Viridans group streptococci form the major part of the commensal flora of the human upper respiratory tract. However, these organisms are also the leading cause of infective endocarditis and an increasing source of bacteremia in neutropenic patients (1). Beta-lactam agents are the treatment of choice for these infections, but macrolides and related drugs are recommended for prophylaxis and alternative treatment in allergic patients (1). The two presently recognized mechanisms of resistance to macrolide antibiotics in streptococci are (i) target site modification mediated by erythromycin resistance methylases (Erm), which confer cross-resistance to macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramin B components (MLS phenotype), and (ii) active-drug efflux pumps, encoded either by the mefAE genes or by the mreA gene (3, 4, 11). The efflux systems encoded by the mef genes cause resistance to 14- and 15-membered macrolide compounds only, and this phenotype is designated M (10). Phenotype M is widespread among beta-hemolytic streptococci and Streptococcus pneumoniae in a number of countries (6, 7, 10). During a survey of antimicrobial resistance in viridans streptococci, strains with the M phenotype were investigated.
A total of 90 consecutive strains of viridans group streptococci were isolated from 90 patients hospitalized in a French hospital (Haut-Lévêque, Pessac), between 1988 and 1995. These strains were identified with two commercial kits, API20 STREP and Rapid ID32 (Biomérieux): 57 isolates belonged to the Streptococcus mitis group, 24 to the Streptococcus milleri group, and 9 to the Streptococcus salivarius group. By the disk diffusion method, the strains were classified in three categories with regard to their MLS behavior: (i) 55 strains (61.1%) were susceptible, 27 (30%) had the MLS phenotype, and 8 (8.9%) had the M phenotype. The latter strains (five S. mitis strains, two Streptococcus oralis strains, and one S. salivarius strain) were susceptible to all other antibiotics, except for three which were additionally penicillin resistant. MICs of MLS antibiotics were determined by the agar dilution method on Mueller-Hinton medium supplemented with 5% horse blood. The eight isolates with the M phenotype exhibited low-level resistance to erythromycin and other 14- and 15-membered macrolides, although the intrinsically more active new ketolide HMR 3647 retained significant activity; in contrast, they remained fully susceptible to 16-membered macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramins (Table 1). The DNAs of the eight isolates were amplified with primers specific to the mefAE genes (2). The PCR protocol consisted of a 5-min melt at 94°C, followed by 35 cycles (1-min melt at 94°C, 1-min primer-annealing step at 50°C, and 1-min extension step at 72°C), with a final extension step of 10 min at 72°C. All strains except for one (S. mitis 4) yielded a PCR product of the expected size (1.2 kb), whether no amplification was obtained with the DNAs of negative-control strains (sensitive or MLS phenotype strains). The amplicons were analyzed by restriction using four endonucleases designed to differentiate mefA and mefE (ClaI, HindIII, AccI, and HhaI) (2). The results showed that six strains carried a mefE gene, while the remaining one (S. oralis 6) possessed a mefA gene (Table 1). Thus, mefE appears to be predominant in viridans streptococci with the M phenotype, as previously observed for S. pneumoniae (6) and Streptococcus agalactiae (2). With specific primers for ermA, -B, -C (9), ermTR (8), and mreA (4), no PCR amplification was obtained with S. mitis 4 under the above conditions (Table 1). These results suggest the existence of a novel erythromycin resistance gene or mechanism in these species.
TABLE 1.
Strain | MIC (mg/liter)a
|
mef gene | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Macrolides
|
Lincosamides
|
Streptogramins
|
||||||||||||
14 membered
|
15 membered
|
16 membered
|
||||||||||||
E | ROX | CLA | DIR | HMR 3647 | AZI | SP | JOS | L | CM | PT | IIA | IB | ||
1. S. mitis | 1 | 2 | 0.2 | 4 | 0.02 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 8 | 2 | E |
2. S. mitis | 1 | 2 | 0.2 | 4 | 0.05 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 0.2 | 32 | 4 | E |
3. S. mitis | 1 | 2 | 0.5 | 4 | 0.05 | 1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 2 | 2 | E |
4. S. mitis | 4 | 16 | 4 | 32 | 0.2 | 4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.02 | 0.1 | 1 | 2 | |
5. S. oralis | 4 | 8 | 1 | 16 | 0.2 | 4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 1 | 4 | E |
6. S. oralis | 16 | 32 | 4 | 64 | 0.2 | 8 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 8 | 4 | A |
7. S. salivarius | 8 | 32 | 4 | 64 | 0.2 | 4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.02 | 0.2 | 8 | 4 | E |
8. S. anginosus | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0.05 | 2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 2 | 2 | E |
S.b S. mitis | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.2 | 0.01 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 16 | 2 | |
MLS. S. mitis | >512 | 512 | 512 | 512 | 0.02 | 512 | 512 | 256 | 256 | 128 | 0.1 | 8 | 32 |
E, erythromycin; ROX, roxithromycin; CLA, clarithromycin; DIR, dirithromycin; AZI, azithromycin; SP, spiramycin; JOS, josamycin; L, lincomycin; CM, clindamycin; PT, pristinamycin; IIA, pristinamycin IIA; IB, pristinamycin IB. Data were read at 24 h.
S, susceptible strain.
The erythromycin resistance rate in viridans group streptococci was similar to those reported recently (around 40%) (1, 5), but the incidence of the M phenotype was lower than that reported elsewhere (about 20%) (1, 12). This is consistent with a lower incidence of beta-hemolytic streptococci and pneumococci with mef genes in France (<1%) (2). Commercially available 14- and 15-membered macrolides appear to be of limited value for chemoprophylaxis and therapy in viridans streptococcal infections.
REFERENCES
- 1.Alcaide F, Carratala J, Linares J, Gudiol F, Martin R. In vitro activities of eight macrolide antibiotics and RP-59500 (quinupristin-dalfopristin) against viridans group streptococci isolated from blood of neutropenic cancer patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:2117–2120. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.9.2117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Arpin C, Daube H, Tessier F, Quentin C. Presence of mefA and mefE genes in Streptococcus agalactiae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43:944–946. doi: 10.1128/aac.43.4.944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Clancy J, Petitpas J, Did-Hajj F, Yuan W, Cronan M, Kamath A V, Bergeron J, Retsema J A. Molecular cloning and functional analysis of a novel macrolide-resistance determinant, mefA, from Streptococcus pyogenes. Mol Microbiol. 1996;22:867–879. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1996.01521.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Clancy J, Did-Hajj F, Petitpas J W, Yuan W. Cloning and characterization of a novel macrolide efflux gene, mreA, from Streptococcus agalactiae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:2719–2723. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.12.2719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Doern G V, Ferraro M J, Brueggemann A B, Ruoff K L. Emergence of high rates of antimicrobial resistance among viridans group streptococci in the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:891–894. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.4.891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Johnston N J, De Azavedo J C, Kellner J D, Low D E. Prevalence and characterization of the mechanisms of macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin resistance in isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:2425–2426. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.9.2425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kataja J, Seppälä H, Skurnik M, Sarkkinen H, Huovinen P. Different erythromycin resistance mechanisms in group C and group G streptococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:1493–1494. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.6.1493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Seppälä H, Skurnik M, Soini H, Roberts M C, Huovinen P. A novel erythromycin methylase gene (ermTR) in Streptococcus pyogenes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:257–262. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.2.257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sutcliffe J, Grebe T, Tait-Kamradt A, Wondrack L. Detection of erythromycin-resistant determinants by PCR. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:2562–2566. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.11.2562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sutcliffe J, Tait-Kamradt A, Wondrack L. Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes resistant to macrolides but sensitive to clindamycin: a common resistance pattern mediated by an efflux system. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:1817–1824. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.8.1817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tait-Kamradt A, Clancy J, Cronan M, Did-Hajj F, Wondrack L, Yuan W, Sutcliffe J. mefE is necessary for the erythromycin-resistance M phenotype in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:2251–2255. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.10.2251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wu J-J, Lin K-Y, Hsueh P-R, Liu J-W, Pan H-I, Sheu S-M. High incidence of erythromycin-resistant streptococci in Taiwan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:844–846. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.4.844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]