Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1999 Oct;43(10):2361–2365. doi: 10.1128/aac.43.10.2361

Molecular Basis of Rifampin Resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae

Thanugarani Padayachee 1,*, Keith P Klugman 1
PMCID: PMC89483  PMID: 10508007

Abstract

Rifampin resistance among South African clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae was shown to be due to missense mutations within the rpoB gene. Sequence analysis of 24 rifampin-resistant isolates revealed the presence of mutations within cluster I as well as novel mutations in an area designated pneumococcus cluster III. Of the 24 isolates characterized, only 1 resistant isolate did not contain any mutations in the regions sequenced. Either the cluster I or the cluster III mutations separately conferred MICs of 32 to 128 μg/ml. Clinical isolate 55, for which the MIC was 256 μg/ml, was noted to contain 9 of the 10 mutations identified, which included the cluster I and cluster III mutations. As in Escherichia coli, it is possible that cluster I (amino acids 406 to 434) and cluster III (amino acids 523 to 600) of S. pneumoniae interact to form part of the antibiotic binding site, thus accounting for the very high MIC observed for isolate 55. PCR products containing cluster I or cluster III mutations were able to transform rifampin-susceptible S. pneumoniae to resistance. Although many of the isolates studied displayed identical sequences, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis revealed that the isolates were not of clonal origin.


Rifampin, a semisynthetic derivative of the rifamycins, is active against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. It has principally been advocated for use in the treatment of tuberculosis but has nevertheless found use in therapy for infections caused by staphylococci (28), legionellae (29), and brucellae (1) and as a prophylactic treatment for meningococcus (25) and Haemophilus influenzae (34) carriers. Rifampin is widely used in South Africa for the treatment of tuberculosis in children. The majority of young children have colonization with pneumococci in their nasopharynx, a fact which results in the bacteria being indirectly exposed to the selective pressures of the antimicrobial agent. Rifampin is, however, not routinely used in the treatment of pneumococcal infections, although it may be used in combination with ceftriaxone or cefotaxime for cephalosporin-resistant pneumococcal meningitis (16, 18). Its mechanism of action is based on its ability to bind to and inactivate the bacterial DNA-dependent RNA polymerase, a mode of action not shared by any other antibiotic in use (10, 35).

The RNA polymerase molecule consists of five subunits, namely, α2ββ′ς. Rifampin binds directly to the β subunit of the polymerase (38), and bacterial resistance to rifampin has been shown to be due to mutations occurring in the rpoB gene. Mutations to rifampin resistance result in alterations of rifampin binding and render the organism highly resistant. These mutations occur at a frequency of approximately 10−6 to 10−8 in naturally occurring cells (19, 28).

Bacterial resistance to rifampin has been investigated extensively with Escherichia coli (15), Mycobacterium tuberculosis (4, 17, 31, 32), M. smegmatis (12, 22), M. leprae (13), and Neisseria meningitidis (5). The mutations within the rpoB gene appear to cluster into three distinct areas and are generally numbered according to the E. coli protein coordinates. The principal clusters, I (amino acids 505 to 532) and II (amino acids 560 to 572), harbor most of the mutations, while a single mutation at position 687 defines cluster III (11, 14, 15, 38). The discovery of numerous other mutations (23) has made the delineation of the central rifampin resistance region difficult. In E. coli, the majority of the mutations map to clusters I and II, while in other species, rifampin resistance appears to be due to cluster I mutations.

Until recently, little was known about the mechanism of rifampin resistance in pneumococci. We thus investigated rifampin resistance among South African clinical strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains.

Twenty-four rifampin-resistant and 8 rifampin-susceptible isolates were randomly selected from a group of clinical isolates collected from 1987 to 1996 and kept at the South African Institute for Medical Research, a reference center for laboratories in South Africa. S. pneumoniae R6, an unencapsulated laboratory strain, was also included in this study. All isolates were serotyped by use of the Quellung reaction (8) with specific antisera from the Staten Seruminstitut (Copenhagen, Denmark). Serogroups, serotypes, and antibiotic data for the isolates are presented in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Properties of the clinical isolates used in this study as well as the mutations identified in rifampin-resistant isolates

Isolate Culturea Hospitalb Serotype Antibiotic resistance patternc Rifampin MIC (μg/ml) Clonal typed Mutation(s) within rpoBe
42 TA Red Cross 23F PCTR 64 IIIa D415-E, H425-N
8 NS JHB 6A PCTECdR 64 V D415-E, H425-N
36023 SP Red Cross 7 PCTR 128 VI D415-E, H425-N
85697 BC CHB 7 PCR 128 III D415-E, H425-N
3422 TA Tshepeng 23F PCT 64 IIIa D415-E, H425-N
18078 SP Red Cross 23F PCTR 64 IV D415-E, H425-N
28760 BC CHB 6B PCTR 128 III D415-E, H425-N
1412 BC CHB 23F PCTR 128 III D415-E, H425-N, I550-V
24985 SP CHB 6B PCTR 128 III D415-E, H425-N
55885 TA CHB 23F PCT 128 IIIa D415-E, H425-N
46471 BC CHB 23F PCTR 128 I D415-E, H425-N, I550-V
2 BC CHB 6B PTECdR 128 V H425-N
26940 GJ CHB 23F PCTECdR 64 VII H425-N
37277 BC CHB 6B PCTECdR 128 Va H425-N
55 CSF CHB 6A PTECdR 256 XIV H425-N, R523-K, E526-A, I534-V, N549-S, I550-S, N595-D, Q597-K, Y600-F
85991 BC Red Cross 6A PTECdR 32 VII H425-N
8085 BC CHB 6A PTR 128 VII H425-N
17 NS Morningside 6A PTR 32 VIII H425-N
17236 CSF Red Cross 23F PCTR 64 III R523-K, E526-A, I534-V, N549-S, I550-S, N595-D, Q597-K, Y600-F
13619 BC CHB 6A PCTECdR 32 IIIa R523-K, E526-A, I534-V, N549-S, I550-S, N595-D, Q597-K, Y600-F
45 NS CHB 6A PCTECdR 32 Vb R523-K, E526-A, I534-V, N549-S, I550-S, N595-D, Q597-K, Y600-F
81519 SP East Rand 6A PCTECdR 128 III R523-K, E526-A, I534-V, N549-S, I550-S, N595-D, Q597-K, Y600-F
16997 PT CHB 6A PCTECdR 32 Vb R523-K, E526-A, I534-V, N549-S, I550-S, N595-D, Q597-K, Y600-F
13897 BC CHB 6B PCTECdR 64 II None
69602 TA Red Cross 23F PT 0.06 VIII None
111 CSF Groote Schuur 14 Sens 0.03 XI None
620 BC CHB 6A Sens 0.03 X None
514 BC Red Cross 23F Sens 2 VIIIA None
N1503 NS Lancet 6B Sens 0.06 XII None
10 BC Red Cross 23F PCECd 0.03 Ia None
33175 BC Hillbrow 4 Sens 0.03 XI None
56762 GJ Tshepeng 23F PCT 0.06 XIII None
R6f Sens 0.03
a

BC, blood culture; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; GJ, gastric juice; NS, nasal swab; PT, pleural tap; SP, sputum; TA, tracheal aspirate. 

b

CHB, Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital; JHB, Johannesburg Hospital. 

c

C, chloroamphenicol; Cd, clindamycin; E, erythromycin; P, penicillin; R, rifampin; T, tetracycline; Sens, sensitive. 

d

Clonal type was determined by comparing the PFGE patterns of each isolate with those of the reference clones. Where the patterns differ by one band, the clonal type is denoted by a letter after the number, e.g., I and Ia. 

e

Numbering of the amino acids is that of the S. pneumoniae rpoB gene sequence obtained from the TIGR database. The mutations identified are presented as Xzzz-Y, representing the amino acid and its position as well as the substitution that occurs (for example, D415-E means aspartate 415 changed to glutamate). 

f

Unencapsulated laboratory strain. 

Susceptibility testing.

The MICs were determined by the agar dilution method according to the guidelines of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (26). Antibiotic plates were made by use of Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 5% horse blood.

DNA isolation.

Chromosomal DNA was extracted by the salt lysis method of Ausubel et al. (3). DNA was precipitated at 37°C for 10 min with 0.6 volume of a solution containing 20% polyethylene glycol (PEG) and 2.5 M NaCl. DNA was resuspended in water containing 20 μg of RNase A per ml and stored at −70°C for further use.

PCR.

The PCR primers were designed from the S. pneumoniae rpoB gene sequence obtained from the TIGR database (contig no BSP131). The primers rpoBF1 (5′-GACAATGAAGTCTTGACACC-3′) (nucleotides 1144 to 1163; S. pneumoniae coordinates) and rpoBR1 (5′-CGTGACAACACCTGTTTC-3′) (nucleotides 1486 to 1503) were designed to flank clusters I and II. For isolates which carried no mutations within this central region, the primers rpoBF2 (5′-CCTGAAACTGGAGAAATCTTG-3′) (nucleotides 721 to 741), rpoBR2 (5′-TGTTACAGGACGGATATTGAT-3′) (nucleotides 1174 to 1194), rpoBF3 (5′-GTTCAAACACCATACCGTAAG-3′) (nucleotides 1456 to 1176), and rpoBR3 (5′-CAATGAACCATCTTCACGACG-3′) (nucleotides 1906 to 1926) were designed to amplify the regions upstream and downstream of clusters I and II.

PCR amplification was carried out with 50-μl volumes containing 1 μM (each) primer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 150 μM (each) deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP), 1 U of Taq polymerase, and 1 μl of DNA in the buffer provided. PCR products for use in cloning were amplified with mixtures containing 2.5 U of Taq polymerase with proofreading activity (Pwo Taq; Boehringer GmbH, Mannheim, Germany), 1 μM (each) primer, 1.5 mM MgSO4, 150 μM (each) dNTP, and 1 μl of DNA in the buffer provided by the manufacturer.

Reactions were performed with a Cetus thermocycler and the following program: 1 cycle at 95°C for 5 min; 30 cycles at 95°C for 1 min, of primer-specific annealing for 2 min, and at 72°C for 2 min; and a final extension at 72°C for 2 min. Primer pairs rpoBF1-rpoBR1 and rpoBF3-rpoBR3 were annealed at 58°C, while primer pair rpoBF2-rpoBR2 was annealed at 57°C.

PFGE.

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) for S. pneumoniae was carried out by the method of Lefevre and coworkers (21). Separation of the SmaI restriction fragments was achieved by electrophoresis for 21 h at 200 V, and visualization was done with UV illumination after ethidium bromide staining.

Nucleotide sequence analysis.

Single-stranded PCR products were prepared for sequencing with streptavidin-coated magnetic particles (Boehringer). Briefly, a standard amplification reaction (100 μl) was performed with a 5′-biotinylated forward primer (rpoBF1, rpoBF2, or rpoBF3) and an unlabelled reverse primer. Nonincorporated dNTPs and primers were removed by precipitation with PEG as described previously (3), and the pellet was resuspended in 40 μl of Tris-EDTA buffer. Single-stranded DNA bound to the magnetic beads was prepared according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. The unlabelled DNA was salt precipitated from the supernatant and resuspended in 20 μl of water.

Sequence analysis was carried out by use of the Sequenase version 2.0 sequencing kit (United States Biochemicals, Cleveland, Ohio) with 6.5 μl of single-stranded DNA and 2 μl of primer (10 μM stock) per dideoxy chain termination sequencing reaction according to the manufacturer’s recommendations.

Cloning of PCR products.

The amplified PCR products of the rpoB gene were PEG precipitated (3). Blunt-end ligations into SmaI (Boehringer)-digested expression vector pGEM-7Zf(+) were performed. The ligations were carried out with 12-μl reaction volumes containing 0.1 μg of SmaI-restricted vector, 0.3 μg of PCR product, 8% PEG 6000; 4.34 mM ATP, 5 U of SmaI, and 2 U of T4 DNA ligase (United States Biochemicals) in ligation buffer provided by the manufacturer. The mixtures were subjected to cycling overnight at between 10 and 30°C for 30 s by the method described by Lund et al. (24). Competent E. coli JM109 cells were electrotransformed with purified ligated DNA as described previously (6). Transformants were selected for α-complementation on Luria-Bertani agar containing 50 μg of ampicillin per ml, 20 mg of β-galactosidase per ml, and 100 mM isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG).

Transformations.

Transformations were performed with competent S. pneumoniae R6 as detailed by Tomasz and Hotchkiss (33). Thawed competent cells were incubated with 1 μg of cloned PCR product per ml at 30°C for 30 min. The cells were allowed to express resistance at 37°C for 60 min before plating of 100 μl of cells onto selection media. The plates were incubated for 48 h at 37°C. DNA-free controls were also tested in order to confirm that any growth observed was the result of transformation and not mutation. Cells were also plated on antibiotic-free medium for the determination of viable counts. The MICs for transformants were determined as described above.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The accession numbers AJ236789, AJ236790, AJ236791, and AJ236792 have been assigned to the sequences submitted to the EMBL database.

RESULTS

PCR amplification and sequence analysis.

The amino acid numbering used in this study is that of the S. pneumoniae sequence obtained from the TIGR database. The corresponding E. coli numbering has been inserted in some instances to allow for alignment with previously identified mutations.

Amplification of genomic DNA with primer pair rpoBF1-rpoBR1 yielded a 360-bp fragment that included the area designated clusters I and II; these clusters map to S. pneumoniae amino acid positions 406 to 434 and 462 to 472, respectively. Sequence analysis of the 24 rifampin-resistant and 8 rifampin-susceptible isolates, including S. pneumoniae R6, revealed numerous polymorphisms (data not shown). Some of these changes caused amino acid alterations, but most were single base substitutions that had no effect at the protein level. Eighteen of the 24 resistant isolates contained mutations within rpoB cluster I, and no mutations were identified within cluster II.

Of these 18 resistant isolates, 11 displayed Asp415-Glu (equivalent to E. coli Asp516) as well as His425-Asn (equivalent to E. coli His526) substitutions (Table 1 and Fig. 1). For strains that contained the His425-Asn mutation, the MICs were found to be in the range of 32 to 128 μg/ml. The presence of the Asp415-Glu mutation did not increase the MICs for strains containing both mutations. Of the remaining seven resistant isolates, six contained the single His425-Asn mutation (isolates 2, 26940, 37277, 85991, 8085, and 17), while the other (isolate 55) contained His425-Asn as well as novel downstream mutations (described below). Six of the 24 rifampin-resistant isolates (isolates 17236, 13619, 45, 81519, 16997, and 13897) lacked these mutations and did not contain any other mutations within this PCR-amplified region. All of the rifampin-susceptible isolates lacked the mutations.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1

Nucleic acid substitutions occurring in the 23 rifampin-resistant strains containing mutations. The codon numbering is that of the S. pneumoniae sequence obtained from the TIGR database. Cluster I (□) and cluster III (Inline graphic) are indicated above the amino acid residues. The shaded codons correspond to the E. coli Asp516 and His526 amino acids. Mutations that have been reported previously are indicated by asterisks (14, 16, 30). The mutations observed appear in the boxes; the numbers represent the number (percentage) of strains in which they occur.

To investigate the sequences of the six isolates that lacked mutations within clusters I and II, genomic DNA upstream and downstream of the central region was amplified with primer pairs rpoBF2-rpoBR2 and rpoBF3-rpoBR3. No changes occurred exclusively in the PCR product obtained from the resistant isolates with primer pair rpoBF2-rpoBR2. However, the fragment obtained with primer pair rpoBF3-rpoBR3 harbored numerous mutations that were present only in the resistant isolates. The mutations Arg523-Lys, Glu526-Ala, Iso534-Val, Asn549-Ser, Iso550-Ser, Asn595-Glu, Gln597-Lys, and Tyr600-Phe occurred in all six isolates that lacked cluster I and II mutations (Table 1 and Fig. 1). It was interesting to note that isolate 55, for which the MIC was highest (256 μg/ml), contained the cluster I mutation His425-Asn as well as all the mutations mentioned above. The MICs for isolates 46471 and 1412, which contained the mutation Iso550-Val in addition to the Asp415-Glu and His425-Asn mutations, were not higher than those for the isolates lacking the Iso550-Val mutation. The rifampin-susceptible isolates studied lacked these mutations.

Transformations.

The significance of the mutations observed was confirmed by transformation. The rpoBF1-rpoBR1 PCR product containing cluster I mutations and the fragment obtained with rpoBF3-rpoBR3 were able to transform rifampin-susceptible R6 to resistance. The mean transformation efficiencies were 6.3 × 10−4 and 1.4 × 10−4, respectively. The MICs for the transformants obtained with the cluster I product were equivalent to the MICs for the donor, while the downstream fragment was only able to transform S. pneumoniae R6 so that the MIC was 16 μg/ml.

Genetic relatedness of isolates.

The observation that many of the rpoB gene sequences obtained were identical led us to investigate the clonal relationship of the isolates. PFGE patterns (Fig. 2) were obtained for isolates representative of the different mutation groups. Contrary to expectations, the PFGE patterns of the isolates were very different. Isolates 85991, 8085, and 17 were related on the basis of their PFGE pattern, but none of the other isolates were of clonal origin.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2

PFGE separation of the SmaI restriction fragments of clinical isolates of S. pneumoniae. Lane Mw, lambda phage molecular weight ladder; lanes A to F, reference clones 9V, 6B, Spanish 23F, Tennessee 23F, and South African 19A and 6B, respectively; lanes G to Q, rifampin-resistant isolates 46471, 13897, 1412, 42, 2, 55, 36023, 18078, 85991, 8085, and 17, respectively; lanes R to T, rifampin-susceptible isolates 620, 111, and N1503, respectively.

DISCUSSION

Rifampin resistance among South African clinical isolates of S. pneumoniae appears to involve mutations within the β subunit of the rpoB gene, as is the case in numerous other bacteria.

It was observed that 75% of the rifampin-resistant isolates studied contained cluster I mutations—both Asp415-Glu (equivalent to E. coli Asp516) and His425-Asn (equivalent to E. coli His526) or His425-Asn alone. Numerous mutations at both of these locations have been reported previously, both for E. coli (15) and, more recently, while this study was being conducted, for S. pneumoniae (7). The substitution Asp415-Asn has been reported to confer low-level resistance (MIC, 8 μg/ml) in S. pneumoniae (7) on its own. We report for the first time the presence in S. pneumoniae of an Asp415-Glu substitution, a mutation reported previously to occur in M. tuberculosis and shown to be involved in the resistance phenotype (17, 32). The second cluster I mutation, His425-Asn, has been reported for S. pneumoniae (7), N. meningitidis (5), and M. tuberculosis (31, 32). It is interesting to note that a large proportion of the isolates studied contained both mutations, an observation made previously for M. tuberculosis (36). The presence of both Asp415-Glu and His425-Asn mutations does not, however, appear to contribute to higher MICs, and the results obtained suggest that the presence of His425-Asn alone is sufficient to confer high-level resistance to rifampin. These results are consistent with other findings in that mutations at the Asp516 and His526 codons lead to high-level rifampin resistance in both E. coli and M. tuberculosis (15, 27, 36). The predominance of the His425-Asn mutation in the rifampin-resistant isolates used in this study suggests that this mutation plays an important role in the selection of antibiotic resistance, as has been alluded to previously by Carter and colleagues (5).

Resistant isolates that did not contain mutations in cluster I or cluster II have been reported previously for S. pneumoniae (7) and M. tuberculosis (17, 36), but further investigation of their nucleotide sequences was not attempted. Sequence analysis of the six isolates that lacked cluster I or cluster II mutations in this study revealed the presence of eight mutations, Arg523-Lys, Glu526-Ala, Iso534-Val, Asn549-Ser, Iso550-Ser, Asn595-Glu, Gln597-Lys, and Tyr600-Phe, downstream of cluster II, in a region which we now designate S. pneumoniae cluster III. This area is distinct from the E. coli cluster III region (15). The presence of all eight mutations in all six isolates lends support to the assumption that this cluster of mutations involved in rifampin resistance was acquired by homologous recombination of transformed DNA. The MIC for the transformants of these isolates was 16 μg/ml, lower than that for the parent strain, suggesting that these changes may operate in conjunction with other, as-yet-unidentified mutations within rpoB or elsewhere to confer resistance to rifampin. This idea is consistent with the findings for E. coli (30), where the cluster III mutation Arg687-His confers only very low levels of rifampin resistance, suggesting that it might be located at the periphery of the region of RNA polymerase that binds to rifampin. Genetic evidence also suggests that cluster I (the region around E. coli Arg529) and cluster III (the region around E. coli Arg687) are in close proximity in the native protein, suggesting that these two regions of the polypeptide are both involved in forming the binding site for rifampin. A similar scenario may be envisaged to occur in S. pneumoniae, with cluster I (positions 406 to 434) and cluster III (positions 523 to 600) interacting to form the antibiotic binding site. Such a scenario may account for the very high MIC observed for isolate 55 (256 μg/ml), which was found to contain mutations at His425 and in the region from Arg523 to Tyr600.

One isolate, 13897 (MIC, 64 μg/ml), was sequenced from Lys247 to Tyr627 (sequence not shown) and was found to contain no mutations within this region. It is also conceivable that mutations that could play a role in conferring resistance exist elsewhere in rpoB. Substitutions of amino acids 146 and 687, located outside clusters I and III, have been described for E. coli (15, 23). Further characterization of the rpoB gene from isolate 13897 is currently in progress.

Several alternatives have been proposed to account for the lack of mutations observed in rpoB in rifampin-resistant strains. These include the modification of rifampin (2, 37), alterations in drug uptake or efflux mechanisms (9, 20), and changes in antibiotic permeability or metabolism (17). It has also been suggested that mutations in other subunits of the polymerase could contribute to rifampin resistance, perhaps by altering the conformation of the rifampin binding region of the β subunit (12). Although these mechanisms have only been hinted at for organisms other than S. pneumoniae, we cannot rule out the possibility that they may play a role in rifampin resistance in pneumococci.

Sequence analysis revealed the possibility that some isolates may be of clonal origin, but the PFGE fingerprints show that these isolates are in fact unrelated to each other and reference clones. It appears, therefore, that rifampin resistance among South African clinical isolates is not due to the clonal spread of resistant strains.

These molecular studies support the idea that rifampin-resistant strains could be selected by a mutational event occurring among susceptible strains. The shared sequence of mutations identified for the first time in cluster III may indicate a single transformational event that has occurred among a variety of strains.

Our study has documented a second area of mutations in the rpoB gene that confers rifampin resistance in S. pneumoniae and suggests that other mechanisms have yet to be clarified.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Lesley McGee for assistance with the PFGE and Avril Wasas for performing the serotyping.

This work was supported by the Medical Research Council, the South African Institute for Medical Research, and the University of the Witwatersrand.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Akdeniz H, Irmak H, Anlar O, Demiroz A P. Central nervous system brucellosis: presentation, diagnosis and treatment. J Infect. 1998;36:297–301. doi: 10.1016/s0163-4453(98)94279-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Andersen S A, Dabbs E R. Cloning of nocardioform DNA conferring the ability to inactivate rifampin. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1991;63:247–250. doi: 10.1016/0378-1097(91)90093-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ausubel F M, Brent R, Kingston R E, Moore D D, Seidman J G, Smith J A, Struhl K, editors. Current protocols in molecular biology. New York, N.Y: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bodmer T, Zürcher G, Imboden P, Telenti A. Mutation position and type of substitution in the β-subunit of the RNA polymerase influence in-vitro activity of rifamycins in rifampin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995;35:345–348. doi: 10.1093/jac/35.2.345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Carter P E, Abadi F J R, Yakubu D E, Pennington T H. Molecular characterization of rifampin-resistant Neisseria meningitidis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:1256–1261. doi: 10.1128/aac.38.6.1256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dower W J, Miller J F, Ragsdale C W. High efficiency transformation of E. coli by high voltage electroporation. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988;16:6127–6145. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.13.6127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Enright M, Zawadski P, Pickerill P, Dowson C G. Molecular evolution of rifampin resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Microb Drug Resist. 1998;4:65–70. doi: 10.1089/mdr.1998.4.65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Facklam R R, Carey R B. Streptococci and aerococci. In: Lennette E H, Balows A, Hausler W J Jr, Shadomy H J, editors. Manual of clinical microbiology. 4th ed. Washington, D.C: American Society for Microbiology; 1985. pp. 154–174. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Guerrero C, Stockman L, Marchesi F, Bodmer T, Roberts G D, Telenti A. Evaluation of the rpoB gene in rifampin-susceptible and -resistant Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994;33:661–663. doi: 10.1093/jac/33.3.661-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hartmann G, Honikel K O, Knüsel F, Nüesch J. The specific inhibition of the DNA-directed RNA synthesis by rifamycin. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1967;145:843–844. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(67)90147-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Heil A, Zillig W. Reconstruction of bacterial DNA dependent RNA polymerase from isolated subunits as a tool for the elucidation of the subunits in transcription. FEBS Lett. 1970;11:165–168. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(70)80519-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hetherington S V, Watson A S, Patrick C C. Sequence and analysis of the rpoB gene of Mycobacterium smegmatis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:2164–2166. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.9.2164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Honore N, Cole S T. Molecular basis of rifampin resistance in Mycobacterium leprae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993;37:414–418. doi: 10.1128/aac.37.3.414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Iwakura Y, Ishihama A, Yura T. RNA polymerase mutants of Escherichia coli. II. Streptolydigin resistance and its relation to rifampin resistance. Mol Gen Genet. 1973;121:181–196. doi: 10.1007/BF00277531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jin D J, Gross C A. Mapping and sequencing of mutations in the Escherichia coli rpoB gene that lead to rifampin resistance. J Mol Biol. 1988;202:45–58. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90517-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.John C C. Treatment failure with use of a 3rd-generation cephalosporin for penicillin-resistant pneumococcal meningitis—case report and review. Clin Infect Dis. 1994;18:188–193. doi: 10.1093/clinids/18.2.188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kapur V, Ling-Ling L, Iordanescu S, Hamrick M R, Wanger A, Kreiswirth B N, Musser J M. Characterization by automated DNA sequencing of mutations in the gene (rpoB) encoding the RNA polymerase β-subunit in rifampin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains from New York City and Texas. J Clin Microbiol. 1994;32:1095–1098. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.4.1095-1098.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Klugman K P, Friedland I R, Bradley J S. Bactericidal activity against cephalosporin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in cerebrospinal fluid of children with acute bacterial meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:1988–1992. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.9.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Knusel F, Scheiss B. Dominance study with rifampin-resistant mutants of E. coli K12. Mol Gen Genet. 1970;108:331–337. doi: 10.1007/BF00267770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kolenda M C, Kamp D, Hartmann G R. Mu-induced rifamycin-resistant mutations not located in the rpoB gene of Escherichia coli. Mol Gen Genet. 1986;204:192–194. doi: 10.1007/BF00330209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lefevre J C, Fuacon G, Sicard A M, Gasc A M. DNA fingerprinting of Streptococcus pneumoniae by pulse-field gel electrophoresis. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:2724–2728. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.10.2724-2728.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Levin M E, Hatfull G F. Mycobacterium smegmatis RNA polymerase: DNA supercoiling, action of rifampin and mechanism of rifampin resistance. Mol Microbiol. 1993;8:277–285. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01572.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lisitsyn N A, Sverdlov E D, Moiseyera E P, Danilevskaya O N, Nikiforov V G. Mutation of rifampin resistance at the beginning of the RNA polymerase β subunit gene in Escherichia coli. Mol Gen Genet. 1984;196:173–174. doi: 10.1007/BF00334112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lund A H, Duch M, Pedersen F S. Increased cloning efficiency by temperature-cycle ligation. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996;24:800–801. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.4.800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Meningococcal Disease Surveillance group. Analysis of endemic meningococcal disease by serogroup and evaluation of chemoprophylaxis. J Infect Dis. 1976;134:201–204. doi: 10.1093/infdis/134.2.201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, 2nd ed. Approved standard M7-A2. Villanova, Pa: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ohno H, Koga H, Kohno S, Tashiro T, Hara K. Relationship between rifampin MICs for and rpoB mutations of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains isolated in Japan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:1053–1056. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.4.1053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sande M A. The use of rifampin in the treatment of nontuberculosis infections: an overview. Rev Infect Dis. 1983;5(Suppl. 3):S399–S401. doi: 10.1093/clinids/5.supplement_3.s399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Schulin T, Wennersten C B, Ferraro M J, Moellering R C, Jr, Eliopoulos G M. Susceptibilities of Legionella spp. to newer antimicrobials in vitro. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:1520–1523. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.6.1520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Singer M, Jin D J, Walter W A, Gross C A. Genetic evidence for the interaction between cluster I and cluster III rifampin resistant mutations. J Mol Biol. 1993;231:1–5. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Telenti A, Imboden P, Marchesi F, Lowrie D, Cole S, Colston M J, Matter L, Schopfer K, Bodmer T. Detection of rifampin-resistance mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Lancet. 1993;341:647–650. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90417-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Telenti A, Imboden P, Marchesi F, Schmidheini T, Bodmer T. Direct, automated detection of rifampin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis by polymerase chain reaction and single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993;37:2054–2058. doi: 10.1128/aac.37.10.2054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tomasz A, Hotchkiss R D. Regulation of the transformation of pneumococcal cultures by macromolecular cell products. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1964;51:480–487. doi: 10.1073/pnas.51.3.480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Vesely J J, Pien F D, Pien B C. Rifampin, a useful drug for nonmycobacterial infections. Pharmacotherapy. 1998;18:345–347. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wehrli W. Rifampin: mechanisms of action and resistance. Rev Infect Dis. 1983;5(Suppl. 3):S407–S411. doi: 10.1093/clinids/5.supplement_3.s407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Williams D L, Wagusepack C, Eisenach K, Crawford J T, Portaels F, Salfinger M, Nolan C M, Abe C, Sticht-Groh V, Gillis T P. Characterization of rifampin resistance in pathogenic mycobacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:2380–2386. doi: 10.1128/aac.38.10.2380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Yazawa K, Mikami Y, Maeda A, Akao M, Morisaki N, Iwasaki S. Inactivation of rifampin by Nocardia brasiliensis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993;37:1313–1317. doi: 10.1128/aac.37.6.1313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zillig W, Zechel K, Rabussay D, Schachner M, Sethi V S, Palm P, Heil A, Seifert W. On the role of different subunits of DNA-dependent RNA polymerase from E. coli in the transcription process. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol. 1970;35:47–58. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES