Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2022 Mar 24;17(3):e0265358. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265358

Drug susceptibility profiles and factors associated with non-tuberculous mycobacteria species circulating among patients diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis in Tanzania

Togolani Godfrey Maya 1,*, Erick Vitus Komba 1, Gloria Ivy Mensah 2, Peter Masunga Mbelele 3, Stella George Mpagama 3, Sayoki Godfrey Mfinanga 4, Kennedy Kwasi Addo 2, Rudovick Reuben Kazwala 1
Editor: Olivier Neyrolles5
PMCID: PMC8947393  PMID: 35324922

Abstract

Background

While most Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are saprophytic, several species have been associated with human diseases, from localized infection to disseminated diseases. Pulmonary NTM infections lead to TB-like disease called NTM pulmonary disease (NTM-PD). Due to variation in treatment options among NTM species, it is necessary to identify the species and determine drug susceptibility profiles to inform the choice of appropriate regimen for the disease.

Design

A total of 188 culture-positive isolates from patients diagnosed with TB were screened for NTM at the Central Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory. All NTM were further speciated using GenoType® Mycobacterium—Common Mycobacterium and Additional species (GenoType® CM/AS) kit. Mycobacteria avium complex (MAC) and Mycobacteria abscessus complex (MABC) which could not be identified with the test to species were subjected to GenoType® Mycobacteria NTM-DR for further speciation. Using the same test, identified MAC and MABC were genotyped to determine the drug susceptibility profile for each isolate to macrolide and aminoglycosides.

Results

Of all isolates identified as mycobacteria, 24 (13%) were NTM. Fifteen isolates could be identified to species level of which prevalent species was M. avium sub. intracellulare 4 (27%). A total of 10 isolates were MAC (n = 6) and MABC (n = 4) were subjected to GenoType® Mycobacteria NTM-DR for determination of macrolide and aminoglycoside susceptibility. Three of the four MABC had a mutation at the T28 position of the erm (41). All MAC were susceptible to both drugs.

Conclusion

In this study, MAC was the most frequently isolated NTM species followed by MABC. While all MAC and MABC identified, were susceptible to aminoglycosides, three MABC were resistant to the macrolides due to mutation at position 28 of the erm (41) gene. For this, it is important for clinicians need to rule out NTM, understand species and their drug susceptibility for optimal case management.

Background

Non-tuberculous mycobacteria pulmonary disease (NTM-PD) results from lung infection of atypical mycobacteria. These bacteria have also been known as Mycobacteria other than tuberculosis (MOTT) or environmental mycobacteria. On the other hand, Mycobacteria tuberculosis complex species (MTBC) cause Tuberculosis while Mycobacterium leprae cause leprosy. This disease presents with similar features to TB and has frequently been referred to as atypical TB [1, 2]. A study in 2013 reported a total of 140 NTM species [3] in 2019 but there are more than 200 species [4]. While some NTM species cause disease especially in people with other underlying diseases, most of them are saprophytic [5].

More than 30 NTM spp. have been found to have clinical implications on human health [69]. These can further be categorized into two groups: slow-growing and rapid growing [10]. In Tanzania, a case that was misdiagnosed as MDR-TB after relapse and failure of first-line TB drugs regimen was later discovered to be a result of M. yongonense infection, one of the novel NTM [11]. Studies carried out in Kilimanjaro and Arusha discovered NTM causing septicemia and lymphadenitis [12, 13].

There is currently no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of NTM-PD documented [7, 14]. A multicenter NTM prevalence study among people with CF indicated no strong enough strain similarity to prove human to human transmission [15]. In general, MAC are among the most isolated spp. of NTM; more specifically M. avium, M. intracellular, and M. kansasii [16]. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 37 articles on NTM in the Southern Saharan region revealed a prevalence of 7.5% of pulmonary NTM with MAC prevailing by 28% and in 19 of the studies [17]. A study similar to the current which was done on culture-positive samples from a National TB prevalence survey revealed an NTM proportion of 54.3% with M. fortuitum being the most isolated species [18].

The proportion of cases of NTM is significantly high among TB presumptive cases in Tanzania. Two studies that were carried out in Tanga indicated 9.7% and 8.1% of presumptive TB patients had NTM. M. interjectum isolates were found the leading NTM in the catchment (16.7%) followed by M. intracelallare 11.1%. The prevalence was high among patients with other underlying diseases like AIDS and Cystic Fibrosis (CF) [19, 20]. Non-tuberculous mycobacteria diversity has also been investigated from human-animal interaction in the Serengeti ecosystem where 36.7% were M. intracellulare [21].

Success in the management of NTM is largely limited by a lack of knowledge on species circulating and their drug susceptibility profiles. This is because the treatment regimen is species-dependent and most of the clinically relevant NTM species are naturally resistant to conventional TB drugs [22, 23]. While some clinically relevant NTM species can respond to conventional TB drugs such as M. kansasii, the rest are naturally resistant to these drugs [24]. This poses a high risk of unsuccessful treatment outcomes and long hospitalization of NTM cases misdiagnosed as TB.

The current study sought to identify species and drug susceptibility profiles of non-tuberculous mycobacteria commonly isolated at the Central Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory (CTRL) in Tanzania.

Material and methods

Study site

Testing of TB in Tanzania is organized into different levels of laboratories from National/central, zonal, regional, district, health center, and dispensary level. However, this study was conducted at the Central Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory (CTRL) in Dar es Salaam. In addition to receiving culture-positive isolates from the zonal laboratories for comprehensive routine surveillance of drug resistance, CTRL serves as zonal in its catchment, Eastern zone (Dar es Salaam, Pwani, Morogoro, Lindi, and Mtwara). Others include; Kibong’oto Hospital Laboratory (Northern zone), Pemba Public Health Laboratory (Pemba and Unguja), Bugando Medical Centre Laboratory (Lake Zone), Mbeya Referral hospital laboratory (Southern highlands), and Dodoma Regional Referral Hospital laboratory (Central zone).

In implementing universal drug susceptibility testing (DST) coverage strategy, Tanzania implements a culture of sputum specimens from bacteriologically confirmed TB patients for comprehensive conventional DST. For 2018 a total of 27,201 pulmonary TB cases were bacteriologically confirmed in Tanzania for which drug susceptibility status to at least one drug was required [25]. Samples are received at CTRL for various reasons including DR-TB surveillance (by Xpert MTB/Rif, Hain line probe assay and/or conventional DST), TB diagnosis (from clinically diagnosed patients), and treatment monitoring. A total of 2624 sputa and 538 isolates were received at CTRL in 2018 for culture and DST respectively [26].

Study design and sampling

This was a cross-sectional study in which isolates from culture-positive sputa specimens were conveniently selected and screened for NTM. Identified NTM were speciated and tested for genotypic drug susceptibility. Only pulmonary TB patients who were bacteriologically confirmed and their isolates available were included in this study. On the other hand, pulmonary TB patients who turned culture-negative and those whose isolates could not be found were excluded from this study. A priority was given to isolates that grew on a culture medium containing para-aminobenzoic acid (PNB) during conventional DST as these were the most probable NTMs. The isolates were genotyped using GenoType® Mycobacterium, Common Mycobacteria, and Additional species (GenoType® CM/AS) for NTM species identification, and then the species were genotyped using GenoType® Mycobacteria NTM-DR for drug susceptibility to the recommended drugs. CTRL culture registers and the list of culture-positive isolates received between November 2019 and August 2020 provided the sampling frame from which samples were conveniently selected. Each of the selected positive cultures (mycobacteria isolate) from primary culture media were transferred to a 2ml cryotube containing 15% glycerol in Tryptic Soya Broth (TSB). These isolates were then stored at– 200C until used.

This study only included isolates received at CTRL for diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and conventional TB DST. While most of the isolates were from newly diagnosed patients before treatment initiation, few were isolates from patients under treatment monitoring (follow up). This is because NTM, especially MAC, has been frequently isolated from patients under TB treatment [26]. Based on the formula below at least 134 AFB culture positive isolates were supposed to be analyzed for this study.

Where;

N = Sample size t = 1.96 L = 0.05 P = 0.097

T = student t–value

L = Significance level

SD = Standard Deviation

        n ≥ 134

Data collection

Patients information (from patients’ test request/report forms)

Patients’ demographic characteristics (age, gender, district, region, etc.) and clinical information such as HIV status, the diagnostic test used, initial local GeneXpert or AFB smear, and culture results were collected. Laboratory test request form and TB LIS (electronic laboratory information system) provided a source of patients’ data.

Extraction and storage of DNA

For genotyping, DNA were extracted chemically using GenoLyse® (Hain Lifescience, Nehren, Germany) protocol [27]. In case DNA could not be GenoTyped® on the same day of extraction, it was stored in a deep freezer at– 20°C. After genotyping, the DNA was transferred to– 80°C for long-term storage.

Species identification

PCR was carried out in the GTQ Cycler 96 using the protocol in the user guide (Hain Lifescience, Nehren, Germany). Speciation was carried out using GenoType®CM/AS (Hain Lifescience, Nehren, Germany) protocol on TwinCubator (Hain Lifescience, Nehren, Germany). Species-specific probes are mounted to the DNA strips to determine complementary strands from amplified DNA samples [28, 29]. Table 1 below shows that MAC and Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MABC) that could not be speciated by this technique were further speciated using GenoType® NTM-DR (Hain Lifescience, Nehren, Germany) protocol [30]. DNA amplicon that could not be identified to species level the same day of amplification were stored at– 200C. On the other hand, isolates that GenoType® CM/AS assay could not GenoType® to species level are stored at– 800C for sequencing of 16S rRNA gene.

Table 1. Banding pattern and presumed species.
Band pattern Frequency Band pattern Band pattern Presumed species
CM AS NTM-DR
1,2 9 Not Applicable Not Applicable Negative for Mycobacteria
1,2,3,10,16 155 Not Applicable Not Applicable MTBC
1,2,3,5,6,10 3 Not Applicable SP4, SP5, SP6, SP9, SP10 M. abscessus sub. abscessus
1,2,3,5,6,10 1 Not Applicable SP5, SP6, SP7, SP9, SP10 M. abscessus sub. bolletti
1,2,3,9 4 Not Applicable SP2 M. avium sub. intracelluare
1,2,3,7,14 2 Not Applicable Not Applicable M. fortuitum group
1,2,3,10,11 1 1,2,3,4,6 Not Applicable M. simiae
1,2,3,6,10,11 1 1,2,3 Not Applicable M. szulgai
1,2,3,10 4 1,2,3 Not Applicable Indeterminate*
1,2,3,10 3 1,2,3,12 Not Applicable Indeterminate*
1,2,3,5,6,10,16 1 1,2,3,12 Not Applicable (Mixed MTBC and NTM)
1,2,3 1 1,2,3 Not Applicable Indeterminate*
1,2,3,4 2 Not Applicable SP1 M. avium
1,2,3,10,12 1 Not Applicable Not Applicable M. kansasii

* Need targeted sequencing of 16S rRNA gene to identify species

Drug susceptibility testing of NTM

Molecular drug susceptibility profiles of Mycobacteria avium Complex and M. abscessus complex isolates were carried out using the GenoType® NTM-DR. This PCR technique involves amplification of the erm (41) (erythromycin ribosomal methylase) gene which encodes for 23S peptidyl transferase of the large (50S) subunit of rRNA. GenoType® NTM-DR detects mutation that may result in the development of resistance to macrolides. However, erm (41) is available only in MABC with exception of a few spp. Moreover, this also involves amplification of the rrs gene. Mutation(s) in the rrs gene which encodes for 16S rRNA results in resistance to aminoglycosides [31].

Quality control

For each investigation, known positive control strains M. fortuitum (ATCC® 6841™) and M. kansasii (ATCC® 12478™) were included. On other hand, DNAse-free water (molecular grade) was used as a negative control for quality assurance. The machines used for testing of samples had passed method validation that ensures they produce reproducible results and match manufacturer specifications.

Data management, confidentiality, and statistical analysis

Patients’ descriptive data and genotyping analytical data were collected and cleaned in Microsoft Excel® 2010 and then imported to R software for analysis. These include independent variables such as age, gender, NTM species, HIV status, patients’ category, and reason for testing (diagnosis or treatment monitoring). Dependent (response) variables include; NTM species and drug susceptibility (i.e. susceptible or resistant).

Ethical clearance

This study protocol was approved by the Sokoine University of Agriculture Institutional Research Review Board and ethical clearance was provided by the Institutional Research Ethical Committee of the National Institute for Medical Research (NIMR) (NIMR/HQ/R.8a/Vol. IX/3245). The need for participants’ consent for this study was waived by the ethical committee. Study Identification numbers, and laboratory serial numbers were used instead of patients’ names so the identity of each participant remained fully anonymous. Data obtained was kept in a computer having its access protected using a password and hard copies were kept in a lockable draw.

Study results

Patients’ demographic characteristics

Specimen analyzed in this study came from 188 patients diagnosed with pulmonary TB of whom 45 (24%) were females. Overall mean age was 43 (STD: 15) years with females being 38 and males 48. The 35 to 44 years age group had the largest number (30%) of study subjects. The mean age of patients with NTM was 47 (STD: 15). Fig 1 indicates study subjects’ distribution by age groups. The number of patients who had a known HIV status was 144 of whom 34 (24%) were positive for the virus. While of 110 who were HIV-negative, 11 (10%) had NTM, of the 34 patients with HIV, 10 (29%) had NTM infection. The remaining three isolates had their patients with unknown HIV statuses. About treatment history, a total of 176 patients records were available of which 113 (64%) were new TB patients while 63 (36%) had previously been treated for the disease.

Fig 1. Variation of the number of non-tuberculous mycobacteria between various independent variables.

Fig 1

Non-tuberculous mycobacteria species and drug susceptibility

Isolates analyzed in this study resulted from culture-positive sputum from patients diagnosed with pulmonary TB. Of the 188 isolates tested, 179 (95%) were positive for the genus mycobacteria while the remaining were negative. Among the positive samples, 24 (13%) were NTM while the rest were MTBC. GenoType® Mycobacterium CM/AS and GenoType® Mycobacterium NTM-DR could identify 15 (63%) NTMs to their species levels. This study revealed Mycobacterium Avium Complex (MAC) as the most prevalent group. There were six (25%) species belonging to this group (four M. intracellulare and two M. avium). On the other hand, there were four (17%) Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MABC), three M. abscessus sub. abscessus, one M. bollettii, and two (8%) in the Fortuitum group. Other species included one (4%) M. kansasii, one (4%), M. simiae, and one (4%) M. szulgai.

All MAC and MABC (10 isolates) were subjected to GenoType® NTM-DR for susceptibility testing to macrolides (azithromycin and capreomycin) and aminoglycosides (kanamycin, amikacin, and gentamycin). While MABC resistance to macrolides results from mutation conferred in either or both of rrl and erm (41) genes, MAC resistance to this drug results from a mutation in the rrl gene only. Of the 10 NTMs tested for drug susceptibility, 3 were found to have a mutation (T28 point mutation) in the erm (41) of which Cytosine is replaced by Thymine at position 28 of the gene. However, there was no macrolide resistance mutation detected in the rrl gene. Likewise, no mutation was detected for aminoglycosides resistance (in the rrs gene) for both MABC and MAC (Table 2).

Table 2. Summary wild type bands and associated mutations in the GenoType® Mycobacterium NTM-DR assay.

Gene Macrolides Aminoglycosides Frequency
MAC/MABC Species erm (41) rrl rrs
C28 T28 WT MUT WT MUT
Intracellulaire NA NA + - + - S S 4
Abscessus - + + - + - R S 2
Abscessus + - + - + - S S 1
Bollettii - + + - + - R S 1
Avium NA NA + - + - S S 2

WT–Wild type, MUT–Mutation, S–Susceptible, R–Resistant and

NA–Not applicable

Factors associated with non-tuberculous mycobacterial infection

Fig 2 illustrates NTM proportions among levels of some important variables investigated in this study. The prevalence of NTM was higher among people who were previously treated (category) for TB 14 (58%) compared to new patients (p = 0.0656). Most cases of NTM were in the reproductive age between 35 and 44 years which is similar to TB. There was a significant relationship between gender and NTM infection where males were more likely to be positive than females (p = 0.008655). While 11(46%) tested positive for NTM among patients for specimen collected just before treatment initiation, 6 (25%) patients tested positive for NTM after some months of treatment (p = 0.004426) suggesting that more NTM are recovered at diagnosis than during treatment monitoring. NTM were recovered in 9 (26.5%) patients among those who were positive for HIV (n = 34, 18%). This study could not find a significant relationship between the type of mycobacterial infection (MTBC or NTM) and HIV status (p = 0.1708).

Fig 2. Factors associated with Non-tuberculous mycobacteria among patients with pulmonary TB.

Fig 2

Discussion

Increasing numbers and burden of NTM among presumptive TB cases makes it of paramount importance for National TB Programs (NTP) to consider screening for NTMs from among TB presumptive cases especially for patients at risk [32, 33]. Furthermore, knowledge of prevailing species and their drug susceptibility pattern is critical for correct diagnosis and selection of appropriate drug regimens [6].

The current study aimed at determining NTM species circulating among patients diagnosed with TB and their drug susceptibility profiles. Drug susceptibility profiles were specifically performed to MAC and MABC on the recommended drugs. There have been several reports of NTM among patients on TB treatment in Tanzania [11, 34]. In this particular study, the interest was in characterizing NTM often recovered from sputum of presumed pulmonary TB patients received at CTRL for species and molecular drug susceptibility tests.

In this study, M. intracellulare (MAC) was the most prevalent species as has been observed in previous studies [6, 16, 35]. This was followed by MABC species which have also been well documented in the causation of NTM-PD. Moreover recovered M. kansasii has commonly been associated with pulmonary disease. The fact that coinfection occurs between MTBC and NTM was also complemented in our findings where one of the isolates had both of these mycobacteria strains [36]. For this, the use of rapid chromatographic assays to screen- out NTM among mycobacteria culture-positive, and exclusion of NTM in laboratory reporting in Tanzania blinds the existence of these pathogenic NTM among the patients. To remedy the situation, it will be advisable to report culture-positive NTM among patients with chronic or acute pulmonary disease. This study is the first to recover Mycobacterium abscessus sub. bolletii and M. szulgae isolates in Tanzania [12, 20, 37, 38]. The greater number of species identified (eight different species) indicates the diversity of NTM species circulating among patients treated for TB in Tanzania. A national NTM prevalence survey is warranted to enable the estimation of the burden and treatment options in Tanzania.

In this study, NTM were more frequently isolated from males (twice) when compared to females. This finding is similar to what has been reported by González et al. [39] but contrary to this study, Park et al., and Dodd et al [40, 41] reported that NTM was isolated from more females than males. Findings from this study are similar for Tuberculosis on gender where more males contract the disease than females with the reason being a higher number of daily close and casual contacts in men [41]. NTM distribution by age group is also similar to the distribution of TB where more patients are within the ages of 35 to 44 years. We observed a proportional increase with age where patients with higher age were more likely to have NTM-PD [42].

Our results support the fact that patients previously treated for TB (relapse, loss to follow-up, treatment failure, and MDR contact) have higher chances of being positive for NTM infection than new cases [43]. More epidemiological studies are required to investigate the factors that favor NTM colonization and infection in this group of patients. While most of the recovered NTM were from samples collected at the time of TB diagnosis, some were identified from samples of patients after several months of TB drug administration. On the other hand, despite the high number of NTMs among HIV infected compared to non-infected, the current study could not support the hypothesis that people with HIV have higher chances of NTM infection in comparison to HIV-negative, a similar observation to the one made earlier [44]. This might have resulted from differences in the sample size and sampling methods employed.

Erythromycin resistance methylase gene (erm (41)) exists in MABC species like M. abscessus sub. abscessus and M. abscessus sub. bollettii [35]. Other species in this group like M. massilience lack the target base at position 28 which results from a large deletion of a 397 base-pair sequence in which this target region is included. Such species have a nonfunctional erm (41) gene thus do not express resistance to macrolides. Mutation at nucleotide position 28 of this gene where Cytosine is replaced by Thymine results in phenotypic drug resistance of these two species to macrolides [45, 46]. Two of the three identified M. abscessus sub. abscessus and one M. bollettii were detected with this mutation indicating prevailing resistance among the MABC population. However, these strains were all susceptible to the aminoglycosides. Management of MABC that are resistant to macrolide can follow other recommended guidelines [22]. On the other hand, no mutation was detected in both rrl and rrs genes in this study. This indicates the susceptibility of the remaining identified MABC and MAC to both drugs. A study carried out in Ghana on National prevalence survey samples also revealed susceptibility of all isolated MAC and MABC to aminoglycosides [18].

Study limitations

While most of the isolates characterized in this study came from patients within their first month of TB treatment, few were from patients after some months of treatment. There is no evidence of these isolates to meet diagnostic criteria for non-tuberculous mycobacteria causation of lung disease as described in the ATS/IDSA Statement (Griffith et al., 2007) and the British Thoracic Society Guideline for the management of non-tuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD) (Haworth et al., 2017). Moreover, the genotyping techniques employed in this study could not identify all isolated NTM to species level; nine isolates were left un-speciated. Aminoglycosides and macrolides are the recommended important components treatment of NTM-PD however many other drugs can be combined in developing an efficient regimen.

Conclusion

This study recovered a total of eight different NTM species from sputum of pulmonary TB patients submitted for routine culture and drug susceptibility testing. Mycobacteria avium complex was the most frequent, (n = 6) isolate followed by MABC (n = 4). Both of these require medical attention when diagnosed as they have been associated with pulmonary disease. On the other hand, while all MAC and MABC were susceptible to aminoglycosides, three MABC had a mutation that causes resistance to macrolides.

Supporting information

S1 File

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the management of the Central Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory (CTRL) in Tanzania for accepting and giving permission on the use of the archived samples. Moreover, to the laboratory staff for support, they gave during retrieving the archived samples, DNA extraction, and genotyping. Also, we acknowledge the CTRL data management team who assisted in accessing the patients’ data and in analysis. Lastly but not least we acknowledge the TB patients whose samples were used in this analysis.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The research for this paper was carried out within the framework of the DELTAS Africa Initiative [Afrique One-ASPIRE /DEL-15-008]. Afrique One-ASPIRE is funded by a consortium of donor including the African Academy of Sciences (AAS) Alliance for Accelerating Excellence in Science in Africa (AESA), the New Partnership for Africa’s Development Planning and Coordinating (NEPAD) Agency, the Wellcome Trust [107753/A/15/Z] and the UK government. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Ryu YJ, Koh WJ, Daley CL. Diagnosis and treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease: Clinicians’ perspectives. Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases. Korean National Tuberculosis Association. 2016;79: 74–84. doi: 10.4046/trd.2016.79.2.74 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kendall BA, Varley CD, Choi D, Maureen CP, Hedberg K, Ware MA, et al. Distinguishing tuberculosis from nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease, Oregon, USA. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2011. Mar;17(3):506–9. doi: 10.3201/eid1703.101164 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.van Ingen J. Diagnosis of nontuberculous mycobacterial infections. Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2013;34(1):103–9. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1333569 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Parte AC, Carbasse JS, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2020;70(11):5607–12. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Honda JR, Virdi R, Chan ED. Global environmental nontuberculous mycobacteria and their contemporaneous man-made and natural niches. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2018;9. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Griffith DE, Aksamit T, Brown-Elliott BA, Catanzaro A, Daley C, Gordin F, et al. An official ATS/IDSA statement: Diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2007;175(4):367–416. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200604-571ST [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Honda JR, Knight V, Chan ED. Pathogenesis and risk factors for nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease. Clinics in Chest Medicine. W.B. Saunders; 2015; 36:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2014.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kim C, Park SH, Oh SY, Kim SS, Jo KW, Shim TS, et al. Comparison of chest CT findings in nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases vs. Mycobacterium tuberculosis lung disease in HIV-negative patients with cavities. PLoS ONE. 2017. Mar 1;12(3). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Evans SA, Colville A, Evans AJ, Crisp AJ, Johnston IDA. Pulmonary Mycobacterium kansasii infection: Comparison of the clinical features, treatment, and outcome with pulmonary tuberculosis. Thorax. 1996;51(12):1248–52. doi: 10.1136/thx.51.12.1248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Forbes BA, Hall GS, Miller MB, Novak SM, Rowlinson MC, Salfinger M, et al. Practice guidelines for clinical microbiology laboratories: Mycobacteria. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2018. Apr 1;31(2). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mnyambwa NP, Kim D, Corporation B, Ngadaya E, Chun J. Genome sequence of Mycobacterium yongonense RT 955–2015 isolate from a patient misdiagnosed with multi-drug resistant tuberculosis: first clinical isolate in Tanzania. 2018;(May). doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2018.04.796 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Crump JA, Ingen J van, Morrissey AB, Boeree MJ, Mavura DR, Swai B, et al. Caused by Nontuberculous. 2009;15(1):53–5. doi: 10.3201/eid1501.081093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mfinanga SGM, Morkve O, Kazwala RR., Cleaveland S, Sharp MJ, Kunda J, and Nilsen R. Mycobacterial Adenitis: Role of Mycobacterium Bovis, Non-Tuberculous Mycobacteria, HIV Infection, and Risk Factors in Arusha, Tanzania. E African, Journal M. 2004;81(4):171–8. doi: 10.4314/eamj.v81i4.9150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Harris KA, Underwood A, Kenna DTD, Brooks A, Kavaliunaite E, Kapatai G, et al. Whole-Genome Sequencing and Epidemiological Analysis Do Not Provide Evidence for Cross- transmission of Mycobacterium abscessus in a Cohort of Pediatric Cystic Fibrosis Patients. 2015;60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Olivier KN, Weber DJ, Jr RJW, Faiz AR, Lee J, Zhang Y, et al. Multicenter Prevalence Study in Cystic Fibrosis. 2003;167:828–34. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200207-678OC [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Okoi C, Anderson STB, Antonio M, Mulwa SN, Gehre F, Adetifa IMO. Non-tuberculous Mycobacteria isolated from Pulmonary samples in sub-Saharan Africa—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. Scientific Reports. 2017. Dec 1;7(1). doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12175-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Okoi C, Anderson STB, Antonio M, Mulwa SN, Gehre F, Adetifa IMO. Non-tuberculous Mycobacteria isolated from Pulmonary samples in sub-Saharan Africa—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. Scientific Reports. 2017;(September):1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-016-0028-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Addo KK, Addo SO, Mensah GI, Mosi L, Bonsu FA. Genotyping and drug susceptibility testing of mycobacterial isolates from population-based tuberculosis prevalence survey in Ghana. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2017. Dec 2;17(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.McShane PJ, Glassroth J. Pulmonary disease due to nontuberculous mycobacteria current state and new insights. Chest. 2015;148(6):1517–27. doi: 10.1378/chest.15-0458 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hoza AS, Mfinanga SGM, Rodloff AC, Moser I, König B. Increased isolation of nontuberculous mycobacteria among TB suspects in Northeastern, Tanzania: Public health and diagnostic implications for control programs. BMC Research Notes. 2016. Feb 17;9(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Katale BZ, Mbugi EV, Botha L, Keyyu JD, Kendall S, Dockrell HM, et al. Species diversity of non-tuberculous mycobacteria isolated from humans, livestock, and wildlife in the Serengeti ecosystem, Tanzania. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2014;14(1):616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Haworth CS, Banks J, Capstick T, Fisher AJ, Gorsuch T, Laurenson IF, et al. British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of non-tuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD). 2017. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-210927 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Brown-Elliott BA, Nash KA, Wallace RJ. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, drug resistance mechanisms, and therapy of infections with nontuberculous mycobacteria. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2012;25(3):545–82. doi: 10.1128/CMR.05030-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tuberculosis A, Dis -L. Prevalence and Drug Resistance of Nontuberculous Emerging Infectious Diseases Journal Podcasts Zombies—A Pop Culture Resource for Public Health Awareness Reginald Tucker reads an. 2014;20(7). [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tb N, Programme L, Services P. The National Tuberculosis and Leprosy Programme Annual report for 2017 Table of Contents. 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nishiuchi Y, Iwamoto T, Maruyama F. Infection sources of a common non-tuberculous mycobacterial pathogen, Mycobacterium avium complex [Internet]. Vol. 4, Frontiers in Medicine. Frontiers Media S.A.; 2017. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28326308/ doi: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hain Lifescience. GenoLyse ® VER 1.0 Instructions for Use for in vitro diagnostic use only [Internet]. Nehren, Germany; 2017 Sep. Available from: www.hain-lifescience.com/products/msds.html
  • 28.Mäkinen J, Marjamäki M, Marttila H, Soini H. Evaluation of a novel strip test, GenoType Mycobacterium CM/AS, for species identification of mycobacterial cultures. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2006;12(5):481–3. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01380.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lee AS, Jelfs P, Sintchenko V, Gilbert GL. Identification of non-tuberculous mycobacteria: Utility of the GenoType Mycobacterium CM/AS assay compared with HPLC and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2009;58(7):900–4. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.007484-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Huh HJ, Kim SY, Shim HJ, Kim DH, Yoo IY, Kang OK, et al. GenoType NTM-DR Performance Evaluation for Identification of Mycobacterium avium Complex and Mycobacterium abscessus and Determination of Clarithromycin and Amikacin Resistance. Journal of Clinical Microbiology [Internet]. 2019;57(8):516–19. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00516-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mougari F, Loiseau J, Veziris N, Bernard C, Jarlier V. Evaluation of the new GenoType NTM-DR kit for the molecular detection of antimicrobial resistance in non-tuberculous mycobacteria. 2017;(February):1669–77. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ephraim Z, Kazwala R, Simon Mwakapuja R, Malakalinga J, Ephraim Makondo Z, Reuben Kazwala R, et al. Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Infections in Katavi Rukwa Ecosystems Health for Animals and Livelihood Improvement (HALI) Project View project Strengthening Health and Biosecurity in Tanzania by Biodetection Capacity Building View Project Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Infections in Katavi Rukwa Ecosystems. Article in Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology. 2014;4. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hoza AS, Lupindu AM, Mfinanga SGM, Moser I, König B. The role of nontuberculous mycobacteria in the diagnosis, management, and quantifying risks of tuberculosis in Tanga, Tanzania. Tanzania Journal of Health Research. 2016;18(2):1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mbelele PM, Mpolya E, Sauli E, Mfinanga S, Addo K, Mpagama S, et al. Detection of Mycobacteria species and anti-tuberculosis medicine susceptibility profile among adult, presumptive multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patients: Preliminary results. AAS Open Res. 2019. Aug 5;2. doi: 10.12688/aasopenres.12911.2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Daley CL, Iaccarino JM, Lange C, Cambau E, Wallace RJ, Andrejak C, et al. Treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease: An official ats/ers/escmid/idsa clinical practice guideline. Clinical Infectious Diseases [Internet]. 2020. Aug 15;71(4):1–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mertaniasih N, Kusumaningrum D, Koendhori E, Soedarsono, Kusmiati T, Dewi D. Nontuberculous mycobacterial species and Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex coinfection in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in Dr. Soetomo Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia. International Journal of Mycobacteriology. 2017. Jan 1;6(1):9–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mbugi EV., Katale BZ, Siame KK, Keyyu JD, Kendall SL, Dockrell HM, et al. Genetic diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolated from tuberculosis patients in the Serengeti ecosystem in Tanzania. Tuberculosis. 2015;95(2):170–8. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2014.11.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mnyambwa N, Ngadaya E, Kimaro G, Kim D-J, Kazwala R, Petrucka P, et al. Assessment of sputum smear-positive but culture-negative results among newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Tanzania. International Journal of General Medicine. 2017. Jul 12;10:199–205. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S137469 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.González SM, Cortés AC, Yoldi LAS, García JMG, Álvarez LMA, Gutiérrez JJP. Non-Tuberculous Mycobacteria. An Emerging Threat? Arch Bronconeumol. 2017. Oct;53(10):554–560. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2017.02.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Park SC, Kang MJ, Han CH, Lee SM, Kim CJ, Lee JM, et al. Prevalence, incidence, and mortality of nontuberculous mycobacterial infection in Korea: A nationwide population-based study. BMC Pulmonary Medicine. 2019. Aug 1;19(1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12890-018-0755-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dodd PJ, Looker C, Plumb ID, Bond V, Schaap A, Shanaube K, et al. Age- and Sex-Specific Social Contact Patterns and Incidence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2016. Jan 15;183(2):156–66. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Shteinberg M, Stein N, Adir Y, Ken-Dror S, Shitrit D, Bendayan D, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and prognosis of nontuberculous mycobacterial infection among people with bronchiectasis: A population survey. European Respiratory Journal. European Respiratory Society. 2018;51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zhang ZX, Cherng BPZ, Sng LH, Tan YE. Clinical and microbiological characteristics of non-tuberculous mycobacterial diseases in Singapore with a focus on pulmonary disease, 2012–2016. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2019. May 17;19(1). doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-3909-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.McCarthy KD, Cain KP, Winthrop KL, Udomsantisuk N, Lan NTN, Sar B, et al. Nontuberculous mycobacterial disease in patients with HIV in Southeast Asia. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2012. May 1;185(9):981–8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201107-1327OC [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wallace RJ, Meier A, Brown BA, Zhang Y, Sander P, Onyi GO, et al. Genetic basis for clarithromycin resistance among isolates of Mycobacterium chelonae and Mycobacterium abscessus. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 1996;40(7):1676–81. doi: 10.1128/AAC.40.7.1676 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bastian S, Veziris N, Roux AL, Brossier F, Gaillard JL, Jarlier V, et al. Assessment of clarithromycin susceptibility in strains belonging to the Mycobacterium abscessus group by erm (41) and rrl sequencing. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy [Internet]. 2011. Feb;55(2):775–81. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00861-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Seyed Ehtesham Hasnain

10 Dec 2021

PONE-D-21-34246Drug susceptibility profiles of non-tuberculous mycobacteria species circulating among patients diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis in TanzaniaPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Maya,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

 Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 24 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Seyed Ehtesham Hasnain

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please provide additional details regarding participant consent. In the ethics statement in the Methods and online submission information, please ensure that you have specified (1) whether consent was informed and (2) what type you obtained (for instance, written or verbal, and if verbal, how it was documented and witnessed). If your study included minors, state whether you obtained consent from parents or guardians. If the need for consent was waived by the ethics committee, please include this information.

If you are reporting a retrospective study of medical records or archived samples, please ensure that you have discussed whether all data were fully anonymized before you accessed them and/or whether the IRB or ethics committee waived the requirement for informed consent. If patients provided informed written consent to have data from their medical records used in research, please include this information.

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript: 

The research for this paper was carried out within the framework of the DELTAS Africa Initiative [Afrique One-ASPIRE /DEL-15-008]. Afrique One-ASPIRE is funded by a consortium of donor including the African Academy of Sciences (AAS) Alliance for Accelerating Excellence in Science in Africa (AESA), the New Partnership for Africa’s Development Planning and Coordinating (NEPAD) Agency, the Wellcome Trust [107753/A/15/Z] and the UK government.

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form. 

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows: 

The research for this paper was carried out within the framework of the DELTAS Africa Initiative [Afrique One-ASPIRE /DEL-15-008]. Afrique One-ASPIRE is funded by a consortium of donor including the African Academy of Sciences (AAS) Alliance for Accelerating Excellence in Science in Africa (AESA), the New Partnership for Africa’s Development Planning and Coordinating (NEPAD) Agency, the Wellcome Trust [107753/A/15/Z] and the UK government.

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

Additional Editor Comments:

Major Revision

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

Reviewer #2: I Don't Know

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: In this study authors have tried to identify Mycobacterium species in NTM-PD cases so that better treatment option can be done. There are a few concerns, under following headings

1. Study sites

In 2018 a total of 27 201 TB cases were bacteriologically confirmed in (26)- Incomplete sentence.

2. Quality control

Is it DNA free water or DNAse free water?

3. Factors associated with Non-tuberculous mycobacteria infection among patients with pulmonary TB

Similarly, this study found an association between NTM infection and age of patients (p

270 = 0.07367).- Elaborate

4. Results

Table 1 is not clear,, not making any sense or give better explanation in results section

5. Discussion

Similarly to the González, SG (39) and contrary to Park SC and Dodd PJ (41,42) NTM were more frequently isolated from males when compared to females- Rephrase

6. Conclusion

followed up by MABC (n=4); remove “up”

Reviewer #2: Overall assessment: Major revision

The paper entitled " Drug susceptibility profiles of non-tuberculous mycobacteria species circulating among patients diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis in Tanzania" by Togolani Godfrey Maya et al., have tried to address an important issue of drug susceptibility associated with NTMs diagnosed with Pulmonary TB. It is well documented that many NTM) are saprophytic, however several species of NTM have been shown to cause human diseases, Pulmonary NTM infectious lead to TB-like disease called NTM pulmonary disease (NTM-PD). Due to variation in treatment options among NTM species, it is necessary to identify the species and determine drug susceptibility profiles to inform choice of appropriate regimen for the disease. 188 isolates from TB patients diagnosed were screened for NTM and were genotyped to determine drug susceptibility profile to macrolide and aminoglycosides. Data suggest that out of all the isolates 24 were NTM of which 15 were M. avium sub. intracellulare 4 and a total of 10 isolates were MAC (n=6) and MABC (n=4). Further authors have shown that the MAC were the most frequently isolated NTM species followed by MABC. While all MAC and MABC identified, were susceptible to aminoglycosides. Although the rationale of this study is interesting but it should be rejected because of lacks depth, clarity and possible explanation for mechanists, poor data presentation and

Comments:

1. Sample size in the study for NTM is too small. Majority of the NTM reported is in the HIV + cases (29%) as compared to HIV negative cases (10%). What could be the possible explanation.

2. It would be better to include patients with no history of HIV infection. What about other immune comprised conditions. Dose these NTMs are also seen in similar way.

3. No proper explanation of inclusion and exclusion criterion for including Pulmonary TB patients

4. In abstract it is written 188 TB patients; however, data shown is for 144 HIV co-infected patients. Where 44 patients had no history of HIV????, if so, how was the status of NTM in these patients. There is no clarity in this regard???

5. To do justice with title of the manuscript, authors should include other TB conditions or change it as TB patients having HIV history.

6. Figures are poorly represented.

7. Why M avium was not used for drug susceptibility profile test in Table 2?

8. Grammatical checks need to be done throughout the manuscript.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2022 Mar 24;17(3):e0265358. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265358.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


26 Jan 2022

Thanks to both the editor and reviewers for taking your extremely valuable time to review our paper. You comments have been constructive and have improved this work significantly.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Olivier Neyrolles

1 Mar 2022

Drug susceptibility profiles and factors associated with non-tuberculous mycobacteria species circulating among patients diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis in Tanzania

PONE-D-21-34246R1

Dear Dr. Maya,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Olivier Neyrolles

Section Editor

PLOS ONE

Acceptance letter

Olivier Neyrolles

7 Mar 2022

PONE-D-21-34246R1

Drug susceptibility profiles and factors associated with non-tuberculous mycobacteria species circulating among patients diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis in Tanzania

Dear Dr. Maya:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Olivier Neyrolles

Section Editor

PLOS ONE


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES