms, and therapy of infections with nontuberculous mycobacteria. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2012;25(3):545–82. doi: 10.1128/CMR.05030-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tuberculosis A, Dis -L. Prevalence and Drug Resistance of Nontuberculous Emerging Infectious Diseases Journal Podcasts Zombies—A Pop Culture Resource for Public Health Awareness Reginald Tucker reads an. 2014;20(7). [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tb N, Programme L, Services P. The National Tuberculosis and Leprosy Programme Annual report for 2017 Table of Contents. 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Nishiuchi Y, Iwamoto T, Maruyama F. Infection sources of a common non-tuberculous mycobacterial pathogen, Mycobacterium avium complex [Internet]. Vol. 4, Frontiers in Medicine. Frontiers Media S.A.; 2017. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28326308/ doi: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hain Lifescience. GenoLyse ® VER 1.0 Instructions for Use for in vitro diagnostic use only [Internet]. Nehren, Germany; 2017 Sep. Available from: www.hain-lifescience.com/products/msds.html
- 28.Mäkinen J, Marjamäki M, Marttila H, Soini H. Evaluation of a novel strip test, GenoType Mycobacterium CM/AS, for species identification of mycobacterial cultures. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2006;12(5):481–3. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01380.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lee AS, Jelfs P, Sintchenko V, Gilbert GL. Identification of non-tuberculous mycobacteria: Utility of the GenoType Mycobacterium CM/AS assay compared with HPLC and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2009;58(7):900–4. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.007484-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Huh HJ, Kim SY, Shim HJ, Kim DH, Yoo IY, Kang OK, et al. GenoType NTM-DR Performance Evaluation for Identification of Mycobacterium avium Complex and Mycobacterium abscessus and Determination of Clarithromycin and Amikacin Resistance. Journal of Clinical Microbiology [Internet]. 2019;57(8):516–19. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00516-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mougari F, Loiseau J, Veziris N, Bernard C, Jarlier V. Evaluation of the new GenoType NTM-DR kit for the molecular detection of antimicrobial resistance in non-tuberculous mycobacteria. 2017;(February):1669–77. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ephraim Z, Kazwala R, Simon Mwakapuja R, Malakalinga J, Ephraim Makondo Z, Reuben Kazwala R, et al. Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Infections in Katavi Rukwa Ecosystems Health for Animals and Livelihood Improvement (HALI) Project View project Strengthening Health and Biosecurity in Tanzania by Biodetection Capacity Building View Project Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Infections in Katavi Rukwa Ecosystems. Article in Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology. 2014;4. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hoza AS, Lupindu AM, Mfinanga SGM, Moser I, König B. The role of nontuberculous mycobacteria in the diagnosis, management, and quantifying risks of tuberculosis in Tanga, Tanzania. Tanzania Journal of Health Research. 2016;18(2):1–9. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mbelele PM, Mpolya E, Sauli E, Mfinanga S, Addo K, Mpagama S, et al. Detection of Mycobacteria species and anti-tuberculosis medicine susceptibility profile among adult, presumptive multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patients: Preliminary results. AAS Open Res. 2019. Aug 5;2. doi: 10.12688/aasopenres.12911.2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Daley CL, Iaccarino JM, Lange C, Cambau E, Wallace RJ, Andrejak C, et al. Treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease: An official ats/ers/escmid/idsa clinical practice guideline. Clinical Infectious Diseases [Internet]. 2020. Aug 15;71(4):1–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mertaniasih N, Kusumaningrum D, Koendhori E, Soedarsono, Kusmiati T, Dewi D. Nontuberculous mycobacterial species and Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex coinfection in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in Dr. Soetomo Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia. International Journal of Mycobacteriology. 2017. Jan 1;6(1):9–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mbugi EV., Katale BZ, Siame KK, Keyyu JD, Kendall SL, Dockrell HM, et al. Genetic diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolated from tuberculosis patients in the Serengeti ecosystem in Tanzania. Tuberculosis. 2015;95(2):170–8. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2014.11.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mnyambwa N, Ngadaya E, Kimaro G, Kim D-J, Kazwala R, Petrucka P, et al. Assessment of sputum smear-positive but culture-negative results among newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Tanzania. International Journal of General Medicine. 2017. Jul 12;10:199–205. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S137469 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.González SM, Cortés AC, Yoldi LAS, García JMG, Álvarez LMA, Gutiérrez JJP. Non-Tuberculous Mycobacteria. An Emerging Threat? Arch Bronconeumol. 2017. Oct;53(10):554–560. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2017.02.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Park SC, Kang MJ, Han CH, Lee SM, Kim CJ, Lee JM, et al. Prevalence, incidence, and mortality of nontuberculous mycobacterial infection in Korea: A nationwide population-based study. BMC Pulmonary Medicine. 2019. Aug 1;19(1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12890-018-0755-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Dodd PJ, Looker C, Plumb ID, Bond V, Schaap A, Shanaube K, et al. Age- and Sex-Specific Social Contact Patterns and Incidence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2016. Jan 15;183(2):156–66. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Shteinberg M, Stein N, Adir Y, Ken-Dror S, Shitrit D, Bendayan D, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and prognosis of nontuberculous mycobacterial infection among people with bronchiectasis: A population survey. European Respiratory Journal. European Respiratory Society. 2018;51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zhang ZX, Cherng BPZ, Sng LH, Tan YE. Clinical and microbiological characteristics of non-tuberculous mycobacterial diseases in Singapore with a focus on pulmonary disease, 2012–2016. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2019. May 17;19(1). doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-3909-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.McCarthy KD, Cain KP, Winthrop KL, Udomsantisuk N, Lan NTN, Sar B, et al. Nontuberculous mycobacterial disease in patients with HIV in Southeast Asia. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2012. May 1;185(9):981–8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201107-1327OC [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wallace RJ, Meier A, Brown BA, Zhang Y, Sander P, Onyi GO, et al. Genetic basis for clarithromycin resistance among isolates of Mycobacterium chelonae and Mycobacterium abscessus. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 1996;40(7):1676–81. doi: 10.1128/AAC.40.7.1676 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Bastian S, Veziris N, Roux AL, Brossier F, Gaillard JL, Jarlier V, et al. Assessment of clarithromycin susceptibility in strains belonging to the Mycobacterium abscessus group by erm (41) and rrl sequencing. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy [Internet]. 2011. Feb;55(2):775–81. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00861-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]